Whatever name is used, the “castle doctrine” or “stand your ground” laws specify that using deadly force in self-defense is warranted in certain circumstances.
What those exact circumstances are were debated at the House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee Wednesday, which approved a bill that would allow a person to use reasonable force in self-defense “regardless of whether a reasonable possibility of retreat to avoid the danger exists.”
Currently, a person must not have had a reasonable possibility to retreat to avoid the danger before using force in self-defense.
Bill sponsor Rep. Matt Bliss (R-Pennington) said HF13 would correct what he called an erroneous July 2024 Minnesota Supreme Court decision in State v. Blevins that held that the duty to retreat applies to so-called “fear” assaults involving the threatened use of a deadly weapon in addition to physical actions to actually cause harm to another person.