Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Meatpacking workers — their plight spotlighted amid pandemic — afforded more protections under bill advancing in House

Minnesota meatpacking companies could be required to install more stringent COVID-19 measures, while their workers could be allowed to refuse to work in dangerous conditions without getting fired or facing retaliation. House Photography file photo
Minnesota meatpacking companies could be required to install more stringent COVID-19 measures, while their workers could be allowed to refuse to work in dangerous conditions without getting fired or facing retaliation. House Photography file photo

Minnesota meatpacking companies could be required to install more stringent COVID-19 measures, while their workers could be allowed to refuse to work in dangerous conditions without getting fired or facing retaliation.

HF800, sponsored by Rep. Dan Wolgamott (DFL-St. Cloud), would implement a series of pandemic-related measures, from requiring companies to space workers at least 6 feet apart to providing them sufficient personal protective equipment.

It would also create paid sick time requirements for meatpacking workers during the pandemic and require companies to pay workers who refuse to work in dangerous conditions.

That's provided the employees report the dangerous conditions and they aren't corrected.

In addition, the bill would allow employees to receive unemployment insurance when they quit because of dangerous conditions.

On Wednesday, the bill, as amended, was approved along party lines by the House Labor, Industry, Veterans and Military Affairs Finance and Policy Committee and referred to the House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee.

Its companion, SF1598, is sponsored by Sen. Aric Putnam (DFL-St. Cloud) and awaits action by the Senate Labor and Industry Policy Committee.

The plight of meat and poultry workers in the U.S., many of whom work in tight quarters in processing facilities, has been highly scrutinized because of COVID-19 outbreaks across the Midwest.

Wolgamott said the bill would increase training and standards in processing plants and that some processing workers have been forced to sacrifice their health for their jobs.

The bill would require companies to create committees comprised of an ergonomist, a doctor and employees to build worker-safety programs.

Companies would also be required to provide at least eight hours of paid training annually to employees and provide paid training to employees before they start new duties.

The bill would prohibit retaliation or adverse action against employees who report health and safety concerns and create the presumption that adverse actions taken against employees within 90 days of the reporting were retaliatory.

In addition, it would create a "workers right's coordinator" within the Department of Labor and Industry who would enforce the provisions.

Meatpacking workers said the bill is critical to ensuring health and safety.

Rod Ryks, who has worked at Hormel Foods in Austin for decades, said workers need help in holding meatpacking facilities accountable and safety issues need to be addressed in a timely fashion.

Tamara Nelsen, executive director of the Minnesota AgriGrowth Council, said businesses are committed to employee health and safety and suggested that attention be focused on employee vaccination efforts.


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

Ways and Means Committee OKs House budget resolution
(House Photography file photo) Total net General Fund expenditures in the 2026-27 biennium will not exceed a hair less than $66.62 billion. That is the budget resolution approved Tuesday by the House Ways...
Minnesota's budget outlook worsens in both near, long term
Gov. Tim Walz takes questions following the release of the state's November budget forecast in December 2024. The latest projections show a $456 million surplus in the current budget cycle and a $6 billion deficit longer-term. (House Photography file photo) It looks as if those calling for less state spending could get their wish, judging from Thursday’s release of the February 2025 Budget and Economic Forecast. A state su...

Minnesota House on Twitter