Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

House health panel briefed on MN's COVID-19 situation, potential future trends

A COVID-19 vaccine site at the Mall of America in Bloomington, pictured last year. (Photo by Paul Battaglia)
A COVID-19 vaccine site at the Mall of America in Bloomington, pictured last year. (Photo by Paul Battaglia)

[CORRECTION: The original story implied that people with long COVID were in the hospital. This is not always the case.]

REFILED Feb. 3, 2022 — How the state will respond to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is one of the topics the House Health Finance and Policy Committee will focus on this session. To prepare for the task ahead, members heard presentations from three COVID-19 experts Wednesday.

Each presenter focused on different aspects of the pandemic in Minnesota, but each stressed that vaccinating as many residents as possible is the best strategy to combat the virus and lead to a return to pre-pandemic economic and social conditions.

Assistant Health Commissioner Daniel Huff highlighted the crushing caseloads of the hospitals treating COVID-19 patients and how state resources are being deployed to assist the frontline workers in those settings.

Some of that support includes:

  • $50 million in federal American Rescue Plan funding distributed to long-term care facilities to hire and retain employees;
  • $40 million to hospitals to cover costs for emergency hospital staff, targeting hospitals experiencing staffing shortages due to COVID-19;
  • regulatory relief based on input from hospitals and long-term care providers;
  • four Department of Defense emergency teams provided staff to Hennepin County Medical Center, Fairview Southdale and Abbott Northwestern and St. Cloud hospitals;
  • four nursing home-based alternative care sites for treating non-critical patients; and
  • National Guard members serving as skilled-nursing response teams, providing crisis staffing support at 40 facilities.

A presentation by Dr. Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, focused on the biology of the virus and what’s known about how the human immune system responds to different COVID-19 mutations.

He said the political debate surrounding whether natural immunity resulting from a previous COVID-19 infection is better or worse than immunity obtained through vaccination is not productive.

Both kinds of immunity are important, he noted, adding that current medical thinking is that a previous COVID-19 infection confers about the same immunity as one shot of a vaccine.

“But one shot is not enough,” he said.

Three shots of a vaccine give about a 95% rate of protection, he said, even against the new Omicron variant.

And he noted that trying to get natural immunity by a deliberate exposure to COVID-19 is “a very bad idea.”

In the final presentation, Dr. Greg Vanichkachorn, assistant professor of Preventive Medicine at the Mayo Clinic, focused on long-haul COVID-19, where patients contracting the disease experience symptoms and health effects of the disease months and even years after contracting it.

In his experience at Mayo Clinic, the long-term effects in patients and their frequencies are:

  • fatigue 80%;
  • respiratory 59%;
  • neurologic 59%;
  • cognitive impairment 45%;
  • sleep disturbance 30%; and
  • mental health issues 26%.

Vanichkachorn said that as the pandemic continues, the number of patients with long-haul COVID-19 will possibly grow to more than 7 million nationwide, with about 2.2 million of those unable to return to work.


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

House closes 2024 session in chaotic fashion, trading bonding for budget boosts
(House Photography file photo) It was a session of modest ambitions. After 2023 produced a record $72 billion in biennial funding, Minnesota’s legislative leaders were dampening expectations for anything ...
Ways and Means Committee OKs proposed $512 million supplemental budget on party-line vote
(House Photography file photo) Meeting more needs or fiscal irresponsibility is one way to sum up the differences among the two parties on a supplemental spending package a year after a $72 billion state budg...

Minnesota House on Twitter