Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

House passes lands bill containing same provisions that failed in 2022

Authorizing the Department of Natural Resources to buy or sell land has historically been noncontroversial and routine. But the 2022 legislation was in an omnibus bill that failed to make it into law.

Rep. Rick Hansen (DFL-South St. Paul) hopes the House gets back in the habit of passing an annual lands bill. He’s part of the way there this year.

Hansen sponsors HF50, which includes provisions from last year’s proposal. It was passed 128-0 by the House Thursday and now goes to the Senate.

Several sections would authorize the DNR to divest small parcels that are too isolated, cut off from other DNR managed land or no longer have a use. The amount of land ranges from less than one acre to nearly 60 acres. Some are private sales, some public. Proceeds are estimated at $1.6 million.

Other provisions in the bill would:

  • allow the DNR to waive application fees for preparing an easement when the transfer of land benefits the DNR or another division; 
  • add 11.5 acres to Myre-Big Island State Park in Freeborn County;
  • designate land from Cloquet Valley State Forest as part of Riverlands State Forest;
  • allow St. Louis County to deposit the proceeds from the sale of tax-forfeited lands into a land acquisition trust fund; and
  • clarify that some state leases are permitted even when they don’t apply to recreation trails.

Hansen suggested the House will see another lands bill later this session to get back on course to passing annual lands bills.

 


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

House closes 2024 session in chaotic fashion, trading bonding for budget boosts
(House Photography file photo) It was a session of modest ambitions. After 2023 produced a record $72 billion in biennial funding, Minnesota’s legislative leaders were dampening expectations for anything ...
Ways and Means Committee OKs proposed $512 million supplemental budget on party-line vote
(House Photography file photo) Meeting more needs or fiscal irresponsibility is one way to sum up the differences among the two parties on a supplemental spending package a year after a $72 billion state budg...

Minnesota House on Twitter