Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Bill proposes considering cumulative impact of environmental stressors in MPCA’s permitting process

Shannon Haiden has asthma. As does her daughter, granddaughter, grandson, daughter-in-law and niece.

Their breathing struggles are part of living in a North Minneapolis neighborhood overburdened with polluters, Haiden said. The highest rates of asthma are in the six ZIP codes closest to downtown Minneapolis.

Polluters such as incinerators, industry and heavy traffic are disproportionally sited in neighborhoods with concentrated poverty and higher proportions of residents of color, adding to stressors that contribute to poor health and lower life expectancy.

That cumulative impact should be recognized before adding to the burden, say supporters of HF637, the “Frontline Communities Protection Act.”

The bill would require the Pollution Control Agency to deny permits if they would add to cumulative adverse environmental stressors in an environmental justice area.

It’s not easy living in community overburden by constant traumas, said Roxxanne O’Brien, founder of Community Members for Environmental Justice. “This is not the end of our work, but it’s a really good start by stopping more of the accumulation of pollution in our community.”

After adopting a delete-all amendment, the bill, sponsored by Rep. Fue Lee (DFL-Mpls), was laid over Tuesday by the House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee.

An environmental justice area, as defined in the bill, is a census tract where 40% or more of the population is nonwhite, 40% or more of the population speak limited English, or 35% or more of the households have an income at or below 200% of the poverty level or are on tribal lands.  

Before receiving a permit from the Pollution Control Agency that could affect an environmental justice area, the bill would require an applicant to hold a public meeting with community members, offer an opportunity for robust public engagement and accept oral and written comments which would be forwarded to the Pollution Control Agency.

Permits would be denied if the permit would contribute to environmental stressors in an environmental justice area unless the applicant and an organization representing residents enter into a community benefit agreement.  

Several issues such as defining when a cumulative impact analysis would be required would be part of the agency’s rulemaking process.

Past iterations of the bill were criticized for being too specific, Lee said. However, committee members questioned giving the agency authority that should reside with the Legislature.

“There’s too much going on here to leave it up to an agency,” said Rep. Josh Heintzeman (R-Nisswa).   


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

Minnesota's budget outlook worsens in both near, long term
Gov. Tim Walz takes questions following the release of the state's November budget forecast in December 2024. The latest projections show a $456 million surplus in the current budget cycle and a $6 billion deficit longer-term. (House Photography file photo) It looks as if those calling for less state spending could get their wish, judging from Thursday’s release of the February 2025 Budget and Economic Forecast. A state su...
Full House convenes for first time in 2025, elects Demuth speaker
Rep. Jeff Backer, left and Rep. Matt Norris greet each other on the House floor Feb. 6. House DFLers returned to the House Chamber for the first time during the 2025 session after leaders struck a power-sharing agreement. (Photo by Michele Jokinen) DFL, Republicans convene with a quorum for the first time in 2025 session after agreeing to a power-sharing deal.

Minnesota House on Twitter