Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Ag policy omnibus bill sails through committee to House Floor

For the first time, Rep. Samantha Vang (DFL-Brooklyn Center) could use the line “peace in the valley” as the House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee approved Thursday, without objection, this year’s omnibus agriculture policy bill.

It now goes to the House Floor.

HF1587, as amended, is sponsored by Vang and includes provisions that would prohibit non-disclosure clauses in carbon contracts, streamline regulations of genetically modified organisms, and allow the Department of Natural Resources to manage non-native phragmites.

A provision prohibiting nursery stock with detectable levels of neonicotinoid pesticide from being sold as “pollinator friendly” earned scrutiny during earlier meetings.

Following conversations with Department of Agriculture staff, Rep. Kristi Pursell (DFL-Northfield), sponsor of the original bill, is expected to offer an amendment on the floor clarifying the definition of “detectable level” to one linked to federal Environmental Protection Agency standards.

Committee members can now turn to programs and policies that impact tax dollars.

The omnibus agriculture finance bill is expected to be unveiled Monday. The plan is to walk through the bill and take public testimony Tuesday. Mark-up and action are planned for Thursday, March 30.

Based on committee targets agreed to by Gov. Tim Walz and House and Senate leaders, there is $48 million available over base for programs under jurisdiction of the agriculture committee plus $100 million marked for expanding broadband.


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

House closes 2024 session in chaotic fashion, trading bonding for budget boosts
(House Photography file photo) It was a session of modest ambitions. After 2023 produced a record $72 billion in biennial funding, Minnesota’s legislative leaders were dampening expectations for anything ...
Ways and Means Committee OKs proposed $512 million supplemental budget on party-line vote
(House Photography file photo) Meeting more needs or fiscal irresponsibility is one way to sum up the differences among the two parties on a supplemental spending package a year after a $72 billion state budg...

Minnesota House on Twitter