Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

State could boost services for victims of sexual assault, domestic violence, child abuse with $20 million appropriation

Lauren Franzen, a domestic violence survivor, is comforted by friend Sarah Busch while giving emotional testimony Thursday to the House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee on HF3398. (Photo by Andrew VonBank)
Lauren Franzen, a domestic violence survivor, is comforted by friend Sarah Busch while giving emotional testimony Thursday to the House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee on HF3398. (Photo by Andrew VonBank)

Fighting back tears, Lauren Franzen described enduring years of physical and emotional abuse from her domestic partner.

“I had been isolated, degraded, beaten, and controlled by my partner,” she told the House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee Thursday. “I felt broken and alone.”

After arriving at a domestic abuse shelter with her 1-year-old daughter, Franzen received food and shelter immediately. During her five-month stay, she received clothes, money to pay past due utility bills, transportation, child care, and help dealing with eviction notices and obtaining permanent housing, among other services.

“I moved into a new place, and for the first time ever, I have all my kids with me,” she said. “And it is a safe place.”

But opportunities for happier endings like hers are dwindling.

“We are in dire straits with victim services in this state right now,” says Rep. Kelly Moller (DFL-Shoreview).

The safety and support these kinds of shelters provide to victims is in jeopardy due to chronic underfunding, said PaHoua Vang, interim executive director of Minnesota Coalition Against Sexual Assault.

Vang described how a 21-bed shelter in Hastings operated by 360 Communities and serving about 200 people annually has closed. “This was the first closure related to the lack of funding,” she said. “But we know without additional crime victim services funding it won’t be the last.”

Moller sponsors HF3398, which would appropriate $20 million in fiscal year 2025 to the Office of Justice Programs within the Department of Public Safety “to provide grants for direct services and advocacy for victims of sexual assault, general crime, domestic violence, and child abuse.” It was laid over by the committee.

“Advocacy programs are critical to public safety. They are critical services to victims and survivors,” Moller said.

But despite increased funding to the office in last year’s biennial budget, Moller said the needs of victims and survivors are still not being met, in part because promised federal funds have not materialized.

House public safety committee hears HF3398 2/15/24

Rep. Elliott Engen (R-White Bear Township) unsuccessfully offered an amendment — it failed on a 9-6 party-line vote — to redirect the $20 million to the funds used by the Crime Victims Reimbursement Board to compensate crime victims for monetary losses resulting from a crime committed against them.

The Office of Justice Programs uses a small portion of money it is given to cover administrative costs; advocacy groups do the same and have to pay their staff, he said.

“This [amendment] would just ensure that every single dollar goes toward victims,” he said.

While the function of the board is important, Moller said not all crime victims are eligible to receive reimbursement, and the board only distributes funds months after a crime has been committed.

The victim support that would be funded by the bill is immediate, and includes clothing, transportation, shelter, medicine, and food when victims need it most, Moller said.


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

House closes 2024 session in chaotic fashion, trading bonding for budget boosts
(House Photography file photo) It was a session of modest ambitions. After 2023 produced a record $72 billion in biennial funding, Minnesota’s legislative leaders were dampening expectations for anything ...
Ways and Means Committee OKs proposed $512 million supplemental budget on party-line vote
(House Photography file photo) Meeting more needs or fiscal irresponsibility is one way to sum up the differences among the two parties on a supplemental spending package a year after a $72 billion state budg...

Minnesota House on Twitter