Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Bill aims to defray costs of new health insurance mandates

State mandates requiring health insurance providers cover certain medical expenses to help people, but they come with a cost.

It can be particularly challenging for small businesses.

As they compete for workers, not being able to offer health insurance as an employee benefit puts them at a disadvantage for recruitment, said Jon Boesche, Minnesota state director of the National Federation of Independent Business.

The Affordable Care Act requires that health insurance providers in the individual and small group markets cover 10 essential health benefits, and the state can expand the mandates required. Minnesota has added 20 mandates since 2014, said Dan Endreson, senior director of policy and government affairs for the Minnesota Council on Health Plans, and there’s more than a dozen bills this session proposing more mandates.

States are required to defray the costs for some new mandates, and HF400 would take that a step further, said Rep. Bernie Perryman (R-St. Augusta), the bill sponsor. It would protect Minnesotans from increased costs related to new mandates by requiring the Department of Commerce to defray costs for the individual, small group and large group markets for all new mandates beginning in 2026 that would increase costs for enrollees.

It was laid over by the House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee Thursday.

“The cost of health insurance is a real concern for many Minnesotans. Minnesota has the 13th highest individual premiums in the country for employer-sponsored insurance,” Perryman said.

Three-quarters of Minnesota Chamber of Commerce members who offer health insurance say they’ll have to either change their insurance benefit or drop it entirely if costs continue to increase, said Bentley Graves, director of health care and transportation policy at the chamber.

Endreson said the bill would use the existing defrayal process created by the Affordable Care Act, and the state would only pay if a claim was made with a health insurance provider.

Rep. Carlie Kotyza-Witthuhn (DFL-Eden Prairie) expressed concern this change would benefit for-profit health insurance providers, who, she said, should be using their profit to cover the costs. 

Rep. Liz Reyer (DFL-Eagan) said the bill doesn’t address other issues such as increasing drug prices that are driving health care costs up. And Rep. Kaohly Vang Her (DFL-St. Paul) pointed out that businesses in other industries know their future costs, but health care costs continue to escalate without explanations while companies ask the government to help.

“One of the greatest crises we are experiencing is health care and increasing health care costs, and yet we keep putting Band-Aids on here,” she said.


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

Minnesota's budget outlook worsens in both near, long term
Gov. Tim Walz takes questions following the release of the state's November budget forecast in December 2024. The latest projections show a $456 million surplus in the current budget cycle and a $6 billion deficit longer-term. (House Photography file photo) It looks as if those calling for less state spending could get their wish, judging from Thursday’s release of the February 2025 Budget and Economic Forecast. A state su...
Full House convenes for first time in 2025, elects Demuth speaker
Rep. Jeff Backer, left and Rep. Matt Norris greet each other on the House floor Feb. 6. House DFLers returned to the House Chamber for the first time during the 2025 session after leaders struck a power-sharing agreement. (Photo by Michele Jokinen) DFL, Republicans convene with a quorum for the first time in 2025 session after agreeing to a power-sharing deal.

Minnesota House on Twitter