Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

House panel mulls modifying tax breaks to include state's largest data centers

Barbara Comstock, and advisor to NetChoice, and Bartlett Cleland, the organization’s general counsel and director of strategic initiatives, testify Feb. 27 before the House Taxes Committee for HF1277. The bill would modify current tax exemptions to include “large-scale data centers.” (Photo by Michele Jokinen)
Barbara Comstock, and advisor to NetChoice, and Bartlett Cleland, the organization’s general counsel and director of strategic initiatives, testify Feb. 27 before the House Taxes Committee for HF1277. The bill would modify current tax exemptions to include “large-scale data centers.” (Photo by Michele Jokinen)

Luring businesses to Minnesota with tax incentives is nothing new. But, if the state starts seeing budget deficits in the coming years, could those tax breaks start looking too generous?

That’s part of the discussion around data centers.

Since 2011, those buildings (or sections thereof) that house a company’s information technology infrastructure have had tax exemptions in Minnesota. For purchases of most equipment and software, sales taxes are paid up front and later refunded. Meanwhile, electricity is exempt at the point of purchase.

But most data centers were considerably smaller in 2011, mostly belonging to businesses specializing in manufacturing, banking and health care. The new, larger data centers being proposed around the state often belong to the technology giants that rule the internet, companies like Google, Amazon, Microsoft and Meta. Should they get the same tax breaks?

Rep. Greg Davids (R-Preston) thinks so.

House Taxes Committee debates bill to modify tax breaks for MN data centers, HF1277 2/27/25

He sponsors HF1277, which would establish “large-scale data centers” as a new category eligible for the same exemption. It would also make those equipment and software purchases tax-free at the time of purchase (rather than refundable) and stipulate that the expiration date for the current law (2042) doesn’t apply to these new large-scale centers.

On Thursday, after 90 minutes of testimony for and against the bill, the House Taxes Committee tabled the bill and plans to take it up again on Tuesday before laying it over for possible inclusion in an omnibus tax bill.

Davids sponsored the original data center legislation in 2011.

“I was told that these would be the thing of the future and Minnesota had better get in it or you’re not going to be in it,” Davids said. “I thought it was a good idea to get Minnesota involved in this. We did and it has been a tremendously successful program throughout the state. Many jobs, many construction jobs.”

So what defines a “qualified large-scale data center”? It would be a facility in Minnesota comprising one or more buildings connected to each other by fiber and associated equipment that add up to at least 25,000 square feet.

And the total cost to open it — construction or refurbishment, investment of enterprise information technology equipment and computer software — needs to be at least $250 million by the facility and its tenants within a 60-month period beginning after June 30, 2025.

The bill would allow the exemption for large-scale data centers indefinitely. And data center projects would be subject to prevailing wage requirements and environmental standards.

The Revenue Department estimates that, in fiscal year 2028 (the only year for which the department has projections), the exemption would reduce the General Fund and Natural Resources and Arts Funds by a total of $20 million.

Among the 17 testifiers at Thursday’s hearing, 10 spoke against the bill and seven in favor. The arguments in opposition centered largely on the environmental and energy demand of large data centers, but a recurring theme was also the loss of tax revenue and the size of the corporations involved.

Those speaking in favor of the bill focused upon jobs in the construction trades and potential economic development. But Avonna Starck, state director of Clean Water Action Minnesota, cited a ProPublica article saying that Washington state offered a very similar tax package to large data centers and it resulted in no clear increase in jobs and a demand for electricity that threatened clean energy efforts.

“We’ve seen this in state after state, and we know how this story ends,” Starck said.


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

Full House convenes for first time in 2025, elects Demuth speaker
Rep. Jeff Backer, left and Rep. Matt Norris greet each other on the House floor Feb. 6. House DFLers returned to the House Chamber for the first time during the 2025 session after leaders struck a power-sharing agreement. (Photo by Michele Jokinen) DFL, Republicans convene with a quorum for the first time in 2025 session after agreeing to a power-sharing deal.
Walz proposes slimmed-down 2026-27 state budget, sales tax changes
Gov. Tim Walz speaks last month during a news conference following the release of the November Budget and Economic Forecast. The governor on Thursday proposed a slimmed-down $66 billion state budget for the 2026-27 biennium. (Photo by Michele Jokinen) This is an odd-numbered year, and so the Legislature is constitutionally required to craft a budget to fund the state government for the next two fiscal years. Gov. Tim Walz...

Minnesota House on Twitter