Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Increasing penalty for deadly careless driving

Most, if not all, victim crimes in state statute contain harsher penalties based on the damage done. The same goes for property crimes.

Supporters of a bill want penalty enhancements when it comes to some instances of careless driving.

Sponsored by Rep. Pat Garofalo (R-Farmington), HF68 would increase the penalty for careless driving if it results in the death of another person to a gross misdemeanor.

Approved by the House Public Safety and Crime Prevention Policy and Finance Committee, the bill next goes to the House Judiciary Policy and Finance Committee. It has no Senate companion.

Current law provides that when a person is found to be carelessly driving and causes the death of another person they can be charged with either a misdemeanor — the equivalent of running as stop sign — or a felony. Probable cause must be shown to get a felony conviction.

“This would create a third option, where only in those cases where a person is first of all negligent, and second of all, their action results in the death of another individual, it would give the option or the flexibility of charging with a gross misdemeanor,” Garofalo said.

Nancy Johnson, president of Minnesotans for Safe Driving, would like to see “great bodily harm” added to the bill, but said the organization supports the proposal.

Rep. Joe Mullery (DFL-Mpls) was one of at a least a couple of members to audibly vote against the bill.

“Some of the top prosecutors in the state have told me this is a very bad bill, and that it’ll take away their possibility to get felonies on really bad cases,” he said.

Garofalo said the Minnesota County Attorney’s Association has expressed support for a third way to charge; however, he wouldn’t “state their support” for his exact bill.

Scott Hersey, head of the Criminal Division of the Dakota County Attorney’s Office, said the county attorney’s association approved a proposal Jan. 21 that is “substantially and substantively” the same as the Garofalo bill.

“I’ve been to a number of meetings where we meet with the family of people killed by careless drivers. We always get the question, ‘Why is there no stronger law?’" Hersey said. "We believe this will give judges more options.”


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

Ways and Means Committee OKs House budget resolution
(House Photography file photo) Total net General Fund expenditures in the 2026-27 biennium will not exceed a hair less than $66.62 billion. That is the budget resolution approved Tuesday by the House Ways...
Minnesota's budget outlook worsens in both near, long term
Gov. Tim Walz takes questions following the release of the state's November budget forecast in December 2024. The latest projections show a $456 million surplus in the current budget cycle and a $6 billion deficit longer-term. (House Photography file photo) It looks as if those calling for less state spending could get their wish, judging from Thursday’s release of the February 2025 Budget and Economic Forecast. A state su...

Minnesota House on Twitter