(2) stopped accepting solid waste, except demolition debris, for disposal by April 9, 1994; and

(3) stopped accepting demolition debris for disposal by June 1, 1994, except that demolition debris may be accepted until May 1, 1995, at a permitted area where disposal of demolition debris is allowed, if the area where the demolition debris is deposited is at least 50 feet from the fill boundary of the area where mixed municipal solid waste was deposited.

Sec. 2. [115B.403] [ACCEPTANCE OF DUMP MATERIALS TO AUGMENT CLOSURE OR CLOSURE UPGRADE ACTIVITIES AT QUALIFIED FACILITIES.]

(a) The commissioner may allow dump materials at qualified facilities from sites that have been in public ownership on or after January 1, 1998, provided that the commissioner finds that:

(1) accepting the dump materials will not significantly increase the potential environmental impacts of the qualified facility;

(2) accepting the dump materials will benefit the qualified facility by improving final slopes, or in some other tangible manner, and the materials will be provided to the qualified facility according to a schedule consistent with closure or closure upgrade activities at the qualified facility;

(3) the owner of the site where the dump materials were disposed complies with the requirements of paragraph (b) and agrees to:

(i) pay any costs of screening and inspection needed at point of excavation or point of deposit to ensure that unacceptable materials are not delivered to the qualified facility;

(ii) secure any permissions necessary from the owner of the property containing the qualified facility;

(iii) transport the dump materials to the qualified facility according to a process and schedule acceptable to the commissioner and, at owner's cost, pay all transportation costs related to the activity; and

(iv) complete cleanup, final grading, seeding, and other related activities for the area where the dump existed.

(b) in order to qualify for consideration for disposal of dump materials at qualified facilities, the owner of the site where the dump materials were disposed shall notify the commissioner, in writing, at least six months before closure activity at the qualified facility indicating the owner's desire to dispose of the dump material at the qualified facility in order to allow adequate time for construction planning and public information activities. The commissioner shall consider requests based on the schedule of closure and closure upgrade activities at qualified facilities. The commissioner shall require the owner of the site to submit, at the owner's expense, physical and chemical evaluation data regarding the dump material including any necessary coring, excavation, or other sampling data at least six months before closure construction to assist the commissioner in making the determination whether or not to accept the material.

(c) The commissioner may reject any and all requests to dispose of dump materials at qualified facilities.

(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed as allowing unpermitted disposal facilities to be included as qualified facilities in the closed landfill program.

Sec. 3. [EFFECTIVE DATE.]

This act is effective the day following final enactment."

S. F. No. 3016, A bill for an act relating to the environment; authorizing acceptance of dump materials at certain qualified landfills; amending Minnesota Statutes 1997 Supplement, section 115B.39, subdivision 2; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 115B.

The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon its final passage.

The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 125 yeas and 0 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Abrams	Erhardt	Johnson, R.	Mares	Paymar	Sviggum
Anderson, B.	Erickson	Juhnke	Marko	Pelowski	Swenson, H.
Anderson, I.	Evans	Kahn	McCollum	Peterson	Sykora
Bakk	Finseth	Kalis	McElroy	Pugh	Tomassoni
Bettermann	Folliard	Kelso	McGuire	Rest	Tompkins
Biernat	Garcia	Kielkucki	Milbert	Reuter	Trimble
Bishop	Goodno	Kinkel	Molnau	Rhodes	Tuma
Boudreau	Greenfield	Knight	Mulder	Rifenberg	Tunheim
Bradley	Greiling	Knoblach	Mullery	Rostberg	Van Dellen
Broecker	Gunther	Koskinen	Munger	Rukavina	Vandeveer
Carlson	Haas	Kraus	Murphy	Schumacher	Wagenius
Chaudhary	Harder	Krinkie	Ness	Seagren	Weaver
Clark, J.	Hasskamp	Kubly	Nornes	Seifert	Wejcman
Clark, K.	Hausman	Kuisle	Olson, E.	Sekhon	Wenzel
Daggett	Hilty	Larsen	Opatz	Skare	Westfall
Davids	Holsten	Leighton	Orfield	Skoglund	Westrom
Dawkins	Huntley	Leppik	Osskopp	Slawik	Winter
Dehler	Jaros	Lieder	Otremba, M.	Smith	Wolf
Delmont	Jefferson	Lindner	Ozment	Solberg	Workman
Dorn	Jennings	Long	Paulsen	Stanek	Spk. Carruthers
Entenza	Johnson, A.	Mahon	Pawlenty	Stang

The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.

There being no objection, the order of business reverted to Reports of Standing Committees.

Solberg from the Committee on Ways and Means to which was referred:

H. F. No. 3830, A bill for an act relating to claims; providing for payment of certain claims against the state; authorizing reimbursement of certain costs and fees; appropriating money; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 3.

Reported the same back with the following amendments:

Page 2, line 27, delete "For medical services provided"

With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.

Solberg from the Committee on Ways and Means to which was referred:

H. F. No. 3843, A bill for an act relating to public administration; authorizing spending for public purposes; authorizing spending to acquire and to better public land and buildings and other public improvements of a capital nature with certain conditions; authorizing state bonds; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 1996, sections 16A.105; 16A.11, subdivision 3a, and by adding a subdivision; 16A.501; 16B.30; 16B.35, subdivision 1; and 446A.072, by adding a subdivision; Minnesota Statutes 1997 Supplement, sections 16A.641, subdivision 4; 124C.498, subdivision 2; 268.917; and 462A.202, subdivision 3a; Laws 1986, chapter 396, section 2, subdivision 1, as amended; Laws 1994, chapter 643, section 2, subdivision 13; Laws 1996, chapter 463, sections 13, subdivision 4, as amended; and 22, subdivision 7; and Laws 1997, chapter 202, article 1, section 35, as amended; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 116J; repealing Laws 1986, chapter 396, section 2, subdivision 2.

Reported the same back with the following amendments:

Page 3, line 8, after "equip" insert "phase one of"

Page 3, line 14, delete everything after "sources" and insert ". The project cost of phase two may not exceed $13,600,000. Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, the board of regents may enter into construction contracts for both phases of the project for a total amount not to exceed $53,600,000."

Page 3, delete line 15

Page 17, line 33, delete "$2,500,000" and insert "$2,800,000"

Page 17, line 34, delete "$750,000" and insert "$400,000"

Page 17, line 37, delete "$750,000" and insert "$800,000"

Page 24, line 48, after the period, insert "Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 16B.24, the commissioner of administration must retain the capitol square site."

Page 26, after line 15, insert:

"Subd. 14. Department of Human Services Consolidation

Within the limits of available appropriations, the commissioner of administration and the commissioner of human services may enter into a contract with a third party to consolidate the department of human services central office operations into one location."

Page 29, lines 41 and 49, after "Minneapolis" insert "and St. Paul"

Page 45, delete section 34

Page 48, line 33, delete "36" and insert "35"

Page 56, line 9, delete "54" and insert "53"

Renumber the sections in sequence

Amend the title as follows:

Page 1, lines 9 and 10, delete "16B.35, subdivision 1;"

With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.

The report was adopted.

H. F. Nos. 3830 and 3843 were read for the second time.

The Speaker called Wejcman to the Chair.

S. F. No. 2581, A bill for an act relating to local government; permitting the appointment of the Olmsted county auditor/treasurer.

The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final passage.

The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 83 yeas and 44 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Bakk	Evans	Jaros	Mares	Pelowski	Stanek
Biernat	Finseth	Jefferson	Mariani	Pugh	Stang
Bishop	Folliard	Jennings	Marko	Rest	Swenson, H.
Boudreau	Garcia	Johnson, A.	McCollum	Rhodes	Tomassoni
Bradley	Goodno	Johnson, R.	McGuire	Rostberg	Tompkins
Carlson	Greenfield	Kahn	Milbert	Rukavina	Trimble
Chaudhary	Greiling	Kelso	Mullery	Schumacher	Tunheim
Clark, J.	Gunther	Kinkel	Munger	Seagren	Wagenius
Clark, K.	Haas	Kraus	Murphy	Sekhon	Wejcman
Daggett	Harder	Kubly	Olson, E.	Skare	Wenzel
Dawkins	Hausman	Leighton	Opatz	Skoglund	Winter
Delmont	Hilty	Lieder	Orfield	Slawik	Wolf
Dorn	Holsten	Long	Ozment	Smith	Spk. Carruthers
Entenza	Huntley	Mahon	Paulsen	Solberg

Those who voted in the negative were:

Abrams	Erickson	Krinkie	Ness	Rifenberg	Weaver
Anderson, B.	Hasskamp	Kuisle	Nornes	Seifert	Westfall
Anderson, I.	Juhnke	Larsen	Osskopp	Sviggum	Westrom
Bettermann	Kalis	Leppik	Otremba, M.	Sykora	Workman
Broecker	Kielkucki	Lindner	Pawlenty	Tingelstad
Davids	Knight	McElroy	Paymar	Tuma
Dehler	Knoblach	Molnau	Peterson	Van Dellen
Erhardt	Koskinen	Mulder	Reuter	Vandeveer

The bill was passed and its title agreed to.

S. F. No. 2281 was reported to the House.

Pugh, McElroy, Pawlenty, Milbert and Tompkins moved to amend S. F. No. 2281 as follows:

Page 1, after line 6, insert:

"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 383D.09, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

(b) Upon adoption of a resolution by the Dakota county board of commissioners and subject to paragraphs (c) and (d), the duties of the elected treasurer/auditor whose office is made appointive under this subdivision shall be discharged by the board of commissioners acting through a department head appointed for that purpose. The appointed department head shall serve at the pleasure of the board. The board may reorganize, consolidate, reallocate, or delegate the duties to promote efficiency in county government. A reorganization, consolidation, reallocation, or delegation or other administrative change or transfer shall not impair the discharge of duties required by statute to otherwise by performed by the treasurer/auditor.

(c) The person elected to be county treasurer/auditor at the last county general election preceding action under this subdivision shall serve in that capacity and perform the duties, functions, and responsibilities until the completion of the term of office to which elected, or until a vacancy occurs in the office, whichever occurs earlier.

(d) The county board, before acting as permitted by paragraph (b) and before any appointment permitted by paragraph (a) or (b), but after adopting a resolution permitted by paragraph (a) or (b), shall publish the resolution once each week for two consecutive weeks in the official publication of the county. The resolution may be implemented without the submission of the question to the voters of the county, unless within 21 days after the second publication of the resolution, a petition requesting a referendum, signed by at least ten percent of the registered voters in the county voting in the last general election, is filed with the county treasurer/auditor. If a petition is filed, the resolution may be implemented unless disapproved by a majority of the voters of the county voting on the question at a regular or special election."

Page 1, line 7, delete "Section 1." and insert "Sec. 2."

Page 1, line 13, delete "2" and insert "3"

Page 1, line 14, delete "Section 1 is" and insert "Sections 1 and 2 are"

Amend the title as follows:

Page 1, line 2, after the semicolon, insert "authorizing appointment of treasurer/auditor;"

Page 1, line 4, delete "section" and insert "sections 383D.09, by adding a subdivision; and"

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

S. F. No. 2281, A bill for an act relating to Dakota county; clarifying the employment status of certain employees; amending Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 383D.41, by adding a subdivision.

The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon its final passage.

The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 89 yeas and 34 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Anderson, I.	Evans	Jefferson	Marko	Pugh	Stang
Biernat	Finseth	Jennings	McCollum	Rest	Swenson, H.
Bishop	Folliard	Johnson, A.	McElroy	Rhodes	Tomassoni
Boudreau	Garcia	Kahn	McGuire	Rostberg	Tompkins
Bradley	Goodno	Kalis	Milbert	Rukavina	Trimble
Carlson	Greenfield	Kelso	Mullery	Schumacher	Tunheim
Journal of the House - 90th Day - Thursday, March 12, 1998 - Top of Page 8262
Chaudhary	Greiling	Kinkel	Murphy	Seagren	Vandeveer
Clark, J.	Gunther	Kraus	Ness	Seifert	Wagenius
Clark, K.	Haas	Kubly	Olson, E.	Sekhon	Wejcman
Daggett	Harder	Leighton	Opatz	Skare	Wenzel
Dawkins	Hausman	Lieder	Orfield	Skoglund	Westfall
Delmont	Hilty	Long	Ozment	Slawik	Wolf
Dorn	Holsten	Mahon	Paulsen	Smith	Workman
Entenza	Huntley	Mares	Pelowski	Solberg	Spk. Carruthers
Erhardt	Jaros	Mariani	Peterson	Stanek

Those who voted in the negative were:

Abrams	Erickson	Koskinen	Molnau	Paymar	Tuma
Anderson, B.	Hasskamp	Krinkie	Mulder	Reuter	Van Dellen
Bettermann	Juhnke	Kuisle	Munger	Rifenberg	Weaver
Broecker	Kielkucki	Larsen	Nornes	Sviggum	Westrom
Davids	Knight	Leppik	Osskopp	Sykora
Dehler	Knoblach	Lindner	Otremba, M.	Tingelstad

The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.

S. F. No. 2378, A bill for an act relating to business organizations; defining the terms "professional" and "professional services" as they relate to professional corporations and professional firms; regulating professional health services; amending Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 319A.02, subdivisions 2, 3, and by adding a subdivision; Minnesota Statutes 1997 Supplement, sections 319A.02, subdivision 2a; 319B.02, subdivisions 17, 19, and by adding a subdivision; and 319B.40.

The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final passage.

The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 126 yeas and 0 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Abrams	Erhardt	Juhnke	Mariani	Paymar	Sviggum
Anderson, B.	Erickson	Kahn	Marko	Pelowski	Swenson, H.
Anderson, I.	Evans	Kalis	McCollum	Peterson	Sykora
Bakk	Finseth	Kelso	McElroy	Pugh	Tingelstad
Bettermann	Folliard	Kielkucki	McGuire	Rest	Tomassoni
Biernat	Garcia	Kinkel	Milbert	Reuter	Tompkins
Bishop	Goodno	Knight	Molnau	Rhodes	Trimble
Boudreau	Greenfield	Knoblach	Mulder	Rifenberg	Tuma
Bradley	Gunther	Koskinen	Mullery	Rostberg	Tunheim
Broecker	Haas	Kraus	Munger	Rukavina	Van Dellen
Carlson	Harder	Krinkie	Murphy	Schumacher	Vandeveer
Chaudhary	Hasskamp	Kubly	Ness	Seagren	Wagenius
Clark, J.	Hausman	Kuisle	Nornes	Seifert	Weaver
Clark, K.	Hilty	Larsen	Olson, E.	Sekhon	Wejcman
Daggett	Holsten	Leighton	Opatz	Skare	Wenzel
Davids	Huntley	Leppik	Orfield	Skoglund	Westfall
Dawkins	Jaros	Lieder	Osskopp	Slawik	Westrom
Dehler	Jefferson	Lindner	Otremba, M.	Smith	Winter
Delmont	Jennings	Long	Ozment	Solberg	Wolf
Dorn	Johnson, A.	Mahon	Paulsen	Stanek	Workman
Entenza	Johnson, R.	Mares	Pawlenty	Stang	Spk. Carruthers

The bill was passed and its title agreed to.

section 221.0355, subdivision 5; Laws 1994, chapter 589, section 8, as amended; repealing Minnesota Statutes 1996, sections 221.0335 and 221.035; Minnesota Statutes 1997 Supplement, section 221.0355, subdivision 15; Laws 1997, chapter 230, section 24; Minnesota Rules, parts 8870.0100; 8870.0200; 8870.0300; 8870.0400; 8870.0500; 8870.0600; 8870.0700; 8870.0800; 8870.0900; 8870.1000; and 8870.1100.

The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final passage.

The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 123 yeas and 1 nay as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Abrams	Erhardt	Juhnke	Marko	Peterson	Tingelstad
Anderson, B.	Erickson	Kahn	McCollum	Pugh	Tomassoni
Anderson, I.	Evans	Kalis	McElroy	Rest	Tompkins
Bakk	Finseth	Kelso	McGuire	Reuter	Trimble
Bettermann	Folliard	Kielkucki	Milbert	Rhodes	Tuma
Biernat	Garcia	Kinkel	Molnau	Rifenberg	Tunheim
Bishop	Goodno	Knight	Mulder	Rostberg	Van Dellen
Boudreau	Greenfield	Knoblach	Mullery	Rukavina	Vandeveer
Bradley	Greiling	Koskinen	Munger	Schumacher	Wagenius
Broecker	Gunther	Kraus	Murphy	Seagren	Weaver
Carlson	Haas	Krinkie	Ness	Seifert	Wejcman
Chaudhary	Harder	Kubly	Nornes	Sekhon	Wenzel
Clark, J.	Hasskamp	Kuisle	Olson, E.	Skare	Westfall
Clark, K.	Hausman	Larsen	Opatz	Skoglund	Westrom
Daggett	Hilty	Leighton	Osskopp	Slawik	Winter
Davids	Holsten	Leppik	Otremba, M.	Solberg	Wolf
Dawkins	Huntley	Lieder	Ozment	Stanek	Workman
Dehler	Jaros	Lindner	Paulsen	Stang	Spk. Carruthers
Delmont	Jefferson	Long	Pawlenty	Sviggum
Dorn	Jennings	Mares	Paymar	Swenson, H.
Entenza	Johnson, A.	Mariani	Pelowski	Sykora

Those who voted in the negative were:

Mahon

The bill was passed and its title agreed to.

S. F. No. 2274 was reported to the House.

Tunheim moved to amend S. F. No. 2274 as follows:

Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert the following language of H. F. No. 2695, the first engrossment:

"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 325B.01, is amended to read:

325B.01 [DEFINITIONS.]

Subdivision 1. As used in sections 325B.01 to 325B.17 and unless otherwise required by the context, the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them.

Subd. 2. "Agreement" means one or more of the following:

(b) A relationship whereby the beer wholesaler is granted the right to offer and sell a brand or brands of beer offered by a brewer;

(c) A relationship whereby the beer wholesaler, as an independent business, constitutes a component of a brewer's distribution system;

(d) A relationship whereby the beer wholesaler's business is substantially associated with a brewer's brand or brands, designating the brewer;

(e) A relationship whereby the beer wholesaler's business is substantially reliant on a brewer for the continued supply of beer;

(f) A written or oral arrangement for a definite or indefinite period whereby a brewer grants to a beer wholesaler a license to use a brand, trade name, trademark, or service mark, and in which there is a community of interest in the marketing of goods or services at wholesale or retail.

Subd. 3. "Beer wholesaler" shall mean any licensed person importing or causing to be imported into this state or purchasing or causing to be purchased within this state, any beer for sale or resale to retailers or wholesalers licensed under chapter 340, without regard to whether the business of the person is conducted under the terms of an agreement with a licensed brewer.

Subd. 4. "Brewer" means every licensed brewer or importer of beer located within or without the state of Minnesota, who enters into an "agreement" with any beer wholesaler licensed to do doing business in the state of Minnesota.

Subd. 5. "Person" means a natural person, corporation, partnership, trust, agency, or other entity as well as the individual officers, directors or other persons in active control of the activities of each such entity. Person also includes heirs, assigns, personal representatives and guardians.

Subd. 5a. "Successor" means a person who replaces a brewer, importer, or wholesaler with regard to the right to manufacture, sell, distribute, or import a brand or brands of beer.

Subd. 6. "Territory" or "sales territory" means the area of primary sales responsibility designated by any agreement between any beer wholesaler and brewer for the brand or brands of any brewer.

Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 325B.14, is amended to read:

325B.14 [OBLIGATIONS OF PURCHASER SUCCESSOR.]

Except for good cause, which shall include, but not be limited to (1) revocation of the wholesaler's license to do business in the state, (2) bankruptcy or insolvency of the wholesaler, (3) assignment for the benefit of creditors or similar disposition of the assets of the wholesaler, (4) failure by the wholesaler to substantially comply, without reasonable excuse or justification, with any reasonable and material requirement imposed upon the wholesaler by the brewery, the purchaser of a "brewer" as defined in sections 325B.01 to 325B.17 shall become obligated to all of the terms and conditions of the agreement in effect on the date of purchase. "Purchase", as defined for the purposes of sections 325B.01 to 325B.17, shall include, but is not limited to, the sale of stock, sale of assets, merger, lease, transfer or consolidation.

A successor shall become obligated to all of the terms and conditions of the agreement in effect on the date of succession. This section applies regardless of the character or form of the succession. A successor has the right to contractually require its wholesalers to comply with operational standards of performance, if the standards are uniformly established for all of the successor's wholesalers and conform to sections 325B.01 to 325B.17.

Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 340A.404, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

Subd. 4a. [STATE-OWNED RECREATION; ENTERTAINMENT FACILITIES.] Notwithstanding any other law, local ordinance, or charter provision, the commissioner may issue on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses to:

(2) the state agency administratively responsible for, or to an entity holding a concession or facility management contract with such agency for beverage sales at, the premises of any Ironworld Discovery Center building or facility owned by the state at Chisholm.

Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 340A.404, subdivision 10, is amended to read:

Subd. 10. [TEMPORARY ON-SALE LICENSES.] The governing body of a municipality may issue to (1) a club or charitable, religious, or other nonprofit organization in existence for at least three years, or to (2) a political committee registered under section 10A.14, or (3) a state university, a temporary license for the on-sale of intoxicating liquor in connection with a social event within the municipality sponsored by the licensee. The license may authorize the on-sale of intoxicating liquor for not more than four consecutive days, and may authorize on-sales on premises other than premises the licensee owns or permanently occupies. The license may provide that the licensee may contract for intoxicating liquor catering services with the holder of a full-year on-sale intoxicating liquor license issued by any municipality. The licenses are subject to the terms, including a license fee, imposed by the issuing municipality. Licenses issued under this subdivision are subject to all laws and ordinances governing the sale of intoxicating liquor except sections 340A.409 and 340A.504, subdivision 3, paragraph (d), and those laws and ordinances which by their nature are not applicable. Licenses under this subdivision are not valid unless first approved by the commissioner of public safety.

A county under this section may issue a temporary license only to a premises located in the unincorporated or unorganized territory of the county.

Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 340A.408, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

Subd. 2. [INTOXICATING LIQUOR; ON-SALE.] (a) The license fee for a retail on-sale intoxicating liquor license is the fee set by the city or county issuing the license subject to the limitations imposed under this subdivision. The license fee is intended to cover the costs of issuing and inspecting and other directly related costs of enforcement, including the cost of any enforcement checks to determine compliance with section 340A.503.

(b) The annual license fee for an on-sale intoxicating liquor license issued by a municipality to a club must be no greater than:

(1) $300 for a club with under 200 members;

(2) $500 for a club with between 201 and 500 members;

(3) $650 for a club with between 501 and 1,000 members;

(4) $800 for a club with between 1,001 and 2,000 members;

(5) $1,000 for a club with between 2,001 and 4,000 members;

(6) $2,000 for a club with between 4,001 and 6,000 members; or

(7) $3,000 for a club with over 6,000 members.

(c) The license fee for the issuance of a wine license may not exceed one-half of the license fee charged for an on-sale intoxicating liquor license, or $2,000, whichever is less.

(d) The town board of a town in which an on-sale establishment has been licensed by a county may impose an additional license fee on each such establishment in an amount not to exceed 20 percent of the county license fee.

Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 340A.410, subdivision 10, is amended to read:

(b) A municipality may not issue more than one temporary license under section 340A.404, subdivision 10, for the sale of alcoholic beverages to any one organization or registered political committee, or for any one location, within any 30-day period. This restriction does not apply to a municipality with a population of 5,000 or fewer people.

(c) A municipality that issues separate temporary wine and liquor licenses may separately apply the limitations contained in paragraphs (a) and (b) to the issuance of such licenses to any one organization or registered political committee or for any one location.

Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 340A.412, subdivision 4, is amended to read:

Subd. 4. [LICENSES PROHIBITED IN CERTAIN AREAS.] (a) No license to sell intoxicating liquor may be issued within the following areas:

(1) where restricted against commercial use through zoning ordinances and other proceedings or legal processes regularly had for that purpose, except licenses may be issued to restaurants in areas which were restricted against commercial uses after the establishment of the restaurant;

(2) within the capitol or on the capitol grounds, except as provided under Laws 1983, chapter 259, section 9;

(3) on the state fairgrounds or at any place in a city of the first class within one-half mile of the fairgrounds, except as otherwise provided by charter;

(4) on the campus of the college of agriculture of the University of Minnesota or at any place in a city of the first class within one-half mile of the campus, provided that a city may issue one on-sale wine license in this area that is not included in the area described in clause (3), except as provided by charter;

(5) within 1,000 feet of a state hospital, training school, reformatory, prison, or other institution under the supervision or control, in whole or in part, of the commissioner of human services or the commissioner of corrections;

(6) in a town or municipality in which a majority of votes at the last election at which the question of license was voted upon were not in favor of license under section 340A.416, or within one-half mile of any such town or municipality, except that intoxicating liquor manufactured within this radius may be sold to be consumed outside it;

(7) at any place on the east side of the Mississippi River within one-tenth of a mile of the main building of the University of Minnesota unless the licensed establishment is on property owned or operated by a nonprofit corporation organized prior to January 1, 1940, for and by former students of the University of Minnesota;

(8) within 1,500 feet of a state university, except only 1,200 feet from that:

(i) the minimum distance in the case of Winona and Southwest State University provided that is 1,200 feet;

(ii) within 1,500 feet of St. Cloud State University one on-sale wine and two off-sale intoxicating liquor licenses may be issued, measured by a direct line from the nearest corner of the administration building to the main entrance of the licensed establishment except;

(iii) at Mankato State University the distance is measured from the front door of the student union of the Highland campus; and

(iv) a temporary license under section 340A.404, subdivision 10, may be issued to a location on the grounds of a state university for an event sponsored or approved by the state university; and

(9) within 1,500 feet of any public school that is not within a city.

Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 340A.504, subdivision 4, is amended to read:

Subd. 4. [INTOXICATING LIQUOR; OFF-SALE.] No sale of intoxicating liquor may be made by an off-sale licensee:

(1) on Sundays;

(2) before 8:00 a.m. on Monday through Saturday;

(3) after 10:00 p.m. on Monday through Saturday at an establishment located in a city other than a city of the first class or within a city located within 15 miles of a city of the first class in the same county;

(4) after 8:00 p.m. on Monday through Thursday and after 10:00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday at an establishment located in a city of the first class or within a city located within 15 miles of a city of the first class in the same county, provided that an establishment may sell intoxicating liquor until 10:00 p.m. on December 31 and July 3, and on the day preceding Thanksgiving day, unless otherwise prohibited under clause (1);

(5) on Thanksgiving Day;

(6) on Christmas Day, December 25; or

(7) after 8:00 p.m. on Christmas Eve, December 24.

A municipality may further restrict days of sale for off-sale of alcoholic beverages within its limits.

Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 340A.510, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

Subd. 2. [MALT LIQUOR FURNISHED FOR SAMPLING.] (a) Notwithstanding section 340A.308, with respect only to sampling authorized under subdivision 1, a brewer may furnish at no cost to an off-sale retailer malt liquor the brewer manufactures if:

(1) the malt liquor is dispensed by the retailer only for tastings authorized under subdivision 1;

(2) the retailer makes available for return to the brewer any unused malt liquor and empty containers;

(3) the samples are dispensed by an employee of the retailer or brewer or by a sampling service retained by the retailer or brewer and not affiliated directly or indirectly with a brewer or malt liquor wholesaler;

(4) the brewer furnishes not more than three cases of malt liquor to the retailer for each sampling;

(5) each sampling continues for not more than eight hours;

(6) the brewer has furnished malt liquor for not more than five samplings for any retailer in any calendar year;

(7) the brewer delivers the malt liquor for the sampling to its exclusive wholesaler for that malt liquor;

(8) the brewer has at least seven days before the sampling filed with the commissioner, on a form the commissioner prescribes, written notice of intent to furnish malt liquor for the sampling, which contains (i) the name and address of the retailer conducting the sampling, (ii) the amount of malt liquor being furnished by the brewer, (iii) the number of times the brewer has furnished malt liquor to the retailer in the calendar year in which the notice is filed, (iv) the date and time of the sampling, (v) the exclusive wholesaler to whom the brewer will deliver the malt liquor, and (vi) a statement by the brewer to the effect that to the brewer's knowledge all requirements of this section have been or will be complied with; and

(9) the commissioner has not notified the brewer filing the notice under clause (8) that the commissioner disapproves the notice.

Sec. 10. Laws 1994, chapter 611, section 32, as amended by Laws 1996, chapter 418, section 15, is amended to read:

Sec. 32. [EAGAN; LICENSES AUTHORIZED.]

The city of Eagan may issue not more than eight 12 on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses in addition to the number authorized by Minnesota Statutes, section 340A.413. All provisions of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 340A, not inconsistent with this section, apply to the licenses authorized by this section.

Sec. 11. [CITY OF ALBERT LEA; LIQUOR LICENSES.]

The city of Albert Lea may issue three on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses in addition to the number authorized by law. All provisions of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 340A, not inconsistent with this section, apply to the licenses authorized under this section, except that the city may issue the licenses only to establishments that derive 50 percent or more of their gross income from food sales.

Sec. 12. [TOWN OF CANOSIA; OFF-SALE HOURS.]

Notwithstanding any other law, the town of Canosia may by ordinance permit the off-sale of intoxicating liquor until 10:00 p.m. on Monday through Saturday.

Sec. 13. [EAST GRAND FORKS; ADDITIONAL LICENSES.]

The city of East Grand Forks may issue not more than five on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses in addition to the number authorized by Minnesota Statutes, section 340A.413. All provisions of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 340A, not inconsistent with this section, apply to the licenses authorized by this section.

Sec. 14. [NEW ULM COMMUNITY FESTIVAL.]

Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 340A.410, subdivision 10, paragraph (b), the New Ulm city council may issue two temporary licenses under Minnesota Statutes, section 340A.404, subdivision 10, to an organization or for a location within a 30-day period if the licenses are for sale of alcoholic beverages at a community festival within the city.

Sec. 15. [CITY OF PINE CITY; LIQUOR LICENSES.]

The city of Pine City may issue one on-sale intoxicating liquor license in addition to the number authorized by law. All provisions of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 340A, not inconsistent with this section, apply to the license authorized under this section.

Sec. 16. [CITY OF VIRGINIA; LIQUOR LICENSES.]

The city of Virginia may issue one on-sale intoxicating liquor license in addition to the number authorized by law. All provisions of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 340A, not inconsistent with this section, apply to the license authorized under this section.

Sec. 17. [EFFECTIVE DATE.]

Sections 3, 8, and 9 are effective the day following final enactment. Sections 10 to 16 are each effective on approval of the city councils of the political subdivisions named in those sections and compliance with Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021."

Delete the title and insert:

of sale; prohibiting deliveries to residences; authorizing additional on-sale licenses; amending Minnesota Statutes 1996, sections 325B.01; 325B.14; 340A.404, subdivision 10, and by adding a subdivision; 340A.408, subdivision 2; 340A.410, subdivision 10; 340A.412, subdivision 4; 340A.504, subdivision 4; and 340A.510, subdivision 2; Laws 1994, chapter 611, section 32, as amended."

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

S. F. No. 2274, A bill for an act relating to liquor; regulating beer brewers and wholesalers; providing for the obligations of successors; allowing the commissioner of public safety to issue on-sale licenses to Giants Ridge and Ironworld Discovery Center; modifying restrictions for temporary on-sale licenses; authorizing issuance of temporary on-sale licenses to state universities; regulating malt liquor sampling; authorizing certain cities to issue additional on-sale licenses; amending Minnesota Statutes 1996, sections 325B.01; 325B.14; 340A.404, subdivision 10, and by adding a subdivision; 340A.410, subdivision 10; 340A.412, subdivision 4; and 340A.510, subdivision 2; Laws 1994, chapter 611, section 32, as amended.

The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon its final passage.

The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 115 yeas and 13 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Abrams	Erhardt	Johnson, R.	Marko	Peterson	Tomassoni
Anderson, I.	Evans	Juhnke	McCollum	Pugh	Tompkins
Bakk	Finseth	Kahn	McElroy	Reuter	Trimble
Bettermann	Folliard	Kalis	McGuire	Rhodes	Tuma
Biernat	Garcia	Kelso	Milbert	Rifenberg	Tunheim
Bishop	Goodno	Kielkucki	Molnau	Rostberg	Van Dellen
Boudreau	Greenfield	Kinkel	Mulder	Rukavina	Vandeveer
Bradley	Greiling	Koskinen	Mullery	Schumacher	Weaver
Broecker	Gunther	Kraus	Munger	Seagren	Wejcman
Carlson	Haas	Krinkie	Murphy	Seifert	Wenzel
Chaudhary	Harder	Kubly	Nornes	Sekhon	Westrom
Clark, J.	Hasskamp	Kuisle	Olson, E.	Skare	Winter
Clark, K.	Hausman	Larsen	Opatz	Slawik	Wolf
Daggett	Hilty	Leighton	Osskopp	Solberg	Workman
Davids	Holsten	Leppik	Otremba, M.	Stanek	Spk. Carruthers
Dawkins	Huntley	Lieder	Ozment	Stang
Dehler	Jaros	Long	Paulsen	Sviggum
Delmont	Jefferson	Mahon	Pawlenty	Swenson, H.
Dorn	Jennings	Mares	Paymar	Sykora
Entenza	Johnson, A.	Mariani	Pelowski	Tingelstad

Those who voted in the negative were:

Anderson, B.	Knoblach	Olson, M.	Rest	Westfall
Erickson	Lindner	Orfield	Skoglund
Knight	Ness	Osthoff	Wagenius

The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.

S. F. No. 1654 was reported to the House.

Mulder moved to amend S. F. No. 1654 as follows:

Page 3, lines 12 and 14, delete "state"

Page 3, line 16, strike "Fifty cents of each" and insert "The"

Page 3, line 17, strike everything after "costs"

Page 3, line 18, strike everything before the period

Page 7, line 15, after the semicolon, insert "and"

Page 7, delete lines 16 to 19

Page 7, line 20, delete "(20)" and insert "(19)"

Page 7, line 22, delete "state"

Page 7, line 23, delete "Fifty cents of each" and insert "The"

Page 7, line 24, delete everything after "costs" and insert a period

Page 7, delete lines 25 and 26

Page 10, line 33, after the semicolon, insert "and"

Page 10, delete lines 34 to 36

Page 11, delete line 1

Page 11, line 2, delete "(20)" and insert "(19)"

Page 11, line 4, delete "state" and delete "Fifty cents"

Page 11, line 5, delete "of each" and insert "The"

Page 11, line 6, delete everything after "costs" and insert a period

Page 11, delete line 7

A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

The question was taken on the Mulder amendment and the roll was called. There were 56 yeas and 73 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Anderson, B.	Erickson	Krinkie	Nornes	Seagren	Vandeveer
Bettermann	Finseth	Kuisle	Olson, M.	Seifert	Weaver
Bishop	Gunther	Larsen	Osskopp	Stang	Westfall
Boudreau	Haas	Leppik	Ozment	Sviggum	Westrom
Broecker	Harder	Lindner	Paulsen	Swenson, H.	Wolf
Clark, J.	Holsten	Mares	Pawlenty	Sykora	Workman
Daggett	Kielkucki	McElroy	Reuter	Tingelstad
Davids	Knight	Molnau	Rhodes	Tompkins
Dehler	Knoblach	Mulder	Rifenberg	Tuma
Dempsey	Kraus	Ness	Rostberg	Van Dellen

Those who voted in the negative were:

Abrams	Evans	Johnson, A.	Mahon	Paymar	Stanek
Anderson, I.	Folliard	Johnson, R.	Mariani	Pelowski	Tomassoni
Bakk	Garcia	Juhnke	Marko	Peterson	Tunheim
Biernat	Goodno	Kahn	McCollum	Pugh	Wagenius
Bradley	Greenfield	Kalis	McGuire	Rest	Wejcman
Carlson	Greiling	Kelso	Milbert	Rukavina	Wenzel
Chaudhary	Hasskamp	Kinkel	Mullery	Schumacher	Winter
Clark, K.	Hausman	Koskinen	Munger	Sekhon	Spk. Carruthers
Dawkins	Hilty	Kubly	Murphy	Skare
Delmont	Huntley	Leighton	Olson, E.	Skoglund
Dorn	Jaros	Lieder	Opatz	Slawik
Entenza	Jefferson	Long	Orfield	Smith
Erhardt	Jennings	Macklin	Otremba, M.	Solberg

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

S. F. No. 1654, A bill for an act relating to real property; providing for fee changes for filing and recording certain documents; amending Minnesota Statutes 1996, sections 357.18, subdivisions 1, 2, and 3; 505.08, subdivision 2; 508.82, subdivision 1; and 508A.82, subdivision 1; Minnesota Statutes 1997 Supplement, section 515B.1-116.

The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final passage.

The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 69 yeas and 59 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Anderson, I.	Garcia	Juhnke	Mariani	Ozment	Solberg
Bakk	Goodno	Kahn	Marko	Paymar	Tomassoni
Biernat	Greiling	Kalis	McCollum	Pelowski	Trimble
Carlson	Hasskamp	Kelso	McGuire	Peterson	Tunheim
Chaudhary	Hausman	Kinkel	Milbert	Pugh	Wagenius
Clark, K.	Hilty	Koskinen	Mullery	Rest	Wejcman
Dawkins	Huntley	Kubly	Murphy	Rukavina	Wenzel
Delmont	Jaros	Leighton	Ness	Schumacher	Winter
Dorn	Jefferson	Lieder	Olson, E.	Sekhon	Spk. Carruthers
Entenza	Jennings	Long	Opatz	Skare
Evans	Johnson, A.	Mahon	Orfield	Skoglund
Folliard	Johnson, R.	Mares	Otremba, M.	Slawik

Those who voted in the negative were:

Abrams	Dehler	Knoblach	Mulder	Rostberg	Tompkins
Anderson, B.	Dempsey	Kraus	Munger	Seagren	Tuma
Bettermann	Erhardt	Krinkie	Nornes	Seifert	Van Dellen
Bishop	Erickson	Kuisle	Olson, M.	Smith	Vandeveer
Boudreau	Finseth	Larsen	Osskopp	Stanek	Weaver
Bradley	Haas	Leppik	Paulsen	Stang	Westfall
Broecker	Harder	Lindner	Pawlenty	Sviggum	Westrom
Clark, J.	Holsten	Macklin	Reuter	Swenson, H.	Wolf
Daggett	Kielkucki	McElroy	Rhodes	Sykora	Workman
Davids	Knight	Molnau	Rifenberg	Tingelstad

S. F. No. 2269, A bill for an act relating to water; clarifying provisions relating to hearings of the board of water and soil resources; increasing the level of exempted bids for watershed districts; modifying the public review period for wetland replacement plans; providing for notice of local wetland plan development to the commissioner of agriculture; requiring approval of certain wetland replacements; requiring a report on wetland law consolidation; amending Minnesota Statutes 1996, sections 103B.231, subdivision 9; 103D.105; 103D.641; and 103G.2242, subdivision 8; Minnesota Statutes 1997 Supplement, section 103G.2243, subdivision 1.

The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final passage.

The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 128 yeas and 2 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Abrams	Evans	Kalis	McElroy	Peterson	Tingelstad
Anderson, I.	Finseth	Kelso	McGuire	Pugh	Tomassoni
Bakk	Folliard	Kielkucki	Milbert	Rest	Tompkins
Bettermann	Garcia	Kinkel	Molnau	Reuter	Trimble
Biernat	Goodno	Knoblach	Mulder	Rhodes	Tuma
Bishop	Greenfield	Koskinen	Mullery	Rifenberg	Tunheim
Boudreau	Greiling	Kraus	Munger	Rostberg	Van Dellen
Bradley	Gunther	Krinkie	Murphy	Rukavina	Vandeveer
Broecker	Haas	Kubly	Ness	Schumacher	Wagenius
Carlson	Harder	Kuisle	Nornes	Seagren	Weaver
Chaudhary	Hasskamp	Larsen	Olson, E.	Seifert	Wejcman
Clark, J.	Hausman	Leighton	Olson, M.	Sekhon	Wenzel
Clark, K.	Hilty	Leppik	Opatz	Skare	Westfall
Daggett	Holsten	Lieder	Orfield	Skoglund	Westrom
Davids	Huntley	Lindner	Osskopp	Slawik	Winter
Dawkins	Jaros	Long	Osthoff	Smith	Wolf
Dehler	Jefferson	Macklin	Otremba, M.	Solberg	Workman
Delmont	Jennings	Mahon	Ozment	Stanek	Spk. Carruthers
Dorn	Johnson, A.	Mares	Paulsen	Stang
Entenza	Johnson, R.	Mariani	Pawlenty	Sviggum
Erhardt	Juhnke	Marko	Paymar	Swenson, H.
Erickson	Kahn	McCollum	Pelowski	Sykora

Those who voted in the negative were:

	Anderson, B.Knight

The bill was passed and its title agreed to.

S. F. No. 2373, A bill for an act relating to civil commitment; modifying provisions governing release on pass for persons committed as mentally ill and dangerous; allowing temporary jail confinement of persons subject to commitment as sexual psychopathic personalities or sexually dangerous persons; clarifying various provisions and making conforming and technical amendments; amending Minnesota Statutes 1996, sections 253B.15, subdivision 9; and 253B.185, by adding a subdivision; Minnesota Statutes 1997 Supplement, sections 253B.03, subdivision 7; 253B.045, subdivisions 2 and 3; 253B.05, subdivision 3; 253B.07, subdivisions 5 and 7; 253B.09, subdivision 1; 253B.092, subdivisions 6 and 8; 253B.0921; 253B.095, subdivision 3; 253B.12, subdivision 1; 253B.141, subdivision 1; 253B.15, subdivisions 2, 3, 3a, 3b, and 5; 253B.18, subdivisions 4a and 5; and 253B.19, subdivision 3.

The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 129 yeas and 0 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Abrams	Erhardt	Juhnke	Mariani	Pelowski	Sykora
Anderson, B.	Erickson	Kahn	Marko	Peterson	Tingelstad
Anderson, I.	Evans	Kalis	McCollum	Pugh	Tomassoni
Bakk	Finseth	Kelso	McElroy	Rest	Tompkins
Bettermann	Folliard	Kielkucki	McGuire	Reuter	Trimble
Biernat	Garcia	Kinkel	Milbert	Rhodes	Tuma
Bishop	Goodno	Knight	Molnau	Rifenberg	Tunheim
Boudreau	Greenfield	Knoblach	Mulder	Rostberg	Van Dellen
Bradley	Greiling	Koskinen	Munger	Rukavina	Vandeveer
Broecker	Gunther	Kraus	Murphy	Schumacher	Wagenius
Carlson	Haas	Krinkie	Ness	Seagren	Weaver
Chaudhary	Harder	Kubly	Nornes	Seifert	Wejcman
Clark, J.	Hasskamp	Kuisle	Olson, E.	Sekhon	Wenzel
Clark, K.	Hausman	Larsen	Olson, M.	Skare	Westfall
Daggett	Hilty	Leighton	Opatz	Skoglund	Westrom
Davids	Holsten	Leppik	Osskopp	Slawik	Winter
Dawkins	Huntley	Lieder	Osthoff	Smith	Wolf
Dehler	Jaros	Lindner	Otremba, M.	Solberg	Workman
Delmont	Jefferson	Long	Ozment	Stanek	Spk. Carruthers
Dempsey	Jennings	Macklin	Paulsen	Stang
Dorn	Johnson, A.	Mahon	Pawlenty	Sviggum
Entenza	Johnson, R.	Mares	Paymar	Swenson, H.

The bill was passed and its title agreed to.

S. F. No. 2725, A bill for an act relating to real estate; authorizing additional methods for recorder and registrar functions; amending Minnesota Statutes 1996, sections 386.40; 386.41; 508.32; 508.38; and 508A.38; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 386; 508; and 508A.

The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final passage.

The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 128 yeas and 1 nay as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Abrams	Erickson	Kahn	McCollum	Peterson	Tingelstad
Anderson, B.	Evans	Kalis	McElroy	Pugh	Tomassoni
Anderson, I.	Finseth	Kelso	McGuire	Rest	Tompkins
Bettermann	Folliard	Kielkucki	Milbert	Reuter	Trimble
Biernat	Garcia	Kinkel	Molnau	Rhodes	Tuma
Bishop	Goodno	Knight	Mulder	Rifenberg	Tunheim
Boudreau	Greenfield	Knoblach	Mullery	Rostberg	Van Dellen
Bradley	Greiling	Kraus	Munger	Rukavina	Vandeveer
Broecker	Gunther	Krinkie	Murphy	Schumacher	Wagenius
Carlson	Haas	Kubly	Ness	Seagren	Weaver
Chaudhary	Harder	Kuisle	Nornes	Seifert	Wejcman
Clark, J.	Hasskamp	Larsen	Olson, E.	Sekhon	Wenzel
Clark, K.	Hausman	Leighton	Olson, M.	Skare	Westfall
Daggett	Hilty	Leppik	Opatz	Skoglund	Westrom
Davids	Holsten	Lieder	Osskopp	Slawik	Winter
Dawkins	Huntley	Lindner	Osthoff	Smith	Wolf
Dehler	Jaros	Long	Otremba, M.	Solberg	Workman
Delmont	Jefferson	Macklin	Ozment	Stanek	Spk. Carruthers
Dempsey	Jennings	Mahon	Paulsen	Stang
Dorn	Johnson, A.	Mares	Pawlenty	Sviggum
Journal of the House - 90th Day - Thursday, March 12, 1998 - Top of Page 8274
Entenza	Johnson, R.	Mariani	Paymar	Swenson, H.
Erhardt	Juhnke	Marko	Pelowski	Sykora

Those who voted in the negative were:

Bakk The bill was passed and its title agreed to.

Winter moved that the House recess subject to the call of the Chair. The motion prevailed.

The House reconvened and was called to order by the Speaker.

Macklin was excused between the hours of 3:10 p.m. and 5:45 p.m.

Pursuant to rule 1.10 Solberg requested immediate consideration of H. F. No. 3843.

H. F. No. 3843 was reported to the House.

On the motion of Winter and on the demand of 10 members, a call of the House was ordered. The following members answered to their names:

Anderson, B.	Erhardt	Kahn	Marko	Pelowski	Sykora
Anderson, I.	Erickson	Kalis	McCollum	Peterson	Tingelstad
Bakk	Evans	Kelso	McElroy	Pugh	Tomassoni
Bettermann	Finseth	Kielkucki	McGuire	Rest	Tompkins
Biernat	Folliard	Kinkel	Milbert	Reuter	Tuma
Bishop	Garcia	Knight	Molnau	Rhodes	Tunheim
Boudreau	Goodno	Knoblach	Mulder	Rifenberg	Van Dellen
Bradley	Greenfield	Koskinen	Mullery	Rostberg	Vandeveer
Broecker	Greiling	Kraus	Murphy	Rukavina	Wagenius
Carlson	Gunther	Krinkie	Ness	Schumacher	Weaver
Chaudhary	Harder	Kubly	Nornes	Seagren	Wejcman
Clark, J.	Hasskamp	Kuisle	Olson, E.	Seifert	Wenzel
Clark, K.	Hausman	Larsen	Olson, M.	Sekhon	Westfall
Commers	Hilty	Leighton	Opatz	Skare	Westrom
Daggett	Huntley	Leppik	Osskopp	Skoglund	Winter
Davids	Jaros	Lieder	Osthoff	Slawik	Wolf
Dawkins	Jefferson	Lindner	Otremba, M.	Solberg	Workman
Dehler	Jennings	Long	Ozment	Stanek	Spk. Carruthers
Delmont	Johnson, A.	Mahon	Paulsen	Stang
Dempsey	Johnson, R.	Mares	Pawlenty	Sviggum
Entenza	Juhnke	Mariani	Paymar	Swenson, H.

Winter moved that further proceedings of the roll call be suspended and that the Sergeant at Arms be instructed to bring in the absentees. The motion prevailed and it was so ordered.

Pursuant to Article IV, Section 19, of the Constitution of the state of Minnesota, Kalis moved that the rule therein be suspended and an urgency be declared so that H. F. No. 3843 be given its third reading and be placed upon its final passage.

A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

The question was taken on the Kalis motion and the roll was called.

Winter moved that those not voting be excused from voting. The motion prevailed.

There were 118 yeas and 13 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Abrams	Erhardt	Jennings	Marko	Peterson	Swenson, H.
Anderson, B.	Erickson	Johnson, A.	McCollum	Pugh	Sykora
Anderson, I.	Evans	Johnson, R.	McElroy	Rest	Tingelstad
Bakk	Farrell	Juhnke	McGuire	Reuter	Tomassoni
Bettermann	Finseth	Kahn	Milbert	Rhodes	Tompkins
Biernat	Folliard	Kalis	Molnau	Rifenberg	Trimble
Bishop	Garcia	Kelso	Mullery	Rostberg	Tuma
Boudreau	Goodno	Kielkucki	Munger	Rukavina	Tunheim
Bradley	Greenfield	Kinkel	Murphy	Schumacher	Van Dellen
Carlson	Greiling	Knoblach	Ness	Seagren	Wagenius
Chaudhary	Gunther	Koskinen	Nornes	Seifert	Weaver
Clark, J.	Haas	Kraus	Olson, E.	Sekhon	Wejcman
Clark, K.	Harder	Kubly	Opatz	Skare	Wenzel
Daggett	Hasskamp	Kuisle	Orfield	Skoglund	Westfall
Davids	Hausman	Leighton	Osskopp	Slawik	Westrom
Dawkins	Hilty	Leppik	Osthoff	Smith	Winter
Delmont	Holsten	Lieder	Otremba, M.	Solberg	Wolf
Dempsey	Huntley	Long	Ozment	Stanek	Spk. Carruthers
Dorn	Jaros	Mahon	Paymar	Stang
Entenza	Jefferson	Mariani	Pelowski	Sviggum

Those who voted in the negative were:

Broecker	Knight	Lindner	Olson, M.	Workman
Commers	Krinkie	Mares	Paulsen
Dehler	Larsen	Mulder	Vandeveer

The motion prevailed.

Kalis moved that the Rules of the House be so far suspended that H. F. No. 3843 be given its third reading and be placed upon its final passage. The motion prevailed.

Sviggum moved to amend H. F. No. 3843, the first engrossment, as follows:

Pages 12 and 13, delete subdivision 4

Adjust amounts accordingly

Renumber or reletter in sequence and correct internal references

Amend the title accordingly

The question was taken on the Sviggum amendment and the roll was called.

Winter moved that those not voting be excused from voting. The motion prevailed.

There were 43 yeas and 89 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Abrams	Erhardt	Krinkie	Nornes	Seagren	Weaver
Anderson, B.	Goodno	Kuisle	Olson, M.	Seifert	Westrom
Bettermann	Haas	Larsen	Osskopp	Stanek	Workman
Boudreau	Holsten	Leppik	Ozment	Sviggum
Bradley	Kielkucki	Lindner	Paulsen	Sykora
Broecker	Knight	McElroy	Pawlenty	Tingelstad
Commers	Knoblach	Molnau	Rifenberg	Tuma
Dehler	Kraus	Mulder	Rostberg	Van Dellen

Those who voted in the negative were:

Anderson, I.	Erickson	Jefferson	Mares	Paymar	Stang
Bakk	Evans	Jennings	Mariani	Pelowski	Swenson, H.
Biernat	Farrell	Johnson, A.	Marko	Peterson	Tomassoni
Bishop	Finseth	Johnson, R.	McCollum	Pugh	Tompkins
Carlson	Folliard	Juhnke	McGuire	Rest	Trimble
Chaudhary	Garcia	Kahn	Milbert	Reuter	Tunheim
Clark, J.	Greenfield	Kalis	Mullery	Rhodes	Vandeveer
Clark, K.	Greiling	Kelso	Munger	Rukavina	Wagenius
Daggett	Gunther	Kinkel	Murphy	Schumacher	Wejcman
Davids	Harder	Koskinen	Ness	Sekhon	Wenzel
Dawkins	Hasskamp	Kubly	Olson, E.	Skare	Westfall
Delmont	Hausman	Leighton	Opatz	Skoglund	Winter
Dempsey	Hilty	Lieder	Orfield	Slawik	Wolf
Dorn	Huntley	Long	Osthoff	Smith	Spk. Carruthers
Entenza	Jaros	Mahon	Otremba, M.	Solberg

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

Krinkie moved to amend H. F. No. 3843, the first engrossment, as follows:

Page 41, delete subdivision 8

Adjust amounts accordingly

Renumber or reletter in sequence and correct internal references

Amend the title accordingly

A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

Winter moved that those not voting be excused from voting. The motion prevailed.

There were 50 yeas and 81 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Abrams	Erhardt	Knoblach	Nornes	Smith	Vandeveer
Anderson, B.	Erickson	Krinkie	Olson, M.	Stanek	Weaver
Bettermann	Finseth	Kuisle	Osskopp	Stang	Westfall
Boudreau	Goodno	Larsen	Ozment	Sviggum	Westrom
Bradley	Haas	Lindner	Paulsen	Sykora	Workman
Broecker	Harder	Mares	Pawlenty	Tingelstad
Commers	Holsten	McElroy	Rifenberg	Tompkins
Daggett	Kielkucki	Molnau	Rostberg	Tuma
Dehler	Knight	Mulder	Seifert	Van Dellen

Those who voted in the negative were:

Anderson, I.	Evans	Johnson, A.	Mariani	Paymar	Solberg
Bakk	Farrell	Johnson, R.	Marko	Pelowski	Swenson, H.
Biernat	Folliard	Juhnke	McCollum	Peterson	Tomassoni
Bishop	Garcia	Kahn	McGuire	Pugh	Trimble
Carlson	Greenfield	Kalis	Milbert	Rest	Tunheim
Chaudhary	Greiling	Kinkel	Mullery	Reuter	Wagenius
Clark, J.	Gunther	Koskinen	Munger	Rhodes	Wejcman
Clark, K.	Hasskamp	Kraus	Murphy	Rukavina	Wenzel
Davids	Hausman	Kubly	Ness	Schumacher	Winter
Dawkins	Hilty	Leighton	Olson, E.	Seagren	Wolf
Delmont	Huntley	Leppik	Opatz	Sekhon	Spk. Carruthers
Dempsey	Jaros	Lieder	Orfield	Skare
Dorn	Jefferson	Long	Osthoff	Skoglund
Entenza	Jennings	Mahon	Otremba, M.	Slawik

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

Stanek and Lindner moved to amend H. F. No. 3843, the first engrossment, as follows:

Page 34, line 36, delete "1,628,000" and insert "4,648,000"

Page 34, after line 51, insert:

"Subd. 4. $3,020,000 is for a grant to the city of Maple Grove to design, construct, expand, and equip firearm and tactical training facilities for law enforcement in the city of Maple Grove."

Page 41, delete subdivision 8

Renumber the subdivisions in sequence

Adjust amounts accordingly

The question was taken on the Stanek and Lindner amendment and the roll was called. There were 44 yeas and 88 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Anderson, B.	Erhardt	Knight	Nornes	Stanek	Westfall
Bettermann	Erickson	Knoblach	Ozment	Sviggum	Westrom
Boudreau	Finseth	Lindner	Paulsen	Swenson, H.	Wolf
Broecker	Goodno	Mahon	Rhodes	Tingelstad	Workman
Clark, J.	Gunther	Mares	Rostberg	Tompkins
Commers	Haas	McElroy	Seagren	Van Dellen
Daggett	Harder	Molnau	Seifert	Vandeveer
Dehler	Kielkucki	Mulder	Smith	Weaver

Those who voted in the negative were:

Abrams	Evans	Johnson, R.	Long	Osthoff	Slawik
Anderson, I.	Farrell	Juhnke	Mariani	Otremba, M.	Solberg
Bakk	Folliard	Kahn	Marko	Pawlenty	Stang
Biernat	Garcia	Kalis	McCollum	Paymar	Sykora
Bishop	Greenfield	Kelso	McGuire	Pelowski	Tomassoni
Bradley	Greiling	Kinkel	Milbert	Peterson	Trimble
Carlson	Hasskamp	Koskinen	Mullery	Pugh	Tuma
Chaudhary	Hausman	Kraus	Munger	Rest	Tunheim
Clark, K.	Hilty	Krinkie	Murphy	Reuter	Wagenius
Davids	Holsten	Kubly	Ness	Rifenberg	Wejcman
Dawkins	Huntley	Kuisle	Olson, E.	Rukavina	Wenzel
Delmont	Jaros	Larsen	Olson, M.	Schumacher	Winter
Dempsey	Jefferson	Leighton	Opatz	Sekhon	Spk. Carruthers
Dorn	Jennings	Leppik	Orfield	Skare
Entenza	Johnson, A.	Lieder	Osskopp	Skoglund

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

Knoblach moved to amend H. F. No. 3843, the first engrossment, as follows:

Page 43, after line 31, insert:

"Sec. 31 [16A.111] [CAPITAL PROJECT GRANTS TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS]

Subdivision 1. [SCOPE.] Unless specifically excluded from the requirements of this subdivision, any appropriation authorized by the legislature after July 1, 1999, that is made to a local unit of government to acquire and to better public land and buildings and other public improvements of a capital nature is subject to the requirements of this section.

Subd. 2. [PURPOSES.] Grants to local units of government must be for one or more of the following purposes:

(1) to prevent, or mitigate the results of, a disaster;

(2) to provide basic, necessary services to an area that could not otherwise afford to provide such services;

(3) to provide a statewide resource that is reasonably expected to serve a substantial portion of the state's population; or

Subd. 3. [LOCAL MATCH AND PREDESIGN REQUIRED] Grants for the purposes in subdivision 2, paragraphs (3) and (4), must be contingent upon commitment of at least an equal amount from nonstate sources and upon submission to the commissioner of administration of an independent predesign study completed with funds from nonstate sources.

Subd. 4. [DEMONSTRATION OF PROJECT VIABILITY] Grants for the purposes in subdivision 2, paragraphs (1) and (2), must not be made until the local unit of government demonstrates to the commissioner of finance that projected revenues and other nonstate sources of funding can reasonably be expected to finance the continued operation of the facility without additional state financial assistance, unless a state agency occupies and pays rent in the facility."

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct internal references

Amend the title accordingly

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

Mahon and Stanek moved to amend H. F. No. 3843, the first engrossment, as follows:

Page 34, after line 51, insert:

"Subd. 4. $2,500,000 is appropriated from the bond proceeds fund to the commissioner of public safety for a grant to the city of Richfield or other fiscal agent for the joint powers entity created for the purpose under Minnesota Statutes, section 471.59. The appropriation must be matched by $4,000,000 from nonstate sources."

Adjust amounts accordingly

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

Knight moved to amend H. F. No. 3843, the first engrossment, as follows:

Pages 17 and 18, delete subdivision 13

Adjust amounts accordingly

Renumber or reletter in sequence and correct internal references

Amend the title accordingly

A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

The question was taken on the Knight amendment and the roll was called.

Winter moved that those not voting be excused from voting. The motion prevailed.

There were 35 yeas and 94 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Abrams	Daggett	Krinkie	Molnau	Rostberg	Tompkins
Anderson, B.	Finseth	Kuisle	Mulder	Seagren	Weaver
Boudreau	Gunther	Larsen	Olson, M.	Stanek	Westfall
Bradley	Harder	Leppik	Osskopp	Sviggum	Westrom
Broecker	Kielkucki	Lindner	Paulsen	Swenson, H.	Workman
Commers	Knight	McElroy	Pawlenty	Tingelstad

Those who voted in the negative were:

Anderson, I.	Erhardt	Jennings	Mariani	Paymar	Solberg
Bakk	Erickson	Johnson, A.	Marko	Pelowski	Stang
Bettermann	Evans	Johnson, R.	McCollum	Peterson	Sykora
Biernat	Farrell	Juhnke	McGuire	Pugh	Tomassoni
Bishop	Folliard	Kahn	Milbert	Rest	Trimble
Carlson	Garcia	Kalis	Mullery	Reuter	Tuma
Chaudhary	Goodno	Kinkel	Munger	Rhodes	Tunheim
Clark, J.	Greenfield	Knoblach	Murphy	Rifenberg	Vandeveer
Clark, K.	Greiling	Koskinen	Ness	Rukavina	Wagenius
Davids	Haas	Kraus	Nornes	Schumacher	Wejcman
Dawkins	Hasskamp	Kubly	Olson, E.	Seifert	Wenzel
Dehler	Hausman	Leighton	Opatz	Sekhon	Winter
Delmont	Hilty	Lieder	Orfield	Skare	Wolf
Dempsey	Huntley	Long	Osthoff	Skoglund	Spk. Carruthers
Dorn	Jaros	Mahon	Otremba, M.	Slawik
Entenza	Jefferson	Mares	Ozment	Smith

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

Sviggum moved to amend H. F. No. 3843, the first engrossment, as follows:

Page 13, delete subdivision 5

Adjust amounts accordingly

Renumber or reletter in sequence and correct internal references

Amend the title accordingly

A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

The question was taken on the Sviggum amendment and the roll was called.

Winter moved that those not voting be excused from voting. The motion prevailed.

There were 41 yeas and 90 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Abrams	Davids	Holsten	McElroy	Rostberg	Tuma
Anderson, B.	Dehler	Kielkucki	Molnau	Seifert	Van Dellen
Bettermann	Erhardt	Knight	Mulder	Smith	Vandeveer
Boudreau	Erickson	Knoblach	Nornes	Stang	Weaver
Bradley	Gunther	Krinkie	Olson, M.	Sviggum	Westrom
Commers	Haas	Kuisle	Osskopp	Tingelstad	Workman
Daggett	Harder	Lindner	Rifenberg	Tompkins

Those who voted in the negative were:

Anderson, I.	Farrell	Johnson, R.	Mares	Ozment	Slawik
Bakk	Finseth	Juhnke	Mariani	Paulsen	Solberg
Biernat	Folliard	Kahn	Marko	Paymar	Stanek
Journal of the House - 90th Day - Thursday, March 12, 1998 - Top of Page 8281
Bishop	Garcia	Kalis	McCollum	Pelowski	Swenson, H.
Broecker	Goodno	Kelso	McGuire	Peterson	Sykora
Carlson	Greenfield	Kinkel	Milbert	Pugh	Tomassoni
Chaudhary	Greiling	Koskinen	Mullery	Rest	Trimble
Clark, J.	Hasskamp	Kraus	Munger	Reuter	Tunheim
Clark, K.	Hausman	Kubly	Murphy	Rhodes	Wagenius
Dawkins	Hilty	Larsen	Ness	Rukavina	Wejcman
Delmont	Huntley	Leighton	Olson, E.	Schumacher	Wenzel
Dempsey	Jaros	Leppik	Opatz	Seagren	Westfall
Dorn	Jefferson	Lieder	Orfield	Sekhon	Winter
Entenza	Jennings	Long	Osthoff	Skare	Wolf
Evans	Johnson, A.	Mahon	Otremba, M.	Skoglund	Spk. Carruthers

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

Sviggum moved to amend H. F. No. 3843, the first engrossment, as follows:

Pages 40 and 41, delete subdivision 6

Adjust amounts accordingly

Renumber or reletter in sequence and correct internal references

Amend the title accordingly

A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

The question was taken on the Sviggum amendment and the roll was called.

Winter moved that those not voting be excused from voting. The motion prevailed.

There were 54 yeas and 78 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Abrams	Dehler	Knight	Molnau	Rifenberg	Tompkins
Anderson, B.	Erhardt	Knoblach	Mulder	Rostberg	Tuma
Bettermann	Erickson	Krinkie	Nornes	Seagren	Van Dellen
Boudreau	Finseth	Kuisle	Olson, M.	Seifert	Vandeveer
Bradley	Goodno	Larsen	Osskopp	Smith	Weaver
Broecker	Haas	Leppik	Ozment	Stanek	Westfall
Clark, J.	Harder	Lindner	Paulsen	Stang	Westrom
Commers	Holsten	Mares	Pawlenty	Sviggum	Wolf
Daggett	Kielkucki	McElroy	Rhodes	Sykora	Workman

Those who voted in the negative were:

Anderson, I.	Evans	Jennings	Long	Orfield	Skoglund
Bakk	Farrell	Johnson, A.	Mahon	Osthoff	Slawik
Biernat	Folliard	Johnson, R.	Mariani	Otremba, M.	Solberg
Bishop	Garcia	Juhnke	Marko	Paymar	Swenson, H.
Carlson	Greenfield	Kahn	McCollum	Pelowski	Tingelstad
Chaudhary	Greiling	Kalis	McGuire	Peterson	Tomassoni
Clark, K.	Gunther	Kelso	Milbert	Pugh	Trimble
Davids	Hasskamp	Kinkel	Mullery	Rest	Tunheim
Dawkins	Hausman	Koskinen	Munger	Reuter	Wagenius
Delmont	Hilty	Kraus	Murphy	Rukavina	Wejcman
Journal of the House - 90th Day - Thursday, March 12, 1998 - Top of Page 8282
Dempsey	Huntley	Kubly	Ness	Schumacher	Wenzel
Dorn	Jaros	Leighton	Olson, E.	Sekhon	Winter
Entenza	Jefferson	Lieder	Opatz	Skare	Spk. Carruthers

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

Haas moved to amend H. F. No. 3843, the first engrossment, as follows:

Pages 38 and 39, delete subdivision 21

Adjust amounts accordingly

Renumber or reletter in sequence and correct internal references

Amend the title accordingly

A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

The question was taken on the Haas amendment and the roll was called. There were 54 yeas and 78 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Abrams	Dehler	Knight	Mulder	Rostberg	Tingelstad
Anderson, B.	Erhardt	Knoblach	Nornes	Seagren	Tompkins
Bettermann	Erickson	Krinkie	Olson, M.	Seifert	Tuma
Boudreau	Finseth	Kuisle	Osskopp	Smith	Van Dellen
Bradley	Goodno	Larsen	Otremba, M.	Stanek	Vandeveer
Broecker	Haas	Leppik	Ozment	Stang	Weaver
Clark, J.	Harder	Lindner	Paulsen	Sviggum	Westfall
Commers	Holsten	McElroy	Pawlenty	Swenson, H.	Westrom
Daggett	Kielkucki	Molnau	Rifenberg	Sykora	Workman

Those who voted in the negative were:

Anderson, I.	Evans	Jennings	Long	Opatz	Skare
Bakk	Farrell	Johnson, A.	Mahon	Orfield	Skoglund
Biernat	Folliard	Johnson, R.	Mares	Osthoff	Slawik
Bishop	Garcia	Juhnke	Mariani	Paymar	Solberg
Carlson	Greenfield	Kahn	Marko	Pelowski	Tomassoni
Chaudhary	Greiling	Kalis	McCollum	Peterson	Trimble
Clark, K.	Gunther	Kelso	McGuire	Pugh	Tunheim
Davids	Hasskamp	Kinkel	Milbert	Rest	Wagenius
Dawkins	Hausman	Koskinen	Mullery	Reuter	Wejcman
Delmont	Hilty	Kraus	Munger	Rhodes	Wenzel
Dempsey	Huntley	Kubly	Murphy	Rukavina	Winter
Dorn	Jaros	Leighton	Ness	Schumacher	Wolf
Entenza	Jefferson	Lieder	Olson, E.	Sekhon	Spk. Carruthers

Sviggum moved to amend H. F. No. 3843, the first engrossment, as follows:

Pages 35 and 36, delete subdivision 4

Adjust amounts accordingly

Renumber or reletter in sequence and correct internal references

Amend the title accordingly

A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

The question was taken on the Sviggum amendment and the roll was called. There were 42 yeas and 90 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Anderson, B.	Erhardt	Knight	Nornes	Seifert	Van Dellen
Bettermann	Erickson	Krinkie	Olson, M.	Smith	Vandeveer
Boudreau	Finseth	Kuisle	Paulsen	Stang	Weaver
Bradley	Haas	Lindner	Pawlenty	Sviggum	Westfall
Commers	Harder	McElroy	Rifenberg	Tingelstad	Westrom
Daggett	Holsten	Molnau	Rostberg	Tompkins	Wolf
Dehler	Kielkucki	Mulder	Seagren	Tuma	Workman

Those who voted in the negative were:

Abrams	Entenza	Jennings	Lieder	Orfield	Skare
Anderson, I.	Evans	Johnson, A.	Long	Osskopp	Skoglund
Bakk	Farrell	Johnson, R.	Mahon	Osthoff	Slawik
Biernat	Folliard	Juhnke	Mares	Otremba, M.	Solberg
Bishop	Garcia	Kahn	Mariani	Ozment	Stanek
Broecker	Goodno	Kalis	Marko	Paymar	Swenson, H.
Carlson	Greenfield	Kelso	McCollum	Pelowski	Sykora
Chaudhary	Greiling	Kinkel	McGuire	Peterson	Tomassoni
Clark, J.	Gunther	Knoblach	Milbert	Pugh	Trimble
Clark, K.	Hasskamp	Koskinen	Mullery	Rest	Tunheim
Davids	Hausman	Kraus	Munger	Reuter	Wagenius
Dawkins	Hilty	Kubly	Murphy	Rhodes	Wejcman
Delmont	Huntley	Larsen	Ness	Rukavina	Wenzel
Dempsey	Jaros	Leighton	Olson, E.	Schumacher	Winter
Dorn	Jefferson	Leppik	Opatz	Sekhon	Spk. Carruthers

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

Knight moved to amend H. F. No. 3843, the first engrossment, as follows:

Page 41, delete subdivision 7

Adjust amounts accordingly

Renumber or reletter in sequence and correct internal references

Amend the title accordingly

The question was taken on the Knight amendment and the roll was called.

Winter moved that those not voting be excused from voting. The motion prevailed.

There were 39 yeas and 91 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Abrams	Daggett	Knight	Molnau	Rostberg	Weaver
Anderson, B.	Dehler	Knoblach	Mulder	Stanek	Westfall
Bettermann	Erhardt	Krinkie	Osskopp	Sviggum	Westrom
Boudreau	Goodno	Kuisle	Ozment	Sykora	Workman
Bradley	Haas	Larsen	Paulsen	Tompkins
Broecker	Holsten	Lindner	Pawlenty	Tuma
Commers	Kielkucki	McElroy	Rifenberg	Van Dellen

Those who voted in the negative were:

Anderson, I.	Finseth	Juhnke	Marko	Peterson	Swenson, H.
Bakk	Folliard	Kahn	McCollum	Pugh	Tomassoni
Biernat	Garcia	Kalis	McGuire	Rest	Trimble
Bishop	Greenfield	Kelso	Milbert	Reuter	Tunheim
Carlson	Greiling	Kinkel	Mullery	Rhodes	Vandeveer
Chaudhary	Gunther	Koskinen	Munger	Rukavina	Wagenius
Clark, J.	Harder	Kraus	Murphy	Schumacher	Wejcman
Clark, K.	Hasskamp	Kubly	Ness	Seagren	Wenzel
Davids	Hausman	Leighton	Nornes	Seifert	Winter
Dawkins	Hilty	Leppik	Olson, E.	Sekhon	Wolf
Delmont	Huntley	Lieder	Opatz	Skare	Spk. Carruthers
Dorn	Jaros	Long	Orfield	Skoglund
Entenza	Jefferson	Macklin	Osthoff	Slawik
Erickson	Jennings	Mahon	Otremba, M.	Smith
Evans	Johnson, A.	Mares	Paymar	Solberg
Farrell	Johnson, R.	Mariani	Pelowski	Stang

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

Krinkie moved to amend H. F. No. 3843, the first engrossment, as follows:

Page 29, delete lines 30 to 42

Adjust amounts accordingly

Renumber or reletter in sequence and correct internal references

Amend the title accordingly

A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

The question was taken on the Krinkie amendment and the roll was called. There were 43 yeas and 90 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Abrams	Dehler	Knight	Mulder	Rostberg	Vandeveer
Anderson, B.	Erhardt	Krinkie	Nornes	Seagren	Weaver
Journal of the House - 90th Day - Thursday, March 12, 1998 - Top of Page 8285
Bettermann	Finseth	Kuisle	Olson, M.	Seifert	Westrom
Boudreau	Goodno	Larsen	Osskopp	Smith
Bradley	Haas	Leppik	Paulsen	Sviggum
Clark, J.	Harder	Lindner	Pawlenty	Tingelstad
Commers	Holsten	McElroy	Reuter	Tompkins
Daggett	Kielkucki	Molnau	Rifenberg	Van Dellen

Those who voted in the negative were:

Anderson, I.	Evans	Johnson, R.	Mares	Ozment	Stang
Bakk	Farrell	Juhnke	Mariani	Paymar	Swenson, H.
Biernat	Folliard	Kahn	Marko	Pelowski	Sykora
Bishop	Garcia	Kalis	McCollum	Peterson	Tomassoni
Broecker	Greenfield	Kelso	McGuire	Pugh	Trimble
Carlson	Greiling	Kinkel	Milbert	Rest	Tuma
Chaudhary	Gunther	Knoblach	Mullery	Rhodes	Tunheim
Clark, K.	Hasskamp	Koskinen	Munger	Rukavina	Wagenius
Davids	Hausman	Kraus	Murphy	Schumacher	Wejcman
Dawkins	Hilty	Kubly	Ness	Sekhon	Wenzel
Delmont	Huntley	Leighton	Olson, E.	Skare	Westfall
Dempsey	Jaros	Lieder	Opatz	Skoglund	Winter
Dorn	Jefferson	Long	Orfield	Slawik	Wolf
Entenza	Jennings	Macklin	Osthoff	Solberg	Workman
Erickson	Johnson, A.	Mahon	Otremba, M.	Stanek	Spk. Carruthers

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

McElroy and Knoblach moved to amend H. F. No. 3843, the first engrossment, as follows:

Page 55, after line 35, insert:

"Sec. 53. [CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROCESS STANDARDS; LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION; REPORT.]

The speaker of the house of representatives shall appoint five members of the house and the rules and administration subcommittee on committees of the senate shall appoint five members of the senate to serve on a legislative commission. The commission shall make findings and recommendations to the legislature to establish standards regarding capital grants to local units of government. The commission shall make a written report, including its findings and recommendations, to the legislature by February 15, 1999. This commission expires February 15, 1999."

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct internal references

Amend the title accordingly

A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

The question was taken on the McElroy and Knoblach amendment and the roll was called.

Winter moved that those not voting be excused from voting. The motion prevailed.

There were 54 yeas and 78 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Journal of the House - 90th Day - Thursday, March 12, 1998 - Top of Page 8286
Abrams	Daggett	Holsten	Macklin	Paulsen	Sviggum
Anderson, B.	Dehler	Kielkucki	Mares	Pawlenty	Swenson, H.
Bettermann	Erhardt	Knight	McElroy	Rhodes	Sykora
Bishop	Erickson	Knoblach	Molnau	Rifenberg	Tingelstad
Boudreau	Finseth	Krinkie	Mulder	Rostberg	Tompkins
Bradley	Goodno	Kuisle	Nornes	Seifert	Tuma
Broecker	Gunther	Larsen	Olson, M.	Smith	Weaver
Clark, J.	Haas	Leppik	Osskopp	Stanek	Westfall
Commers	Harder	Lindner	Ozment	Stang	Westrom

Those who voted in the negative were:

Anderson, I.	Farrell	Johnson, R.	Mariani	Otremba, M.	Slawik
Bakk	Folliard	Juhnke	Marko	Paymar	Solberg
Biernat	Garcia	Kahn	McCollum	Pelowski	Tomassoni
Carlson	Greenfield	Kalis	McGuire	Peterson	Trimble
Chaudhary	Greiling	Kelso	Milbert	Pugh	Tunheim
Clark, K.	Hasskamp	Kinkel	Mullery	Rest	Vandeveer
Davids	Hausman	Koskinen	Munger	Reuter	Wagenius
Dawkins	Hilty	Kraus	Murphy	Rukavina	Wejcman
Delmont	Huntley	Kubly	Ness	Schumacher	Wenzel
Dempsey	Jaros	Leighton	Olson, E.	Seagren	Winter
Dorn	Jefferson	Lieder	Opatz	Sekhon	Wolf
Entenza	Jennings	Long	Orfield	Skare	Workman
Evans	Johnson, A.	Mahon	Osthoff	Skoglund	Spk. Carruthers

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

Anderson, B., and Broecker moved to amend H. F. No. 3843, the first engrossment, as follows:

Page 7, delete lines 25 to 30

Adjust amounts accordingly

Renumber or reletter in sequence and correct internal references

Amend the title accordingly

A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

The question was taken on the Anderson, B., and Broecker amendment and the roll was called.

Winter moved that those not voting be excused from voting. The motion prevailed.

There were 36 yeas and 96 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Abrams	Erhardt	Knight	Molnau	Smith	Tompkins
Anderson, B.	Erickson	Knoblach	Mulder	Stanek	Van Dellen
Bradley	Goodno	Krinkie	Olson, M.	Stang	Vandeveer
Broecker	Haas	Larsen	Ozment	Sviggum	Weaver
Clark, J.	Harder	Lindner	Pawlenty	Sykora	Westrom
Commers	Kielkucki	McElroy	Rostberg	Tingelstad	Workman

Those who voted in the negative were:

Anderson, I.	Entenza	Johnson, A.	Mahon	Osthoff	Skare
Bakk	Evans	Johnson, R.	Mares	Otremba, M.	Skoglund
Bettermann	Farrell	Juhnke	Mariani	Paulsen	Slawik
Biernat	Finseth	Kahn	Marko	Paymar	Solberg
Bishop	Folliard	Kalis	McCollum	Pelowski	Swenson, H.
Boudreau	Garcia	Kelso	McGuire	Peterson	Tomassoni
Carlson	Greenfield	Kinkel	Milbert	Pugh	Trimble
Chaudhary	Greiling	Koskinen	Mullery	Rest	Tuma
Clark, K.	Gunther	Kraus	Munger	Reuter	Tunheim
Daggett	Hasskamp	Kubly	Murphy	Rhodes	Wagenius
Davids	Hausman	Kuisle	Ness	Rifenberg	Wejcman
Dawkins	Hilty	Leighton	Nornes	Rukavina	Wenzel
Dehler	Huntley	Leppik	Olson, E.	Schumacher	Westfall
Delmont	Jaros	Lieder	Opatz	Seagren	Winter
Dempsey	Jefferson	Long	Orfield	Seifert	Wolf
Dorn	Jennings	Macklin	Osskopp	Sekhon	Spk. Carruthers

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

H. F. No. 3843, A bill for an act relating to public administration; authorizing spending for public purposes; authorizing spending to acquire and to better public land and buildings and other public improvements of a capital nature with certain conditions; authorizing state bonds; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 1996, sections 16A.105; 16A.11, subdivision 3a, and by adding a subdivision; 16A.501; 16B.30; and 446A.072, by adding a subdivision; Minnesota Statutes 1997 Supplement, sections 16A.641, subdivision 4; 124C.498, subdivision 2; 268.917; and 462A.202, subdivision 3a; Laws 1986, chapter 396, section 2, subdivision 1, as amended; Laws 1994, chapter 643, section 2, subdivision 13; Laws 1996, chapter 463, sections 13, subdivision 4, as amended; and 22, subdivision 7; and Laws 1997, chapter 202, article 1, section 35, as amended; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 116J; repealing Laws 1986, chapter 396, section 2, subdivision 2.

The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final passage.

The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 96 yeas and 37 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Anderson, I.	Entenza	Jaros	Long	Osthoff	Skare
Bakk	Erickson	Jefferson	Mares	Otremba, M.	Skoglund
Bettermann	Evans	Jennings	Mariani	Paymar	Slawik
Biernat	Farrell	Johnson, A.	Marko	Pelowski	Solberg
Bishop	Finseth	Johnson, R.	McCollum	Peterson	Swenson, H.
Boudreau	Folliard	Juhnke	McGuire	Pugh	Tomassoni
Carlson	Garcia	Kahn	Milbert	Rest	Trimble
Chaudhary	Goodno	Kalis	Mullery	Reuter	Tunheim
Clark, J.	Greenfield	Kelso	Munger	Rhodes	Wagenius
Clark, K.	Greiling	Kielkucki	Murphy	Rifenberg	Wejcman
Daggett	Gunther	Kinkel	Ness	Rostberg	Wenzel
Davids	Hasskamp	Koskinen	Nornes	Rukavina	Westfall
Dawkins	Hausman	Kraus	Olson, E.	Schumacher	Westrom
Delmont	Hilty	Kubly	Opatz	Seagren	Winter
Dempsey	Holsten	Leighton	Orfield	Seifert	Wolf
Dorn	Huntley	Lieder	Osskopp	Sekhon	Spk. Carruthers

Those who voted in the negative were:

Abrams	Haas	Leppik	Olson, M.	Sviggum	Weaver
Anderson, B.	Harder	Lindner	Ozment	Sykora	Workman
Bradley	Knight	Macklin	Paulsen	Tingelstad
Broecker	Knoblach	Mahon	Pawlenty	Tompkins
Journal of the House - 90th Day - Thursday, March 12, 1998 - Top of Page 8288
Commers	Krinkie	McElroy	Smith	Tuma
Dehler	Kuisle	Molnau	Stanek	Van Dellen
Erhardt	Larsen	Mulder	Stang	Vandeveer

The bill was passed and its title agreed to.

Winter moved that the bills on General Orders for today be continued. The motion prevailed.

Boudreau moved that her name be stricken as an author on H. F. No. 1278. The motion prevailed.

Milbert moved that his name be stricken as an author on H. F. No. 3841. The motion prevailed.

Anderson, I., moved that the names of Wagenius; Juhnke; Johnson, A., and Kahn be added as authors on H. F. No. 3842. The motion prevailed.

Clark, K., moved that the following statement be printed in the Journal of the House: "It was my intention to vote in the affirmative on Wednesday, March 11, 1998, when the vote was taken on the repassage of H. F. No. 2895, as amended by the Senate." The motion prevailed.

Mahon moved that the following statement be printed in the Journal of the House: "It was my intention to vote in the affirmative on Wednesday, March 11, 1998, when the vote was taken on the Rest et al amendment to H. F. No. 3840, the first engrossment, as amended." The motion prevailed.

Paymar moved that the following statement be printed in the Journal of the House: "It was my intention to vote in the affirmative on Wednesday, March 11, 1998, when the vote was taken on the Macklin et al amendment to H. F. No. 3840, the first engrossment, as amended." The motion prevailed.

Wenzel moved that the following statement be printed in the Journal of the House: "It was my intention to vote in the affirmative on Wednesday, March 11, 1998, when the vote was taken on the Orfield et al amendment to H. F. No. 3840, the first engrossment, as amended." The motion prevailed.

Wenzel moved that the following statement be printed in the Journal of the House: "It was my intention to vote in the affirmative on Wednesday, March 11, 1998, when the vote was taken on the Rest et al amendment to H. F. No. 3840, the first engrossment, as amended." The motion prevailed.

Sykora moved that the following statement be printed in the Journal of the House: "It was my intention to vote in the affirmative on Wednesday, March 11, 1998, when the vote was taken on the final passage of S. F. No. 2570." The motion prevailed.

Skare moved that the following statement be printed in the Journal of the House: "It was my intention to vote in the affirmative on Monday, March 9, 1998, when the vote was taken on the Olson, M., et al amendment to S. F. No. 3346, the second unofficial engrossment, as amended." The motion prevailed.

Bakk moved that H. F. No. 3827 be returned to its author. The motion prevailed.

Winter moved that when the House adjourns today it adjourn until 10:00 a.m., Friday, March 13, 1998. The motion prevailed.

Winter moved that the House adjourn. The motion prevailed, and the Speaker declared the House stands adjourned until 10:00 a.m., Friday, March 13, 1998.

Edward A. Burdick, Chief Clerk, House of Representatives