This Journal as a PDF document

The House of Representatives convened at 2:00 p.m. and was called to order by Steve Sviggum, Speaker of the House.

Prayer was offered by the Reverend Nathan Allen, Archdiocese of St. Paul and staff member of the Minnesota House of Representatives, St. Paul, Minnesota.

The members of the House gave the pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.

The roll was called and the following members were present:

Abeler	Dibble	Holberg	Leighton	Opatz	Slawik
Abrams	Dorman	Holsten	Lenczewski	Osskopp	Smith
Anderson, B.	Dorn	Howes	Leppik	Osthoff	Solberg
Anderson, I.	Eastlund	Huntley	Lieder	Ozment	Stanek
Bakk	Entenza	Jacobson	Lindner	Paulsen	Stang
Bernardy	Erhardt	Jennings	Lipman	Pawlenty	Swapinski
Biernat	Erickson	Johnson, J.	Mahoney	Paymar	Swenson
Bishop	Evans	Johnson, R.	Mares	Pelowski	Sykora
Blaine	Finseth	Johnson, S.	Mariani	Penas	Thompson
Bradley	Folliard	Jordan	Marko	Peterson	Tingelstad
Buesgens	Fuller	Juhnke	Marquart	Pugh	Tuma
Carlson	Gleason	Kahn	McElroy	Rhodes	Vandeveer
Cassell	Goodwin	Kalis	McGuire	Rifenberg	Wagenius
Clark, J.	Gray	Kelliher	Milbert	Rukavina	Walz
Clark, K.	Greiling	Kielkucki	Molnau	Ruth	Wasiluk
Daggett	Gunther	Knoblach	Mulder	Schumacher	Westerberg
Davids	Haas	Koskinen	Mullery	Seagren	Westrom
Davnie	Hackbarth	Krinkie	Murphy	Seifert	Wilkin
Dawkins	Harder	Kubly	Ness	Sertich	Winter
Dehler	Hausman	Kuisle	Nornes	Skoe	Workman
Dempsey	Hilstrom	Larson	Olson	Skoglund	Spk. Sviggum

A quorum was present.

Boudreau, Goodno, Hilty, Jaros, Otremba and Wolf were excused.

Walker was excused until 2:25 p.m. Gerlach was excused until 2:30 p.m.

The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the Journal of the preceding day. Kalis moved that further reading of the Journal be suspended and that the Journal be approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk. The motion prevailed.

The following communication was received:

Speaker of the House of Representatives

The Honorable Don Samuelson

President of the Senate

I have the honor to inform you that the following enrolled Acts of the 2002 Session of the State Legislature have been received from the Office of the Governor and are deposited in the Office of the Secretary of State for preservation, pursuant to the State Constitution, Article IV, Section 23:

Time and

S.F. H.F. Session Laws Date Approved Date Filed

No. No. Chapter No. 2002 2002

2960 350 1:29 p.m. April 29 April 29

2674 351 1:25 p.m. April 29 April 29

Sincerely,

Mary Kiffmeyer
Secretary of State

Ozment from the Committee on Environment and Natural Resources Policy to which was referred:

H. F. No. 3719, A bill for an act relating to agriculture; clarifying the prohibition on certain application of pesticides; amending Minnesota Statutes 2000, section 18B.07, subdivision 2.

Reported the same back with the following amendments:

Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2000, section 18B.07, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

Subd. 2. [PROHIBITED PESTICIDE USE.] (a) A person may not use, store, handle, distribute, or dispose of a pesticide, rinsate, pesticide container, or pesticide application equipment in a manner:

(1) that is inconsistent with a label or labeling as defined by FIFRA; 

(2) that endangers humans, damages agricultural products, food, livestock, fish, or wildlife; or

(3) that will cause unreasonable adverse effects on the environment.

(b) A person may not direct a pesticide onto property beyond the boundaries of the target site. A person may not apply a pesticide resulting in damage to adjacent property.

(c) A person may not directly apply a pesticide on a human by overspray or target site spray, except when:

(1) the pesticide is intended for use on a human;

(2) the pesticide is intended for mosquito control operations;

(3) the pesticide application is for control of gypsy moth, forest tent caterpillar, or other pest species, as determined by the commissioner, and the pesticide used is a biological agent; or

(4) the pesticide application is for a public health risk, as determined by the commissioner of health. The commissioner of health, in consultation with the commissioner of agriculture, must determine the application is warranted based on the commissioner's balancing of the public health risk with the risk the application poses to the health of the general population, with special attention to the health of children.

(d) For pesticide applications under paragraph (c), clauses (2), (3), and (4), the following conditions apply:

(1) no practicable and effective alternative method of control exists;

(2) the pesticide is among the least toxic available for control of the target pest; and

(3) notification of residents in the area to be treated is provided by direct notification and through publication in a newspaper of general circulation within the affected area.

(e) For purposes of this subdivision, "direct notification" may include mailings, public meetings, posted placards, neighborhood newsletters, or other means of contact designed to reach as many residents as possible.

(d) (f) A person may not apply a pesticide in a manner so as to expose a worker in an immediately adjacent, open field.

Sec. 2. [EFFECTIVE DATE.]

Section 1 is effective the day following final enactment."

With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration.

The report was adopted. 

INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS

The following House File was introduced:

Davids introduced:

H. F. No. 3720, A resolution memorializing the President and Congress to take action to establish a federal backstop for insurance against terrorism.

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Jobs and Economic Development.

The following Conference Committee Report was received:

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON H. F. NO. 3359

A bill for an act relating to professions; modifying certain protocols for nurses; amending Minnesota Statutes 2000, sections 148.235, by adding subdivisions; 151.37, subdivision 2; Minnesota Statutes 2001 Supplement, section 148.284.

April 25, 2002

The Honorable Steve Sviggum

Speaker of the House of Representatives

The Honorable Don Samuelson

President of the Senate

We, the undersigned conferees for H. F. No. 3359, report that we have agreed upon the items in dispute and recommend as follows:

That the Senate recede from its amendments and that H. F. No. 3359 be further amended as follows:

Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2000, section 148.235, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

Subd. 8. [PRESCRIPTION BY PROTOCOL.] A registered nurse may implement a protocol that does not reference a specific patient and results in a prescription of a legend drug that has been predetermined and delegated by a licensed practitioner as defined under section 151.01, subdivision 23, when caring for a patient whose condition falls within the protocol and when the protocol specifies the circumstances under which the drug is to be prescribed or administered.

Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2000, section 148.235, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

Subd. 9. [VACCINE BY PROTOCOL.] A nurse may implement a protocol that does not reference a specific patient and results in the administration of a vaccine that has been predetermined and delegated by a licensed practitioner as defined in section 151.01, subdivision 23, when caring for a patient whose characteristics fall within the protocol and when the protocol specifies the contraindications for implementation, including patients or populations of patients for whom the vaccine must not be administered and the conditions under which the vaccine must not be administered. 

Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2001 Supplement, section 148.284, is amended to read:

148.284 [CERTIFICATION OF ADVANCED PRACTICE REGISTERED NURSES.]

(a) No person shall practice advanced practice registered nursing or use any title, abbreviation, or other designation tending to imply that the person is an advanced practice registered nurse, clinical nurse specialist, nurse anesthetist, nurse-midwife, or nurse practitioner unless the person is certified for such advanced practice registered nursing by a national nurse certification organization.

(b) Paragraph (a) does not apply to an advanced practice registered nurse who is within six months after completion of an advanced practice registered nurse course of study and is awaiting certification, provided that the person has not previously failed the certification examination.

(c) An advanced practice registered nurse who has completed a formal course of study as an advanced practice registered nurse and has been certified by a national nurse certification organization prior to January 1, 1999, may continue to practice in the field of nursing in which the advanced practice registered nurse is practicing as of July 1, 1999, regardless of the type of certification held if the advanced practice registered nurse is not eligible for the proper certification.

(d) Prior to July 1, 2007, a clinical nurse specialist may petition the board for waiver from the certification requirement in paragraph (a) if the clinical nurse specialist is academically prepared as a clinical nurse specialist in a specialty area for which there is no certification within the clinical nurse specialist role and specialty or a related specialty. The board may determine that an available certification as a clinical nurse specialist in a related specialty must be obtained in lieu of the specific specialty or subspecialty. The petitioner must be academically prepared as a clinical nurse specialist in a specific field of clinical nurse specialist practice with a master's degree in nursing that included clinical experience in the clinical specialty, and must have 1,000 hours of supervised clinical experience in the clinical specialty for which the individual was academically prepared with a minimum of 500 hours of supervised clinical practice after graduation. The board may grant a nonrenewable permit for no longer than 12 months for the supervised postgraduate clinical experience. The board may renew the waiver for three-year periods provided the clinical nurse specialist continues to be ineligible for certification as a clinical nurse specialist by an organization acceptable to the board.

[EFFECTIVE DATE.] This section is effective July 1, 2002.

Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2000, section 151.37, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

Subd. 2. [PRESCRIBING AND FILING.] (a) A licensed practitioner in the course of professional practice only, may prescribe, administer, and dispense a legend drug, and may cause the same to be administered by a nurse, a physician assistant, or medical student or resident under the practitioner's direction and supervision, and may cause a person who is an appropriately certified, registered, or licensed health care professional to prescribe, dispense, and administer the same within the expressed legal scope of the person's practice as defined in Minnesota Statutes. A licensed practitioner may prescribe a legend drug, without reference to a specific patient, by directing a registered nurse, pursuant to section 148.235, subdivisions 8 and 9, physician assistant, or medical student or resident to adhere to a particular practice guideline or protocol when treating patients whose condition falls within such guideline or protocol, and when such guideline or protocol specifies the circumstances under which the legend drug is to be prescribed and administered. An individual who verbally, electronically, or otherwise transmits a written, oral, or electronic order, as an agent of a prescriber, shall not be deemed to have prescribed the legend drug. This paragraph applies to a physician assistant only if the physician assistant meets the requirements of section 147A.18.

(b) A licensed practitioner that dispenses for profit a legend drug that is to be administered orally, is ordinarily dispensed by a pharmacist, and is not a vaccine, must file with the practitioner's licensing board a statement indicating that the practitioner dispenses legend drugs for profit, the general circumstances under which the practitioner dispenses for profit, and the types of legend drugs generally dispensed. It is unlawful to dispense legend drugs for profit after July 31, 1990, unless the statement has been filed with the appropriate licensing board. For

purposes of this paragraph, "profit" means (1) any amount received by the practitioner in excess of the acquisition cost of a legend drug for legend drugs that are purchased in prepackaged form, or (2) any amount received by the practitioner in excess of the acquisition cost of a legend drug plus the cost of making the drug available if the legend drug requires compounding, packaging, or other treatment. The statement filed under this paragraph is public data under section 13.03. This paragraph does not apply to a licensed doctor of veterinary medicine or a registered pharmacist. Any person other than a licensed practitioner with the authority to prescribe, dispense, and administer a legend drug under paragraph (a) shall not dispense for profit. To dispense for profit does not include dispensing by a community health clinic when the profit from dispensing is used to meet operating expenses.

Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2001 Supplement, section 256B.437, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

Subd. 9. [TRANSFER OF BEDS.] The board of commissioners of Saint Louis county may amend their planned closure rate adjustment application to allow up to 50 beds of a 159-licensed bed county-owned nursing facility that is in the process of closing to be transferred to a hospital-attached nursing facility in Aurora and up to 50 beds to a 235-bed nursing facility in Duluth, and may also assign all or a portion of the planned closure rate adjustment that would be received as a result of closure to the Aurora facility or the Duluth facility.

Sec. 6. [EPINEPHRINE ON EMERGENCY AMBULANCE CALLS.]

The emergency medical services regulatory board, in cooperation with the Minnesota Nurses Association, the Minnesota Medical Association, the American College of Emergency Physicians, and the Minnesota Ambulance Association, shall establish a plan under which epinephrine is available on emergency ambulance calls made in Minnesota on or after September 1, 2002. The emergency medical services regulatory board shall report to the legislature by January 15, 2003, on the success of the policy of making epinephrine fully available.

[EFFECTIVE DATE.] This section is effective the day following final enactment."

Delete the title and insert:

"A bill for an act relating to health; modifying certain protocols for nurses; authorizing transfer of certain nursing facility beds; providing for the administration of epinephrine on emergency ambulance calls; amending Minnesota Statutes 2000, sections 148.235, by adding subdivisions; 151.37, subdivision 2; Minnesota Statutes 2001 Supplement, sections 148.284; 256B.437, by adding a subdivision."

We request adoption of this report and repassage of the bill.

House Conferees: Jim Abeler, Gregory M. Davids and Thomas Huntley.

Senate Conferees: Deanna L. Wiener, Kenric J. Scheevel and Yvonne Prettner Solon.

Abeler moved that the report of the Conference Committee on H. F. No. 3359 be adopted and that the bill be repassed as amended by the Conference Committee. The motion prevailed.

H. F. No. 3359, A bill for an act relating to professions; modifying certain protocols for nurses; amending Minnesota Statutes 2000, sections 148.235, by adding subdivisions; 151.37, subdivision 2; Minnesota Statutes 2001 Supplement, section 148.284.

The bill was read for the third time, as amended by Conference, and placed upon its repassage.

The question was taken on the repassage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 120 yeas and 0 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Abeler	Dibble	Holberg	Leighton	Osskopp	Slawik
Abrams	Dorn	Holsten	Lenczewski	Osthoff	Smith
Anderson, B.	Eastlund	Howes	Leppik	Ozment	Solberg
Anderson, I.	Entenza	Huntley	Lieder	Paulsen	Stang
Bakk	Erhardt	Jacobson	Lindner	Pawlenty	Swapinski
Bernardy	Erickson	Jennings	Lipman	Paymar	Swenson
Biernat	Evans	Johnson, J.	Mahoney	Pelowski	Sykora
Bishop	Finseth	Johnson, R.	Mares	Penas	Thompson
Blaine	Folliard	Johnson, S.	Marko	Peterson	Tingelstad
Bradley	Fuller	Jordan	Marquart	Pugh	Tuma
Buesgens	Gleason	Juhnke	McGuire	Rhodes	Vandeveer
Carlson	Goodwin	Kahn	Milbert	Rifenberg	Wagenius
Cassell	Gray	Kalis	Molnau	Rukavina	Walz
Clark, J.	Greiling	Kelliher	Mulder	Ruth	Wasiluk
Clark, K.	Gunther	Kielkucki	Mullery	Schumacher	Westerberg
Daggett	Haas	Knoblach	Murphy	Seagren	Westrom
Davids	Hackbarth	Koskinen	Ness	Seifert	Wilkin
Davnie	Harder	Kubly	Nornes	Sertich	Winter
Dawkins	Hausman	Kuisle	Olson	Skoe	Workman
Dempsey	Hilstrom	Larson	Opatz	Skoglund	Spk. Sviggum

The bill was repassed, as amended by Conference, and its title agreed to.

H. F. No. 1025 was reported to the House.

Rhodes and Entenza moved to amend H. F. No. 1025, the second engrossment, as follows:

Page 2, after line 21, insert:

"Sec. 2. [PARKING; ACCESS.]

Notwithstanding Laws 2002, chapter 220, article 10, section 37, the commissioner of administration must enter into all contracts necessary to reconfigure access to the state office building parking ramp and lot D. The design work and construction must be completed by January 1, 2003.

Sec. 3. [EFFECTIVE DATE.]

Section 2 is effective the day following final enactment."

Amend the title accordingly

The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

H. F. No. 1025, as amended, was read for the third time.

Bishop moved that the action whereby H. F. No. 1025, as amended, was given its third reading be now reconsidered. The motion prevailed.

Bishop moved to amend H. F. No. 1025, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

Page 2, line 7, delete the comma and insert "and"

Page 2, line 8, delete everything after "arrangement"

Page 2, line 9, delete everything before the period

A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

The question was taken on the Bishop amendment and the roll was called. There were 26 yeas and 98 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Abeler	Dempsey	Johnson, J.	Mullery	Seagren	Wilkin
Bishop	Gunther	Knoblach	Murphy	Solberg
Blaine	Haas	Leppik	Ozment	Sykora
Daggett	Hackbarth	Milbert	Paulsen	Tingelstad
Davnie	Jacobson	Mulder	Penas	Westrom

Those who voted in the negative were:

Abrams	Dorn	Holsten	Lieder	Paymar	Swapinski
Anderson, B.	Eastlund	Howes	Lindner	Pelowski	Swenson
Anderson, I.	Entenza	Huntley	Lipman	Peterson	Thompson
Bakk	Erhardt	Johnson, R.	Mahoney	Pugh	Tuma
Bernardy	Erickson	Johnson, S.	Mares	Rhodes	Vandeveer
Biernat	Evans	Jordan	Mariani	Rifenberg	Wagenius
Bradley	Finseth	Juhnke	Marko	Rukavina	Walker
Buesgens	Folliard	Kahn	Marquart	Ruth	Walz
Carlson	Fuller	Kelliher	McElroy	Schumacher	Wasiluk
Cassell	Gerlach	Kielkucki	McGuire	Seifert	Westerberg
Clark, J.	Gleason	Koskinen	Molnau	Sertich	Winter
Clark, K.	Goodwin	Krinkie	Ness	Skoe	Workman
Davids	Greiling	Kubly	Nornes	Skoglund	Spk. Sviggum
Dawkins	Harder	Kuisle	Olson	Slawik
Dehler	Hausman	Larson	Opatz	Smith
Dibble	Hilstrom	Leighton	Osskopp	Stanek
Dorman	Holberg	Lenczewski	Pawlenty	Stang

The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

Lenczewski, Marquart, Opatz and Gray moved to amend H. F. No. 1025, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

Page 2, after line 21, insert:

"(e) The requirements of this section also apply to members of the legislature."

A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

Abrams raised a point of order pursuant to section 124 of "Mason's Manual of Legislative Procedure," relating to Personalities Not Permitted in Debate. The Speaker ruled the point of order well taken.

Dawkins and Mahoney were excused for the remainder of today's session.

Lipman moved to amend the Lenczewski et al amendment to H. F. No. 1025, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:

Page 1, line 5, before the period, insert "having contracts with a lobbyist or principal"

A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

Seifert moved that H. F. No. 1025, as amended, be re-referred to the Committee on Governmental Operations and Veterans Affairs Policy.

A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

Mariani was excused for the remainder of today's session.

Biernat raised a point of order pursuant to section 387, paragraph 1, of "Mason's Manual of Legislative Procedure," relating to Debate and the Application of Subsidiary Motions to the Motion to Refer. The Speaker ruled the point of order well taken.

The question recurred on the Seifert motion and the roll was called. There were 33 yeas and 92 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Journal of the House - 104th Day - Wednesday, May 1, 2002 - Top of Page 8116
Biernat	Gerlach	Juhnke	McElroy	Peterson	Vandeveer
Bishop	Gunther	Kielkucki	Ruth	Westrom
Blaine	Haas	Krinkie	Seagren	Wilkin
Buesgens	Hackbarth	Leppik	Seifert
Dempsey	Harder	Lipman	Stanek
Erhardt	Johnson, J.	Mares	Sykora
Molnau
Mulder
Mullery
Ness
Penas

Those who voted in the negative were:

Abeler	Dorman	Holsten	Leighton	Pawlenty	Swenson
Abrams	Dorn	Howes	Lenczewski	Paymar	Thompson
Anderson, B.	Eastlund	Huntley	Lieder	Pelowski	Tingelstad
Anderson, I.	Entenza	Jacobson	Lindner	Pugh	Tuma
Bakk	Erickson	Jennings	Marko	Rhodes	Wagenius
Bernardy	Evans	Johnson, R.	Marquart	Rifenberg	Walker
Bradley	Finseth	Johnson, S.	McGuire	Rukavina	Walz
Carlson	Folliard	Jordan	Milbert	Schumacher	Wasiluk
Cassell	Fuller	Kahn	Murphy	Sertich	Westerberg
Clark, J.	Gleason	Kalis	Nornes	Skoe	Winter
Clark, K.	Goodwin	Kelliher	Olson	Skoglund	Workman
Daggett	Gray	Knoblach	Opatz	Slawik	Spk. Sviggum
Davids	Greiling	Koskinen	Osskopp	Smith
Davnie	Hausman	Kubly	Osthoff	Solberg
Dehler	Hilstrom	Kuisle	Ozment	Stang
Dibble	Holberg	Larson	Paulsen	Swapinski

The motion did not prevail.

The question recurred on the Lipman amendment to the Lenczewski et al amendment to H. F. No. 1025, the second engrossment, as amended, and the roll was called. There were 16 yeas and 107 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Anderson, B.	Gerlach	Jordan	Olson	Paymar	Spk. Sviggum
Bradley	Harder	Krinkie	Osskopp	Vandeveer
Clark, J.	Johnson, J.	Lipman	Paulsen	Westerberg

Those who voted in the negative were:

---

Journal of the House - 104th Day - Wednesday, May 1, 2002 - Top of Page 8117

---

Abeler	Dorman	Hilstrom	Leighton	OsthoffSmith
Abrams	Dorn	Holberg	Lenczewski	Ozment
Anderson, I.	Eastlund	Holsten	Leppik	Pawlenty
Bakk	Entenza	Howes	Lieder	Pelowski
Bernardy	Erhardt	Huntley	Lindner	Penas
Biernat	Erickson	Jacobson	Mares	Peterson
Bishop	Evans	Jennings	Marko	Pugh
Blaine	Finseth	Johnson, R.	Marquart	Rhodes
Buesgens	Folliard	Johnson, S.	McElroy	Rifenberg
Carlson	Fuller	Juhnke	McGuire	Rukavina
Cassell	Gleason	Kahn	Milbert	Ruth
Clark, K.	Goodwin	Kalis	Molnau	Schumacher
Daggett	Gray	Kielkucki	Mulder	Seagren
Davids	Greiling	Knoblach	Mullery	Seifert
Davnie	Gunther	Koskinen	Murphy	Sertich
Dehler	Haas	Kubly	Ness	Skoe
Dempsey	Hackbarth	Kuisle	Nornes	Skoglund
Dibble	Hausman	Larson	Opatz	Slawik
Solberg
	Stang
	Swapinski
	Swenson
	Sykora
	Thompson
	Tingelstad
	Tuma
	Wagenius
	Walker
	Walz
	Wasiluk
	Westrom
	Wilkin
	Winter
	Workman

The motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.

Krinkie raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the Lenczewski et al amendment was not in order. The Speaker ruled the point of order well taken and the Lenczewski et al amendment out of order.

Lenczewski appealed the decision of the Speaker.

A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

Davids moved to lay the Lenczewski appeal of the decision of the Speaker on the table.

A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

The question was taken on the Davids motion and the roll was called. There were 70 yeas and 53 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Abrams	Dorman	Holberg	Krinkie	Ozment	Stang
Anderson, B.	Dorn	Holsten	Kuisle	Paulsen	Sykora
Bishop	Eastlund	Howes	Lindner	Pawlenty	Tingelstad
Blaine	Erhardt	Jacobson	Lipman	Paymar	Tuma
Bradley	Erickson	Johnson, J.	Mares	Penas	Vandeveer
Buesgens	Finseth	Johnson, R.	McElroy	Rifenberg	Westerberg
Cassell	Fuller	Jordan	Molnau	Ruth	Westrom
Clark, J.	Gerlach	Juhnke	Mulder	Seagren	Wilkin
Daggett	Gunther	Kahn	Mullery	Seifert	Workman
Davids	Haas	Kalis	Nornes	Smith	Spk. Sviggum
Dehler	Hackbarth	Kielkucki	Osskopp	Solberg
Dempsey	Harder	Knoblach	Osthoff	Stanek

Those who voted in the negative were:

Abeler	Entenza	Huntley	Leppik	Pelowski	Swapinski
Anderson, I.	Evans	Jennings	Lieder	Peterson	Swenson
Bakk	Folliard	Johnson, S.	Marko	Pugh	Thompson
Bernardy	Gleason	Kelliher	Marquart	Rhodes	Wagenius
Biernat	Goodwin	Koskinen	McGuire	Rukavina	Walker
Carlson	Gray	Kubly	Milbert	Schumacher	Walz
Journal of the House - 104th Day - Wednesday, May 1, 2002 - Top of Page 8118
Clark, K.	Greiling	Larson	Murphy	Sertich	Wasiluk
Davnie	Hausman	Leighton	Olson	Skoe	Winter
Dibble	Hilstrom	Lenczewski	Opatz	Slawik

The motion prevailed and the appeal of the decision of the Speaker was laid on the table.

H. F. No. 1025, A bill for an act relating to state government; requiring members of the state board of investment to disclose certain arrangements; imposing certain duties on the commissioner of administration regarding parking lots; amending Minnesota Statutes 2000, section 11A.075.

The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon its final passage.

The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 94 yeas and 30 nays as follows:

Those who voted in the affirmative were:

Abeler	Dempsey	Hilstrom	Krinkie	Opatz	Slawik
Anderson, B.	Dibble	Holberg	Kubly	Osskopp	Smith
Anderson, I.	Dorn	Holsten	Larson	Osthoff	Swapinski
Bakk	Entenza	Howes	Leighton	Paulsen	Swenson
Bernardy	Erhardt	Huntley	Lenczewski	Pawlenty	Thompson
Blaine	Evans	Jacobson	Lieder	Paymar	Tuma
Bradley	Finseth	Jennings	Lindner	Pelowski	Wagenius
Buesgens	Folliard	Johnson, R.	Lipman	Peterson	Walker
Carlson	Fuller	Johnson, S.	Mares	Pugh	Walz
Cassell	Gerlach	Jordan	Marko	Rhodes	Wasiluk
Clark, J.	Gleason	Juhnke	McElroy	Rifenberg	Westerberg
Clark, K.	Goodwin	Kahn	McGuire	Ruth	Westrom
Daggett	Gray	Kalis	Molnau	Seagren	Winter
Davids	Greiling	Kelliher	Murphy	Sertich	Spk. Sviggum
Davnie	Harder	Kielkucki	Nornes	Skoe
Dehler	Hausman	Koskinen	Olson	Skoglund

Those who voted in the negative were:

Abrams	Erickson	Knoblach	Mulder	Rukavina	Sykora
Biernat	Gunther	Kuisle	Mullery	Schumacher	Tingelstad
Bishop	Haas	Leppik	Ness	Seifert	Vandeveer
Dorman	Hackbarth	Marquart	Ozment	Solberg	Wilkin
Eastlund	Johnson, J.	Milbert	Penas	Stang	Workman

The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.

Pawlenty moved that the remaining bills on the Calendar for the Day be continued. The motion prevailed.

Pawlenty moved that when the House adjourns today it adjourn until 9:00 a.m., Thursday, May 2, 2002. The motion prevailed.

Pawlenty moved that the House adjourn. The motion prevailed, and the Speaker declared the House stands adjourned until 9:00 a.m., Thursday, May 2, 2002.

Edward A. Burdick, Chief Clerk, House of Representatives