STATE OF MINNESOTA
EIGHTY-THIRD SESSION - 2004
_____________________
EIGHTY-SIXTH DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Monday, April 5, 2004
The House of Representatives convened at 10:00 a.m. and was
called to order by Steve Sviggum, Speaker of the House.
Prayer was offered by Aba Semere Belay, St. Gabriel Church, St.
Paul, Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge of allegiance to the
flag of the United States of America.
The roll was called and the following members were present:
Abeler
Adolphson
Anderson, B.
Anderson, I.
Anderson, J.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Biernat
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Cox
Davids
Davnie
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Goodwin
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Harder
Hausman
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Howes
Huntley
Jacobson
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Kuisle
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, C.
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olsen, S.
Olson, M.
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson
Powell
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Ruth
Seagren
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Walker
Walz
Wardlow
Wasiluk
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
A quorum was present.
Abrams; Haas; Johnson, S., and Samuelson were excused.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the Journal of the preceding
day. Ruth moved that further reading of
the Journal be suspended and that the Journal be approved as corrected by the
Chief Clerk. The motion prevailed.
REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES
Holberg from the Committee on Civil Law to which was referred:
H. F. No. 2915, A bill for an act relating to workers'
compensation; making technical changes; modifying the definition of
"personal injury" to include injury or disease resulting from certain
vaccines; authorizing qualifying employees to opt to receive alternative
workers' compensation benefits; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections
176.011, subdivisions 15, 16; 176.081, subdivision 1; 176.092, subdivision 1a;
176.102, subdivision 3a; 176.129, subdivisions 1b, 2a, 13; 176.135,
subdivisions 1, 7; 176.1351, subdivisions 3, 5, by adding a subdivision;
176.136, subdivision 1a; 176.181, by adding a subdivision; 176.1812,
subdivision 6; 176.185, subdivision 1; 176.231, subdivision 5; 176.238,
subdivision 10; 176.391, subdivision 2; 176.83, subdivision 5.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 22, line 1, after "proceedings" insert
"against the authorized representative of the religious sect who
submitted an affidavit described in paragraph (a), clause (3) or (4),"
Page 26, line 36, after "14.389" insert ",
including section 14.389, subdivision 5,"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill be
re-referred to the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration without
further recommendation.
The report was adopted.
INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS
The following House Files were introduced:
Westrom introduced:
H. F. No. 3162, A bill for an act relating to the county aid
program; adjusting the formula for the tax base equalization aid; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2003 Supplement, section 477A.0124, subdivision 4.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Taxes.
Cox and Brod introduced:
H. F. No. 3163, A bill for an act relating to education
finance; authorizing a facilities joint powers agreement; authorizing a levy.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Education Finance.
Urdahl; Seifert; Hoppe; Lipman; Powell; Lindgren;
Simpson; Finstad; Paulsen; Adolphson; Pelowski; Davids; Zellers; Eastlund;
Dill; Marquart; Biernat; Buesgens; Krinkie; Erickson; Gerlach; Wardlow;
Westrom; Anderson, J.; Dorman; Gunther; Cornish; Boudreau; Ruth;
Johnson, J.; Penas; Holberg; Harder; Magnus and Blaine introduced:
H. F. No. 3164, A bill for an act relating to civil actions;
prohibiting actions against certain persons for weight gain as a result of consuming
certain foods; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 604.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Civil Law.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 4.03
ON
FINANCE AND REVENUE BILLS
April
2, 2004
Edward A. Burdick
Chief Clerk of the House of
Representatives
The State of Minnesota
Dear Mr. Burdick:
House Rule 4.03 requires the Chair of the Committee on Ways and
Means to certify to the House of Representatives that the Committee has
reconciled any finance and revenue bills with the budget resolution and
targets.
Please accept this letter as certification that H. F. No. 1867,
the Omnibus Environment and Natural Resources Finance bill, H. F. No. 2755, the
Omnibus Agriculture and Rural Development Finance bill, H. F. No. 3090, the
Omnibus Jobs and Economic Development Finance bill and H. F. No. 3141, the
Omnibus Transportation Finance bill reconcile with the budget resolution and
targets.
Sincerely,
Representative
Jim Knoblach
Chair,
House Ways and Means Committee
FISCAL CALENDAR
Pursuant to rule 1.22, Knoblach requested immediate
consideration of H. F. No. 2755.
H. F. No. 2755 was reported to the House.
Otremba moved to amend H. F. No. 2755, the third engrossment,
as follows:
Page 34, lines 15 to 25, reinstate the stricken language
Page 34, line 29, delete the new language and reinstate
the stricken language
Page 34, line 33, delete "(3)" and insert
"(6)"
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Otremba amendment and the roll
was called. There were 48 yeas and 81
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, I.
Atkins
Bernardy
Biernat
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Goodwin
Greiling
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Huntley
Jaros
Kahn
Kelliher
Koenen
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Mahoney
Mariani
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Opatz
Otremba
Otto
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson
Pugh
Sertich
Sieben
Slawik
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Wagenius
Walker
Wasiluk
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Adolphson
Anderson, B.
Anderson, J.
Beard
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Cox
Davids
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Gunther
Hackbarth
Harder
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Jacobson
Johnson, J.
Juhnke
Klinzing
Knoblach
Kohls
Krinkie
Kuisle
Lanning
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Nelson, C.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olsen, S.
Osterman
Ozment
Paulsen
Penas
Powell
Rhodes
Rukavina
Ruth
Seagren
Seifert
Severson
Simpson
Smith
Soderstrom
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Sykora
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Walz
Wardlow
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Mariani, Peterson and Paymar moved to amend H. F. No. 2755, the
third engrossment, as follows:
Page 15, line 35, after the period, insert "No payment
shall be made for ethanol produced after June 30, 2005, at an ethanol plant
located in a city of the first class."
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Mariani et al amendment and
the roll was called. There were 50 yeas
and 80 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, I.
Atkins
Bernardy
Biernat
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dorn
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Goodwin
Greiling
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Huntley
Jaros
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Koenen
Larson
Latz
Lesch
Lieder
Mariani
Marquart
Mullery
Murphy
Olson, M.
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Sertich
Sieben
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Wagenius
Walker
Wasiluk
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Adolphson
Anderson, B.
Anderson, J.
Beard
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Cox
Davids
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dorman
Eastlund
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Gunther
Hackbarth
Harder
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Jacobson
Johnson, J.
Klinzing
Knoblach
Kohls
Krinkie
Kuisle
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
Mahoney
McNamara
Meslow
Nelson, C.
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olsen, S.
Otto
Ozment
Paulsen
Penas
Powell
Ruth
Seagren
Seifert
Severson
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Sykora
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Walz
Wardlow
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
The Speaker called Boudreau to the Chair.
Eken, Otremba and Peterson moved to amend H. F. No. 2755, the
third engrossment, as follows:
Page 33, line 28, after "those" insert "best
management" and after "practices" insert "for
that type of agriculture operation"
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Eken et al amendment and the roll
was called. There were 48 yeas and 82
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, I.
Atkins
Bernardy
Biernat
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Goodwin
Greiling
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Huntley
Jaros
Kahn
Kelliher
Koenen
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Mahoney
Mariani
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Opatz
Otremba
Otto
Paymar
Peterson
Pugh
Rukavina
Sertich
Sieben
Slawik
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Wagenius
Walker
Wasiluk
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Adolphson
Anderson, B.
Anderson, J.
Beard
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Cox
Davids
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Gunther
Hackbarth
Harder
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Jacobson
Johnson, J.
Juhnke
Klinzing
Knoblach
Kohls
Krinkie
Kuisle
Lanning
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Nelson, C.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olsen, S.
Olson, M.
Osterman
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Penas
Powell
Rhodes
Ruth
Seagren
Seifert
Severson
Simpson
Smith
Soderstrom
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Sykora
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Walz
Wardlow
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Strachan was excused for the remainder of today's session.
Otremba offered an amendment to H. F. No. 2755,
the third engrossment.
POINT
OF ORDER
Seifert raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the
Otremba amendment was not in order. Speaker pro tempore Boudreau ruled the
point of order not well taken and the Otremba amendment in order.
POINT
OF ORDER
Knoblach raised a point of order pursuant to rule 4.03 relating
to Ways and Means Committee; Budget Resolution; Effect on Expenditure and
Revenue Bills that the Otremba amendment was not in order.
Pursuant to section 245 of "Mason's Manual of Legislative
Procedure," Speaker pro tempore Boudreau submitted the following question
to the House: "Is it the judgment
of the House that the Knoblach point of order is well taken?"
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Knoblach point of order and the
roll was called.
Pursuant to rule 2.05, Speaker pro
tempore Boudreau excused McNamara from voting on the Knoblach point of order
relating to the Otremba amendment to H. F. No. 2755.
There were 70 yeas and 58 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Adolphson
Anderson, B.
Anderson, J.
Beard
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Cox
Davids
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dorman
Eastlund
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Gunther
Hackbarth
Harder
Holberg
Howes
Jacobson
Johnson, J.
Klinzing
Knoblach
Kohls
Krinkie
Kuisle
Lanning
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
Meslow
Nelson, C.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olsen, S.
Olson, M.
Osterman
Ozment
Paulsen
Penas
Powell
Rhodes
Ruth
Seagren
Seifert
Severson
Simpson
Soderstrom
Stang
Swenson
Sykora
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Walz
Wardlow
Westerberg
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, I.
Atkins
Bernardy
Biernat
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dorn
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Goodwin
Greiling
Hausman
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hoppe
Hornstein
Huntley
Jaros
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Koenen
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Opatz
Otremba
Otto
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson
Pugh
Rukavina
Sertich
Sieben
Slawik
Smith
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Walker
Wasiluk
Westrom
So it was the judgment of the House that the Knoblach point of
order was well taken and the Otremba amendment was out of order.
H. F. No. 2755 was read for the third time.
POINT
OF ORDER
Paulsen raised a point of order pursuant to section 124 of
"Mason's Manual of Legislative Procedure," relating to Personalities
Not Permitted in Debate. Speaker pro
tempore Boudreau ruled the point of order not well taken.
The Speaker resumed the Chair.
H. F. No. 2755, A bill for an act relating to agriculture;
changing certain duties, loan requirements, procedures, inspection requirements,
and fees; regulating certain veterinary treatments; modifying provisions
governing county and regional fairs; eliminating an ownership disclosure
requirement; changing certain grain buyers' bond and financial reporting
requirements; changing certain limits; establishing loan and grant programs;
providing for faculty veterinary
licensure; limiting certain nuisance claims; prohibiting intentional
introduction of disease to domestic animals; prohibiting certain trespass on
agricultural land; providing a civil remedy; providing criminal penalties;
transferring certain funds; appropriating money; changing certain
appropriations; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 16C.135, by adding
subdivisions; 17.115, subdivisions 2, 3, 4, 5; 17B.03, subdivision 1; 17B.15,
subdivision 1; 27.10; 35.243; 38.04; 38.12; 38.14; 38.15; 38.16; 41B.036;
41B.046, subdivision 5; 41B.049, subdivision 2; 41C.02, subdivision 12; 156.12,
subdivision 2, by adding a subdivision; 223.17, subdivisions 3, 6; 231.16;
232.22, subdivision 3; 236.02, subdivision 4; 561.19, subdivision 2; 609.605,
subdivision 1, by adding a subdivision; Minnesota Statutes 2003 Supplement,
sections 18G.10, subdivisions 5, 7; 38.02, subdivisions 1, 3; 41A.09,
subdivision 3a; 223.17, subdivision 4; proposing coding for new law in
Minnesota Statutes, chapters 41B; 116J; 609; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2002,
sections 18C.433; 38.02, subdivision 2; 38.13; 41B.046, subdivision 3.
The bill was placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 81 yeas and 48
nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Adolphson
Anderson, B.
Anderson, J.
Beard
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Cox
Davids
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dorman
Eastlund
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Gunther
Hackbarth
Harder
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Jacobson
Johnson, J.
Juhnke
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Kuisle
Lanning
Larson
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
McNamara
Meslow
Nelson, C.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olsen, S.
Olson, M.
Osterman
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Penas
Powell
Rhodes
Ruth
Seagren
Seifert
Severson
Simpson
Smith
Soderstrom
Stang
Swenson
Sykora
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Walz
Wardlow
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anderson, I.
Atkins
Bernardy
Biernat
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dorn
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Goodwin
Greiling
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Huntley
Jaros
Kahn
Kelliher
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Opatz
Otremba
Otto
Paymar
Peterson
Pugh
Rukavina
Sertich
Sieben
Slawik
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Wagenius
Walker
Wasiluk
The bill was passed and its title agreed to.
FISCAL CALENDAR
Pursuant to rule 1.22, Knoblach requested immediate
consideration of H. F. No. 3141.
H. F. No. 3141 was
reported to the House.
Kuisle moved to amend H. F. No. 3141, the first engrossment, as
follows:
Page 5, line 9, delete everything after the period, and insert
"Under the pilot project the user must pay a base fare of $7, the
council must pay the remainder of the fare up to a maximum subsidy of $13, and
the user must pay that portion of the fare that exceeds $20."
Page 5, delete lines 10 to 13
Page 5, line 14, delete everything through the period
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
DeLaForest moved to amend H. F. No. 3141, the first
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 5, lines 28 to 33, delete the new language
Page 8, line 2, delete "(a)"
Page 8, delete lines 8 to 11
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Dempsey and Huntley moved to amend H. F. No. 3141, the first
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 3, after line 34, insert:
"Sec. 8. [PORT
DEVELOPMENT GRANT.]
Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 457A.092, the
commissioner of transportation may grant up to $100,000 of the funds available
in the port development assistance program to the Duluth Port Authority to
determine the cause of fresh water corrosion of harbor sheet piling, provided
state funds are matched on a dollar-for-dollar basis by nonstate funds."
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Erhardt and Kuisle moved to amend H. F. No. 3141, the first
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 8, after line 22, insert:
"Sec. 11.
Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 161.125, subdivision 3, is amended to
read:
Subd. 3. [SOUND
ABATEMENT MEASURES.] (a) For the purpose of this section, sound abatement
measures include but are not limited to the following:
(1) traffic management measures, including reduced speed limits
or exclusion and rerouting of excessively noisy vehicles;
(2) design and construction measures, including use of sound
absorbing road surface materials, landscaping and planning, acquisition of
buffer zones or noise insulation of buildings on abutting property;
(3) enforcement of the motor vehicle source noise limits of the
Pollution Control Agency and of the federal Bureau of Motor Carrier Safety; and
(4) other measures designed for the purpose of reducing motor
vehicle source noise or reducing the effects of that noise.
(b) The commissioner of public safety shall cooperate with the
commissioner of transportation in implementing any sound abatement measures
that include law enforcement activities.
(c) In addition to all criteria for the installation or
implementation of sound abatement measures under this section, the commissioner
shall consider the presence of bus shoulder lanes in residential areas."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Kahn and Kelliher moved to amend H. F. No. 3141, the first engrossment,
as amended, as follows:
Page 26, after line 10, insert:
"Sec. 29.
Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 174.03, is amended by adding a
subdivision to read:
Subd. 10.
[PROMOTION OF BICYCLE COMMUTING.] To conserve energy, alleviate
traffic congestion, improve employee health through increased physical
activity, decrease demand for motor vehicle parking, and minimize the
environmental impact of commuting by singly occupied motor vehicles, the
commissioner of transportation must promote bicycle commuting. As part of promoting bicycle commuting, the
commissioner must:
(1) consider the effect on bicycle commuting in the design
of transportation facilities throughout the state;
(2) encourage employers who are making capital improvements
to their facilities to incorporate design elements that will facilitate bicycle
commuting, such as bike racks, indoor or outdoor sheltered bicycle parking,
high-security bicycle parking, showers, and dressing areas for bikers; and
(3) encourage employers that provide parking or other
subsidies for drivers to provide subsidies for bicycle commuters."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Lipman offered an amendment to H. F. No. 3141, the first
engrossment, as amended.
POINT
OF ORDER
Hornstein raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that
the Lipman amendment was not in order. The Speaker ruled the point of order
well taken and the Lipman amendment out of order.
Holberg, Sykora, Seagren, Huntley, Kuisle, Lieder and Biernat
moved to amend H. F. No. 3141, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 14, after line 17, insert:
"Sec. 16.
[169.2212] [BUS DRIVER DUTY OF CARE.]
The duty of care owed by a driver of a regular route transit
bus to a passenger on that bus, including a passenger who is an elementary or
secondary pupil, applies only when the passenger is on the bus or boarding or
disembarking. The duty of care owed by
a driver of a paratransit vehicle to a passenger on that vehicle, including a
passenger who is an elementary or secondary pupil, applies only when the
passenger is on the vehicle or boarding or disembarking, and as provided in the
local passenger assistance policy. At
all other times the passenger is a pedestrian and a driver's duty is limited to
the duty of care owed by an operator of a motor vehicle to a pedestrian. For purposes of this section, "regular
route transit" has the meaning given it in section 174.22, subdivision 8,
and "paratransit" has the meaning given it in section 174.22,
subdivision 6."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
The Speaker called Boudreau to the Chair.
Rukavina moved to amend H. F. No. 3141, the first engrossment,
as amended, as follows:
Page 20, after line 28, insert:
"Sec. 20.
Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 169.87, is amended by adding a
subdivision to read:
Subd. 7.
[VEHICLE TRANSPORTING PROPANE.] A weight restriction imposed under
subdivision 1 or 2 by the commissioner of transportation or a local road
authority does not apply to a vehicle primarily designed and used for transporting
propane for delivery in bulk, while the vehicle is engaged in that
activity. This subdivision does not
authorize a vehicle described in this subdivision to exceed a weight allowed
for a utility vehicle under subdivision 5, paragraph (a)."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Cornish moved to amend H. F. No. 3141, the first engrossment,
as amended, as follows:
Page 15, after line 9, insert:
"Sec. 17.
Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 169.81, is amended by adding a
subdivision to read:
Subd. 3e.
[ARTICULATED BUSES.] Notwithstanding subdivision 2, a motor carrier
of passengers registered under section 221.0252 may operate without a permit an
articulated bus of up to 61 feet in length."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Fuller moved to amend H. F. No. 3141, the first engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 14, after line 5, insert:
"Sec. 15.
Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 169.01, subdivision 78, is amended to
read:
Subd. 78. [RECREATIONAL
VEHICLE COMBINATION.] "Recreational vehicle combination" means a
combination of vehicles consisting of a pickup truck as defined in section
168.011, subdivision 29, attached by means of a fifth-wheel coupling to a
camper-semitrailer which has hitched to it a trailer carrying a watercraft as
defined in section 86B.005, subdivision 18; off-highway motorcycle as defined
in section 84.787, subdivision 7; motorcycle; motorized bicycle; snowmobile as
defined in section 84.81, subdivision 3; or all-terrain vehicle as
defined in section 84.92, subdivision 8; or equestrian equipment and
supplies. For purposes of this
subdivision:
(a) A "fifth-wheel coupling" is a coupling between a
camper-semitrailer and a towing pickup truck in which a portion of the weight
of the camper-semitrailer is carried over or forward of the rear axle of the
towing pickup.
(b) A "camper-semitrailer" is a trailer, other than a
manufactured home as defined in section 327B.01, subdivision 13, designed for
human habitation and used for vacation or recreational purposes for limited
periods."
Page 15, after line 9, insert:
"Sec. 18.
Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 169.81, subdivision 3c, is amended to
read:
Subd. 3c. [RECREATIONAL
VEHICLE COMBINATION.] Notwithstanding subdivision 3, a recreational vehicle
combination may be operated without a permit if:
(1) the combination does not consist of more than three
vehicles, and the towing rating of the pickup truck is equal to or greater than
the total weight of all vehicles being towed;
(2) the combination does not exceed 60 feet in length;
(3) the camper-semitrailer in the combination does not exceed
28 feet in length;
(4) the operator of the combination is at least 18 years of
age;
(5) the trailer carrying a watercraft, motorcycle, motorized
bicycle, off-highway motorcycle, snowmobile, or all-terrain vehicle,
or equestrian equipment and supplies meets all requirements of law;
(6) the trailers in the combination are connected to the pickup
truck and each other in conformity with section 169.82; and
(7) the combination is not operated within the seven-county
metropolitan area, as defined in section 473.121, subdivision 2, during the
hours of 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. on Mondays through
Fridays."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Kohls; Fuller; Biernat; Strachan; Hoppe; Krinkie; Lipman;
Lindgren; Zellers; DeLaForest; Buesgens; Wardlow; Gerlach; Kahn; Nelson, C.;
Wilkin; Holberg; Opatz; Brod; Powell; Borrell; Kuisle; Paulsen; Tingelstad;
Bradley; Walz; Lenczewski; Meslow; Thissen; Adolphson; Johnson, J.; Stang and
Finstad moved to amend H. F. No. 3141, the first engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 31, after line 13, insert:
"Sec. 38.
[REPEALER.]
Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 169.685, subdivision 4, is
repealed.
[EFFECTIVE DATE.] This
section is effective July 1, 2005, and applies to actions commenced on or after
that date."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
POINT OF ORDER
Atkins raised a point of order pursuant to rule 4.03, relating
to Ways and Means Committee; Budget Resolution; Effect on Expenditure and
Revenue Bills that the Kohls et al amendment was not in order. Speaker pro tempore Boudreau ruled the point
of order not well taken and the Kohls et al amendment in order.
Latz moved to amend the Kohls et al amendment to H. F. No.
3141, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, after line 8, insert:
"Sec. 39.
Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 169.686, subdivision 1, is amended to
read:
Subdivision 1. [SEAT
BELT REQUIREMENT.] (a) A properly adjusted and fastened seat belt, including
both the shoulder and lap belt when the vehicle is so equipped, shall be worn
by:
(1) the driver of a passenger vehicle or commercial motor
vehicle;
(2) a passenger riding in the front seat of a passenger vehicle
or commercial motor vehicle; and
(3) a passenger riding in any seat of a passenger vehicle who
is older than three but younger than 11 years of age.
(b) A person who is 15 years of age or older and who violates
paragraph (a), clause (1) or (2), is subject to a fine of $25. The driver of the passenger vehicle or
commercial motor vehicle in which the violation occurred is subject to a $25
fine for a violation of paragraph (a), clause (2) or (3), by a child of the
driver under the age of 15 or any child under the age of 11. A peace officer may not issue a citation
for a violation of this section unless the officer lawfully stopped or detained
the driver of the motor vehicle for a moving violation other than a violation
involving motor vehicle equipment.
The Department of Public Safety shall not record a violation of this
subdivision on a person's driving record.
Sec. 40. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 171.05, subdivision 2b, is amended to read:
Subd. 2b. [INSTRUCTION
PERMIT USE BY PERSON UNDER AGE 18.] (a) This subdivision applies to persons who
have applied for and received an instruction permit under subdivision 2.
(b) The permit holder may, with the permit in possession,
operate a motor vehicle, but must be accompanied by and be under the
supervision of a certified driver education instructor, the permit holder's
parent or guardian, or another licensed driver age 21 or older. The supervisor must occupy the seat beside
the permit holder.
(c) The permit holder may operate a motor vehicle only when
every occupant under the age of 18 has a seat belt or child passenger restraint
system properly fastened. A person who
violates this paragraph is subject to a fine of $25. A peace officer may not issue a citation for a violation of this
paragraph unless the officer lawfully stopped or detained the driver of the
motor vehicle for a moving violation as defined in section 171.04, subdivision
1. The commissioner shall not
record a violation of this paragraph on a person's driving record.
(d) The permit holder must maintain a driving record free of
convictions for moving violations, as defined in section 171.04, subdivision 1,
and free of convictions for violation of section 169A.20, 169A.33, 169A.35, or
sections 169A.50 to 169A.53. If the
permit holder drives a motor vehicle in violation of the law, the commissioner
shall suspend, cancel, or revoke the permit in accordance with the statutory
section violated.
Sec. 41. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 171.055, subdivision 2, is amended
to read:
Subd. 2. [USE OF
PROVISIONAL LICENSE.] (a) A provisional license holder may operate a motor
vehicle only when every occupant under the age of 18 has a seat belt or child
passenger restraint system properly fastened.
A person who violates this paragraph is subject to a fine of $25. A peace officer may not issue a citation
for a violation of this paragraph unless the officer lawfully stopped or
detained the driver of the motor vehicle for a moving violation as defined in
section 171.04. The commissioner shall not record a violation of this
paragraph on a person's driving record.
(b) If the holder of a provisional license during the period of
provisional licensing incurs (1) a conviction for a violation of section
169A.20, 169A.33, 169A.35, or sections 169A.50 to 169A.53, (2) a conviction for
a crash-related moving violation, or (3) more than one conviction for a moving
violation that is not crash related, the person may not be issued a driver's
license until 12 consecutive months have expired since the date of the
conviction or until the person reaches the age of 18 years, whichever occurs
first.
Sec. 42. [EFFECTIVE
DATE.]
Sections 39 to 42 are effective August 1, 2004, and apply to
violations committed on and after that date."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the amendment to the amendment and
the roll was called. There were 19 yeas
and 110 nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Biernat
Clark
Cornish
Entenza
Greiling
Hausman
Hornstein
Huntley
Jaros
Juhnke
Kahn
Latz
Lenczewski
Murphy
Paymar
Pugh
Rhodes
Sieben
Wagenius
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Adolphson
Anderson, B.
Anderson, I.
Anderson, J.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Cox
Davids
Davnie
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Goodwin
Gunther
Hackbarth
Harder
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Jacobson
Johnson, J.
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Kuisle
Lanning
Larson
Lesch
Lieder
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Mullery
Nelson, C.
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olsen, S.
Olson, M.
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson
Powell
Rukavina
Ruth
Seagren
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Stang
Swenson
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Walker
Walz
Wardlow
Wasiluk
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment
was not adopted.
Mahoney offered an amendment to the Kohls et al amendment to H.
F. No. 3141, the first engrossment, as amended.
POINT
OF ORDER
Kohls raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the
Mahoney amendment to the Kohls et al amendment was not in order. Speaker pro tempore Boudreau ruled the point
of order well taken and the Mahoney amendment to the Kohls et al amendment out
of order.
POINT
OF ORDER
Seifert raised a point of order pursuant to section 124 of
"Mason's Manual of Legislative Procedure," relating to Personalities
Not Permitted in Debate. Speaker pro
tempore Boudreau ruled the point of order well taken.
The Speaker resumed the Chair.
POINT
OF ORDER
Solberg raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the
Kohls et al amendment was not in order.
The Speaker ruled the point of order not well taken and the Kohls et al
amendment in order.
The question recurred on the Kohls et al amendment and the roll
was called. There were 70 yeas and 59
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Adolphson
Anderson, B.
Anderson, J.
Beard
Biernat
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Cox
Davids
Davnie
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dorman
Eastlund
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Gunther
Harder
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Jacobson
Johnson, J.
Kahn
Klinzing
Knoblach
Kohls
Krinkie
Kuisle
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
McNamara
Meslow
Nelson, C.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olsen, S.
Olson, M.
Opatz
Ozment
Paulsen
Penas
Powell
Ruth
Severson
Simpson
Soderstrom
Swenson
Thissen
Tingelstad
Walz
Wardlow
Westerberg
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
Those who voted in the negative
were:
Abeler
Anderson, I.
Atkins
Bernardy
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Dill
Dorn
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Goodwin
Greiling
Hackbarth
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Huntley
Jaros
Juhnke
Kelliher
Koenen
Larson
Latz
Lesch
Lieder
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Seagren
Seifert
Sertich
Sieben
Slawik
Smith
Solberg
Stang
Sykora
Thao
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Walker
Wasiluk
Westrom
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Paymar, Mariani and Entenza moved to amend H. F. No. 3141, the
first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 14, delete section 15
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Paymar et al amendment and the
roll was called. There were 42 yeas and
81 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dorn
Eken
Entenza
Greiling
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Huntley
Jaros
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Knoblach
Koenen
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lipman
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Meslow
Mullery
Nelson, M.
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson
Seagren
Solberg
Thissen
Wagenius
Walker
Wasiluk
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Adolphson
Anderson, I.
Anderson, J.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Biernat
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Cox
Davids
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dorman
Eastlund
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Goodwin
Gunther
Hackbarth
Harder
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Jacobson
Johnson, J.
Kohls
Krinkie
Kuisle
Lanning
Lieder
Lindgren
Lindner
Magnus
McNamara
Nelson, C.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olsen, S.
Olson, M.
Ozment
Paulsen
Penas
Powell
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Ruth
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simpson
Smith
Soderstrom
Stang
Swenson
Sykora
Thao
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Walz
Wardlow
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Wasiluk was excused for the remainder of today's session.
Westrom moved to amend H. F. No. 3141, the first engrossment,
as amended, as follows:
Page 12, after line 22, insert:
"Sec. 13.
Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 168.27, subdivision 24, is amended to
read:
Subd. 24. [BONDS.] (a)
Except as otherwise provided in this subdivision, all persons licensed
according to this section shall keep in full force and effect a bond with a
corporate surety to be approved by the registrar of motor vehicles in the
following amounts; in the case of boat trailer, snowmobile trailer, horse
trailer or motorized bicycle dealers, or dealers in trailers with a
manufacturer's rated carrying capacity under 15,000 pounds designed to
transport small construction or farm equipment, in the amount of $5,000;
and as to all other persons in the amount of $50,000. The bond must be conditioned on the faithful performance by the
licensee of the obligations imposed on persons engaged in motor vehicle
transactions by the laws of this state, including the conduct required of a
licensee by this section and other sections governing the sale or transfer of
motor vehicles, and the payment of all taxes, license fees, and penalties. The bond must be for the benefit of the
state of Minnesota and any transferor, seller, or purchaser of a motor vehicle
for any monetary loss caused by failure of the licensee to meet the obligations
enumerated above. Proceedings on the
forfeiture of the bonds must be commenced in the district court of the county
wherein the business of the licensed person was carried on, or if in more than
one county, the county in which the offense occurred. This subdivision does not apply to a used vehicle parts dealer or
a scrap metal processor.
(b) This subdivision does not apply to:
(1) a dealer in new trailers designed to transport small
construction or farm equipment in any year following a year in which the dealer
had less than $500,000 in gross receipts from the sale of such trailers; or
(2) a dealer in new trailers designed to transport small
construction or farm equipment who has been a dealer in such trailers for less
than one year and who the department reasonably determines will have gross
receipts of less than $500,000 during the first year of business."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
The Speaker called Boudreau to the Chair.
Seifert moved to amend H. F. No. 3141, the first engrossment,
as amended, as follows:
Page 23, after line 19, insert:
"Sec. 24.
Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 171.13, subdivision 1, is amended to
read:
Subdivision 1.
[SUBJECTS TESTED.] Except as otherwise provided in this section, the
commissioner shall examine each applicant for a driver's license by such agency
as the commissioner directs. The
commissioner may not give the examination in any language other than English. This examination must include a test of
applicant's eyesight; ability to read and understand highway signs regulating,
warning, and directing traffic; knowledge of traffic laws; knowledge of the
effects of alcohol and drugs on a driver's ability to operate a motor vehicle
safely and legally, and of the legal penalties and financial consequences
resulting from violations of laws prohibiting the operation of a motor vehicle
while under the influence of alcohol or drugs; knowledge of railroad grade
crossing safety; knowledge of slow-moving vehicle safety; knowledge of traffic
laws related to bicycles; an actual demonstration of ability to exercise
ordinary and reasonable control in the operation of a motor vehicle; and other
physical and mental examinations as the commissioner finds necessary to
determine the applicant's fitness to operate a motor vehicle safely upon the
highways, provided, further however, no driver's license shall be denied an
applicant on the exclusive grounds that the applicant's eyesight is deficient
in color perception. Provided, however,
that war veterans operating motor vehicles especially equipped for handicapped
persons, shall, if otherwise entitled to a license, be granted such
license. The commissioner shall make
provision for giving these examinations either in the county where the
applicant resides or at a place adjacent thereto reasonably convenient to the
applicant."
Page 31, after line 13, insert:
"Sec. 39.
[REPEALER.]
Minnesota Rules, part 7410.4740, subpart A, is repealed."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The Speaker resumed the Chair.
POINT
OF ORDER
Ellison raised a point of order pursuant to rule 4.03, relating
to Ways and Means Committee; Budget Resolution; Effect on Expenditure and
Revenue Bills, that the Seifert amendment was not in order. The Speaker ruled the point of order not
well taken and the Seifert amendment in order.
Entenza appealed the decision of the Speaker.
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
LAY ON
THE TABLE
Seifert moved to lay the Entenza appeal of the decision of the
Speaker on the table.
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
MOTION TO FIX TIME TO CONVENE
Juhnke moved that when the House adjourns today it adjourn
until 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, April 7, 2004.
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Juhnke motion and the roll was
called. There were 52 yeas and 74 nays
as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, I.
Atkins
Bernardy
Biernat
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dorn
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Goodwin
Greiling
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Huntley
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Koenen
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Sertich
Sieben
Slawik
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Wagenius
Walker
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Adolphson
Anderson, B.
Anderson, J.
Beard
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Cox
Davids
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dorman
Eastlund
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Gunther
Hackbarth
Harder
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Jacobson
Johnson, J.
Knoblach
Kohls
Krinkie
Kuisle
Lanning
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
McNamara
Meslow
Nelson, C.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olsen, S.
Olson, M.
Ozment
Paulsen
Penas
Powell
Ruth
Seagren
Seifert
Severson
Simpson
Smith
Soderstrom
Stang
Swenson
Sykora
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Walz
Wardlow
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The motion did not prevail.
The
question recurred on the Seifert motion to lay the Entenza appeal of the
decision of the Speaker on the table and the roll was called. There were 75 yeas and 51 nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Adolphson
Anderson, B.
Anderson, J.
Beard
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Cox
Davids
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dorman
Eastlund
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Gunther
Hackbarth
Harder
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Jacobson
Johnson, J.
Knoblach
Kohls
Krinkie
Kuisle
Lanning
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
McNamara
Meslow
Nelson, C.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olsen, S.
Olson, M.
Osterman
Ozment
Paulsen
Penas
Powell
Rhodes
Ruth
Seagren
Seifert
Severson
Simpson
Smith
Soderstrom
Stang
Swenson
Sykora
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Walz
Wardlow
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, I.
Atkins
Bernardy
Biernat
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dorn
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Goodwin
Greiling
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Huntley
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Koenen
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Opatz
Otremba
Otto
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson
Pugh
Rukavina
Sertich
Sieben
Slawik
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Wagenius
Walker
The motion prevailed and the appeal of the decision of the
Speaker was laid on the table.
MOTION
TO FIX TIME TO CONVENE
Entenza moved that when the House adjourns today it adjourn
until 8:30 a.m., Wednesday, April 7, 2004.
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Entenza motion and the roll was
called. There were 51 yeas and
72 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, I.
Atkins
Bernardy
Biernat
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dorn
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Goodwin
Greiling
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Huntley
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Koenen
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Mullery
Nelson, M.
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Sertich
Sieben
Slawik
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Wagenius
Walker
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Adolphson
Anderson, B.
Anderson, J.
Beard
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Cox
Davids
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dorman
Eastlund
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Gunther
Hackbarth
Harder
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Jacobson
Johnson, J.
Klinzing
Knoblach
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
McNamara
Meslow
Nelson, C.
Newman
Nornes
Olsen, S.
Olson, M.
Ozment
Paulsen
Penas
Powell
Ruth
Seagren
Seifert
Severson
Simpson
Smith
Soderstrom
Stang
Swenson
Sykora
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Walz
Wardlow
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The motion did not prevail.
Pursuant to rule 1.22, Knoblach withdrew his request for
immediate consideration of H. F. No. 3141, as amended.
FISCAL CALENDAR ANNOUNCEMENTS
Pursuant to rule 1.22,
Knoblach announced his intention to place H. F. No. 3141, as amended, and H. F. Nos. 1867, 3090 and 2684 on
the Fiscal Calendar for Wednesday, April 7, 2004.
ADJOURNMENT
Paulsen moved that when the House adjourns today it adjourn
until 8:00 a.m., Wednesday, April 7, 2004.
The motion prevailed.
Paulsen moved that the House adjourn. The motion prevailed, and the Speaker declared the House stands
adjourned until 8:00 a.m., Wednesday, April 7, 2004.
Edward
A. Burdick,
Chief Clerk, House of Representatives