STATE OF MINNESOTA
EIGHTY-THIRD SESSION - 2003
_____________________
THIRTY-SIXTH DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Thursday, April 10,
2003
The House of Representatives convened at 3:00 p.m. and was
called to order by Steve Sviggum, Speaker of the House.
"The Star Spangled Banner" was sung by Aleesha
Clomon, from the High School for the Recording Arts, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Prayer was offered by Major Ed Wilson, Salvation Army, St.
Paul, Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge of allegiance to the
flag of the United States of America.
The roll was called and the following members were present:
Abeler
Abrams
Adolphson
Anderson, B.
Anderson, I.
Anderson, J.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Biernat
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Cox
Davids
Davnie
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Goodwin
Gunther
Haas
Hackbarth
Harder
Hausman
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Howes
Huntley
Jacobson
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Kielkucki
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Kuisle
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, C.
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Nornes
Olsen, S.
Olson, M.
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson
Powell
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Ruth
Samuelson
Seagren
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Walker
Walz
Wardlow
Wasiluk
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
A quorum was present.
Greiling was excused.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the Journal of the preceding
day. Zellers moved that further reading
of the Journal be suspended and that the Journal be approved as corrected by
the Chief Clerk. The motion prevailed.
REPORTS
OF CHIEF CLERK
S. F. No. 328 and H. F. No. 865,
which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison, were examined and
found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION
OF RULES
Powell moved that the rules be so far suspended that
S. F. No. 328 be substituted for H. F. No. 865
and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 1099 and
H. F. No. 1132, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical.
Gerlach moved that S. F. No. 1099 be substituted
for H. F. No. 1132 and that the House File be indefinitely
postponed. The motion prevailed.
REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES
Davids from the Committee on Commerce, Jobs and Economic
Development to which was referred:
H. F. No. 155, A bill for an act relating to commerce; enacting
the revisions to the general provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code and
amendments to Articles 3 and 4 of the Uniform Commercial Code recommended by
the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws; making
conforming changes; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 17.94; 84.787,
subdivision 9; 84.797, subdivision 10; 84.92, subdivision 6; 86B.820,
subdivision 12; 168A.01, subdivision 20; 234.27; 325L.03; 325L.16; 336.2-103;
336.2-202; 336.2A-103; 336.2A-501; 336.2A-518; 336.2A-519; 336.2A-527;
336.2A-528; 336.3-103; 336.3-106; 336.3-116; 336.3-305; 336.3-309; 336.3-416;
336.3-417; 336.3-602; 336.3-604; 336.3-605; 336.4-104; 336.4-207; 336.4-208;
336.4-212; 336.4-301; 336.4-403; 336.4A-105; 336.4A-106; 336.4A-204; 336.5-103;
336.8-102; 336.9-102; 513.33, subdivision 1; 514.963, subdivision 9; 514.965,
subdivision 10; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter
336; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 336.1-101; 336.1-102;
336.1-103; 336.1-104; 336.1-105; 336.1-106; 336.1-107; 336.1-108; 336.1-109;
336.1-110; 336.1-201; 336.1-202; 336.1-203; 336.1-204; 336.1-205; 336.1-206;
336.1-207; 336.1-208; 336.1-209; 336.2-208; 336.2A-207.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 1, line 27 to page 61, line 27, delete articles 1 to 3
Page 61, line 28, delete "4" and insert "1"
Page 62, line 8, reinstate everything after "(6)"
Page 62, reinstate line 9
Page 62, delete line 10
Page 63, delete line 6 and insert:
"(14) "Record" means information that is
inscribed on a tangible medium or that is stored in an electronic or
other medium and is retrievable in perceivable form."
Page 63, line 10, delete "consumer" and delete
"drawn"
Page 63, line 11, delete everything before "is"
and insert "that"
Page 63, line 12, after "handwritten" insert
"or facsimile"
Page 64, line 23, reinstate the stricken language
Page 66, after line 15, insert:
"Sec. 4. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 336.3-119, is amended to read:
336.3-119 [NOTICE OF RIGHT TO DEFEND ACTION.]
In an action for breach of an obligation for which a third
person is answerable over pursuant to this article or article 4, the defendant
may give the third person written notice of the litigation in a
record, and the person notified may then give similar notice to any other
person who is answerable over. If the
notice states (i) that the person notified may come in and defend and (ii) that
failure to do so will bind the person notified in an action later brought by
the person giving the notice as to any determination of fact common to the two
litigations, the person notified is so bound unless after seasonable receipt of
the notice the person notified does come in and defend."
Page 66, line 19, strike "stated in subsection (b)"
and insert "otherwise provided in this section"
Page 69, after line 2, insert:
"Sec. 7. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 336.3-312, is amended to read:
336.3-312 [LOST, DESTROYED, OR STOLEN CASHIER'S CHECK, TELLER'S
CHECK, OR CERTIFIED CHECK.]
(a) In this section:
(1) "Check" means a cashier's check, teller's check,
or certified check.
(2) "Claimant" means a person who claims the right to
receive the amount of a cashier's check, teller's check, or certified check
that was lost, destroyed, or stolen.
(3) "Declaration of loss" means a written
statement, made in a record under penalty of perjury, to the effect that
(i) the declarer lost possession of a check, (ii) the declarer is the drawer or
payee of the check, in the case of a certified check, or the remitter or payee
of the check, in the case of a cashier's check or teller's check, (iii) the
loss of possession was not the result of a transfer by the declarer or a lawful
seizure, and (iv) the declarer cannot reasonably obtain possession of the check
because the check was destroyed, its whereabouts cannot be determined, or it is
in the wrongful possession of an unknown person or a person that cannot be
found or is not amenable to service of process.
(4) "Obligated bank" means the issuer of a cashier's
check or teller's check or the acceptor of a certified check.
(b) A claimant may assert a claim to the
amount of a check by a communication to the obligated bank describing the check
with reasonable certainty and requesting payment of the amount of the check, if
(i) the claimant is the drawer or payee of a certified check or the remitter or
payee of a cashier's check or teller's check, (ii) the communication contains
or is accompanied by a declaration of loss of the claimant with respect to the
check, (iii) the communication is received at a time and in a manner affording
the bank a reasonable time to act on it before the check is paid, and (iv) the
claimant provides reasonable identification if requested by the obligated bank. Delivery of a declaration of loss is a
warranty of the truth of the statements made in the declaration. If a claim is asserted in compliance with
this subsection, the following rules apply:
(1) The claim becomes enforceable at the later of (i) the time
the claim is asserted, or (ii) the 90th day following the date of the check, in
the case of a cashier's check or teller's check, or the 90th day following the
date of the acceptance, in the case of a certified check.
(2) Until the claim becomes enforceable, it has no legal effect
and the obligated bank must pay the check or, in the case of a teller's check,
may permit the drawee to pay the check. Payment to a person entitled to enforce
the check discharges all liability of the obligated bank with respect to the
check.
(3) If the claim becomes enforceable before the check is
presented for payment, the obligated bank is not obliged to pay the check.
(4) When the claim becomes enforceable, the obligated bank
becomes obliged to pay the amount of the check to the claimant if payment of
the check has not been made to a person entitled to enforce the check. Subject to section 336.4-302(a)(1), payment
to the claimant discharges all liability of the obligated bank with respect to
the check.
(c) If the obligated bank pays the amount of a check to a
claimant under subsection (b)(4) and the check is presented for payment by a
person having rights of a holder in due course, the claimant is obliged to (i)
refund the payment to the obligated bank if the check is paid, or (ii) pay the
amount of the check to the person having rights of a holder in due course if
the check is dishonored.
(d) If a claimant has the right to assert a claim under
subsection (b) and is also a person entitled to enforce a cashier's check, teller's
check, or certified check which is lost, destroyed, or stolen, the claimant may
assert rights with respect to the check either under this section or section
336.3-309."
Page 69, line 20, delete everything before "the"
and insert:
"(6) with respect to a remotely-created item,"
Page 70, after line 2, insert:
"(e) No claim for breach of the warranty in subsection
(a)(6) is available against a person to which an item was transferred
to the extent that under applicable law (including the applicable
choice-of-law principles) the person that transferred the item to that
person did not make the warranty in subsection (a)(6)."
Page 70, line 19, delete everything before "the"
and insert:
"(4) with respect to any remotely-created item,"
Page 71, after line 29, insert:
"(g) No claim for breach of the warranty in subsection
(a)(4) is available against a person to which an item was transferred
to the extent that under applicable law (including the applicable
choice-of-law principles) the person that transferred the item to that
person did not make the warranty in subsection (a)(4).
Sec. 10. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 336.3-419, is amended to read:
336.3-419 [INSTRUMENTS SIGNED FOR ACCOMMODATION.]
(a) If an instrument is issued for value given for the benefit
of a party to the instrument ("accommodated party") and another party
to the instrument ("accommodation party") signs the instrument for
the purpose of incurring liability on the instrument without being a direct
beneficiary of the value given for the instrument, the instrument is signed by
the accommodation party "for accommodation."
(b) An accommodation party may sign the instrument as maker,
drawer, acceptor, or endorser and, subject to subsection (d), is obliged to pay
the instrument in the capacity in which the accommodation party signs. The obligation of an accommodation party may
be enforced notwithstanding any statute of frauds and whether or not the
accommodation party receives consideration for the accommodation.
(c) A person signing an instrument is presumed to be an
accommodation party and there is notice that the instrument is signed for
accommodation if the signature is an anomalous endorsement or is accompanied by
words indicating that the signer is acting as surety or guarantor with respect
to the obligation of another party to the instrument. Except as provided in section 336.3-605, the obligation of an
accommodation party to pay the instrument is not affected by the fact that the
person enforcing the obligation had notice when the instrument was taken by
that person that the accommodation party signed the instrument for
accommodation.
(d) If the signature of a party to an instrument is accompanied
by words indicating unambiguously that the party is guaranteeing collection
rather than payment of the obligation of another party to the instrument, the
signer is obliged to pay the amount due on the instrument to a person entitled
to enforce the instrument only if (i) execution of judgment against the other party
has been returned unsatisfied, (ii) the other party is insolvent or in an
insolvency proceeding, (iii) the other party cannot be served with process, or
(iv) it is otherwise apparent that payment cannot be obtained from the other
party.
(e) If the signature of a party to an instrument is accompanied
by words indicating that the party guarantees payment or the signer
signs the instrument as an accommodation party in some other manner that
does not unambiguously indicate an intention to guarantee collection
rather than payment, the signer is obligated to pay the amount due on
the instrument to a person entitled to enforce the instrument in the
same circumstances as the accommodated party would be obliged, without
prior resort to the accommodated party by the person entitled to enforce
the instrument.
(f) An accommodation party who pays the instrument is
entitled to reimbursement from the accommodated party and is entitled to
enforce the instrument against the accommodated party. In proper circumstances, an accommodation
party may obtain relief that requires the accommodated party to perform
its obligations on the instrument.
An accommodated party who that pays the instrument has no
right of recourse against, and is not entitled to contribution from, an
accommodation party."
Page 73, lines 10 and 30, delete "to or with the record"
Page 79, line 20, delete "5" and insert "2"
Page 80, line 34, reinstate the stricken language
Page 81, line 24, delete "consumer"
Page 82, line 10, delete "consumer"
Page 82, line 11, delete "that"
Page 83, after line 4, insert:
"(f) No claim for breach in the warranty in subsection
(a)(6) is available against a person to which an item was transferred
to the extent that under applicable law (including the applicable
choice-of-law principles) the person that transferred the item to that
person did not make the warranty in subsection (a)(6)."
Page 83, line 21, delete "consumer"
Page 83, line 22, delete "that"
Page 84, after line 29, insert:
"(g) No claim for breach of the warranty in subsection
(a)(4) is available against a person to which an item was transferred
to the extent that under applicable law (including the applicable
choice-of-law principle) the person that transferred the item to that
person did not make the warranty in subsection (a)(4)."
Renumber the sections in sequence
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to commerce; modifying and
enacting the amendments to Articles 3 and 4 of the Uniform Commercial Code
recommended by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 336.3-103; 336.3-106; 336.3-116;
336.3-119; 336.3-305; 336.3-309; 336.3-312; 336.3-416; 336.3-417; 336.3-419;
336.3-602; 336.3-604; 336.3-605; 336.4-104; 336.4-207; 336.4-208; 336.4-212;
336.4-301; 336.4-403."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Smith from the Committee on Judiciary Policy and Finance to
which was referred:
H. F. No. 283, A bill for an act relating to taxation;
individual income; providing an income tax checkoff to fund benefits for
survivors of law enforcement officers and firefighters and providing for
maintenance of peace officer and firefighter memorials; proposing coding for
new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 290.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill
pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Taxes.
The report was adopted.
Davids from the Committee on Commerce, Jobs and Economic
Development to which was referred:
H. F. No. 344, A bill for an act relating to economic
development; providing for job enhancement as a goal of business financing
programs; converting the Minnesota investment fund to a revolving loan fund; appropriating
money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 41A.036, subdivision 2;
116J.011; 116J.411, by adding a subdivision; 116J.415, subdivisions 1, 5;
116J.8731, subdivisions 1, 4, 5, 7; 116J.994, subdivision 4; 116J.995.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 3, line 4, delete the colon
Page 3, line 5, delete the paragraph coding and delete "(1)"
and after the semicolon, insert "and"
Page 3, line 6, delete "(2)" and insert "(1)"
Page 3, line 8, delete "(3)" and insert "(2)"
Page 5, line 22, delete "The"
Page 5, delete lines 23 to 26
Page 5, line 27, delete "made."
Page 6, line 25, delete "or forgive"
Page 6, line 28, delete "forgiveness or"
Page 6, line 32, delete "or forgiveness"
Page 8, line 2, delete everything after the period
Page 8, delete line 3
Page 8, line 4, delete everything before "For"
Page 8, line 5, delete everything after "be"
Page 8, line 6, delete "in greater Minnesota; and (2)"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass and
be re-referred to the Committee on Jobs and Economic Development Finance.
The report was adopted.
Smith from the Committee on Judiciary Policy and Finance to
which was referred:
H. F. No. 374, A bill for an act relating to child safety;
prohibiting the sale and commercial use of certain cribs; providing
enforcement; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 245A;
325F.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 7, line 6, before the period, insert "and
applies to crimes committed on or after this date"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass and
be re-referred to the Committee on Health and Human Services Policy.
The report was adopted.
Rhodes from the Committee on Governmental Operations and
Veterans Affairs Policy to which was referred:
H. F. No. 379, A bill for an act relating to state government;
authorizing capital cost avoidance for guaranteed savings contracts; proposing
coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 16C.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1.
[16C.144] [GUARANTEED SAVINGS CONTRACTS.]
Subdivision 1.
[DEFINITIONS.] (a) The following definitions apply to this
section.
(b) "Utility" means electricity, natural gas, or
other energy resource, water, and wastewater.
(c) "Utility cost savings" means the difference
between the utility costs under the precontract conditions and the utility
costs after the changes have been made under the contract. The savings must be calculated in
comparison to an established baseline of utility costs.
(d) "Established baseline" means the precontract
utilities, operations, and maintenance costs.
(e) "Utility cost-savings measure" means a measure
that produces utility cost savings and/or operation and maintenance cost
savings.
(f) "Operation and maintenance cost savings" means
a measurable decrease in operation and maintenance costs that are a
direct result of the implementation of one or more utility cost-savings
measures, but do not include savings from in-house staff labor. The savings must be calculated in comparison
to an established baseline of operation and maintenance costs.
(g) "Guaranteed savings contract" means a contract
for the evaluation, recommendation, and installation of one or more utility
cost-savings measures. The contract
must provide that all payments are to be made over time, but not to
exceed 15 years from the date of final installation, and the savings are
guaranteed to the extent necessary to make payments for the utility
cost-savings measures.
(h) "Baseline adjustments" means adjusting the
established baselines in paragraphs (c) and (e) for changes in the
following variables:
(1) utility rates;
(2) number of days in the utility billing cycle;
(3) square footage of the facility;
(4) operational schedule of the facility;
(5) facility temperature set points;
(6) weather;
(7) amount of equipment or lighting utilized in the facility;
and
(8) indoor air quality.
(i) "Lease purchase contract" means a contract
obligating the state to make regular lease payments to satisfy the lease
costs of the utility cost-savings measures until the final payment,
after which the utility cost-savings measures become the sole property
of the state of Minnesota.
(j) "Qualified provider" means a person or
business experienced in the design, implementation, and installation of
utility cost-savings measures.
(k) "Engineering report" means a report prepared
by a professional engineer licensed by the state of Minnesota summarizing
estimates of all costs of installations, modifications, or remodeling,
including costs of design, engineering, installation, maintenance,
repairs, and estimates of the amounts by which utility and operation and
maintenance costs will be reduced.
(l) "Capital cost avoidance" means money expended
by a state agency to pay for utility cost-savings measures with a guaranteed
savings contract so long as the measures that are being implemented to
achieve the cost savings are a significant portion of an overall
project.
(m) "Guaranteed savings contracting guidelines"
means policies, procedures, and requirements of guaranteed savings contracts
established by the department of administration under this section.
Subd. 2.
[GUARANTEED SAVINGS CONTRACT.] The commissioner may enter into
a guaranteed savings contract with a qualified provider if:
(1) the qualified provider is selected through a competitive
process in accordance with the guaranteed savings contracting guidelines
within the department of administration;
(2) the qualified provider agrees to submit an engineering
report prior to the execution of the guaranteed savings contract;
(3) the commissioner finds that the amount that would be
spent on the utility cost-savings measures recommended in the engineering
report is not likely to exceed the amount to be saved in utility
operation and maintenance costs over 15 years from the date of
implementation of utility cost-savings measures;
(4) the qualified provider provides a written guarantee that
the utility and operation and maintenance cost savings will meet or
exceed the costs of the guaranteed savings contract. The qualified provider
shall reimburse the state for any shortfall of guaranteed utility cost
savings; and
(5) the qualified provider gives a sufficient bond in accordance
with section 574.26 to the commissioner for the faithful implementation
and installation of the utility cost-savings measures.
Subd. 3.
[LEASE PURCHASE CONTRACT.] The commissioner may enter into a
lease purchase agreement with any party for the implementation of
utility cost-savings measures in accordance with an engineering
report. The implementation costs of the
utility cost-savings measures recommended in the engineering report
shall not exceed the amount to be saved in utility and operation and
maintenance costs over the term of the lease purchase agreement. The term of the lease purchase agreement
shall not exceed 15 years. The lease
is assignable in accordance with terms approved by the commissioner of
finance.
Subd. 4. [USE OF
CAPITAL COST AVOIDANCE.] The affected state agency may contribute
funds for capital cost avoidance for guaranteed savings contracts. Use of capital cost avoidance is subject
to the guaranteed savings contracting guidelines within the department
of administration.
[EFFECTIVE DATE.] This
section is effective the day following final enactment."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass and
be re-referred to the Committee on State Government Finance.
The report was adopted.
Dempsey from the Committee on Local Government and Metropolitan
Affairs to which was referred:
H. F. No. 433, A bill for an act relating to zoning; modifying
deadlines for agency actions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 15.99.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 15.99, is amended to read:
15.99 [TIME DEADLINE FOR AGENCY ACTION.]
Subdivision 1. [DEFINITION
DEFINITIONS.] (a) For purposes of this section, the following
terms shall have the meanings given.
(b) "Agency" means a department, agency,
board, commission, or other group in the executive branch of state government;
a statutory or home rule charter city, county, town, or school district; any
metropolitan agency or regional entity; and any other political subdivision of
the state.
(c) "Request" means a written application related
to zoning, septic systems, or the expansion of the metropolitan urban
service area, for a permit, license, or other governmental approval of
an action. A request must be submitted
in writing to the agency on an application form provided by the agency,
if one exists. The agency may
reject as incomplete a request not on a form of the agency if the
request does not include information required by the agency. A request not on a form of the agency
must clearly identify on the first page the specific permit, license, or
other governmental approval being sought. No request shall be deemed
made if not in compliance with this paragraph.
(d) "Applicant" means a person submitting a
request under this section. An
applicant may designate a person to act on the applicant's behalf
regarding a request under this section and any action taken by or notice
given to the applicant's designee related to the request shall be deemed
taken by or given to the applicant.
Subd. 2. [DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE.] (a) Except as otherwise provided
in this section, section 462.358, subdivision 3b, or chapter 505,
and notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, an agency must approve or
deny within 60 days a written request relating to zoning, septic systems, or
expansion of the metropolitan urban service area for a permit, license, or
other governmental approval of an action.
Failure of an agency to deny a request within 60 days is approval of the
request. If an agency denies the
request, it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time that
it denies the request.
(b) When a vote on a resolution or properly made motion to
approve a request fails for any reason, the failure shall constitute
a denial of the request provided that those voting against the motion
state on the record the reasons why they oppose the request. A denial of a request because of a failure
to approve a resolution or motion does not preclude an immediate submission
of a same or similar request.
(c) Except as provided in paragraph (b), if an agency, other
than a multimember governing body, denies the request, it must state in
writing the reasons for the denial at the time that it denies the
request. If a multimember governing
body denies a request, it must state the reasons for denial on the record
and provide the applicant in writing a statement of the reasons for the
denial. If the written statement is not
adopted at the same time as the denial, it must be adopted at the next
meeting following the denial of the request but before the expiration
of the time allowed for making a decision under this section. The written statement must be consistent
with the reasons stated in the record at the time of the denial. The written statement must be
provided to the applicant upon adoption.
Subd. 3. [APPLICATION;
EXTENSIONS.] (a) The time limit in subdivision 2 begins upon the agency's
receipt of a written request containing all information required by law or by a
previously adopted rule, ordinance, or policy of the agency, including
the applicable application fee. If
an agency receives a written request that does not contain all required
information, the 60-day limit starts over only if the agency sends written
notice within ten 15 business days of receipt of the request
telling the requester what information is missing.
(b) If an action a request relating to zoning,
septic systems, or expansion of the metropolitan urban service area requires
the approval of more than one state agency in the executive branch, the 60-day
period in subdivision 2 begins to run for all executive branch agencies on the
day a request containing all required information is received by one state
agency. The agency receiving the
request must forward copies to other state agencies whose approval is required.
(c) An agency response meets the 60-day time limit if the
agency can document that the response was sent within 60 days of receipt of the
written request.
(d) The time limit in subdivision 2 is extended if a state
statute, federal law, or court order requires a process to occur before the
agency acts on the request, and the time periods prescribed in the state
statute, federal law, or court order make it impossible to act on the request
within 60 days. In cases described in
this paragraph, the deadline is extended to 60 days after completion of the
last process required in the applicable statute, law, or order. Final approval of an agency receiving a
request is not considered a process for purposes of this paragraph.
(e) The time limit in subdivision 2 is extended if: (1) a request submitted to a state agency
requires prior approval of a federal agency; or (2) an application submitted to
a city, county, town, school district, metropolitan or regional entity, or
other political subdivision requires prior approval of a state or federal
agency. In cases described in this
paragraph, the deadline for agency action is extended to 60 days after the
required prior approval is granted.
(f) An agency may extend the time limit in subdivision 2 before
the end of the initial 60-day period by providing written notice of the
extension to the applicant. The
notification must state the reasons for the extension and its anticipated
length, which may not exceed 60 days unless approved by the applicant.
(g) An applicant may by written notice to the agency request
an extension of the time limit under this section.
Sec. 2.
[EFFECTIVE DATE.]
This act is effective June 1, 2003, for requests submitted
on or after that date."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Holberg from the Committee on Civil Law to which was referred:
H. F. No. 444, A bill for an act relating to municipal
contracts; permitting the awarding of attorney fees in certain cases; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 471.345, subdivision 14.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 1, line 13, delete "(1)"
Page 1, line 14, delete the new language and after the period,
insert "If the court finds that the municipality has engaged in
unlawful bidding practices and invalidates the award of the bid, the
court may award reasonable attorney fees and costs to the
protester. If the court finds that the
municipality did not violate the law, and the award is not invalidated,
the court may award reasonable attorney fees and costs to the
municipality if the court makes the further finding that the protest was
filed without substantial basis in fact or law."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Rhodes from the Committee on Governmental Operations and
Veterans Affairs Policy to which was referred:
H. F. No. 509, A bill for an act relating to government
operations; transferring authority over certain Indian scholarship programs
from the commissioner of children, families, and learning to the higher
education services office.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 1, line 11, delete "is" and insert "are"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass and
be re-referred to the Committee on Education Finance.
The report was adopted.
Haas from the Committee on State
Government Finance to which was referred:
H. F. No. 676, A bill for an act relating to mental health;
clarifying that persons who are voluntary patients for treatment of a mental
illness are not subject to civil commitment; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002,
sections 253B.04, subdivision 1; 253B.05, subdivision 3.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill
pass.
The report was adopted.
Stang from the Committee on Higher Education Finance to which
was referred:
H. F. No. 772, A bill for an act relating to agriculture;
extending the expiration date for the Minnesota agriculture education
leadership council; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 41D.01,
subdivision 4.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 1, line 10, delete "2006" and insert
"2008"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Rhodes from the Committee on Governmental Operations and
Veterans Affairs Policy to which was referred:
H. F. No. 785, A bill for an act relating to metropolitan
government; eliminating certain reporting requirements; abolishing the
metropolitan parks and open space commission; providing for the direct charging
by the metropolitan council of industrial dischargers for certain wastewater
treatment user fees; removing an obsolete requirement for metropolitan school
districts to submit capital improvement plans to the metropolitan council for
review; making conforming changes; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections
352.01, subdivision 2a; 473.121, subdivision 5a; 473.13, subdivision 1;
473.143, subdivision 1; 473.147; 473.313, subdivision 2; 473.315, subdivision
1; 473.333; 473.351, subdivision 3; 473.517, by adding a subdivision; repealing
Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 473.121, subdivision 12; 473.1623; 473.301,
subdivision 4; 473.303; 473.704, subdivision 19; 473.863.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill
pass.
The report was adopted.
Gunther from the Committee on Jobs and Economic Development
Finance to which was referred:
H. F. No. 831, A bill for an act relating to unemployment
insurance; modifying provisions to increase the solvency of the trust fund;
making policy and technical changes; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections
268.035, subdivisions 15, 23; 268.044, subdivision 1, by adding a subdivision;
268.051, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, by adding
a subdivision; 268.052, subdivision 1; 268.057, subdivision 5; 268.067; 268.07,
subdivision 2; 268.085, subdivision 3; 268.086, subdivision 2; 268.095,
subdivisions 1, 2, 6, 11; 268.105, subdivision 7; 268.18, subdivisions 1, 4;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 268; repealing
Minnesota Rules, part 3315.1015, subpart 4.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill
pass and be placed on the Consent Calendar.
The report was adopted.
Haas from the Committee on State Government Finance to which
was referred:
H. F. No. 873, A bill for an act relating to counties; changing
certain auditing requirements; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 6.48;
6.49; 6.54; 6.55; 6.64; 6.65; 6.66; 6.67; 6.68, subdivision 1; 6.70; 6.71.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 1, lines 19 to 21, delete the new language and insert
"If the audit is performed by a private certified public accountant,
the state auditor may require specific additional information from the
private certified public accountant to resolve the specified issues or
questions."
Page 1, line 22, delete "public accountant."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass and
be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The report was adopted.
Swenson from the Committee on Agriculture Policy to which was
referred:
H. F. No. 967, A bill for an act relating to environment;
modifying expenditure limits for upgrading feedlots; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 116.07, subdivision 7.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 4, line 23, after the comma, insert "in effect on
April 15, 2003,"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass and
be re-referred to the Committee on Environment and Natural Resources Policy.
The report was adopted.
Holberg from the Committee on Civil Law to which was referred:
H. F. No. 984, A bill for an act relating to cooperatives;
authorizing businesses to organize as cooperative associations; providing
penalties; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 80A.14, subdivision 17;
80A.15, subdivision 2; proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter
308B.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 4, delete section 4
Page 20, line 14, delete everything after "A"
and insert "cooperative organized under chapter 308A"
Page 20, delete lines 15 and 16
Page 20, line 17, delete everything before "may"
Page 20, line 19, delete "business entity" and
insert "cooperative organized under chapter 308A"
Page 20, line 24, delete "ENTITIES" and insert
"COOPERATIVES" and delete everything after "A" and
insert "cooperative organized under chapter 308A"
Page 20, line 25, delete everything before "may"
Page 20, line 26, delete everything after "under"
and insert "chapter 308A"
Page 20, line 27, delete everything before "to"
Page 20, line 30, delete "status" and insert
"separate existence" and delete everything after the
second "the" and insert "cooperative organized under
chapter 308A"
Page 20, line 31, delete "statutes terminates"
and insert "ceases"
Page 20, delete lines 33 to 36
Page 21, delete lines 1 to 7
Page 41, delete lines 23 to 36
Page 42, delete lines 1 to 3
Page 42, line 4, delete "5" and insert "4"
Page 44, after line 13, insert:
"(3) for knowing violations of securities laws under
section 80A.23 or for illegal distributions;"
Page 44, line 14, delete "(3)" and insert
"(4)"
Page 44, line 16, delete "(4)" and insert
"(5)"
Page 70, line 1, delete "the statutes of this state"
and insert "law"
Page 90, line 34, delete everything after "MERGER"
Page 91, line 4, delete "this state or"
Page 91, line 6, after the period, insert "A
cooperative may not merge or consolidate with a business entity
organized under the laws of this state, other than a cooperative
organized under chapter 308A, unless the law governing the business
entity expressly authorizes merger or consolidation with a cooperative. This subdivision does not authorize a
foreign business entity to do any act not authorized by the law governing
the foreign business entity."
Page 91, line 11, after "constituent" insert
"domestic" and after "and" delete "other"
and insert "any foreign"
Page 91, line 13, after "new" insert "domestic"
and delete "other" and insert "foreign"
Page 91, line 16, before "cooperatives" insert
"domestic" and before "business" insert
"foreign"
Page 91, line 18, before "cooperative" insert
"domestic" and before "business" insert
"foreign"
Page 91, line 21, delete the second "the" and
insert "each constituent domestic"
Page 91, line 23, delete "entity" and insert
"domestic cooperative or foreign business entity"
Page 91, line 24, before "entity" insert
"foreign business"
Page 91, line 34, after "adopted" insert
"by a domestic cooperative"
Page 92, lines 6 and 15, before "cooperative"
insert "domestic"
Page 92, line 19, after "surviving" insert
"domestic"
Page 92, line 20, delete "article" and insert
"chapter"
Page 92, line 24, before the period, insert "of this
state or appropriate office of another jurisdiction"
Page 92, line 29, before "cooperatives" insert
"domestic" and delete "or" and insert "and
any" and delete "other" and insert "foreign"
Page 92, line 33, before "cooperative" insert
"domestic" and delete "other" and insert
"any foreign"
Page 92, line 35, after "new" insert "domestic
cooperative or foreign"
Page 93, line 2, after "new" insert "domestic
cooperative or foreign"
Page 93, line 5, delete the second "the" and
insert "each" and after "consolidated" insert
"domestic cooperative or foreign"
Page 93, line 6, after "new" insert "domestic
cooperative or foreign"
Page 93, delete lines 9 and 10
Page 93, line 13, before "cooperative" insert
"domestic" in both places
Page 93, line 15, before the period, insert ", provided
however, if either the parent or the subsidiary is a business entity
organized under the laws of this state, the merger of the subsidiary is
not authorized under this section unless the law governing the business
entity expressly authorizes merger with a cooperative. For purposes of this
section, "subsidiary" means a domestic cooperative or
foreign business entity and the term "cooperative" means a
domestic cooperative"
Page 95, delete lines 19 to 26
Page 95, line 27, delete "7" and insert "6"
Pages 95 to 122, delete sections 71 to 75
Page 122, line 33, delete "308B.835" and insert
"308B.811"
Page 122, line 35, delete everything after "merger"
Page 123, line 1, delete everything after "plan"
Page 123, line 2, delete "308B.831,"
Page 123, line 4, delete "OR EXCHANGE"
Page 123, lines 5 and 21, delete "or exchange"
Page 123, line 6, before "cooperatives" insert
"domestic"
Page 123, line 10, before "the" insert "if"
and delete "or exchange" and after "domestic"
insert "cooperative"
Page 123, line 11, delete "if" and insert
"the"
Page 123, line 13, before "business" insert
"foreign" and after "and" insert "if"
Page 123, lines 14 and 15, before "cooperative"
insert "domestic"
Page 123, line 23, before "cooperative" insert
"domestic" and delete the second "of"
Page 123, line 24, delete "exchange"
Page 123, line 26, delete "or exchange"
Page 123, line 27, delete "domestic or" and
delete the second "or"
Page 123, line 28, delete "exchange"
Page 123, lines 29 and 30, before "business"
insert "foreign"
Page 123, line 33, delete "or exchange"
Renumber the sections in sequence
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Dempsey from the Committee on Local Government and Metropolitan
Affairs to which was referred:
H. F. No. 1003, A bill for an act relating to public employees;
providing an exclusion from the political subdivision compensation limit;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 43A.17, subdivision 9.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1.
Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 43A.17, subdivision 9, is amended to
read:
Subd. 9. [POLITICAL
SUBDIVISION COMPENSATION LIMIT.] (a) The salary and the value of all
other forms of compensation of a person employed by a statutory or home rule
charter city, county, town, metropolitan or regional agency, or other
political subdivision of this state excluding a school district, or employed
under section 422A.03, may not exceed 95 percent of the salary of the governor
as set under section 15A.082, except as provided in this subdivision. For purposes of this subdivision,
"political subdivision of this state" includes a statutory or
home rule charter city, county, town, metropolitan or regional agency,
or other political subdivision, but does not include a hospital, clinic,
or health maintenance organization owned by such a governmental unit.
(b) Deferred compensation and payroll allocations to
purchase an individual annuity contract for an employee are included in
determining the employee's salary.
Other forms of compensation which shall be included to determine an
employee's total compensation are all other direct and indirect items of
compensation which are not specifically excluded by this subdivision. Other forms of compensation which shall not
be included in a determination of an employee's total compensation for the
purposes of this subdivision are:
(1) employee benefits that are also provided for the majority
of all other full-time employees of the political subdivision, vacation and
sick leave allowances, health and dental insurance, disability insurance, term
life insurance, and pension benefits or like benefits the cost of which is
borne by the employee or which is not subject to tax as income under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986;
(2) dues paid to organizations that are of a civic,
professional, educational, or governmental nature; and
(3) reimbursement for actual expenses incurred by the employee
which the governing body determines to be directly related to the performance
of job responsibilities, including any relocation expenses paid during the
initial year of employment.
The value of other forms of compensation shall be the annual
cost to the political subdivision for the provision of the compensation.
(c) The salary of a medical doctor or doctor of
osteopathy occupying a position that the governing body of the political
subdivision has determined requires an M.D. or D.O. degree is excluded from the
limitation in this subdivision.
(d) The commissioner may increase the limitation in this
subdivision for a position that the commissioner has determined requires
special expertise necessitating a higher salary to attract or retain a
qualified person. The commissioner
shall review each proposed increase giving due consideration to salary rates
paid to other persons with similar responsibilities in the state and
nation. The commissioner may not
increase the limitation until the commissioner has presented the proposed increase
to the legislative coordinating commission and received the commission's
recommendation on it. The
recommendation is advisory only. If the
commission does not give its recommendation on a proposed increase within 30
days from its receipt of the proposal, the commission is deemed to have
recommended approval."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Haas from the Committee on State Government Finance to which
was referred:
H. F. No. 1006, A bill for an act relating to elections;
providing for conformity with the federal Help America Vote Act; creating a
complaint process; imposing a penalty; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002,
sections 201.021; 201.022; 201.061, subdivisions 1, 3, by adding subdivisions;
201.071, subdivisions 1, 3, by adding subdivisions; 201.091, subdivisions 1, 4,
5, by adding a subdivision; 201.121, subdivision 1; 201.13, subdivision 1;
201.15; 201.155; 201.161; 201.171; 201.221, subdivisions 2, 3; 203B.06,
subdivision 4; 203B.08, subdivision 3; 203B.12, subdivision 2; 203B.16, by
adding a subdivision; 203B.17; 203B.19; 203B.24, subdivision 2; 203B.26;
204B.47; 204C.10; 206.57, by adding subdivisions; 206.81; proposing coding for
new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 200; 201; 204C.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 3, delete lines 7 and 8
Page 27, after line 25, insert:
"Sec. 41.
[REIMBURSEMENT.]
The secretary of state must reimburse the commissioner of
public safety up to $37,000 in fiscal year 2004 and up to $1,000 in
each following year, for costs incurred by the department of public
safety in implementing the Help America Vote Act of 2002."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass and
be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The report was adopted.
Rhodes from the Committee on Governmental Operations and
Veterans Affairs Policy to which was referred:
H. F. No. 1042, A bill for an act relating to the metropolitan
sports facilities commission; changing its name and membership; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 473.551, subdivision 3; 473.553, subdivisions
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7; 473.564, subdivision 3; 473.5995, subdivision 2; 473I.01,
subdivision 3.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 3, lines 31 and 32, strike "football stadium
account" and insert "general fund"
Amend the title as follows:
Page 1, line 3, before "amending" insert
"changing the disposition of Metrodome net sales proceeds;"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass and
be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The report was adopted.
Kuisle from the Committee on
Transportation Finance to which was referred:
H. F. No. 1056, A bill for an act relating to metropolitan
government; providing for the financing of metropolitan area transit and
paratransit capital expenditures; authorizing the issuance of certain
obligations; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 473.39, by adding a
subdivision.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill
pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Taxes.
The report was adopted.
Holberg from the Committee on Civil Law to which was referred:
H. F. No. 1114, A bill for an act relating to real property; conveyances
by spouses; purchase-money mortgages; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002,
sections 507.02; 507.03.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill
pass.
The report was adopted.
Haas from the Committee on State Government Finance to which
was referred:
H. F. No. 1133, A bill for an act relating to public employees;
transferring duties relating to exceptions to the political subdivision
compensation limit; authorizing the state auditor to charge a fee; proposing
coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 15A; repealing Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 43A.17, subdivision 9.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 3, line 2, delete everything after the period
Page 3, delete lines 3 to 5
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass and
be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The report was adopted.
Holberg from the Committee on Civil Law to which was referred:
H. F. No. 1202, A bill for an act relating to the environment;
modifying environmental review for animal feedlots; amending Minnesota Statutes
2002, sections 116.07, subdivision 7a; 116D.04, subdivisions 2a, 10, 11, 13.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1.
Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 116.07, subdivision 7a, is amended to
read:
Subd. 7a. [NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR LIVESTOCK FEEDLOT PERMIT.] (a)
A person who applies to the pollution control agency or a county board for a
permit to construct or expand a feedlot with a capacity of 500 animal units or
more shall, not later less than ten business days after the
application is submitted before the date on which a permit is issued,
provide notice to each resident and each owner of real property within 5,000
feet of the perimeter of the proposed feedlot.
The notice may be delivered by first class mail, in person, or by the
publication in a newspaper of general circulation within the affected area and
must include information on the type of livestock and the proposed capacity of
the feedlot. Notification under this subdivision is satisfied under an equal or
greater notification requirement of a county conditional use permit.
(b) The agency or a county board must verify that notice
was provided as required under paragraph (a) prior to issuing a permit.
Sec. 2. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 116D.04, subdivision 2a, is amended to read:
Subd. 2a. Where there
is potential for significant environmental effects resulting from any major
governmental action, the action shall be preceded by a detailed environmental
impact statement prepared by the responsible governmental unit. The
environmental impact statement shall be an analytical rather than an
encyclopedic document which describes the proposed action in detail, analyzes
its significant environmental impacts, discusses appropriate alternatives to
the proposed action and their impacts, and explores methods by which adverse
environmental impacts of an action could be mitigated. The environmental impact statement shall
also analyze those economic, employment and sociological effects that cannot be
avoided should the action be implemented.
To ensure its use in the decision making process, the environmental
impact statement shall be prepared as early as practical in the formulation of
an action.
(a) The board shall by rule establish categories of actions for
which environmental impact statements and for which environmental assessment
worksheets shall be prepared as well as categories of actions for which no
environmental review is required under this section.
(b) The responsible governmental unit shall promptly publish
notice of the completion of an environmental assessment worksheet in a manner
to be determined by the board and shall provide copies of the environmental
assessment worksheet to the board and its member agencies. Comments on the need for an environmental
impact statement may be submitted to the responsible governmental unit during a
30 day period following publication of the notice that an environmental
assessment worksheet has been completed.
The responsible governmental unit's decision on the need for an
environmental impact statement shall be based on the environmental assessment
worksheet and the comments received during the comment period, and shall be
made within 15 days after the close of the comment period. The board's chair may extend the 15 day
period by not more than 15 additional days upon the request of the responsible
governmental unit.
(c) An environmental assessment worksheet shall also be
prepared for a proposed action whenever material evidence accompanying a
petition by not less than 25 individuals, submitted before the proposed project
has received final approval by the appropriate governmental units, demonstrates
that, because of the nature or location of a proposed action, there may be
potential for significant environmental effects. Petitions requesting the
preparation of an environmental assessment worksheet shall be submitted to the
board. The chair of the board shall
determine the appropriate responsible governmental unit and forward the
petition to it. A decision on the need
for an environmental assessment worksheet shall be made by the responsible
governmental unit within 15 days after the petition is received by the
responsible governmental unit. The
board's chair may extend the 15 day period by not more than 15 additional days
upon request of the responsible governmental unit. Except in an environmentally sensitive location where Minnesota
Rules, part 4410.4300, subpart 29, item B, apply, if the proposed action
is an animal feedlot facility with a capacity of less than 1,000 animal
units, or is an expansion of an existing animal feedlot
facility by less than 1,000 animal units, and if the application for the
animal feedlot facility includes a written commitment by the proposer to
design, construct, and operate the facility in full compliance with Minnesota
Rules, chapter 7020, an environmental assessment worksheet must not be
required by the responsible governmental unit.
(d) The board may, prior to final approval of a proposed
project, require preparation of an environmental assessment worksheet by a
responsible governmental unit selected by the board for any action where
environmental review under this section has not been specifically provided for
by rule or otherwise initiated.
(e) An early and open process shall be utilized to limit the
scope of the environmental impact statement to a discussion of those impacts,
which, because of the nature or location of the project, have the potential for
significant environmental effects. The
same process shall be utilized to determine the form, content and level of
detail of the statement as well as the alternatives which are appropriate for
consideration in the statement. In
addition, the permits which will be required for the proposed action shall be
identified during the scoping process.
Further, the process shall identify those permits for which information
will be developed concurrently with the environmental impact statement. The board shall provide in its rules for the
expeditious completion of the scoping process. The determinations reached in
the process shall be incorporated into the order requiring the preparation of
an environmental impact statement.
(f) Whenever practical, information needed by a governmental
unit for making final decisions on permits or other actions required for a
proposed project shall be developed in conjunction with the preparation of an
environmental impact statement.
(g) An environmental impact statement shall be prepared and its
adequacy determined within 280 days after notice of its preparation unless the
time is extended by consent of the parties or by the governor for good cause. The responsible governmental unit shall
determine the adequacy of an environmental impact statement, unless within 60
days after notice is published that an environmental impact statement will be
prepared, the board chooses to determine the adequacy of an environmental
impact statement. If an environmental
impact statement is found to be inadequate, the responsible governmental unit
shall have 60 days to prepare an adequate environmental impact statement.
Sec. 3. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 116D.04, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Decisions on
the need for an environmental assessment worksheet, the need for an
environmental impact statement and the adequacy of an environmental impact
statement may be reviewed by a declaratory judgment action in the district
court of the county wherein the proposed action, or any part thereof, would
be undertaken appeals brought by any person aggrieved by the
decision. Judicial review under
this section shall be initiated within 30 days after the governmental unit
makes the decision, and a bond may be required under section 562.02 unless at
the time of hearing on the application for the bond the plaintiff has shown
that the claim has sufficient possibility of success on the merits to sustain
the burden required for the issuance of a temporary restraining order. Nothing
in this section shall be construed to alter the requirements for a temporary
restraining order or a preliminary injunction pursuant to the Minnesota rules
of civil procedure for district courts.
The board may initiate judicial review of decisions referred to herein
and may intervene as of right in any proceeding brought under this subdivision.
Sec. 4. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 116D.04, subdivision 11, is amended to read:
Subd. 11. If the board
or governmental unit which is required to act within a time period specified in
this section fails to so act, any person may seek an order of the district
court relief through the court of appeals requiring the board or
governmental unit to immediately take the action mandated by subdivisions 2a
and 3a. The court of appeals shall
make a decision based on the information and record supplied by the responsible
governmental unit.
Sec. 5.
Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 116D.04, subdivision 13, is amended to
read:
Subd. 13. This section
may be enforced by injunction, action to compel performance, or other
appropriate action in the district court of the county where the violation
takes place court of appeals.
The court of appeals shall have full jurisdiction to hear and
determine the matter appealed. The proceeding
may be governed by the Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure. Upon the request of the board or the chair
of the board, the attorney general may bring an action under this
subdivision."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass and
be re-referred to the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration.
The report was adopted.
Haas from the Committee on State Government Finance to which was
referred:
H. F. No. 1253, A bill for an act relating to local government;
providing for local government pay equity reports to be filed with the
commissioner of employee relations every five years; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2002, sections 471.999; 477A.014, subdivision 4.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill
pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The report was adopted.
Boudreau from the Committee on Health and Human Services Policy
to which was referred:
H. F. No. 1332, A bill for an act relating to professions;
regulating the issuance of social work licenses and the payment of fees;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 148B.18, subdivision 2a, by adding a
subdivision; 148B.20, subdivision 3; 148B.21, subdivision 7; 148B.22, by adding
a subdivision; 148B.26, subdivision 1; 148B.27, subdivisions 1, 2; Laws 2001,
chapter 90, section 6; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 148B; repealing Minnesota Rules, parts 8740.0200, subpart 3, item C;
8740.0222; 8740.0227; 8740.0290.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill
pass.
The report was adopted.
Smith from the Committee on Judiciary Policy and Finance to
which was referred:
H. F. No. 1354, A bill for an act relating to crime; creating a
sanctions conference procedure to allow probation officers to impose, with
district court confirmation, probation sanctions for technical violations of
probation; requesting the chief judge of each judicial district to develop
procedures for sanctions conferences and a sanctions conference form; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 243.05, subdivision 1; 609.135, subdivision
1; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 243; 244; 401; repealing
Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 244.19, subdivision 3a; 401.02, subdivision
5.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Pages 1 to 7, delete sections 1 to 5
Pages 10 to 13, delete sections 10 to 13
Page 13, delete lines 33 to 36 and insert "probation
officers may impose community work service for an offender's or
probation violation sanctions, consistent with section 243.05,
subdivision 1; 244.19, subdivision 3a; or 401.02, subdivision 5; or
sections 244.196 to 244.199."
Page 14, delete line 1
Page 14, line 20, delete "commissioner of corrections
and each"
Page 14, line 23, after "in" insert "Minnesota
Statutes," and delete "2 to 13" and insert "244.196
to 244.199,"
Page 16, line 2, delete "sections" and insert
"section" and delete the semicolon and insert ", is
repealed."
Page 16, delete line 3
Page 16, line 5, delete "16" and insert "7"
Renumber the sections in sequence
Amend the title as follows:
Page 1, line 3, after "allow" insert
"certain"
Page 1, line 5, delete everything after the semicolon
Page 1, delete lines 6 to 13 and insert "requiring the
chief executive officer of a local corrections agency to develop procedures for
sanctions conferences and a sanctions conference form; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 609.135, subdivision 1; proposing coding for new law in
Minnesota Statutes, chapter 244; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2002, section
244.19, subdivision 3a."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Rhodes from the Committee on Governmental Operations and
Veterans Affairs Policy to which was referred:
H. F. No. 1437, A bill for an act relating to elections;
requiring disclosures by certain persons conducting polls; proposing coding for
new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 211B.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 1, delete lines 7 to 15 and insert:
"A person who conducts a survey by telephone that
relates to a candidate for elective office of the state, or any of its
political subdivisions, must, at the request of the survey respondent,
provide the following information at the termination of the survey:
(1) the name, address, and telephone number of the person
who retained the pollster; and
(2) whether the survey is being conducted with the consent
or cooperation of any candidate mentioned in the survey."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Smith from the Committee on Judiciary Policy and Finance to
which was referred:
H. F. No. 1482, A bill for an act relating to crime prevention;
clarifying the reporting requirements of the predatory offender registration
law; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 243.166, subdivisions 3, 4a.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 3, line 22, reinstate the stricken language and delete the
new language
Page 3, line 23, strike "a clause" and insert "any
information reported under clauses (1) to (6)"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Boudreau from the Committee on Health and Human Services Policy
to which was referred:
S. F. No. 39, A bill for an act relating to health; allowing
application for designation as an essential community provider; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 62Q.19, subdivision 2.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill
pass.
The report was adopted.
Smith from the Committee on Judiciary Policy and Finance to
which was referred:
S. F. No. 351, A bill for an act relating to crime prevention;
providing that in certain cases authorized representatives of entities
possessing a permit to use radio equipment capable of receiving police
emergency transmissions may use and possess the equipment without a permit;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 299C.37, subdivisions 1, 3.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill
pass.
The report was adopted.
Rhodes from the Committee on Governmental Operations and
Veterans Affairs Policy to which was referred:
S. F. No. 842, A bill for an act relating to natural resources;
modifying commissioner's authority relating to employees, gifts, and grants;
modifying provisions of the state parks working capital fund; modifying
application provisions for certain licenses; providing for reciprocity of
certain safety courses; modifying certain county reimbursement provisions;
modifying identification provisions for fish and dark houses; eliminating
requirement to publish pamphlet form of laws; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002,
sections 84.01, subdivision 3; 84.026; 84.085, subdivision 1; 84.82,
subdivision 2; 84.862, by adding a subdivision; 85.22, by adding a subdivision;
86B.401, subdivision 1; 97A.065, subdivision 2; 97C.355, subdivisions 1, 2;
repealing Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 97A.051, subdivision 1; Minnesota
Rules, part 6262.0100, subpart 2.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill
pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Environment and Natural Resources
Finance.
The report was adopted.
SECOND READING OF HOUSE BILLS
H. F. Nos. 155, 433, 444, 676, 772, 785, 831, 984, 1003, 1114,
1332, 1354, 1437 and 1482 were read for the second time.
SECOND READING OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. Nos. 328, 1099, 39 and 351 were read for the second time.
INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS
The following House Files were introduced:
Ozment introduced:
H. F. No. 1520, A bill for an act relating to the state lottery;
establishing an oversight council for the state lottery; providing powers and
duties; requiring a report; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 349A.08,
subdivision 5; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter
349A.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on State Government Finance.
Nornes, Magnus, Rhodes, Dill, Westrom and Harder introduced:
H. F. No. 1521, A bill for an act relating to capital
improvements; authorizing the issuance of state bonds; appropriating money to
the veterans homes board for the state's share of five capital projects.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Health and Human Services Finance.
Sykora and Rhodes introduced:
H. F. No. 1522, A bill for an act relating to education;
modifying the notice given on ballot for referendum revenue; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 126C.17, subdivision 9.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Education Finance.
Kelliher introduced:
H. F. No. 1523, A bill for an act relating to transportation;
requiring creation of interagency environmental review streamlining committee,
specifying duties; requiring development of model environmental review
memorandum of understanding and specifying its content; proposing coding for
new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 174.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Transportation Policy.
Demmer, Cox, Nornes, Kuisle, Krinkie, Lipman, Wilkin and Meslow
introduced:
H. F. No. 1524, A bill for an act relating to higher education;
providing for the repayment of grants under certain conditions; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 136A.131, by adding a subdivision; proposing
coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 136A.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Higher Education Finance.
Knoblach introduced:
H. F. No. 1525, A bill for an act relating to public finance;
requiring the sale of surplus state property.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on State Government Finance.
Tingelstad introduced:
H. F. No. 1526, A bill for an act relating to the environment;
providing funding for individual sewage treatment systems; appropriating money;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 17.117, subdivisions 5a, 10, 11, 13;
115.55, subdivision 1, by adding a subdivision; 115.56, subdivision 4; 115.72,
by adding a subdivision; 116P.04, subdivision 3; 116P.12, subdivision 1;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 115.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Environment and Natural Resources Finance.
Kelliher, Walker, Davnie, Biernat, Thissen, Mullery, Kahn,
Wagenius and Hornstein introduced:
H. F. No. 1527, A bill for an act relating to capital
improvements; authorizing issuance of state bonds; appropriating money for
grants to the city of Minneapolis to pay the principal on the city's bonds for
the Minneapolis Convention Center and related facilities and for the Target
Center.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Jobs and Economic Development Finance.
CONSENT CALENDAR
S. F. No. 1095 was reported to the House.
Kielkucki moved that S. F. No. 1095 be continued
on the Consent Calendar. The motion
prevailed.
H. F. No. 956 was reported to the House.
Magnus moved that H. F. No. 956 be continued on
the Consent Calendar. The motion
prevailed.
S. F. No. 790, A bill for an act relating to human services;
recodifying and reorganizing the background study provisions in the Human
Services Licensing Act; making conforming changes; amending Minnesota Statutes
2002, sections 245A.04, subdivisions 1, 3, 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d, 3e, 3f; 245A.041;
proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 245C.
The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final
passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 133 yeas and 0
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Adolphson
Anderson, B.
Anderson, I.
Anderson, J.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Biernat
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Cox
Davids
Davnie
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Goodwin
Gunther
Haas
Hackbarth
Harder
Hausman
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Howes
Huntley
Jacobson
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Kielkucki
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Kuisle
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, C.
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Nornes
Olsen, S.
Olson, M.
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson
Powell
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Ruth
Samuelson
Seagren
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Walker
Walz
Wardlow
Wasiluk
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The bill was passed and its title agreed to.
H. F. No. 1095, A bill for an act
relating to human services; extending the deadline for commencing construction
for previously approved moratorium projects; providing for expired and canceled
proposals; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 144A.073, by adding
subdivisions.
The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final
passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 133 yeas and 0
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Adolphson
Anderson, B.
Anderson, I.
Anderson, J.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Biernat
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Cox
Davids
Davnie
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Goodwin
Gunther
Haas
Hackbarth
Harder
Hausman
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Howes
Huntley
Jacobson
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Kielkucki
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Kuisle
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, C.
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Nornes
Olsen, S.
Olson, M.
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson
Powell
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Ruth
Samuelson
Seagren
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Walker
Walz
Wardlow
Wasiluk
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The bill was passed and its title agreed to.
H. F. No. 1374, A bill for an act relating to agriculture;
providing for the headquarters of the department of agriculture to be named
after Orville L. Freeman.
The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final
passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 131 yeas and 2
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Adolphson
Anderson, B.
Anderson, I.
Anderson, J.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Biernat
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Cox
Davids
Davnie
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Goodwin
Gunther
Haas
Hackbarth
Harder
Hausman
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Howes
Huntley
Jacobson
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Kielkucki
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Kuisle
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, C.
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Nornes
Olsen, S.
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson
Powell
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Ruth
Samuelson
Seagren
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Walker
Walz
Wardlow
Wasiluk
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Krinkie
Olson, M.
The bill
was passed and its title agreed to.
S. F. No. 1001, A bill for an act relating to environment;
modifying requirements for solid waste plans; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002,
section 115A.46, subdivision 1.
The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final
passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 133 yeas and 0
nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Adolphson
Anderson, B.
Anderson, I.
Anderson, J.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Biernat
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Cox
Davids
Davnie
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Goodwin
Gunther
Haas
Hackbarth
Harder
Hausman
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Howes
Huntley
Jacobson
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Kielkucki
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Kuisle
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, C.
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Nornes
Olsen, S.
Olson, M.
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson
Powell
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Ruth
Samuelson
Seagren
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Walker
Walz
Wardlow
Wasiluk
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The bill was passed and its title agreed to.
H. F. No. 1059 was reported to the House.
Osterman moved to amend H. F. No. 1059, the first engrossment,
as follows:
Page 5, line 25, delete "6 and 7" and insert
"7 and 8"
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
H. F. No. 1059, A bill for an act relating to housing; housing
finance agency; making various clarifying, technical, and other changes to
agency programs; increasing debt ceiling; extending civil service pilot
project; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 462A.05, by adding a
subdivision; 462A.057, subdivision 1; 462A.073, subdivision 2; 462A.21,
subdivision 3a; 462A.22, subdivisions 1, 7; Laws 1993, chapter 301, section 1,
subdivision 4, as amended; Laws 1995, chapter 248, article 12, section 2, as
amended.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 129 yeas and 3
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Adolphson
Anderson, B.
Anderson, I.
Anderson, J.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Biernat
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Cox
Davids
Davnie
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Goodwin
Gunther
Haas
Hackbarth
Harder
Hausman
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Howes
Huntley
Jacobson
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Kielkucki
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Kuisle
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, C.
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Nornes
Olsen, S.
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson
Powell
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Ruth
Samuelson
Seagren
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Walker
Walz
Wardlow
Wasiluk
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
Those who voted in the negative were:
Buesgens
Krinkie
Olson, M.
The bill
was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
There being no objection, H. F. No. 956, which
was continued earlier today on the Consent Calendar, was again reported to the
House.
H. F. No. 956, A bill for an act relating to veterans homes;
clarifying use of certain funds; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, section
198.261.
The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final
passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 133 yeas and 0
nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Adolphson
Anderson, B.
Anderson, I.
Anderson, J.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Biernat
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Cox
Davids
Davnie
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Goodwin
Gunther
Haas
Hackbarth
Harder
Hausman
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Howes
Huntley
Jacobson
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Kielkucki
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Kuisle
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, C.
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Nornes
Olsen, S.
Olson, M.
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson
Powell
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Ruth
Samuelson
Seagren
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Walker
Walz
Wardlow
Wasiluk
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The bill
was passed and its title agreed to.
MOTION TO FIX TIME TO
CONVENE
Paulsen
moved that when the House adjourns today it adjourn until 3:00 p.m., Monday,
April 14, 2003. The motion prevailed.
CALENDAR FOR THE DAY
H. F. No. 335 was reported to the House.
Ozment moved to amend H. F. No. 335, the first engrossment, as
follows:
Page 1, line 8, delete "new"
Page 1, line 14, after "2003" insert ",
for all landscape irrigation systems installed after that date"
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
H. F. No. 335, A bill for an act relating to water; requiring
new landscape irrigation systems to have furnished and installed moisture
or rainfall sensing equipment; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota
Statutes, chapter 103G.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 109 yeas and 23
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Adolphson
Anderson, I.
Anderson, J.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Biernat
Boudreau
Brod
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Cox
Davnie
DeLaForest
Dempsey
Dill
Dorman
Dorn
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Fuller
Goodwin
Gunther
Haas
Hackbarth
Harder
Hausman
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hoppe
Hornstein
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Lindgren
Lipman
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, C.
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Nornes
Olsen, S.
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Ruth
Samuelson
Seagren
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simpson
Slawik
Soderstrom
Solberg
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Walz
Wardlow
Wasiluk
Westerberg
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Borrell
Bradley
Buesgens
Davids
Demmer
Eastlund
Erickson
Finstad
Gerlach
Holberg
Jacobson
Kielkucki
Krinkie
Kuisle
Lindner
Olson, M.
Powell
Seifert
Smith
Vandeveer
Westrom
Wilkin
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
S. F. No. 422 was reported to the House.
Buesgens moved that S. F. No. 422 be returned to the General
Register. The motion prevailed.
MOTIONS AND RESOLUTIONS
Fuller moved that his name be stricken as an author on
H. F. No. 403. The
motion prevailed.
Howes moved that the name of Demmer be added as an author on
H. F. No. 532. The
motion prevailed.
Dorman moved that the name of Demmer be added as an author on
H. F. No. 873. The
motion prevailed.
Seifert moved that the name of Demmer be added as an author on
H. F. No. 885. The
motion prevailed.
Gunther moved that the name of Demmer be added as an author on
H. F. No. 892. The
motion prevailed.
Holberg moved that the name of Demmer be added as an author on
H. F. No. 906. The
motion prevailed.
Soderstrom moved that the name of Demmer be added as an author
on H. F. No. 921. The
motion prevailed.
Vandeveer moved that the name of Demmer be added as an author
on H. F. No. 932. The
motion prevailed.
Magnus moved that the name of Demmer be added as an author on
H. F. No. 956. The
motion prevailed.
Beard moved that the name of Wasiluk be added as an author on
H. F. No. 965. The
motion prevailed.
Smith moved that the name of Demmer be added as an author on
H. F. No. 1123. The
motion prevailed.
Pugh moved that the name of Krinkie be added as an author on
H. F. No. 1209. The
motion prevailed.
Finstad moved that the name of Harder be added as an author on
H. F. No. 1361. The
motion prevailed.
Klinzing moved that the name of Brod be added as an author on
H. F. No. 1375. The
motion prevailed.
Pugh moved that the name of Marquart be added as an author on
H. F. No. 1464. The
motion prevailed.
Dorman moved that the name of Sertich be added as an author on
H. F. No. 1502. The
motion prevailed.
Hackbarth moved that the names of Brod and Westrom be added as
authors on H. F. No. 1508.
The motion prevailed.
Gunther moved that the name of Mahoney be added as an author on
H. F. No. 1509. The
motion prevailed.
Carlson moved that the name of Goodwin be added as an author on
H. F. No. 1516. The
motion prevailed.
Gunther moved that H. F. No. 831, now on the
Technical Consent Calendar, be placed on the General Register. The motion prevailed.
Swenson moved that S. F. No. 675 be recalled
from the Committee on Higher Education Finance and together with H. F. No. 772, now on the
General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
Slawik, Rhodes, Greiling and Seagren introduced:
House Resolution No. 8, A House resolution proclaiming the week
of April 6-12, 2003, as the Week of the Young Child in Minnesota.
SUSPENSION
OF RULES
Slawik moved that the rules be so far suspended that House Resolution
No. 8 be now considered and be placed upon its adoption. The motion prevailed.
HOUSE
RESOLUTION NO. 8
A House resolution proclaiming the week of April 6-12, 2003, as
the Week of the Young Child in Minnesota.
Whereas, the Week of the Young Child is an annual
celebration sponsored by the National Association for the Education of Young
Children (NAEYC), the world's largest early childhood education association,
with over 100,000 members and a network of nearly 450 local, state, and regional
affiliates; and
Whereas, the purpose of the Week of the Young Child is
to focus public attention on the needs of young children and their families and
to recognize the early childhood programs and services that meet those needs;
and
Whereas, NAEYC first established the Week of the Young
Child in 1971, recognizing that the early childhood years (birth through age 8)
lay the foundation for children's success in school and later life; and
Whereas, the Week of the Young Child is a time to plan
how we - as citizens of a community, of a state, and of a nation - will better
meet the needs of all young children and their families;
Whereas, the week of April 6-12, 2003, has been
proclaimed by the Governor to be the Week of the Young Child in Minnesota; Now,
Therefore,
Be It Resolved by the House of
Representatives of the State of Minnesota that it recognizes the week of April
6‑12 as
the Week of the Young Child and urges all Minnesotans to recognize and support
the needs of young children in their communities.
Be It Further Resolved that the Chief Clerk of the House
of Representatives is directed to prepare an enrolled copy of this resolution,
to be authenticated by his signature and that of the Speaker, and transmit it
to the National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Slawik moved that House Resolution No. 8 be now adopted. The motion prevailed and House Resolution
No. 8 was adopted.
POINT OF ORDER
Seifert raised a point of order pursuant to section 114 of
"Mason's Manual of Legislative Procedure," relating to Asking
Questions of Members. The Speaker ruled
the point of order not well taken.
ADJOURNMENT
Paulsen moved that the House adjourn. The motion prevailed, and the Speaker declared the House stands
adjourned until 3:00 p.m., Monday, April 14, 2003.
Edward
A. Burdick,
Chief Clerk, House of Representatives