STATE OF MINNESOTA
EIGHTY-THIRD SESSION - 2004
_____________________
NINETY-THIRD DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Monday, April 19, 2004
The House of Representatives convened at 3:00 p.m. and was
called to order by Steve Sviggum, Speaker of the House.
Prayer was offered by Pastor Eldon DeWeerth, Redeemer Lutheran
Church, White Bear Lake, Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge of allegiance to the
flag of the United States of America.
The roll was called and the following members were present:
Abeler
Abrams
Adolphson
Anderson, I.
Anderson, J.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Biernat
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Cornish
Cox
Davids
Davnie
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Goodwin
Greiling
Gunther
Haas
Hackbarth
Harder
Hausman
Heidgerken
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Howes
Huntley
Jacobson
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lieder
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, C.
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olson, M.
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson
Powell
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Ruth
Samuelson
Seagren
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Walker
Walz
Wardlow
Wasiluk
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
A quorum was present.
Anderson, B.; Clark; Hilstrom; Lesch and Olsen, S., were
excused.
Kuisle was excused until 6:00 p.m.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the Journal of the preceding
day. Dempsey moved that further reading
of the Journal be suspended and that the Journal be approved as corrected by
the Chief Clerk. The motion prevailed.
PETITIONS
AND COMMUNICATIONS
The following communications were received:
STATE
OF MINNESOTA
OFFICE
OF THE GOVERNOR
SAINT
PAUL 55155
April
14, 2004
The Honorable Steve Sviggum
Speaker of the House of
Representatives
The State of Minnesota
Dear Speaker Sviggum:
It is my honor to inform you that I have received, approved,
signed, and deposited in the Office of the Secretary of State the following
House Files:
H. F. No. 2651, relating to corrections;
amending the Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision by providing
procedures for retaking and reincarceration of parolees and probationers;
delaying the repeal of the interstate compact for the supervision of parolees
and probationers to provide more transition time for adoption of rules under
the new compact.
H. F. No. 2455, relating to corrections;
authorizing a five-level correctional facility classification system.
H. F. No. 1836, relating to the environment;
clarifying permitting for mineral tailing deposition into mine pits.
H. F. No. 3005, relating to elections; changing
times for voting on changing county seats.
Sincerely,
Tim
Pawlenty
Governor
STATE
OF MINNESOTA
OFFICE
OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE
ST.
PAUL 55155
The Honorable Steve Sviggum
Speaker of the House of
Representatives
The Honorable James P.
Metzen
President of the Senate
I have the honor to inform you that the following enrolled Acts
of the 2004 Session of the State Legislature have been received from the Office
of the Governor and are deposited in the Office of the Secretary of State for
preservation, pursuant to the State Constitution, Article IV, Section 23:
S. F. No. |
H. F. No. |
Session Laws Chapter No. |
Time and Date Approved 2004 |
Date Filed 2004 |
2651 155 4:40
p.m. April 14 April
15
2455 156 4:55
p.m. April 14 April
15
1836 157 4:05
p.m. April 14 April
15
3005 158 4:00
p.m. April 14 April
15
Sincerely,
Mary
Kiffmeyer
Secretary
of State
REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES
Paulsen from the Committee on Rules and Legislative
Administration to which was referred:
H. F. No. 2360, A bill for an act relating to natural
resources; modifying certain state park fee and permit requirements; modifying rulemaking
authority; modifying provisions for the Fort Snelling lease; adding to state
parks and recreation areas; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 85.052,
subdivision 4; 85.054, subdivision 7, by adding a subdivision; 85.22,
subdivision 2a; 85.34, by adding subdivisions; Minnesota Statutes 2003
Supplement, section 16B.24, subdivision 5; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2002,
section 85.34, subdivision 4.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill
pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The report was adopted.
Paulsen from the Committee on Rules and Legislative
Administration to which was referred:
H. F. No. 2436, A bill for an act relating to health; providing
for public health emergencies; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections
12.03, subdivision 4d; 12.39, subdivision 2; 144.419, subdivision 1; 144.4195,
subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 5; Minnesota Statutes 2003 Supplement, section 13.37,
subdivision 3; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 12;
144; repealing Laws 2002, chapter 402, section 21.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill
pass.
The report was adopted.
Paulsen from the Committee on Rules and Legislative
Administration to which was referred:
H. F. No. 2461, A bill for an act relating to agriculture;
defining certain terms; providing for the validity of certain electronic
documents and signatures; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 223.16, by
adding subdivisions; 223.177, subdivision 3; 232.21, by adding subdivisions;
232.23, subdivision 4.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill
pass.
The report was adopted.
Paulsen from the Committee on Rules
and Legislative Administration to which was referred:
H. F. No. 2874, A bill for an act relating to state employment;
modifying state hiring process provisions; adding, modifying, and eliminating
definitions; making technical changes; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002,
sections 43A.02, subdivisions 4, 6, 11, 26, 32, 34, by adding subdivisions;
43A.04, subdivisions 3, 4; 43A.05, subdivision 1; 43A.10; 43A.11, subdivisions
5, 6, 7, 8, 9; 43A.15, subdivisions 1, 2, 4, 7, 10, 15; 43A.16, subdivision 1;
43A.191, subdivision 3; 43A.36, subdivision 1; 43A.39, subdivision 1; 197.455;
Minnesota Statutes 2003 Supplement, section 43A.15, subdivision 14; proposing
coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 43A; repealing Minnesota
Statutes 2002, sections 43A.02, subdivisions 7, 8, 15, 16, 19, 20, 37; 43A.11,
subdivisions 3, 4; 43A.12; 43A.13, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8; 43A.15,
subdivisions 8, 9, 11; Minnesota Statutes 2003 Supplement, section 43A.13,
subdivision 7; Minnesota Rules, parts 3900.3300; 3900.6100; 3900.6300;
3900.6400; 3900.6500; 3900.6600; 3900.7100; 3900.7200; 3900.7300; 3900.7400;
3900.8500; 3900.8600; 3900.8800.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill
pass.
The report was adopted.
Paulsen from the Committee on Rules and Legislative
Administration to which was referred:
H. F. No. 2915, A bill for an act relating to workers'
compensation; making technical changes; modifying the definition of
"personal injury" to include injury or disease resulting from certain
vaccines; authorizing qualifying employees to opt to receive alternative
workers' compensation benefits; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections
176.011, subdivisions 15, 16; 176.081, subdivision 1; 176.092, subdivision 1a;
176.102, subdivision 3a; 176.129, subdivisions 1b, 2a, 13; 176.135,
subdivisions 1, 7; 176.1351, subdivisions 3, 5, by adding a subdivision;
176.136, subdivision 1a; 176.181, by adding a subdivision; 176.1812,
subdivision 6; 176.185, subdivision 1; 176.231, subdivision 5; 176.238,
subdivision 10; 176.391, subdivision 2; 176.83, subdivision 5.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill
pass.
The report was adopted.
Paulsen from the Committee on Rules and Legislative
Administration to which was referred:
H. F. No. 2976, A bill for an act relating to corrections;
authorizing the Fugitive Apprehension Unit to share in certain asset
forfeitures under the forfeiture law; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002,
sections 609.531, subdivision 1; 609.5311, subdivisions 2, 3; 609.5312,
subdivision 1; 609.5314, subdivision 1; 609.5318, subdivision 1; Minnesota
Statutes 2003 Supplement, sections 609.5312, subdivisions 3, 4; 609.5317,
subdivision 1.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill
pass.
The report was adopted.
Paulsen from the Committee on Rules and Legislative
Administration to which was referred:
S. F. No. 1080, A bill for an act relating to veterans homes;
updating and correcting certain language; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002,
sections 198.001, by adding a subdivision; 198.004, subdivision 1; 198.005;
198.007; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 198.001, subdivision 7;
198.002, subdivision 5; 198.003, subdivision 2.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill
pass.
The report was adopted.
Paulsen from the Committee on Rules
and Legislative Administration to which was referred:
House Resolution No. 20, A House resolution congratulating the
University of Minnesota women's hockey team on winning the 2004 NCAA women's
hockey championship.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the
resolution be adopted.
The report was adopted.
SECOND READING OF HOUSE BILLS
H. F. Nos. 2436, 2461, 2874, 2915 and 2976 were read for the
second time.
SECOND READING OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. No. 1080 was read for the second time.
INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS
The following House Files were introduced:
Wilkin, Huntley, Stang, Wardlow and Davids introduced:
H. F. No. 3180, A resolution memorializing the Center for
Medicaid and Medicare services to designate the state of Minnesota as a
single-state region under the Medicare Modernization Act.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration.
Brod, Cox and Boudreau introduced:
H. F. No. 3181, A bill for an act relating to education
finance; allowing school boards to elect to levy debt service against
referendum market value; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 123B.53, by
adding a subdivision; 123B.55; 123B.71, subdivision 9; Minnesota Statutes 2003
Supplement, section 123B.53, subdivision 4.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Education Finance.
Bernardy, Jaros, McNamara, Dempsey and Rhodes introduced:
H. F. No. 3182, A bill for an act relating to tax increment
financing; authorizing authorities to establish an urban renewal area; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 469.174, by adding a subdivision; 469.176, by
adding a subdivision.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Taxes.
MESSAGES
FROM THE SENATE
The following messages were received from the Senate:
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following
House Files, herewith returned:
H. F. No. 995, A bill for an act relating to utilities;
modifying notice and plan requirements before excavating around utility
facilities; making technical and clarifying changes; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2002, sections 216D.01, by adding a subdivision; 216D.04, subdivisions
1, 1a, 2, 3, 4; 216D.05.
H. F. No. 1983, A bill for an act relating to commerce;
enacting the revisions to the general provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code
and enacting a revised Article 7 of the Uniform Commercial Code recommended by
the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws; making
conforming changes; amending provisions in Articles 3 and 4 of the Uniform
Commercial Code relating to warranties on remotely created items; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 17.94; 84.787, subdivision 9; 84.797,
subdivision 10; 84.92, subdivision 6; 86B.820, subdivision 12; 168A.01,
subdivision 20; 234.27; 325L.03; 325L.16; 336.2-103; 336.2-104; 336.2-202;
336.2-310; 336.2-323; 336.2-401; 336.2-503; 336.2-505; 336.2-506; 336.2-509;
336.2-605; 336.2-705; 336.2A-103; 336.2A-501; 336.2A-514; 336.2A-518;
336.2A-519; 336.2A-526; 336.2A-527; 336.2A-528; 336.4-210; 336.4A-105;
336.4A-106; 336.4A-204; 336.5-103; 336.8-102; 336.8-103; 336.9-102; 336.9-203;
336.9-207; 336.9-208; 336.9-301; 336.9-310; 336.9-312; 336.9-313; 336.9-314;
336.9-317; 336.9-338; 336.9-601; 513.33, subdivision 1; 514.963, subdivision 9;
514.965, subdivision 10; 514.973; Minnesota Statutes 2003 Supplement, sections
336.3-103; 336.3-416; 336.3-417; 336.4-104; 336.4-207; 336.4-208; proposing
coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 336; repealing Minnesota
Statutes 2002, sections 336.1-101; 336.1-102; 336.1-103; 336.1-104; 336.1-105;
336.1-106; 336.1-107; 336.1-108; 336.1-109; 336.1-110; 336.1-201; 336.1-202;
336.1-203; 336.1-204; 336.1-205; 336.1-206; 336.1-207; 336.1-208; 336.1-209;
336.2-208; 336.2A-207; 336.7-101; 336.7-102; 336.7-103; 336.7-104; 336.7-105;
336.7-201; 336.7-202; 336.7-203; 336.7-204; 336.7-205; 336.7-206; 336.7-207;
336.7-208; 336.7-209; 336.7-210; 336.7-301; 336.7-302; 336.7-303; 336.7-304;
336.7-305; 336.7-306; 336.7-307; 336.7-308; 336.7-309; 336.7-401; 336.7-402;
336.7-403; 336.7-404; 336.7-501; 336.7-502; 336.7-503; 336.7-504; 336.7-505;
336.7-506; 336.7-507; 336.7-508; 336.7-509; 336.7-601; 336.7-602; 336.7-603;
336.10-104.
Patrick E. Flahaven, Secretary of the Senate
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following
House File, herewith returned, as amended by the Senate, in which amendments
the concurrence of the House is respectfully requested:
H. F. No. 1944, A bill for an act relating to domestic abuse;
providing another ground for extending an order for protection; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518B.01.
Patrick E. Flahaven, Secretary of the Senate
CONCURRENCE
AND REPASSAGE
Smith moved that the House concur in the Senate amendments to
H. F. No. 1944 and that the bill be repassed as amended by the
Senate. The motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 1944, A bill for an act relating to domestic
abuse; providing another ground for extending an order for protection; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 518B.01.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended by the Senate,
and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of the bill and the
roll was called. There were 128 yeas
and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Adolphson
Anderson, I.
Anderson, J.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Biernat
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Cornish
Cox
Davids
Davnie
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Goodwin
Greiling
Gunther
Haas
Hackbarth
Harder
Hausman
Heidgerken
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Howes
Huntley
Jacobson
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lieder
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, C.
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olson, M.
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson
Powell
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Ruth
Samuelson
Seagren
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Walker
Walz
Wardlow
Wasiluk
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The bill was repassed, as amended by the Senate, and its title
agreed to.
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following
House File, herewith returned, as amended by the Senate, in which amendments
the concurrence of the House is respectfully requested:
H. F. No. 2906, A bill for an act relating to local government;
increasing the efficiency of payroll processing; authorizing the use of
electronic time recording systems; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, section
412.271, subdivision 2.
Patrick E. Flahaven, Secretary of the Senate
CONCURRENCE
AND REPASSAGE
Buesgens moved that the House concur in the Senate amendments
to H. F. No. 2906 and that the bill be repassed as amended by
the Senate. The motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 2906, A bill for an act relating to local
government; increasing the efficiency of payroll processing; authorizing the
use of electronic time recording systems; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002,
section 412.271, subdivision 2.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended by the Senate,
and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of the bill and the
roll was called. There were 127 yeas
and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Adolphson
Anderson, I.
Anderson, J.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Biernat
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Cornish
Cox
Davids
Davnie
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Goodwin
Greiling
Gunther
Haas
Hackbarth
Harder
Hausman
Heidgerken
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Howes
Jacobson
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lieder
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, C.
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olson, M.
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson
Powell
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Ruth
Samuelson
Seagren
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Walker
Walz
Wardlow
Wasiluk
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The bill was repassed, as amended by the Senate, and its title
agreed to.
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following
Senate Files, herewith transmitted:
S. F. Nos. 2009, 2413, 1639, 2494 and 2851.
Patrick E. Flahaven, Secretary of the Senate
FIRST READING OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. No. 2009, A bill for an act relating to state government;
transferring tourism functions from Department of Employment and Economic
Development to Explore Minnesota Tourism; appropriating money; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 116J.01, subdivision 5; 160.276, subdivision
5; Minnesota Statutes 2003 Supplement, sections 15.057;
15.75, subdivision 5; 116J.60; 161.20, subdivision 3; 270B.14, subdivision 13;
proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 116U; repealing
Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 116J.01, subdivision 4; 116J.036; 116J.615;
116J.616; 116J.63, subdivision 4.
The bill was read for the first time.
Davids moved that S. F. No. 2009 and H. F. No. 2044, now on the
General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 2413, A bill for an act relating to employment;
regulating payment for overtime work; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, section
177.25, subdivision 1.
The bill was read for the first time.
SUSPENSION
OF RULES
Pursuant to Article IV, Section 19, of the Constitution of the
state of Minnesota, Sertich moved that the rule therein be suspended and an
urgency be declared so that S. F. No. 2413 be given its second
and third readings and be placed upon its final passage.
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Sertich motion and the roll was
called. There were 56 yeas and 72 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, I.
Anderson, J.
Atkins
Bernardy
Biernat
Carlson
Davnie
Dill
Dorman
Dorn
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Goodwin
Greiling
Hausman
Hilty
Hornstein
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Koenen
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lieder
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Meslow
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Sertich
Sieben
Slawik
Solberg
Strachan
Thao
Thissen
Wagenius
Walker
Wasiluk
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Adolphson
Beard
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Cox
Davids
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Eastlund
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Gunther
Haas
Hackbarth
Harder
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Jacobson
Johnson, J.
Klinzing
Knoblach
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
McNamara
Nelson, C.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olson, M.
Ozment
Paulsen
Penas
Powell
Ruth
Samuelson
Seagren
Seifert
Severson
Simpson
Smith
Soderstrom
Stang
Swenson
Sykora
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Walz
Wardlow
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
Not having received the constitutionally required two-thirds
vote, the motion did not prevail.
The bill was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Jobs and
Economic Development.
FIRST READING OF SENATE BILLS, Continued
S. F. No. 1639, A bill for an act relating to motor vehicles;
providing for removal and disposal of unauthorized vehicles on private,
nonresidential property used for servicing vehicles; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 168B.04, subdivision 2; proposing coding for new law in
Minnesota Statutes, chapter 168B.
The bill was read for the first time.
Pugh moved that S. F. No. 1639 and H. F. No. 1972, now on the
General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 2494, A bill for an act relating to school safety;
allowing certain colors for school safety patrol accessories and flags;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 121A.34, by adding subdivisions.
The bill was read for the first time.
Slawik moved that S. F. No. 2494 and H. F. No. 2587, now on the
General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 2851, A bill for an act relating to drivers'
licenses; limiting issuance of instruction permit and provisional driver's
license after certain convictions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 169A.55, by adding a
subdivision; 171.05, by adding a
subdivision; 171.055, subdivision 1.
The bill was read for the first time.
Blaine moved that S. F. No. 2851 and H. F. No. 2555, now on the
General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
CALENDAR FOR THE DAY
S. F. No. 1753 was reported to the House.
Westrom moved to amend S. F. No. 1753 as
follows:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert the
following language of H. F. No. 1830, the first engrossment:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 216B.16,
subdivision 14, is amended to read:
Subd. 14. [LOW-INCOME
ELECTRIC RATE DISCOUNT.] A public utility shall provide fund an
affordability program for low-income customers in an amount based on a 50
percent electric rate discount on the first 300 kilowatt hours consumed in a
billing period for a low-income residential customer customers
of the utility. For the purposes of
this subdivision, "low-income" means describes a
customer who is receiving assistance from the federal low-income home energy
assistance program. The
affordability program must be designed to target participating customers with
the lowest incomes and highest energy costs in order to lower the percentage of
income they devote to energy bills, increase their payments, and lower costs
associated with collection activities on their accounts. For low-income customers who are 62 years of
age or older or disabled, the program must, in addition to any other program
benefits, include a 50 percent electric rate discount on the first 300 kilowatt
hours consumed in a billing period.
For the purposes of this subdivision, "public utility"
includes only those public utilities with more than 200,000 residential
electric service customers. The
commission may issue orders necessary to implement, administer, and recover the
discount rate costs of the program on a timely basis.
[EFFECTIVE DATE.] This
section is effective July 1, 2004.
Sec. 2. Minnesota
Statutes 2003 Supplement, section 216B.241, subdivision 1b, is amended to read:
Subd. 1b. [CONSERVATION
IMPROVEMENT BY COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION OR MUNICIPALITY.] (a) This subdivision
applies to:
(1) a cooperative electric association that provides retail
service to its members;
(2) a municipality that provides electric service to retail
customers; and
(3) a municipality with gross operating revenues in excess of
$5,000,000 from sales of natural gas to retail customers.
(b) Each cooperative electric association and municipality subject
to this subdivision shall spend and invest for energy conservation improvements
under this subdivision the following amounts:
(1) for a municipality, 0.5 percent of its gross operating
revenues from the sale of gas and 1.5 percent of its gross operating revenues
from the sale of electricity, excluding gross operating revenues from electric
and gas service provided in the state to large electric customer facilities;
and
(2) for a cooperative electric association, 1.5 percent of its
gross operating revenues from service provided in the state, excluding gross
operating revenues from service provided in the state to large electric
customer facilities indirectly through a distribution cooperative electric
association.
(c) Each municipality and cooperative electric association
subject to this subdivision shall identify and implement energy conservation
improvement spending and investments that are appropriate for the municipality
or association, except that a municipality or association may not spend or
invest for energy conservation improvements that directly benefit a large
electric customer facility for which the commissioner has issued an exemption
under subdivision 1a, paragraph (b).
(d) Each municipality and cooperative electric association
subject to this subdivision may spend and invest annually up to ten percent of
the total amount required to be spent and invested on energy conservation
improvements under this subdivision on research and development projects that
meet the definition of energy conservation improvement in subdivision 1 and
that are funded directly by the municipality or cooperative electric
association.
(e) Load-management activities that do
not reduce energy use but that increase the efficiency of the electric system
may be used to meet the following percentage of the conservation investment and
spending requirements of this subdivision:
(1) 2002 - 90 percent;
(2) 2003 - 80 percent;
(3) 2004 - 65 percent; and
(4) 2005 and thereafter - 50 percent.
(f) A generation and transmission cooperative electric
association that provides energy services to cooperative electric associations
that provide electric service at retail to consumers may invest in energy
conservation improvements on behalf of the associations it serves and may
fulfill the conservation, spending, reporting, and energy savings goals on an
aggregate basis. A municipal power
agency or other not-for-profit entity that provides energy service to municipal
utilities that provide electric service at retail may invest in energy
conservation improvements on behalf of the municipal utilities it serves and
may fulfill the conservation, spending, reporting, and energy savings goals on
an aggregate basis, under an agreement between the municipal power agency or
not-for-profit entity and each municipal utility for funding the investments.
(g) By June 1, 2002, and every two years thereafter, each
municipality or cooperative shall file an overview of its conservation
improvement plan with the commissioner.
With this overview, the municipality or cooperative shall also provide
an evaluation to the commissioner detailing its energy conservation improvement
spending and investments for the previous period. The evaluation must briefly describe each conservation program
and must specify the energy savings or increased efficiency in the use of
energy within the service territory of the utility or association that is the
result of the spending and investments.
The evaluation must analyze the cost-effectiveness of the utility's or
association's conservation programs, using a list of baseline energy and
capacity savings assumptions developed in consultation with the
department. The commissioner shall
review each evaluation and make recommendations, where appropriate, to the
municipality or association to increase the effectiveness of conservation
improvement activities. Up to three
percent of a utility's conservation spending obligation under this section may
be used for program pre-evaluation, testing, and monitoring and program
evaluation. The overview and
evaluation filed by a municipality with less than $2,500,000 60,000,000
kilowatt hours in annual gross revenues from the retail sale sales
of electric service may consist of a letter from the governing board of the
municipal utility to the department providing the amount of annual conservation
spending required of that municipality and certifying that the required amount
has been spent on conservation programs pursuant to this subdivision.
(h) The commissioner shall also review each evaluation for
whether a portion of the money spent on residential conservation improvement
programs is devoted to programs that directly address the needs of renters and
low-income persons unless an insufficient number of appropriate programs are
available. For the purposes of this
subdivision and subdivision 2, "low-income" means an income at or
below 50 percent of the state median income.
(i) As part of its spending for conservation improvement, a
municipality or association may contribute to the energy and conservation
account. A municipality or association
may propose to the commissioner to designate that all or a portion of funds
contributed to the account be used for research and development projects that
can best be implemented on a statewide basis.
Any amount contributed must be remitted to the commissioner by February
1 of each year.
(j) A municipality may spend up to 50 percent of its required
spending under this section to refurbish an existing district heating or cooling
system. This paragraph expires July 1,
2007.
Sec. 3. [REPEALER.]
Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 325E.015, is repealed."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to utilities; modifying the
low-income electric rate discount program; regulating conservation improvement
by cooperatives and municipalities; eliminating the budget payment plans as a
required customer option; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 216B.16,
subdivision 14; Minnesota Statutes Supplement 2003, section 216B.241,
subdivision 1b; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 325E.015."
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Westrom moved to amend S. F. No. 1753, as amended, as follows:
Page 3, line 36, strike "By June 1, 2002, and" and
strike "thereafter" and insert ", on a schedule determined by
the commissioner"
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Mullery was excused for the remainder of today's session.
Cox, Peterson, Magnus and Demmer moved to amend S. F. No. 1753,
as amended, as follows:
Page 1, after line 5, insert:
"Section 1.
Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 123B.02, is amended by adding a
subdivision to read:
Subd. 21. [WIND
ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEM.] The board may acquire, own in whole or in part,
operate, or sell energy from a wind energy conservation system, as defined in
section 216C.06, subdivision 19. The
board's share of proceeds from the sale of any energy from the wind energy
conservation system must not exceed the sum of the district's total energy
costs for the preceding year, net of any maintenance and repair costs related
to the wind energy conservation system.
A board owning, operating, or selling energy from a wind energy
conservation system must integrate information about wind energy conservation
systems in its educational programming.
[EFFECTIVE DATE.] This
section is effective the day following final enactment."
Page 2, after line 4, insert:
"Sec. 3. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 216C.10, is amended to read:
216C.10 [COMMISSIONER POWERS.]
(a) The commissioner may:
(1) adopt rules under chapter 14 as necessary to carry out the
purposes of sections 216C.05 to 216C.30;
(2) make all contracts under sections
216C.05 to 216C.30 and do all things necessary to cooperate with the United
States government, and to qualify for, accept, and disburse any grant intended
for the administration of sections 216C.05 to 216C.30;
(3) provide on-site technical assistance to school districts
with wind energy conservation systems and to all units of local government
in order to enhance local capabilities for dealing with energy problems;
(4) administer for the state, energy programs under federal
law, regulations, or guidelines, except for the low-income home energy
assistance program and low-income weatherization programs administered by the
Department of Economic Security, and coordinate the programs and activities
with other state agencies, units of local government, and educational
institutions;
(5) develop a state energy investment plan with yearly energy
conservation and alternative energy development goals, investment targets, and
marketing strategies;
(6) perform market analysis studies relating to conservation,
alternative and renewable energy resources, and energy recovery;
(7) assist with the preparation of proposals for innovative
conservation, renewable, alternative, or energy recovery projects;
(8) manage and disburse funds made available for the purpose of
research studies or demonstration projects related to energy conservation or
other activities deemed appropriate by the commissioner;
(9) intervene in certificate of need proceedings before the
Public Utilities Commission;
(10) collect fees from recipients of loans, grants, or other financial
aid from money received from litigation or settlement of alleged violations of
federal petroleum-pricing regulations, which fees must be used to pay the
department's costs in administering those financial aids; and
(11) collect fees from proposers and operators of conservation
and other energy-related programs that are reviewed, evaluated, or approved by
the department, other than proposers that are political subdivisions or
community or nonprofit organizations, to cover the department's cost in making
the reviewal, evaluation, or approval and in developing additional programs for
others to operate.
(b) Notwithstanding any other law, the commissioner is
designated the state agent to apply for, receive, and accept federal or other
funds made available to the state for the purposes of sections 216C.05 to
216C.30."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
S. F. No. 1753, A bill for an act relating to utilities;
modifying low-income electric rate discount program; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 216B.16, subdivision 14.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage
of the bill and the roll was called.
There were 126 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Adolphson
Anderson, I.
Anderson, J.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Biernat
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Cornish
Cox
Davids
Davnie
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Goodwin
Greiling
Gunther
Haas
Hackbarth
Harder
Hausman
Heidgerken
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Howes
Huntley
Jacobson
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lieder
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Murphy
Nelson, C.
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson
Powell
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Ruth
Samuelson
Seagren
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Walker
Walz
Wardlow
Wasiluk
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
H. F. No. 2368 was reported to the House.
Seagren; Sykora; Greiling; Paymar; Nelson, C.; Kelliher; Otto;
Latz; Rhodes; Lenczewski; Davnie; Erhardt; Goodwin and Samuelson moved to amend
H. F. No. 2368, the third engrossment, as follows:
Pages 1 and 2, delete section 1
Page 9, delete section 21
Page 12, delete section 27
Page 12, delete lines 25 and 26
Page 12, line 27, delete "(b)"
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Seagren et al amendment and the
roll was called. There were 49 yeas and
78 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abrams
Anderson, I.
Atkins
Bernardy
Biernat
Carlson
Davnie
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Gerlach
Goodwin
Greiling
Hausman
Hilty
Holberg
Hornstein
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelliher
Klinzing
Latz
Lenczewski
Lieder
Mahoney
Mariani
McNamara
Murphy
Nelson, C.
Nelson, P.
Opatz
Osterman
Otto
Paymar
Pelowski
Pugh
Rhodes
Samuelson
Seagren
Sieben
Slawik
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Wagenius
Walker
Wasiluk
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Adolphson
Anderson, J.
Beard
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Cox
Davids
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gunther
Haas
Hackbarth
Harder
Heidgerken
Hoppe
Howes
Jacobson
Johnson, J.
Juhnke
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Larson
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
Marquart
Meslow
Nelson, M.
Newman
Nornes
Olson, M.
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Penas
Peterson
Powell
Rukavina
Ruth
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Simpson
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Walz
Wardlow
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Rukavina; Anderson, I.; Lieder; Dorman; Howes and Walz moved to
amend H. F. No. 2368, the third engrossment, as follows:
Page 12, after line 23, insert:
"Sec. 28.
[ISSUANCE OF MOOSE LICENSE.]
The commissioner of natural resources shall issue a moose
license for the 2004 hunting season to any resident who will be 75 years of age
or older during the 2004 moose season, who has been a state resident for at
least 20 years, and who has previously applied for a moose license for ten
seasons since 1985, but has never received a moose license. The license shall be valid for a party of up
to three additional individuals chosen by the resident."
Page 12, line 30, delete "28" and insert
"29"
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Dill and Hackbarth moved to amend H. F. No. 2368, the third
engrossment, as follows:
Page 3, after line 6, insert:
"Sec. 6. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 97A.093, is amended to read:
97A.093 [HUNTING, TRAPPING, AND FISHING IN SCIENTIFIC AND
NATURAL AREAS.]
(a) Except as otherwise provided by law in
statutes, scientific and natural areas are closed to hunting,
trapping, and fishing unless:
(1) for scientific and natural areas designated before May 15,
1992, the designating document allows hunting, trapping, or fishing;
or
(2) for other scientific and natural areas, the commissioner
allows hunting, trapping, or fishing in accordance with according
to the procedure in section 86A.05, subdivision 5, paragraph (d).
(b) Except as otherwise provided in statutes, scientific and
natural areas are open to hunting and fishing unless the commissioner prohibits
hunting or fishing according to the procedure in section 86A.05, subdivision 5,
paragraph (d).
[EFFECTIVE DATE.] This
section is effective the day following final enactment and applies to all
designated scientific and natural areas, including those where use hearings are
pending on that date under Minnesota Statutes, section 86A.05, subdivision 5,
paragraph (d)."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Hackbarth moved to amend H. F. No. 2368, the third engrossment,
as follows:
Page 12, line 27, delete everything after the first comma
Page 12, delete line 28, and insert "section 97B.935,
is repealed."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Erhardt moved to amend H. F. No. 2368, the third engrossment,
as amended, as follows:
Page 9, line 34, after the period, insert "The taking
shall be done only with bow and arrow."
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Kahn moved to amend H. F. No. 2368, the third engrossment,
as amended, as follows:
Page 9, line 34, before the period, insert "only in
flight"
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
H. F. No. 2368, A bill for an act relating to game and fish;
modifying game and migratory waterfowl refuge provisions; providing for
suspension of game and fish license and permit privileges under certain
circumstances; modifying certain hearing provisions; modifying certain game
license provisions; modifying shooting hours for migratory game birds;
authorizing a hunting season for mourning doves; requiring reports; modifying
deer hunting provisions and fees; modifying restriction on importation of
cervidae carcasses; modifying restriction on the transport of game birds;
providing for certain trapping by nonresidents; modifying dark house and fish
house hours on ice; modifying turtle license requirements; eliminating
prohibition on the use of vehicles for trapping beaver and otter; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 97A.015, subdivisions 24, 52; 97A.085,
subdivisions 2, 3, 4; 97A.095, subdivisions 1, 2; 97A.420, subdivision 4;
97A.421, by adding a subdivision; 97A.435, subdivision 4; 97A.465, by adding a
subdivision; 97A.475, subdivision 20; 97A.545, subdivision 5; 97B.075; 97B.301,
subdivisions 6, 7; 97B.601, subdivision 3, by adding a subdivision; 97B.721;
97C.355, subdivision 7; 97C.605, subdivision 2; Minnesota Statutes 2003
Supplement, sections 97A.475, subdivision 2; 97A.505, subdivision 8; 97C.605,
subdivision 2c; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter
97B; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 97B.731, subdivision 2;
97B.935.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 89 yeas and 34
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Adolphson
Anderson, I.
Anderson, J.
Atkins
Beard
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Cox
Davids
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Gunther
Haas
Hackbarth
Harder
Heidgerken
Hoppe
Howes
Jacobson
Johnson, J.
Juhnke
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Larson
Lenczewski
Lieder
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
Mahoney
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Nelson, C.
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olson, M.
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson
Powell
Ruth
Samuelson
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Simpson
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Walz
Wardlow
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abrams
Bernardy
Biernat
Carlson
Davnie
Entenza
Erhardt
Goodwin
Greiling
Hausman
Hilty
Hornstein
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelliher
Krinkie
Latz
Mariani
Murphy
Otto
Paymar
Rhodes
Rukavina
Seagren
Sieben
Slawik
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Wagenius
Walker
Wasiluk
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
H. F. No. 2151 was reported to the House.
Westrom moved to amend H. F. No. 2151, the first engrossment,
as follows:
Page 1, delete section 1
Renumber the sections in sequence
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Vandeveer, Westerberg, Davnie, Westrom, Gunther, Paymar, Davids
and Jacobson moved to amend H. F. No. 2151, the first
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 28, after line 10, insert:
"ARTICLE
4
CONSUMER
PROTECTIONS FOR WIRELESS CUSTOMERS
Section 1. [325F.695]
[CONSUMER PROTECTIONS FOR WIRELESS CUSTOMERS.]
Subdivision 1.
[DEFINITIONS.] The definitions in this subdivision apply to this
section.
(a) "Contract" means an oral or written agreement
of definite duration between a provider and a customer, detailing the wireless
telecommunications services to be provided to the customer and the terms and
conditions for provision of those services.
(b) "Wireless telecommunications services" means
commercial mobile radio services as defined in Code of Federal Regulations,
title 47, part 20.
(c) "Provider" means a provider of wireless
telecommunications services.
(d) "Substantive change" means a modification to,
or addition or deletion of, a term or condition in a contract that results in
an increase in the charge to the customer under that contract. "Substantive change" includes a
modification in the provider's administration of an existing contract term or
condition. "Substantive
change" does not include a change in state or federal taxes or a change in
mandated state or federal surcharges, including, but not limited to, 911
surcharges.
Subd. 2.
[COPY OF CONTRACT.] A provider must provide each customer with a
written or electronic copy of the customer's contract between the provider and
the customer within 15 days of the date the contract is entered into. A provider must maintain verification that
the customer accepted the terms of the contract for the duration of the
contract period.
Subd. 3. [NOTICE
OF SUBSTANTIVE CHANGE.] A provider must notify the customer in writing of
any proposed provider initiated substantive change in an existing contract
between the provider and the customer 30 days before that change is to take
effect. The notification must be sent
separately from other mailings and the envelope must be labeled "NOTICE OF
PROPOSED CHANGE IN CONTRACT TERMS."
The notification print must be of sufficient size to be clearly legible
and it must contain clear and unambiguous language separately detailing each
substantive change proposed by the provider.
Subd. 4.
[CUSTOMER MAY OPT OUT.] The customer may choose to opt out of and
terminate the contract without penalty within the 30-day notice period. The choice to opt out of and terminate the
contract must be in writing. If no
affirmative action is taken by the customer to opt out of and terminate the
contract, the customer is considered to have agreed to the proposed substantive
change and the contract is considered modified.
Sec. 2. [EFFECTIVE
DATE.]
Section 1 is effective on July 1, 2004, and applies to
contracts for wireless service entered into on or after May 1, 2004."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Davids and Westrom moved to amend H. F. No. 2151, the first
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Delete page 4, line 9, to page 26, line 36, and insert:
"ARTICLE
2
CABLE
SYSTEM CHANGES
Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 238.02, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. [CABLE
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.] (a) "Cable communications system"
means a system which operates that (1) provides the service of
receiving and amplifying (i) programs broadcast by one or more
television or radio stations and (ii) other programs originated by a person
operating a cable communications company system or by another
party, and distributing person, and (2) distributes those
programs by wire, cable, microwave, or other means, regardless of
whether the means are owned or leased, to persons who subscribe to the service.
(b) This definition does not
include:
(a) (1) a system which that serves
fewer than 50 subscribers or a system which that serves more than
50 but fewer than 1,000 subscribers if the governing bodies of all political
subdivisions served by the system, vote, by resolution, to remove the system
from the provisions of this chapter.; provided that:
(i) no part of a system, nor any area within the
municipality served by the system, may be removed from the provisions of this
chapter if more than 1,000 subscribers are served by the system.; and
(ii) any system which serves serving more
than 50 but fewer than 1,000 subscribers that has been removed from the
provisions of this chapter shall be returned becomes subject to
the provisions of this chapter if the governing bodies of 50 percent or more of
the political subdivisions served by the system vote, by resolution, in
favor of the return;
(b) (2) a master antenna television system;
(c) (3) a specialized closed-circuit system which
that does not use the public rights-of-way for the construction of its
physical plant; and
(d) (4) a translator system which that
receives and rebroadcasts over-the-air signals.
Sec. 2. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 238.03, is amended to read:
238.03 [APPLICABILITY.]
This chapter applies to every cable communications system and
every cable communications company, as defined in section 238.02,
operating within the state, including a cable communications company which
constructs, operates and maintains a cable communications system comprised
in whole or in part through the of facilities of a person
franchised to offer common or contract carrier services subject to
regulation under chapter 237.
Persons possessing franchises for any of the purposes of this chapter
are subject to this chapter although no property has been acquired, business
transacted, or franchises exercised.
Sec. 3. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 238.08, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. [MUNICIPAL
OPERATION.] Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to limit Unless
otherwise prohibited by applicable law, any municipality from the right
to may construct, purchase, and operate cable communications systems,
or, to operate facilities and channels for community television,
including, but not limited to, public, educational, and governmental access and
local origination programming. Any
municipal system, including the operation of community television by a
municipality, shall be is subject to this chapter to the same
extent as would any nonpublic cable communications system.
Sec. 4. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 238.08, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. [FEE, TAX, OR
CHARGE.] Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to limit the power of any
municipality to impose upon any person operating a cable communications company
system a fee, tax, or charge.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 238.081, is amended to read:
238.081 [FRANCHISE PROCEDURE.]
Subdivision 1.
[PUBLICATION OF NOTICE.] The franchising authority shall have published
once each week for two successive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation
in each municipality within the cable service territory, a notice of intent to consider
an application for a franchise, requesting applications for the
franchise other than a franchise renewal pursuant to the United States
Code, title 47, section 546.
Subd. 2. [REQUIRED
INFORMATION IN NOTICE.] The notice must include at least the following
information:
(1) the name of the municipality making the request;
(2) the closing date for submission of applications;
(3) a statement of the application fee, if any, and the method
for its submission;
(4) a statement by the franchising authority of the desired
system design and services to be offered;
(5) a statement by the franchising authority of criteria and
priorities against which the applicants for the franchise must be evaluated;
(6) a statement that applications for the franchise must
contain at least the information required by subdivision 4;
(7) the date, time, and place for the public hearing, to hear
proposals from franchise applicants; and
(8) the name, address, and telephone number of the individuals
who may be contacted for further information.
Subd. 3. [OTHER
RECIPIENTS OF NOTICE.] In addition to the published notice, the franchising
authority shall mail copies of the notice of intent to franchise to any person
it has identified as being a potential candidate for the franchise.
Subd. 4. [CONTENTS OF
FRANCHISING PROPOSAL.] (a) The franchising authority shall require that
proposals for a cable communications franchise be notarized and contain, but
not necessarily be limited to, the following information:
(1) plans for channel capacity, including both the total number
of channels capable of being energized in the system and the number of channels
to be energized immediately;
(2) a statement of the television and radio broadcast signals
for which permission to carry will be requested from the Federal Communications
Commission;
(3) a description of the proposed system design and planned
operation, including at least the following items:
(i) the general area for location of antennae and the head end,
if known;
(ii) the schedule for activating two-way capacity;
(iii) the type of automated services
to be provided;
(iv) the number of channels and services to be made available
for access cable broadcasting; and
(v) a schedule of charges for facilities and staff assistance
for access cable broadcasting;
(4) the terms and conditions under which particular service is
to be provided to governmental and educational entities;
(5) a schedule of proposed rates in relation to the services to
be provided, and a proposed policy regarding unusual or difficult connection of
services;
(6) a time schedule for construction of the entire system with
the time sequence for wiring the various parts of the area requested to be
served in the request for proposals;
(7) a statement indicating the applicant's qualifications and
experience in the cable communications field, if any;
(8) an identification of the municipalities in which the
applicant either owns or operates a cable communications system, directly or
indirectly, or has outstanding franchises for which no system has been built;
(9) plans for financing the proposed system, which must
indicate every significant anticipated source of capital and significant
limitations or conditions with respect to the availability of the indicated
sources of capital;
(10) a statement of ownership detailing the corporate
organization of the applicant, if any, including the names and addresses of
officers and directors and the number of shares held by each officer or
director, and intracompany relationship including a parent, subsidiary,
or affiliated company; and
(11) a notation and explanation of omissions or other
variations with respect to the requirements of the proposal.
(b) Substantive amendments may not be made in a proposal
after a proposal has been submitted to the franchising authority and before
award of a franchise Upon submission of a proposal, the municipality and
applicant may negotiate franchise terms.
Subd. 5. [TIME LIMIT TO
SUBMIT APPLICATION.] The franchising authority shall allow at least 20 days
from the first date of published notice to the closing date for submitting
applications.
Subd. 6. [PUBLIC
HEARING ON FRANCHISE.] A public hearing before the franchising authority
affording reasonable notice and a reasonable opportunity to be heard with
respect to all applications for the franchise must be completed at least seven
days before the introduction of the adoption of a franchise
ordinance in the proceedings of the franchising authority.
Subd. 7. [AWARD OF
FRANCHISE.] Franchises may be awarded only by ordinance or other
official action by the franchising authority.
Subd. 8. [COSTS OF
AWARDING FRANCHISE.] Nothing in this section prohibits a franchising authority
from recovering from a successful an applicant the entire
reasonable and necessary costs of the entire process of awarding the processing
a cable communications franchise.
Subd. 9. [FRANCHISING
NONPROFIT OR MUNICIPALLY OWNED SYSTEM.] Nothing contained in this section
prohibits a franchising authority from franchising a nonprofit or municipally
owned system. The municipality or
nonprofit entity is considered an applicant for purposes of this section.
Subd. 10. [FRANCHISE; JOINT POWERS.] In the cases of municipalities acting
in concert, the municipalities may delegate to another entity such any
duties, responsibilities, privileges, or activities described in this section,
if such the delegation is proper according to state and local
law.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes
2002, section 238.083, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. [WRITTEN
APPROVAL OF FRANCHISING AUTHORITY.] A sale or transfer of a franchise,
including a sale or transfer by means of a fundamental corporate change,
requires the written approval of the franchising authority. The parties to the sale or transfer of a
franchise shall make a written request to the franchising authority for its
approval of the sale or transfer. The
franchising authority shall reply in writing within 30 days of the request and
shall indicate its approval of the request or its determination that a public
hearing is necessary if it determines that a sale or transfer of a franchise
may adversely affect the company's subscribers. The franchising authority shall conduct a public hearing on the
request within 30 days of that determination.
Sec. 7. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 238.083, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. [APPROVAL OR
DENIAL OF TRANSFER REQUEST.] Within 30 days after the public hearing, The
franchising authority shall approve or deny in writing the sale or transfer
request. The approval must not be
unreasonably withheld.
Sec. 8. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 238.084, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. [ALL
SYSTEMS.] The following requirements apply to all classes A, B, and C cable
communications systems unless provided otherwise:
(a) a provision that the franchise complies shall
comply with the Minnesota franchise standards contained in this section;
(b) a provision requiring the franchisee and the franchising
authority to conform to state laws and rules regarding cable communications not
later than one year after they become effective, unless otherwise stated, and
to conform to federal laws and regulations regarding cable as they become
effective;
(c) a provision limiting the initial and renewal franchise term
to not more than 15 years each;
(d) a provision specifying that the franchise is must
be nonexclusive;
(e) a provision prohibiting sale or transfer of the franchise
or sale or transfer of stock so as to create a new controlling interest under
section 238.083, except at the approval of the franchising authority, which
approval must not be unreasonably withheld, and conditioned that the
sale or transfer is completed pursuant to section 238.083;
(f) a provision granting the franchising authority collecting a
franchise fee the authority to audit the franchisee's accounting and financial
records upon reasonable notice, and requiring that the franchisee file with the
franchising authority annually reports of gross subscriber revenues and other
information as the franchising authority deems appropriate;
(g) provisions specifying:
(1) current subscriber charges or that the current charges are
available for public inspection in the municipality;
(2) the length and terms of residential subscriber contracts,
if they exist, or that the current length and terms of residential subscriber
contracts are available for public inspection in the municipality; and
(3) the procedure by which subscriber charges are
established, unless such a provision is contrary to state or federal law;
(h) a provision indicating by title the office or officer of
the franchising authority that is responsible for the continuing administration
of the franchise;
(i) a provision requiring the franchisee to indemnify and hold
harmless the franchising authority during the term of the franchise, and to
maintain throughout the term of the franchise, liability insurance in an
amount as the franchising authority may require insuring both the franchising
authority and the franchisee with regard to damages and penalties which that
they may legally be required to pay as a result of the exercise of the
franchise;
(j) a provision that at the time the franchise becomes
effective and thereafter until the franchisee has liquidated all of its
obligation with the franchising authority, the franchisee shall furnish a
performance bond, certificate of deposit, or other type of instrument approved
by the franchising authority in an amount as the franchising authority deems to
be adequate compensation for damages resulting from the franchisee's
nonperformance. The franchising
authority may, from year to year and in its sole discretion, reduce the amount
of the performance bond or instrument;
(k) a provision that nothing contained in the franchise
relieves a person from liability arising out of the failure to exercise
reasonable care to avoid injuring the franchisee's facilities while performing
work connected with grading, regrading, or changing the line of a street or
public place or with the construction or reconstruction of a sewer or water
system;
(l) a provision that the franchisee's technical ability,
financial condition, and legal qualification were considered and approved by
the franchising authority in a full public proceeding that afforded reasonable
notice and a reasonable opportunity to be heard;
(m) a provision requiring the construction of a cable system
with a channel capacity available for immediate or potential use, equal to a
minimum of 72 MHz of bandwidth, the equivalent of 12 television broadcast
channels. For purposes of this section,
a cable system with a channel capacity, available for immediate or potential
use, equal to a minimum of 72 MHz of bandwidth means: the provision of a distribution system designed and constructed
so that a minimum of 72 MHz of bandwidth, the equivalent of 12 television
broadcast channels, can be put into use with only the addition of the
appropriate headend equipment;
(n) a provision in initial franchises that there be a
full description of the system proposed for construction identifying the
system capacity and technical design and a schedule showing:
(1) that for franchise areas which will be served by a
system proposed to have fewer than 100 plant miles of cable:
(i) that within 90 days of the granting of the franchise,
the franchisee shall apply for the necessary governmental permits, licenses,
certificates, and authorizations;
(ii) that energized trunk cable must be extended
substantially throughout the authorized area within one year after receipt of
the necessary governmental permits, licenses, certificates, and authorizations
and that persons along the route of the energized cable will have individual
"drops" as desired during the same period of time; and
(iii) that the requirement of this section may be waived by
the franchising authority only upon occurrence of unforeseen events or acts of
God construction of the cable communications system must commence no
later than 240 days after the granting of the franchise; or
(2) that for franchise areas which will be served by a
system proposed to have 100 plant miles of cable or more, a provision: construction
of the cable communications system must proceed at a reasonable rate of not
less than 50 plant miles constructed per year of the franchise term;
(i) (3) that within 90 days of the granting of
the franchise, the franchisee shall apply for the necessary governmental permits,
licenses, certificates, and authorizations;
(ii) that engineering and design must be completed within
one year after the granting of the franchise and that a significant amount of
construction must be completed within one year after the franchisee's receipt
of the necessary governmental permits, licenses, certificates, and
authorizations;
(iii) that energized trunk cable must be extended
substantially throughout the authorized area within five years after
commencement of construction and that persons along the route of the energized
cable will have individual "drops" within the same period of time, if
desired construction throughout the authorized franchise area must be
substantially completed within five years of the granting of the franchise;
and
(iv) (4) that the requirement of this section be
waived by the franchising authority only upon occurrence of unforeseen events
or acts of God;
(o) (n) unless otherwise already provided for by
local law, a provision that the franchisee shall obtain a permit from the
proper municipal authority before commencing construction of a cable
communications system, including the opening or disturbance of a street,
sidewalk, driveway, or public place.
The provision must specify remedies available to the franchising
authority in cases where the franchisee fails to meet the conditions of the
permit;
(p) (o) unless otherwise already provided for by
local law, a provision that wires, conduits, cable, and other property and
facilities of the franchisee be located, constructed, installed, and maintained
in compliance with applicable codes.
The provision must also specify that the franchisee keep and maintain
its property so as not to unnecessarily interfere with the usual and customary
trade, traffic, or travel upon the streets and public places of the franchise
area or endanger the life or property of any person;
(q) (p) unless otherwise already provided for by
local law, a provision that the franchising authority and the franchisee shall
establish a procedure in the franchise for the relocation or removal of the
franchisee's wires, conduits, cables, and other property located in the street,
right-of-way, or public place whenever the franchising authority undertakes
public improvements which that affect the cable equipment;
(r) (q) a provision incorporating by reference as
a minimum the technical standards promulgated by the Federal Communications
Commission relating to cable communications systems contained in subpart K of
part 76 of the Federal Communications Commission's rules and regulations
relating to cable communications systems and found in Code of Federal
Regulations, title 47, sections 76.601 to 76.617. The results of tests required by the Federal Communications
Commission must be filed within ten days of the conduct of the tests with the
franchising authority;
(s) (r) a provision establishing how the
franchising authority and the person operating a cable communications company
system shall determine who is to bear the costs of required special
testing;
(t) a provision pertaining to the franchisee's construction
and maintenance of a cable communications system having the technical capacity
for nonvoice return communications which, for purposes of this section, means
the provision of appropriate system design techniques with the installation of
cable and amplifiers suitable for the subsequent insertion of necessary
nonvoice communications electronic modules.
In cases where an initial
franchise is granted, the franchisee shall provide a cable communications
system having the technical capacity for nonvoice return communications.
When a franchise is renewed,
sold, or transferred and is served by a system that does not have the technical
capacity for nonvoice return communications, the franchising authority shall
determine when and if the technical capacity for nonvoice return communications
is needed after appropriate public proceedings at the municipal level giving
reasonable notice and a reasonable opportunity to be heard;
(u) (s) a provision stating that no signals of a
class IV cable communications channel may be transmitted from a subscriber
terminal for purposes of monitoring individual viewing patterns or practices
without the express written permission of the subscriber. The request for permission must be contained
in a separate document with a prominent statement that the subscriber is
authorizing the permission in full knowledge of its provisions. The written permission must be for a limited
period of time not to exceed one year, which is renewable at the option
of the subscriber. No penalty may be
invoked for a subscriber's failure to provide or renew the authorization. The authorization is revocable at any time
by the subscriber without penalty of any kind. The permission must be required for each type or classification
of class IV cable communications activity planned for the purpose;
(1) No information or data obtained by monitoring transmission
of a signal from a subscriber terminal, including but not limited to lists of the
names and addresses of the subscribers or lists that identify the viewing
habits of subscribers, may be sold or otherwise made available to any party
person other than to the company and its employees for internal business
use, or to the subscriber who is the subject of that information, unless the
company has received specific written authorization from the subscriber to make
the data available;.
(2) Written permission from the subscriber must not be required
for the systems conducting systemwide or individually addressed electronic
sweeps for the purpose of verifying system integrity or monitoring for the
purpose of billing. Confidentiality of
this information is subject to clause (1);.
(3) For purposes of this provision, a "class IV cable
communications channel" means a signaling path provided by a cable
communications system to transmit signals of any type from a subscriber
terminal to another point in the communications system;
(v) (t) a provision specifying the procedure for
the investigation and resolution by the franchisee of complaints regarding
quality of service, equipment malfunction, billing disputes, and other matters;
(w) (u) a provision requiring that at least a
toll-free or collect telephone number for the reception of complaints be
provided to the subscriber and that the franchisee shall maintain a
repair service capable of responding to subscriber complaints or requests for
service within 24 hours after receipt of the complaint or request. The A provision must also
state who will bear the costs included in making these repairs, adjustments, or
installations;
(x) (v) a provision granting the franchising
authority has the right to terminate and cancel the franchise and the
rights and privileges of the franchise if the franchisee substantially violates
a provision of the franchise ordinance, attempts to evade the provisions of the
franchise ordinance, or practices fraud or deceit upon the franchising
authority. The municipality shall provide
the franchisee with a written notice of the cause for termination and its
intention to terminate the franchise and shall allow the franchisee a minimum
of 30 days after service of the notice in which to correct the violation. The franchisee must be provided with an
opportunity to be heard at a public hearing before the governing body of the
municipality before the termination of the franchise;
(y) (w) a provision that no person operating a
cable communications company system, notwithstanding any
provision in a franchise, may abandon a cable communications service system
or a portion of it without having given three months prior written notice to
the franchising authority. No person
operating a cable communications company system may abandon a
cable communications service system or a portion of it without
compensating the franchising authority for damages resulting to it from the
abandonment;
(z) (x) a provision requiring that upon
termination or forfeiture of a franchise, unless otherwise required by
applicable law, the franchisee shall remove its cable, wires, and
appliances from the streets, alleys, and other public places within the
franchise area if the franchising authority so requests, and a procedure to be
followed in the event the franchisee fails to remove its cable, wires, and appliances
from the streets, alleys, and other public places within the franchise area;
(aa) (y) a provision that when a franchise or
cable system is offered for sale to be transferred or sold, the
franchising authority shall have has the right to purchase the
system;
(bb) (z) a provision establishing the minimum
number of access channels that the franchisee shall make available. This provision must require that the
franchisee shall provide to each of its subscribers who receive some or all of
the services offered on the system, reception on at least one specially
designated access channel. The
specially designated access channel may be used by local educational
authorities and local government on a first-come, first-served,
nondiscriminatory basis. During those
hours that the specially designated access channel is not being used by the
local educational authorities or local government, the franchisee shall lease
time to commercial or noncommercial users on a first-come, first-served,
nondiscriminatory basis if the demand for that time arises. The franchisee may also use this specially
designated access channel for local origination during those hours when the
channel is not in use by local educational authorities, local government, or
commercial or noncommercial users who have leased time. The provision may require the franchisee
to provide separate public access channels available for use by the general
public on a first-come, first-served, nondiscriminatory basis; local
educational access channels; local governmental access channels; and channels
available for lease on a first-come, first-served, nondiscriminatory basis by
commercial and noncommercial users. The
provision may require that whenever the specially designated access channel
required by this paragraph is in use during 80 percent of the weekdays, Monday
through Friday, for 80 percent of the time during a consecutive three-hour
period for six weeks running, and there is a demand for use of an additional
channel for the same purpose, the franchisee has six months in which to provide
a new, specially designated access channel for the same purpose; provided that,
the provision of the additional channel or channels does not require the cable
system to install converters. The
VHF spectrum must be used for one of the public, educational, or
governmental specially designated access channel channels
required in this paragraph. The
provision must also require that the franchisee shall establish rules for the
administration of the specially designated access channel. Franchisees providing only alarm services
or only data transmission services for computer-operated functions do not need
to provide access channel reception to alarm and data service subscribers.,
unless such channel is administered by a municipality;
(aa) a provision specifying the minimum equipment that the
franchisee shall make available for public use. The provision may require the franchisee to make readily
available for public use at least the minimal equipment necessary for the
production of programming and playback of prerecorded programs for the access
channels. The provision may require
that, upon request, the franchisee, at minimum, shall also make readily
available the minimum equipment necessary to make it possible to record
programs at remote locations with battery-operated portable equipment;
(bb) for a franchise in the metropolitan area, as defined in
section 473.121, a provision designating the standard VHF channel 6 for uniform
regional channel usage as required in section 238.43.
Sec. 9. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 238.11, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. [ACCESS CHANNEL.] No cable communications the officers, directors, or
employees of the cable communications system is liable for any penalties or
damages arising from programming content not originating from or produced by
the cable communications company
system may prohibit or limit a program or class or type of program
presented over a leased channel or a channel made available for public access,
governmental or educational purposes.
Neither the person operating a cable communications company
system nor company system and shown on any public
access channel, education access channel, government access channel, leased
access channel, or regional channel.
Sec. 10. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 238.22, subdivision 13, is amended to read:
Subd. 13. [PROPERTY
OWNER.] "Property owner" means any person with a recorded interest in
a multiple dwelling complex, or person known to the person operating a
cable communications company system to be an owner, or the
authorized agent of the person.
Sec. 11. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 238.23, is amended to read:
238.23 [ACCESS REQUIRED.]
Subdivision 1.
[PROVISION OF ACCESS.] A property owner or other person controlling
access shall provide a cable communications company system access
to the property owner's multiple dwelling complex. The access provided must be perpetual and freely transferable by
one person operating a cable communications company system
to another. A cable communications company
system granted access, and its successors in interest, must fully comply
with sections 238.22 to 238.27.
Subd. 2. [RESIDENT'S
RIGHTS.] The intent of sections 238.22 to 238.27 is to give residents the
freedom to choose among competing cable communications services and nothing in
sections 238.22 to 238.27 shall be interpreted to require requires
residents to hook up or subscribe to any services offered by any cable
communications company system or alternative provider of cable
communications services.
Sec. 12. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 238.24, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. [INSTALLATION;
BOND.] The facilities must be installed in an expeditious and workmanlike manner,
must comply with applicable codes, and must be installed parallel to utility
lines when economically feasible. A
property owner may require a person operating a cable communications company
system to post a bond or equivalent security in an amount not exceeding
the estimated cost of installation of the cable communications facilities on
the premises. Any bond filed by a cable
communications company system with a municipality which that
would provide coverage to the property owner as provided under this subdivision
shall be considered to fulfill fulfills the requirements of this
subdivision.
Sec. 13. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 238.24, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. [INDEMNIFY FOR
DAMAGE.] A person operating a cable communications company system
shall indemnify a property owner for damage caused by the company in the
installation, operation, maintenance, or removal of its facilities.
Sec. 14. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 238.24, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. [MASTER
ANTENNA TELEVISION SYSTEM.] Nothing in sections 238.22 to 238.27 precludes a
property owner from entering into an agreement for use of a master antenna
television system by a person operating a cable communications company
system or other television communications service.
Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 238.24, subdivision 9, is
amended to read:
Subd. 9. [NOT
RETROACTIVE.] Nothing in sections 238.22 to 238.27 affects the validity of an
agreement effective before June 15, 1983 between a property owner, a person
operating a cable communications company system, or any other
person providing cable communications services on or within the premises of the
property owner.
Sec. 16. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 238.24, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. [CHANNEL
CAPACITY.] (a) A property owner must provide access by to a
franchised person operating a cable communications company system,
as required under section 238.23, only if that cable company installs equipment
with channel capacity sufficient to provide access to other providers of
television programming or cable communications services so that residents or
association members have a choice of alternative providers of those services. If the equipment is installed, the cable
communications company system shall allow alternative providers
to use the equipment. If some of the
residents or association members choose to subscribe to the services of an
alternative provider, the cable company that installed the equipment shall
must be reimbursed by the other providers for the cost of equipment and
installation on the property on a pro rata basis which that
reflects the number of subscribers of each provider on that property to the
total number of subscribers on that property.
In determining the pro rata amount of reimbursement by any alternative
provider, the cost of equipment and installation shall must be
reduced to the extent of cumulative depreciation of that equipment at the time
the alternative provider begins providing service.
(b) If equipment is already installed as of June 15, 1983,
with channel capacity sufficient to allow access to alternative providers, the
access and pro rata reimbursement provisions of paragraph (a) apply.
Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes
2002, section 238.242, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1.
[PROVIDING ALTERNATIVE SERVICE.] Other providers of television
programming or cable communications services shall notify the person
operating a cable communications company system when a
resident or association member occupying a dwelling unit in a multiple dwelling
complex requests the services provided for by this section or section
238.241. After reaching agreement with
the alternative service provider for reimbursement to be paid for use of the
equipment, the cable communications company system shall make
available the equipment necessary to provide the alternative service without
unreasonable delay.
Sec. 18. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 238.242, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. [FINANCIAL
RECORDS MADE AVAILABLE.] The person operating a cable communications company
system, upon written request, shall make available to the alternative
provider financial records supporting the reimbursement cost requested.
Sec. 19. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 238.25, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. [SERVICE OF
PETITION.] The petition must be served upon all persons named in the petition
as property owners in the same manner as a summons in a civil action; except
that, service may be made upon a property owner by three weeks' published
notice if the person operating a cable communications company system,
its or the person's agent or attorney, files an affidavit stating
on belief that the property owner is not a resident of the state and that the
company has mailed a copy of the notice to the property owner at the property
owner's place of residence, or that after diligent inquiry the property owner's
place of residence cannot be ascertained by the company. If the state is a property owner, the notice
must be served upon the attorney general.
Any property owner not served as provided under this paragraph is not
bound by the proceeding unless the property owner voluntarily appears therein
in the proceeding.
Sec. 20. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 238.25, subdivision 10, is
amended to read:
Subd. 10. [FINAL
CERTIFICATE.] Upon completion of the proceedings, the attorney for the
person operating the cable communications company system
shall make a certificate describing the access acquired and the purpose or
purposes for which acquired, and reciting the fact of final payment of all
awards or judgments in relation thereto.
The certificate must be filed with the court administrator and a certified
copy thereof filed for record with the county recorder. The record is notice to all parties of the
access to the premises described in the petition.
Sec. 21. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 238.35, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1.
[LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS.] There is a long-standing legislative policy in
the state of Minnesota to provide for the dedication or other provision of
easements and public rights-of-way required by public utilities and
cable communications companies systems. Except for applicable governmental rules, these easements do not
include any limitation on the type, number, or size of cables or related cable
communication system components. There
is a public understanding and acceptance of the need of public utilities and
cable communications companies systems to have the ability to use
existing utility easements and public rights-of-way in order to provide
new and improved cable communications services made possible by technological
developments and to make changes to the cables or related cable communication
systems components. Changing technology
has caused and will continue to cause over time the development of new cable
communications services requiring changing uses of existing utility easements and
public rights-of-way. Cable
communications companies systems have a need to use existing
utility easements and public rights-of-way in order to deliver their
services to the public. The addition of
cable communications system components does not constitute an unanticipated or
added burden on the real estate subject to the easements or public
rights-of-way.
Sec. 22. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 238.35, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. [RESTRICTIONS
ON USE.] (a) As a condition of using any utility easement, a cable
communications company shall be system is subject to any burdens,
duties, or obligations specified in the easement of the grantee of the
easement.
(b) Subject to any applicable rights and obligations of
sections 237.162 and 237.163 and any local right-of-way ordinance adopted under
those statutes, a person operating a cable communications company system
shall restore the real estate, and any landscaping or improvements thereon, to
the condition they were in prior to entry within 30 days of completing the
installation of the cables and related cable communications system components
upon that real estate and to make changes to the cables or related cable
communication systems components. Changing
technology has caused and will continue to cause over time the development of
new cable communications services requiring changing uses of existing utility
easements. Restoration which cannot be
completed during the winter months must be accomplished as promptly as weather
conditions permit.
Sec. 23. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 238.36, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. [CABLE
COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY'S SYSTEM'S EQUIPMENT.] "Cable
communications company's system's equipment" means aerial
wires, cables, amplifiers, associated power supply equipment, and other
transmission apparatus necessary for the proper operation of the cable
communications system in a franchised area.
Sec. 24. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 238.39, is amended to read:
238.39 [LEGAL AUTHORITY.]
Every pole, duct, and conduit agreement must contain a
provision that the cable communications company system shall
submit to the public utility company evidence of the cable communications company's
system's lawful authority to place, maintain, and operate its facilities
within public streets, highways, and other thoroughfares and shall secure the
legally necessary permits and consents from federal, state, county, and
municipal authorities to construct, maintain, and operate facilities at the
locations of poles or conduit systems of the public utility company which
that it uses. The parties to the
agreement shall at all times observe and comply with, and the provisions of a
pole, duct, and conduit agreement are subject to, the laws, ordinances, and
rules which that in any manner affect the rights and obligations
of the parties to the agreement, so long as the laws, ordinances, or rules
remain in effect.
Sec. 25. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 238.40, is amended to read:
238.40 [LIABILITY; INDEMNIFY PUBLIC UTILITY.]
(a) Every pole, duct, and conduit agreement must contain
a provision that the cable communications company system shall
defend, indemnify, protect, and save harmless the public utility from and
against any and all claims and demands for damages to property and injury or
death to persons, including payments made under any worker's compensation law
or under any plan for employees' disability and death benefits, which may arise
out of or be caused:
(1) by the erection, maintenance, presence, use, or
removal of the cable communications company's system's cable,
equipment, and facilities or by the proximity of the cables, equipment, and
facilities of the parties to the agreement,; or
(2) by any act of the cable communications company
system on or in the vicinity of the public utility company's poles and
conduit system, in the performance of the agreement. Nothing contained in this section relieves the public utility
company from liability for the negligence of the public utility company or
anyone acting under its direction and control.
(b) The cable communications company system
shall also indemnify, protect, and save harmless the public utility:
(1) from any and all claims and demands which that
arise directly or indirectly from the operation of the cable communications company's
system's facilities including taxes, special charges by others, claims,
and demands (i) for damages or loss for infringement of copyright, (ii)
for libel and slander, (iii) for unauthorized use of television
broadcast programs, and (iv) for unauthorized use of other program
material,; and
(2) from and against all claims and demands for
infringement of patents with respect to the manufacture, use, and operation of
the cable communications equipment in combination with the public utility
company's poles, conduit system, or otherwise.
(c) Nothing contained in this section relieves the
public utility company from liability for the negligence of the public utility
company or anyone acting under its direction and control.
Sec. 26. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 238.43, subdivision 1, is
amended to read:
Subdivision 1. [DEFINITION
REGIONAL CHANNEL ENTITY.] For the purposes of this section
"Regional channel entity" or "entity" means an
independent, nonprofit corporation to govern the operation of the regional
channel.
Sec. 27. [REVISOR
INSTRUCTIONS.]
(a) The revisor of statutes shall delete the words
"shall mean" and insert "means" where found in Minnesota
Statutes, section 238.02.
(b) The revisor of statutes shall change the term
"cable communications company" to "cable communications
system" where found in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 238.
(c) In Minnesota Statutes, section 238.18, subdivision 1,
the revisor of statutes shall delete paragraph (a) and renumber paragraph (b)
as section 238.02, subdivision 1b, and renumber paragraph (c) as section
238.02, subdivision 34.
(d) In Minnesota Statutes, section 238.22, the revisor of
statutes shall renumber subdivision 6 as section 238.02, subdivision 1a;
subdivision 7 as section 238.02, subdivision 1c; subdivision 8 as section
238.02, subdivision 1d; subdivision 10 as section 238.02, subdivision 21a;
subdivision 11 as section 238.02, subdivision 28a; subdivision 12 as section
238.02, subdivision 29a; subdivision 13 as section 238.02, subdivision 31a; and
subdivision 14 as section 238.02, subdivision 31d.
(e) In Minnesota Statutes, section 238.36, the revisor of
statutes shall renumber subdivision 2 as section 238.02, subdivision 3a;
subdivision 3 as section 238.02, subdivision 20a; and subdivision 4 as section
238.02, subdivision 31b.
(f) The revisor of statutes shall renumber Minnesota
Statutes, section 238.43, subdivision 1, as section 238.02, subdivision 31c.
Sec. 28. [REPEALER.]
Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 238.01; 238.02,
subdivisions 2, 17, 18, 19, and 25; 238.082; 238.083, subdivisions 3 and 5;
238.084, subdivisions 2, 3, and 5; 238.12, subdivision 1a; and 238.36,
subdivision 1, are repealed."
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Opatz moved to amend H. F. No. 2151, the first engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 18, after line 31, insert:
"Sec. 10.
[238.115] [CABLE PROVIDER COMPLAINTS.]
A cable communications company holding a franchise to
provide cable communications services in any area of this state must
immediately provide a consumer complaint telephone number to any person who
calls the company or its agent and asks for a
consumer complaint number. The number
provided must be the telephone number of a person or agency that is
unaffiliated with the cable communications company and that is organized to
provide assistance to complaining consumers."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Gunther and Westrom moved to amend H. F. No. 2151, the first
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 28, after line 10, insert:
"ARTICLE
4
EXPANDED
CALLING AREAS
Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 237.01, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. [INDEPENDENT
TELEPHONE COMPANY.] "Independent telephone company" means a telephone
company organized and operating under chapter 301 or 302A or authorized to do
business in Minnesota under chapter 303 as of January 1, 1983, and providing
local exchange service to fewer than 30,000 50,000 subscribers
within the state.
Sec. 2. [237.414]
[EXPANDED CALLING AREAS; TRANSPORT FACILITIES; TERMINATIONS.]
Subdivision 1.
[EXPANDED CALLING AREAS.] (a) In addition to any existing authority
applicable to telephone companies, an independent telephone company may expand
the area to which it can provide calling to its customers upon filing with the
commission any agreements between the independent telephone company and other
telephone companies and telecommunications carriers entered into under
subdivision 3. Calling to these
expanded areas must be optional to customers and must be in addition to the
customers' existing local service and any extended area service. Subject to sections 237.06 and 237.09, the
independent telephone company may determine the quantity of expanded calling to
provide, the prices for that calling, and whether to offer calling alone or in
combination with one or more other telephone or unregulated services.
(b) Prices for expanded calling service or for bundles of
services that include expanded calling must exceed the variable cost of the
expanded calling service or bundles of services, determined on an aggregate
basis. An independent telephone company
is not required to file cost information before implementing its prices and is
not required to file cost information except on request of the department,
Office of the Attorney General, or commission.
Customers must be notified of local service options and prices,
including options that do not include expanded calling, as required under
section 237.66. The independent
telephone company shall clearly identify the distinction between the expanded
calling area and the basic local calling area to customers. The independent telephone company is not
required to offer unlimited flat rate calling to these expanded calling areas. The independent telephone company shall file
tariffs setting forth the expanded calling area along with the applicable
prices and quantities of calling.
(c) A rate increase or a substantial change in terms and
conditions of the expanded calling service may be effective 30 days after
filing with the commission and 30 days after providing written notice to
affected customers. Rate decreases may
be effective immediately upon filing.
Minor changes to terms and conditions may be effective immediately upon filing and
upon notice to the customers. This section
does not apply to extended area service or to calling areas previously or
hereafter established by order of the commission. This section does not limit the existing rights and obligations
of telephone companies and telecommunications carriers to provide local
calling, including the obligation to offer unlimited flat rate calling in the
basic local calling area, or expanded calling.
Subd. 2.
[OBTAINING TRANSPORT, SWITCHING FACILITIES.] An independent telephone
company may construct, purchase, lease, or rent transport and switching
facilities between its existing local area and the expanded calling area that
are needed to provide the expanded calling.
If the independent telephone company is unable to reach agreement with
other telephone companies or telecommunications carriers, the company or
carrier may petition the commission under section 237.12 to resolve issues
regarding prices, terms, and conditions for use of any transport facilities
that are subject to the jurisdiction of the commission.
Subd. 3.
[TERMINATION OF EXPANDED CALLING TRAFFIC.] (a) An independent
telephone company providing an expanded calling area under this section may
enter into an agreement to terminate calls with telephone companies and
telecommunications carriers providing service within the expanded calling
area. Compensation to the telephone
company or telecommunications carrier to terminate expanded calling into such
areas must be the intrastate access charges of the telephone company or
telecommunications carrier terminating the call or other rates agreed upon by
the companies.
(b) Two telephone companies that provide expanded calling
between their respective areas may also enter into "bill and keep"
arrangements for exchange of the expanded calling traffic.
(c) The independent telephone company shall file with the
commission any agreements for termination of calling by telephone companies and
telecommunications carriers providing service within the expanded calling area.
Subd. 4.
[AMENDING OR TERMINATING EXPANDED CALLING SERVICE.] Except for
calling areas that result from a prior or subsequent order of the commission,
an independent telephone company may amend or terminate the expanded calling
service upon 30 days' written notice to customers, the commission, and other
telephone companies and telecommunications carriers providing local service in
the expanded area. The notice to
customers of an amendment to the expanded calling area or termination of an
expanded calling area must be sent separately from other mailings and clearly
explain how the expanded calling area is being changed. The notice to customers of an amendment must
also clearly identify that calls to areas outside of the expanded calling area
will be long distance calls billed at the applicable rate of the customer's
long distance carrier. The notice to
customers of a termination must clearly identify that calls to the terminated
expanded calling area will become long distance calls billed at the applicable
rate of the customer's long distance carrier.
Sec. 3. [237.435]
[ANNUAL UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUNDING CERTIFICATION.]
In determining whether to provide the annual certification
of any eligible telecommunications carrier for continued receipt of federal
universal service funding, the commission shall apply the same standards and
criteria to all eligible telecommunications carriers."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Sertich moved to amend H. F. No. 2151, the first engrossment,
as amended, as follows:
Page 25, after line 34, insert:
"Sec. 27.
[BINDING ARBITRATION REQUIRED.]
Class C cable systems as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
section 238.02, subdivision 19, must carry Victory Sports One productions of
Minnesota Twins baseball games for the 2004 season, Showtime, the Disney
Channel and the Movie Channel as part of expanded basic cable service and not
as a premium service. The monthly
subscriber fee which is fair and reasonable and may be charged for these
broadcasts shall be as determined by binding arbitration conducted pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, sections 572.08 to 572.30, by one court-appointed
arbitrator.
[EFFECTIVE DATE.] This
section is effective the day following final enactment."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
Abrams moved to amend the Sertich amendment to H. F. No. 2151,
the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 8, after "season" insert ",
Home Box Office"
The motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was
adopted.
Kahn moved to amend the Sertich amendment, as amended, to H. F.
No. 2151, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 8, delete ", Showtime, the Disney
Channel and the Movie Channel"
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the amendment to the amendment, as
amended, and the roll was called. There
were 41 yeas and 85 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, I.
Atkins
Bernardy
Carlson
Davnie
Dill
Eken
Ellison
Greiling
Hausman
Heidgerken
Hilty
Hornstein
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Koenen
Larson
Latz
Lieder
Lipman
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Otremba
Otto
Paymar
Pugh
Rukavina
Sertich
Sieben
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Wagenius
Walker
Wasiluk
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Adolphson
Anderson, J.
Beard
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Cox
Davids
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Goodwin
Gunther
Haas
Hackbarth
Harder
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Jacobson
Johnson, J.
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lindgren
Lindner
Magnus
McNamara
Meslow
Nelson, C.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olson, M.
Opatz
Osterman
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson
Powell
Rhodes
Ruth
Samuelson
Seagren
Seifert
Severson
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Sykora
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Walz
Wardlow
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment,
as amended, was not adopted.
Sertich withdrew the Sertich amendment, as amended, to H. F.
No. 2151, the first engrossment, as amended.
Bernardy and Goodwin moved to amend H. F. No. 2151, the first
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 27, delete line 2 and insert:
"CONSUMER
PROTECTION"
Page 28, after line 4, insert:
"Sec. 3.
[325E.317] [LONG DISTANCE PHONE CARDS.]
If a prepaid long distance telephone usage card has an
expiration date, the date must be clearly expressed in bold nine-point type on
both the front of the card and its packaging."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Bernardy and Goodwin amendment
and the roll was called. There were 55
yeas and 71 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, I.
Atkins
Bernardy
Biernat
Brod
Carlson
Davnie
Dill
Dorn
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Goodwin
Greiling
Hausman
Hilty
Hornstein
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Koenen
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lieder
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Newman
Opatz
Otremba
Otto
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Sertich
Sieben
Slawik
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Wagenius
Walker
Wasiluk
Westerberg
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abrams
Adolphson
Anderson, J.
Beard
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Buesgens
Cornish
Cox
Davids
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dorman
Eastlund
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Gunther
Haas
Hackbarth
Harder
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Jacobson
Johnson, J.
Klinzing
Knoblach
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
McNamara
Meslow
Nelson, C.
Nelson, P.
Nornes
Olson, M.
Osterman
Ozment
Paulsen
Penas
Powell
Ruth
Samuelson
Seagren
Seifert
Severson
Simpson
Smith
Soderstrom
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Sykora
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Walz
Wardlow
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Beard, Pelowski and Westrom moved to amend H. F. No. 2151, the
first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 28, after line 10, insert:
"ARTICLE 4
ALTERNATIVE REGULATION PLANS
FOR TELEPHONE COMPANIES
Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 237.766, is amended to read:
237.766 [PLAN DURATION AND EXTENSION.]
Subdivision 1.
[PLAN DURATION.] An alternative regulation plan approved by the
commission under section 237.764 must remain in force as approved for the term
specified in the plan, which must be for no less than three years. Except as otherwise provided in this section,
within six months prior to the termination of the plan, the plan must be
reviewed by the commission and, with the consent of the company, revised or
renewed consistent with sections 237.76 to 237.774, except that the
justification of earnings levels in section 237.764, subdivision 1, paragraph
(c), if required and the provisions prohibiting rate increases at the
initiation of or during the first three years of a plan contained in section
237.762, shall not apply to a revised or renewed plan. Any revised or renewed plan must be approved
by the commission and shall contain a mechanism under which a telephone company
may reduce the rates for price-regulated services below the initial rates or
prices or increase the rates or prices during the term of the revised or
renewed plan. The plan must specify the
reports required of the telephone company for review of the plan and specify
that the telephone company shall maintain records in sufficient detail to
facilitate the review the company shall give notice that it will propose
a new plan, extend an existing plan, or revert to rate of return regulation.
Subd. 2. [NEW
PLAN.] A new plan proposed by a company must be reviewed by the commission
and, with the consent of the company, revised or approved consistent with
sections 237.76 to 237.774, except that the justification of earnings levels in
section 237.764, subdivision 1, paragraph (c), if required, and the provisions
prohibiting rate increases at the initiation of or during the first three years
of a plan contained in section 237.762, shall not apply to a new
plan. Any new plan must be approved by
the commission and shall contain a mechanism under which a telephone company
may reduce the rates for price-regulated services below the initial rates or
prices or increase the rates or prices during the term of the plan. The plan must specify the reports required
of the telephone company for review of the plan and specify that the telephone
company shall maintain records in sufficient detail to facilitate the
review. A new plan is not an extension,
which must be made pursuant to subdivision 3.
Subd. 3. [PLAN
EXTENSION.] (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of its plan, a telephone
company operating under a plan as of the effective date of this section, may elect
to extend that plan for up to three years from the expiration date of the plan
or until December 31, 2007, whichever is earlier. The election is effective upon notification to customers, the
commission, the department, and the Office of the Attorney General. A telephone company must provide
notification of its election within 30 days of the effective date of this
section, or within six months of the expiration of its current or expired plan,
whichever is later. Once a telephone
company has elected to exercise the option provided under this subdivision, the
company may elect at any time to terminate the plan by notifying customers, the
commission, the department, and the Office of the Attorney General, in writing,
six months prior to the termination date.
Upon termination of a plan, the company shall be regulated as provided
in this chapter.
(b) A telephone company may elect to extend a plan entered
into after the effective date of this section in lieu of proposing a new plan
only if the company is in substantial compliance with the plan's service
quality provisions and has met its infrastructure obligations under the
plan. If the company elects to extend a
plan, the rates for price-regulated services shall be capped at the rate levels
in effect at the time the extension commences, provided, however, exceptions to
a price cap contained in the plan being extended may remain in force. Unless otherwise specified in the plan, all
other provisions of the plan shall continue in effect throughout the extension
period. A plan may not be extended for
less than one year or more than three years, and may only be extended once.
(c) The Department of Commerce or the Office of the Attorney
General may file an objection to the extension with the commission if the
company is not in substantial compliance with the service quality provisions of
its plan or has not met its infrastructure obligations under the plan. An objection must be filed within 45 days of
the company's notice of its intention to extend the plan.
(d) If an objection is filed by the Department of Commerce
or the Office of the Attorney General, the commission may hold a hearing on the
issues raised in the objection. The
hearings shall be completed within 30 days of the deadline for filing the
objections. If the commission finds
that the issues raised in the objection are valid, it may reject the
extension. If the commission finds that
the issues raised in the objection are not valid, it shall approve the
extension. The commission shall issue
its decision within 15 days of the completion of the hearings concerning the
objection.
(e) If the Department of Commerce or the Office of the
Attorney General does not file an objection, the commission shall approve the
extension within 60 days of the company's filing of its notice of its intention
to extend the plan.
Sec. 2. Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 237.773, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. [LOCAL RATE.]
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a small telephone company shall not
implement a rate increase for any service listed in section 237.761,
subdivision 3, beyond the level in effect 60 days prior to an election under
subdivision 2, until the later of January 1, 1998, or two years after making an
election. However, a small telephone
company may implement any new service and establish rates for any new service
and may change rates for any other service at any time subject to the
requirements of section 237.761, subdivision 4. A small company shall provide to its customers the ability to
block, at no extra charge, any new service which it offers, provides, or
bills. This requirement shall not apply
to services that require affirmative subscription by the customer. Nothing in this section shall prevent the
commission from requiring blocking or other privacy or safety protections for
other types of telecommunications services under section 237.081.
(b) At any time following one year
after electing under subdivision 2, a small telephone company may change rates
for local services except switched network access services, listed in section
237.761, subdivision 3, to reflect:
(1) changes in state and federal taxes;
(2) changes in jurisdictional allocations from the Federal
Communications Commission, the amount of which the small telephone company
cannot control and for which equal and opposite exogenous changes are made on
the federal level;
(3) substantial financial impacts of investments in network
upgrades which are made; or
(i) if the investment exceeds 20 percent of the gross plant
investment of the company; or
(ii) as the result of government mandates to construct specific
telephone infrastructure, if the mandate applies to local telephone companies
and the company would not otherwise be compensated.
A small telephone company
may change rates for local services listed in section 237.761, subdivision 3,
at any time, to implement extended area service or any successor to that
service on an income-neutral basis.
A small telephone company
proposing an increase under this subdivision shall provide 60 days' advance
written notice to the department and each of the company's customers including
the individual rates affected and the procedure necessary for the customers to
petition for investigation. If the
department receives a petition within 45 days after the notice from five
percent or 500, whichever is fewer, of the customers of the small telephone
company, the department and the company shall jointly determine
if the petition is valid and, if so, may investigate the rate change to
determine if it conforms to the limitations of this subdivision. Within 30 days of validating the
petition, the department shall report its findings to the commission, which
shall either adopt the report or order changes to conform to this subdivision.
(c) On or after the later of January 1998, or two years after
making an election under subdivision 2, a small telephone company may increase
rates for local services, except switched network access services, listed in
section 237.761, subdivision 3. A small
telephone company proposing an increase shall provide 60 days' advance written
notice to its customers including individual rates affected and the procedure
necessary for the customers to petition for investigation. If the commission receives a petition within
45 days after such notice, from five percent or 500, whichever is fewer, of the
customers of the small telephone company, the department and the company
shall jointly determine if the petition is valid and, if so, may investigate
the proposed rate increase to determine if it is appropriate in light of rates
charged by other local exchange telephone companies for comparable services,
taking into account calling scope, quality of service, the availability of
competitive alternatives, service costs, and the features available to the
customers. Within 30 days of
validating the petition, the department shall file a report with the
commission which shall then approve appropriate rates for those services. Rates established by the commission under
this paragraph shall not be increased within one year of implementation.
Sec. 3. [AFOR PLAN
EXTENDED; EXPEDITED APPROVAL OF NEW PLAN.]
(a) A telephone company that has received an order from the
Federal Communications Commission, pursuant to United States Code, title 47,
section 271, to provide in-region interLATA services in the state and that was
operating under an alternative form of regulation plan approved under Minnesota
Statutes 2003, sections 237.73 to 237.775, as of December 1, 2003, shall
continue to be regulated under the provisions of that plan until December 31,
2005, notwithstanding any contrary provision in the plan or in Minnesota
Statutes, sections 237.73 to 237.773.
During this period, the telephone company may elect to be regulated
under traditional rate of return regulation under Minnesota Statutes, chapter
237, but must give six months' notice of that election to the Public Utilities
Commission, the Office of the Attorney General, and the Department of Commerce.
(b) If, on or before December 31,
2004, a telephone company described in paragraph (a), the Department of
Commerce and the Office of the Attorney General jointly file with the Public
Utilities Commission a new alternative form of regulation plan for the telephone
company under Minnesota Statutes 2003, sections 237.73 to 237.775, the new plan
shall be effective 60 days after the date of filing. Prior to the filing, the Department of Commerce and the Office of
the Attorney General shall consult with interested stakeholders, including
consumer groups, regarding the new alternative form of regulation plan.
Sec. 4. [EFFECTIVE
DATE.]
Sections 1 and 3 are effective the day following final
enactment."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
H. F. No. 2151, A bill for an act relating to
telecommunications; regulating certain payments, credits, and interest charges;
changing various cable system provisions; establishing consumer protections for
wireless customers; expanding call areas; providing alternative regulation
plans for telephone companies; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections
237.01, subdivision 3; 237.06; 237.766; 237.773, subdivision 3; 238.02,
subdivision 3; 238.03; 238.08, subdivisions 3, 4; 238.081; 238.083,
subdivisions 2, 4; 238.084, subdivision 1; 238.11, subdivision 2; 238.22,
subdivision 13; 238.23; 238.24, subdivisions 3, 4, 6, 9, 10; 238.242,
subdivisions 1, 3; 238.25, subdivisions 5, 10; 238.35, subdivisions 1, 4;
238.36, subdivision 2; 238.39; 238.40; 238.43, subdivision 1; 325E.02;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 237; 325F;
repealing Minnesota Statutes 2002, sections 238.01; 238.02, subdivisions 2, 17,
18, 19, 25; 238.082; 238.083, subdivisions 3, 5; 238.084, subdivisions 2, 3, 5;
238.12, subdivision 1a; 238.36, subdivision 1.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 122 yeas and 3
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Adolphson
Anderson, J.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Cornish
Cox
Davids
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Goodwin
Gunther
Haas
Hackbarth
Harder
Heidgerken
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Howes
Huntley
Jacobson
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lieder
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Murphy
Nelson, C.
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olson, M.
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson
Powell
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Ruth
Samuelson
Seagren
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Walker
Walz
Wardlow
Wasiluk
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, I.
Biernat
Greiling
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
S. F. No. 2609, A bill for an act relating to education;
including a mental health community representative on a community transition
team; amending Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 125A.22.
The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final
passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 127 yeas and 0
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Adolphson
Anderson, I.
Anderson, J.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Biernat
Blaine
Borrell
Boudreau
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Cornish
Cox
Davids
Davnie
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gerlach
Goodwin
Greiling
Gunther
Haas
Hackbarth
Harder
Hausman
Heidgerken
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Howes
Huntley
Jacobson
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lieder
Lindgren
Lindner
Lipman
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Murphy
Nelson, C.
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olson, M.
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson
Powell
Pugh
Rhodes
Rukavina
Ruth
Samuelson
Seagren
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Stang
Strachan
Swenson
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Walker
Walz
Wardlow
Wasiluk
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The bill was passed and its title agreed to.
H. F. No. 2005 was reported to the House.
McNamara moved to amend H. F. No. 2005 as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1.
Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 18C.60, subdivision 2, is amended to
read:
Subd. 2. [PHOSPHORUS
USE RESTRICTIONS.] (a) A person may not apply a fertilizer containing the plant
nutrient phosphorus to turf in a metropolitan county statewide,
except under conditions listed in paragraph (d) (b).
(b) A person may not apply granular fertilizer containing
greater than three percent phosphate (P205) by weight, or liquid fertilizer at
a rate greater than 0.3 pound phosphate (P205) per 1,000 square feet, to turf
in a county other than a metropolitan county, except under conditions listed in
paragraph (d).
(c) A local unit of government in a county other than a
metropolitan county may adopt paragraph (a) in place of paragraph (b). The local unit of government must notify the
commissioner of the adoption of paragraph (a) within 30 days of its adoption. The commissioner shall maintain a list of
local units of government in counties other than a metropolitan county that
have adopted paragraph (a).
(d) Paragraphs Paragraph (a) and (b) do does
not apply when:
(1) a tissue, soil, or other test by a laboratory or method
approved by the commissioner and performed within the last three years
indicates that the level of available phosphorus in the soil is insufficient to
support healthy turf growth;
(2) the property owner or an agent of the property owner is
first establishing turf via seed or sod procedures, and only during the first
growing season; or
(3) the fertilizer containing the plant food phosphorus is used
on a golf course under the direction of a person licensed, certified, or
approved by an organization with an ongoing training program approved by the
commissioner.
(e) (c) Applications of phosphorous fertilizer
authorized under paragraph (d), clause (1) or (2), (b) must not
exceed rates recommended by the University of Minnesota and approved by the
commissioner.
Sec. 2. [EFFECTIVE
DATE; APPLICATION.]
Section 1 is effective January 1, 2005, and applies to
fertilizer to be used for turf purchased at retail after August 1, 2004."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Westrom and Dorman moved to amend H. F. No. 2005, as
amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 7, strike "to" and insert "on
any surface, including but not limited to sidewalks and streets, other than"
and reinstate the stricken language and delete the new language
Page 1, line 8, to page 2, line 13, reinstate the stricken
language and delete the new language
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
H. F. No. 2005, as amended, was read for the third time.
Dorman moved that H. F. No. 2005, as amended, be re-referred to
the Committee on Agriculture Policy.
The motion did not prevail.
H. F. No. 2005, A bill for an act relating to the environment;
extending the restriction on phosphorus use in fertilizers; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2002, section 18C.60, subdivision 2.
The bill, as amended, was placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 88 yeas and 40
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Adolphson
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Biernat
Boudreau
Brod
Carlson
Cornish
Cox
Davnie
DeLaForest
Dempsey
Dill
Dorn
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Gerlach
Goodwin
Greiling
Hackbarth
Hausman
Hilty
Hoppe
Hornstein
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelliher
Klinzing
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lindgren
Lipman
Mahoney
Mariani
McNamara
Meslow
Murphy
Nelson, C.
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Opatz
Osterman
Otremba
Otto
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson
Powell
Pugh
Rhodes
Ruth
Samuelson
Seagren
Sieben
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Strachan
Swenson
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Walker
Walz
Wasiluk
Westerberg
Spk. Sviggum
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, I.
Anderson, J.
Blaine
Borrell
Bradley
Buesgens
Davids
Demmer
Dorman
Eastlund
Erickson
Finstad
Fuller
Gunther
Haas
Harder
Heidgerken
Holberg
Jacobson
Juhnke
Knoblach
Krinkie
Kuisle
Lieder
Lindner
Magnus
Marquart
Nornes
Olson, M.
Penas
Rukavina
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Solberg
Stang
Wardlow
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
Paulsen moved that the remaining bills on the Calendar for
the Day be continued. The motion
prevailed.
MOTIONS AND RESOLUTIONS
Davnie moved that the name of Clark be added as an author on
H. F. No. 1382. The
motion prevailed.
Osterman moved that the name of Tingelstad be added as an
author on H. F. No. 1897.
The motion prevailed.
Bradley moved that the name of Nelson, C., be added as an
author on H. F. No. 2391.
The motion prevailed.
Lanning moved that the name of Erhardt be added as an author on
H. F. No. 2525. The
motion prevailed.
Blaine moved that the names of Erickson and Soderstrom be added
as authors on H. F. No. 2555.
The motion prevailed.
Abrams moved that the name of Nelson, C., be added as an author
on H. F. No. 2643. The
motion prevailed.
Tingelstad moved that the name of Paulsen be added as an author
on H. F. No. 2753. The
motion prevailed.
Knoblach moved that the name of Magnus be added as an author on
H. F. No. 2772. The
motion prevailed.
Nelson, C., moved that the name of Bradley be added as an
author on H. F. No. 3174.
The motion prevailed.
McNamara moved that his name be stricken as an author on
H. F. No. 3175. The
motion prevailed.
Hornstein moved that the name of Bernardy be added as an author
on H. F. No. 3178. The
motion prevailed.
Johnson, J., moved that H. F. No. 2915, now on
the General Register, be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means. The motion prevailed.
ADJOURNMENT
Paulsen moved that when the House adjourns today it adjourn
until 12:00 noon, Wednesday, April 21, 2004.
The motion prevailed.
Paulsen moved that the House adjourn. The motion prevailed, and the Speaker declared the House stands
adjourned until 12:00 noon, Wednesday, April 21, 2004.
Edward
A. Burdick,
Chief Clerk, House of Representatives