STATE OF
EIGHTY-FOURTH SESSION - 2006
_____________________
ONE HUNDRED FIFTH DAY
Prior to the convening of session, Gemma
Bulos, a musician and composer, performed "We Rise," a song she composed
in response to the September 11, 2001, tragedy.
The House of Representatives convened at
10:00 a.m. and was called to order by Erik Paulsen, Speaker pro tempore.
Prayer was offered by the Reverend Lonnie
E. Titus, House Chaplain.
The members of the House gave the pledge
of allegiance to the flag of the
The roll was called and the following
members were present:
Abeler
Abrams
Anderson, B.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Charron
Cornish
Cox
Cybart
Davids
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dittrich
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Emmer
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gazelka
Goodwin
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, R.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Moe
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Powell
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Samuelson
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Wardlow
Welti
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
A quorum was present.
Anderson, I., was excused.
Speaker pro tempore Paulsen called Abrams
to the Chair.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the
Journals of the preceding days. Lillie
moved that further reading of the Journals be suspended and that the Journals
be approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk.
The motion prevailed.
REPORTS OF
CHIEF CLERK
S. F. No. 2576 and
H. F. No. 3049, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION OF RULES
Davids moved that the rules be so far
suspended that S. F. No. 2576 be substituted for
H. F. No. 3049 and that the House File be indefinitely
postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 2635 and
H. F. No. 3452, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical.
Hilstrom moved that
S. F. No. 2635 be substituted for H. F. No. 3452
and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 2973 and
H. F. No. 3200, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION OF RULES
Hackbarth moved that the rules be so far
suspended that S. F. No. 2973 be substituted for
H. F. No. 3200 and that the House File be indefinitely
postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 3450 and
H. F. No. 3637, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical.
Holberg moved that
S. F. No. 3450 be substituted for H. F. No. 3637
and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.
PETITIONS
AND COMMUNICATIONS
The following communications were
received:
STATE OF
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
May 5, 2006
The
Honorable Steve Sviggum
Speaker of
the House of Representatives
The State of
Dear Speaker
Sviggum:
Please be advised that I have received,
approved, signed, and deposited in the Office of the Secretary of State the
following House Files:
H. F. No. 1480, relating to
drainage; allowing an outlet fee to be charged for use of an established
drainage system in Red Lake County as an outlet for drainage originating in
Pennington County.
H. F. No. 3142, relating to
H. F. No. 2745, relating to
occupations and professions; modifying provisions for medical licenses.
Sincerely,
Tim
Pawlenty
Governor
STATE OF
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE
The
Honorable Steve Sviggum
Speaker of
the House of Representatives
The
Honorable James P. Metzen
President of
the Senate
I have the honor to inform you that the
following enrolled Acts of the 2006 Session of the State Legislature have been
received from the Office of the Governor and are deposited in the Office of the
Secretary of State for preservation, pursuant to the State Constitution,
Article IV, Section 23:
S. F. No. |
H. F. No. |
Session Laws Chapter No. |
Time and Date Approved 2006 |
Date Filed 2006 |
1480 186 10:48 a.m. May 5 May 5
3142 187 10:50 a.m. May 5 May 5
2745 188 10:51 a.m. May 5 May 5
3615 191 10:45
a.m. May 5 May
5
Sincerely,
Mary
Kiffmeyer
Secretary
of State
STATE OF
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
May 4, 2006
The
Honorable Steve Sviggum
Speaker of
the House of Representatives
The State of
Dear Speaker
Sviggum:
Please be advised that I have received,
approved, signed, and deposited in the Office of the Secretary of State the
following House File:
H. F. No. 1838, relating to
traffic regulations; authorizing operation of neighborhood electric vehicles on
streets and highways.
Sincerely,
Tim
Pawlenty
Governor
STATE OF
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE
The
Honorable Steve Sviggum
Speaker of
the House of Representatives
The
Honorable James P. Metzen
President of
the Senate
I have the honor to inform you that the
following enrolled Acts of the 2006 Session of the State Legislature have been
received from the Office of the Governor and are deposited in the Office of the
Secretary of State for preservation, pursuant to the State Constitution,
Article IV, Section 23:
S. F. No. |
H. F. No. |
Session Laws Chapter No. |
Time and Date Approved 2006 |
Date Filed 2006 |
1838 189 2:25 p.m. May 4 May 4
2532 190 4:15
p.m. May 4 May
4
Sincerely,
Mary
Kiffmeyer
Secretary
of State
REPORTS OF STANDING
COMMITTEES
Paulsen from the Committee on Rules and Legislative
Administration to which was referred:
H. F. No. 3442, A bill for an act relating to agriculture;
providing for certain inspections; repealing beekeeping regulation provisions;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 28A.15, subdivision 4; proposing
coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 17; repealing Minnesota
Statutes 2004, sections 19.50, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
12, 12a, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18; 19.51, subdivisions 1, 2; 19.52; 19.53; 19.55;
19.56; 19.561; 19.57; 19.58, subdivisions 1, 2, 4, 5, 9; 19.59; 19.61,
subdivision 1; 19.63; 19.65; Minnesota Statutes 2005 Supplement, section 19.64,
subdivision 1.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 2, line 9, delete "general"
and insert "agricultural" and after the period, insert "Revenue
from inspection fees and other charges deposited in the agricultural
fund, including any interest earned, is appropriated to the commissioner to
perform the services provided for under this section."
Page 2, after line 14, insert:
"Sec. 3. APPROPRIATION.
($21,000) in 2006 and ($21,000) in 2007 are subtracted from
the general fund appropriation to the Department of Agriculture enacted into
law by the legislature in 2005."
Page 2, line 22, delete "3" and insert
"4"
Renumber the sections in sequence
Amend the title as follows:
Page 1, line 3, after the semicolon, insert "reducing an
appropriation; appropriating money;"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Knoblach
from the Committee on Ways and Means to which was referred:
H. F. No. 3697, A bill for an act relating to government
operations; making changes to health and human services programs; modifying
human service policy; modifying health policy; modifying health care cost
containment provisions; changing provisions for federal health care compliance;
changing provisions in state health care programs; modifying long-term care and
mental health provisions; establishing community electronic health
collaboratives; requiring a description of annuities for medical assistance
payments for long-term care; amending the assisted living bill of rights;
establishing the pharmacy payment reform advisory committee; requiring certain
abortion notification data; providing penalties; prohibiting pharmacists from
refusing to dispense a prescription drug; modifying provisions of the Women's
Right to Know Act; prohibiting the use of state funds for abortions; requiring
reports; appropriating money; making forecast adjustments; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2004, sections 13.3806, by adding a subdivision; 62A.045; 62D.02,
subdivision 4, by adding a subdivision; 62D.03, subdivision 1; 62D.05,
subdivision 1; 62D.095, subdivisions 3, 4, by adding a subdivision; 62E.11,
subdivision 13; 62J.81, subdivision 1; 62S.05, by adding a subdivision; 62S.08,
subdivision 3; 62S.081, subdivision 4; 62S.10, subdivision 2; 62S.13, by adding
a subdivision; 62S.14, subdivision 2; 62S.15; 62S.20, subdivision 1; 62S.24,
subdivisions 1, 3, 4, by adding subdivisions; 62S.25, subdivision 6, by adding
a subdivision; 62S.26; 62S.266, subdivision 2; 62S.29, subdivision 1; 62S.30;
72A.20, by adding a subdivision; 123A.21, subdivision 7; 144.0724, subdivision
4; 144.6501, subdivision 6; 144.698, by adding a subdivision; 144A.071,
subdivisions 4a, 4c; 144A.4605; 144D.01, by adding a subdivision; 144D.015;
144D.02; 144D.03, subdivision 2, by adding a subdivision; 144D.04; 144D.05;
144D.065; 145.4241, by adding subdivisions; 151.214, subdivision 1; 256.01,
subdivision 18, by adding a subdivision; 256B.02, subdivision 9; 256B.056,
subdivision 2, by adding subdivisions; 256B.0595, subdivisions 1, 3, 4;
256B.431, by adding a subdivision; 256B.434, by adding a subdivision; 256B.438,
subdivision 4; 256B.69, subdivision 9, by adding a subdivision; 256B.692,
subdivision 6; 256B.76; 256D.03, by adding a subdivision; 256L.04, subdivision
10; 256L.17, subdivision 3; 295.52, by adding a subdivision; Minnesota Statutes
2005 Supplement, sections 62J.052; 145.4242; 157.16, subdivision 3a; 214.071;
256B.0571; 256B.0595, subdivision 2; 256B.06, subdivision 4; 256B.434,
subdivision 4; 256B.69, subdivision 23; 256D.03, subdivision 3; 256L.05,
subdivision 2; Laws 2003, First Special Session chapter 14, article 12, section
93, as amended; Laws 2005, First Special Session chapter 4, article 8, section
84; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 62J; 62M; 62Q;
62S; 144; 144A; 144D; 145; 151; 214; 245; 256B; proposing coding for new law as
Minnesota Statutes, chapter 144G; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2004, sections
62J.17; 62J.694; 144.395; 256B.692, subdivision 10; Minnesota Statutes 2005
Supplement, sections 62Q.251; 256B.0571, subdivisions 2, 5, 11; Minnesota
Rules, part 4668.0215.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"ARTICLE 1
HEALTH CARE FEDERAL COMPLIANCE
Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2004, section 62A.045, is amended to read:
62A.045 PAYMENTS ON BEHALF
OF ENROLLEES IN GOVERNMENT HEALTH PROGRAMS.
(a) As a condition of doing business in Minnesota, each
health insurer shall comply with the requirements of the federal Deficit
Reduction Act of 2005, Public Law 109-171, including any federal regulations
adopted under that act, to the extent that it imposes a requirement that
applies in this state and that is not also required by the laws of this
state. This section does not require compliance
with any provision of the federal act prior to the effective date provided for
that provision in the federal act. The
commissioner shall enforce this section.
"Health
insurer" for the purpose of this section includes self-insured plans,
group health plans (as defined in section 607(1) of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974), service benefit plans, managed care
organizations, pharmacy benefit managers, or other parties that are by contract
legally responsible to pay a claim for a healthcare item or service for an
individual receiving benefits under paragraph (b).
(b) No health plan issued or renewed to provide coverage to
a Minnesota resident shall contain any provision denying or reducing benefits
because services are rendered to a person who is eligible for or receiving
medical benefits pursuant to title XIX of the Social Security Act (Medicaid) in
this or any other state; chapter 256; 256B; or 256D or services pursuant to
section 252.27; 256L.01 to 256L.10; 260B.331, subdivision 2; 260C.331,
subdivision 2; or 393.07, subdivision 1 or 2.
No health carrier providing benefits under plans covered by this section
shall use eligibility for medical programs named in this section as an
underwriting guideline or reason for nonacceptance of the risk.
(b) (c) If payment for covered expenses has
been made under state medical programs for health care items or services
provided to an individual, and a third party has a legal liability to make
payments, the rights of payment and appeal of an adverse coverage decision for
the individual, or in the case of a child their responsible relative or
caretaker, will be subrogated to the state agency. The state agency may assert its rights under
this section within three years of the date the service was rendered. For purposes of this section, "state
agency" includes prepaid health plans under contract with the commissioner
according to sections 256B.69, 256D.03, subdivision 4, paragraph (c), and
256L.12; children's mental health collaboratives under section 245.493;
demonstration projects for persons with disabilities under section 256B.77;
nursing homes under the alternative payment demonstration project under section
256B.434; and county-based purchasing entities under section 256B.692.
(c) (d) Notwithstanding any law to the
contrary, when a person covered by a health plan receives medical benefits
according to any statute listed in this section, payment for covered services
or notice of denial for services billed by the provider must be issued directly
to the provider. If a person was
receiving medical benefits through the Department of Human Services at the time
a service was provided, the provider must indicate this benefit coverage on any
claim forms submitted by the provider to the health carrier for those
services. If the commissioner of human
services notifies the health carrier that the commissioner has made payments to
the provider, payment for benefits or notices of denials issued by the health
carrier must be issued directly to the commissioner. Submission by the department to the health
carrier of the claim on a Department of Human Services claim form is proper
notice and shall be considered proof of payment of the claim to the provider
and supersedes any contract requirements of the health carrier relating to the
form of submission. Liability to the
insured for coverage is satisfied to the extent that payments for those
benefits are made by the health carrier to the provider or the commissioner as
required by this section.
(d) (e) When a state agency has acquired
the rights of an individual eligible for medical programs named in this section
and has health benefits coverage through a health carrier, the health carrier
shall not impose requirements that are different from requirements applicable
to an agent or assignee of any other individual covered.
(e) (f) For the purpose of this section,
health plan includes coverage offered by community integrated service networks,
any plan governed under the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974 (ERISA), United States Code, title 29, sections 1001 to 1461, and coverage
offered under the exclusions listed in section 62A.011, subdivision 3, clauses
(2), (6), (9), (10), and (12).
Sec. 2. Minnesota
Statutes 2004, section 62S.05, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 4. Extension of limitation periods. The commissioner may extend the limitation
periods set forth in subdivisions 1 and 2 as to specific age group categories
in specific policy forms upon finding that the extension is in the best
interest of the public.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec.
3. Minnesota Statutes 2004, section
62S.08, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Mandatory format. The following standard format outline of
coverage must be used, unless otherwise specifically indicated:
COMPANY NAME
ADDRESS - CITY AND STATE
TELEPHONE NUMBER
LONG-TERM CARE INSURANCE
OUTLINE OF COVERAGE
Policy
Number or Group Master Policy and Certificate Number
(Except for policies or certificates which are guaranteed
issue, the following caution statement, or language substantially similar, must
appear as follows in the outline of coverage.)
CAUTION: The issuance of this long-term care insurance
(policy) (certificate) is based upon your responses to the questions on your
application. A copy of your
(application) (enrollment form) (is enclosed) (was retained by you when you
applied). If your answers are incorrect
or untrue, the company has the right to deny benefits or rescind your policy. The best time to clear up any questions is
now, before a claim arises. If, for any
reason, any of your answers are incorrect, contact the company at this address:
(insert address).
(1) This policy is (an individual policy of insurance) (a
group policy) which was issued in the (indicate jurisdiction in which group
policy was issued).
(2) PURPOSE OF OUTLINE OF COVERAGE. This outline of coverage provides a very
brief description of the important features of the policy. You should compare this outline of coverage
to outlines of coverage for other policies available to you. This is not an insurance contract, but only a
summary of coverage. Only the individual
or group policy contains governing contractual provisions. This means that the policy or group policy
sets forth in detail the rights and obligations of both you and the insurance
company. Therefore, if you purchase this
coverage, or any other coverage, it is important that you READ YOUR POLICY (OR
CERTIFICATE) CAREFULLY.
(3) THIS PLAN IS INTENDED TO BE A QUALIFIED LONG-TERM CARE
INSURANCE CONTRACT AS DEFINED UNDER SECTION 7702(B)(b) OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE
CODE OF 1986.
(4) TERMS UNDER WHICH THE POLICY OR CERTIFICATE MAY BE
CONTINUED IN FORCE OR DISCONTINUED.
(a) (For long-term care health insurance policies or
certificates describe one of the following permissible policy renewability
provisions:)
(1) (Policies and certificates that are guaranteed renewable
shall contain the following statement:) RENEWABILITY: THIS POLICY (CERTIFICATE)
IS GUARANTEED RENEWABLE. This means you
have the right, subject to the terms of your policy, (certificate) to continue
this policy as long as you pay your premiums on time. (Company name) cannot
change any of the terms of your policy on its own, except that, in the future,
IT MAY INCREASE THE PREMIUM YOU PAY.
(2) (Policies and certificates that are noncancelable shall
contain the following statement:) RENEWABILITY: THIS POLICY (CERTIFICATE) IS
NONCANCELABLE. This means that you have
the right, subject to the terms of your policy, to continue this policy as long
as you pay your premiums on time. (Company name) cannot change any of the terms
of your policy on its own and cannot change the premium you currently pay. However, if your policy contains an inflation
protection feature where you choose to increase your benefits, (company name)
may increase your premium at that time for those additional benefits.
(b)
(For group coverage, specifically describe continuation/conversion provisions
applicable to the certificate and group policy.)
(c) (Describe waiver of premium provisions or state that
there are not such provisions.)
(5) TERMS UNDER WHICH THE COMPANY MAY CHANGE PREMIUMS.
(In bold type larger than the maximum type required to be
used for the other provisions of the outline of coverage, state whether or not
the company has a right to change the premium and, if a right exists, describe
clearly and concisely each circumstance under which the premium may change.)
(6) TERMS UNDER WHICH THE POLICY OR CERTIFICATE MAY BE
RETURNED AND PREMIUM REFUNDED.
(a) (Provide a brief description of the right to return --
"free look" provision of the policy.)
(b) (Include a statement that the policy either does or does
not contain provisions providing for a refund or partial refund of premium upon
the death of an insured or surrender of the policy or certificate. If the policy contains such provisions,
include a description of them.)
(5) (7) THIS IS NOT MEDICARE SUPPLEMENT
COVERAGE. If you are eligible for
Medicare, review the Medicare Supplement Buyer's Guide available from the
insurance company.
(a) (For agents) neither (insert company name) nor its agents
represent Medicare, the federal government, or any state government.
(b) (For direct response) (insert company name) is not
representing Medicare, the federal government, or any state government.
(6) (8) LONG-TERM CARE COVERAGE. Policies of this category are designed to
provide coverage for one or more necessary or medically necessary diagnostic,
preventive, therapeutic, rehabilitative, maintenance, or personal care
services, provided in a setting other than an acute care unit of a hospital,
such as in a nursing home, in the community, or in the home.
This policy provides coverage in the form of a fixed dollar
indemnity benefit for covered long-term care expenses, subject to policy
(limitations), (waiting periods), and (coinsurance) requirements. (Modify this
paragraph if the policy is not an indemnity policy.)
(7) (9) BENEFITS PROVIDED BY THIS POLICY.
(a) (Covered services, related deductible(s), waiting
periods, elimination periods, and benefit maximums.)
(b) (Institutional benefits, by skill level.)
(c) (Noninstitutional benefits, by skill level.)
(d) (Eligibility for payment of benefits.)
(Activities of daily living and cognitive impairment shall be
used to measure an insured's need for long-term care and must be defined and
described as part of the outline of coverage.)
(Any
benefit screens must be explained in this section. If these screens differ for different
benefits, explanation of the screen should accompany each benefit
description. If an attending physician
or other specified person must certify a certain level of functional dependency
in order to be eligible for benefits, this too must be specified. If activities of daily living (ADLs) are used
to measure an insured's need for long-term care, then these qualifying criteria
or screens must be explained.)
(8) (10) LIMITATIONS AND EXCLUSIONS:
Describe:
(a) preexisting conditions;
(b) noneligible facilities/provider;
(c) noneligible levels of care (e.g., unlicensed providers,
care or treatment provided by a family member, etc.);
(d) exclusions/exceptions; and
(e) limitations.
(This section should provide a brief specific description of
any policy provisions which limit, exclude, restrict, reduce, delay, or in any
other manner operate to qualify payment of the benefits described in paragraph (6)
(8).)
THIS POLICY MAY NOT COVER ALL THE EXPENSES ASSOCIATED WITH
YOUR LONG-TERM CARE NEEDS.
(9) (11) RELATIONSHIP OF COST OF CARE AND
BENEFITS. Because the costs of long-term
care services will likely increase over time, you should consider whether and
how the benefits of this plan may be adjusted.
As applicable, indicate the following:
(a) that the benefit level will not increase over time;
(b) any automatic benefit adjustment provisions;
(c) whether the insured will be guaranteed the option to buy
additional benefits and the basis upon which benefits will be increased over
time if not by a specified amount or percentage;
(d) if there is such a guarantee, include whether additional
underwriting or health screening will be required, the frequency and amounts of
the upgrade options, and any significant restrictions or limitations; and
(e) whether there will be any additional premium charge
imposed and how that is to be calculated.
(10) (12) ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND OTHER ORGANIC
BRAIN DISORDERS. (State that the policy provides coverage for insureds
clinically diagnosed as having Alzheimer's disease or related degenerative and
dementing illnesses. Specifically,
describe each benefit screen or other policy provision which provides
preconditions to the availability of policy benefits for such an insured.)
(11) (13) PREMIUM.
(a) State the total annual premium for the policy.
(b)
If the premium varies with an applicant's choice among benefit options,
indicate the portion of annual premium which corresponds to each benefit
option.
(12) (14) ADDITIONAL FEATURES.
(a) Indicate if medical underwriting is used.
(b) Describe other important features.
(15) CONTACT THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE OR SENIOR
LINKAGE LINE IF YOU HAVE GENERAL QUESTIONS REGARDING LONG-TERM CARE
INSURANCE. CONTACT THE INSURANCE COMPANY
IF YOU HAVE SPECIFIC QUESTIONS REGARDING YOUR LONG-TERM CARE INSURANCE POLICY
OR CERTIFICATE.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec. 4. Minnesota
Statutes 2004, section 62S.081, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Forms.
An insurer shall use the forms in Appendices B (Personal Worksheet) and
F (Potential Rate Increase Disclosure Form) of the Long-term Care
Insurance Model Regulation adopted by the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners to comply with the requirements of subdivisions 1 and 2.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec. 5. Minnesota
Statutes 2004, section 62S.10, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Contents. The summary must include the following
information:
(1) an explanation of how the long-term care benefit interacts
with other components of the policy, including deductions from death benefits;
(2) an illustration of the amount of benefits, the length of
benefits, and the guaranteed lifetime benefits, if any, for each covered
person; and
(3) any exclusions, reductions, and limitations on benefits
of long-term care; and
(4) a statement that any long-term care inflation protection
option required by section 62S.23 is not available under this policy.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec. 6. Minnesota
Statutes 2004, section 62S.13, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 6. Death of insured. In the event of the death of the insured,
this section shall not apply to the remaining death benefit of a life insurance
policy that accelerates benefits for long-term care. In this situation, the remaining death
benefits under these policies shall be governed by section 61A.03, subdivision
1, paragraph (c). In all other
situations, this section shall apply to life insurance policies that accelerate
benefits for long-term care.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec.
7. Minnesota Statutes 2004, section
62S.14, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Terms.
The terms "guaranteed renewable" and "noncancelable"
may not be used in an individual long-term care insurance policy without
further explanatory language that complies with the disclosure requirements of
section 62S.20. The term "level
premium" may only be used when the insurer does not have the right to
change the premium.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec. 8. Minnesota
Statutes 2004, section 62S.15, is amended to read:
62S.15 AUTHORIZED LIMITATIONS
AND EXCLUSIONS.
No policy may be delivered or issued for delivery in this
state as long-term care insurance if the policy limits or excludes coverage by
type of illness, treatment, medical condition, or accident, except as follows:
(1) preexisting conditions or diseases;
(2) mental or nervous disorders; except that the exclusion or
limitation of benefits on the basis of Alzheimer's disease is prohibited;
(3) alcoholism and drug addiction;
(4) illness, treatment, or medical condition arising out of
war or act of war; participation in a felony, riot, or insurrection; service in
the armed forces or auxiliary units; suicide, attempted suicide, or
intentionally self-inflicted injury; or non-fare-paying aviation; and
(5) treatment provided in a government facility unless
otherwise required by law, services for which benefits are available under
Medicare or other government program except Medicaid, state or federal workers'
compensation, employer's liability or occupational disease law, motor vehicle
no-fault law; services provided by a member of the covered person's immediate family;
and services for which no charge is normally made in the absence of insurance;
and
(6) expenses for services or items available or paid under
another long-term care insurance or health insurance policy.
This
subdivision does not prohibit exclusions and limitations by type of provider or
territorial limitations.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec. 9. Minnesota
Statutes 2004, section 62S.20, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Renewability. (a) Individual long-term care
insurance policies must contain a renewability provision that is appropriately
captioned, appears on the first page of the policy, and clearly states the
duration, where limited, of renewability and the duration of the term of
coverage for which the policy is issued and for which it may be renewed
that the coverage is guaranteed renewable or noncancelable. This subdivision does not apply to policies
which are part of or combined with life insurance policies which do not contain
a renewability provision and under which the right to nonrenew is reserved
solely to the policyholder.
(b) A long-term care insurance policy or certificate, other
than one where the insurer does not have the right to change the premium, shall
include a statement that premium rates may change.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec.
10. Minnesota Statutes 2004, section
62S.24, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Required questions. An application form must include the following
questions designed to elicit information as to whether, as of the date of the
application, the applicant has another long-term care insurance policy or
certificate in force or whether a long-term care policy or certificate is
intended to replace any other accident and sickness or long-term care
policy or certificate presently in force.
A supplementary application or other form to be signed by the applicant
and agent, except where the coverage is sold without an agent, containing the
following questions may be used. If a
replacement policy is issued to a group as defined under section 62S.01,
subdivision 15, clause (1), the following questions may be modified only to the
extent necessary to elicit information about long-term care insurance policies
other than the group policy being replaced; provided, however, that the
certificate holder has been notified of the replacement:
(1) do you have another long-term care insurance policy or
certificate in force (including health care service contract or health maintenance
organization contract)?;
(2) did you have another long-term care insurance policy or
certificate in force during the last 12 months?;
(i) if so, with which company?; and
(ii) if that policy lapsed, when did it lapse?; and
(3) are you covered by Medicaid?; and
(4) do you intend to replace any of your medical or health
insurance coverage with this policy (certificate)?
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec. 11. Minnesota
Statutes 2004, section 62S.24, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 1a. Other health insurance policies sold by
agent. Agents shall list all
other health insurance policies they have sold to the applicant that are still
in force or were sold in the past five years and are no longer in force.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec. 12. Minnesota
Statutes 2004, section 62S.24, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Solicitations other than direct response. After determining that a sale will involve
replacement, an insurer, other than an insurer using direct response
solicitation methods or its agent, shall furnish the applicant, before issuance
or delivery of the individual long-term care insurance policy, a notice
regarding replacement of accident and sickness or long-term care coverage. One copy of the notice must be retained by
the applicant and an additional copy signed by the applicant must be retained
by the insurer. The required notice must
be provided in the following manner:
NOTICE TO APPLICANT REGARDING REPLACEMENT OF
INDIVIDUAL ACCIDENT AND SICKNESS OR LONG-TERM CARE INSURANCE
(Insurance company's name and address)
SAVE THIS NOTICE! IT
MAY BE IMPORTANT TO YOU IN THE FUTURE.
According
to (your application) (information you have furnished), you intend to lapse or
otherwise terminate existing accident and sickness or long-term care
insurance and replace it with an individual long-term care insurance policy to
be issued by (company name) insurance company.
Your new policy provides 30 days within which you may decide, without
cost, whether you desire to keep the policy.
For your own information and protection, you should be aware of and
seriously consider certain factors which may affect the insurance protection
available to you under the new policy.
You should review this new coverage carefully, comparing it
with all accident and sickness or long-term care insurance coverage you
now have, and terminate your present policy only if, after due consideration,
you find that purchase of this long-term care coverage is a wise decision.
STATEMENT TO APPLICANT BY AGENT
(BROKER OR OTHER REPRESENTATIVE):
(Use additional sheets, as necessary.)
I have reviewed your current medical health insurance
coverage. I believe the replacement of
insurance involved in this transaction materially improves your position. My conclusion has taken into account the
following considerations, which I call to your attention:
(a) Health conditions which you presently have (preexisting
conditions) may not be immediately or fully covered under the new policy. This could result in denial or delay in
payment of benefits under the new policy, whereas a similar claim might have
been payable under your present policy.
(b) State law provides that your replacement policy or
certificate may not contain new preexisting conditions or probationary
periods. The insurer will waive any time
periods applicable to preexisting conditions or probationary periods in the new
policy (or coverage) for similar benefits to the extent such time was spent
(depleted) under the original policy.
(c) If you are replacing existing long-term care insurance
coverage, you may wish to secure the advice of your present insurer or its
agent regarding the proposed replacement of your present policy. This is not only your right, but it is also
in your best interest to make sure you understand all the relevant factors
involved in replacing your present coverage.
(d) If, after due consideration, you still wish to terminate
your present policy and replace it with new coverage, be certain to truthfully
and completely answer all questions on the application concerning your medical
health history. Failure to include all
material medical information on an application may provide a basis for the
company to deny any future claims and to refund your premium as though your
policy had never been in force. After
the application has been completed and before you sign it, reread it carefully
to be certain that all information has been properly recorded.
.........................…...............................….....................
(Signature of Agent, Broker, or Other Representative)
(Typed Name and Address of Agency or Broker)
The above "Notice to Applicant" was delivered to me
on:
…...............................….
(Date)
…...............................….
(Applicant's
Signature)
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec.
13. Minnesota Statutes 2004, section
62S.24, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Direct response solicitations. Insurers using direct response solicitation
methods shall deliver a notice regarding replacement of long-term care coverage
to the applicant upon issuance of the policy.
The required notice must be provided in the following manner:
NOTICE TO APPLICANT REGARDING REPLACEMENT OF
ACCIDENT AND SICKNESS OR
LONG-TERM CARE INSURANCE
(Insurance company's name and address)
SAVE THIS NOTICE!
IT MAY BE IMPORTANT TO YOU IN THE FUTURE.
According to (your application) (information you have
furnished), you intend to lapse or otherwise terminate existing accident and
sickness or long-term care insurance and replace it with the long-term care
insurance policy delivered herewith issued by (company name) insurance company.
Your new policy provides 30 days within which you may
decide, without cost, whether you desire to keep the policy. For your own information and protection, you
should be aware of and seriously consider certain factors which may affect the
insurance protection available to you under the new policy.
You should review this new coverage carefully,
comparing it with all long-term care insurance coverage you now have, and
terminate your present policy only if, after due consideration, you find that
purchase of this long-term care coverage is a wise decision.
(a) Health conditions which you presently have
(preexisting conditions) may not be immediately or fully covered under the new
policy. This could result in denial or
delay in payment of benefits under the new policy, whereas a similar claim
might have been payable under your present policy.
(b) State law provides that your replacement policy or
certificate may not contain new preexisting conditions or probationary
periods. Your insurer will waive any
time periods applicable to preexisting conditions or probationary periods in
the new policy (or coverage) for similar benefits to the extent such time was
spent (depleted) under the original policy.
(c) If you are replacing existing long-term care
insurance coverage, you may wish to secure the advice of your present insurer
or its agent regarding the proposed replacement of your present policy. This is not only your right, but it is also
in your best interest to make sure you understand all the relevant factors
involved in replacing your present coverage.
(d) (To be included only if the application is
attached to the policy.)
If, after due consideration, you still wish to
terminate your present policy and replace it with new coverage, read the copy
of the application attached to your new policy and be sure that all questions
are answered fully and correctly.
Omissions or misstatements in the application could cause an otherwise
valid claim to be denied. Carefully
check the application and write to (company name and address) within 30 days if
any information is not correct and complete, or if any past medical history has
been left out of the application.
…...............................….
(Company
Name)
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec.
14. Minnesota Statutes 2004, section
62S.24, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 7.
Life insurance policies. Life insurance policies that accelerate
benefits for long-term care shall comply with this section if the policy being
replaced is a long-term care insurance policy.
If the policy being replaced is a life insurance policy, the insurer
shall comply with the replacement requirements of sections 61A.53 to
61A.60. If a life insurance policy that
accelerates benefits for long-term care is replaced by another such policy, the
replacing insurer shall comply with both the long-term care and the life
insurance replacement requirements.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec. 15.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 62S.24, is amended by adding a
subdivision to read:
Subd. 8.
Exchange for long-term care
partnership policy; addition of policy rider. (a) If federal law is amended or a federal
waiver is granted with respect to the long-term care partnership program
referenced in section 256B.0571, issuers of long-term care policies may
voluntarily exchange a current long-term care insurance policy for a long-term
care partnership policy that meets the requirements of Public Law 109-171,
section 6021, after the effective date of the state plan amendment implementing
the partnership program in this state.
(b) If federal law is amended or a federal waiver is
granted with respect to the long-term care partnership program referenced in
section 256B.0571, allowing an existing long-term care insurance policy to
qualify as a partnership policy by addition of a policy rider, the issuer of
the policy is authorized to add the rider to the policy after the effective
date of the state plan amendment implementing the partnership program in this
state.
(c) The commissioner, in cooperation with the
commissioner of human services, shall pursue any federal law changes or waivers
necessary to allow the implementation of paragraphs (a) and (b).
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec. 16.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 62S.25, subdivision 6, is amended to
read:
Subd. 6. Claims denied. Each insurer shall report annually by June 30
the number of claims denied for any reason during the reporting period
for each class of business, expressed as a percentage of claims denied, other
than claims denied for failure to meet the waiting period or because of any
applicable preexisting condition. For
purposes of this subdivision, "claim" means a request for payment of
benefits under an in-force policy regardless of whether the benefit claimed is
covered under the policy or any terms or conditions of the policy have been
met.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec. 17.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 62S.25, is amended by adding a
subdivision to read:
Subd. 7.
Reports. Reports under this section shall be
done on a statewide basis and filed with the commissioner. They shall include, at a minimum, the
information in the format contained in Appendix E (Claim Denial Reporting Form)
and in Appendix G (Replacement and Lapse Reporting Form) of the Long-Term Care
Model Regulation adopted by the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec.
18. Minnesota Statutes 2004, section
62S.26, is amended to read:
62S.26 LOSS
RATIO.
Subdivision 1.
Minimum loss ratio. (a) The minimum loss ratio must be at
least 60 percent, calculated in a manner which provides for adequate reserving
of the long-term care insurance risk. In
evaluating the expected loss ratio, the commissioner shall give consideration
to all relevant factors, including:
(1) statistical credibility of incurred claims
experience and earned premiums;
(2) the period for which rates are computed to provide
coverage;
(3) experienced and projected trends;
(4) concentration of experience within early policy
duration;
(5) expected claim fluctuation;
(6) experience refunds, adjustments, or dividends;
(7) renewability features;
(8) all appropriate expense factors;
(9) interest;
(10) experimental nature of the coverage;
(11) policy reserves;
(12) mix of business by risk classification; and
(13) product features such as long elimination
periods, high deductibles, and high maximum limits.
Subd. 2.
Life insurance policies. Subdivision 1 shall not apply to life
insurance policies that accelerate benefits for long-term care. A life insurance policy that funds long-term
care benefits entirely by accelerating the death benefit is considered to
provide reasonable benefits in relation to premiums paid, if the policy
complies with all of the following provisions:
(1) the interest credited internally to determine cash
value accumulations, including long-term care, if any, are guaranteed not to be
less than the minimum guaranteed interest rate for cash value accumulations
without long-term care set forth in the policy;
(2) the portion of the policy that provides life
insurance benefits meets the nonforfeiture requirements of section 61A.24;
(3) the policy meets the disclosure requirements of
sections 62S.09, 62S.10, and 62S.11; and
(4) an actuarial memorandum is filed with the
insurance department that includes:
(i) a description of the basis on which the long-term
care rates were determined;
(ii)
a description of the basis for the reserves;
(iii) a summary of the type of policy, benefits,
renewability, general marketing method, and limits on ages of issuance;
(iv) a description and a table of each actuarial
assumption used. For expenses, an
insurer must include percentage of premium dollars per policy and dollars per
unit of benefits, if any;
(v) a description and a table of the anticipated
policy reserves and additional reserves to be held in each future year for
active lives;
(vi) the estimated average annual premium per policy
and the average issue age;
(vii) a statement as to whether underwriting is
performed at the time of application.
The statement shall indicate whether underwriting is used and, if used,
the statement shall include a description of the type or types of underwriting
used, such as medical underwriting or functional assessment underwriting. Concerning a group policy, the statement
shall indicate whether the enrollee or any dependent will be underwritten and
when underwriting occurs; and
(viii) a description of the effect of the long-term
care policy provision on the required premiums, nonforfeiture values, and
reserves on the underlying life insurance policy, both for active lives and
those in long-term care claim status.
Subd. 3.
Nonapplication. (b) This section does not apply to
policies or certificates that are subject to sections 62S.021, 62S.081, and
62S.265, and that comply with those sections.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec. 19.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 62S.266, subdivision 2, is amended to
read:
Subd. 2. Requirement. (a) An insurer must offer each
prospective policyholder a nonforfeiture benefit in compliance with the
following requirements:
(1) a policy or certificate offered with nonforfeiture
benefits must have coverage elements, eligibility, benefit triggers, and
benefit length that are the same as coverage to be issued without nonforfeiture
benefits. The nonforfeiture benefit
included in the offer must be the benefit described in subdivision 5; and
(2) the offer must be in writing if the nonforfeiture
benefit is not otherwise described in the outline of coverage or other
materials given to the prospective policyholder.
(b) When a group long-term care insurance policy is
issued, the offer required in paragraph (a) shall be made to the group policy
holder. However, if the policy is issued
as group long-term care insurance as defined in section 62S.01, subdivision 15,
clause (4), other than to a continuing care retirement community or other
similar entity, the offering shall be made to each proposed certificate holder.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec. 20.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 62S.29, subdivision 1, is amended to
read:
Subdivision 1. Requirements. An insurer or other entity marketing
long-term care insurance coverage in this state, directly or through its
producers, shall:
(1)
establish marketing procedures and agent training requirements to assure
that a any marketing activities, including any comparison of
policies by its agents or other producers, are fair and accurate;
(2) establish marketing procedures to assure excessive
insurance is not sold or issued;
(3) display prominently by type, stamp, or other
appropriate means, on the first page of the outline of coverage and policy, the
following:
"Notice to buyer: This policy may not cover all
of the costs associated with long-term care incurred by the buyer during the
period of coverage. The buyer is advised
to review carefully all policy limitations.";
(4) provide copies of the disclosure forms required
in section 62S.081, subdivision 4, to the applicant;
(5) inquire and otherwise make every
reasonable effort to identify whether a prospective applicant or enrollee for
long-term care insurance already has long-term care insurance and the types and
amounts of the insurance;
(5) (6) establish auditable
procedures for verifying compliance with this subdivision; and
(6) (7) if applicable, provide
written notice to the prospective policyholder and certificate holder, at
solicitation, that a senior insurance counseling program approved by the
commissioner is available and the name, address, and telephone number of the
program;
(8) use the terms "noncancelable" or
"level premium" only when the policy or certificate conforms to
section 62S.14; and
(9) provide an explanation of contingent benefit upon
lapse provided for in section 62S.266.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec. 21.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 62S.30, is amended to read:
62S.30 APPROPRIATENESS
OF RECOMMENDED PURCHASE SUITABILITY.
In recommending the purchase or replacement of a
long-term care insurance policy or certificate, an agent shall comply with
section 60K.46, subdivision 4.
Subdivision 1.
Standards. Every insurer or other entity marketing
long-term care insurance shall:
(1) develop and use suitability standards to determine
whether the purchase or replacement of long-term care insurance is appropriate
for the needs of the applicant;
(2) train its agents in the use of its suitability
standards; and
(3) maintain a copy of its suitability standards and
make them available for inspection upon request by the commissioner.
Subd. 2.
Procedures. (a) To determine whether the applicant
meets the standards developed by the insurer or other entity marketing
long-term care insurance, the agent and insurer or other entity marketing
long-term care insurance shall develop procedures that take the following into
consideration:
(1)
the ability to pay for the proposed coverage and other pertinent financial
information related to the purchase of the coverage;
(2) the applicant's goals or needs with respect to
long-term care and the advantages and disadvantages of insurance to meet those
goals or needs; and
(3) the values, benefits, and costs of the applicant's
existing insurance, if any, when compared to the values, benefits, and costs of
the recommended purchase or replacement.
(b) The insurer or other entity marketing long-term
care insurance, and where an agent is involved, the agent, shall make
reasonable efforts to obtain the information set forth in paragraph (a). The efforts shall include presentation to the
applicant, at or prior to application, of the "Long-Term Care Insurance
Personal Worksheet." The personal worksheet used by the insurer or other
entity marketing long-term care insurance shall contain, at a minimum, the
information in the format contained in Appendix B of the Long-Term Care Model
Regulation adopted by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, in
not less than 12-point type. The insurer
or other entity marketing long-term care insurance may request the applicant to
provide additional information to comply with its suitability standards. The insurer or other entity marketing
long-term care insurance shall file a copy of its personal worksheet with the
commissioner.
(c) A completed personal worksheet shall be returned to
the insurer or other entity marketing long-term care insurance prior to
consideration of the applicant for coverage, except the personal worksheet need
not be returned for sales of employer group long-term care insurance to
employees and their spouses. The sale or
dissemination by the insurer or other entity marketing long-term care
insurance, or the agent, of information obtained through the personal
worksheet, is prohibited.
(d) The insurer or other entity marketing long-term
care insurance shall use the suitability standards it has developed under this
section in determining whether issuing long-term care insurance coverage to an
applicant is appropriate. Agents shall
use the suitability standards developed by the insurer or other entity
marketing long-term care insurance in marketing long-term care insurance.
(e) At the same time as the personal worksheet is
provided to the applicant, the disclosure form entitled "Things You Should
Know Before You Buy Long-Term Care Insurance" shall be provided. The form shall be in the format contained in
Appendix C of the Long-Term Care Insurance Model Regulation adopted by the
National Association of Insurance Commissioners in not less than 12-point type.
(f) If the insurer or other entity marketing long-term
care insurance determines that the applicant does not meet its financial
suitability standards, or if the applicant has declined to provide the
information, the insurer or other entity marketing long-term care insurance may
reject the application. In the
alternative, the insurer or other entity marketing long-term care insurance
shall send the applicant a letter similar to Appendix D of the Long-Term Care
Insurance Model Regulation adopted by the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners. However, if the applicant
has declined to provide financial information, the insurer or other entity
marketing long-term care insurance may use some other method to verify the
applicant's intent. The applicant's
returned letter or a record of the alternative method of verification shall be
made part of the applicant's file.
Subd. 3.
Reports. The insurer or other entity marketing
long-term care insurance shall report annually to the commissioner the total
number of applications received from residents of this state, the number of
those who declined to provide information on the personal worksheet, the number
of applicants who did not meet the suitability standards, and the number of
those who chose to confirm after receiving a suitability letter.
Subd. 4.
Application. This section shall not apply to life
insurance policies that accelerate benefits for long-term care.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec.
22. [62S.315]
PRODUCER TRAINING.
The commissioner shall approve producer training
requirements in accordance with the NAIC Long-Term Care Insurance Model Act
provisions. The commissioner of the
Department of Human Services shall provide technical assistance and information
to the commissioner in accordance with Public Law 109-171, section 6021.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec. 23.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 144.6501, subdivision 6, is amended to
read:
Subd. 6. Medical assistance payment. (a) An admission contract for a facility that
is certified for participation in the medical assistance program must state
that neither the prospective resident, nor anyone on the resident's behalf, is
required to pay privately any amount for which the resident's care at the
facility has been approved for payment by medical assistance or to make any
kind of donation, voluntary or otherwise.
Except as permitted under section 6015 of the Deficit Reduction Act
of 2005, Public Law 109-171, an admission contract must state that the
facility does not require as a condition of admission, either in its admission
contract or by oral promise before signing the admission contract, that
residents remain in private pay status for any period of time.
(b) The admission contract must state that upon
presentation of proof of eligibility, the facility will submit a medical
assistance claim for reimbursement and will return any and all payments made by
the resident, or by any person on the resident's behalf, for services covered
by medical assistance, upon receipt of medical assistance payment.
(c) A facility that participates in the medical
assistance program shall not charge for the day of the resident's discharge
from the facility or subsequent days.
(d) If a facility's charges incurred by the resident
are delinquent for 30 days, and no person has agreed to apply for medical
assistance for the resident, the facility may petition the court under chapter
525 to appoint a representative for the resident in order to apply for medical
assistance for the resident.
(e) The remedy provided in this subdivision does not
preclude a facility from seeking any other remedy available under other laws of
this state.
Sec. 24.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 256B.02, subdivision 9, is amended to
read:
Subd. 9. Private health care coverage. "Private health care coverage"
means any plan regulated by chapter 62A, 62C or 64B. Private health care coverage also includes
any self-insurance self-insured plan providing health care
benefits, pharmacy benefit manager, service benefit plan, managed care
organization, and other parties that are by contract legally responsible for
payment of a claim for a health care item or service for an individual
receiving medical benefits under chapter 256B, 256D, or 256L.
Sec. 25.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 256B.056, subdivision 2, is amended to
read:
Subd. 2. ; exclusion and homestead equity
limit for institutionalized persons.
(a) The homestead shall be excluded for the first six calendar
months of a person's stay in a long-term care facility and shall continue to be
excluded for as long as the recipient can be reasonably expected to return to
the homestead. For purposes of this
subdivision, "reasonably expected to return to the homestead" means
the recipient's attending physician has certified that the expectation is
reasonable, and the recipient can show that the cost of care upon returning
home will be met through medical assistance or other sources. The homestead shall continue to be excluded
for persons residing in a long-term care facility if it is used as a primary
residence by one of the following individuals:
(a) (1) the
spouse;
(b) (2) a child
under age 21;
(c) (3) a child of
any age who is blind or permanently and totally disabled as defined in the
supplemental security income program;
(d) (4) a sibling
who has equity interest in the home and who resided in the home for at least
one year immediately before the date of the person's admission to the facility;
or
(e) (5) a child of
any age, or, subject to federal approval, a grandchild of any age, who resided
in the home for at least two years immediately before the date of the person's admission
to the facility, and who provided care to the person that permitted the person
to reside at home rather than in an institution.
(b) Effective for applications filed on or after July
1, 2006, and for renewals after July 1, 2006, for persons who first applied for
payment of long-term care services on or after January 2, 2006, the equity
interest in the homestead of an individual whose eligibility for long-term care
services is determined on or after January 1, 2006, shall not exceed $500,000,
unless it is the lawful residence of the individual's spouse or child who is
under age 21, blind, or disabled. The
amount specified in this paragraph shall be increased beginning in year 2011,
from year to year based on the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index
for all urban consumers, all items - United States city average, rounded to the
nearest $1,000. This provision may be
waived in the case of demonstrated hardship by a process to be determined by
the secretary of health and human services pursuant to section 6014 of the
Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Public Law 109-171.
Sec. 26.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 256B.056, is amended by adding a
subdivision to read:
Subd. 3e.
Treatment of continuing care
retirement and life care community entrance fees. An entrance fee paid by an individual to a
continuing care retirement or life care community shall be treated as an
available asset to the extent that:
(1) the individual has the ability to use the entrance
fee, or the contract provides that the entrance fee may be used, to pay for
care should other resources or income of the individual be insufficient to pay
for care;
(2) the individual is eligible for a refund of any
remaining entrance fees when the individual dies or terminates the continuing
care retirement or life care community contract and leaves the community; and
(3) the entrance fee does not confer an ownership
interest in the continuing care retirement or life care community.
Sec. 27.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 256B.056, is amended by adding a
subdivision to read:
Subd. 11.
Treatment of annuities. (a) Any individual applying for or seeking
recertification of eligibility for medical assistance payment of long-term care
services shall provide a complete description of any interest either the
individual or the individual's spouse has in annuities. The individual and the individual's spouse
shall furnish the agency responsible for determining eligibility with complete
current copies of their annuities and related documents for review as part of
the application process on disclosure forms provided by the department as part
of their application.
(b) The disclosure form shall include a statement that
the department becomes the remainder beneficiary under the annuity or similar
financial instrument by virtue of the receipt of medical assistance. The disclosure form shall include a notice to
the issuer of the department's right under this section as a preferred
remainder beneficiary under the
annuity or similar financial instrument for medical assistance furnished to the
individual or the individual's spouse, and require the issuer to provide
confirmation that a remainder beneficiary designation has been made and to
notify the county agency when there is a change in the amount of the income or
principal being withdrawn from the annuity or other similar financial
instrument at the time of the most recent disclosure required under this
section. The individual and the
individual's spouse shall execute separate disclosure forms for each annuity or
similar financial instrument that they are required to disclose under this
section and in which they have an interest.
(c) An issuer of an annuity or similar financial
instrument who receives notice on a disclosure form as described in paragraph
(b) shall provide confirmation to the requesting agency that a remainder
beneficiary designating the state has been made and shall notify the county
agency when there is a change in the amount of income or principal being
withdrawn from the annuity or other similar financial instrument. The county agency shall provide the issuer
with the name, address, and telephone number of a unit within the department
that the insurer can contact to comply with this paragraph.
Sec. 28.
Minnesota Statutes 2005 Supplement, section 256B.0571, is amended to
read:
256B.0571
LONG-TERM CARE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM.
Subdivision 1. Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following
terms have the meanings given them.
Subd. 2.
Home care service. "Home care service" means care
described in section 144A.43.
Subd. 3. Long-term care insurance. "Long-term care insurance" means a
policy described in section 62S.01.
Subd. 4. Medical assistance. "Medical assistance" means the
program of medical assistance established under section 256B.01.
Subd. 5.
Nursing home. "Nursing home" means a nursing
home as described in section 144A.01.
Subd. 6. Partnership policy. "Partnership policy" means a
long-term care insurance policy that meets the requirements under subdivision
10 or 11, regardless of when the policy and was first
issued on or after the effective date of the state plan amendment.
Subd. 7. Partnership program. "Partnership program" means the
Subd. 7a.
Protected assets. "Protected assets" means assets
or proceeds of assets that are protected from recovery under subdivisions 13
and 15.
Subd. 8. Program established. (a) The commissioner, in cooperation with the
commissioner of commerce, shall establish the
(b) An individual who meets the requirements in this
paragraph is eligible to participate in the partnership program. The individual must:
(1) be a
(2) purchase a partnership policy that is delivered,
issued for delivery, or renewed on or after the effective date of Laws 2005,
First Special Session chapter 4, article 7, section 5, and maintain the
partnership policy in effect throughout the period of participation in the
partnership program be a beneficiary of a partnership policy that (i) is
issued on or after the effective date of the state plan amendment implementing
the partnership program in Minnesota, or (ii) qualifies as a partnership policy
under the provisions of section 62S.24, subdivision 8; and
(3)
exhaust the minimum have exhausted all of the benefits under the
partnership policy as described in this section. Benefits received under a long-term care
insurance policy before the effective date of Laws 2005, First Special
Session chapter 4, article 7, section 5 July 1, 2006, do not count
toward the exhaustion of benefits required in this subdivision.
Subd. 9. Medical assistance eligibility. (a) Upon application of for medical
assistance program payment of long-term care services by an individual who
meets the requirements described in subdivision 8, the commissioner shall
determine the individual's eligibility for medical assistance according to
paragraphs (b) and (c) to (i).
(b) After disregarding financial determining
assets exempted under medical assistance eligibility requirements
subject to the asset limit under section 256B.056, subdivision 3 or 3c, or
section 256B.057, subdivision 9 or 10, the commissioner shall disregard
an additional amount of financial assets equal allow the individual to
designate assets to be protected from recovery under subdivisions 13 and 15 up to
the dollar amount of coverage the benefits utilized under the
partnership policy. Designated assets
shall be disregarded for purposes of determining eligibility for payment of
long-term care services.
(c) The commissioner shall consider the
individual's income according to medical assistance eligibility requirements.
The individual shall identify the designated assets and the full fair market
value of those assets and designate them as assets to be protected at the time
of initial application for medical assistance.
The full fair market value of real property or interests in real
property shall be based on the most recent full assessed value for property tax
purposes for the real property, unless the individual provides a complete
professional appraisal by a licensed appraiser to establish the full fair
market value. The extent of a life
estate in real property shall be determined using the life estate table in the
health care program's manual. Ownership
of any asset in joint tenancy shall be treated as ownership as tenants in
common for purposes of its designation as a disregarded asset. The unprotected value of any protected asset
is subject to estate recovery according to subdivisions 13 and 15.
(d) The right to designate assets to be protected is
personal to the individual and ends when the individual dies, except as
otherwise provided in subdivisions 13 and 15.
It does not include the increase in the value of the protected asset and
the income, dividends, or profits from the asset. It may be exercised by the individual or by
anyone with the legal authority to do so on the individual's behalf. It shall not be sold, assigned, transferred,
or given away.
(e) If the dollar amount of the benefits utilized
under a partnership policy is greater than the full fair market value of all
assets protected at the time of the application for medical assistance
long-term care services, the individual may designate additional assets that
become available during the individual's lifetime for protection under this
section. The individual must make the
designation in writing to the county agency no later than the last date on
which the individual must report a change in circumstances to the county agency,
as provided for under the medical assistance program. Any excess used for this purpose shall not be
available to the individual's estate to protect assets in the estate from
recovery under section 256B.15, 524.3-1202, or otherwise.
(f) This section applies only to estate recovery under
United States Code, title 42, section 1396p, subsections (a) and (b), and does
not apply to recovery authorized by other provisions of federal law, including,
but not limited to, recovery from trusts under United States Code, title 42,
section 1396p, subsection (d)(4)(A) and (C), or to recovery from annuities, or
similar legal instruments, subject to section 6012, subsections (a) and (b), of
the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Public Law 109-171.
(g) An individual's protected assets owned by the
individual's spouse who applies for payment of medical assistance long-term
care services shall not be protected assets or disregarded for purposes of
eligibility of the individual's spouse solely because they were protected assets
of the individual.
(h)
Assets designated under this subdivision shall not be subject to penalty under
section 256B.0595.
(i) The commissioner shall otherwise determine the
individual's eligibility for payment of long-term care services according to
medical assistance eligibility requirements.
Subd. 10. Dollar-for-dollar asset protection
policies Inflation protection.
(a) A dollar-for-dollar asset protection policy must meet all of the
requirements in paragraphs (b) to (e).
(b) The policy must satisfy the requirements of chapter
62S.
(c) The policy must offer an elimination period of not
more than 180 days for an adjusted premium.
(d) The policy must satisfy the requirements
established by the commissioner of human services under subdivision 14.
(e) Minimum daily benefits shall be $130 for nursing
home care or $65 for home care, with inflation protection provided in the
policy as described in section 62S.23, subdivision 1, clause (1). These minimum daily benefit amounts shall be
adjusted by the commissioner on October 1 of each year by a percentage equal to
the inflation protection feature described in section 62S.23, subdivision 1,
clause (1), for purposes of setting minimum requirements that a policy must
meet in future years in order to initially qualify as an approved policy under
this subdivision. Adjusted minimum daily
benefit amounts shall be rounded to the nearest whole dollar.
A long-term care partnership policy must provide the
inflation protection described in this paragraph. If the policy is sold to an individual who:
(1) has not attained age 61 as of the date of purchase,
the policy provides compound annual inflation protection;
(2) has attained age 61, but has not attained age 76 as
of such date, the policy provides some level of inflation protection; and
(3) has attained age 76 as of such date, the policy
may, but is not required to, provide some level of inflation protection.
Subd. 11.
Total asset protection
policies. (a) A total asset
protection policy must meet all of the requirements in subdivision 10,
paragraphs (b) to (d), and this subdivision.
(b) Minimum coverage shall be for a period of not less
than three years and for a dollar amount equal to 36 months of nursing home
care at the minimum daily benefit rate determined and adjusted under paragraph
(c).
(c) Minimum daily benefits shall be $150 for nursing
home care or $75 for home care, with inflation protection provided in the
policy as described in section 62S.23, subdivision 1, clause (1). These minimum daily benefit amounts shall
also be adjusted by the commissioner on October 1 of each year by a percentage
equal to the inflation protection feature described in section 62S.23,
subdivision 1, clause (1), for purposes of setting minimum requirements that a
policy must meet in future years in order to initially qualify as an approved
policy under this subdivision. Adjusted
minimum daily benefit amounts shall be rounded to the nearest whole dollar.
(d) The policy must cover all of the following
services:
(1) nursing home stay;
(2) home care service; and
(3) care management.
Subd.
12. Compliance
with federal law. An issuer of a
partnership policy must comply with any federal law authorizing partnership
policies in Minnesota Public Law 109-171, section 6021, including
any federal regulations, as amended, adopted under that law. This subdivision does not require
compliance with any provision of this federal law until the date upon which the
law requires compliance with the provision.
The commissioner has authority to enforce this subdivision.
Subd. 13. Limitations on estate recovery. (a) For an individual who exhausts the
minimum benefits of a dollar-for-dollar asset protection policy under
subdivision 10, and is determined eligible for medical assistance under subdivision
9, the state shall limit recovery under the provisions of section 256B.15
against the estate of the individual or individual's spouse for medical
assistance benefits received by that individual to an amount that exceeds the
dollar amount of coverage utilized under the partnership policy.
Protected assets of the individual shall not be subject to recovery under
section 256B.15 or section 524.3-1201 for medical assistance or alternative
care paid on behalf of the individual.
Protected assets of the individual in the estate of the individual's
surviving spouse shall not be liable to pay a claim for recovery of medical
assistance paid for the predeceased individual that is filed in the estate of
the surviving spouse under section 256B.15.
Protected assets of the individual shall not be protected assets in the
surviving spouse's estate by reason of the preceding sentence and shall be
subject to recovery under section 256B.15 or 524.3-1201 for medical assistance
paid on behalf of the surviving spouse.
(b) For an individual who exhausts the minimum
benefits of a total asset protection policy under subdivision 11, and is
determined eligible for medical assistance under subdivision 9, the state shall
not seek recovery under the provisions of section 256B.15 against the estate of
the individual or individual's spouse for medical assistance benefits received
by that individual. The personal representative may protect the full
fair market value of an individual's unprotected assets in the individual's
estate in an amount equal to the unused amount of asset protection the
individual had on the date of death. The
personal representative shall apply the asset protection so that the full fair
market value of any unprotected asset in the estate is protected. When or if the asset protection available to
the personal representative is or becomes less than the full fair market value
of any remaining unprotected asset, it shall be applied to partially protect
one unprotected asset.
(c) The asset protection described in paragraph (a)
terminates with respect to an asset includable in the individual's estate under
chapter 524 or section 256B.15:
(1) when the estate distributes the asset; or
(2) if the estate of the individual has not been
probated within one year from the date of death.
(d) If an individual owns a protected asset on the
date of death and the estate is opened for probate more than one year after
death, the state or a county agency may file and collect claims in the estate
under section 256B.15, and no statute of limitations in chapter 524 that would
otherwise limit or bar the claim shall apply.
(e) Except as otherwise provided, nothing in this
section shall limit or prevent recovery of medical assistance.
Subd. 14. Implementation. (a) If federal law is amended or a federal
waiver is granted to permit implementation of this section, the commissioner,
in consultation with the commissioner of commerce, may alter the requirements
of subdivisions 10 and 11, and may establish additional requirements for approved
policies in order to conform with federal law or waiver authority. In establishing these requirements, the
commissioner shall seek to maximize purchase of qualifying policies by
(b) The commissioner is authorized to suspend
implementation of this section until the next session of the legislature if the
commissioner, in consultation with the commissioner of commerce, determines
that the federal legislation or federal waiver authorizing a partnership
program in
(c)
The commissioner must take action under paragraph (a) or (b) within 45 days of
final federal action authorizing a partnership policy in Minnesota.
(d) The commissioner must notify the appropriate
legislative committees of action taken under this subdivision within 50 days of
final federal action authorizing a partnership policy in
(e) The commissioner must publish a notice in the
State Register of implementation decisions made under this subdivision as soon
as practicable. The commissioner shall submit a state plan amendment
to the federal government to implement the long-term care partnership program
in accordance with this section.
Subd. 15.
Limitation on liens. (a) An individual's interest in real
property shall not be subject to a medical assistance lien or a notice of
potential claim while it is protected under subdivision 9, to the extent it is
protected.
(b) Medical assistance liens or liens arising under
notices of potential claims against an individual's interests in real property
in their estate that are designated as protected under subdivision 13,
paragraph (b), shall be released to the extent of the dollar value of the
protection applied to the interest.
(c) If an interest in real property is protected from
a lien for recovery of medical assistance paid on behalf of the individual
under paragraph (a) or (b), no such lien for recovery of medical assistance
paid on behalf of that individual shall be filed against the protected interest
in real property after it is distributed to the individual's heirs or devisees.
Subd. 16.
Burden of proof. Any individual or the personal
representative of the individual's estate who asserts that an asset is a
disregarded or protected asset under this section in connection with any
determination of eligibility for benefits under the medical assistance program
or any appeal, case, controversy, or other proceedings, shall have the initial
burden of:
(1) documenting and proving by convincing evidence
that the asset or source of funds for the asset in question was designated as
disregarded or protected;
(2) tracing the asset and the proceeds of the asset
from that time forward; and
(3) documenting that the asset or proceeds of the
asset remained disregarded or protected at all relevant times.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec. 29. [256B.0594] PAYMENT OF BENEFITS FROM AN
ANNUITY.
When payment becomes due under an annuity that names
the department a remainder beneficiary as described in section 256B.056,
subdivision 11, the issuer shall request and the department shall, within 45
days after receipt of the request, provide a written statement of the total
amount of the medical assistance paid.
Upon timely receipt of the written statement of the amount of medical
assistance paid, the issuer shall pay the department an amount equal to the
lesser of the amount due the department under the annuity or the total amount
of medical assistance paid on behalf of the individual or the individual's
spouse. Any amounts remaining after the
issuer's payment to the department shall be payable according to the terms of
the annuity or similar financial instrument.
The county agency or the department shall provide the issuer with the
name, address, and telephone number of a unit within the department the issuer
can contact to comply with this section.
The requirements of section 72A.201, subdivision 4, clause (3), shall
not apply to payments made under this section until the issuer has received
final payment information from the department, if the issuer has notified the
beneficiary of the requirements of this section at the time it initially
requests payment information from the department.
Sec.
30. Minnesota Statutes 2004, section
256B.0595, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Prohibited transfers. (a) For transfers of assets made on or before
August 10, 1993, if a person or the person's spouse has given away, sold, or disposed
of, for less than fair market value, any asset or interest therein, except
assets other than the homestead that are excluded under the supplemental
security program, within 30 months before or any time after the date of
institutionalization if the person has been determined eligible for medical
assistance, or within 30 months before or any time after the date of the first
approved application for medical assistance if the person has not yet been
determined eligible for medical assistance, the person is ineligible for
long-term care services for the period of time determined under subdivision 2.
(b) Effective for transfers made after August 10,
1993, a person, a person's spouse, or any person, court, or administrative body
with legal authority to act in place of, on behalf of, at the direction of, or
upon the request of the person or person's spouse, may not give away, sell, or
dispose of, for less than fair market value, any asset or interest therein,
except assets other than the homestead that are excluded under the supplemental
security income program, for the purpose of establishing or maintaining medical
assistance eligibility. This applies to
all transfers, including those made by a community spouse after the month in
which the institutionalized spouse is determined eligible for medical
assistance. For purposes of determining
eligibility for long-term care services, any transfer of such assets within 36
months before or any time after an institutionalized person applies for medical
assistance, or 36 months before or any time after a medical assistance
recipient becomes institutionalized, for less than fair market value may be
considered. Any such transfer is
presumed to have been made for the purpose of establishing or maintaining
medical assistance eligibility and the person is ineligible for long-term care
services for the period of time determined under subdivision 2, unless the
person furnishes convincing evidence to establish that the transaction was
exclusively for another purpose, or unless the transfer is permitted under
subdivision 3 or 4. Notwithstanding
the provisions of this paragraph, In the case of payments from a trust or
portions of a trust that are considered transfers of assets under federal law, or
in the case of any other disposal of assets made on or after February 8, 2006, any
transfers made within 60 months before or any time after an institutionalized
person applies for medical assistance and within 60 months before or any time
after a medical assistance recipient becomes institutionalized, may be
considered.
(c) This section applies to transfers, for less than
fair market value, of income or assets, including assets that are considered
income in the month received, such as inheritances, court settlements, and
retroactive benefit payments or income to which the person or the person's
spouse is entitled but does not receive due to action by the person, the
person's spouse, or any person, court, or administrative body with legal
authority to act in place of, on behalf of, at the direction of, or upon the
request of the person or the person's spouse.
(d) This section applies to payments for care or
personal services provided by a relative, unless the compensation was
stipulated in a notarized, written agreement which was in existence when the
service was performed, the care or services directly benefited the person, and
the payments made represented reasonable compensation for the care or services
provided. A notarized written agreement is
not required if payment for the services was made within 60 days after the
service was provided.
(e) This section applies to the portion of any asset
or interest that a person, a person's spouse, or any person, court, or
administrative body with legal authority to act in place of, on behalf of, at
the direction of, or upon the request of the person or the person's spouse,
transfers to any annuity that exceeds the value of the benefit likely to be
returned to the person or spouse while alive, based on estimated life
expectancy using the life expectancy tables employed by the supplemental
security income program to determine the value of an agreement for services for
life. The commissioner may adopt rules
reducing life expectancies based on the need for long-term care. This section applies to an annuity described
in this paragraph purchased on or after March 1, 2002, that:
(1) is not purchased from an insurance company or
financial institution that is subject to licensing or regulation by the
Minnesota Department of Commerce or a similar regulatory agency of another
state;
(2)
does not pay out principal and interest in equal monthly installments; or
(3) does not begin payment at the earliest possible
date after annuitization.
(f) Effective for transactions, including the purchase
of an annuity, occurring on or after February 8, 2006, the purchase of an
annuity by or on behalf of an individual who has applied for or is receiving
long-term care services or the individual's spouse shall be treated as the
disposal of an asset for less than fair market value unless:
(1) the department is named as the remainder
beneficiary in first position for an amount equal to at least the total amount
of medical assistance paid on behalf of the individual or the individual's
spouse; or the department is named as the remainder beneficiary in second
position for an amount equal to at least the total amount of medical assistance
paid on behalf of the individual or the individual's spouse after the
individual's community spouse or minor or disabled child and is named as the
remainder beneficiary in the first position if the community spouse or a
representative of the minor or disabled child disposes of the remainder for
less than fair market value. Any
subsequent change to the designation of the department as a remainder
beneficiary shall result in the annuity being treated as a disposal of assets
for less than fair market value. The
amount of such transfer shall be the maximum amount the individual or the
individual's spouse could receive from the annuity or similar financial
instrument. Any change in the amount of
the income or principal being withdrawn from the annuity or other similar
financial instrument at the time of the most recent disclosure shall be deemed
to be a transfer of assets for less than fair market value unless the
individual or the individual's spouse demonstrates that the transaction was for
fair market value; and
(2) the purchase of an annuity by or on behalf of an
individual applying for or receiving long-term care services shall be treated
as a disposal of assets for less than fair market value unless it is:
(i) an annuity described in subsection (b) or (q) of
section 408 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; or
(ii) purchased with proceeds from:
(A) an account or trust described in subsection (a),
(c), or (p) of section 408 of the Internal Revenue Code;
(B) a simplified employee pension within the meaning
of section 408(k) of the Internal Revenue Code; or
(C) a Roth IRA described in section 408A of the
Internal Revenue Code; or
(iii) an annuity that is irrevocable and
nonassignable; is actuarially sound as determined in accordance with actuarial
publications of the Office of the Chief Actuary of the Social Security
Administration; and provides for payments in equal amounts during the term of
the annuity, with no deferral and no balloon payments made.
(f) (g) For
purposes of this section, long-term care services include services in a nursing
facility, services that are eligible for payment according to section
256B.0625, subdivision 2, because they are provided in a swing bed,
intermediate care facility for persons with mental retardation, and home and
community-based services provided pursuant to sections 256B.0915, 256B.092, and
256B.49. For purposes of this
subdivision and subdivisions 2, 3, and 4, "institutionalized person"
includes a person who is an inpatient in a nursing facility or in a swing bed,
or intermediate care facility for persons with mental retardation or who is
receiving home and community-based services under sections 256B.0915, 256B.092,
and 256B.49.
(h) This section applies to funds used to purchase a
promissory note, loan, or mortgage unless the note, loan, or mortgage:
(1) has a repayment term that is actuarially sound;
(2)
provides for payments to be made in equal amounts during the term of the loan,
with no deferral and no balloon payments made; and
(3) prohibits the cancellation of the balance upon the
death of the lender.
In the case of a promissory note, loan, or mortgage
that does not meet an exception in clauses (1) to (3), the value of such note,
loan, or mortgage shall be the outstanding balance due as of the date of the
individual's application for long-term care services.
(i) This section applies to the purchase of a life
estate interest in another individual's home unless the purchaser resides in
the home for a period of at least one year after the date of purchase.
Sec. 31.
Minnesota Statutes 2005 Supplement, section 256B.0595, subdivision 2, is
amended to read:
Subd. 2. Period of ineligibility. (a) For any uncompensated transfer occurring
on or before August 10, 1993, the number of months of ineligibility for
long-term care services shall be the lesser of 30 months, or the uncompensated
transfer amount divided by the average medical assistance rate for nursing
facility services in the state in effect on the date of application. The amount used to calculate the average
medical assistance payment rate shall be adjusted each July 1 to reflect
payment rates for the previous calendar year.
The period of ineligibility begins with the month in which the assets
were transferred. If the transfer was
not reported to the local agency at the time of application, and the applicant
received long-term care services during what would have been the period of ineligibility
if the transfer had been reported, a cause of action exists against the
transferee for the cost of long-term care services provided during the period
of ineligibility, or for the uncompensated amount of the transfer, whichever is
less. The action may be brought by the
state or the local agency responsible for providing medical assistance under
chapter 256G. The uncompensated transfer
amount is the fair market value of the asset at the time it was given away,
sold, or disposed of, less the amount of compensation received.
(b) For uncompensated transfers made after August 10,
1993, the number of months of ineligibility for long-term care services shall
be the total uncompensated value of the resources transferred divided by the
average medical assistance rate for nursing facility services in the state in
effect on the date of application. The
amount used to calculate the average medical assistance payment rate shall be
adjusted each July 1 to reflect payment rates for the previous calendar year. The period of ineligibility begins with the
first day of the month after the month in which the assets were transferred
except that if one or more uncompensated transfers are made during a period of
ineligibility, the total assets transferred during the ineligibility period
shall be combined and a penalty period calculated to begin on the first day of
the month after the month in which the first uncompensated transfer was
made. If the transfer was reported to
the local agency after the date that advance notice of a period of
ineligibility that affects the next month could be provided to the recipient
and the recipient received medical assistance services or the transfer was not
reported to the local agency, and the applicant or recipient received medical assistance
services during what would have been the period of ineligibility if the
transfer had been reported, a cause of action exists against the transferee for
the cost of medical assistance services provided during the period of
ineligibility, or for the uncompensated amount of the transfer, whichever is
less. The action may be brought by the
state or the local agency responsible for providing medical assistance under
chapter 256G. The uncompensated transfer
amount is the fair market value of the asset at the time it was given away,
sold, or disposed of, less the amount of compensation received. Effective for transfers made on or after
March 1, 1996, involving persons who apply for medical assistance on or after April
13, 1996, no cause of action exists for a transfer unless:
(1) the transferee knew or should have known that the
transfer was being made by a person who was a resident of a long-term care
facility or was receiving that level of care in the community at the time of
the transfer;
(2) the transferee knew or should have known that the
transfer was being made to assist the person to qualify for or retain medical
assistance eligibility; or
(3)
the transferee actively solicited the transfer with intent to assist the person
to qualify for or retain eligibility for medical assistance.
(c) For uncompensated transfers made on or after
February 8, 2006, the period of ineligibility begins on the first day of the
month in which advance notice can be given following the month in which assets
have been transferred for less than fair market value, or the date on which the
individual is eligible for medical assistance under the Medicaid state plan and
would otherwise be receiving long-term care services based on an approved
application for such care but for the application of the penalty period,
whichever is later, and which does not occur during any other period of
ineligibility.
(d) If a calculation of a penalty
period results in a partial month, payments for long-term care services shall
be reduced in an amount equal to the fraction,. except that in
calculating the value of uncompensated transfers, if the total value of all
uncompensated transfers made in a month not included in an existing penalty
period does not exceed $200, then such transfers shall be disregarded for each
month prior to the month of application for or during receipt of medical
assistance.
(e) In the case of multiple fractional transfers of
assets in more than one month for less than fair market value on or after
February 8, 2006, the period of ineligibility is calculated by treating the
total, cumulative, uncompensated value of all assets transferred during all
months on or after February 8, 2006, as one transfer.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. Amendments to this
section are effective for applications on or after July 1, 2006, and for
renewals and reports of transfers on or after July 1, 2006.
Sec. 32.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 256B.0595, subdivision 3, is amended to
read:
Subd. 3. Homestead exception to transfer
prohibition. (a) An institutionalized
person is not ineligible for long-term care services due to a transfer of
assets for less than fair market value if the asset transferred was a homestead
and:
(1) title to the homestead was transferred to the
individual's:
(i) spouse;
(ii) child who is under age 21;
(iii) blind or permanently and totally disabled child
as defined in the supplemental security income program;
(iv) sibling who has equity interest in the home and
who was residing in the home for a period of at least one year immediately
before the date of the individual's admission to the facility; or
(v) son or daughter who was residing in the
individual's home for a period of at least two years immediately before the
date of the individual's admission to the facility, and who provided care to
the individual that, as certified by the individual's attending physician,
permitted the individual to reside at home rather than in an institution or
facility;
(2) a satisfactory showing is made that the individual
intended to dispose of the homestead at fair market value or for other valuable
consideration; or
(3) the local agency grants a waiver of a penalty
resulting from a transfer for less than fair market value because denial of
eligibility would cause undue hardship for the individual, based on imminent
threat to the individual's health and well-being. Whenever an applicant or recipient is denied
eligibility because of a transfer for less than fair market
value, the local agency shall notify the applicant or recipient that the applicant
or recipient may request a waiver of the penalty if the denial of eligibility
will cause undue hardship. With the
written consent of the individual or the personal representative of the
individual, a long-term care facility in which an individual is residing may
file an undue hardship waiver request, on behalf of the individual who is
denied eligibility for long-term care services on or after July 1, 2006, due to
a period of ineligibility resulting from a transfer on or after February 8,
2006. In evaluating a waiver, the
local agency shall take into account whether the individual was the victim of
financial exploitation, whether the individual has made reasonable efforts to
recover the transferred property or resource, and other factors relevant to a
determination of hardship. If the local
agency does not approve a hardship waiver, the local agency shall issue a
written notice to the individual stating the reasons for the denial and the
process for appealing the local agency's decision.
(b) When a waiver is granted under paragraph (a),
clause (3), a cause of action exists against the person to whom the homestead
was transferred for that portion of long-term care services granted within:
(1) 30 months of a transfer made on or before August
10, 1993;
(2) 60 months if the homestead was transferred after
August 10, 1993, to a trust or portion of a trust that is considered a transfer
of assets under federal law; or
(3) 36 months if transferred in any other manner after
August 10, 1993, but prior to February 8, 2006; or
(4) 60 months if the homestead was transferred on or
after February 8, 2006,
or the
amount of the uncompensated transfer, whichever is less, together with the
costs incurred due to the action. The
action shall be brought by the state unless the state delegates this
responsibility to the local agency responsible for providing medical assistance
under chapter 256G.
Sec. 33.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 256B.0595, subdivision 4, is amended to
read:
Subd. 4. Other exceptions to transfer prohibition. An institutionalized person who has made, or
whose spouse has made a transfer prohibited by subdivision 1, is not ineligible
for long-term care services if one of the following conditions applies:
(1) the assets were transferred to the individual's
spouse or to another for the sole benefit of the spouse; or
(2) the institutionalized spouse, prior to being
institutionalized, transferred assets to a spouse, provided that the spouse to
whom the assets were transferred does not then transfer those assets to another
person for less than fair market value. (At the time when one spouse is
institutionalized, assets must be allocated between the spouses as provided
under section 256B.059); or
(3) the assets were transferred to the individual's
child who is blind or permanently and totally disabled as determined in the
supplemental security income program; or
(4) a satisfactory showing is made that the individual
intended to dispose of the assets either at fair market value or for other
valuable consideration; or
(5) the local agency determines that denial of
eligibility for long-term care services would work an undue hardship and grants
a waiver of a penalty resulting from a transfer for less than fair market value
based on an imminent threat to the individual's health and well-being. Whenever an applicant or recipient is denied
eligibility because of a transfer for less than fair market value, the local
agency shall notify the applicant or recipient that the applicant or recipient
may request a waiver of the penalty if the denial of eligibility will cause
undue hardship. With the
written consent of the individual or the personal representative of the
individual, a long-term care facility in which an individual is residing may
file an undue hardship waiver request, on behalf of the individual who is
denied eligibility for long-term care services on or after July 1, 2006, due to
a period of ineligibility resulting from a transfer on or after February 8,
2006. In evaluating a waiver, the
local agency shall take into account whether the individual was the victim of
financial exploitation, whether the individual has made reasonable efforts to
recover the transferred property or resource, whether the individual has
taken any action to prevent the designation of the department as a remainder
beneficiary on an annuity as described in section 256B.056, subdivision 11,
and other factors relevant to a determination of hardship. If the local agency does not approve a
hardship waiver, the local agency shall issue a written notice to the
individual stating the reasons for the denial and the process for appealing the
local agency's decision. When a waiver
is granted, a cause of action exists against the person to whom the assets were
transferred for that portion of long-term care services granted within:
(i) 30 months of a transfer made on or before August
10, 1993;
(ii) 60 months of a transfer if the assets were
transferred after August 30, 1993, to a trust or portion of a trust that is
considered a transfer of assets under federal law; or
(iii) 36 months of a transfer if transferred in any
other manner after August 10, 1993, but prior to February 8, 2006; or
(iv) 60 months of any transfer made on or after
February 8, 2006,
or the
amount of the uncompensated transfer, whichever is less, together with the
costs incurred due to the action. The
action shall be brought by the state unless the state delegates this
responsibility to the local agency responsible for providing medical assistance
under this chapter; or
(6) for transfers occurring after August 10, 1993, the
assets were transferred by the person or person's spouse: (i) into a trust
established for the sole benefit of a son or daughter of any age who is blind
or disabled as defined by the Supplemental Security Income program; or (ii)
into a trust established for the sole benefit of an individual who is under 65
years of age who is disabled as defined by the Supplemental Security Income
program.
"For the sole benefit of" has the meaning
found in section 256B.059, subdivision 1.
Sec. 34.
Minnesota Statutes 2005 Supplement, section 256B.06, subdivision 4, is
amended to read:
Subd. 4. Citizenship requirements. (a) Eligibility for medical assistance is
limited to citizens of the
(b) "Qualified noncitizen" means a person
who meets one of the following immigration criteria:
(1) admitted for lawful permanent residence according
to United States Code, title 8;
(2) admitted to the
(3) granted asylum according to United States Code,
title 8, section 1158;
(4) granted withholding of deportation according to
United States Code, title 8, section 1253(h);
(5) paroled for a period of at least one year
according to United States Code, title 8, section 1182(d)(5);
(6)
granted conditional entrant status according to United States Code, title 8,
section 1153(a)(7);
(7) determined to be a battered noncitizen by the
United States Attorney General according to the Illegal Immigration Reform and
Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, title V of the Omnibus Consolidated
Appropriations Bill, Public Law 104-200;
(8) is a child of a noncitizen determined to be a
battered noncitizen by the United States Attorney General according to the
Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, title V,
of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Bill, Public Law 104-200; or
(9) determined to be a Cuban or Haitian entrant as
defined in section 501(e) of Public Law 96-422, the Refugee Education
Assistance Act of 1980.
(c) All qualified noncitizens who were residing in the
(d) All qualified noncitizens who entered the
Beginning December 1, 1996, qualified noncitizens who
entered the
(i) refugees admitted to the
(ii) persons granted asylum according to United States
Code, title 8, section 1158;
(iii) persons granted withholding of deportation
according to United States Code, title 8, section 1253(h);
(iv) veterans of the United States armed forces with
an honorable discharge for a reason other than noncitizen status, their spouses
and unmarried minor dependent children; or
(v) persons on active duty in the
Beginning December 1, 1996, qualified noncitizens who
do not meet one of the criteria in items (i) to (v) are eligible for medical
assistance without federal financial participation as described in paragraph
(j).
(e) Noncitizens who are not qualified noncitizens as
defined in paragraph (b), who are lawfully residing in the
(1) Persons who were medical assistance recipients on
August 22, 1996, are eligible for medical assistance with federal financial
participation through December 31, 1996.
(2)
Beginning January 1, 1997, persons described in clause (1) are eligible for
medical assistance without federal financial participation as described in
paragraph (j).
(3) Beginning December 1, 1996, persons residing in
the United States prior to August 22, 1996, who were not receiving medical
assistance and persons who arrived on or after August 22, 1996, are eligible
for medical assistance without federal financial participation as described in
paragraph (j).
(f) Nonimmigrants who otherwise meet the eligibility
requirements of this chapter are eligible for the benefits as provided in
paragraphs (g) to (i). For purposes of
this subdivision, a "nonimmigrant" is a person in one of the classes
listed in United States Code, title 8, section 1101(a)(15).
(g) Payment shall also be made for care and services
that are furnished to noncitizens, regardless of immigration status, who
otherwise meet the eligibility requirements of this chapter, if such care and
services are necessary for the treatment of an emergency medical condition,
except for organ transplants and related care and services and routine prenatal
care.
(h) For purposes of this subdivision, the term
"emergency medical condition" means a medical condition that meets
the requirements of United States Code, title 42, section 1396b(v).
(i) Pregnant noncitizens who are undocumented,
nonimmigrants, or eligible for medical assistance as described in paragraph
(j), and who are not covered by a group health plan or health insurance
coverage according to Code of Federal Regulations, title 42, section 457.310,
and who otherwise meet the eligibility requirements of this chapter, are
eligible for medical assistance through the period of pregnancy, including
labor and delivery, to the extent federal funds are available under title XXI
of the Social Security Act, and the state children's health insurance program,
followed by 60 days postpartum without federal financial participation.
(j) Qualified noncitizens as described in paragraph
(d), and all other noncitizens lawfully residing in the
(k) Beginning October 1, 2003, persons who are
receiving care and rehabilitation services from a nonprofit center established
to serve victims of torture and are otherwise ineligible for medical assistance
under this chapter are eligible for medical assistance without federal
financial participation. These
individuals are eligible only for the period during which they are receiving
services from the center. Individuals
eligible under this paragraph shall not be required to participate in prepaid
medical assistance.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec. 35.
Minnesota Statutes 2005 Supplement, section 256D.03, subdivision 3, is
amended to read:
Subd.
3. General
assistance medical care; eligibility.
(a) General assistance medical care may be paid for any person who is
not eligible for medical assistance under chapter 256B, including eligibility
for medical assistance based on a spenddown of excess income according to
section 256B.056, subdivision 5, or MinnesotaCare as defined in paragraph (b),
except as provided in paragraph (c), and:
(1) who is receiving assistance under section 256D.05,
except for families with children who are eligible under Minnesota family
investment program (MFIP), or who is having a payment made on the person's
behalf under sections 256I.01 to 256I.06; or
(2) who is a resident of
(i) who has gross countable income not in excess of 75
percent of the federal poverty guidelines for the family size, using a
six-month budget period and whose equity in assets is not in excess of $1,000
per assistance unit. Exempt assets, the
reduction of excess assets, and the waiver of excess assets must conform to the
medical assistance program in section 256B.056, subdivision 3, with the
following exception: the maximum amount of undistributed funds in a trust that
could be distributed to or on behalf of the beneficiary by the trustee,
assuming the full exercise of the trustee's discretion under the terms of the
trust, must be applied toward the asset maximum;
(ii) who has gross countable income above 75 percent
of the federal poverty guidelines but not in excess of 175 percent of the
federal poverty guidelines for the family size, using a six-month budget
period, whose equity in assets is not in excess of the limits in section
256B.056, subdivision 3c, and who applies during an inpatient hospitalization;
or
(iii) the commissioner shall adjust the income
standards under this section each July 1 by the annual update of the federal
poverty guidelines following publication by the United States Department of
Health and Human Services.
(b) Effective for applications and renewals processed
on or after September 1, 2006, general assistance medical care may not be paid
for applicants or recipients who are adults with dependent children under 21
whose gross family income is equal to or less than 275 percent of the federal
poverty guidelines who are not described in paragraph (e).
(c) Effective for applications and renewals processed
on or after September 1, 2006, general assistance medical care may be paid for
applicants and recipients who meet all eligibility requirements of paragraph
(a), clause (2), item (i), for a temporary period beginning the date of
application. Immediately following
approval of general assistance medical care, enrollees shall be enrolled in
MinnesotaCare under section 256L.04, subdivision 7, with covered services as
provided in section 256L.03 for the rest of the six-month eligibility period,
until their six-month renewal.
(d) To be eligible for general assistance medical care
following enrollment in MinnesotaCare as required by paragraph (c), an
individual must complete a new application.
(e) Applicants and recipients eligible under paragraph
(a), clause (1), or; who have applied for and are awaiting a
determination of blindness or disability by the state medical review team or a
determination of eligibility for Supplemental Security Income or Social
Security Disability Insurance by the Social Security Administration, or;
who fail to meet the requirements of section 256L.09, subdivision 2, are exempt
from the MinnesotaCare enrollment requirements of this subdivision.
(f)
For applications received on or after October 1, 2003, eligibility may begin no
earlier than the date of application.
For individuals eligible under paragraph (a), clause (2), item (i), a
redetermination of eligibility must occur every 12 months. Individuals are eligible under paragraph (a),
clause (2), item (ii), only during inpatient hospitalization but may reapply if
there is a subsequent period of inpatient hospitalization.
(g) Beginning September 1, 2006,
(h) The date of an initial Minnesota health care
program application necessary to begin a determination of eligibility shall be
the date the applicant has provided a name, address, and Social Security
number, signed and dated, to the county agency or the Department of Human
Services. If the applicant is unable to
provide a name, address, Social Security number, and signature when health care
is delivered due to a medical condition or disability, a health care provider
may act on an applicant's behalf to establish the date of an initial Minnesota
health care program application by providing the county agency or Department of
Human Services with provider identification and a temporary unique identifier
for the applicant. The applicant must
complete the remainder of the application and provide necessary verification
before eligibility can be determined.
The county agency must assist the applicant in obtaining verification if
necessary.
(i) County agencies are authorized to use all
automated databases containing information regarding recipients' or applicants'
income in order to determine eligibility for general assistance medical care or
MinnesotaCare. Such use shall be
considered sufficient in order to determine eligibility and premium payments by
the county agency.
(j) General assistance medical care is not available
for a person in a correctional facility unless the person is detained by law
for less than one year in a county correctional or detention facility as a
person accused or convicted of a crime, or admitted as an inpatient to a
hospital on a criminal hold order, and the person is a recipient of general
assistance medical care at the time the person is detained by law or admitted
on a criminal hold order and as long as the person continues to meet other
eligibility requirements of this subdivision.
(k) General assistance medical care is not available
for applicants or recipients who do not cooperate with the county agency to
meet the requirements of medical assistance.
(l) In determining the amount of assets of an
individual eligible under paragraph (a), clause (2), item (i), there shall be
included any asset or interest in an asset, including an asset excluded under
paragraph (a), that was given away, sold, or disposed of for less than fair
market value within the 60 months preceding application for general assistance
medical care or during the period of eligibility. Any transfer described in this paragraph
shall be presumed to have been for the purpose of establishing eligibility for
general assistance medical care, unless the individual furnishes convincing
evidence to establish that the transaction was exclusively for another
purpose. For purposes of this paragraph,
the value of the asset or interest shall be the fair market value at the time
it was given away, sold, or disposed of, less the amount of compensation
received. For any uncompensated
transfer, the number of months of ineligibility, including partial months,
shall be calculated by dividing the uncompensated transfer amount by the
average monthly per person payment made by the medical assistance program to
skilled nursing facilities for the previous calendar year. The individual shall remain ineligible until
this fixed period has expired. The
period of ineligibility may exceed 30 months, and a reapplication for benefits
after 30 months from the date of the transfer shall not result in eligibility
unless and until the period of ineligibility has expired. The period of ineligibility begins in the
month the transfer was reported to the county agency, or if the transfer was
not reported, the month in which the county agency discovered the transfer,
whichever comes first. For applicants,
the period of ineligibility begins on the date of the first approved
application.
(m) When determining eligibility for any state
benefits under this subdivision, the income and resources of all noncitizens
shall be deemed to include their sponsor's income and resources as defined in
the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996,
title IV, Public Law 104-193, sections 421 and 422, and subsequently set out in
federal rules.
(n) Undocumented noncitizens and nonimmigrants are
ineligible for general assistance medical care.
For purposes of this subdivision, a nonimmigrant is an individual in one
or more of the classes listed in United States Code, title 8, section
1101(a)(15), and an undocumented noncitizen is an individual who resides in the
(o) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a
noncitizen who is ineligible for medical assistance due to the deeming of a
sponsor's income and resources, is ineligible for general assistance medical
care.
(p) Effective July 1, 2003, general assistance medical
care emergency services end.
(q) Citizens or nationals of the
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec. 36.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 256L.04, subdivision 10, is amended to
read:
Subd. 10. Citizenship requirements. Eligibility for MinnesotaCare is limited to citizens
or nationals of the United States, qualified noncitizens, and other
persons residing lawfully in the United States as described in section 256B.06,
subdivision 4, paragraphs (a) to (e) and (j).
Undocumented noncitizens and nonimmigrants are ineligible for
MinnesotaCare. For purposes of this
subdivision, a nonimmigrant is an individual in one or more of the classes
listed in United States Code, title 8, section 1101(a)(15), and an undocumented
noncitizen is an individual who resides in the
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006.
Sec. 37. DESIGNATION OF ASSETS AS CONTINGENTLY
EXEMPT UNDER LONG-TERM CARE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM.
The commissioner of human services shall develop and
present to the legislature by December 15, 2006, a plan and draft legislation
to allow individuals participating in the long-term care partnership program
established under partnership
policy is greater than the full fair market value of all assets protected due
to a decrease in the value of the protected assets, the plan and draft
legislation must allow the individual or the personal representative to
designate assets that are contingently exempt as protected, up to the amount of
the decrease in value of the protected assets.
The plan and draft legislation must provide that any contingently exempt
asset that is not designated as protected be subject to recovery.
Sec. 38. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2005 Supplement, section 256B.0571,
subdivisions 2, 5, and 11, are repealed.
ARTICLE 2
CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FEDERAL COMPLIANCE
Section 1.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 256J.021, is amended to read:
256J.021
Beginning (a) Until October 1,
2001, and each year thereafter 2006, the commissioner of human
services must treat MFIP expenditures made to or on behalf of any minor child
under section 256J.02, subdivision 2, clause (1), who is a resident of this
state under section 256J.12, and who is part of a two-parent eligible household
as expenditures under a separately funded state program and report those
expenditures to the federal Department of Health and Human Services as separate
state program expenditures under Code of Federal Regulations, title 45, section
263.5.
(b) Beginning October 1, 2006, the commissioner of
human services must treat MFIP expenditures made to or on behalf of any minor
child under section 256J.02, subdivision 2, clause (1), who is a resident of
this state under section 256J.12, and who is part of a two-parent eligible
household, as expenditures under a separately funded state program. These expenditures shall not count toward the
state's maintenance of effort (MOE) requirements under the federal Temporary
Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) program except if counting certain families
would allow the commissioner to avoid a federal penalty. Families receiving assistance under this
section must comply with all applicable requirements in this chapter.
Sec. 2.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 256J.626, subdivision 2, is amended to
read:
Subd. 2. Allowable expenditures. (a) The commissioner must restrict
expenditures under the consolidated fund to benefits and services allowed under
title IV-A of the federal Social Security Act.
Allowable expenditures under the consolidated fund may include, but are
not limited to:
(1) short-term, nonrecurring shelter and utility needs
that are excluded from the definition of assistance under Code of Federal
Regulations, title 45, section 260.31, for families who meet the residency
requirement in section 256J.12, subdivisions 1 and 1a. Payments under this subdivision are not
considered TANF cash assistance and are not counted towards the 60-month time
limit;
(2) transportation needed to obtain or retain
employment or to participate in other approved work activities;
(3) direct and administrative costs of staff to
deliver employment services for MFIP or the diversionary work program, to
administer financial assistance, and to provide specialized services intended
to assist hard-to-employ participants to transition to work;
(4)
costs of education and training including functional work literacy and English
as a second language;
(5) cost of work supports including tools, clothing,
boots, and other work-related expenses;
(6) county administrative expenses as defined in Code
of Federal Regulations, title 45, section 260(b);
(7) services to parenting and pregnant teens;
(8) supported work;
(9) wage subsidies;
(10) child care needed for MFIP or diversionary work
program participants to participate in social services;
(11) child care to ensure that families leaving MFIP
or diversionary work program will continue to receive child care assistance
from the time the family no longer qualifies for transition year child care
until an opening occurs under the basic sliding fee child care program; and
(12) services to help noncustodial parents who live in
(b) Administrative costs that are not matched with
county funds as provided in subdivision 8 may not exceed 7.5 percent of a
county's or 15 percent of a tribe's allocation under this section. The commissioner shall define administrative
costs for purposes of this subdivision.
(c) The commissioner may waive the cap on
administrative costs for a county or tribe that elects to provide an approved
supported employment, unpaid work, or community work experience program for a
major segment of the county's or tribe's MFIP population. The county or tribe must apply for the waiver
on forms provided by the commissioner.
In no case shall total administrative costs exceed the TANF limits.
Sec. 3.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 518.551, subdivision 7, is amended to
read:
Subd. 7. Fees and cost recovery fees for IV-D
services. (a) When a recipient of
IV-D services is no longer receiving assistance under the state's title IV-A,
IV-E foster care, medical assistance, or MinnesotaCare programs, the public
authority responsible for child support enforcement must notify the recipient,
within five working days of the notification of ineligibility, that IV-D
services will be continued unless the public authority is notified to the
contrary by the recipient. The notice
must include the implications of continuing to receive IV-D services, including
the available services and fees, cost recovery fees, and distribution policies
relating to fees.
(b) An application fee of $25 shall be paid by the
person who applies for child support and maintenance collection services,
except persons who are receiving public assistance as defined in section
256.741 and, if enacted, the diversionary work program under section
256J.95, persons who transfer from public assistance to nonpublic assistance
status, and minor parents and parents enrolled in a public secondary school,
area learning center, or alternative learning program approved by the
commissioner of education.
(c) In the case of an individual who has never
received assistance under a state program funded under Title IV-A of the Social
Security Act and for whom the public authority has collected at least $500 of
support, the public authority must impose an annual federal collections fee of
$25 for each case in which services are furnished. This fee must be retained by the public
authority from support collected on behalf of the individual, but not from the
first $500 collected.
(c) (d) When the
public authority provides full IV-D services to an obligee who has applied for
those services, upon written notice to the obligee, the public authority must
charge a cost recovery fee of one percent of the amount collected. This fee must be deducted from the amount of
the child support and maintenance collected and not assigned under section
256.741 before disbursement to the obligee.
This fee does not apply to an obligee who:
(1) is currently receiving assistance under the state's
title IV-A, IV-E foster care, medical assistance, or MinnesotaCare programs; or
(2) has received assistance under the state's title IV-A
or IV-E foster care programs, until the person has not received this assistance
for 24 consecutive months.
(d) (e) When the
public authority provides full IV-D services to an obligor who has applied for
such services, upon written notice to the obligor, the public authority must
charge a cost recovery fee of one percent of the monthly court-ordered child
support and maintenance obligation. The
fee may be collected through income withholding, as well as by any other
enforcement remedy available to the public authority responsible for child
support enforcement.
(e) (f) Fees
assessed by state and federal tax agencies for collection of overdue support
owed to or on behalf of a person not receiving public assistance must be
imposed on the person for whom these services are provided. The public authority upon written notice to
the obligee shall assess a fee of $25 to the person not receiving public
assistance for each successful federal tax interception. The fee must be withheld prior to the release
of the funds received from each interception and deposited in the general fund.
(f) (g) Federal collections fees
collected under paragraph (c) and cost recovery fees collected under
paragraphs (c) and (d) and (e) shall be considered child support
program income according to Code of Federal Regulations, title 45, section
304.50, and shall be deposited in the cost recovery fee special
revenue fund account established under paragraph (h) (i). The commissioner of human services must elect
to recover costs based on either actual or standardized costs.
(g) (h) The
limitations of this subdivision on the assessment of fees shall not apply to
the extent inconsistent with the requirements of federal law for receiving
funds for the programs under Title IV-A and Title IV-D of the Social Security
Act, United States Code, title 42, sections 601 to 613 and United States Code,
title 42, sections 651 to 662.
(h) (i) The
commissioner of human services is authorized to establish a special revenue
fund account to receive child support the federal collections fees
collected under paragraph (c) and cost recovery fees collected under
paragraphs (d) and (e). A portion of
the nonfederal share of these fees may be retained for expenditures necessary
to administer the fee fees and must be transferred to the child
support system special revenue account.
The remaining nonfederal share of the federal collections fees and cost
recovery fee fees must be retained by the commissioner and
dedicated to the child support general fund county performance-based grant
account authorized under sections 256.979 and 256.9791.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective October 1, 2006, or later, if the commissioner determines that a
later implementation will not result in federal financial penalties.
ARTICLE 3
APPROPRIATIONS AND RELATED PROVISIONS
Section 1. SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS.
The appropriations in this article are added to or, if
shown in parentheses, subtracted from the appropriations enacted into law by
the legislature in 2005, or other specified law, to the named agencies and for
the specified programs or activities.
The sums shown are appropriated from the general fund, or another named
fund, to be available
for the fiscal years indicated: 2006 is the fiscal year ending June 30, 2006;
2007 is the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007; and the biennium is fiscal years
2006 and 2007. Supplementary
appropriations and reductions to appropriations for the fiscal year ending June
30, 2006, are effective the day following final enactment.
APPROPRIATIONS
Available
for the Year
Ending June
30
2006 2007
Sec. 2.
COMMISSIONER OF HUMAN SERVICES
Subdivision 1. Total
Appropriation $-0- $1,291,000
Summary by
Fund
General -0- (429,000)
Health Care
Access -0- 1,720,000
Subd. 2. Children
and Economic Assistance Management
General -0- 8,000
Children
and Economic
Assistance Operations -0- 8,000
CHILDREN AND ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE OPERATIONS BASE
ADJUSTMENT. The general fund base for children and economic assistance operations
shall be decreased by $8,000 in fiscal year 2008 and $8,000 in fiscal year 2009.
Subd. 3. Health
Care Grants
General -0- (325,000)
Medical
Assistance Basic Health Care - Elderly Disabled
General -0- (325,000)
Subd.
4. Health Care Management
Summary by
Fund
General -0- 1,384,000
Health Care
Access -0- 1,720,000
(a) Health
Care Administration
General -0- 1,303,000
APPROPRIATIONS
Available
for the Year
Ending June
30
2006 2007
HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION BASE ADJUSTMENT. The general fund base for
health care administration shall be decreased by $119,000 in fiscal year 2008
and decreased by $666,000 in fiscal year 2009.
(b) Health
Care Operations
General -0- 81,000
Health Care
Access -0- 1,720,000
HEALTH CARE OPERATIONS BASE ADJUSTMENT. The general fund base for health care
operations shall be decreased by $57,000 in fiscal year 2008 and increased
by $13,000 in fiscal year 2009.
HEALTH CARE OPERATIONS BASE ADJUSTMENT. The health
care access fund base for health care operations shall be decreased by
$1,085,000 in fiscal year 2008 and $1,085,000 in fiscal year 2009.
Subd. 5. Continuing
Care Grants
Summary by
Fund
General -0- (1,589,000)
(a) Medical
Assistance Long-Term Care Facilities
General -0- (1,275,000)
(b) Medical
Assistance Long-Term Care Waivers
General -0- (414,000)
(c) Adult
and Aging Services Grants
General -0- 100,000
AGING AND ADULT SERVICES GRANTS FOR MEDICARE PART D. $100,000 in
fiscal year 2007 is appropriated from the general fund to the commissioner of
human services for grants awarded through the
APPROPRIATIONS
Available
for the Year
Ending June
30
2006 2007
MEDICARE PART D INFORMATION AND ASSISTANCE REIMBURSEMENT. Federal
administrative reimbursement obtained from information and assistance services
provided by the Senior Linkage or Disability Linkage lines to people who are
identified as eligible for medical assistance shall be appropriated to the
commissioner for this activity.
AGING AND ADULT SERVICES GRANTS BASE ADJUSTMENT. The general
fund base for aging and adult services grants is decreased by $100,000 in
fiscal year 2008 and $100,000 in fiscal year 2009 for information and
assistance grants to area Agencies on Aging for assisting with Medicare Part D.
Subd. 6. Continuing
Care Management
General -0- 93,000
CONTINUING CARE MANAGEMENT BASE ADJUSTMENT.
The general fund base for continuing care management shall be
decreased by $10,000 in fiscal year 2008 and fiscal year 2009.
Sec.
3. EMPLOYMENT
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
General $-0- $900,000
BIOTECH PARTNERSHIP. (a) Notwithstanding
(b) An
annual report on the expenditure of this appropriation must be submitted to the
governor and the chairs of the senate Higher Education Budget Division, the
house of representatives Higher Education Finance Committee, the senate
Environment, Agriculture, and Economic Development Budget Division, and the
house of representatives Jobs and Economic Opportunity Policy and Finance
Committee by June 30 of each fiscal year until the appropriation is
expended. This appropriation is
available until expended.
Sec.
4. Minnesota Statutes 2004, section
256B.76, is amended to read:
256B.76
PHYSICIAN AND DENTAL REIMBURSEMENT.
(a) Effective for services rendered on or after
October 1, 1992, the commissioner shall make payments for physician services as
follows:
(1) payment for level one Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services' common procedural coding system codes titled "office
and other outpatient services," "preventive medicine new and
established patient," "delivery, antepartum, and postpartum
care," "critical care," cesarean delivery and pharmacologic
management provided to psychiatric patients, and level three codes for enhanced
services for prenatal high risk, shall be paid at the lower of (i) submitted
charges, or (ii) 25 percent above the rate in effect on June 30, 1992. If the rate on any procedure code within
these categories is different than the rate that would have been paid under the
methodology in section 256B.74, subdivision 2, then the larger rate shall be
paid;
(2) payments for all other services shall be paid at
the lower of (i) submitted charges, or (ii) 15.4 percent above the rate in
effect on June 30, 1992;
(3) all physician rates shall be converted from the
50th percentile of 1982 to the 50th percentile of 1989, less the percent in
aggregate necessary to equal the above increases except that payment rates for
home health agency services shall be the rates in effect on September 30, 1992;
(4) effective for services rendered on or after
January 1, 2000, payment rates for physician and professional services shall be
increased by three percent over the rates in effect on December 31, 1999,
except for home health agency and family planning agency services; and
(5) the increases in clause (4) shall be implemented
January 1, 2000, for managed care.
(b) Effective for services rendered on or after
October 1, 1992, the commissioner shall make payments for dental services as
follows:
(1) dental services shall be paid at the lower of (i)
submitted charges, or (ii) 25 percent above the rate in effect on June 30,
1992;
(2) dental rates shall be converted from the 50th
percentile of 1982 to the 50th percentile of 1989, less the percent in
aggregate necessary to equal the above increases;
(3) effective for services rendered on or after
January 1, 2000, payment rates for dental services shall be increased by three
percent over the rates in effect on December 31, 1999;
(4) the commissioner shall award grants to community
clinics or other nonprofit community organizations, political subdivisions,
professional associations, or other organizations that demonstrate the ability
to provide dental services effectively to public program recipients. Grants may be used to fund the costs related
to coordinating access for recipients, developing and implementing patient care
criteria, upgrading or establishing new facilities, acquiring furnishings or
equipment, recruiting new providers, or other development costs that will
improve access to dental care in a region.
In awarding grants, the commissioner shall give priority to applicants
that plan to serve areas of the state in which the number of dental providers is
not currently sufficient to meet the needs of recipients of public programs or
uninsured individuals. The commissioner
shall consider the following in awarding the grants:
(i) potential to successfully increase access to an
underserved population;
(ii)
the ability to raise matching funds;
(iii) the long-term viability of the project to improve
access beyond the period of initial funding;
(iv) the efficiency in the use of the funding; and
(v) the experience of the proposers in providing
services to the target population.
The commissioner shall monitor the grants and may
terminate a grant if the grantee does not increase dental access for public
program recipients. The commissioner
shall consider grants for the following:
(i) implementation of new programs or continued
expansion of current access programs that have demonstrated success in
providing dental services in underserved areas;
(ii) a pilot program for utilizing hygienists outside
of a traditional dental office to provide dental hygiene services; and
(iii) a program that organizes a network of volunteer
dentists, establishes a system to refer eligible individuals to volunteer
dentists, and through that network provides donated dental care services to
public program recipients or uninsured individuals;
(5) beginning October 1, 1999, the payment for tooth
sealants and fluoride treatments shall be the lower of (i) submitted charge, or
(ii) 80 percent of median 1997 charges;
(6) the increases listed in clauses (3) and (5) shall
be implemented January 1, 2000, for managed care; and
(7) effective for services provided on or after January
1, 2002, payment for diagnostic examinations and dental x-rays provided to
children under age 21 shall be the lower of (i) the submitted charge, or (ii)
85 percent of median 1999 charges.
(c) Effective for dental services rendered on or after
January 1, 2002, the commissioner may, within the limits of available
appropriation, increase reimbursements to dentists and dental clinics deemed by
the commissioner to be critical access dental providers. Reimbursement to a critical access dental
provider may be increased by not more than 50 percent above the reimbursement
rate that would otherwise be paid to the provider. Payments to health plan companies shall be
adjusted to reflect increased reimbursements to critical access dental
providers as approved by the commissioner.
In determining which dentists and dental clinics shall be deemed
critical access dental providers, the commissioner shall review:
(1) the utilization rate in the service area in which
the dentist or dental clinic operates for dental services to patients covered
by medical assistance, general assistance medical care, or MinnesotaCare as
their primary source of coverage;
(2) the level of services provided by the dentist or
dental clinic to patients covered by medical assistance, general assistance
medical care, or MinnesotaCare as their primary source of coverage; and
(3) whether the level of services provided by the
dentist or dental clinic is critical to maintaining adequate levels of patient
access within the service area.
In the
absence of a critical access dental provider in a service area, the
commissioner may designate a dentist or dental clinic as a critical access
dental provider if the dentist or dental clinic is willing to provide care to
patients covered by medical assistance, general assistance medical care, or
MinnesotaCare at a level which significantly increases access to dental care in
the service area.
The
commissioner shall annually establish a reimbursement schedule for critical
access dental providers and provider-specific limits on total reimbursement
received under the reimbursement schedule, and shall notify each critical
access dental provider of the schedule and limit.
(d) An entity that operates both a Medicare certified
comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility and a facility which was
certified prior to January 1, 1993, that is licensed under Minnesota Rules,
parts 9570.2000 to 9570.3600, and for whom at least 33 percent of the clients
receiving rehabilitation services in the most recent calendar year are medical
assistance recipients, shall be reimbursed by the commissioner for
rehabilitation services at rates that are 38 percent greater than the maximum
reimbursement rate allowed under paragraph (a), clause (2), when those services
are (1) provided within the comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility
and (2) provided to residents of nursing facilities owned by the entity.
(e) Effective for services rendered on or after January
1, 2007, the commissioner shall make payments for physician and professional
services based on the Medicare relative value units (RVUs). This change shall be budget neutral and the
cost of implementing RVUs will be incorporated in the established conversion
factor.
Sec. 5. PHARMACY PAYMENT REFORM ADVISORY
COMMITTEE.
Subdivision 1.
Definitions. For purposes of this section, the
following words, terms, and phrases have the following meanings:
(a) "Department" means the Department of
Human Services.
(b) "Commissioner" means the commissioner of
the Department of Human Services.
(c) "Cost of dispensing" includes, but is not
limited to, operational and overhead costs; professional counseling as required
under the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, excluding medication
management services under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.0625, subdivision
13h; salaries; and other associated administrative costs, as well as a
reasonable return on investment. In
addition, cost of dispensing includes expenses transferred by wholesale drug
distributors to pharmacies as a result of the wholesale drug distributor tax
under
(d) "Additional costs" include, but are not
limited to, costs relating to coordination of benefits, bad debt, uncollected
co-pays, payment lag times, and high rate of rejected claims.
(e) "Advisory committee" means the Pharmacy
Payment Reform Advisory Committee established by this section.
Subd. 2.
Advisory committee. The Pharmacy Payment Reform Advisory
Committee is established under the direction of the commissioner of human
services. The commissioner, after
receiving recommendations from the Minnesota Pharmacists Association, the
Minnesota Retailers Association, the Minnesota Hospital Association, and the
Minnesota Wholesale Druggists Association, shall convene a pharmacy payment
reform advisory committee to advise the commissioner and make recommendations
to the legislature on implementation of pharmacy reforms contained in title VI,
chapter IV, of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005. The committee shall be comprised of three
licensed pharmacists representing both independent and chain pharmacy entities,
one of whom must have expertise in pharmacoeconomics, two individuals representing
hospitals with outpatient pharmacies, and two individuals with expertise in
wholesale drug distribution. The
committee shall be staffed by an employee of the department who shall serve as
an ex officio nonvoting member of the committee. The department's pharmacy program manager shall also
serve as an ex officio, nonvoting member of the committee. The committee is governed by
Subd.
3.
Subd. 4.
Content of study. The study shall determine the cost of
dispensing the average prescription and any additional costs that might be
incurred for dispensing Medicaid prescriptions.
The study shall include the current level of dispensing fees paid to
providers and an estimate of revenues required to adequately adjust
reimbursement to cover the cost to pharmacies.
Subd. 5.
Methodology of study and
publishing requirement. The
independent third-party entity performing the cost of dispensing research shall
submit to the advisory committee the entity's proposed research methodology and
shall publish the collected data to allow other independent researchers to
validate the study results. The data
shall be published in a manner that does not identify the source of the data.
Subd. 6.
Recommendations. The advisory committee shall use the
information from the cost of dispensing study and make recommendations to the
commissioner on implementation of pharmacy reforms contained in title VI,
chapter IV, of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005. The commissioner shall report the findings of
the study and the recommendations of the advisory committee to the legislature
by January 15, 2007. The department
shall conduct a cost of dispensing study every three years following the
initial report. The commissioner, in
consultation with the advisory committee, shall make recommendations to the
legislature on how to adequately adjust reimbursement rates to pharmacies to
cover the costs of dispensing and additional costs to pharmacies. Reports shall include the current level of
dispensing fees paid to providers and an estimate of revenues required to
adequately adjust reimbursement to ensure that:
(1) reimbursement is sufficient to enlist an adequate
number of participating pharmacy providers so that pharmacy services are as
available for Medicaid recipients under the program as for the state's general
population;
(2) Medicaid dispensing fees are adequate to reimburse
pharmacy providers for the costs of dispensing prescriptions under the Medicaid
program;
(3) Medicaid pharmacy reimbursement for
multiple-source drugs included on the federal upper reimbursement limit is set
at the level established by the federal government under United States Code,
title 42, section 1396r-8(e)(5);
(4) the combined Medicaid program reimbursement for
prescription drug product and the dispensing fee provides a return adequate to
provide a reasonable profit for the participating pharmacy; and
(5) the new payment system does not create
disincentives for pharmacists to dispense generic drugs.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to the operation of state
government; making changes to health and human services programs and policy;
making changes to health policy to comply with federal law; modifying long-term
care provisions; modifying treatment of asset recovery for medical assistance
eligibility; requiring evidence of citizenship or nationality for qualified
noncitizens; modifying the treatment of payment of benefits from an annuity;
making changes
to children and families policy to comply with federal law; modifying treatment
of MFIP expenditures; allowing waiver of administrative costs under MFIP;
imposing an annual federal collections fee; making supplemental appropriations
and budget reductions; establishing the Pharmacy Payment Reform Advisory
Committee; amending Minnesota Statutes 2004, sections 62A.045; 62S.05, by
adding a subdivision; 62S.08, subdivision 3; 62S.081, subdivision 4; 62S.10,
subdivision 2; 62S.13, by adding a subdivision; 62S.14, subdivision 2; 62S.15;
62S.20, subdivision 1; 62S.24, subdivisions 1, 3, 4, by adding subdivisions; 62S.25,
subdivision 6, by adding a subdivision; 62S.26; 62S.266, subdivision 2; 62S.29,
subdivision 1; 62S.30; 144.6501, subdivision 6; 256B.02, subdivision 9;
256B.056, subdivision 2, by adding subdivisions; 256B.0595, subdivisions 1, 3,
4; 256B.76; 256J.021; 256J.626, subdivision 2; 256L.04, subdivision 10;
518.551, subdivision 7; Minnesota Statutes 2005 Supplement, sections 256B.0571;
256B.0595, subdivision 2; 256B.06, subdivision 4; 256D.03, subdivision 3;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 62S; 256B;
repealing Minnesota Statutes 2005 Supplement, section 256B.0571, subdivisions
2, 5, 11."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill
pass.
The report was adopted.
Knoblach from the Committee on Ways and Means to which was
referred:
H. F. No. 3761, A bill for an act relating to transportation;
authorizing sale of trunk highway bonds for capital improvements related to
transportation; establishing transit fund and accounts; increasing motor fuel
taxes; providing for treatment and allocation of tax proceeds related to motor
vehicles; modifying proposed amendment to Minnesota Constitution and its
proposed ballot question; modifying provisions relating to the town bridge
account, old automobile liens, tow truck operators, impounded vehicles, the
rail service improvement account, the tax attributable to fuel used by
all-terrain vehicles, and a connector highway agreement; requiring a study;
appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2004, sections 16A.88;
161.082, subdivision 2a; 168B.06, subdivision 1; 168B.07, by adding a
subdivision; 169.829, subdivision 2; 169.86, by adding a subdivision; 222.50,
subdivisions 6, 7; 296A.07, by adding a subdivision; 296A.18, subdivision 4;
297A.94; 297B.09, subdivision 1; Minnesota Statutes 2005 Supplement, sections
168A.20, subdivision 5; 297A.815, by adding a subdivision; Laws 2005, chapter
88, article 3, section 10; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 167.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 5, delete section 7
Page 5, line 11, after "9," insert "as
amended by this act,"
Page 7, delete section 10 and insert:
"Sec. 10. Laws
2005, chapter 88, article 3, section 9, is amended to read:
Sec. 9. CONSTITUTIONAL
AMENDMENT PROPOSED.
An amendment to the Minnesota Constitution is proposed to the
people. If the amendment is adopted, two
sections will be added to article XIV to read:
Sec. 12. Beginning with
the fiscal year starting July 1, 2007, 63.75 percent of the revenue from a tax
imposed by the state on the sale of a new or used motor vehicle must be
apportioned for the transportation purposes described in section 13, then the
revenue apportioned for transportation purposes must be increased by ten
percent for each subsequent fiscal year through June 30, 2011, and then the
revenue must be apportioned 100 percent for transportation purposes after June
30, 2011.
Sec.
13. The revenue apportioned in section
12 must be allocated for the following transportation purposes: not more
than 60 percent must be deposited in the highway user tax distribution
fund, and not less than 40 percent must be deposited in a fund dedicated
solely to public transit assistance as defined by law.
Sec. 11. Laws 2005,
chapter 88, article 3, section 10, is amended to read:
Sec. 10. SUBMISSION
TO VOTERS.
The constitutional amendment proposed in section 12 9
must be presented to the people at the 2006 general election. The question submitted must be:
"Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to dedicate
revenue from a the existing tax on the sale of new and used motor
vehicles over a five-year period, so that after June 30, 2011, all of the
revenue is dedicated at least 40 percent for public transit assistance
and not more than 60 percent for highway purposes?
Yes
.......
No
........""
Page 8, after line 5, insert:
"Sec. 12. ACTION CONCERNING PROPOSED
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.
Any action brought for declaratory or injunctive relief
concerning a proposed amendment to the state constitution that relates to
distribution of motor vehicle sales tax revenue, or concerning the related
question, to be submitted to the people at the 2006 general election, must be
filed with any judge of the Supreme Court within 30 days after adjournment of
the 84th legislative session. The
Supreme Court shall advance the matter on the docket and expedite to the
greatest possible extent the final disposition of the action, which must occur
no later than four weeks before the state general election."
Page 11, line 18, after "9," insert "as
amended by this act,"
Page 15, after line 18, insert:
"Sec. 10.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 471.345, is amended by adding a
subdivision to read:
Subd.
Renumber the sections in sequence
Amend the title as follows:
Page 1, line 4, delete "increasing motor fuel
taxes;"
Page 1, line 6, after the semicolon, insert "setting certain
court deadlines and procedures;"
Page
1, line 7, after the first comma, insert "town road construction and
maintenance,"
Correct the title numbers accordingly
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass
and be re-referred to the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration.
The report was adopted.
Knoblach from the Committee on Ways and Means to which was
referred:
S. F. No. 762, A bill for an act relating to the environment;
creating the Clean Water Legacy Act; providing authority, direction, and
funding to achieve and maintain water quality standards for Minnesota's surface
waters in accordance with section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act;
appropriating money; amending Laws 2005, chapter 20, article 1, section 39; proposing
coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 446A; proposing coding for
new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 114D.
Reported the same back with the following amendments to the
third unofficial engrossment:
Page 10, line 13, after "council's" insert
"nonbinding"
Page 10, line 14, delete everything after "114D.35"
and insert a period
Page 10, delete lines 15 to 17
Page 10, line 18, delete everything before "The"
Page 10, line 21, after the period, insert "Expenditures
from the account are subject to appropriation by the legislature."
Page 11, after line 18, insert:
"Sec. 9. [114D.45] CLEAN WATER LEGACY ACCOUNT.
Subdivision 1.
Creation. The clean water legacy account is created
as an account in the environmental fund.
Money in the account must be made available for the implementation of
this chapter and section 446A.073, without supplanting or taking the place of
any other funds which are currently available or may become available from any
other source, whether federal, state, local, or private, for implementation of
this chapter and section 446A.073.
Subd. 2. Sources of revenue. The following revenues must be deposited
in the clean water legacy account:
(1) money transferred to the account; and
(2) interest accrued on the account.
Subd.
3.
(1) to provide grants, loans, and technical assistance to
public agencies and others who are participating in the process of identifying
impaired waters, developing TMDL's, implementing restoration plans for impaired
waters, and monitoring the effectiveness of restoration;
(2) to support measures to prevent waters from becoming
impaired and to improve the quality of waters that are listed as impaired but
have no approved TMDL addressing the impairment;
(3) to provide grants and loans for wastewater and storm
water treatment projects through the Public Facilities Authority;
(4) to support the efforts of public agencies associated with
individual sewage treatment systems and financial assistance for upgrading and
replacing the systems; and
(5) to provide funds to state agencies to carry out their
responsibilities under this chapter."
Page 11, line 31, delete "9" and insert
"10"
Renumber the sections in sequence
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Hackbarth from the Committee on Environment and Natural
Resources to which was referred:
S. F. No. 1298, A bill for an act relating to environment;
enacting the Minnesota Electronics Recycling Act of 2005; providing penalties;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 116H.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. [115A.1306] REGISTRATION FEE AND PROGRAM
FOR COLLECTION, TRANSPORTATION, AND RECYCLING OF VIDEO DISPLAY DEVICES FROM
HOUSEHOLDS.
Subdivision 1.
Definitions. For the purpose of this section, the
following definitions shall apply.
(a) "Agency" means the Pollution Control Agency.
(b) "Cathode-ray tube" or "CRT" means a
vacuum tube or picture tube used to convert an electronic signal into a visual
image.
(c) "Video display device" means a television or computer
monitor, including a laptop computer, containing a cathode-ray tube or a flat
panel screen with a screen size that is greater than nine inches in size
measured diagonally. Video display
device does not include any of the following:
(1)
a video display device that is a part of a motor vehicle or any component part
of a motor vehicle assembled by, or for, a vehicle manufacturer or franchised
dealer, including replacement parts for use in a motor vehicle;
(2) a video display device or a touch-screen display that is
functionally or physically a part of a larger piece of equipment or is designed
and intended for use in an industrial; commercial; library checkout; traffic
control; security other than household security; border control; or medical setting,
including diagnostic, monitoring, or control equipment;
(3) a video display device that is contained within a clothes
washer, clothes dryer, refrigerator, refrigerator and freezer, microwave oven,
conventional oven or range, dishwasher, room air conditioner, dehumidifier, or
air purifier; or
(4) a telephone of any type unless it contains a video
display area greater than nine inches measured diagonally.
(d) "Manufacturer" means a person who:
(1) manufactures video display devices to be sold under its
own brand as identified by its own brand label; or
(2) sells video display devices manufactured by others under
its own brand as identified by its own brand label.
(e) "Sell" or "sale" means any transfer
for consideration of title or of the right to use, by lease or sales contract,
including, but not limited to, transactions conducted through sales outlets,
catalogs, or the Internet, or any other similar electronic means, either inside
or outside of the state, by a person who conducts the transaction and controls
the delivery of a video display device to a consumer in the state, but does not
include a manufacturer's or distributor's wholesale transaction with a
distributor or a retailer.
Subd. 2. Labeling of video display devices. By January 1, 2007, manufacturers shall
label all video display devices to be offered for sale in
Subd. 3. Requirements for sale. (a) On and after February 1, 2007, no
person shall sell or offer for sale to any person in this state a video display
device unless the video display device is labeled with the manufacturer's
brand, which label shall be permanently affixed and readily visible.
(b) On and after February 1, 2007, no person shall sell or
offer for sale to any person in this state a video display device unless the
manufacturer of the video display device has filed a registration with the
agency under subdivision 4. Beginning
February 1, 2007, the agency shall maintain on its Web site a list of
manufacturers registered with the agency and a list of each manufacturer's
brands as reported in the manufacturer's registration. A person is considered to have complied with
this section if, on the date the device was ordered, the manufacturer was
listed on the agency's Web site as having registered.
Subd. 4. Manufacturer responsibility. (a) A manufacturer of video display
devices sold in this state, including, but not limited to, transactions
conducted through sales outlets, catalogs, or the Internet, or any other
similar electronic means, either inside or outside of the state, shall conduct,
beginning July 1, 2007, a program for the collection, transportation, and
recycling of video display devices from households in this state. A manufacturer has sole discretion to
determine the scope, terms, and conditions of such a program.
(b) A manufacturer of video display devices sold to
households in this state shall, by January 1, 2007, and by July 1 of each year
thereafter, file a registration with the agency and submit with the
registration a fee of $5,000, which shall be deposited into the electronics
recycling account established in subdivision 6.
The registration must list the manufacturer's brands.
(c)
A manufacturer that filed a registration under paragraph (b) by January 1,
2007, shall, by July 1, 2007, file with the agency a description of the program
for the collection, transportation, and recycling of video display devices from
households that the manufacturer may operate in the state beginning July 1,
2007, and ending on June 30, 2008. A
registration filed by July 1, 2008, and thereafter, shall contain a description
of the recycling program that the manufacturer operated in the previous year
for the collection, transportation, and recycling of video display devices from
(d) All video display devices collected by a manufacturer
shall be recycled in a manner that is in compliance with all applicable
federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations.
(e) A manufacturer may report on recycling programs
independently, collectively, or through a representative organization of
manufacturers.
(f) A manufacturer may collect, transport, and recycle video
display devices jointly with other manufacturers.
Subd. 5. Manufacturers' plans. (a) Manufacturers' plans shall be
coordinated to ensure the recycling of collected video display devices in each
county at least once per year utilizing existing public and private
infrastructure to the extent practicable.
Counties with a population of less than 20,000 may be served through
regional programs.
(b) A manufacturer that sells video display devices
manufactured by others under its own brand as identified by its own brand label
from more than three separate physical locations in this state is exempt from
the requirements of this subdivision.
Subd. 6. Electronics recycling account. An electronics recycling account is
established in the environmental fund.
Fees collected under subdivision 4, interest accruing on the account,
and any money appropriated for purposes of this section shall be credited to
the account. Money in the account shall
be used solely by the agency for the purpose of fulfilling agency
responsibilities specified in this section and for payments to political
subdivisions under subdivision 7. Money
in the account may not be diverted for any purpose or activity other than those
specified in this section.
Subd. 7. Local programs. (a) Beginning February 1, 2007, and no
later than April 1, 2007, a political subdivision engaged in the collection,
transportation, and recycling of video display devices from households in
Minnesota in an area determined by the commissioner of the Pollution Control
Agency to be underserved with respect to the collection, transportation, and
recycling of video display devices from households may apply to the agency for
a grant from the electronics recycling account for collection, transportation,
and recycling costs projected to be incurred by the local government for the
recycling of video display devices from households in Minnesota from January 1,
2007, through December 31, 2007. By May
1, 2007, the commissioner shall distribute the available funds among political
subdivisions that have applied, taking into account population levels and
densities and transportation costs. The
amounts to be paid to each local government shall be established by the agency.
(b) Beginning January 1, 2008, and each January 1 thereafter,
political subdivisions in underserved areas engaged in the collection,
transportation, and recycling of video display devices from households in
Minnesota may apply to the agency for a grant from the electronics recycling account
to offset costs of such programs under procedures established by the agency.
(c) The agency may use no more than five percent of the funds
in the electronics recycling account for public education and assistance to
local government education activities.
(d)
Beginning January 1, 2009, and annually thereafter, political subdivisions,
retailers, charities, and recyclers engaged in the collection, transportation,
or recycling of video display devices from households in the state shall submit
a report to the agency on their recycling efforts, including methods of
collection and amounts collected and recycled.
Subd. 8. Agency duties. On or before March 1, 2008, and each year
thereafter, the agency shall submit a report to the governor and the
legislature on the implementation of this section. For each program year, the report must
discuss the total weight of video display devices recycled from households in
Minnesota and summarize information submitted to the agency by manufacturers
under subdivision 4, paragraphs (b) to (f), and beginning in 2009, by political
subdivisions, retailers, charities, and recyclers under subdivision 7,
paragraph (d). The report must also
discuss collection programs, if any, used by manufacturers to collect video
display devices and information regarding video display devices being disposed
of in landfills in this state, if any.
The report must include a description of enforcement actions under this
section. The agency may include in its
report other information received by the agency regarding the implementation of
this section.
Subd. 9. Enforcement. (a) The agency shall enforce this section
according to this subdivision.
(b) Civil liability may be administratively imposed by the
agency following the procedures set forth in section 116.072, for violations of
this section in an amount up to $5,000 per violation for the first violation
and up to $10,000 per violation for the second and any subsequent violation.
(c) Civil liability may be imposed by a district court for
violation of this section in an amount up to $15,000 per violation for the
first violation and up to $25,000 per violation for the second and any
subsequent violation.
(d) Any penalty imposed under this subdivision shall be
deposited into the electronics recycling account.
Subd. 10. National recycling program. This section expires 30 days after the
agency publishes a notice in the State Register that a federal law, or
combination of federal laws, have been enacted and implemented that establish a
program for collecting, transporting, and recycling waste video display devices
from households.
Subd. 11. Anticompetitive conduct. A manufacturer or organization of
manufacturers and its officers, members, employees, and agents who participate
in projects or programs to collect and properly manage collected video display
devices are immune from liability under state law relating to antitrust,
restraint of trade, unfair trade practices, and other regulation of trade or
commerce for activities related to the collection and management of collected
video display devices under this section.
Sec. 2. [115A.1308] EVALUATION.
Subdivision 1.
Reporting. By February 1, 2008, and February 1, 2009,
manufacturers shall report to the agency the total weight of video display
devices collected and recycled under section 115A.1306 in each county during
the previous calendar year, including documentation as to how the amounts were
calculated and certification that the amounts reported are accurate.
Subd. 2. Determination. The commissioner of the Pollution Control
Agency shall review the report submitted under subdivision 1 and determine
whether the following conditions are met:
(1) the total weight of video display devices collected and
recycled statewide under section 115A.1306 during calendar year 2008 equals or
exceeds the equivalent of 2.25 pounds per capita, based on the most recently
available population estimates of the state demographer made pursuant to
section 4A.02; and
(2) the provisions of clause (1) are met in at least 66
individual counties in the state.
Subd.
3.
(1) the commissioner shall publish that determination in the
State Register by March 15, 2009;
(2) this section and section 115A.1306 are repealed upon
adjournment of the regular legislative session of 2009; and
(3) sections 115A.1310 to 115A.1330 become effective upon
adjournment of the regular legislative session of 2009.
Sec. 3. [115A.1310] DEFINITIONS.
Subdivision 1.
Scope. For the purposes of sections 115A.1310 to
115A.1324, the following terms have the meanings given.
Subd. 2. Cathode-ray tube or CRT. "Cathode-ray tube" or
"CRT" means a vacuum tube or picture tube used to convert an
electronic signal into a visual image.
It is composed primarily of glass and is the video display component of
a television or computer monitor, and includes other items integrally attached
to the CRT.
Subd. 3. Collection. "Collection" means the
aggregation of covered electronic devices from households and includes all the
activities up to the time the covered electronic devices are delivered to a
recycler.
Subd. 4. Collector. "Collector" means a public or
private entity that receives covered electronic devices from households and
arranges for the delivery of the devices to a recycler.
Subd. 5. Computer. "Computer" means an electronic,
magnetic, optical, electrochemical, or other high-speed data processing device
performing logical, arithmetic, or storage functions, but does not include an
automated typewriter or typesetter, a portable hand-held calculator or device,
or other similar device.
Subd. 6. Computer monitor. "Computer monitor" means an
electronic device that is a cathode-ray tube or flat panel display primarily
intended to display information from a central processing unit or the
Internet. Computer monitor includes a
laptop computer, desktop computer, or personal computer.
Subd. 7. Covered electronic device. "Covered electronic device"
means computers, peripherals, facsimile machines, scanners, DVD players, video
cassette recorders, and video display devices that are sold to a household by
means of retail, wholesale, or electronic commerce.
Subd. 8. Department. "Department" means the
Department of Revenue.
Subd. 9. Dwelling unit. "Dwelling unit" has the meaning
given in section 238.02, subdivision 21a.
Subd. 10. Household. "Household" means an occupant of
a single detached dwelling unit or a single unit of a multiple dwelling unit
located in this state who has used a video display device at a dwelling unit
primarily for personal use.
Subd. 11. Manufacturer. "Manufacturer" means a person
who:
(1) manufactures video display devices to be sold under its
own brand as identified by its own brand label; or
(2) sells video display devices manufactured by others under
its own brand as identified by its own brand label.
Subd.
12.
Subd. 13. Program year. "Program year" means the period
from July 1 through June 30.
Subd. 14. Recycler. "Recycler" means a public or
private individual or entity who accepts covered electronic devices from
households and collectors for the purpose of recycling.
Subd. 15. Recycling. "Recycling" means the process of
collecting and preparing covered electronic devices for reuse in their original
form, including any repair or refurbishment that may be performed, or for use
in manufacturing processes that do not cause the destruction of the component
materials in a manner that precludes further use.
Subd. 16. Recycling credits. "Recycling credits" means the
number of pounds of covered electronic devices recycled by a manufacturer from
households during a program year, less the product of the number of pounds of
video display devices sold to households during the same program year,
multiplied by the proportion of sales a manufacturer is required to
recycle. The calculation and uses of
recycling credits are as specified in section 115A.1314, subdivision 1.
Subd. 17. Retailer. "Retailer" means a person who
sells, rents, or leases, through sales outlets, catalogs, or the Internet, a
video display device to a household and not for resale in any form.
Subd. 18. Sell or sale. "Sell" or "sale" means
any transfer for consideration of title or of the right to use, by lease or
sales contract, including, but not limited to, transactions conducted through
sales outlets, catalogs, or the Internet, or any other similar electronic means
either inside or outside of the state, by a person who conducts the transaction
and controls the delivery of a video display device to a consumer in the state,
but does not include a manufacturer's or distributor's wholesale transaction
with a distributor or a retailer, or a transfer by a manufacturer, distributor,
or retailer of a video display device that is not manufactured or marketed by a
manufacturer for use in households.
Subd. 19. Television. "Television" means an electronic
device that is a cathode-ray tube or flat panel display primarily intended to
receive video programming via broadcast, cable, or satellite transmission or
video from surveillance or other similar cameras.
Subd. 20. Video display device. "Video display device" means a
computer monitor or television with a screen size greater than four inches
measured diagonally. Video display
device does not include a video display device that is a touch-screen monitor
or that is part of or contained in a motor vehicle; industrial, commercial,
traffic control, or security, other than household security, equipment; medical
equipment, including diagnostic, monitoring, and control equipment; or any
appliance.
Sec. 4. [115A.1312] REGISTRATION PROGRAM.
Subdivision 1.
Requirements for sale. (a) On and after January 1, 2007, a
retailer or manufacturer must not sell or offer for sale a new video display
device to any household unless:
(1) the video display device is labeled with the
manufacturer's brand, which label is permanently affixed and readily visible;
and
(2) the manufacturer has filed a registration with the
agency, as specified in subdivision 2.
(b)
A retailer or manufacturer who sells or offers for sale a new video display
device to a household must, before the initial offer for sale, review the
agency Web site specified in subdivision 2, paragraph (g), and determine that
all new video display devices that the retailer or manufacturer is offering for
sale are labeled with manufacturer's brands that are registered with the
agency.
(c) A retailer is not responsible for an unlawful sale under
this subdivision if the manufacturer's registration expired or was revoked and
the retailer took possession of the video display device prior to the
expiration or revocation of the manufacturer's registration and the unlawful
sale occurred within six months after the expiration or revocation.
Subd. 2. Manufacturer's registration. (a) By August 1, 2006, and each year
thereafter, a manufacturer of video display devices sold to a household must
submit a registration to the agency that includes:
(1) a list of the manufacturer's brands of video display
devices offered for sale in this state;
(2) the name, address, and contact information of a person
responsible for ensuring compliance with this chapter; and
(3) a certification that the manufacturer has complied and
will continue to comply with the requirements of sections 115A.1312 to
115A.1318.
(b) By August 1, 2008, and each year thereafter, a
manufacturer of video display devices sold or offered for sale to a household
must include in the registration submitted under paragraph (a), a statement
disclosing whether any video display devices sold to households exceed the
maximum concentration values established for lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent
chromium, polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs), and polybrominated diphenyl ethers
(PBDEs) under the RoHS (restricting the use of certain hazardous substances in
electrical and electronic equipment) Directive 2002/95/EC of the European
Parliament and Council and any amendments thereto.
(c) A manufacturer who begins to sell or offer for sale video
display devices to households after August 1, 2006, and has not filed a
registration under this subdivision must submit a registration to the agency
within ten days of beginning to sell or offer for sale video display devices to
households.
(d) A registration must be updated within ten days after a
change in the manufacturer's brands of video display devices sold or offered
for sale to households.
(e) A registration is effective upon receipt by the agency
and is valid until August 1 of each year.
(f) The agency must review each registration and notify the
manufacturer of any information required by this section that is omitted from
the registration. Within 30 days of
receipt of a notification from the agency, the manufacturer must submit a
revised registration providing the information noted by the agency.
(g) The agency must maintain on its Web site the names of
manufacturers and the manufacturers' brands listed in registrations filed with
the agency. The agency must update the
Web site information promptly upon receipt of a new or updated registration.
Subd. 3. Collector's registration. After August 1, 2006, no person may
operate as a collector of covered electronic devices from households unless
that person has submitted a registration with the agency on a form prescribed
by the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency. Registration information must include the
name, address, telephone number, and location of the business and a
certification that the collector has complied and will continue to comply with
the requirements of sections 115A.1312 to 115A.1318. A registration is effective upon receipt by
the agency and is valid until August 1 of each year.
Subd.
4.
Sec. 5. [115A.1314] MANUFACTURER'S REGISTRATION
FEE; CREATION OF ACCOUNT.
Subdivision 1.
Registration fee. (a) Each manufacturer who registers under
section 115A.1312 must, by August 1, 2006, and each year thereafter, pay to the
commissioner of revenue an annual registration fee. The commissioner of revenue must deposit the
fee in the account established in subdivision 2.
(b) The registration fee for the initial program year during
which a manufacturer sells or offers for sale video display devices to
households is $5,000. Each year
thereafter, the registration fee is equal to a base fee of $5,000, plus a
variable recycling fee calculated according to the formula:
((A x B) - (C + D)) x E, where:
(1) A = the number of pounds of video display devices sold by
a manufacturer to households during the previous program year, as reported to
the department under section 115A.1316, subdivision 1;
(2) B = the proportion of sales of video display devices
required to be recycled, initially set at 1.00;
(3) C = the number of
pounds of covered electronic devices recycled by a manufacturer from households
during the previous program year, as reported to the department under section
115A.1316, subdivision 2;
(4) D = the number of recycling credits a manufacturer elects
to use to calculate the variable recycling fee, as reported to the department
under section 115A.1316, subdivision 1; and
(5) E = the estimated per-pound cost of recycling, initially
set at $.50 per pound.
(c) If, as specified in paragraph (b), the term C - (A x B)
equals a positive number of pounds, that amount is defined as the manufacturer's
recycling credits. A manufacturer may
retain recycling credits to be added, in whole or in part, to the actual value
of C, as reported under section 115A.1316, subdivision 2, during any of the
three succeeding program years. A
manufacturer may sell any portion or all of its recycling credits to another
manufacturer, at a price negotiated by the parties, who may use the credits in
the same manner.
(d) For the purpose of calculating a manufacturer's variable
recycling fee under paragraph (b), the weight of covered electronic devices
collected from households located in counties other than Anoka, Carver,
Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Kanabec, Le Sueur, McLeod, Meeker, Pine,
Ramsey, Renville, Rice, Scott, Sherburne, Sibley, Washington, and Wright is
calculated at 1.3 times their actual weight.
(e) The registration fee for the initial program year and the
base registration fee thereafter for a manufacturer who sells fewer than 1,000
video display devices annually to households is $2,500.
Subd. 2. Creation of account; appropriations. (a) The electronic waste account is
established in the environmental fund.
The commissioner of revenue must deposit receipts from the fee
established in subdivision 2 in the account.
Any interest earned on the account must remain in the account. Money from other sources may be credited to
the account.
(b)
The legislature shall appropriate money from the account:
(1) to the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency and
the commissioner of revenue for the purpose of implementing sections 115A.1312
to 115A.1330; and
(2) to the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency to be
distributed on a competitive basis through contracts with counties other than
Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Sherburne,
Washington, and Wright, and with private entities that collect for recycling
covered electronic devices in counties other than those counties, for the
purpose of carrying out the activities of sections 115A.1312 to 115A.1330.
Sec. 6. [115A.1316] REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.
Subdivision 1.
Manufacturer's reporting
requirements. (a) By August 1
of each year, beginning in 2006, each manufacturer must report to the
department the weight of each specific model of video display device sold to
households during the previous program year.
The department will use this information to verify a manufacturer's
annual registration fee as specified in section 115A.1314, subdivision 1.
(b) By August 1 of each year, beginning in 2007, each
manufacturer must report to the department the total weight of covered
electronic devices collected from households and recycled during the preceding
program year. A manufacturer must report
separately the total weight of covered electronic devices collected from households
located in counties specified in section 115A.1314, subdivision 1, paragraph
(d), and those collected from households located outside those counties.
(c) By August 1 of each year, beginning in 2007, each
manufacturer must report to the department:
(1) the number of recycling credits the manufacturer has
purchased and sold during the preceding program year;
(2) the number of recycling credits possessed by the
manufacturer that the manufacturer elects to use in the calculation of its
variable recycling fee under section 115A.1314, subdivision 1; and
(3) the number of recycling credits the manufacturer retains
at the beginning of the current program year.
Subd. 2. Recycler's reporting requirements. By August 1 of each year, beginning in
2007, a recycler of covered electronic devices must report to the agency and
the department the total weight of covered electronic devices recycled during
the preceding program year and must certify that the recycler has complied with
section 115A.1318, subdivision 2.
Subd. 3. Collector's reporting requirements. By August 1 of each year, beginning in
2007, a collector must report separately to the agency the total pounds of
covered electronic devices collected in the counties specified in section
115A.1314, subdivision 1, paragraph (d), and all other Minnesota counties, and
a list of all recyclers to whom collectors delivered covered electronic
devices.
Sec. 7. [115A.1318] RESPONSIBILITIES.
Subdivision 1.
Manufacturer's
responsibilities. (a) In
addition to fulfilling the requirements of sections 115A.1311 to 115A.1330, a
manufacturer must comply with paragraphs (b) to (d).
(b) A manufacturer must annually recycle or arrange for the
collection and recycling of an amount of covered electronic devices equal to
the total weight of video display devices sold by the manufacturer during the
preceding program year, multiplied by the proportion of sales of video display
devices required to be recycled, as established by the agency under section
115A.1320, subdivision 1, paragraph (c).
(c)
The obligations of a manufacturer apply only to video display devices received
from households and do not apply to video display devices received from sources
other than households.
(d) A manufacturer must conduct and document due diligence
assessments of collectors and recyclers it contracts with to ensure that all
recyclers comply with the requirements of subdivision 2. A manufacturer is responsible for
maintaining, for a period of three years, documentation that all video display
devices recycled, partially recycled, or sent to downstream recycling
operations comply with the requirements of subdivision 2.
Subd. 2. Recycler's responsibilities. (a) As part of the report submitted under
section 115A.1316, subdivision 2, a recycler must certify, except as provided
in paragraph (b), that facilities that recycle video display devices, including
all downstream recycling operations:
(1) comply with all applicable health, environmental, safety,
and financial responsibility regulations;
(2) are licensed by all applicable governmental authorities;
(3) use no prison labor to recycle video display devices; and
(4) possess liability insurance of not less than $1,000,000
for environmental releases, accidents, and other emergencies.
(b) A nonprofit corporation that contracts with a
correctional institution to refurbish and reuse donated computers in schools is
exempt from paragraph (a), clauses (3) and (4).
(c) Except to the extent otherwise required by law, a
recycler has no responsibility for any data that may be contained in a covered
electronic device if an information storage device is included in the covered
electronic device.
Subd. 3. Retailer's responsibilities. (a) By July 1 of each year, a retailer
must report to a manufacturer the number of video display devices labeled with
the manufacturer's brand sold to households during the previous program year.
(b) A retailer who sells new video display devices shall
provide information to households describing where and how they may recycle
video display devices and advising them of opportunities and locations for the
convenient collection of video display devices for the purpose of
recycling. This requirement may be met
by providing to households the agency's toll-free number and Web site
address. Retailers selling through
catalogs or the Internet may meet this requirement by including the information
in a prominent location on the retailer's Web site.
Sec. 8. [115A.1320] AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT
DUTIES.
Subdivision 1.
Duties of the agency. (a) The agency shall administer sections
115A.1310 to 115A.1330.
(b) The agency shall establish procedures for:
(1) receipt and maintenance of the registration statements
and certifications filed with the agency under section 115A.1312; and
(2) making the statements and certifications easily available
to manufacturers, retailers, and members of the public.
(c)
The agency shall annually review the value of the following variables that are
part of the formula used to calculate a manufacturer's annual registration fee
under section 115A.1314, subdivision 1:
(1) the proportion of sales of video display devices sold to
households that manufacturers are required to recycle;
(2) the estimated per-pound price of recycling covered
electronic devices sold to households;
(3) the base registration fee; and
(4) the multiplier established for the weight of covered
electronic devices collected in section 115A.1314, subdivision 1, paragraph
(d). If the agency determines that any
of these values must be changed in order to improve the efficiency or
effectiveness of the activities regulated under sections 115A.1312 to
115A.1330, it shall present those recommendations and the reasons for them to
the chairs of the senate and house of representatives committees with
jurisdiction over solid waste policy.
(d) The agency shall annually calculate estimated sales of
video display devices sold to households by each manufacturer during the
preceding program year based on national sales data and forward the estimates
to the department.
(e) The agency shall manage the account established in
section 115A.1314, subdivision 2.
(f) On or before December 1, 2007, and each year thereafter,
the agency shall provide a report to the governor and the legislature on the
implementation of sections 115A.1310 to 115A.1330. For each program year, the report must
discuss the total weight of covered electronic devices recycled and a summary
of information in the reports submitted by manufacturers and recyclers under
section 115A.1316. The report must also
discuss the various collection programs used by manufacturers to collect
covered electronic devices; information regarding covered electronic devices
that are being collected by persons other than registered manufacturers,
collectors, and recyclers; and information about covered electronic devices, if
any, being disposed of in landfills in this state. The report must include a description of
enforcement actions under sections 115A.1310 to 115A.1330. The agency may include in its report other
information received by the agency regarding the implementation of sections
115A.1312 to 115A.1330.
(g) The agency shall promote public participation in the
activities regulated under sections 115A.1312 to 115A.1330 through public education
and outreach efforts.
(h) The agency shall enforce sections 115A.1310 to 115A.1330
in the manner provided by sections 115.071, subdivisions 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6; and
116.072, except for those provisions enforced by the department, as provided in
subdivision 2. The agency may revoke a
registration of a collector or recycler found to have violated sections
115A.1310 to 115A.1330.
Subd. 2. Duties of the department. (a) The department must collect the data
submitted to it annually by each manufacturer on the weight of each specific
model of video display device sold to households, the weight of covered
electronic devices collected from households that is recycled, and data on
recycling credits, as required under section 115A.1316. The department must use this data to review
each manufacturer's annual registration fee submitted to the department to
ensure that the fee was calculated accurately according to the formula in
section 115A.1314, subdivision 1.
(b) The department must estimate, for each registered
manufacturer, the sales of video display devices to households during the
previous program year, based on:
(1)
data provided by a manufacturer on sales of video display devices to
households, including documentation describing how that amount was calculated
and certification that the amount is accurate; or
(2) if a manufacturer does not provide the data specified in
clause (1), national data on sales of video display devices.
The
department must use the data specified in this subdivision to review each
manufacturer's annual registration fee submitted to the department to ensure
that the fee was calculated accurately according to the formula in section
115A.1314, subdivision 1.
(c) The department must enforce section 115A.1314,
subdivision 1. The audit, assessment,
appeal, collection, enforcement, disclosure, and other administrative
provisions of chapters 270B, 270C, and 289A that apply to the taxes imposed
under chapter 297A apply to the fee imposed under section 115A.1314,
subdivision 1. To enforce this
subdivision, the commissioner of revenue may grant extensions to pay, and
impose and abate penalties and interest on, the fee due under section
115A.1314, subdivision 1, in the manner provided in chapters 270C and 289A as
if the fee were a tax imposed under chapter 297A.
(d) The department may disclose nonpublic data to the agency
only when necessary for the efficient and effective administration of the
activities regulated under sections 115A.1312 to 115A.1330. Any data disclosed by the department to the
agency retains the classification it had when in the possession of the
department.
Sec. 9. [115A.1322] OTHER RECYCLING PROGRAMS.
A city, county, or other public agency may not require
households to use public facilities to recycle their covered electronic devices
to the exclusion of other lawful programs available. Nothing in sections 115A.1310 to 115A.1330
prohibits or restricts the operation of any program recycling covered
electronic devices in addition to those provided by manufacturers or prohibits
or restricts any persons from receiving, collecting, transporting, or recycling
covered electronic devices, provided that those persons are registered under
section 115A.1312.
Sec. 10. [115A.1324] REQUIREMENTS FOR PURCHASES
BY STATE AGENCIES.
(a) The Department of Administration must ensure that
acquisitions of video display devices under chapter 16C are certified by the
vendor to be in compliance with sections 115A.1312 to 115A.1318.
(b) The bid solicitation documents must specify that the
prospective bidder is required to cooperate fully in providing reasonable
access to its records and documents that evidence compliance with paragraph (a)
and sections 115A.1312 to 115A.1318.
(c) Any person awarded a contract under chapter 16C for purchase
or lease of video display devices that is found to be in violation of paragraph
(a) or sections 115A.1312 to 115A.1318 is subject to the following sanctions:
(1) the contract must be voided;
(2) the contractor is ineligible to bid on any state contract
for a period of three years; and
(3) if the attorney general establishes that any money,
property, or benefit was obtained by a contractor as a result of violating
paragraph (a) or sections 115A.1312 to 115A.1318, the court may, in addition to
any other remedy, order the disgorgement of the unlawfully obtained money,
property, or benefit.
Sec.
11. [115A.1326]
REGULATION OF VIDEO DISPLAY DEVICES.
If the United States Environmental Protection Agency adopts
regulations under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act regarding the
handling, storage, or treatment of any type of video display device being
recycled, those regulations are automatically effective in this state on the
same date and supersede any rules previously adopted by the agency regarding
the handling, storage, or treatment of all video display devices being
recycled.
Sec. 12. [115A.1328] MULTISTATE IMPLEMENTATION.
The agency and department are authorized to participate in
the establishment and implementation of a regional multistate organization or
compact to assist in carrying out the requirements of this chapter.
Sec. 13. [115A.1330] LIMITATIONS.
Sections 115A.1310 to 115A.1330 expire if a federal law, or
combination of federal laws, take effect that is applicable to all video
display devices sold in the United States and establish a program for the
collection and recycling or reuse of video display devices that is applicable
to all video display devices discarded by households.
Sec. 14. EFFECTIVE DATE.
Sections 1 and 2 are effective the day following final
enactment. Sections 3 to 13 are
effective as provided in section 115A.1308, subdivision 3, clause (3)."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to environment; providing
for collection, transportation, and recycling of video display devices;
providing civil penalties; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 115A."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass
and be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The report was adopted.
Pursuant to Joint Rule 2.03 and in
accordance with Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 8, S. F. No. 1298
was re‑referred to the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration.
SECOND
H. F. Nos. 3442 and 3697 were read for the
second time.
SECOND
S. F. Nos. 2576, 2635, 2973, 3450 and 762
were read for the second time.
INTRODUCTION
AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS
The following House File was introduced:
Hamilton; Brod; Sviggum; Magnus; Bradley;
Finstad; Soderstrom; Erickson; Nornes; Davids; Cornish; Gunther; Ruth; Demmer;
Cox; Samuelson; Nelson, P.; Simpson; Gazelka and Seifert introduced:
H. F. No. 4199, A bill for an act relating
to human services; adjusting medical assistance operating payment rates for
low-payment rate nursing facilities; appropriating money; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2004, section 256B.434, by adding a subdivision.
The bill was read for the first time and
referred to the Committee on Health Policy and Finance.
MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE
The following messages were received from
the Senate:
Mr.
Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the
Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully
requested:
H. F. No. 3779, A bill for an act relating
to adults-only businesses; requiring notice by certified mail to the
appropriate statutory or home-rule charter city under certain circumstances;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 617.
Patrick E. Flahaven, Secretary
of the Senate
Urdahl moved that the House refuse to
concur in the Senate amendments to H. F. No. 3779, that the
Speaker appoint a Conference Committee of 3 members of the House, and that the
House requests that a like committee be appointed by the Senate to confer on
the disagreeing votes of the two houses.
The motion prevailed.
Mr.
Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the
Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully
requested:
H. F. No. 4162, A bill for an act relating
to the financing of state government; making supplemental appropriations;
regulating government operations; providing for and modifying certain programs;
regulating abortion funding and notification; providing for a Rochester campus
of the University of Minnesota; creating the Boxing Commission and regulating
boxing; ratifying certain labor agreements and compensation plans; providing
criminal penalties; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2004,
sections 3.737, subdivision 1; 3.7371, subdivision 3; 13.3806, by adding a
subdivision; 16A.152, subdivision 1b; 137.022, subdivision 4; 137.17, subdivisions
1, 3; 256.01, subdivision 18, by adding a subdivision; 256B.431, by adding a
subdivision; 256J.021; 256J.626, subdivision 2; Minnesota Statutes 2005
Supplement, sections 16A.152, subdivision 2; 35.05; 119B.13, subdivision 7;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 4; 144; 197; 256;
256D; 341; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2004, sections 62J.694; 144.395.
Patrick E. Flahaven, Secretary
of the Senate
Knoblach moved that the House refuse to
concur in the Senate amendments to H. F. No. 4162, that the
Speaker appoint a Conference Committee of 5 members of the House, and that the
House requests that a like committee be appointed by the Senate to confer on
the disagreeing votes of the two houses.
The motion prevailed.
Mr.
Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the
Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully
requested:
H. F. No. 2480, A bill for an act relating
to a ballpark for major league baseball; providing for the financing,
construction, operation, and maintenance of the ballpark and related
facilities; establishing the Minnesota Ballpark Authority; providing powers and
duties of the authority; providing a community ownership option; authorizing
Hennepin County to issue bonds and to contribute to ballpark costs and to
engage in ballpark and related activities; authorizing local sales and use
taxes and revenues; exempting Minnesota State High School League events from
sales taxes; requiring the Minnesota State High School League to transfer tax
savings to a foundation to promote extracurricular activities; exempting
building materials used for certain local government projects from certain
taxes; amending Minnesota Statutes 2004, sections 297A.70, subdivision 11;
297A.71, by adding subdivisions; Minnesota Statutes 2005 Supplement, section
10A.01, subdivision 35; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2004, sections 473I.01;
473I.02; 473I.03; 473I.04; 473I.05; 473I.06; 473I.07; 473I.08; 473I.09;
473I.10; 473I.11; 473I.12; 473I.13.
Patrick E. Flahaven, Secretary
of the Senate
Finstad moved that the House refuse to
concur in the Senate amendments to H. F. No. 2480, that the
Speaker appoint a Conference Committee of 5 members of the House, and that the
House requests that a like committee be appointed by the Senate to confer on
the disagreeing votes of the two houses.
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Finstad
motion and the roll was called. There
were 100 yeas and 29 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abrams
Anderson, B.
Atkins
Beard
Bradley
Brod
Carlson
Charron
Cornish
Cox
Cybart
Davids
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Emmer
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gazelka
Goodwin
Greiling
Gunther
Hansen
Hausman
Heidgerken
Hilty
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Johnson,
J.
Johnson, R.
Johnson, S.
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Magnus
McNamara
Meslow
Moe
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Powell
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Samuelson
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Sykora
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wagenius
Welti
Westerberg
Westrom
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Bernardy
Buesgens
Davnie
Eken
Ellison
Haws
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hornstein
Hortman
Jaros
Juhnke
Kahn
Krinkie
Latz
Lesch
Lieder
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Nelson, M.
Peppin
Rukavina
Thao
Vandeveer
Wardlow
Wilkin
The motion prevailed.
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the
Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully
requested:
H. F. No. 2697, A bill for an act relating
to traffic regulations; authorizing use of communications headset by
firefighters operating an emergency vehicle in emergency; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2004, section 169.471, subdivision 2.
Patrick E. Flahaven, Secretary
of the Senate
CONCURRENCE AND REPASSAGE
Bradley moved that the House concur in the
Senate amendments to H. F. No. 2697 and that the bill be
repassed as amended by the Senate. The
motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 2697, A bill for an act relating
to traffic regulations; authorizing use of communications headset by
firefighters operating fire department emergency vehicle in emergency; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 169.471, subdivision 2.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended by the Senate, and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 131 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Anderson, B.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Charron
Cornish
Cox
Cybart
Davids
Davnie
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dittrich
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Emmer
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gazelka
Goodwin
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, R.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Moe
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Powell
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Samuelson
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Wardlow
Welti
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
The bill was repassed, as amended by the
Senate, and its title agreed to.
Speaker pro tempore Abrams called Davids
to the Chair.
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the
Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully
requested:
H. F. No. 3477, A bill for an act relating
to local government; providing for subdivision regulations; modifying the
terms; amending Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 462.358, subdivision 2a.
Patrick E. Flahaven, Secretary
of the Senate
CONCURRENCE AND REPASSAGE
Hosch moved that the House concur in the
Senate amendments to H. F. No. 3477 and that the bill be
repassed as amended by the Senate. The
motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 3477, A bill for an act relating
to local government; establishing timelines for municipal action on release of
letters of credit; amending Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 462.358,
subdivision 2a.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended by the Senate, and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 133 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Anderson, B.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Charron
Cornish
Cox
Cybart
Davids
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dittrich
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Emmer
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gazelka
Goodwin
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, R.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Moe
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Powell
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Samuelson
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Wardlow
Welti
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The bill was repassed, as amended by the
Senate, and its title agreed to.
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the
Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully
requested:
H. F. No. 3940, A bill for an act relating
to liquor; allowing Minnesota farm wineries to produce certain fortified wines;
authorizing certain local on-sale licenses; modifying and establishing
licensing provisions; clarifying sale hours; prohibiting alcohol without liquid
devices; amending Minnesota Statutes 2004, sections 340A.101, subdivision 11,
by adding a subdivision; 340A.315, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 340A.404,
subdivision 5; 340A.414, subdivision 2; 340A.504, subdivision 6; Minnesota
Statutes 2005 Supplement, sections 340A.301, subdivision 6; 340A.404,
subdivision 2; 340A.412, subdivision 4; proposing coding for new law in
Minnesota Statutes, chapter 340A.
Patrick E. Flahaven, Secretary
of the Senate
CONCURRENCE AND REPASSAGE
Hoppe moved that the House concur in the
Senate amendments to H. F. No. 3940 and that the bill be
repassed as amended by the Senate. The
motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 3940, A bill for an act relating
to liquor; allowing Minnesota farm wineries to produce fortified wine;
modifying certain fee provisions; providing for licensing provisions;
clarifying certain sale hours; authorizing various local on-sale licenses;
prohibiting alcohol without liquid devices; amending Minnesota Statutes 2004,
sections 340A.101, subdivision 11, by adding a subdivision; 340A.315,
subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 340A.404, subdivision 5; 340A.414, subdivision 2;
340A.504, subdivision 6; Minnesota Statutes 2005 Supplement, sections 340A.301,
subdivision 6; 340A.404, subdivision 2; 340A.412, subdivision 4; proposing
coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 340A.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended by the Senate, and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 122 yeas and 11 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abrams
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Charron
Cornish
Cox
Cybart
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dittrich
Dorman
Dorn
Eken
Ellison
Emmer
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gazelka
Goodwin
Gunther
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, R.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Moe
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Nornes
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Powell
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Samuelson
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wagenius
Wardlow
Welti
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
DeLaForest
Eastlund
Greiling
Hackbarth
Krinkie
Newman
Olson
Peppin
Vandeveer
The bill was repassed, as amended by the
Senate, and its title agreed to.
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following Senate File, herewith transmitted:
S. F. No. 2302.
Patrick E. Flahaven, Secretary
of the Senate
FIRST
S. F. No. 2302, A bill for an act relating
to state government; designating the state fruit; proposing coding for new law
in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 1.
The bill was read for the first time and
referred to the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration.
CALENDAR
FOR THE DAY
H. F. No. 3144 was reported
to the House.
Bradley moved to amend H. F. No. 3144, the
first engrossment, as follows:
Page 45, line 19, delete "55"
and insert "57" and delete "January 1, 2006"
and insert "December 31, 2004"
Page 45, line 21, delete "skilled"
Page 45, line 22, after "rates"
insert "with a RUGS weight of 1.0" and delete "skilled"
Page 45, line 23, delete "facilities"
Page 45, line 24, after "County"
insert "nursing"
Page 45, line 25, delete everything before
the period and insert "case mix rates to compute the operating payment
rates"
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Eken; Fritz; Heidgerken; Koenen; Sailer;
Moe; Peterson, A.; Huntley; Urdahl and Simpson moved to amend H. F. No.
3144, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 32, after line 20, insert:
"Sec. 5.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 144A.10, is amended by adding a
subdivision to read:
Subd. 6e. Use of fines. When the commissioner of health determines
the use of, or provides recommendations on the use of fines collected under
subdivisions 6 or 6b, two representatives of the nursing home industry,
appointed by nursing home trade associations and two consumer representatives
as appointed by the commissioner, must be included in the process of developing
or preparing any information, reviews, or recommendations on the use of the
fines. This includes, but is not limited
to, including two representatives of the nursing home industry in any committee
designed to provide information and recommendations for the use of the fines."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
H. F. No. 3144, A bill for an act relating
to health; establishing requirements for assisted living services; changing
provisions for housing with services establishment; limiting use of the term
assisted living; establishing an advisory committee to recommend a consumer
information guide; modifying the home care bill of rights for assisted living
clients; changing provisions for long-term care; making facility rate
increases; changing provisions for alternative services for elderly and disabled
persons; requiring the commissioner of human services to confer with advocacy
groups; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2004, sections
144.0724, subdivisions 3, 4; 144A.071, subdivision 4a; 144A.10, by adding a
subdivision; 144A.161, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5a, 5c, 6, 8, by adding a
subdivision; 144A.4605; 144D.01, by adding a subdivision; 144D.015; 144D.02;
144D.03, subdivision 2, by adding a subdivision; 144D.04; 144D.05; 144D.065;
256B.434, by adding subdivisions; 256B.437, subdivision 3; 256B.438,
subdivision 4; 256B.69, subdivision 9, by adding a subdivision; Minnesota
Statutes 2005 Supplement, sections 144A.071, subdivision 1a; 256B.0918,
subdivisions 1, 3, 4; 256B.434, subdivision 4; 256B.69, subdivision 23; Laws 2005, First Special Session chapter 4,
article 9, section 5, subdivision 8; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota
Statutes, chapters 144A; 144D; proposing coding for new law as Minnesota
Statutes, chapter 144G; repealing Minnesota Rules, part 4668.0215.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 124 yeas and 8 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Anderson, B.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Bradley
Brod
Carlson
Charron
Cornish
Cox
Cybart
Davids
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dittrich
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Emmer
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gazelka
Goodwin
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, R.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Magnus
Mahoney
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Moe
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Nornes
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Powell
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Samuelson
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wagenius
Wardlow
Welti
Westerberg
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
Those who voted in the negative were:
Buesgens
Krinkie
Newman
Olson
Sykora
Vandeveer
Westrom
Wilkin
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
The Speaker assumed the Chair.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
BY THE SPEAKER
The Speaker announced the appointment of
the following members of the House to a Conference Committee on
H. F. No. 2480:
Finstad; Sykora; Lanning; Peterson, N.,
and Kelliher.
The Speaker announced the appointment of
the following members of the House to a Conference Committee on
H. F. No. 4162:
Knoblach, Ozment, Seifert, Bradley and
Solberg.
CALENDAR FOR THE DAY,
Continued
The Speaker called Abrams to the Chair.
H. F. No. 2916 was reported
to the House.
Klinzing moved to amend H. F. No. 2916,
the fourth engrossment, as follows:
Page 1, delete section 1
Page 2, delete section 2 and insert:
"Section 1.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 297I.05, subdivision 6, is amended to
read:
Subd. 6. Fire insurance tax. (a) For the purpose of maintaining the
office of the state fire marshal and paying the expenses incident thereto, a
tax is imposed on every licensed company, including reciprocals or
interinsurance exchanges, doing business in this state, except farmers' mutual
fire insurance companies and township fire insurance companies. The rate of tax is equal to one-half of one
percent of the gross fire premiums and assessments, less return premiums, on
all direct business received by the company in this state, or by its agents for
it, in cash or otherwise, during the year. "Gross fire premiums and
assessments" includes premiums on policies covering fire risks only on
automobiles, whether written under floater form or otherwise. Amounts collected by the commissioner
under this section must be deposited in the fire safety account established
pursuant to paragraph (b).
(b) A special account, to be known as the fire safety
account, is created in the state treasury.
The account consists of proceeds under subdivision 1. Money in the account does not cancel but
remains available for maintaining the office of the state fire marshal and
paying the expenses incident thereto.
The general fund base appropriation for the fire marshal is reduced by
$2,832,000 in fiscal year 2008 and each year thereafter. The base funding for the fire marshal program
from the fire safety account in the special revenue fund shall be $7,400,000 in
fiscal year 2008 and $11,600,000 each year thereafter."
Page 3, delete section 4
Page 3, line 29, delete everything after "2007"
Page
3, delete line 30 and insert a period
Correct the title numbers accordingly
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Klinzing
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 29 yeas and 103 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Buesgens
Charron
Cybart
Dean
DeLaForest
Dorman
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gazelka
Holberg
Hoppe
Klinzing
Knoblach
Kohls
Krinkie
Nelson, P.
Olson
Paulsen
Peppin
Seifert
Severson
Vandeveer
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Bradley
Brod
Carlson
Cornish
Cox
Davids
Davnie
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dittrich
Dorn
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Fritz
Goodwin
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Koenen
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Moe
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Newman
Nornes
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Powell
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Samuelson
Scalze
Sertich
Sieben
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wagenius
Wardlow
Welti
Westerberg
Spk. Sviggum
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Klinzing moved to amend H. F. No. 2916,
the fourth engrossment, as follows:
Page 2, after line 16, insert:
"Subd. 4. Sunset. This section expires June 30, 2011."
Page
2, line 24, after the period, insert "This subdivision expires June 30,
2011."
Page 3, after line 25, insert:
"Subd. 4. Sunset. This section expires June 30, 2011."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Klinzing
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 26 yeas and 106 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Brod
Buesgens
Charron
Dean
DeLaForest
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Gazelka
Haws
Hoppe
Hosch
Klinzing
Knoblach
Kohls
Krinkie
Nelson, P.
Newman
Olson
Paulsen
Peppin
Seifert
Severson
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Bradley
Carlson
Cornish
Cox
Cybart
Davids
Davnie
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dittrich
Dorman
Dorn
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Fritz
Garofalo
Goodwin
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Hausman
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hornstein
Hortman
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, R.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Koenen
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Moe
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Nornes
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Powell
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Samuelson
Scalze
Sertich
Sieben
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Wardlow
Welti
Westerberg
Wilkin
Spk. Sviggum
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
H. F. No. 2916, A bill for an act relating
to public safety; establishing the fire safety account from revenues on fire
premiums and assessments; abolishing the fire insurance tax; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2004, section 297I.30, by adding a subdivision; proposing coding for
new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 297I; 299F; repealing Minnesota
Statutes 2004, section 297I.05, subdivision 6.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 114 yeas and 19 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Bradley
Brod
Carlson
Cornish
Cox
Cybart
Davids
Davnie
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dittrich
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fritz
Goodwin
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, R.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Koenen
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Moe
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Powell
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Samuelson
Scalze
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wagenius
Wardlow
Welti
Westerberg
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Buesgens
Charron
Dean
DeLaForest
Emmer
Garofalo
Gazelka
Klinzing
Knoblach
Kohls
Krinkie
Olson
Paulsen
Peppin
Seifert
Vandeveer
Westrom
Wilkin
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
S. F. No. 3526 was reported
to the House.
Vandeveer moved to amend
S. F. No. 3526 as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting
clause and insert the following language of H. F. No. 3805, the
second engrossment:
"Section
1. Minnesota Statutes 2004, section
161.14, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 56.
(b)
The commissioner of transportation shall adopt a suitable marking design to
memorialize this highway, in consultation with and approval by the Shawn
Silvera Foundation, that conforms to the manual on uniform traffic control devices
adopted by the commissioner of transportation pursuant to section 169.06,
except for the following requirements:
(1) be a
height of at least 60 inches, and a width of at least 48 inches; and
(2) have a
background color of blue, and have white lettering.
(c) The
commissioner of transportation shall erect suitable signs as close as
practicable to the following locations, subject to section 161.139:
(1) one sign on southbound marked
(2) one sign
on northbound marked Interstate Highway 35W within 300 feet of the location at
which Officer Silvera was killed in the line of duty on September 6, 2005;
(3) one sign
on northbound marked Interstate Highway 35 between the point where it divides
into marked Interstate Highways 35E and 35W and marked Trunk Highway 97; and
(4) one sign
on southbound marked
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
The Speaker resumed the Chair.
S. F. No. 3526, A bill for an act relating
to highways; designating the
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 77 yeas and 56 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Atkins
Beard
Bradley
Brod
Carlson
Charron
Cornish
Cox
Cybart
Davids
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dittrich
Dorman
Eastlund
Ellison
Entenza
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gazelka
Gunther
Hackbarth
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilty
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Johnson, J.
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Lesch
Lillie
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Moe
Murphy
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olson
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Powell
Ruud
Samuelson
Scalze
Seifert
Severson
Slawik
Smith
Sykora
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wardlow
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abrams
Bernardy
Buesgens
Davnie
Dill
Dorn
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Fritz
Goodwin
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, R.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Koenen
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Liebling
Lieder
Loeffler
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Mullery
Nelson, M.
Otremba
Paymar
Penas
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Sailer
Sertich
Sieben
Simon
Simpson
Soderstrom
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Wagenius
Welti
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
H. F. No. 3079 was reported
to the House.
Abrams moved to amend H. F. No. 3079, the
first engrossment, as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting clause
and insert:
"Section 1.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 3.736, subdivision 4, is amended to
read:
Subd. 4. Limits.
The total liability of the state and its employees acting within the
scope of their employment on any tort claim shall not exceed:
(a) $300,000 when the claim is one for death by wrongful act
or omission and $300,000 to any claimant in any other case, for claims
arising before January 1, 2008;
(b) $400,000 when the claim is one for death by wrongful
act or omission and $400,000 to any claimant in any other case, for claims
arising on or after January 1, 2008, and before January 1, 2010;
(c) $500,000 when the claim is one for death by wrongful act
or omission and $500,000 to any claimant in any other case, for claims arising
on or after January 1, 2010;
(d) $750,000 for any number of claims arising out of a
single occurrence, for claims arising on or after January 1, 1998,
and before January 1, 2000; or
(c) (e) $1,000,000 for any number of
claims arising out of a single occurrence, for claims arising on or after
January 1, 2000., and before January 1, 2008;
(f) $1,200,000 for any number of claims arising out of a
single occurrence, for claims arising on or after January 1, 2008, and
before January 1, 2010; or
(g) $1,500,000 for any number of claims arising out of a
single occurrence, for claims arising on or after January 1, 2010.
If
the amount awarded to or settled upon multiple claimants exceeds the applicable
limit under clause (b) (d), (e), (f), or (c) (g),
any party may apply to the district court to apportion to each claimant a
proper share of the amount available under the applicable limit under clause (b)
(d), (e), (f), or (c) (g).
The share apportioned to each claimant shall be in the proportion that
the ratio of the award or settlement bears to the aggregate awards and
settlements for all claims arising out of the occurrence.
The limitation imposed by this subdivision on individual
claimants includes damages claimed for loss of services or loss of support
arising out of the same tort.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective January 1, 2008, and applies to claims arising from acts or omissions
that occur on or after that date.
Sec. 2. Minnesota
Statutes 2004, section 466.04, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Limits; punitive damages. (a) Liability of any municipality on any
claim within the scope of sections 466.01 to 466.15 shall not exceed:
(1) $300,000 when the claim is one for death by wrongful act
or omission and $300,000 to any claimant in any other case, for claims
arising before January 1, 2008;
(2) $400,000 when the claim is one for death by wrongful
act or omission and $400,000 to any claimant in any other case, for claims
arising on or after January 1, 2008, and before January 1, 2010;
(3) $500,000 when the claim is one for death by wrongful act
or omission and $500,000 to any claimant in any other case, for claims arising
on or after January 1, 2010;
(4) $750,000 for any number of claims arising out of a
single occurrence, for claims arising on or after January 1, 1998,
and before January 1, 2000;
(3) (5) $1,000,000 for any number of
claims arising out of a single occurrence, for claims arising on or after
January 1, 2000, and before January 1, 2008; or
(6) $1,200,000 for any number of claims arising out of a
single occurrence, for claims arising on or after January 1, 2008, and
before January 1, 2010;
(7) $1,500,000 for any number of claims arising out of a
single occurrence, for claims arising on or after January 1, 2010; or
(4) (8) twice the limits provided in
clauses (1) to (3) (7) when the claim arises out of the release
or threatened release of a hazardous substance, whether the claim is brought
under sections 115B.01 to 115B.15 or under any other law.
(b) No award for damages on any such claim shall include
punitive damages.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective January 1, 2008, and applies to claims arising from acts or omissions
that occur on or after that date.
Sec.
3. Minnesota Statutes 2004, section
471.59, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 1a. Liability. (a) A governmental unit participating in a
joint venture or joint enterprise, including participation in a cooperative
activity undertaken pursuant to this section or other law, is not liable for the
acts or omissions of another governmental unit participating in the joint
venture or joint enterprise, unless the participating governmental unit has
agreed in writing to be responsible for the acts or omissions of another
participating governmental unit.
(b) For purposes of determining total liability for damages,
the participating governmental units and the joint board, if one is
established, are considered a single governmental unit and the total liability
for the participating governmental units and the joint board, if established,
shall not exceed the limits on governmental liability for a single governmental
unit as specified in section 3.736 or 466.04, subdivision 1, or as waived or
extended by the joint board or all participating governmental units under
section 3.736, subdivision 8; 466.06; or 471.981. This paragraph does not protect a
governmental unit from liability for its own independent acts or omissions not
directly related to the joint activity.
(c) If a participating governmental unit has procured or
extended insurance coverage pursuant to section 3.736, subdivision 8; 466.06;
or 471.981 in excess of the limits on governmental liability under section
3.736 or 466.04, subdivision 1, covering participation in the joint venture or
joint enterprise, the procurement of that insurance constitutes a waiver of the
limits of governmental liability for that governmental unit to the extent that
valid and collectable insurance or self-insurance, including, where applicable,
proceeds from the Minnesota Guarantee Fund, exceeds those limits and covers
that governmental unit's liability for the claim, if any.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment."
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
The Speaker called Emmer to the Chair.
H. F. No. 3079, A bill for an act relating
to civil actions; limiting liability on tort claims brought against the state
or a municipality; limiting liability on claims brought against a governmental
unit participating in a joint venture or enterprise; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2004, sections 3.736, subdivision 4; 466.04, subdivision 1; 471.59, by
adding a subdivision.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 126 yeas and 7 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Bradley
Brod
Carlson
Charron
Cornish
Cox
Cybart
Davids
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dittrich
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gazelka
Goodwin
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, R.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Moe
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Nornes
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Powell
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Samuelson
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Wardlow
Welti
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Buesgens
Emmer
Krinkie
Newman
Olson
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
S. F. No. 1039 was reported
to the House.
Peppin, Bradley and Buesgens offered an
amendment to S. F. No. 1039.
POINT OF ORDER
Davids raised a point of order pursuant to
rule 3.21 that the Peppin et al amendment was not in order. Speaker pro tempore Emmer ruled the point of
order well taken and the Peppin et al amendment out of order.
Speaker pro tempore Emmer called Abrams to
the Chair.
S. F. No. 1039, A bill for an act relating
to commerce; prohibiting tampering with clock-hour meters on farm tractors;
prescribing a civil penalty and a private right of action; proposing coding for
new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 325E.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 133 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Anderson, B.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Charron
Cornish
Cox
Cybart
Davids
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dittrich
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Emmer
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gazelka
Goodwin
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, R.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Moe
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Powell
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Samuelson
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Wardlow
Welti
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
H. F. No. 1862 was reported
to the House.
Abeler, Bradley, Powell, Huntley and
Thissen moved to amend H. F. No. 1862, the third engrossment, as follows:
Page 1, delete section 1 and insert:
"Section 1. [62J.431] PRACTICE STANDARDS.
Subdivision 1.
Health-related boards and
provider organizations; practice standards. The health-related boards, under chapter
148, or professional provider organizations may establish practice standards
for treating patients within their respective scopes of practice. The boards or provider organizations may
utilize the services of appropriate public or private entities to facilitate
the development or review of practice standards. Each board or provider organization that has
established or ratified existing standards shall report these standards to the
legislative committees with jurisdiction over the public health occupations by
January 15, 2007, and shall report subsequent changes annually thereafter. If a board or provider organization has
existing standards, nothing in this section requires a board or provider
organization to establish new standards.
Nothing in this section shall require a health plan company to cover
treatments, testing, or imaging, based on standards developed under this
section.
Subd. 2. Criteria for practice standards. (a) Practice standards developed under
this section must meet the following criteria:
(1) the scope and application are clear;
(2) authorship is stated and any conflicts of interest
disclosed, including sources of funding;
(3) authors represent all pertinent clinical fields or other
means of input have been used;
(4)
the development process is explicitly stated;
(5) the standard is grounded on valid, timely research and
clinical practice;
(6) the practice standards allow for reasonable situational
variations;
(7) the research and data used are cited and graded and based
on longitudinally representative samples of the population as appropriate;
(8) the document itself is clear and practical;
(9) the document is flexible in use, with exceptions noted or
provided for with general statements;
(10) measures are included for use in systems improvement;
and
(11) the practice standard has scheduled reviews and
updating.
(b) Upon request, an entity that is subject to paragraph (a)
must disclose its practice standards and the basis for them."
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Abeler and Huntley moved to amend H. F.
No. 1862, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 2, line 31, after the period, insert
"This section does not prohibit an insurer or utilization review
organization from denying coverage for services that are investigational,
experimental, or not medically necessary."
Page 3, after line 27, insert:
"Sec. 7.
Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 148.06, subdivision 1, is amended to
read:
Subdivision 1. License required; qualifications. No person shall practice chiropractic in this
state without first being licensed by the State Board of Chiropractic
Examiners. The applicant shall have earned
at least one-half of all academic credits required for awarding of a
baccalaureate degree from the University of Minnesota, or other university,
college, or community college of equal standing, in subject matter determined
by the board, and taken a four-year resident course of at least eight months
each in a school or college of chiropractic or in a chiropractic program that
is accredited by the Council on Chiropractic Education, holds a recognition
agreement with the Council on Chiropractic Education, or is accredited
by an agency approved by the United States Office of Education or their
successors as of January 1, 1988. The
board may issue licenses to practice chiropractic without compliance with
prechiropractic or academic requirements listed above if in the opinion of the
board the applicant has the qualifications equivalent to those required of
other applicants, the applicant satisfactorily passes written and practical
examinations as required by the Board of Chiropractic Examiners, and the applicant
is a graduate of a college of chiropractic with a reciprocal recognition
agreement with the Council on Chiropractic Education as of January 1, 1988. The board may recommend a two-year
prechiropractic course of instruction to any university, college, or community
college which in its judgment would satisfy the academic prerequisite for
licensure as established by this section.
An examination for a license shall be in writing and shall
include testing in:
(a)
The basic sciences including but not limited to anatomy, physiology,
bacteriology, pathology, hygiene, and chemistry as related to the human body or
mind;
(b) The clinical sciences including but not limited to the
science and art of chiropractic, chiropractic physiotherapy, diagnosis,
roentgenology, and nutrition; and
(c) Professional ethics and any other subjects that the board
may deem advisable.
The board may consider a valid certificate of examination
from the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners as evidence of compliance
with the examination requirements of this subdivision. The applicant shall be required to give
practical demonstration in vertebral palpation, neurology, adjusting and any
other subject that the board may deem advisable. A license, countersigned by the members of
the board and authenticated by the seal thereof, shall be granted to each
applicant who correctly answers 75 percent of the questions propounded in each
of the subjects required by this subdivision and meets the standards of
practical demonstration established by the board. Each application shall be accompanied by a
fee set by the board. The fee shall not
be returned but the applicant may, within one year, apply for examination
without the payment of an additional fee.
The board may grant a license to an applicant who holds a valid license
to practice chiropractic issued by the appropriate licensing board of another
state, provided the applicant meets the other requirements of this section and
satisfactorily passes a practical examination approved by the board. The burden of proof is on the applicant to
demonstrate these qualifications or satisfaction of these requirements.
Sec. 8. [148.108] FEES.
Subdivision 1.
Fees. In addition to the fees established in
Subd. 2. Annual renewal of inactive acupuncture
registration. The annual
renewal of inactive acupuncture registration fee is $25.
Subd. 3. Acupuncture reinstatement. The acupuncture reinstatement fee is $50."
Page 5, after line 29, insert:
"Sec. 15. STUDY; REPORT.
The medical director for medical assistance and the assistant
commissioner for chemical and mental health services of the Department of Human
Services, in conjunction with the mental health licensing boards, shall
evaluate the requirements for licensed mental health practitioners to receive
medical assistance reimbursement under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.0625,
subdivision 38. The purpose of this study
is to evaluate qualifications of all licensed mental health practitioners and
licensed mental health professionals and make recommendations regarding
requirements for medical assistance reimbursement. This study is to be completed by January 15,
2007. Written results of the study are
to be submitted to the chairs of the house of representatives and senate
committees with jurisdiction over health related licensing boards."
Page 5, line 30, delete "APPROPRIATION" and
insert "APPROPRIATIONS"
Page 5, line 31, before "In" insert "(a)"
Page
5, after line 33, insert:
"(b) $5,000 is appropriated from the state government
special revenue fund in fiscal year 2006 and $5,000 is appropriated from the
state government special revenue fund in fiscal year 2007 to the Board of
Chiropractic Examiners, to correct programming difficulties incurred during
implementation of payment processing changes.
This is a onetime appropriation."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Emmer, Abeler, Thissen and Powell moved to
amend H. F. No. 1862, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 9, after line 35, insert:
"Sec. 2. Laws
2003, First Special Session chapter 14, article 12, section 93, as amended by
Laws 2005, First Special Session chapter 4, article 8, section 80, is amended
to read:
Sec. 93. REVIEW OF SPECIAL TRANSPORTATION
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND POTENTIAL COST SAVINGS.
The commissioner of human services, in consultation with the
commissioner of transportation and special transportation service providers,
shall review eligibility criteria for medical assistance special transportation
services and shall evaluate whether the level of special transportation
services provided should be based on the degree of impairment of the client, as
well as the medical diagnosis. The
commissioner shall also evaluate methods for reducing the cost of special
transportation services, including, but not limited to:
(1) requiring providers to maintain a daily log book
confirming delivery of clients to medical facilities;
(2) requiring providers to implement commercially available
computer mapping programs to calculate mileage for purposes of
reimbursement;
(3) restricting special transportation service from being
provided solely for trips to pharmacies;
(4) modifying eligibility for special transportation;
(5) expanding alternatives to the use of special
transportation services;
(6) improving the process of certifying persons as eligible
for special transportation services; and
(7) examining the feasibility and benefits of licensing
special transportation providers.
The commissioner shall present recommendations for changes in
the eligibility criteria and potential cost-savings for special transportation
services to the chairs and ranking minority members of the house and senate
committees having jurisdiction over health and human services spending by
January 15, 2004. The commissioner is prohibited
from using a broker or coordinator to manage special transportation services
until July 1, 2006, except for the purposes
of checking for recipient eligibility, authorizing recipients for appropriate
level of transportation, and monitoring provider compliance with Minnesota
Statutes, section 256B.0625, subdivision 17, and except that the
commissioner shall extend this prohibition on using a broker or coordinator to
manage special transportation services until July 1, 2007, if this extension
can be done on a budget-neutral basis.
The commissioner shall not amend the initial contract to broker or
manage nonemergency medical transportation to extend beyond two consecutive
years. The commissioner shall not enter
into a broker or management contract for transportation services which denies a
medical assistance recipient the free choice of health service provider,
including a special transportation provider, as specified in Code of Federal
Regulations, title 42, section 431.51.
This prohibition does not apply to the purchase or management of common
carrier transportation.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2006."
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Powell moved to amend H. F. No. 1862, the
third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 3, after line 22, insert:
"Sec. 6. [144E.20] LIABILITY LIMITS OF NONGOVERNMENT
LICENSEES AND MEDICAL DIRECTORS.
(a) A licensee that is not a unit of government is subject to
the same liability limits under chapter 466 as a licensee that is a unit of
government.
(b) The medical director of a licensed ambulance service and
the medical director's designee are subject to the same liability limits under
chapter 466 as a licensee that is a unit of government.
EFFECTIVE
DATE; APPLICATION. This section
is effective August 1, 2006, and applies to claims arising from incidents
occurring on or after that date."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Atkins moved to amend the Powell amendment
to H. F. No. 1862, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, after line 9 of the Powell
amendment, insert:
"(c) An insurer must provide an appropriate premium
reduction of at least 33 percent on a policy of liability coverage for a
licensed ambulance service subject to liability under chapter 466, that is
issued, delivered, or renewed in this state on or after August 1, 2006."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the amendment to
the amendment and the roll was called.
Pursuant to rule 2.05, Speaker pro tempore
Abrams excused Sertich from voting on the Atkins amendment to the Powell
amendment to H. F. No. 1862, the third engrossment, as amended.
There were 56 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Atkins
Bernardy
Carlson
Davnie
Dill
Dorn
Eken
Ellison
Emmer
Entenza
Fritz
Goodwin
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Jaros
Johnson, R.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Koenen
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Mullery
Nelson, M.
Newman
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Scalze
Sieben
Simon
Slawik
Smith
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Wagenius
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Anderson, B.
Beard
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Charron
Cornish
Cox
Cybart
Davids
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dittrich
Dorman
Eastlund
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gazelka
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Johnson, J.
Klinzing
Knoblach
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Lieder
Magnus
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Moe
Murphy
Nelson, P.
Nornes
Olson
Ozment
Paulsen
Penas
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Powell
Ruth
Sailer
Samuelson
Seifert
Severson
Simpson
Soderstrom
Sykora
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wardlow
Welti
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
Olson and Powell moved to amend the Powell
amendment to H. F. No. 1862, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, after line 9 of the Powell
amendment, insert:
"(c) All actuary based savings from this section must
be reflected in the insurance medical liability premiums for ambulance
services."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the amendment to
the amendment and the roll was called.
Pursuant to rule 2.05, Speaker pro tempore
Abrams excused Sertich from voting on the Olson and Powell amendment to the
Powell amendment to H. F. No. 1862, the third engrossment, as amended.
There were 130 yeas and 1 nay as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Blaine
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Charron
Clark
Cornish
Cox
Cybart
Davids
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dittrich
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Emmer
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gazelka
Goodwin
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, R.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Klinzing
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Moe
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Powell
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Samuelson
Scalze
Seifert
Severson
Sieben
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Walker
Wardlow
Welti
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abrams
The motion prevailed and the amendment to
the amendment was adopted.
The Speaker resumed the Chair.
The question recurred on the Powell
amendment, as amended, and the roll was called.
Pursuant to rule 2.05, Speaker pro tempore
Abrams excused Sertich from voting on the Powell amendment, as amended, to H.
F. No. 1862, the third engrossment, as amended.
There were 83 yeas and 48 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Beard
Blaine
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Charron
Cornish
Cox
Cybart
Davids
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dorman
Eastlund
Eken
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gazelka
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Larson
Lenczewski
Lieder
Magnus
Marquart
McNamara
Moe
Murphy
Nelson, P.
Nornes
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Penas
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Powell
Rukavina
Sailer
Samuelson
Seifert
Severson
Simpson
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wardlow
Welti
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abrams
Atkins
Bernardy
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dempsey
Dorn
Emmer
Entenza
Fritz
Goodwin
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Huntley
Johnson, R.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Latz
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Meslow
Mullery
Nelson, M.
Newman
Paymar
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Ruth
Ruud
Scalze
Sieben
Simon
Slawik
Sykora
Thao
Wagenius
Walker
The motion prevailed and the amendment, as
amended, was adopted.
Klinzing and Olson offered an amendment to
H. F. No. 1862, the third engrossment, as amended.
Abeler requested a division of the
Klinzing and Olson amendment to H. F. No. 1862, the third engrossment, as
amended.
Abeler further requested that the second
portion of the divided Klinzing and Olson amendment be voted on first.
The second portion of the Klinzing and
Olson amendment to H. F. No. 1862, the third engrossment, as amended, reads as
follows:
Page 4, line 19, delete "that are
supported by the findings of evidence-based research"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the second
portion of the Klinzing and Olson amendment and the roll was called. There were 99 yeas and 33 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Beard
Bernardy
Blaine
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Charron
Clark
Cornish
Cox
Cybart
Davids
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Dempsey
Dill
Dorman
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Emmer
Entenza
Erickson
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gazelka
Goodwin
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Johnson, J.
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Latz
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Moe
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Penas
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Powell
Rukavina
Ruth
Sailer
Samuelson
Seifert
Severson
Simon
Simpson
Smith
Soderstrom
Sykora
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Walker
Wardlow
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abrams
Atkins
Bradley
Demmer
Dittrich
Dorn
Erhardt
Greiling
Hansen
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, R.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Koenen
Larson
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Paymar
Poppe
Ruud
Scalze
Sieben
Slawik
Solberg
Thao
Wagenius
Welti
The motion prevailed and the second
portion of the Klinzing and Olson amendment was adopted.
The first portion of the Klinzing and
Olson amendment to H. F. No. 1862, the third engrossment, as amended, reads as
follows:
Page 1, delete section 1
Renumber the sections in sequence and
correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the first
portion of the Klinzing and Olson amendment and the roll was called. There were 27 yeas and 105 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Buesgens
Charron
Dean
DeLaForest
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Goodwin
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Johnson, J.
Klinzing
Knoblach
Kohls
Krinkie
Murphy
Nelson, P.
Newman
Olson
Paulsen
Peppin
Vandeveer
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Blaine
Bradley
Brod
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Cox
Cybart
Davids
Davnie
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dittrich
Dorman
Dorn
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gazelka
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, R.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Koenen
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Moe
Mullery
Nelson, M.
Nornes
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Powell
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Samuelson
Scalze
Seifert
Severson
Sieben
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Wardlow
Welti
Westerberg
Wilkin
Spk. Sviggum
The motion did not prevail and the first
portion of the Klinzing and Olson amendment was not adopted.
Olson; Abeler; Hilty; Greiling; Anderson,
B., and Klinzing moved to amend H. F. No. 1862, the third engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 18, after "clear"
insert "for treating specific conditions addressed by the standards and
for treating the specific condition in combination with multiple medical
conditions"
Page 1, line 19, after "and"
insert "all contributing individuals are listed with"
Page 1, line 20, after "funding"
insert "for development, review and updating"
Page 1, line 26, after "research"
insert a comma and delete "and" and after "data"
insert "and randomized clinical trials"
Page 2, lines 2 to 3, delete ",with
exceptions noted or provided for with general statements" and insert
"for individual patient physiology, including treatment tolerances and
multiple medical conditions, with discretion for practitioner judgement allowed
and noted"
Page 2, line 3, after the semicolon,
insert "and"
Page 2, delete line 4
Page 2, line 5, delete "(11)"
and insert "(10)"
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
The Speaker called Davids to the Chair.
Olson; Hilty; Abeler; Emmer; Anderson, B.;
Greiling and Klinzing moved to amend H. F. No. 1862, the third engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 5, after line 2, insert:
"Sec. 11.
Minnesota Statutes 2005 Supplement, section 256B.072, is amended to
read:
256B.072 PERFORMANCE
REPORTING AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT SYSTEM.
(a) The commissioner of human services shall establish a
performance reporting system for health care providers who provide health care
services to public program recipients covered under chapters 256B, 256D, and
256L, reporting separately for managed care and fee-for-service recipients.
(b) The measures used for the performance reporting system for
medical groups shall include measures of care for asthma, diabetes,
hypertension, and coronary artery disease and measures of preventive care
services. The measures used for the
performance reporting system for inpatient hospitals shall include measures of
care for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia, and
measures of care and prevention of surgical infections. In the case of a medical group, the measures
used shall be consistent with measures published by nonprofit Minnesota or
national organizations that produce and disseminate health care quality
measures or evidence-based health care guidelines. In the case of inpatient hospital measures,
the commissioner shall appoint the Minnesota Hospital Association and Stratis
Health to advise on the development of the performance measures to be used for hospital
reporting. To enable a consistent
measurement process across the community, the commissioner may use measures of
care provided for patients in addition to those identified in paragraph
(a). The commissioner shall ensure
collaboration with other health care reporting organizations so that the
measures described in this section are consistent with those reported by those
organizations and used by other purchasers in Minnesota.
(c) The commissioner may require providers to submit
information in a required format to a health care reporting organization or to
cooperate with the information collection procedures of that organization. The commissioner may collaborate with a
reporting organization to collect information reported and to prevent duplication
of reporting.
(d) By October 1, 2007, and annually thereafter, the
commissioner shall report through a public Web site the results by medical
groups and hospitals, where possible, of the measures under this section, and
shall compare the results by medical groups and hospitals for patients enrolled
in public programs to patients enrolled in private health plans. To achieve this reporting, the commissioner
may collaborate with a health care reporting organization that operates a Web
site suitable for this purpose.
(e) This section expires July 1, 2010."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Olson et al
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 30 yeas and 100 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Brod
Buesgens
Charron
Dean
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Goodwin
Hackbarth
Heidgerken
Hilty
Holberg
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Klinzing
Knoblach
Kohls
Krinkie
Nelson, P.
Olson
Paulsen
Peppin
Seifert
Severson
Soderstrom
Vandeveer
Walker
Wardlow
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abrams
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Blaine
Bradley
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Cox
Cybart
Davids
Davnie
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dittrich
Dorman
Dorn
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Erhardt
Fritz
Garofalo
Gazelka
Gunther
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Johnson, R.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Koenen
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Moe
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Newman
Nornes
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Powell
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Samuelson
Scalze
Sertich
Sieben
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Solberg
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wagenius
Welti
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Olson and Abeler moved to amend H. F. No. 1862, the third
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 4, line 19, before the semicolon, insert "and
clinical practice"
Page 4, line 21, after the period, insert "The
commissioner shall post the recommendations required under this subdivision on
agency Web sites according to chapter 144.0506, subdivision 1."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Loeffler
moved to amend H. F. No. 1862, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 7,
line 4, delete "$5,000" and insert "$4,000"
and delete "$10,000" and insert "$8,000"
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Goodwin
moved to amend H. F. No. 1862, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 6,
delete lines 29 and 30
Page 7,
delete lines 1 to 19
Renumber
the sections in sequence
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Goodwin
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 34 yeas and 96 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Atkins
Bernardy
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Eken
Ellison
Entenza
Fritz
Goodwin
Greiling
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Jaros
Kahn
Kelliher
Koenen
Lesch
Lieder
Lillie
Mahoney
Mullery
Nelson, M.
Otremba
Peterson, A.
Rukavina
Sieben
Solberg
Thao
Wagenius
Walker
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Anderson, B.
Beard
Blaine
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Charron
Cornish
Cox
Cybart
Davids
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dittrich
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gazelka
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Johnson, J.
Johnson, R.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Klinzing
Knoblach
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Liebling
Loeffler
Magnus
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Moe
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olson
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Powell
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Samuelson
Scalze
Seifert
Severson
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Sykora
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wardlow
Welti
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
The Speaker resumed the Chair.
Seifert moved to amend H. F. No. 1862, the
third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 2, after line 31, insert:
"Sec. 5. Minnesota
Statutes 2004, section 62Q.64, is amended to read:
62Q.64 DISCLOSURE OF
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
(a) Each health plan company doing business in this state,
each holding company located in this state that owns a health maintenance
organization located in this state or elsewhere, and each Minnesota hospital
shall annually file with the Consumer Advisory Board created in section
62J.75:
(1) a copy of the health plan company's form 990 filed with
the federal Internal Revenue Service; or
(2)
if the health plan company did not file a form 990 with the federal Internal
Revenue Service commissioner, a list of the amount and recipients
job titles of the health plan company's five entity's 20
highest salaries, including all types of compensation, in excess of $50,000
$200,000.
(b) A filing under this section is public data under section
13.03, and must be placed on the minnesotahealthinfo.com Web site."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Seifert
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 124 yeas and 7 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Anderson, B.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Blaine
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Charron
Clark
Cornish
Cox
Cybart
Davids
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dittrich
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Emmer
Entenza
Erickson
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gazelka
Goodwin
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, R.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Magnus
Mahoney
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Moe
Mullery
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Powell
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Samuelson
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Walker
Wardlow
Welti
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
Those who voted in the negative were:
Erhardt
Huntley
Murphy
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Wagenius
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
H. F. No. 1862, A bill for an act relating
to health; establishing practice standards and evidence-based guidelines for
treating patients; implementing health care cost-containment measures;
requiring the disclosure of executive compensation; establishing liability
limits for certain licensed ambulance services and medical directors; modifying
the qualification standards of certain licenses; establishing certain fees;
requiring a study of hospital uncompensated care;
allowing discounted payment for health care under certain circumstances;
regulating eligibility criteria for medical assistance special transportation
services; allowing entity certain specific administrative efficiency reports to
be published on the state agency Web sites; requiring certain reports; adding
provisions for service cooperatives contracts; appropriating money; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2004, sections 62D.095, subdivisions 3, 4; 62Q.64; 72A.20, by adding a
subdivision; 123A.21, subdivision 7; 148.06, subdivision 1; 151.214,
subdivision 1; Minnesota Statutes 2005 Supplement, section 214.071; Laws 2003, First Special Session chapter 14,
article 12, section 93, as amended; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota
Statutes, chapters 62J; 62M; 62Q; 144; 144E; 147; 148; 214; 256B; repealing
Minnesota Statutes 2005 Supplement, section 62Q.251.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called.
Pursuant to rule 2.05,
Speaker pro tempore Abrams excused Sertich from voting on final passage of H.
F. No. 1862, the third engrossment, as amended.
There were 100 yeas and 30 nays as
follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Blaine
Bradley
Brod
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Cox
Davids
Davnie
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dittrich
Dorman
Dorn
Ellison
Entenza
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gazelka
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Haws
Heidgerken
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, R.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Koenen
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Magnus
Mahoney
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Moe
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Powell
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Samuelson
Scalze
Seifert
Severson
Sieben
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Sykora
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Welti
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Spk. Sviggum
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abrams
Anderson, B.
Buesgens
Charron
Cybart
Dean
DeLaForest
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Goodwin
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Johnson, S.
Klinzing
Knoblach
Kohls
Krinkie
Nelson, M.
Olson
Peppin
Thao
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Walker
Zellers
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
The Speaker called Emmer to the Chair.
H. F. No. 3718 was reported
to the House.
Hornstein moved to amend H. F. No. 3718,
the third engrossment, as follows:
Page 2, line 18, delete "13"
and insert "14"
Page 2, line 30, delete "and"
Page 2, line 31, before the period, insert
"; and
(9) a representative of a Minnesota-based manufacturer of
electric vehicles"
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal
references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
H. F. No. 3718, A bill for an act relating
to transportation; requiring language that the state will purchase plug-in
hybrid electric vehicles when commercially available to be inserted in certain
bid documents; creating a task force.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 133 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Abrams
Anderson, B.
Atkins
Beard
Bernardy
Blaine
Bradley
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Charron
Clark
Cornish
Cox
Cybart
Davids
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dempsey
Dill
Dittrich
Dorman
Dorn
Eastlund
Eken
Ellison
Emmer
Entenza
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gazelka
Goodwin
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson, J.
Johnson, R.
Johnson, S.
Juhnke
Kahn
Kelliher
Klinzing
Knoblach
Koenen
Kohls
Krinkie
Lanning
Larson
Latz
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Meslow
Moe
Mullery
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Nelson, P.
Newman
Nornes
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Penas
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Powell
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Samuelson
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Sieben
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Soderstrom
Solberg
Sykora
Thao
Thissen
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Vandeveer
Wagenius
Walker
Wardlow
Welti
Westerberg
Westrom
Wilkin
Zellers
Spk. Sviggum
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
Speaker pro tempore Emmer called Abrams to
the Chair.
Seifert moved that the remaining bills on the Calendar for the
Day be continued. The motion prevailed.
MOTIONS AND RESOLUTIONS
Powell moved that the name of Ozment be added as chief author
on H. F. No. 1120. The
motion prevailed.
Emmer moved that the names of Wardlow and Soderstrom be added
as authors on H. F. No. 1443.
The motion prevailed.
Beard moved that the names of Wilkin, Cybart, Wardlow and
Powell be added as authors on H. F. No. 2086. The motion prevailed.
Hilty moved that his name be stricken as an author on
H. F. No. 2425. The
motion prevailed.
Hilty moved that his name be stricken as an author on
H. F. No. 2480. The
motion prevailed.
Powell moved that the name of Soderstrom be added as an author
on H. F. No. 3490. The
motion prevailed.
Powell moved that his name be stricken as an author on
H. F. No. 4186. The
motion prevailed.
Loeffler moved that the name of Kahn be added as an author on
H. F. No. 4198. The
motion prevailed.
Hilty moved that the name of Westrom be added as an author on
House Resolution No. 25.
The motion prevailed.
Ozment moved that S. F. No. 1057 be recalled
from the Committee on Governmental Operations and Veterans Affairs and be
re-referred to the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration. The motion prevailed.
NOTICE TO PLACE A BILL ON THE CALENDAR FOR THE DAY
Pursuant to House Rule 1.21, Lieder gave notice of his intent to make a motion placing S. F. No. 1604, A resolution memorializing the President and Congress to support Amtrak funding, on the Calendar for the Day.
ADJOURNMENT
Seifert moved that when the House adjourns today it adjourn
until 11:00 a.m., Monday, May 15, 2006.
The motion prevailed.
Seifert moved that the House adjourn. The motion prevailed, and Speaker pro tempore
Abrams declared the House stands adjourned until 11:00 a.m., Monday, May 15,
2006.
Albin
A. Mathiowetz,
Chief Clerk, House of Representatives