STATE OF MINNESOTA
EIGHTY-FIFTH SESSION - 2008
_____________________
NINETY-NINTH DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Thursday, April 3, 2008
The House of Representatives convened at 10:00 a.m. and was
called to order by Margaret Anderson Kelliher, Speaker of the House.
Prayer was offered by the Reverend Brian Schulenburg, Wooddale
Church, Eden Prairie, Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge of allegiance to the
flag of the United States of America.
The roll was called and the following members were present:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
A quorum was present.
Kranz was excused.
Olson was excused until 12:25 p.m.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the Journal of the preceding
day. Faust moved that further reading
of the Journal be suspended and that the Journal be approved as corrected by
the Chief Clerk. The motion prevailed.
Sertich moved that the House recess subject to the call of the
Chair. The motion prevailed.
RECESS
RECONVENED
The House reconvened and was called to order by the Speaker.
REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES AND DIVISIONS
Atkins
from the Committee on Commerce and Labor to which was referred:
H. F.
No. 2471, A bill for an act relating to charitable organizations; modifying
financial statement requirements for certain charitable organizations; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 309.53, subdivision 3.
Reported
the same back with the following amendments:
Page
2, line 17, after "included" insert "if the food is
donated for subsequent distribution at no charge, and not for resale"
Page
2, line 18, after "enactment" insert "and applies to
any financial statement that is required to be filed under this section after
May 14, 2008"
With
the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Pursuant to Joint Rule 2.03 and in accordance with Senate
Concurrent Resolution No. 8, H. F. No. 2471 was re‑referred to the
Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration.
Atkins
from the Committee on Commerce and Labor to which was referred:
H. F.
No. 3789, A bill for an act relating to agriculture; requiring certain
retailers to provide retail signage on the legal limitations on the use of lawn
fertilizers containing phosphorus; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
18C.60, by adding a subdivision; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
18C.60, subdivision 4.
Reported
the same back with the recommendation that the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
SECOND READING OF HOUSE BILLS
H. F. No. 3789 was read for the second time.
INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS
The following House Files were introduced:
Olin introduced:
H. F. No. 4165, A bill for an act relating to agriculture;
creating a price support program for beef cattle producers located within a
downgraded bovine tuberculosis split state zone; proposing coding for new law
in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 17.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Finance.
Olin introduced:
H. F. No. 4166, A bill for an act relating to legislative
enactments; correcting miscellaneous oversights, inconsistencies, ambiguities,
unintended results, and technical errors; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006,
section 260C.007, subdivision 18.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration.
MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE
The following message was received from the Senate:
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate has concurred in and adopted
the report of the Conference Committee on:
H. F. No. 380, A bill for an act relating to capital
improvements; authorizing spending to acquire and better public land and
buildings and other improvements of a capital nature with certain conditions;
establishing new programs and modifying existing programs; authorizing the sale
of state bonds; canceling and modifying previous appropriations; appropriating
money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 16B.32, by adding a
subdivision; 16B.325; 16B.335, subdivision 2; 103D.335, subdivision 17;
116.155, subdivisions 2, 3; 116J.423, by adding a subdivision; 119A.45;
462A.21, by adding a subdivision; Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, sections
16A.695, subdivision 3; 103G.222, subdivision 1; Laws 1997, chapter 21, section
1; Laws 2003, First Special Session chapter 20, article 1, section 12,
subdivision 3; Laws 2005, chapter 20, article 1, sections 7, subdivision 21;
17; 23, subdivisions 8, 11, as amended, 16; Laws 2006, chapter 258, sections 7,
subdivisions 7, 11, 22; 16, subdivision 5; 21, subdivisions 6, 14, 15; 23,
subdivision 3; Laws 2006, chapter 282, article 11, section 2, subdivision 6;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 116; 137; 462A.
The Senate has repassed said bill in accordance with the
recommendation and report of the Conference Committee. Said House File is herewith returned to the
House.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
FISCAL CALENDAR
Pursuant to rule 1.22, Solberg requested immediate
consideration of H. F. No. 1812.
H. F. No. 1812 was reported to the House.
Carlson moved to amend H. F.
No. 1812, the third engrossment, as follows:
Page 15, line 23, delete
"2009-2010" and insert "2008-2009"
Page 44, line 15, delete
"(c)" and insert "(d)"
Page 45, line 11, delete
"(d)" and insert "(e)"
Page 271, line 11, delete
"833,000" and insert "932,000" and delete
"947,000" and insert "1,046,000"
Page 271, line 12, delete
"(817,000)" and insert "(718,000)" and delete
"(703,000)" and insert "(604,000)"
Page 271, line 29, delete
"(1,017,000)" and insert "(918,000)"
Page 271, line 34, delete
"633,000" and insert "732,000"
Page 272, line 1, delete
"633,000" and insert "732,000"
Page 272, line 4, delete
"633,000" and insert "732,000" and delete
"722,000" and insert "821,000"
Page 311, line 7, after
"2008," insert "after determining the blending in
section 256B.441, subdivision 55, paragraph (a),"
Page 320, delete section 8
Page 349, line 3, after the
period, insert "The return of the withhold under this paragraph is not
subject to the requirements of paragraph (c)."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Hosch, Abeler, Gunther,
Gottwalt, Fritz, Thissen and Dean moved to amend H. F. No. 1812, the third
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 313, after line 19,
insert:
"Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, section
256B.441, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Rebasing of nursing facility operating cost
payment rates. (a) The commissioner
shall rebase nursing facility operating cost payment rates to align
payments to facilities with the cost of providing care. The rebased operating cost payment
rates shall be calculated using the statistical and cost report filed by each
nursing facility for the report period ending one year prior to the rate year.
(b) The new operating cost
payment rates based on this section shall take effect beginning with the rate
year beginning October 1, 2008, and shall be phased in over eight rate years
through October 1, 2015. For each
year of the phase-in, the operating payment rates shall be calculated using the
statistical and cost report filed by each nursing facility for the report
period ending one year prior to the rate year.
(c) Operating cost
payment rates shall be rebased on October 1, 2016, and every two years after
that date.
(d) Each cost reporting year
shall begin on October 1 and end on the following September 30. Beginning in 2006, a statistical and cost
report shall be filed by each nursing facility by January 15. Notice of rates shall be distributed by
August 15 and the rates shall go into effect on October 1 for one year.
(e) Effective October 1,
2014, property rates shall be rebased in accordance with section 256B.431 and
Minnesota Rules, chapter 9549. The
commissioner shall determine what the property payment rate for a nursing
facility would be had the facility not had its property rate determined under
section 256B.434. The commissioner
shall allow nursing facilities to provide information affecting this rate
determination that would have been filed annually under Minnesota Rules,
chapter 9549, and nursing facilities shall report information necessary to
determine allowable debt. The
commissioner shall use this information to determine the property payment rate.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, section
256B.441, subdivision 55, is amended to read:
Subd. 55. Phase-in
of rebased operating cost payment rates. (a) For the rate years beginning October 1, 2008, to October 1, 2012
2015, the operating cost payment rate calculated under this section
shall be phased in by blending the operating cost rate with the
operating cost payment rate determined under section 256B.434. For purposes of this subdivision, the
rate to be used that is determined under section 256B.434 shall not include the
portion of the operating payment rate related to performance-based incentive
payments under section 256B.434, subdivision 4, paragraph (d). For the rate year beginning October 1,
2008, the operating cost payment rate for each facility shall be 13
percent of the operating cost payment rate from this section, and 87
percent of the operating cost payment rate from section 256B.434. For the rate year beginning October 1, 2009,
the operating cost payment rate for each facility shall be 14 percent of
the operating cost payment rate from this section, and 86 percent of the
operating cost payment rate from section 256B.434. For the rate year beginning October 1, 2010,
the operating cost payment rate for each facility shall be 14 percent of
the operating cost payment rate from this section, and 86 percent of the
operating cost payment rate from section 256B.434. For the rate year beginning October 1, 2011,
the operating cost payment rate for each facility shall be 31 percent of
the operating cost payment rate from this section, and 69 percent of the
operating cost payment rate from section 256B.434. For the rate year beginning October 1, 2012,
the operating cost payment rate for each facility shall be 48 percent of
the operating cost payment rate from this section, and 52 percent of the
operating cost payment rate from section 256B.434. For the rate year beginning October 1, 2013,
the operating cost payment rate for each facility shall be 65 percent of
the operating cost payment rate from this section, and 35 percent of the
operating cost payment rate from section 256B.434. For the rate year beginning October 1, 2014,
the operating cost payment rate for each facility shall be 82 percent of
the operating cost payment rate from this section, and 18 percent of the
operating cost payment rate from section 256B.434. For the rate year beginning October 1, 2015,
the operating cost payment rate for each facility shall be the operating
cost payment rate determined under this section. The blending of operating cost
payment rates under this section shall be performed separately for each RUG's
class.
(b) For the rate year
beginning October 1, 2008, the commissioner shall apply limits to the operating
payment rate increases under paragraph (a) by creating a minimum percentage
increase and a maximum percentage increase.
(1) Each nursing facility
that receives a blended October 1, 2008, operating payment rate increase under
paragraph (a) of less than one percent, when compared to its operating payment
rate on September 30, 2008, computed using rates with RUG's weight of 1.00,
shall receive a rate adjustment of one percent.
(2) The commissioner shall
determine a maximum percentage increase that will result in savings equal to
the cost of allowing the minimum increase in clause (1). Nursing facilities with a blended October 1,
2008, operating payment rate increase under paragraph (a) greater than the
maximum percentage increase determined by the commissioner, when compared to
its operating payment rate on September 30, 2008, computed using rates with a
RUG's weight of 1.00, shall receive the maximum percentage increase.
(3) Nursing facilities with
a blended October 1, 2008, operating payment rate increase under paragraph (a)
greater than one percent and less than the maximum percentage increase
determined by the commissioner, when compared to its operating payment rate on
September 30, 2008, computed using rates with a RUG's weight of 1.00, shall
receive the blended October 1, 2008, operating payment rate increase determined
under paragraph (a).
(4) The October 1, 2009,
through October 1, 2015, operating payment rate for facilities receiving the
maximum percentage increase determined in clause (2) shall be the amount
determined under paragraph (a) less the difference between the amount
determined under paragraph (a) for October 1, 2008, and the amount allowed
under clause (2). This rate restriction
does not apply to rate increases provided in any other section.
(b) (c) A portion of the funds
received under this subdivision that are in excess of operating cost
payment rates that a facility would have received under section 256B.434, as
determined in accordance with clauses (1) to (3), shall be subject to the
requirements in section 256B.434, subdivision 19, paragraphs (b) to (h).
(1) Determine the amount of
additional funding available to a facility, which shall be equal to total
medical assistance resident days from the most recent reporting year times the
difference between the blended rate determined in paragraph (a) for the rate
year being computed and the blended rate for the prior year.
(2) Determine the portion of
all operating costs, for the most recent reporting year, that are compensation
related. If this value exceeds 75
percent, use 75 percent.
(3) Subtract the amount
determined in clause (2) from 75 percent.
(4) The portion of the fund
received under this subdivision that shall be subject to the requirements in
section 256B.434, subdivision 19, paragraphs (b) to (h), shall equal the amount
determined in clause (1) times the amount determined in clause (3).
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, section
256B.441, subdivision 56, is amended to read:
Subd. 56. Hold
harmless. For the rate years
beginning October 1, 2008, to October 1, 2016, no nursing facility shall
receive an operating cost payment rate less than its operating cost payment
rate under section 256B.434. For
rate years beginning between October 1, 2009, and October 1, 2015, no nursing
facility shall receive an operating payment rate less than its operating
payment rate in effect on September 30, 2009.
The comparison of operating cost payment rates under this
section shall be made for a RUG's rate with a weight of 1.00."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Paulsen was excused between the hours of 1:20 p.m. and 3:30
p.m.
Atkins; Davnie; Morrow;
Dominguez; Nelson; Knuth; Mahoney; Zellers; Peterson, A.; Johnson; Tillberry;
Anzelc; Lillie and Simpson moved to amend H. F. No. 1812, the third
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 254, delete section 38
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Kahn moved to amend H. F.
No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 249, line 6, delete
"SIGNIFICANT OTHER" and insert "OTHERS"
Page 249, delete lines 7 to
22 and insert:
"An employee must be
granted leave to the extent the employee's attendance is necessary to care for
a member of the employee's immediate household, up to five days within a
12-month period. The leave must be
unpaid, unless otherwise provided in a collective bargaining agreement or
compensation plan."
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Kahn amendment and the roll was
called. There were 85 yeas and 47 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
Moe
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Magnus
McNamara
Morrow
Nornes
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Peppin
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Huntley moved to amend H. F.
No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 316, after line 23,
insert:
"Sec. 15. MORATORIUM
EXCEPTION PROPOSAL; WAIVER.
The commissioner of health
may waive the six-mile limit in Minnesota Statutes, section 144A.073,
subdivision 5, paragraph (e), when considering a moratorium exception proposal submitted
under Minnesota Statutes, section 144A.073, to allow a nursing facility
providing specialty care in Minneapolis to close and relocate beds to a new
facility in Robbinsdale under common ownership."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Abeler moved to amend H. F.
No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 288, after line 35,
insert:
"Sec. 5. [256.0122]
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FINANCE BOARD.
Subdivision 1. Establishment. The governor, by August 1, 2008, shall
appoint a 25-member health and human services finance board. The board shall consist of: ten members
representing state agencies administering health and human services programs,
including five members from administrative and managerial positions and five
members representing staff from nonadministrative or nonmanagerial positions;
five members representing nonprofit organizations and agencies; and ten members
representing counties, including five members from administrative and
managerial positions and five members representing staff from nonadministrative
or nonmanagerial positions. The
commissioners of human services and health shall provide staffing,
administrative support, and office space for the board out of existing funds of
the operations budget. The board is
governed by section 15.0575.
Subd. 2. Duties. The board shall manage the functions and
services for health and human services programs receiving general fund
appropriations, and shall ensure that aggregate spending for those programs
remains within the targets specified in this section, by:
(1) increasing the
efficiency of service delivery;
(2) increasing cooperation
and coordination between state agencies, counties, and nonprofit organizations;
(3) innovating methods of
delivering services;
(4) if necessary, reducing
spending and eligibility for health and human services programs; and
(5) consolidating or
eliminating specific programs.
Subd. 3. Administering spending
targets. During each fiscal
year, beginning with fiscal year 2010, the board shall manage spending on
health and human services programs receiving general fund appropriations to
ensure that the annual aggregate spending growth for these programs for the
next fiscal year does not exceed spending for the previous fiscal year plus a
three percent annual growth rate or another rate established by law. The annual spending growth for specific
programs may differ from this aggregate spending target.
Subd. 4. Authority; rulemaking. Actions taken by the board that are
supported by at least 75 percent of board members have the force of law and
shall be implemented by the appropriate state agencies. The board shall regularly report actions
taken to implement this section to the chairs and ranking minority members of
the legislative committee with jurisdiction over health and human services
policy and finance. The board may adopt
rules necessary under chapter 14 to implement this subdivision, and may adopt
exempt rules under section 14.386, except that the rules adopted shall not
expire."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
The Speaker called Hausman to the Chair.
DeLaForest and Pelowski
moved to amend H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 259, delete article 14
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the DeLaForest and Pelowski amendment
and the roll was called. There were
62 yeas and 68 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Kohls
Lanning
Lieder
Magnus
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Poppe
Ruth
Scalze
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Wollschlager
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dominguez
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
The Speaker resumed the Chair.
Drazkowski, Buesgens,
Zellers and Heidgerken moved to amend H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 254, line 12, delete
everything after the first comma and insert "section"
Page 254, line 13, delete
"and" and delete "are" and insert "is"
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Drazkowski et al amendment and
the roll was called. There were 47 yeas
and 85 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Howes
Kohls
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Nornes
Olson
Ozment
Pelowski
Peppin
Poppe
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Olson moved to amend H. F.
No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 3, delete section 1
Page 4, delete section 2
Page 5, delete section 4
Page 6, delete section 5
Page 10, delete section 6
Page 12, delete section 7
Page 15, delete section 8
Page 16, delete section 9
Page 18, delete section 11
Page 19, delete section 13
Page 24, delete section 22
Page 43, delete section 51
Page 44, delete section 52
Page 45, delete sections 53
and 54
Page 46, delete sections 55
and 57
Page 47, delete section 58
Page 62, delete section 5
Page 64, delete sections 6
and 7
Page 65, delete section 8
Page 67, delete section 11
Pages 71 to 75, delete sections
14 to 24
Pages 76 to 80, delete
sections 26 to 31
Page 89, delete section 39
Page 93, delete section 7
Page 96, delete section 11
Page 97, delete sections 12
and 13
Page 99, delete section 14
Page 100, delete sections 15
and 16
Page 101, delete section 17
Page 102, delete sections 18
and 19
Page 103, delete sections 20
and 21
Page 104, delete section 22
Page 105, delete sections 23
and 24
Page 106, delete section 25
Page 107, delete sections 26
to 28
Page 108, delete section 29
Page 109, delete section 30
Page 110, delete section 31
Page 111, delete sections 32
to 34
Page 112, delete section 35
Page 113, delete sections 36
and 37
Page 114, delete sections 38
and 39
Page 116, delete section 40
Page 117, delete section 41
Page 118, delete sections 42
and 43
Page 119, delete sections 44
to 47
Page 120, delete section 48
Page 121, delete section 49
Page 125, delete section 50
Page 131, delete sections 51
and 52
Page 149, delete section 56
Page 150, delete section 57
Page 151, delete section 58
Page 153, delete section 61
Page 154, delete lines 21
and 22
Page 172, delete section 3
Page 173, delete section 4
Page 174, delete section 5
Page 175, delete sections 6
and 7
Page 176, delete section 8
Page 177, delete section 9
Page 178, delete sections 10
to 13
Page 179, delete sections 14
to 17
Page 182, delete section 19
Page 183, delete section 20
Page 186, delete section 24
Page 187, delete sections 25
and 27
Page 189, delete sections 30
and 31 and insert:
"Sec. 10. REPEALER.
Laws 1989, chapter 335,
article 1, section 21, subdivision 8, as amended by Laws 2002, chapter 323,
section 19, is repealed."
Page 194, delete section 5
Page 195, delete section 6
Page 196, delete section 7
Page 197, delete sections 8
to 10
Page 198, delete section 11
Page 200, delete section 14
Page 211, delete section 1
Page 224, delete sections 10
to 12
Page 226, delete sections 13
and 14
Page 227, delete section 15
Page 229, delete section 17
Page 235, delete sections 13
and 14
Page 236, delete section 16
Page 240, delete sections 18
to 20
Page 241, delete section 21
Page 243, delete sections 22
to 24
Page 244, delete section 26
Page 247, delete sections 27
and 28
Page 249, delete sections 29
and 30
Page 254, delete sections 38
and 39
Page 259, delete article 14
Page 274, delete section 6
Page 275, delete sections 7,
8 and 9
Page 276, delete sections 10
and 11
Page 277, delete section 12
Page 281, delete sections 13
and 14
Page 282, delete sections 15
to 17
Page 283, delete section 19
Page 283, delete article 18
Page 316, delete section 14
Page 316, delete article 21
Page 340, delete sections 3
and 4
Page 342, delete section 5
Page 343, delete section 6
Page 345, delete section 8
Page 349, delete section 12
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Olson amendment and the roll was
called. There were 54 yeas and 77 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Kohls
Lanning
Liebling
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Norton
Olson
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Poppe
Ruth
Scalze
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Wollschlager
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Bunn and Sailer offered an amendment to H. F. No. 1812, the
third engrossment, as amended.
Hoppe requested a division of the Bunn and Sailer amendment to
H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended.
The first portion of the Bunn and Sailer amendment to H. F. No.
1812, the third engrossment, as amended, reads as follows:
Page 188, line 1, after
"application" insert ", except as provided in
paragraph (e),"
Page 188, line 2, delete
"major"
Page 188, line 12, delete
"enriched"
Page 188, line 23, delete
everything after the period
Page 188, delete lines 24
and 25
Page 188, delete lines 30 to
32 and insert:
"(e) This section
does not apply to an application for:
(1) reissuance of a permit
for a land disposal facility operating as of March 1, 2008;
(2) a permit to expand a
land disposal facility operating as of March 1, 2008, beyond its permitted
boundaries, including expansion on land that is not contiguous to, but is
located within 600 yards of, the land disposal facility's permitted boundaries;
(3) a permit to modify the
type of waste accepted at a land disposal facility operating as of March 1,
2008; or
(4) a permit to locate a
Class I, II, or III land disposal facility that will accept construction debris
and demolition debris, as described in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's
"Demolition Landfill Guidance," published in August 2005, that is
operating as of July 1, 2010."
Page 188, line 33, delete
everything after "a" and insert "permit application
for an industrial solid waste land disposal facility, unless the commissioner
determines that the proposed facility is unlikely to pose a risk of groundwater
contamination."
Page 188, delete line 34
Page 188, after line 34,
insert:
"(g) By September
15, 2008, the commissioner shall submit a report to the chairs and ranking
minority members of the senate and house committees with primary jurisdiction
over environmental policy containing recommendations, including suggested
legislation or rules, for changes in the provisions governing the location of
industrial solid waste land disposal facilities and Class I, II, or III land disposal
facilities that accept construction debris and demolition debris, as described
in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's "Demolition Landfill
Guidance," published in August 2005, in order to prevent the contamination
of ground water by those facilities."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the first portion of the Bunn and
Sailer amendment and the roll was called.
There were 85 yeas and 48 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dean
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kohls
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Olson
Ozment
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Wollschlager
Zellers
The motion prevailed and the first portion of the Bunn and
Sailer amendment was adopted.
The
second portion of the Bunn and Sailer amendment to H. F. No. 1812, the third
engrossment, as amended, reads as follows:
Page 188, after line 35,
insert:
"Sec. 28. INDUSTRIAL
AND CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION LANDFILL WORKING GROUP.
The commissioner of the
Pollution Control Agency shall, by July 15, 2008, convene a working group to
develop, evaluate, and recommend policies and legislation regarding the
management of industrial solid waste and construction and demolition debris in
land disposal facilities. The commissioner
shall appoint members of the working group, including representatives from
counties, state agencies, private landfill owners, waste haulers, environmental
organizations, and other interested parties to serve on the working group. The Pollution Control Agency shall serve as
staff to the working group. The working
group shall submit a report of its findings and recommendations to the chairs
and ranking minority members of the senate and house committees with primary
jurisdiction over environmental policy and environmental finance by January 15,
2009."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the second portion of the Bunn and
Sailer amendment and the roll was called.
There were 127 yeas and 5 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eastlund
Eken
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Beard
Buesgens
Drazkowski
Emmer
Zellers
The motion prevailed and the second portion of the Bunn and Sailer
amendment was adopted.
Hoppe moved to amend H. F.
No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 187, delete section 27
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Hoppe amendment and the roll was
called. There were 64 yeas and 69 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Juhnke
Kohls
Lanning
Lieder
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Marquart
McFarlane
Nornes
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Poppe
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Thao
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Wollschlager
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dean
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Jaros
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mariani
Masin
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Olson moved that H. F. No. 1812, as amended, be re-referred to
the Committee on Finance.
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Olson motion and the roll was
called. There were 56 yeas and 77 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Kalin
Kohls
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Olson
Ozment
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Poppe
Ruth
Ruud
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Swails
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Wollschlager
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Rukavina
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail.
The Speaker called Pelowski to the Chair.
Seifert moved to amend H. F.
No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 254, after line 10,
insert:
"Sec. 39. LEGISLATIVE CARRYFORWARD BALANCES.
On July 1, 2008, the
legislature shall cancel $4,000,000 to the general fund from balances
previously carried forward under Minnesota Statutes, section 16A.281."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Adjust totals accordingly
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Seifert amendment and the roll
was called. There were 56 yeas and 77
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kalin
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Magnus
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Mullery
Nornes
Olson
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Ruud
Scalze
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Wollschlager
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Moe
Morrow
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Sailer
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Kohls was excused for the remainder of today's session.
Severson, Dettmer, Wardlow,
DeLaForest, Koenen, Tingelstad and Juhnke moved to amend H. F. No. 1812, the
third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 254, after line 10,
insert:
"Sec. 39. STUDY
OF VETERANS EMPLOYMENT IN STATE GOVERNMENT.
(a) By October 1, 2008, each
hiring authority of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of state
government must report to the commissioner of finance on the incidence of
employment, recruitment, retention, and retirement of veterans in their
nonelected workforce for fiscal year 2008.
The report must be made in a manner approved by the commissioner, and
must include analysis by age category.
Each hiring authority must also report specific veteran employment data
requested by the commissioner as of June 30, 2008; June 30, 2001, and an
earlier date if judged feasible by the commissioner.
(b) By January 15, 2009, the
commissioner must submit a report on the employment of veterans in state
government to the chairs of the house and senate policy and finance committees
having jurisdiction over veterans affairs.
The report must present and analyze the data obtained in paragraph (a).
(c) For purposes of this
section, "veteran" has the meaning given in section 197.447.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Garofalo and Hosch moved to
amend H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 234, delete section 12
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
The Speaker resumed the Chair.
Peterson, S.; Slawik;
Wardlow; Brynaert; Laine; Murphy, E.; Davnie; Ruth; Eastlund and Greiling moved
to amend H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 59, after line 32,
insert:
"ARTICLE 3
EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION
Section 1. [124D.141]
STATE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION AND CARE.
Subdivision 1. Membership. Two members of the house of
representatives, one appointed by the speaker and one appointed by the minority
leader; and two members of the senate, one appointed by the majority leader and
one by the minority leader; and two parents with a child under age six, shall
be added to the membership of the State Advisory Council on Early Education and
Care required under the federal Improving Head Start for School Readiness Act of
2007.
Subd. 2. Additional duties. The following duties are added to those
assigned to the Council under federal law:
(1) make recommendations on
the most efficient and effective way to leverage state and federal funding
streams for early childhood and child care programs;
(2) make recommendations on
how to coordinate or colocate early childhood and child care programs in one
state Office of Early Learning; and
(3) make recommendations to
the governor and legislature, including proposed legislation on how to most
effectively create a high quality early childhood system in Minnesota in order
to improve the educational outcomes of children so that all children are
school-ready by 2020.
Subd. 3. Administration. An amount up to $12,500 of federal child care
and development fund administrative funds and up to $12,500 of prekindergarten
exploratory project funds appropriated under Laws 2007, chapter 147, article
19, section 3, may be used to reimburse the parents on the Council and for the
administration of the State Advisory Council on Early Childhood Education and
Care. This funding stream is for fiscal
year 2009. The Council may pursue
additional operational funds from state, federal, and private sources."
Renumber the articles in
sequence
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Buesgens
moved to amend H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page
254, line 12, after "5;" insert "and"
Page
254, line 13, delete "and 645.44, subdivision 19,"
Amend
the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Buesgens amendment and the roll
was called. There were 57 yeas and 75
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Brown
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Dettmer
Dittrich
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kalin
Koenen
Magnus
Masin
McNamara
Morgan
Nornes
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Swails
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Wollschlager
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Demmer
Dill
Dominguez
Doty
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Knuth
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McFarlane
Moe
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Kalin moved to amend H. F.
No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 46, line 26, before the
period, insert "if: (1) the
commissioners of education and finance jointly certify that by not implementing
the provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act, the state's schools will
realize a net financial benefit; and (2) the commissioner of education
implements the state assessment and accountability provisions in article 1,
sections 5 to 9 and 51 to 54 of this act"
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Buesgens
and Zellers moved to amend H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended,
as follows:
Page
240, delete section 18
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend
the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Buesgens and Zellers amendment
and the roll was called. There were 37
yeas and 95 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Olson
Paulsen
Peppin
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Wardlow
Westrom
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Olson moved to amend H. F.
No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 241, after line 17,
insert:
"Sec. 21. [16A.1524]
BUDGET BALANCING.
Notwithstanding any law to
the contrary, if a forecast under section 16A.103 shows a decrease in revenues
in the current biennium that would result in a shortfall in the state budget,
the governor must direct the commissioner to make across the board reductions
in general fund appropriations, excluding appropriations for essential state
services. If the forecast shows that
revenues in future bienniums are also insufficient for a balanced budget, each
state agency must develop a plan to reduce spending by five percent in future
fiscal years. Each political
subdivision that receives state appropriations must also report under section
6.79 with a plan to reduce mandates to achieve a five percent reduction in
general fund supported expenditures in future fiscal years."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Olson amendment and the roll was
called. There were 19 yeas and 113 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Buesgens
Cornish
DeLaForest
Demmer
Drazkowski
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Gunther
Hackbarth
Holberg
Hoppe
Nornes
Olson
Peppin
Seifert
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eastlund
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Hilstrom was excused between the hours of 6:15 p.m. and 7:25
p.m.
Olson moved to amend H. F.
No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 241, after line 17,
insert:
"Sec. 21. [16A.1524]
BUDGET BALANCING.
Notwithstanding any law to
the contrary, if the forecast under section 16A.103 shows that revenues in
future bienniums are insufficient for a balanced budget, each state agency must
develop a plan to reduce spending by five percent in future fiscal years. Each political subdivision that receives
state appropriations must also report under section 6.79 with a plan to reduce
mandates to achieve a five percent reduction in general fund supported
expenditures in future fiscal years."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Olson amendment and the roll was
called. There were 48 yeas and 83 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
Dettmer
Dittrich
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hortman
Hosch
Lenczewski
Marquart
McNamara
Olson
Ozment
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Poppe
Ruud
Scalze
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Wollschlager
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dill
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilty
Hoppe
Hornstein
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
McFarlane
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Rukavina
Ruth
Sailer
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
McNamara moved to amend H.
F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 155, line 28, after the
period, insert "These rules shall not take effect until the California
low emissions regulations have been adopted by all of the states bordering
Minnesota and shall become effective beginning with motor vehicles with a model
year equal to the latest model year to which the California low emissions
regulations apply in a state bordering Minnesota."
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the McNamara amendment and the roll
was called. There were 48 yeas and 80
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Juhnke
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Olin
Olson
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Rukavina
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Solberg
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Wollschlager
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Rukavina, Dill and Hackbarth
moved to amend H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 160, after line 24
insert:
"$100,000
is appropriated in fiscal year 2009 from the all-terrain vehicle account in the
natural resource fund to the commissioner of natural resources for a grant to
the city of Biwabik to convert the Moose Trail snowmobile trail to a dual usage
trail, so that it may also be used as an Off-Highway Vehicle trail connecting
the city of Biwabik to the Iron Range Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area."
Adjust amounts accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Hackbarth offered an amendment to
H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended.
POINT
OF ORDER
Mullery raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the
Hackbarth amendment was not in order. The Speaker ruled the point of order well
taken and the Hackbarth amendment out of order.
Seifert appealed the decision of the Speaker.
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
CALL
OF THE HOUSE
On the motion of Hackbarth and on the demand of 10 members, a
call of the House was ordered. The following
members answered to their names:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
All members answered to the call and it was so ordered.
The vote was taken on the question "Shall the decision of
the Speaker stand as the judgment of the House?" and the roll was called.
There were 68 yeas and 64 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Dominguez
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Kahn
Knuth
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Walker
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Berns
Brod
Brown
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Juhnke
Kalin
Koenen
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Nornes
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Rukavina
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
So it was the judgment of the House that the decision of the
Speaker should stand.
CALL
OF THE HOUSE LIFTED
Sertich moved that the call of the House be lifted. The motion prevailed and it was so ordered.
The Speaker called Thissen to the Chair.
Beard moved to amend H. F.
No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 201, delete section 15
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Hackbarth
moved to amend H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page
194, delete section 5
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend
the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Hackbarth amendment and the roll
was called. There were 36 yeas and 96
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
Morgan
Nornes
Olson
Peppin
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Wardlow
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamara
Moe
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Zellers, Heidgerken,
Buesgens, Urdahl, Magnus, Finstad, Hamilton, Drazkowski, Simpson, Brod and Dean
moved to amend H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 155, delete lines 21 to
28 and insert:
"$134,000
in fiscal year 2009 is from the environmental fund for purposes of Minnesota
Statutes, chapter 114D."
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Zellers et al amendment and the
roll was called. There were 50 yeas and
81 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Juhnke
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
Nornes
Olin
Olson
Ozment
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Solberg
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Wollschlager
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Westrom
moved to amend H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page
192, line 13, delete "cap-and-trade" and insert "the
renewable hydrogen initiative under section 216B.813."
Page
192, delete lines 14 to 19
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Westrom amendment and the roll
was called. There were 46 yeas and 86
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Koenen
Lanning
Magnus
Mahoney
McFarlane
Nornes
Olson
Paulsen
Peppin
Rukavina
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Wollschlager
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Atkins
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
The Speaker resumed the Chair.
Simpson, Paulsen, Demmer,
Brod, Lanning and Zellers moved to amend H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment,
as amended, as follows:
Page 362, after line 15,
insert:
"Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 289A.20,
subdivision 4, as amended by Laws 2008, chapter 154, article 6, section 1, is
amended to read:
Subd. 4. Sales
and use tax. (a) The taxes imposed
by chapter 297A are due and payable to the commissioner monthly on or before
the 20th day of the month following the month in which the taxable event
occurred, or following another reporting period as the commissioner prescribes
or as allowed under section 289A.18, subdivision 4, paragraph (f) or (g),
except that use taxes due on an annual use tax return as provided under section
289A.11, subdivision 1, are payable by April 15 following the close of the
calendar year.
(b) A vendor having a
liability of $120,000 or more during a fiscal year ending June 30 must remit
the June liability for the next year in the following manner:
(1) Two business days before
June 30 of the year, the vendor must remit 80 86 percent of the
estimated June liability to the commissioner.
(2) On or before August 20
of the year, the vendor must pay any additional amount of tax not remitted in
June.
(c) A vendor having a
liability of:
(1) $20,000 or more in the
fiscal year ending June 30, 2005; or
(2) $10,000 or more in the
fiscal year ending June 30, 2006, and fiscal years thereafter,
must remit all liabilities
on returns due for periods beginning in the subsequent calendar year by
electronic means on or before the 20th day of the month following the month in
which the taxable event occurred, or on or before the 20th day of the month
following the month in which the sale is reported under section 289A.18,
subdivision 4, except for 80 86 percent of the estimated June
liability, which is due two business days before June 30. The remaining amount of the June liability is
due on August 20.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective beginning with the June 2009 tax
liabilities.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 289A.60,
subdivision 15, as amended by Laws 2008, chapter 154, article 6, section 2, is
amended to read:
Subd. 15. Accelerated
payment of June sales tax liability; penalty for underpayment. For payments made after December 31, 2006,
if a vendor is required by law to submit an estimation of June sales tax liabilities
and 80 86 percent payment by a certain date, the vendor shall pay
a penalty equal to ten percent of the amount of actual June liability required
to be paid in June less the amount remitted in June. The penalty must not be imposed, however, if the amount remitted
in June equals the lesser of 80 86 percent of the preceding May's
liability or 80 86 percent of the average monthly liability for
the previous calendar year.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective beginning with June 2009 tax
liabilities.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 290.01,
subdivision 6b, is amended to read:
Subd. 6b. Foreign
operating corporation. The term
"foreign operating corporation," when applied to a corporation, means
a domestic corporation with the following characteristics:
(1) it is part of a unitary
business at least one member of which is taxable in this state;
(2) it is not a foreign
sales corporation under section 922 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended
through December 31, 1999, for the taxable year;
(3) either (i) the
average of the percentages of its property and payrolls, including the pro rata
share of its unitary partnerships' property and payrolls, assigned to locations
outside the United States, where the United States includes the District of
Columbia and excludes the commonwealth of Puerto Rico and possessions of the
United States, as determined under section 290.191 or 290.20, is 80 percent or
more; or (ii) it has in effect a valid election under section 936 of the
Internal Revenue Code; or (ii) at least 80 percent of the gross income from
all sources of the corporation in the tax year is active foreign business
income; and
(4) it has $1,000,000 of
payroll and $2,000,000 of property, as determined under section 290.191 or
290.20, that are located outside the United States. If the domestic corporation does not have payroll as determined
under section 290.191 or 290.20, but it or its partnerships have paid
$1,000,000 for work, performed directly for the domestic corporation or the
partnerships, outside the United States, then paragraph (3)(i) shall not
require payrolls to be included in the average calculation for purposes
of this subdivision, active foreign business income means gross income that is
(i) derived from sources without the United States, as defined in subtitle A,
chapter 1, subchapter N, part 1, of the Internal Revenue Code; and (ii)
attributable to the active conduct of a trade or business in a foreign country.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2007."
Page 366, delete section 5,
and insert:
"Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 290.01,
subdivision 19d, is amended to read:
Subd. 19d. Corporations;
modifications decreasing federal taxable income. For corporations, there shall be subtracted from federal taxable
income after the increases provided in subdivision 19c:
(1) the amount of foreign
dividend gross-up added to gross income for federal income tax purposes under
section 78 of the Internal Revenue Code;
(2) the amount of salary
expense not allowed for federal income tax purposes due to claiming the federal
jobs credit under section 51 of the Internal Revenue Code;
(3) any dividend (not
including any distribution in liquidation) paid within the taxable year by a
national or state bank to the United States, or to any instrumentality of the
United States exempt from federal income taxes, on the preferred stock of the
bank owned by the United States or the instrumentality;
(4) amounts disallowed for
intangible drilling costs due to differences between this chapter and the
Internal Revenue Code in taxable years beginning before January 1, 1987, as
follows:
(i) to the extent the
disallowed costs are represented by physical property, an amount equal to the
allowance for depreciation under Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 290.09,
subdivision 7, subject to the modifications contained in subdivision 19e; and
(ii) to the extent the
disallowed costs are not represented by physical property, an amount equal to
the allowance for cost depletion under Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 290.09,
subdivision 8;
(5) the deduction for
capital losses pursuant to sections 1211 and 1212 of the Internal Revenue Code,
except that:
(i) for capital losses
incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986, capital loss
carrybacks shall not be allowed;
(ii) for capital losses
incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986, a capital loss
carryover to each of the 15 taxable years succeeding the loss year shall be
allowed;
(iii) for capital losses
incurred in taxable years beginning before January 1, 1987, a capital loss
carryback to each of the three taxable years preceding the loss year, subject
to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 290.16, shall be allowed;
and
(iv) for capital losses
incurred in taxable years beginning before January 1, 1987, a capital loss
carryover to each of the five taxable years succeeding the loss year to the
extent such loss was not used in a prior taxable year and subject to the
provisions of Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 290.16, shall be allowed;
(6) an amount for interest
and expenses relating to income not taxable for federal income tax purposes, if
(i) the income is taxable under this chapter and (ii) the interest and expenses
were disallowed as deductions under the provisions of section 171(a)(2), 265 or
291 of the Internal Revenue Code in computing federal taxable income;
(7) in the case of mines,
oil and gas wells, other natural deposits, and timber for which percentage
depletion was disallowed pursuant to subdivision 19c, clause (11), a reasonable
allowance for depletion based on actual cost.
In the case of leases the deduction must be apportioned between the
lessor and lessee in accordance with rules prescribed by the commissioner. In the case of property held in trust, the
allowable deduction must be apportioned between the income beneficiaries and
the trustee in accordance with the pertinent provisions of the trust, or if
there is no provision in the instrument, on the basis of the trust's income
allocable to each;
(8) for certified pollution
control facilities placed in service in a taxable year beginning before
December 31, 1986, and for which amortization deductions were elected under
section 169 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended through December
31, 1985, an amount equal to the allowance for depreciation under Minnesota
Statutes 1986, section 290.09, subdivision 7;
(9) amounts included in
federal taxable income that are due to refunds of income, excise, or franchise
taxes based on net income or related minimum taxes paid by the corporation to
Minnesota, another state, a political subdivision of another state, the
District of Columbia, or a foreign country or possession of the United States
to the extent that the taxes were added to federal taxable income under section
290.01, subdivision 19c, clause (1), in a prior taxable year;
(10) 80 90
percent of royalties, fees, or other like income accrued or received from a
foreign operating corporation or a foreign corporation which is part of the
same unitary business as the receiving corporation, unless the income
resulting from such payments or accruals is income from sources within the
United States as defined in subtitle A, chapter 1, subchapter N, part 1, of the
Internal Revenue Code;
(11) income or gains from
the business of mining as defined in section 290.05, subdivision 1, clause (a),
that are not subject to Minnesota franchise tax;
(12) the amount of
disability access expenditures in the taxable year which are not allowed to be
deducted or capitalized under section 44(d)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code;
(13) the amount of qualified
research expenses not allowed for federal income tax purposes under section
280C(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, but only to the extent that the amount
exceeds the amount of the credit allowed under section 290.068;
(14) the amount of salary
expenses not allowed for federal income tax purposes due to claiming the Indian
employment credit under section 45A(a) of the Internal Revenue Code;
(15) the amount of any
refund of environmental taxes paid under section 59A of the Internal Revenue
Code;
(16) for taxable years
beginning before January 1, 2008, the amount of the federal small ethanol
producer credit allowed under section 40(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code
which is included in gross income under section 87 of the Internal Revenue
Code;
(17) for a corporation whose
foreign sales corporation, as defined in section 922 of the Internal Revenue
Code, constituted a foreign operating corporation during any taxable year
ending before January 1, 1995, and a return was filed by August 15, 1996,
claiming the deduction under section 290.21, subdivision 4, for income received
from the foreign operating corporation, an amount equal to 1.23 multiplied by
the amount of income excluded under section 114 of the Internal Revenue Code,
provided the income is not income of a foreign operating company;
(18) any decrease in subpart
F income, as defined in section 952(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, for the
taxable year when subpart F income is calculated without regard to the
provisions of section 614 of Public Law 107-147;
(19) in each of the five tax
years immediately following the tax year in which an addition is required under
subdivision 19c, clause (15) (14), an amount equal to one-fifth
of the delayed depreciation. For
purposes of this clause, "delayed depreciation" means the amount of
the addition made by the taxpayer under subdivision 19c, clause (15)
(14). The resulting delayed
depreciation cannot be less than zero; and
(20) in each of the five tax
years immediately following the tax year in which an addition is required under
subdivision 19c, clause (16) (15), an amount equal to one-fifth
of the amount of the addition.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2007."
Page 371, line 7, reinstate
the stricken "or royalties, fees, or other like income described in
section"
Page 371, line 8, reinstate
the stricken language
Page 371, after line 26,
insert:
"Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 297F.09,
subdivision 10, as amended by Laws 2008, chapter 154, article 6, section 3, is
amended to read:
Subd. 10. Accelerated
tax payment; cigarette or tobacco products distributor. A cigarette or tobacco products distributor
having a liability of $120,000 or more during a fiscal year ending June 30,
shall remit the June liability for the next year in the following manner:
(a) Two business days before
June 30 of the year, the distributor shall remit the actual May liability and 80
86 percent of the estimated June liability to the commissioner and file the
return in the form and manner prescribed by the commissioner.
(b) On or before August 18
of the year, the distributor shall submit a return showing the actual June
liability and pay any additional amount of tax not remitted in June. A penalty is imposed equal to ten percent of
the amount of June liability required to be paid in June, less the amount
remitted in June. However, the penalty
is not imposed if the amount remitted in June equals the lesser of:
(1) 80 86
percent of the actual June liability; or
(2) 80 86
percent of the preceding May's liability.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective beginning with June 2009 tax
liabilities.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 297G.09,
subdivision 9, as amended by Laws 2008, chapter 154, article 6, section 4, is
amended to read:
Subd. 9. Accelerated
tax payment; penalty. A person
liable for tax under this chapter having a liability of $120,000 or more during
a fiscal year ending June 30, shall remit the June liability for the next year
in the following manner:
(a) Two business days before
June 30 of the year, the taxpayer shall remit the actual May liability and 80
86 percent of the estimated June liability to the commissioner and file the
return in the form and manner prescribed by the commissioner.
(b) On or before August 18
of the year, the taxpayer shall submit a return showing the actual June
liability and pay any additional amount of tax not remitted in June. A penalty is imposed equal to ten percent of
the amount of June liability required to be paid in June less the amount
remitted in June. However, the penalty
is not imposed if the amount remitted in June equals the lesser of:
(1) 80 86
percent of the actual June liability; or
(2) 80 86
percent of the preceding May liability.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective beginning with June 2009 tax
liabilities."
Page 371, delete section 7
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Simpson et al amendment and the
roll was called. There were 54 yeas and
77 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Norton
Ozment
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Swails
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Wollschlager
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slocum
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Paulsen moved to amend H. F.
No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 371, after line 26,
insert:
"Sec. 30. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 290.191,
subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Apportionment
formula of general application. (a)
Except for those trades or businesses required to use a different formula under
subdivision 3 or section 290.36, and for those trades or businesses that
receive permission to use some other method under section 290.20 or under
subdivision 4, a trade or business required to apportion its net income must
apportion its income to this state on the basis of the percentage obtained by
taking the sum of:
(1) the percent for the
sales factor under paragraph (b) of the percentage which the sales made within
this state in connection with the trade or business during the tax period are
of the total sales wherever made in connection with the trade or business
during the tax period;
(2) the percent for the
property factor under paragraph (b) of the percentage which the total tangible
property used by the taxpayer in this state in connection with the trade or
business during the tax period is of the total tangible property, wherever
located, used by the taxpayer in connection with the trade or business during
the tax period; and
(3) the percent for the
payroll factor under paragraph (b) of the percentage which the taxpayer's total
payrolls paid or incurred in this state or paid in respect to labor performed
in this state in connection with the trade or business during the tax period
are of the taxpayer's total payrolls paid or incurred in connection with the
trade or business during the tax period.
(b) For purposes of
paragraph (a) and subdivision 3, the following percentages apply for the
taxable years specified:
Taxable years Sales Property Payroll
beginning factor factor factor
during percent percent percent
calendar year
2007 78 11 11
2008 81 9.5 9.5
2009 84 8 8
2010 87 6.5 6.5
2011 90 5 5
2012 93 3.5 3.5
2013 96 2 2
2014 and later calendar years 100 0 0
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for tax years beginning after December
31, 2009."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Paulsen amendment and the roll
was called. There were 61 yeas and 71
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Brown
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Nornes
Norton
Olson
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Poppe
Ruth
Ruud
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Swails
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Wollschlager
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Rukavina
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slocum
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Heidgerken and Ward moved to
amend H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 4, line 21, delete
"2009-2010" and insert "2010-2011"
Page 5, line 14, delete
"2009-2010" and insert "2010-2011"
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Brod moved to amend H. F.
No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 369, after line 9,
insert:
"Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 290.06,
subdivision 2c, as amended by Laws 2008, chapter 154, article 4, section 6, is
amended to read:
Subd. 2c. Schedules
of rates for individuals, estates, and trusts. (a) The income taxes imposed by this chapter upon married
individuals filing joint returns and surviving spouses as defined in section
2(a) of the Internal Revenue Code must be computed by applying to their taxable
net income the following schedule of rates:
(1) On the first $25,680, 5.35
5.1 percent;
(2) On all over $25,680, but
not over $102,030, 7.05 percent;
(3) On all over $102,030,
7.85 percent.
Married individuals filing
separate returns, estates, and trusts must compute their income tax by applying
the above rates to their taxable income, except that the income brackets will
be one-half of the above amounts.
(b) The income taxes imposed
by this chapter upon unmarried individuals must be computed by applying to
taxable net income the following schedule of rates:
(1) On the first $17,570, 5.35
5.1 percent;
(2) On all over $17,570, but
not over $57,710, 7.05 percent;
(3) On all over $57,710,
7.85 percent.
(c) The income taxes imposed
by this chapter upon unmarried individuals qualifying as a head of household as
defined in section 2(b) of the Internal Revenue Code must be computed by
applying to taxable net income the following schedule of rates:
(1) On the first $21,630, 5.35
5.1 percent;
(2) On all over $21,630, but
not over $86,910, 7.05 percent;
(3) On all over $86,910,
7.85 percent.
(d) In lieu of a tax
computed according to the rates set forth in this subdivision, the tax of any
individual taxpayer whose taxable net income for the taxable year is less than
an amount determined by the commissioner must be computed in accordance with
tables prepared and issued by the commissioner of revenue based on income
brackets of not more than $100. The
amount of tax for each bracket shall be computed at the rates set forth in this
subdivision, provided that the commissioner may disregard a fractional part of
a dollar unless it amounts to 50 cents or more, in which case it may be
increased to $1.
(e) An individual who is not
a Minnesota resident for the entire year must compute the individual's
Minnesota income tax as provided in this subdivision. After the application of the nonrefundable credits provided in
this chapter, the tax liability must then be multiplied by a fraction in which:
(1) the numerator is the
individual's Minnesota source federal adjusted gross income as defined in
section 62 of the Internal Revenue Code and increased by the additions required
under section 290.01, subdivision 19a, clauses (1), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9),
(11), and (12) and reduced by the Minnesota assignable portion of the
subtraction for United States government interest under section 290.01,
subdivision 19b, clause (1), and the subtractions under section 290.01,
subdivision 19b, clauses (9), (10), (14), (15), and (16), after applying the
allocation and assignability provisions of section 290.081, clause (a), or
290.17; and
(2) the denominator is the
individual's federal adjusted gross income as defined in section 62 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, increased by the amounts specified in section
290.01, subdivision 19a, clauses (1), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), (11), and (12)
and reduced by the amounts specified in section 290.01, subdivision 19b,
clauses (1), (9), (10), (14), (15), and (16).
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2009."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Brod amendment and the roll was
called. There were 56 yeas and 76 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kalin
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Olin
Olson
Ozment
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dominguez
Eken
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Buesgens moved to amend H.
F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 39, delete section 42
Page 40, line 17, delete
"21,791,000" and insert "21,761,000"
Page 41, delete lines 3 to 8
Pages 43 to 45, delete
sections 51 to 53
Page 47, delete section 58
Page 51, delete subdivision
6
Page 64, delete section 7
Page 155, delete lines 29 to
36
Page 156, delete lines 1 to
36
Page 157, delete lines 1 to
31
Page 159, delete lines 7 to
13
Page 161, delete lines 11 to
16
Page 191, delete lines 22 to
34
Page 192, line 12, delete
", and up to" and insert a period
Page 192, delete lines 13 to
36
Pages 199 to 200, delete
sections 12 to 13
Page 201, delete section 15
Page 208, delete lines 11 to
26
Page 220, delete section 7
Page 220, after line 25,
insert:
"Laws 2008, chapter
152, article 1, section 6, is repealed."
Page 253, delete section 37
Page 258, delete section 10
Page 270, delete section 8
Page 324, delete sections 13
to 15
Page 325, delete section 17
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Adjust amounts accordingly
Amend the appropriations by
the specified amounts and correct the totals and the appropriations by fund
accordingly.
Renumber the subdivisions in
sequence
Renumber or reletter in
sequence
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Buesgens amendment and the roll
was called. There were 32 yeas and 100
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Lanning
Magnus
Nornes
Olson
Peppin
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Tingelstad
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dill
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Finstad; Westrom; Buesgens; Hamilton; Eastlund; Anderson, B.;
Urdahl; Dettmer; Severson; Demmer; Nornes; Shimanski; Gottwalt; Magnus; Brod;
Dean; Beard; Seifert; Ozment; Ruth; Drazkowski; Lanning; Gunther and Olson
offered an amendment to H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment,
as amended.
POINT
OF ORDER
Davnie raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the
Finstad et al amendment was not in order.
The Speaker ruled the point of order well taken and the Finstad et al
amendment out of order.
Finstad appealed the decision of the Speaker.
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The vote was taken on the question "Shall the decision of
the Speaker stand as the judgment of the House?" and the roll was
called. There were 68 yeas and 63 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Dominguez
Erhardt
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Juhnke
Koenen
Lanning
Lenczewski
Magnus
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Solberg
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
So it was the judgment of the House that the decision of the
Speaker should stand.
Dean, Olson, Hamilton, Ruth, Nornes, Finstad, Gottwalt and
Drazkowski offered an amendment to H. F. No. 1812, the third
engrossment, as amended.
POINT
OF ORDER
Davnie raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the
Dean et al amendment was not in order.
The Speaker ruled the point of order well taken and the Dean et al
amendment out of order.
Dean appealed the decision of the Speaker.
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The vote was taken on the question "Shall the decision of
the Speaker stand as the judgment of the House?" and the roll was
called. There were 67 yeas and 63 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Dominguez
Erhardt
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Juhnke
Koenen
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lieder
Magnus
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Rukavina
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
So it was the judgment of the House that the decision of the
Speaker should stand.
Drazkowski moved to amend H.
F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 313, after line 19,
insert:
"Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 256B.434,
is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 21. Nursing facility
payment. (a) For the rate
year beginning October 1, 2008, the commissioner shall make available to each
nursing facility reimbursed under this
section a onetime payment equal to 1.50 percent of the operating payment rates
in effect on September 30, 2008. This
payment shall be provided after determining the blending in section 256B.441,
subdivision 55, paragraph (a). This
payment shall not become part of the facility's operating payment rate for the
rate year beginning October 1, 2009.
(b) Seventy-five percent of
the money resulting from the payment under paragraph (a) must be used to provide a onetime
compensation-related bonus for employees directly employed by the nursing facility on or after October 1,
2008, except:
(1) the administrator;
(2) persons employed in the
central office of a corporation that has an ownership interest in the nursing
facility or exercises control over the nursing facility; and
(3) persons paid by the
nursing facility under a management contract.
(c) The commissioner shall
allow as compensation-related costs all costs for:
(1) wages and salaries;
(2) the employee's share of
health and dental insurance, life insurance, disability insurance, long-term
care insurance, uniform allowance, and pensions; and
(3) other benefits provided,
subject to the approval of the commissioner.
(d) The portion of the
payment under paragraph (a) that is not subject to the requirements in
paragraph (b) shall be provided to nursing facilities effective October 1,
2008."
Page 348, line 2, delete
"two" and insert "three"
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
The Speaker called Thissen to the Chair.
Brod moved to amend H. F.
No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 349, after line 3,
insert:
"Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 295.52, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 8. Contingent reduction in
tax rate. On September 1 of
each odd-numbered year, beginning September 1, 2009, the commissioner of
finance shall determine the projected balance of the health care access fund as
of the end of the current biennium, based on the most recent February forecast
adjusted for any legislative session changes.
If the commissioner projects a surplus in the health care access fund as
of the end of the current biennium, the commissioner of finance, in
consultation with the commissioner of revenue, shall reduce the tax rates
specified in subdivisions 1, 1a, 2, 3, and 4 in one-tenth of one percent
increments, making the largest reduction in tax rates consistent with ensuring
that the health care access fund retains a surplus as of the end of the current
biennium. The reduced tax rates shall
take effect on the January 1 that immediately follows the September 1 on which
the commissioner determines the projected balance and shall remain in effect for
two tax years. The tax rates specified
in subdivisions 1, 1a, 2, 3, and 4 shall apply for subsequent tax years, unless
the commissioner, based on a determination of the projected balance of the
health care access fund made on September 1 of an odd-numbered year, reduces
the tax rates. If the commissioner does
not project a surplus in the health care access fund as of the end of the
current biennium, the tax rates specified in subdivisions 1, 1a, 2, 3, and 4
shall continue to apply. The
commissioner of finance shall publish in the State Register by October 1 of
each odd-numbered year the amount of tax to be imposed for the next two
calendar years."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Brod amendment and the roll was
called. There were 50 yeas and 82 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Howes
Lanning
Liebling
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Norton
Olson
Ozment
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Peppin offered an amendment to H. F. No. 1812,
the third engrossment, as amended.
POINT OF ORDER
Murphy, E., raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that
the Peppin amendment was not in order.
Speaker pro tempore Thissen ruled the point of order well taken and the
Peppin amendment out of order.
Peppin appealed the decision of Speaker pro tempore Thissen.
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The vote
was taken on the question "Shall the decision of Speaker pro tempore
Thissen stand as the judgment of the House?" and the roll was called. There were 69 yeas and 62 nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Dominguez
Erhardt
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Juhnke
Koenen
Lanning
Lenczewski
Magnus
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Murphy, M.
Nornes
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
So it was the judgment of the House that the decision of
Speaker pro tempore Thissen should stand.
Gottwalt; Ruth; Wardlow; Abeler; Drazkowski; Dettmer; Otremba;
Erickson; Eastlund; Lanning; Anderson, B.; Severson; Finstad; Tingelstad; Olson
and Brod offered an amendment to H. F. No. 1812, the third
engrossment, as amended.
POINT OF ORDER
Davnie raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the
Gottwalt et al amendment was not in order. Speaker pro tempore Thissen ruled
the point of order well taken and the Gottwalt et al amendment out of order.
Olson appealed the decision of Speaker pro tempore Thissen.
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The vote was taken on the question "Shall the decision of
Speaker pro tempore Thissen stand as the judgment of the House?" and the roll
was called. There were 68 yeas and 64 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Dominguez
Erhardt
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Juhnke
Koenen
Lanning
Lenczewski
Magnus
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Murphy, M.
Nornes
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Solberg
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
So it was the judgment of the House that the decision of
Speaker pro tempore Thissen should stand.
Garofalo moved to amend H.
F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 27, after line 11,
insert:
"Sec. 27. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 126C.05,
subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Compensation
revenue pupil units. (a) Compensation
revenue pupil units for fiscal year 1998 and thereafter must be computed
according to this subdivision.
(a) The compensation revenue
concentration percentage for each building in a district equals the product of
100 times the ratio of:
(1) the sum of the number of
pupils enrolled in the building eligible to receive free lunch plus one-half of
the pupils eligible to receive reduced priced lunch on October 1 of the
previous fiscal year; to
(2) the number of pupils
enrolled in the building on October 1 of the previous fiscal year.
(b) The compensation revenue
pupil weighting factor for a building equals the lesser of one or the quotient
obtained by dividing the building's compensation revenue concentration
percentage by 80.0.
(c) The compensation revenue
pupil units for a building equals the product of:
(1) the sum of the number of
pupils enrolled in the building eligible to receive free lunch and one-half of
the pupils eligible to receive reduced priced lunch on October 1 of the
previous fiscal year; times
(2) the compensation revenue
pupil weighting factor for the building; times
(3) .60.
(d) (b) Notwithstanding paragraphs
paragraph (a) to (c), for charter schools and contracted alternative
programs in the first year of operation, compensation revenue pupil units shall
be computed using data for the current fiscal year. If the charter school or contracted alternative program begins
operation after October 1, compensatory revenue pupil units shall be computed
based on pupils enrolled on an alternate date determined by the commissioner,
and the compensation revenue pupil units shall be prorated based on the ratio
of the number of days of student instruction to 170 days.
(e) The percentages in this
subdivision must be based on the count of individual pupils and not on a
building average or minimum.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for revenue for fiscal year 2009.
Sec. 28. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 126C.10,
subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Compensatory
education revenue. (a) The
compensatory education revenue for each building in the district equals the
formula allowance minus $415 $1,495 times the compensation revenue
pupil units computed according to section 126C.05, subdivision 3. Revenue shall be paid to the district and
must be allocated according to section 126C.15, subdivision 2.
(b) When the district
contracting with an alternative program under section 124D.69 changes prior to
the start of a school year, the compensatory revenue generated by pupils
attending the program shall be paid to the district contracting with the
alternative program for the current school year, and shall not be paid to the
district contracting with the alternative program for the prior school year.
(c) When the fiscal agent
district for an area learning center changes prior to the start of a school
year, the compensatory revenue shall be paid to the fiscal agent district for
the current school year, and shall not be paid to the fiscal agent district for
the prior school year.
(d) Notwithstanding
paragraph (a), the compensatory revenue for a school district that has been
adversely affected by a natural disaster and that has received by law a
specific education aid payment to compensate the district for the disaster
during fiscal year 2008, equals the greater of the revenue calculated under
this subdivision, or the amount the district would have received under
Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 126C.05, subdivision 3, and 126C.10,
subdivision 3.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2008, for revenue for fiscal
year 2009 and later."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Garofalo amendment and the roll
was called. There were 52 yeas and 77
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Brown
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gunther
Hackbarth
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Kalin
Liebling
Magnus
McNamara
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Gardner
Gottwalt
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Otremba
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Walker
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
The Speaker resumed the Chair.
Holberg, Urdahl, Otremba,
Magnus, Drazkowski, DeLaForest, Emmer, Zellers, Finstad, Olson and Seifert
moved to amend H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 283, after line 11,
insert:
"ARTICLE 18
FUNDING FOR SEX-SELECTION
ABORTIONS
Section 1. [256B.0625]
SEX-SELECTION ABORTION FUNDING BAN.
Subdivision 1. Funding restriction. The following provisions apply to any
section in this act relating to sex-selection abortion:
(1) none of the funds
appropriated under this act, nor in any trust fund to which funds are
appropriated under this act, shall be expended for any sex-selection abortion;
(2) none of the funds
appropriated under this act, nor in any trust fund to which funds are
appropriated under this act, shall be expended for health benefits coverage
that includes coverage of sex-selection abortion; and
(3) the term "health
benefits coverage" means the package of services covered by a managed care
provider or organization pursuant to a contract or other arrangement.
Subd. 2. Severability. If any one or more provisions,
subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words of this section
or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is found to be
unconstitutional, the same is hereby declared to be severable and the balance
of this section shall remain effective notwithstanding such
unconstitutionality. The legislature
hereby declares that it would have passed this section, and each provision,
subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or word thereof, irrespective
of the fact that any one or more provision, subdivision, paragraph, sentence,
clause, phrase, or word be declared unconstitutional.
Subd. 3. Supreme Court
jurisdiction. The Minnesota
Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over an action challenging the
constitutionality of this section and shall expedite the resolution of the
action."
Renumber the articles in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Holberg et al amendment and the
roll was called. There were 75 yeas and
57 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bly
Brod
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Juhnke
Kalin
Koenen
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lieder
Magnus
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Murphy, M.
Nornes
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Ruth
Scalze
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Atkins
Bigham
Brown
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dominguez
Erhardt
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Kahn
Knuth
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Dill; Brown; Anzelc;
Solberg; Doty; Juhnke; Koenen; Rukavina; Peterson, A., and Morrow moved to
amend H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 157, delete lines 32 to
35
Page 158, delete lines 1 and
2
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Dill et al amendment and the roll
was called. There were 87 yeas and 45
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Berns
Bly
Brod
Brown
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Jaros
Juhnke
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lesch
Lieder
Lillie
Magnus
Mahoney
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morrow
Nornes
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Sailer
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Solberg
Thao
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Wollschlager
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Benson
Bigham
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dominguez
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Lenczewski
Liebling
Loeffler
Madore
Mariani
Masin
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Peterson, S.
Ruud
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Swails
Thissen
Wagenius
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Brod and Lanning moved to
amend H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 231, after line 18,
insert:
"On July 1, 2008,
the legislature shall cancel $100,000 to the general fund from balances
previously carried forward under Minnesota Statutes, section 16A.281."
Page 236, after line 18,
insert:
"Sec. 15. [3.99]
UNFUNDED MANDATES PROHIBITED; LOCAL MANDATE REVIEW BOARD.
Subdivision 1. Unfunded mandates
prohibited. No law or rule
may impose on a local government an unfunded mandate.
Subd. 2. Definitions. For purposes of this section, the terms
in this subdivision have the meanings given them.
(a) "Board" means
the local mandate review board established in this section.
(b) "Local
government" means a school district or a statutory or home rule charter
city, town, or county.
(c) "Unfunded
mandate" means a state law or rule enacted or adopted on or after the
effective date of this section that does not authorize resources to offset the
additional direct expenditures required for the implementation of the statute
or rule by the local government.
Unfunded mandate does not mean a law or rule (1) required to comply with
the state constitution or federal laws or rules, or to meet eligibility
standards for federal entitlements; (2) imposed on both government and
nongovernment entities in the same or substantially similar circumstances; (3)
that stems from a failure to comply with previously enacted laws or rules; or
(4) enacted after a public hearing on the proposed legislation for which
reasonable notice is given that unfunded mandates will be considered, for which
a fiscal analysis is available at the time of the public hearing.
Subd. 3. Established. A local mandate review board is
established to hear and decide complaints from local governments relating to
unfunded mandates.
Subd. 4. Membership;
qualifications; appointment; terms; compensation. The board consists of eight members and a
chair appointed by the governor.
Persons appointed to the board must not hold any other elected or
appointed office. Section 15.0575
applies to the appointment, terms, compensation, removal, and filling of
vacancies of members of the board.
Subd. 5. Administration. The Office of Administrative Hearings
shall provide administrative support and space for meetings and hearings held
by the board.
Subd. 6. Powers; duties. (a) The board shall review and issue
rulings on complaints filed with the board by a local government asserting that
a law enacted or a rule adopted by a state agency, on or after the effective
date of this section, is an unfunded mandate.
The board shall determine the form and required contents for complaints
but at a minimum a complaint must be supported by a resolution adopted by the
governing body of the local government.
(b) The board may hold
hearings on any complaint filed with the board. All meetings and hearings of the board must be open to the
public.
(c) The board may
consolidate complaints related to the same provision of law or rule.
(d) Any group or individual
may file a written request with the board to appear as amicus curiae.
(e) The board's decision
must be supported by a written opinion agreed to by a majority of the
board. The decision and majority
opinion may be accompanied by any concurring or dissenting opinions. Decisions, including any concurring or
dissenting opinions, must be published on a Web site established for the board
on the Web site of the Office of Administrative Hearings and mailed to any
party who filed a complaint.
(f) If the board decides
that the law or rule complained of is an unfunded mandate, the board may enjoin
enforcement of the law or rule as to any local government affected by the law
or rule, as provided in the board's decision.
Subd. 7. Report to legislature. By January 15 each year, the board must
report on the board's activities during the prior year to the chairs of the
legislative committees with jurisdiction over taxes, finance, and local
government. The report must include a
summary of each complaint, the disposition of the matter, and any
recommendations the board has relating to the laws or rules in the complaints."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Brod and Lanning amendment and
the roll was called. There were 59 yeas
and 72 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Kalin
Lanning
Lenczewski
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Ruud
Scalze
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Wollschlager
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dominguez
Eken
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olson
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Sailer
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Heidgerken, Moe, Buesgens,
Howes, Anzelc, Ozment, Rukavina, Koenen, Faust, Eken, Hackbarth and Gunther
moved to amend H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 277, after line 5,
insert:
"Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, section
144.4167, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 10. Smoking shelters. Sections 144.411 to 144.417 do not
prohibit smoking in a structure located outside of an establishment that
provides shelter for persons smoking outdoors.
Employees of an establishment with a smoking shelter may not serve food
or beverages to persons in the smoking shelter."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
POINT OF ORDER
Huntley raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the
Heidgerken et al amendment was not in order.
The Speaker ruled the point of order not well taken and the Heidgerken
et al amendment in order.
Pursuant to rule 1.50, Sertich moved that the House be allowed
to continue in session after 12:00 midnight.
The motion prevailed.
The question recurred on the Heidgerken et al amendment and the
roll was called. There were 73 yeas and
59 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Berns
Bly
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Garofalo
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Haws
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Jaros
Juhnke
Kalin
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lesch
Lieder
Magnus
Mahoney
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morrow
Nelson
Nornes
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Rukavina
Ruth
Sailer
Seifert
Sertich
Shimanski
Simpson
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Wollschlager
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Dominguez
Erhardt
Fritz
Gardner
Gottwalt
Greiling
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Knuth
Lenczewski
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mariani
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Norton
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Ruud
Scalze
Severson
Simon
Slawik
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Emmer moved to amend H. F.
No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 218, line 31, strike
"(94,000)" and insert "($30,025,000)"
Page 220, after line 14,
insert:
"Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes, section 297A.992,
subdivision 5, as added by Laws 2008, chapter 152, article 4, section 2, is
amended to read:
Subd. 5. Grant
application and awards; Grant Evaluation and Ranking System (GEARS) Committee. (a) The joint powers board shall establish a
grant application process and identify the amount of available funding for grant
awards. Grant applications must be
submitted in a form prescribed by the joint powers board. An applicant must provide, in addition to
all other information required by the joint powers board, the estimated cost of
the project, the amount of the grant sought, possible sources of funding in
addition to the grant sought, and identification of any federal funds that will
be utilized if the grant is awarded. A
grant application seeking transit capital funding must identify the source of
money necessary to operate the transit improvement.
(b) The joint powers board
shall establish a timeline and procedures for the award of grants, and may
award grants only to the state and political subdivisions. The board shall define objective criteria
for the award of grants, which must include, but not be limited to, consistency
with the most recent version of the transportation policy plan adopted by the
Metropolitan Council under section 473.146.
The joint powers board shall maximize the availability and use of federal
funds in projects funded under this section.
(c) The joint powers board
shall establish a GEARS Committee, which must consist of:
(1) one county commissioner
from each county that is in the metropolitan transportation area, appointed by
its county board;
(2) one elected city
representative from each county that is in the metropolitan transportation
area;
(3) one additional elected
city representative from each county for every additional 400,000 in
population, or fraction of 400,000, in the county that is above 400,000 in
population; and
(4) the chair of the
Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee.
(d) Each city representative
must be elected at a meeting of cities in the metropolitan transportation area,
which must be convened for that purpose by the Association of Metropolitan
Municipalities.
(e) The committee shall
evaluate grant applications following objective criteria established by the
joint powers board, and must provide to the joint powers board a selection list
of transportation projects that includes a priority ranking.
(f) A grant award for a
transit project located within the metropolitan area, as defined in section
473.121, subdivision 2, may be funded only after the Metropolitan Council
reviews the project for consistency with the transit portion of the
Metropolitan Council policy plan and one of the following occurs:
(1) the Metropolitan Council
finds the project to be consistent;
(2) the Metropolitan Council
initially finds the project to be inconsistent, but after a good faith effort
to resolve the inconsistency through negotiations with the joint powers board,
agrees that the grant award may be funded; or
(3) the Metropolitan Council
finds the project to be inconsistent, and submits the consistency issue for final
determination to a panel, which determines the project to be consistent. The panel is composed of a member appointed
by the chair of the Metropolitan Council, a member appointed by the joint
powers board, and a member agreed upon by both the chair and the joint powers
board.
(g) Grants must be funded by
the proceeds of the taxes imposed under this section, bonds, notes, or other
obligations issued by the joint powers board under subdivision 7.
(h) Notwithstanding the
provisions of this subdivision, in fiscal year 2009, of the initial revenue
collected under this section, the joint powers board shall allocate at least $30,783,000
$60,714,000 to the Metropolitan Council for operating assistance for
transit.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment."
Page 220, after line 23,
insert:
"Sec. 9. TRANSFER.
By June 30, 2009,
$29,931,000 is transferred from the general fund to the onetime expenditure
account in the special revenue fund."
Renumber the sections in sequence
and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
Garofalo moved to amend the
Emmer amendment to H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 1, after line 1,
insert:
"Page 43, line 17,
delete "$51" and insert "$84"
Page 51, after line 11,
insert:
"Subd. 8. Onetime
general education aid. For
additional general education aid:
$29,931,000 . . . . . 2009
This appropriation is from the onetime expenditure
account in the special revenue account.""
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the amendment to the amendment and
the roll was called. There were 48 yeas
and 84 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Bly
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hosch
Howes
Kalin
Liebling
Magnus
McNamara
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Peppin
Ruth
Sailer
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Urdahl
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
DeLaForest
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Eken
Erhardt
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Olson
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment
was not adopted.
Sertich moved to amend the
Emmer amendment to H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 2, delete lines 30 to
33
Emmer withdrew his amendment to H. F. No. 1812, the third
engrossment, as amended.
Garofalo moved to amend H.
F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 26, after line 15,
insert:
"Sec. 25. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 124D.86,
subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Integration
revenue. Integration revenue equals
the following amounts:
(1) for Independent School
District No. 709, Duluth, $206 the lesser of $175 times the adjusted pupil
units for the school year;
(2) for Independent School
District No. 625, St. Paul, $445 times
the adjusted pupil units for the school year;
(3) for Special School
District No. 1, Minneapolis, the sum of $445 times the adjusted pupil units for
the school year and an additional $35 times the adjusted pupil units for the
school year that is provided entirely through a local levy;
(4) for a each
qualifying district not listed
in clause (1), (2), or (3), or the actual cost of implementing the plan
during the fiscal year. A qualifying
district is a district that must implement a plan under Minnesota Rules,
parts 3535.0100 to 3535.0180, where the district's enrollment of protected
students, as defined under Minnesota Rules, part 3535.0110, exceeds 15 percent,
the lesser of (i) the actual cost of implementing the plan during the fiscal
year minus the aid received under subdivision 6, or (ii) $129 times the
adjusted pupil units for the school year; or that is a member district
of a multidistrict integration collaborative that files a plan with the
commissioner, but is not contiguous to a racially isolated district.
(5) for a district not
listed in clause (1), (2), (3), or (4), that is required to implement a plan
according to the requirements of Minnesota Rules, parts 3535.0100 to 3535.0180,
the lesser of
(i) the actual cost of
implementing the plan during the fiscal year minus the aid received under
subdivision 6, or
(ii) $92 times the adjusted
pupil units for the school year.
Any Money received by districts
in clauses (1) to (3) which exceeds the amount received in fiscal year 2000
shall be under this subdivision is subject to the budget
requirements in subdivision 1a; and
(6) for a member district of
a multidistrict integration collaborative that files a plan with the
commissioner, but is not contiguous to a racially isolated district,
integration revenue equals the amount defined in clause (5).
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2008, for revenue for fiscal
year 2009 and later."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Garofalo amendment and the roll
was called. There were 51 yeas and 81
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Juhnke
Liebling
Magnus
McNamara
Nornes
Norton
Olson
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Peppin
Poppe
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Urdahl
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Wollschlager
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Gunther moved to amend H. F.
No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 99, line 21, delete the
new language
Page 99, delete line 22
Page 99, line 23, delete the
new language
Page 100, delete lines 9 to
12 and insert:
"EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective the day following final enactment."
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Gunther amendment and the roll
was called. There were 48 yeas and 83
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Norton
Olson
Ozment
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Drazkowski offered an amendment to
H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended.
POINT
OF ORDER
Huntley raised a point of order pursuant to rule 4.03, relating
to Ways and Means Committee; Budget Resolution; Effect on Expenditure and
Revenue Bills, that the Drazkowski amendment was not in order. The Speaker ruled the point of order well
taken and the Drazkowski amendment out of order.
Lanning
moved to amend H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page
66, line 24, delete "44.5 " and insert "44"
Page
75, delete section 25
Page
81, delete lines 19 to 25
Page
86, delete section 36
Page
89, delete section 38
Adjust
the totals accordingly
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend
the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Lanning amendment and the roll
was called. There were 54 yeas and 78
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Bly
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Nornes
Olson
Ozment
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Ruud
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Hackbarth offered an amendment to
H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended.
POINT
OF ORDER
Solberg raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the
Hackbarth amendment was not in order.
The Speaker ruled the point of order well taken and the Hackbarth
amendment out of order.
Seifert appealed the decision of the Speaker.
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The vote was taken on the question "Shall the decision of
the Speaker stand as the judgment of the House?" and the roll was
called. There were 67 yeas and 65 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dominguez
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Kahn
Knuth
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Berns
Brod
Brown
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Juhnke
Kalin
Koenen
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morrow
Nornes
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Poppe
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
So it was the judgment of the House that the decision of the
Speaker should stand.
Drazkowski
moved to amend H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page
313, after line 19, insert:
"Sec.
11. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.434, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
21. Nursing
facility payment. (a) For
the rate year beginning October 1, 2008, the commissioner shall make available
to each nursing facility reimbursed
under this section a onetime payment equal to 1.4 percent of the operating
payment rates in effect on September 30, 2008.
This payment shall be provided after determining the blending in section
256B.441, subdivision 55, paragraph (a).
This payment shall not become part of the facility's operating payment
rate for the rate year beginning October 1, 2009.
(b)
Seventy-five percent of the money resulting from the payment under paragraph
(a) must be used to provide a onetime
compensation-related bonus for employees directly employed by the nursing facility on or after October 1,
2008, except:
(1)
the administrator;
(2)
persons employed in the central office of a corporation that has an ownership
interest in the nursing facility or exercises control over the nursing
facility; and
(3)
persons paid by the nursing facility under a management contract.
(c)
The commissioner shall allow as compensation-related costs all costs for:
(1)
wages and salaries;
(2)
the employee's share of health and dental insurance, life insurance, disability
insurance, long-term care insurance, uniform allowance, and pensions; and
(3)
other benefits provided, subject to the approval of the commissioner.
(d)
The portion of the payment under paragraph (a) that is not subject to the
requirements in paragraph (b) shall be provided to nursing facilities effective
October 1, 2008."
Page
348, line 2, delete "two" and insert "three"
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend
the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Drazkowski amendment and the roll
was called. There were 45 yeas and 86
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Beard
Bly
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Koenen
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Erhardt
Faust
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Olson moved to amend H. F.
No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 46, delete section 56
and insert:
"Sec. 56. NO
CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT; WAIVER FROM FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS.
(a) The commissioner of
education must immediately petition the federal Department of Education to
allow Minnesota to use the federal funds it receives under the No Child Left
Behind Act of 2001 for state educational assessment and accountability,
consistent with the Minnesota Statutes, chapter 120B. The commissioner must include in the petition information to
demonstrate the efficacy of Minnesota's current statutory system of educational
assessment and accountability and how added flexibility related to expending
such federal funds enhances the state system.
(b) Notwithstanding other
law to the contrary, if the federal Department of Education does not grant the
commissioner flexibility under this section by August 1, 2008, the commissioner
must not enforce the educational assessment and accountability provisions in
Minnesota Statutes, chapter 120B, related to implementing the No Child Left
Behind Act of 2001 after the 2008-2009 school year. A school board may file a written resolution with the state
auditor under Minnesota Statutes, section 6.79, recommending how the
commissioner might implement the educational assessment and accountability
provisions in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 120B, absent the federal mandates."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Moe; Hosch; Tschumper; Heidgerken; Howes; Otremba; Eken;
Hamilton; Doty; Peterson, A.; Ward; Anzelc; Urdahl and Simpson offered an
amendment to H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended.
POINT
OF ORDER
Seifert raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the
Moe et al amendment was not in order.
The Speaker ruled the point of order not well taken and the Moe et al
amendment in order.
Paulsen requested a division of the Moe et al amendment to H.
F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended.
The first portion of the Moe et al amendment to H. F. No. 1812,
the third engrossment, as amended, reads as follows:
Page 27, after line 11,
insert:
"Sec. 27. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, section
126C.10, subdivision 24, is amended to read:
Subd. 24. Equity
revenue. (a) A school district
qualifies for equity revenue if:
(1) the school district's
adjusted marginal cost pupil unit amount of basic revenue, supplemental
revenue, transition revenue, and referendum revenue is less than the value of
the school district at or immediately above the 95th percentile of school
districts in its equity region for those revenue categories; and
(2) the school district's
administrative offices are not located in a city of the first class on July 1,
1999.
(b) Equity revenue for a
qualifying district that receives referendum revenue under section 126C.17,
subdivision 4, equals the product of (1) the district's adjusted marginal cost
pupil units for that year; times (2) the sum of (i) $13, plus (ii) $75, times
the school district's equity index computed under subdivision 27.
(c) Equity revenue for a
qualifying district that does not receive referendum revenue under section
126C.17, subdivision 4, equals the product of the district's adjusted marginal
cost pupil units for that year times $13.
(d) A school district's
equity revenue is increased by the greater of zero or an amount equal to the
district's resident marginal cost pupil units times the difference between ten
percent of the statewide average amount of referendum revenue per resident
marginal cost pupil unit for that year and the district's referendum revenue
per resident marginal cost pupil unit.
A school district's revenue under this paragraph must not exceed
$100,000 for that year.
(e) A school district's
equity revenue for a school district located in the metro equity region equals
the amount computed in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) multiplied by 1.25.
(f) For fiscal year 2007 and
later, notwithstanding paragraph (a), clause (2), a school district that has
per pupil referendum revenue below the 95th percentile qualifies for additional
equity revenue equal to $46 times its adjusted marginal cost pupil units.
(g) A district that does not
qualify for revenue under paragraph (f) qualifies for equity revenue equal to
$46 times its adjusted marginal cost pupil units.
(h) Notwithstanding
paragraphs (a) to (g), a school district's equity revenue for fiscal year 2010
and later equals its equity revenue for the previous year.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for revenue for fiscal year 2010 and
later."
Page 50, after line 8,
insert:
"Sec. 60. GOVERNOR'S
K-12 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS.
The governor's proposed K-12
education budget for the 2010-2011 biennium must include recommendations to
replace the school district funding that was previously raised through locally
approved operating referenda. A
preliminary draft of this
portion of the budget must be publicly released prior to October 1, 2008. The draft must specify the revenue sources
used to replace the operating referenda and provide details on the distribution
of the replacement revenue among school districts.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the first portion of the Moe et al
amendment and the roll was called.
There were 40 yeas and 92 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Berns
Brod
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Drazkowski
Eken
Finstad
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Koenen
Magnus
McNamara
Moe
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Peterson, A.
Rukavina
Sailer
Seifert
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Urdahl
Ward
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Demmer
Dominguez
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olson
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Ruth
Ruud
Scalze
Sertich
Severson
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Wardlow
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the first portion of the Moe et
al amendment was not adopted.
Moe withdrew the second portion of the Moe et al amendment to
H. F. No. 1812, the third engrossment, as amended.
Tschumper, Paymar, Buesgens,
DeLaForest, Peppin, Scalze and Greiling moved to amend H. F. No. 1812, the
third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 217, after line 6,
insert:
"Sec. 7. APPROPRIATION
CANCELED.
Notwithstanding the
reduction in article 8, section 2, the appropriation in Laws 2007, chapter 45,
article 1, section 3, subdivision 4, from the general fund to the commissioner
of agriculture for ethanol producer payments in fiscal years 2008 and 2009 is
canceled.
Sec. 8. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2006,
section 41A.09, subdivisions 1a, 2a, 3a, 4, and 10, are repealed.
Sec. 9. EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Sections 7 and 8 are
effective the day following final enactment."
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Tschumper et al amendment and the
roll was called. There were 37 yeas and
87 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Buesgens
Bunn
DeLaForest
Dettmer
Dittrich
Emmer
Erhardt
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Knuth
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Morgan
Murphy, E.
Norton
Olson
Paulsen
Paymar
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Ruud
Scalze
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Carlson
Cornish
Dean
Demmer
Dill
Dominguez
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Garofalo
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lieder
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morrow
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Sailer
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Urdahl
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
H. F. No. 1812, A bill for an act relating to the financing,
organization, and operation of state government; providing for programs in
education, early childhood education, higher education, environment and natural
resources, energy, agriculture, veterans affairs, military affairs, jobs and
economic development activities or programs, transportation, public safety,
courts, human rights, judiciary, housing, public health, health department, and
human services; modifying certain statutory provisions and laws; providing for
certain programs for economic and state affairs; regulating certain activities
and practices; regulating abortion funding; fixing and limiting fees; providing
for the taxation of certain corporations; authorizing rulemaking, requiring
studies and reports; providing civil penalties; making technical corrections;
providing for fund transfers; appropriating money or reducing appropriations;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 3.30, subdivision 1; 3.855,
subdivision 3; 3.971, subdivision 2; 10A.071, subdivision 3; 13.32, subdivision
3, by adding a subdivision; 13.461, by adding a subdivision; 13.465,
subdivision 8; 13.851, by adding a subdivision; 15A.081, subdivision 8;
15A.0815; 16A.133, subdivision 1; 16B.281, subdivision 3; 16B.282; 16B.283;
16B.284; 16B.287, subdivision 2; 16C.16, subdivision 5; 16E.01, subdivision 3;
16E.03, subdivision 1; 16E.04, subdivision 2; 17.4988, subdivisions 2, 3;
43A.01, subdivision 3; 43A.17, subdivision 9; 84.788, subdivision 3; 84.82,
subdivision 2, by adding a subdivision; 84.922, subdivision 2; 84.9256,
subdivision 1; 85.011; 85.012, subdivisions 28, 49a; 85.013, subdivision 1;
85.054, subdivision 3, by adding a subdivision; 86B.401, subdivision 2; 88.15,
subdivision 2; 89.715; 93.481, by adding a subdivision; 97A.055, subdivision
4b; 97A.141, subdivision 1; 103A.204; 103A.43; 103B.151, subdivision 1;
103G.291, by adding a subdivision; 103G.615, subdivision 2; 116J.423, by adding
a subdivision; 116J.8731, subdivision 4; 116L.17, by adding a subdivision;
116U.26; 119A.03, subdivision 1; 120B.131, subdivision 2; 120B.31, as amended;
120B.35, as amended; 120B.36, as amended; 120B.362; 122A.21; 123B.02,
subdivision 21; 123B.59, subdivision 1; 123B.62; 124D.04, subdivisions 3, 6, 8,
9; 124D.05, by adding a subdivision; 124D.10, subdivision 20; 124D.385,
subdivision 4; 124D.55; 125A.65, by adding a subdivision; 125A.76, by adding a
subdivision; 126C.10, subdivision 31, by adding a subdivision; 126C.17,
subdivision 9; 126C.21, subdivision 1; 126C.51; 126C.52, subdivision 2, by
adding a subdivision; 126C.53; 126C.55; 127A.45, subdivision 16; 136A.101,
subdivision 8; 136A.121, subdivision 5; 136F.90, subdivision 1; 141.25, by
adding a subdivision; 144.1222, subdivision 1a, by adding subdivisions;
144.1501, subdivision 2; 144.218, subdivision 1; 144.225, subdivision 2;
144.2252; 144.226, subdivision 1; 157.16, as amended; 168.1255, by adding a
subdivision; 171.29, subdivision 1; 190.19, subdivision 1, by adding a
subdivision; 192.501, by adding subdivisions; 197.585, subdivision 5; 216C.41,
subdivision 4; 253B.045, subdivisions 1, 2, by adding a subdivision; 253B.185,
subdivision 5; 256.01, by adding a subdivision; 256.741, subdivisions 2, 2a, 3;
256.969, subdivisions 2b, 20; 256B.0571, subdivisions 8, 9; 256B.0621,
subdivisions 2, 6, 10; 256B.0917, subdivision 8; 256B.0924, subdivisions 4, 6;
256B.19, subdivision 1d; 256B.431, subdivision 23; 256B.69, subdivisions 5a, 6,
by adding subdivisions; 256B.692, by adding a subdivision; 256D.44,
subdivisions 2, 5; 256L.12, subdivision 9; 259.89, subdivision 1; 260C.317,
subdivision 4; 268.125, subdivisions 1, 2, by adding a subdivision; 290.01,
subdivisions 5, 19c, as amended, 19d, as amended, by adding a subdivision;
290.17, subdivision 4; 298.2214, subdivisions 1, 2, as amended; 298.223,
subdivision 2; 298.28, subdivisions 9b, 9d, as added; 298.292, subdivision 2,
as amended; 298.2961, subdivision 2; 341.21, as amended; 341.23; 341.26; 341.28,
as amended; 341.29; 341.30; 341.32, as amended; 341.33; 341.34, subdivision 1;
341.35; 341.37; 349A.02, subdivision 1; 446A.12, subdivision 1; 462A.22,
subdivision 1; 473.1565, subdivision 3; 518A.50; 518A.53, subdivision 5;
609.531, subdivision 1; Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, sections 3.922, by
adding a subdivision; 10A.01, subdivision 35; 16B.328, by adding a subdivision;
80A.28, subdivision 1; 84.8205, subdivision 1; 103G.291, subdivision 3;
116J.575, subdivision 1a; 116L.17, subdivision 1; 120B.021, subdivision 1;
120B.024; 120B.30; 123B.143, subdivision 1; 124D.531, subdivision 1; 126C.21,
subdivision 3; 126C.44; 136A.121, subdivision 7a; 136A.126; 136A.127; 136A.128,
by adding a subdivision; 136A.65, subdivisions 1, 3, 5, 6, 7; 136A.66; 136A.67;
136A.69; 136F.02, subdivision 1; 136F.03, subdivision 4; 141.25, subdivision 5;
141.28,
subdivision 1; 141.35;
144.4167, by adding a subdivision; 190.19, subdivision 2; 214.04, subdivision
3; 216C.052, subdivision 2; 216C.41, subdivision 3; 253B.185, subdivision 1b;
256.741, subdivision 1; 256B.0625, subdivision 20; 256B.0631, subdivisions 1,
3; 256B.199; 256B.434, subdivision 19; 256B.441, subdivisions 1, 55, 56;
256J.621; 268.047, subdivisions 1, 2; 268.085, subdivisions 3, 9, 16; 268.125,
subdivision 3; 298.227; 341.22; 341.25; 341.27; 341.321; 446A.072, subdivisions
3, 5a; 446A.086; Laws 1999, chapter 223, article 2, section 72; Laws 2006,
chapter 282, article 2, section 27, subdivision 4; Laws 2007, chapter 45,
article 2, section 1; Laws 2007, chapter 54, article 1, section 11; Laws 2007,
chapter 57, article 1, section 4, subdivisions 3, 4, 6; Laws 2007, chapter 135,
article 1, section 3, subdivisions 2, 3; Laws 2007, chapter 144, article 1,
sections 3, subdivisions 2, 18; 5, subdivisions 2, 5; Laws 2007, chapter 146,
article 1, section 24, subdivisions 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; article 2, section 46,
subdivisions 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 13; article 3, sections 23, subdivision 2; 24,
subdivisions 3, 4, 9; article 4, section 16, subdivisions 2, 3, 6, 8; article
5, section 13, subdivisions 2, 3, 4, 5; article 7, section 4; article 9,
section 17, subdivisions 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 13; Laws 2007, chapter 147, article 2,
section 21; article 19, section 3, subdivisions 1, 4; Laws 2007, chapter 148,
article 1, sections 7; 12, subdivision 4; Laws 2007, First Special Session
chapter 2, article 1, section 11, subdivisions 1, 2, 6; Laws 2008, chapter 152,
article 1, section 6, subdivision 2; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota
Statutes, chapters 5; 13B; 16A; 43A; 115A; 116J; 120B; 121A; 124D; 127A; 136F;
144; 192; 256B; 268; 325F; 341; 446A; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006,
sections 16B.281, subdivisions 2, 4, 5; 16B.285; 84.961, subdivision 4; 85.013,
subdivision 21b; 97A.141, subdivision 2; 121A.67; 125A.16; 125A.19; 125A.20; 125A.57;
168.123, subdivision 2a; 256.741, subdivision 15; 256J.24, subdivision 6;
259.83, subdivision 3; 259.89, subdivisions 2, 3, 4, 5; 290.01, subdivision 6b;
298.28, subdivision 9a; 341.31; 645.44, subdivision 19; Minnesota Statutes 2007
Supplement, section 256.969, subdivision 27; Laws 1989, chapter 335, article 1,
section 21, subdivision 8, as amended; Laws 2004, chapter 188, section 2; Laws
2006, chapter 263, article 3, section 16; Laws 2007, First Special Session
chapter 2, article 1, section 11, subdivisions 3, 4.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 83 yeas and 49
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Olson
Ozment
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Wollschlager
Zellers
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE, Continued
The following messages were received from the Senate:
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate refuses to concur in the
House amendments to the following Senate File:
S. F.
No. 2822, A bill for an act relating to insurance; providing for penalties and
attorney fees for certain insurance claims practices; proposing coding for new
law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 604.
The
Senate respectfully requests that a Conference Committee be appointed
thereon. The Senate has appointed as
such committee:
Senators
Clark, Scheid, Moua, Higgins and Jungbauer.
Said
Senate File is herewith transmitted to the House with the request that the
House appoint a like committee.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
Atkins moved that the House accede to the request of the Senate
and that the Speaker appoint a Conference Committee of 5 members of the House
to meet with a like committee appointed by the Senate on the disagreeing votes
of the two houses on S. F. No. 2822. The motion prevailed.
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate refuses to concur in the
House amendments to the following Senate File:
S. F.
No. 2369, A bill for an act relating to education; requiring criminal history
background checks; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 123B.03,
subdivision 1.
The
Senate respectfully requests that a Conference Committee be appointed
thereon. The Senate has appointed as
such committee:
Senators
Rest; Olson, G., and Betzold.
Said
Senate File is herewith transmitted to the House with the request that the
House appoint a like committee.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
Bigham moved that the House accede to the request of the Senate
and that the Speaker appoint a Conference Committee of 3 members of the House
to meet with a like committee appointed by the Senate on the disagreeing votes
of the two houses on S. F. No. 2369. The motion prevailed.
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate refuses to concur in the
House amendments to the following Senate File:
S. F.
No. 2909, A bill for an act relating to landlord and tenant; modifying right of
tenant to pay utility bills; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
504B.215, subdivision 3.
The
Senate respectfully requests that a Conference Committee be appointed
thereon. The Senate has appointed as
such committee:
Senators
Olseen, Higgins and Limmer.
Said
Senate File is herewith transmitted to the House with the request that the
House appoint a like committee.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
Gunther moved that the House accede to the request of the
Senate and that the Speaker appoint a Conference Committee of 3 members of the
House to meet with a like committee appointed by the Senate on the disagreeing
votes of the two houses on S. F. No. 2909. The motion prevailed.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Sertich moved that the Consent Calendar be continued. The motion prevailed.
REPORT
FROM THE COMMITTEE ON RULES AND
LEGISLATIVE
ADMINISTRATION
Sertich from the Committee on Rules and Legislative
Administration, pursuant to rule 1.21, designated the following bills to be
placed on the Calendar for the Day for Monday, April 7, 2008:
H. F. Nos. 2991, 1665, 2721, 2662, 3644,
3646, 1625, 3690, 3228, 2627, 3396, 3710, 3576 and 2426;
S. F. Nos. 3286 and 2377; H. F. Nos. 2588 and
3264; S. F. No. 2667; and H. F. Nos. 3438, 3204,
3572 and 995.
CALENDAR FOR THE DAY
Sertich moved that the Calendar for the Day be continued. The motion prevailed.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
BY THE SPEAKER
The Speaker announced the appointment of the following members
of the House to a Conference Committee on S. F. No. 2369:
Bigham; Peterson, S., and Dettmer.
The Speaker announced the appointment of the following members
of the House to a Conference Committee on S. F. No. 2822:
Atkins, Smith, Morrow, Hilstrom and Lillie.
The Speaker announced the appointment of the following members
of the House to a Conference Committee on S. F. No. 2909:
Gunther, Mullery and Tillberry.
MOTIONS AND RESOLUTIONS
Brod moved that the name of Morgan be added as an author on
H. F. No. 2172. The
motion prevailed.
Moe moved that the names of Paulsen and Brod be added as
authors on H. F. No. 3935.
The motion prevailed.
Wagenius moved that her name be stricken as an author on
H. F. No. 4021. The
motion prevailed.
McFarlane moved that the names of Gardner and Scalze be added
as authors on H. F. No. 4159.
The motion prevailed.
Koenen moved that the name of McNamara be added as an author on
H. F. No. 4160. The
motion prevailed.
DeLaForest and Kahn introduced:
House Resolution No. 10, A House resolution expressing the
sense of the House of Representatives relating to China's treatment of Tibet.
The resolution was referred to the Committee on Rules and
Legislative Administration.
Slawik; Juhnke; Hamilton; Peterson, S., and Wardlow introduced:
House Resolution No. 11, A House resolution recognizing April
2008 as the Month of the Military Child in the state of Minnesota.
The resolution was referred to the Committee on Rules and
Legislative Administration.
ADJOURNMENT
Sertich moved that when the House adjourns today it adjourn
until 12:30 p.m., Monday, April 7, 2008.
The motion prevailed.
Sertich moved that the House adjourn. The motion prevailed, and the Speaker declared the House stands
adjourned until 12:30 p.m., Monday, April 7, 2008.
Albin
A. Mathiowetz,
Chief Clerk, House of Representatives