STATE OF MINNESOTA
EIGHTY-FIFTH SESSION - 2008
_____________________
ONE HUNDRED FIFTH DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Monday, April 21, 2008
The House of Representatives convened at 1:30 p.m. and was
called to order by Al Juhnke, Speaker pro tempore.
Prayer was offered by Father Tony Wroblewski, Brainerd Area
Catholic Churches, Brainerd, Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge of allegiance to the
flag of the United States of America.
The roll was called and the following members were present:
Abeler
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
A quorum was present.
Hamilton and Kranz were excused.
Kelliher, Sertich and Walker were excused until 2:35 p.m. Westrom was excused until 2:40 p.m. Anderson, B., was excused until 2:55
p.m. Kahn was excused until 4:25 p.m.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the Journal of the preceding
day. Dominguez moved that further
reading of the Journal be suspended and that the Journal be approved as
corrected by the Chief Clerk. The
motion prevailed.
REPORTS
OF CHIEF CLERK
S. F. No. 3001 and
H. F. No. 3316, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION
OF RULES
Mariani moved that the rules be so far suspended that
S. F. No. 3001 be substituted for H. F. No. 3316
and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 3698 and
H. F. No. 3857, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION
OF RULES
Sailer moved that the rules be so far suspended that
S. F. No. 3698 be substituted for H. F. No. 3857
and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.
PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS
The following communication was received:
STATE
OF MINNESOTA
OFFICE
OF THE GOVERNOR
SAINT
PAUL 55155
April
17, 2008
The Honorable Margaret
Anderson Kelliher
Speaker of the House of
Representatives
The State of Minnesota
Dear Speaker Kelliher:
I have vetoed and am returning House File No. 3114, Chapter No.
193, a bill related to real estate acquisitions by park district boards.
Existing law provides local city governments an opportunity to
review and vote on a park district board's acquisition of real property within
the city. This requirement maximizes
local input over land issues that directly impact land within the city.
While the statutory change sought in this legislation requires
that land acquisitions be in accordance with a city's local master plans, these
plans are typically only developed every 10 years. Additional timely review and input by local elected officials
assures that property being acquired for park purposes remains consistent with
the priorities of the elected local government.
Sincerely,
Tim
Pawlenty
Governor
REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES AND DIVISIONS
Solberg
from the Committee on Ways and Means to which was referred:
H.
F. No. 615, A bill for an act relating to education; providing for responsible
family life and sexuality education programs; requiring information on certain
immunizations; appropriating money; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota
Statutes, chapter 121A; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 121A.23.
Reported
the same back with the recommendation that the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was
referred:
H. F. No. 934, A bill for an act relating to the
environment; requiring manufacturers of certain flame retardants to register
with the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency; creating a fire safety
committee; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 325E.
Reported the same back with the following
amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and
insert:
"Section 1.
Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, section 325E.386, is amended to read:
325E.386
PRODUCTS CONTAINING CERTAIN POLYBROMINATED DIPHENYL ETHERS BANNED; EXEMPTIONS.
Subdivision 1.
Penta- and octabromodiphenyl ethers. Except as provided in subdivision 3 2, beginning
January 1, 2008, a person may not manufacture, process, or distribute in
commerce a product or flame-retardant part of a product containing more than
one-tenth of one percent of pentabromodiphenyl ether or octabromodiphenyl ether
by mass.
Subd. 2. Exemptions;
penta- and octabromodiphenyl ethers.
The following products containing polybrominated diphenyl ethers are
exempt from subdivision 1 and section 325E.387, subdivision 2:
(1) the sale or distribution of any used
transportation vehicle with component parts containing polybrominated diphenyl
ethers;
(2) the sale or distribution of any used
transportation vehicle parts or new transportation vehicle parts manufactured
before January 1, 2008, that contain polybrominated diphenyl ethers;
(3) the manufacture, sale, repair, distribution,
maintenance, refurbishment, or modification of equipment containing
polybrominated diphenyl ethers and used primarily for military or federally
funded space program applications. This
exemption does not cover consumer-based goods with broad applicability;
(4) the sale or distribution by a business, charity,
public entity, or private party of any used product containing polybrominated
diphenyl ethers;
(5) the manufacture, sale, or distribution of new
carpet cushion made from recycled foam containing more than one-tenth of one
percent polybrominated diphenyl ether;
(6) medical devices; or
(7) the manufacture, sale, repair, distribution,
maintenance, refurbishment, or modification of telecommunications equipment
containing polybrominated diphenyl ethers used by entities eligible to hold
authorization in the Public Safety Pool under Code of Federal Regulations,
title 47, part 90.
In-state retailers in possession of products on
January 1, 2008, that are banned for sale under subdivision 1 may exhaust their
stock through sales to the public.
Nothing in this section restricts the ability of a manufacturer,
importer, or distributor from transporting products containing polybrominated
diphenyl ethers through the state, or storing such products in the state for
later distribution outside the state.
Subd. 3. Commercial decabromodiphenyl ether. (a) Except as provided in subdivision 4,
beginning July 1, 2010, a person may not manufacture, process, or distribute in
commerce any of the following products containing more than one-tenth of one percent
of commercial decabromodiphenyl ether by mass:
(1) the exterior casing of a television, computer,
or computer monitor;
(2) upholstered furniture or textiles intended for
indoor use in a home or other residential occupancy; or
(3) mattresses and mattress pads.
(b) The sale or distribution by a business, charity,
public entity, or private party of any used product containing commercial
decabromodiphenyl ether is exempted from this subdivision.
(c) In-state retailers in possession of products on
January 1, 2010, that are banned for sale under this subdivision may exhaust
their stock of products located in the state as of that date through sales to
the public. Nothing in this section
restricts a manufacturer, importer, or distributor from transporting products
containing commercial decabromodiphenyl ether through the state or storing such
products in the state for later distribution outside the state.
Subd. 4. Exemption process; commercial decabromodiphenyl ether. (a) A manufacturer or user of a product
prohibited from manufacture, sale, or distribution under subdivision 3 may
apply for an exemption for a specific use of commercial decabromodiphenyl ether
under this section by filing a written request with the commissioner. The commissioner may grant an exemption for
a term not to exceed three years. The
exemption is renewable upon written request.
An initial or renewal request for exemption must include at least the
following:
(1) a policy statement articulating upper management
support for eliminating or reducing to the maximum feasible extent the use of
commercial decabromodiphenyl ether;
(2) a description of the product and the amount of
commercial decabromodiphenyl ether distributed for sale and use in the state on
an annual basis;
(3) a description of the recycling and disposal
system used for the product in the state and an estimate of the amount of
product or commercial decabromodiphenyl ether that is recycled or disposed of
in the state on an annual basis;
(4) a description of the manufacturer's or user's
past and ongoing efforts to eliminate or reduce the amount of commercial
decabromodiphenyl ether used in the product;
(5) an assessment of options available to reduce or
eliminate the use of commercial decabromodiphenyl ether, including any
alternatives that do not contain commercial decabromodiphenyl ether, perform
the same technical function, are commercially available, and are economically
practicable;
(6) a statement of objectives in numerical terms and
a schedule for achieving the elimination of commercial decabromodiphenyl ether
and an environmental assessment of alternative products, including but not
limited to human health, solid waste, hazardous waste, and wastewater impacts
associated with production, use, recycling, and disposal of the alternatives;
(7) a listing of options considered not to be
technically or economically practicable; and
(8) certification of the accuracy of the information
contained in the request, signed and dated by an official of the manufacturer
or user.
(b) The commissioner may grant an initial or renewal
exemption for a specific use of commercial decabromodiphenyl ether, with or
without conditions, upon finding that the applicant has demonstrated that there
is no alternative that performs the same technical function, is commercially
available, is economically practicable, and provides net health and
environmental benefits to the state.
Subd. 5. Fees for exemption applicants. The application fee for an exemption
under subdivision 4 is $2,000 per exemption.
The fee is exempt from section 16A.1285. Revenues from application fees must be deposited in the
environmental fund.
Sec. 2.
Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, section 325E.387, is amended by
adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 3. Participation in interstate clearinghouse. The commissioner may participate in a
regional or national multistate clearinghouse to assist in carrying out the
requirements of this section. The
clearinghouse is authorized to maintain information on behalf of Minnesota,
including, but not limited to:
(1) a list of all products containing polybrominated
diphenyl ethers; and
(2) information on all exemptions granted by the
state.
Sec. 3. REPORT.
By July 1, 2011, the Pollution Control Agency shall
report to the senate and house of representatives committees with jurisdiction
over environment and natural resources and commerce policy regarding
flame-retardant alternatives available for decabromodiphenyl ether."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to environment;
banning certain products containing commercial decabromodiphenyl ether;
providing for exemptions and fees; authorizing participation in multistate
clearinghouse; requiring a report; amending Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
sections 325E.386; 325E.387, by adding a subdivision."
With the recommendation that when so amended the
bill pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was
referred:
H. F. No. 2351, A bill for an act relating to
telecommunications; requiring a study of the impact of state video franchising
in states that have enacted such legislation.
Reported the same back with the following
amendments:
Page 1, line 6, delete "contract" and
insert "issue a request for proposals"
Page 2, delete line 14 and insert:
"Sec. 2. APPROPRIATION.
Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 237.52,
subdivision 5, $85,000 is appropriated from the telecommunications access
Minnesota fund to the commissioner of commerce for the purposes of section 1.
Sec. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.
Sections 1 and 2 are effective the day following
final enactment."
Amend the title as follows:
Page 1, line 3, before the period, insert ";
appropriating money"
With the recommendation that when so amended the
bill pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was
referred:
H. F. No. 2998, A bill for an act relating to
natural resources; authorizing free entrance to state parks for totally and
permanently disabled veterans; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
85.053, by adding a subdivision.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that
the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Solberg from the Committee on Ways and Means to
which was referred:
H. F. No. 3195, A bill for an act relating to
environment; establishing an intent to participate in a cap and trade program
for greenhouse gas emissions; requiring studies; appropriating money; proposing
coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 216H.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that
the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was
referred:
H. F. No. 3301, A bill for an act relating to
transportation; modifying provisions related to design-build project requests
for proposals, scoring, project awards, protests, and stipulated fees;
modifying provisions relating to Technical Review Committee; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2006, sections 13.72, subdivision 11; 161.3420, subdivisions 2, 3, 4;
161.3422; 161.3426, subdivisions 1, 3, 4; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006,
section 161.3426, subdivision 2.
Reported the same back with the following
amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and
insert:
"Section 1.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 161.3412, subdivision 3, is amended to
read:
Subd. 3. Restriction;
reports. (a) The number of
design-build contracts awarded by the commissioner in any fiscal year may not
exceed ten percent of the total number of transportation construction contracts
awarded by the commissioner in the previous fiscal year.
(b) The commissioner shall notify the chairs of the
senate and house of representatives committees with jurisdiction over
transportation policy and transportation finance each time the commissioner
decides to use the design-build method of procurement and. The
notification must explain why that method was chosen, and provide the
initial cost estimate, the expected date of release for the RFP, and the
expected stipulated fee.
(c) The commissioner shall notify the chairs of the
senate and house of representatives committees with jurisdiction over
transportation policy and transportation finance within three days of any
change to the cost estimate or to the stipulated fee of a design-build project.
Sec. 2.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 161.3420, subdivision 2, is amended to
read:
Subd. 2. Technical
Review Committee. During the
phase-one request for qualifications (RFQ) and before solicitation, the
commissioner shall appoint a Technical Review Committee of at least five
individuals. The Technical Review
Committee must include an individual whose name and qualifications are
submitted to the commissioner by the Minnesota chapter of the Associated
General Contractors, after consultation with other commercial contractor
associations in the state. Members of
the Technical Review Committee who are not state employees are subject to the
Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and section 16C.06 to the same extent
that state agencies are subject to those provisions. The commissioner shall pay reasonable compensation to
Technical Review Committee members who are not public employees for their
services. A minimum of two state
employees on the Technical Review Committee must be at the level of senior
administrative engineer or above. A
Technical Review Committee member may not participate in the review or
discussion of responses to an RFQ or request for proposals (RFP) when the
member has a financial interest in any of the design-build firms that respond
to that RFQ or RFP. "Financial interest" includes, but is not limited
to, being or serving as an owner, employee, partner, limited liability partner,
shareholder, joint venturer, family member, officer, or director of a
design-build firm responding to an RFQ or RFP for a specific project, or having
any other economic interest in that design-build firm. The members of the Technical Review
Committee must be treated as state employees in the event of litigation
resulting from any action arising out of their service on the committee.
Sec. 3.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 161.3420, subdivision 3, is amended to
read:
Subd. 3. Contents. The commissioner shall prepare or have
prepared an RFQ. The RFQ must include
the following:
(1) the minimum qualifications of design-builders
necessary to meet the requirements for acceptance;
(2) a scope of work statement and schedule;
(3) documents defining the project requirements;
(4) the form of contract to be awarded;
(5) the weighted selection criteria for compiling a
short list and the number of firms to be included in the short list, which must
be at least two but not more than five;
(6) a description of the request for proposals (RFP)
requirements;
(7) the maximum time allowed for design and
construction;
(8) the commissioner's estimated cost of design and
construction;
(9) requirements for construction experience, design
experience, financial, personnel, and equipment resources available from
potential design-builders for the project and experience in other design-build
transportation projects or similar projects, provided that these requirements
may not unduly restrict competition; and
(10) a statement that "past performance,"
or "experience," or other criteria used in the RFQ
evaluation process does not include the exercise or assertion of a person's
legal rights.
Sec. 4.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 161.3420, subdivision 4, is amended to
read:
Subd. 4. Evaluation. The selection team Technical
Review Committee shall evaluate the design-build qualifications of
responding firms and shall compile a short list of no more than five most
highly qualified firms in accordance with qualifications criteria described in
the request for qualifications (RFQ).
If only one design-build firm responds to the RFQ or remains on the
short list, the commissioner may readvertise or cancel the project as the
commissioner deems necessary.
Sec. 5.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 161.3422, is amended to read:
161.3422
RFP FOR DESIGN-BUILD.
During phase two, the commissioner shall issue a
request for proposals (RFP) to the design-builders on the short list. The request must include:
(1) the scope of work, including (i) performance and
technical requirements, (ii) conceptual design, (iii) specifications, and (iv)
functional and operational elements for the delivery of the completed project,
which must be prepared by a registered or licensed professional engineer;
(2) a description of the qualifications required of
the design-builder and the selection criteria, including the weight or
relative order, or both, of each criterion and subcriterion;
(3) copies of the contract documents that the
successful proposer will be expected to sign;
(4) the maximum time allowable for design and
construction;
(5) the road authority's estimated cost of design
and construction;
(6) the requirement that a submitted proposal be
segmented into two parts, a technical proposal and a price proposal;
(7) the requirement that each proposal be in a
separately sealed, clearly identified package and include the date and time of
the submittal deadline;
(8) the requirement that the technical proposal
include a critical path method; bar schedule of the work to be performed, or
similar schematic; design plans and specifications; technical reports;
calculations; permit requirements; applicable development fees; and other data
requested in the RFP;
(9) the requirement that the price proposal contain
all design, construction, engineering, inspection, and construction costs of
the proposed project;
(10) the date, time, and location of the public
opening of the sealed price proposals; and
(11) other information relevant to the project;
and
(12) a statement that "past performance,"
"experience," or other criteria used in the RFP evaluation process
does not include the exercise or assertion of a person's legal rights.
Sec. 6.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 161.3426, subdivision 1, is amended to
read:
Subdivision 1.
Award; computation; announcement. Except as provided in subdivision 2, A design-build
contract shall be awarded as follows:
(a) The Technical Review Committee shall score the
technical proposals using the selection criteria in the request for proposals
(RFP). The Technical Review Committee
shall then submit a technical proposal score for each design-builder to the
commissioner. The Technical Review
Committee shall reject any proposal it deems nonresponsive proposal.
(b) The commissioner shall announce the technical
proposal score for each design-builder and shall publicly open the sealed price
proposals and shall divide each design-builder's price by the technical score
that the Technical Review Committee has given to it to obtain an adjusted score. The design-builder selected must be that
responsive and responsible design-builder (1) whose adjusted score is
the lowest, and (2) whose price component does not exceed 120 percent of the
lowest price that is submitted by a responsive, responsible design-builder. The requirement in clause (2) of this
paragraph only applies if the project has a value in excess of $25,000,000, as
stated in the RFP.
(c) If a time factor is included with the selection
criteria in the RFP package, the commissioner may also adjust the bids using
a shall include the value of the time factor established by the
commissioner as a criterion within the RFP. The value of the time factor must be expressed as a value per
day. The adjustment must be based on
the total time value. The total time
value is the design-builder's total number of days to complete the project
multiplied by the factor. The
time-adjusted price is the total time value plus the bid amount. This time adjustment to the
bids must be used for selection purposes only, and must not affect the
Department of Transportation's liquidated damages schedule or incentive or
disincentive program. An adjusted
score must then be obtained by dividing each design-builder's time-adjusted
price by the score given by the technical review team. The commissioner shall select the responsive
and responsible design-builder whose adjusted score is the lowest.
(d) Unless all proposals are rejected, the
commissioner shall award the contract to the responsive and responsible
design-builder with the lowest adjusted score.
The commissioner shall reserve the right to reject all proposals.
(e) The commissioner shall not limit the ability of
design-builders that have submitted proposals to protest a contemplated or
actual award by the commissioner by, among other things, unreasonably
restricting the time to protest, restricting the right to seek judicial review
of the commissioner's actions, attempting to change the judicial standard of
review, or attempting to shift the commissioner's costs or damages from a
protest to a protestor. Unless all
design-builders that have submitted proposals agree to execution of a contract
for the project without a waiting period beforehand, the commissioner shall
wait at least seven days after both the award of the project and public
disclosure of the Technical Review Committee's scoring data and the successful
proposal before executing a contract for the project.
Sec. 7.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 161.3426, subdivision 3, is amended to
read:
Subd. 3. Stipulated
fee. The commissioner shall award a
stipulated fee not less than two-tenths of one percent of the department's
estimated cost of design and construction to each short-listed, responsible
proposer who provides a responsive but unsuccessful proposal. Any increases to the stipulated fee must
be made only by the commissioner and the reasons for those changes must be
publicly announced at the time of the change.
If the commissioner does not award a contract, all short-listed
proposers must receive the stipulated fee.
If the commissioner cancels the contract before reviewing the technical
proposals, the commissioner shall award each design-builder on the short list a
stipulated fee of not less than two-tenths of one percent of the commissioner's
estimated cost of design and construction.
The commissioner shall pay the stipulated fee to each proposer within 90
days after the award of the contract or the decision not to award a contract
without conditions other than those stated in this subdivision. In consideration for paying the stipulated
fee, the commissioner may use any ideas or information contained in the
proposals in connection with any contract awarded for the project or in
connection with a subsequent procurement, without any obligation to pay any
additional compensation to the unsuccessful proposers. Notwithstanding the other provisions of this
subdivision, an unsuccessful short-list proposer may elect to waive the
stipulated fee. If an unsuccessful
short-list proposer elects to waive the stipulated fee, the commissioner may
not use ideas and information contained in that proposer's proposal. Upon the request of the commissioner, a
proposer who waived a stipulated fee may withdraw the waiver, in which case the
commissioner shall pay the stipulated fee to the proposer and thereafter may
use ideas and information in the proposer's proposal.
Sec. 8.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 161.3426, subdivision 4, is amended to
read:
Subd. 4. Low-bid
design-build process. (a) The
commissioner may also use low-bid, design-build procedures to award a
design-build contract where the scope of the work can be clearly defined.
(b) Low-bid design-build projects may require a
request for qualifications (RFQ) and short-listing, and must require a request
for proposals (RFP).
(c) Submitted proposals under this subdivision must
include separately a technical proposal and a price proposal. The low-bid, design-build procedures must
follow a two-step process for review of the responses to the RFP as follows:
(1) The first step is the review of the technical
proposal by the Technical Review Committee as provided in section 161.3420,
subdivision 2. The Technical Review
Committee must open the technical proposal first and must determine if it
complies with the requirements of the RFP and is responsive. The Technical Review Committee shall
reject any nonresponsive proposal. The
Technical Review Committee may not perform any ranking or scoring of the
technical proposals.
(2) The second step is the determination of the low
bidder based on the price proposal. The
commissioner may not open the price proposal until the review of the technical
proposal is complete.
(d) The contract award under low-bid, design-build
procedures must be made to the proposer whose sealed bid is responsive to the
technical requirements as determined by the Technical Review Committee
and that is also the lowest bid.
(e) A stipulated fee may be paid for unsuccessful
bids on low-bid, design-build projects only when the commissioner has required
an RFQ and short-listed the most highly qualified responsive bidders.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This
section is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 9. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 161.3426,
subdivision 2, is repealed."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to transportation;
modifying provisions relating to design-build projects; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2006, sections 161.3412, subdivision 3; 161.3420, subdivisions 2, 3,
4; 161.3422; 161.3426, subdivisions 1, 3, 4; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006,
section 161.3426, subdivision 2."
With the recommendation that when so amended the
bill pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The report was adopted.
Solberg from the Committee on Ways and Means to
which was referred:
H. F. No. 3343, A bill for an act relating to
energy; creating wind energy conversion system aggregation program;
appropriating money; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 216F.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that
the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was
referred:
H. F. No. 3505, A bill for an act relating to public
safety; prohibiting predatory offenders required to register from accessing and
using social networking Web sites; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections
243.166, subdivisions 1a, 4; 244.05, subdivision 6.
Reported the same back with the following
amendments:
Page 5, after line 27, insert:
"Sec. 4.
EFFECTIVE DATE.
Sections 1 to 3 are effective August 1, 2009, and
apply to predatory offenders who are required to register before, on, or after
that date."
With the recommendation that when so amended the
bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Lenczewski from the Committee on Taxes to which was
referred:
H. F. No. 3585, A bill for an act relating to
energy; authorizing certain governments to engage in energy-related activities,
including ownership of renewable energy projects; authorizing bonds;
authorizing an annual ad valorem tax; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006,
sections 216B.1612, by adding a subdivision; 473.1293, by adding a subdivision;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 216F; 373.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 1, delete section 2
Page 2, delete subdivision 3
Page 3, delete section 4
Renumber the sections in sequence
Amend the title as follows:
Page 1, line 4, delete everything before
"amending"
Correct the title numbers accordingly
With the recommendation that when so amended the
bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Solberg from the Committee on Ways and Means to
which was referred:
H. F. No. 3722, A bill for an act relating to
economic development; providing military reservist economic injury loans;
defining terms; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2007
Supplement, section 116L.17, subdivision 1; proposing coding for new law in
Minnesota Statutes, chapter 116J.
Reported the same back with the following
amendments:
Page 4, after line 7, insert:
"Sec. 5.
DUPLICATE APPROPRIATIONS.
Unless another act explicitly provides otherwise,
appropriations made in this act and other acts must be implemented only once
even if the provision or a similar provision with the same fiscal effect in the
same fiscal year is included in another act.
This section applies to laws enacted in the 2008 regular session.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This
section is effective the day following final enactment."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill
pass.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was
referred:
H. F. No. 3725, A bill for an act relating to
transportation; authorizing urban partnership agreements to provide for user
fees for use of high-occupancy vehicle lanes and dynamic shoulder lanes;
exempting commissioner of transportation from rulemaking regarding urban
partnership agreements, toll facilities, and final layouts for highways;
imposing penalties; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006,
sections 160.02, by adding a subdivision; 169.01, subdivision 31, by adding a
subdivision; 169.306; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 160.
Reported the same back with the following
amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and
insert:
"Section 1.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 160.02, is amended by adding a
subdivision to read:
Subd. 30. Dynamic shoulder lane. "Dynamic shoulder lane" means the shoulder of a
freeway on which the commissioner may allow the operation of vehicles during
certain periods.
Sec. 2.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 160.93, is amended to read:
160.93
USER FEES; HIGH-OCCUPANCY VEHICLE AND DYNAMIC SHOULDER LANES.
Subdivision 1.
Fees authorized. To
improve efficiency and provide more options to individuals traveling in a trunk
highway corridor, the commissioner of transportation may charge user fees to
owners or operators of single-occupant vehicles using dynamic shoulder lanes
as designated by the commissioner and any designated high-occupancy vehicle
lanes. The fees may be collected using
electronic or other toll-collection methods and may vary in amount with the
time of day and level of traffic congestion within the corridor. The commissioner shall consult with the
Metropolitan Council and obtain necessary federal authorizations before
implementing user fees on a high-occupancy vehicle lane or dynamic shoulder
lane. Fees under this section are
not subject to section 16A.1283.
Subd. 2. Deposit
of revenues; appropriation. (a)
Except as provided in subdivision 2a, money collected from fees authorized
under subdivision 1 must be deposited in a high-occupancy vehicle lane user fee
account in the special revenue fund. A
separate account must be established for each trunk highway corridor. Money in the account is appropriated to the
commissioner.
(b) From this appropriation the commissioner shall
first repay the trunk highway fund and any other fund source for money spent to
install, equip, or modify the corridor for the purposes of subdivision 1, and
then shall pay all the costs of implementing and administering the fee
collection system for that corridor.
(c) The commissioner shall spend remaining money in
the account as follows:
(1) one-half must be spent for transportation
capital improvements within the corridor; and
(2) one-half must be transferred to the Metropolitan
Council for expansion and improvement of bus transit services within the
corridor beyond the level of service provided on the date of implementation of
subdivision 1.
Subd. 2a. I-35W high-occupancy vehicle and dynamic shoulder lane
account. (a) An I-35W
high-occupancy vehicle and dynamic shoulder lane account is established in the
special revenue fund. Money collected
from fees authorized under subdivision 1 for the marked Interstate Highway 35W
(I-35W) corridor must be deposited in the account and used as described in this
subdivision. Money in the account is
appropriated to the commissioner.
(b) During the first year of revenue operations, the
commissioner shall use the money received in that year to pay the costs of
operating and administering the fee collection system within the corridor, up
to $1,000,000. Any remaining money must
be transferred to the Metropolitan Council for improvement of bus transit
services within the I-35W corridor including transit capital expenses.
(c) During the second and subsequent years of
revenue operations, the commissioner shall use money in the account as follows:
(1) each year, allocate the lesser amount of
$1,000,000 or 75 percent of the revenues for operating and administering the
fee collection system within the corridor;
(2) transfer the remaining amount up to the amount
allocated under clause (1) to the Metropolitan Council for improvement of bus
transit within the corridor including capital expenses; and
(3) allocate any remaining amount as follows: (i) 25 percent to the commissioner for
operating and administering the fee collection system within the corridor and
for transportation capital improvements that are consistent with the goals of
the urban partnership agreement and that are located within the corridor and
(ii) 75 percent to the Metropolitan Council for improvement of bus transit
services within the corridor including transit capital expenses.
Subd. 3. Rules
exemption. With respect to this
section, the commissioner is exempt from statutory rulemaking requirements,
including section 14.386, and from sections 160.84 to 160.92 and 161.162 to
161.167.
Subd. 4. Prohibition. No person may operate a single-occupant
vehicle in a designated high-occupancy vehicle lane or dynamic shoulder lane
except in compliance with the requirements of the commissioner. A person who violates this subdivision is
guilty of a petty misdemeanor and is subject to sections 169.89, subdivisions
1, 2, and 4, and 169.891 and any other provision of chapter 169 applicable to
the commission of a petty misdemeanor traffic offense.
Subd. 5. Dynamic shoulder lanes. (a) The commissioner may designate dynamic shoulder lanes on
freeways. The commissioner may operate
dynamic shoulder lanes as priced lanes, general purpose lanes, high-occupancy
vehicle lanes, or as shoulders as defined in section 169.01, subdivision 73. The commissioner may prescribe the
conditions under which the lanes may be used.
(b) The commissioner may not operate a dynamic
shoulder lane on marked Trunk Highway 35W from its intersection with marked
Trunk Highway 94 to its intersection with marked Trunk Highway 62 as a general
purpose lane. A dynamic shoulder lane
along this portion of marked Trunk Highway 35W may only be used by:
(1) a vehicle with more than one occupant;
(2) a single-occupant vehicle if the fee under
subdivision 1 is paid;
(3) a transit bus providing public transit, as
defined in section 174.22, subdivision 7; and
(4) an authorized emergency vehicle, as defined in
section 169.01, subdivision 5.
(c) The commissioner shall erect signs to indicate
when the lanes may be used.
Sec. 3.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 169.01, subdivision 31, is amended to
read:
Subd. 31. Roadway. "Roadway" means that portion of a
highway improved, designed, or ordinarily used for vehicular travel, exclusive
of the sidewalk or shoulder. During
periods when the commissioner allows the use of dynamic shoulder lanes as
defined in subdivision 93, roadway includes that shoulder. In the event a highway includes two or
more separate roadways, the term "roadway" as used herein shall refer
to any such roadway separately but not to all such roadways collectively.
Sec. 4.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 169.01, is amended by adding a
subdivision to read:
Subd. 93. Dynamic shoulder lane. "Dynamic shoulder lane" has the meaning given in
section 160.02, subdivision 30.
Sec. 5.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 169.306, is amended to read:
169.306
USE OF SHOULDERS BY BUSES.
(a) The commissioner of transportation may permit
the use by transit buses and metro mobility buses of a shoulder of a freeway or
expressway, as defined in section 160.02, in the seven-county metropolitan
area.
(b) If the commissioner permits the use of a freeway
or expressway shoulder by transit buses, the commissioner shall also permit the
use on that shoulder of a bus with a seating capacity of 40 passengers or more
operated by a motor carrier of passengers, as defined in section 221.011,
subdivision 48, while operating in intrastate commerce.
(c) Buses authorized to use the shoulder under this
section may be operated on the shoulder only when main line traffic speeds are
less than 35 miles per hour. Drivers of
buses being operated on the shoulder may not exceed the speed of main line
traffic by more than 15 miles per hour and may never exceed 35 miles per
hour. Drivers of buses being operated
on the shoulder must yield to merging, entering, and exiting traffic and must
yield to other vehicles on the shoulder.
Buses operated on the shoulder must be registered with the Department of
Transportation.
(d) For the purposes of this section, the term
"metro mobility bus" means a motor vehicle of not less than 20 feet
in length engaged in providing special transportation services under section
473.386 that is:
(1) operated by the Metropolitan Council, or
operated by a public or private entity receiving financial assistance from the
Metropolitan Council; and
(2) authorized by the council to use freeway or
expressway shoulders.
(e) This section does not apply to the operation of
buses on dynamic shoulder lanes.
Sec. 6. REPORT
ON URBAN PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT.
By January 15, 2009, and on January 15 each year
through 2014, the commissioner of transportation, in conjunction with the
Metropolitan Council, shall report to the chairs and ranking minority members
of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over transportation concerning
the status of the state's participation in the urban partnership
agreement. The report must:
(1) present the elements of congestion reduction
strategies to be implemented under the urban partnership agreement;
(2) summarize average daily traffic and congestion
levels on affected roadways;
(3) summarize transit usage in affected corridors;
(4) identify the costs of participation and the
sources of funding secured or to be secured;
(5) include information on revenues and expenditures
under the urban partnership agreement;
(6) summarize any user fees collected on I-35W
high-occupancy vehicle and dynamic shoulder lanes; and
(7) recommend any further legislative action
necessary for the successful implementation and operation of the urban
partnership agreement.
Sec. 7. EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Sections 1 to 6 are effective the day following
final enactment."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to transportation;
authorizing urban partnership agreements to provide for user fees for use of
high-occupancy vehicle lanes and dynamic shoulder lanes; appropriating money;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 160.02, by adding a subdivision;
160.93; 169.01, subdivision 31, by adding a subdivision; 169.306."
With the recommendation that when so amended the
bill pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The report was adopted.
Solberg from the Committee on Ways and Means to
which was referred:
H. F. No. 3902, A bill for an act relating to the
operation of state government; making certain changes in agriculture, fuel, and
veterans policy; establishing or changing certain programs, requirements, and
procedures; regulating certain activities; establishing a planning group and a
working group; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 13.785, by adding a
subdivision; 18B.065, subdivisions 2, 7; 18B.07, subdivision 2; 18D.305,
subdivision 2; 18E.04, subdivision 2; 28A.03, by adding a subdivision; 28A.08;
28A.082, by adding a subdivision; 28A.09, subdivision 1; 29.23; 31.05; 31.171;
41D.01, subdivision 4; 97A.028, subdivision 3; 148.01, subdivision 1, by adding
subdivisions; 196.021; 196.03; 197.236; 198.32, subdivision 1; 239.77, as
amended; 349.12, subdivision 3a; 609.115, by adding a subdivision; Minnesota
Statutes 2007 Supplement, sections 18B.065, subdivisions 1, 2a; 18B.26,
subdivision 3; 31.175; 35.244; 41A.105, subdivision 2; 197.791, subdivisions 1,
4, 5; 296A.01, subdivision 8a; Laws 2007, chapter 45, article 1, section 3,
subdivisions 3, 4, 5; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes,
chapters 17; 32; 148; 192; 196; 197; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006,
sections 197.236, subdivisions 7, 10; 198.001, subdivisions 6, 9; 198.002,
subdivisions 1, 3, 6; 198.003, subdivisions 5, 6; 198.004, subdivision 2;
Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, sections 41A.105, subdivision 5; 198.002,
subdivision 2; 198.004, subdivision 1; Minnesota Rules, part 9050.0040, subpart
15.
Reported the same back with the following
amendments:
Page 35, after line 10, insert:
"Sec. 33.
2008 FAMILY MOTOR COACH ASSOCIATION EVENT.
For the 2008 Family Motor Coach Association event
held on the State Fair grounds, the fee the State Agricultural Society must
obtain for expansion of the recreational camping area license, as required in
Minnesota Statutes, section 327.15, shall be 50 percent of the primary license
fee prescribed in Minnesota Rules, part 4630.2000."
Page 46, line 28, after the semicolon, insert "or"
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the
internal references
Amend the title as follows:
Page 1, line 5, after the semicolon, insert
"appropriating money;"
Correct the title numbers accordingly
With the recommendation that when so amended the
bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was
referred:
H. F. No. 4189, A bill for an act relating to
convention and events centers in the cities of the first class; requiring a
study and report to the 2009 legislature.
Reported the same back with the following
amendments:
Page 1, line 14, delete "and"
Page 1, line 15, after "fund"
insert "; and
(5) the economic impact of the facilities on the
surrounding communities"
Page 1, line 16, delete "(d)" and
insert "(c)"
Amend the title accordingly
With the recommendation that when so amended the
bill pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Taxes.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was
referred:
S. F. No. 2866, A bill for an act relating to
telecommunications; requiring the Department of Commerce to produce a statewide
inventory of broadband service.
Reported the same back with the following
amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and
insert:
"Section 1.
BROADBAND MAPPING PROJECT.
Subdivision 1. Project. The commissioner of commerce shall
contract with a nonprofit organization that has significant experience working
with broadband providers to develop Geographical Information System maps
displaying levels of broadband service by connection speed and type of
technology used and integrating the maps with demographic information to
produce a comprehensive statewide inventory and mapping of existing broadband
service and capability.
Subd. 2. Mapping. Data
must be collected from broadband providers and entered into a geographic
information system to produce maps that, for the state of Minnesota and any
defined geographical entity within it, clearly convey the following
information:
(1) areas unserved by any broadband provider;
(2) areas served by a single broadband provider;
(3) the location of towers used to transmit and
receive broadband signals;
(4) actual upstream and downstream transmission
speeds at the county level of detail;
(5) areas served by multiple broadband providers;
and
(6) the types of technology used to provide broadband
service.
The
data used to produce the maps must be capable of being integrated with
demographic data from other sources including, but not limited to, population
density and household income to allow for the production of maps that measure,
down to the census block level of detail, various characteristics of residents
in areas receiving different levels of broadband services and utilizing
different technologies. Data provided
by a broadband provider to the contractor under this subdivision is nonpublic
data under Minnesota Statutes, section 13.02, subdivision 9. Maps produced under this subdivision are
public data under Minnesota Statutes, section 13.03.
For the purposes of this section,
"technology" or "technologies" means different methods of
connecting to the Internet including, but not limited to, cable modem, DSL,
ADSL, VDSL, and fiber optics.
Sec. 2. APPROPRIATION.
Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 237.52,
subdivision 5, $175,000 is appropriated from the telecommunications access Minnesota
fund to the commissioner of commerce for the purposes of section 1.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This
section is effective the day following final enactment."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to
telecommunications; providing for a broadband mapping project; appropriating
money."
With the recommendation that when so amended the
bill pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The report was adopted.
Solberg from the Committee on Ways and Means to
which was referred:
S. F. No. 3061, A bill for an act relating to
environment; modifying Petrofund program; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006,
sections 115C.04, subdivision 3; 115C.09, subdivision 3h, by adding a
subdivision; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 115C.09, subdivision
3j.
Reported the same back with the following
amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and
insert:
"Section 1.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 115C.04, subdivision 3, is amended to
read:
Subd. 3. Agency
Cost recovery; subrogation.
Reasonable and necessary expenses incurred by the agency in taking a
corrective action, including costs of investigating a release, administrative
and legal expenses, and reimbursement costs described in subdivision 1,
paragraph (b), may be recovered in a civil action in district court brought by
the attorney general board against a responsible person. The agency's certification of expenses is
prima facie evidence that the expenses are reasonable and necessary. If the responsible person has petroleum tank
leakage or spill insurance coverage that insures against the liability provided
in this section, the agency board is subrogated to the rights of
the responsible person with respect to that insurance coverage, to the extent
of the expenses incurred by the agency and described in this subdivision. The agency board may request
the attorney general to bring an action in district court against the insurer
to enforce this subrogation right.
Expenses that are recovered under this section must be deposited in the
fund.
Sec. 2.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 115C.09, subdivision 3h, is amended to
read:
Subd. 3h. Reimbursement;
aboveground tanks in bulk plants.
(a) As used in this subdivision, "bulk plant" means an
aboveground or underground tank facility with a storage capacity of more than
1,100 gallons but less than 1,000,000 gallons that is used to dispense
petroleum into cargo tanks for transportation and sale at another location.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision in this
chapter and any rules adopted pursuant to this chapter, the board shall
reimburse 90 percent of an applicant's cost for bulk plant upgrades or closures
completed between June 1, 1998, and November 1, 2003, to comply with Minnesota
Rules, chapter 7151, provided that the board determines the costs were incurred
and reasonable. The reimbursement may
not exceed $10,000 per bulk plant. The
board may provide reimbursement under this paragraph for work completed after
November 1, 2003, if the work was contracted for prior to that date and was not
completed by that date as a result of an unanticipated situation, provided that
an application for reimbursement under this paragraph, which may be a renewal
of an application previously denied, is submitted prior to December 31, 2005.
(c) For corrective action at
a bulk plant located on what is or was railroad right-of-way, the board shall
reimburse 90 percent of total reimbursable costs on the first $40,000 of
reimbursable costs and 100 percent of any remaining reimbursable costs when the
applicant can document that more than one bulk plant was operated on the same
section of right-of-way, as determined by the commissioner of commerce.
Sec. 3.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 115C.09, is amended by adding a
subdivision to read:
Subd. 3k. PVC piping at residential locations. (a) The purpose of this subdivision is to
assist homeowners who have installed PVC fill piping as part of the heating oil
system at their residences, not knowing that heating oil has been shown to
dissolve certain types of glue used to hold PVC piping together. Replacement of the PVC piping with metal
piping is intended to avoid the catastrophic release of heating oil, as well as
the ensuing cleanup costs, that can occur at residences where the PVC piping
fails.
(b) As used in this subdivision:
(1) "residential locations" means a
storage tank and appurtenances for heating oil that are used to heat a
single-family residence; and
(2) "qualified person" means someone who
is registered as a contractor under section 115C.11 and, as part of their trade
or business, installs or repairs nonpressure piping, heating systems, air
conditioning systems, or storage tank systems.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this
chapter or any rules adopted under this chapter, the board shall reimburse a
qualified person 90 percent of the cost for replacing PVC fill piping with
metal piping at residential locations between May 1, 2008, and September 1,
2011, provided that the board determines the costs were incurred and reasonable. The reimbursement may not exceed $250 per
residential location. The maximum
expenditure from the fund may not exceed $1,500,000.
(d) A heating oil vendor is not a responsible person
for a heating oil spill inside a residential location if the spill was caused
solely by the failure of a tank or appurtenance to a tank owned by the
homeowner.
Sec. 4. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 115C.09,
subdivision 3j, is repealed."
With the recommendation that when so amended the
bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was
referred:
S. F. No. 3158, A bill for an act relating to
commerce; requiring Explore Minnesota Tourism to study vacation rental lodging;
creating definitions; requiring a report.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that
the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Solberg from the Committee on Ways and Means to
which was referred:
S. F. No. 3337, A bill for an act relating to
energy; creating coordinated process for reducing greenhouse gas emissions;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 216H.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that
the first unofficial engrossment pass.
The report was adopted.
Solberg from the Committee on Ways and Means to
which was referred:
S. F. No. 3669, A bill for an act relating to
transportation; requiring report on mitigating effects of transportation
construction projects on small businesses.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that
the first unofficial engrossment pass.
The report was adopted.
Pelowski from the Committee on Governmental Operations, Reform,
Technology and Elections reported on the following appointment which had been
referred to the committee by the speaker:
CAMPAIGN
FINANCE AND PUBLIC DISCLOSURE BOARD
A.
Hilda Bettermann
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the
appointment be confirmed.
Pelowski moved that the report of the Committee on Governmental
Operations, Reform, Technology and Elections relating to the appointment of A.
Hilda Bettermann to the Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board be
adopted. The motion prevailed and the
report was adopted.
CONFIRMATION
Pelowski moved that the House, having advised, do now consent
to and confirm the appointment of A. Hilda Bettermann, 8435 Sara Road
Northwest, Brandon, Minnesota 56315 in the County of Douglas, effective January
14, 2008, for a four-year term expiring January 2, 2012. The motion prevailed and the appointment of
A. Hilda Bettermann was confirmed by the House.
Pelowski from the Committee on Governmental Operations, Reform,
Technology and Elections reported on the following appointment which had been
referred to the committee by the speaker:
CAMPAIGN
FINANCE AND PUBLIC DISCLOSURE BOARD
Felicia
Boyd
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the
appointment be confirmed.
Pelowski moved that the report of the Committee on Governmental
Operations, Reform, Technology and Elections relating to the appointment of
Felicia Boyd to the Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board be
adopted. The motion prevailed and the
report was adopted.
CONFIRMATION
Pelowski moved that the House, having advised, do now consent
to and confirm the appointment of Felicia Boyd,
22399 Wagonwheel Trail, Lakeville, Minnesota 55044 in the County of Dakota,
effective January 14, 2008, for a four-year term expiring January 2,
2012. The motion prevailed and the
appointment of Felicia Boyd was
confirmed by the House.
SECOND
READING OF HOUSE BILLS
H. F. Nos. 615, 2998, 3195, 3343, 3505,
3585, 3722 and 3902 were read for the second time.
SECOND
READING OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. Nos. 3001, 3698, 3061, 3158, 3337
and 3669 were read for the second time.
INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS
The following House Files were introduced:
Lenczewski and Lieder introduced:
H. F. No. 4204, A bill for an act relating to taxation;
increasing the maximum levy of housing and redevelopment authorities; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 469.033, subdivision 6.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Taxes.
Sailer introduced:
H. F. No. 4205, A bill for an act relating to environment;
prohibiting certain charges by the Pollution Control Agency for services regarding
voluntary response actions on contaminated land; amending Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 115B.175, by adding a subdivision.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Finance.
Dean introduced:
H. F. No. 4206, A bill for an act relating to health;
establishing a state policy for stem cell research; proposing coding for new
law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 137; 145.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Biosciences and Emerging Technology.
Atkins, Hilstrom, Johnson and Tillberry introduced:
H. F. No. 4207, A bill for an act relating to certain state
contracts; requiring full enforcement of certain agreements between the state
and an airline company.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Commerce and Labor.
MESSAGES
FROM THE SENATE
The following messages were received from
the Senate:
Madam
Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate accedes
to the request of the House for the appointment of a Conference Committee on
the amendments adopted by the Senate to the following House File:
H. F. No. 3477, A bill for an act relating
to manufactured housing; providing for regulation of lending practices and
default; providing notices and remedies; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006,
sections 327.64, subdivision 2; 327.65; 327.66; 327B.01, by adding
subdivisions; 327B.08, by adding a subdivision; 327B.09, by adding a
subdivision; 327B.12; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes,
chapters 327; 327B.
The Senate has appointed as such
committee:
Senators Marty, Jungbauer and Scheid.
Said House File is herewith returned to
the House.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following
House File, herewith returned, as amended by the Senate, in which amendments
the concurrence of the House is respectfully requested:
H. F. No. 3500, A bill for an act relating to business
organizations; proposing technical amendments to the Business Corporations Act,
the Limited Liability Company Act, and the Uniform Limited Partnership Act of
2001; authorizing the formation of nonprofit limited liability companies;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 302A.011, subdivisions 17, 50;
302A.111, subdivisions 2, 3, 4; 302A.231, subdivisions 2, 3; 302A.237;
302A.241, subdivision 1; 302A.255, subdivision 1; 302A.449, subdivision 3;
302A.471, subdivision 3; 302A.521, subdivision 1; 302A.553, subdivision 1;
302A.701; 302A.721; 321.1206; 322B.03, subdivisions 20, 32, by adding a
subdivision; 322B.10; 322B.11; 322B.35, subdivision 3; 322B.363, subdivision 3;
322B.643, subdivisions 2, 3; 322B.66, subdivision 1; 322B.666, subdivision 1;
322B.699, subdivision 1; 322B.78; 322B.80, subdivision 1; 322B.806; 322B.90,
subdivision 2; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter
322B.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
CONCURRENCE
AND REPASSAGE
Lillie moved that the House concur in the Senate amendments to
H. F. No. 3500 and that the bill be repassed as amended by the
Senate. The motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 3500, A bill for an act relating
to business organizations; proposing technical amendments to the Business
Corporations Act, the Limited Liability Company Act, and the Uniform Limited
Partnership Act of 2001; authorizing the formation of nonprofit limited
liability companies; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 290.01,
subdivision 3b; 302A.011, subdivisions 17, 50; 302A.111, subdivisions 2, 3, 4;
302A.231, subdivisions 2, 3; 302A.237; 302A.241, subdivision 1; 302A.255,
subdivision 1; 302A.449, subdivision 3; 302A.471, subdivision 3; 302A.521,
subdivision 1; 302A.553, subdivision 1; 302A.701; 302A.721; 321.1206; 322B.03,
subdivisions 20, 32, by adding a subdivision; 322B.10; 322B.11; 322B.35,
subdivision 3; 322B.363, subdivision 3; 322B.643, subdivisions 2, 3; 322B.66,
subdivision 1; 322B.666, subdivision 1; 322B.699, subdivision 1; 322B.78;
322B.80, subdivision 1; 322B.806; 322B.90, subdivision 2; proposing coding for
new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 322B.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended by the Senate,
and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of the bill and the
roll was called. There were 124 yeas
and 2 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Buesgens
Drazkowski
The bill was repassed, as amended by the Senate, and its title
agreed to.
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate refuses to concur in the
House amendments to the following Senate File:
S. F. No. 2368, A bill for an act relating to human services;
requiring the commissioner to notify the legislature prior to the closure or
transfer of an enterprise activity; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
246.0136, by adding a subdivision.
The Senate respectfully requests that a Conference Committee be
appointed thereon. The Senate has
appointed as such committee:
Senators Koering, Berglin and Lourey.
Said Senate File is herewith transmitted to the House with the
request that the House appoint a like committee.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
Ward moved that the House accede to the
request of the Senate and that the Speaker appoint a Conference Committee of 3
members of the House to meet with a like committee appointed by the Senate on
the disagreeing votes of the two houses on S. F. No. 2368. The motion prevailed.
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate refuses to concur in the
House amendments to the following Senate File:
S. F. No. 2390, A bill for an act relating to consumer
protection; modifying restrictions on the collection and use of Social Security
numbers; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 325E.59, subdivision 3;
Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, section 325E.59, subdivision 1.
The Senate respectfully requests that a Conference Committee be
appointed thereon. The Senate has
appointed as such committee:
Senators Betzold, Scheid and Pariseau.
Said Senate File is herewith transmitted to the House with the
request that the House appoint a like committee.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
Hilstrom moved that the House accede to
the request of the Senate and that the Speaker appoint a Conference Committee
of 3 members of the House to meet with a like committee appointed by the Senate
on the disagreeing votes of the two houses on
S. F. No. 2390. The
motion prevailed.
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate refuses to concur in the
House amendments to the following Senate File:
S. F. No. 3235, A bill for an act relating to data practices;
classifying data and authorizing data sharing; making technical changes;
regulating practices of business screening services; providing for civil
penalties and remedies; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 6.715, by
adding a subdivision; 13.03, subdivision 3; 13.32, by adding a subdivision;
123B.03, subdivisions 2, 3, by adding a subdivision; 260B.171, subdivision 5;
518.10; Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, section 13.39, subdivisions 2, 2a;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 332.
The Senate respectfully requests that a Conference Committee be
appointed thereon. The Senate has
appointed as such committee:
Senators Olson, M.; Moua; Betzold; Scheid and Limmer.
Said Senate File is herewith transmitted to the House with the
request that the House appoint a like committee.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
Simon moved that the House accede to the
request of the Senate and that the Speaker appoint a Conference Committee of 5
members of the House to meet with a like committee appointed by the Senate on
the disagreeing votes of the two houses on S. F. No. 3235. The motion prevailed.
REPORT FROM THE COMMITTEE ON
RULES AND
LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATION
Sertich from the Committee on Rules and Legislative
Administration, pursuant to rule 1.21, designated the following bills to be
placed on the Supplemental Calendar for the Day for Monday, April 21, 2008:
S. F. No. 3218; H. F. No. 3134;
S. F. Nos. 3775, 2775, 3441, 2511, 3132 and 3213;
H. F. Nos. 3376 and 3493; and S. F. No. 3174.
CALENDAR FOR THE DAY
S. F. No. 2597 was reported
to the House.
Bigham moved to amend S. F.
No. 2597, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 1, line 10, after
"school" insert "board or other"
Page 1, line 12, after
"school" insert "board or other"
Page 1, delete line 14 and
insert "that sexual misconduct or attempted sexual misconduct occurred"
Page 1, line 16, delete
"conduct" and insert "misconduct" and after
"school" insert "board or other"
Page 1, line 17, delete
"sections" and insert "section" and delete
", and 13.43, subdivision 2,"
Page 1, line 18, after
"school" insert "board or other"
Page 1, delete line 21, and
insert "license as a result of sexual misconduct or attempted sexual"
Page 1, line 22, delete
"conduct" and insert "misconduct"
Page 2, line 2, after
"school" insert "board or other"
Page 2, line 6, after
"school" insert "board or other"
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Emmer moved to amend S. F.
No. 2597, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, after line 6,
insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 122A.40,
subdivision 13, is amended to read:
Subd. 13. Immediate
discharge. (a) Except as otherwise
provided in paragraph (b), a board may discharge a continuing-contract teacher,
effective immediately, upon any of the following grounds:
(1) immoral conduct,
insubordination, or conviction of a felony;
(2) conduct unbecoming a
teacher which requires the immediate removal of the teacher from classroom or
other duties;
(3) failure without
justifiable cause to teach without first securing the written release of the
school board;
(4) gross inefficiency which
the teacher has failed to correct after reasonable written notice;
(5) willful neglect of duty;
or
(6) continuing physical or
mental disability subsequent to a 12 months leave of absence and inability to
qualify for reinstatement in accordance with subdivision 12.
For purposes of this
paragraph, conduct unbecoming a teacher includes an unfair discriminatory
practice described in section 363A.13.
Prior to discharging a
teacher under this paragraph, the board must notify the teacher in writing and
state its ground for the proposed discharge in reasonable detail. Within ten days after receipt of this
notification the teacher may make a written request for a hearing before the
board and it shall be granted before final action is taken. The board may, however, suspend a
teacher with pay pending the conclusion of such the hearing and
determination of the issues raised in the hearing after charges have been filed
which constitute ground for discharge. If
a teacher has been charged with a felony and the underlying conduct that is the
subject of the felony charge is a ground for a proposed immediate discharge,
the suspension pending the conclusion of the hearing and determination of the
issues may be without pay. If a hearing
under this paragraph is held, the board must reimburse the teacher for any
salary or compensation withheld if the final decision of the board or the
arbitrator does not result in a penalty on or suspension, termination, or
discharge of the teacher.
(b) A board must discharge a
continuing-contract teacher, effective immediately, upon receipt of notice
under section 122A.20, subdivision 1, paragraph (b), that the teacher's license
has been revoked due to a conviction for child abuse or sexual abuse.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
POINT OF ORDER
Bigham raised a point of order pursuant to
rule 3.21 that the Emmer amendment was not in order. Speaker pro tempore Juhnke ruled the point of order not well
taken and the Emmer amendment in order.
The Speaker assumed the Chair.
The question recurred on the Emmer
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 123 yeas and 4 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson,
S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy,
E.
Murphy,
M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson,
A.
Peterson,
N.
Peterson,
S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk.
Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Heidgerken
Slocum
Thissen
Walker
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
S. F. No. 2597, A bill for an act relating to education;
requiring school boards to seek information from prospective teachers and the
Board of Teaching about disciplinary actions against the teachers; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 123B.03, subdivision 2, by adding a
subdivision.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 129 yeas and 1
nay as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Heidgerken
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
S. F. No. 3139 was reported
to the House.
Atkins moved to amend S.
F. No. 3139, the first engrossment, as
follows:
Page 1, line 6, after "uses"
insert "or sells"
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
S. F. No. 3139, A bill for an act relating to crime;
establishing offense related to interfering with Internet ticket sales;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 609.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 119 yeas and 12
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eastlund
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Severson
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Beard
Buesgens
Drazkowski
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Olson
Peppin
Seifert
Shimanski
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
S. F. No. 3214, A bill for an act relating to commerce;
clarifying the application of the Minnesota Residential Mortgage Originator and
Servicer Licensing Act; clarifying the investment authority of certain
insurers; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 58.02, subdivisions 18,
21; 58.14, subdivisions 3, 4, 5; 60A.11, subdivision 9.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 131 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson,
B.
Anderson,
S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy,
E.
Murphy,
M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson,
A.
Peterson,
N.
Peterson,
S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk.
Kelliher
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
S. F. No. 3154, A bill for an act relating to commerce;
regulating residential mortgage originators and services; verifying the
borrower's ability to pay; amending Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, section
58.13, subdivision 1.
The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final
passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 131 yeas and 0
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed and its title agreed to.
S. F. No. 3342, A bill for an act relating to public safety;
providing for an e-charging service; requiring fingerprinting; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 13.871, by adding a subdivision; 299C.10,
subdivision 1; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter
299C.
The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final
passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 86 yeas and 45
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Kohls
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Olson
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
S. F. No. 3303 was reported to the House.
Dean moved to amend S. F.
No. 3303, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 2, line 20, after the
period, insert "If H. F. 3220 is enacted during the 2008 regular
session, the city of Minneapolis must not make gifts or donations to the
corporation under the authority of that law."
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Dean amendment and the roll was
called. There were 51 yeas and 80 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Benson
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Knuth
Kohls
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Olson
Ozment
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Ruud
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Atkins
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kalin
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Buesgens moved to amend S.
F. No. 3303, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 2, line 5, after the
period, insert "A member of the board of directors of the corporation
is a public official for the purposes of Minnesota Statutes, section 10A.09."
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Buesgens amendment and the roll
was called. There were 59 yeas and 72
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Benson
Berns
Brod
Brown
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Haws
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Juhnke
Kohls
Lenczewski
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Olson
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Peppin
Poppe
Ruth
Ruud
Scalze
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Swails
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Bigham
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Greiling
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Rukavina
Sailer
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Zellers moved to amend S. F. No. 3303, the second engrossment,
as follows:
Page 2, line 20, after the period, insert "The amount
of any contributions from the city of Minneapolis from governmental funds shall
be an offset against the city's certified aid payment under sections 477A.013,
subdivision 9, in the calendar year following the year in which the
contribution is made."
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Zellers amendment and the roll
was called. There were 37 yeas and 94
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Kohls
Magnus
Morgan
Olson
Paulsen
Peppin
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Wardlow
Wollschlager
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Holberg moved to amend S. F.
No. 3303, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 2, line 20, after the
period, insert "The maximum value in aggregate of all contributions by
the city to the corporation must not exceed $50,000. This section expires June 30, 2010."
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Holberg amendment and the roll
was called. There were 38 yeas and 93
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Kohls
Magnus
Olson
Paulsen
Peppin
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Seifert offered an amendment to S. F. No. 3303,
the second engrossment.
POINT
OF ORDER
Paymar raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the
Seifert amendment was not in order. The
Speaker ruled the point of order well taken and the Seifert amendment out of
order.
Seifert appealed the decision of the Speaker.
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The vote was taken on the question "Shall the decision of
the Speaker stand as the judgment of the House?" and the roll was
called. There were 74 yeas and 56 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dominguez
Doty
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Brown
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Kohls
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Poppe
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
So it was the judgment of the House that the decision of the
Speaker should stand.
Emmer moved to amend S. F.
No. 3303, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 2, line 32, delete
"December"
Page 3, line 1, delete
"31" and insert "July 1"
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Seifert offered an amendment to S. F. No. 3303,
the second engrossment, as amended.
POINT
OF ORDER
Sertich raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the
Seifert amendment was not in order. The
Speaker ruled the point of order well taken and the Seifert amendment out of
order.
Seifert appealed the decision of the Speaker.
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The vote was taken on the question "Shall the decision of
the Speaker stand as the judgment of the House?" and the roll was
called. There were 72 yeas and 59 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Brown
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Kohls
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Poppe
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Swails
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
So it was the judgment of the House that the decision of the
Speaker should stand.
S. F. No. 3303, A bill for an act relating to the city of
Minneapolis; authorizing the creation of a nonprofit riverfront revitalization
corporation; requiring a report.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 99 yeas and 33
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Demmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Kohls
Magnus
Nornes
Olson
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
The Speaker called Juhnke to the Chair.
Severson was excused for the remainder of today's session.
S. F. No. 2403, A bill for an act relating to public safety;
modifying provision relating to disability of peace officer or firefighter;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 299A.465, subdivision 1.
The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final
passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 131 yeas and 0
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed and its title agreed to.
S. F. No. 2876 was reported to the House.
Paymar moved to amend S. F. No. 2876, the fourth
engrossment, as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert the
following language of H. F. No. 2906, the third engrossment:
"Section
1. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.50, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
8. Provocation. "Provocation" means an act that
an adult could reasonably expect may cause a dog to attack or bite.
Sec.
2. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.51, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Registration. An animal control authority shall issue a
certificate of registration to the owner of a dangerous dog if the owner
presents sufficient evidence that:
(1) a
proper enclosure exists for the dangerous dog and a posting on the premises
with a clearly visible warning sign, including a warning symbol to inform
children, that there is a dangerous dog on the property;
(2) a
surety bond issued by a surety company authorized to conduct business in this
state in a form acceptable to the animal control authority in the sum of at least
$50,000 $300,000, payable to any person injured by the dangerous
dog, or a policy of liability insurance issued by an insurance company
authorized to conduct business in this state in the amount of at least $50,000
$300,000, insuring the owner for any personal injuries inflicted by the
dangerous dog;
(3)
the owner has paid an annual fee of not more than $500, in addition to any
regular dog licensing fees, to obtain a certificate of registration for a
dangerous dog under this section; and
(4)
the owner has had microchip identification implanted in the dangerous dog as
required under section 347.515.
Sec.
3. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.51, subdivision 2a, is amended to read:
Subd.
2a. Warning symbol. If a
county an animal control authority issues a certificate of
registration to the owner of a dangerous dog pursuant to subdivision 2, the county
animal control authority must provide, for posting on the owner's property,
a copy of a warning symbol to inform children that there is a dangerous dog on
the
property. The design of the warning symbol must
be the uniform and specified symbol provided by the
commissioner of public safety, after consultation with animal control
professionals. The commissioner
shall provide the number of copies of the warning symbol requested by each
county the animal control authority and shall charge the county
animal control authority the actual cost of the warning symbols
received. The county animal
control authority may charge the registrant a reasonable fee to cover its
administrative costs and the cost of the warning symbol.
Sec.
4. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.51, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Fee. The county animal control
authority may charge the owner an annual fee, in addition to any regular
dog licensing fees, to obtain a certificate of registration for a dangerous dog
under this section.
Sec.
5. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.51, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd.
7. Tag. A dangerous dog registered under this section
must have a standardized, easily identifiable tag identifying the dog as
dangerous and containing the uniform dangerous dog symbol, affixed to the dog's
collar at all times. The
commissioner of public safety, after consultation with animal control professionals,
shall provide by rule for the design of the tag.
Sec.
6. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.51, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd.
9. Contracted
services. A county An
animal control authority may contract with another political subdivision or
other person to provide the services required under sections 347.50 to 347.54
347.565. Notwithstanding any
contract entered into under this subdivision, all fees collected under sections
347.50 to 347.54 shall be paid to the county animal control authority
and all certificates of registration must be issued in the name of the county
animal control authority.
Sec.
7. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.52, is amended to read:
347.52 DANGEROUS DOGS; REQUIREMENTS.
(a) An
owner of a dangerous dog shall keep the dog, while on the owner's property, in
a proper enclosure. If the dog is
outside the proper enclosure, the dog must be muzzled and restrained by a
substantial chain or leash and under the physical restraint of a responsible
person. The muzzle must be made in a
manner that will prevent the dog from biting any person or animal but that will
not cause injury to the dog or interfere with its vision or respiration.
(b) An
owner of a dangerous dog must renew the registration of the dog annually until
the dog is deceased. If the dog is
removed from the jurisdiction, it must be registered as a dangerous dog in its
new jurisdiction.
(c) An
owner of a dangerous dog must notify the animal control authority in writing of
the death of the dog or its transfer to a new jurisdiction location
where the dog will reside within 30 days of the death or transfer, and
must, if requested by the animal control authority, execute an affidavit under
oath setting forth either the circumstances of the dog's death and disposition
or the complete name, address, and telephone number of the person to whom the
dog has been transferred or the address where the dog has been relocated.
(d) An
animal control authority may shall require a dangerous dog to be
sterilized at the owner's expense. If
the owner does not have the animal sterilized within 30 days, the animal
control authority may shall seize the dog and have the animal
it sterilized at the owner's expense.
(e) A
person who owns a dangerous dog and who rents property from another where the
dog will reside must disclose to the property owner prior to entering the lease
agreement and at the time of any lease renewal that the person owns a dangerous
dog that will reside at the property.
(f) A
person who sells transfers ownership of a dangerous dog must
notify the purchaser new owner that the animal control authority
has identified the dog as dangerous.
The seller current owner must also notify the animal
control authority in writing of the sale transfer of ownership
and provide the animal control authority with the new owner's name, address,
and telephone number.
Sec.
8. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.53, is amended to read:
347.53 POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND DANGEROUS
DOGS.
Any
statutory or home rule charter city, or any county, may regulate potentially
dangerous and dangerous dogs.
Except as provided in section 347.51, subdivision 8, nothing in sections
347.50 to 347.54 347.565 limits any restrictions that the
local jurisdictions may place on owners of potentially dangerous or
dangerous dogs.
Sec.
9. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.54, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Seizure. (a) The animal control authority having
jurisdiction shall immediately seize any dangerous dog if:
(1)
after 14 days after the owner has notice that the dog is dangerous, the dog is
not validly registered under section 347.51;
(2)
after 14 days after the owner has notice that the dog is dangerous, the owner
does not secure the proper liability insurance or surety coverage as required
under section 347.51, subdivision 2;
(3)
the dog is not maintained in the proper enclosure; or
(4)
the dog is outside the proper enclosure and not under physical restraint of a
responsible person as required under section 347.52.; or
(5)
the dog is not sterilized within 30 days, pursuant to section 347.52, paragraph
(d).
(b) If
an owner of a dog is convicted of a crime for which the dog was originally
seized, the court may order that the dog be confiscated and destroyed in a
proper and humane manner, and that the owner pay the costs incurred in
confiscating, confining, and destroying the dog.
Sec.
10. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.54, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Subsequent
offenses; seizure. If a person has
been convicted of a misdemeanor for violating a provision of section 347.51,
347.515, or 347.52, and the person is charged with a subsequent violation
relating to the same dog, the dog must be seized by the animal control
authority having jurisdiction. If the
owner is convicted of the crime for which the dog was seized, the court shall
order that the dog be destroyed in a proper and humane manner and the owner pay
the cost of confining and destroying the animal. If the person is not convicted of the crime for which the dog
was seized, the owner may reclaim the dog upon payment to the animal control
authority of a fee for the care and boarding of the dog. If the owner is found not guilty and
the dog is not reclaimed by the owner within seven days after the owner has
been notified that the dog may be reclaimed, the dog may be disposed of as
provided under section 35.71, subdivision 3, and the owner is liable to the
animal control authority for the costs incurred in confining, impounding, and
disposing of the dog.
Sec.
11. [347.541] DISPOSITION OF SEIZED ANIMALS.
Subdivision
1. Hearing. The owner of any dog declared dangerous
has the right to a hearing by an impartial hearing officer.
Subd.
2. Security. A
person claiming an interest in a seized dog may prevent disposition of the dog
by posting security in an amount sufficient to provide for the dog's actual
cost of care and keeping. The security
must be posted within 14 days of the seizure inclusive of the date of the
seizure.
Subd.
3. Notice. (a) The authority declaring the dog
dangerous shall give notice of this section by delivering or mailing it to the
owner of the dog, or by posting a copy of it at the place where the dog is
kept, or by delivering it to a person residing on the property, and
telephoning, if possible. The notice
must include:
(1)
a description of the seized dog; the authority for and purpose of the dangerous
dog declaration and seizure; the time, place, and circumstances under which the
dog was declared dangerous; and the telephone number and contact person where
the dog is kept;
(2)
a statement that the owner of the dog may request a hearing concerning the
dangerous dog declaration and, if applicable, prior potentially dangerous dog
declarations for the dog, and that failure to do so within 14 days of the date
of the notice will terminate the owner's right to a hearing under this section;
(3)
a statement that if an appeal request is made within 14 days of the notice, the
owner must immediately comply with the requirements of section 347.52,
paragraphs (a) and (c), and until such time as the hearing officer issues an
opinion;
(4)
a statement that if the hearing officer affirms the dangerous dog declaration,
the owner will have 14 days from receipt of that decision to comply with all
other requirements of sections 347.51, 347.515, and 347.52;
(5)
a form that can be used by the owner of the dog that was seized for requesting
a hearing under this subdivision; and
(6)
a statement that all actual costs of the care, keeping, and disposition of the
dog are the responsibility of the person claiming an interest in the dog,
except to the extent that a court or hearing officer finds that the seizure or
impoundment was not substantially justified by law.
Subd.
4. Right
to hearing. Any hearing must
be held within 30 days of the request to determine the validity of the
dangerous dog declaration. The hearing
officer must be an impartial employee of the local government or an impartial
person retained by the local government to conduct the hearing. In the event that the dangerous dog
declaration is upheld by the hearing officer, actual expenses of the hearing up
to a maximum of $1,000 will be the responsibility of the dog's owner. The hearing officer shall issue a decision on
the matter within ten days after the hearing.
The decision must be delivered to the dog's owner by hand delivery or
registered mail as soon as practical and a copy must be provided to the animal
control authority.
Sec.
12. [347.542] RESTRICTIONS.
Subdivision
1. Dog
ownership prohibited. Except
as provided in subdivision 3, no person may own a dog if the person has:
(1)
been convicted of a third or subsequent violation of section 347.51, 347.515,
or 347.52;
(2)
been convicted of a violation under section 609.205, clause (4);
(3)
been convicted of a gross misdemeanor under section 609.226, subdivision 1;
(4)
been convicted of a violation under section 609.226, subdivision 2; or
(5)
had a dog ordered destroyed under section 347.56 and been convicted of one or
more violations of section 347.51, 346.515, 347.52, or 609.226, subdivision 2.
Subd.
2. Household
members. No member of a
household may own a dog where a person resides who is prohibited from dog
ownership under subdivision 1.
Subd.
3. Dog
ownership prohibition review. Beginning
three years after a conviction under subdivision 1 that prohibits a person from
owning a dog, and annually thereafter, the person may request that the animal
control authority review the prohibition.
The animal control authority may consider such facts as the seriousness
of the violation or violations that led to the prohibition, any criminal
convictions, or other facts that the animal control authority deems
appropriate. The animal control
authority may rescind the prohibition entirely or rescind it with
limitations. The animal control
authority also may establish conditions a person must meet before the
prohibition is rescinded, including, but not limited to, successfully
completing dog training or dog handling courses. If the animal control authority rescinds a person's prohibition
and the person subsequently fails to comply with any limitations imposed by the
animal control authority or the person is convicted of any animal violation
involving unprovoked bites or dog attacks, the animal control authority may
permanently prohibit the person from owning a dog in this state.
Sec.
13. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.55, is amended to read:
347.55 PENALTY.
(a) Any
A person who violates any a provision of section 347.51,
347.515, or 347.52 is guilty of a misdemeanor.
(b) It
is a misdemeanor to remove a microchip from a dangerous or potentially
dangerous dog, to fail to renew the registration of a dangerous dog, to fail to
account for a dangerous dog's death or removal from the jurisdiction
change of location where the dog will reside, to sign a false affidavit
with respect to a dangerous dog's death or removal from the jurisdiction
change of location where the dog will reside, or to fail to disclose ownership
of a dangerous dog to a property owner from whom the person rents property.
(c)
A person who is convicted of a second or subsequent violation of paragraph (a)
or (b) is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
(d)
An owner who violates section 347.542, subdivision 1, is guilty of a gross
misdemeanor.
(e)
Any household member who knowingly violates section 347.542, subdivision 2, is
guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
Sec.
14. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.56, is amended to read:
347.56 DESTRUCTION OF DOG IN CERTAIN
CIRCUMSTANCES.
Subdivision
1. Circumstances. Notwithstanding sections 347.51 to 347.55, a
dog that inflicted substantial or great bodily harm on a human being on
public or private property without provocation may be destroyed in a proper and
humane manner by the animal control authority.
The animal control authority may not destroy the dog until the dog owner
has had the opportunity for a hearing before an impartial decision maker.
may be destroyed in a proper and humane manner by the animal control authority
if the dog:
(1)
inflicted substantial or great bodily harm on a human on public or private
property without provocation;
(2)
inflicted multiple bites on a human on public or private property without
provocation;
(3)
bit multiple human victims on public or private property in the same attack
without provocation; or
(4)
bit a human on public or private property without provocation in an attack
where more than one dog participated in the attack.
Subd.
2. Hearing. The animal control authority may not
destroy the dog until the dog owner has had the opportunity for a hearing
before an impartial decision maker. The
definitions in section 347.50 and the exemptions under section 347.51,
subdivision 5, apply to this section.
Sec.
15. [347.565] APPLICABILITY.
Sections
347.50 to 347.56 must be enforced by animal control authorities or law
enforcement agencies, whether or not these sections have been adopted into
local ordinance."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to animals; changing
provisions regulating dangerous dogs; imposing penalties; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2006, sections 347.50, by adding a subdivision; 347.51, subdivisions
2, 2a, 3, 7, 9; 347.52; 347.53; 347.54, subdivisions 1, 3; 347.55; 347.56; proposing
coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 347."
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Thao moved to amend S. F.
No. 2876, the fourth engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 2, line 23, before
"A" insert "(a)"
Page 2, after line 27,
insert:
"(b) A dangerous dog
registered under this section in the seven-county metropolitan area must wear
the tag required under paragraph (a), attached to a bright red collar."
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
The Speaker resumed the Chair.
Urdahl was excused for the remainder of today's session.
S. F. No. 2876, A bill for an act relating to animals; changing
provisions regulating dangerous dogs and dogs at certain establishments;
imposing penalties; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 347.50, by
adding a subdivision; 347.51, subdivisions 2, 2a, 3, 4, 7, 9; 347.52; 347.53;
347.54, subdivisions 1, 3; 347.55; 347.56; proposing coding for new law in
Minnesota Statutes, chapters 157; 347.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 130 yeas and 0
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
Anderson, S., was excused for the remainder of today's session.
S. F. No. 3166 was reported to the House.
Walker moved to amend S. F. No. 3166, the third
engrossment, as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert the
following language of H. F. No. 3564, the second engrossment:
"Section
1. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 245C.14, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Disqualification
from direct contact. (a) The commissioner
shall disqualify an individual who is the subject of a background study from
any position allowing direct contact with persons receiving services from the
license holder or entity identified in section 245C.03, upon receipt of
information showing, or when a background study completed under this chapter
shows any of the following:
(1) a
conviction of, admission to, or Alford plea to one or more crimes listed in
section 245C.15, regardless of whether the conviction or admission is a felony,
gross misdemeanor, or misdemeanor level crime;
(2) a
preponderance of the clear and convincing evidence indicates the
individual has committed an act or acts that meet the definition of any of the
crimes listed in section 245C.15, regardless of whether the preponderance of
the clear and convincing evidence is for a felony, gross
misdemeanor, or misdemeanor level crime; or
(3) an
investigation results in an administrative determination listed under section
245C.15, subdivision 4, paragraph (b).
(b) No
individual who is disqualified following a background study under section
245C.03, subdivisions 1 and 2, may be retained in a position involving direct
contact with persons served by a program or entity identified in section
245C.03, unless the commissioner has provided written notice under section
245C.17 stating that:
(1)
the individual may remain in direct contact during the period in which the
individual may request reconsideration as provided in section 245C.21,
subdivision 2;
(2)
the commissioner has set aside the individual's disqualification for that
program or entity identified in section 245C.03, as provided in section
245C.22, subdivision 4; or
(3)
the license holder has been granted a variance for the disqualified individual
under section 245C.30.
Sec.
2. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 245C.15, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. 15-year
disqualification. (a) An individual
is disqualified under section 245C.14 if:
(1) less than 15 years have passed since the discharge of the sentence
imposed, if any, for the offense; and (2) the individual has committed a
felony-level violation of any of the following offenses: sections 256.98 (wrongfully obtaining
assistance); 268.182 (false representation; concealment of facts); 393.07, subdivision
10, paragraph (c) (federal Food Stamp Program fraud); 609.165 (felon ineligible
to possess firearm); 609.21 (criminal vehicular homicide and injury); 609.215
(suicide); 609.223 or 609.2231 (assault in the third or fourth degree); repeat
offenses under 609.224 (assault in the fifth degree); 609.229 (crimes committed
for benefit of a gang); 609.2325 (criminal abuse of a vulnerable adult);
609.2335 (financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult); 609.235 (use of drugs
to injure or facilitate crime); 609.24 (simple robbery); 609.255 (false
imprisonment); 609.2664 (manslaughter of an unborn child in the first degree);
609.2665 (manslaughter of an unborn child in the second degree); 609.267
(assault of an unborn child in the first degree); 609.2671 (assault of an
unborn child in the second degree); 609.268 (injury or death of an unborn child
in the commission of a crime); 609.27 (coercion); 609.275 (attempt to coerce);
609.466 (medical assistance fraud); 609.498, subdivision 1 or 1b (aggravated
first degree or first degree tampering with a witness); 609.52 (theft); 609.521
(possession of shoplifting gear); 609.525 (bringing stolen goods into
Minnesota); 609.527 (identity theft); 609.53 (receiving stolen property);
609.535 (issuance of dishonored checks); 609.562 (arson in the second degree);
609.563 (arson in the third degree); 609.582 (burglary); 609.59 (possession of
burglary tools); 609.611 (insurance fraud); 609.625 (aggravated forgery);
609.63 (forgery); 609.631 (check forgery; offering a forged check); 609.635
(obtaining signature by false pretense); 609.66 (dangerous weapons); 609.67
(machine guns and short-barreled shotguns); 609.687 (adulteration); 609.71
(riot); 609.713 (terroristic threats); 609.82 (fraud in obtaining credit);
609.821 (financial transaction card fraud); 617.23 (indecent exposure), not
involving a minor; repeat offenses under 617.241 (obscene materials and
performances; distribution and exhibition prohibited; penalty); 624.713
(certain persons not to possess firearms); chapter 152 (drugs; controlled
substance); or a felony-level conviction involving alcohol or drug use.
(b) An
individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than 15 years has
passed since the individual's aiding and abetting, attempt, or conspiracy to
commit any of the offenses listed in paragraph (a), as each of these offenses
is defined in Minnesota Statutes.
(c)
For foster care and family child care an individual is disqualified under
section 245C.14 if less than 15 years has passed since the individual's voluntary
termination of the individual's parental rights under section 260C.301,
subdivision 1, paragraph (b), or 260C.301, subdivision 3.
(d) An
individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than 15 years has
passed since the discharge of the sentence imposed for an offense in any other
state or country, the elements of which are substantially similar to the
elements of the offenses listed in paragraph (a).
(e) If
the individual studied commits one of the offenses listed in paragraph (a), but
the sentence or level of offense is a gross misdemeanor or misdemeanor, the
individual is disqualified but the disqualification look-back period for the
offense is the period applicable to the gross misdemeanor or misdemeanor
disposition.
(f)
When a disqualification is based on a judicial determination other than a
conviction, the disqualification period begins from the date of the court
order. When a disqualification is based
on an admission, the disqualification period begins from the date of an admission
in court. When a disqualification is
based on a preponderance of clear and convincing evidence of a
disqualifying act, the disqualification date begins from the date of the
dismissal, the date of discharge of the sentence imposed for a conviction for a
disqualifying crime of similar elements, or the date of the incident, whichever
occurs last.
Sec.
3. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 245C.15, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Ten-year
disqualification. (a) An individual
is disqualified under section 245C.14 if:
(1) less than ten years have passed since the discharge of the sentence
imposed, if any, for the offense; and (2) the individual has committed a gross
misdemeanor-level violation of any of the following offenses: sections 256.98 (wrongfully obtaining
assistance); 268.182 (false representation; concealment of facts); 393.07,
subdivision 10, paragraph (c) (federal Food Stamp Program fraud); 609.21
(criminal vehicular homicide and injury); 609.221 or 609.222 (assault in the
first or second degree); 609.223 or 609.2231 (assault in the third or fourth
degree); 609.224 (assault in the fifth degree); 609.224, subdivision 2,
paragraph (c) (assault in the fifth degree by a caregiver against a vulnerable
adult); 609.2242 and 609.2243 (domestic assault); 609.23 (mistreatment of
persons confined); 609.231 (mistreatment of residents or patients); 609.2325
(criminal abuse of a vulnerable adult); 609.233 (criminal neglect of a
vulnerable adult); 609.2335 (financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult);
609.234 (failure to report maltreatment of a vulnerable adult); 609.265
(abduction); 609.275 (attempt to coerce); 609.324, subdivision 1a (other
prohibited acts; minor engaged in prostitution); 609.33 (disorderly house);
609.377 (malicious punishment of a child); 609.378 (neglect or endangerment of
a child); 609.466 (medical assistance fraud); 609.52 (theft); 609.525 (bringing
stolen goods into Minnesota); 609.527 (identity theft); 609.53 (receiving
stolen property); 609.535 (issuance of dishonored checks); 609.582 (burglary);
609.59 (possession of burglary tools); 609.611 (insurance fraud); 609.631
(check forgery; offering a forged check); 609.66 (dangerous weapons); 609.71
(riot); 609.72, subdivision 3 (disorderly conduct against a vulnerable adult);
repeat offenses under 609.746 (interference with privacy); 609.749, subdivision
2 (harassment; stalking); 609.82 (fraud in obtaining credit); 609.821
(financial transaction card fraud); 617.23 (indecent exposure), not involving a
minor; 617.241 (obscene materials and performances); 617.243 (indecent
literature, distribution); 617.293 (harmful materials; dissemination and
display to minors prohibited); or violation of an order for protection under
section 518B.01, subdivision 14.
(b) An
individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than ten years has
passed since the individual's aiding and abetting, attempt, or conspiracy to
commit any of the offenses listed in paragraph (a), as each of these offenses
is defined in Minnesota Statutes.
(c) An
individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than ten years has
passed since the discharge of the sentence imposed for an offense in any other
state or country, the elements of which are substantially similar to the
elements of any of the offenses listed in paragraph (a).
(d) If
the individual studied commits one of the offenses listed in paragraph (a), but
the sentence or level of offense is a misdemeanor disposition, the individual
is disqualified but the disqualification lookback period for the offense is the
period applicable to misdemeanors.
(e)
When a disqualification is based on a judicial determination other than a
conviction, the disqualification period begins from the date of the court
order. When a disqualification is based
on an admission, the disqualification period begins from the date of an
admission in court. When a
disqualification is based on a preponderance of clear and convincing
evidence of a disqualifying act, the disqualification date begins from the date
of the dismissal, the date of discharge of the sentence imposed for a
conviction for a disqualifying crime of similar elements, or the date of the
incident, whichever occurs last.
Sec.
4. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 245C.15, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd.
4. Seven-year
disqualification. (a) An individual
is disqualified under section 245C.14 if:
(1) less than seven years has passed since the discharge of the sentence
imposed, if any, for the offense; and (2) the individual has committed a
misdemeanor-level violation of any of the following offenses: sections 256.98 (wrongfully obtaining
assistance); 268.182 (false representation; concealment of facts); 393.07,
subdivision 10, paragraph (c) (federal Food Stamp Program fraud); 609.21 (criminal
vehicular homicide and injury); 609.221 (assault in the first degree); 609.222
(assault in the second degree); 609.223 (assault in the third degree); 609.2231
(assault in the fourth degree); 609.224 (assault in the fifth degree); 609.2242
(domestic assault); 609.2335 (financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult);
609.234 (failure to report maltreatment of a vulnerable adult); 609.2672
(assault of an unborn child in the third degree); 609.27 (coercion); violation
of an order for protection under 609.3232 (protective order authorized;
procedures; penalties); 609.466 (medical assistance fraud); 609.52 (theft);
609.525 (bringing stolen goods into Minnesota); 609.527 (identity theft);
609.53 (receiving stolen property); 609.535 (issuance of dishonored checks);
609.611 (insurance fraud); 609.66 (dangerous weapons); 609.665 (spring guns);
609.746 (interference with privacy); 609.79 (obscene or harassing telephone
calls); 609.795 (letter, telegram, or package; opening; harassment); 609.82
(fraud in obtaining credit); 609.821 (financial transaction card fraud); 617.23
(indecent exposure), not involving a minor; 617.293 (harmful materials;
dissemination and display to minors prohibited); or violation of an order for
protection under section 518B.01 (Domestic Abuse Act).
(b) An
individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than seven years has
passed since a determination or disposition of the individual's:
(1)
failure to make required reports under section 626.556, subdivision 3, or
626.557, subdivision 3, for incidents in which: (i) the final disposition under section 626.556 or 626.557 was
substantiated maltreatment, and (ii) the maltreatment was recurring or serious;
or
(2)
substantiated serious or recurring maltreatment of a minor under section
626.556, a vulnerable adult under section 626.557, or serious or recurring
maltreatment in any other state, the elements of which are substantially
similar to the elements of maltreatment under section 626.556 or 626.557 for
which: (i) there is a preponderance of
evidence that the maltreatment occurred, and (ii) the subject was responsible
for the maltreatment.
(c) An
individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than seven years has
passed since the individual's aiding and abetting, attempt, or conspiracy to
commit any of the offenses listed in paragraphs (a) and (b), as each of these
offenses is defined in Minnesota Statutes.
(d) An
individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than seven years has
passed since the discharge of the sentence imposed for an offense in any other
state or country, the elements of which are substantially similar to the
elements of any of the offenses listed in paragraphs (a) and (b).
(e)
When a disqualification is based on a judicial determination other than a
conviction, the disqualification period begins from the date of the court
order. When a disqualification is based
on an admission, the disqualification period begins from the date of an
admission in court. When a
disqualification is based on a preponderance of clear and convincing
evidence of a disqualifying act, the disqualification date begins from the date
of the dismissal, the date of discharge of the sentence imposed for a
conviction for a disqualifying crime of similar elements, or the date of the
incident, whichever occurs last.
(f) An
individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than seven years has
passed since the individual was disqualified under section 256.98, subdivision
8.
Sec.
5. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
245C.24, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Permanent
bar to set aside a disqualification.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph paragraphs (b) and
(c), the commissioner may not set aside the disqualification of any
individual disqualified pursuant to this chapter, regardless of how much time
has passed, if the individual was disqualified for a crime or conduct listed in
section 245C.15, subdivision 1.
(b) For
An individual in the chemical dependency field who was:
(1) disqualified for a crime or
conduct listed under section 245C.15, subdivision 1, and;
(2) whose disqualification was
set aside prior to July 1, 2005, the commissioner must consider granting;
and
(3)
was granted
a variance pursuant to section 245C.30 for the license holder for a program
dealing primarily with adults. A
request for reconsideration evaluated under this paragraph must include a
letter of recommendation from the license holder that was subject to the prior
set-aside decision addressing the individual's quality of care to children or
vulnerable adults and the circumstances of the individual's departure from that
service under this section prior to August 1, 2008, is eligible to
request a set-aside under paragraph (c).
(c)
For any individual who was disqualified for a crime or conduct listed under
section 245C.15, subdivision 1, and whose disqualification was set aside prior
to July 1, 2005, the commissioner must consider granting a set-aside pursuant
to section 245C.22. An employer who
hires any individual who provides in-home services shall monitor service
provision with the client by telephone at least quarterly.
(d)
For an individual who was disqualified for an offense under section 609.66,
subdivision 1e, that was committed when the individual was a minor, and more
than seven years has passed since the incident, during which time the
individual has attended and graduated from college, the commissioner may
consider setting aside the disqualification for a children's residential
facility licensed by the Department of Corrections.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2008.
Sec.
6. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 245C.24, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Ten-year
bar to set aside disqualification.
(a) The commissioner may not set aside the disqualification of an
individual in connection with a license to provide family child care for
children, foster care for children in the provider's home, or foster care or
day care services for adults in the provider's home if: (1) less than ten years has passed since the
discharge of the sentence imposed, if any, for the offense; or (2) when
disqualified based on a preponderance of clear and convincing
evidence determination under section 245C.14, subdivision 1, paragraph (a),
clause (2), or an admission under section 245C.14, subdivision 1, paragraph
(a), clause (1), and less than ten years has passed since the individual
committed the act or admitted to committing the act, whichever is later; and
(3) the individual has committed a violation of any of the following
offenses: sections 609.165 (felon
ineligible
to possess firearm); criminal vehicular homicide under 609.21 (criminal
vehicular homicide and injury); 609.215 (aiding suicide or aiding attempted
suicide); felony violations under 609.223 or 609.2231 (assault in the third or
fourth degree); 609.229 (crimes committed for benefit of a gang); 609.713
(terroristic threats); 609.235 (use of drugs to injure or to facilitate crime);
609.24 (simple robbery); 609.255 (false imprisonment); 609.562 (arson in the
second degree); 609.71 (riot); 609.498, subdivision 1 or 1b (aggravated first
degree or first degree tampering with a witness); burglary in the first or
second degree under 609.582 (burglary); 609.66 (dangerous weapon); 609.665
(spring guns); 609.67 (machine guns and short-barreled shotguns); 609.749,
subdivision 2 (gross misdemeanor harassment; stalking); 152.021 or 152.022
(controlled substance crime in the first or second degree); 152.023,
subdivision 1, clause (3) or (4) or subdivision 2, clause (4) (controlled
substance crime in the third degree); 152.024, subdivision 1, clause (2), (3),
or (4) (controlled substance crime in the fourth degree); 609.224, subdivision
2, paragraph (c) (fifth-degree assault by a caregiver against a vulnerable adult);
609.23 (mistreatment of persons confined); 609.231 (mistreatment of residents
or patients); 609.2325 (criminal abuse of a vulnerable adult); 609.233
(criminal neglect of a vulnerable adult); 609.2335 (financial exploitation of a
vulnerable adult); 609.234 (failure to report); 609.265 (abduction); 609.2664
to 609.2665 (manslaughter of an unborn child in the first or second degree);
609.267 to 609.2672 (assault of an unborn child in the first, second, or third
degree); 609.268 (injury or death of an unborn child in the commission of a
crime); repeat offenses under 617.23 (indecent exposure); 617.293
(disseminating or displaying harmful material to minors); a felony-level
conviction involving alcohol or drug use, a gross misdemeanor offense under
609.324, subdivision 1 (other prohibited acts); a gross misdemeanor offense
under 609.378 (neglect or endangerment of a child); a gross misdemeanor offense
under 609.377 (malicious punishment of a child); 609.72, subdivision 3
(disorderly conduct against a vulnerable adult); or 624.713 (certain persons
not to possess firearms).
(b)
The commissioner may not set aside the disqualification of an individual if
less than ten years have passed since the individual's aiding and abetting,
attempt, or conspiracy to commit any of the offenses listed in paragraph (a) as
each of these offenses is defined in Minnesota Statutes.
(c)
The commissioner may not set aside the disqualification of an individual if
less than ten years have passed since the discharge of the sentence imposed for
an offense in any other state or country, the elements of which are
substantially similar to the elements of any of the offenses listed in
paragraph (a).
Sec.
7. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 245C.27, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Fair
hearing when disqualification is not set aside. (a) If the commissioner does not set aside a disqualification of
an individual under section 245C.22 who is disqualified on the basis of a
preponderance of clear and convincing evidence that the individual
committed an act or acts that meet the definition of any of the crimes listed
in section 245C.15; for a determination under section 626.556 or 626.557 of
substantiated maltreatment that was serious or recurring under section 245C.15;
or for failure to make required reports under section 626.556, subdivision 3;
or 626.557, subdivision 3, pursuant to section 245C.15, subdivision 4,
paragraph (b), clause (1), the individual may request a fair hearing under
section 256.045, unless the disqualification is deemed conclusive under section
245C.29.
(b)
The fair hearing is the only administrative appeal of the final agency
determination for purposes of appeal by the disqualified individual. The disqualified individual does not have
the right to challenge the accuracy and completeness of data under section
13.04.
(c)
Except as provided under paragraph (e), if the individual was disqualified
based on a conviction or admission to any crimes listed in section 245C.15,
subdivisions 1 to 4, or for a disqualification under section 256.98,
subdivision 8, the reconsideration decision under section 245C.22 is the final
agency determination for purposes of appeal by the disqualified individual and
is not subject to a hearing under section 256.045. If the individual was disqualified based on a judicial
determination, that determination is treated the same as a conviction for
purposes of appeal.
(d)
This subdivision does not apply to a public employee's appeal of a
disqualification under section 245C.28, subdivision 3.
(e)
Notwithstanding paragraph (c), if the commissioner does not set aside a
disqualification of an individual who was disqualified based on both a
preponderance of clear and convincing evidence and a conviction or
admission, the individual may request a fair hearing under section 256.045,
unless the disqualifications are deemed conclusive under section 245C.29. The scope of the hearing conducted under
section 256.045 with regard to the disqualification based on a conviction or
admission shall be limited solely to whether the individual poses a risk of
harm, according to section 256.045, subdivision 3b. In this case, the reconsideration decision under section 245C.22
is not the final agency decision for purposes of appeal by the disqualified
individual.
Sec.
8. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
245C.29, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Conclusive
disqualification determination. (a)
Unless otherwise specified in statute, a determination that:
(1)
the information the commissioner relied upon to disqualify an individual under
section 245C.14 was correct based on serious or recurring maltreatment;
(2) a
preponderance of the clear and convincing evidence shows that the
individual committed an act or acts that meet the definition of any of the
crimes listed in section 245C.15; or
(3)
the individual failed to make required reports under section 626.556,
subdivision 3, or 626.557, subdivision 3, is conclusive if:
(i)
the commissioner has issued a final order in an appeal of that determination
under section 245A.08, subdivision 5, or 256.045, or a court has issued a final
decision;
(ii)
the individual did not request reconsideration of the disqualification under
section 245C.21; or
(iii)
the individual did not request a hearing on the disqualification under section
256.045 or chapter 14.
(b)
When a licensing action under section 245A.05, 245A.06, or 245A.07 is based on
the disqualification of an individual in connection with a license to provide
family child care, foster care for children in the provider's own home, or
foster care services for adults in the provider's own home, that
disqualification shall be conclusive for purposes of the licensing action if a
request for reconsideration was not submitted within 30 calendar days of the
individual's receipt of the notice of disqualification.
(c) If
a determination that the information relied upon to disqualify an individual
was correct and is conclusive under this section, and the individual is
subsequently disqualified under section 245C.15, the individual has a right to
request reconsideration on the risk of harm under section 245C.21. Subsequent determinations regarding the risk
of harm shall be made according to section 245C.22 and are not subject to
another hearing under section 256.045 or chapter 14.
Sec.
9. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256.045, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. State
agency hearings. (a) State agency
hearings are available for the following:
(1) any person applying for, receiving or having received public
assistance, medical care, or a program of social services granted by the state
agency or a county agency or the federal Food Stamp Act whose application for
assistance is denied, not acted upon with reasonable promptness, or whose assistance
is suspended, reduced, terminated, or claimed to have been incorrectly paid;
(2) any patient or relative aggrieved by an order of the commissioner under
section 252.27;
(3) a
party aggrieved by a ruling of a prepaid health plan; (4) except as provided
under chapter 245C, any individual or facility determined by a lead agency to
have maltreated a vulnerable adult under section 626.557 after they have
exercised their right to administrative reconsideration under section 626.557;
(5) any person whose claim for foster care payment according to a placement of
the child resulting from a child protection assessment under section 626.556 is
denied or not acted upon with reasonable promptness, regardless of funding
source; (6) any person to whom a right of appeal according to this section is
given by other provision of law; (7) an applicant aggrieved by an adverse
decision to an application for a hardship waiver under section 256B.15; (8) an
applicant aggrieved by an adverse decision to an application or redetermination
for a Medicare Part D prescription drug subsidy under section 256B.04,
subdivision 4a; (9) except as provided under chapter 245A, an individual or
facility determined to have maltreated a minor under section 626.556, after the
individual or facility has exercised the right to administrative
reconsideration under section 626.556; or (10) except as provided under chapter
245C, an individual disqualified under sections 245C.14 and 245C.15, on the
basis of serious or recurring maltreatment; a preponderance of the
clear and convincing evidence that the individual has committed an act or
acts that meet the definition of any of the crimes listed in section 245C.15,
subdivisions 1 to 4; or for failing to make reports required under section
626.556, subdivision 3, or 626.557, subdivision 3. Hearings regarding a maltreatment determination under clause (4)
or (9) and a disqualification under this clause in which the basis for a
disqualification is serious or recurring maltreatment, which has not been set aside
under sections 245C.22 and 245C.23, shall be consolidated into a single fair
hearing. In such cases, the scope of
review by the human services referee shall include both the maltreatment
determination and the disqualification.
The failure to exercise the right to an administrative reconsideration
shall not be a bar to a hearing under this section if federal law provides an
individual the right to a hearing to dispute a finding of maltreatment. Individuals and organizations specified in
this section may contest the specified action, decision, or final disposition
before the state agency by submitting a written request for a hearing to the
state agency within 30 days after receiving written notice of the action,
decision, or final disposition, or within 90 days of such written notice if the
applicant, recipient, patient, or relative shows good cause why the request was
not submitted within the 30-day time limit.
The
hearing for an individual or facility under clause (4), (9), or (10) is the
only administrative appeal to the final agency determination specifically,
including a challenge to the accuracy and completeness of data under section
13.04. Hearings requested under clause
(4) apply only to incidents of maltreatment that occur on or after October 1,
1995. Hearings requested by nursing
assistants in nursing homes alleged to have maltreated a resident prior to
October 1, 1995, shall be held as a contested case proceeding under the
provisions of chapter 14. Hearings
requested under clause (9) apply only to incidents of maltreatment that occur
on or after July 1, 1997. A hearing for
an individual or facility under clause (9) is only available when there is no
juvenile court or adult criminal action pending. If such action is filed in either court while an administrative
review is pending, the administrative review must be suspended until the
judicial actions are completed. If the
juvenile court action or criminal charge is dismissed or the criminal action
overturned, the matter may be considered in an administrative hearing.
For
purposes of this section, bargaining unit grievance procedures are not an
administrative appeal.
The
scope of hearings involving claims to foster care payments under clause (5)
shall be limited to the issue of whether the county is legally responsible for
a child's placement under court order or voluntary placement agreement and, if
so, the correct amount of foster care payment to be made on the child's behalf
and shall not include review of the propriety of the county's child protection
determination or child placement decision.
(b) A
vendor of medical care as defined in section 256B.02, subdivision 7, or a
vendor under contract with a county agency to provide social services is not a
party and may not request a hearing under this section, except if assisting a
recipient as provided in subdivision 4.
(c) An
applicant or recipient is not entitled to receive social services beyond the
services prescribed under chapter 256M or other social services the person is
eligible for under state law.
(d)
The commissioner may summarily affirm the county or state agency's proposed
action without a hearing when the sole issue is an automatic change due to a
change in state or federal law.
Sec.
10. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256.045, subdivision 3b, is amended to read:
Subd.
3b. Standard of evidence for maltreatment and disqualification hearings. (a) The state human services referee shall
determine that maltreatment has occurred if a preponderance of evidence exists
to support the final disposition under sections 626.556 and 626.557. For purposes of hearings regarding
disqualification, the state human services referee shall affirm the proposed
disqualification in an appeal under subdivision 3, paragraph (a), clause (9),
if a preponderance of the evidence shows the individual has:
(1) a
preponderance of the evidence shows the individual has committed
maltreatment under section 626.556 or 626.557, which is serious or recurring;
(2) clear
and convincing evidence shows the individual has committed an act or acts
meeting the definition of any of the crimes listed in section 245C.15,
subdivisions 1 to 4; or
(3) a
preponderance of the evidence shows the individual has failed to make
required reports under section 626.556 or 626.557, for incidents in which the
final disposition under section 626.556 or 626.557 was substantiated
maltreatment that was serious or recurring.
(b) If
the disqualification is affirmed, the state human services referee shall
determine whether the individual poses a risk of harm in accordance with the
requirements of section 245C.16, and whether the disqualification should be set
aside or not set aside. In determining
whether the disqualification should be set aside, the human services referee
shall consider all of the characteristics that cause the individual to be
disqualified, including those characteristics that were not subject to review
under paragraph (a), in order to determine whether the individual poses a risk
of harm. A decision to set aside a
disqualification that is the subject of the hearing constitutes a determination
that the individual does not pose a risk of harm and that the individual may
provide direct contact services in the individual program specified in the set
aside. If a determination that the
information relied upon to disqualify an individual was correct and is
conclusive under section 245C.29, and the individual is subsequently
disqualified under section 245C.14, the individual has a right to again request
reconsideration on the risk of harm under section 245C.21. Subsequent determinations regarding risk of
harm are not subject to another hearing under this section.
(c)
The state human services referee shall recommend an order to the commissioner
of health, education, or human services, as applicable, who shall issue a final
order. The commissioner shall affirm,
reverse, or modify the final disposition.
Any order of the commissioner issued in accordance with this subdivision
is conclusive upon the parties unless appeal is taken in the manner provided in
subdivision 7. In any licensing appeal
under chapters 245A and 245C and sections 144.50 to 144.58 and 144A.02 to
144A.46, the commissioner's determination as to maltreatment is conclusive, as
provided under section 245C.29.
Sec.
11. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.20, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Policy
and purpose. The policy of the
state of Minnesota and the purpose of sections 259.20 to 259.69 is to ensure:
(1)
that the best interests of children adopted persons are met in
the planning and granting of adoptions; and
(2)
that laws and practices governing adoption recognize the diversity of
Minnesota's population and the diverse needs of persons affected by adoption.
Sec.
12. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.21, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
2a. Adult
adoption. "Adult
adoption" means the adoption of a person at least 18 years of age.
Sec.
13. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.22, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Children
Persons who may be adopted.
No petition for adoption shall be filed unless the child person
sought to be adopted has been placed by the commissioner of human services,
the commissioner's agent, or a licensed child-placing agency. The provisions of this subdivision shall not
apply if
(a)
the child person to be adopted is over 14 years of age;
(b)
the child is sought to be adopted by an individual who is related to the child,
as defined by section 245A.02, subdivision 13;
(c)
the child has been lawfully placed under the laws of another state while the
child and petitioner resided in that other state;
(d)
the court waives the requirement of this subdivision in the best interests of
the child or petitioners, provided that the adoption does not involve a
placement as defined in section 259.21, subdivision 8; or
(e)
the child has been lawfully placed under section 259.47.
Sec.
14. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.23, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Contents
of petition. The petition shall be
signed by the petitioner and, if married, by the spouse. It shall be verified, and filed in
duplicate. The petition shall allege:
(a)
The full name, age and place of residence of petitioner, and if married, the
date and place of marriage;
(b)
The date petitioner acquired physical custody of the child and from what person
or agency;
(c)
The date of birth of the child person to be adopted, if known,
and the state and county where born;
(d)
The name of the child's parents, if known, and the guardian if there be one;
(e)
The actual name of the child person to be adopted, if known, and
any known aliases;
(f)
The name to be given the child person to be adopted if a change
of name is desired;
(g)
The description and value of any real or personal property owned by the child
person to be adopted;
(h)
That the petitioner desires that the relationship of parent and child be
established between petitioner and the child, and that it is to the
person to be adopted and that adoption is in the best interests of the child
for the child person to be adopted by the petitioner.
In
agency placements, the information required in clauses (d) and (e) shall not be
required to be alleged in the petition but shall be transmitted to the court by
the commissioner of human services or the agency.
Sec.
15. [259.241] ADULT ADOPTION.
(a)
Any adult person may be adopted, regardless of his or her residence. A resident of Minnesota may petition the
court of record having jurisdiction of adoption proceedings to adopt an
individual who has reached the age of 18 years or older.
(b)
The consent of the person to be adopted shall be the only consent necessary,
according to section 259.24. The
consent of an adult in his or her own adoption is invalid if the adult is
considered to be a vulnerable adult under section 626.5572, subdivision 21, or
if the person consenting to the adoption is determined not competent to give
consent.
(c)
The decree of adoption establishes a parent-child relationship between the adopting
parent or parents and the person adopted, including the right to inherit, and
also terminates the parental rights and sibling relationship between the
adopted person and the adopted person's birth parents and siblings according to
section 259.59.
(d)
If the adopted person requests a change of name, the adoption decree shall
order the name change.
Sec.
16. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 259.41, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Study
required before placement; certain relatives excepted. (a) An approved adoption study; completed
background study, as required under section 245C.33; and written report must be
completed before the child is placed in a prospective adoptive home under this
chapter, except as allowed by section 259.47, subdivision 6. In an agency placement, the report must be
filed with the court at the time the adoption petition is filed. In a direct adoptive placement, the report
must be filed with the court in support of a motion for temporary preadoptive
custody under section 259.47, subdivision 3, or, if the study and report are
complete, in support of an emergency order under section 259.47, subdivision
6. The study and report shall be
completed by a licensed child-placing agency and must be thorough and
comprehensive. The study and report
shall be paid for by the prospective adoptive parent, except as otherwise
required under section 256.01, subdivision 2, paragraph (h), 259.67,
or 259.73.
(b) A
placement for adoption with an individual who is related to the child, as
defined by section 245A.02, subdivision 13, is not subject to this
section except as the background study required by sections
245C.33 and 259.53, subdivision 2, paragraph (c). by subdivision 2,
paragraph (a), clause (1), items (i) and (ii), and subdivision 3. In the case of a stepparent adoption, a
background study must be completed on the stepparent and any children as
required under subdivision 3, paragraph (b), except that a child of the stepparent
does not need to have a background study complete if they are a sibling through
birth or adoption of the person being adopted.
The local social services agency of the county in which the prospective
adoptive parent lives must initiate a background study unless a child-placing
agency has been involved with the adoption.
The local social service agency may charge a reasonable fee for the
background study. If a placement is
being made the background study must be completed prior to placement pursuant
to section 259.29, subdivision 1, paragraph (c). Background study results must be filed with the adoption petition
according to section 259.22, except in an adult adoption where an adoption
study and background study are not needed.
(c) In
the case of a licensed foster parent seeking to adopt a child who is in the
foster parent's care, any portions of the foster care licensing process that
duplicate requirements of the home study may be submitted in satisfaction of
the relevant requirements of this section.
Sec.
17. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.43, is amended to read:
259.43 BIRTH PARENT HISTORY; COMMISSIONER'S
FORM.
In any
adoption under this chapter, except a stepparent or an adult adoption
under section 259.241, a birth parent or an agency, if an agency
placement, shall provide a prospective adoptive parent with a complete,
thorough, detailed, and current social and medical history of the birth
families child being adopted, if information is known after
reasonable inquiry. Each birth
family child social and medical history must be provided on a form or
forms prepared by the commissioner and must include background and
health history specific to the child, the child's birth parents, and the
child's other birth relatives.
Applicable background and health information about the child
includes: the child's current health
condition, behavior, and demeanor; placement history; education history;
sibling information; and birth, medical, dental, and immunization information. Redacted copies of pertinent records,
assessments, and evaluations shall be attached to the child's social and
medical history. Applicable background
information about the child's birth parents and other birth relatives
includes: general background
information; education and employment history; physical health and mental
health history; and reasons for the child's placement. The child's social and medical history shall
be completed in a manner so that the completed form protects
the identities of all individuals described in it. The commissioner shall make the form available to agencies and
court administrators for public distribution.
The birth family child's social and medical history must
be provided to the prospective adoptive family prior to adoptive placement,
provided to the Department of Human Services with application for adoption
assistance, if applicable, and filed with the court when the adoption
petition is filed, or,. In
a direct adoptive placement, the child's social and medical history must be
filed with the court with the motion for temporary preadoptive custody.
Sec.
18. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.52, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Requirement
to search registry before adoption petition can be granted; proof of search. No petition for adoption may be granted
unless the agency supervising the adoptive placement, the birth mother of the
child, or, in the case of a stepparent or relative adoption, the county agency
responsible for the report required under section 259.53, subdivision 1,
requests that the commissioner of health search the registry to determine
whether a putative father is registered in relation to a child who is or may be
the subject of an adoption petition.
The search required by this subdivision must be conducted no sooner than
31 days following the birth of the child.
A search of the registry may be proven by the production of a certified
copy of the registration form or by a certified statement of the commissioner
of health that after a search no registration of a putative father in relation
to a child who is or may be the subject of an adoption petition could be
located. The filing of a certified
copy of an order from a juvenile protection matter under chapter 260C
containing a finding that certification of the requisite search of the
Minnesota Fathers' Adoption Registry was filed with the court in that matter
shall also constitute proof of search. Certification
that the fathers' adoption registry has been searched must be filed with the
court prior to entry of any final order of adoption. In addition to the search required by this subdivision, the
agency supervising the adoptive placement, the birth mother of the child, or,
in the case of a stepparent or relative adoption, the county social
services agency responsible for the report under section 259.53,
subdivision 1, or the responsible social services agency that is a
petitioner in a juvenile protection matter under chapter 260C may request
that the commissioner of health search the registry at any time.
Sec.
19. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.53, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Reports
and records. (a) The contents of
all reports and records of the commissioner of human services, local social
services agency, or child-placing agency bearing on the suitability of the
proposed adoptive home and the child to each other shall not be disclosed
either directly or indirectly to any person other than the commissioner of
human services, the child's guardian ad litem appointed under: (1) section 260C.163 when the guardian's
appointment continues under section 260C.317, subdivision 3, paragraph (b); or
(2) section 259.65 or a judge of the court having jurisdiction of the
matter, except as provided in paragraph (b).
(b) A
judge of the court having jurisdiction of the matter shall upon request
disclose to a party to the proceedings or the party's counsel any portion of a
report or record that relates only to the suitability of the proposed adoptive
parents. In this disclosure, the judge
may withhold the identity of individuals providing information in the report or
record. When the judge is considering
whether to disclose the identity of individuals providing information, the
agency with custody of the report or record shall be permitted to present reasons
for or against disclosure.
Sec.
20. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 259.57, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Findings;
orders. Upon the hearing,
(a) if
the court finds that it is in the best interests of the child person
to be adopted that the petition be granted, a decree of adoption shall be
made and recorded in the office of the court administrator, ordering that
henceforth the child person to be adopted shall be the child of
the petitioner. In the decree the court
may change the name of the child adopted person if desired. After the decree is granted for a child
an adopted person who is:
(1)
under the guardianship of the commissioner or a licensed child-placing agency
according to section 260C.201, subdivision 11, or 260C.317;
(2)
placed by the commissioner, commissioner's agent, or licensed child-placing
agency after a consent to adopt according to section 259.24 or under an
agreement conferring authority to place for adoption according to section
259.25; or
(3)
adopted after a direct adoptive placement ordered by the district court under
section 259.47,
the court administrator
shall immediately mail a copy of the recorded decree to the commissioner of
human services;
(b) if
the court is not satisfied that the proposed adoption is in the best interests
of the child person to be adopted, the court shall deny the
petition, and in the case of a child shall order the child returned to
the custody of the person or agency legally vested with permanent custody or
certify the case for appropriate action and disposition to the court having
jurisdiction to determine the custody and guardianship of the child.
Sec.
21. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.59, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Legal
effect. Upon adoption, the child
adopted person shall become the legal child of the adopting persons and
they shall become the legal parents of the child with all the rights and duties
between them of birth parents and legitimate child. By virtue of the adoption the child adopted person shall
inherit from the adoptive parents or their relatives the same as though the child
adopted person were the natural child of the parents, and in case of the
child's adopted person's death intestate the adoptive parents and
their relatives shall inherit the child's adopted person's estate
as if they the adopted person had been the child's birth parents
and relatives. After a decree of
adoption is entered the birth parents of an adopted child person shall
be relieved of all parental responsibilities for the child adopted
person, and they shall not exercise or have any rights over the adopted child
person or the child's adopted person's property. The child adopted person shall
not owe the birth parents or their relatives any legal duty nor shall the child
adopted person inherit from the birth parents or kindred, except as
provided in subdivision 1a and section 257C.08, subdivision 6.
Sec.
22. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.59, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Enrollment
in American Indian tribe. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision 1, the adoption of a
child person whose birth parent or parents are enrolled in an
American Indian tribe shall not change the child's person's
enrollment in that tribe.
Sec.
23. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.67, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Adoption
assistance agreement. The placing
agency shall certify a child as eligible for adoption assistance according to
rules promulgated by the commissioner.
The placing agency shall not certify a child who remains under the
jurisdiction of the sending agency pursuant to section 260.851, article 5, for
state-funded adoption assistance when Minnesota is the receiving state. Not later than 30 days after a parent or
parents are found and approved for adoptive placement of a child certified as
eligible for adoption assistance, and before the final decree of adoption is
issued, a written agreement must be entered into by the commissioner, the
adoptive parent or parents, and the placing agency. The written agreement must be fully completed by the placing
agency and in the form prescribed by the commissioner and must set forth the
responsibilities of all parties, the anticipated duration of the adoption
assistance payments, and the payment terms.
The adoption assistance agreement shall be subject to the commissioner's
approval, which must be granted or denied not later than 15 days after the
agreement is entered.
The
amount of adoption assistance is subject to the availability of state and
federal funds and shall be determined through agreement with the adoptive
parents. The agreement shall take into
consideration the circumstances of the adopting parent or parents, the needs of
the child being adopted and may provide ongoing monthly assistance, supplemental
maintenance expenses related to the adopted person's child's
special needs, nonmedical expenses periodically necessary for purchase of
services, items, or equipment related to the special needs, and medical
expenses. The placing agency or the
adoptive parent or parents shall provide written documentation to support the
need for adoption assistance payments.
The commissioner may require periodic reevaluation of adoption
assistance payments. The amount of
ongoing monthly adoption assistance granted may in no case exceed that which
would be allowable for the child under foster family care and is subject to the
availability of state and federal funds.
Sec.
24. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.67, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Annual
affidavit Modification or termination of the adoption assistance
agreement. When adoption
assistance agreements are for more than one year, the adoptive parents or
guardian or conservator shall annually present an affidavit stating whether the
adopted person remains under their care and whether the need for adoption
assistance continues to exist. The
commissioner may verify the affidavit. The
adoption assistance agreement shall continue in accordance with its terms as
long as the need for adoption assistance continues and the adopted person
child is the legal or financial dependent of the adoptive parent or parents
or guardian or conservator and is under 18 years of age. The adoption assistance agreement may be
extended to age 22 as allowed by rules adopted by the commissioner. Termination or modification of the adoption
assistance agreement may be requested by the adoptive parents or subsequent
guardian or conservator at any time.
When the commissioner determines that a child is eligible for adoption
assistance under Title IV-E of the Social Security Act, United States Code,
title 42, sections 670 to 679a, the commissioner shall modify the adoption
assistance agreement in order to obtain the funds under that act.
Sec.
25. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.67, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
3a. Recovery
of overpayments. An amount
of adoption assistance paid to an adoptive parent in excess of the payment due
is recoverable by the commissioner, even when the overpayment was caused by
agency error or circumstances outside the responsibility and control of the
family or provider. Adoption assistance
amounts covered by this subdivision include basic maintenance needs payments,
monthly supplemental maintenance needs payments, reimbursement of nonrecurring
adoption expenses, reimbursement of special nonmedical costs, and reimbursement
of medical costs.
Sec.
26. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 259.67, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd.
4. Eligibility
conditions. (a) The placing agency
shall use the AFDC requirements as specified in federal law as of July 16,
1996, when determining the child's eligibility for adoption assistance under
title IV-E of the Social Security Act. If
the child does not qualify, the placing agency shall certify a child as
eligible for state funded adoption assistance only if the following criteria
are met:
(1)
Due to the child's characteristics or circumstances it would be difficult to
provide the child an adoptive home without adoption assistance.
(2)(i)
A placement agency has made reasonable efforts to place the child for adoption
without adoption assistance, but has been unsuccessful; or
(ii)
the child's licensed foster parents desire to adopt the child and it is
determined by the placing agency that the adoption is in the best interest of
the child; or
(iii)
the child's relative, as defined in section 260C.007, subdivision 27, desires
to adopt the child, and it is determined by the placing agency that the
adoption is in the best interest of the child.
(3)(i)
The child has been is a ward of the commissioner, a
Minnesota-licensed child-placing agency, or a tribal social service agency
of Minnesota recognized by the Secretary of the Interior; or (ii) the child
will be adopted according to tribal law without a termination of parental
rights or relinquishment, provided that the tribe has documented the valid
reason why the child cannot or should not be returned to the home of the
child's parent. The placing agency
shall not certify a child who remains under the jurisdiction of the sending
agency pursuant to section 260.851, article 5, for state-funded adoption
assistance when Minnesota is the receiving state. A child who is adopted by the child's legal custodian or
guardian shall not be eligible for state-funded adoption assistance.
(b) For
purposes of this subdivision, The characteristics or circumstances that may
be considered in determining whether a child is a child with special needs
under United States Code, title 42, chapter 7, subchapter IV, part E, or
meets the requirements of paragraph (a), clause (1), or section 473(c)(2)(A)
of the Social Security Act, are the following:
(1)
The child is a member of a sibling group to be placed as one unit in which at
least one sibling is older than 15 months of age or is described in clause (2)
or (3).
(2)
The child has documented physical, mental, emotional, or behavioral
disabilities.
(3)
The child has a high risk of developing physical, mental, emotional, or
behavioral disabilities.
(4)
The child is five years of age or older.
(c)
When a child's eligibility for adoption assistance is based upon the high risk
of developing physical, mental, emotional, or behavioral disabilities, payments
shall not be made under the adoption assistance agreement unless and until the
potential disability manifests itself as documented by an appropriate health
care professional.
Sec.
27. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.75, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd.
5. Withdrawal
of registration. A child's
registration shall be withdrawn when the exchange service has been notified in
writing by the local social service agency and or the licensed
child-placing agency that the child has been adopted, has become 14 years
old and will not consent to an adoption plan, placed in an adoptive home
or has died.
Sec.
28. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.89, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Request. An adopted person who is 19 years of age or
over may request the commissioner of health to disclose the information on the
adopted person's original birth record.
The commissioner of health shall, within five days of receipt of the
request, notify the commissioner of human services agent or licensed
child-placing agency when known or the commissioner of human services when the
agency is not known in writing of the request by the adopted person.
Sec.
29. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.89, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Search. Within six months after receiving notice of
the request of the adopted person, the commissioner of human services services'
agent or a licensed child-placing agency shall make complete and reasonable
efforts to notify each parent identified on the original birth record of the
adopted person. The commissioner, the
commissioner's agents, and licensed child-placing agencies may charge a
reasonable fee to the adopted person for the cost of making a search pursuant
to this subdivision. Every licensed
child-placing agency in the state shall cooperate with the commissioner of
human services in efforts to notify an identified parent. All communications under this subdivision
are confidential pursuant to section 13.02, subdivision 3.
For
purposes of this subdivision, "notify" means a personal and
confidential contact with the birth parents named on the original birth record
of the adopted person. The contact shall
not be by mail and shall be by an employee or agent of the licensed
child-placing agency which processed the pertinent adoption or some other
licensed child-placing agency designated by the commissioner of human services
when it is determined to be reasonable by the commissioner; otherwise contact
shall be by mail or telephone. The
contact shall be evidenced by filing with the commissioner of health an
affidavit of notification executed by the person who notified each parent
certifying that each parent was given the following information:
(a) (1) the nature of the
information requested by the adopted person;
(b) (2) the date of the request of
the adopted person;
(c) (3) the right of the parent to
file, within 30 days of receipt of the notice, an affidavit with the
commissioner of health stating that the information on the original birth
record should not be disclosed;
(d) (4) the right of the parent to
file a consent to disclosure with the commissioner of health at any time; and
(e) (5) the effect of a failure of
the parent to file either a consent to disclosure or an affidavit stating that
the information on the original birth record should not be disclosed.
Sec.
30. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.89, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd.
4. Release
of information after notice. If,
within six months, the commissioner of human services certifies services'
agent or licensed child-placing agency document to the commissioner of
health notification of each parent identified on the original birth record
pursuant to subdivision 2, the commissioner of health shall disclose the
information requested by the adopted person 31 days after the date of the
latest notice to either parent. This
disclosure will occur if, at any time during the 31 days both of the parents
identified on the original birth record have filed a consent to disclosure with
the commissioner of health and neither consent to disclosure has been revoked
by the subsequent filing by a parent of an affidavit stating that the
information should not be disclosed. If
only one parent has filed a consent to disclosure and the consent has not been
revoked, the commissioner of health shall disclose, to the adopted person,
original birth record information on the consenting parent only.
Sec.
31. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.89, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
7. Adult
adoptions. Notwithstanding
section 144.218, a person adopted as an adult shall be permitted to access the
person's birth records that existed prior to the adult adoption. Access to the existing birth records shall
be the same access that was permitted prior to the adult adoption.
Sec.
32. [260.853] INTERSTATE COMPACT FOR THE PLACEMENT OF CHILDREN.
ARTICLE
I. PURPOSE
The
purpose of this Interstate Compact for the Placement of Children is to:
A.
Provide a process through which children subject to this compact are placed in
safe and suitable homes in a timely manner.
B.
Facilitate ongoing supervision of a placement, the delivery of services, and
communication between the states.
C.
Provide operating procedures that will ensure that children are placed in safe
and suitable homes in a timely manner.
D.
Provide for the promulgation and enforcement of administrative rules
implementing the provisions of this compact and regulating the covered
activities of the member states.
E.
Provide for uniform data collection and information sharing between member
states under this compact.
F.
Promote coordination between this compact, the Interstate Compact for
Juveniles, the Interstate Compact on Adoption and Medical Assistance and other
compacts affecting the placement of and which provide services to children
otherwise subject to this compact.
G.
Provide for a state's continuing legal jurisdiction and responsibility for
placement and care of a child that it would have had if the placement were
intrastate.
H.
Provide for the promulgation of guidelines, in collaboration with Indian
tribes, for interstate cases involving Indian children as is or may be
permitted by federal law.
ARTICLE
II. DEFINITIONS
As
used in this compact,
A.
"Approved placement" means the public child-placing agency in the
receiving state has determined that the placement is both safe and suitable for
the child.
B.
"Assessment" means an evaluation of a prospective placement by a
public child-placing agency to determine whether the placement meets the
individualized needs of the child, including but not limited to the child's
safety and stability, health and well-being, and mental, emotional, and
physical development. An assessment is
only applicable to a placement by a public child-placing agency.
C.
"Child" means an individual who has not attained the age of eighteen
(18).
D.
"Certification" means to attest, declare or sworn to before a judge
or notary public.
E.
"Default" means the failure of a member state to perform the
obligations or responsibilities imposed upon it by this compact, the bylaws or
rules of the Interstate Commission.
F.
"Home Study" means an evaluation of a home environment conducted
according to the applicable requirements of the State in which the home is
located, and documents the preparation and the suitability of the placement
resource for placement of a child according to the laws and requirements of the
state in which the home is located.
G.
"Indian tribe" means any Indian tribe, band, nation, or other
organized group or community of Indians recognized as eligible for services
provided to Indians by the Secretary of the Interior because of their status as
Indians, including any Alaskan native village as defined in section 3 (c) of
the Alaska Native Claims settlement Act at 43 USC § 1602(c).
H.
"Interstate Commission for the Placement of Children" means the
commission that is created under Article VIII of this compact and which is
generally referred to as the Interstate Commission.
I.
"Jurisdiction" means the power and authority of a court to hear and
decide matters.
J.
"Legal Risk Placement" ("Legal Risk Adoption") means a
placement made preliminary to an adoption where the prospective adoptive
parents acknowledge in writing that a child can be ordered returned to the
sending state or the birth mother's state of residence, if different from the
sending state and a final decree of adoption shall not be entered in any
jurisdiction until all required consents are obtained or are dispensed with
according to applicable law.
K.
"Member state" means a state that has enacted this compact.
L.
"Non-custodial parent" means a person who, at the time of the
commencement of court proceedings in the sending state, does not have sole
legal custody of the child or has joint legal custody of a child, and who is
not the subject of allegations or findings of child abuse or neglect.
M.
"Non-member state" means a state which has not enacted this compact.
N.
"Notice of residential placement" means information regarding a
placement into a residential facility provided to the receiving state
including, but not limited to the name, date and place of birth of the child,
the identity and address of the parent or legal guardian, evidence of authority
to make the placement, and the name and address of the facility in which the
child will be placed. Notice of
residential placement shall also include information regarding a discharge and
any unauthorized absence from the facility.
O.
"Placement" means the act by a public or private child-placing agency
intended to arrange for the care or custody of a child in another state.
P.
"Private child-placing agency" means any private corporation, agency,
foundation, institution, or charitable organization, or any private person or
attorney that facilitates, causes, or is involved in the placement of a child
from one state to another and that is not an instrumentality of the state or
acting under color of state law.
Q.
"Provisional placement" means a determination made by the public
child-placing agency in the receiving state that the proposed placement is safe
and suitable, and, to the extent allowable, the receiving state has temporarily
waived its standards or requirements otherwise applicable to prospective foster
or adoptive parents so as to not delay the placement. Completion of an assessment and the receiving state requirements
regarding training for prospective foster or adoptive parents shall not delay
an otherwise safe and suitable placement.
R.
"Public child-placing agency" means any government child welfare
agency or child protection agency or a private entity under contract with such
an agency, regardless of whether they act on behalf of a state, county,
municipality or other governmental unit and which facilitates, causes, or is
involved in the placement of a child from one state to another.
S.
"Receiving state" means the state to which a child is sent, brought,
or caused to be sent or brought.
T.
"Relative" means someone who is related to the child as a parent,
step-parent, sibling by half or whole blood or by adoption, grandparent, aunt,
uncle, or first cousin or a non-relative with such significant ties to the
child that they may be regarded as relatives as determined by the court in the
sending state.
U.
"Residential Facility" means a facility providing a level of care
that is sufficient to substitute for parental responsibility or foster care,
and is beyond what is needed for assessment or treatment of an acute
condition. For purposes of the compact,
residential facilities do not include institutions primarily educational in
character, hospitals or other medical facilities.
V.
"Rule" means a written directive, mandate, standard or principle
issued by the Interstate Commission promulgated pursuant to Article XI of this
compact that is of general applicability and that implements, interprets or
prescribes a policy or provision of the compact. "Rule" has the force
and effect of an administrative rule in a member state, and includes the
amendment, repeal, or suspension of an existing rule.
W.
"Sending state" means the state from which the placement of a child
is initiated.
X.
"Service member's permanent duty station" means the military
installation where an active duty Armed Services member is currently assigned
and is physically located under competent orders that do not specify the duty
as temporary.
Y.
"Service member's state of legal residence" means the state in which
the active duty Armed Services member is considered a resident for tax and
voting purposes.
Z.
"State" means a state of the United States, the District of Columbia,
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa,
the Northern Marianas Islands and any other territory of the United States.
AA.
"State court" means a judicial body of a state that is vested by law
with responsibility for adjudicating cases involving abuse, neglect,
deprivation, delinquency or status offenses of individuals who have not
attained the age of eighteen (18).
BB.
"Supervision" means monitoring provided by the receiving state once a
child has been placed in a receiving state pursuant to this compact.
ARTICLE
III. APPLICABILITY
A.
Except as otherwise provided in Article III, Section B, this compact shall
apply to:
1.
The interstate placement of a child in a custody proceeding in which a public
child placing agency is not a party, provided, the placement is not intended to
effectuate an adoption.
2.
The interstate placement of a child subject to ongoing court jurisdiction in
the sending state, due to allegations or findings that the child has been
abused, neglected, or deprived as defined by the laws of the sending state,
provided, however, that the placement of such a child into a residential
facility shall only require notice of residential placement to the receiving
state prior to placement.
3.
The interstate placement of a child adjudicated delinquent or unmanageable
based on the laws of the sending state and subject to ongoing court
jurisdiction of the sending state if:
a.
the child is being placed in a residential facility in another member state and
is not covered under another compact; or
b.
the child is being placed in another member state and the determination of
safety and suitability of the placement and services required is not provided
through another compact.
4.
The interstate placement of any child by a public child-placing agency or
private child-placing agency as defined in this compact as a preliminary step
to a possible adoption.
B.
The provisions of this compact shall not apply to:
1.
The interstate placement of a child with a non-relative in a receiving state by
a parent with the legal authority to make such a placement provided, however,
that the placement is not intended to effectuate an adoption.
2.
The interstate placement of a child by one relative with the lawful authority
to make such a placement directly with a relative in a receiving state.
3.
The placement of a child, not subject to Article III, Section A, into a
residential facility by his parent.
4.
The placement of a child with a non-custodial parent provided that:
a.
The non-custodial parent proves to the satisfaction of a court in the sending
state a substantial relationship with the child; and
b.
The court in the sending state makes a written finding that placement with the
non-custodial parent is in the best interests of the child; and
c. The court in the sending state dismisses its
jurisdiction over the child's case.
5.
A child entering the United States from a foreign country for the purpose of
adoption or leaving the United States to go to a foreign country for the
purpose of adoption in that country.
6.
Cases in which a U.S. citizen child living overseas with his family, at least
one of whom is in the U.S. Armed Services, and who is stationed overseas, is
removed and placed in a state.
7. The sending of a child by a public
child-placing agency or a private child-placing agency for a visit as defined
by the rules of the Interstate Commission.
C.
For purposes of determining the applicability of this compact to the placement
of a child with a family in the Armed Services, the public child-placing agency
or private child-placing agency may choose the state of the service member's
permanent duty station or the service member's declared legal residence.
D.
Nothing in this compact shall be construed to prohibit the concurrent
application of the provisions of this compact with other applicable interstate
compacts including the Interstate Compact for Juveniles and the Interstate
Compact on Adoption and Medical Assistance.
The Interstate Commission may in cooperation with other interstate
compact commissions having responsibility for the interstate movement,
placement or transfer of children, promulgate like rules to ensure the
coordination of services, timely placement of children, and the reduction of
unnecessary or duplicative administrative or procedural requirements.
ARTICLE
IV. JURISDICTION
A.
Except as provided in Article IV, Section G, concerning private and independent
adoptions, and in interstate placements in which the public child placing
agency is not a party to a custody proceeding the sending state shall retain
jurisdiction over a child with respect to all matters of custody and
disposition of the child which it would have had if the child had remained in
the sending state. Such jurisdiction
shall also include the power to order the return of the child to the sending
state.
B.
When an issue of child protection or custody is brought before a court in the
receiving state, such court shall confer with the court of the sending state to
determine the most appropriate forum for adjudication.
C. In accordance with its own laws, the court in the
sending state shall have authority to terminate its jurisdiction if:
1.
The child is reunified with the parent in the receiving state who is the
subject of allegations or findings of abuse or neglect, only with the
concurrence of the public child-placing agency in the receiving state; or
2.
The child is adopted;
3.
The child reaches the age of majority under the laws of the sending state; or
4.
The child achieves legal independence pursuant to the laws of the sending
state; or
5.
A guardianship is created by a court in the receiving state with the
concurrence of the court in the sending state; or
6.
An Indian tribe has petitioned for and received jurisdiction from the court in
the sending state; or
7.
The public child-placing agency of the sending state requests termination and
has obtained the concurrence of the public child-placing agency in the
receiving the state.
D.
When a sending state court terminates its jurisdiction, the receiving state
child-placing agency shall be notified.
E.
Nothing in this article shall defeat a claim of jurisdiction by a receiving
state court sufficient to deal with an act of truancy, delinquency, crime or
behavior involving a child as defined by the laws of the receiving state
committed by the child in the receiving state which would be a violation of its
laws.
F.
Nothing in this article shall limit the receiving state's ability to take
emergency jurisdiction for the protection of the child.
G.
The substantive laws of the state in which an adoption will be finalized shall
solely govern all issues relating to the adoption of the child and the court in
which the adoption proceeding is filed shall have subject matter jurisdiction
regarding all substantive issues relating to the adoption, except:
1.
when the child is a ward of another court that established jurisdiction over
the child prior to the placement;
2.
when the child is in the legal custody of a public agency in the sending state;
or
3.
when the court in the sending state has otherwise appropriately assumed
jurisdiction over the child, prior to the submission of the request for
approval of placement.
ARTICLE
V. PLACEMENT EVALUATION
A.
Prior to sending, bringing, or causing a child to be sent or brought into a
receiving state, the public child-placing agency shall provide a written
request for assessment to the receiving state.
B.
For placements by a private child-placing agency, a child may be sent or
brought, or caused to be sent or brought, into a receiving state, upon receipt
and immediate review of the required content to accompany a request for
approval of a placement in both the sending and receiving state public
child-placing agency. The required
content for a request for provisional approval shall include all of the
following:
1.
A request for approval identifying the child, birth parents, the prospective
adoptive parents, and the supervising agency, signed by the person requesting
approval; and
2.
The appropriate consents or relinquishments signed by the birth parents in
accordance with the laws of the sending state, or where permitted by the laws
of the state where the adoption will be finalized; and
3.
Certification by a licensed attorney or other authorized agent of a private
adoption agency that the consent or relinquishment is in compliance with the
applicable laws of the sending state, or where permitted the laws of the state
where finalization of the adoption will occur; and
4.
A home study; and
5.
An acknowledgment of legal risk signed by the prospective adoptive parents.
C.
The sending state and the receiving state may request additional information or
documents prior to finalization of an approved placement, but they may not
delay travel by the prospective adoptive parents with the child if the required
content for approval has been submitted, received, and reviewed by the public
child-placing agency in both the sending state and the receiving state.
D.
Approval from the public child-placing agency in the receiving state for a
provisional or approved placement is required as provided for in the rules of
the Interstate Commission.
E.
The procedures for making, and the request for an assessment, shall contain all
information and be in such form as provided for in the rules of the Interstate
Commission.
F.
Upon receipt of a request from the public child-placing agency of the sending
state, the receiving state shall initiate an assessment of the proposed
placement to determine its safety and suitability. If the proposed placement is a placement with a relative, the
public child-placing agency of the sending state may request a determination
for a provisional placement.
G.
The public child-placing agency in the receiving state may request from the
public child-placing agency or the private child-placing agency in the sending
state, and shall be entitled to receive supporting or additional information
necessary to complete the assessment.
ARTICLE
VI. PLACEMENT AUTHORITY
A.
Except as otherwise provided in this compact, no child subject to this compact
shall be placed into a receiving state until approval for such placement is
obtained.
B.
If the public child-placing agency in the receiving state does not approve the
proposed placement then the child shall not be placed. The receiving state shall provide written
documentation of any such determination in accordance with the rules
promulgated by the Interstate Commission.
Such determination is not subject to judicial review in the sending
state.
C.
If the proposed placement is not approved, any interested party shall have
standing to seek an administrative review of the receiving state's
determination.
1.
The administrative review and any further judicial review associated with the
determination shall be conducted in the receiving state pursuant to its
applicable administrative procedures.
2.
If a determination not to approve the placement of the child in the receiving
state is overturned upon review, the placement shall be deemed approved,
provided however that all administrative or judicial remedies have been
exhausted or the time for such remedies has passed.
ARTICLE
VII. PLACING AGENCY RESPONSIBILITY
A.
For the interstate placement of a child made by a public child-placing agency
or state court:
1.
The public child-placing agency in the sending state shall have financial
responsibility for:
a.
the ongoing support and maintenance for the child during the period of the
placement, unless otherwise provided for in the receiving state; and
b.
as determined by the public child-placing agency in the sending state, services
for the child beyond the public services for which the child is eligible in the
receiving state.
2.
The receiving state shall only have financial responsibility for:
a.
any assessment conducted by the receiving state; and
b.
supervision conducted by the receiving state at the level necessary to support
the placement as agreed upon by the public child-placing agencies of the
receiving and sending state.
3.
Nothing in this provision shall prohibit public child-placing agencies in the
sending state from entering into agreements with licensed agencies or persons
in the receiving state to conduct assessments and provide supervision.
B.
For the placement of a child by a private child-placing agency preliminary to a
possible adoption, the private child-placing agency shall be:
1.
Legally responsible for the child during the period of placement as provided
for in the law of the sending state until the finalization of the adoption.
2.
Financially responsible for the child absent a contractual agreement to the
contrary.
C.
The public child-placing agency in the receiving state shall provide timely
assessments, as provided for in the rules of the Interstate Commission.
D.
The public child-placing agency in the receiving state shall provide, or
arrange for the provision of, supervision and services for the child, including
timely reports, during the period of the placement.
E.
Nothing in this compact shall be construed as to limit the authority of the public
child-placing agency in the receiving state from contracting with a licensed
agency or person in the receiving state for an assessment or the provision of
supervision or services for the child or otherwise authorizing the provision of
supervision or services by a licensed agency during the period of placement.
F.
Each member state shall provide for coordination among its branches of
government concerning the state's participation in, and compliance with, the
compact and Interstate Commission activities, through the creation of an
advisory council or use of an existing body or board.
G.
Each member state shall establish a central state compact office, which shall
be responsible for state compliance with the compact and the rules of the
Interstate Commission.
H.
The public child-placing agency in the sending state shall oversee compliance
with the provisions of the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 USC 1901 et seq.) for
placements subject to the provisions of this compact, prior to placement.
I.
With the consent of the Interstate Commission, states may enter into limited
agreements that facilitate the timely assessment and provision of services and
supervision of placements under this compact.
ARTICLE
VIII. INTERSTATE COMMISSION FOR THE
PLACEMENT OF CHILDREN
The
member states hereby establish, by way of this compact, a commission known as
the "Interstate Commission for the Placement of Children." The
activities of the Interstate Commission are the formation of public policy and
are a discretionary state function. The
Interstate Commission shall:
A.
Be a joint commission of the member states and shall have the responsibilities,
powers and duties set forth herein, and such additional powers as may be
conferred upon it by subsequent concurrent action of the respective
legislatures of the member states.
B.
Consist of one commissioner from each member state who shall be appointed by
the executive head of the state human services administration with ultimate
responsibility for the child welfare program.
The appointed commissioner shall have the legal authority to vote on
policy related matters governed by this compact binding the state.
1.
Each member state represented at a meeting of the Interstate Commission is
entitled to one vote.
2.
A majority of the member states shall constitute a quorum for the transaction
of business, unless a larger quorum is required by the bylaws of the Interstate
Commission.
3.
A representative shall not delegate a vote to another member state.
4.
A representative may delegate voting authority to another person from their
state for a specified meeting.
C.
In addition to the commissioners of each member state, the Interstate
Commission shall include persons who are members of interested organizations as
defined in the bylaws or rules of the Interstate Commission. Such members shall be ex officio and shall
not be entitled to vote on any matter before the Interstate Commission.
D.
Establish an executive committee which shall have the authority to administer
the day-to-day operations and administration of the Interstate Commission. It shall not have the power to engage in
rulemaking.
ARTICLE
IX. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE INTERSTATE
COMMISSION
The
Interstate Commission shall have the following powers:
A.
To promulgate rules and take all necessary actions to effect the goals,
purposes and obligations as enumerated in this compact.
B.
To provide for dispute resolution among member states.
C.
To issue, upon request of a member state, advisory opinions concerning the
meaning or interpretation of the interstate compact, its bylaws, rules or
actions.
D.
To enforce compliance with this compact or the bylaws or rules of the
Interstate Commission pursuant to Article XII.
E.
Collect standardized data concerning the interstate placement of children
subject to this compact as directed through its rules which shall specify the
data to be collected, the means of collection and data exchange and reporting
requirements.
F.
To establish and maintain offices as may be necessary for the transacting of
its business.
G.
To purchase and maintain insurance and bonds.
H.
To hire or contract for services of personnel or consultants as necessary to
carry out its functions under the compact and establish personnel qualification
policies, and rates of compensation.
I.
To establish and appoint committees and officers including, but not limited to,
an executive committee as required by Article X.
J.
To accept any and all donations and grants of money, equipment, supplies,
materials, and services, and to receive, utilize, and dispose thereof.
K.
To lease, purchase, accept contributions or donations of, or otherwise to own,
hold, improve or use any property, real, personal, or mixed.
L.
To sell, convey, mortgage, pledge, lease, exchange, abandon, or otherwise
dispose of any property, real, personal or mixed.
M.
To establish a budget and make expenditures.
N.
To adopt a seal and bylaws governing the management and operation of the
Interstate Commission.
O.
To report annually to the legislatures, governors, the judiciary, and state
advisory councils of the member states concerning the activities of the
Interstate Commission during the preceding year. Such reports shall also include any recommendations that may have
been adopted by the Interstate Commission.
P.
To coordinate and provide education, training and public awareness regarding
the interstate movement of children for officials involved in such activity.
Q.
To maintain books and records in accordance with the bylaws of the Interstate
Commission.
R.
To perform such functions as may be necessary or appropriate to achieve the
purposes of this compact.
ARTICLE
X. ORGANIZATION AND OPERATION OF THE
INTERSTATE COMMISSION
A. Bylaws
1.
Within 12 months after the first Interstate Commission meeting, the Interstate
Commission shall adopt bylaws to govern its conduct as may be necessary or
appropriate to carry out the purposes of the compact.
2.
The Interstate Commission's bylaws and rules shall establish conditions and
procedures under which the Interstate Commission shall make its information and
official records available to the public for inspection or copying. The Interstate Commission may exempt from
disclosure information or official records to the extent they would adversely
affect personal privacy rights or proprietary interests.
B.
Meetings
1.
The Interstate Commission shall meet at least once each calendar year. The chairperson may call additional meetings
and, upon the request of a simple majority of the member states shall call
additional meetings.
2.
Public notice shall be given by the Interstate Commission of all meetings and
all meetings shall be open to the public, except as set forth in the rules or
as otherwise provided in the compact.
The Interstate Commission and its committees may close a meeting, or
portion thereof, where it determines by two-thirds vote that an open meeting
would be likely to:
a.
relate solely to the Interstate Commission's internal personnel practices and
procedures; or
b.
disclose matters specifically exempted from disclosure by federal law; or
c.
disclose financial or commercial information which is privileged, proprietary
or confidential in nature; or
d.
involve accusing a person of a crime, or formally censuring a person; or
e.
disclose information of a personal nature where disclosure would constitute a
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy or physically endanger one or
more persons; or
f.
disclose investigative records compiled for law enforcement purposes; or
g.
specifically relate to the Interstate Commission's participation in a civil
action or other legal proceeding.
3.
For a meeting, or portion of a meeting, closed pursuant to this provision, the
Interstate Commission's legal counsel or designee shall certify that the
meeting may be closed and shall reference each relevant exemption
provision. The Interstate Commission
shall keep minutes which shall fully and clearly describe all matters discussed
in a meeting and shall provide a full and accurate summary of actions taken,
and the reasons therefore, including a description of the views expressed and
the record of a roll call vote. All
documents considered in connection with an action shall be identified in such
minutes. All minutes and documents of a
closed meeting shall remain under seal, subject to release by a majority vote
of the Interstate Commission or by court order.
4.
The bylaws may provide for meetings of the Interstate Commission to be
conducted by telecommunication or other electronic communication.
C.
Officers and Staff
1.
The Interstate Commission may, through its executive committee, appoint or
retain a staff director for such period, upon such terms and conditions and for
such compensation as the Interstate Commission may deem appropriate. The staff director shall serve as secretary
to the Interstate Commission, but shall not have a vote. The staff director may hire and supervise
such other staff as may be authorized by the Interstate Commission.
2.
The Interstate Commission shall elect, from among its members, a chairperson
and a vice chairperson of the executive committee and other necessary officers,
each of whom shall have such authority and duties as may be specified in the
bylaws.
D.
Qualified Immunity, Defense and Indemnification
1.
The Interstate Commission's staff director and its employees shall be immune
from suit and liability, either personally or in their official capacity, for a
claim for damage to or loss of property or personal injury or other civil
liability caused or arising out of or relating to an actual or alleged act,
error, or omission that occurred, or that such person had a reasonable basis
for believing occurred within the scope of Commission employment, duties, or
responsibilities; provided, that such person shall not be protected from suit
or liability for damage, loss, injury, or liability caused by a criminal act or
the intentional or willful and wanton misconduct of such person.
a.
The liability of the Interstate Commission's staff director and employees or
Interstate Commission representatives, acting within the scope of such person's
employment or duties for acts, errors, or omissions occurring within such
person's state may not exceed the limits of liability set forth under the
Constitution and laws of that state for state officials, employees, and
agents. The Interstate Commission is
considered to be an instrumentality of the states for the purposes of any such
action. Nothing in this subsection
shall be construed to protect such person from suit or liability for damage,
loss, injury, or liability caused by a criminal act or the intentional or
willful and wanton misconduct of such person.
b.
The Interstate Commission shall defend the staff director and its employees
and, subject to the approval of the Attorney General or other appropriate legal
counsel of the member state shall defend the commissioner of a member state in
a civil action seeking to impose liability arising out of an actual or alleged
act, error or omission that occurred within the scope of Interstate Commission
employment, duties or responsibilities, or that the defendant had a reasonable
basis for believing occurred within the scope of Interstate Commission
employment, duties, or responsibilities, provided that the actual or alleged
act, error, or omission did not result from intentional or willful and wanton
misconduct on the part of such person.
c.
To the extent not covered by the state involved, member state, or the
Interstate Commission, the representatives or employees of the Interstate
Commission shall be held harmless in the amount of a settlement or judgment,
including attorney's fees and costs, obtained against such persons arising out
of an actual or alleged act, error, or omission that occurred within the scope
of Interstate Commission employment, duties, or responsibilities, or that such
persons had a reasonable basis for believing occurred within the scope of
Interstate Commission employment, duties, or responsibilities, provided that
the actual or alleged act, error, or omission did not result from intentional
or willful and wanton misconduct on the part of such persons.
ARTICLE
XI. RULEMAKING FUNCTIONS OF THE
INTERSTATE COMMISSION
A.
The Interstate Commission shall promulgate and publish rules in order to
effectively and efficiently achieve the purposes of the compact.
B.
Rulemaking shall occur pursuant to the criteria set forth in this article and
the bylaws and rules adopted pursuant thereto.
Such rulemaking shall substantially conform to the principles of the
"Model State Administrative Procedures Act," 1981 Act, Uniform Laws
Annotated, Vol. 15, p.1 (2000), or such other administrative procedure acts as
the Interstate Commission deems appropriate consistent with due process
requirements under the United
States
Constitution as now or hereafter interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court. All rules and amendments shall become
binding as of the date specified, as published with the final version of the
rule as approved by the Interstate Commission.
C.
When promulgating a rule, the Interstate Commission shall, at a minimum:
1.
Publish the proposed rule's entire text stating the reason(s) for that proposed
rule; and
2.
Allow and invite any and all persons to submit written data, facts, opinions
and arguments, which information shall be added to the record, and be made
publicly available; and
3.
Promulgate a final rule and its effective date, if appropriate, based on input
from state or local officials, or interested parties.
D.
Rules promulgated by the Interstate Commission shall have the force and effect
of administrative rules and shall be binding in the compacting states to the
extent and in the manner provided for in this compact.
E.
Not later than 60 days after a rule is promulgated, an interested person may
file a petition in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia or in
the Federal District Court where the Interstate Commission's principal office
is located for judicial review of such rule.
If the court finds that the Interstate Commission's action is not
supported by substantial evidence in the rulemaking record, the court shall
hold the rule unlawful and set it aside.
F.
If a majority of the legislatures of the member states rejects a rule, those
states may by enactment of a statute or resolution in the same manner used to
adopt the compact cause that such rule shall have no further force and effect
in any member state.
G.
The existing rules governing the operation of the Interstate Compact on the
Placement of Children superseded by this act shall be null and void no less
than 12, but no more than 24 months after the first meeting of the Interstate
Commission created hereunder, as determined by the members during the first
meeting.
H.
Within the first 12 months of operation, the Interstate Commission shall
promulgate rules addressing the following:
1.
Transition rules
2.
Forms and procedures
3.
Time lines
4.
Data collection and reporting
5.
Rulemaking
6.
Visitation
7.
Progress reports/supervision
8.
Sharing of information/confidentiality
9.
Financing of the Interstate Commission
10.
Mediation, arbitration and dispute resolution
11.
Education, training and technical assistance
12.
Enforcement
13.
Coordination with other interstate compacts
I.
Upon determination by a majority of the members of the Interstate Commission
that an emergency exists:
1.
The Interstate Commission may promulgate an emergency rule only if it is
required to:
a.
Protect the children covered by this compact from an imminent threat to their
health, safety and well-being; or
b.
Prevent loss of federal or state funds; or
c.
Meet a deadline for the promulgation of an administrative rule required by
federal law.
2.
An emergency rule shall become effective immediately upon adoption, provided
that the usual rulemaking procedures provided hereunder shall be retroactively
applied to said rule as soon as reasonably possible, but no later than 90 days
after the effective date of the emergency rule.
3.
An emergency rule shall be promulgated as provided for in the rules of the
Interstate Commission.
ARTICLE
XII. OVERSIGHT, DISPUTE RESOLUTION,
ENFORCEMENT
A.
Oversight
1.
The Interstate Commission shall oversee the administration and operation of the
compact.
2.
The executive, legislative and judicial branches of state government in each
member state shall enforce this compact and the rules of the Interstate
Commission and shall take all actions necessary and appropriate to effectuate
the compact's purposes and intent. The
compact and its rules shall be binding in the compacting states to the extent
and in the manner provided for in this compact.
3.
All courts shall take judicial notice of the compact and the rules in any
judicial or administrative proceeding in a member state pertaining to the
subject matter of this compact.
4.
The Interstate Commission shall be entitled to receive service of process in
any action in which the validity of a compact provision or rule is the issue
for which a judicial determination has been sought and shall have standing to
intervene in any proceedings. Failure
to provide service of process to the Interstate Commission shall render any
judgment, order or other determination, however so captioned or classified,
void as to the Interstate Commission, this compact, its bylaws or rules of the
Interstate Commission.
B.
Dispute Resolution
1.
The Interstate Commission shall attempt, upon the request of a member state, to
resolve disputes which are subject to the compact and which may arise among
member states and between member and non-member states.
2.
The Interstate Commission shall promulgate a rule providing for both mediation
and binding dispute resolution for disputes among compacting states. The costs of such mediation or dispute
resolution shall be the responsibility of the parties to the dispute.
C.
Enforcement
1.
If the Interstate Commission determines that a member state has defaulted in
the performance of its obligations or responsibilities under this compact, its
bylaws or rules, the Interstate Commission may:
a.
Provide remedial training and specific technical assistance; or
b.
Provide written notice to the defaulting state and other member states, of the
nature of the default and the means of curing the default. The Interstate Commission shall specify the
conditions by which the defaulting state must cure its default; or
c.
By majority vote of the members, initiate against a defaulting member state
legal action in the United State District Court for the District of Columbia
or, at the discretion of the Interstate Commission, in the federal district
where the Interstate Commission has its principal office, to enforce compliance
with the provisions of the compact, its bylaws or rules. The relief sought may include both
injunctive relief and damages. In the
event judicial enforcement is necessary the prevailing party shall be awarded
all costs of such litigation including reasonable attorney's fees; or
d.
Avail itself of any other remedies available under state law or the regulation
of official or professional conduct.
ARTICLE
XIII. FINANCING OF THE COMMISSION
A.
The Interstate Commission shall pay, or provide for the payment of the
reasonable expenses of its establishment, organization and ongoing activities.
B.
The Interstate Commission may levy on and collect an annual assessment from
each member state to cover the cost of the operations and activities of the
Interstate Commission and its staff which must be in a total amount sufficient
to cover the Interstate Commission's annual budget as approved by its members
each year. The aggregate annual
assessment amount shall be allocated based upon a formula to be determined by
the Interstate Commission which shall promulgate a rule binding upon all member
states.
C.
The Interstate Commission shall not incur obligations of any kind prior to
securing the funds adequate to meet the same; nor shall the Interstate
Commission pledge the credit of any of the member states, except by and with
the authority of the member state.
D.
The Interstate Commission shall keep accurate accounts of all receipts and
disbursements. The receipts and
disbursements of the Interstate Commission shall be subject to the audit and
accounting procedures established under its bylaws. However, all receipts and disbursements of funds handled by the
Interstate Commission shall be audited yearly by a certified or licensed public
accountant and the report of the audit shall be included in and become part of
the annual report of the Interstate Commission.
ARTICLE
XIV. MEMBER STATES, EFFECTIVE DATE AND
AMENDMENT
A.
Any state is eligible to become a member state.
B.
The compact shall become effective and binding upon legislative enactment of
the compact into law by no less than 35 states. The effective date shall be the later of July 1, 2007 or upon
enactment of the compact into law by the 35th state. Thereafter it shall become effective and binding as to any other
member state upon enactment of the compact into law by that state. The executive heads of the state human
services administration with ultimate responsibility for the child welfare
program of non-member states or their designees shall be invited to participate
in the activities of the Interstate Commission on a non-voting basis prior to
adoption of the compact by all states.
C.
The Interstate Commission may propose amendments to the compact for enactment
by the member states. No amendment
shall become effective and binding on the member states unless and until it is
enacted into law by unanimous consent of the member states.
ARTICLE
XV. WITHDRAWAL AND DISSOLUTION
A.
Withdrawal
1.
Once effective, the compact shall continue in force and remain binding upon
each and every member state; provided that a member state may withdraw from the
compact specifically repealing the statute which enacted the compact into law.
2.
Withdrawal from this compact shall be by the enactment of a statute repealing
the same. The effective date of
withdrawal shall be the effective date of the repeal of the statute.
3.
The withdrawing state shall immediately notify the president of the Interstate
Commission in writing upon the introduction of legislation repealing this
compact in the withdrawing state. The
Interstate Commission shall then notify the other member states of the
withdrawing state's intent to withdraw.
4.
The withdrawing state is responsible for all assessments, obligations and
liabilities incurred through the effective date of withdrawal.
5.
Reinstatement following withdrawal of a member state shall occur upon the
withdrawing state reenacting the compact or upon such later date as determined
by the members of the Interstate Commission.
B.
Dissolution of Compact
1.
This compact shall dissolve effective upon the date of the withdrawal or
default of the member state which reduces the membership in the compact to one
member state.
2.
Upon the dissolution of this compact, the compact becomes null and void and
shall be of no further force or effect, and the business and affairs of the
Interstate Commission shall be concluded and surplus funds shall be distributed
in accordance with the bylaws.
ARTICLE
XVI. SEVERABILITY AND CONSTRUCTION
A.
The provisions of this compact shall be severable, and if any phrase, clause,
sentence or provision is deemed unenforceable, the remaining provisions of the
compact shall be enforceable.
B.
The provisions of this compact shall be liberally construed to effectuate its
purposes.
C.
Nothing in this compact shall be construed to prohibit the concurrent
applicability of other interstate compacts to which the states are members.
ARTICLE
XVII. BINDING EFFECT OF COMPACT AND
OTHER LAWS
A.
Other Laws
1.
Nothing herein prevents the enforcement of any other law of a member state that
is not inconsistent with this compact.
B.
Binding Effect of the Compact
1.
All lawful actions of the Interstate Commission, including all rules and bylaws
promulgated by the Interstate Commission, are binding upon the member states.
2.
All agreements between the Interstate Commission and the member states are
binding in accordance with their terms.
3.
In the event any provision of this compact exceeds the constitutional limits
imposed on the legislature of any member state, such provision shall be
ineffective to the extent of the conflict with the constitutional provision in
question in that member state.
ARTICLE
XVIII. INDIAN TRIBES
Notwithstanding
any other provision in this compact, the Interstate Commission may promulgate
guidelines to permit Indian tribes to utilize the compact to achieve any or all
of the purposes of the compact as specified in Article I. The Interstate Commission shall make
reasonable efforts to consult with Indian tribes in promulgating guidelines to
reflect the diverse circumstances of the various Indian tribes.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective upon legislative enactment of the
compact into law by no less than 35 states.
The commissioner of human services shall inform the Revisor of Statutes
when this occurs.
Sec.
33. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.001, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Child
in need of protection services. (a)
The paramount consideration in all proceedings concerning a child alleged
or found to be in need of protection or services is the health, safety, and
best interests of the child. In
proceedings involving an American Indian child, as defined in section 260.755,
subdivision 8, the best interests of the child must be determined consistent
with sections 260.751 to 260.835 and the Indian Child Welfare Act, United
States Code, title 25, sections 1901 to 1923.
(b)
The purpose
of the laws relating to juvenile courts is:
(1) to secure for each child
alleged or adjudicated in need of protection or services and under the
jurisdiction of the court, the care and guidance, preferably in the child's own
home, as will best serve the spiritual, emotional, mental, and physical welfare
of the child;
(2) to provide judicial
procedures which protect the welfare of the child;
(3) to preserve and strengthen
the child's family ties whenever possible and in the child's best interests,
removing the child from the custody of parents only when the child's welfare or
safety cannot be adequately safeguarded without removal;
(4)
to ensure that when removal from the child's own family is necessary and in the
child's best interests, the responsible social services agency has legal
responsibility for the child removal either:
(i)
pursuant to a voluntary placement agreement between the child's parent or
guardian and the responsible social services agency; or
(ii)
by court order pursuant to section 260C.151, subdivision 6; 206C.178; or
260C.201;
(5)
to ensure that, when placement is pursuant to court order, the court order
removing the child or continuing the child in foster care contains an
individualized determination that placement is in the best interests of the
child that coincides with the actual removal of the child; and, when removal from
the child's own family is necessary and in the child's best interests,
(6) to secure for ensure
that when the child is removed, the child custody, child's care
and discipline is, as nearly as possible, equivalent to that
which should have been given by the parents. and is either in:
(i)
the home of a noncustodial parent pursuant to section 260C.178 or 260C.201,
subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (1);
(ii)
the home of a relative pursuant to emergency placement by the responsible
social services agency under chapter 245A; or
(iii)
a foster home licensed under chapter 245A.
Sec.
34. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.007, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd.
5. Child
abuse. "Child abuse"
means an act that involves a minor victim and that constitutes a
violation of section 609.221, 609.222, 609.223, 609.224, 609.2242, 609.322,
609.324, 609.342, 609.343, 609.344, 609.345, 609.377, 609.378, 617.246, or
that is physical or sexual abuse as defined in section 626.556, subdivision 2, or
an act committed in another state that involves a minor victim and would
constitute a violation of one of these sections if committed in this state.
Sec.
35. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.007, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd.
6. Child
in need of protection or services.
"Child in need of protection or services" means a child who is
in need of protection or services because the child:
(1) is
abandoned or without parent, guardian, or custodian;
(2)(i)
has been a victim of physical or sexual abuse as defined in section 626.556,
subdivision 2, (ii) resides with or has resided with a victim of child
abuse as defined in subdivision 5 or domestic child abuse as defined in
subdivision 5 13, (iii) resides with or would reside with a
perpetrator of domestic child abuse as defined in subdivision 13 or
child abuse as defined in subdivision 5, or (iv) is a victim of emotional
maltreatment as defined in subdivision 8;
(3) is
without necessary food, clothing, shelter, education, or other required care
for the child's physical or mental health or morals because the child's parent,
guardian, or custodian is unable or unwilling to provide that care;
(4) is
without the special care made necessary by a physical, mental, or emotional
condition because the child's parent, guardian, or custodian is unable or
unwilling to provide that care, including a child in voluntary placement due
solely to the child's developmental disability or emotional disturbance;
(5) is
medically neglected, which includes, but is not limited to, the withholding of
medically indicated treatment from a disabled infant with a life-threatening
condition. The term "withholding
of medically indicated treatment" means the failure to respond to the
infant's life-threatening conditions by providing treatment, including
appropriate nutrition, hydration, and medication which, in the treating
physician's or physicians' reasonable medical judgment, will be most likely to
be effective in ameliorating or correcting all conditions, except that the term
does not include the failure to provide treatment other than appropriate
nutrition, hydration, or medication to an infant when, in the treating
physician's or physicians' reasonable medical judgment:
(i)
the infant is chronically and irreversibly comatose;
(ii)
the provision of the treatment would merely prolong dying, not be effective in
ameliorating or correcting all of the infant's life-threatening conditions, or
otherwise be futile in terms of the survival of the infant; or
(iii)
the provision of the treatment would be virtually futile in terms of the
survival of the infant and the treatment itself under the circumstances would
be inhumane;
(6) is
one whose parent, guardian, or other custodian for good cause desires to be
relieved of the child's care and custody, including a child in placement
according to who entered foster care under a voluntary release by
placement agreement between the parent and the responsible social
services agency under section 260C.212, subdivision 8;
(7)
has been placed for adoption or care in violation of law;
(8) is
without proper parental care because of the emotional, mental, or physical
disability, or state of immaturity of the child's parent, guardian, or other
custodian;
(9) is
one whose behavior, condition, or environment is such as to be injurious or
dangerous to the child or others. An
injurious or dangerous environment may include, but is not limited to, the
exposure of a child to criminal activity in the child's home;
(10)
is experiencing growth delays, which may be referred to as failure to thrive,
that have been diagnosed by a physician and are due to parental neglect;
(11)
has engaged in prostitution as defined in section 609.321, subdivision 9;
(12)
has committed a delinquent act or a juvenile petty offense before becoming ten
years old;
(13)
is a runaway;
(14)
is a habitual truant; or
(15)
has been found incompetent to proceed or has been found not guilty by reason of
mental illness or mental deficiency in connection with a delinquency
proceeding, a certification under section 260B.125, an extended jurisdiction
juvenile prosecution, or a proceeding involving a juvenile petty offense.
Sec.
36. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.007, subdivision 13, is amended to read:
Subd.
13. Domestic child abuse.
"Domestic child abuse" means:
(1)
any physical injury to a minor family or household member inflicted by an adult
family or household member other than by accidental means; or
(2)
subjection of a minor family or household member by an adult family or
household member to any act which constitutes a violation of sections 609.321
to 609.324, 609.342, 609.343, 609.344, 609.345, or 617.246.; or
(3)
physical or sexual abuse as defined in section 626.556, subdivision 2.
Sec.
37. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.101, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Jurisdiction
over other matters relating to children.
Except as provided in clause (d), the juvenile court has original and
exclusive jurisdiction in proceedings concerning:
(a)
The termination of parental rights to a child in accordance with the provisions
of sections 260C.301 to 260C.328.
(b)
The appointment and removal of a juvenile court guardian for a child, where
parental rights have been terminated under the provisions of sections 260C.301
to 260C.328.
(c)
Judicial consent to the marriage of a child when required by law.
(d)
The juvenile court in those counties in which the judge of the probate-juvenile
court has been admitted to the practice of law in this state shall proceed
under the laws relating to adoptions in all adoption matters. In those counties in which the judge of the
probate-juvenile court has not been admitted to the practice of law in this state
the district court shall proceed under the laws relating to adoptions in all
adoption matters.
(e)
The review of the foster care status placement of a child who has
been placed is in a residential facility, as defined in section
260C.212, subdivision 1, foster care pursuant to a voluntary release
by placement agreement between the child's parent or parents and the
responsible social services agency under section 260C.212, subdivision 8.
(f)
The review of voluntary foster care placement of a child for treatment under
chapter 260D according to the review requirements of that chapter.
Sec.
38. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.141, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Review
of foster care status. Except
for a child in foster care due solely to the child's developmental disability
or emotional disturbance, When a child continues in voluntary placement
foster care according to section 260C.212, subdivision 8, a petition
shall be filed alleging the child to be in need of protection or services or
seeking termination of parental rights or other permanent placement of the
child away from the parent within 90 days of the date of the voluntary
placement agreement. The petition shall
state the reasons why the child is in placement foster care, the
progress on the out-of-home placement plan required under section 260C.212,
subdivision 1, and the statutory basis for the petition under section 260C.007,
subdivision 6, 260C.201, subdivision 11, or 260C.301.
(1) In
the case of a petition alleging the child to be in need of protection or services
filed under this paragraph, if all parties agree and the court finds it is in
the best interests of the child, the court may find the petition states a prima
facie case that:
(i)
the child's needs are being met;
(ii)
the placement of the child in foster care is in the best interests of the
child;
(iii)
reasonable efforts to reunify the child and the parent or guardian are being
made; and
(iv)
the child will be returned home in the next three months.
(2) If
the court makes findings under paragraph (1), the court shall approve the
voluntary arrangement and continue the matter for up to three more months to
ensure the child returns to the parents' home.
The responsible social services agency shall:
(i)
report to the court when the child returns home and the progress made by the
parent on the out-of-home placement plan required under section 260C.212, in
which case the court shall dismiss jurisdiction;
(ii)
report to the court that the child has not returned home, in which case the
matter shall be returned to the court for further proceedings under section
260C.163; or
(iii)
if any party does not agree to continue the matter under this paragraph and
paragraph (1), the matter shall proceed under section 260C.163.
Sec.
39. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 260C.163, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. General. (a) Except for hearings arising under
section 260C.425, hearings on any matter shall be without a jury and may be
conducted in an informal manner. In all
adjudicatory proceedings involving a child alleged to be in need of protection
or services, the court shall admit only evidence that would be admissible in a
civil trial. To be proved at trial,
allegations of a petition alleging a child to be in need of protection or services
must be proved by clear and convincing evidence.
(b)
Except for proceedings involving a child alleged to be in need of protection or
services and petitions for the termination of parental rights, hearings may be
continued or adjourned from time to time.
In proceedings involving a child alleged to be in need of protection or
services and petitions for the termination of parental rights, hearings may not
be continued or adjourned for more than one week unless the court makes
specific findings that the continuance or adjournment is in the best interests
of the child. If a hearing is held on a
petition involving physical or sexual abuse of a child who is alleged to be in
need of protection or services or neglected and in foster care, the court shall
file the decision with the court administrator as soon as possible but no later
than 15 days after the matter is submitted to the court. When a continuance or adjournment is ordered
in any proceeding, the court may make any interim orders as it deems in the
best interests of the minor in accordance with the provisions of sections
260C.001 to 260C.421.
(c) Except
as otherwise provided in this paragraph, the court shall exclude the general
public from hearings under this chapter and shall admit only those persons who,
in the discretion of the court, have a direct interest in the case or in the
work of the court. Absent exceptional circumstances, hearings under this
chapter are presumed to be accessible to the public, however the court may
close any hearing and the records related to any matter as provided in the
Minnesota Rules of Juvenile Protection Procedure.
(d)
Adoption hearings shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of laws
relating to adoptions.
(e) In
any permanency hearing, including the transition of a child from foster care to
independent living, the court shall ensure that any consult with the child is
in an age-appropriate manner.
Sec.
40. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.171, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Public
inspection of records. (a) The following
records from proceedings or portions of proceedings involving a child in need
of protection or services that, permanency, or terminational of
parental rights are open accessible to the public as
authorized by Supreme Court order and court rules are accessible to the
public unless the court determines that access should be restricted because of
the intensely personal nature of the information: the Minnesota Rules of
Juvenile Protection Procedure.
(1)
the summons and petition;
(2)
affidavits of publication and service;
(3)
certificates of representation;
(4)
court orders;
(5)
hearing and trial notices, witness lists, and subpoenas;
(6)
motions and legal memoranda;
(7)
exhibits introduced at hearings or trial that are not inaccessible under
paragraph (b);
(8)
birth records; and
(9)
all other documents not listed as inaccessible to the public under paragraph
(b).
(b)
The following records are not accessible to the public under paragraph (a):
(1)
written, audiotaped, or videotaped information from the social services agency,
except to the extent the information appears in the petition, court orders, or
other documents that are accessible under paragraph (a);
(2)
child protection intake or screening notes;
(3)
documents identifying reporters of maltreatment, unless the names and other
identifying information are redacted;
(4)
guardian ad litem reports;
(5)
victim statements and addresses and telephone numbers;
(6)
documents identifying nonparty witnesses under the age of 18, unless the names
and other identifying information are redacted;
(7)
transcripts of testimony taken during closed hearing;
(8)
fingerprinting materials;
(9)
psychological, psychiatric, and chemical dependency evaluations;
(10)
presentence evaluations of juveniles and probation reports;
(11)
medical records and test results;
(12)
reports issued by sexual predator programs;
(13)
diversion records of juveniles;
(14)
any document which the court, upon its own motion or upon motion of a party,
orders inaccessible to serve the best interests of the child; and
(15)
any other records that are not accessible to the public under rules developed
by the courts.
In
addition, records that are accessible to the public under paragraph (a) become
inaccessible to the public if one year has elapsed since either the proceeding
was dismissed or the court's jurisdiction over the matter was terminated.
(c)
Except as otherwise provided by this section, none of the records of the
juvenile court and (b) None of the records relating to an appeal from a nonpublic
juvenile court proceeding, except the written appellate opinion, shall be open
to public inspection or their contents disclosed except by order of a court.
(d) (c) The records of juvenile
probation officers are records of the court for the purposes of this
subdivision. This subdivision applies
to all proceedings under this chapter, including appeals from orders of the
juvenile court. The court shall
maintain the confidentiality of adoption files and records in accordance with
the provisions of laws relating to adoptions.
In juvenile court proceedings any report or social history furnished to
the court shall be open to inspection by the attorneys of record and the
guardian ad litem a reasonable time before it is used in connection with any
proceeding before the court.
(e)
When a judge of a juvenile court, or duly authorized agent of the court,
determines under a proceeding under this chapter that a child has violated a
state or local law, ordinance, or regulation pertaining to the operation of a
motor vehicle on streets and highways, except parking violations, the judge or
agent shall immediately report the violation to the commissioner of public
safety. The report must be made on a
form provided by the Department of Public Safety and must contain the
information required under section 169.95.
Sec.
41. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.178, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Hearing
and release requirements. (a) If a
child was taken into custody under section 260C.175, subdivision 1, clause (a)
or (b)(2), the court shall hold a hearing within 72 hours of the time the child
was taken into custody, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, to
determine whether the child should continue in custody.
(b)
Unless there is reason to believe that the child would endanger self or others,
not return for a court hearing, run away from the child's parent, guardian, or
custodian or otherwise not remain in the care or control of the person to whose
lawful custody the child is released, or that the child's health or welfare
would be immediately endangered, the child shall be released to the custody of
a parent, guardian, custodian, or other suitable person, subject to reasonable
conditions of release including, but not limited to, a requirement that the
child undergo a chemical use assessment as provided in section 260C.157,
subdivision 1.
(c)
If the
court determines there is reason to believe that the child would endanger self
or others; not return for a court hearing; run away from the child's parent,
guardian, or custodian or otherwise not remain in the care or control of the
person to whose lawful custody the child is released; or that the child's
health or welfare would be immediately endangered if returned to the care of
the parent or guardian who has custody and from whom the child was removed,
the court shall order the child into foster care under the legal responsibility
of the responsible social services agency or responsible probation or
corrections agency for the purposes of protective care as that term is used in
the juvenile court rules. or into the home of a noncustodial parent
and order the noncustodial parent to comply with any conditions the court
determines to be appropriate to the safety and care of the child, including
cooperating with paternity establishment proceedings in the case of a man who
has not been adjudicated the child's father.
The court shall not give the responsible social services legal custody
and order a trial home visit at any time prior to adjudication and disposition
under section 260C.201, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (3), but may order
the child returned to the care of the parent or guardian who has custody and
from whom the child was removed and order the parent or guardian to comply with
any conditions the court determines to be appropriate to meet the safety,
health, and welfare of the child.
(d)
In
determining whether the child's health or welfare would be immediately
endangered, the court shall consider whether the child would reside with a
perpetrator of domestic child abuse.
(c) (e) The court, before
determining whether a child should be placed in or continue in foster care
under the protective care of the responsible agency, shall also make a
determination, consistent with section 260.012 as to whether reasonable efforts
were made to prevent placement or whether reasonable efforts to prevent
placement are not required. In the case
of an Indian child, the court shall determine whether active efforts, according
to the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, United States Code, title 25, section
1912(d), were made to prevent placement.
The court shall enter a finding that the responsible social services agency
has made reasonable efforts to prevent placement when the agency establishes
either:
(1)
that it has actually provided services or made efforts in an attempt to prevent
the child's removal but that such services or efforts have not proven
sufficient to permit the child to safely remain in the home; or
(2)
that there are no services or other efforts that could be made at the time of
the hearing that could safely permit the child to remain home or to return
home. When reasonable efforts to
prevent placement are required and there are services or other efforts that
could be ordered which would permit the child to safely return home, the court
shall order the child returned to the care of the parent or guardian and the
services or efforts put in place to ensure the child's safety. When the court makes a prima facie
determination that one of the circumstances under paragraph (e) (g)
exists, the court shall determine that reasonable efforts to prevent placement
and to return the child to the care of the parent or guardian are not required.
If the
court finds the social services agency's preventive or reunification efforts
have not been reasonable but further preventive or reunification efforts could
not permit the child to safely remain at home, the court may nevertheless
authorize or continue the removal of the child.
(d) (f) The court may not order or
continue the foster care placement of the child unless the court makes
explicit, individualized findings that continued custody of the child by the
parent or guardian would be contrary to the welfare of the child and that
placement is in the best interest of the child.
(e) (g) At the emergency removal
hearing, or at any time during the course of the proceeding, and upon notice
and request of the county attorney, the court shall determine whether a
petition has been filed stating a prima facie case that:
(1)
the parent has subjected a child to egregious harm as defined in section
260C.007, subdivision 14;
(2)
the parental rights of the parent to another child have been involuntarily
terminated;
(3)
the child is an abandoned infant under section 260C.301, subdivision 2,
paragraph (a), clause (2);
(4)
the parents' custodial rights to another child have been involuntarily
transferred to a relative under section 260C.201, subdivision 11, paragraph (e),
clause (1), or a similar law of another jurisdiction; or
(5)
the provision of services or further services for the purpose of reunification
is futile and therefore unreasonable.
(f) (h) When a petition to
terminate parental rights is required under section 260C.301, subdivision 3 or
4, but the county attorney has determined not to proceed with a termination of
parental rights petition, and has instead filed a petition to transfer
permanent legal and physical custody to a relative under section 260C.201,
subdivision 11, the court shall schedule a permanency hearing within 30 days of
the filing of the petition.
(g) (i) If the county attorney has
filed a petition under section 260C.307, the court shall schedule a trial under
section 260C.163 within 90 days of the filing of the petition except when the
county attorney determines that the criminal case shall proceed to trial first
under section 260C.201, subdivision 3.
(h) (j) If the court determines the
child should be ordered into foster care and the child's parent refuses to give
information to the responsible social services agency regarding the child's
father or relatives of the child, the court may order the parent to disclose
the names, addresses, telephone numbers, and other identifying information to
the responsible social services agency for the purpose of complying with the
requirements of sections 260C.151, 260C.212, and 260C.215.
(i) (k) If a child ordered into
foster care has siblings, whether full, half, or step, who are also ordered
into foster care, the court shall inquire of the responsible social services
agency of the efforts to place the children together as required by section
260C.212, subdivision 2, paragraph (d), if placement together is in each
child's best interests, unless a child is in placement due solely to the
child's own behavior or a child is placed with a previously noncustodial parent
who is not parent to all siblings. If
the children are not placed together at the time of the hearing, the court
shall inquire at each subsequent hearing of the agency's efforts to place the
siblings together. If any sibling is
not placed with another sibling or siblings, the agency must develop a plan for
visitation among the siblings as required under section 260C.212, subdivision
1.
Sec. 42. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 260C.205,
is amended to read:
260C.205 DISPOSITIONS; VOLUNTARY FOSTER CARE PLACEMENTS
FOR TREATMENT.
Unless
the court disposes of the petition under section 260C.141, subdivision 2, Upon a petition for
review of the foster care status of a by a parent or guardian under
section 260C.141, subdivision 1b, regarding a child in voluntary foster
care for treatment under chapter 260D, the court may:
(a) find that the child's needs
are not being met, in which case the court shall order the social services
agency or the parents to take whatever action is necessary and feasible to meet
the child's needs, including, when appropriate, the provision by the social
services agency of services to the parents which would enable the child to live
at home, and order a disposition under section 260C.201.
(b)
Find that the child has been abandoned by parents financially or emotionally,
or that the developmentally disabled child does not require out-of-home care
because of the disabling condition, in which case the court shall order the
social services agency to file an appropriate petition pursuant to section
260C.141, subdivision 1, or 260C.307.
(c)
When a child is in placement due solely to the child's developmental disability
or emotional disturbance and the court finds that there are compelling reasons
which permit the court to approve the continued voluntary placement of the
child and retain jurisdiction to conduct reviews as required under section
260C.141, subdivision 2, the court shall give the parent notice by registered
United States mail of the review requirements of section 260C.141, subdivision
2, in the event the child continues in placement 12 months or longer.
Nothing
in this section shall be construed to prohibit bringing a petition pursuant to
section 260C.141, subdivision 1 or 4, sooner than required by court order
pursuant to this section.
Sec.
43. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 260C.209, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Subjects. The responsible social services agency must
initiate a background study to be completed by the commissioner under chapter
245C may have access to the criminal history and history of child and
adult maltreatment on the following individuals:
(1) a
noncustodial parent or nonadjudicated parent who is being assessed for purposes
of providing day-to-day care of a child temporarily or permanently under
section 260C.212, subdivision 4, and any member of the parent's household who
is over the age of 13 when there is a reasonable cause to believe that the
parent or household member over age 13 has a criminal history or a history of
maltreatment of a child or vulnerable adult which would endanger the child's
health, safety, or welfare;
(2) an
individual whose suitability for relative placement under section 260C.212,
subdivision 5, is being determined and any member of the relative's household
who is over the age of 13 when:
(i)
the relative must be licensed for foster care; or
(ii)
the background study is required under section 259.53, subdivision 2; or
(iii)
the agency or the commissioner has reasonable cause to believe the relative or
household member over the age of 13 has a criminal history which would not make
transfer of permanent legal and physical custody to the relative under section
260C.201, subdivision 11, in the child's best interest; and
(3) a
parent, following an out-of-home placement, when the responsible social
services agency has reasonable cause to believe that the parent has been
convicted of a crime directly related to the parent's capacity to maintain the
child's health, safety, or welfare or the parent is the subject of an open
investigation of, or has been the subject of a substantiated allegation of,
child or vulnerable-adult maltreatment within the past ten years.
"Reasonable cause"
means that the agency has received information or a report from the subject or
a third person that creates an articulable suspicion that the individual has a
history that may pose a risk to the health, safety, or welfare of the
child. The information or report must
be specific to the potential subject of the background check and shall not be
based on the race, religion, ethnic background, age, class, or lifestyle of the
potential subject.
Sec.
44. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 260C.209, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. General
procedures. (a) When initiating
a background check accessing information under subdivision 1, the
agency shall require the individual being assessed to provide sufficient
information to ensure an accurate assessment under this section, including:
(1)
the individual's first, middle, and last name and all other names by which the
individual has been known;
(2)
home address, zip code, city, county, and state of residence for the past five
years;
(3)
sex;
(4)
date of birth; and
(5)
driver's license number or state identification number.
(b)
When notified by the commissioner or the responsible social services
agency that it is conducting an assessment under this section accessing
information under subdivision 1, the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension,
commissioners of health and human services, law enforcement, and county
agencies must provide the commissioner or the responsible social
services agency or county attorney with the following information on the
individual being assessed: criminal
history data, local law enforcement data about the household, reports
about the maltreatment of adults substantiated under section 626.557, and
reports of maltreatment of minors substantiated under section 626.556.
Sec.
45. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 260C.209, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
5. Assessment
for emergency relative placement.
The responsible social services agency may obtain household members'
criminal history and the history of maltreatment of a child or adult and use
the history to assess whether putting the child in the household would endanger
the child's health, safety, or welfare and to assess the suitability of a
relative prior to an emergency placement.
This assessment does not substitute for the background study required
under chapter 245C and does not supersede requirements related to emergency
placement under section 245A.035.
Sec.
46. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 260C.212, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Out-of-home
placement; plan. (a) An out-of-home
placement plan shall be prepared within 30 days after any child is placed in a
residential facility foster care by court order or by the a
voluntary release of the child by placement agreement between the
responsible social services agency and the child's parent or
parents pursuant to subdivision 8 or chapter 260D.
For
purposes of this section, a residential facility means any group home, family
foster home or other publicly supported out-of-home residential facility,
including any out-of-home residential facility under contract with the state,
county or other political subdivision, or any agency thereof, to provide those
services or foster care as defined in section 260C.007, subdivision 18.
(b) An
out-of-home placement plan means a written document which is prepared by the
responsible social services agency jointly with the parent or parents or
guardian of the child and in consultation with the child's guardian ad litem,
the child's tribe, if the child is an Indian child, the child's foster parent
or representative of the residential facility, and, where appropriate, the
child. For a child in placement due
solely or in part to the child's emotional disturbance voluntary foster
care for treatment under chapter 260D, preparation of the out-of-home placement plan shall additionally include the
child's mental health treatment provider.
As appropriate, the plan shall be:
(1)
submitted to the court for approval under section 260C.178, subdivision 7;
(2)
ordered by the court, either as presented or modified after hearing, under
section 260C.178, subdivision 7, or 260C.201, subdivision 6; and
(3)
signed by the parent or parents or guardian of the child, the child's guardian
ad litem, a representative of the child's tribe, the responsible social
services agency, and, if possible, the child.
(c)
The out-of-home placement plan shall be explained to all persons involved in
its implementation, including the child who has signed the plan, and shall set
forth:
(1) a
description of the residential facility including how the out-of-home placement
plan is designed to achieve a safe placement for the child in the least
restrictive, most family-like, setting available which is in close proximity to
the home of the parent or parents or guardian of the child when the case plan
goal is reunification, and how the placement is consistent with the best
interests and special needs of the child according to the factors under
subdivision 2, paragraph (b);
(2)
the specific reasons for the placement of the child in a residential facility,
and when reunification is the plan, a description of the problems or conditions
in the home of the parent or parents which necessitated removal of the child
from home and the changes the parent or parents must make in order for the
child to safely return home;
(3) a
description of the services offered and provided to prevent removal of the
child from the home and to reunify the family including:
(i)
the specific actions to be taken by the parent or parents of the child to
eliminate or correct the problems or conditions identified in clause (2), and
the time period during which the actions are to be taken; and
(ii)
the reasonable efforts, or in the case of an Indian child, active efforts to be
made to achieve a safe and stable home for the child including social and other
supportive services to be provided or offered to the parent or parents or
guardian of the child, the child, and the residential facility during the
period the child is in the residential facility;
(4) a
description of any services or resources that were requested by the child or
the child's parent, guardian, foster parent, or custodian since the date of the
child's placement in the residential facility, and whether those services or
resources were provided and if not, the basis for the denial of the services or
resources;
(5)
the visitation plan for the parent or parents or guardian, other relatives as
defined in section 260C.007, subdivision 27, and siblings of the child if the
siblings are not placed together in the residential foster care
facility, and whether visitation is consistent with the best interest of the
child, during the period the child is in the residential facility
foster care;
(6)
documentation of steps to finalize the adoption or legal guardianship of the
child if the court has issued an order terminating the rights of both parents
of the child or of the only known, living parent of the child. At a minimum, the documentation must include
child-specific recruitment efforts such as relative search and the use of
state, regional, and national adoption exchanges to facilitate orderly and
timely placements in and outside of the state.
A copy of this documentation shall be provided to the court in the
review required under section 260C.317, subdivision 3, paragraph (b);
(7)
the health and educational records of the child including the most recent
information available regarding:
(i)
the names and addresses of the child's health and educational providers;
(ii)
the child's grade level performance;
(iii)
the child's school record;
(iv)
assurances that the child's placement in foster care takes into account
proximity to the school in which the child is enrolled at the time of
placement;
(v) a
record of the child's immunizations;
(vi)
the child's known medical problems, including any known communicable diseases,
as defined in section 144.4172, subdivision 2;
(vii)
the child's medications; and
(viii)
any other relevant health and education information;
(8) an
independent living plan for a child age 16 or older who is in placement as a
result of a permanency disposition. The
plan should include, but not be limited to, the following objectives:
(i)
educational, vocational, or employment planning;
(ii)
health care planning and medical coverage;
(iii)
transportation including, where appropriate, assisting the child in obtaining a
driver's license;
(iv)
money management;
(v)
planning for housing;
(vi) social
and recreational skills; and
(vii)
establishing and maintaining connections with the child's family and community;
and
(9)
for a child in placement due solely or in part to the child's emotional
disturbance voluntary foster care for treatment under chapter 260D,
diagnostic and assessment information, specific services relating to meeting
the mental health care needs of the child, and treatment outcomes.
(d)
The parent or parents or guardian and the child each shall have the right to
legal counsel in the preparation of the case plan and shall be informed of the
right at the time of placement of the child.
The child shall also have the right to a guardian ad litem. If unable to employ counsel from their own
resources, the court shall appoint counsel upon the request of the parent or
parents or the child or the child's legal guardian. The parent or parents may also receive assistance from any person
or social services agency in preparation of the case plan.
After
the plan has been agreed upon by the parties involved or approved or ordered by
the court, the foster parents shall be fully informed of the provisions of the
case plan and shall be provided a copy of the plan.
Upon
discharge from foster care, the parent, adoptive parent, or permanent legal and
physical custodian, as appropriate, and the child, if appropriate, must be
provided with a current copy of the child's health and education record.
Sec.
47. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 260C.212, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd.
4. Responsible
social service agency's duties for children in placement. (a) When a child is in placement foster
care, the responsible social services agency shall make diligent efforts to
identify, locate, and, where appropriate, offer services to both parents of the
child.
(1)
The responsible social services agency shall assess whether a noncustodial or
nonadjudicated parent is willing and capable of providing for the day-to-day
care of the child temporarily or permanently.
An assessment under this clause may include, but is not limited to,
obtaining information under section 260C.209.
If after assessment, the responsible social services agency determines
that a noncustodial or nonadjudicated parent is willing and capable of
providing day-to-day care of the child, the responsible social services agency
may seek authority from the custodial parent or the court to have that parent
assume day-to-day care of the child. If
a parent is not an adjudicated parent, the responsible social services agency shall
require the nonadjudicated parent to cooperate with paternity establishment
procedures as part of the case plan.
(2)
If, after assessment, the responsible social services agency determines that
the child cannot be in the day-to-day care of either parent, the agency shall:
(i)
prepare an out-of-home placement plan addressing the conditions that each
parent must meet before the child can be in that parent's day-to-day care; and
(ii)
provide a parent who is the subject of a background study under section
260C.209 15 days' notice that it intends to use the study to recommend against
putting the child with that parent, as well as the notice provided in section
260C.209, subdivision 4, and the court shall afford the parent an opportunity
to be heard concerning the study.
The
results of a background study of a noncustodial parent shall not be used by the
agency to determine that the parent is incapable of providing day-to-day care
of the child unless the agency reasonably believes that placement of the child
into the home of that parent would endanger the child's health, safety, or
welfare.
(3)
If, after the provision of services following an out-of-home placement plan
under this section, the child cannot return to the care of the parent from whom
the child was removed or who had legal custody at the time the child was placed
in foster care, the agency may petition on behalf of a noncustodial parent to
establish legal custody with that parent under section 260C.201, subdivision
11. If paternity has not already been
established, it may be established in the same proceeding in the manner
provided for under chapter 257.
(4)
The responsible social services agency may be relieved of the requirement to
locate and offer services to both parents by the juvenile court upon a finding
of good cause after the filing of a petition under section 260C.141.
(b)
The responsible social services agency shall give notice to the parent or
parents or guardian of each child in a residential facility foster
care, other than a child in placement due solely to that child's
developmental disability or emotional disturbance voluntary foster care
for treatment under chapter 260D, of the following information:
(1)
that residential care of the child child's placement in foster
care may result in termination of parental rights or an order permanently
placing the child out of the custody of the parent, but only after notice and a
hearing as required under chapter 260C and the juvenile court rules;
(2)
time limits on the length of placement and of reunification services, including
the date on which the child is expected to be returned to and safely maintained
in the home of the parent or parents or placed for adoption or otherwise
permanently removed from the care of the parent by court order;
(3)
the nature of the services available to the parent;
(4)
the consequences to the parent and the child if the parent fails or is unable
to use services to correct the circumstances that led to the child's placement;
(5)
the first consideration for placement with relatives;
(6)
the benefit to the child in getting the child out of residential foster
care as soon as possible, preferably by returning the child home, but if that
is not possible, through a permanent legal placement of the child away from the
parent;
(7)
when safe for the child, the benefits to the child and the parent of
maintaining visitation with the child as soon as possible in the course of the
case and, in any event, according to the visitation plan under this section;
and
(8)
the financial responsibilities and obligations, if any, of the parent or
parents for the support of the child during the period the child is in the residential
facility foster care.
(c)
The responsible social services agency shall inform a parent considering voluntary
placement of a child who is not developmentally disabled or emotionally disturbed
under subdivision 8 of the following information:
(1)
the parent and the child each has a right to separate legal counsel before
signing a voluntary placement agreement, but not to counsel appointed at public
expense;
(2)
the parent is not required to agree to the voluntary placement, and a parent
who enters a voluntary placement agreement may at any time request that the
agency return the child. If the parent
so requests, the child must be returned within 24 hours of the receipt of the
request;
(3)
evidence gathered during the time the child is voluntarily placed may be used
at a later time as the basis for a petition alleging that the child is in need
of protection or services or as the basis for a petition seeking termination of
parental rights or other permanent placement of the child away from the parent;
(4) if
the responsible social services agency files a petition alleging that the child
is in need of protection or services or a petition seeking the termination of
parental rights or other permanent placement of the child away from the parent,
the parent would have the right to appointment of separate legal counsel and
the child would have a right to the appointment of counsel and a guardian ad
litem as provided by law, and that counsel will be appointed at public expense
if they are unable to afford counsel; and
(5)
the timelines and procedures for review of voluntary placements under
subdivision 3, and the effect the time spent in voluntary placement on the
scheduling of a permanent placement determination hearing under section
260C.201, subdivision 11.
(d)
When an agency accepts a child for placement, the agency shall determine
whether the child has had a physical examination by or under the direction of a
licensed physician within the 12 months immediately preceding the date when the
child came into the agency's care. If
there is documentation that the child has had an examination within the last 12
months, the agency is responsible for seeing that the child has another
physical examination within one year of the documented examination and annually
in subsequent years. If the agency
determines that the child has not had a physical examination within the 12
months immediately preceding placement, the agency shall ensure that the child
has an examination within 30 days of coming into the agency's care and once a
year in subsequent years.
(e) Whether
under state guardianship or not, if a child leaves foster care by reason of
having attained the age of majority under state law, the child must be given at
no cost a copy of the child's health social and medical history, as
defined in section 259.43, and education report.
Sec.
48. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.212, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
4a. Monthly
caseworker visits with children in foster care. (a) Every child in foster care or on a
trial home visit shall be visited by the child's caseworker on a monthly basis,
with the majority of visits occurring in the child's residence. For the purposes of this section, the
following definitions apply:
(1)
"visit" is defined as a face-to-face contact between a child and the
child's caseworker;
(2)
"visited on a monthly basis" is defined as at least one visit per
calendar month;
(3)
"the child's caseworker" is defined as the person who has
responsibility for managing the child's foster care placement case as assigned
by the responsible social service agency; and
(4)
"the child's residence" is defined as the home where the child is
residing, and can include the foster home, child care institution, or the home
from which the child was removed if the child is on a trial home visit.
(b)
Caseworker visits shall be of sufficient substance and duration to address
issues pertinent to case planning and service delivery to ensure the safety,
permanency, and well-being of the child.
Sec.
49. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.212, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd.
7. Administrative
or court review of placements. (a)
There shall be an administrative review of the out-of-home placement plan of
each child placed in a residential facility foster care no later
than 180 days after the initial placement of the child in a residential
facility foster care and at least every six months thereafter if the
child is not returned to the home of the parent or parents within that
time. The out-of-home placement plan
must be monitored and updated at each administrative review. The administrative review shall be
conducted by the responsible social services agency using a panel of
appropriate persons at least one of whom is not responsible for the case
management of, or the delivery of services to, either the child or the parents
who are the subject of the review. The
administrative review shall be open to participation by the parent or guardian
of the child and the child, as appropriate.
(b)
As an
alternative to the administrative review required in paragraph (a), the
social services agency responsible for the placement may bring a petition as
provided in section 260C.141, subdivision 2, to the court for review of
the foster care to determine if placement is in the best interests of the
child. This petition must be brought to
the court in order for a court determination to be made regarding the best
interests of the child within the applicable six months and is not in lieu of
the requirements contained in subdivision 3 or 4. may, as part of any
hearing required under the Minnesota Rules of Juvenile Protection Procedure,
conduct a hearing to monitor and update the out-of-home placement plan pursuant
to the procedure and standard in section 260C.201, subdivision 6, paragraph
(d). The party requesting review of the
out-of-home placement plan shall give parties to the proceeding notice of the
request to review and update the out-of-home placement plan. A court review conducted pursuant to
section 260C.193; 260C.201, subdivision 1 or 11, or section;
260C.141, subdivision 2, or 2a, clause (2); or 260C.317 shall
satisfy the requirement for an administrative the review so long
as the other requirements of this section are met.
(b) (c) At the review
required under paragraph (a), the reviewing administrative body As
appropriate to the stage of the proceedings and relevant court orders, the
responsible social services agency or the court shall review:
(1)
the safety, permanency needs, and well-being of the child;
(2)
the continuing necessity for and appropriateness of the placement;
(3)
the extent of compliance with the out-of-home placement plan;
(4) where
appropriate, the extent of progress which has been made toward alleviating
or mitigating the causes necessitating placement in a residential facility
foster care;
(5) where
appropriate, the projected date by which the child may be returned to and
safely maintained in the home or placed permanently away from the care of the
parent or parents or guardian; and
(6)
the appropriateness of the services provided to the child.
(d)
When a child is age 16 or older, in addition to any administrative review
conducted by the agency, at the review required under section 260C.201,
subdivision 11, paragraph (d), clause (3), unit (iii); or 260C.317, subdivision
3, clause (3), the court shall review the independent living plan required
under subdivision 1, paragraph (c), clause (8), and the provision of services
to the child related to the well-being of the child as the child prepares to
leave foster care. The review shall
include the actual plans related to each item in the plan necessary to the
child's future safety and well-being when the child is no longer in foster
care.
(1)
At the court review, the responsible social services agency shall establish
that it has given the notice required under Minnesota Rules, part 9560.0060,
regarding the right to continued access to services for certain children in
foster care past age 18 and of the right to appeal a denial of social services
under section 256.245. If the agency is
unable to establish that the notice, including the right to appeal a denial of
social services, has been given, the court shall require the agency to give it.
(2)
If the plan is for the child to leave foster care at age 18, the court shall
make findings regarding the child's progress toward or accomplishment of the
following goals:
(i)
the child has obtained a high school diploma or its equivalent;
(ii)
the child has completed a driver's education course or has demonstrated the
ability to use public transportation in the child's community;
(iii)
the child is employed or enrolled in postsecondary education;
(iv)
the child has applied for and obtained postsecondary education financial aid
for which the child is eligible;
(v)
the child has health care coverage and health care providers to meet the child's
physical and mental health needs;
(vi)
the child has applied for and obtained disability income assistance for which
the child is eligible;
(vii)
the child has obtained affordable housing with necessary supports, which does
not include a homeless shelter;
(viii)
the child has saved sufficient funds to pay for the first month's rent and a
damage deposit;
(ix)
the child has an alternative affordable housing plan, which does not include a
homeless shelter, if the original housing plan is unworkable;
(x)
the child, if male, has registered for the Selective Service; and
(xi)
the child has a permanent connection to a caring adult.
The child in conjunction
with the placement provider and the responsible social services agency shall
work to complete the goals of the living plan.
(3)
The court shall ensure that the responsible agency assists the child in
obtaining the following documents prior to the child's leaving foster
care: a Social Security card; the
child's birth certificate; a state identification card or driver's license,
green card, or school visa; the child's school, medical, and dental records; a
contact list of the child's medical, dental, and mental health providers; and
contact information for the child's siblings, if the siblings are in foster
care.
Sec.
50. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.212, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd.
8. Review
of Voluntary placements foster care; required court review. Except for a child in placement due
solely to the child's developmental disability or emotional disturbance, if
When the responsible social services agency and the child's parent or
guardian agree that the child's safety, health, and best interests require that
the child be in foster care, the agency and the parent or guardian may enter
into a voluntary agreement for the placement of the child in foster care. The voluntary agreement must be in writing
and in a form approved by the
commissioner. When the child has been placed in a residential
facility foster care pursuant to a voluntary release by foster
care agreement between the agency and the parent or parents, under
this subdivision and the child is not returned home within 90 days
after initial placement in the residential facility foster care,
the social services agency responsible for the child's placement in
foster care shall:
(1)
return the child to the home of the parent or parents; or
(2)
file a petition according to section 260C.141, subdivision 1 or 2, which may:
(i)
ask the court to review the child's placement in foster care and
approve it as continued voluntary foster care for up to an additional 90
days;
(ii)
ask the court to order continued out-of-home placement foster care according
to sections 260C.178 and 260C.201; or
(iii)
ask the court to terminate parental rights under section 260C.301.
The
out-of-home placement plan must be updated and filed along with the petition.
If the
court approves continued out-of-home placement continuing the child
in foster care for up to 90 more days on a voluntary basis, at the
end of the court-approved 90-day period, the child must be returned to the
parent's home. If the child is not
returned home, the responsible social services agency must proceed on the
petition filed alleging the child in need of protection or services or the
petition for termination of parental rights or other permanent placement of the
child away from the parent. The court
must find a statutory basis to order the placement of the child under section
260C.178; 260C.201; or 260C.317.
Sec.
51. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.325, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Transfer
of custody. (a) If the court
terminates parental rights of both parents or of the only known living parent,
the court shall order the guardianship and the legal custody of the child
transferred to:
(a) (1) the commissioner of human
services; or
(b) (2) a licensed child-placing
agency; or
(c) (3) an individual
who is willing and capable of assuming the appropriate duties and
responsibilities to the child.
(b)
The court shall order transfer of guardianship and legal custody of a child to
the commissioner of human services only when the responsible county social
services agency had legal responsibility for planning for the permanent
placement of the child and the child was in foster care under the legal
responsibility of the responsible county social services agency at the time the
court orders guardianship and legal custody transferred to the commissioner.
Sec.
52. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.325, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Both
parents deceased. (a) If
upon petition to the juvenile court by a reputable person, including but not
limited to an agent of the commissioner of human services, and upon hearing in
the manner provided in section 260C.163, the court finds that both parents or
the only known legal parent are or is deceased and no appointment
has been made or petition for appointment filed pursuant to sections 524.5-201
to 524.5-317, the court shall order the guardianship and legal custody of the
child transferred to:
(a) (1) the commissioner
of human services;
(b) (2) a licensed
child-placing agency; or
(c) (3) an individual
who is willing and capable of assuming the appropriate duties and
responsibilities to the child.
(b)
The court shall order transfer of guardianship and legal custody of a child to
the commissioner of human services only if there is no individual who is
willing and capable of assuming the appropriate duties and responsibilities to
the child.
Sec.
53. [260D.001] CHILD IN VOLUNTARY FOSTER CARE FOR TREATMENT.
(a)
Sections 260D.001 to 260D.301 may be cited as the "child in voluntary
foster care for treatment" provisions of the Juvenile Court Act.
(b)
The juvenile court has original and exclusive jurisdiction over a child in
voluntary foster care for treatment upon the filing of a report or petition
required under this chapter. All
obligations of the agency to a child and family in foster care contained in chapter
260C not inconsistent with this chapter are also obligations of the agency with
regard to a child in foster care for treatment under this chapter.
(c)
This chapter shall be construed consistently with the mission of the children's
mental health service system as set out in section 245.487, subdivision 3, and
the duties of an agency under section 256B.092 and Minnesota Rules, parts
9525.0004 to 9525.0016, to meet the needs of a child with a developmental
disability or related condition. This
chapter:
(1)
establishes voluntary foster care through a voluntary foster care agreement as
the means for an agency and a parent to provide needed treatment when the child
must be in foster care to receive necessary treatment for an emotional
disturbance or developmental disability or related condition;
(2)
establishes court review requirements for a child in voluntary foster care for
treatment due to emotional disturbance or developmental disability or a related
condition;
(3)
establishes the ongoing responsibility of the parent as legal custodian to visit
the child, to plan together with the agency for the child's treatment needs, to
be available and accessible to the agency to make treatment decisions, and to
obtain necessary medical, dental, and other care for the child; and
(4)
applies to voluntary foster care when the child's parent and the agency agree
that the child's treatment needs require foster care either:
(i)
due to a level of care determination by the agency's screening team informed by
the diagnostic and functional assessment under section 245.4885; or
(ii)
due to a determination regarding the level of services needed by the
responsible social services' screening team under section 256B.092 and
Minnesota Rules, parts 9525.0004 to 9525.0016.
(d)
This chapter does not apply when there is a current determination under section
626.556 that the child requires child protective services or when the child is
in foster care for any reason other than treatment for the child's emotional
disturbance or developmental disability or related condition. When there is a determination under section
626.556 that the child requires child protective services based on an
assessment that there are safety and risk issues for the child that have not
been mitigated through the parent's engagement in services or otherwise, or
when the child is in foster care for any reason other than the child's
emotional disturbance or developmental disability or related condition, the
provisions of chapter 260C apply.
(e)
The paramount consideration in all proceedings concerning a child in voluntary
foster care for treatment is the safety, health, and best interests of the
child. The purpose of this chapter is:
(1)
to ensure a child with a disability is provided the services necessary to treat
or ameliorate the symptoms of the child's disability;
(2)
to preserve and strengthen the child's family ties whenever possible and in the
child's best interests, approving the child's placement away from the child's
parents only when the child's need for care or treatment requires it, and the
child cannot be maintained in the home of the parent; and
(3)
to ensure the child's parent retains legal custody of the child and associated
decision-making authority unless the child's parent willfully fails or is
unable to make decisions that meet the child's safety, health, and best
interests. The court may not find the
parent willfully fails or is unable to make decisions that meet the child's
needs solely because the parent disagrees with the agency's choice of foster
care facility, unless the agency files a petition under chapter 260C, and
establishes by clear and convincing evidence that the child is in need of
protection or services.
(f)
The legal parent-child relationship shall be supported under this chapter by
maintaining the parent's legal authority and responsibility for ongoing
planning for the child and by the agency's assisting the parent, where
necessary, to exercise the parent's ongoing right and obligation to visit or to
have reasonable contact with the child.
Ongoing planning means:
(1)
actively participating in the planning and provision of educational services,
medical care, and dental care for the child;
(2)
actively planning and participating with the agency and the foster care
facility for the child's treatment needs; and
(3)
planning to meet the child's need for safety, stability, and permanency, and
the child's need to stay connected to the child's family and community.
(g)
The provisions of section 260.012 to ensure placement prevention, family
reunification, and all active and reasonable effort requirements of that
section apply. This chapter shall be
construed consistently with the requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act of
1978, United States Code, title 25, section 1901, et al, and the provisions of
the Minnesota Indian Family Preservation Act, sections 260.071 to 260.835.
Sec.
54. [260D.005] DEFINITIONS.
Subdivision
1. Definitions. The definitions in this section
supplement the definitions in section 260C.007. The definitions in section 260C.007 apply to this chapter and
have the same meaning for purposes of this chapter as for chapter 260C.
Subd.
2. Agency. "Agency" means the responsible
social services agency or a licensed child-placing agency.
Subd.
3. Case
plan. "Case plan"
means any plan for the delivery of services to a child and parent, or when
reunification is not required, the child alone, that is developed according to
the requirements of sections 245.4871, subdivision 19 or 21; 245.492,
subdivision 16; 256B.092; 260C.212, subdivision 1; 626.556, subdivision 10; and
Minnesota Rules, parts 9525.0004 to 9525.0016.
Subd.
4. Child. "Child" means an individual
under 18 years of age.
Subd.
5. Child
in voluntary foster care for treatment. "Child in voluntary foster care for treatment" means
a child who is emotionally disturbed or developmentally disabled or has a
related condition and is in foster care under a voluntary foster care agreement
between the child's parent and the agency due to concurrence between the agency
and the parent that the child's level of care requires placement in foster care
either:
(1)
due to a determination by the agency's screening team based on its review of
the diagnostic and functional assessment under section 245.4885; or
(2)
due to a determination by the agency's screening team under section 256B.092
and Minnesota Rules, parts 9525.0004 to 9525.0016.
A
child is not in voluntary foster care for treatment under this chapter when
there is a current determination under section 626.556 that the child requires
child protective services or when the child is in foster care for any reason
other than the child's emotional or developmental disability or related
condition.
Subd.
6. Compelling
reasons. "Compelling
reasons" has the same meaning given in section 260C.007, subdivision
8. The agency may determine compelling
reasons when the child is in foster care for treatment and no grounds to
terminate parental rights exist because the child must be in placement to
access treatment, the child's individual treatment needs cannot be met in the
childs' home or through community-based care, and the parent continues to be
responsible for planning together with the agency for the child's needs and
maintains appropriate contact with the child.
Subd.
7. Court. "Court" means juvenile court
unless otherwise specified in this section.
Subd.
8. Development
disability. "Developmental
disability" means developmental disability as defined in United States
Code, title 42, section 6001(8).
Subd.
9. Emotionally
disturbed or emotional disturbance.
"Emotionally disturbed" or "emotional
disturbance" means emotional disturbance as described in section 245.4871,
subdivision 15.
Subd.
10. Foster
care. "Foster
care" means 24-hour substitute care for children placed away from their
parents and for whom an agency has placement and care responsibility. Foster care includes, but is not limited to,
placement in foster family homes, foster homes of relatives, group homes,
emergency shelters, residential facilities not excluded in this subdivision,
child care institutions, and preadoptive homes. A child is in foster care under this definition, regardless of
whether the facility is licensed and payments are made for the cost of care. Nothing in this definition creates any
authority to place a child in a home or facility that is required to be
licensed that is not licensed. Foster
care does not include placement in any of the following facilities: hospitals, inpatient chemical dependency
treatment facilities, facilities that are primarily for delinquent children,
any corrections facility or program within a particular corrections facility
not meeting requirements for Title IV-E facilities as determined by the
commissioner, facilities to which a child is committed under the provision of
chapter 253B, forestry camps, or jails.
Subd.
11. Legal
authority to place the child. "Legal
authority to place the child" means the agency has legal responsibility
for the care and control of the child while the child is in foster care. The agency may acquire legal authority to
place a child through a voluntary placement agreement between the agency and
the child's parent under this chapter.
Legal authority to place the child does not mean the agency has
authority to make major life decisions regarding the child, including major
medical decisions. A parent with legal
custody of the child continues to have legal authority to make major life
decisions regarding the child, including major medical decisions.
Subd.
12. Minor. "Minor" means an individual
under 18 years of age.
Subd.
13. Parent. "Parent" means the birth or
adoptive parent of a minor. Parent also
means the child's legal guardian or any individual who has legal authority to
make decisions and plans for the child.
For an Indian child, parent includes any Indian person who has adopted a
child by tribal law or custom, as provided in section 260.755, subdivision 14.
Subd. 14. Reasonable efforts to
finalize a permanent plan for the child. "Reasonable efforts to finalize a permanent plan for the
child" has the same meaning under this chapter as provided in section
260.012, paragraph (e).
Sec.
55. [260D.101] VOLUNTARY FOSTER CARE.
Subdivision
1. Voluntary
foster care. When the
agency's screening team, based upon the diagnostic and functional assessment
under section 245.4885 or 256B.092, subdivision 7, determines the child's need
for treatment due to emotional disturbance or developmental disability or
related condition requires foster care placement of the child, a voluntary
foster care agreement between the child's parent and the agency gives the
agency legal authority to place the child in foster care.
Subd.
2. Voluntary
foster care agreement. A
voluntary foster care agreement shall be used to provide the agency the legal
authority to place a child in foster care for treatment due to the child's
disability. The agreement must be in
writing and signed by both the child's parent and the agency. The agreement must be in a form approved by
the commissioner of human services, and shall contain notice to parents of the
consequences to the parent and to the child of being in voluntary foster care.
Sec.
56. [260D.102] REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR CHILD IN VOLUNTARY FOSTER CARE
FOR TREATMENT.
An
agency with authority to place a child in voluntary foster care for treatment
due to emotional disturbance or developmental disability or related condition
shall inform the child age 12 or older of the following:
(a)
The child has the right to be consulted in the preparation of the out-of-home
placement plan required under section 260C.212, subdivision 1, and the
administrative review required under section 260C.212, subdivision 7.
(b)
The child has the right to visit the parent and the right to visit the child's
siblings as determined safe and appropriate by the parent and the agency.
(c)
If the child disagrees with the foster care facility or services provided under
the out-of-home placement plan required under section 260C.212, subdivision 1,
the agency shall include information about the nature of the child's
disagreement and, to the extent possible, the agency's understanding of the
basis of the child's disagreement in the information provided to the court in
the report required under section 260D.105.
(d)
The child has the rights established under Minnesota Rules, part 2960.0050, as
a resident of a facility licensed by the state.
Sec.
57. [260D.103] ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF CHILD IN VOLUNTARY FOSTER CARE
FOR TREATMENT.
The
administrative reviews required under section 260C.212, subdivision 7, must be
conducted for a child in voluntary foster care for treatment, except that the
initial administrative review must take place prior to the submission of the
report to the court required under section 260D.105, subdivision 2.
Sec.
58. [260D.105] AGENCY REPORT TO THE COURT AND COURT REVIEW OF CHILD IN
VOLUNTARY FOSTER CARE FOR TREATMENT DUE TO DISABILITY.
Subdivision
1. Judicial
review. In the case of a
child in voluntary foster care for treatment due to disability under section
260D.101, the agency shall obtain judicial review of the child's voluntary
foster care placement within 165 days of the placement.
Subd.
2. Agency
report to court; court review. The
agency shall obtain judicial review by reporting to the court according to the
following procedures:
(a)
A written report shall be forwarded to the court within 165 days of the date of
the voluntary placement agreement. The
written report shall contain or have attached:
(1)
a statement of facts that necessitate the child's foster care placement;
(2)
the child's name, date of birth, race, gender, and current address;
(3)
the names, race, date of birth, residence, and post office addresses of the
child's parents or legal custodian;
(4)
a statement regarding the child's eligibility for membership or enrollment in
an Indian tribe and the agency's compliance with applicable provisions of
sections 260.751 to 260.835;
(5)
the names and addresses of the foster parents or chief administrator of the
facility in which the child is placed, if the child is not in a family foster
home or group home;
(6)
a copy of the out-of-home placement plan required under section 260C.212,
subdivision 1;
(7)
a written summary of the proceedings of any administrative review required
under section 260C.212, subdivision 7; and
(8)
any other information the agency, parent or legal custodian, child or foster
parent, or other residential facility wants the court to consider.
(b)
In the case of a child in placement due to emotional disturbance, the written
report shall include as an attachment the child's individual treatment plan
developed by the child's treatment professional, as provided in section
245.4871, subdivision 21, or the child's individual interagency intervention
plan, as provided in section 125A.023, subdivision 3, paragraph (c).
(c)
In the case of a child in placement due to developmental disability or a
related condition, the written report shall include as an attachment the
child's individual service plan, as provided in section 256B.092, subdivision
1b; the child's individual program plan, as provided in Minnesota Rules, part
9525.0004, subpart 11; the child's waiver care plan; or the child's individual
interagency intervention plan, as provided in section 125A.023, subdivision 3,
paragraph (c).
(d)
The agency must inform the child age 12 or older, the child's parent, and the
foster parent or foster care facility of the reporting and court review
requirements of this section and of their right to submit information to the
court:
(1)
if the child or the child's parent or the foster care provider wants to send
information to the court, the agency shall advise those persons of the
reporting date and the date by which the agency must receive the information
they want forwarded to the court so the agency is timely able to submit it with
the agency's report required under this subdivision;
(2)
the agency must also inform the child age 12 or older, the child's parent, and
the foster care facility that they have the right to be heard in person by the
court and how to exercise that right;
(3)
the agency must also inform the child age 12 or older, the child's parent, and
the foster care provider that an in-court hearing will be held if requested by
the child, the parent, or the foster care provider; and
(4)
if, at the time required for the report under this section, a child age 12 or
older disagrees about the foster care facility or services provided under the
out-of-home placement plan required under section 260C.212, subdivision 1, the
agency shall include information regarding the child's disagreement, and to the
extent possible, the basis for the child's disagreement in the report required
under this section.
(e)
After receiving the required report, the court has jurisdiction to make the
following determinations and must do so within ten days of receiving the
forwarded report, whether a hearing is requested:
(1)
whether the voluntary foster care arrangement is in the child's best interests;
(2)
whether the parent and agency are appropriately planning for the child; and
(3)
in the case of a child age 12 or older who disagrees with the foster care
facility or services provided under the out-of-home placement plan, whether it
is appropriate to appoint counsel and a guardian ad litem for the child using
standards and procedures under section 260C.163.
(f)
Unless requested by a parent, representative of the foster care facility, or
the child, no in-court hearing is required in order for the court to make
findings and issue an order as required in paragraph (e).
(g)
If the court finds that the voluntary foster care arrangement is in the child's
best interests and that the agency and parent are appropriately planning for
the child, the court shall issue an order containing explicit, individualized
findings to support its determination.
The individualized findings shall be based on the agency's written
report and other materials submitted to the court. The court may make this determination notwithstanding the child's
disagreement, if any, reported under paragraph (d).
(h)
The court shall send a copy of the order to the county attorney, agency,
parent, child age 12 or older, and foster parent or foster care facility.
(i)
The court shall also send the parent, child age 12 or older, foster parent, or
representative of the foster care facility notice of the permanency review
hearing required under section 260D.107, paragraph (e).
(j)
If the court finds continuing the voluntary foster care arrangement is not in
the child's best interests or that the agency or the parent are not appropriately
planning for the child, the court shall notify the agency, parent, foster
parent or foster care facility, child age 12 or older, and county attorney of
the court's determinations and the basis for the court's determinations. In this case, the court shall set the matter
for hearing and appoint a guardian ad litem for the child under section
260C.163, subdivision 5.
Sec.
59. [260D.107] REQUIRED PERMANENCY REVIEW HEARING.
(a)
When the court has found that the voluntary arrangement is in the child's best
interests and that the agency and parent are appropriately planning for the
child pursuant to the report submitted under section 260D.105, and the child
continues in voluntary foster care as defined in section 260D.007, subdivision
10, for 13 months from the date of the voluntary foster care agreement, or has
been in placement for 15 of the last 22 months, the agency must:
(1)
terminate the voluntary foster care agreement and return the child home;
(2)
determine whether there are compelling reasons to continue the voluntary foster
care arrangement and, if the agency determines there are compelling reasons,
seek judicial approval if its determination; or
(3)
file a petition for the termination of parental rights.
(b)
When the agency is asking for the court's approval of its determination that
there are compelling reasons to continue the child in the voluntary foster care
arrangement, the agency shall file a "Petition for Permanency Review
Regarding a Child in Voluntary Foster Care for Treatment" and ask the
court to proceed under this section.
(c)
The "Petition for Permanency Review Regarding a Child in Voluntary Foster
Care for Treatment" shall be drafted or approved by the county attorney
and be under oath. The petition shall
include:
(1)
the date of the voluntary placement agreement;
(2)
whether the petition is due to the child's developmental disability or
emotional disturbance;
(3)
the plan for the ongoing care of the child and the parent's participation in
the plan;
(4)
a description of the parent's visitation and contact with the child;
(5)
the date of the court finding that the foster care placement was in the best
interests of the child, if required under section 260D.105, or the date the
agency filed the motion under section 260D.201, paragraph (b);
(6)
the agency's reasonable efforts to finalize the permanent plan for the child,
including returning the child to the care of the child's family; and
(7)
a citation to this chapter as the basis for the petition.
(d)
An updated copy of the out-of-home placement plan required under section
260C.212, subdivision 1, shall be filed with the petition.
(e)
The court shall set the date for the permanency review hearing no later than 14
months after the child has been in placement or within 30 days of the petition
filing date when the child has been in placement 15 of the last 22 months. The court shall serve the petition together
with a notice of hearing by United States mail on the parent; the child age 12
or older; the child's guardian ad litem, if one has been appointed; the agency;
the county attorney; and counsel for any party.
(f)
The court shall conduct the permanency review hearing on the petition no later
than 14 months after the date of the voluntary placement agreement, within 30
days of the filing of the petition when the child has been in placement 15 of
the last 22 months, or within 15 days of a motion to terminate jurisdiction and
to dismiss an order for foster care under chapter 260C, as provided in section
260D.201, paragraph (b).
(g)
At the permanency review hearing, the court shall:
(1)
inquire of the parent if the parent has reviewed the "Petition for
Permanency Review Regarding a Child in Voluntary Foster Care for
Treatment," whether the petition is accurate, and whether the parent
agrees to the continued voluntary foster care arrangement as being in the
child's best interests;
(2)
inquire of the parent if the parent is satisfied with the agency's reasonable
efforts to finalize the permanent plan for the child, including whether there
are services available and accessible to the parent that might allow the child
to safely be with the child's family;
(3)
inquire of the parent if the parent consents to the court entering an order
that:
(i)
approves the responsible agency's reasonable efforts to finalize the permanent
plan for the child, which includes ongoing future planning for the safety,
health, and best interests of the child; and
(ii)
approves the responsible agency's determination that there are compelling
reasons why the continued voluntary foster care arrangement is in the child's
best interests;
(4)
inquire of the child's guardian ad litem and any other party whether the
guardian or the party agrees that:
(i)
the court should approve the responsible agency's reasonable efforts to
finalize the permanent plan for the child, which includes ongoing and future
planning for the safety, health, and best interests of the child; and
(ii)
the court should approve of the responsible agency's determination that there
are compelling reasons why the continued voluntary foster care arrangement is
in the child's best interests.
(h)
At a permanency review hearing under this section, the court may take the
following actions based on the contents of the sworn petition and the consent
of the parent:
(1)
approve the agency's compelling reasons that the voluntary foster care
arrangement is in the best interests of the child; and
(2)
find that the agency has made reasonable efforts to finalize the permanent plan
for the child.
(i)
A child age 12 or older may object to the agency's request that the court
approve its compelling reasons for the continued voluntary arrangement and may
be heard on the reasons for the objection.
Notwithstanding the child's objection, the court may approve the
agency's compelling reasons and the voluntary arrangement.
(j)
If the court does not approve the voluntary arrangement after hearing from the
child or the child's guardian ad litem, the court shall dismiss the
petition. In this case, either:
(1)
the child must be returned to the care of the parent; or
(2)
the agency must file a petition under section 260C.141 asking for appropriate
relief under section 260C.201, subdivision 11, or 260C.301.
(k)
When the court approves the agency's compelling reasons for the child to
continue in voluntary foster care for treatment, and finds that the agency has
made reasonable efforts to finalize a permanent plan for the child, the court
shall approve the continued voluntary foster care arrangement, and continue the
matter under the court's jurisdiction for the purposes of reviewing the child's
placement every 12 months while the child is in foster care.
(l)
A finding that the court approves the continued voluntary placement means the
agency has continued legal authority to place the child while a voluntary
placement agreement remains in effect.
The parent or the agency may terminate a voluntary agreement as provided
in section 260D.301. Termination of a
voluntary foster care placement of an Indian child is governed by section
260.765, subdivision 4.
Sec.
60. [260D.109] ANNUAL REVIEW.
(a)
After the court conducts a permanency review hearing under section 260D.107,
the matter must be returned to the court for further review of the child's
foster care placement at least every 12 months while the child is in foster
care. The court shall give notice to
the parent and child age 12 or older and the foster parents of the continued
review requirements under this section at the permanency review hearing.
(b)
Every 12 months, the court shall determine whether the agency made reasonable
efforts to finalize the permanent plan for the child, which means the exercise
of due diligence by the agency to:
(1)
ensure that the agreement for voluntary foster care is the most appropriate
legal arrangement to meet the child's safety, health, and best interests;
(2)
engage and support the parent in continued involvement in planning and decision
making for the needs of the child;
(3)
strengthen the child's ties to the parent, relatives, and community;
(4)
implement the out-of-home placement plan required under section 260C.212,
subdivision 1, and ensure that the plan requires the provision of appropriate
services to address the physical health, mental health, and educational needs of
the child; and
(5)
ensure appropriate planning for the child's safe, permanent, and independent
living arrangement after the child's 18th birthday.
Sec.
61. [260D.201] PERMANENCY REVIEW AFTER ADJUDICATION UNDER CHAPTER 260C.
(a)
If a child has been ordered into foster care under section 260C.178 or
260C.201, subdivision 1, and the conditions that led to the court's order have
been corrected so that the child could safely return home, except for the
child's need to continue in foster care for treatment due to the child's
disability, the child's parent and the agency may enter into a voluntary foster
care agreement under this chapter using the procedure described in paragraph
(b).
(b)
When the agency and the parent agree to enter into a voluntary foster care
agreement under this chapter, the agency must file a motion to terminate
jurisdiction under section 260C.193, subdivision 6, and to dismiss the order
for foster care under section 260C.178 or 260C.201, subdivision 1, together
with the petition required under section 260D.107, paragraph (b), for
permanency review and the court's approval of the voluntary arrangement.
(c)
The court shall send the motion and the petition filed under subdivision 2
together with a notice of hearing by mail as required in section 260D.107,
paragraph (e).
(d)
The petition and motion under this section must be filed no later than the time
the agency is required to file a petition for permanent placement under section
260C.201, subdivision 11, but may be filed as soon as the agency and the parent
agree that the child should remain in foster care under a voluntary foster care
agreement, because the child needs treatment and voluntary foster care is in
the child's best interests.
(e)
In order for the agency to have continuous legal authority to place the child,
the parent and the agency must execute a voluntary foster care agreement for
the child's continuation in foster care for treatment prior to the termination
of the order for foster care under section 260C.178 or 260C.201, subdivision
1. The parent and agency may execute
the voluntary foster care agreement at or before the permanency review hearing
required under this section. The
voluntary foster care agreement shall not be effective until the court
terminates jurisdiction under section 260C.193, subdivision 6, and dismisses
the order for foster care under section 260C.178 or 260C.201, subdivision
1. Unless the agency and the parent
execute a voluntary placement agreement for the child to continue in voluntary
foster care for treatment, the agency shall not have legal authority to place
the child after the court terminates jurisdiction under chapter 260C.
Sec.
62. [260D.301] TERMINATION OF VOLUNTARY PLACEMENT AGREEMENT.
(a)
The child's parent may terminate a voluntary placement agreement under this
chapter upon written notice to the agency of the termination of the
agreement. The termination of a
voluntary foster care agreement regarding an Indian child shall be governed by
section 260.765, subdivision 4.
(b)
The agency may terminate a voluntary placement agreement under this section
upon written notice of the termination of the agreement to the parent. Prior to sending notice of termination of
the voluntary foster care placement agreement, the agency shall contact the
parent regarding transition planning under paragraph (e). Written notice by the agency shall be
considered received by the parent three business days after mailing by the
agency.
(c)
Upon receipt of notice of the termination of the voluntary foster care
agreement, the agency, the parent, and the facility may agree to a time that
the child shall return home. The
scheduled time to return home shall meet the child's need for safety and
reasonable transition. Unless otherwise
agreed to by the parent and the agency, the child's return home shall not occur
sooner than 72 hours and not later than 30 days after written notice of
termination is received or sent by the agency.
(d)
A parent who disagrees with the termination of a voluntary foster care agreement
by the agency under this chapter has the right to a fair hearing under section
256.045 to appeal the termination of the voluntary foster care agreement. When the agency gives written notice to the
parent of the termination of the agreement, the agency must also give the
parent notice of the parent's right to a fair hearing under section 256.045 to
appeal the agency's decision to terminate the voluntary foster care agreement.
(e)
The agency and the child's parents shall engage in transition planning for the
child's return home, including establishing a scheduled time for the child to
return home, an increased visitation plan between the parent and child, and a
plan for what services will be provided and in place upon the child's return
home.
(f)
Notice of termination of voluntary foster care agreement does not terminate the
agreement. The voluntary foster care
agreement and the agency's legal authority to place the child are terminated by
the child's return home or by court order.
Sec.
63. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
524.2-114, is amended to read:
524.2-114 MEANING OF CHILD AND RELATED TERMS.
If,
for purposes of intestate succession, a relationship of parent and child must
be established to determine succession by, through, or from a person:
(1) An
adopted person child is the child of an adopting parent and not
of the birth parents except that adoption of a child by the spouse of a birth
parent has no effect on the relationship between the child and that birth
parent. If a parent dies and a child is
subsequently adopted by a stepparent who is the spouse of a surviving parent,
any rights of inheritance of the child or the child's descendant from or
through the deceased parent of the child which exist at the time of the death
of that parent shall not be affected by the adoption.
(2) In
cases not covered by clause (1), a person is the child of the person's parents
regardless of the marital status of the parents and the parent and child
relationship may be established under the Parentage Act, sections 257.51 to
257.74.
Sec.
64. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
626.556, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd.
7. Report. An oral report shall be made immediately by
telephone or otherwise. An oral report
made by a person required under subdivision 3 to report shall be followed
within 72 hours, exclusive of weekends and holidays, by a report in writing to
the appropriate police department, the county sheriff, the agency responsible
for assessing or investigating the report, or the local welfare agency, unless
the appropriate agency has informed the reporter that the oral information does
not constitute a report under subdivision 10.
The local welfare agency shall determine if the report is accepted
for an assessment or investigation as soon as possible but in no event longer
than 24 hours after the report is received.
Any report shall be of sufficient content to identify the child, any
person believed to be responsible for the abuse or neglect of the child if the
person is known, the nature and extent of the abuse or neglect and the name and
address of the reporter. If requested,
the local welfare agency or the agency responsible for assessing or
investigating the report shall inform the reporter within ten days after the
report is made, either orally or in writing, whether the report was accepted
for assessment or investigation.
Written reports received by a police department or the county sheriff
shall be forwarded immediately to the local welfare agency or the agency
responsible for assessing or investigating the report. The police department or the county sheriff
may keep copies of reports received by them.
Copies of written reports received by a local welfare department or the
agency responsible for assessing or investigating the report shall be forwarded
immediately to the local police department or the county sheriff.
A
written copy of a report maintained by personnel of agencies, other than
welfare or law enforcement agencies, which are subject to chapter 13 shall be
confidential. An individual subject of
the report may obtain access to the original report as provided by subdivision
11.
Sec.
65. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 626.556, subdivision 10a, is amended to read:
Subd.
10a. Law enforcement agency responsibility for investigation; welfare agency
reliance on law enforcement fact-finding; welfare agency offer of services. (a) If the report alleges neglect, physical
abuse, or sexual abuse by a person who is not a parent, guardian, sibling,
person responsible for the child's care functioning within the family unit, or
a person who lives in the child's household and who has a significant
relationship to the child, in a setting other than a facility as defined in
subdivision 2, the local welfare agency shall immediately notify the
appropriate law enforcement agency, which shall conduct an investigation of the
alleged abuse or neglect if a violation of a criminal statute is alleged.
(b)
The local agency may rely on the fact-finding efforts of the law enforcement
investigation conducted under this subdivision to make a determination whether
or not threatened harm injury or other maltreatment has occurred
under subdivision 2 if an alleged offender has minor children or lives with
minors.
(c)
The local welfare agency shall offer appropriate social services for the
purpose of safeguarding and enhancing the welfare of the abused or neglected
minor.
Sec.
66. REVISOR'S INSTRUCTION.
In
each section of Minnesota Statutes referred to in column A, the revisor of
statutes shall delete the reference in column B and insert the reference in
column C.
Column A Column
B Column
C
259.67 260.851,
article 5 260.853,
article 4
256B.094 260.851 260.853
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective upon legislative enactment of the
interstate compact in section 25 by no less than 35 states.
Sec. 67. REPEALER.
(a) Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 260.851, is repealed effective
upon legislative enactment of the interstate compact in section 25 by no less
than 35 states. The commissioner of human
services shall inform the revisor of statutes when this occurs.
(b) Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 260B.241; and 260C.207, are
repealed.
(c) Minnesota Rules, part 9560.0092, is repealed."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to human services; amending
child welfare provisions; changing a standard of evidence; adopting a new
Interstate Compact for the Placement of Children and repealing the old compact;
regulating child and adult adoptions; regulating voluntary foster care for
treatment; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 245C.24, subdivision 2;
245C.29, subdivision 2; 256.045, subdivisions 3, 3b; 259.20, subdivision 1;
259.21, by adding a subdivision; 259.22, subdivision 2; 259.23, subdivision 2;
259.43; 259.52, subdivision 2; 259.53, subdivision 3; 259.59, subdivisions 1,
2; 259.67, subdivisions 2, 3, by adding a subdivision; 259.75, subdivision 5;
259.89, subdivisions 1, 2, 4, by adding a subdivision; 260C.001, subdivision 2;
260C.007, subdivisions 5, 6, 13; 260C.101, subdivision 2; 260C.141, subdivision
2; 260C.171, subdivision 2; 260C.178, subdivision 1; 260C.205; 260C.212,
subdivisions 7, 8, by adding a subdivision; 260C.325, subdivisions 1, 3;
524.2-114; 626.556, subdivision 7; Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, sections
245C.14, subdivision 1; 245C.15, subdivisions 2, 3, 4; 245C.24, subdivision 3;
245C.27, subdivision 1; 259.41, subdivision 1; 259.57, subdivision 1; 259.67,
subdivision 4; 260C.163, subdivision 1; 260C.209, subdivisions 1, 2, by adding
a subdivision; 260C.212, subdivisions 1, 4; 626.556, subdivision 10a; proposing
coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 259; 260; proposing coding
for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 260D; repealing Minnesota Statutes
2006, sections 260.851; 260B.241; 260C.207; Minnesota Rules, part
9560.0092."
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Walker moved to amend S. F.
No. 3166, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, before line 24,
insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 13.46, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 12. Child care resource and
referral programs. This
subdivision applies to data collected by child care resource and referral
programs under section 119B.19. Data
collected under section 119B.19 is not licensing data under subdivision 4. Data on unlicensed family child care
providers is data on individuals governed by subdivision 2. In addition to the disclosures authorized by
this section, the names and addresses of unlicensed family child care providers
may be disclosed to the commissioner of education for purposes of promoting and
evaluating school readiness.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 13.46, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 13. Family, friend, and
neighbor grant program. This
subdivision applies to data collected by family, friend, and neighbor (FFN)
grantees under section 119B.232. Data
collected under section 119B.232 is data on individuals governed by subdivision
2. The commissioner may disclose
private data collected under this section to early childhood care and education
experts at the University of Minnesota to evaluate the impact of the grants
under subdivision 2 on children's school readiness and to evaluate the FFN
grant program. The commissioner may
disclose the names and addresses of FFN caregivers to the commissioner of
education for purposes of promoting and evaluating school readiness."
Page 6, line 34, delete
"and (c)" and insert ", (c) and (d)"
Page 52, line 33, delete
"1b" and insert "1, paragraph (b)"
Page 79, after line 21,
insert:
"Sec. 65. Laws 2007, chapter 147, article 2, section
56, is amended to read:
Sec. 56. COMMISSIONER
OF HUMAN SERVICES DUTIES; EARLY CHILDHOOD AND SCHOOL-AGE PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT TRAINING.
Subdivision 1. Development
and implementation of an early childhood and school-age professional
development system. (a) The
commissioner of human services, in cooperation with the commissioners of
education and health, shall develop and phase-in the implementation of a
professional development system for practitioners serving children in early
childhood and school-age programs. The
system shall provide training options and supports for practitioners to voluntarily
choose, as they complete or exceed existing licensing requirements.
The system must, at a
minimum, include the following features:
(1) a continuum of training
content based on the early childhood and school-age care practitioner core
competencies that translates knowledge into improved practice to support
children's school success;
(2) training strategies that
provide direct feedback about practice to practitioners through ongoing
consultation, mentoring, or coaching with special emphasis on early literacy
and early mathematics;
(3) an approval process for
trainers;
(4) a professional
development registry for early childhood and school-age care practitioners that
will provide tracking and recognition of practitioner training/career
development progress;
(5) a career lattice that includes
a range of professional development and educational opportunities that provide
appropriate coursework and degree pathways;
(6) development of a plan
with public higher education institutions for an articulated system of
education, training, and professional development that includes credit for
prior learning and development of equivalences to two- and four-year degrees;
(7) incentives and supports
for early childhood and school-age care practitioners to seek additional
training and education, including TEACH, other scholarships, and career
guidance; and
(8) coordinated and
accessible delivery of training to early childhood and school-age care
practitioners.
(b) By January 1, 2008, the
commissioner, in consultation with the organizations named in subdivision 2
shall develop additional opportunities in order to qualify more licensed family
child care providers under Minnesota Statutes, section 119B.13, subdivision 3a.
(c) The commissioner of
human services must evaluate the professional development system and make
continuous improvements.
(d) Beginning July 1, 2007,
as appropriations permit, the commissioner shall phase-in the professional
development system.
Subd. 2. Two-hour
early childhood training. By
January 15, 2008, the commissioner of human services, with input from the
Minnesota Licensed Family Child Care Association and the Minnesota Professional
Development Council, shall identify trainings that qualify for the two-hour
early childhood development training requirement for new child care
practitioners under Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.14, subdivision 9a,
paragraphs (a) and (b). For licensed
family child care, the commissioner shall also seek the input of labor unions
that serve licensed family child care providers, if the union has been
recognized by a county to serve licensed family child care providers.
Subd. 3. Data classification for
child care practitioner professional development system. This subdivision applies to data
collected under this section by the child care practitioner professional
development system. Data collected
under this section is welfare data under Minnesota Statutes, section 13.46 but
is not licensing data under Minnesota Statutes, section 13.46, subdivision
4. Data on individuals who are licensed
family child care providers is private data on individuals governed by
Minnesota Statutes, section 13.46, subdivision 2. The commissioner may disclose nonpublic data collected under this
section as described in Minnesota Statutes, section 13.46, subdivision 2. The commissioner also may disclose private
and nonpublic data collected under this section to the following entities:
(1) personnel of the welfare
system who require the data for child care licensing purposes;
(2) personnel of the welfare
system who require the data to administer or evaluate the child care assistance
program;
(3) the commissioner of
education for purposes of implementing, administering, and evaluating the child
care practitioner professional development system;
(4) the commissioner of
health for purposes of implementing and administering this section; and
(5) an individual's employer
for purposes of tracking and verifying employee training, education, and
expertise."
Page 80, line 2, delete
everything after the first comma and insert "parts 9560.0092; and
9560.0093, subpart 2, are repealed."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Erickson and Eastlund offered an amendment to
S. F. No. 3166, the third engrossment, as amended.
POINT
OF ORDER
Thissen raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the
Erickson and Eastlund amendment was not in order. The Speaker ruled the point of order well taken and the Erickson
and Eastlund amendment out of order.
Tingelstad moved to amend S.
F. No. 3166, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, after line 23,
insert:
"ARTICLE 1
CHILD WELFARE"
Page 80, after line 2,
insert:
"ARTICLE 2
ADOPTION RECORDS
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 13.465,
subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Adoption
records. Various adoption records
are classified under section 259.53, subdivision 1. Access to the original birth record of a person who has been
adopted is governed by section 259.89 144.2253.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 144.218,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Adoption. (a) Upon receipt of a certified copy
of an order, decree, or certificate of adoption, the state registrar shall
register a replacement vital record in the new name of the adopted person. Except as provided in paragraph (b),
the original record of birth is confidential pursuant to private data
on individuals as defined in section 13.02, subdivision 3 12,
and shall not be disclosed except pursuant to court order or section 144.2252
or 144.2253.
(b) The information contained on
the original birth record, except for the registration number, shall be
provided on request to: (1) a parent who is named on the original birth
record; or (2) the adopted person who is subject of the record if the person
is at least 19 years of age, unless there is an affidavit of nondisclosure on
file with the state registrar. Upon
the receipt of a certified copy of a court order of annulment of adoption the
state registrar shall restore the original vital record to its original place
in the file.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 144.225,
subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Data
about births. (a) Except as
otherwise provided in this subdivision, data pertaining to the birth of a child
to a woman who was not married to the child's father when the child was
conceived nor when the child was born, including the original record of birth
and the certified vital record, are confidential data. At the time of the birth of a child to a
woman who was not married to the child's father when the child was conceived
nor when the child was born, the mother may designate demographic data
pertaining to the birth as public.
Notwithstanding the designation of the data as confidential, it may be
disclosed:
(1) to a parent or guardian
of the child;
(2) to the child when the
child is 16 years of age or older;
(3) under paragraph (b) or
(e); or
(4) pursuant to a court order. For purposes of this section, a subpoena
does not constitute a court order.
(b) Unless the child is
adopted, data pertaining to the birth of a child that are not accessible to the
public become public data if 100 years have elapsed since the birth of the
child who is the subject of the data, or as provided under section 13.10,
whichever occurs first.
(c) If a child is adopted,
data pertaining to the child's birth are governed by the provisions relating to
adoption records, including sections 13.10, subdivision 5; 144.218, subdivision
1; 144.2252; 144.2253; and 259.89.
(d) The name and address of
a mother under paragraph (a) and the child's date of birth may be disclosed to
the county social services or public health member of a family services collaborative
for purposes of providing services under section 124D.23.
(e) The commissioner of
human services shall have access to birth records for:
(1) the purposes of
administering medical assistance, general assistance medical care, and the
MinnesotaCare program;
(2) child support
enforcement purposes; and
(3) other public health
purposes as determined by the commissioner of health.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 144.2252,
is amended to read:
144.2252 ACCESS TO ORIGINAL BIRTH RECORD AFTER ADOPTION.
(a) Whenever an adopted
person requests the state registrar to disclose the information on the adopted
person's original birth record, the state registrar shall act according to
section 259.89 144.2253.
(b) The state registrar
shall provide a transcript of an adopted person's original birth record to an
authorized representative of a federally recognized American Indian tribe for
the sole purpose of determining the adopted person's eligibility for enrollment
or membership. Information contained in
the birth record may not be used to provide the adopted person information
about the person's birth parents, except as provided in this section or section
259.83 144.2253.
Sec. 5. [144.2253]
ACCESS TO ORIGINAL BIRTH RECORDS BY ADOPTED PERSON; DEPARTMENT DUTIES.
Subdivision 1. Affidavits. The department shall prepare affidavit of
disclosure and nondisclosure forms under which a birth parent may agree to or
object to the release of the original birth record to the adopted person. The department shall make the forms readily
accessible to birth parents on the department's Web site.
Subd. 2. Disclosure. Upon request, the state registrar shall
provide a noncertified copy of the original birth record to an adopted person
age 19 or older unless there is an affidavit of nondisclosure on file. The state registrar must comply with the
terms of the affidavits of disclosure or affidavits of nondisclosure.
Subd. 3. Recission of affidavit. A birth parent may rescind an affidavit
of disclosure or an affidavit of nondisclosure at any time.
Subd. 4. Affidavit of
nondisclosure; access to birth record.
(a) An adopted person age 19 or older may petition the appropriate
court for disclosure of the original birth record pursuant to section 259.61,
and the court shall grant the petition, if, after consideration of the
interests of all known persons involved, the court determines that disclosure
of the information would be of greater benefit than nondisclosure.
(b) An adopted person age 19
or older may request the state registrar search the state death records to
determine if the birth parent is deceased.
The state registrar may impose a fee for the record search. If the birth parent is deceased, a
noncertified copy of the original birth record must be released only to the
adopted person making the request.
Subd. 5. Information provided. (a) The department shall, in consultation
with adoption agencies and adoption advocates, provide information and
educational materials to adopted persons and birth parents about the changes in
the law affecting accessibility to birth records. For purposes of this subdivision, an adoption advocate is a
nonprofit organization that works with adoption issues in Minnesota.
(b) The department shall
provide notice on the department Web site about the change in the law, and will
direct individuals to private agencies and advocates for post-adoption
resources.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 260C.317,
subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Rights
of terminated parent. Upon entry of
an order terminating the parental rights of any person who is identified as a
parent on the original birth record of the child as to whom the parental rights
are terminated, the court shall cause written notice to be made to that person
setting forth:
(1) the right of the person
to file at any time with the state registrar of vital statistics a consent to
disclosure, as defined in section 144.212, subdivision 11;
(2) the right of the person
to file at any time with the state registrar of vital statistics an affidavit
stating that the information on the original birth record shall not be
disclosed as provided in section 144.2252 144.2253; and
(3) the effect of a failure
to file either a consent to disclosure, as defined in section 144.212,
subdivision 11, or an affidavit stating that the information on the original
birth record shall not be disclosed.
Sec. 7. ADOPTION
AGENCIES; FEE.
Adoption agencies may charge
a fee for counseling and support services provided to adopted persons and birth
parents.
Sec. 8. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2006,
sections 259.83, subdivision 3; and 259.89, subdivisions 3 and 5, are repealed.
Sec. 9. EFFECTIVE
DATE.
This article is effective
July 1, 2009."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
POINT
OF ORDER
Buesgens raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the
Tingelstad amendment was not in order.
The Speaker ruled the point of order not well taken and the Tingelstad
amendment in order.
The question recurred on the Tingelstad amendment and the roll
was called. There were 91 yeas and 36
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Buesgens
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Holberg
Hoppe
Kohls
Lanning
Lillie
Loeffler
Masin
McFarlane
Nornes
Paymar
Peppin
Ruth
Seifert
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Solberg
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
The Speaker called Juhnke to the Chair.
Hilstrom and Mullery were excused for the remainder of today's
session.
S. F. No. 3166, A bill for an act relating to human services;
amending child welfare and licensing provisions; adopting a new Interstate
Compact for the Placement of Children and repealing the old compact; regulating
child and adult adoptions; regulating children in voluntary foster care for
treatment; providing targeted case management services to certain children with
developmental disabilities; providing for certain data classifications;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 13.46, by adding subdivisions;
245C.24, subdivision 2; 245C.29, subdivision 2; 256.045, subdivisions 3, 3b;
259.20, subdivision 1; 259.21, by adding a subdivision; 259.22, subdivision 2;
259.23, subdivision 2; 259.43; 259.52, subdivision 2; 259.53, subdivision 3;
259.59, subdivisions 1, 2; 259.67, subdivisions 2, 3, by adding a subdivision;
259.75, subdivision 5; 259.89, subdivisions 1, 2, 4, by adding a subdivision;
260C.001, subdivision 2; 260C.007, subdivisions 5, 6, 13; 260C.101, subdivision
2; 260C.141, subdivision 2; 260C.171, subdivision 2; 260C.178, subdivision 1;
260C.205; 260C.212, subdivisions 7, 8, by adding a subdivision; 260C.325,
subdivisions 1, 3; 524.2-114; 626.556, subdivision 7; Minnesota Statutes 2007
Supplement, sections 245C.14, subdivision 1; 245C.15, subdivisions 2, 3, 4;
245C.24, subdivision 3; 245C.27, subdivision 1; 259.41, subdivision 1; 259.57,
subdivision 1; 259.67, subdivision 4; 260C.163, subdivision 1; 260C.209,
subdivisions 1, 2, by adding a subdivision; 260C.212, subdivisions 1, 4;
626.556, subdivision 10a; Laws 2007, chapter 147, article 2, section 56;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 259; 260;
proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 260D; repealing
Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 260.851; 260C.141, subdivision 2a; 260C.431;
260C.435; Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, section 260C.212, subdivision 9;
Minnesota Rules, part 9560.0609.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 72 yeas and 55
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dominguez
Eken
Erhardt
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Beard
Benson
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kalin
Kohls
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Ruth
Scalze
Seifert
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
Sertich moved that the remaining bills on the Calendar for the
Day be continued. The motion prevailed.
There being no objection, the order of business reverted to
Reports of Standing Committees and Divisions.
REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES AND DIVISIONS
Sertich
from the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration to which was
referred:
H. F.
No. 2996, A bill for an act relating to public safety; allowing persons facing
civil commitment as sexually dangerous persons or sexual psychopathic
personalities to choose to be confined in correctional facilities while the
petition is being adjudicated; addressing the cost of care for persons facing
civil commitment; addressing access to certain data by county attorneys on
persons facing civil commitment; establishing a working group to review,
assess, and make recommendations regarding the modification and application of
controlled substance laws; providing for a report; amending Minnesota Statutes
2006, sections 13.851, by adding a subdivision; 253B.045, subdivisions 1, 2, by
adding a subdivision; 253B.185, subdivision 5; 609.115, by adding a
subdivision; Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, section 253B.185, subdivision
1b.
Reported
the same back with the recommendation that the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Sertich
from the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration to which was
referred:
S. F.
No. 3672, A bill for an act relating to relating to liquor; permitting farm
wineries to manufacturer and sell distilled spirits under certain conditions;
authorizing liquor licenses; making technical corrections; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2006, section 340A.315, by adding a subdivision; Minnesota Statutes
2007 Supplement, section 340A.412, subdivision 4.
Reported
the same back with the following amendments to the unofficial engrossment:
Page
1, after line 23, insert:
"Sec.
2. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
340A.315, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Sales. A license authorizes the sale, on the farm
winery premises, of table, sparkling, or fortified wines produced by that farm winery at on-sale or off-sale, in
retail, or wholesale lots in total quantities not in excess of 50,000 gallons
in a calendar year, glassware, wine literature and accessories, cheese and
cheese spreads, other wine-related food items, and the dispensing of free
samples of the wines offered for sale.
Sales at on-sale and off-sale may be made on Sundays between 12:00 noon
and 12:00 midnight. Labels for each
type or brand produced must be registered with the commissioner, without fee
prior to sale. Distilled spirits
manufactured pursuant to subdivision 7 may only be sold through a licensed
wholesaler. A farm winery may provide
samples of distilled spirits in the same manner as they are able for farm
wines.
Sec.
3. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
340A.315, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
7. Distilled
spirits permitted. Farm
wineries licensed under this section are permitted to manufacture distilled
spirits as defined under section 340A.101, subdivision 9, which may exceed 25
percent alcohol by volume, made from Minnesota produced or grown grapes, grape
juice, other fruit bases, or honey. The
following conditions pertain:
(1)
no farm winery or firm owning multiple farm wineries may manufacture more than
5,000 gallons of distilled spirits in a given year, and this 5,000 gallon limit
is part of the 50,000 gallon limit found in subdivision 2;
(2)
farm wineries must pay an additional annual fee of $500 to the commissioner
before beginning production of distilled spirits; and
(3)
farm wineries may not sell or produce distilled spirits for direct sale to
manufacturers licensed under section 340A.301, subdivision 6, paragraph (a).
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment."
Renumber
the sections in sequence
Amend
the title as follows:
Page
1, line 3, before "authorizing" insert "permitting farm wineries
to manufacture distilled spirits under certain conditions;"
Correct
the title numbers accordingly
With
the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
SECOND READING OF HOUSE BILLS
H. F. No. 2996 was read for the second time.
SECOND READING OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. No. 3672 was read for the second time.
MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE
The following messages were received from the Senate:
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following
House File, herewith returned:
H. F. No. 2896, A bill for an act relating to public buildings;
removing a requirement that a city hold a referendum before building,
equipping, or maintaining a memorial for war veterans; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
416.01.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate has concurred in and adopted
the report of the Conference Committee on:
H. F. No. 3220, A bill for an act relating to local government;
authorizing political subdivisions to make grants to nonprofit organizations;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 471.
The Senate has repassed said bill in accordance with the
recommendation and report of the Conference Committee. Said House File is herewith returned to the
House.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate has concurred in and adopted
the report of the Conference Committee on:
H. F. No. 3516, A bill for an act relating to real property;
providing specification of certain information about a premises subject to
foreclosure; providing for electronic recording; requiring a report; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 14.03, subdivision 3; 58.02, by adding a
subdivision; 287.08; 287.241; 287.25; 386.03; 386.19; 386.26, subdivision 1;
386.31; 386.409; 507.093; 507.40; 507.46, subdivision 1; Minnesota Statutes
2007 Supplement, section 507.24, subdivision 2; proposing coding for new law in
Minnesota Statutes, chapters 272; 507; 580.
The Senate has repassed said bill in accordance with the
recommendation and report of the Conference Committee. Said House File is herewith returned to the
House.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate has concurred in and adopted
the report of the Conference Committee on:
H. F. No. 1351, A bill for
an act relating to transportation; modifying or adding provisions related to
geotechnical investigations before eminent domain proceedings, the highway sign
franchise program, streets and highways, highway safety rest areas, highway
construction bids and training, town road abandonment, bridges, special mobile
equipment, motor vehicle titles, motor vehicle transfers, traffic regulations,
flammable liquid definition, drivers' licenses and identification cards, driver
records and education, the Real ID Act, traffic-control signals, transportation
goals and mission, statewide transportation plan, metropolitan transportation
system performance evaluations, transportation contracts, rail service
improvement, use of rail bank property, local airports, towing, vehicle
impoundments, transit and paratransit, special transportation, small vehicle
passenger service, transportation accessibility, transit ways and facilities,
light rail transit, vehicle license plates, vehicle size and weight
restrictions, vehicle load limits and permits, paper product vehicle routes and
permits, definition of full-size pickup truck, vehicle idle reduction
technology, commercial vehicles and drivers, vehicle registration, insurance
requirements for vehicles owned by charitable organizations, the Unified
Carrier Registration Agreement, household goods movers, obsolete motor carrier
laws and conforming changes, railroad company requirements, the position of
state rail safety inspector, and the Railroad Walkways Safety Act; requiring
studies and reports; imposing penalties; making clarifying and technical
changes; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections
117.041, by adding a subdivision; 160.02, subdivision 19, by adding a
subdivision; 160.80; 161.14, subdivision 18, by adding subdivisions; 161.32,
subdivisions 1, 1b, 4; 164.06, subdivision 2; 165.01; 165.03; 168.011,
subdivision 22; 168.013, subdivision 1e; 168.10, subdivisions 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d,
1g, 1h, 1i; 168.12, subdivisions 1, 2, 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 2e; 168A.01, by adding a
subdivision; 168A.05, subdivisions 3, 5; 168A.10, subdivision 1; 168A.101;
168A.151, subdivision 1; 168A.153; 168B.04, subdivision 2; 168B.051,
subdivision 2; 168B.06, subdivisions 1, 3; 168B.07, by adding subdivisions;
168B.087, subdivision 1, by adding a subdivision; 169.01, subdivisions 4c, 19,
20, 78, by adding subdivisions; 169.041, subdivisions 1, 2; 169.06, subdivision
5; 169.14, subdivision 2, by adding subdivisions; 169.34; 169.471, subdivision
1; 169.781; 169.782, subdivision 1; 169.783, subdivision 1; 169.81,
subdivisions 2, 3c; 169.823, subdivision 1; 169.824, subdivision 2; 169.8261;
169.86, subdivision 5, by adding a subdivision; 169.862; 169.864, subdivisions
1, 2; 169.87, subdivision 4; 171.01, by adding a subdivision; 171.02,
subdivision 1; 171.06, subdivision 3; 171.07, subdivisions 1, 3; 171.12,
subdivision 6; 171.14; 174.01, subdivision 2; 174.02, subdivision 1a; 174.03,
subdivision 1, by adding subdivisions; 174.24, subdivision 2a; 174.255, by
adding a subdivision; 174.29, by adding subdivisions; 174.30, subdivisions 4,
9; 174.64, subdivisions 2, 4; 174.66; 218.021, subdivision 1; 218.041,
subdivision 6; 221.011, subdivision 8, by adding a subdivision; 221.025;
221.026; 221.031, subdivisions 1, 6; 221.0314, subdivision 9, by adding a
subdivision; 221.033, subdivision 2d; 221.036, subdivisions 1, 3; 221.037,
subdivision 1; 221.091, subdivision 2; 221.131; 221.132; 221.141, subdivisions
1, 4; 221.185; 221.221, subdivision 3; 221.231; 221.291, subdivision 4; 221.60,
subdivision 1, by adding a subdivision; 222.50, subdivision 7; 222.63,
subdivision 4, by adding a subdivision; 299F.60, subdivision 1; 299J.16,
subdivision 1; 325F.665, by adding a subdivision; 473.1466; 473.166; 473.386,
subdivisions 1, 2, 2a, 3; 473.399; 473.3993, subdivisions 1, 3, by adding a
subdivision; 473.3994; 473.3997; 473.4051; 473.408, by adding subdivisions;
Laws 2005, First Special Session chapter 1, article 4, section 39; proposing
coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 160; 161; 169; 174; 219;
221; 473; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 168A.05, subdivision 5a;
174.65; 221.011, subdivisions 24, 25, 28, 29, 38, 41, 44, 45; 221.0252,
subdivision 7; 221.072; 221.111; 221.121, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 6a,
6c, 6d, 6e, 6f, 7; 221.122; 221.123; 221.131, subdivisions 2a, 3; 221.141,
subdivision 6; 221.151; 221.152; 221.153, subdivisions 1, 2; 221.161; 221.171;
221.172, subdivisions 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; 221.296, subdivisions 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8;
221.60, subdivisions 2, 3, 3a, 4, 5, 6; 221.601; 221.602; 325E.0951,
subdivision 3a; 473.1465; 473.247; 473.3994, subdivision 13; Laws 1999, chapter
230, section 44.
The Senate has repassed said bill in accordance with the
recommendation and report of the Conference Committee. Said House File is herewith returned to the
House.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate has concurred in and adopted
the report of the Conference Committee on:
S. F. No. 1298.
The Senate has repassed said bill in accordance with the
recommendation and report of the Conference Committee. Said Senate File is herewith transmitted to
the House.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
CONFERENCE
COMMITTEE REPORT ON S. F. NO. 1298
A bill for an act relating to elections; changing certain voter
registration procedures and requirements, filing requirements, voting
procedures, election day prohibitions, and ballot preparation requirements;
establishing a complaint and resolution process; requiring challengers to prove
residence in this state; requiring certain notices; changing a petition
requirement; imposing penalties; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections
201.016, subdivision 1a; 201.056; 201.061, subdivisions 1, 3, by adding a
subdivision; 201.071, subdivision 1; 201.171; 203B.07, subdivision 2; 203B.081;
203B.12, subdivision 4; 203B.13, subdivisions 1, 2; 204B.09, subdivisions 1,
1a, 3; 204B.11, subdivision 2; 204B.16, subdivision 1; 204B.45, subdivisions 1,
2; 204C.06, subdivisions 1, 8; 204C.07, subdivision 3a, by adding a
subdivision; 204D.09, subdivision 2; 204D.16; 205.10, by adding a subdivision;
205.13, by adding a subdivision; 205.16, subdivisions 2, 3, 4; 205A.05, by
adding a subdivision; 205A.07, subdivisions 3, 3a; 206.57, subdivision 5;
206.89, subdivisions 1, 5; 211A.02, subdivision 2; 211A.05, subdivision 1; 211B.11,
subdivision 1; 410.12, subdivision 1; 447.32, subdivision 4; proposing coding
for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 204B; repealing Minnesota Statutes
2006, sections 200.04; 201.061, subdivision 7; 201.096; 203B.02, subdivision
1a; 203B.13, subdivision 3a.
April
15, 2008
The Honorable James P.
Metzen
President of the Senate
The Honorable Margaret
Anderson Kelliher
Speaker of the House of
Representatives
We, the undersigned conferees for S. F. No. 1298 report that we
have agreed upon the items in dispute and recommend as follows:
That the Senate concur in the House amendments and that S. F.
No. 1298 be further amended as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"ARTICLE
1
ELECTIONS
AND VOTING
Section
1. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
135A.17, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Residential
housing list. All postsecondary
institutions that enroll students accepting state or federal financial aid may
prepare a current list of students enrolled in the institution and residing in
the institution's housing or within ten miles of the institution's campus. The list shall include each student's
current address. The list shall be
certified
and sent to the appropriate county auditor or auditors for use in election day
registration as provided under section 201.061, subdivision 3. A residential housing list provided under
this subdivision may not be used or disseminated by a county auditor or the
secretary of state for any other purpose.
Sec.
2. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
201.054, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
3. Prohibited
methods of compensation; penalty.
(a) No individual may be compensated for the solicitation,
collection, or acceptance of voter registration applications from voters for
submission to the secretary of state, a county auditor, or other local election
official in a manner in which payment is calculated by multiplying
(1) either a set or variable payment rate, by (2) the number of voter
registration applications solicited, collected, or accepted.
(b)
No individual may be deprived of compensation or have compensation
automatically reduced exclusively for failure to solicit, collect, or accept a
minimum number of voter registration applications, and no individual may receive
additional compensation for reaching or exceeding a minimum number of voter
registration applications.
(c)
A person who violates this subdivision is guilty of a petty misdemeanor.
Sec.
3. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
201.056, is amended to read:
201.056 SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED VOTER; MARKS
ALLOWED.
An
individual who is unable to write the individual's name shall be required to
sign a registration card by making the individual's mark application
in the manner provided by section 645.44, subdivision 14. If the individual registers in person and
signs by making a mark, the clerk or election judge accepting the
registration shall certify the mark by signing the individual's name. If the individual registers by mail and
signs by making a mark, the mark shall be certified by having a voter
registered in the individual's precinct sign the individual's name and the
voter's own name and give the voter's own address.
Sec.
4. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
201.061, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Election
day registration. (a) An individual
who is eligible to vote may register on election day by appearing in person at
the polling place for the precinct in which the individual maintains residence,
by completing a registration application, making an oath in the form prescribed
by the secretary of state and providing proof of residence. An individual may prove residence for
purposes of registering by:
(1)
presenting a driver's license or Minnesota identification card issued pursuant to
section 171.07;
(2)
presenting any document approved by the secretary of state as proper
identification;
(3)
presenting one of the following:
(i) a
current valid student identification card from a postsecondary educational
institution in Minnesota, if a list of students from that institution has been
prepared under section 135A.17 and certified to the county auditor in the
manner provided in rules of the secretary of state; or
(ii) a
current student fee statement that contains the student's valid address in the
precinct together with a picture identification card; or
(4)
having a voter who is registered to vote in the precinct, or who is an employee
employed by and working in a residential facility in the precinct and vouching
for a resident in the facility, sign an oath in the presence of the election
judge vouching that the voter or employee personally knows that the individual
is a resident of the precinct. A voter
who has been vouched for on election day may not sign a proof of residence oath
vouching for any other individual on that election day. A voter who is registered to vote in the
precinct may sign up to 15 proof-of-residence oaths on any election day. This limitation does not apply to an
employee of a residential facility described in this clause. The secretary of state shall provide a form
for election judges to use in recording the number of individuals for whom a
voter signs proof-of-residence oaths on election day. The form must include space for the maximum number of individuals
for whom a voter may sign proof-of-residence oaths. For each proof-of-residence oath, the form must include a
statement that the voter is registered to vote in the precinct, personally
knows that the individual is a resident of the precinct, and is making the
statement on oath. The form must
include a space for the voter's printed name, signature, telephone number, and
address.
The
oath required by this subdivision and Minnesota Rules, part 8200.9939, must be
attached to the voter registration application and the information on the
oath must be recorded on the records of both the voter registering on election
day and the voter who is vouching for the person's residence, and entered into
the statewide voter registration system by the county auditor when the voter
registration application is entered into that system.
(b)
The operator of a residential facility shall prepare a list of the names of its
employees currently working in the residential facility and the address of the
residential facility. The operator
shall certify the list and provide it to the appropriate county auditor no less
than 20 days before each election for use in election day registration.
(c)
"Residential facility" means transitional housing as defined in
section 256E.33, subdivision 1; a supervised living facility licensed by the
commissioner of health under section 144.50, subdivision 6; a nursing home as
defined in section 144A.01, subdivision 5; a residence registered with the
commissioner of health as a housing with services establishment as defined in
section 144D.01, subdivision 4; a veterans home operated by the board of
directors of the Minnesota Veterans Homes under chapter 198; a residence
licensed by the commissioner of human services to provide a residential program
as defined in section 245A.02, subdivision 14; a residential facility for
persons with a developmental disability licensed by the commissioner of human
services under section 252.28; group residential housing as defined in section
256I.03, subdivision 3; a shelter for battered women as defined in section
611A.37, subdivision 4; or a supervised publicly or privately operated shelter
or dwelling designed to provide temporary living accommodations for the
homeless.
(d)
For tribal band members, an individual may prove residence for purposes of
registering by:
(1)
presenting an identification card issued by the tribal government of a tribe
recognized by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, United States Department of the
Interior, that contains the name, address, signature, and picture of the
individual; or
(2)
presenting an identification card issued by the tribal government of a tribe
recognized by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, United States Department of the
Interior, that contains the name, signature, and picture of the individual and
also presenting one of the documents listed in Minnesota Rules, part 8200.5100,
subpart 2, item B.
(e) A
county, school district, or municipality may require that an election judge
responsible for election day registration initial each completed registration
application.
Sec.
5. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
201.171, is amended to read:
201.171 POSTING VOTING HISTORY; FAILURE TO
VOTE; REGISTRATION REMOVED.
Within
six weeks after every election, the county auditor shall post the voting history
for every person who voted in the election.
After the close of the calendar year, the secretary of state shall
determine if any registrants have not voted during the preceding four years. The secretary of state shall perform list
maintenance by changing the status of those registrants to "inactive"
in the statewide registration system.
The list maintenance performed must be conducted in a manner that
ensures that the name of each registered voter appears in the official list of
eligible voters in the statewide registration system. A voter must not be removed from the official list of eligible
voters unless the voter is not eligible or is not registered to vote. List maintenance must include procedures for
eliminating duplicate names from the official list of eligible voters.
The
secretary of state shall also prepare a report to the county auditor containing
the names of all registrants whose status was changed to "inactive."
Registrants
whose status was changed to "inactive" must register in the manner
specified in section 201.054 before voting in any primary, special primary,
general, school district, or special election, as required by section 201.018.
Although
not counted in an election, a late or rejected absentee or mail
ballot must be considered a vote for the purpose of continuing registration.
Sec.
6. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
203B.07, is amended to read:
203B.07 RETURN AND BALLOT ENVELOPES;
DIRECTIONS TO VOTERS.
Subdivision
1. Delivery
of envelopes, directions. The
county auditor or the municipal clerk shall prepare, print, and transmit a
return envelope, a ballot envelope, and a copy of the directions for casting an
absentee ballot to each applicant whose application for absentee ballots is
accepted pursuant to section 203B.04. The
county auditor or municipal clerk shall provide first class postage for the
return envelope. The directions for
casting an absentee ballot shall be printed in at least 14-point bold type with
heavy leading and may be printed on the ballot envelope. When a person requests the directions in
Braille or on cassette tape, the county auditor or municipal clerk shall
provide them in the form requested. The
secretary of state shall prepare Braille and cassette copies and make them
available.
When a
voter registration card is sent to the applicant as provided in section
203B.06, subdivision 4, the directions or registration card shall include
instructions for registering to vote.
Subd.
2. Design
of envelopes. The return envelope
shall be of sufficient size to conveniently enclose and contain the ballot
envelope and a folded voter registration card folded along its
perforations application.
The return envelope shall be designed to open on the left-hand end. Notwithstanding any rule to the contrary,
If the voter was not previously registered, the return envelope must be
designed in one of the following ways:
(1) it
must be of sufficient size to contain an additional envelope that when sealed,
conceals the signature, identification, and other information; or
(2) it
must provide an additional flap that when sealed, conceals the signature,
identification, and other information.
Election
officials may open the flap or the additional envelope at any time after
receiving the returned ballot to inspect the returned certificate for
completeness or to ascertain other information.
Subd.
3. Eligibility
certificate. A certificate of
eligibility to vote by absentee ballot shall be printed on the back of the
return envelope. The certificate
shall contain a statement to be signed and sworn by the voter indicating that
the voter meets all of the requirements established by law for voting by
absentee ballot. The certificate shall
also contain a statement signed by a person who is registered to vote in
Minnesota or by a notary public or other individual authorized to administer
oaths stating that:
(a) (1) the ballots were displayed
to that individual unmarked;
(b) (2) the voter marked the
ballots in that individual's presence without showing how they were marked, or,
if the voter was physically unable to mark them, that the voter directed
another individual to mark them; and
(c)
(3) if the voter was not
previously registered, the voter has provided proof of residence as required by
section 201.061, subdivision 3.
The
county auditor or municipal clerk shall affix first class postage to the return
envelopes.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for elections held after June 1,
2008.
Sec.
7. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
203B.081, is amended to read:
203B.081 LOCATIONS FOR ABSENTEE VOTING IN
PERSON.
An
eligible voter may vote by absentee ballot during the 30 days before the
election in the office of the county auditor and at any other polling place
designated by the county auditor. The
county auditor shall make such designations at least 90 days before the
election. At least one voting booth in
each polling place must be made available by the county auditor for this
purpose. The county auditor must
also make available at least one electronic ballot marker in each polling place
that has implemented a voting system that is accessible for individuals with
disabilities pursuant to section 206.57, subdivision 5.
Sec.
8. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
203B.13, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Establishment. The governing body of any county that has
established a counting center as provided in section 206.85, subdivision 2,
any municipality, or any school district may by ordinance or resolution,
authorize an absentee ballot board. The
board shall consist of a sufficient number of election judges appointed as
provided in sections 204B.19 to 204B.22.
Sec.
9. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
203B.13, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Duties. The absentee ballot board may do any of
the following:
(a)
receive from each precinct in the municipality or school district all ballot
envelopes marked "Accepted" by the election judges; provided that the
governing body of a municipality or the school board of a school district may
authorize the board to examine all return absentee ballot envelopes and receive
accept or reject absentee ballots in the manner provided in section 203B.12;.
(b)
open and count the absentee ballots, tabulating the vote in a manner that
indicates each vote of the absentee voter and the total absentee vote cast for
each candidate or question in each precinct; or
(c)
report the vote totals tabulated for each precinct.
The
absentee ballot board may begin the process of examining the return envelopes
and marking them "accepted" or "rejected" at any time
during the 30 days before the election.
If an envelope has been rejected at least five days before the election,
the ballots in the envelope must be considered spoiled ballots and the official
in charge of the absentee ballot board shall provide the voter with a
replacement absentee ballot and return envelope in place of the spoiled
ballot. The secretary of state shall
provide samples of the replacement ballot and return envelope for use by the
county auditor.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for elections held after June 1,
2008.
Sec.
10. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
204B.09, is amended to read:
204B.09 TIME AND PLACE OF FILING AFFIDAVITS
AND PETITIONS.
Subdivision
1. Candidates
in state and county general elections.
(a) Except as otherwise provided by this subdivision, affidavits of
candidacy and nominating petitions for county, state, and federal offices
filled at the state general election shall be filed not more than 70 days nor
less than 56 days before the state primary.
The affidavit may be prepared and signed at any time between 60 days
before the filing period opens and the last day of the filing period.
(b)
Notwithstanding other law to the contrary, the affidavit of candidacy must be
signed in the presence of a notarial officer or an individual authorized to
administer oaths under section 358.10.
(c)
This provision does not apply to candidates for presidential elector nominated
by major political parties. Major party
candidates for presidential elector are certified under section 208.03. Other candidates for presidential electors
may file petitions on or before the state primary day pursuant to section
204B.07. Nominating petitions to fill
vacancies in nominations shall be filed as provided in section 204B.13. No affidavit or petition shall be accepted
later than 5:00 p.m. on the last day for filing.
(d)
Affidavits and petitions for county offices to be voted on in only
one county shall must be filed with the county auditor of that
county. Affidavits and petitions for
federal offices to be voted on in more than one county shall must
be filed with the secretary of state. Affidavits
and petitions for state offices must be filed with the secretary of state or
with the county auditor of the county in which the candidate resides.
(e)
Affidavits other than those filed pursuant to subdivision 1a must be submitted
by mail or by hand, notwithstanding chapter 325L, or any other law to the
contrary and must be received by 5:00 p.m. on the last day for filing.
Subd.
1a. Absent candidates. (a) A
candidate for special district, county, state, or federal office who will be
absent from the state during the filing period may submit a properly executed
affidavit of candidacy, the appropriate filing fee, and any necessary petitions
in person to the filing officer. The
candidate shall state in writing the reason for being unable to submit the
affidavit during the filing period. The
affidavit, filing fee, if any, and petitions must be submitted to the
filing officer during the seven days immediately preceding the candidate's
absence from the state. Nominating
petitions may be signed during the 14 days immediately preceding the date when
the affidavit of candidacy is filed.
(b)
A candidate for special district, county, state, or federal office who will be
absent from the state during the entire filing period or who must leave the
state for the remainder of the filing period and who certifies to the secretary
of state that the circumstances constitute an emergency and were unforeseen,
may submit a properly executed affidavit of candidacy by facsimile device or by
transmitting electronically a scanned image of the affidavit to the secretary
of state during the filing period. The
candidate shall state in writing the specific reason for being unable to submit
the affidavit by mail or by hand during the filing period or in person prior to
the start of the filing period. The
affidavit of candidacy, filing fee, if any, and any necessary petitions must be
received by the secretary of state by 5:00 p.m. on the last day for
filing. If the candidate is filing for
a special district or county office, the secretary of state shall forward the
affidavit of candidacy, filing fee, if any, and any necessary petitions to the
appropriate filing officer.
Subd.
2. Other
elections. Affidavits of candidacy
and nominating petitions for city, town or other elective offices shall be
filed during the time and with the official specified in chapter 205 or other
applicable law or charter, except as provided for a special district candidate
under subdivision 1a. Affidavits of
candidacy and applications filed on behalf of eligible voters for school board
office shall be filed during the time and with the official specified in
chapter 205A or other applicable law. Affidavits
of candidacy and nominating petitions filed under this subdivision must be
submitted by mail or by hand, notwithstanding chapter 325L, or any other law to
the contrary, and must be received by the appropriate official within the
specified time for the filing of affidavits and petitions for the office.
Subd.
3. Write-in
candidates. (a) A candidate for
county, state, or federal office who wants write-in votes for the
candidate to be counted must file a written request with the filing office for
the office sought no later than the fifth seventh day before the
general election. The filing officer
shall provide copies of the form to make the request.
(b) A
candidate for president of the United States who files a request under this
subdivision must include the name of a candidate for vice-president of the
United States. The request must also
include the name of at least one candidate for presidential elector. The total number of names of candidates for
presidential elector on the request may not exceed the total number of
electoral votes to be cast by Minnesota in the presidential election.
(c) A
candidate for governor who files a request under this subdivision must include
the name of a candidate for lieutenant governor.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for elections held after June 1,
2008.
Sec.
11. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
204B.16, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Authority;
location. The governing body of each
municipality and of each county with precincts in unorganized territory shall
designate by ordinance or resolution a polling place for each election
precinct. Polling places must be
designated and ballots must be distributed so that no one is required to go to
more than one polling place to vote in a school district and municipal election
held on the same day. The polling place
for a precinct in a city or in a school district located in whole or in part in
the metropolitan area defined by section 200.02, subdivision 24, shall be
located within the boundaries of the precinct or within 3,000 feet
one mile of one of those boundaries unless a single polling place is
designated for a city pursuant to section 204B.14, subdivision 2, or a school
district pursuant to section 205A.11.
The polling place for a precinct in unorganized territory may be located
outside the precinct at a place which is convenient to the voters of the
precinct. If no suitable place is
available within a town or within a school district located outside the
metropolitan area defined by section 200.02, subdivision 24, then the polling
place for a town or school district may be located outside the town or school
district within five miles of one of the boundaries of the town or school district.
Sec.
12. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
204B.45, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Procedure. Notice of the election and the special mail
procedure must be given at least six weeks prior to the election. No earlier Not more than 20
30 days or nor later than 14 days prior to the election, the
auditor shall mail ballots by nonforwardable mail to all voters registered in
the town or unorganized territory. No
later than 14 days before the election, the auditor must make a subsequent mailing
of ballots to those voters who register to vote after the initial mailing but
before the 20th day before the election.
Eligible voters not registered at the time the ballots are mailed
may apply for ballots as provided in chapter 203B. Ballot return envelopes, with return postage provided, must be
preaddressed to the auditor or clerk and the voter may return the ballot by
mail or in person to the office of the auditor or clerk. The auditor or clerk may appoint election
judges to examine the return envelopes and mark them "accepted" or
"rejected" during the 30 days before the election. If an envelope has been rejected at least
five days before the election, the ballots in the envelope must be considered
spoiled ballots and the auditor or clerk shall provide the voter with a
replacement ballot and return envelope in place of the spoiled ballot. The costs of the mailing shall be paid
by the election jurisdiction in which the voter resides. Any ballot received by 8:00 p.m. on the day
of the election must be counted.
Sec.
13. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
204C.06, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Lingering
near polling place. An individual
shall be allowed to go to and from the polling place for the purpose of voting
without unlawful interference. No one
except an election official or an individual who is waiting to register or to
vote shall stand within 100 feet of the entrance to a polling place. The entrance to a polling place is the
doorway or point of entry leading into the room or area where voting is
occurring building in which a polling place is located.
Sec.
14. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
204C.07, subdivision 3a, is amended to read:
Subd.
3a. Residence requirement. A
challenger must be a resident of this state. Appointed challengers seeking admission to a polling place to
serve in that capacity must prove their status as a resident of this state by
presenting one of the documents listed in section 201.061, subdivision 3. Challengers need not prove residence in the
precinct in which they seek to act as a challenger.
Sec.
15. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
205.10, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
6. Cancellation. A special election ordered by the
governing body of the municipality on its own motion under subdivision 1 may be
cancelled by motion of the governing body, but not less than 46 days before the
election.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for elections held after June 1,
2008.
Sec.
16. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
205.16, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd.
4. Notice
to auditor. At least 53 days prior
to every municipal election, the municipal clerk shall provide a written notice
to the county auditor, including the date of the election, the offices to be
voted on at the election, and the title and language for each ballot question
to be voted on at the election. Not
less than 46 days before the election, the municipal clerk must provide written
notice to the county auditor of any special election canceled under section
205.10, subdivision 6.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for elections held after June 1,
2008.
Sec.
17. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
205A.05, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
3. Cancellation. A special election ordered by the school
board on its own motion under subdivision 1 may be canceled by motion of the
school board, but not less than 46 days before the election.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for elections held after June 1,
2008.
Sec.
18. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
205A.07, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Notice
to auditor. At least 53 days prior
to every school district election, the school district clerk shall provide a
written notice to the county auditor of each county in which the school
district is located. The notice must
include the date of the election, the offices to be voted on at the election,
and the title and language for each ballot question to be voted on at the election. For the purposes of meeting the timelines of
this section, in a bond election, a notice, including a proposed question, may
be provided to the county auditor prior to receipt of a review and comment from
the commissioner of education and prior to actual initiation of the election. Not less than 46 days before the
election, the school district clerk must provide written notice to the county
auditor of any special election canceled under section 205A.05, subdivision 3.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for elections held after June 1,
2008.
Sec.
19. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
205A.07, subdivision 3a, is amended to read:
Subd.
3a. Notice to commissioner of education. At least 49 days prior to every school district election, under
section 123B.62, 123B.63, 126C.17, 126C.69, or 475.58, the school district
clerk shall provide a written notice to the commissioner of education. The notice must include the date of the
election and the title and language for each ballot question to be voted on at
the election. Not less than 46 days
before the election, the school district clerk must provide a written notice to
the commissioner of education of any special election canceled under section
205A.05, subdivision 3. The
certified vote totals for each ballot question shall be provided in a written
notice to the commissioner in a timely manner.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for elections held after June 1,
2008.
Sec.
20. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
206.89, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Definition. For purposes of this section
"postelection review official" means the election administration
official who is responsible for the conduct of elections in a precinct selected
for review under this section county auditor, unless the county auditor
designates the municipal clerk as the "postelection review official"
within 24 hours after the canvass of the state general election.
Sec.
21. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
206.89, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd.
5. Additional
review. (a) If the postelection
review in one of the reviewed precincts reveals a difference greater
than one-half of one percent, or greater than two votes in a precinct where
400 or fewer voters cast ballots, the postelection review official must,
within two days, conduct an additional review of the races indicated in
subdivision 3 in at least three precincts in the same jurisdiction where
the discrepancy was discovered. If all
precincts in that jurisdiction have been reviewed, the county auditor must
immediately publicly select by lot at least three additional precincts for
review. The postelection review
official must complete the additional review within two days after the
precincts are selected and report the results immediately to the county
auditor. If the second review in any
of the reviewed precincts also indicates a difference in the vote totals
compiled by the voting system that is greater than one-half of one percent from
the result indicated by the postelection review, or greater than two votes
in a precinct where 400 or fewer voters cast ballots, the county auditor
must conduct a review of the ballots from all the remaining precincts in the
county for the races indicated in subdivision 3. This review must be completed no later than
six weeks after the state general election.
(b) If
the results from the countywide reviews from one or more counties comprising in
the aggregate more than ten percent of the total number of persons voting in
the election clearly indicate that an error in vote counting has occurred, the
postelection review official must conduct a manual recount of all the ballots
in the district for the affected office.
The recount must be completed and the results reported to the
appropriate canvassing board no later than ten weeks after the state general
election.
Sec.
22. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
211A.02, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Information
required. The report to be filed by
a candidate or committee must include:
(1)
the name of the candidate or ballot question;
(2)
the printed name and, address, telephone number,
signature, and e-mail address, if available, of the person responsible for
filing the report;
(3)
the total amount of receipts and expenditures for the period from the last
previous report to five days before the current report is due;
(4)
the amount, date, and purpose for each expenditure; and
(5)
the name, address, and employer, or occupation if self-employed, of any
individual or committee that during the year has made one or more contributions
that in the aggregate are equal to or greater than exceed $100,
and the amount and date of each contribution.
The filing officer must restrict public access to the address of any
individual who has made a contribution that exceeds $100 and who has filed with
the filing officer a written statement signed by the individual that
withholding the individual's address from the financial report is required for
the safety of the individual or the individual's family.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment,
and applies to contributions made after December 31, 2007. However, if a candidate or committee has
filed a report before the effective date of this section that includes
contributions made after December 31, 2007, the candidate or committee does not
need to amend or refile that report.
Sec.
23. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
211A.05, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Penalty. A candidate who intentionally fails to file
a report required by section 211A.02 or a certification required by this
section is guilty of a misdemeanor.
The treasurer of a committee formed to promote or defeat a ballot
question who intentionally fails to file a report required by section 211A.02 or
a certification required by this section is guilty of a misdemeanor. Each candidate or treasurer of a committee
formed to promote or defeat a ballot question shall certify to the filing
officer that all reports required by section 211A.02 have been submitted to the
filing officer or that the candidate or committee has not received
contributions or made disbursements exceeding $750 in the calendar year. The certification shall be submitted to the
filing officer no later than seven days after the general or special
election. The secretary of state shall
prepare blanks for this certification.
An officer who issues a certificate of election to a candidate who has
not certified that all reports required by section 211A.02 have been filed is
guilty of a misdemeanor.
Sec.
24. REPEALER.
Minnesota
Statutes 2006, sections 203B.02, subdivision 1a; and 203B.13, subdivision 3a,
are repealed.
Sec.
25. EFFECTIVE DATE.
Unless
otherwise noted, all sections in this article are effective on June 1, 2008.
ARTICLE
2
TECHNICAL
MODIFICATIONS
Section
1. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
103C.305, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Ballots. Ballots shall be prepared by the county
auditor. The names of candidates shall
be placed on the "canary ballot" described in section 204D.11, subdivision
3. The office title printed on the
ballot must be either "Soil and Water Conservation District
Supervisor" or "Conservation District Supervisor," based upon
the district from which the supervisor is to be elected.
Sec.
2. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
201.054, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Registration. An individual may register to vote:
(1) at
any time before the 20th day preceding any election as provided in section
201.061, subdivision 1;
(2) on
the day of an election as provided in section 201.061, subdivision 3; or
(3)
when submitting an absentee ballot, by enclosing a completed registration card
application as provided in section 203B.04, subdivision 4.
Sec.
3. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
201.061, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd.
4. Registration
by election judges; procedures.
Registration at the polling place on election day shall be conducted by
the election judges. The election judge
who registers an individual at the polling place on election day shall not
handle that voter's ballots at any time prior to the opening of the ballot box
after the voting ends. Registration cards
applications and forms for oaths shall be available at each polling
place. If an individual who registers
on election day proves residence by oath of a registered voter, the form
containing the oath shall be attached to the individual's registration card
application. Registration cards
applications completed on election day shall be forwarded to the county
auditor who shall add the name of each voter to the registration system unless
the information forwarded is substantially deficient. A county auditor who finds an election day registration
substantially deficient shall give written notice to the individual whose registration
is found deficient. An election day
registration shall not be found deficient solely because the individual who
provided proof of residence was ineligible to do so.
Sec.
4. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
201.071, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Deficient
registration. No voter registration
application is deficient if it contains the voter's name, address, date of
birth, current and valid Minnesota driver's license number or Minnesota state
identification number, or if the voter has no current and valid Minnesota
driver's license or Minnesota state identification number, the last four digits
of the voter's Social Security number, if the voter has been issued a Social
Security number, prior registration, if any, and signature. The absence of a zip code number does not
cause the registration to be deficient.
Failure to check a box on an application form that a voter has certified
to be true does not cause the registration to be deficient. The election judges shall request an individual
to correct a voter registration application if it is deficient or illegible or
if the name or number of the voter's school district is missing or obviously
incorrect. No eligible voter may be
prevented from voting unless the voter's registration application is deficient
or the voter is duly and successfully challenged in accordance with section
201.195 or 204C.12.
A
voter registration application accepted prior to August 1, 1983, is not
deficient for lack of date of birth.
The county or municipality may attempt to obtain the date of birth for a
voter registration application accepted prior to August 1, 1983, by a request
to the voter at any time except at the polling place. Failure by the voter to comply with this request does not make
the registration deficient.
A
voter registration application accepted before January 1, 2004, is not
deficient for lack of a valid Minnesota driver's license or state
identification number or the last four digits of a Social Security number. A voter registration application submitted
by a voter who does not have a Minnesota driver's license or state
identification number, or a Social Security number, is not deficient for lack
of any of these numbers.
Sec.
5. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
201.071, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd.
4. Change
of registration. Any A county
auditor who receives a registration card application indicating
that an individual was previously registered in a different county in Minnesota
shall notify the county auditor of that county update the voter's
record electronically through the statewide registration system in the
manner prescribed in the rules of by the secretary of state. A county auditor receiving a registration
card indicating that a voter was previously registered in a different precinct
in the same county or receiving a notification as provided in this subdivision
shall remove that individual's voter registration card from the files. Any A county auditor who receives
a registration card application or notification requiring a
change of registration records under this subdivision as a result of an
election day registration shall also check the statewide registration system to
determine whether the individual voted in more than one precinct in the most
recent election.
Sec.
6. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
201.081, is amended to read:
201.081 REGISTRATION FILES.
The
statewide registration system is the official record of registered voters. The voter registration cards applications
and the terminal providing access to the statewide registration system must
be under the control of the county auditor or the public official to whom the
county auditor has delegated the responsibility for maintaining voter
registration records. The voter
registration cards applications and terminals providing access to
the statewide registration system must not be removed from the control of the
county auditor except as provided in this subdivision. The county auditor may make photographic
copies of voter registration cards applications in the manner
provided by section 138.17.
A
properly completed voter registration card application that has
been submitted to the secretary of state or a county auditor must be maintained
by the secretary of state or the county auditor for at least 22 months after
the date that the information on the card application is entered
into the database of the statewide registration system. The secretary of state or the county auditor
may dispose of the cards applications after retention for 22
months in the manner provided by section 138.17.
Sec.
7. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
201.091, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Master
list. Each county auditor shall
prepare and maintain a current list of registered voters in each precinct in
the county which is known as the master list.
The master list must be created by entering each completed voter
registration card application received by the county auditor into
the statewide registration system. It
must show the name, residence address, and date of birth of each voter
registered in the precinct. The
information contained in the master list may only be made available to public
officials for purposes related to election administration, jury selection, and
in response to a law enforcement inquiry concerning a violation of or failure
to comply with any criminal statute or state or local tax statute.
Sec.
8. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
201.091, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd.
8. Registration
places. Each county auditor shall
designate a number of public buildings in those political subdivisions of the
county where preregistration of voters is allowed as provided in section
201.061, subdivision 1, where eligible voters may register to vote. At least one public building must be
designated for each 30,000 residents of the county. At least one telecommunications device for the deaf must be
available for voter registration information in each county seat and in every
city of the first, second, and third class.
An
adequate supply of registration cards applications and
instructions must be maintained at each designated location, and a designated
individual must be available there to accept registration cards applications
and transmit them to the county auditor.
A
person who, because of disability, needs assistance in order to determine
eligibility or to register must be assisted by a designated individual. Assistance includes but is not limited to
reading the registration form and instructions and filling out the registration
form as directed by the eligible voter.
Sec.
9. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
201.27, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Intentional
violation. No officer, deputy,
clerk, or other employee shall intentionally:
(1)
fail to perform or enforce any of the provisions of this chapter except
subdivision 2;
(2)
remove a registration card application or record from its proper
place in the registration files in a manner or for a purpose not authorized by
law;
(3)
destroy or make an unauthorized change to a record required to be kept by this
chapter; or
(4)
add a name or names to the voter registration files, records, or cards
applications, except as authorized by law.
An
individual who violates this subdivision is guilty of a felony.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 203B.04,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Application
procedures. Except as otherwise
allowed by subdivision 2 or by section 203B.11, subdivision 4, an
application for absentee ballots for any election may be submitted at any time
not less than one day before the day of that election. The county auditor shall prepare absentee
ballot application forms in the format provided by the secretary of state,
notwithstanding rules on absentee ballot forms, and shall furnish them to any
person on request. By January 1 of each
even-numbered year, the secretary of state shall make the forms to be used
available to auditors through electronic means. An application submitted pursuant to this subdivision shall be in
writing and shall be submitted to:
(a)
the county auditor of the county where the applicant maintains residence; or
(b)
the municipal clerk of the municipality, or school district if applicable,
where the applicant maintains residence.
An
application shall be approved if it is timely received, signed and dated by the
applicant, contains the applicant's name and residence and mailing addresses,
and states that the applicant is eligible to vote by absentee ballot for one of
the reasons specified in section 203B.02.
The application may contain a request for the voter's date of birth,
which must not be made available for public inspection. An application may be submitted to the
county auditor or municipal clerk by an electronic facsimile device. An application mailed or returned in person
to the county auditor or municipal clerk on behalf of a voter by a person other
than the voter must be deposited in the mail or returned in person to the
county auditor or municipal clerk within ten days after it has been dated by
the voter and no later than six days before the election. The absentee ballot applications or a list
of persons applying for an absentee ballot may not be made available for public
inspection until the close of voting on election day.
An
application under this subdivision may contain an application under subdivision
5 to automatically receive an absentee ballot application.
Sec.
11. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
203B.04, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd.
4. Registration
at time of application. An eligible
voter who is not registered to vote but who is otherwise eligible to vote by
absentee ballot may register by including a completed voter registration card
application with the absentee ballot.
The individual shall present proof of residence as required by section
201.061, subdivision 3, to the individual who witnesses the marking of the
absentee ballots. A military voter, as
defined in section 203B.01, may register in this manner if voting pursuant to
sections 203B.04 to 203B.15, or may register pursuant to sections 203B.16 to
203B.27.
Sec.
12. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
203B.05, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. City,
school district, and town elections.
For city, town, and school district elections not held on the
same day as a statewide election, for school district elections not held on
the same day as a statewide election, and for town elections conducted under
the Australian ballot system, applications for absentee ballots shall be
filed with
the
city, school district, or town clerk and the duties prescribed by this chapter
for the county auditor shall be performed by the city, school district, or town
clerk unless the county auditor agrees to perform those duties on behalf of the
city, school district, or town clerk.
The costs incurred to provide absentee ballots and perform the duties
prescribed by this subdivision shall be paid by the city, town, or school
district holding the election.
Notwithstanding
any other law, this chapter applies to school district elections held on the
same day as a statewide election or an election for a county or municipality
wholly or partially within the school district.
Sec.
13. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
203B.07, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Delivery
of envelopes, directions. The
county auditor or the municipal clerk shall prepare, print, and transmit a
return envelope, a ballot envelope, and a copy of the directions for casting an
absentee ballot to each applicant whose application for absentee ballots is
accepted pursuant to section 203B.04.
The directions for casting an absentee ballot shall be printed in at
least 14-point bold type with heavy leading and may be printed on the ballot
envelope. When a person requests the
directions in Braille or on cassette tape, the county auditor or municipal
clerk shall provide them in the form requested. The secretary of state shall prepare Braille and cassette copies
and make them available.
When a
voter registration card application is sent to the applicant as
provided in section 203B.06, subdivision 4, the directions or registration card
application shall include instructions for registering to vote.
Sec.
14. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
203B.08, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Procedures
on receipt of ballots. When
absentee ballots are returned to a county auditor or municipal clerk, that
official shall stamp or initial and date the return envelope with an
official seal of the office and place it in a secure location with other
return envelopes received by that office.
The county auditor or municipal clerk shall deliver to the appropriate
election judges on election day all ballots received before or with the last
mail delivery by the United States Postal Service on election day. A town clerk may request the United States
Postal Service to deliver absentee ballots to the polling place on election day
instead of to the official address of the town clerk.
Sec.
15. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
203B.10, is amended to read:
203B.10 DELIVERY OF ABSENTEE BALLOT
APPLICATIONS TO ELECTION JUDGES.
(a)
On the day
before an election:
(a) (1) the county
auditor shall deliver to the municipal clerks within that county the
applications for absentee ballots theretofore received and endorsed as provided
in section 203B.06, subdivision 5; and
(b) (2) the municipal
clerks shall deliver the applications received from the county auditor and the
applications for absentee ballots filed with their respective offices and
endorsed as provided in section 203B.06, subdivision 5, to the appropriate
election judges. Applications received
on election day pursuant to section 203B.04, subdivision 2, shall be promptly
delivered to the election judges in the precincts or to the judges of an
absentee ballot board.
(b)
Delivery of the applications to the municipal clerks and election judges in the
precinct is not required if the absentee ballot envelopes have been accepted or
rejected by an absentee ballot board pursuant to section 203B.13.
Sec.
16. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
204B.06, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd.
8. Proof
of eligibility. A candidate for
judicial office or for the office of county attorney shall submit with the
affidavit of candidacy proof that the candidate is licensed to practice law in
this state. Proof means providing a
copy of a current attorney license.
A
candidate for county sheriff shall submit with the affidavit of candidacy proof
of licensure as a peace officer in this state.
Proof means providing a copy of a current Peace Officer Standards and
Training Board license.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for elections held after June 1,
2008.
Sec.
17. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
204B.08, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Number
of signatures. The number of
signatures required on a nominating petition shall be as follows:
(a)
for a federal or state office voted on statewide or for United States
senator, one percent of the total number of individuals voting in the state
at the last preceding state general election, or 2,000, whichever is less;
(b)
for a congressional office, five percent of the total number of individuals
voting in the district at the last preceding state general election, or 1,000,
whichever is less;
(c)
for a county or legislative office, ten percent of the total number of
individuals voting in the county or legislative district at the last preceding
state or county general election, or 500, whichever is less;
(d)
for a municipal office in a city of the first class, the number specified in
section 205.121; and
(e)
for any other municipal or school district office, ten percent of the total
number of individuals voting in the municipality, ward, school district, or
other election district at the last preceding municipal, or school district if
applicable, general election, or 500, whichever is less.
Sec.
18. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
205A.10, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Materials,
ballots. The school district clerk
shall prepare and have printed the necessary election materials, including
ballots, for a school district election.
The name of each candidate for office shall be rotated with the names
of the other candidates for the same office so that the name of each candidate
appears substantially an equal number of times at the top, at the bottom, and
at each intermediate place in the group of candidates for that office
names must be arranged on school district ballots in the manner provided in
section 204D.08, subdivision 3, for state elections.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for elections held after June 1,
2008.
Sec.
19. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
205A.11, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Combined
polling place. When no other
election is being held in two or more precincts on the day of a school district
election, the school board may designate one or more combined polling places at
which the voters in those precincts may vote in the school district
election. In school districts that
have organized into separate board member election districts under section
205A.12, a combined polling place for a school general election must be
arranged so that it does not include more than one board member election
district.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for elections held after June 1,
2008.
Sec.
20. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
206.82, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Plan. (a) Subject to paragraph (b), The
municipal clerk in a municipality where an electronic voting system is used and
the county auditor of a county in which an electronic voting system is used in
more than one municipality and the county auditor of a county in which a
counting center serving more than one municipality is located shall prepare a
plan which indicates acquisition of sufficient facilities, computer time, and
professional services and which describes the proposed manner of complying with
section 206.80. The plan must be
signed, notarized, and submitted to the secretary of state more than 60 days
before the first election at which the municipality uses an electronic voting
system. Prior to July 1 of each
subsequent general election year, the clerk or auditor shall submit to the
secretary of state notification of any changes to the plan on file with the
secretary of state. The secretary of
state shall review each plan for its sufficiency and may request technical
assistance from the Department of Administration or other agency which may be
operating as the central computer authority.
The secretary of state shall notify each reporting authority of the
sufficiency or insufficiency of its plan within 20 days of receipt of the
plan. The attorney general, upon
request of the secretary of state, may seek a district court order requiring an
election official to fulfill duties imposed by this subdivision or by rules
promulgated pursuant to this section.
(b)
Systems implemented by counties and municipalities in calendar year 2006 are
exempt from paragraph (a) and section 206.58, subdivision 4, if:
(1)
the municipality has fewer than 10,000 residents; and
(2)
a valid county plan was filed by the county auditor of the county in which the
municipality is located.
Sec.
21. Laws 2004, chapter 293, article 1,
section 37, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Social
Security number. A voter must not
be included on the list of voters prepared under Minnesota Statutes, section
201.121, subdivision 1, whose registration is incomplete because of a failure
to match the last four digits of the voter's Social Security number until the
commissioner of public safety has:
(1)
entered into an agreement with the commissioner of the Social Security
Administration under Minnesota Statutes, section 201.1615, regarding the use of
the last four digits of a Social Security number to verify voter registration
information;
(2)
assembled a complete and current database of the last four digits of the Social
Security number of each resident of this state as maintained by the Social
Security Administration; and
(3) (2) certified, along with the
secretary of state, that the voter registration system has been tested and
shown to properly verify the last four digits of a voter's Social Security
number.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective retroactively to November 29, 2007.
Sec.
22. EFFECTIVE DATE.
Unless
otherwise specified, all sections in this article are effective on June 1,
2008."
Delete
the title and insert:
"A
bill for an act relating to elections; changing or establishing certain voter
registration procedures and requirements, filing requirements, voting
procedures, election day prohibitions, ballot preparation requirements, and
other election provisions; imposing penalties; amending Minnesota Statutes
2006, sections 103C.305, subdivision 3;
135A.17,
subdivision 2; 201.054, subdivision 1, by adding a subdivision; 201.056;
201.061, subdivisions 3, 4; 201.071, subdivisions 3, 4; 201.081; 201.091,
subdivisions 1, 8; 201.171; 201.27, subdivision 1; 203B.04, subdivisions 1, 4;
203B.05, subdivision 2; 203B.07; 203B.08, subdivision 3; 203B.081; 203B.10;
203B.13, subdivisions 1, 2; 204B.06, subdivision 8; 204B.08, subdivision 3;
204B.09; 204B.16, subdivision 1; 204B.45, subdivision 2; 204C.06, subdivision
1; 204C.07, subdivision 3a; 205.10, by adding a subdivision; 205.16,
subdivision 4; 205A.05, by adding a subdivision; 205A.07, subdivisions 3, 3a;
205A.10, subdivision 1; 205A.11, subdivision 2; 206.82, subdivision 2; 206.89,
subdivisions 1, 5; 211A.02, subdivision 2; 211A.05, subdivision 1; Laws 2004,
chapter 293, article 1, section 37, subdivision 2; repealing Minnesota Statutes
2006, sections 203B.02, subdivision 1a; 203B.13, subdivision 3a."
We
request the adoption of this report and repassage of the bill.
Senate Conferees: Linda Higgins, Ann H. Rest and Dan Larson.
House Conferees: Bill Hilty, Jeremy Kalin and Neil W. Peterson.
Hilty moved that the report of the Conference Committee on
S. F. No. 1298 be adopted and that the bill be repassed as
amended by the Conference Committee.
The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 1298, A bill for an act relating to elections;
changing certain voter registration procedures and requirements, filing
requirements, voting procedures, election day prohibitions, and ballot
preparation requirements; establishing a complaint and resolution process;
requiring challengers to prove residence in this state; requiring certain
notices; changing a petition requirement; imposing penalties; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 201.016, subdivision 1a; 201.056; 201.061,
subdivisions 1, 3, by adding a subdivision; 201.071, subdivision 1; 201.171;
203B.07, subdivision 2; 203B.081; 203B.12, subdivision 4; 203B.13, subdivisions
1, 2; 204B.09, subdivisions 1, 1a, 3; 204B.11, subdivision 2; 204B.16,
subdivision 1; 204B.45, subdivisions 1, 2; 204C.06, subdivisions 1, 8; 204C.07,
subdivision 3a, by adding a subdivision; 204D.09, subdivision 2; 204D.16;
205.10, by adding a subdivision; 205.13, by adding a subdivision; 205.16,
subdivisions 2, 3, 4; 205A.05, by adding a subdivision; 205A.07, subdivisions
3, 3a; 206.57, subdivision 5; 206.89, subdivisions 1, 5; 211A.02, subdivision
2; 211A.05, subdivision 1; 211B.11, subdivision 1; 410.12, subdivision 1;
447.32, subdivision 4; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 204B; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 200.04; 201.061,
subdivision 7; 201.096; 203B.02, subdivision 1a; 203B.13, subdivision 3a.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended by Conference,
and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of the bill and the
roll was called. There were 127 yeas
and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was repassed, as amended by Conference, and its title
agreed to.
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following
Senate Files, herewith transmitted:
S. F. Nos. 2965, 2795, 651, 3683 and 2942.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
FIRST READING OF SENATE BILLS
S. F.
No. 2965, A bill for an act relating to children; regulating gestational
carrier arrangements; establishing intended parents rights under assisted
reproduction; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 257.56; proposing
coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 257.
The
bill was read for the first time.
Tingelstad
moved that S. F. No. 2965 and H. F. No. 3448, now on the General Register, be
referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison.
The motion prevailed.
S. F.
No. 2795, A bill for an act relating to real property; providing for conveyance
of interests in real property by transfer on death deeds; clarifying
acknowledgments made in a representative capacity; clarifying application of
certain common law doctrine to registered land; eliminating obsolete language
and making other technical and conforming changes; amending Minnesota Statutes
2006, sections 256B.15, subdivisions 1h, 1i; 272.12; 287.22; 508.02; 508.48;
508.52; 508.671, subdivision 1; 508A.02, subdivision 1; 508A.48; 508A.52;
524.2-702; 557.02; Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, section 507.24,
subdivision 2; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 507.
The
bill was read for the first time.
Thissen
moved that S. F. No. 2795 and H. F. No. 3134, now on the Calendar for the Day,
be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison.
The motion prevailed.
S. F.
No. 651, A bill for an act relating to the environment; restricting the
manufacture and sale of certain polybrominated diphenyl ethers; requiring a
report; providing penalties; amending Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
sections 325E.386; 325E.387, by adding a subdivision.
The
bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Ways and
Means.
S. F.
No. 3683, A bill for an act relating to the operation of state government;
changing certain provisions and programs related to agriculture; creating a
livestock investment grant program; modifying pesticide and fertilizer
regulation; changing certain payment provisions for certain agricultural
chemical corrective action costs; changing certain food sanitary provisions;
changing certain fee provisions; defining certain terms; regulating egg sales
and handling; increasing the somatic cell count limit for goat milk; providing
for control of bovine tuberculosis; adding a member to the NextGen Energy
Board; modifying the expiration date for the NextGen Energy Board; modifying
the expiration date for the Minnesota Agriculture Education Leadership Council;
establishing requirements for practicing animal chiropractic care; recognizing
a Program for the Assessment of Veterinary Education Equivalence certification;
limiting use of certain drugs; changing certain requirements; regulating
prescription of veterinary drugs; modifying definition of biodiesel; increasing
minimum biodiesel content; creating a tiered biodiesel content goal; requiring
counties to consider natural heritage data in adopting or amending
comprehensive plans; requiring local governments to consider comprehensive
plans to limit development on agricultural, forest, wildlife, and open space
land; regulating certain racetracks; modifying 2007 appropriation language;
creating the Veterans Health Care Advisory Council; changing certain provisions
and programs related to veterans; providing for certain medallions; authorizing
the placement of a plaque in the court of honor on the Capitol grounds by
Minnesota's Mexican-American veterans to honor all Minnesota veterans who have
served at any time in the United States armed forces; appropriating money;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 18B.07, subdivision 2; 18D.305,
subdivision 2; 18E.04, subdivision 2; 28A.03, by adding a subdivision; 28A.08;
28A.082, by adding a subdivision; 28A.09, subdivision 1; 29.23; 31.05; 31.171;
41D.01, subdivision 4; 148.01, subdivision 1, by adding subdivisions; 156.001,
by adding a subdivision; 156.02, subdivisions 1, 2; 156.04; 156.072,
subdivision 2; 156.073; 156.12, subdivisions 2, 4, 6; 156.15, subdivision 2;
156.16, subdivisions 3, 10; 156.18, subdivisions 1, 2; 156.19; 168.1255,
subdivisions 1, 3, by adding subdivisions; 196.021; 196.03; 197.236; 198.32,
subdivision 1; 239.77, as amended; 240.06, subdivision 5a, by adding a
subdivision; 240.13, subdivision 6; 394.232, subdivision 6; 462.355,
subdivision 1; 462.357, by adding subdivisions; Minnesota Statutes 2007
Supplement, sections 31.175; 35.244; 41A.105; 296A.01, subdivision 8a; 394.23;
Laws 2007, chapter 45, article 1, section 3, subdivisions 3, 4; proposing
coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 17; 18C; 32; 148; 196; 394;
repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 198.001, subdivisions 6, 9;
198.002, subdivisions 1, 3, 6; 198.003, subdivisions 5, 6; 198.004, subdivision
2; Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, sections 198.002, subdivision 2;
198.004, subdivision 1; Minnesota Rules, part 9050.0040, subpart 15.
The
bill was read for the first time.
Juhnke
moved that S. F. No. 3683 and H. F. No. 3902, now on the General Register, be
referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison.
The motion prevailed.
S. F.
No. 2942, A bill for an act relating to higher education; establishing a P-20
education partnership; modifying various scholarship programs; modifying
private school regulation; authorizing oral health practitioners to practice;
authorizing rulemaking; establishing an oral practitioner work group; requiring
a report; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 13.32, by adding a
subdivision; 141.25, by adding a subdivision; Minnesota
Statutes
2007 Supplement, sections 136A.126; 136A.127; 136A.65, subdivisions 1, 3, 5, 6,
7; 136A.66; 136A.67; 136A.69; 141.25, subdivision 5; 141.28, subdivision 1;
141.35; 197.791, subdivisions 1, 4, 5; proposing coding for new law in
Minnesota Statutes, chapters 136F; 150A.
The
bill was read for the first time.
Rukavina
moved that S. F. No. 2942 and H. F. No. 3349, now on the General Register, be
referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison.
The motion prevailed.
MOTIONS AND RESOLUTIONS
Walker moved that the name of Thao be added as an author on
H. F. No. 1724. The
motion prevailed.
Nelson moved that the name of Sailer be added as an author on
H. F. No. 3503. The
motion prevailed.
Brynaert moved that the name of Heidgerken be added as an
author on H. F. No. 3843.
The motion prevailed.
Moe moved that the names of Morrow and Slocum be added as
authors on H. F. No. 3935.
The motion prevailed.
Hornstein moved that the names of Hilstrom, Morgan, Ward and
Madore be added as authors on H. F. No. 4015. The motion prevailed.
Gardner moved that the names of Slocum and Erhardt be added as
authors on H. F. No. 4188.
The motion prevailed.
Morrow moved that the name of Slocum be added as an author on
H. F. No. 4196. The
motion prevailed.
Hornstein moved that H. F. No. 4015 be recalled
from the Committee on Local Government and Metropolitan Affairs and be
re-referred to the Committee on Commerce and Labor. The motion prevailed.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
BY THE SPEAKER
The Speaker announced the appointment of the following members
of the House to a Conference Committee on S. F. No. 2368:
Ward, Juhnke and Howes.
The Speaker announced the appointment of the following members
of the House to a Conference Committee on S. F. No. 2390:
Hilstrom, Simon and Holberg.
The Speaker announced the appointment of the following members
of the House to a Conference Committee on S. F. No. 3235:
Simon, Lesch, Lillie, Hortman and DeLaForest.
FISCAL CALENDAR ANNOUNCEMENT
Pursuant to rule 1.22, Solberg announced his intention to place
H. F. No. 3722 and S. F. No. 3337 on the Fiscal Calendar for
Wednesday, April 23, 2008.
ADJOURNMENT
Sertich moved that when the House adjourns today it adjourn
until 9:00 a.m., Wednesday, April 23, 2008.
The motion prevailed.
Sertich moved that the House adjourn. The motion prevailed, and Speaker pro tempore Juhnke declared the
House stands adjourned until 9:00 a.m., Wednesday, April 23, 2008.
Albin
A. Mathiowetz,
Chief Clerk, House of Representatives