STATE OF MINNESOTA
EIGHTY-FIFTH SESSION - 2008
_____________________
ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Monday, May 12, 2008
The House of Representatives convened at 10:00 a.m. and was
called to order by Kathy Tingelstad, Speaker pro tempore.
The colors were presented by officers from the Minnesota State
Patrol in recognition of Police Week beginning on May 12, 2008 and Peace
Officer's Memorial Day on May 15, 2008.
Prayer was offered by the Reverend Alan Bray, Pastor at First
Lutheran Church, St. Peter, Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge of allegiance to the
flag of the United States of America.
The roll was called and the following members were present:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Kranz
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
A quorum was present.
Paulsen was excused until 1:55 p.m. Hoppe was excused until 2:50 p.m.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the Journal of the preceding
day. Hosch moved that further reading
of the Journal be suspended and that the Journal be approved as corrected by
the Chief Clerk. The motion prevailed.
ANNOUNCEMENT
BY THE SPEAKER
The Speaker announced the following change in membership of the
Conference Committee on H. F. No. 6:
Delete the name of Davnie and add the name of Mariani.
INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS
The following House Files were introduced:
Otremba introduced:
H. F. No. 4239, A bill for an act relating to agriculture;
changing the incidence of a dog food fee; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006,
sections 25.33, by adding a subdivision; 25.39, subdivision 1.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Agriculture, Rural Economies and Veterans Affairs.
Berns, Morrow, Cornish and Paymar introduced:
H. F. No. 4240, A bill for an act relating to public safety;
establishing crime of disarming a peace officer; providing criminal penalties;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 609.50, subdivision 2; proposing
coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 609.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Public Safety and Civil Justice.
Huntley introduced:
H. F. No. 4241, A bill for an act relating to health care;
proposing an amendment to the Minnesota Constitution, article XI; dedicating
the proceeds of the health care provider tax to MinnesotaCare and health care
access.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration.
Sertich moved that the House recess subject to the call of the
Chair. The motion prevailed.
RECESS
RECONVENED
The House reconvened and was called to order by Speaker pro
tempore Pelowski.
MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE
The following messages were received from the Senate:
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate accedes to the request of the
House for the appointment of a Conference Committee on the amendments adopted
by the Senate to the following House File:
H. F. No. 6, A bill for an act relating to education; providing
for early childhood, family, adult, and prekindergarten through grade 12
education including general education, education excellence, special programs,
facilities and technology, nutrition and accounting, libraries, state agencies,
forecast adjustments, technical and conforming amendments, pupil transportation
standards, and early childhood and adult programs; providing for task force and
advisory groups; requiring school districts to give employees who are veterans
the option to take personal leave on Veteran's Day and encouraging private
employers to give employees who are veterans a day off with pay on Veteran's
Day; requiring reports; authorizing rulemaking; funding parenting time centers;
funding lead hazard reduction; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes
2006, sections 13.32, by adding a subdivision; 16A.152, subdivision 2; 119A.50,
by adding a subdivision; 119A.52; 119A.535; 120A.22, subdivision 7; 120B.021,
subdivision 1; 120B.023, subdivision 2; 120B.024; 120B.11, subdivision 5;
120B.132; 120B.15; 120B.30; 120B.31, subdivision 3; 120B.36, subdivision 1;
121A.17, subdivision 5; 121A.22, subdivisions 1, 3, 4; 122A.16; 122A.18, by
adding a subdivision; 122A.20, subdivision 1; 122A.414, subdivisions 1, 2;
122A.415, subdivision 1; 122A.60, subdivision 3; 122A.61, subdivision 1;
122A.628, subdivision 2; 122A.72, subdivision 5; 123A.73, subdivision 8;
123B.02, by adding a subdivision; 123B.10, subdivision 1, by adding a
subdivision; 123B.143, subdivision 1; 123B.36, subdivision 1; 123B.37,
subdivision 1; 123B.49, subdivision 4; 123B.53, subdivisions 1, 4, 5; 123B.54;
123B.57, subdivision 3; 123B.63, subdivision 3; 123B.77, subdivision 4;
123B.79, subdivisions 6, 8, by adding a subdivision; 123B.81, subdivisions 2,
4, 7; 123B.83, subdivision 2; 123B.88, subdivision 12; 123B.90, subdivision 2;
123B.92, subdivisions 1, 3, 5; 124D.095, subdivisions 2, 3, 4, 7; 124D.10,
subdivisions 4, 8, 23a, 24; 124D.11, subdivision 1; 124D.111, subdivision 1;
124D.128, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 124D.13, subdivisions 1, 2, 11, by adding a
subdivision; 124D.135, subdivisions 1, 3, 5; 124D.16, subdivision 2; 124D.175;
124D.34, subdivision 7; 124D.4531; 124D.454, subdivisions 2, 3; 124D.531,
subdivisions 1, 4; 124D.55; 124D.56, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 124D.59, subdivision
2; 124D.65, subdivisions 5, 11; 124D.84, subdivision 1; 125A.11, subdivision 1;
125A.13; 125A.14; 125A.39; 125A.42; 125A.44; 125A.45; 125A.63, by adding a
subdivision; 125A.75, subdivisions 1, 4; 125A.76, subdivisions 1, 2, 4, 5, by
adding a subdivision; 125A.79, subdivisions 1, 5, 6, 8; 125B.15; 126C.01,
subdivision 9, by adding subdivisions; 126C.05, subdivisions 1, 8, 15; 126C.10,
subdivisions 1, 2, 2a, 2b, 4, 13a, 18, 24, 34, by adding a subdivision;
126C.126; 126C.13, subdivision 4; 126C.15, subdivision 2; 126C.17, subdivisions
6, 9; 126C.21, subdivisions 3, 5; 126C.41, by adding a subdivision; 126C.44;
126C.48, subdivisions 2, 7; 127A.441; 127A.47, subdivisions 7, 8; 127A.48, by
adding a subdivision; 127A.49, subdivisions 2, 3; 128D.11, subdivision 3;
134.31, by adding a subdivision; 134.34, subdivision 4; 134.355, subdivision 9;
169.01, subdivision 6, by adding a subdivision; 169.443, by adding a
subdivision; 169.447, subdivision 2; 169.4501, subdivisions 1, 2; 169.4502,
subdivision 5; 169.4503, subdivisions 13, 20; 171.02, subdivisions 2, 2a;
171.321, subdivision 4; 205A.03, subdivision 1; 205A.05, subdivision 1;
205A.06, subdivision 1a; 272.029, by adding a subdivision; 273.11, subdivision
1a; 273.1393; 275.065, subdivisions 1, 1a, 3; 275.07, subdivision 2; 275.08,
subdivision 1b; 276.04, subdivision 2; 517.08, subdivision 1c; Laws 2005, First
Special Session chapter 5, article 1, sections 50, subdivision 2; 54,
subdivisions 2, as amended, 4, 5, as amended, 6, as amended, 7, as amended, 8,
as amended; article 2, sections 81, as amended; 84, subdivisions 2, as amended,
3, as amended, 4, as amended, 6, as amended, 10, as amended; article 3, section
18, subdivisions 2, as amended, 3, as amended, 4, as amended, 6, as amended;
article 4, section 25, subdivisions 2, as amended, 3, as amended; article 5,
section 17, subdivision 3, as amended; article 7, section 20, subdivisions 2,
as amended, 3, as amended, 4, as amended; article 8, section 8, subdivisions 2,
as amended, 5, as amended; article 9, section 4, subdivision 2; Laws 2006,
chapter 263, article 3, section 15; Laws 2006, chapter 282, article 2, section
28, subdivision 4; article 3, section 4, subdivision 2; proposing coding for
new law in Minnesota
Statutes, chapters 119A;
121A; 122A; 123B; 124D; 135A; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections
120B.233; 121A.23; 123A.22, subdivision 11; 123B.81, subdivision 8; 124D.06;
124D.081, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9; 124D.454, subdivisions 4, 5, 6, 7;
124D.531, subdivision 5; 124D.62; 125A.10; 125A.75, subdivision 6; 125A.76,
subdivision 3; 169.4502, subdivision 15; 169.4503, subdivisions 17, 18, 26.
The Senate has appointed as such committee:
Senators Stumpf, Saltzman, Rummel, Wiger and Torres Ray.
Said House File is herewith returned to the House.
Colleen
J. Pacheco,
Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following
House File, herewith returned, as amended by the Senate, in which amendments
the concurrence of the House is respectfully requested:
H. F. No. 3574, A bill for an act relating to the State
Building Code; regulating the application and enforcement of the State Building
Code; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 16B.616, subdivision 4;
16B.62; 16B.71; Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, sections 16B.61,
subdivision 3; 16B.735; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, sections
16B.72; 16B.73.
Colleen
J. Pacheco,
Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
CONCURRENCE AND REPASSAGE
Juhnke moved that the House concur in the Senate amendments to
H. F. No. 3574 and that the bill be repassed as amended by the
Senate. The motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 3574, A bill for an act relating to the State
Building Code; regulating the application and enforcement of the State Building
Code; modifying continuing education course content for residential contractors
and remodelers; requiring commercial general liability insurance for licensees;
authorizing Duluth Entertainment and Convention Center Authority to enter
contract for construction work on entertainment and convention center; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 16B.616, subdivision 4; 16B.62; 16B.71;
Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, sections 16B.61, subdivision 3; 16B.735;
326.87, subdivision 5; 326.94, subdivision 2; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2007
Supplement, sections 16B.72; 16B.73.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended by the Senate,
and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of the bill and the
roll was called. There were 110 yeas
and 22 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eastlund
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kranz
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Severson
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Beard
Berns
Buesgens
DeLaForest
Drazkowski
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Hackbarth
Heidgerken
Holberg
Johnson
Kohls
Magnus
Olson
Peppin
Seifert
Shimanski
Simpson
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was repassed, as amended by the Senate, and its title
agreed to.
Kalin was excused between the hours of 1:20 p.m. and 2:20 p.m.
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate has concurred in and adopted
the report of the Conference Committee on:
S. F. No. 3138.
The Senate has repassed said bill in accordance with the
recommendation and report of the Conference Committee. Said Senate File is herewith transmitted to
the House.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
CONFERENCE
COMMITTEE REPORT ON S. F. NO. 3138
A bill for an act relating to health; changing provisions for
handling genetic information; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections
13.386, subdivision 3; 144.05, by adding a subdivision; Minnesota Statutes 2007
Supplement, section 144.125, subdivision 3.
April
30, 2008
The Honorable James P.
Metzen
President of the Senate
The Honorable Margaret
Anderson Kelliher
Speaker of the House of
Representatives
We, the undersigned conferees for S. F. No. 3138 report that we
have agreed upon the items in dispute and recommend as follows:
That the House recede from its amendments and that S. F. No.
3138 be further amended as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section
1. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
13.386, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Collection, storage, use, and dissemination of genetic information. (a) Unless otherwise expressly
provided by law, genetic information about an individual:
(1)
may be collected by a government entity, as defined in section 13.02,
subdivision 7a, or any other person only with the written informed consent of
the individual;
(2)
may be used only for purposes to which the individual has given written
informed consent;
(3)
may be stored only for a period of time to which the individual has given
written informed consent; and
(4)
may be disseminated only:
(i)
with the individual's written informed consent; or
(ii)
if necessary in order to accomplish purposes described by clause (2). A consent to disseminate genetic information
under item (i) must be signed and dated.
Unless otherwise provided by law, such a consent is valid for one year
or for a lesser period specified in the consent.
(b)
Notwithstanding paragraph (a), the Department of Health's collection, storage,
use, and dissemination of genetic information and blood specimens for testing
infants for heritable and congenital disorders are governed by sections 144.125
to 144.128.
Sec.
2. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 144.125, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Objection
of parents to test Information provided to parents. Persons with a duty to perform testing
under subdivision 1 shall advise parents of infants (1) that the blood or
tissue samples used to perform testing thereunder as well as the results of
such testing may be retained by the Department of Health, (2) the benefit of
retaining the blood or tissue sample, and (3) that the following options are
available to them with respect to the testing: (i) to decline to have the
tests, or (ii) to elect to have the tests but to require that all blood samples
and records of test results be destroyed within 24 months of the testing. If the parents of an infant object in
writing to testing for heritable and congenital disorders or elect to require that blood samples and test
results be destroyed, the objection or election shall be recorded on a form
that is signed by a parent or legal guardian and made part of the infant's
medical record. A written objection
exempts an infant from the requirements of this section and section 144.128.
(a) Prior to collecting a sample, persons
with a duty to perform testing under subdivision 1 must provide parents or
legal guardians of infants with a document that provides the following
information:
(1)
the blood sample will be used to test for heritable and congenital disorders,
the blood sample will be retained by the Department of Health for a period of
at least two years and that the blood sample may be used for public health
studies and research;
(2)
the data that will be collected as a result of the testing;
(3)
the alternatives available to the parents set forth in paragraph (b) and that a
form to exercise the alternatives is available from the person with a duty to
perform testing under subdivision 1;
(4)
the benefits of testing and the consequences of a decision to permit or refuse
to supply a sample;
(5)
the benefits of retaining the blood sample and the consequences of a decision
to destroy the blood sample after two years or to permit or decline to have the
blood sample used for public health studies and research;
(6)
the ways in which the samples and data collected will be stored and used at the
Department of Health and elsewhere; and
(7)
the Department of Health's Web site address where the forms referenced in
paragraph (b) may be obtained.
This document satisfies the
requirements of section 13.04, subdivision 2.
(b) The parent or legal guardian of an infant
otherwise subject to testing under this section may object to any of the
following:
(1)
the testing itself;
(2)
the maintenance of the infant's blood samples and test result records for a
period longer than 24 months; and
(3)
the use of the infant's blood samples and test result records for public health
studies and research.
If a parent or legal
guardian elects one of the alternatives, the election shall be recorded on a
form that is signed by the parent or legal guardian. The signed form shall be made part of the infant's medical record
and shall be provided to the Department of Health. The signature of the parent or legal guardian is sufficient and
no witness to the signature, photo identification, or notarization shall be
required. When a parent or legal
guardian elects an alternative under this subdivision, the Department of Health
must follow the election and section 144.128.
A written election exempts an infant from the requirements of this
section and section 144.128.
(c)
For purposes of this subdivision, "public health studies and
research" includes calibrating newborn screening equipment, evaluating
existing newborn screening tests to reduce the number of false positive and
false negative results, studying the development of new newborn screening tests
for heritable and congenital disorders, and other population-based health
studies.
Sec.
3. NEWBORN
SCREENING REPORT.
By
January 15, 2009, the Department of Health shall report and make
recommendations to the legislature on its current efforts for ensuring and
enhancing how parents of newborns are fully informed about the newborn
screening program and of their rights and options regarding: (1) testing; (2)
storage; (3) public health practices, studies, and research; (4) the ability to
opt out of the collection of data and specimens related to the testing; and (5)
the ability to seek private testing."
Delete
the title and insert:
"A
bill for an act relating to health; changing provisions for handling genetic
information from newborn screening; requiring a report; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2006, section 13.386, subdivision 3; Minnesota Statutes 2007
Supplement, section 144.125, subdivision 3."
We request the adoption of this report and repassage of the
bill.
Senate Conferees: Ann Lynch, Julie A. Rosen and Mee Moua.
House Conferees: Paul Thissen, Maria Ruud and Mary Liz Holberg.
Thissen moved that the House refuse to adopt the Conference
Committee report on S. F. No. 3138, and that the bill be
returned to the Conference Committee.
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Thissen motion and the roll was
called. There were 128 yeas and 3 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Kranz
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Heidgerken
Olson
The motion prevailed.
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following
House File, herewith returned, as amended by the Senate, in which amendments
the concurrence of the House is respectfully requested:
H. F. No. 3420, A bill for an act relating to local government;
revising procedures and fees charged by county registrars of title for
registering supplemental declarations of common interest communities; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 508.82, subdivision 1; 515B.1-116.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
Hilstrom moved that the House refuse to concur in the Senate
amendments to H. F. No. 3420, that the Speaker appoint a
Conference Committee of 3 members of the House, and that the House requests
that a like committee be appointed by the Senate to confer on the disagreeing
votes of the two houses. The motion
prevailed.
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate has concurred in and adopted
the report of the Conference Committee on:
S. F. No. 3166.
The Senate has repassed said bill in accordance with the
recommendation and report of the Conference Committee. Said Senate File is herewith transmitted to
the House.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
CONFERENCE
COMMITTEE REPORT ON S. F. NO. 3166
A bill for an act relating to human services; amending child
welfare and licensing provisions; adopting a new Interstate Compact for the
Placement of Children and repealing the old compact; regulating child and adult
adoptions; regulating children in voluntary foster care for treatment;
providing targeted case management services to certain children with
developmental disabilities; providing for certain data classifications;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 13.46, by adding subdivisions;
245C.24, subdivision 2; 245C.29, subdivision 2; 256.045, subdivisions 3, 3b;
259.20, subdivision 1; 259.21, by adding a subdivision; 259.22, subdivision 2;
259.23, subdivision 2; 259.43; 259.52, subdivision 2; 259.53, subdivision 3;
259.59, subdivisions 1, 2; 259.67, subdivisions 2, 3, by adding a subdivision;
259.75, subdivision 5; 259.89, subdivisions 1, 2, 4, by adding a subdivision;
260C.001, subdivision 2; 260C.007, subdivisions 5, 6, 13; 260C.101, subdivision
2; 260C.141, subdivision 2; 260C.171, subdivision 2; 260C.178, subdivision 1;
260C.205; 260C.212, subdivisions 7, 8, by adding a subdivision; 260C.325,
subdivisions 1, 3; 524.2-114; 626.556, subdivision 7; Minnesota Statutes 2007
Supplement, sections 245C.14, subdivision 1; 245C.15, subdivisions 2, 3, 4;
245C.24, subdivision 3; 245C.27, subdivision 1; 259.41, subdivision 1; 259.57,
subdivision 1; 259.67, subdivision 4; 260C.163, subdivision 1; 260C.209,
subdivisions 1, 2, by adding a subdivision; 260C.212, subdivisions 1, 4;
626.556, subdivision 10a; Laws 2007, chapter 147, article 2, section 56;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 259; 260;
proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 260D; repealing Minnesota
Statutes 2006, sections 260.851; 260C.141, subdivision 2a; 260C.431; 260C.435;
Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, section 260C.212, subdivision 9; Minnesota
Rules, part 9560.0609.
May 6,
2008
The Honorable James P.
Metzen
President of the Senate
The Honorable Margaret
Anderson Kelliher
Speaker of the House of
Representatives
We, the undersigned conferees for S. F. No. 3166 report that we
have agreed upon the items in dispute and recommend as follows:
That the House recede from its amendments and that S. F. No.
3166 be further amended as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"ARTICLE
1
CHILD
WELFARE
Section
1. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.20, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Policy
and purpose. The policy of the
state of Minnesota and the purpose of sections 259.20 to 259.69 is to ensure:
(1)
that the best interests of children adopted persons are met in
the planning and granting of adoptions; and
(2)
that laws and practices governing adoption recognize the diversity of
Minnesota's population and the diverse needs of persons affected by adoption.
Sec.
2. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.21, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
2a. Adult
adoption. "Adult
adoption" means the adoption of a person at least 18 years of age.
Sec.
3. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.22, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Children
Persons who may be adopted.
No petition for adoption shall be filed unless the child person
sought to be adopted has been placed by the commissioner of human services,
the commissioner's agent, or a licensed child-placing agency. The provisions of this subdivision shall not
apply if
(a)
the child person to be adopted is over 14 years of age;
(b)
the child is sought to be adopted by an individual who is related to the child,
as defined by section 245A.02, subdivision 13;
(c)
the child has been lawfully placed under the laws of another state while the
child and petitioner resided in that other state;
(d)
the court waives the requirement of this subdivision in the best interests of
the child or petitioners, provided that the adoption does not involve a
placement as defined in section 259.21, subdivision 8; or
(e)
the child has been lawfully placed under section 259.47.
Sec.
4. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.23, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Contents
of petition. The petition shall be
signed by the petitioner and, if married, by the spouse. It shall be verified, and filed in
duplicate. The petition shall allege:
(a)
The full name, age and place of residence of petitioner, and if married, the
date and place of marriage;
(b)
The date petitioner acquired physical custody of the child and from what person
or agency;
(c)
The date of birth of the child person to be adopted, if known,
and the state and county where born;
(d)
The name of the child's parents, if known, and the guardian if there be one;
(e)
The actual name of the child person to be adopted, if known, and
any known aliases;
(f)
The name to be given the child person to be adopted if a change
of name is desired;
(g)
The description and value of any real or personal property owned by the child
person to be adopted;
(h)
That the petitioner desires that the relationship of parent and child be
established between petitioner and the child, and that it is to the
the person to be adopted and that adoption is in the best interests of the child
for the child person to be adopted by the petitioner.
In
agency placements, the information required in clauses (d) and (e) shall not be
required to be alleged in the petition but shall be transmitted to the court by
the commissioner of human services or the agency.
Sec.
5. [259.241]
ADULT ADOPTION.
(a)
Any adult person may be adopted, regardless of his or her residence. A resident of Minnesota may petition the
court of record having jurisdiction of adoption proceedings to adopt an
individual who has reached the age of 18 years or older.
(b)
The consent of the person to be adopted shall be the only consent necessary,
according to section 259.24. The
consent of an adult in his or her own adoption is invalid if the adult is
considered to be a vulnerable adult under section 626.5572, subdivision 21, or
if the person consenting to the adoption is determined not competent to give
consent.
(c)
The decree of adoption establishes a parent-child relationship between the
adopting parent or parents and the person adopted, including the right to
inherit, and also terminates the parental rights and sibling relationship
between the adopted person and the adopted person's birth parents and siblings
according to section 259.59.
(d)
If the adopted person requests a change of name, the adoption decree shall
order the name change.
Sec.
6. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 259.41, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Study
required before placement; certain relatives excepted. (a) An approved adoption study; completed
background study, as required under section 245C.33; and written report must be
completed before the child is placed in a prospective adoptive home under this
chapter, except as allowed by section 259.47, subdivision 6. In an agency placement, the report must be
filed with the court at the time the adoption petition is
filed. In a direct adoptive placement, the report
must be filed with the court in support of a motion for temporary preadoptive
custody under section 259.47, subdivision 3, or, if the study and report are
complete, in support of an emergency order under section 259.47, subdivision
6. The study and report shall be
completed by a licensed child-placing agency and must be thorough and
comprehensive. The study and report
shall be paid for by the prospective adoptive parent, except as otherwise
required under section 256.01, subdivision 2, paragraph (h), 259.67,
or 259.73.
(b) A
placement for adoption with an individual who is related to the child, as
defined by section 245A.02, subdivision 13, is not subject to this
section except as a background study required by sections 245C.33
and 259.53, subdivision 2, paragraph (c) by subdivision 2, paragraph
(a), clause (1), items (i) and (ii), and subdivision 3. In the case of a stepparent adoption, a
background study must be completed on the stepparent and any children as
required under subdivision 3, paragraph (b), except that a child of the
stepparent does not need to have a background study complete if they are a
sibling through birth or adoption of the person being adopted. The local social services agency of the
county in which the prospective adoptive parent lives must initiate a
background study unless a child-placing agency has been involved with the
adoption. The local social service
agency may charge a reasonable fee for the background study. If a placement is being made the background
study must be completed prior to placement pursuant to section 259.29,
subdivision 1, paragraph (c).
Background study results must be filed with the adoption petition
according to section 259.22, except in an adult adoption where an adoption
study and background study are not needed.
(c) In
the case of a licensed foster parent seeking to adopt a child who is in the
foster parent's care, any portions of the foster care licensing process that
duplicate requirements of the home study may be submitted in satisfaction of
the relevant requirements of this section.
Sec.
7. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.43, is amended to read:
259.43 BIRTH PARENT HISTORY; COMMISSIONER'S
FORM.
In any
adoption under this chapter, except a stepparent or an adult adoption
under section 259.241, a birth parent or an agency, if an agency
placement, shall provide a prospective adoptive parent with a complete,
thorough, detailed, and current social and medical history of the birth
families child being adopted, if information is known after
reasonable inquiry. Each birth
family child's social and medical history must be provided on a form
or forms prepared by the commissioner and must include background and
health history specific to the child, the child's birth parents, and the
child's other birth relatives.
Applicable background and health information about the child
includes: the child's current health
condition, behavior, and demeanor; placement history; education history;
sibling information; and birth, medical, dental, and immunization
information. Redacted copies of
pertinent records, assessments, and evaluations shall be attached to the
child's social and medical history.
Applicable background information about the child's birth parents and
other birth relatives includes: general
background information; education and employment history; physical health and
mental health history; and reasons for the child's placement. The child's social and medical history shall
be completed in a manner so that the completed form protects
the identities of all individuals described in it. The commissioner shall make the form available to agencies and
court administrators for public distribution.
The birth family child's social and medical history must
be provided to the prospective adoptive family prior to adoptive placement,
provided to the Department of Human Services with application for adoption
assistance, if applicable, and filed with the court when the adoption
petition is filed, or,. In
a direct adoptive placement, the child's social and medical history must be
filed with the court with the motion for temporary preadoptive custody.
Sec.
8. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.52, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Requirement
to search registry before adoption petition can be granted; proof of search. No petition for adoption may be granted
unless the agency supervising the adoptive placement, the birth mother of the
child, or, in the case of a stepparent or relative adoption, the county agency
responsible for the report required under section 259.53, subdivision 1,
requests that the commissioner of health search the registry to determine
whether a
putative
father is registered in relation to a child who is or may be the subject of an
adoption petition. The search required
by this subdivision must be conducted no sooner than 31 days following the
birth of the child. A search of the registry
may be proven by the production of a certified copy of the registration form or
by a certified statement of the commissioner of health that after a search no
registration of a putative father in relation to a child who is or may be the
subject of an adoption petition could be located. The filing of a certified copy of an order from a juvenile
protection matter under chapter 260C containing a finding that certification of
the requisite search of the Minnesota Fathers' Adoption Registry was filed with
the court in that matter shall also constitute proof of search. Certification that the fathers' adoption
registry has been searched must be filed with the court prior to entry of any
final order of adoption. In addition to
the search required by this subdivision, the agency supervising the adoptive
placement, the birth mother of the child, or, in the case of a stepparent or
relative adoption, the county social services agency responsible
for the report under section 259.53, subdivision 1, or the responsible
social services agency that is a petitioner in a juvenile protection matter under
chapter 260C may request that the commissioner of health search the
registry at any time.
Sec.
9. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.53, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Reports
and records. (a) The contents of
all reports and records of the commissioner of human services, local social
services agency, or child-placing agency bearing on the suitability of the
proposed adoptive home and the child to each other shall not be disclosed
either directly or indirectly to any person other than the commissioner of
human services, the child's guardian ad litem appointed under: (1) section 260C.163 when the guardian's
appointment continues under section 260C.317, subdivision 3, paragraph (b); or
(2) section 259.65, or a judge of the court having jurisdiction of the
matter, except as provided in paragraph (b).
(b) A
judge of the court having jurisdiction of the matter shall upon request
disclose to a party to the proceedings or the party's counsel any portion of a
report or record that relates only to the suitability of the proposed adoptive
parents. In this disclosure, the judge
may withhold the identity of individuals providing information in the report or
record. When the judge is considering
whether to disclose the identity of individuals providing information, the
agency with custody of the report or record shall be permitted to present
reasons for or against disclosure.
Sec.
10. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 259.57, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Findings;
orders. Upon the hearing,
(a) if
the court finds that it is in the best interests of the child person
to be adopted that the petition be granted, a decree of adoption shall be
made and recorded in the office of the court administrator, ordering that henceforth
the child person to be adopted shall be the child of the
petitioner. In the decree the court may
change the name of the child adopted person if desired. After the decree is granted for a child
an adopted person who is:
(1)
under the guardianship of the commissioner or a licensed child-placing agency
according to section 260C.201, subdivision 11, or 260C.317;
(2)
placed by the commissioner, commissioner's agent, or licensed child-placing
agency after a consent to adopt according to section 259.24 or under an
agreement conferring authority to place for adoption according to section
259.25; or
(3)
adopted after a direct adoptive placement ordered by the district court under
section 259.47,
the court administrator
shall immediately mail a copy of the recorded decree to the commissioner of
human services;
(b) if
the court is not satisfied that the proposed adoption is in the best interests
of the child person to be adopted, the court shall deny the
petition, and in the case of a child shall order the child returned to
the custody of the person or agency legally vested with permanent custody or
certify the case for appropriate action and disposition to the court having
jurisdiction to determine the custody and guardianship of the child.
Sec.
11. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.59, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Legal
effect. Upon adoption, the child
adopted person shall become the legal child of the adopting persons and
they shall become the legal parents of the child with all the rights and duties
between them of birth parents and legitimate child. By virtue of the adoption the child adopted person shall
inherit from the adoptive parents or their relatives the same as though the child
adopted person were the natural child of the parents, and in case of the
child's adopted person's death intestate the adoptive parents and
their relatives shall inherit the child's adopted person's estate
as if they the adopted person had been the child's birth parents
and relatives. After a decree of
adoption is entered the birth parents of an adopted child person shall
be relieved of all parental responsibilities for the child adopted
person, and they shall not exercise or have any rights over the adopted child
person or the child's adopted person's property. The child adopted person shall
not owe the birth parents or their relatives any legal duty nor shall the child
adopted person inherit from the birth parents or kindred, except as
provided in subdivision 1a and section 257C.08, subdivision 6.
Sec.
12. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.59, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Enrollment
in American Indian tribe.
Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision 1, the adoption of a child
person whose birth parent or parents are enrolled in an American Indian
tribe shall not change the child's person's enrollment in that
tribe.
Sec.
13. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.67, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Adoption
assistance agreement. The placing
agency shall certify a child as eligible for adoption assistance according to
rules promulgated by the commissioner.
The placing agency shall not certify a child who remains under the
jurisdiction of the sending agency pursuant to section 260.851, article 5, for
state-funded adoption assistance when Minnesota is the receiving state. Not later than 30 days after a parent or
parents are found and approved for adoptive placement of a child certified as
eligible for adoption assistance, and before the final decree of adoption is
issued, a written agreement must be entered into by the commissioner, the
adoptive parent or parents, and the placing agency. The written agreement must be fully completed by the placing
agency and in the form prescribed by the commissioner and must set forth the
responsibilities of all parties, the anticipated duration of the adoption
assistance payments, and the payment terms.
The adoption assistance agreement shall be subject to the commissioner's
approval, which must be granted or denied not later than 15 days after the
agreement is entered.
The
amount of adoption assistance is subject to the availability of state and
federal funds and shall be determined through agreement with the adoptive
parents. The agreement shall take into
consideration the circumstances of the adopting parent or parents, the needs of
the child being adopted and may provide ongoing monthly assistance,
supplemental maintenance expenses related to the adopted person's
child's special needs, nonmedical expenses periodically necessary for
purchase of services, items, or equipment related to the special needs, and
medical expenses. The placing agency or
the adoptive parent or parents shall provide written documentation to support
the need for adoption assistance payments. The commissioner may require periodic reevaluation of adoption
assistance payments. The amount of
ongoing monthly adoption assistance granted may in no case exceed that which
would be allowable for the child under foster family care and is subject to the
availability of state and federal funds.
Sec.
14. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.67, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Annual
affidavit Modification or termination of the adoption assistance
agreement. When adoption
assistance agreements are for more than one year, the adoptive parents or
guardian or conservator shall annually present an affidavit stating whether the
adopted person remains under their care and whether the need for adoption
assistance continues to exist. The
commissioner may verify the affidavit. The
adoption assistance agreement shall continue in accordance with its terms as
long as the need for adoption assistance continues and the adopted person
child is the legal or financial dependent of the adoptive parent or parents
or guardian or conservator and is under 18 years of age. The adoption assistance agreement may be
extended to age 22 as allowed by rules adopted by the commissioner. Termination or modification of the adoption
assistance agreement may be requested by the adoptive parents or subsequent
guardian or conservator at any time.
When the commissioner determines that a child is eligible for adoption
assistance under Title IV-E of the Social Security Act, United States Code,
title 42, sections 670 to 679a, the commissioner shall modify the adoption
assistance agreement in order to obtain the funds under that act.
Sec.
15. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.67, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
3a. Recovery
of overpayments. An amount
of adoption assistance paid to an adoptive parent in excess of the payment due
is recoverable by the commissioner, even when the overpayment was caused by
agency error or circumstances outside the responsibility and control of the
family or provider. Adoption assistance
amounts covered by this subdivision include basic maintenance needs payments,
monthly supplemental maintenance needs payments, reimbursement of nonrecurring
adoption expenses, reimbursement of special nonmedical costs, and reimbursement
of medical costs.
Sec.
16. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 259.67, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd.
4. Eligibility
conditions. (a) The placing agency
shall use the AFDC requirements as specified in federal law as of July 16,
1996, when determining the child's eligibility for adoption assistance under
title IV-E of the Social Security Act.
If the child does not qualify, the placing agency shall certify a child
as eligible for state funded adoption assistance only if the following criteria
are met:
(1)
Due to the child's characteristics or circumstances it would be difficult to
provide the child an adoptive home without adoption assistance.
(2)(i)
A placement agency has made reasonable efforts to place the child for adoption
without adoption assistance, but has been unsuccessful; or
(ii)
the child's licensed foster parents desire to adopt the child and it is
determined by the placing agency that the adoption is in the best interest of
the child; or
(iii)
the child's relative, as defined in section 260C.007, subdivision 27, desires
to adopt the child, and it is determined by the placing agency that the
adoption is in the best interest of the child.
(3)(i)
The child has been is a ward of the commissioner, a
Minnesota-licensed child-placing agency, or a tribal social service agency
of Minnesota recognized by the Secretary of the Interior; or (ii) the child
will be adopted according to tribal law without a termination of parental
rights or relinquishment, provided that the tribe has documented the valid
reason why the child cannot or should not be returned to the home of the
child's parent. The placing agency
shall not certify a child who remains under the jurisdiction of the sending
agency pursuant to section 260.851, article 5, for state-funded adoption
assistance when Minnesota is the receiving state. A child who is adopted by the child's legal custodian or
guardian shall not be eligible for state-funded adoption assistance.
(b) For
purposes of this subdivision, The characteristics or circumstances that may
be considered in determining whether a child is a child with special needs
under United States Code, title 42, chapter 7, subchapter IV, part E, or
meets the requirements of paragraph (a), clause (1), or section 473(c)(2)(A)
of the Social Security Act, are the following:
(1)
The child is a member of a sibling group to be placed as one unit in which at
least one sibling is older than 15 months of age or is described in clause (2)
or (3).
(2)
The child has documented physical, mental, emotional, or behavioral
disabilities.
(3)
The child has a high risk of developing physical, mental, emotional, or
behavioral disabilities.
(4)
The child is five years of age or older.
(c)
When a child's eligibility for adoption assistance is based upon the high risk
of developing physical, mental, emotional, or behavioral disabilities, payments
shall not be made under the adoption assistance agreement unless and until the
potential disability manifests itself as documented by an appropriate health
care professional.
Sec.
17. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.75, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd.
5. Withdrawal
of registration. A child's
registration shall be withdrawn when the exchange service has been notified in
writing by the local social service agency and or the licensed
child-placing agency that the child has been adopted, has become 14 years
old and will not consent to an adoption plan, placed in an adoptive home
or has died.
Sec.
18. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.89, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Request. An adopted person who is 19 years of age or
over may request the commissioner of health to disclose the information on the
adopted person's original birth record.
The commissioner of health shall, within five days of receipt of the
request, notify the commissioner of human services services' agent or
licensed child-placing agency when known, or the commissioner of human services
when the agency is not known in writing of the request by the adopted
person.
Sec.
19. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.89, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Search. Within six months after receiving notice of
the request of the adopted person, the commissioner of human services services'
agent or a licensed child-placing agency shall make complete and reasonable
efforts to notify each parent identified on the original birth record of the
adopted person. The commissioner, the
commissioner's agents, and licensed child-placing agencies may charge a
reasonable fee to the adopted person for the cost of making a search pursuant
to this subdivision. Every licensed
child-placing agency in the state shall cooperate with the commissioner of
human services in efforts to notify an identified parent. All communications under this subdivision
are confidential pursuant to section 13.02, subdivision 3.
For
purposes of this subdivision, "notify" means a personal and
confidential contact with the birth parents named on the original birth record
of the adopted person. The contact shall
not be by mail and shall be by an employee or agent of the licensed
child-placing agency which processed the pertinent adoption or some other
licensed child-placing agency designated by the commissioner of human services
when it is determined to be reasonable by the commissioner; otherwise contact
shall be by mail or telephone. The
contact shall be evidenced by filing with the commissioner of health an
affidavit of notification executed by the person who notified each parent
certifying that each parent was given the following information:
(a) (1) the nature of the
information requested by the adopted person;
(b) (2) the date of the request of
the adopted person;
(c) (3) the right of the parent to
file, within 30 days of receipt of the notice, an affidavit with the
commissioner of health stating that the information on the original birth
record should not be disclosed;
(d) (4) the right of the parent to
file a consent to disclosure with the commissioner of health at any time; and
(e) (5) the effect of a failure of
the parent to file either a consent to disclosure or an affidavit stating that
the information on the original birth record should not be disclosed.
Sec.
20. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.89, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd.
4. Release
of information after notice. If,
within six months, the commissioner of human services certifies services'
agent or licensed child-placing agency document to the commissioner of
health notification of each parent identified on the original birth record
pursuant to subdivision 2, the commissioner of health shall disclose the
information requested by the adopted person 31 days after the date of the
latest notice to either parent. This
disclosure will occur if, at any time during the 31 days both of the parents
identified on the original birth record have filed a consent to disclosure with
the commissioner of health and neither consent to disclosure has been revoked
by the subsequent filing by a parent of an affidavit stating that the information
should not be disclosed. If only one
parent has filed a consent to disclosure and the consent has not been revoked,
the commissioner of health shall disclose, to the adopted person, original
birth record information on the consenting parent only.
Sec.
21. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
259.89, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
7. Adult
adoptions. Notwithstanding
section 144.218, a person adopted as an adult shall be permitted to access the
person's birth records that existed prior to the adult adoption. Access to the existing birth records shall
be the same access that was permitted prior to the adult adoption.
Sec.
22. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260.835, is amended to read:
260.835 AMERICAN INDIAN CHILD WELFARE
ADVISORY COUNCIL.
Subdivision
1. Creation. The commissioner shall appoint an American
Indian Advisory Council to help formulate policies and procedures relating to
Indian child welfare services and to make recommendations regarding approval of
grants provided under section 260.785, subdivisions 1, 2, and 3. The council shall consist of 17 members
appointed by the commissioner and must include representatives of each of the
11 Minnesota reservations who are authorized by tribal resolution, one
representative from the Duluth Urban Indian Community, three representatives
from the Minneapolis Urban Indian Community, and two representatives from the
St. Paul Urban Indian Community.
Representatives from the urban Indian communities must be selected
through an open appointments process under section 15.0597. The terms, compensation, and removal of
American Indian Child Welfare Advisory Council members shall be as provided in
section 15.059.
Subd.
2. Expiration. Notwithstanding section 15.059, subdivision
5, the American Indian Child Welfare Advisory Council expires June 30, 2008
2012.
Sec.
23. [260.853] INTERSTATE COMPACT FOR THE PLACEMENT OF CHILDREN.
ARTICLE
I. PURPOSE
The
purpose of this Interstate Compact for the Placement of Children is to:
A.
Provide a process through which children subject to this compact are placed in
safe and suitable homes in a timely manner.
B.
Facilitate ongoing supervision of a placement, the delivery of services, and
communication between the states.
C.
Provide operating procedures that will ensure that children are placed in safe
and suitable homes in a timely manner.
D.
Provide for the promulgation and enforcement of administrative rules
implementing the provisions of this compact and regulating the covered
activities of the member states.
E.
Provide for uniform data collection and information sharing between member
states under this compact.
F.
Promote coordination between this compact, the Interstate Compact for
Juveniles, the Interstate Compact on Adoption and Medical Assistance and other
compacts affecting the placement of and which provide services to children
otherwise subject to this compact.
G.
Provide for a state's continuing legal jurisdiction and responsibility for
placement and care of a child that it would have had if the placement were
intrastate.
H.
Provide for the promulgation of guidelines, in collaboration with Indian
tribes, for interstate cases involving Indian children as is or may be
permitted by federal law.
ARTICLE
II. DEFINITIONS
As
used in this compact,
A.
"Approved placement" means the public child-placing agency in the
receiving state has determined that the placement is both safe and suitable for
the child.
B.
"Assessment" means an evaluation of a prospective placement by a
public child-placing agency to determine whether the placement meets the
individualized needs of the child, including but not limited to the child's
safety and stability, health and well-being, and mental, emotional, and
physical development. An assessment is
only applicable to a placement by a public child-placing agency.
C.
"Child" means an individual who has not attained the age of eighteen
(18).
D.
"Certification" means to attest, declare or sworn to before a judge
or notary public.
E.
"Default" means the failure of a member state to perform the
obligations or responsibilities imposed upon it by this compact, the bylaws or
rules of the Interstate Commission.
F.
"Home Study" means an evaluation of a home environment conducted
according to the applicable requirements of the State in which the home is
located, and documents the preparation and the suitability of the placement
resource for placement of a child according to the laws and requirements of the
state in which the home is located.
G.
"Indian tribe" means any Indian tribe, band, nation, or other
organized group or community of Indians recognized as eligible for services
provided to Indians by the Secretary of the Interior because of their status as
Indians, including any Alaskan native village as defined in section 3 (c) of
the Alaska Native Claims settlement Act at 43 USC§1602(c).
H.
"Interstate Commission for the Placement of Children" means the
commission that is created under Article VIII of this compact and which is
generally referred to as the Interstate Commission.
I.
"Jurisdiction" means the power and authority of a court to hear and
decide matters.
J.
"Legal Risk Placement" ("Legal Risk Adoption") means a
placement made preliminary to an adoption where the prospective adoptive
parents acknowledge in writing that a child can be ordered returned to the
sending state or the birth mother's state of residence, if different from the
sending state and a final decree of adoption shall not be entered in any
jurisdiction until all required consents are obtained or are dispensed with
according to applicable law.
K.
"Member state" means a state that has enacted this compact.
L.
"Noncustodial parent" means a person who, at the time of the
commencement of court proceedings in the sending state, does not have sole legal
custody of the child or has joint legal custody of a child, and who is not the
subject of allegations or findings of child abuse or neglect.
M.
"Nonmember state" means a state which has not enacted this compact.
N.
"Notice of residential placement" means information regarding a
placement into a residential facility provided to the receiving state
including, but not limited to the name, date and place of birth of the child,
the identity and address of the parent or legal guardian, evidence of authority
to make the placement, and the name and address of the facility in which the
child will be placed. Notice of
residential placement shall also include information regarding a discharge and
any unauthorized absence from the facility.
O.
"Placement" means the act by a public or private child-placing agency
intended to arrange for the care or custody of a child in another state.
P.
"Private child-placing agency" means any private corporation, agency,
foundation, institution, or charitable organization, or any private person or
attorney that facilitates, causes, or is involved in the placement of a child
from one state to another and that is not an instrumentality of the state or
acting under color of state law.
Q.
"Provisional placement" means a determination made by the public
child-placing agency in the receiving state that the proposed placement is safe
and suitable, and, to the extent allowable, the receiving state has temporarily
waived its standards or requirements otherwise applicable to prospective foster
or adoptive parents so as to not delay the placement. Completion of an assessment and the receiving state requirements
regarding training for prospective foster or adoptive parents shall not delay
an otherwise safe and suitable placement.
R.
"Public child-placing agency" means any government child welfare
agency or child protection agency or a private entity under contract with such
an agency, regardless of whether they act on behalf of a state, county,
municipality or other governmental unit and which facilitates, causes, or is
involved in the placement of a child from one state to another.
S.
"Receiving state" means the state to which a child is sent, brought,
or caused to be sent or brought.
T.
"Relative" means someone who is related to the child as a parent,
step-parent, sibling by half or whole blood or by adoption, grandparent, aunt,
uncle, or first cousin or a non-relative with such significant ties to the
child that they may be regarded as relatives as determined by the court in the
sending state.
U.
"Residential Facility" means a facility providing a level of care
that is sufficient to substitute for parental responsibility or foster care,
and is beyond what is needed for assessment or treatment of an acute condition. For purposes of the compact, residential
facilities do not include institutions primarily educational in character,
hospitals or other medical facilities.
V.
"Rule" means a written directive, mandate, standard or principle
issued by the Interstate Commission promulgated pursuant to Article XI of this
compact that is of general applicability and that implements, interprets or
prescribes a policy or provision of the compact. "Rule" has the force
and effect of an administrative rule in a member state, and includes the amendment,
repeal, or suspension of an existing rule.
W.
"Sending state" means the state from which the placement of a child
is initiated.
X.
"Service member's permanent duty station" means the military
installation where an active duty Armed Services member is currently assigned
and is physically located under competent orders that do not specify the duty
as temporary.
Y.
"Service member's state of legal residence" means the state in which
the active duty Armed Services member is considered a resident for tax and voting
purposes.
Z.
"State" means a state of the United States, the District of Columbia,
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa,
the Northern Marianas Islands and any other territory of the United States.
AA.
"State court" means a judicial body of a state that is vested by law
with responsibility for adjudicating cases involving abuse, neglect,
deprivation, delinquency or status offenses of individuals who have not
attained the age of eighteen (18).
BB.
"Supervision" means monitoring provided by the receiving state once a
child has been placed in a receiving state pursuant to this compact.
ARTICLE
III. APPLICABILITY
A.
Except as otherwise provided in Article III, Section B, this compact shall
apply to:
1.
The interstate placement of a child subject to ongoing court jurisdiction in
the sending state, due to allegations or findings that the child has been
abused, neglected, or deprived as defined by the laws of the sending state,
provided, however, that the placement of such a child into a residential
facility shall only require notice of residential placement to the receiving
state prior to placement.
2.
The interstate placement of a child adjudicated delinquent or unmanageable
based on the laws of the sending state and subject to ongoing court
jurisdiction of the sending state if:
a.
the child is being placed in a residential facility in another member state and
is not covered under another compact; or
b.
the child is being placed in another member state and the determination of
safety and suitability of the placement and services required is not provided
through another compact.
3.
The interstate placement of any child by a public child-placing agency or
private child-placing agency as defined in this compact as a preliminary step
to a possible adoption.
B.
The provisions of this compact shall not apply to:
1.
The interstate placement of a child in a custody proceeding in which a public
child placing agency is not a party, provided the placement is not intended to
effectuate an adoption.
2.
The interstate placement of a child with a non-relative in a receiving state by
a parent with the legal authority to make such a placement provided, however,
that the placement is not intended to effectuate an adoption.
3. The
interstate placement of a child by one relative with the lawful authority to
make such a placement directly with a relative in a receiving state.
4.
The placement of a child, not subject to Article III, Section A, into a
residential facility by his parent.
5.
The placement of a child with a noncustodial parent provided that:
a.
The noncustodial parent proves to the satisfaction of a court in the sending
state a substantial relationship with the child; and
b.
The court in the sending state makes a written finding that placement with the
non-custodial parent is in the best interests of the child; and
c.
The court in the sending state dismisses its jurisdiction over the child's
case.
6.
A child entering the United States from a foreign country for the purpose of
adoption or leaving the United States to go to a foreign country for the
purpose of adoption in that country.
7.
Cases in which a U.S. citizen child living overseas with his family, at least
one of whom is in the U.S. Armed Services, and who is stationed overseas, is
removed and placed in a state.
8.
The sending of a child by a public child-placing agency or a private
child-placing agency for a visit as defined by the rules of the Interstate
Commission.
C.
For purposes of determining the applicability of this compact to the placement
of a child with a family in the Armed Services, the public child-placing agency
or private child-placing agency may choose the state of the service member's
permanent duty station or the service member's declared legal residence.
D.
Nothing in this compact shall be construed to prohibit the concurrent
application of the provisions of this compact with other applicable interstate
compacts including the Interstate Compact for Juveniles and the Interstate
Compact on Adoption and Medical Assistance.
The Interstate Commission may in cooperation with other interstate
compact commissions having responsibility for the interstate movement,
placement or transfer of children, promulgate like rules to ensure the
coordination of services, timely placement of children, and the reduction of
unnecessary or duplicative administrative or procedural requirements.
ARTICLE
IV. JURISDICTION
A.
Except as provided in Article IV, Section G, concerning private and independent
adoptions and in interstate placements in which the public child placing agency
is not a party to a custody proceeding, the sending state shall retain
jurisdiction over a child with respect to all matters of custody and
disposition of the child which it would have had if the child had remained in
the sending state. Such jurisdiction
shall also include the power to order the return of the child to the sending
state.
B.
When an issue of child protection or custody is brought before a court in the
receiving state, such court shall confer with the court of the sending state to
determine the most appropriate forum for adjudication.
C. In accordance with its own laws, the court in the
sending state shall have authority to terminate its jurisdiction if:
1.
The child is reunified with the parent in the receiving state who is the
subject of allegations or findings of abuse or neglect, only with the
concurrence of the public child-placing agency in the receiving state; or
2.
The child is adopted;
3.
The child reaches the age of majority under the laws of the sending state; or
4.
The child achieves legal independence pursuant to the laws of the sending
state; or
5.
A guardianship is created by a court in the receiving state with the
concurrence of the court in the sending state; or
6.
An Indian tribe has petitioned for and received jurisdiction from the court in
the sending state; or
7.
The public child-placing agency of the sending state requests termination and
has obtained the concurrence of the public child-placing agency in the
receiving the state.
D.
When a sending state court terminates its jurisdiction, the receiving state
child-placing agency shall be notified.
E.
Nothing in this article shall defeat a claim of jurisdiction by a receiving
state court sufficient to deal with an act of truancy, delinquency, crime or
behavior involving a child as defined by the laws of the receiving state
committed by the child in the receiving state which would be a violation of its
laws.
F.
Nothing in this article shall limit the receiving state's ability to take
emergency jurisdiction for the protection of the child.
G.
The substantive laws of the state in which an adoption will be finalized shall
solely govern all issues relating to the adoption of the child and the court in
which the adoption proceeding is filed shall have subject matter jurisdiction
regarding all substantive issues relating to the adoption, except:
1.
when the child is a ward of another court that established jurisdiction over
the child prior to the placement;
2.
when the child is in the legal custody of a public agency in the sending state;
or
3.
when the court in the sending state has otherwise appropriately assumed
jurisdiction over the child, prior to the submission of the request for
approval of placement.
ARTICLE
V. PLACEMENT EVALUATION
A.
Prior to sending, bringing, or causing a child to be sent or brought into a
receiving state, the public child-placing agency shall provide a written
request for assessment to the receiving state.
B.
For placements by a private child-placing agency, a child may be sent or
brought, or caused to be sent or brought, into a receiving state, upon receipt
and immediate review of the required content in a request for approval of a
placement in both the sending and receiving state public child-placing
agency. The required content to
accompany a request for provisional approval shall include all of the
following:
1.
A request for approval identifying the child, birth parents, the prospective
adoptive parents, and the supervising agency, signed by the person requesting
approval; and
2.
The appropriate consents or relinquishments signed by the birthparents in
accordance with the laws of the sending state or, where permitted, the laws of
the state where the adoption will be finalized; and
3.
Certification by a licensed attorney or other authorized agent of a private
adoption agency that the consent or relinquishment is in compliance with the
applicable laws of the sending state, or where permitted the laws of the state
where finalization of the adoption will occur; and
4.
A home study; and
5.
An acknowledgment of legal risk signed by the prospective adoptive parents.
C.
The sending state and the receiving state may request additional information or
documents prior to finalization of an approved placement, but they may not
delay travel by the prospective adoptive parents with the child if the required
content for approval has been submitted, received, and reviewed by the public
child-placing agency in both the sending state and the receiving state.
D.
Approval from the public child-placing agency in the receiving state for a
provisional or approved placement is required as provided for in the rules of
the Interstate Commission.
E.
The procedures for making, and the request for an assessment, shall contain all
information and be in such form as provided for in the rules of the Interstate
Commission.
F.
Upon receipt of a request from the public child-placing agency of the sending
state, the receiving state shall initiate an assessment of the proposed
placement to determine its safety and suitability. If the proposed placement is a placement with a relative, the
public child-placing agency of the sending state may request a determination
for a provisional placement.
G.
The public child-placing agency in the receiving state may request from the
public child-placing agency or the private child-placing agency in the sending
state, and shall be entitled to receive supporting or additional information
necessary to complete the assessment.
ARTICLE
VI. PLACEMENT AUTHORITY
A.
Except as otherwise provided in this compact, no child subject to this compact
shall be placed into a receiving state until approval for such placement is
obtained.
B.
If the public child-placing agency in the receiving state does not approve the
proposed placement then the child shall not be placed. The receiving state shall provide written
documentation of any such determination in accordance with the rules
promulgated by the Interstate Commission.
Such determination is not subject to judicial review in the sending
state.
C.
If the proposed placement is not approved, any interested party shall have
standing to seek an administrative review of the receiving state's
determination.
1.
The administrative review and any further judicial review associated with the
determination shall be conducted in the receiving state pursuant to its
applicable administrative procedures.
2.
If a determination not to approve the placement of the child in the receiving
state is overturned upon review, the placement shall be deemed approved,
provided however that all administrative or judicial remedies have been
exhausted or the time for such remedies has passed.
ARTICLE
VII. PLACING AGENCY RESPONSIBILITY
A.
For the interstate placement of a child made by a public child-placing agency
or state court:
1.
The public child-placing agency in the sending state shall have financial
responsibility for:
a.
the ongoing support and maintenance for the child during the period of the
placement, unless otherwise provided for in the receiving state; and
b.
as determined by the public child-placing agency in the sending state, services
for the child beyond the public services for which the child is eligible in the
receiving state.
2.
The receiving state shall only have financial responsibility for:
a.
any assessment conducted by the receiving state; and
b.
supervision conducted by the receiving state at the level necessary to support
the placement as agreed upon by the public child-placing agencies of the
receiving and sending state.
3.
Nothing in this provision shall prohibit public child-placing agencies in the
sending state from entering into agreements with licensed agencies or persons
in the receiving state to conduct assessments and provide supervision.
B.
For the placement of a child by a private child-placing agency preliminary to a
possible adoption, the private child-placing agency shall be:
1.
Legally responsible for the child during the period of placement as provided
for in the law of the sending state until the finalization of the adoption.
2.
Financially responsible for the child absent a contractual agreement to the
contrary.
C.
The public child-placing agency in the receiving state shall provide timely
assessments, as provided for in the rules of the Interstate Commission.
D.
The public child-placing agency in the receiving state shall provide, or
arrange for the provision of, supervision and services for the child, including
timely reports, during the period of the placement.
E.
Nothing in this compact shall be construed as to limit the authority of the
public child-placing agency in the receiving state from contracting with a
licensed agency or person in the receiving state for an assessment or the
provision of supervision or services for the child or otherwise authorizing the
provision of supervision or services by a licensed agency during the period of
placement.
F.
Each member state shall provide for coordination among its branches of
government concerning the state's participation in, and compliance with, the
compact and Interstate Commission activities, through the creation of an
advisory council or use of an existing body or board.
G.
Each member state shall establish a central state compact office, which shall
be responsible for state compliance with the compact and the rules of the
Interstate Commission.
H.
The public child-placing agency in the sending state shall oversee compliance
with the provisions of the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 USC 1901 et seq.) for
placements subject to the provisions of this compact, prior to placement.
I.
With the consent of the Interstate Commission, states may enter into limited
agreements that facilitate the timely assessment and provision of services and
supervision of placements under this compact.
ARTICLE
VIII. INTERSTATE COMMISSION FOR THE
PLACEMENT
OF CHILDREN
The
member states hereby establish, by way of this compact, a commission known as
the "Interstate Commission for the Placement of Children." The
activities of the Interstate Commission are the formation of public policy and
are a discretionary state function. The
Interstate Commission shall:
A.
Be a joint commission of the member states and shall have the responsibilities,
powers and duties set forth herein, and such additional powers as may be
conferred upon it by subsequent concurrent action of the respective
legislatures of the member states.
B.
Consist of one commissioner from each member state who shall be appointed by
the executive head of the state human services administration with ultimate
responsibility for the child welfare program.
The appointed commissioner shall have the legal authority to vote on
policy related matters governed by this compact binding the state.
1.
Each member state represented at a meeting of the Interstate Commission is
entitled to one vote.
2.
A majority of the member states shall constitute a quorum for the transaction
of business, unless a larger quorum is required by the bylaws of the Interstate
Commission.
3.
A representative shall not delegate a vote to another member state.
4.
A representative may delegate voting authority to another person from their
state for a specified meeting.
C.
In addition to the commissioners of each member state, the Interstate
Commission shall include persons who are members of interested organizations as
defined in the bylaws or rules of the Interstate Commission. Such members shall be ex officio and shall
not be entitled to vote on any matter before the Interstate Commission.
D.
Establish an executive committee which shall have the authority to administer
the day-to-day operations and administration of the Interstate Commission. It shall not have the power to engage in
rulemaking.
ARTICLE
IX. POWERS AND DUTIES OF
THE
INTERSTATE COMMISSION
The
Interstate Commission shall have the following powers:
A.
To promulgate rules and take all necessary actions to effect the goals,
purposes and obligations as enumerated in this compact.
B.
To provide for dispute resolution among member states.
C.
To issue, upon request of a member state, advisory opinions concerning the
meaning or interpretation of the interstate compact, its bylaws, rules or
actions.
D.
To enforce compliance with this compact or the bylaws or rules of the
Interstate Commission pursuant to Article XII.
E.
Collect standardized data concerning the interstate placement of children
subject to this compact as directed through its rules which shall specify the
data to be collected, the means of collection and data exchange and reporting
requirements.
F.
To establish and maintain offices as may be necessary for the transacting of
its business.
G.
To purchase and maintain insurance and bonds.
H.
To hire or contract for services of personnel or consultants as necessary to
carry out its functions under the compact and establish personnel qualification
policies, and rates of compensation.
I.
To establish and appoint committees and officers including, but not limited to,
an executive committee as required by Article X.
J.
To accept any and all donations and grants of money, equipment, supplies,
materials, and services, and to receive, utilize, and dispose thereof.
K.
To lease, purchase, accept contributions or donations of, or otherwise to own,
hold, improve or use any property, real, personal, or mixed.
L.
To sell, convey, mortgage, pledge, lease, exchange, abandon, or otherwise
dispose of any property, real, personal or mixed.
M.
To establish a budget and make expenditures.
N.
To adopt a seal and bylaws governing the management and operation of the
Interstate Commission.
O.
To report annually to the legislatures, governors, the judiciary, and state
advisory councils of the member states concerning the activities of the
Interstate Commission during the preceding year. Such reports shall also include any recommendations that may have
been adopted by the Interstate Commission.
P.
To coordinate and provide education, training and public awareness regarding
the interstate movement of children for officials involved in such activity.
Q.
To maintain books and records in accordance with the bylaws of the Interstate
Commission.
R.
To perform such functions as may be necessary or appropriate to achieve the
purposes of this compact.
ARTICLE
X. ORGANIZATION AND OPERATION OF THE
INTERSTATE COMMISSION
A.
Bylaws
1.
Within 12 months after the first Interstate Commission meeting, the Interstate
Commission shall adopt bylaws to govern its conduct as may be necessary or
appropriate to carry out the purposes of the compact.
2.
The Interstate Commission's bylaws and rules shall establish conditions and
procedures under which the Interstate Commission shall make its information and
official records available to the public for inspection or copying. The Interstate Commission may exempt from
disclosure information or official records to the extent they would adversely
affect personal privacy rights or proprietary interests.
B.
Meetings
1.
The Interstate Commission shall meet at least once each calendar year. The chairperson may call additional meetings
and, upon the request of a simple majority of the member states shall call
additional meetings.
2.
Public notice shall be given by the Interstate Commission of all meetings and
all meetings shall be open to the public, except as set forth in the rules or
as otherwise provided in the compact.
The Interstate Commission and its committees may close a meeting, or
portion thereof, where it determines by two-thirds vote that an open meeting
would be likely to:
a.
relate solely to the Interstate Commission's internal personnel practices and
procedures; or
b.
disclose matters specifically exempted from disclosure by federal law; or
c.
disclose financial or commercial information which is privileged, proprietary
or confidential in nature; or
d.
involve accusing a person of a crime, or formally censuring a person; or
e.
disclose information of a personal nature where disclosure would constitute a
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy or physically endanger one or
more persons; or
f.
disclose investigative records compiled for law enforcement purposes; or
g.
specifically relate to the Interstate Commission's participation in a civil
action or other legal proceeding.
3.
For a meeting, or portion of a meeting, closed pursuant to this provision, the
Interstate Commission's legal counsel or designee shall certify that the
meeting may be closed and shall reference each relevant exemption
provision. The Interstate Commission
shall keep minutes which shall fully and clearly describe all matters discussed
in a meeting and shall provide a full and accurate summary of actions taken,
and the reasons therefore, including a description of the views expressed and
the record of a roll call vote. All
documents considered in connection with an action shall be identified in such
minutes. All minutes and documents of a
closed meeting shall remain under seal, subject to release by a majority vote
of the Interstate Commission or by court order.
4.
The bylaws may provide for meetings of the Interstate Commission to be
conducted by telecommunication or other electronic communication.
C.
Officers and Staff
1.
The Interstate Commission may, through its executive committee, appoint or
retain a staff director for such period, upon such terms and conditions and for
such compensation as the Interstate Commission may deem appropriate. The staff director shall serve as secretary
to the Interstate Commission, but shall not have a vote. The staff director may hire and supervise
such other staff as may be authorized by the Interstate Commission.
2.
The Interstate Commission shall elect, from among its members, a chairperson
and a vice chairperson of the executive committee and other necessary officers,
each of whom shall have such authority and duties as may be specified in the
bylaws.
D. Qualified
Immunity, Defense and Indemnification
1.
The Interstate Commission's staff director and its employees shall be immune
from suit and liability, either personally or in their official capacity, for a
claim for damage to or loss of property or personal injury or other civil
liability caused or arising out of or relating to an actual or alleged act,
error, or omission that occurred, or that such person had a reasonable basis
for believing occurred within the scope of Commission employment, duties, or
responsibilities; provided, that such person shall not be protected from suit
or liability for damage, loss, injury, or liability caused by a criminal act or
the intentional or willful and wanton misconduct of such person.
a.
The liability of the Interstate Commission's staff director and employees or
Interstate Commission representatives, acting within the scope of such person's
employment or duties for acts, errors, or omissions occurring within such
person's state may not exceed the limits of liability set forth under the
Constitution and laws of that state for state officials, employees, and
agents. The Interstate Commission is
considered to be an instrumentality of the states for the purposes of any such
action. Nothing in this subsection
shall be construed to protect such person from suit or liability for damage,
loss, injury, or liability caused by a criminal act or the intentional or
willful and wanton misconduct of such person.
b.
The Interstate Commission shall defend the staff director and its employees
and, subject to the approval of the Attorney General or other appropriate legal
counsel of the member state shall defend the commissioner of a member state in
a civil action seeking to impose liability arising out of an actual or alleged
act, error or omission that occurred within the scope of Interstate Commission
employment, duties or responsibilities, or that the defendant had a reasonable
basis for believing occurred within the scope of Interstate Commission
employment, duties, or responsibilities, provided that the actual or alleged
act, error, or omission did not result from intentional or willful and wanton
misconduct on the part of such person.
c.
To the extent not covered by the state involved, member state, or the
Interstate Commission, the representatives or employees of the Interstate
Commission shall be held harmless in the amount of a settlement or judgment,
including attorney's fees and costs, obtained against such persons arising out
of an actual or alleged act, error, or omission that occurred within the scope
of Interstate Commission employment, duties, or responsibilities, or that such
persons had a reasonable basis for believing occurred within the scope of
Interstate Commission employment, duties, or responsibilities, provided that
the actual or alleged act, error, or omission did not result from intentional
or willful and wanton misconduct on the part of such persons.
ARTICLE
XI. RULEMAKING FUNCTIONS OF
THE
INTERSTATE COMMISSION
A.
The Interstate Commission shall promulgate and publish rules in order to
effectively and efficiently achieve the purposes of the compact.
B.
Rulemaking shall occur pursuant to the criteria set forth in this article and
the bylaws and rules adopted pursuant thereto.
Such rulemaking shall substantially conform to the principles of the
"Model State Administrative Procedures Act," 1981 Act, Uniform Laws
Annotated, Vol. 15, p.1 (2000), or such other administrative procedure acts as
the Interstate Commission deems appropriate consistent with due process
requirements under the United States Constitution as now or hereafter
interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court.
All rules and amendments shall become binding as of the date specified,
as published with the final version of the rule as approved by the Interstate
Commission.
C.
When promulgating a rule, the Interstate Commission shall, at a minimum:
1.
Publish the proposed rule's entire text stating the reason(s) for that proposed
rule; and
2.
Allow and invite any and all persons to submit written data, facts, opinions
and arguments, which information shall be added to the record, and be made
publicly available; and
3.
Promulgate a final rule and its effective date, if appropriate, based on input
from state or local officials, or interested parties.
D.
Rules promulgated by the Interstate Commission shall have the force and effect
of administrative rules and shall be binding in the compacting states to the
extent and in the manner provided for in this compact.
E.
Not later than 60 days after a rule is promulgated, an interested person may
file a petition in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia or in
the Federal District Court where the Interstate Commission's principal office
is located for judicial review of such rule.
If the court finds that the Interstate Commission's action is not
supported by substantial evidence in the rulemaking record, the court shall
hold the rule unlawful and set it aside.
F.
If a majority of the legislatures of the member states rejects a rule, those
states may by enactment of a statute or resolution in the same manner used to
adopt the compact cause that such rule shall have no further force and effect
in any member state.
G.
The existing rules governing the operation of the Interstate Compact on the
Placement of Children superseded by this act shall be null and void no less
than 12, but no more than 24 months after the first meeting of the Interstate
Commission created hereunder, as determined by the members during the first
meeting.
H.
Within the first 12 months of operation, the Interstate Commission shall
promulgate rules addressing the following:
1.
Transition rules
2.
Forms and procedures
3.
Time lines
4.
Data collection and reporting
5.
Rulemaking
6.
Visitation
7.
Progress reports/supervision
8.
Sharing of information/confidentiality
9.
Financing of the Interstate Commission
10.
Mediation, arbitration and dispute resolution
11.
Education, training and technical assistance
12.
Enforcement
13.
Coordination with other interstate compacts
I.
Upon determination by a majority of the members of the Interstate Commission
that an emergency exists:
1.
The Interstate Commission may promulgate an emergency rule only if it is
required to:
a.
Protect the children covered by this compact from an imminent threat to their
health, safety and well-being; or
b.
Prevent loss of federal or state funds; or
c.
Meet a deadline for the promulgation of an administrative rule required by
federal law.
2.
An emergency rule shall become effective immediately upon adoption, provided
that the usual rulemaking procedures provided hereunder shall be retroactively
applied to said rule as soon as reasonably possible, but no later than 90 days
after the effective date of the emergency rule.
3.
An emergency rule shall be promulgated as provided for in the rules of the
Interstate Commission.
ARTICLE
XII. OVERSIGHT, DISPUTE RESOLUTION,
ENFORCEMENT
A.
Oversight
1.
The Interstate Commission shall oversee the administration and operation of the
compact.
2.
The executive, legislative and judicial branches of state government in each
member state shall enforce this compact and the rules of the Interstate
Commission and shall take all actions necessary and appropriate to effectuate
the compact's purposes and intent. The
compact and its rules shall be binding in the compacting states to the extent
and in the manner provided for in this compact.
3.
All courts shall take judicial notice of the compact and the rules in any
judicial or administrative proceeding in a member state pertaining to the
subject matter of this compact.
4.
The Interstate Commission shall be entitled to receive service of process in
any action in which the validity of a compact provision or rule is the issue
for which a judicial determination has been sought and shall have standing to
intervene in any proceedings. Failure
to provide service of process to the Interstate Commission shall render any
judgment, order or other determination, however so captioned or classified,
void as to the Interstate Commission, this compact, its bylaws or rules of the
Interstate Commission.
B.
Dispute Resolution
1.
The Interstate Commission shall attempt, upon the request of a member state, to
resolve disputes which are subject to the compact and which may arise among
member states and between member and nonmember states.
2.
The Interstate Commission shall promulgate a rule providing for both mediation
and binding dispute resolution for disputes among compacting states. The costs of such mediation or dispute
resolution shall be the responsibility of the parties to the dispute.
C.
Enforcement
1.
If the Interstate Commission determines that a member state has defaulted in
the performance of its obligations or responsibilities under this compact, its
bylaws or rules, the Interstate Commission may:
a.
Provide remedial training and specific technical assistance; or
b.
Provide written notice to the defaulting state and other member states, of the
nature of the default and the means of curing the default. The Interstate Commission shall specify the
conditions by which the defaulting state must cure its default; or
c.
By majority vote of the members, initiate against a defaulting member state
legal action in the United State District Court for the District of Columbia
or, at the discretion of the Interstate Commission, in the federal district
where the Interstate Commission has its principal office, to enforce compliance
with the provisions of the compact, its bylaws or rules. The relief sought may include both
injunctive relief and damages. In the
event judicial enforcement is necessary the prevailing party shall be awarded
all costs of such litigation including reasonable attorney's fees; or
d.
Avail itself of any other remedies available under state law or the regulation
of official or professional conduct.
ARTICLE
XIII. FINANCING OF THE COMMISSION
A.
The Interstate Commission shall pay, or provide for the payment of the
reasonable expenses of its establishment, organization and ongoing activities.
B.
The Interstate Commission may levy on and collect an annual assessment from
each member state to cover the cost of the operations and activities of the
Interstate Commission and its staff which must be in a total amount sufficient
to cover the Interstate Commission's annual budget as approved by its members
each year. The aggregate annual
assessment amount shall be allocated based upon a formula to be determined by
the Interstate Commission which shall promulgate a rule binding upon all member
states.
C.
The Interstate Commission shall not incur obligations of any kind prior to
securing the funds adequate to meet the same; nor shall the Interstate
Commission pledge the credit of any of the member states, except by and with
the authority of the member state.
D.
The Interstate Commission shall keep accurate accounts of all receipts and
disbursements. The receipts and
disbursements of the Interstate Commission shall be subject to the audit and
accounting procedures established under its bylaws. However, all receipts and disbursements of funds handled by the
Interstate Commission shall be audited yearly by a certified or licensed public
accountant and the report of the audit shall be included in and become part of
the annual report of the Interstate Commission.
ARTICLE
XIV. MEMBER STATES, EFFECTIVE DATE
AND
AMENDMENT
A.
Any state is eligible to become a member state.
B.
The compact shall become effective and binding upon legislative enactment of
the compact into law by no less than 35 states. The effective date shall be the later of July 1, 2007 or upon
enactment of the compact into law by the 35th state. Thereafter it shall become effective and binding as to any other
member state upon enactment of the compact into law by that state. The executive heads of the state human
services administration with ultimate responsibility for the child welfare
program of nonmember states or their designees shall be invited to participate
in the activities of the Interstate Commission on a non-voting basis prior to
adoption of the compact by all states.
C.
The Interstate Commission may propose amendments to the compact for enactment
by the member states. No amendment
shall become effective and binding on the member states unless and until it is
enacted into law by unanimous consent of the member states.
ARTICLE
XV. WITHDRAWAL AND DISSOLUTION
A.
Withdrawal
1.
Once effective, the compact shall continue in force and remain binding upon
each and every member state; provided that a member state may withdraw from the
compact specifically repealing the statute which enacted the compact into law.
2.
Withdrawal from this compact shall be by the enactment of a statute repealing
the same. The effective date of
withdrawal shall be the effective date of the repeal of the statute.
3.
The withdrawing state shall immediately notify the president of the Interstate
Commission in writing upon the introduction of legislation repealing this
compact in the withdrawing state. The
Interstate Commission shall then notify the other member states of the
withdrawing state's intent to withdraw.
4.
The withdrawing state is responsible for all assessments, obligations and
liabilities incurred through the effective date of withdrawal.
5.
Reinstatement following withdrawal of a member state shall occur upon the
withdrawing state reenacting the compact or upon such later date as determined
by the members of the Interstate Commission.
B.
Dissolution of Compact
1.
This compact shall dissolve effective upon the date of the withdrawal or
default of the member state which reduces the membership in the compact to one
member state.
2.
Upon the dissolution of this compact, the compact becomes null and void and
shall be of no further force or effect, and the business and affairs of the
Interstate Commission shall be concluded and surplus funds shall be distributed
in accordance with the bylaws.
ARTICLE
XVI. SEVERABILITY AND CONSTRUCTION
A.
The provisions of this compact shall be severable, and if any phrase, clause,
sentence or provision is deemed unenforceable, the remaining provisions of the
compact shall be enforceable.
B.
The provisions of this compact shall be liberally construed to effectuate its
purposes.
C.
Nothing in this compact shall be construed to prohibit the concurrent
applicability of other interstate compacts to which the states are members.
ARTICLE
XVII. BINDING EFFECT OF COMPACT
AND
OTHER LAWS
A.
Other Laws
1.
Nothing herein prevents the enforcement of any other law of a member state that
is not inconsistent with this compact.
B.
Binding Effect of the Compact
1.
All lawful actions of the Interstate Commission, including all rules and bylaws
promulgated by the Interstate Commission, are binding upon the member states.
2.
All agreements between the Interstate Commission and the member states are
binding in accordance with their terms.
3.
In the event any provision of this compact exceeds the constitutional limits
imposed on the legislature of any member state, such provision shall be
ineffective to the extent of the conflict with the constitutional provision in
question in that member state.
ARTICLE
XVIII. INDIAN TRIBES
Notwithstanding
any other provision in this compact, the Interstate Commission may promulgate
guidelines to permit Indian tribes to
utilize the compact to achieve any or all of the purposes of the compact as
specified in Article I. The
Interstate Commission shall make reasonable efforts to consult with Indian
tribes in promulgating guidelines to reflect the diverse circumstances of
the various Indian tribes.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective upon legislative enactment of the
compact into law by no less than 35 states.
The commissioner of human services shall inform the Revisor of Statutes
when this occurs.
Sec.
24. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.001, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Child
in need of protection services. (a)
The paramount consideration in all proceedings concerning a child alleged
or found to be in need of protection or services is the health, safety, and
best interests of the child. In
proceedings involving an American Indian child, as defined in section 260.755,
subdivision 8, the best interests of the child must be determined consistent
with sections 260.751 to 260.835 and the Indian Child Welfare Act, United
States Code, title 25, sections 1901 to 1923.
(b)
The purpose
of the laws relating to juvenile courts is:
(1) to secure for each child
alleged or adjudicated in need of protection or services and under the
jurisdiction of the court, the care and guidance, preferably in the child's own
home, as will best serve the spiritual, emotional, mental, and physical welfare
of the child;
(2) to provide judicial
procedures which protect the welfare of the child;
(3) to preserve and strengthen
the child's family ties whenever possible and in the child's best interests,
removing the child from the custody of parents only when the child's welfare or
safety cannot be adequately safeguarded without removal;
(4)
to ensure that when removal from the child's own family is necessary and in the
child's best interests, the responsible social services agency has legal
responsibility for the child removal either:
(i)
pursuant to a voluntary placement agreement between the child's parent or
guardian and the responsible social services agency; or
(ii)
by court order pursuant to section 260C.151, subdivision 6; 206C.178; or
260C.201;
(5)
to ensure that, when placement is pursuant to court order, the court order
removing the child or continuing the child in foster care contains an
individualized determination that placement is in the best interests of the
child that coincides with the actual removal of the child; and, when removal from
the child's own family is necessary and in the child's best interests,
(6) to secure for ensure
that when the child is removed, the child custody, child's care
and discipline is, as nearly as possible, equivalent to that
which should have been given by the parents. and is either in:
(i)
the home of a noncustodial parent pursuant to section 260C.178 or 260C.201,
subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (1);
(ii)
the home of a relative pursuant to emergency placement by the responsible
social services agency under chapter 245A; or
(iii)
a foster home licensed under chapter 245A.
Sec.
25. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.007, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd.
5. Child
abuse. "Child abuse"
means an act that involves a minor victim and that constitutes a
violation of section 609.221, 609.222, 609.223, 609.224, 609.2242, 609.322,
609.324, 609.342, 609.343, 609.344, 609.345, 609.377, 609.378, 617.246, or
that is physical or sexual abuse as defined in section 626.556, subdivision 2, or
an act committed in another state that involves a minor victim and would
constitute a violation of one of these sections if committed in this state.
Sec.
26. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.007, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd.
6. Child
in need of protection or services.
"Child in need of protection or services" means a child who is
in need of protection or services because the child:
(1) is
abandoned or without parent, guardian, or custodian;
(2)(i)
has been a victim of physical or sexual abuse as defined in section 626.556,
subdivision 2, (ii) resides with or has resided with a victim of child
abuse as defined in subdivision 5 or domestic child abuse as defined in
subdivision 5 13, (iii) resides with or would reside with a
perpetrator of domestic child abuse as defined in subdivision 13 or
child abuse as defined in subdivision 5, or (iv) is a victim of emotional
maltreatment as defined in subdivision 8;
(3) is
without necessary food, clothing, shelter, education, or other required care
for the child's physical or mental health or morals because the child's parent,
guardian, or custodian is unable or unwilling to provide that care;
(4) is
without the special care made necessary by a physical, mental, or emotional
condition because the child's parent, guardian, or custodian is unable or
unwilling to provide that care, including a child in voluntary placement due
solely to the child's developmental disability or emotional disturbance;
(5) is
medically neglected, which includes, but is not limited to, the withholding of
medically indicated treatment from a disabled infant with a life-threatening
condition. The term "withholding
of medically indicated treatment" means the failure to respond to the
infant's life-threatening conditions by providing treatment, including
appropriate nutrition, hydration, and medication which, in the treating
physician's or physicians' reasonable medical judgment, will be most likely to
be effective in ameliorating or correcting all conditions, except that the term
does not include the failure to provide treatment other than appropriate
nutrition, hydration, or medication to an infant when, in the treating
physician's or physicians' reasonable medical judgment:
(i)
the infant is chronically and irreversibly comatose;
(ii)
the provision of the treatment would merely prolong dying, not be effective in
ameliorating or correcting all of the infant's life-threatening conditions, or
otherwise be futile in terms of the survival of the infant; or
(iii)
the provision of the treatment would be virtually futile in terms of the
survival of the infant and the treatment itself under the circumstances would
be inhumane;
(6) is
one whose parent, guardian, or other custodian for good cause desires to be
relieved of the child's care and custody, including a child in placement
according to who entered foster care under a voluntary release by
placement agreement between the parent and the responsible social
services agency under section 260C.212, subdivision 8;
(7)
has been placed for adoption or care in violation of law;
(8) is
without proper parental care because of the emotional, mental, or physical
disability, or state of immaturity of the child's parent, guardian, or other
custodian;
(9) is
one whose behavior, condition, or environment is such as to be injurious or
dangerous to the child or others. An
injurious or dangerous environment may include, but is not limited to, the
exposure of a child to criminal activity in the child's home;
(10)
is experiencing growth delays, which may be referred to as failure to thrive,
that have been diagnosed by a physician and are due to parental neglect;
(11)
has engaged in prostitution as defined in section 609.321, subdivision 9;
(12)
has committed a delinquent act or a juvenile petty offense before becoming ten
years old;
(13)
is a runaway;
(14)
is a habitual truant; or
(15)
has been found incompetent to proceed or has been found not guilty by reason of
mental illness or mental deficiency in connection with a delinquency
proceeding, a certification under section 260B.125, an extended jurisdiction
juvenile prosecution, or a proceeding involving a juvenile petty offense.
Sec. 27. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 260C.007,
subdivision 13, is amended to read:
Subd.
13. Domestic child abuse.
"Domestic child abuse" means:
(1)
any physical injury to a minor family or household member inflicted by an adult
family or household member other than by accidental means; or
(2)
subjection of a minor family or household member by an adult family or
household member to any act which constitutes a violation of sections 609.321
to 609.324, 609.342, 609.343, 609.344, 609.345, or 617.246.; or
(3)
physical or sexual abuse as defined in section 626.556, subdivision 2.
Sec.
28. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.101, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Jurisdiction
over other matters relating to children.
Except as provided in clause (d), the juvenile court has original and
exclusive jurisdiction in proceedings concerning:
(a)
The termination of parental rights to a child in accordance with the provisions
of sections 260C.301 to 260C.328.
(b)
The appointment and removal of a juvenile court guardian for a child, where
parental rights have been terminated under the provisions of sections 260C.301
to 260C.328.
(c)
Judicial consent to the marriage of a child when required by law.
(d)
The juvenile court in those counties in which the judge of the probate-juvenile
court has been admitted to the practice of law in this state shall proceed
under the laws relating to adoptions in all adoption matters. In those counties in which the judge of the
probate-juvenile court has not been admitted to the practice of law in this
state the district court shall proceed under the laws relating to adoptions in
all adoption matters.
(e) The review of the foster care status placement
of a child who has been placed is in a residential
facility, as defined in section 260C.212, subdivision 1, foster care pursuant
to a voluntary release by placement agreement between the child's
parent or parents and the responsible social services agency under section
260C.212, subdivision 8.
(f)
The review of voluntary foster care placement of a child for treatment under
chapter 260D according to the review requirements of that chapter.
Sec.
29. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.141, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Review
of foster care status. Except for
a child in foster care due solely to the child's developmental disability or
emotional disturbance, When a child continues in voluntary placement
foster care according to section 260C.212, subdivision 8, a petition
shall be filed alleging the child to be in need of protection or services or
seeking termination of parental rights or other permanent placement of the
child away from the parent within 90 days of the date of the voluntary
placement agreement. The petition shall
state the reasons why the child is in placement foster care, the
progress on the out-of-home placement plan required under section 260C.212,
subdivision 1, and the statutory basis for the petition under section 260C.007,
subdivision 6, 260C.201, subdivision 11, or 260C.301.
(1) In
the case of a petition alleging the child to be in need of protection or
services filed under this paragraph, if all parties agree and the court finds
it is in the best interests of the child, the court may find the petition
states a prima facie case that:
(i)
the child's needs are being met;
(ii)
the placement of the child in foster care is in the best interests of the
child;
(iii)
reasonable efforts to reunify the child and the parent or guardian are being
made; and
(iv)
the child will be returned home in the next three months.
(2) If
the court makes findings under paragraph (1), the court shall approve the
voluntary arrangement and continue the matter for up to three more months to
ensure the child returns to the parents' home.
The responsible social services agency shall:
(i)
report to the court when the child returns home and the progress made by the
parent on the out-of-home placement plan required under section 260C.212, in
which case the court shall dismiss jurisdiction;
(ii)
report to the court that the child has not returned home, in which case the
matter shall be returned to the court for further proceedings under section
260C.163; or
(iii)
if any party does not agree to continue the matter under this paragraph and
paragraph (1), the matter shall proceed under section 260C.163.
Sec.
30. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 260C.163, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. General. (a) Except for hearings arising under
section 260C.425, hearings on any matter shall be without a jury and may be
conducted in an informal manner. In all
adjudicatory proceedings involving a child alleged to be in need of protection
or services, the court shall admit only evidence that would be admissible in a
civil trial. To be proved at trial,
allegations of a petition alleging a child to be in need of protection or
services must be proved by clear and convincing evidence.
(b)
Except for proceedings involving a child alleged to be in need of protection or
services and petitions for the termination of parental rights, hearings may be
continued or adjourned from time to time.
In proceedings involving a child alleged to be in need of protection or
services and petitions for the termination of parental rights, hearings may not
be continued or adjourned for more than one week unless the court makes
specific findings that the continuance or adjournment is in the best interests
of the child. If a hearing is held on a
petition involving physical or sexual abuse of a child who is alleged to be in
need of protection or services or neglected and in foster care, the court shall
file the decision with the court administrator as soon as possible but no later
than 15 days after the matter is submitted to the court. When a continuance or adjournment is ordered
in any proceeding, the court may make any interim orders as it deems in the
best interests of the minor in accordance with the provisions of sections
260C.001 to 260C.421.
(c) Except
as otherwise provided in this paragraph, the court shall exclude the general
public from hearings under this chapter and shall admit only those persons who,
in the discretion of the court, have a direct interest in the case or in the
work of the court. Absent exceptional circumstances, hearings under this
chapter are presumed to be accessible to the public, however the court may
close any hearing and the records related to any matter as provided in the
Minnesota Rules of Juvenile Protection Procedure.
(d)
Adoption hearings shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of laws
relating to adoptions.
(e) In
any permanency hearing, including the transition of a child from foster care to
independent living, the court shall ensure that any consult with the child is
in an age-appropriate manner.
Sec.
31. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.171, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Public
inspection of records. (a) The following
records from proceedings or portions of proceedings involving a child in need
of protection or services that, permanency, or terminational of
parental rights are open accessible to the public as
authorized by Supreme Court order and court rules are accessible to the
public unless the court determines that access should be restricted because of
the intensely personal nature of the information: the Minnesota Rules of
Juvenile Protection Procedure.
(1)
the summons and petition;
(2)
affidavits of publication and service;
(3)
certificates of representation;
(4)
court orders;
(5)
hearing and trial notices, witness lists, and subpoenas;
(6)
motions and legal memoranda;
(7)
exhibits introduced at hearings or trial that are not inaccessible under
paragraph (b);
(8)
birth records; and
(9)
all other documents not listed as inaccessible to the public under paragraph
(b).
(b)
The following records are not accessible to the public under paragraph (a):
(1)
written, audiotaped, or videotaped information from the social services agency,
except to the extent the information appears in the petition, court orders, or
other documents that are accessible under paragraph (a);
(2)
child protection intake or screening notes;
(3)
documents identifying reporters of maltreatment, unless the names and other
identifying information are redacted;
(4)
guardian ad litem reports;
(5)
victim statements and addresses and telephone numbers;
(6)
documents identifying nonparty witnesses under the age of 18, unless the names
and other identifying information are redacted;
(7)
transcripts of testimony taken during closed hearing;
(8)
fingerprinting materials;
(9)
psychological, psychiatric, and chemical dependency evaluations;
(10)
presentence evaluations of juveniles and probation reports;
(11)
medical records and test results;
(12)
reports issued by sexual predator programs;
(13)
diversion records of juveniles;
(14)
any document which the court, upon its own motion or upon motion of a party,
orders inaccessible to serve the best interests of the child; and
(15)
any other records that are not accessible to the public under rules developed
by the courts.
In
addition, records that are accessible to the public under paragraph (a) become
inaccessible to the public if one year has elapsed since either the proceeding
was dismissed or the court's jurisdiction over the matter was terminated.
(c)
Except as otherwise provided by this section, none of the records of the
juvenile court and (b) None of the records relating to an appeal from a nonpublic
juvenile court proceeding, except the written appellate opinion, shall be open
to public inspection or their contents disclosed except by order of a court.
(d) (c) The records of juvenile
probation officers are records of the court for the purposes of this
subdivision. This subdivision applies
to all proceedings under this chapter, including appeals from orders of the
juvenile court. The court shall
maintain the confidentiality of adoption files and records in accordance with
the provisions of laws relating to adoptions.
In juvenile court proceedings any report or social history furnished to
the court shall be open to inspection by the attorneys of record and the
guardian ad litem a reasonable time before it is used in connection with any
proceeding before the court.
(e)
When a judge of a juvenile court, or duly authorized agent of the court,
determines under a proceeding under this chapter that a child has violated a
state or local law, ordinance, or regulation pertaining to the operation of a
motor vehicle on streets and highways, except parking violations, the judge or
agent shall immediately report the violation to the commissioner of public
safety. The report must be made on a
form provided by the Department of Public Safety and must contain the
information required under section 169.95.
Sec.
32. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.178, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Hearing
and release requirements. (a) If a
child was taken into custody under section 260C.175, subdivision 1, clause (a)
or (b)(2), the court shall hold a hearing within 72 hours of the time the child
was taken into custody, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, to
determine whether the child should continue in custody.
(b)
Unless there is reason to believe that the child would endanger self or others,
not return for a court hearing, run away from the child's parent, guardian, or
custodian or otherwise not remain in the care or control of the person to whose
lawful custody the child is released, or that the child's health or welfare
would be immediately endangered, the child shall be released to the custody of
a parent, guardian, custodian, or other suitable person, subject to reasonable
conditions of release including, but not limited to, a requirement that the
child undergo a chemical use assessment as provided in section 260C.157,
subdivision 1.
(c)
If the
court determines there is reason to believe that the child would endanger self
or others; not return for a court hearing; run away from the child's parent,
guardian, or custodian or otherwise not remain in the care or control of the
person to whose lawful custody the child is released; or that the child's
health or welfare would be immediately endangered if returned to the care of
the parent or guardian who has custody and from whom the child was removed,
the court shall order the child into foster care under the legal responsibility
of the responsible social services agency or responsible probation or
corrections agency for the purposes of protective care as that term is used in
the juvenile court rules. or into the home of a noncustodial parent
and order the noncustodial parent to comply with any conditions the court
determines to be appropriate to the safety and care of the child, including
cooperating with paternity establishment proceedings in the case of a man who
has not been adjudicated the child's father.
The court shall not give the responsible social services legal custody
and order a trial home visit at any time prior to adjudication and disposition
under section 260C.201, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (3), but may order
the child returned to the care of the parent or guardian who has custody and
from whom the child was removed and order the parent or guardian to comply with
any conditions the court determines to be appropriate to meet the safety,
health, and welfare of the child.
(d)
In
determining whether the child's health or welfare would be immediately
endangered, the court shall consider whether the child would reside with a
perpetrator of domestic child abuse.
(c) (e) The court, before
determining whether a child should be placed in or continue in foster care
under the protective care of the responsible agency, shall also make a
determination, consistent with section 260.012 as to whether reasonable efforts
were made to prevent placement or whether reasonable efforts to prevent
placement are not required. In the case
of an Indian child, the court shall determine whether active efforts, according
to the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, United States Code, title 25, section
1912(d), were made to prevent placement.
The court shall enter a finding that the responsible social services
agency has made reasonable efforts to prevent placement when the agency
establishes either:
(1)
that it has actually provided services or made efforts in an attempt to prevent
the child's removal but that such services or efforts have not proven
sufficient to permit the child to safely remain in the home; or
(2)
that there are no services or other efforts that could be made at the time of
the hearing that could safely permit the child to remain home or to return
home. When reasonable efforts to
prevent placement are required and there are services or other efforts that
could be ordered which would permit the child to safely return home, the court
shall order the child returned to the care of the parent or guardian and the
services or efforts put in place to ensure the child's safety. When the court makes a prima facie
determination that one of the circumstances under paragraph (e) (g)
exists, the court shall determine that reasonable efforts to prevent placement
and to return the child to the care of the parent or guardian are not required.
If the
court finds the social services agency's preventive or reunification efforts
have not been reasonable but further preventive or reunification efforts could
not permit the child to safely remain at home, the court may nevertheless
authorize or continue the removal of the child.
(d) (f) The court may not order or
continue the foster care placement of the child unless the court makes
explicit, individualized findings that continued custody of the child by the
parent or guardian would be contrary to the welfare of the child and that
placement is in the best interest of the child.
(e) (g) At the emergency removal
hearing, or at any time during the course of the proceeding, and upon notice
and request of the county attorney, the court shall determine whether a
petition has been filed stating a prima facie case that:
(1)
the parent has subjected a child to egregious harm as defined in section
260C.007, subdivision 14;
(2)
the parental rights of the parent to another child have been involuntarily
terminated;
(3)
the child is an abandoned infant under section 260C.301, subdivision 2,
paragraph (a), clause (2);
(4)
the parents' custodial rights to another child have been involuntarily transferred
to a relative under section 260C.201, subdivision 11, paragraph (e), clause
(1), or a similar law of another jurisdiction; or
(5)
the provision of services or further services for the purpose of reunification
is futile and therefore unreasonable.
(f) (h) When a petition to
terminate parental rights is required under section 260C.301, subdivision 3 or
4, but the county attorney has determined not to proceed with a termination of
parental rights petition, and has instead filed a petition to transfer
permanent legal and physical custody to a relative under section 260C.201,
subdivision 11, the court shall schedule a permanency hearing within 30 days of
the filing of the petition.
(g) (i) If the county attorney has
filed a petition under section 260C.307, the court shall schedule a trial under
section 260C.163 within 90 days of the filing of the petition except when the
county attorney determines that the criminal case shall proceed to trial first
under section 260C.201, subdivision 3.
(h) (j) If the court determines the
child should be ordered into foster care and the child's parent refuses to give
information to the responsible social services agency regarding the child's
father or relatives of the child, the court may order the parent to disclose the
names, addresses, telephone numbers, and other identifying information to the
responsible social services agency for the purpose of complying with the
requirements of sections 260C.151, 260C.212, and 260C.215.
(i) (k) If a child ordered into
foster care has siblings, whether full, half, or step, who are also ordered
into foster care, the court shall inquire of the responsible social services
agency of the efforts to place the children together as required by section
260C.212, subdivision 2, paragraph (d), if placement together is in each
child's best interests, unless a child is in placement due solely to the
child's own behavior or a child is placed with a previously noncustodial parent
who is not parent to all siblings. If
the children are not placed together at the time of the hearing, the court
shall inquire at each subsequent hearing of the agency's efforts to place the
siblings together. If any sibling is
not placed with another sibling or siblings, the agency must develop a plan for
visitation among the siblings as required under section 260C.212, subdivision
1.
Sec.
33. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.205, is amended to read:
260C.205 DISPOSITIONS; VOLUNTARY FOSTER CARE PLACEMENTS
FOR TREATMENT.
Unless
the court disposes of the petition under section 260C.141, subdivision 2, Upon a petition for
review of the foster care status of a by a parent or guardian under
section 260C.141, subdivision 1, regarding a child in voluntary foster
care for treatment under chapter 260D, the court may:
(a) find that the child's needs
are not being met, in which case the court shall order the social services
agency or the parents to take whatever action is necessary and feasible to meet
the child's needs, including, when appropriate, the provision by the social
services agency of services to the parents which would enable the child to live
at home, and order a disposition under section 260C.201.
(b)
Find that the child has been abandoned by parents financially or emotionally,
or that the developmentally disabled child does not require out-of-home care
because of the disabling condition, in which case the court shall order the
social services agency to file an appropriate petition pursuant to section
260C.141, subdivision 1, or 260C.307.
(c)
When a child is in placement due solely to the child's developmental disability
or emotional disturbance and the court finds that there are compelling reasons
which permit the court to approve the continued voluntary placement of the
child and retain jurisdiction to conduct reviews as required under section
260C.141, subdivision 2, the court shall give the parent notice by registered
United States mail of the review requirements of section 260C.141, subdivision
2, in the event the child continues in placement 12 months or longer.
Nothing
in this section shall be construed to prohibit bringing a petition pursuant to
section 260C.141, subdivision 1 or 4, sooner than required by court order
pursuant to this section.
Sec.
34. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 260C.209, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Subjects. The responsible social services agency must
initiate a background study to be completed by the commissioner under chapter
245C may have access to the criminal history and history of child and
adult maltreatment on the following individuals:
(1) a
noncustodial parent or nonadjudicated parent who is being assessed for purposes
of providing day-to-day care of a child temporarily or permanently under
section 260C.212, subdivision 4, and any member of the parent's household who
is over the age of 13 when there is a reasonable cause to believe that the
parent or household member over age 13 has a criminal history or a history of
maltreatment of a child or vulnerable adult which would endanger the child's
health, safety, or welfare;
(2) an
individual whose suitability for relative placement under section 260C.212,
subdivision 5, is being determined and any member of the relative's household
who is over the age of 13 when:
(i)
the relative must be licensed for foster care; or
(ii)
the background study is required under section 259.53, subdivision 2; or
(iii)
the agency or the commissioner has reasonable cause to believe the relative or
household member over the age of 13 has a criminal history which would not make
transfer of permanent legal and physical custody to the relative under section
260C.201, subdivision 11, in the child's best interest; and
(3) a
parent, following an out-of-home placement, when the responsible social
services agency has reasonable cause to believe that the parent has been
convicted of a crime directly related to the parent's capacity to maintain the
child's health, safety, or welfare or the parent is the subject of an open
investigation of, or has been the subject of a substantiated allegation of,
child or vulnerable-adult maltreatment within the past ten years.
"Reasonable cause"
means that the agency has received information or a report from the subject or
a third person that creates an articulable suspicion that the individual has a
history that may pose a risk to the health, safety, or welfare of the
child. The information or report must
be specific to the potential subject of the background check and shall not be
based on the race, religion, ethnic background, age, class, or lifestyle of the
potential subject.
Sec.
35. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 260C.209, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. General
procedures. (a) When initiating
a background check accessing information under subdivision 1, the
agency shall require the individual being assessed to provide sufficient
information to ensure an accurate assessment under this section, including:
(1)
the individual's first, middle, and last name and all other names by which the
individual has been known;
(2)
home address, zip code, city, county, and state of residence for the past five
years;
(3)
sex;
(4)
date of birth; and
(5)
driver's license number or state identification number.
(b)
When notified by the commissioner or the responsible social services
agency that it is conducting an assessment under this section accessing
information under subdivision 1, the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension,
commissioners of health and human services, law enforcement, and county
agencies must provide the commissioner or the responsible social
services agency or county attorney with the following information on the
individual being assessed: criminal
history data, local law enforcement data about the household, reports
about the maltreatment of adults substantiated under section 626.557, and
reports of maltreatment of minors substantiated under section 626.556.
Sec.
36. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 260C.209, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
5. Assessment
for emergency relative placement.
The responsible social services agency may obtain household members'
criminal history and the history of maltreatment of a child or adult and use
the history to assess whether putting the child in the household would endanger
the child's health, safety, or welfare and to assess the suitability of a
relative prior to an emergency placement.
This assessment does not substitute for the background study required
under chapter 245C and does not supersede requirements related to emergency placement
under section 245A.035.
Sec.
37. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 260C.212, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Out-of-home
placement; plan. (a) An out-of-home
placement plan shall be prepared within 30 days after any child is placed in a
residential facility foster care by court order or by the a
voluntary release of the child by placement agreement between the
responsible social services agency and the child's parent or
parents pursuant to subdivision 8 or chapter 260D.
For
purposes of this section, a residential facility means any group home, family
foster home or other publicly supported out-of-home residential facility,
including any out-of-home residential facility under contract with the state,
county or other political subdivision, or any agency thereof, to provide those
services or foster care as defined in section 260C.007, subdivision 18.
(b) An
out-of-home placement plan means a written document which is prepared by the
responsible social services agency jointly with the parent or parents or
guardian of the child and in consultation with the child's guardian ad litem,
the child's tribe, if the child is an Indian child, the child's foster parent
or representative of the residential facility, and, where appropriate, the
child. For a child in placement due
solely or in part to the child's emotional disturbance voluntary foster
care for treatment under chapter 260D, preparation of the out-of-home placement plan shall additionally include the
child's mental health treatment provider.
As appropriate, the plan shall be:
(1)
submitted to the court for approval under section 260C.178, subdivision 7;
(2)
ordered by the court, either as presented or modified after hearing, under
section 260C.178, subdivision 7, or 260C.201, subdivision 6; and
(3)
signed by the parent or parents or guardian of the child, the child's guardian
ad litem, a representative of the child's tribe, the responsible social
services agency, and, if possible, the child.
(c)
The out-of-home placement plan shall be explained to all persons involved in
its implementation, including the child who has signed the plan, and shall set
forth:
(1) a
description of the residential facility including how the out-of-home placement
plan is designed to achieve a safe placement for the child in the least
restrictive, most family-like, setting available which is in close proximity to
the home of the parent or parents or guardian of the child when the case plan
goal is reunification, and how the placement is consistent with the best
interests and special needs of the child according to the factors under
subdivision 2, paragraph (b);
(2)
the specific reasons for the placement of the child in a residential facility,
and when reunification is the plan, a description of the problems or conditions
in the home of the parent or parents which necessitated removal of the child
from home and the changes the parent or parents must make in order for the
child to safely return home;
(3) a
description of the services offered and provided to prevent removal of the
child from the home and to reunify the family including:
(i)
the specific actions to be taken by the parent or parents of the child to
eliminate or correct the problems or conditions identified in clause (2), and
the time period during which the actions are to be taken; and
(ii)
the reasonable efforts, or in the case of an Indian child, active efforts to be
made to achieve a safe and stable home for the child including social and other
supportive services to be provided or offered to the parent or parents or
guardian of the child, the child, and the residential facility during the
period the child is in the residential facility;
(4) a
description of any services or resources that were requested by the child or
the child's parent, guardian, foster parent, or custodian since the date of the
child's placement in the residential facility, and whether those services or
resources were provided and if not, the basis for the denial of the services or
resources;
(5)
the visitation plan for the parent or parents or guardian, other relatives as
defined in section 260C.007, subdivision 27, and siblings of the child if the
siblings are not placed together in the residential facility foster
care, and whether visitation is consistent with the best interest of the
child, during the period the child is in the residential facility
foster care;
(6)
documentation of steps to finalize the adoption or legal guardianship of the
child if the court has issued an order terminating the rights of both parents
of the child or of the only known, living parent of the child. At a minimum, the documentation must include
child-specific recruitment efforts such as relative search and the use of
state, regional, and national adoption exchanges to facilitate orderly and
timely placements in and outside of the state.
A copy of this documentation shall be provided to the court in the
review required under section 260C.317, subdivision 3, paragraph (b);
(7)
the health and educational records of the child including the most recent
information available regarding:
(i)
the names and addresses of the child's health and educational providers;
(ii)
the child's grade level performance;
(iii)
the child's school record;
(iv)
assurances that the child's placement in foster care takes into account
proximity to the school in which the child is enrolled at the time of
placement;
(v) a
record of the child's immunizations;
(vi)
the child's known medical problems, including any known communicable diseases,
as defined in section 144.4172, subdivision 2;
(vii)
the child's medications; and
(viii)
any other relevant health and education information;
(8) an
independent living plan for a child age 16 or older who is in placement as a
result of a permanency disposition. The
plan should include, but not be limited to, the following objectives:
(i)
educational, vocational, or employment planning;
(ii)
health care planning and medical coverage;
(iii)
transportation including, where appropriate, assisting the child in obtaining a
driver's license;
(iv)
money management;
(v)
planning for housing;
(vi)
social and recreational skills; and
(vii)
establishing and maintaining connections with the child's family and community;
and
(9)
for a child in placement due solely or in part to the child's emotional
disturbance voluntary foster care for treatment under chapter 260D,
diagnostic and assessment information, specific services relating to meeting
the mental health care needs of the child, and treatment outcomes.
(d)
The parent or parents or guardian and the child each shall have the right to
legal counsel in the preparation of the case plan and shall be informed of the
right at the time of placement of the child.
The child shall also have the right to a guardian ad litem. If unable to employ counsel from their own
resources, the court shall appoint counsel upon the request of the parent or
parents or the child or the child's legal guardian. The parent or parents may also receive assistance from any person
or social services agency in preparation of the case plan.
After
the plan has been agreed upon by the parties involved or approved or ordered by
the court, the foster parents shall be fully informed of the provisions of the
case plan and shall be provided a copy of the plan.
Upon discharge
from foster care, the parent, adoptive parent, or permanent legal and physical
custodian, as appropriate, and the child, if appropriate, must be provided with
a current copy of the child's health and education record.
Sec.
38. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 260C.212, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd.
4. Responsible
social service agency's duties for children in placement. (a) When a child is in placement foster
care, the responsible social services agency shall make diligent efforts to
identify, locate, and, where appropriate, offer services to both parents of the
child.
(1)
The responsible social services agency shall assess whether a noncustodial or
nonadjudicated parent is willing and capable of providing for the day-to-day
care of the child temporarily or permanently.
An assessment under this clause may include, but is not limited to,
obtaining information under section 260C.209.
If after assessment, the responsible social services agency determines
that a noncustodial or nonadjudicated parent is willing and capable of
providing day-to-day care of the child, the responsible social services agency
may seek authority from the custodial parent or the court to have that parent
assume day-to-day care of the child. If
a parent is not an adjudicated parent, the responsible social services agency
shall require the nonadjudicated parent to cooperate with paternity
establishment procedures as part of the case plan.
(2)
If, after assessment, the responsible social services agency determines that
the child cannot be in the day-to-day care of either parent, the agency shall:
(i)
prepare an out-of-home placement plan addressing the conditions that each
parent must meet before the child can be in that parent's day-to-day care; and
(ii)
provide a parent who is the subject of a background study under section
260C.209 15 days' notice that it intends to use the study to recommend against
putting the child with that parent, as well as the notice provided in section
260C.209, subdivision 4, and the court shall afford the parent an opportunity
to be heard concerning the study.
The
results of a background study of a noncustodial parent shall not be used by the
agency to determine that the parent is incapable of providing day-to-day care
of the child unless the agency reasonably believes that placement of the child
into the home of that parent would endanger the child's health, safety, or
welfare.
(3)
If, after the provision of services following an out-of-home placement plan
under this section, the child cannot return to the care of the parent from whom
the child was removed or who had legal custody at the time the child was placed
in foster care, the agency may petition on behalf of a noncustodial parent to
establish legal custody with that parent under section 260C.201, subdivision
11. If paternity has not already been
established, it may be established in the same proceeding in the manner
provided for under chapter 257.
(4)
The responsible social services agency may be relieved of the requirement to
locate and offer services to both parents by the juvenile court upon a finding
of good cause after the filing of a petition under section 260C.141.
(b)
The responsible social services agency shall give notice to the parent or
parents or guardian of each child in a residential facility foster
care, other than a child in placement due solely to that child's
developmental disability or emotional disturbance voluntary foster care
for treatment under chapter 260D, of the following information:
(1) that
residential care of the child child's placement in foster care
may result in termination of parental rights or an order permanently placing
the child out of the custody of the parent, but only after notice and a hearing
as required under chapter 260C and the juvenile court rules;
(2)
time limits on the length of placement and of reunification services, including
the date on which the child is expected to be returned to and safely maintained
in the home of the parent or parents or placed for adoption or otherwise
permanently removed from the care of the parent by court order;
(3)
the nature of the services available to the parent;
(4)
the consequences to the parent and the child if the parent fails or is unable
to use services to correct the circumstances that led to the child's placement;
(5)
the first consideration for placement with relatives;
(6)
the benefit to the child in getting the child out of residential foster
care as soon as possible, preferably by returning the child home, but if that
is not possible, through a permanent legal placement of the child away from the
parent;
(7)
when safe for the child, the benefits to the child and the parent of
maintaining visitation with the child as soon as possible in the course of the
case and, in any event, according to the visitation plan under this section;
and
(8)
the financial responsibilities and obligations, if any, of the parent or
parents for the support of the child during the period the child is in the
residential facility foster care.
(c) The
responsible social services agency shall inform a parent considering voluntary
placement of a child who is not developmentally disabled or emotionally disturbed
under subdivision 8, of the following information:
(1)
the parent and the child each has a right to separate legal counsel before
signing a voluntary placement agreement, but not to counsel appointed at public
expense;
(2)
the parent is not required to agree to the voluntary placement, and a parent
who enters a voluntary placement agreement may at any time request that the
agency return the child. If the parent
so requests, the child must be returned within 24 hours of the receipt of the
request;
(3)
evidence gathered during the time the child is voluntarily placed may be used
at a later time as the basis for a petition alleging that the child is in need
of protection or services or as the basis for a petition seeking termination of
parental rights or other permanent placement of the child away from the parent;
(4) if
the responsible social services agency files a petition alleging that the child
is in need of protection or services or a petition seeking the termination of
parental rights or other permanent placement of the child away from the parent,
the parent would have the right to appointment of separate legal counsel and
the child would have a right to the appointment of counsel and a guardian ad
litem as provided by law, and that counsel will be appointed at public expense
if they are unable to afford counsel; and
(5)
the timelines and procedures for review of voluntary placements under
subdivision 3, and the effect the time spent in voluntary placement on the
scheduling of a permanent placement determination hearing under section
260C.201, subdivision 11.
(d)
When an agency accepts a child for placement, the agency shall determine
whether the child has had a physical examination by or under the direction of a
licensed physician within the 12 months immediately preceding the date when the
child came into the agency's care. If
there is documentation that the child has had an examination within the last 12
months, the agency is responsible for seeing that the child has another
physical examination within one year of the documented examination and annually
in subsequent years. If the agency
determines that the child has not had a physical examination within the 12
months immediately preceding placement, the agency shall ensure that the child
has an examination within 30 days of coming into the agency's care and once a
year in subsequent years.
(e) Whether
under state guardianship or not, if a child leaves foster care by reason of
having attained the age of majority under state law, the child must be given at
no cost a copy of the child's health social and medical history, as
defined in section 259.43, and education report.
Sec.
39. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.212, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
4a. Monthly
caseworker visits with children in foster care. (a) Every child in foster care or on a
trial home visit shall be visited by the child's caseworker on a monthly basis,
with the majority of visits occurring in the child's residence. For the purposes of this section, the
following definitions apply:
(1)
"visit" is defined as a face-to-face contact between a child and the
child's caseworker;
(2)
"visited on a monthly basis" is defined as at least one visit per
calendar month;
(3)
"the child's caseworker" is defined as the person who has
responsibility for managing the child's foster care placement case as assigned
by the responsible social service agency; and
(4)
"the child's residence" is defined as the home where the child is
residing, and can include the foster home, child care institution, or the home
from which the child was removed if the child is on a trial home visit.
(b)
Caseworker visits shall be of sufficient substance and duration to address
issues pertinent to case planning and service delivery to ensure the safety,
permanency, and well-being of the child.
Sec.
40. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.212, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd.
7. Administrative
or court review of placements. (a)
There shall be an administrative review of the out-of-home placement plan of
each child placed in a residential facility foster care no later
than 180 days after the initial placement of the child in a residential
facility foster care and at least every six months thereafter if the
child is not returned to the home of the parent or parents within that
time. The out-of-home placement plan
must be monitored and updated at each administrative review. The administrative review shall be
conducted by the responsible social services agency using a panel of
appropriate persons at least one of whom is not responsible for the case
management of, or the delivery of services to, either the child or the parents
who are the subject of the review. The
administrative review shall be open to participation by the parent or guardian
of the child and the child, as appropriate.
(b)
As an
alternative to the administrative review required in paragraph (a), the
social services agency responsible for the placement may bring a petition as
provided in section 260C.141, subdivision 2, to the court for review of
the foster care to determine if placement is in the best interests of the
child. This petition must be brought to
the court in order for a court determination to be made regarding the best
interests of the child within the applicable six months and is not in lieu of
the requirements contained in subdivision 3 or 4. may, as part of any
hearing required under the Minnesota Rules of Juvenile Protection Procedure,
conduct a hearing to monitor and update the out-of-home placement plan pursuant
to the procedure and standard in section 260C.201, subdivision 6, paragraph
(d). The party requesting review of the
out-of-home placement plan shall give parties to the proceeding notice of the
request to review and update the out-of-home placement plan. A court review conducted pursuant to
section 260C.193; 260C.201, subdivision 1 or 11, or section;
260C.141, subdivision 2, or 2a, clause (2); or 260C.317 shall
satisfy the requirement for an administrative the review so long
as the other requirements of this section are met.
(b) (c) At the review
required under paragraph (a), the reviewing administrative body As
appropriate to the stage of the proceedings and relevant court orders, the
responsible social services agency or the court shall review:
(1)
the safety, permanency needs, and well-being of the child;
(2)
the continuing necessity for and appropriateness of the placement;
(3)
the extent of compliance with the out-of-home placement plan;
(4) where
appropriate, the extent of progress which has been made toward alleviating
or mitigating the causes necessitating placement in a residential facility
foster care;
(5) where
appropriate, the projected date by which the child may be returned to and
safely maintained in the home or placed permanently away from the care of the
parent or parents or guardian; and
(6)
the appropriateness of the services provided to the child.
(d)
When a child is age 16 or older, in addition to any administrative review
conducted by the agency, at the review required under section 260C.201,
subdivision 11, paragraph (d), clause (3), item (iii); or 260C.317, subdivision
3, clause (3), the court shall review the independent living plan required
under subdivision 1, paragraph (c), clause (8), and the provision of services
to the child related to the well-being of the child as the child prepares to
leave foster care. The review shall
include the actual plans related to each item in the plan necessary to the
child's future safety and well-being when the child is no longer in foster
care.
(1)
At the court review, the responsible social services agency shall establish
that it has given the notice required under Minnesota Rules, part 9560.0060,
regarding the right to continued access to services for certain children in
foster care past age 18 and of the right to appeal a denial of social services
under section 256.245. If the agency is
unable to establish that the notice, including the right to appeal a denial of
social services, has been given, the court shall require the agency to give it.
(2)
The court shall make findings regarding progress toward or accomplishment of
the following goals:
(i)
the child has obtained a high school diploma or its equivalent;
(ii)
the child has completed a driver's education course or has demonstrated the
ability to use public transportation in the child's community;
(iii)
the child is employed or enrolled in postsecondary education;
(iv)
the child has applied for and obtained postsecondary education financial aid
for which the child is eligible;
(v)
the child has health care coverage and health care providers to meet the child's
physical and mental health needs;
(vi)
the child has applied for and obtained disability income assistance for which
the child is eligible;
(vii)
the child has obtained affordable housing with necessary supports, which does
not include a homeless shelter;
(viii)
the child has saved sufficient funds to pay for the first month's rent and a
damage deposit;
(ix)
the child has an alternative affordable housing plan, which does not include a
homeless shelter, if the original housing plan is unworkable;
(x)
the child, if male, has registered for the Selective Service; and
(xi)
the child has a permanent connection to a caring adult.
(3)
The court shall ensure that the responsible agency in conjunction with the
placement provider assists the child in obtaining the following documents prior
to the child's leaving foster care: a
Social Security card; the child's birth certificate; a state identification
card or driver's license, green card, or school visa; the child's school,
medical, and dental records; a contact list of the child's medical, dental, and
mental health providers; and contact information for the child's siblings, if
the siblings are in foster care.
Sec.
41. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.212, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd.
8. Review
of Voluntary placements foster care; required court review. Except for a child in placement due
solely to the child's developmental disability or emotional disturbance, if
When the responsible social services agency and the child's parent or guardian
agree that the child's safety, health, and best interests require that the
child be in foster care, the agency and the parent or guardian may enter into a
voluntary agreement for the placement of the child in foster care. The voluntary agreement must be in writing
and in a form approved by the commissioner.
When the child has been placed in a residential facility foster
care pursuant to a voluntary release by foster care agreement
between the agency and the parent or parents, under this subdivision
and the child is not returned home within 90 days after initial
placement in the residential facility foster care, the social
services agency responsible for the child's placement in foster
care shall:
(1)
return the child to the home of the parent or parents; or
(2)
file a petition according to section 260C.141, subdivision 1 or 2, which may:
(i)
ask the court to review the child's placement in foster care and
approve it as continued voluntary foster care for up to an additional 90
days;
(ii)
ask the court to order continued out-of-home placement foster care according
to sections 260C.178 and 260C.201; or
(iii)
ask the court to terminate parental rights under section 260C.301.
The
out-of-home placement plan must be updated and filed along with the petition.
If the
court approves continued out-of-home placement continuing the child
in foster care for up to 90 more days on a voluntary basis, at the
end of the court-approved 90-day period, the child must be returned to the
parent's home. If the child is not
returned home, the responsible social services agency must proceed on the
petition filed alleging the child in need of protection or services or the
petition for termination of parental rights or other permanent placement of the
child away from the parent. The court
must find a statutory basis to order the placement of the child under section
260C.178; 260C.201; or 260C.317.
Sec.
42. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.325, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Transfer
of custody. (a) If the court
terminates parental rights of both parents or of the only known living parent,
the court shall order the guardianship and the legal custody of the child
transferred to:
(a) (1) the commissioner of human
services; or
(b) (2) a licensed child-placing
agency; or
(c) (3) an individual
who is willing and capable of assuming the appropriate duties and
responsibilities to the child.
(b)
The court shall order transfer of guardianship and legal custody of a child to
the commissioner of human services only when the responsible county social
services agency had legal responsibility for planning for the permanent
placement of the child and the child was in foster care under the legal
responsibility of the responsible county social services agency at the time the
court orders guardianship and legal custody transferred to the commissioner.
Sec.
43. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
260C.325, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Both
parents deceased. (a) If
upon petition to the juvenile court by a reputable person, including but not
limited to an agent of the commissioner of human services, and upon hearing in
the manner provided in section 260C.163, the court finds that both parents or
the only known legal parent are or is deceased and no appointment
has been made or petition for appointment filed pursuant to sections 524.5-201
to 524.5-317, the court shall order the guardianship and legal custody of the
child transferred to:
(a) (1) the commissioner
of human services;
(b) (2) a licensed
child-placing agency; or
(c) (3) an individual
who is willing and capable of assuming the appropriate duties and
responsibilities to the child.
(b)
The court shall order transfer of guardianship and legal custody of a child to
the commissioner of human services only if there is no individual who is
willing and capable of assuming the appropriate duties and responsibilities to
the child.
Sec.
44. [260D.001] CHILD IN VOLUNTARY FOSTER CARE FOR TREATMENT.
(a)
Sections 260D.001 to 260D.301, may be cited as the "child in voluntary
foster care for treatment" provisions of the Juvenile Court Act.
(b)
The juvenile court has original and exclusive jurisdiction over a child in
voluntary foster care for treatment upon the filing of a report or petition required
under this chapter. All obligations of
the agency to a child and family in foster care contained in chapter 260C not
inconsistent with this chapter are also obligations of the agency with regard
to a child in foster care for treatment under this chapter.
(c)
This chapter shall be construed consistently with the mission of the children's
mental health service system as set out in section 245.487, subdivision 3, and
the duties of an agency under section 256B.092, and Minnesota Rules, parts
9525.0004 to 9525.0016, to meet the needs of a child with a developmental
disability or related condition. This
chapter:
(1)
establishes voluntary foster care through a voluntary foster care agreement as
the means for an agency and a parent to provide needed treatment when the child
must be in foster care to receive necessary treatment for an emotional
disturbance or developmental disability or related condition;
(2)
establishes court review requirements for a child in voluntary foster care for
treatment due to emotional disturbance or developmental disability or a related
condition;
(3)
establishes the ongoing responsibility of the parent as legal custodian to
visit the child, to plan together with the agency for the child's treatment
needs, to be available and accessible to the agency to make treatment
decisions, and to obtain necessary medical, dental, and other care for the
child; and
(4)
applies to voluntary foster care when the child's parent and the agency agree
that the child's treatment needs require foster care either:
(i)
due to a level of care determination by the agency's screening team informed by
the diagnostic and functional assessment under section 245.4885; or
(ii)
due to a determination regarding the level of services needed by the
responsible social services' screening team under section 256B.092, and
Minnesota Rules, parts 9525.0004 to 9525.0016.
(d)
This chapter does not apply when there is a current determination under section
626.556 that the child requires child protective services or when the child is
in foster care for any reason other than treatment for the child's emotional
disturbance or developmental disability or related condition. When there is a determination under section
626.556 that the child requires child protective services based on an
assessment that there are safety and risk issues for the child that have not
been mitigated through the parent's engagement in services or otherwise, or
when the child is in foster care for any reason other than the child's
emotional disturbance or developmental disability or related condition, the
provisions of chapter 260C apply.
(e)
The paramount consideration in all proceedings concerning a child in voluntary
foster care for treatment is the safety, health, and the best interests of the
child. The purpose of this chapter is:
(1)
to ensure a child with a disability is provided the services necessary to treat
or ameliorate the symptoms of the child's disability;
(2)
to preserve and strengthen the child's family ties whenever possible and in the
child's best interests, approving the child's placement away from the child's
parents only when the child's need for care or treatment requires it and the
child cannot be maintained in the home of the parent; and
(3)
to ensure the child's parent retains legal custody of the child and associated
decision-making authority unless the child's parent willfully fails or is
unable to make decisions that meet the child's safety, health, and best
interests. The court may not find that
the parent willfully fails or is unable to make decisions that meet the child's
needs solely because the parent disagrees with the agency's choice of foster
care facility, unless the agency files a petition under chapter 260C, and
establishes by clear and convincing evidence that the child is in need of
protection or services.
(f)
The legal parent-child relationship shall be supported under this chapter by
maintaining the parent's legal authority and responsibility for ongoing
planning for the child and by the agency's assisting the parent, where
necessary, to exercise the parent's ongoing right and obligation to visit or to
have reasonable contact with the child.
Ongoing planning means:
(1)
actively participating in the planning and provision of educational services,
medical, and dental care for the child;
(2)
actively planning and participating with the agency and the foster care
facility for the child's treatment needs; and
(3)
planning to meet the child's need for safety, stability, and permanency, and
the child's need to stay connected to the child's family and community.
(g)
The provisions of section 260.012 to ensure placement prevention, family
reunification, and all active and reasonable effort requirements of that
section apply. This chapter shall be
construed consistently with the requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act of
1978, United States Code, title 25, section 1901, et.al., and the provisions of
the Minnesota Indian Family Preservation Act, sections 260.751 to 260.835.
Sec.
45. [260D.005] DEFINITIONS.
Subdivision
1. Definitions. The definitions in this section
supplement the definitions in section 260C.007. The definitions in section 260C.007 apply to this chapter and
have the same meaning for purposes of this chapter as for chapter 260C.
Subd.
2. Agency. "Agency" means the responsible
social services agency or a licensed child-placing agency.
Subd.
3. Case
plan. "Case plan"
means any plan for the delivery of services to a child and parent, or when
reunification is not required, the child alone, that is developed according to
the requirements of sections 245.4871, subdivision 19 or 21; 245.492,
subdivision 16; 256B.092; 260C.212, subdivision 1; 626.556, subdivision 10; and
Minnesota Rules, parts 9525.0004 to 9525.0016.
Subd.
4. Child. "Child" means an individual
under 18 years of age.
Subd.
5. Child
in voluntary foster care for treatment. "Child in voluntary foster care for treatment" means
a child who is emotionally disturbed or developmentally disabled or has a
related condition and is in foster care under a voluntary foster care agreement
between the child's parent and the agency due to concurrence between the agency
and the parent that the child's level of care requires placement in foster care
either:
(1)
due to a determination by the agency's screening team based on its review of
the diagnostic and functional assessment under section 245.4885; or
(2)
due to a determination by the agency's screening team under section 256B.092
and Minnesota Rules, parts 9525.0004 to 9525.0016.
A
child is not in voluntary foster care for treatment under this chapter when
there is a current determination under section 626.556 that the child requires
child protective services or when the child is in foster care for any reason
other than the child's emotional or developmental disability or related
condition.
Subd.
6. Compelling
reasons. "Compelling
reasons" has the same meaning given in section 260C.007, subdivision
8. The agency may determine compelling
reasons when the child is in foster care for treatment and no grounds to
terminate parental rights exist because the child must be in placement to
access treatment, the child's individual treatment needs cannot be met in the
childs' home or through community-based care, and the parent continues to be
responsible for planning together with the agency for the child's needs and
maintains appropriate contact with the child.
Subd.
7. Court. "Court" means juvenile court
unless otherwise specified in this section.
Subd.
8. Development
disability. "Developmental
disability" means developmental disability as defined in United States
Code, title 42, section 6001(8).
Subd.
9. Emotionally
disturbed or emotional disturbance.
"Emotionally disturbed" or "emotional
disturbance" means emotional disturbance as described in section 245.4871,
subdivision 15.
Subd.
10. Foster
care. "Foster
care" means 24-hour substitute care for children placed away from their
parents and for whom an agency has placement and care responsibility. Foster care includes, but is not limited to,
placement in foster family homes, foster homes of relatives, group homes,
emergency shelters, residential facilities not excluded in this subdivision,
child care institutions, and preadoptive homes. A child is in foster care under this definition, regardless of
whether the facility is licensed and payments are made for the cost of
care. Nothing in this definition
creates any authority to place a child in a home or facility that is required
to be licensed that is not licensed.
Foster care does not include placement in any of the following
facilities: hospitals, inpatient
chemical dependency treatment facilities, facilities that are primarily for
delinquent children, any corrections facility or program within a particular
corrections facility not meeting requirements for Title IV-E facilities as
determined by the commissioner, facilities to which a child is committed under
the provision of chapter 253B, forestry camps, or jails.
Subd.
11. Legal
authority to place the child. "Legal
authority to place the child" means the agency has legal responsibility
for the care and control of the child while the child is in foster care. The agency may acquire legal authority to
place a child through a voluntary placement agreement between the agency and
the child's parent under this chapter.
Legal authority to place the child does not mean the agency has
authority to make major life decisions regarding the child, including major
medical decisions. A parent with legal
custody of the child continues to have legal authority to make major life
decisions regarding the child, including major medical decisions.
Subd.
12. Minor. "Minor" means an individual
under 18 years of age.
Subd.
13. Parent. "Parent" means the birth or
adoptive parent of a minor. Parent also
means the child's legal guardian or any individual who has legal authority to
make decisions and plans for the child.
For an Indian child, parent includes any Indian person who has adopted a
child by tribal law or custom, as provided in section 260.755, subdivision 14.
Subd. 14. Reasonable efforts to
finalize a permanent plan for the child. "Reasonable efforts to finalize a permanent plan for the
child" has the same meaning under this chapter as provided in section
260.012, paragraph (e).
Sec.
46. [260D.101] VOLUNTARY FOSTER CARE.
Subdivision
1. Voluntary
foster care. When the
agency's screening team, based upon the diagnostic and functional assessment
under section 245.4885 or 256B.092, subdivision 7, determines the child's need
for treatment due to emotional disturbance or developmental disability or
related condition requires foster care placement of the child, a voluntary
foster care agreement between the child's parent and the agency gives the
agency legal authority to place the child in foster care.
Subd.
2. Voluntary
foster care agreement. A
voluntary foster care agreement shall be used to provide the agency the legal
authority to place a child in foster care for treatment due to the child's
disability. The agreement must be in
writing and signed by both the child's parent and the agency. The agreement must be in a form approved by
the commissioner of human services, and shall contain notice to parents of the
consequences to the parent and to the child of being in voluntary foster care.
Sec.
47. [260D.102] REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR A CHILD IN VOLUNTARY FOSTER CARE
FOR TREATMENT.
An
agency with authority to place a child in voluntary foster care for treatment
due to emotional disturbance or developmental disability or related condition,
shall inform the child, age 12 or older, of the following:
(1)
the child has the right to be consulted in the preparation of the out-of-home
placement plan required under section 260C.212, subdivision 1, and the
administrative review required under section 260C.212, subdivision 7;
(2)
the child has the right to visit the parent and the right to visit the child's
siblings as determined safe and appropriate by the parent and the agency;
(3)
if the child disagrees with the foster care facility or services provided under
the out-of-home placement plan required under section 260C.212, subdivision 1,
the agency shall include information about the nature of the child's
disagreement and, to the extent possible, the agency's understanding of the
basis of the child's disagreement in the information provided to the court in
the report required under section 260D.105; and
(4)
the child has the rights established under Minnesota Rules, part 2960.0050, as
a resident of a facility licensed by the state.
Sec.
48. [260D.103] ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF CHILD IN VOLUNTARY FOSTER CARE
FOR TREATMENT.
The
administrative reviews required under section 260C.212, subdivision 7, must be
conducted for a child in voluntary foster care for treatment, except that the
initial administrative review must take place prior to the submission of the
report to the court required under section 260D.105, subdivision 2.
Sec.
49. [260D.105] AGENCY REPORT TO THE COURT AND COURT REVIEW OF CHILD IN
VOLUNTARY FOSTER CARE FOR TREATMENT DUE TO DISABILITY.
Subdivision
1. Judicial
review. In the case of a
child in voluntary foster care for treatment due to disability under section
260D.101, the agency shall obtain judicial review of the child's voluntary
foster care placement within 165 days of the placement.
Subd.
2. Agency
report to court; court review. The
agency shall obtain judicial review by reporting to the court according to the
following procedures:
(a)
A written report shall be forwarded to the court within 165 days of the date of
the voluntary placement agreement. The
written report shall contain or have attached:
(1)
a statement of facts that necessitate the child's foster care placement;
(2)
the child's name, date of birth, race, gender, and current address;
(3)
the names, race, date of birth, residence, and post office addresses of the
child's parents or legal custodian;
(4)
a statement regarding the child's eligibility for membership or enrollment in
an Indian tribe and the agency's compliance with applicable provisions of sections
260.751 to 260.835;
(5)
the names and addresses of the foster parents or chief administrator of the
facility in which the child is placed, if the child is not in a family foster
home or group home;
(6)
a copy of the out-of-home placement plan required under section 260C.212,
subdivision 1;
(7)
a written summary of the proceedings of any administrative review required
under section 260C.212, subdivision 7; and
(8)
any other information the agency, parent or legal custodian, the child or the
foster parent, or other residential facility wants the court to consider.
(b)
In the case of a child in placement due to emotional disturbance, the written
report shall include as an attachment, the child's individual treatment plan
developed by the child's treatment professional, as provided in section
245.4871, subdivision 21, or the child's individual interagency intervention
plan, as provided in section 125A.023, subdivision 3, paragraph (c).
(c)
In the case of a child in placement due to developmental disability or a
related condition, the written report shall include as an attachment, the
child's individual service plan, as provided in section 256B.092, subdivision
1b; the child's individual program plan, as provided in Minnesota Rules, part
9525.0004, subpart 11; the child's waiver care plan; or the child's individual
interagency intervention plan, as provided in section 125A.023, subdivision 3,
paragraph (c).
(d)
The agency must inform the child, age 12 or older, the child's parent, and the
foster parent or foster care facility of the reporting and court review
requirements of this section and of their right to submit information to the
court:
(1)
if the child or the child's parent or the foster care provider wants to send
information to the court, the agency shall advise those persons of the
reporting date and the date by which the agency must receive the information
they want forwarded to the court so the agency is timely able submit it with
the agency's report required under this subdivision;
(2)
the agency must also inform the child, age 12 or older, the child's parent, and
the foster care facility that they have the right to be heard in person by the
court and how to exercise that right;
(3)
the agency must also inform the child, age 12 or older, the child's parent, and
the foster care provider that an in-court hearing will be held if requested by
the child, the parent, or the foster care provider; and
(4)
if, at the time required for the report under this section, a child, age 12 or
older, disagrees about the foster care facility or services provided under the
out-of-home placement plan required under section 260C.212, subdivision 1, the
agency shall include information regarding the child's disagreement, and to the
extent possible, the basis for the child's disagreement in the report required
under this section.
(e)
After receiving the required report, the court has jurisdiction to make the
following determinations and must do so within ten days of receiving the
forwarded report, whether a hearing is requested:
(1)
whether the voluntary foster care arrangement is in the child's best interests;
(2)
whether the parent and agency are appropriately planning for the child; and
(3)
in the case of a child age 12 or older, who disagrees with the foster care
facility or services provided under the out-of-home placement plan, whether it
is appropriate to appoint counsel and a guardian ad litem for the child using
standards and procedures under section 260C.163.
(f)
Unless requested by a parent, representative of the foster care facility, or
the child, no in-court hearing is required in order for the court to make
findings and issue an order as required in paragraph (e).
(g)
If the court finds the voluntary foster care arrangement is in the child's best
interests and that the agency and parent are appropriately planning for the
child, the court shall issue an order containing explicit, individualized
findings to support its determination.
The individualized findings shall be based on the agency's written report
and other materials submitted to the court.
The court may make this determination notwithstanding the child's
disagreement, if any, reported under paragraph (d).
(h)
The court shall send a copy of the order to the county attorney, the agency,
parent, child, age 12 or older, and the foster parent or foster care facility.
(i)
The court shall also send the parent, the child, age 12 or older, the foster
parent, or representative of the foster care facility notice of the permanency
review hearing required under section 260D.107, paragraph (e).
(j)
If the court finds continuing the voluntary foster care arrangement is not in
the child's best interests or that the agency or the parent are not
appropriately planning for the child, the court shall notify the agency, the
parent, the foster parent or foster care facility, the child, age 12 or older,
and the county attorney of the court's determinations and the basis for the
court's determinations. In this case,
the court shall set the matter for hearing and appoint a guardian ad litem for
the child under section 260C.163, subdivision 5.
Sec.
50. [260D.107] REQUIRED PERMANENCY REVIEW HEARING.
(a)
When the court has found that the voluntary arrangement is in the child's best
interests and that the agency and parent are appropriately planning for the
child pursuant to the report submitted under section 260D.105, and the child
continues in voluntary foster care as defined in section 260D.005, subdivision
10, for 13 months from the date of the voluntary foster care agreement, or has
been in placement for 15 of the last 22 months, the agency must:
(1)
terminate the voluntary foster care agreement and return the child home; or
(2)
determine whether there are compelling reasons to continue the voluntary foster
care arrangement and, if the agency determines there are compelling reasons,
seek judicial approval of its determination; or
(3)
file a petition for the termination of parental rights.
(b)
When the agency is asking for the court's approval of its determination that
there are compelling reasons to continue the child in the voluntary foster care
arrangement, the agency shall file a "Petition for Permanency Review
Regarding a Child in Voluntary Foster Care for Treatment" and ask the
court to proceed under this section.
(c)
The "Petition for Permanency Review Regarding a Child in Voluntary Foster
Care for Treatment" shall be drafted or approved by the county attorney
and be under oath. The petition shall
include:
(1)
the date of the voluntary placement agreement;
(2)
whether the petition is due to the child's developmental disability or
emotional disturbance;
(3)
the plan for the ongoing care of the child and the parent's participation in
the plan;
(4)
a description of the parent's visitation and contact with the child;
(5)
the date of the court finding that the foster care placement was in the best
interests of the child, if required under section 260D.105, or the date the
agency filed the motion under section 260D.201, paragraph (b);
(6)
the agency's reasonable efforts to finalize the permanent plan for the child,
including returning the child to the care of the child's family; and
(7)
a citation to this chapter as the basis for the petition.
(d)
An updated copy of the out-of-home placement plan required under section
260C.212, subdivision 1, shall be filed with the petition.
(e)
The court shall set the date for the permanency review hearing no later than 14
months after the child has been in placement or within 30 days of the petition
filing date when the child has been in placement 15 of the last 22 months. The court shall serve the petition together
with a notice of hearing by United States mail on the parent, the child age 12
or older, the child's guardian ad litem, if one has been appointed, the agency,
the county attorney, and counsel for any party.
(f)
The court shall conduct the permanency review hearing on the petition no later
than 14 months after the date of the voluntary placement agreement, within 30
days of the filing of the petition when the child has been in placement 15 days
of the last 22 months, or within 15 days of a motion to terminate jurisdiction
and to dismiss an order for foster care under chapter 260C, as provided in
section 260D.201, paragraph (b).
(g)
At the permanency review hearing, the court shall:
(1)
inquire of the parent if the parent has reviewed the "Petition for
Permanency Review Regarding a Child in Voluntary Foster Care for
Treatment," whether the petition is accurate, and whether the parent
agrees to the continued voluntary foster care arrangement as being in the
child's best interests;
(2)
inquire of the parent if the parent is satisfied with the agency's reasonable
efforts to finalize the permanent plan for the child, including whether there
are services available and accessible to the parent that might allow the child
to safely be with the child's family;
(3)
inquire of the parent if the parent consents to the court entering an order
that:
(i)
approves the responsible agency's reasonable efforts to finalize the permanent
plan for the child, which includes ongoing future planning for the safety,
health, and best interests of the child; and
(ii)
approves the responsible agency's determination that there are compelling
reasons why the continued voluntary foster care arrangement is in the child's
best interests; and
(4)
inquire of the child's guardian ad litem and any other party whether the
guardian or the party agrees that:
(i)
the court should approve the responsible agency's reasonable efforts to
finalize the permanent plan for the child, which includes ongoing and future
planning for the safety, health, and best interests of the child; and
(ii)
the court should approve of the responsible agency's determination that there
are compelling reasons why the continued voluntary foster care arrangement is
in the child's best interests.
(h)
At a permanency review hearing under this section, the court may take the
following actions based on the contents of the sworn petition and the consent
of the parent:
(1)
approve the agency's compelling reasons that the voluntary foster care
arrangement is in the best interests of the child; and
(2)
find that the agency has made reasonable efforts to finalize a plan for the
permanent plan for the child.
(i)
A child, age 12 or older, may object to the agency's request that the court
approve its compelling reasons for the continued voluntary arrangement and may
be heard on the reasons for the objection.
Notwithstanding the child's objection, the court may approve the
agency's compelling reasons and the voluntary arrangement.
(j)
If the court does not approve the voluntary arrangement after hearing from the
child or the child's guardian ad litem, the court shall dismiss the
petition. In this case, either:
(1)
the child must be returned to the care of the parent; or
(2)
the agency must file a petition under section 260C.141, asking for appropriate
relief under section 260C.201, subdivision 11, or 260C.301.
(k)
When the court approves the agency's compelling reasons for the child to
continue in voluntary foster care for treatment, and finds that the agency has
made reasonable efforts to finalize a permanent plan for the child, the court
shall approve the continued voluntary foster care arrangement, and continue the
matter under the court's jurisdiction for the purposes of reviewing the child's
placement every 12 months while the child is in foster care.
(l)
A finding that the court approves the continued voluntary placement means the
agency has continued legal authority to place the child while a voluntary
placement agreement remains in effect.
The parent or the agency may terminate a voluntary agreement as provided
in section 260D.301. Termination of a voluntary
foster care placement of an Indian child is governed by section 260.765,
subdivision 4.
Sec.
51. [260D.109] ANNUAL REVIEW.
(a)
After the court conducts a permanency review hearing under section 260D.107,
the matter must be returned to the court for further review of the child's
foster care placement at least every 12 months while the child is in foster
care. The court shall give notice to
the parent and child, age 12 or older, and the foster parents of the continued
review requirements under this section at the permanency review hearing.
(b)
Every 12 months, the court shall determine whether the agency made reasonable
efforts to finalize the permanency plan for the child, which means the exercise
of due diligence by the agency to:
(1)
ensure that the agreement for voluntary foster care is the most appropriate
legal arrangement to meet the child's safety, health, and best interests;
(2)
engage and support the parent in continued involvement in planning and decision
making for the needs of the child;
(3)
strengthen the child's ties to the parent, relatives, and community;
(4)
implement the out-of-home placement plan required under section 260C.212,
subdivision 1, and ensure that the plan requires the provision of appropriate
services to address the physical health, mental health, and educational needs
of the child; and
(5)
ensure appropriate planning for the child's safe, permanent, and independent
living arrangement after the child's 18th birthday.
Sec.
52. [260D.201] PERMANENCY REVIEW AFTER ADJUDICATION UNDER CHAPTER 260C.
(a)
If a child has been ordered into foster care under section 260C.178 or
260C.201, subdivision 1, and the conditions that led to the court's order have
been corrected so that the child could safely return home except for the
child's need to continue in foster care for treatment due to the child's
disability, the child's parent and the agency may enter into a voluntary foster
care agreement under this chapter using the procedure set out in paragraph (b).
(b)
When the agency and the parent agree to enter into a voluntary foster care
agreement under this chapter, the agency must file a motion to terminate
jurisdiction under section 260C.193, subdivision 6, and to dismiss the order
for foster care under section 260C.178 or 260C.201, subdivision 1, together
with the petition required under section 260D.107, paragraph (b), for
permanency review and the court's approval of the voluntary arrangement.
(c)
The court shall send the motion and the petition filed under subdivision 2
together with a notice of hearing by mail as required in section 260D.107, paragraph
(e).
(d)
The petition and motion under this section must be filed no later than the time
the agency is required to file a petition for permanent placement under section
260C.201, subdivision 11, but may be filed as soon as the agency and the parent
agree that the child should remain in foster care under a voluntary foster care
agreement, because the child needs treatment and voluntary foster care is in
the child's best interest.
(e)
In order for the agency to have continuous legal authority to place the child,
the parent and the agency must execute a voluntary foster care agreement for
the child's continuation in foster care for treatment prior to the termination
of the order for foster care under section 260C.178 or 260C.201, subdivision 1. The parent and agency may execute the
voluntary foster care agreement at or before the permanency review hearing
required under this section. The
voluntary foster care agreement shall not be effective until the court terminates
jurisdiction under section 260C.193, subdivision 6, and dismisses the order for
foster care under section 260C.178 or 260C.201, subdivision 1. Unless the agency and the parent execute a
voluntary placement agreement for the child to continue in voluntary foster
care for treatment, the agency shall not have legal authority to place the
child after the court terminates jurisdiction under chapter 260C.
Sec.
53. [260D.301] TERMINATION OF VOLUNTARY PLACEMENT AGREEMENT.
(a)
The child's parent may terminate a voluntary placement agreement under this
chapter upon written notice to the agency of the termination of the
agreement. The termination of a
voluntary foster care agreement regarding an Indian child shall be governed by
section 260.765, subdivision 4.
(b)
The agency may terminate a voluntary placement agreement under this section
upon written notice of the termination of the agreement to the parent. Prior to sending notice of termination of
the voluntary foster care placement agreement, the agency shall contact the
parent regarding transition planning under paragraph (e). Written notice by the agency shall be
considered received by the parent three business days after mailing by the
agency.
(c)
Upon receipt of notice of the termination of the voluntary foster care
agreement, the agency, the parent, and the facility may agree to a time that
the child shall return home. The
scheduled time to return home shall meet the child's need for safety and
reasonable transition. Unless otherwise
agreed by the parent and the agency, the child's return home shall not occur
sooner than 72 hours and not later than 30 days after written notice of
termination is received or sent by the agency.
(d)
A parent who disagrees with the termination of a voluntary foster care
agreement by the agency under this chapter has the right to a fair hearing
under section 256.045 to appeal the termination of the voluntary foster care
agreement. When the agency gives
written notice to the parent of the termination of the agreement, the agency
must also give the parent notice of the parent's right to a fair hearing under
section 256.045 to appeal the agency's decision to terminate the voluntary
foster care agreement.
(e)
The agency and the child's parents shall engage in transition planning for the
child's return home, including establishing a scheduled time for the child to
return home, an increased visitation plan between the parent and child, and a
plan for what services will be provided and in place upon the child's return
home.
(f)
Notice of termination of voluntary foster care agreement does not terminate the
agreement. The voluntary foster care
agreement and the agency's legal authority to place the child are terminated by
the child's return home or by court order.
Sec.
54. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
524.2-114, is amended to read:
524.2-114 MEANING OF CHILD AND RELATED TERMS.
If,
for purposes of intestate succession, a relationship of parent and child must
be established to determine succession by, through, or from a person:
(1) An
adopted person child is the child of an adopting parent and not
of the birth parents except that adoption of a child by the spouse of a birth
parent has no effect on the relationship between the child and that birth
parent. If a parent dies and a child is
subsequently adopted by a stepparent who is the spouse of a surviving parent,
any rights of inheritance of the child or the child's descendant from or
through the deceased parent of the child which exist at the time of the death
of that parent shall not be affected by the adoption.
(2) In
cases not covered by clause (1), a person is the child of the person's parents
regardless of the marital status of the parents and the parent and child
relationship may be established under the Parentage Act, sections 257.51 to
257.74.
Sec.
55. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
626.556, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd.
7. Report. An oral report shall be made immediately by
telephone or otherwise. An oral report
made by a person required under subdivision 3 to report shall be followed
within 72 hours, exclusive of weekends and holidays, by a report in writing to
the appropriate police department, the county sheriff, the agency responsible
for assessing or investigating the report, or the local welfare agency, unless
the appropriate agency has informed the reporter that the oral information does
not constitute a report under subdivision 10.
The local welfare agency shall determine if the report is accepted
for an assessment or investigation as soon as possible but in no event longer
than 24 hours after the report is received.
Any report shall be of sufficient content to identify the child, any
person believed to be responsible for the abuse or neglect of the child if the
person is known, the nature and extent of the abuse or neglect and the name and
address of the reporter. If requested,
the local welfare agency or the agency responsible for assessing or
investigating the report shall inform the reporter within ten days after the
report is made, either orally or in writing, whether the report was accepted
for assessment or investigation.
Written reports received by a police department or the county sheriff
shall be forwarded immediately to the local welfare agency or the agency
responsible for assessing or investigating the report. The police department or the county sheriff
may keep copies of reports received by them.
Copies of written reports received by a local welfare department or the
agency responsible for assessing or investigating the report shall be forwarded
immediately to the local police department or the county sheriff.
A
written copy of a report maintained by personnel of agencies, other than
welfare or law enforcement agencies, which are subject to chapter 13 shall be
confidential. An individual subject of
the report may obtain access to the original report as provided by subdivision
11.
Sec.
56. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 626.556, subdivision 10a, is amended to read:
Subd.
10a. Law enforcement agency responsibility for investigation; welfare agency
reliance on law enforcement fact-finding; welfare agency offer of services. (a) If the report alleges neglect, physical
abuse, or sexual abuse by a person who is not a parent, guardian, sibling,
person responsible for the child's care functioning within the family unit, or
a person who lives in the child's household and who has a significant
relationship to the child, in a setting other than a facility as defined in
subdivision 2, the local welfare agency shall immediately notify the
appropriate law enforcement agency, which shall conduct an investigation of the
alleged abuse or neglect if a violation of a criminal statute is alleged.
(b)
The local agency may rely on the fact-finding efforts of the law enforcement
investigation conducted under this subdivision to make a determination whether
or not threatened harm injury or other maltreatment has occurred
under subdivision 2 if an alleged offender has minor children or lives with
minors.
(c)
The local welfare agency shall offer appropriate social services for the
purpose of safeguarding and enhancing the welfare of the abused or neglected
minor.
Sec.
57. TARGETED CASE MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR CHILDREN.
The
commissioner of human services shall seek an amendment to the state plan to
provide targeted case management services to children with developmental
disabilities who are in need of activities that coordinate and link social and
other services designed to help children gain access to needed medical, social,
educational, and other services under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.092.
Sec.
58. REVISOR'S INSTRUCTION.
In
each section of Minnesota Statutes referred to in column A, the revisor of
statutes shall delete the reference in column B and insert the reference in
column C.
Column A Column
B Column
C
259.67 260.851,
article 5 260.853,
article 4
256B.094 260.851 260.853
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective upon legislative enactment of the
interstate compact in section 23 by no less than 35 states.
Sec. 59. REPEALER.
(a) Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 260.851, is repealed effective
upon legislative enactment of the interstate compact in section 23 by no less
than 35 states. The commissioner of
human services shall inform the revisor of statutes when this occurs.
(b) Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 260B.241; 260C.141, subdivision
2a; 260C.207; 260C.431; and 260C.435, are repealed.
(c) Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, section 260C.212, subdivision
9, is repealed.
Minnesota Rules, parts 9560.0092; 9560.0093, subpart 2; and 9560.0609,
are repealed.
ARTICLE 2
LICENSING
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes
2007 Supplement, section 245C.14, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Disqualification from direct contact. (a) The commissioner shall disqualify an
individual who is the subject of a background study from any position allowing
direct contact with persons receiving services from the license holder or
entity identified in section 245C.03, upon receipt of information showing, or
when a background study completed under this chapter shows any of the
following:
(1) a conviction of, admission to, or Alford plea to one or more crimes
listed in section 245C.15, regardless of whether the conviction or admission is
a felony, gross misdemeanor, or misdemeanor level crime;
(2) a preponderance of the clear and convincing evidence
indicates the individual has committed an act or acts that meet the definition
of any of the crimes listed in section 245C.15, regardless of whether the preponderance
of the clear and convincing evidence is for a felony, gross
misdemeanor, or misdemeanor level crime; or
(3) an investigation results in an administrative determination listed
under section 245C.15, subdivision 4, paragraph (b).
(b) No individual who is disqualified following a background study
under section 245C.03, subdivisions 1 and 2, may be retained in a position
involving direct contact with persons served by a program or entity identified
in section 245C.03, unless the commissioner has provided written notice under
section 245C.17 stating that:
(1) the individual may remain in direct contact during the period in
which the individual may request reconsideration as provided in section
245C.21, subdivision 2;
(2) the commissioner has set aside the individual's disqualification
for that program or entity identified in section 245C.03, as provided in
section 245C.22, subdivision 4; or
(3) the license holder has been granted a variance for the disqualified
individual under section 245C.30.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2007
Supplement, section 245C.15, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. 15-year disqualification.
(a) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if: (1) less than 15 years have passed since the
discharge of the sentence imposed, if any, for the offense; and (2) the
individual has committed a felony-level violation of any of the following
offenses: sections 256.98 (wrongfully
obtaining assistance); 268.182 (false representation; concealment of facts);
393.07, subdivision 10, paragraph (c) (federal Food Stamp Program fraud);
609.165 (felon ineligible to possess firearm); 609.21 (criminal vehicular
homicide and injury); 609.215 (suicide); 609.223 or 609.2231 (assault in the
third or fourth degree); repeat offenses under 609.224 (assault in the fifth
degree); 609.229 (crimes committed for benefit of a gang); 609.2325 (criminal
abuse of a vulnerable adult); 609.2335 (financial exploitation of a vulnerable
adult); 609.235 (use of drugs to injure or facilitate crime); 609.24 (simple
robbery); 609.255 (false imprisonment); 609.2664 (manslaughter of an unborn
child in the first degree); 609.2665 (manslaughter of an unborn child in the
second degree); 609.267 (assault of an unborn child in the first degree);
609.2671 (assault of an unborn child in the second degree); 609.268 (injury or
death of an unborn child in the commission of a crime); 609.27 (coercion);
609.275 (attempt to coerce); 609.466 (medical assistance fraud); 609.498,
subdivision 1 or 1b (aggravated first degree or first degree tampering with a
witness); 609.52 (theft); 609.521 (possession of shoplifting gear); 609.525
(bringing stolen goods into Minnesota); 609.527 (identity theft); 609.53
(receiving stolen property); 609.535 (issuance of dishonored checks); 609.562
(arson in the second degree); 609.563 (arson in the third degree); 609.582
(burglary); 609.59 (possession of burglary tools);
609.611 (insurance fraud); 609.625 (aggravated forgery); 609.63
(forgery); 609.631 (check forgery; offering a forged check); 609.635 (obtaining
signature by false pretense); 609.66 (dangerous weapons); 609.67 (machine guns
and short-barreled shotguns); 609.687 (adulteration); 609.71 (riot); 609.713
(terroristic threats); 609.82 (fraud in obtaining credit); 609.821 (financial
transaction card fraud); 617.23 (indecent exposure), not involving a minor;
repeat offenses under 617.241 (obscene materials and performances; distribution
and exhibition prohibited; penalty); 624.713 (certain persons not to possess
firearms); chapter 152 (drugs; controlled substance); or a felony-level
conviction involving alcohol or drug use.
(b) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than 15
years has passed since the individual's aiding and abetting, attempt, or
conspiracy to commit any of the offenses listed in paragraph (a), as each of
these offenses is defined in Minnesota Statutes.
(c) For foster care and family child care an individual is disqualified
under section 245C.14 if less than 15 years has passed since the individual's
voluntary termination of the individual's parental rights under section
260C.301, subdivision 1, paragraph (b), or 260C.301, subdivision 3.
(d) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than 15
years has passed since the discharge of the sentence imposed for an offense in
any other state or country, the elements of which are substantially similar to
the elements of the offenses listed in paragraph (a).
(e) If the individual studied commits one of the offenses listed in
paragraph (a), but the sentence or level of offense is a gross misdemeanor or
misdemeanor, the individual is disqualified but the disqualification look-back
period for the offense is the period applicable to the gross misdemeanor or
misdemeanor disposition.
(f) When a disqualification is based on a judicial determination other
than a conviction, the disqualification period begins from the date of the
court order. When a disqualification is
based on an admission, the disqualification period begins from the date of an
admission in court. When a
disqualification is based on a preponderance of clear and convincing
evidence of a disqualifying act, the disqualification date begins from the date
of the dismissal, the date of discharge of the sentence imposed for a
conviction for a disqualifying crime of similar elements, or the date of the
incident, whichever occurs last.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2007
Supplement, section 245C.15, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Ten-year disqualification.
(a) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if: (1) less than ten years have passed since
the discharge of the sentence imposed, if any, for the offense; and (2) the
individual has committed a gross misdemeanor-level violation of any of the
following offenses: sections 256.98
(wrongfully obtaining assistance); 268.182 (false representation; concealment
of facts); 393.07, subdivision 10, paragraph (c) (federal Food Stamp Program
fraud); 609.21 (criminal vehicular homicide and injury); 609.221 or 609.222
(assault in the first or second degree); 609.223 or 609.2231 (assault in the
third or fourth degree); 609.224 (assault in the fifth degree); 609.224,
subdivision 2, paragraph (c) (assault in the fifth degree by a caregiver
against a vulnerable adult); 609.2242 and 609.2243 (domestic assault); 609.23
(mistreatment of persons confined); 609.231 (mistreatment of residents or
patients); 609.2325 (criminal abuse of a vulnerable adult); 609.233 (criminal
neglect of a vulnerable adult); 609.2335 (financial exploitation of a
vulnerable adult); 609.234 (failure to report maltreatment of a vulnerable
adult); 609.265 (abduction); 609.275 (attempt to coerce); 609.324, subdivision
1a (other prohibited acts; minor engaged in prostitution); 609.33 (disorderly
house); 609.377 (malicious punishment of a child); 609.378 (neglect or endangerment
of a child); 609.466 (medical assistance fraud); 609.52 (theft); 609.525
(bringing stolen goods into Minnesota); 609.527 (identity theft); 609.53
(receiving stolen property); 609.535 (issuance of dishonored checks); 609.582
(burglary); 609.59 (possession of burglary tools); 609.611 (insurance fraud);
609.631 (check forgery; offering a forged check); 609.66 (dangerous weapons);
609.71 (riot); 609.72, subdivision 3 (disorderly conduct against a vulnerable
adult); repeat offenses under 609.746 (interference with privacy); 609.749,
subdivision 2 (harassment; stalking); 609.82 (fraud in obtaining credit);
609.821 (financial transaction card fraud); 617.23
(indecent exposure), not involving a minor; 617.241 (obscene materials
and performances); 617.243 (indecent literature, distribution); 617.293
(harmful materials; dissemination and display to minors prohibited); or
violation of an order for protection under section 518B.01, subdivision 14.
(b) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than
ten years has passed since the individual's aiding and abetting, attempt, or
conspiracy to commit any of the offenses listed in paragraph (a), as each of
these offenses is defined in Minnesota Statutes.
(c) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than
ten years has passed since the discharge of the sentence imposed for an offense
in any other state or country, the elements of which are substantially similar
to the elements of any of the offenses listed in paragraph (a).
(d) If the individual studied commits one of the offenses listed in
paragraph (a), but the sentence or level of offense is a misdemeanor
disposition, the individual is disqualified but the disqualification lookback
period for the offense is the period applicable to misdemeanors.
(e) When a disqualification is based on a judicial determination other
than a conviction, the disqualification period begins from the date of the
court order. When a disqualification is
based on an admission, the disqualification period begins from the date of an
admission in court. When a
disqualification is based on a preponderance of clear and convincing
evidence of a disqualifying act, the disqualification date begins from the date
of the dismissal, the date of discharge of the sentence imposed for a
conviction for a disqualifying crime of similar elements, or the date of the
incident, whichever occurs last.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2007
Supplement, section 245C.15, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Seven-year disqualification.
(a) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if: (1) less than seven years has passed since
the discharge of the sentence imposed, if any, for the offense; and (2) the
individual has committed a misdemeanor-level violation of any of the following
offenses: sections 256.98 (wrongfully
obtaining assistance); 268.182 (false representation; concealment of facts);
393.07, subdivision 10, paragraph (c) (federal Food Stamp Program fraud);
609.21 (criminal vehicular homicide and injury); 609.221 (assault in the first
degree); 609.222 (assault in the second degree); 609.223 (assault in the third
degree); 609.2231 (assault in the fourth degree); 609.224 (assault in the fifth
degree); 609.2242 (domestic assault); 609.2335 (financial exploitation of a
vulnerable adult); 609.234 (failure to report maltreatment of a vulnerable
adult); 609.2672 (assault of an unborn child in the third degree); 609.27
(coercion); violation of an order for protection under 609.3232 (protective
order authorized; procedures; penalties); 609.466 (medical assistance fraud);
609.52 (theft); 609.525 (bringing stolen goods into Minnesota); 609.527
(identity theft); 609.53 (receiving stolen property); 609.535 (issuance of
dishonored checks); 609.611 (insurance fraud); 609.66 (dangerous weapons);
609.665 (spring guns); 609.746 (interference with privacy); 609.79 (obscene or
harassing telephone calls); 609.795 (letter, telegram, or package; opening;
harassment); 609.82 (fraud in obtaining credit); 609.821 (financial transaction
card fraud); 617.23 (indecent exposure), not involving a minor; 617.293
(harmful materials; dissemination and display to minors prohibited); or
violation of an order for protection under section 518B.01 (Domestic Abuse
Act).
(b) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than
seven years has passed since a determination or disposition of the
individual's:
(1) failure to make required reports under section 626.556, subdivision
3, or 626.557, subdivision 3, for incidents in which: (i) the final disposition under section 626.556 or 626.557 was
substantiated maltreatment, and (ii) the maltreatment was recurring or serious;
or
(2) substantiated serious or recurring maltreatment of a minor under
section 626.556, a vulnerable adult under section 626.557, or serious or
recurring maltreatment in any other state, the elements of which are
substantially similar to the elements of maltreatment under section 626.556 or
626.557 for which: (i) there is a
preponderance of evidence that the maltreatment occurred, and (ii) the subject
was responsible for the maltreatment.
(c) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than
seven years has passed since the individual's aiding and abetting, attempt, or
conspiracy to commit any of the offenses listed in paragraphs (a) and (b), as
each of these offenses is defined in Minnesota Statutes.
(d) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than
seven years has passed since the discharge of the sentence imposed for an
offense in any other state or country, the elements of which are substantially
similar to the elements of any of the offenses listed in paragraphs (a) and
(b).
(e) When a disqualification is based on a judicial determination other
than a conviction, the disqualification period begins from the date of the
court order. When a disqualification is
based on an admission, the disqualification period begins from the date of an
admission in court. When a
disqualification is based on a preponderance of clear and convincing
evidence of a disqualifying act, the disqualification date begins from the date
of the dismissal, the date of discharge of the sentence imposed for a
conviction for a disqualifying crime of similar elements, or the date of the
incident, whichever occurs last.
(f) An individual is disqualified under section 245C.14 if less than
seven years has passed since the individual was disqualified under section
256.98, subdivision 8.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 245C.24, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Permanent bar to set aside a disqualification. (a) Except as provided in paragraph
paragraphs (b), (c) and (d), the commissioner may not set aside the
disqualification of any individual disqualified pursuant to this chapter,
regardless of how much time has passed, if the individual was disqualified for
a crime or conduct listed in section 245C.15, subdivision 1.
(b) For An individual in the chemical dependency field who was:
(1)
disqualified for a crime or conduct listed under section 245C.15, subdivision 1,
and;
(2)
whose disqualification was set aside prior to July 1, 2005, the commissioner
must consider granting; and
(3) was granted a variance pursuant to section 245C.30 for the license holder for a
program dealing primarily with adults.
A request for reconsideration evaluated under this paragraph must
include a letter of recommendation from the license holder that was subject to
the prior set-aside decision addressing the individual's quality of care to
children or vulnerable adults and the circumstances of the individual's
departure from that service under this section prior to August 1, 2008,
is eligible to request a set-aside under paragraph (c).
(c) For any individual who was disqualified for a crime or conduct
listed under section 245C.15, subdivision 1, and whose disqualification was set
aside prior to July 1, 2005, the commissioner must consider granting a
set-aside pursuant to section 245C.22.
An employer who hires any individual who provides in-home services shall
monitor service provision with the client by telephone at least quarterly.
(d) For an individual who was disqualified for an offense under section
609.66, subdivision 1e, that was committed when the individual was a minor, and
more than seven years has passed since the incident, during which time the
individual has attended and graduated from college, the commissioner may
consider setting aside the disqualification for a children's residential
facility licensed by the Department of Corrections.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2008.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2007
Supplement, section 245C.24, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Ten-year bar to set aside disqualification. (a) The commissioner may not set aside the
disqualification of an individual in connection with a license to provide
family child care for children, foster care for children in the provider's
home, or foster care or day care services for adults in the provider's home
if: (1) less than ten years has passed
since the discharge of the sentence imposed, if any, for the offense; or (2)
when disqualified based on a preponderance of clear and convincing
evidence determination under section 245C.14, subdivision 1, paragraph (a),
clause (2), or an admission under section 245C.14, subdivision 1, paragraph
(a), clause (1), and less than ten years has passed since the individual
committed the act or admitted to committing the act, whichever is later; and
(3) the individual has committed a violation of any of the following offenses: sections 609.165 (felon ineligible to
possess firearm); criminal vehicular homicide under 609.21 (criminal vehicular
homicide and injury); 609.215 (aiding suicide or aiding attempted suicide);
felony violations under 609.223 or 609.2231 (assault in the third or fourth
degree); 609.229 (crimes committed for benefit of a gang); 609.713 (terroristic
threats); 609.235 (use of drugs to injure or to facilitate crime); 609.24
(simple robbery); 609.255 (false imprisonment); 609.562 (arson in the second
degree); 609.71 (riot); 609.498, subdivision 1 or 1b (aggravated first degree
or first degree tampering with a witness); burglary in the first or second
degree under 609.582 (burglary); 609.66 (dangerous weapon); 609.665 (spring
guns); 609.67 (machine guns and short-barreled shotguns); 609.749, subdivision
2 (gross misdemeanor harassment; stalking); 152.021 or 152.022 (controlled
substance crime in the first or second degree); 152.023, subdivision 1, clause
(3) or (4) or subdivision 2, clause (4) (controlled substance crime in the
third degree); 152.024, subdivision 1, clause (2), (3), or (4) (controlled
substance crime in the fourth degree); 609.224, subdivision 2, paragraph (c)
(fifth-degree assault by a caregiver against a vulnerable adult); 609.23
(mistreatment of persons confined); 609.231 (mistreatment of residents or
patients); 609.2325 (criminal abuse of a vulnerable adult); 609.233 (criminal
neglect of a vulnerable adult); 609.2335 (financial exploitation of a
vulnerable adult); 609.234 (failure to report); 609.265 (abduction); 609.2664
to 609.2665 (manslaughter of an unborn child in the first or second degree);
609.267 to 609.2672 (assault of an unborn child in the first, second, or third
degree); 609.268 (injury or death of an unborn child in the commission of a
crime); repeat offenses under 617.23 (indecent exposure); 617.293
(disseminating or displaying harmful material to minors); a felony-level
conviction involving alcohol or drug use, a gross misdemeanor offense under
609.324, subdivision 1 (other prohibited acts); a gross misdemeanor offense
under 609.378 (neglect or endangerment of a child); a gross misdemeanor offense
under 609.377 (malicious punishment of a child); 609.72, subdivision 3
(disorderly conduct against a vulnerable adult); or 624.713 (certain persons
not to possess firearms).
(b) The commissioner may not set aside the disqualification of an
individual if less than ten years have passed since the individual's aiding and
abetting, attempt, or conspiracy to commit any of the offenses listed in
paragraph (a) as each of these offenses is defined in Minnesota Statutes.
(c) The commissioner may not set aside the disqualification of an
individual if less than ten years have passed since the discharge of the
sentence imposed for an offense in any other state or country, the elements of
which are substantially similar to the elements of any of the offenses listed
in paragraph (a).
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2007
Supplement, section 245C.27, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Fair hearing when disqualification is not
set aside. (a) If the commissioner
does not set aside a disqualification of an individual under section 245C.22
who is disqualified on the basis of a preponderance of clear and
convincing evidence that the individual committed an act or acts that meet
the definition of any of the crimes listed in section 245C.15; for a
determination under section 626.556 or 626.557 of substantiated maltreatment
that was serious or recurring under section 245C.15; or for failure to make
required reports under section 626.556, subdivision 3; or 626.557, subdivision
3, pursuant to section 245C.15, subdivision 4, paragraph (b), clause (1), the
individual may request a fair hearing under section 256.045, unless the
disqualification is deemed conclusive under section 245C.29.
(b) The fair hearing is the only administrative appeal of the final
agency determination for purposes of appeal by the disqualified
individual. The disqualified individual
does not have the right to challenge the accuracy and completeness of data
under section 13.04.
(c) Except as provided under paragraph (e), if the individual was
disqualified based on a conviction or admission to any crimes listed in section
245C.15, subdivisions 1 to 4, or for a disqualification under section 256.98,
subdivision 8, the reconsideration decision under section 245C.22 is the final
agency determination for purposes of appeal by the disqualified individual and
is not subject to a hearing under section 256.045. If the individual was disqualified based on a judicial
determination, that determination is treated the same as a conviction for
purposes of appeal.
(d) This subdivision does not apply to a public employee's appeal of a
disqualification under section 245C.28, subdivision 3.
(e) Notwithstanding paragraph (c), if the commissioner does not set
aside a disqualification of an individual who was disqualified based on both a
preponderance of clear and convincing evidence and a conviction or
admission, the individual may request a fair hearing under section 256.045,
unless the disqualifications are deemed conclusive under section 245C.29. The scope of the hearing conducted under
section 256.045 with regard to the disqualification based on a conviction or
admission shall be limited solely to whether the individual poses a risk of
harm, according to section 256.045, subdivision 3b. In this case, the reconsideration decision under section 245C.22
is not the final agency decision for purposes of appeal by the disqualified
individual.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 245C.29, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Conclusive disqualification determination. (a) Unless otherwise specified in statute, a
determination that:
(1) the information the commissioner relied upon to disqualify an
individual under section 245C.14 was correct based on serious or recurring
maltreatment;
(2) a preponderance of the clear and convincing evidence
shows that the individual committed an act or acts that meet the definition of
any of the crimes listed in section 245C.15; or
(3) the individual failed to make required reports under section
626.556, subdivision 3, or 626.557, subdivision 3, is conclusive if:
(i) the commissioner has issued a final order in an appeal of that
determination under section 245A.08, subdivision 5, or 256.045, or a court has
issued a final decision;
(ii) the individual did not request reconsideration of the
disqualification under section 245C.21; or
(iii) the individual did not request a hearing on the disqualification
under section 256.045 or chapter 14.
(b) When a licensing action under section 245A.05, 245A.06, or 245A.07
is based on the disqualification of an individual in connection with a license
to provide family child care, foster care for children in the provider's own
home, or foster care services for adults in the provider's own home, that
disqualification shall be conclusive for purposes of the licensing action if a
request for reconsideration was not submitted within 30 calendar days of the
individual's receipt of the notice of disqualification.
(c) If a determination that the information relied upon to disqualify
an individual was correct and is conclusive under this section, and the
individual is subsequently disqualified under section 245C.15, the individual
has a right to request reconsideration on the risk of harm under section
245C.21. Subsequent determinations
regarding the risk of harm shall be made according to section 245C.22 and are
not subject to another hearing under section 256.045 or chapter 14.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 256.045, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. State agency hearings. (a)
State agency hearings are available for the following: (1) any person applying for, receiving or
having received public assistance, medical care, or a program of social
services granted by the state agency or a county agency or the federal Food
Stamp Act whose application for assistance is denied, not acted upon with
reasonable promptness, or whose assistance is suspended, reduced, terminated,
or claimed to have been incorrectly paid; (2) any patient or relative aggrieved
by an order of the commissioner under section 252.27; (3) a party aggrieved by
a ruling of a prepaid health plan; (4) except as provided under chapter 245C,
any individual or facility determined by a lead agency to have maltreated a
vulnerable adult under section 626.557 after they have exercised their right to
administrative reconsideration under section 626.557; (5) any person whose
claim for foster care payment according to a placement of the child resulting
from a child protection assessment under section 626.556 is denied or not acted
upon with reasonable promptness, regardless of funding source; (6) any person
to whom a right of appeal according to this section is given by other provision
of law; (7) an applicant aggrieved by an adverse decision to an application for
a hardship waiver under section 256B.15; (8) an applicant aggrieved by an
adverse decision to an application or redetermination for a Medicare Part D
prescription drug subsidy under section 256B.04, subdivision 4a; (9) except as
provided under chapter 245A, an individual or facility determined to have
maltreated a minor under section 626.556, after the individual or facility has
exercised the right to administrative reconsideration under section 626.556; or
(10) except as provided under chapter 245C, an individual disqualified under
sections 245C.14 and 245C.15, on the basis of serious or recurring
maltreatment; a preponderance of the clear and convincing evidence
that the individual has committed an act or acts that meet the definition of
any of the crimes listed in section 245C.15, subdivisions 1 to 4; or for
failing to make reports required under section 626.556, subdivision 3, or
626.557, subdivision 3. Hearings
regarding a maltreatment determination under clause (4) or (9) and a
disqualification under this clause in which the basis for a disqualification is
serious or recurring maltreatment, which has not been set aside under sections
245C.22 and 245C.23, shall be consolidated into a single fair hearing. In such cases, the scope of review by the
human services referee shall include both the maltreatment determination and
the disqualification. The failure to
exercise the right to an administrative reconsideration shall not be a bar to a
hearing under this section if federal law provides an individual the right to a
hearing to dispute a finding of maltreatment.
Individuals and organizations specified in this section may contest the
specified action, decision, or final disposition before the state agency by
submitting a written request for a hearing to the state agency within 30 days
after receiving written notice of the action, decision, or final disposition,
or within 90 days of such written notice if the applicant, recipient, patient,
or relative shows good cause why the request was not submitted within the
30-day time limit.
The hearing for an individual or facility under clause (4), (9), or
(10) is the only administrative appeal to the final agency determination
specifically, including a challenge to the accuracy and completeness of data
under section 13.04. Hearings requested
under clause (4) apply only to incidents of maltreatment that occur on or after
October 1, 1995. Hearings requested by
nursing assistants in nursing homes alleged to have maltreated a resident prior
to October 1, 1995, shall be held as a contested case proceeding under the
provisions of chapter 14. Hearings
requested under clause (9) apply only to incidents of maltreatment that occur
on or after July 1, 1997. A hearing for
an individual or facility under clause (9) is only available when there is no
juvenile court or adult criminal action pending. If such action is filed in either court while an administrative
review is pending, the administrative review must be suspended until the
judicial actions are completed. If the
juvenile court action or criminal charge is dismissed or the criminal action
overturned, the matter may be considered in an administrative hearing.
For purposes of this section, bargaining unit grievance procedures are
not an administrative appeal.
The scope of hearings involving claims to foster care payments under
clause (5) shall be limited to the issue of whether the county is legally
responsible for a child's placement under court order or voluntary placement
agreement and, if so, the correct amount of foster care payment to be made on
the child's behalf and shall not include review of the propriety of the
county's child protection determination or child placement decision.
(b) A vendor of medical care as defined in section 256B.02, subdivision
7, or a vendor under contract with a county agency to provide social services
is not a party and may not request a hearing under this section, except if
assisting a recipient as provided in subdivision 4.
(c) An applicant or recipient is not entitled to receive social
services beyond the services prescribed under chapter 256M or other social
services the person is eligible for under state law.
(d) The commissioner may summarily affirm the county or state agency's
proposed action without a hearing when the sole issue is an automatic change
due to a change in state or federal law.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 256.045, subdivision 3b, is amended to read:
Subd. 3b. Standard of evidence for maltreatment and disqualification hearings. (a) The state human services referee shall
determine that maltreatment has occurred if a preponderance of evidence exists
to support the final disposition under sections 626.556 and 626.557. For purposes of hearings regarding
disqualification, the state human services referee shall affirm the proposed
disqualification in an appeal under subdivision 3, paragraph (a), clause (9),
if a preponderance of the evidence shows the individual has:
(1) a preponderance of the evidence shows the individual has committed
maltreatment under section 626.556 or 626.557, which is serious or recurring;
(2) clear and convincing evidence shows the individual has committed
an act or acts meeting the definition of any of the crimes listed in section
245C.15, subdivisions 1 to 4; or
(3) a preponderance of the evidence shows the individual has failed
to make required reports under section 626.556 or 626.557, for incidents in
which the final disposition under section 626.556 or 626.557 was substantiated
maltreatment that was serious or recurring.
(b) If the disqualification is affirmed, the state human services
referee shall determine whether the individual poses a risk of harm in
accordance with the requirements of section 245C.16, and whether the
disqualification should be set aside or not set aside. In determining whether the disqualification
should be set aside, the human services referee shall consider all of the
characteristics that cause the individual to be disqualified, including those
characteristics that were not subject to review under paragraph (a), in order
to determine whether the individual poses a risk of harm. A decision to set aside a disqualification
that is the subject of the hearing constitutes a determination that the
individual does not pose a risk of harm and that the individual may provide
direct contact services in the individual program specified in the set
aside. If a determination that the
information relied upon to disqualify an individual was correct and is
conclusive under section 245C.29, and the individual is subsequently
disqualified under section 245C.14, the individual has a right to again request
reconsideration on the risk of harm under section 245C.21. Subsequent determinations regarding risk of
harm are not subject to another hearing under this section.
(c) The state human services referee shall recommend an order to the
commissioner of health, education, or human services, as applicable, who shall
issue a final order. The commissioner
shall affirm, reverse, or modify the final disposition. Any order of the commissioner issued in
accordance with this subdivision is conclusive upon the
parties unless appeal is taken in the manner provided in subdivision 7.
In any licensing appeal under chapters
245A and 245C and sections 144.50 to 144.58 and 144A.02 to 144A.46, the
commissioner's determination as to maltreatment is conclusive, as provided
under section 245C.29.
ARTICLE 3
DATA PRIVACY
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 13.46, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 12. Child care resource and referral programs. This subdivision applies to data
collected by child care resource and referral programs under section
119B.19. Data collected under section
119B.19 are not licensing data under subdivision 4. Data on unlicensed family child care providers are data on
individuals governed by subdivision 2.
In addition to the disclosures authorized by this section, the names and
addresses of unlicensed family child care providers may be disclosed to the
commissioner of education for purposes of promoting and evaluating school
readiness.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 13.46, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 13. Family, friend, and neighbor grant program. This subdivision applies to data
collected by family, friend, and neighbor (FFN) grantees under section
119B.232. Data collected under section
119B.232 are data on individuals governed by subdivision 2. The commissioner may disclose private data
collected under this section to early childhood care and education experts at
the University of Minnesota to evaluate the impact of the grants under
subdivision 2 on children's school readiness and to evaluate the FFN grant
program. The commissioner may disclose
the names and addresses of FFN caregivers to the commissioner of education for
purposes of promoting and evaluating school readiness.
Sec. 3. Laws 2007, chapter 147,
article 2, section 56, is amended to read:
Sec. 56. COMMISSIONER OF HUMAN SERVICES DUTIES; EARLY CHILDHOOD AND SCHOOL-AGE
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT TRAINING.
Subdivision 1. Development and implementation of an early
childhood and school-age professional development system. (a) The commissioner of human services, in
cooperation with the commissioners of education and health, shall develop and
phase-in the implementation of a professional development system for
practitioners serving children in early childhood and school-age programs. The system shall provide training options
and supports for practitioners to voluntarily choose, as they complete or
exceed existing licensing requirements.
The system must, at a minimum, include the following features:
(1) a continuum of training content based on the early childhood and
school-age care practitioner core competencies that translates knowledge into
improved practice to support children's school success;
(2) training strategies that provide direct feedback about practice to
practitioners through ongoing consultation, mentoring, or coaching with special
emphasis on early literacy and early mathematics;
(3) an approval process for trainers;
(4) a professional development registry for early childhood and
school-age care practitioners that will provide tracking and recognition of
practitioner training/career development progress;
(5) a career lattice that includes a range of professional development
and educational opportunities that provide appropriate coursework and degree
pathways;
(6) development of a plan with public higher education institutions for
an articulated system of education, training, and professional development that
includes credit for prior learning and development of equivalences to two- and
four-year degrees;
(7) incentives and supports for early childhood and school-age care
practitioners to seek additional training and education, including TEACH, other
scholarships, and career guidance; and
(8) coordinated and accessible delivery of training to early childhood
and school-age care practitioners.
(b) By January 1, 2008, the commissioner, in consultation with the
organizations named in subdivision 2 shall develop additional opportunities in
order to qualify more licensed family child care providers under section
119B.13, subdivision 3a.
(c) The commissioner of human services must evaluate the professional
development system and make continuous improvements.
(d) Beginning July 1, 2007, as appropriations permit, the commissioner
shall phase-in the professional development system.
Subd. 2. Two-hour early childhood training.
By January 15, 2008, the commissioner of human services, with input from
the Minnesota Licensed Family Child Care Association and the Minnesota
Professional Development Council, shall identify trainings that qualify for the
two-hour early childhood development training requirement for new child care
practitioners under Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.14, subdivision 9a,
paragraphs (a) and (b). For licensed
family child care, the commissioner shall also seek the input of labor unions
that serve licensed family child care providers, if the union has been
recognized by a county to serve licensed family child care providers.
Subd. 3. Data classification for child care practitioner professional
development system. This
subdivision applies to data collected under this section by the child care
practitioner professional development system.
Data collected under this section is welfare data under section 13.46
but is not licensing data under section 13.46, subdivision 4. Data on individuals who are licensed family
child care providers are private data on individuals governed by section 13.46,
subdivision 2. The commissioner may disclose
nonpublic data collected under this section as described in section 13.46,
subdivision 2. The commissioner also
may disclose private and nonpublic data collected under this section to the
following entities:
(1) personnel of the welfare system who require the data for child care
licensing purposes;
(2) personnel of the welfare system who require the data to administer
or evaluate the child care assistance program;
(3) the commissioner of education for purposes of implementing,
administering, and evaluating the child care practitioner professional
development system;
(4) the commissioner of health for purposes of implementing and
administering this section; and
(5) an individual's employer for purposes of tracking and verifying
employee training, education, and expertise.
ARTICLE 4
ADOPTION
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 13.465, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Adoption records. Various
adoption records are classified under section 259.53, subdivision 1. Access to the original birth record of a
person who has been adopted is governed by section 259.89 144.2253.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 144.218, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Adoption. (a) Upon receipt of a certified copy of an order, decree,
or certificate of adoption, the state registrar shall register a replacement
vital record in the new name of the adopted person. Except as provided in paragraph (b), the original record
of birth is confidential pursuant to private data on individuals, as
defined in section 13.02, subdivision 3 12, and shall not be
disclosed except pursuant to court order or section 144.2252 or 144.2253.
(b) The
information contained on the original birth record, except for the registration
number, shall be provided on request to:
(1) a parent who is named on the original birth record; or (2)
the adopted person who is the subject of the record if the person is at least
19 years of age, unless there is an affidavit of nondisclosure on file with the
state registrar. Upon the receipt
of a certified copy of a court order of annulment of adoption the state
registrar shall restore the original vital record to its original place in the
file.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 144.225, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Data about births. (a)
Except as otherwise provided in this subdivision, data pertaining to the birth
of a child to a woman who was not married to the child's father when the child
was conceived nor when the child was born, including the original record of
birth and the certified vital record, are confidential data. At the time of the birth of a child to a
woman who was not married to the child's father when the child was conceived
nor when the child was born, the mother may designate demographic data
pertaining to the birth as public.
Notwithstanding the designation of the data as confidential, it may be
disclosed:
(1) to a parent or guardian of the child;
(2) to the child when the child is 16 years of age or older;
(3) under paragraph (b) or (e); or
(4) pursuant to a court order.
For purposes of this section, a subpoena does not constitute a court
order.
(b) Unless the child is adopted, data pertaining to the birth of a
child that are not accessible to the public become public data if 100 years
have elapsed since the birth of the child who is the subject of the data, or as
provided under section 13.10, whichever occurs first.
(c) If a child is adopted, data pertaining to the child's birth are
governed by the provisions relating to adoption records, including sections
13.10, subdivision 5; 144.218, subdivision 1; 144.2252; 144.2253; and
259.89.
(d) The name and address of a mother under paragraph (a) and the
child's date of birth may be disclosed to the county social services or public
health member of a family services collaborative for purposes of providing
services under section 124D.23.
(e) The commissioner of human services shall have access to birth
records for:
(1) the purposes of administering medical assistance, general
assistance medical care, and the MinnesotaCare program;
(2) child support enforcement purposes; and
(3) other public health purposes as determined by the commissioner of
health.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 144.2252, is amended to read:
144.2252 ACCESS TO ORIGINAL
BIRTH RECORD AFTER ADOPTION.
(a) Whenever an adopted person requests the state registrar to disclose
the information on the adopted person's original birth record, the state
registrar shall act according to section 259.89 144.2253.
(b) The state registrar shall provide a transcript of an adopted
person's original birth record to an authorized representative of a federally
recognized American Indian tribe for the sole purpose of determining the
adopted person's eligibility for enrollment or membership. Information contained in the birth record may
not be used to provide the adopted person information about the person's birth
parents, except as provided in this section or section 259.83
144.2253.
Sec. 5. [144.2253] ACCESS TO ORIGINAL BIRTH RECORDS BY ADOPTED PERSON;
DEPARTMENT DUTIES.
Subdivision 1. Affidavits. The
department shall prepare affidavit of disclosure and nondisclosure forms under
which a birth parent may agree to or object to the release of the original
birth record to the adopted person. The
department shall make the forms readily accessible to birth parents on the
department's Web site.
Subd. 2. Disclosure. Upon
request, the state registrar shall provide a noncertified copy of the original
birth record to an adopted person age 19 or older, unless there is an affidavit
of nondisclosure on file. The state
registrar must comply with the terms of affidavits of disclosure or affidavits
of nondisclosure.
Subd. 3. Recission of affidavit.
A birth parent may rescind an affidavit of disclosure or an affidavit
of nondisclosure at any time.
Subd. 4. Affidavit of nondisclosure; access to birth record. (a) If an affidavit of nondisclosure is
on file with the registrar, an adopted person age 19 or older may petition the
appropriate court for disclosure of the original birth record pursuant to
section 259.61. The court shall grant
the petition if, after consideration of the interests of all known persons
affected by the petition, the court determines that the benefits of disclosure
of the information are greater than the benefits of nondisclosure.
(b) An adopted person age 19 or older may request the state registrar
to search the state death records to determine if the birth parent is
deceased. The state registrar may
impose a fee for the record search. If
the birth parent is deceased, a noncertified copy of the original birth record
must be released to the adopted person making the request.
Subd. 5. Information provided.
(a) The department shall, in consultation with adoption agencies and
adoption advocates, provide information and educational materials to adopted
persons and birth parents about the changes in the law under this act affecting
accessibility to birth records. For
purposes of this subdivision, an adoption advocate is a nonprofit organization
that works with adoption issues in Minnesota.
(b) The department shall include a notice on the department Web site
about the change in the law under this act and direct individuals to private
agencies and advocates for post adoption resources.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 144.226, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Which services are for fee. The fees for the following services shall be
the following or an amount prescribed by rule of the commissioner:
(a) The fee for the issuance of a certified vital record or a
certification that the vital record cannot be found is $9. No fee shall be charged for a certified
birth, stillbirth, or death record that is reissued within one year of the
original issue, if an amendment is made to the vital record and if the
previously issued vital record is surrendered.
The fee is nonrefundable.
(b) The fee for processing a request for the replacement of a birth
record for all events, except when filing a recognition of parentage pursuant
to section 257.73, subdivision 1, is $40.
The fee is payable at the time of application and is nonrefundable.
(c) The fee for processing a request for the filing of a delayed
registration of birth, stillbirth, or death is $40. The fee is payable at the time of application and is nonrefundable. This fee includes one subsequent review of
the request if the request is not acceptable upon the initial receipt.
(d) The fee for processing a request for the amendment of any vital
record when requested more than 45 days after the filing of the vital record is
$40. No fee shall be charged for an
amendment requested within 45 days after the filing of the vital record. The fee is payable at the time of application
and is nonrefundable. This fee includes
one subsequent review of the request if the request is not acceptable upon the
initial receipt.
(e) The fee for processing a request for the verification of
information from vital records is $9 when the applicant furnishes the specific
information to locate the vital record.
When the applicant does not furnish specific information, the fee is $20
per hour for staff time expended.
Specific information includes the correct date of the event and the
correct name of the registrant. Fees
charged shall approximate the costs incurred in searching and copying the vital
records. The fee is payable at the time
of application and is nonrefundable.
(f) The fee for processing a request for the issuance of a copy of any
document on file pertaining to a vital record or statement that a related
document cannot be found is $9. The fee
is payable at the time of application and is nonrefundable.
(g) The department shall charge a fee of $18 for noncertified copies of
birth records provided to adopted persons age 19 or older to cover the cost of
providing the birth record and any costs associated with the distribution of
information to adopted persons and birth parents required under section
144.2253, subdivision 5.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 259.89, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Request. An adopted person who is 19 years of age or over may request the
commissioner of health to disclose the information on the adopted person's
original birth record. The
commissioner of health shall, within five days of receipt of the request,
notify the commissioner of human services in writing of the request by the
adopted person.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 260C.317, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Rights of terminated parent.
Upon entry of an order terminating the parental rights of any person who
is identified as a parent on the original birth record of the child as to whom
the parental rights are terminated, the court shall cause written notice to be
made to that person setting forth:
(1) the right of the person to file at any time with the state
registrar of vital statistics a consent to disclosure, as defined in section
144.212, subdivision 11;
(2) the right of the person to file at any time with the state
registrar of vital statistics an affidavit stating that the information on the
original birth record shall not be disclosed as provided in section 144.2252
144.2253; and
(3) the effect of a failure to file either a consent to disclosure, as
defined in section 144.212, subdivision 11, or an affidavit stating that the
information on the original birth record shall not be disclosed.
Sec. 9. ADOPTION AGENCIES; FEE.
Adoption agencies may charge a fee for counseling and support services
provided to adopted persons and birth parents.
Sec. 10. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 259.83, subdivision 3; and 259.89,
subdivisions 2, 3, 4, and 5, are repealed.
Sec. 11. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This article is effective July 1, 2009."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to human services; changing child
welfare and licensing provisions; adopting a new Interstate Compact for the
Placement of Children and repealing the old compact; regulating adoptions;
changing adoption records provisions; changing provisions for children in voluntary
foster care for treatment; changing data privacy provisions; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2006, sections 13.46, by adding subdivisions; 13.465, subdivision 8;
144.218, subdivision 1; 144.225, subdivision 2; 144.2252; 144.226, subdivision
1; 245C.24, subdivision 2; 245C.29, subdivision 2; 256.045, subdivisions 3, 3b;
259.20, subdivision 1; 259.21, by adding a subdivision; 259.22, subdivision 2;
259.23, subdivision 2; 259.43; 259.52, subdivision 2; 259.53, subdivision 3;
259.59, subdivisions 1, 2; 259.67, subdivisions 2, 3, by adding a subdivision;
259.75, subdivision 5; 259.89, subdivisions 1, 2, 4, by adding a subdivision;
260.835; 260C.001, subdivision 2; 260C.007, subdivisions 5, 6, 13; 260C.101,
subdivision 2; 260C.141, subdivision 2; 260C.171, subdivision 2; 260C.178,
subdivision 1; 260C.205; 260C.212, subdivisions 7, 8, by adding a subdivision;
260C.317, subdivision 4; 260C.325, subdivisions 1, 3; 524.2-114; 626.556,
subdivision 7; Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, sections 245C.14,
subdivision 1; 245C.15, subdivisions 2, 3, 4; 245C.24, subdivision 3; 245C.27,
subdivision 1; 259.41, subdivision 1; 259.57, subdivision 1; 259.67,
subdivision 4; 260C.163, subdivision 1; 260C.209, subdivisions 1, 2, by adding
a subdivision; 260C.212, subdivisions 1, 4; 626.556, subdivision 10a; Laws
2007, chapter 147, article 2, section 56; proposing coding for new law in
Minnesota Statutes, chapters 144; 259; 260; proposing coding for new law as
Minnesota Statutes, chapter 260D; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections
259.83, subdivision 3; 259.89, subdivisions 2, 3, 4, 5; 260.851; 260B.241;
260C.141, subdivision 2a; 260C.207; 260C.431; 260C.435; Minnesota Statutes 2007
Supplement, section 260C.212, subdivision 9; Minnesota Rules, parts 9560.0092;
9560.0093, subpart 2; 9560.0609."
We request the adoption of this report and repassage of the
bill.
Senate Conferees: Patricia Torres Ray, Mee Moua and Betsy L.
Wergin.
House Conferees: Neva Walker, John Lesch and Jim Abeler.
Walker moved that the report of the Conference Committee on
S. F. No. 3166 be adopted and that the bill be repassed as
amended by the Conference Committee.
The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 3166, A bill for an act relating to human services;
amending child welfare and licensing provisions; adopting a new Interstate
Compact for the Placement of Children and repealing the old compact; regulating
child and adult adoptions; regulating children in voluntary foster care for
treatment; providing targeted case management services to certain children with
developmental disabilities; providing for certain data classifications;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 13.46, by adding subdivisions;
245C.24, subdivision 2; 245C.29, subdivision 2; 256.045, subdivisions 3, 3b;
259.20, subdivision 1; 259.21, by adding a subdivision; 259.22, subdivision 2;
259.23, subdivision 2; 259.43; 259.52, subdivision 2; 259.53, subdivision 3;
259.59, subdivisions 1, 2; 259.67, subdivisions 2, 3, by adding a subdivision;
259.75, subdivision 5; 259.89, subdivisions 1, 2, 4, by adding a subdivision;
260C.001, subdivision 2; 260C.007, subdivisions 5, 6, 13; 260C.101, subdivision
2; 260C.141, subdivision 2; 260C.171, subdivision 2; 260C.178, subdivision 1;
260C.205; 260C.212, subdivisions 7, 8, by adding a subdivision; 260C.325,
subdivisions 1, 3; 524.2-114; 626.556, subdivision 7; Minnesota Statutes 2007
Supplement, sections 245C.14, subdivision 1; 245C.15, subdivisions 2, 3, 4;
245C.24, subdivision 3; 245C.27, subdivision 1; 259.41, subdivision 1; 259.57,
subdivision 1; 259.67, subdivision 4; 260C.163, subdivision 1; 260C.209,
subdivisions 1, 2, by adding a subdivision; 260C.212, subdivisions 1, 4;
626.556, subdivision 10a; Laws 2007, chapter 147, article 2, section 56;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 259; 260;
proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 260D; repealing
Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 260.851; 260C.141, subdivision 2a; 260C.431;
260C.435; Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, section 260C.212, subdivision 9;
Minnesota Rules, part 9560.0609.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended by Conference,
and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of the bill and the
roll was called. There were 76 yeas and
55 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dominguez
Eken
Erhardt
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Knuth
Koenen
Kranz
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Ozment
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Wardlow
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Benson
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Howes
Kohls
Lanning
Magnus
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Olson
Otremba
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Poppe
Ruth
Scalze
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Urdahl
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was repassed, as amended by Conference, and its title
agreed to.
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following
Senate File, herewith transmitted:
S. F. No. 3281.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
FIRST READING OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. No. 3281, A bill for an act relating to state government;
creating the Veterans Health Care Advisory Council; proposing coding for new
law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 196.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Finance.
FISCAL CALENDAR
Pursuant to rule 1.22, Solberg requested immediate
consideration of H. F. No. 2748.
H. F. No. 2748, A bill for an act relating to health;
establishing oversight for rural health cooperative; requiring the
administrative services unit to apportion the amount necessary to purchase
medical professional liability insurance coverage and authorizing fees to be
adjusted to compensate for the apportioned amount; appropriating money;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 214.40, by adding a subdivision;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 62R.
The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final
passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 122 yeas and 9
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Drazkowski
Eken
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Kranz
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Brod
Buesgens
Eastlund
Emmer
Finstad
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Olson
The bill was passed and its title agreed to.
FISCAL CALENDAR
Pursuant to rule 1.22, Solberg requested immediate
consideration of H. F. No. 3796.
H. F. No. 3796 was reported to the House.
Hosch; Haws; Kalin; Eken;
Morgan; Benson; Welti; Norton; Lillie; Murphy, E., and Ruud moved to amend
H. F. No. 3796, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 2, line 2, after "salaries"
insert "and per diem"
Page 2, line 3, after "salary"
insert "and per diem"
Page 2, line 9, after "salaries"
insert "and per diem" in both places
Amend the title as follows:
Page 1, line 3, after
"salaries" insert "and per diem"
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
Emmer moved that H. F. No. 3796 be re-referred to the Committee
on Governmental Operations, Reform, Technology and Elections.
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Emmer motion and the roll was
called. There were 48 yeas and 83 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Fritz
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Magnus
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Nornes
Olson
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Poppe
Ruth
Seifert
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Gardner
Garofalo
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Knuth
Koenen
Kranz
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Moe
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Severson
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail.
Kohls moved to amend the Hosch et al amendment to H. F. No.
3796, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 1, line 2, delete "and" and insert a
comma and after "per diem" insert "and housing
expenses"
Page 1, line 3, delete "and" and insert a
comma and after "per diem" insert "and housing
expenses"
Page 1, line 4, delete "and" and insert a
comma and after "per diem" insert "and housing
expenses"
Page 1, line 6, delete "and" and insert a
comma and after "per diem" insert "and housing
expenses"
The motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment
was not adopted.
The question recurred on the Hosch et al amendment and the roll
was called. There were 73 yeas and 59
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Cornish
Demmer
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Erickson
Faust
Gardner
Garofalo
Greiling
Hamilton
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Johnson
Knuth
Kranz
Lenczewski
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mariani
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Norton
Olson
Otremba
Paulsen
Paymar
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Seifert
Severson
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Swails
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Berns
Bly
Brod
Buesgens
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Dettmer
Dill
Dominguez
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Finstad
Fritz
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Huntley
Jaros
Juhnke
Kahn
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lesch
Liebling
Mahoney
Masin
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Olin
Ozment
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Sertich
Shimanski
Simpson
Solberg
Thao
Tingelstad
Walker
Wardlow
Westrom
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Kohls moved to amend H. F.
No. 3796, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 2, line 3, after the
period, insert "The salaries prescribed by the council require
legislative approval."
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Kohls amendment and the roll was
called. There were 46 yeas and 87 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Liebling
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Olson
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Thissen
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Greiling
Gunther
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kranz
Laine
Lesch
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Hamilton moved that H. F. No. 3796, as amended, be laid on the
table.
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Hamilton motion and the roll was
called. There were 43 yeas and 90 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Beard
Berns
Bigham
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Fritz
Gottwalt
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Liebling
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Olson
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Ruth
Seifert
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Demmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Gardner
Garofalo
Greiling
Gunther
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kranz
Laine
Lesch
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Severson
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail.
Olson moved to amend H. F.
No. 3796, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 2, line 3, after the
period, insert "The salaries prescribed by the council require
legislative approval."
Page 2, line 10, after
"legislators" insert "with legislative approval"
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
POINT
OF ORDER
Howes raised a point of order pursuant to section 398,
paragraph 2, of "Mason's Manual of Legislative Procedure," relating
to Decisions on Amendments as Final that the Olson amendment was not in
order. Speaker pro tempore Pelowski
ruled the point of order not well taken and the Olson amendment in order.
The question recurred on the Olson amendment and the roll was
called. There were 42 yeas and 91 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Demmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Liebling
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nelson
Nornes
Olson
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Greiling
Gunther
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kranz
Laine
Lesch
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Buesgens moved to amend H.
F. No. 3796, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, lines 2, 3, and 4 of
the Hosch et al amendment adopted earlier today, delete "per diem"
and insert "walking around money"
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
H. F. No. 3796, A bill for an act relating to state government;
proposing an amendment to the Minnesota Constitution, article IV, section 9;
authorizing a council to establish salaries and per diem for legislators; changing
the composition of the Citizen Compensation Council; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2006, section 15A.082, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 91 yeas and 43
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Demmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Gardner
Garofalo
Greiling
Gunther
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kranz
Laine
Lesch
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Severson
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Thao
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Dean
DeLaForest
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Fritz
Gottwalt
Hackbarth
Holberg
Hoppe
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Liebling
Magnus
McFarlane
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Olson
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Ruth
Seifert
Shimanski
Simpson
Swails
Thissen
Tschumper
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
Dettmer was excused between the hours of 3:00 p.m. and 10:05
p.m.
FISCAL CALENDAR
Pursuant to rule 1.22, Solberg requested immediate
consideration of S. F. No. 2833.
S. F. No. 2833 was reported to the House.
Thissen moved to amend S. F.
No. 2833, the unofficial engrossment, as follows:
Page 3, delete section 6
Page 4, line 23, delete
everything after the period
Page 4, delete lines 24 and
25
Page 10, before line 1,
insert:
"Sec. 11. STUDIES.
Subdivision 1. Report. By January 15, 2009, the commissioner of
health shall report to the chairs and ranking minority members of the
legislative committees and divisions having jurisdiction over the regulation of
public pools and spas: the number of public pools and spas under license in the
state of Minnesota, the type of ownership of
public pools under license
in the state, the type of drains at all licensed public pools and spas as
reported by owners or licensees, and the number of pools and spas that required
drain modification due to this act.
This report shall include the estimated economic impact and costs of the
installation of a second main drain and cover.
Subd. 2. Stakeholder group. The commissioner of health shall convene
a group of stakeholders to address the exception for public swimming ponds,
under Minnesota Statutes, section 144.1222, subdivision 5, and make
recommendations to the legislature by December 15, 2010."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
S. F. No. 2833, A bill for an act relating to health; requiring
public pools and spas to be equipped with anti-entrapment devices or systems;
appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 144.1222,
subdivision 1a, by adding subdivisions; 157.16, as amended; 157.20,
subdivisions 1, 2a.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 133 yeas and 0
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Kranz
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE SPEAKER
The Speaker announced the appointment of the following members
of the House to a Conference Committee on S. F. No. 2651:
Dill, Wagenius, Thao, Moe and McNamara.
The Speaker announced the appointment of the following members
of the House to a Conference Committee on H. F. No. 3420:
Hilstrom, Pelowski and Smith.
REPORT FROM THE COMMITTEE ON
RULES AND
LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATION
Sertich from the Committee on Rules and Legislative
Administration, pursuant to rule 1.21, designated the following bills to be
placed on the Supplemental Calendar for the Day for Monday, May 12, 2008:
H. F. Nos. 1875, 4072 and 3301;
S. F. Nos. 3203 and 3370; H. F. No. 2554; and
S. F. No. 1605.
CALENDAR FOR THE DAY
H. F. No. 1875, A bill for an act relating to health; modifying
board of directors for comprehensive health association; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2006, section 62E.10, subdivision 2.
The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final
passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 133 yeas and 0
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Kranz
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed and its title agreed to.
H. F. No. 4072 was reported to the House.
H. F. No. 4072 was read for the third time.
POINT
OF ORDER
Buesgens raised a point of order pursuant to rule 4.03 relating
to Ways and Means Committee; Budget Resolution; Effect on Expenditure and
Revenue Bills. Speaker pro tempore
Pelowski ruled the point of order not well taken.
H. F. No. 4072, A bill for an act relating to capital
improvements; appropriating money for asset preservation at the University of
Minnesota and Minnesota State Colleges and Universities; authorizing the sale
and issuance of state bonds.
The bill was placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 95 yeas and 38
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kranz
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Berns
Brod
Brown
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kohls
Lanning
Magnus
Nornes
Olson
Paulsen
Peppin
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was passed and its title agreed to.
The following Conference Committee Report was received:
CONFERENCE
COMMITTEE REPORT ON H. F. NO. 3222
A bill for an act relating to human services; amending health
care services provisions; making changes to general assistance medical care,
medical assistance, and MinnesotaCare; modifying claims, liens, and treatment
of assets; establishing a statewide information exchange; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2006, sections 256B.056, subdivisions 2, 4a, 11, by adding a
subdivision; 256B.057, subdivision 1; 256B.0571, subdivisions 8, 9, 15, by adding
a subdivision; 256B.058; 256B.059, subdivisions 1, 1a; 256B.0594; 256B.0595,
subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, by adding subdivisions; 256B.0625, subdivision 13g;
256B.075, subdivision 2; 256B.15, subdivision 4; 256B.69, subdivisions 6, 27;
524.3-803; Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, sections 256B.055, subdivision
14; 256B.0625, subdivision 49; 256D.03, subdivision 3; proposing coding for new
law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 256B.
May 7,
2008
The Honorable Margaret
Anderson Kelliher
Speaker of the House of
Representatives
The Honorable James P.
Metzen
President of the Senate
We, the undersigned conferees for H. F. No. 3222 report that we
have agreed upon the items in dispute and recommend as follows:
That the Senate recede from its amendments and that H. F. No.
3222 be further amended as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"ARTICLE
1
HEALTH
CARE
Section
1. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
125A.02, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Child
with a disability. Every child who
has a hearing impairment, blindness, visual disability, speech or language
impairment, physical disability, other health impairment, mental disability,
emotional/behavioral disorder, specific learning disability, autism, traumatic
brain injury, multiple disabilities, or deaf/blind disability and needs special
instruction and services, as determined by the standards of the commissioner,
is a child with a disability. A
licensed physician, an advanced practice nurse, or a licensed psychologist is
qualified to make a diagnosis and determination of attention deficit disorder
or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder for purposes of
identifying
a child with a disability. In addition, every child
under age three, and at local district discretion from age three to age seven,
who needs special instruction and services, as determined by the standards of
the commissioner, because the child has a substantial delay or has an
identifiable physical or mental condition known to hinder normal development is
a child with a disability.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec.
2. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
144A.45, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Rules. The commissioner shall adopt rules for the
regulation of home care providers pursuant to sections 144A.43 to 144A.47. The rules shall include the following:
(a) (1) provisions to assure, to
the extent possible, the health, safety and well-being, and appropriate
treatment of persons who receive home care services;
(b) (2) requirements that home care
providers furnish the commissioner with specified information necessary to
implement sections 144A.43 to 144A.47;
(c) (3) standards of training of
home care provider personnel, which may vary according to the nature of the
services provided or the health status of the consumer;
(d) (4) standards for medication
management which may vary according to the nature of the services provided, the
setting in which the services are provided, or the status of the consumer. Medication management includes the central
storage, handling, distribution, and administration of medications;
(e) (5) standards for supervision
of home care services requiring supervision by a registered nurse or other appropriate
health care professional which must occur on site at least every 62 days, or
more frequently if indicated by a clinical assessment, and in accordance with
sections 148.171 to 148.285 and rules adopted thereunder, except that,
notwithstanding the provisions of Minnesota Rules, part 4668.0110, subpart 5,
item B, supervision of a person performing home care aide tasks for a class B
licensee providing paraprofessional services must occur only every 180 days, or
more frequently if indicated by a clinical assessment;
(f) (6) standards for client
evaluation or assessment which may vary according to the nature of the services
provided or the status of the consumer;
(g) (7) requirements for the
involvement of a consumer's physician, the documentation of physicians' orders,
if required, and the consumer's treatment plan, and the maintenance of
accurate, current clinical records;
(h) (8) the establishment of
different classes of licenses for different types of providers and different
standards and requirements for different kinds of home care services; and
(i) (9) operating procedures
required to implement the home care bill of rights.
Sec.
3. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
144A.45, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
1a. Home
care aide tasks. Notwithstanding
the provisions of Minnesota Rules, part 4668.0110, subpart 1, item E, home care
aide tasks also include assisting toileting, transfers, and ambulation if the
client is ambulatory and if the client has no serious acute illness or infectious
disease.
Sec.
4. [145.1622]
POLICY FOR NOTIFICATION OF DISPOSITION OPTIONS.
Hospitals,
clinics, and medical facilities must have in place by January 15, 2009, a
policy for informing a woman of available options for fetal disposition when
the woman experiences a miscarriage or is expected to experience a miscarriage.
Sec.
5. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
150A.06, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
9. Graduates
of nonaccredited dental programs.
A graduate of a nonaccredited dental program who successfully
completes the clinical licensure examination, and meets all other applicant
requirements of the board shall be licensed to practice dentistry and granted a
limited general dentist license by the board.
The board shall place limitations on the licensee's authority to
practice by requiring the licensee to practice under the general supervision of
a Minnesota-licensed dentist approved by the board. A person licensed under this subdivision must practice for three
consecutive years in Minnesota pursuant to a written agreement, approved by the
board, between the licensee and a Minnesota-licensed dentist who may limit the
types of services authorized. At the
conclusion of the three-year period, the board shall grant an unlimited license
without further restrictions if all supervising dentists who had entered into
written agreements with the licensee during any part of the three-year period
recommend unlimited licensure, and if no corrective action or disciplinary
action has been taken by the board against the licensee.
Sec.
6. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
214.40, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
8. Fee
adjustment. The
administrative services unit shall apportion between the Board of Medical
Practice, the Board of Dentistry, and the Board of Nursing an amount to be
raised through fees by the respective board.
The amount apportioned to each board shall be the total amount expended
on medical professional liability insurance coverage purchased for the providers
regulated by the respective board. The
respective board may adjust the fees which the board is required to collect to
compensate for the amount apportioned to the board by the administrative
services unit.
Sec.
7. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256.01, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
27. Statewide
health information exchange. (a)
The commissioner has the authority to join and participate as a member in a
legal entity developing and operating a statewide health information exchange
that shall meet the following criteria:
(1)
the legal entity must meet all constitutional and statutory requirements to
allow the commissioner to participate; and
(2)
the commissioner or the commissioner's designated representative must have the
right to participate in the governance of the legal entity under the same terms
and conditions and subject to the same requirements as any other member in the
legal entity and in that role shall act to advance state interests and lessen
the burdens of government.
(b)
Notwithstanding chapter 16C, the commissioner may pay the state's prorated
share of development-related expenses of the legal entity retroactively from
October 29, 2007, regardless of the date the commissioner joins the legal
entity as a member.
Sec.
8. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 256B.055, subdivision 14, is amended to read:
Subd.
14. Persons detained by law.
(a) Medical assistance may be paid for an inmate of a correctional
facility who is conditionally released as authorized under section 241.26,
244.065, or 631.425, if the individual does not require the security of a
public detention facility and is housed in a halfway house or community
correction center, or under house arrest and monitored by electronic
surveillance in a residence approved by the commissioner of corrections, and if
the individual meets the other eligibility requirements of this chapter.
(b) An
individual who is enrolled in medical assistance, and who is charged with a
crime and incarcerated for less than 12 months shall be suspended from
eligibility at the time of incarceration until the individual is released. Upon release, medical assistance eligibility
is reinstated without reapplication using a reinstatement process and form, if
the individual is otherwise eligible.
(c) An
individual, regardless of age, who is considered an inmate of a public
institution as defined in Code of Federal Regulations, title 42, section 435.1009
435.1010, is not eligible for medical assistance.
Sec.
9. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.056, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Homestead
exclusion and homestead equity limit for institutionalized
persons residing in a long-term care facility. (a) The homestead shall be excluded
for the first six calendar months of a person's stay in a long-term care
facility and shall continue to be excluded for as long as the recipient can be
reasonably expected to return to the homestead. For purposes of this subdivision, "reasonably expected to
return to the homestead" means the recipient's attending physician has
certified that the expectation is reasonable, and the recipient can show that
the cost of care upon returning home will be met through medical assistance or
other sources. The homestead shall
continue to be excluded for persons residing in a long-term care facility if it
is used as a primary residence by one of the following individuals:
(1)
the spouse;
(2) a
child under age 21;
(3) a
child of any age who is blind or permanently and totally disabled as defined in
the supplemental security income program;
(4) a
sibling who has equity interest in the home and who resided in the home for at
least one year immediately before the date of the person's admission to the
facility; or
(5) a
child of any age, or, subject to federal approval, a grandchild
of any age, who resided in the home for at least two years immediately
before the date of the person's admission to the facility, and who provided
care to the person that permitted the person to reside at home rather than in an
institution.
(b)
Effective for applications filed on or after July 1, 2006, and for renewals
after July 1, 2006, for persons who first applied for payment of long-term care
services on or after January 2, 2006, the equity interest in the homestead of an
individual whose eligibility for long-term care services is determined on or
after January 1, 2006, shall not exceed $500,000, unless it is the lawful
residence of the individual's spouse or child who is under age 21, blind, or
disabled. The amount specified in this
paragraph shall be increased beginning in year 2011, from year to year based on
the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers
(all items; United States city average), rounded to the nearest $1,000. This provision may be waived in the case of
demonstrated hardship by a process to be determined by the secretary of health
and human services pursuant to section 6014 of the Deficit Reduction Act of
2005, Public Law 109-171.
Sec.
10. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 256B.056,
is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
2a. Home
equity limit for medical assistance payment of long-term care services. (a) Effective for requests of medical
assistance payment of long-term care services filed on or after July 1, 2006,
and for renewals on or after July 1, 2006, for persons who received payment of
long-term care services under a request filed on or after January 1, 2006, the
equity interest in the home of a person whose eligibility for long-term care
services is determined on or after January 1, 2006, shall not exceed $500,000,
unless it is the lawful residence of the person's spouse or child who is under
age 21, or a child of any age who is blind or permanently and totally disabled
as
defined
in the Supplemental Security Income program.
The amount specified in this paragraph shall be increased beginning in
year 2011, from year to year based on the percentage increase in the Consumer
Price Index for all urban consumers (all items; United States city average),
rounded to the nearest $1,000.
(b)
For purposes of this subdivision, a "home" means any real or personal
property interest, including an interest in an agricultural homestead as
defined under section 273.124, subdivision 1, that, at the time of the request
for medical assistance payment of long-term care services, is the primary
dwelling of the person or was the primary dwelling of the person before receipt
of long-term care services began outside of the home.
(c)
A person denied or terminated from medical assistance payment of long-term care
services because the person's home equity exceeds the home equity limit may
seek a waiver based upon a hardship by filing a written request with the county
agency. Hardship is an imminent threat
to the person's health and well-being that is demonstrated by documentation of
no alternatives for payment of long-term care services. The county agency shall make a decision
regarding the written request to waive the home equity limit within 30 days if
all necessary information has been provided.
The county agency shall send the person and the person's representative
a written notice of decision on the request for a demonstrated hardship waiver
that also advises the person of appeal rights under the fair hearing process of
section 256.045.
Sec.
11. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.056, subdivision 4a, is amended to read:
Subd.
4a. Asset verification. For
purposes of verification, the value of an individual is not required
to make a good faith effort to sell a life estate that is not excluded
under subdivision 2 and the life estate shall be considered
deemed not salable unless the owner of the remainder interest intends to
purchase the life estate, or the owner of the life estate and the owner of the
remainder sell the entire property. This
subdivision applies only for the purpose of determining eligibility for medical
assistance, and does not apply to the valuation of assets owned by either the
institutional spouse or the community spouse under section 256B.059,
subdivision 2.
Sec.
12. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.056, subdivision 11, is amended to read:
Subd.
11. Treatment of annuities. (a)
Any individual applying for or seeking recertification of eligibility for
person requesting medical assistance payment of long-term care services
shall provide a complete description of any interest either the individual
person or the individual's person's spouse has in
annuities on a form designated by the department. The form shall include a statement that the state becomes a
preferred remainder beneficiary of annuities or similar financial instruments
by virtue of the receipt of medical assistance payment of long-term care
services. The individual person
and the individual's person's spouse shall furnish the agency
responsible for determining eligibility with complete current copies of their
annuities and related documents for review as part of the application
process on disclosure forms provided by the department as part of their
application and complete the form designating the state as the preferred
remainder beneficiary for each annuity in which the person or the person's
spouse has an interest.
(b) The
disclosure form shall include a statement that the department becomes the
remainder beneficiary under the annuity or similar financial instrument by
virtue of the receipt of medical assistance.
The disclosure form department shall include a
provide notice to the issuer of the department's right under this section
as a preferred remainder beneficiary under the annuity or similar financial
instrument for medical assistance furnished to the individual person or
the individual's person's spouse, and require the issuer to
provide confirmation that a remainder beneficiary designation has been made and
to notify the county agency when there is a change in the amount of the income
or principal being withdrawn from the annuity or other similar financial
instrument at the time of the most recent disclosure required under this
section. The individual and the
individual's spouse shall execute separate disclosure forms for each annuity or
similar financial instrument that they are required to disclose under this
section and in which they have an interest provide notice of the
issuer's responsibilities as provided in paragraph (c).
(c) An
issuer of an annuity or similar financial instrument who receives notice on
a disclosure form of the state's right to be named a preferred remainder
beneficiary as described in paragraph (b) shall provide confirmation to the
requesting agency that a remainder beneficiary designating the state has
been made and a preferred remainder beneficiary. The issuer shall also notify the
county agency when there is a change in the amount of income or
principal being withdrawn from the annuity or other similar financial
instrument or a change in the state's preferred remainder beneficiary
designation under the annuity or other similar financial instrument occurs. The county agency shall provide the issuer
with the name, address, and telephone number of a unit within the department
that the issuer can contact to comply with this paragraph.
(d)
"Preferred remainder beneficiary" for purposes of this subdivision
and sections 256B.0594 and 256B.0595 means the state is a remainder beneficiary
in the first position in an amount equal to the amount of medical assistance
paid on behalf of the institutionalized person, or is a remainder beneficiary
in the second position if the institutionalized person designates and is
survived by a remainder beneficiary who is (1) a spouse who does not reside in
a medical institution, (2) a minor child, or (3) a child of any age who is
blind or permanently and totally disabled as defined in the Supplemental
Security Income program.
Notwithstanding this paragraph, the state is the remainder beneficiary
in the first position if the spouse or child disposes of the remainder for less
than fair market value.
(e)
For purposes of this subdivision, "institutionalized person" and
"long-term care services" have the meanings given in section
256B.0595, subdivision 1, paragraph (h).
(f)
For purposes of this subdivision, "medical institution" means a
skilled nursing facility, intermediate care facility, intermediate care
facility for persons with developmental disabilities, nursing facility, or
inpatient hospital.
Sec.
13. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.057, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Infants
and pregnant women. (a)(1) An
infant less than one year of age or a pregnant woman who has written
verification of a positive pregnancy test from a physician or licensed
registered nurse is eligible for medical assistance if countable family
income is equal to or less than 275 percent of the federal poverty guideline
for the same family size. A pregnant
woman who has written verification of a positive pregnancy test from a
physician or licensed registered nurse is eligible for medical assistance if
countable family income is equal to or less than 200 percent of the federal
poverty guideline for the same family size.
For purposes of this subdivision, "countable family
income" means the amount of income considered available using the
methodology of the AFDC program under the state's AFDC plan as of July 16,
1996, as required by the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation
Act of 1996 (PRWORA), Public Law 104-193, except for the earned income
disregard and employment deductions.
(2)
For applications processed within one calendar month prior to the effective
date, eligibility shall be determined by applying the income standards and
methodologies in effect prior to the effective date for any months in the
six-month budget period before that date and the income standards and
methodologies in effect on the effective date for any months in the six-month
budget period on or after that date.
The income standards for each month shall be added together and compared
to the applicant's total countable income for the six-month budget period to
determine eligibility.
(b)(1)
[Expired, 1Sp2003 c 14 art 12 s 19]
(2)
For applications processed within one calendar month prior to July 1, 2003,
eligibility shall be determined by applying the income standards and
methodologies in effect prior to July 1, 2003, for any months in the six-month
budget period before July 1, 2003, and the income standards and methodologies
in effect on the expiration date for any months in the six-month budget period
on or after July 1, 2003. The income
standards for each month shall be added together and compared to the
applicant's total countable income for the six-month budget period to determine
eligibility.
(3)
An amount equal to the amount of earned income exceeding 275 percent of the
federal poverty guideline, up to a maximum of the amount by which the combined
total of 185 percent of the federal poverty guideline plus the earned income
disregards and deductions allowed under the state's AFDC plan as of July 16,
1996, as required by the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of
1996 (PRWORA), Public Law 104-193, exceeds 275 percent of the federal poverty
guideline will be deducted for pregnant women and infants less than one year of
age.
(c)
Dependent care and child support paid under court order shall be deducted from
the countable income of pregnant women.
(d) An
infant born on or after January 1, 1991, to a woman who was eligible for and
receiving medical assistance on the date of the child's birth shall continue to
be eligible for medical assistance without redetermination until the child's
first birthday, as long as the child remains in the woman's household.
Sec.
14. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.0571, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd.
6. Partnership
policy. "Partnership
policy" means a long-term care insurance policy that meets the
requirements under subdivision 10 and was issued on or after the effective date
of the state plan amendment implementing the partnership program in
Minnesota. Policies that are
exchanged or that have riders or endorsements added on or after the effective
date of the state plan amendment as authorized by the commissioner of commerce
qualify as a partnership policy.
Sec.
15. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.0571, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd.
8. Program
established. (a) The commissioner,
in cooperation with the commissioner of commerce, shall establish the Minnesota
partnership for long-term care program to provide for the financing of
long-term care through a combination of private insurance and medical
assistance.
(b) An
individual who meets the requirements in this paragraph is eligible to
participate in the partnership program.
The individual must:
(1) meet
one of the following criteria:
(i)
be a beneficiary
of, and a Minnesota resident at the time coverage first became effective
under the a partnership policy;
(2)
be a beneficiary of a partnership policy that (i) either is issued on or after the effective date of
the state plan amendment implementing the partnership program in Minnesota, or (ii)
qualifies as a partnership policy under the provisions of subdivision 8a
as authorized by the commissioner of commerce under subdivision 6; and
or
(ii)
be a beneficiary of a policy recognized under subdivision 17; and
(3) (2) have exhausted
all of the benefits under the partnership policy as described in this
section. Benefits received under a
long-term care insurance policy before July 1, 2006, do not count toward the
exhaustion of benefits required in this subdivision.
Sec.
16. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.0571, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd.
9. Medical
assistance eligibility. (a) Upon application
request for medical assistance program payment of long-term care
services by an individual who meets the requirements described in subdivision
8, the commissioner shall determine the individual's eligibility for medical
assistance according to paragraphs (b) to (i).
(b)
After determining assets subject to the asset limit under section 256B.056,
subdivision 3 or 3c, or 256B.057, subdivision 9 or 10, the commissioner shall
allow the individual to designate assets to be protected from recovery under
subdivisions 13 and 15 up to the dollar amount of the benefits utilized under
the partnership policy. Designated
assets shall be disregarded for purposes of determining eligibility for payment
of long-term care services.
(c)
The individual shall identify the designated assets and the full fair market
value of those assets and designate them as assets to be protected at the time
of initial application for medical assistance.
The full fair market value of real property or interests in real
property shall be based on the most recent full assessed value for property tax
purposes for the real property, unless the individual provides a complete
professional appraisal by a licensed appraiser to establish the full fair market
value. The extent of a life estate in
real property shall be determined using the life estate table in the health
care program's manual. Ownership of any
asset in joint tenancy shall be treated as ownership as tenants in common for
purposes of its designation as a disregarded asset. The unprotected value of any protected asset is subject to estate
recovery according to subdivisions 13 and 15.
(d)
The right to designate assets to be protected is personal to the individual and
ends when the individual dies, except as otherwise provided in subdivisions 13
and 15. It does not include the
increase in the value of the protected asset and the income, dividends, or
profits from the asset. It may be
exercised by the individual or by anyone with the legal authority to do so on
the individual's behalf. It shall not
be sold, assigned, transferred, or given away.
(e) If
the dollar amount of the benefits utilized under a partnership policy is
greater than the full fair market value of all assets protected at the time of
the application for medical assistance long-term care services, the individual
may designate additional assets that become available during the individual's
lifetime for protection under this section.
The individual must make the designation in writing to the county
agency no later than the last date on which the individual must report a
change in circumstances to the county agency, as provided for under the medical
assistance program ten days from the date the designation is requested
by the county agency. Any excess
used for this purpose shall not be available to the individual's estate to
protect assets in the estate from recovery under section 256B.15 or 524.3-1202,
or otherwise.
(f)
This section applies only to estate recovery under United States Code, title
42, section 1396p, subsections (a) and (b), and does not apply to recovery
authorized by other provisions of federal law, including, but not limited to,
recovery from trusts under United States Code, title 42, section 1396p,
subsection (d)(4)(A) and (C), or to recovery from annuities, or similar legal
instruments, subject to section 6012, subsections (a) and (b), of the Deficit
Reduction Act of 2005, Public Law 109-171.
(g) An
individual's protected assets owned by the individual's spouse who applies for
payment of medical assistance long-term care services shall not be protected
assets or disregarded for purposes of eligibility of the individual's spouse
solely because they were protected assets of the individual.
(h)
Assets designated under this subdivision shall not be subject to penalty under
section 256B.0595.
(i)
The commissioner shall otherwise determine the individual's eligibility for
payment of long-term care services according to medical assistance eligibility
requirements.
Sec.
17. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.0571, subdivision 15, is amended to read:
Subd.
15. Limitation on liens. (a) An
individual's interest in real property shall not be subject to a medical
assistance lien under sections 514.980 to 514.985 or a notice of
potential claim lien arising under section 256B.15 while and to the
extent it is protected under subdivision 9.
An individual's interest in real property that exceeds the value
protected under subdivision 9 is subject to a lien for recovery.
(b)
Medical assistance liens under sections 514.980 to 514.985 or liens
arising under notices of potential claims section 256B.15 against
an individual's interests in real property in the individual's estate that are
designated as protected under subdivision 13, paragraph (b), shall be released
to the extent of the dollar value of the protection applied to the interest.
(c) If
an interest in real property is protected from a lien for recovery of medical
assistance paid on behalf of the individual under paragraph (a) or (b), no lien
for recovery of medical assistance paid on behalf of that individual shall be
filed against the protected interest in real property after it is distributed
to the individual's heirs or devisees.
Sec.
18. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.0571, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
17. Reciprocal
agreements. The commissioner
may enter into an agreement with any other state with a partnership program
under United States Code, title 42, section 1396p(b)(1)(C), for reciprocal
recognition of qualified long-term care insurance policies purchased under each
state's partnership program. The
commissioner shall notify the secretary of the United States Department of
Health and Human Services if the commissioner declines to enter into a national
reciprocal agreement.
Sec.
19. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.058, is amended to read:
256B.058 TREATMENT OF INCOME OF
INSTITUTIONALIZED SPOUSE.
Subdivision
1. Income
not available. The income described
in subdivisions 2 and 3 shall be deducted from an institutionalized spouse's
monthly income and is not considered available for payment of the monthly costs
of an institutionalized person in the institution spouse after the
person has been the institutionalized spouse has been determined
eligible for medical assistance.
Subd.
2. Monthly
income allowance for community spouse.
(a) For an institutionalized spouse with a spouse residing in the
community, monthly income may be allocated to the community spouse as a
monthly income allowance for the community spouse. Beginning with the first full calendar month the
institutionalized spouse is in the institution, the monthly income allowance is
not considered available to the institutionalized spouse for monthly payment of
costs of care in the institution as long as the income is made available to the
community spouse.
(b)
The monthly income allowance is the amount by which the community spouse's
monthly maintenance needs allowance under paragraphs (c) and (d) exceeds the
amount of monthly income otherwise available to the community spouse.
(c)
The community spouse's monthly maintenance needs allowance is the lesser of
$1,500 or 122 percent of the monthly federal poverty guideline for a family of
two plus an excess shelter allowance.
The excess shelter allowance is for the amount of shelter expenses that
exceed 30 percent of 122 percent of the federal poverty guideline line for a
family of two. Shelter expenses are the
community spouse's expenses for rent, mortgage payments including principal and
interest, taxes, insurance, required maintenance charges for a cooperative or
condominium that is the community spouse's principal residence, and the
standard utility allowance under section 5(e) of the federal Food Stamp Act of
1977. If the community spouse has a
required maintenance charge for a cooperative or condominium, the standard
utility allowance must be reduced by the amount of utility expenses included in
the required maintenance charge.
If the
community or institutionalized spouse establishes that the community spouse
needs income greater than the monthly maintenance needs allowance determined in
this paragraph due to exceptional circumstances resulting in significant
financial duress, the monthly maintenance needs allowance may be increased to
an amount that provides needed additional income.
(d)
The percentage of the federal poverty guideline used to determine the monthly
maintenance needs allowance in paragraph (c) is increased to 133 percent on
July 1, 1991, and to 150 percent on July 1, 1992. Adjustments in the income limits due to annual changes in the
federal poverty guidelines shall be implemented the first day of July following
publication of the annual changes. The
$1,500 maximum must be adjusted January 1, 1990, and every January 1 after that
by the same percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for all urban
consumers (all items; United States city average) between the two previous
Septembers.
(e) If
a court has entered an order against an institutionalized spouse for monthly
income for support of the community spouse, the community spouse's monthly
income allowance under this subdivision shall not be less than the amount of
the monthly income ordered.
Subd.
3. Family
allowance. (a) A family allowance
determined under paragraph (b) is not considered available to the
institutionalized spouse for monthly payment of costs of care in the
institution.
(b)
The family allowance is equal to one-third of the amount by which 122 percent
of the monthly federal poverty guideline for a family of two exceeds the
monthly income for that family member.
(c)
For purposes of this subdivision, the term family member only includes a minor
or dependent child as defined in the Internal Revenue Code, dependent
parent, or dependent sibling of the institutionalized or community spouse if
the sibling resides with the community spouse.
(d)
The percentage of the federal poverty guideline used to determine the family
allowance in paragraph (b) is increased to 133 percent on July 1, 1991, and to
150 percent on July 1, 1992.
Adjustments in the income limits due to annual changes in the federal
poverty guidelines shall be implemented the first day of July following
publication of the annual changes.
Subd.
4. Treatment
of income. (a) No income of the
community spouse will be considered available to an eligible institutionalized
spouse, beginning the first full calendar month of institutionalization, except
as provided in this subdivision.
(b) In
determining the income of an institutionalized spouse or community spouse,
after the institutionalized spouse has been determined eligible for medical
assistance, the following rules apply.
(1)
For income that is not from a trust, availability is determined according to
items (i) to (v), unless the instrument providing the income otherwise
specifically provides:
(i) if
payment is made solely in the name of one spouse, the income is considered
available only to that spouse;
(ii)
if payment is made in the names of both spouses, one-half of the income is
considered available to each;
(iii)
if payment is made in the names of one or both spouses together with one or
more other persons, the income is considered available to each spouse according
to the spouse's interest, or one-half of the joint interest is considered
available to each spouse if each spouse's interest is not specified;
(iv)
if there is no instrument that establishes ownership, one-half of the income is
considered available to each spouse; and
(v)
either spouse may rebut the determination of availability of income by showing
by a preponderance of the evidence that ownership interests are different than
provided above.
(2)
For income from a trust, income is considered available to each spouse as
provided in the trust. If the trust
does not specify an amount available to either or both spouses, availability
will be determined according to items (i) to (iii):
(i) if
payment of income is made only to one spouse, the income is considered
available only to that spouse;
(ii)
if payment of income is made to both spouses, one-half is considered available
to each; and
(iii)
if payment is made to either or both spouses and one or more other persons, the
income is considered available to each spouse in proportion to each spouse's
interest, or if no such interest is specified, one-half of the joint interest
is considered available to each spouse.
Sec.
20. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.059, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Definitions. (a) For purposes of this section and section
sections 256B.058 and 256B.0595, the terms defined in this subdivision have
the meanings given them.
(b)
"Community spouse" means the spouse of an institutionalized spouse.
(c)
"Spousal share" means one-half of the total value of all assets, to
the extent that either the institutionalized spouse or the community spouse had
an ownership interest at the time of the first continuous period of institutionalization.
(d)
"Assets otherwise available to the community spouse" means assets
individually or jointly owned by the community spouse, other than assets
excluded by subdivision 5, paragraph (c).
(e)
"Community spouse asset allowance" is the value of assets that can be
transferred under subdivision 3.
(f)
"Institutionalized spouse" means a person who is:
(1) in
a hospital, nursing facility, or intermediate care facility for persons with
developmental disabilities, or receiving home and community-based services
under section 256B.0915 or 256B.49, and is expected to remain in the
facility or institution or receive the home and community-based services for at
least 30 consecutive days; and
(2)
married to a person who is not in a hospital, nursing facility, or intermediate
care facility for persons with developmental disabilities, and is not receiving
home and community-based services under section 256B.0915, 256B.092, or 256B.49.
(g)
"For the sole benefit of" means no other individual or entity can
benefit in any way from the assets or income at the time of a transfer or at
any time in the future.
(h)
"Continuous period of institutionalization" means a
30-consecutive-day period of time in which a person is expected to stay in a
medical or long-term care facility, or receive home and community-based
services that would qualify for coverage under the elderly waiver (EW) or
alternative care (AC) programs. For a
stay in a facility, the 30-consecutive-day period begins on the date of entry
into a medical or long-term care facility.
For receipt of home and community-based services, the 30-consecutive-day
period begins on the date that the following conditions are met:
(1)
the person is receiving services that meet the nursing facility level of care
determined by a long-term care consultation;
(2)
the person has received the long-term care consultation within the past 60
days;
(3)
the services are paid by the EW program under section 256B.0915 or the AC
program under section 256B.0913 or would qualify for payment under the EW or AC
programs if the person were otherwise eligible for either program, and but for
the receipt of such services the person would have resided in a nursing
facility; and
(4)
the services are provided by a licensed provider qualified to provide home and
community-based services.
Sec.
21. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 256B.059,
subdivision 1a, is amended to read:
Subd.
1a. Institutionalized spouse.
The provisions of this section apply only when a spouse is
institutionalized for a begins the first continuous period beginning
of institutionalization on or after October 1, 1989.
Sec.
22. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.0594, is amended to read:
256B.0594 PAYMENT OF BENEFITS FROM AN
ANNUITY.
When
payment becomes due under an annuity that names the department a remainder
beneficiary as described in section 256B.056, subdivision 11, the issuer
shall request and the department shall, within 45 days after receipt of the
request, provide a written statement of the total amount of the medical
assistance paid or confirmation that any family member designated as a remainder
beneficiary meets requirements for qualification as a beneficiary in the first
position. Upon timely receipt of
the written statement of the amount of medical assistance paid, the issuer
shall pay the department an amount equal to the lesser of the amount due the
department under the annuity or the total amount of medical assistance paid on
behalf of the individual or the individual's spouse. Any amounts remaining after the issuer's payment to the
department shall be payable according to the terms of the annuity or similar
financial instrument. The county agency
or the department shall provide the issuer with the name, address, and
telephone number of a unit within the department the issuer can contact to comply
with this section. The requirements of
section 72A.201, subdivision 4, clause (3), shall not apply to payments made
under this section until the issuer has received final payment information from
the department, if the issuer has notified the beneficiary of the requirements
of this section at the time it initially requests payment information from the
department.
Sec.
23. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.0595, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Prohibited
transfers. (a) For transfers of
assets made on or before August 10, 1993, if a an institutionalized
person or the institutionalized person's spouse has given away, sold, or
disposed of, for less than fair market value, any asset or interest therein,
except assets other than the homestead that are excluded under the supplemental
security program, within 30 months before or any time after the date of
institutionalization if the person has been determined eligible for medical
assistance, or within 30 months before or any time after the date of the first
approved application for medical assistance if the person has not yet been
determined eligible for medical assistance, the person is ineligible for
long-term care services for the period of time determined under subdivision 2.
(b)
Effective for transfers made after August 10, 1993, a an
institutionalized person, a an institutionalized person's
spouse, or any person, court, or administrative body with legal authority to
act in place of, on behalf of, at the direction of, or upon the request of the institutionalized
person or institutionalized person's spouse, may not give away,
sell, or dispose of, for less than fair market value, any asset or interest
therein, except assets other than the homestead that are excluded under the
supplemental security income program, for the purpose of establishing or
maintaining medical assistance eligibility.
This applies to all transfers, including those made by a community
spouse after the month in which the institutionalized spouse is determined eligible
for medical assistance. For purposes of
determining eligibility for long-term care services, any transfer of such
assets within 36 months before or any time after an institutionalized person applies
for requests medical assistance payment of long-term care
services, or 36 months before or any time after a medical assistance
recipient becomes an institutionalized person,
for
less than fair market value may be considered.
Any such transfer is presumed to have been made for the purpose of
establishing or maintaining medical assistance eligibility and the
institutionalized person is ineligible for long-term care services for the
period of time determined under subdivision 2, unless the institutionalized
person furnishes convincing evidence to establish that the transaction was
exclusively for another purpose, or unless the transfer is permitted under
subdivision 3 or 4. In the case of
payments from a trust or portions of a trust that are considered transfers of
assets under federal law, or in the case of any other disposal of assets made
on or after February 8, 2006, any transfers made within 60 months before or any
time after an institutionalized person applies for requests medical
assistance payment of long-term care services and within 60 months
before or any time after a medical assistance recipient becomes an
institutionalized person, may be considered.
(c)
This section applies to transfers, for less than fair market value, of income
or assets, including assets that are considered income in the month received,
such as inheritances, court settlements, and retroactive benefit payments or
income to which the institutionalized person or the institutionalized
person's spouse is entitled but does not receive due to action by the
institutionalized person, the institutionalized person's spouse, or
any person, court, or administrative body with legal authority to act in place
of, on behalf of, at the direction of, or upon the request of the institutionalized
person or the institutionalized person's spouse.
(d)
This section applies to payments for care or personal services provided by a
relative, unless the compensation was stipulated in a notarized, written
agreement which was in existence when the service was performed, the care or
services directly benefited the person, and the payments made represented
reasonable compensation for the care or services provided. A notarized written agreement is not
required if payment for the services was made within 60 days after the service
was provided.
(e)
This section applies to the portion of any asset or interest that a
an institutionalized person, a an institutionalized person's
spouse, or any person, court, or administrative body with legal authority to
act in place of, on behalf of, at the direction of, or upon the request of the
institutionalized person or the institutionalized person's spouse,
transfers to any annuity that exceeds the value of the benefit likely to be
returned to the institutionalized person or institutionalized
person's spouse while alive, based on estimated life expectancy using
the life expectancy tables employed by the supplemental security income program
to determine the value of an agreement for services for life as
determined according to the current actuarial tables published by the Office of
the Chief Actuary of the Social Security Administration. The commissioner may adopt rules reducing
life expectancies based on the need for long-term care. This section applies to an annuity described
in this paragraph purchased on or after March 1, 2002, that:
(1) is
not purchased from an insurance company or financial institution that is
subject to licensing or regulation by the Minnesota Department of Commerce or a
similar regulatory agency of another state;
(2)
does not pay out principal and interest in equal monthly installments; or
(3) does
not begin payment at the earliest possible date after annuitization.
(f)
Effective for transactions, including the purchase of an annuity, occurring on
or after February 8, 2006, the purchase of an annuity by or on behalf of
an individual institutionalized person who has applied for or is
receiving long-term care services or the individual's
institutionalized person's spouse shall be treated as the disposal of an
asset for less than fair market value unless the department is named as the
a preferred remainder beneficiary in first position for an amount equal
to at least the total amount of medical assistance paid on behalf of the
individual or the individual's spouse; or the department is named as the
remainder beneficiary in second position for an amount equal to at least the
total amount of medical assistance paid on behalf of the individual or the
individual's spouse after the individual's community spouse or minor or
disabled child and is named as the remainder beneficiary in the first position
if the community spouse or a representative of the minor or disabled child
disposes of the remainder for less than fair market value as described in section 256B.056,
subdivision 11. Any subsequent
change to the designation
of the
department as a preferred remainder beneficiary shall result in the
annuity being treated as a disposal of assets for less than fair market
value. The amount of such transfer
shall be the maximum amount the individual institutionalized person
or the individual's institutionalized person's spouse could
receive from the annuity or similar financial instrument. Any change in the amount of the income or
principal being withdrawn from the annuity or other similar financial
instrument at the time of the most recent disclosure shall be deemed to be a
transfer of assets for less than fair market value unless the individual
institutionalized person or the individual's institutionalized
person's spouse demonstrates that the transaction was for fair market
value. In the event a distribution
of income or principal has been improperly distributed or disbursed from an
annuity or other retirement planning instrument of an institutionalized person
or the institutionalized person's spouse, a cause of action exists against the
individual receiving the improper distribution for the cost of medical
assistance services provided or the amount of the improper distribution,
whichever is less.
(g)
Effective for transactions, including the purchase of an annuity, occurring on
or after February 8, 2006, the purchase of an annuity by or on behalf of
an individual institutionalized person applying for or receiving
long-term care services shall be treated as a disposal of assets for less than
fair market value unless it is:
(i) an
annuity described in subsection (b) or (q) of section 408 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986; or
(ii)
purchased with proceeds from:
(A) an
account or trust described in subsection (a), (c), or (p) of section 408 of the
Internal Revenue Code;
(B) a
simplified employee pension within the meaning of section 408(k) of the
Internal Revenue Code; or
(C) a
Roth IRA described in section 408A of the Internal Revenue Code; or
(iii)
an annuity that is irrevocable and nonassignable; is actuarially sound as
determined in accordance with actuarial publications of the Office of the Chief
Actuary of the Social Security Administration; and provides for payments in
equal amounts during the term of the annuity, with no deferral and no balloon
payments made.
(h) For purposes of this section, long-term
care services include services in a nursing facility, services that are
eligible for payment according to section 256B.0625, subdivision 2, because
they are provided in a swing bed, intermediate care facility for persons with
developmental disabilities, and home and community-based services provided
pursuant to sections 256B.0915, 256B.092, and 256B.49. For purposes of this subdivision and
subdivisions 2, 3, and 4, "institutionalized person" includes a person
who is an inpatient in a nursing facility or in a swing bed, or intermediate
care facility for persons with developmental disabilities or who is receiving
home and community-based services under sections 256B.0915, 256B.092, and
256B.49.
(i)
This section applies to funds used to purchase a promissory note, loan, or
mortgage unless the note, loan, or mortgage:
(1)
has a repayment term that is actuarially sound;
(2)
provides for payments to be made in equal amounts during the term of the loan,
with no deferral and no balloon payments made; and
(3)
prohibits the cancellation of the balance upon the death of the lender.
In the
case of a promissory note, loan, or mortgage that does not meet an exception in
clauses (1) to (3), the value of such note, loan, or mortgage shall be the
outstanding balance due as of the date of the individual's application institutionalized
person's request for medical assistance payment of long-term care
services.
(j)
This section applies to the purchase of a life estate interest in another individual's
person's home unless the purchaser resides in the home for a period of
at least one year after the date of purchase.
Sec.
24. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.0595, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Period
of ineligibility. (a) For any
uncompensated transfer occurring on or before August 10, 1993, the number of
months of ineligibility for long-term care services shall be the lesser of 30
months, or the uncompensated transfer amount divided by the average medical
assistance rate for nursing facility services in the state in effect on the
date of application. The amount used to
calculate the average medical assistance payment rate shall be adjusted each
July 1 to reflect payment rates for the previous calendar year. The period of ineligibility begins with the
month in which the assets were transferred.
If the transfer was not reported to the local agency at the time of
application, and the applicant received long-term care services during what
would have been the period of ineligibility if the transfer had been reported,
a cause of action exists against the transferee for the cost of long-term care
services provided during the period of ineligibility, or for the uncompensated
amount of the transfer, whichever is less.
The action may be brought by the state or the local agency
responsible for providing medical assistance under chapter 256G. The uncompensated transfer amount is the
fair market value of the asset at the time it was given away, sold, or disposed
of, less the amount of compensation received.
(b)
For uncompensated transfers made after August 10, 1993, the number of months of
ineligibility for long-term care services shall be the total uncompensated
value of the resources transferred divided by the average medical assistance
rate for nursing facility services in the state in effect on the date of
application. The amount used to
calculate the average medical assistance payment rate shall be adjusted each
July 1 to reflect payment rates for the previous calendar year. The period of ineligibility begins with the
first day of the month after the month in which the assets were transferred
except that if one or more uncompensated transfers are made during a period of
ineligibility, the total assets transferred during the ineligibility period
shall be combined and a penalty period calculated to begin on the first day of
the month after the month in which the first uncompensated transfer was
made. If the transfer was reported to
the local agency after the date that advance notice of a period of ineligibility
that affects the next month could be provided to the recipient and the
recipient received medical assistance services or the transfer was not reported
to the local agency, and the applicant or recipient received medical assistance
services during what would have been the period of ineligibility if the
transfer had been reported, a cause of action exists against the transferee for
the cost of medical assistance that portion of long-term care
services provided during the period of ineligibility, or for the uncompensated
amount of the transfer, whichever is less.
The action may be brought by the state or the local agency
responsible for providing medical assistance under chapter 256G. The uncompensated transfer amount is the
fair market value of the asset at the time it was given away, sold, or disposed
of, less the amount of compensation received.
Effective for transfers made on or after March 1, 1996, involving
persons who apply for medical assistance on or after April 13, 1996, no cause
of action exists for a transfer unless:
(1)
the transferee knew or should have known that the transfer was being made by a
person who was a resident of a long-term care facility or was receiving that
level of care in the community at the time of the transfer;
(2)
the transferee knew or should have known that the transfer was being made to
assist the person to qualify for or retain medical assistance eligibility; or
(3)
the transferee actively solicited the transfer with intent to assist the person
to qualify for or retain eligibility for medical assistance.
(c)
For uncompensated transfers made on or after February 8, 2006, the period of
ineligibility:
(1)
for uncompensated transfers by or on behalf of individuals receiving medical
assistance payment of long-term care services, begins on the first
day of the month in which following advance notice can be
given following of the penalty period, but no later than the first day
of the month in which assets have been transferred for less than fair
market value, that follows three full calendar months from the date of
the report or discovery of the transfer; or
(2)
for uncompensated transfers by individuals requesting medical assistance
payment of long-term care services, begins the date on which the individual is eligible
for medical assistance under the Medicaid state plan and would otherwise be
receiving long-term care services based on an approved application for such
care but for the application of the penalty period, whichever is later,;
and which does not occur
(3)
cannot begin during
any other period of ineligibility.
(d) If
a calculation of a penalty period results in a partial month, payments for
long-term care services shall be reduced in an amount equal to the fraction.
(e) In
the case of multiple fractional transfers of assets in more than one month for
less than fair market value on or after February 8, 2006, the period of
ineligibility is calculated by treating the total, cumulative, uncompensated
value of all assets transferred during all months on or after February 8, 2006,
as one transfer.
Sec.
25. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.0595, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Homestead
exception to transfer prohibition.
(a) An institutionalized person is not ineligible for long-term care
services due to a transfer of assets for less than fair market value if the
asset transferred was a homestead and:
(1)
title to the homestead was transferred to the individual's:
(i)
spouse;
(ii)
child who is under age 21;
(iii)
blind or permanently and totally disabled child as defined in the supplemental
security income program;
(iv)
sibling who has equity interest in the home and who was residing in the home
for a period of at least one year immediately before the date of the
individual's admission to the facility; or
(v)
son or daughter who was residing in the individual's home for a period of at
least two years immediately before the date of the individual's admission to
the facility the individual became an institutionalized person, and
who provided care to the individual that, as certified by the individual's
attending physician, permitted the individual to reside at home rather than receive
care in an institution or facility;
(2) a
satisfactory showing is made that the individual intended to dispose of the
homestead at fair market value or for other valuable consideration; or
(3)
the local agency grants a waiver of a penalty resulting from a transfer for
less than fair market value because denial of eligibility would cause undue
hardship for the individual, based on imminent threat to the individual's
health and well-being. Whenever an
applicant or recipient is denied eligibility because of a transfer for less
than fair market value, the local agency shall notify the applicant or
recipient that the applicant or recipient may request a waiver of the penalty
if the denial of eligibility will cause undue hardship. With the written consent of the individual
or the personal representative of the individual, a long-term care facility in
which an individual is residing may file an undue hardship waiver request, on
behalf of the individual who is denied eligibility for long-term care
services
on or after July 1, 2006, due to a period of ineligibility resulting from a
transfer on or after February 8, 2006.
In evaluating a waiver, the local agency shall take into account whether
the individual was the victim of financial exploitation, whether the individual
has made reasonable efforts to recover the transferred property or resource,
and other factors relevant to a determination of hardship. If the local agency does not approve a
hardship waiver, the local agency shall issue a written notice to the
individual stating the reasons for the denial and the process for appealing the
local agency's decision.
(b)
When a waiver is granted under paragraph (a), clause (3), a cause of action
exists against the person to whom the homestead was transferred for that
portion of long-term care services granted provided within:
(1) 30
months of a transfer made on or before August 10, 1993;
(2) 60
months if the homestead was transferred after August 10, 1993, to a trust or
portion of a trust that is considered a transfer of assets under federal law;
(3) 36
months if transferred in any other manner after August 10, 1993, but prior to
February 8, 2006; or
(4) 60
months if the homestead was transferred on or after February 8, 2006,
or the amount of the
uncompensated transfer, whichever is less, together with the costs incurred due
to the action. The action shall be
brought by the state unless the state delegates this responsibility to the
local agency responsible for providing medical assistance under chapter 256G.
Sec.
26. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.0595, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd.
4. Other
exceptions to transfer prohibition.
An institutionalized person who has made, or whose spouse has made a
transfer prohibited by subdivision 1, is not ineligible for long-term care
services if one of the following conditions applies:
(1)
the assets were transferred to the individual's spouse or to another for the
sole benefit of the spouse; or
(2)
the institutionalized spouse, prior to being institutionalized, transferred
assets to a spouse, provided that the spouse to whom the assets were
transferred does not then transfer those assets to another person for less than
fair market value. (At the time when one spouse is institutionalized, assets
must be allocated between the spouses as provided under section 256B.059); or
(3)
the assets were transferred to the individual's child who is blind or
permanently and totally disabled as determined in the supplemental security
income program; or
(4) a
satisfactory showing is made that the individual intended to dispose of the
assets either at fair market value or for other valuable consideration; or
(5)
the local agency determines that denial of eligibility for long-term care
services would work an undue hardship and grants a waiver of a penalty
resulting from a transfer for less than fair market value based on an imminent threat
to the individual's health and well-being.
Whenever an applicant or recipient is denied eligibility because of a
transfer for less than fair market value, the local agency shall notify the
applicant or recipient that the applicant or recipient may request a waiver of
the penalty if the denial of eligibility will cause undue hardship. With the written consent of the individual
or the personal representative of the individual, a long-term care facility in
which an individual is residing may file an undue hardship waiver request, on
behalf of the individual who is denied eligibility for long-term care services
on or after July 1, 2006, due to a period of ineligibility resulting from a
transfer on or after February 8, 2006.
In evaluating a waiver, the local agency shall take into account whether
the
individual
was the victim of financial exploitation, whether the individual has made
reasonable efforts to recover the transferred property or resource, whether the
individual has taken any action to prevent the designation of the department as
a remainder beneficiary on an annuity as described in section 256B.056,
subdivision 11, and other factors relevant to a determination of hardship. The local agency shall make a
determination within 30 days of the receipt of all necessary information needed
to make such a determination. If
the local agency does not approve a hardship waiver, the local agency shall
issue a written notice to the individual stating the reasons for the denial and
the process for appealing the local agency's decision. When a waiver is granted, a cause of action
exists against the person to whom the assets were transferred for that portion
of long-term care services granted provided within:
(i) 30
months of a transfer made on or before August 10, 1993;
(ii)
60 months of a transfer if the assets were transferred after August 30, 1993,
to a trust or portion of a trust that is considered a transfer of assets under
federal law;
(iii)
36 months of a transfer if transferred in any other manner after August 10,
1993, but prior to February 8, 2006; or
(iv)
60 months of any transfer made on or after February 8, 2006,
or the amount of the
uncompensated transfer, whichever is less, together with the costs incurred due
to the action. The action shall be
brought by the state unless the state delegates this responsibility to the
local agency responsible for providing medical assistance under this chapter;
or
(6)
for transfers occurring after August 10, 1993, the assets were transferred by
the person or person's spouse: (i) into a trust established for the sole
benefit of a son or daughter of any age who is blind or disabled as defined by
the Supplemental Security Income program; or (ii) into a trust established for
the sole benefit of an individual who is under 65 years of age who is disabled
as defined by the Supplemental Security Income program.
"For
the sole benefit of" has the meaning found in section 256B.059,
subdivision 1.
Sec.
27. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.0595, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
8. Cause
of action; transfer prior to death.
(a) A cause of action exists against a transferee who receives assets
for less than fair market value, either:
(1)
from a person who was a recipient of medical assistance and who made an
uncompensated transfer that was known to the county agency but a penalty period
could not be implemented under this section due to the death of the person; or
(2)
from a person who was a recipient of medical assistance who made an uncompensated
transfer that was not known to the county agency and the transfer was made with
the intent to hinder, delay, or defraud the state or local agency from
recovering as allowed under section 256B.15.
In determining intent under this clause consideration may be given,
among other factors, to whether:
(i)
the transfer was to a family member;
(ii)
the transferor retained possession or control of the property after the
transfer;
(iii)
the transfer was concealed;
(iv)
the transfer included the majority of the transferor's assets;
(v)
the value of the consideration received was not reasonably equivalent to the
fair market value of the property; and
(vi)
the transfer occurred shortly before the death of the transferor.
(b)
No cause of action exists under this subdivision unless:
(1)
the transferee knew or should have known that the transfer was being made by a
person who was receiving medical assistance as described in section 256B.15,
subdivision 1, paragraph (b); and
(2)
the transferee received the asset without providing a reasonable equivalent
fair market value in exchange for the transfer.
(c)
The cause of action is for the uncompensated amount of the transfer or the
amount of medical assistance paid on behalf of the person, whichever is
less. The uncompensated transfer amount
is the fair market value of the asset at the time it was given away, sold, or
disposed of, less the amount of the compensation received.
Sec.
28. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.0595, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
9. Filing
cause of action; limitation. (a)
The county of financial responsibility under chapter 256G may bring a cause of
action under any or all of the following:
(1)
subdivision 1, paragraph (f);
(2)
subdivision 2, paragraphs (a) and (b);
(3)
subdivision 3, paragraph (b);
(4)
subdivision 4, clause (5); and
(5)
subdivision 8
on behalf of the claimant
who must be the commissioner.
(b)
Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, a cause of action under
subdivision 2, paragraph (a) or (b), or 8, must be commenced within six years
of the date the local agency determines that a transfer was made for less than
fair market value. Notwithstanding any
other law to the contrary, a cause of action under subdivision 3, paragraph
(b), or 4, clause (5), must be commenced within six years of the date of
approval of a waiver of the penalty period for a transfer for less than fair
market value based on undue hardship.
Sec.
29. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.0625, subdivision 3c, is amended to read:
Subd.
3c. Health Services Policy Committee.
The commissioner, after receiving recommendations from professional
physician associations, professional associations representing licensed
nonphysician health care professionals, and consumer groups, shall establish a
13-member Health Services Policy Committee, which consists of 12 voting members
and one nonvoting member. The Health
Services Policy Committee shall advise the commissioner regarding health services
pertaining to the administration of health care benefits covered under the
medical assistance, general assistance medical care, and MinnesotaCare
programs. The Health Services Policy
Committee shall meet at least quarterly.
The Health Services Policy Committee shall annually elect a physician
chair from among its members, who shall work directly with the commissioner's
medical director, to establish the
agenda
for each meeting. The Health
Services Policy Committee shall also recommend criteria for verifying centers
of excellence for specific aspects of medical care where a specific set of
combined services, a volume of patients necessary to maintain a high level of
competency, or a specific level of technical capacity is associated with
improved health outcomes.
Sec.
30. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.0625, subdivision 13g, is amended to read:
Subd.
13g. Preferred drug list. (a)
The commissioner shall adopt and implement a preferred drug list by January 1,
2004. The commissioner may enter into a
contract with a vendor or one or more states for the purpose of
participating in a multistate preferred drug list and supplemental
rebate program. The commissioner shall
ensure that any contract meets all federal requirements and maximizes federal
financial participation. The commissioner
shall publish the preferred drug list annually in the State Register and shall
maintain an accurate and up-to-date list on the agency Web site.
(b)
The commissioner may add to, delete from, and otherwise modify the preferred
drug list, after consulting with the Formulary Committee and appropriate
medical specialists and providing public notice and the opportunity for public
comment.
(c)
The commissioner shall adopt and administer the preferred drug list as part of
the administration of the supplemental drug rebate program. Reimbursement for prescription drugs not on
the preferred drug list may be subject to prior authorization, unless the drug
manufacturer signs a supplemental rebate contract.
(d)
For purposes of this subdivision, "preferred drug list" means a list
of prescription drugs within designated therapeutic classes selected by the
commissioner, for which prior authorization based on the identity of the drug
or class is not required.
(e)
The commissioner shall seek any federal waivers or approvals necessary to
implement this subdivision.
Sec.
31. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.0625, subdivision 13h, is amended to read:
Subd.
13h. Medication therapy management services. (a) Medical assistance and general assistance medical care cover
medication therapy management services for a recipient taking four or more
prescriptions to treat or prevent two or more chronic medical conditions, or a
recipient with a drug therapy problem that is identified or prior authorized by
the commissioner that has resulted or is likely to result in significant
nondrug program costs. The commissioner
may cover medical therapy management services under MinnesotaCare if the
commissioner determines this is cost-effective. For purposes of this subdivision, "medication therapy
management" means the provision of the following pharmaceutical care
services by a licensed pharmacist to optimize the therapeutic outcomes of the
patient's medications:
(1)
performing or obtaining necessary assessments of the patient's health status;
(2)
formulating a medication treatment plan;
(3)
monitoring and evaluating the patient's response to therapy, including safety
and effectiveness;
(4)
performing a comprehensive medication review to identify, resolve, and prevent
medication-related problems, including adverse drug events;
(5)
documenting the care delivered and communicating essential information to the
patient's other primary care providers;
(6)
providing verbal education and training designed to enhance patient
understanding and appropriate use of the patient's medications;
(7)
providing information, support services, and resources designed to enhance
patient adherence with the patient's therapeutic regimens; and
(8)
coordinating and integrating medication therapy management services within the
broader health care management services being provided to the patient.
Nothing in this subdivision
shall be construed to expand or modify the scope of practice of the pharmacist
as defined in section 151.01, subdivision 27.
(b) To
be eligible for reimbursement for services under this subdivision, a pharmacist
must meet the following requirements:
(1)
have a valid license issued under chapter 151;
(2)
have graduated from an accredited college of pharmacy on or after May 1996, or
completed a structured and comprehensive education program approved by the
Board of Pharmacy and the American Council of Pharmaceutical Education for the
provision and documentation of pharmaceutical care management services that has
both clinical and didactic elements;
(3) be
practicing in an ambulatory care setting as part of a multidisciplinary team or
have developed a structured patient care process that is offered in a private
or semiprivate patient care area that is separate from the commercial business that
also occurs in the setting, or in home settings, excluding long-term care
and group homes, if the service is ordered by the provider-directed care
coordination team; and
(4)
make use of an electronic patient record system that meets state standards.
(c)
For purposes of reimbursement for medication therapy management services, the
commissioner may enroll individual pharmacists as medical assistance and
general assistance medical care providers.
The commissioner may also establish contact requirements between the
pharmacist and recipient, including limiting the number of reimbursable
consultations per recipient.
(d)
The commissioner, after receiving recommendations from professional medical
associations, professional pharmacy associations, and consumer groups, shall
convene an 11-member Medication Therapy Management Advisory Committee to advise
the commissioner on the implementation and administration of medication therapy
management services. The committee shall
be comprised of: two licensed physicians; two licensed pharmacists; two
consumer representatives; two health plan company representatives; and three
members with expertise in the area of medication therapy management, who may be
licensed physicians or licensed pharmacists.
The committee is governed by section 15.059, except that committee
members do not receive compensation or reimbursement for expenses. The advisory committee expires on June 30,
2007.
(e)
The commissioner shall evaluate the effect of medication therapy management on
quality of care, patient outcomes, and program costs, and shall include a
description of any savings generated in the medical assistance and general
assistance medical care programs that can be attributable to this
coverage. The evaluation shall be
submitted to the legislature by December 15, 2007. The commissioner may contract with a vendor or an academic
institution that has expertise in evaluating health care outcomes for the
purpose of completing the evaluation.
Sec.
32. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 256B.0625, subdivision 49, is amended to read:
Subd.
49. Community health worker.
(a) Medical assistance covers the care coordination and patient
education services provided by a community health worker if the community
health worker has:
(1) received
a certificate from the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System
approved community health worker curriculum; or
(2) at
least five years of supervised experience with an enrolled physician,
registered nurse, or advanced practice registered nurse, or dentist,
or at least five years of supervised experience by a certified public health
nurse operating under the direct authority of an enrolled unit of government.
Community health workers
eligible for payment under clause (2) must complete the certification program
by January 1, 2010, to continue to be eligible for payment.
(b)
Community health workers must work under the supervision of a medical
assistance enrolled physician, registered nurse, or advanced practice
registered nurse, or dentist, or work under the supervision of a certified
public health nurse operating under the direct authority of an enrolled unit of
government.
(c)
Care coordination and patient education services covered under this subdivision
include, but are not limited to, services relating to oral health and dental
care.
Sec.
33. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.075, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Fee-for-service. (a) The commissioner shall develop and
implement a disease management program for medical assistance and general
assistance medical care recipients who are not enrolled in the prepaid medical
assistance or prepaid general assistance medical care programs and who are
receiving services on a fee-for-service basis.
The commissioner may contract with an outside organization to provide
these services.
(b)
The commissioner shall seek any federal approval necessary to implement this
section and to obtain federal matching funds.
(c)
The commissioner shall develop and implement a pilot intensive care management
program for medical assistance children with complex and chronic medical issues
who are not able to participate in the metro-based U Special Kids program
due to geographic distance.
Sec.
34. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.15, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd.
4. Other
survivors. (a) If the
decedent who was single or the surviving spouse of a married couple is survived
by one of the following persons, a claim exists against the estate payable
first from the value of the nonhomestead property included in the estate and
the personal representative shall make, execute, and deliver to the county
agency a lien against the homestead property in the estate for any unpaid
balance of the claim to the claimant as provided under this section:
(a) (1) a sibling who resided in
the decedent medical assistance recipient's home at least one year before the
decedent's institutionalization and continuously since the date of
institutionalization; or
(b) (2) a son or daughter or a
grandchild who resided in the decedent medical assistance recipient's home for
at least two years immediately before the parent's or grandparent's
institutionalization and continuously since the date of institutionalization,
and who establishes by a preponderance of the evidence having provided care to
the parent or grandparent who received medical assistance, that the care was
provided before institutionalization, and that the care permitted the parent or
grandparent to reside at home rather than in an institution.
(b)
For purposes of this subdivision, "institutionalization" means
receiving care:
(1)
in a nursing facility or swing bed, or intermediate care facility for persons
with developmental disabilities; or
(2)
through home and community-based services under section 256B.0915, 256B.092, or
256B.49.
Sec.
35. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.69, subdivision 3a, is amended to read:
Subd.
3a. County authority. (a) The
commissioner, when implementing the general assistance medical care, or medical
assistance prepayment program within a county, must include the county board in
the process of development, approval, and issuance of the request for proposals
to provide services to eligible individuals within the proposed county. County boards must be given reasonable
opportunity to make recommendations regarding the development, issuance, review
of responses, and changes needed in the request for proposals. The commissioner must provide county boards
the opportunity to review each proposal based on the identification of
community needs under chapters 145A and 256E and county advocacy
activities. If a county board finds
that a proposal does not address certain community needs, the county board and
commissioner shall continue efforts for improving the proposal and network
prior to the approval of the contract.
The county board shall make recommendations regarding the approval of
local networks and their operations to ensure adequate availability and access
to covered services. The provider or
health plan must respond directly to county advocates and the state prepaid
medical assistance ombudsperson regarding service delivery and must be
accountable to the state regarding contracts with medical assistance and
general assistance medical care funds.
The county board may recommend a maximum number of participating health
plans after considering the size of the enrolling population; ensuring adequate
access and capacity; considering the client and county administrative
complexity; and considering the need to promote the viability of locally
developed health plans. The county
board or a single entity representing a group of county boards and the
commissioner shall mutually select health plans for participation at the time
of initial implementation of the prepaid medical assistance program in that
county or group of counties and at the time of contract renewal. The commissioner shall also seek input for
contract requirements from the county or single entity representing a group of
county boards at each contract renewal and incorporate those recommendations
into the contract negotiation process. The
commissioner, in conjunction with the county board, shall actively seek to
develop a mutually agreeable timetable prior to the development of the request
for proposal, but counties must agree to initial enrollment beginning on or
before January 1, 1999, in either the prepaid medical assistance and general
assistance medical care programs or county-based purchasing under section
256B.692. At least 90 days before
enrollment in the medical assistance and general assistance medical care
prepaid programs begins in a county in which the prepaid programs have not been
established, the commissioner shall provide a report to the chairs of senate
and house committees having jurisdiction over state health care programs which
verifies that the commissioner complied with the requirements for county
involvement that are specified in this subdivision.
(b) At
the option of the county board, the board may develop contract requirements
related to the achievement of local public health goals to meet the health
needs of medical assistance and general assistance medical care enrollees. These requirements must be reasonably
related to the performance of health plan functions and within the scope of the
medical assistance and general assistance medical care benefit sets. If the county board and the commissioner
mutually agree to such requirements, the department shall include such
requirements in all health plan contracts governing the prepaid medical
assistance and general assistance medical care programs in that county at
initial implementation of the program in that county and at the time of
contract renewal. The county board may
participate in the enforcement of the contract provisions related to local
public health goals.
(c)
For counties in which prepaid medical assistance and general assistance medical
care programs have not been established, the commissioner shall not implement
those programs if a county board submits acceptable and timely preliminary and
final proposals under section 256B.692, until county-based purchasing is no
longer operational in that county. For
counties in which prepaid medical assistance and general assistance medical
care programs are in existence on or after September 1, 1997, the commissioner
must terminate contracts with health plans according to
section
256B.692, subdivision 5, if the county board submits and the commissioner
accepts preliminary and final proposals according to that subdivision. The commissioner is not required to
terminate contracts that begin on or after September 1, 1997, according to
section 256B.692 until two years have elapsed from the date of initial
enrollment.
(d) In
the event that a county board or a single entity representing a group of county
boards and the commissioner cannot reach agreement regarding: (i) the selection
of participating health plans in that county; (ii) contract requirements;
or (iii) implementation and enforcement of county requirements including
provisions regarding local public health goals, the commissioner shall resolve
all disputes after taking into account the recommendations of a three-person
mediation panel. The panel shall be
composed of one designee of the president of the association of Minnesota
counties, one designee of the commissioner of human services, and one designee
of the commissioner of health person selected jointly by the designee of
the commissioner of human services and the designee of the Association of
Minnesota Counties. Within a reasonable
period of time before the hearing, the panelists must be provided all documents
and information relevant to the mediation.
The parties to the mediation must be given 30 days' notice of a hearing
before the mediation panel.
(e) If
a county which elects to implement county-based purchasing ceases to implement
county-based purchasing, it is prohibited from assuming the responsibility of
county-based purchasing for a period of five years from the date it
discontinues purchasing.
(f)
Notwithstanding the requirement in this subdivision that a county must agree to
initial enrollment on or before January 1, 1999, the commissioner shall grant a
delay in the implementation of the county-based purchasing authorized in
section 256B.692 until federal waiver authority and approval has been granted,
if the county or group of counties has submitted a preliminary proposal for
county-based purchasing by September 1, 1997, has not already implemented the
prepaid medical assistance program before January 1, 1998, and has submitted a
written request for the delay to the commissioner by July 1, 1998. In order for the delay to be continued, the
county or group of counties must also submit to the commissioner the following
information by December 1, 1998. The
information must:
(1)
identify the proposed date of implementation, as determined under section
256B.692, subdivision 5;
(2)
include copies of the county board resolutions which demonstrate the continued
commitment to the implementation of county-based purchasing by the proposed
date. County board authorization may
remain contingent on the submission of a final proposal which meets the
requirements of section 256B.692, subdivision 5, paragraph (b);
(3)
demonstrate actions taken for the establishment of a governance structure
between the participating counties and describe how the fiduciary
responsibilities of county-based purchasing will be allocated between the
counties, if more than one county is involved in the proposal;
(4)
describe how the risk of a deficit will be managed in the event expenditures
are greater than total capitation payments.
This description must identify how any of the following strategies will
be used:
(i)
risk contracts with licensed health plans;
(ii)
risk arrangements with providers who are not licensed health plans;
(iii)
risk arrangements with other licensed insurance entities; and
(iv)
funding from other county resources;
(5)
include, if county-based purchasing will not contract with licensed health
plans or provider networks, letters of interest from local providers in at
least the categories of hospital, physician, mental health, and pharmacy which
express interest in contracting for services.
These letters must recognize any risk transfer identified in clause (4),
item (ii); and
(6)
describe the options being considered to obtain the administrative services
required in section 256B.692, subdivision 3, clauses (3) and (5).
(g)
For counties which receive a delay under this subdivision, the final proposals
required under section 256B.692, subdivision 5, paragraph (b), must be
submitted at least six months prior to the requested implementation date. Authority to implement county-based
purchasing remains contingent on approval of the final proposal as required
under section 256B.692.
(h)
If the commissioner is unable to provide county-specific, individual-level
fee-for-service claims to counties by June 4, 1998, the commissioner shall
grant a delay under paragraph (f) of up to 12 months in the implementation of
county-based purchasing, and shall require implementation not later than
January 1, 2000. In order to receive an
extension of the proposed date of implementation under this paragraph, a county
or group of counties must submit a written request for the extension to the
commissioner by August 1, 1998, must submit the information required under
paragraph (f) by December 1, 1998, and must submit a final proposal as provided
under paragraph (g).
(i)
Notwithstanding other requirements of this subdivision, the commissioner shall
not require the implementation of the county-based purchasing authorized in
section 256B.692 until six months after federal waiver approval has been
obtained for county-based purchasing, if the county or counties have submitted
the final plan as required in section 256B.692, subdivision 5. The commissioner shall allow the county or
counties which submitted information under section 256B.692, subdivision 5, to
submit supplemental or additional information which was not possible to submit
by April 1, 1999. A county or counties
shall continue to submit the required information and substantive detail
necessary to obtain a prompt response and waiver approval. If amendments to the final plan are
necessary due to the terms and conditions of the waiver approval, the commissioner
shall allow the county or group of counties 60 days to make the necessary
amendments to the final plan and shall not require implementation of the
county-based purchasing until six months after the revised final plan has been
submitted.
(f)
The commissioner shall not require that contractual disputes between
county-based purchasing entities and the commissioner be mediated by a panel
that includes a representative of the Minnesota Council of Health Plans.
(g)
At the request of a county-purchasing entity, the commissioner shall adopt a
contract reprocurement or renewal schedule under which all counties included in
the entity's service area are reprocured or renewed at the same time.
(h)
The commissioner shall provide a written report under section 3.195 to the
chairs of the legislative committees having jurisdiction over human services in
the senate and the house of representatives describing in detail the activities
undertaken by the commissioner to ensure full compliance with this section. The report must also provide an explanation
for any decisions of the commissioner not to accept the recommendations of a
county or group of counties required to be consulted under this section. The report must be provided at least 30 days
prior to the effective date of a new or renewed prepaid or managed care
contract in a county.
Sec.
36. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.69, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd.
6. Service
delivery. (a) Each demonstration
provider shall be responsible for the health care coordination for eligible
individuals. Demonstration providers:
(1)
shall authorize and arrange for the provision of all needed health services
including but not limited to the full range of services listed in sections
256B.02, subdivision 8, and 256B.0625 in order to ensure appropriate health
care is delivered to enrollees; notwithstanding section 256B.0621,
demonstration providers that provide nursing home and community-based services
under this section shall provide relocation service coordination to enrolled
persons age 65 and over;
(2)
shall accept the prospective, per capita payment from the commissioner in
return for the provision of comprehensive and coordinated health care services
for eligible individuals enrolled in the program;
(3)
may contract with other health care and social service practitioners to provide
services to enrollees; and
(4)
shall institute recipient grievance procedures according to the method
established by the project, utilizing applicable requirements of chapter
62D. Disputes not resolved through this
process shall be appealable to the commissioner as provided in subdivision 11.
(b)
Demonstration providers must comply with the standards for claims settlement
under section 72A.201, subdivisions 4, 5, 7, and 8, when contracting with other
health care and social service practitioners to provide services to
enrollees. A demonstration provider
must pay a clean claim, as defined in Code of Federal Regulations, title 42,
section 447.45(b), within 30 business days of the date of acceptance of the
claim.
Sec.
37. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.69, subdivision 27, is amended to read:
Subd.
27. Information for persons with limited English-language proficiency. Managed care contracts entered into under
this section and sections 256D.03, subdivision 4, paragraph (c), and 256L.12
must require demonstration providers to inform enrollees that upon request
the enrollee can obtain a certificate of coverage in the following languages:
Spanish, Hmong, Laotian, Russian, Somali, Vietnamese, or Cambodian. Upon request, the demonstration provider
must provide the enrollee with a certificate of coverage in the specified
language of preference provide language assistance to enrollees that
ensures meaningful access to its programs and services according to Title VI of
the Civil Rights Act and federal regulations adopted under that law or any
guidance from the United States Department of Health and Human Services.
Sec.
38. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.69, subdivision 28, is amended to read:
Subd.
28. Medicare special needs plans; medical assistance basic health care. (a) The commissioner may contract with
qualified Medicare-approved special needs plans to provide medical assistance
basic health care services to persons with disabilities, including those with
developmental disabilities. Basic
health care services include:
(1)
those services covered by the medical assistance state plan except for ICF/MR
services, home and community-based waiver services, case management for persons
with developmental disabilities under section 256B.0625, subdivision 20a, and
personal care and certain home care services defined by the commissioner in
consultation with the stakeholder group established under paragraph (d); and
(2) basic
health care services may also include risk for up to 100 days of nursing
facility services for persons who reside in a noninstitutional setting and home
health services related to rehabilitation as defined by the commissioner after
consultation with the stakeholder group.
The
commissioner may exclude other medical assistance services from the basic
health care benefit set. Enrollees in
these plans can access any excluded services on the same basis as other medical
assistance recipients who have not enrolled.
Unless
a person is otherwise required to enroll in managed care, enrollment in these
plans for Medicaid services must be voluntary.
For purposes of this subdivision, automatic enrollment with an option to
opt out is not voluntary enrollment.
(b)
Beginning January 1, 2007, the commissioner may contract with qualified
Medicare special needs plans to provide basic health care services under
medical assistance to persons who are dually eligible for both Medicare and
Medicaid and those Social Security beneficiaries eligible for Medicaid but in
the waiting period for Medicare. The
commissioner shall consult with the stakeholder group under paragraph (d) in
developing program specifications for these services. The commissioner shall report to the chairs of the house and
senate committees with jurisdiction over health and human services policy and
finance by February 1, 2007, on implementation of these programs and the need
for increased funding for the ombudsman for managed care and other consumer assistance
and protections needed due to enrollment in managed care of persons with
disabilities. Payment for Medicaid
services provided under this subdivision for the months of May and June will be
made no earlier than July 1 of the same calendar year.
(c) Beginning
January 1, 2008, the commissioner may expand contracting under this subdivision
to all persons with disabilities not otherwise required to enroll in managed
care.
(d)
The commissioner shall establish a state-level stakeholder group to provide advice
on managed care programs for persons with disabilities, including both MnDHO
and contracts with special needs plans that provide basic health care services
as described in paragraphs (a) and (b).
The stakeholder group shall provide advice on program expansions under
this subdivision and subdivision 23, including:
(1)
implementation efforts;
(2)
consumer protections; and
(3)
program specifications such as quality assurance measures, data collection and
reporting, and evaluation of costs, quality, and results.
(e)
Each plan under contract to provide medical assistance basic health care
services shall establish a local or regional stakeholder group, including
representatives of the counties covered by the plan, members, consumer
advocates, and providers, for advice on issues that arise in the local or
regional area.
(f)
The commissioner is prohibited from providing the names of potential enrollees
to health plans for marketing purposes.
The commissioner may mail marketing materials to potential enrollees on
behalf of health plans, in which case the health plans shall cover any costs
incurred by the commissioner for mailing marketing materials.
Sec.
39. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.692, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd.
7. Dispute
resolution. In the event the
commissioner rejects a proposal under subdivision 6, the county board may
request the recommendation of a three-person mediation panel. The commissioner shall resolve all disputes
after taking into account the recommendations of the mediation panel. The panel shall be composed of one designee
of the president of the Association of Minnesota Counties, one designee of the
commissioner of human services, and one designee of the commissioner of
health person selected jointly by the designee of the commissioner of
human services and the designee of the Association of Minnesota Counties. Within a reasonable period of time before
the hearing, the panelists must be provided all documents and information
relevant to the mediation. The parties
to the mediation must be given 30 days' notice of a hearing before the
mediation panel.
Sec.
40. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 256D.03, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. General
assistance medical care; eligibility.
(a) General assistance medical care may be paid for any person who is
not eligible for medical assistance under chapter 256B, including eligibility
for medical assistance based on a spenddown of excess income according to
section 256B.056, subdivision 5, or MinnesotaCare as defined in paragraph (b),
except as provided in paragraph (c), and:
(1)
who is receiving assistance under section 256D.05, except for families with
children who are eligible under Minnesota family investment program (MFIP), or
who is having a payment made on the person's behalf under sections 256I.01 to
256I.06; or
(2)
who is a resident of Minnesota; and
(i)
who has gross countable income not in excess of 75 percent of the federal
poverty guidelines for the family size, using a six-month budget period and
whose equity in assets is not in excess of $1,000 per assistance unit. General assistance medical care is not
available for applicants or enrollees who are otherwise eligible for medical
assistance but fail to verify their assets.
Enrollees who become eligible for medical assistance shall be terminated
and transferred to medical assistance.
Exempt assets, the reduction of excess assets, and the waiver of excess
assets must conform to the medical assistance program in section 256B.056,
subdivision 3, with the following exception: the maximum amount of
undistributed funds in a trust that could be distributed to or on behalf of the
beneficiary by the trustee, assuming the full exercise of the trustee's
discretion under the terms of the trust, must be applied toward the asset
maximum;
(ii)
who has gross countable income above 75 percent of the federal poverty
guidelines but not in excess of 175 percent of the federal poverty guidelines
for the family size, using a six-month budget period, whose equity in assets is
not in excess of the limits in section 256B.056, subdivision 3c, and who
applies during an inpatient hospitalization; or
(iii)
the commissioner shall adjust the income standards under this section each July
1 by the annual update of the federal poverty guidelines following publication
by the United States Department of Health and Human Services.
(b)
Effective for applications and renewals processed on or after September 1,
2006, general assistance medical care may not be paid for applicants or
recipients who are adults with dependent children under 21 whose gross family
income is equal to or less than 275 percent of the federal poverty guidelines
who are not described in paragraph (e).
(c)
Effective for applications and renewals processed on or after September 1,
2006, general assistance medical care may be paid for applicants and recipients
who meet all eligibility requirements of paragraph (a), clause (2), item (i),
for a temporary period beginning the date of application. Immediately following approval of general
assistance medical care, enrollees shall be enrolled in MinnesotaCare under
section 256L.04, subdivision 7, with covered services as provided in section
256L.03 for the rest of the six-month general assistance medical care
eligibility period, until their six-month renewal.
(d) To
be eligible for general assistance medical care following enrollment in
MinnesotaCare as required by paragraph (c), an individual must complete a new
application.
(e)
Applicants and recipients eligible under paragraph (a), clause (1); who,
are exempt from the MinnesotaCare enrollment requirements in this subdivision
if they:
(1)
have
applied for and are awaiting a determination of blindness or disability by the
state medical review team or a determination of eligibility for Supplemental
Security Income or Social Security Disability Insurance by the Social Security
Administration; who
(2) fail to meet the
requirements of section 256L.09, subdivision 2; who
(3) are homeless as defined by
United States Code, title 42, section 11301, et seq.; who
(4)
are classified as end-stage renal disease
beneficiaries in the Medicare program; who
(5) are enrolled in private
health care coverage as defined in section 256B.02, subdivision 9; who
(6) are eligible under
paragraph (j); or who
(7) receive treatment funded
pursuant to section 254B.02 are exempt from the MinnesotaCare enrollment
requirements of this subdivision; or
(8)
reside in the Minnesota sex offender program defined in chapter 246B.
(f) For
applications received on or after October 1, 2003, eligibility may begin no
earlier than the date of application.
For individuals eligible under paragraph (a), clause (2), item (i), a
redetermination of eligibility must occur every 12 months. Individuals are eligible under paragraph
(a), clause (2), item (ii), only during inpatient hospitalization but may
reapply if there is a subsequent period of inpatient hospitalization.
(g)
Beginning September 1, 2006, Minnesota health care program applications and
renewals completed by recipients and applicants who are persons described in
paragraph (c) and submitted to the county agency shall be determined for
MinnesotaCare eligibility by the county agency. If all other eligibility requirements of this subdivision are
met, eligibility for general assistance medical care shall be available in any
month during which MinnesotaCare enrollment is pending. Upon notification of eligibility for
MinnesotaCare, notice of termination for eligibility for general assistance medical
care shall be sent to an applicant or recipient. If all other eligibility requirements of this subdivision are
met, eligibility for general assistance medical care shall be available until
enrollment in MinnesotaCare subject to the provisions of paragraphs (c), (e),
and (f).
(h)
The date of an initial Minnesota health care program application necessary to
begin a determination of eligibility shall be the date the applicant has
provided a name, address, and Social Security number, signed and dated, to the
county agency or the Department of Human Services. If the applicant is unable to provide a name, address, Social
Security number, and signature when health care is delivered due to a medical
condition or disability, a health care provider may act on an applicant's
behalf to establish the date of an initial Minnesota health care program
application by providing the county agency or Department of Human Services with
provider identification and a temporary unique identifier for the applicant. The applicant must complete the remainder of
the application and provide necessary verification before eligibility can be
determined. The county agency must
assist the applicant in obtaining verification if necessary.
(i)
County agencies are authorized to use all automated databases containing
information regarding recipients' or applicants' income in order to determine
eligibility for general assistance medical care or MinnesotaCare. Such use shall be considered sufficient in
order to determine eligibility and premium payments by the county agency.
(j)
General assistance medical care is not available for a person in a correctional
facility unless the person is detained by law for less than one year in a
county correctional or detention facility as a person accused or convicted of a
crime, or admitted as an inpatient to a hospital on a criminal hold order, and
the person is a recipient of general assistance medical care at the time the
person is detained by law or admitted on a criminal hold order and as long as
the person continues to meet other eligibility requirements of this
subdivision.
(k)
General assistance medical care is not available for applicants or recipients
who do not cooperate with the county agency to meet the requirements of medical
assistance.
(l) In
determining the amount of assets of an individual eligible under paragraph (a),
clause (2), item (i), there shall be included any asset or interest in an
asset, including an asset excluded under paragraph (a), that was given away,
sold, or disposed of for less than fair market value within the 60 months
preceding application for general assistance medical care or during the period
of eligibility. Any transfer described
in this paragraph shall be presumed to have been for the purpose of
establishing eligibility for general assistance medical care, unless the
individual furnishes convincing evidence to establish that the transaction was
exclusively for another purpose. For
purposes of this paragraph, the value of the asset or interest shall be the fair
market value at the time it was given away, sold, or disposed of, less the
amount of compensation received. For
any uncompensated transfer, the number of months of ineligibility, including
partial months, shall be calculated by dividing the uncompensated transfer
amount by the average monthly per person payment made by the medical assistance
program to skilled nursing facilities for the previous calendar year. The individual shall remain ineligible until
this fixed period has expired. The
period of ineligibility may exceed 30 months, and a reapplication for benefits
after 30 months from the date of the transfer shall not result in eligibility
unless and until the period of ineligibility has expired. The period of ineligibility begins in the
month the transfer was reported to the county agency, or if the transfer was
not reported, the month in which the county agency discovered the transfer,
whichever comes first. For applicants,
the period of ineligibility begins on the date of the first approved application.
(m)
When determining eligibility for any state benefits under this subdivision, the
income and resources of all noncitizens shall be deemed to include their
sponsor's income and resources as defined in the Personal Responsibility and
Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, title IV, Public Law 104-193,
sections 421 and 422, and subsequently set out in federal rules.
(n)
Undocumented noncitizens and nonimmigrants are ineligible for general
assistance medical care. For purposes
of this subdivision, a nonimmigrant is an individual in one or more of the
classes listed in United States Code, title 8, section 1101(a)(15), and an
undocumented noncitizen is an individual who resides in the United States
without the approval or acquiescence of the United States Citizenship and
Immigration Services.
(o)
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a noncitizen who is ineligible for
medical assistance due to the deeming of a sponsor's income and resources, is
ineligible for general assistance medical care.
(p)
Effective July 1, 2003, general assistance medical care emergency services end.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec.
41. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
524.3-803, is amended to read:
524.3-803 LIMITATIONS ON PRESENTATION OF
CLAIMS.
(a)
All claims as defined in section 524.1-201(6), against a decedent's estate
which arose before the death of the decedent, including claims of the state and
any subdivision thereof, whether due or to become due, absolute or contingent,
liquidated or unliquidated, if not barred earlier by other statute of
limitations, are barred against the estate, the personal representative, and
the heirs and devisees of the decedent, unless presented as follows:
(1) in
the case of a creditor who is only entitled, under the United States
Constitution and under the Minnesota Constitution, to notice by publication
under section 524.3-801, within four months after the date of the court
administrator's notice to creditors which is subsequently published pursuant to
section 524.3-801;
(2) in
the case of a creditor who was served with notice under section 524.3-801(c),
within the later to expire of four months after the date of the first
publication of notice to creditors or one month after the service;
(3)
within the later to expire of one year after the decedent's death, or one year
after June 16, 1989, whether or not notice to creditors has been published or
served under section 524.3-801, provided, however, that in the case of a decedent
who died before June 16, 1989, no claim which was then barred by any provision
of law may be deemed to have been revived by the amendment of this
section. Claims authorized by
section 246.53, 256B.15, or 256D.16 must not be barred after one year as
provided in this clause.
(b)
All claims against a decedent's estate which arise at or after the death of the
decedent, including claims of the state and any subdivision thereof, whether
due or to become due, absolute or contingent, liquidated or unliquidated, are
barred against the estate, the personal representative, and the heirs and
devisees of the decedent, unless presented as follows:
(1) a
claim based on a contract with the personal representative, within four months
after performance by the personal representative is due;
(2)
any other claim, within four months after it arises.
(c)
Nothing in this section affects or prevents:
(1)
any proceeding to enforce any mortgage, pledge, or other lien upon property of
the estate;
(2)
any proceeding to establish liability of the decedent or the personal
representative for which there is protection by liability insurance, to the
limits of the insurance protection only;
(3)
the presentment and payment at any time within one year after the decedent's
death of any claim arising before the death of the decedent that is referred to
in section 524.3-715, clause (18), although the same may be otherwise barred
under this section; or
(4)
the presentment and payment at any time before a petition is filed in compliance
with section 524.3-1001 or 524.3-1002 or a closing statement is filed under
section 524.3-1003, of:
(i)
any claim arising after the death of the decedent that is referred to in
section 524.3-715, clause (18), although the same may be otherwise barred hereunder;
(ii)
any other claim, including claims subject to clause (3), which would otherwise
be barred hereunder, upon allowance by the court upon petition of the personal
representative or the claimant for cause shown on notice and hearing as the
court may direct.
Sec.
42. NURSING FACILITY PENSION COSTS.
The
commissioner of human services shall evaluate the extent to which the
alternative payment system reimbursement methodology for pension costs leads to
funding shortfalls for nursing facilities that convert from public to private
ownership. The commissioner shall
report to the legislature by January 15, 2009, recommendations for any changes
to the alternative payment system reimbursement methodology for pension costs
necessary to ensure the financial viability of nursing facilities. The commissioner shall pay for any costs
related to this study using existing resources.
Sec.
43. NURSING FACILITY RATE DISPARITY REPORT.
The
commissioner of human services shall study and make a report to the legislature
by January 15, 2009, with recommendations to reduce rate disparities between
nursing facilities in various regions of the state. The recommendations shall include cost estimates and may include
a phase-in schedule. The study shall be
accomplished using existing resources.
Sec.
44. HOME MODIFICATIONS.
Effective
upon federal approval, the costs associated with home modifications that add to
the square footage of an unlicensed private residence when necessary to
complete a modification to configure a bathroom to accommodate a wheelchair may
be allowed expenses for home and community-based waiver services provided under
Minnesota Statutes, sections 256B.0916 and 256B.49, for persons with
disabilities when the following conditions are met:
(1)
the annual cost of the care and modifications for the waiver recipient does not
exceed the cost of care that would otherwise be incurred for the recipient
without the modification, as determined by the local lead agency;
(2)
the modification is based on the assessed needs, goals, and best interest of
the recipient as identified in the plan of care;
(3)
the modification has been found to be the least costly appropriate alternative
after other alternatives have been explored through an evaluation by the local
lead agency; and
(4)
the modification is reasonable given the value and size of the home.
Sec.
45. WAIVER AMENDMENT.
The
commissioner of human services shall submit an amendment to the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services consistent with section 44 by October 1, 2008.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec.
46. APPROPRIATION.
$65,000
is appropriated in the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2008, from the state
government special revenue fund to the administrative services unit to pay for
medical professional liability insurance coverage required under Minnesota
Statutes, section 214.40. This
appropriation shall become part of the base appropriation for the administrative
services unit and shall be annually adjusted based on the cost of the coverage
purchased to comply with Minnesota Statutes, section 214.40.
Sec.
47. REPEALER.
(a)
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 256B.0571, subdivision 8a, is repealed.
(b)
Laws 2003, First Special Session chapter 5, section 11, is repealed.
ARTICLE
2
SEX
OFFENDER PROGRAM
Section
1. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
13.851, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
9. Civil
commitment of sexual offenders.
Data relating to the preparation of a petition to commit an
individual as a sexual psychopathic personality or sexually dangerous person is
governed by section 253B.185, subdivision 1b.
Sec.
2. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
246B.02, is amended to read:
246B.02 ESTABLISHMENT OF MINNESOTA SEX OFFENDER
PROGRAM.
The
commissioner of human services shall establish and maintain a secure facility
located in Moose Lake. The facility
shall be operated by the Minnesota sex offender program. The program shall provide care and treatment
in secure treatment facilities to persons on a court-hold order and residing
in a secure treatment facility or program pending commitment or committed
by the courts as sexual psychopathic personalities or sexually dangerous
persons, or persons admitted there with the consent of the commissioner of
human services.
Sec.
3. [246B.06]
ESTABLISHMENT OF MINNESOTA STATE INDUSTRIES.
Subdivision
1. Establishment;
purpose. (a) The
commissioner of human services may establish, equip, maintain, and operate the
Minnesota State Industries at any Minnesota sex offender program facility under
this chapter. The commissioner may
establish industrial and commercial activities for sex offender treatment
patients as the commissioner deems necessary and suitable to the profitable
employment, educational training, and development of proper work habits of
patients consistent with the requirements in section 246B.05. The industrial and commercial activities
authorized by this section are designated Minnesota State Industries and must
be for the primary purpose of sustaining and ensuring Minnesota State
Industries' self-sufficiency, providing educational training, meaningful
employment, and the teaching of proper work habits to the patients of the
Minnesota sex offender program under this chapter, and not solely as
competitive business ventures.
(b)
The net profits from Minnesota State Industries must be used for the benefit of
the patients as it relates to building education and self-sufficiency
skills. Prior to the establishment of
any industrial and commercial activity, the commissioner of human services
shall consult with stakeholders including representatives of business,
industry, organized labor, the commissioner of education, the state
Apprenticeship Council, the commissioner of labor and industry, the
commissioner of employment and economic development, the commissioner of
administration, and other stakeholders the commissioner deems qualified. The purpose of the stakeholder consultation
is to determine the quantity and nature of the goods, wares, merchandise, and
services to be made or provided, and the types of processes to be used in their
manufacture, processing, repair, and production consistent with the greatest
opportunity for the reform and educational training of the patients, and with
the best interests of the state, business, industry, and labor.
(c)
The commissioner of human services shall, at all times in the conduct of any
industrial or commercial activity authorized by this section, utilize patient
labor to the greatest extent feasible, provided that the commissioner may
employ all administrative, supervisory, and other skilled workers necessary to
the proper instruction of the patients and the profitable and efficient
operation of the industrial and commercial activities authorized by this
section.
(d)
The commissioner of human services may authorize the director of any Minnesota
sex offender treatment facility under the commissioner's control to accept work
projects from outside sources for processing, fabrication, or repair, provided
that preference is given to the performance of work projects for state
departments and agencies.
Subd.
2. Revolving
fund. As described in
section 246B.05, subdivision 2, there is established a Minnesota State
Industries revolving fund under the control of the commissioner of human
services. The revolving fund must be
used for Minnesota State Industries authorized under this section, including,
but not limited to, the purchase of equipment and raw materials, the payment of
salaries and wages, and other necessary expenses as determined by the
commissioner of human services. The
purchase of services, materials, and commodities used in and held for resale
are
not subject to the competitive bidding procedures of section 16C.06, but are
subject to all other provisions of chapters 16B and 16C. When practical, purchases must be made from
small targeted group businesses designated under section 16C.16. Additionally, the expenses of patient
educational training and self-sufficiency skills may be financed from the
revolving fund in an amount to be determined by the commissioner or
designee. The proceeds and income from
all Minnesota State Industries conducted at the Minnesota sex offender
treatment facilities must be deposited in the revolving fund subject to disbursement under
subdivision 3. The commissioner of
human services may request that money in the fund be invested pursuant to
section 11A.25. Proceeds from the
investment not currently needed must be accounted for separately and credited
to the revolving fund.
Subd.
3. Disbursement
from fund. The Minnesota
State Industries revolving fund must be deposited in the state treasury and
paid out only on proper vouchers as authorized and approved by the commissioner
of human services, and in the same manner and under the same restrictions as
are now provided by law for the disbursement of funds by the commissioner. An amount deposited in the state treasury
equal to six months of net operating cash as determined by the prior 12 months
of revenue and cash flow statements must be restricted for use only by
Minnesota State Industries as described under subdivision 2. For purposes of this subdivision, "net
operating cash" means net income, minus sales, plus cost of goods
sold. Cost of goods sold include all direct costs of industry
products attributable to the goods' production.
Subd.
4. Revolving
fund; borrowing. The commissioner of human services is
authorized to borrow sums of money as the commissioner deems necessary to meet
current demands on the Minnesota State Industries revolving fund. The sums borrowed must not exceed, in any
calendar year, six months of net operating cash as determined by the previous
12 months of the industries' revenue and cash flow statements. If the commissioner of human services
determines that borrowing of funds is necessary, the commissioner of human
services shall certify this need to the commissioner of finance. Funds may be borrowed from general fund
appropriations to the Minnesota sex offender program with the authorization of
the commissioner of finance. Upon
authorization of the commissioner of finance, the transfer must be made and
credited to the Minnesota State Industries revolving fund. The sum transferred to the Minnesota State
Industries revolving fund must be repaid by the commissioner of human services
from the revolving fund to the fund from which it was transferred in a time
period specified by the commissioner of finance, but by no later than the end
of the biennium, as defined in section 16A.011, in which the loan is made. When any transfer is made to the Minnesota
State Industries revolving fund, the commissioner of finance shall notify the
commissioner of human services of the amount transferred to the fund and the
date the transfer is to be repaid.
Subd.
5. Federal
grant fund transfers. Grants
received by the commissioner of human services from the federal government for
any vocational training program or for administration by the commissioner of
human services must (1) be credited to a federal grant fund and then (2) be
transferred from the federal grant fund to the credit of the commissioner of
human services in the appropriate account upon certification by the
commissioner of human services that the amounts requested to be transferred
have been earned or are required for the purposes of this section. Funds received by the federal grant fund
need not be budgeted as such, provided transfers from the fund are budgeted for
allotment purposes in the appropriate appropriation.
Subd.
6. Wages. Notwithstanding section 177.24 or any
other law to the contrary, wages paid to patients working within this program
are at the discretion of the commissioner of human services.
Sec.
4. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
253B.045, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Restriction. Except when ordered by the court pursuant to
a finding of necessity to protect the life of the proposed patient or others, or
as provided under subdivision 1a, no person subject to the provisions of
this chapter shall be confined in a jail or correctional institution, except
pursuant to chapter 242 or 244.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec.
5. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
253B.045, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
1a. Exception. A person who is being petitioned for
commitment under section 253B.185 and who is placed under a judicial hold order
under section 253B.07, subdivision 2b or 7, may be confined at a Department of
Corrections or a county correctional or detention facility, rather than a
secure treatment facility, until a determination of the commitment petition as
specified in this subdivision.
(a)
A court may order that a person who is being petitioned for commitment under
section 253B.185 be confined in a Department of Corrections facility pursuant
to the judicial hold order under the following circumstances and conditions:
(1)
The person is currently serving a sentence in a Department of Corrections
facility and the court determines that the person has made a knowing and
voluntary (i) waiver of the right to be held in a secure treatment facility and
(ii) election to be held in a Department of Corrections facility. The order confining the person in the
Department of Corrections facility shall remain in effect until the court
vacates the order or the person's criminal sentence and conditional release
term expire.
In
no case may the person be held in a Department of Corrections facility pursuant
only to this subdivision, and not pursuant to any separate correctional
authority, for more than 210 days.
(2) A person who has elected to be confined in a
Department of Corrections facility under this subdivision may revoke the
election by filing a written notice of intent to revoke the election with the
court and serving the notice upon the Department of Corrections and the county
attorney. The court shall order the
person transferred to a secure treatment facility within 15 days of the date
that the notice of revocation was filed with the court, except that, if the
person has additional time to serve in prison at the end of the 15-day period,
the person shall not be transferred to a secure treatment facility until the
person's prison term expires. After a
person has revoked an election to remain in a Department of Corrections
facility under this subdivision, the court may not adopt another election to
remain in a Department of Corrections facility without the agreement of both
parties and the Department of Corrections.
(3)
Upon petition by the commissioner of corrections, after notice to the parties
and opportunity for hearing and for good cause shown, the court may order that
the person's place of confinement be changed from the Department of Corrections
to a secure treatment facility.
(4)
While at a Department of Corrections facility pursuant to this subdivision, the
person shall remain subject to all rules and practices applicable to
correctional inmates in the facility in which the person is placed including,
but not limited to, the powers and duties of the commissioner of corrections
under section 241.01, powers relating to use of force under section 243.52, and
the right of the commissioner of corrections to determine the place of
confinement in a prison, reformatory, or other facility.
(5)
A person may not be confined in a Department of Corrections facility under this
provision beyond the end of the person's executed sentence or the end of any
applicable conditional release period, whichever is later. If a person confined in a Department of
Corrections facility pursuant to this provision reaches the person's supervised
release date and is subject to a period of conditional release, the period of
conditional release shall commence on the supervised release date even though
the person remains in the Department of Corrections facility pursuant to this
provision. At the end of the later of
the executed sentence or any applicable conditional release period, the person
shall be transferred to a secure treatment facility.
(6)
Nothing in this section may be construed to establish a right of an inmate in a
state correctional facility to participate in sex offender treatment. This section must be construed in a manner
consistent with the provisions of section 244.03.
(b)
The committing county may offer a person who is being petitioned for commitment
under section 253B.185 and who is placed under a judicial hold order under
section 253B.07, subdivision 2b or 7, the option to be held in a county
correctional or detention facility rather than a secure treatment facility,
under such terms as may be agreed to by the county, the commitment petitioner,
and the commitment respondent. If a
person makes such an election under this paragraph, the court hold order shall
specify the terms of the agreement, including the conditions for revoking the
election.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec.
6. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
253B.045, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Facilities. Each county or a group of counties shall
maintain or provide by contract a facility for confinement of persons held
temporarily for observation, evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, and care. When the temporary confinement is provided
at a regional treatment center, the commissioner shall charge the county of
financial responsibility for the costs of confinement of persons hospitalized
under section 253B.05, subdivisions 1 and 2, and section 253B.07, subdivision
2b, except that the commissioner shall bill the responsible health plan
first. If the person has health plan
coverage, but the hospitalization does not meet the criteria in subdivision 6
or section 62M.07, 62Q.53, or 62Q.535, the county is responsible. When a person is temporarily confined in
a Department of Corrections facility solely under subdivision 1a, and not based
on any separate correctional authority:
(1)
the commissioner of corrections may charge the county of financial
responsibility for the costs of confinement; and
(2)
the Department of Human Services shall use existing appropriations to fund all
remaining nonconfinement costs. The
funds received by the commissioner for the confinement and nonconfinement costs
are appropriated to the department for these purposes.
"County of financial
responsibility" means the county in which the person resides at the time
of confinement or, if the person has no residence in this state, the county
which initiated the confinement. The
charge for confinement in a facility operated by the commissioner of human services
shall be based on the commissioner's determination of the cost of care
pursuant to section 246.50, subdivision 5.
When there is a dispute as to which county is the county of financial
responsibility, the county charged for the costs of confinement shall pay for
them pending final determination of the dispute over financial
responsibility. Disputes about the
county of financial responsibility shall be submitted to the commissioner to be
settled in the manner prescribed in section 256G.09.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec.
7. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
253B.18, subdivision 4c, is amended to read:
Subd.
4c. Special review board. (a)
The commissioner shall establish one or more panels of a special review board for
persons committed as mentally ill and dangerous to the public. The board shall consist of three members
experienced in the field of mental illness.
One member of each special review board panel shall be a psychiatrist
and one member shall be an attorney. No
member shall be affiliated with the Department of Human Services. The special review board shall meet at least
every six months and at the call of the commissioner. It shall hear and consider all petitions for a reduction in custody
or to appeal a revocation of provisional discharge. A "reduction in custody" means transfer from a
secure treatment facility; all petitions for, discharge, and provisional
discharge, and revocation of provisional discharge; and make recommendations
to the commissioner concerning them.
Patients may be transferred by the commissioner between secure treatment
facilities without a special review board hearing.
(b) Members of the special
review board shall receive compensation and reimbursement for expenses as
established by the commissioner.
(b)
A petition filed by a person committed as mentally ill and dangerous to the
public under this section must be heard as provided in subdivision 5 and, as
applicable, subdivision 13. A petition
filed by a person committed as a sexual psychopathic personality or as a
sexually dangerous person under section 253B.185, or committed as both mentally
ill and dangerous to the public under this section and as a sexual psychopathic
personality or as a sexually dangerous person must be heard as provided in
section 253B.185, subdivision 9.
Sec.
8. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
253B.18, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd.
5. Petition;
notice of hearing; attendance; order.
(a) A petition for an order of transfer, discharge, provisional
discharge, a reduction in custody or revocation of provisional
discharge shall be filed with the commissioner and may be filed by the patient
or by the head of the treatment facility.
A patient may not petition the special review board for six months
following commitment under subdivision 3 or following the final disposition of
any previous petition and subsequent appeal by the patient. The medical director may petition at any
time.
(b)
Fourteen days prior to the hearing, the committing court, the county attorney
of the county of commitment, the designated agency, interested person, the
petitioner, and the petitioner's counsel shall be given written notice by the
commissioner of the time and place of the hearing before the special review
board. Only those entitled to statutory
notice of the hearing or those administratively required to attend may be
present at the hearing. The patient may
designate interested persons to receive notice by providing the names and
addresses to the commissioner at least 21 days before the hearing. The board shall provide the commissioner
with written findings of fact and recommendations within 21 days of the
hearing. The commissioner shall issue
an order no later than 14 days after receiving the recommendation of the
special review board. A copy of the
order shall be sent by certified mail mailed to every person
entitled to statutory notice of the hearing within five days after it is
signed. No order by the commissioner
shall be effective sooner than 30 days after the order is signed, unless the
county attorney, the patient, and the commissioner agree that it may become
effective sooner.
(c)
The special review board shall hold a hearing on each petition prior to making
its recommendation to the commissioner.
The special review board proceedings are not contested cases as defined
in chapter 14. Any person or agency
receiving notice that submits documentary evidence to the special review board
prior to the hearing shall also provide copies to the patient, the patient's
counsel, the county attorney of the county of commitment, the case manager, and
the commissioner.
(d)
Prior to the final decision by the commissioner, the special review board may
be reconvened to consider events or circumstances that occurred subsequent to
the hearing.
(e) In
making their recommendations and order, the special review board and
commissioner must consider any statements received from victims under
subdivision 5a.
Sec.
9. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
253B.18, subdivision 5a, is amended to read:
Subd.
5a. Victim notification of petition and release; right to submit statement. (a) As used in this subdivision:
(1)
"crime" has the meaning given to "violent crime" in section
609.1095, and includes criminal sexual conduct in the fifth degree and offenses
within the definition of "crime against the person" in section
253B.02, subdivision 4a, and also includes offenses listed in section 253B.02,
subdivision 7a, paragraph (b), regardless of whether they are sexually motivated;
(2)
"victim" means a person who has incurred loss or harm as a result of
a crime the behavior for which forms the basis for a commitment under this
section or section 253B.185; and
(3)
"convicted" and "conviction" have the meanings given in
section 609.02, subdivision 5, and also include juvenile court adjudications,
findings under Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 20.02, that the
elements of a crime have been proved, and findings in commitment cases under
this section or section 253B.185 that an act or acts constituting a crime
occurred.
(b) A county attorney who
files a petition to commit a person under this section or section 253B.185
shall make a reasonable effort to provide prompt notice of filing the petition
to any victim of a crime for which the person was convicted. In addition, the county attorney shall make
a reasonable effort to promptly notify the victim of the resolution of the
petition.
(c) Before provisionally
discharging, discharging, granting pass-eligible status, approving a pass plan,
or otherwise permanently or temporarily releasing a person committed under this
section or section 253B.185 from a treatment facility, the head of the
treatment facility shall make a reasonable effort to notify any victim of a
crime for which the person was convicted that the person may be discharged or
released and that the victim has a right to submit a written statement
regarding decisions of the medical director, special review board, or
commissioner with respect to the person.
To the extent possible, the notice must be provided at least 14 days
before any special review board hearing or before a determination on a pass
plan. Notwithstanding section
611A.06, subdivision 4, the commissioner shall provide the judicial appeal
panel with victim information in order to comply with the provisions of this
section. The judicial appeal panel
shall ensure that the data on victims remains private as provided for in
section 611A.06, subdivision 4.
(d) This subdivision applies
only to victims who have requested notification by contacting, in writing, the
county attorney in the county where the conviction for the crime occurred. A county attorney who receives a request for
notification under this paragraph shall promptly forward the request to the commissioner
of human services.
(e) The rights under this
subdivision are in addition to rights available to a victim under chapter
611A. This provision does not give a
victim all the rights of a "notified person" or a person "entitled
to statutory notice" under subdivision 4a, 4b, or 5.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, section
253B.185, subdivision 1b, is amended to read:
Subd. 1b. County
attorney access to data.
Notwithstanding sections 144.291 to 144.298; 245.467, subdivision 6;
245.4876, subdivision 7; 260B.171; 260B.235, subdivision 8; 260C.171; and
609.749, subdivision 6, or any provision of chapter 13 or other state law,
prior to filing a petition for commitment as a sexual psychopathic personality
or as a sexually dangerous person, and upon notice to the proposed patient, the
county attorney or the county attorney's designee may move the court for an
order granting access to any records or data, to the extent it relates to the
proposed patient, for the purpose of determining whether good cause exists to
file a petition and, if a petition is filed, to support the allegations set
forth in the petition.
The court may grant the
motion if: (1) the Department of Corrections refers the case for commitment as
a sexual psychopathic personality or a sexually dangerous person; or (2) upon a
showing that the requested category of data or records may be relevant to the
determination by the county attorney or designee. The court shall decide a motion under this subdivision within 48
hours after a hearing on the motion.
Notice to the proposed patient need not be given upon a showing that
such notice may result in harm or harassment of interested persons or potential
witnesses.
Notwithstanding any
provision of chapter 13 or other state law, a county attorney considering the
civil commitment of a person under this section may obtain records and data
from the Department of Corrections or any probation or parole agency in this
state upon request, without a court order, for the purpose of determining whether
good cause exists to file a petition and, if a petition is filed, to support
the allegations set forth in the petition.
At the time of the request for the records, the county attorney shall
provide notice of the request to the person who is the subject of the records.
Data
collected pursuant to this subdivision shall retain their original status and,
if not public, are inadmissible in any court proceeding unrelated to civil
commitment, unless otherwise permitted.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec.
11. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
253B.185, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd.
5. Financial
responsibility. (a) For purposes of
this subdivision, "state facility" has the meaning given in section
246.50 and also includes a Department of Corrections facility when the
proposed patient is confined in such a facility pursuant to section 253B.045,
subdivision 1a.
(b)
Notwithstanding sections 246.54, 253B.045, and any other law to the contrary,
when a petition is filed for commitment under this section pursuant to the
notice required in section 244.05, subdivision 7, the state and county are each
responsible for 50 percent of the cost of the person's confinement at a state
facility or county jail, prior to commitment.
(c)
The county shall submit an invoice to the state court administrator for
reimbursement of the state's share of the cost of confinement.
(d)
Notwithstanding paragraph (b), the state's responsibility for reimbursement is
limited to the amount appropriated for this purpose.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec.
12. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
253B.185, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
9. Petition
for reduction in custody. (a)
This subdivision applies only to committed persons as defined in paragraph
(b). The procedures in section 253B.18,
subdivision 5a, for victim notification and right to submit a statement under
section 253B.18 apply to petitions filed and reductions in custody recommended
under this subdivision.
(b)
As used in this subdivision:
(1)
"committed person" means an individual committed under this section,
or under this section and under section 253B.18, as mentally ill and
dangerous. It does not include persons
committed only as mentally ill and dangerous under section 253B.18; and
(2)
"reduction in custody" means transfer out of a secure treatment
facility, a provisional discharge, or a discharge from commitment. A reduction in custody is considered to be a
commitment proceeding under section 8.01.
(c)
A petition for a reduction in custody or an appeal of a revocation of
provisional discharge may be filed by either the committed person or by the
head of the treatment facility and must be filed with and considered by the
special review board. A committed
person may not petition the special review board any sooner than six months
following either:
(1)
the entry of judgment in the district court of the order for commitment issued
under section 253B.18, subdivision 3, or upon the exhaustion of all related
appeal rights in state court relating to that order, whichever is later; or
(2)
any recommendation of the special review board or order of the judicial appeal
panel, or upon the exhaustion of all appeal rights in state court, whichever is
later. The medical director may
petition at any time. The special
review board proceedings are not contested cases as defined in chapter 14.
(d)
The special review board shall hold a hearing on each petition before issuing a
recommendation under paragraph (f).
Fourteen days before the hearing, the committing court, the county
attorney of the county of commitment, the designated agency, an interested
person, the petitioner and the petitioner's counsel, and the committed person
and the committed person's counsel must be given written notice by the
commissioner of the time and place of the hearing before the special review
board. Only those entitled to statutory
notice of the hearing or those administratively required to attend may be
present at the hearing. The patient may
designate interested persons to receive notice by providing the names and
addresses to the commissioner at least 21 days before the hearing.
(e)
A person or agency receiving notice that submits documentary evidence to the
special review board before the hearing must also provide copies to the
committed person, the committed person's counsel, the county attorney of the
county of commitment, the case manager, and the commissioner. The special review board must consider any
statements received from victims under section 253B.18, subdivision 5a.
(f)
Within 30 days of the hearing, the special review board shall issue written
findings of fact and shall recommend denial or approval of the petition to the
judicial appeal panel established under section 253B.19. The commissioner shall forward the
recommendation of the special review board to the judicial appeal panel and to
every person entitled to statutory notice.
No reduction in custody or reversal of a revocation of provisional
discharge recommended by the special review board is effective until it has
been reviewed by the judicial appeal panel and until 15 days after an order
from the judicial appeal panel affirming, modifying, or denying the recommendation.
Sec.
13. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
253B.19, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Petition;
hearing. The committed person or
the county attorney of the county from which a patient was committed as a
person who is mentally ill and dangerous to the public, or as a sexual
psychopathic personality or as a sexually dangerous person may petition the
appeal panel for a rehearing and reconsideration of a decision by the
commissioner. The petition shall be
filed with the Supreme Court within 30 days after the decision of the
commissioner is signed. The Supreme
Court shall refer the petition to the chief judge of the appeal panel.
(a) A person committed as mentally ill and dangerous to the public under
section 253B.18, or the county attorney of the county from which the person was
committed or the county of financial responsibility, may petition the judicial
appeal panel for a rehearing and reconsideration of a decision by the
commissioner under section 253B.18, subdivision 5. The judicial appeal panel must not consider petitions for relief
other than those considered by the commissioner from which the appeal is
taken. The petition must be filed with
the Supreme Court within 30 days after the decision of the commissioner is
signed. The hearing must be held within
45 days of the filing of the petition unless an extension is granted for good
cause.
(b)
A person committed as a sexual psychopathic personality or as a sexually
dangerous person under section 253B.185, or committed as both mentally ill and
dangerous to the public under section 253B.18 and as a sexual psychopathic
personality or as a sexually dangerous person under section 253B.185; the
county attorney of the county from which the person was committed or the county
of financial responsibility; or the commissioner may petition the judicial
appeal panel for a rehearing and reconsideration of a decision of the special
review board under section 253B.185, subdivision 9. The petition must be filed with the Supreme Court within 30 days
after the decision is mailed by the commissioner as required in section
253B.185, subdivision 9, paragraph (f).
The hearing must be held within 180 days of the filing of the petition
unless an extension is granted for good cause.
If no party petitions the judicial appeal panel for a rehearing or
reconsideration within 30 days, the judicial appeal panel shall either issue an
order adopting the recommendations of the special review board or set the
matter on for a hearing pursuant to this paragraph.
(c)
For an appeal under paragraph (a) or (b), the Supreme Court shall refer the
petition to the chief judge of the judicial appeal panel. The chief judge shall notify the patient, the county
attorney of the county of commitment, the designated agency, the commissioner,
the head of the treatment facility, any interested person, and other persons
the chief judge designates, of the time and place of the hearing on the
petition. The notice shall be given at
least 14 days prior to the date of the hearing. The hearing shall be within 45 days of the filing of the
petition unless an extension is granted for good cause.
(d)
Any person
may oppose the petition. The
patient, the patient's counsel, the county attorney of the committing county or
the county of financial responsibility, and the commissioner shall participate
as parties to the proceeding pending before the judicial appeal panel and
shall, no later than 20 days before the hearing on the petition, inform the
judicial appeal panel and the opposing party in writing whether they support or
oppose the petition and provide a summary of facts in support of their
position. The judicial
appeal panel may appoint examiners and may adjourn the hearing from time to
time. It shall hear and receive all
relevant testimony and evidence and make a record of all proceedings. The patient, the patient's counsel,
and the county attorney of the committing county may or the county of
financial responsibility have the right to be present and may present
and cross-examine all witnesses and offer a factual and legal basis in
support of their positions. The
petitioning party bears the burden of going forward with the evidence. The party opposing discharge bears the
burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent is in need
of commitment.
Sec.
14. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
253B.19, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Decision. A majority of the judicial appeal
panel shall rule upon the petition. The
panel shall consider the petition de novo.
The order of the judicial appeal panel shall supersede the
an order of the commissioner in the cases under section
253B.18, subdivision 5. No order of
the judicial appeal panel granting a transfer, discharge or provisional
discharge shall be made effective sooner than 15 days after it is issued. The panel may not consider petitions for
relief other than those considered by the commissioner or special review
board from which the appeal is taken.
The judicial appeal panel may not grant a transfer or provisional
discharge on terms or conditions that were not presented to the commissioner or
the special review board.
Sec.
15. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
626.5572, subdivision 21, is amended to read:
Subd.
21. Vulnerable adult.
"Vulnerable adult" means any person 18 years of age or older
who:
(1) is
a resident or inpatient of a facility;
(2)
receives services at or from a facility required to be licensed to serve adults
under sections 245A.01 to 245A.15, except that a person receiving outpatient
services for treatment of chemical dependency or mental illness, or one who is served
in the Minnesota sex offender program on a court-hold order for commitment, or
is committed as a sexual psychopathic personality or as a sexually
dangerous person under chapter 253B, is not considered a vulnerable adult
unless the person meets the requirements of clause (4);
(3)
receives services from a home care provider required to be licensed under
section 144A.46; or from a person or organization that exclusively offers, provides,
or arranges for personal care assistant services under the medical assistance
program as authorized under sections 256B.04, subdivision 16, 256B.0625,
subdivision 19a, 256B.0651, and 256B.0653 to 256B.0656; or
(4)
regardless of residence or whether any type of service is received, possesses a
physical or mental infirmity or other physical, mental, or emotional
dysfunction:
(i)
that impairs the individual's ability to provide adequately for the
individual's own care without assistance, including the provision of food,
shelter, clothing, health care, or supervision; and
(ii)
because of the dysfunction or infirmity and the need for assistance, the
individual has an impaired ability to protect the individual from maltreatment.
Sec.
16. MINNESOTA SEX OFFENDER PROGRAM; OPERATING STANDARDS.
The
commissioner of human services shall convene a working group of interested
parties to develop standards and guidelines for the operations of the Minnesota
sex offender program. The standards and
guidelines shall include, but not be limited to:
(1)
criteria to establish a sex offender treatment advisory board;
(2)
criteria to ensure the necessary provision of health and dental care for
patients;
(3)
criteria to ensure the necessary provision of mental health care; and
(4)
fire and safety criteria.
The
standards and guidelines shall be developed by the commissioner in consultation
with the working group members by February 1, 2009, and presented to the chairs
of the policy and finance committees having jurisdiction over the Minnesota sex
offender program for review.
ARTICLE
3
MFIP
Section
1. Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 256J.49, subdivision 13, is amended to read:
Subd.
13. Work activity. "Work
activity" means any activity in a participant's approved employment plan
that leads to employment. For purposes
of the MFIP program, this includes activities that meet the definition of work
activity under the participation requirements of TANF. Work activity includes:
(1)
unsubsidized employment, including work study and paid apprenticeships or
internships;
(2)
subsidized private sector or public sector employment, including grant
diversion as specified in section 256J.69, on-the-job training as specified in
section 256J.66, the self-employment investment demonstration program (SEID)
as specified in section 256J.65, paid work experience, and supported work
when a wage subsidy is provided;
(3)
unpaid work experience, including community service, volunteer work, the
community work experience program as specified in section 256J.67, unpaid
apprenticeships or internships, and supported work when a wage subsidy is not
provided. Unpaid work experience is
only an option if the participant has been unable to obtain or maintain paid
employment in the competitive labor market, and no paid work experience
programs are available to the participant.
Prior to placing a participant in unpaid work, the county must inform
the participant that the participant will be notified if a paid work experience
or supported work position becomes available.
Unless a participant consents in writing to participating
participate in unpaid work experience, the participant's employment plan
may only include unpaid work experience if including the unpaid work experience
in the plan will meet the following criteria:
(i)
the unpaid work experience will provide the participant specific skills or
experience that cannot be obtained through other work activity options where
the participant resides or is willing to reside; and
(ii)
the skills or experience gained through the unpaid work experience will result
in higher wages for the participant than the participant could earn without the
unpaid work experience;
(4)
job search including job readiness assistance, job clubs, job placement,
job-related counseling, and job retention services;
(5)
job readiness education, including English as a second language (ESL) or
functional work literacy classes as limited by the provisions of section
256J.531, subdivision 2, general educational development (GED) course work,
high school completion, and adult basic education as limited by the provisions
of section 256J.531, subdivision 1;
(6)
job skills training directly related to employment, including education and
training that can reasonably be expected to lead to employment, as limited by
the provisions of section 256J.53;
(7)
providing child care services to a participant who is working in a community
service program;
(8)
activities included in the employment plan that is developed under section
256J.521, subdivision 3; and
(9)
preemployment activities including chemical and mental health assessments,
treatment, and services; learning disabilities services; child protective
services; family stabilization services; or other programs designed to enhance
employability.
ARTICLE
4
MANAGED
CARE CONTRACT
Section
1. Laws 2005, First Special Session
chapter 4, article 8, section 84, as amended by Laws 2006, chapter 264, section
15, is amended to read:
Sec.
84. SOLE-SOURCE OR SINGLE-PLAN MANAGED CARE CONTRACT.
(a)
Notwithstanding
Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.692, subdivision 6, clause (1), paragraph (c),
the commissioner of human services shall approve a county-based purchasing
health plan proposal, submitted on behalf of Cass, Crow Wing, Morrison, Todd,
and Wadena Counties, that requires county-based purchasing on a single-plan
basis contract if the implementation of the single-plan purchasing proposal
does not limit an enrollee's provider choice or access to services and all
other requirements applicable to health plan purchasing are satisfied. The commissioner shall continue single
health plan purchasing arrangements with county-based purchasing entities in
the service areas in existence on May 1, 2006, including arrangements for which
a proposal was submitted by May 1, 2006, on behalf of Cass, Crow Wing,
Morrison, Todd, and Wadena Counties, in response to a request for proposals
issued by the commissioner. The commissioner shall continue to use
single-health plan, county-based purchasing arrangements for medical assistance
and general assistance medical care programs and products for the counties that
were in single-health plan, county-based purchasing arrangements on March 1,
2008. This paragraph does not require
the commissioner to terminate an existing contract with a noncounty-based
purchasing plan that had enrollment in a medical assistance program or product
in these counties on March 1, 2008.
This paragraph expires on December 31, 2010, or the effective date of a
new contract for medical assistance and general assistance medical care managed
care programs entered into at the conclusion of the commissioner's next
scheduled reprocurement process for the county-based purchasing entities
covered by this paragraph, whichever is later.
(b)
The
commissioner shall consider, and may approve, contracting on a single-health
plan basis with other county-based purchasing plans, or with other
qualified health plans that have coordination arrangements with counties, to
serve persons with a disability who voluntarily enroll, in order to promote
better coordination or integration of health care services, social services and
other community-based services, provided that all
requirements
applicable to health plan purchasing, including those in Minnesota Statutes,
section 256B.69, subdivision 23, are satisfied. By January 15, 2007, the commissioner shall report to the
chairs of the appropriate legislative committees in the house and senate an
analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of using single-health plan
purchasing to serve persons with a disability who are eligible for health care
programs. The report shall include
consideration of the impact of federal health care programs and policies for
persons who are eligible for both federal and state health care programs and
shall consider strategies to improve coordination between federal and state
health care programs for those persons.
Nothing in this paragraph supersedes or modifies the requirements
in paragraph (a)."
Delete
the title and insert:
"A
bill for an act relating to human services; amending health care services
provisions; making changes to a managed care contract provision; increasing a
HMO renewal fee; changing provisions relating to sex offender program; changing
a work activity provision under MFIP; requiring a report; appropriating money;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 13.851, by adding a subdivision;
125A.02, subdivision 1; 144A.45, subdivision 1, by adding a subdivision;
150A.06, by adding a subdivision; 214.40, by adding a subdivision; 246B.02;
253B.045, subdivisions 1, 2, by adding a subdivision; 253B.18, subdivisions 4c,
5, 5a; 253B.185, subdivision 5, by adding a subdivision; 253B.19, subdivisions
2, 3; 256.01, by adding a subdivision; 256B.056, subdivisions 2, 4a, 11, by
adding a subdivision; 256B.057, subdivision 1; 256B.0571, subdivisions 6, 8, 9,
15, by adding a subdivision; 256B.058; 256B.059, subdivisions 1, 1a; 256B.0594;
256B.0595, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, by adding subdivisions; 256B.0625,
subdivisions 3c, 13g, 13h; 256B.075, subdivision 2; 256B.15, subdivision 4;
256B.69, subdivisions 3a, 6, 27, 28; 256B.692, subdivision 7; 524.3-803;
626.5572, subdivision 21; Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, sections
253B.185, subdivision 1b; 256B.055, subdivision 14; 256B.0625, subdivision 49;
256D.03, subdivision 3; 256J.49, subdivision 13; Laws 2005, First Special
Session chapter 4, article 8, section 84, as amended; proposing coding for new
law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 145; 246B; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006,
section 256B.0571, subdivision 8a; Laws 2003, First Special Session chapter 5,
section 11."
We request the adoption of this report and repassage of the
bill.
House Conferees: Thomas Huntley, Erin Murphy and Ron Erhardt.
Senate Conferees: Linda Berglin, Tony Lourey and Paul E. Koering.
Huntley moved that the report of the Conference Committee on
H. F. No. 3222 be adopted and that the bill be repassed as
amended by the Conference Committee.
The motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 3222, A bill for an act relating to human services;
amending health care services provisions; making changes to general assistance
medical care, medical assistance, and MinnesotaCare; modifying claims, liens,
and treatment of assets; establishing a statewide information exchange;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 256B.056, subdivisions 2, 4a, 11, by
adding a subdivision; 256B.057, subdivision 1; 256B.0571, subdivisions 8, 9,
15, by adding a subdivision; 256B.058; 256B.059, subdivisions 1, 1a; 256B.0594;
256B.0595, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, by adding subdivisions; 256B.0625,
subdivision 13g; 256B.075, subdivision 2; 256B.15, subdivision 4; 256B.69,
subdivisions 6, 27; 524.3-803; Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, sections
256B.055, subdivision 14; 256B.0625, subdivision 49; 256D.03, subdivision 3;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 256B.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended by Conference,
and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of the bill and the
roll was called. There were 126 yeas
and 7 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Kranz
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Buesgens
Drazkowski
Hackbarth
Hoppe
Madore
Olson
The bill was repassed, as amended by Conference, and its title
agreed to.
There being no objection, the order of business reverted to
Messages from the Senate.
MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE
The following messages were received from the Senate:
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate has concurred in and adopted
the report of the Conference Committee on:
S. F. No. 2876.
The Senate has repassed said bill in accordance with the
recommendation and report of the Conference Committee. Said Senate File is herewith transmitted to
the House.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
CONFERENCE
COMMITTEE REPORT ON S. F. NO. 2876
A bill for an act relating to animals; changing provisions
regulating dangerous dogs and dogs at certain establishments; imposing
penalties; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 347.50, by adding a
subdivision; 347.51, subdivisions 2, 2a, 3, 4, 7, 9; 347.52; 347.53; 347.54,
subdivisions 1, 3; 347.55; 347.56; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota
Statutes, chapters 157; 347.
May 7,
2008
The Honorable James P.
Metzen
President of the Senate
The Honorable Margaret
Anderson Kelliher
Speaker of the House of
Representatives
We, the undersigned conferees for S. F. No. 2876 report that we
have agreed upon the items in dispute and recommend as follows:
That the Senate concur in the House amendment and that S. F.
No. 2876 be further amended as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section
1. [157.175]
DOGS; OUTDOOR FOOD AND BEVERAGE SERVICE ESTABLISHMENTS.
Subdivision
1. Municipal
authorization. A statutory
or home rule charter city may adopt an ordinance to permit food and beverage
service establishments to allow dogs to accompany persons patronizing
designated outdoor areas of food and beverage establishments.
Subd.
2. Dangerous
and potentially dangerous dogs.
The ordinance must prohibit dangerous and potentially dangerous dogs,
as defined in section 347.50, from accompanying patrons to food and beverage
establishments.
Subd.
3. Banning
dogs. The ordinance may not
prohibit a food and beverage establishment from banning dogs. A person accompanied by a dog who remains at
an establishment knowing that the operator of the establishment or its agent
has posted a sign banning dogs or otherwise informed the person that dogs are
not permitted in the establishment may be ordered to leave the premises.
Subd.
4. Permit
process. (a) The ordinance
must require participating establishments to apply for and receive a permit
from the city before allowing patrons' dogs on their premises. The city shall require from the applicant
such information as the local government deems reasonably necessary, but shall
require, at a minimum, the following information:
(1)
the name, location, and mailing address of the establishment;
(2)
the name, mailing address, and telephone contact information of the permit
applicant;
(3)
a description of the designated outdoor areas in which the permit applicant
intends to allow dogs; and
(4)
a description of the days of the week and hours of operation that patrons' dogs
will be permitted in the designated outdoor areas.
(b)
A permit issued pursuant to the authority granted in this section must not be
transferred to a subsequent owner upon the sale of a food and beverage
establishment but must expire automatically upon the sale of the establishment. The subsequent owner shall be required to
reapply for a permit pursuant to this section if the subsequent owner wishes to
continue to accommodate patrons' dogs.
(c)
A city may incorporate the permit requirements of this section into a permit or
license issued under an existing ordinance if the city ensures that current and
future permit and license holders comply with the requirements of this
section. A city may exempt current
permit and license holders from reapplying for a permit, if the current permit
or license holder provides the city with the information required in paragraph
(a) and any other information that the city requests.
Subd.
5. Minimum
requirements. The ordinance
must include such regulations and limitations as the local government deems
reasonably necessary to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the
public, but must require, at a minimum, the following requirements, which must
be clearly printed on a sign or signs posted on premises in a manner and place that
are conspicuous to employees and patrons:
(1)
employees must be prohibited from touching, petting, or otherwise handling
dogs;
(2)
employees and patrons must not allow dogs to come into contact with serving
dishes, utensils, tableware, linens, paper products, or any other items
involved in food service operations;
(3)
patrons must keep their dogs on a leash at all times and must keep their dogs
under reasonable control;
(4)
dogs must not be allowed on chairs, tables, or other furnishings; and
(5)
dog waste must be cleaned immediately and the area sanitized.
Subd.
6. Service
animals. Nothing in this
statute, or an ordinance adopted pursuant to this statute, shall be construed
to limit:
(1)
the right of a person with disabilities to access places of public
accommodation while accompanied by a service animal as provided in sections
256C.02 and 363A.19; or
(2)
the lawful use of a service animal by a licensed peace officer.
Subd.
7. Designated
outdoor area. The ordinance
must include a definition of "designated outdoor area" that is
consistent with applicable rules adopted by the commissioner of health.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec.
2. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.50, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
8. Provocation. "Provocation" means an act that
an adult could reasonably expect may cause a dog to attack or bite.
Sec.
3. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.51, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Registration. An animal control authority shall issue a
certificate of registration to the owner of a dangerous dog if the owner
presents sufficient evidence that:
(1) a
proper enclosure exists for the dangerous dog and a posting on the premises
with a clearly visible warning sign that there is a dangerous dog on the
property, including a warning symbol to inform children, that there is a
dangerous dog on the property;
(2) a
surety bond issued by a surety company authorized to conduct business in this
state in a form acceptable to the animal control authority in the sum of at
least $50,000 $300,000, payable to any person injured by the
dangerous dog, or a policy of liability insurance issued by an insurance
company authorized to conduct business in this state in the amount of at least $50,000
$300,000, insuring the owner for any personal injuries inflicted by the
dangerous dog;
(3)
the owner has paid an annual fee of not more than $500, in addition to any
regular dog licensing fees, to obtain a certificate of registration for a
dangerous dog under this section; and
(4)
the owner has had microchip identification implanted in the dangerous dog as
required under section 347.515.
Sec.
4. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.51, subdivision 2a, is amended to read:
Subd.
2a. Warning symbol. If a
county an animal control authority issues a certificate of
registration to the owner of a dangerous dog pursuant to subdivision 2, the county
animal control authority must provide, for posting on the owner's property,
a copy of a warning symbol to inform children that there is a dangerous dog on
the property. The design of the
warning symbol must be the uniform and specified symbol
provided by the commissioner of public safety, after consultation with
animal control professionals. The
commissioner shall provide the number of copies of the warning symbol requested
by each county the animal control authority and shall charge the county
animal control authority the actual cost of the warning symbols
received. The county animal
control authority may charge the registrant a reasonable fee to cover its
administrative costs and the cost of the warning symbol.
Sec.
5. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.51, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Fee. The county animal control
authority may charge the owner an annual fee, in addition to any regular
dog licensing fees, to obtain a certificate of registration for a dangerous dog
under this section.
Sec.
6. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.51, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd.
7. Tag. A dangerous dog registered under this
section must have a standardized, easily identifiable tag identifying the dog
as dangerous and containing the uniform dangerous dog symbol, affixed to the
dog's collar at all times. The commissioner
of public safety, after consultation with animal control professionals, shall
provide by rule for the design of the tag.
Sec.
7. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.51, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd.
9. Contracted
services. A county An
animal control authority may contract with another political subdivision or
other person to provide the services required under sections 347.50 to 347.54
347.565. Notwithstanding any
contract entered into under this subdivision, all fees collected under sections
347.50 to 347.54 shall be paid to the county animal control authority
and all certificates of registration must be issued in the name of the county
animal control authority.
Sec.
8. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.52, is amended to read:
347.52 DANGEROUS DOGS; REQUIREMENTS.
(a) An
owner of a dangerous dog shall keep the dog, while on the owner's property, in
a proper enclosure. If the dog is
outside the proper enclosure, the dog must be muzzled and restrained by a
substantial chain or leash and under the physical restraint of a responsible
person. The muzzle must be made in a
manner that will prevent the dog from biting any person or animal but that will
not cause injury to the dog or interfere with its vision or respiration.
(b) An
owner of a dangerous dog must renew the registration of the dog annually until
the dog is deceased. If the dog is
removed from the jurisdiction, it must be registered as a dangerous dog in its
new jurisdiction.
(c) An
owner of a dangerous dog must notify the animal control authority in writing of
the death of the dog or its transfer to a new jurisdiction location
where the dog will reside within 30 days of the death or transfer, and
must, if requested by the animal control authority, execute an affidavit under
oath setting forth either the circumstances of the dog's death and disposition
or the complete name, address, and telephone number of the person to whom the
dog has been transferred or the address where the dog has been relocated.
(d) An
animal control authority may shall require a dangerous dog to be
sterilized at the owner's expense. If
the owner does not have the animal sterilized within 30 days, the animal
control authority may shall seize the dog and have the animal
it sterilized at the owner's expense.
(e) A
person who owns a dangerous dog and who rents property from another where the
dog will reside must disclose to the property owner prior to entering the lease
agreement and at the time of any lease renewal that the person owns a dangerous
dog that will reside at the property.
(f) A
person who sells transfers ownership of a dangerous dog must
notify the purchaser new owner that the animal control authority
has identified the dog as dangerous.
The seller current owner must also notify the animal
control authority in writing of the sale transfer of ownership
and provide the animal control authority with the new owner's name, address,
and telephone number.
Sec.
9. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.53, is amended to read:
347.53 POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND DANGEROUS
DOGS.
Any
statutory or home rule charter city, or any county, may regulate potentially
dangerous and dangerous dogs.
Except as provided in section 347.51, subdivision 8, nothing in sections
347.50 to 347.54 347.565 limits any restrictions that the
local jurisdictions may place on owners of potentially dangerous or
dangerous dogs.
Sec.
10. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.54, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Seizure. (a) The animal control authority having
jurisdiction shall immediately seize any dangerous dog if:
(1)
after 14 days after the owner has notice that the dog is dangerous, the dog is
not validly registered under section 347.51;
(2)
after 14 days after the owner has notice that the dog is dangerous, the owner
does not secure the proper liability insurance or surety coverage as required
under section 347.51, subdivision 2;
(3)
the dog is not maintained in the proper enclosure; or
(4)
the dog is outside the proper enclosure and not under physical restraint of a
responsible person as required under section 347.52.; or
(5)
the dog is not sterilized within 30 days, pursuant to section 347.52, paragraph
(d).
(b) If
an owner of a dog is convicted of a crime for which the dog was originally seized,
the court may order that the dog be confiscated and destroyed in a proper and
humane manner, and that the owner pay the costs incurred in confiscating,
confining, and destroying the dog.
Sec.
11. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.54, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Subsequent
offenses; seizure. If a person has
been convicted of a misdemeanor for violating a provision of section 347.51,
347.515, or 347.52, and the person is charged with a subsequent violation
relating to the same dog, the dog must be seized by the animal control
authority having jurisdiction. If the
owner is convicted of the crime for which the dog was seized, the court shall
order that the dog be destroyed in a proper and humane manner and the owner pay
the cost of confining and destroying the animal. If the person is not convicted of the crime for which the dog
was seized, the owner may reclaim the dog upon payment to the animal control
authority of a fee for the care and boarding of the dog. If the owner is not convicted and the
dog is not reclaimed by the owner within seven days after the owner has
been notified that the dog may be reclaimed, the dog may be disposed of as
provided under section 35.71, subdivision 3, and the owner is liable to the
animal control authority for the costs incurred in confining, impounding, and
disposing of the dog.
Sec.
12. [347.541] DISPOSITION OF SEIZED ANIMALS.
Subdivision
1. Hearing. The owner of any dog declared dangerous
has the right to a hearing by an impartial hearing officer.
Subd.
2. Security. A
person claiming an interest in a seized dog may prevent disposition of the dog
by posting security in an amount sufficient to provide for the dog's actual
cost of care and keeping. The security
must be posted within seven days of the seizure inclusive of the date of the
seizure.
Subd.
3. Notice. The authority declaring the dog dangerous
shall give notice of this section by delivering or mailing it to the owner of
the dog, or by posting a copy of it at the place where the dog is kept, or by
delivering it to a person residing on the property, and telephoning, if
possible. The notice must include:
(1)
a description of the seized dog; the authority for and purpose of the dangerous
dog declaration and seizure; the time, place, and circumstances under which the
dog was declared dangerous; and the telephone number and contact person where
the dog is kept;
(2)
a statement that the owner of the dog may request a hearing concerning the
dangerous dog declaration and, if applicable, prior potentially dangerous dog
declarations for the dog, and that failure to do so within 14 days of the date
of the notice will terminate the owner's right to a hearing under this section;
(3)
a statement that if an appeal request is made within 14 days of the notice, the
owner must immediately comply with the requirements of section 347.52,
paragraphs (a) and (c), and until such time as the hearing officer issues an
opinion;
(4)
a statement that if the hearing officer affirms the dangerous dog declaration,
the owner will have 14 days from receipt of that decision to comply with all
other requirements of sections 347.51, 347.515, and 347.52;
(5)
a form to request a hearing under this subdivision; and
(6)
a statement that all actual costs of the care, keeping, and disposition of the
dog are the responsibility of the person claiming an interest in the dog,
except to the extent that a court or hearing officer finds that the seizure or
impoundment was not substantially justified by law.
Subd.
4. Right
to hearing. Any hearing must
be held within 14 days of the request to determine the validity of the
dangerous dog declaration. The hearing
officer must be an impartial employee of the local government or an impartial
person retained by the local government to conduct the hearing. In the event that the dangerous dog
declaration is upheld by the hearing officer, actual expenses of the hearing up
to a maximum of $1,000 will be the responsibility of the dog's owner. The hearing officer shall issue a decision
on the matter within ten days after the hearing. The decision must be delivered to the dog's owner by hand
delivery or registered mail as soon as practical and a copy must be provided to
the animal control authority.
Sec.
13. [347.542] RESTRICTIONS.
Subdivision
1. Dog
ownership prohibited. Except
as provided in subdivision 3, no person may own a dog if the person has:
(1)
been convicted of a third or subsequent violation of section 347.51, 347.515,
or 347.52;
(2)
been convicted of a violation under section 609.205, clause (4);
(3)
been convicted of a gross misdemeanor under section 609.226, subdivision 1;
(4)
been convicted of a violation under section 609.226, subdivision 2; or
(5)
had a dog ordered destroyed under section 347.56 and been convicted of one or
more violations of section 347.51, 346.515, 347.52, or 609.226, subdivision 2.
Subd.
2. Household
members. If any member of a
household is prohibited from owning a dog in subdivision 1, unless specifically
approved with or without restrictions by an animal control authority, no person
in the household is permitted to own a dog.
Subd.
3. Dog
ownership prohibition review. Beginning
three years after a conviction under subdivision 1 that prohibits a person from
owning a dog, and annually thereafter, the person may request that the animal
control authority review the prohibition.
The animal control authority may consider such facts as the seriousness
of the violation or violations that led to the prohibition, any criminal
convictions, or other facts that the animal control authority deems
appropriate. The animal control
authority may rescind the prohibition entirely or rescind it with
limitations. The animal control
authority also may establish conditions a person must meet before the prohibition
is rescinded, including, but not limited to, successfully completing dog
training or dog handling courses. If
the animal control authority rescinds a person's prohibition and the person
subsequently fails to comply with any limitations imposed by the animal control
authority or the person is convicted of any animal violation involving
unprovoked bites or dog attacks, the animal control authority may permanently
prohibit the person from owning a dog in this state.
Sec.
14. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.55, is amended to read:
347.55 PENALTY.
(a) Any
A person who violates any a provision of section 347.51,
347.515, or 347.52 is guilty of a misdemeanor.
(b) It
is a misdemeanor to remove a microchip from a dangerous or potentially dangerous
dog, to fail to renew the registration of a dangerous dog, to fail to account
for a dangerous dog's death or removal from the jurisdiction change
of location where the dog will reside, to sign a false affidavit with
respect to a dangerous dog's death or removal from the jurisdiction
change of location where the dog will reside, or to fail to disclose
ownership of a dangerous dog to a property owner from whom the person rents
property.
(c)
A person who is convicted of a second or subsequent violation of paragraph (a)
or (b) is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
(d)
An owner who violates section 347.542, subdivision 1, is guilty of a gross
misdemeanor.
(e)
Any household member who knowingly violates section 347.542, subdivision 2, is
guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
Sec.
15. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
347.56, is amended to read:
347.56 DESTRUCTION OF DOG IN CERTAIN
CIRCUMSTANCES.
Subdivision
1. Circumstances. Notwithstanding sections 347.51 to 347.55, a
dog that inflicted substantial or great bodily harm on a human being on
public or private property without provocation may be destroyed in a proper and
humane manner by the animal control authority.
The animal control authority may not destroy the dog until the dog owner
has had the opportunity for a hearing before an impartial decision maker.
may be destroyed in a proper and humane manner by the animal control authority
if the dog:
(1)
inflicted substantial or great bodily harm on a human on public or private
property without provocation;
(2)
inflicted multiple bites on a human on public or private property without
provocation;
(3)
bit multiple human victims on public or private property in the same attack
without provocation; or
(4)
bit a human on public or private property without provocation in an attack
where more than one dog participated in the attack.
Subd.
2. Hearing. The animal control authority may not
destroy the dog until the dog owner has had the opportunity for a hearing
before an impartial decision maker. The
definitions in section 347.50 and the exemptions under section 347.51,
subdivision 5, apply to this section.
Sec.
16. [347.565] APPLICABILITY.
Sections
347.50 to 347.56 must be enforced by animal control authorities or law
enforcement agencies, whether or not these sections have been adopted into
local ordinance."
Delete
the title and insert:
"A
bill for an act relating to animals; changing provisions regulating dangerous
dogs; providing for certain cities to authorize certain outdoor food and
beverage establishments to allow dogs to accompany patrons; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2006, sections 347.50, by adding a subdivision; 347.51, subdivisions
2, 2a, 3, 7, 9; 347.52; 347.53; 347.54, subdivisions 1, 3; 347.55; 347.56;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 157; 347."
We request the adoption of this report and repassage of the
bill.
Senate Conferees: Ellen R. Anderson, D. Scott Dibble and Steve
Dille.
House Conferees: Michael Paymar, Frank Hornstein and Ron
Erhardt.
Paymar moved that the report of the Conference Committee on
S. F. No. 2876 be adopted and that the bill be repassed as
amended by the Conference Committee.
The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 2876, A bill for an act relating to animals; changing
provisions regulating dangerous dogs and dogs at certain establishments;
imposing penalties; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 347.50, by
adding a subdivision; 347.51, subdivisions 2, 2a, 3, 4, 7, 9; 347.52; 347.53;
347.54, subdivisions 1, 3; 347.55; 347.56; proposing coding for new law in
Minnesota Statutes, chapters 157; 347.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended by Conference,
and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of the bill and the
roll was called. There were 110 yeas and
23 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, S.
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
DeLaForest
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eastlund
Eken
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Kranz
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Sertich
Severson
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anzelc
Brod
Cornish
Dean
Demmer
Drazkowski
Emmer
Finstad
Garofalo
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Kalin
Magnus
Olson
Ozment
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Scalze
Seifert
Shimanski
The bill was repassed, as amended by Conference, and its title
agreed to.
Speaker pro tempore Pelowski called Thissen to the Chair.
CALENDAR FOR THE DAY
S. F. No. 2965 was reported to the House.
Tingelstad and Simon moved
to amend S. F. No. 2965, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 4, line 31, before the
semicolon, insert ", including that receipt of compensation must be reported
and may disqualify her from all or part of medical benefits under Minnesota
health care programs established under chapter 256B, 256D, or 256L, and from
all or part of benefits under other income-based governmental assistance
programs"
Page 6, line 5, delete
"and"
Page 6, after line 5,
insert:
"(6) it must require
direct reimbursement to the Department of Human Services for any medical
expenses paid by Minnesota health care programs established under chapter 256B,
256D, or 256L and related to prenatal care and delivery expenses under the
gestational carrier contract. A person
considered to be the parent of the child under section 257.88, paragraph (b),
is a liable third party and obligated to reimburse the department for any
medical expenses related to the birth of the child or medical complication
caused by the birth; and"
Page 6, line 6, delete
"(6)" and insert "(7)"
Page 6, line 36, delete the
semicolon and insert ", provided that the requirements under this
clause must not actually and unreasonably jeopardize the gestational carrier's
own health; and"
Page 7, delete lines 1 and 2
Page 7, line 3, delete
"(4)" and insert "(3)"
Page 8, line 15, before the
period, insert "including, but not limited to, a gestational carrier
who is genetically related to the child"
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Severson moved to amend S.
F. No. 2965, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 8, after line 5,
insert:
"Sec. 9. [257.935]
CERTAIN MEDICAL PROCEDURES PROHIBITED.
A gestational carrier may
not undergo an abortion procedure while carrying a child pursuant to the terms
of a gestational carrier contract. The
terms of a gestational carrier contract may not permit the gestational carrier
to undergo an abortion while the carrier is subject to the contract."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Severson amendment and the roll
was called. There were 63 yeas and 70
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Juhnke
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Magnus
Marquart
Murphy, M.
Nornes
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Solberg
Urdahl
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dominguez
Erhardt
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Kranz
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Emmer moved to amend S. F.
No. 2965, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 9, delete the
first "parents" and insert "mother and father"
Page 1, line 15, delete
"other intended parent" and insert "intended father"
Page 1, line 16, delete
"an intended parent" and insert "an intended father"
Page 1, line 18, delete the
first "parents" and insert "mother and father"
and delete the second "parents" and insert "mother and
father"
Page 1, line 23, delete
"parents" and insert "mother and father"
Page 2, line 4, delete
"parents" and insert "mother and father"
Page 2, line 17, delete
"parents" and insert "mother and father"
Page 2, line 27, delete
"parent" and insert "mother or father"
Page 3, line 4, delete
"parents" and insert "mother and father"
Page 3, line 34, delete the
first "parents" and insert "mother and father"
and delete the second "parents" and insert "mother and
father"
Page 4, line 1, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "mother and father"
Page 4, line 3, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "mother or father or
both"
Page 4, line 4, delete
"parent" and insert "mother or father or both"
Page 4, line 5, delete
"or parents"
Page 4, line 10, delete the
first "parents" and insert "mother or father"
and delete the second "parents" and insert "mother and
father" and delete the third "parents" and insert
"mother and father"
Page 4, line 12, delete
"by one or more of the genetic parents" and insert "either
the genetic mother, genetic father, or both"
Page 4, line 17, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "mother or father or
both"
Page 5, line 1, delete
"parents" and insert "mother and father"
Page 5, line 3, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "mother or father or
both"
Page 5, line 4, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "they"
Page 5, line 6, delete "the
parent or parents" and insert "they"
Page 5, line 8, delete
"the parent or parents" and insert "they"
Page 5, line 10, delete
"the parent or parents" and insert "they"
Page 5, line 12, delete
"the parent or parents" and insert "they"
Page 5, line 27, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "mother or father or
both"
Page 5, line 30, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "mother or father or
both"
Page 5, line 33, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "mother or father or
both"
Page 6, line 10, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "mother or father or
both"
Page 6, line 16, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "mother or father or
both"
Page 6, line 19, delete
"parents" and insert "mother and father"
Page 6, line 19, delete
"parents" and insert "mother or father or both"
Page 6, line 21, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "mother or father or
both"
Page 6, line 32, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "mother or father or
both"
Page 7, line 1, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "mother or father or
both"
Page 7, line 3, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "mother or father or
both"
Page 7, line 10, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "mother or father or
both"
Page 7, line 11, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "mother or father or
both"
Page 7, line 15, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "mother or father or
both"
Page 7, line 16, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "mother or father or
both"
Page 7, line 23, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "mother or father or both"
Page 7, line 32, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "mother or father or
both"
Page 7, line 33, delete the
first "parent or parents" and insert "mother or father
or both" and delete the second "parent or parents"
and insert "mother or father or both"
Page 8, line 13, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "mother or father or
both"
Page 8, line 24, delete
"parent or parents" and insert "mother or father or
both"
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Emmer amendment and the roll was
called. There were 44 yeas and 88 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kohls
Lanning
Magnus
Nornes
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kranz
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Brod moved to amend S. F.
No. 2965, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 6, line 22, delete
"immediately upon the children's birth"
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Brod amendment and the roll was
called. There were 56 yeas and 77 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dill
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Magnus
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Urdahl
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Dominguez
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Kranz
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Buesgens moved to amend S.
F. No. 2965, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 6, line 2, after "must"
insert "(i) be limited to actual costs incurred by the parties to
fulfill the requirements of the contract, and may not permit any party to the
contract to profit financially from the arrangement; and (ii) be"
Page 6, line 2, delete
"have been"
Page 7, delete lines 1 and 2
Page 7, line 3, delete
"(4)" and insert "(3)"
Page 8, after line 21,
insert:
"(c) A contract
which violates the prohibition on for-profit compensation arrangements as
provided in section 257.90, paragraph (b), clause 5 shall be absolutely null
and void."
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Buesgens amendment and the roll
was called. There were 51 yeas and 82
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dill
Dittrich
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Liebling
Magnus
Morgan
Murphy, M.
Nornes
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Peppin
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kranz
Laine
Lesch
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Severson moved to amend S.
F. No. 2965, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 3, delete subdivision
11 and insert:
"Subd. 11. Intended
parent. "Intended
parent" means an individual and the individual's legal spouse who enter
into a gestational carrier contract with a gestational carrier pursuant to
which the married couple will be the legal parents of the resulting child. Any reference to an intended parent includes
both husband and wife for all purposes of sections 257.87 to 257.98. This term includes the intended mother,
intended father, or both."
Page 3, after line 21,
insert:
"Subd. 14. Medical
need. "Medical
need" means infertility between a husband and wife."
Renumber the subdivisions in
sequence
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Paulsen was excused between the hours of 4:45 p.m. and 9:20
p.m.
Emmer offered an amendment to S. F. No. 2965,
the second engrossment, as amended.
POINT
OF ORDER
Kahn raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the
Emmer amendment was not in order.
Speaker pro tempore Thissen ruled the point of order well taken and the
Emmer amendment out of order.
Eastlund moved to amend S.
F. No. 2965, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 8, after line 31,
insert:
"Sec. 14. [257.99]
IDENTIFYING GENETIC DATA.
(a) The Department of Health
shall maintain identifying genetic information for donors who contribute a
gamete or gametes for the purpose of in vitro fertilization or implantation in
another.
(b) The Department of Health
shall release the identifying genetic information, upon request, to the person,
age 18 or older, who was born as a result of the donor's contribution of a
gamete or gametes for the in vitro fertilization or implantation that resulted
in the birth of the person."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Emmer moved to amend S. F.
No. 2965, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 7, after line 6,
insert:
"Sec. 6. [257.905]
ATTORNEY'S FEES PROHIBITED.
An attorney providing legal
services to any party to a gestational carrier contract, including services to
a gestational carrier or to the intended parent of a child, may not charge a
fee for services related to the contract."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Emmer amendment and the roll was
called. There were 38 yeas and 94 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dill
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Hoppe
Kohls
Lanning
Magnus
Nornes
Olson
Otremba
Ozment
Peppin
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kranz
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Severson moved to amend S.
F. No. 2965, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 8, after line 5,
insert:
"Sec. 8. [257.936]
SEXUAL ACTIVITY PROHIBITED.
A gestational carrier may
not engage in any unprotected sexual activity until the carrier has been
successfully impregnated pursuant to the terms of the gestational carrier
contract."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
S. F. No. 2965, A bill for an act relating to children;
regulating gestational carrier arrangements; establishing intended parents
rights under assisted reproduction; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
257.56; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 257.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 86 yeas and 46
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
DeLaForest
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kranz
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Ozment
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
Demmer
Dill
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hosch
Howes
Kohls
Lanning
Magnus
Masin
Nornes
Olson
Otremba
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Urdahl
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
S. F. No. 3193 was reported to the House.
Tingelstad moved to amend S.
F. No. 3193, the first engrossment, as follows:
Page 3, line 22, delete
"(a)"
Page 3, delete lines 28 to
31
Page 5, line 29, after
"3," insert "and" and delete "and 5,"
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Speaker pro tempore Thissen called Juhnke to the Chair.
Thissen was excused between the hours of 5:20 p.m. and 7:00
p.m.
S. F. No. 3193, A bill for an act relating to adoption;
modifying provisions governing access to adoption records and original birth
certificates; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 13.465, subdivision 8;
144.218, subdivision 1; 144.225, subdivision 2; 144.2252; 144.226, subdivision
1; 259.89, subdivision 1; 260C.317, subdivision 4; proposing coding for new law
in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 144; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections
259.83, subdivision 3; 259.89, subdivisions 2, 3, 4, 5.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 78 yeas and 52
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dominguez
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kranz
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Ozment
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Swails
Thao
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Wardlow
Westrom
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brown
Buesgens
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hansen
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kohls
Lanning
Lillie
Loeffler
Magnus
Marquart
Masin
Nornes
Olin
Olson
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Poppe
Ruth
Scalze
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Solberg
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Zellers
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
H. F. No. 3090 was reported to the House.
Morrow moved to amend H. F.
No. 3090, the first engrossment, as follows:
Delete everything after the
enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 174.02,
subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Unclassified
positions. The commissioner may
establish four positions in the unclassified service at the deputy and
assistant commissioner, assistant to commissioner or personal secretary
levels. No more than two of these
positions shall be at the deputy commissioner level. The commissioner or a deputy commissioner must be licensed as
a professional engineer under section 326.02, and serve as chief engineer."
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
H. F. No. 3090, A bill for an act relating to transportation;
modifying provisions relating to certain positions in Department of
Transportation; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 174.02, subdivision
2.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 104 yeas and 26
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kranz
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Demmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Holberg
Kohls
Lanning
McFarlane
McNamara
Olson
Ozment
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Zellers
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
Sertich moved that the House recess subject to the call of the
Chair. The motion prevailed.
RECESS
RECONVENED
The House reconvened and was called to order by the Speaker.
Dill was excused between the hours of 9:20 p.m. and 11:55 p.m.
The following Conference Committee Report was received:
CONFERENCE
COMMITTEE REPORT ON H. F. NO. 3391
A bill for an act relating to health care reform; increasing
affordability and continuity of care for state health care programs; modifying
health care provisions; providing subsidies for employee share of
employer-subsidized insurance in certain cases; establishing the Health Care
Transformation Commission; creating an affordability standard; implementing a
statewide health improvement program; requiring an evaluation of mandated
health benefits; requiring a payment system to encourage provider innovation;
requiring studies and reports; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes
2006, sections 62Q.025, by adding a subdivision; 256.01, subdivision 18;
256B.056, by adding a subdivision; 256B.057, subdivision 8; 256B.69, by adding
a subdivision; 256L.05, by adding a subdivision; 256L.06, subdivision 3;
256L.07, subdivision 3, by adding a subdivision; 256L.15, by adding a
subdivision; Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, sections 256.01, subdivision
2b; 256B.056, subdivision 10; 256L.03, subdivisions 3, 5; 256L.04, subdivisions
1, 7; 256L.05, subdivision 3a; 256L.07, subdivision 1; 256L.15, subdivision 2;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 145; 256B;
proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 62U; repealing
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 256L.15, subdivision 3.
May
11, 2008
The Honorable Margaret
Anderson Kelliher
Speaker of the House of
Representatives
The Honorable James P.
Metzen
President of the Senate
We, the undersigned conferees for H. F. No. 3391 report that we
have agreed upon the items in dispute and recommend as follows:
That the Senate recede from its amendment and that H. F. No.
3391 be further amended as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"ARTICLE 1
PUBLIC HEALTH
Section 1. [145.986] STATEWIDE HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.
Subdivision 1. Goals. It is the
goal of the state to substantially reduce the percentage of Minnesotans who are
obese or overweight, and to reduce the use of tobacco.
Subd. 2. Grants to local communities. (a) Beginning July 1, 2009, the commissioner of health shall
award grants to community health boards established pursuant to section
145A.09, and tribal governments to convene, coordinate, and implement
evidence-based strategies targeted at reducing the percentage of Minnesotans
who are obese or overweight and to reduce the use of tobacco.
(b) Grantee activities shall:
(1) be based on scientific evidence;
(2) be based on community input;
(3) address behavior change at the individual, community, and systems
levels;
(4) occur in community, school, worksite, and health care settings; and
(5) be focused on policy, systems, and environmental changes that
support healthy behaviors.
(c) To receive a grant under this section, community health boards and
tribal governments must submit proposals to the commissioner. A local match of ten percent of the total
funding allocation is required. This local
match may include funds donated by community partners.
(d) In order to receive a grant, community health boards and tribal
governments must submit a health improvement plan to the commissioner of health
for approval. The commissioner may
require the plan to identify a community leadership team, community partners,
and a community action plan that includes an assessment of area strengths and
needs, proposed action strategies, technical assistance needs, and a staffing
plan.
(e) The grant recipient must implement the health improvement plan,
evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions, and modify or discontinue
interventions found to be ineffective.
(f) Grant recipients shall receive the standard base amount and a
standard per capita amount to be established by the commissioner.
(g) By January 15, 2011, the commissioner of health shall recommend
whether any funding should be distributed to community health boards and tribal
governments based on health disparities demonstrated in the populations served.
(h) Grant recipients shall report their activities and their progress
towards the outcomes established under subdivision 3 to the commissioner in a
format and at a time specified by the commissioner.
(i) All grant recipients shall be held accountable for making progress
toward the measurable outcomes established in subdivision 3. The commissioner shall require a corrective
action plan and may reduce the funding level of grant recipients that do not
make adequate progress toward the measurable outcomes.
Subd. 3. Outcomes. (a) The
commissioner shall set measurable outcomes to meet the goals specified in
subdivision 1, and annually review the progress of grant recipients in meeting
the outcomes.
(b) The commissioner shall measure current public health status, using
existing measures and data collection systems when available, to determine
baseline data against which progress shall be monitored.
Subd. 4. Technical assistance and oversight. The commissioner shall provide content
expertise, technical expertise, and training to grant recipients and advice on
evidence-based strategies, including those based on populations and types of
communities served. The commissioner
shall ensure that the statewide health improvement program meets the outcomes
established under subdivision 3 by conducting a comprehensive statewide
evaluation and assisting grant recipients to modify or discontinue
interventions found to be ineffective.
Subd. 5. Evaluation. Using
the outcome measures established in subdivision 3, the commissioner shall
conduct a biennial evaluation of the statewide health improvement program
funded under this section. Grant
recipients shall cooperate with the commissioner in the evaluation and provide
the commissioner with the information necessary to conduct the evaluation.
Subd. 6. Report. The
commissioner shall submit a biennial report to the legislature on the statewide
health improvement program funded under this section. These reports must include information on grant recipients,
activities that were conducted using grant funds, evaluation data, and outcome
measures, if available. In addition,
the commissioner shall provide recommendations on future areas of focus for
health improvement. These reports are
due by January 15 of every other year, beginning in 2010. In the report due on January 15, 2010, the
commissioner shall include recommendations on a sustainable funding source for
the statewide health improvement program other than the health care access
fund.
Subd. 7. Supplantation of existing funds. Community health boards and tribal governments must use funds received
under this section to develop new programs, expand current programs that work
to reduce the percentage of Minnesotans who are obese or overweight, or who use
tobacco, or replace discontinued state or federal funds previously used to
reduce the percentage of Minnesotans who are obese or overweight, or who use
tobacco. Funds must not be used to
supplant current state or local funding to community health boards or tribal
governments used to reduce the percentage of Minnesotans who are obese or
overweight or to reduce tobacco use.
ARTICLE 2
HEALTH CARE HOMES
Section 1. [256B.0751] HEALTH CARE HOMES.
Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a)
For purposes of sections 256B.0751 to 256B.0753, the following definitions
apply.
(b) "Commissioner" means the commissioner of human services.
(c) "Commissioners" means the commissioner of humans services
and the commissioner of health, acting jointly.
(d) "Health plan company" has the meaning provided in section
62Q.01, subdivision 4.
(e) "Personal clinician" means a physician licensed under
chapter 147, a physician assistant registered and practicing under chapter
147A, an advanced practice nurse licensed and registered to practice under
chapter 148, and other health care providers as determined by the commissioner
of health.
(f) "State health care program" means the medical assistance,
MinnesotaCare, and general assistance medical care programs.
Subd. 2. Development and implementation of standards. (a) By July 1, 2009, the commissioners of
health and human services shall develop and implement standards of
certification for health care homes for state health care programs. In developing these standards, the
commissioners shall consider existing standards developed by national
independent accrediting and medical home organizations. The standards developed by the commissioners
must meet the following criteria:
(1) emphasize, enhance, and encourage the use of primary care, and
include the use of primary care physicians, advanced practice nurses, and
physician assistants as personal clinicians, as well as appropriate specialists
if they provide care according to these standards;
(2) focus on delivering high-quality, efficient, and effective health
care services, enhancing the experience of patients and their families, and
appropriately engaging patients and their families in the decision-making
process;
(3) encourage patient-centered care, including active participation by
the patient and family or a legal guardian, or a health care agent as defined
in chapter 145C, as appropriate in decision making, care plan development, and
include patient representation on practice level quality improvement teams;
(4) provide patients with a consistent, ongoing contact with a personal
clinician to ensure continuous and appropriate care for the patient's
condition;
(5) ensure that health care homes develop and maintain appropriate
comprehensive care plans for their patients with complex or chronic conditions,
including the provision of an initial health assessment in order to identify
all of the patient's complex or chronic health conditions;
(6) enable and encourage utilization of a range of qualified health
care professionals to provide care, including dedicated care coordinators, in a
manner that enables providers to practice to the fullest extent of their
license;
(7) focus initially on patients who have or are at risk of developing
chronic health conditions;
(8) provide care that is appropriate to the patient's race, ethnicity,
and language;
(9) incorporate measures of quality and cost of care;
(10) ensure the use of health information technology and systematic
follow-up through the use of patient registries; and
(11) encourage the use of evidence-based health care, patient
decision-making aids that provide patients with information about treatment
options and their associated benefits, risks, costs, and comparative outcomes,
and other clinical decision support tools.
(b) In developing these standards, the commissioners shall consult with
national and local organizations working on health care home models, health
care providers, relevant state agencies, health plans, and hospitals. The commissioners may satisfy this
requirement by continuing the provider directed care coordination advisory
committee.
(c) For the purposes of developing and implementing these standards,
the commissioners are exempt from the provisions of chapter 14, including the
specific provisions in section 14.386.
Subd. 3. Requirements for clinicians certified as health care homes. (a) A personal clinician or a primary
care clinic may be certified as a health care home. If a primary care clinic is certified, all of the primary care
clinics' clinicians must meet the criteria of a health care home. In order to be certified as a health care
home, a clinician or clinic must meet the standards set by the commissioners in
accordance with this section.
Certification as a health care home is voluntary. In order to maintain their status as health
care homes, clinicians or clinics must renew their certification annually.
(b) Clinicians or clinics certified as health care homes must offer
their health care home services to all their patients with complex or chronic
health conditions who are interested in participation.
(c) Health care homes must participate in the health care home learning
collaborative established under subdivision 5.
Subd. 4. Alternative models. Nothing
in this section shall preclude the continued development of existing medical or
health care home projects currently operating or under development by the
commissioner of human services or preclude the commissioner from establishing
alternative models and payment mechanisms for persons
who are enrolled in integrated Medicare and Medicaid programs under
section 256B.69, subdivisions 23 and 28, are enrolled in managed care long-term
care programs under section 256B.69, subdivision 6, paragraph (b), are dually
eligible for Medicare and medical assistance, are in the waiting period for
Medicare, or who have other primary coverage.
Subd. 5. Health care home collaborative. By July 1, 2009, the commissioners shall establish a health
care home collaborative to provide an opportunity for health care homes and
state agencies to exchange information related to quality improvement and best
practices.
Subd. 6. Evaluation and continued development. (a) For continued certification under
this section, health care homes must meet process, outcome, and quality
standards as developed and specified by the commissioners. The commissioners shall collect data from
health care homes necessary for monitoring compliance with certification
standards and for evaluating the impact of health care homes on health care
quality, cost, and outcomes.
(b) The commissioners may contract with a private entity to perform an
evaluation of the effectiveness of health care homes. Data collected under this subdivision is classified as nonpublic
data under chapter 13.
Subd. 7. Outreach. Upon
implementation of the certification process and standards under subdivision 1,
the commissioner shall encourage state health care program enrollees who have a
complex or chronic condition to select a primary care clinic with clinicians
who have been certified as health care homes.
Sec. 2. [256B.0752] CARE COORDINATION FEE.
Subdivision 1. Development. The
commissioner of human services shall develop a payment system that provides
per-person care coordination payments to health care providers for providing
care coordination services and directly managing onsite or employing care coordinators. In order to be eligible for a care
coordination payment, a health care provider must be certified as a health care
home by the commissioners of human services and health based on the
certification standards for health care homes established under section
256B.0751. The care coordination
payment system must vary the fees paid by thresholds of care complexity, with
the highest fees being paid for care provided to individuals requiring the most
intensive care coordination and those who face racial, ethnic, or language
barriers. The commissioner may
determine a schedule for phasing-in care coordination fees such that the fees
will be applied first to individuals who have, or are at risk of developing,
complex or chronic health conditions and coordinate with the implementation of
the provider-directed care coordination payments under section 256B.0625,
subdivision 51. Development of the
payment system must be completed by January 1, 2010.
Subd. 2. Payment of care coordination fee. By July 1, 2010, the commissioner of human services shall pay
each certified health care home a per-person care coordination fee for
providing care coordination services for each state health care program
enrollee served under the fee-for-service system. The care coordination fee must be determined by the commissioner
in contracts with certified health care homes.
Payment of the care coordination fee is contingent on the health care
home meeting the certification standards for health care homes described in
section 256B.0751. The care
coordination fee is in addition to reimbursement received by a health care home
under the medical assistance fee-for-service payment system for health care
services.
Subd. 3. Managed care and county-based purchasing. By July 1, 2010, the commissioner of
human services shall require managed care and county-based purchasing plans
serving state health care program enrollees under sections 256B.69 and
256B.692, and chapters 256D and 256L to implement a care coordination payment
system for state health care program enrollees who are provided care
coordination services in health care homes certified under section
256B.0751. The payment system shall be
designed in accordance with section 62U.05.
Subd. 4. Cost neutrality. If
initial savings from implementation of health care homes are not sufficient to
allow implementation of the care coordination fee in a cost-neutral manner, the
commissioner may make recommendations to the legislature on reallocating costs
within the health care system.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2010, or upon federal
approval, whichever is later.
Sec. 3. [256B.0753] HEALTH CARE HOME REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.
Subdivision 1. Standards and criteria review. Prior to implementation, the commissioners shall report the
certification standards and evaluation criteria established in sections
256B.0751 and 256B.0752 to the Legislative Commission on Health Care
Access. These standards are not subject
to chapter 14, and the specific provisions in section 14.386 do not apply.
Subd. 2. Annual reports on implementation and administration. The commissioners shall report annually
to the legislature on the implementation and administration of the health care
home model for state health care program enrollees in the fee-for-service,
managed care, and county-based purchasing sectors, beginning January 15, 2011,
and each January 15 thereafter. The
annual report must include the cost benefit analysis of the implementation of the
health care home model for the state public health care programs.
Subd. 3. Evaluation reports. The
commissioners shall provide to the legislature comprehensive evaluations of the
health care home model three years and five years after implementation. The report must include:
(1) the number of state health care program enrollees in health care
homes, the number and characteristics of enrollees with complex or chronic
conditions, identified by income, race, ethnicity, and language;
(2) the number and geographic distribution of health care home
providers;
(3) the performance and quality of care of health care homes;
(4) measures of preventive care;
(5) health care home payment arrangements, and costs related to
implementation and payment of care coordination fees; and
(6) the estimated impact of health care homes on health disparities.
Sec. 4. [256B.766] PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIAN REIMBURSEMENT RATE INCREASE.
(a) Effective for physician services rendered on or after January 1,
2009, the commissioner shall increase reimbursements to primary care physicians
deemed by the commissioner to meet the requirements in paragraph (b). Reimbursement may be increased by not more
than 50 percent above the reimbursement rate that would otherwise be paid to
the primary care provider. Payments to
health plan companies shall be adjusted to reflect increased reimbursement to
primary care physicians as approved by the commissioner.
(b) The commissioner, in collaboration with the Office of Rural Health,
shall determine areas of the state in need of primary care physicians. By September 1 of each year, beginning
September 1, 2008, the commissioner shall accept applications from primary care
physicians who agree to practice in a designated underserved area for a period
of no less than five years. The commissioner
shall determine participant eligibility based on their suitability for practice
serving a designated geographic area.
(c) The commissioner may reconsider the designated areas, as
necessary. A primary care physician who
agrees to practice in an area designated as underserved shall receive the
increased reimbursement rates for at least a period of five years, unless the
physician discontinues practicing in the designated area during the five-year
period.
(d) A health care clinic or medical group may submit applications under
this section for primary care physicians who will be hired to fill vacancies,
prior to filling the vacant position.
Sec. 5. WORKFORCE SHORTAGE STUDY.
To address health care workforce shortages, the commissioner of health,
in consultation with the health licensing boards and professional associations,
shall study changes necessary in health professional licensure and regulation
to ensure full utilization of advanced practice registered nurses, physician
assistants, and other licensed health care professionals in the health care
home and primary delivery system. The
commissioner shall make recommendations to the legislature by January 15, 2009.
ARTICLE 3
INCREASING ACCESS; CONTINUITY OF CARE
Section 1. [124D.1115] FREE AND REDUCED SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM DATA SHARING.
(a) Each school participating in the federal school lunch program shall
electronically send to the Department of Education the eligibility information
on each child who is eligible for the free and reduced lunch program, unless
the child's parent or legal guardian after being notified of the potential
disclosure of this information for the limited purpose stated in paragraph (b),
elects not to have the information disclosed.
(b) Pursuant to United States Code, title 42, section 1758(b)(6)(A),
the Department of Education shall enter into an agreement with the Department
of Human Services to share the eligibility information provided by each school
in paragraph (a) for the limited purpose of identifying children who may be
eligible for medical assistance or MinnesotaCare. The Department of Human Services must ensure that this
information remains confidential and shall only be used for this purpose. Any unauthorized disclosure shall be subject
to a penalty.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 256.01, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 27. Automation and coordination for state health care programs. (a) For purposes of this subdivision,
"state health care program" means the medical assistance,
MinnesotaCare, or general assistance medical care programs.
(b) By July 1, 2009, the commissioner shall improve coordination
between state health care programs and social service programs including, but
not limited to WIC, free and reduced school lunch programs, and food stamps,
and shall develop and use automated systems to identify persons served by
social service programs who may be eligible for, but are not enrolled in, a
state health care program. By January
15, 2009, the commissioner shall, as necessary, identify and recommend to the
legislature statutory changes to state health care and social service programs
necessary to improve coordination and automation of outreach and enrollment
efforts.
(c) By January 15, 2009, the commissioner shall establish and implement
an automated process to send out state health care program renewal forms in the
most common foreign languages, to those state health care program enrollees who
request renewal forms in those foreign languages. The commissioner, as part of the initial enrollment process,
shall inform applicants of the availability of this option.
(d) Beginning July 1, 2008, the commissioner, county social service
agencies, and health care providers shall update state health care program
enrollee addresses and related contact information, at the time of each
enrollee contact.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2008.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2007
Supplement, section 256.962, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Incentive program.
Beginning January 1, 2008, the commissioner shall establish an incentive
program for organizations that directly identify and assist potential enrollees
in filling out and submitting an application.
For each applicant who is successfully enrolled in MinnesotaCare,
medical assistance, or general assistance medical care, the commissioner,
within the available appropriation, shall pay the organization a $20 $25
application assistance bonus. The
organization may provide an applicant a gift certificate or other incentive
upon enrollment.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2007
Supplement, section 256.962, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. School districts. (a) At
the beginning of each school year, a school district shall provide information
to each student on the availability of health care coverage through the
Minnesota health care programs.
(b) For each child who is determined to be eligible for a the
free or and reduced priced school lunch
program, the district shall provide the child's family with an
application for the Minnesota health care programs and information on how
to obtain an application for the Minnesota health care programs and application
assistance.
(c) A district shall also ensure that applications and information on
application assistance are available at early childhood education sites and
public schools located within the district's jurisdiction.
(d) Each district shall designate an enrollment specialist to provide
application assistance and follow-up services with families who are eligible
for the reduced or free lunch program or who have indicated an interest in
receiving information or an application for the Minnesota health care
program. A district is eligible for
the application assistance bonus described in subdivision 5.
(e) Each school district shall provide on their Web site a link to
information on how to obtain an application and application assistance.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 256B.057, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Children under age two.
Medical assistance may be paid for a child under two years of age whose
countable family income is above 275 percent of the federal poverty guidelines
for the same size family but less than or equal to 280 305
percent of the federal poverty guidelines for the same size family.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2010, or upon federal
approval, whichever is later.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2007
Supplement, section 256L.04, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Families with children. (a) Families with children with family
income equal to or less than 275 300 percent of the federal
poverty guidelines for the applicable family size shall be eligible for
MinnesotaCare according to this section.
All other provisions of sections 256L.01 to 256L.18, including the
insurance-related barriers to enrollment under section 256L.07, shall apply
unless otherwise specified.
(b) Parents who enroll in the MinnesotaCare program must also enroll
their children, if the children are eligible.
Children may be enrolled separately without enrollment by parents. However, if one parent in the household
enrolls, both parents must enroll, unless other insurance is available. If one child from a family is enrolled, all
children must be enrolled, unless other insurance is available. If one spouse in a household enrolls, the
other spouse in the household must also enroll, unless other insurance is
available. Families cannot choose to
enroll only certain uninsured members.
(c) Beginning October 1, 2003, the dependent sibling definition no
longer applies to the MinnesotaCare program.
These persons are no longer counted in the parental household and may
apply as a separate household.
(d) Beginning July 1, 2003, or upon federal approval, whichever is
later, parents are not eligible for MinnesotaCare if their gross income exceeds
$50,000.
(e)
Children formerly enrolled in medical assistance and automatically deemed
eligible for MinnesotaCare according to section 256B.057, subdivision 2c, are
exempt from the requirements of this section until renewal.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2010, or upon federal
approval, whichever is later. The
commissioner of human services shall notify the revisor of statutes when
federal approval is obtained.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2007
Supplement, section 256L.04, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Single adults and households with no children. (a) The definition of eligible
persons includes all individuals and households with no children who have gross
family incomes that are equal to or less than 200 percent of the federal
poverty guidelines.
(b) Effective
July 1, 2009, the definition of eligible persons includes all individuals and
households with no children who have gross family incomes that are equal to or
less than 215 percent of the federal poverty guidelines.
(c) Effective July 1, 2010, the definition of eligible persons includes
all individuals and households with no children who have gross family incomes
that are equal to or less than 300 percent of the federal poverty guidelines.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2007
Supplement, section 256L.05, subdivision 3a, is amended to read:
Subd. 3a. Renewal of eligibility. (a)
Beginning July 1, 2007, an enrollee's eligibility must be renewed every 12
months. The 12-month period begins in
the month after the month the application is approved.
(b) Each new period of eligibility must take into account any changes
in circumstances that impact eligibility and premium amount. An enrollee must provide all the information
needed to redetermine eligibility by the first day of the month that ends the
eligibility period. If there is no
change in circumstances, the enrollee may renew eligibility at designated
locations that include community clinics and health care providers'
offices. The designated sites shall
forward the renewal forms to the commissioner.
The premium for the new period of eligibility must be received as
provided in section 256L.06 in order for eligibility to continue.
(c) For single adults and households with no children formerly enrolled
in general assistance medical care and enrolled in MinnesotaCare according to
section 256D.03, subdivision 3, the first period of eligibility begins the
month the enrollee submitted the application or renewal for general assistance
medical care.
(d) An enrollee who fails to submit renewal forms and related
documentation necessary for verification of continued eligibility in a timely
manner shall remain eligible for one additional month beyond the end of the
current eligibility period, before being disenrolled. The enrollee remains responsible for MinnesotaCare premiums for
the additional month.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1, 2009, or upon federal
approval, whichever is later. The
commissioner of human services shall notify the revisor of statutes when
federal approval is obtained.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 256L.05, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 6. Delayed verification.
On the basis of information provided on the completed application, an
applicant whose gross income is less than 90 percent of the applicable income
standard and meets all other eligibility requirements, including compliance at
the time of application with citizenship or nationality documentation
requirements under section 256L.04, subdivision 10, must be determined eligible
and enrolled upon payment of premiums according to subdivision 3. The applicant shall provide all required
verifications within 60 days' notice of the eligibility determination, or
eligibility shall be denied or canceled.
Applicants who are denied or canceled for failure to provide all
required verifications are not eligible for coverage using the delayed
verification procedures specified in this subdivision for 12 months.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1, 2009, or upon federal
approval, whichever is later. The
commissioner of human services shall notify the revisor of statutes when
federal approval is obtained.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 256L.06, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Commissioner's duties and payment.
(a) Premiums are dedicated to the commissioner for MinnesotaCare.
(b) The commissioner shall develop and implement procedures to: (1) require enrollees to report changes in
income; (2) adjust sliding scale premium payments, based upon both increases
and decreases in enrollee income, at the time the change in income is reported;
and (3) disenroll enrollees from MinnesotaCare for failure to pay required
premiums. Failure to pay includes
payment with a dishonored check, a returned automatic bank withdrawal, or a
refused credit card or debit card payment.
The commissioner may demand a guaranteed form of payment, including a
cashier's check or a money order, as the only means to replace a dishonored,
returned, or refused payment.
(c) Premiums are calculated on a calendar month basis and may be paid
on a monthly, quarterly, or semiannual basis, with the first payment due upon
notice from the commissioner of the premium amount required. The commissioner shall inform applicants and
enrollees of these premium payment options.
Premium payment is required before enrollment is complete and to
maintain eligibility in MinnesotaCare.
Premium payments received before noon are credited the same day. Premium payments received after noon are
credited on the next working day.
(d) Nonpayment of the premium will result in disenrollment from the
plan effective for the first day of the calendar month following the
calendar month for which the premium was due.
Persons disenrolled for nonpayment or who voluntarily terminate coverage
from the program may not reenroll until four calendar months have elapsed. Persons disenrolled for nonpayment who
pay all past due premiums as well as current premiums due, including premiums
due for the period of disenrollment, within 20 days of disenrollment, shall be
reenrolled retroactively to the first day of disenrollment The
commissioner shall waive premiums for coverage provided under this paragraph to
persons disenrolled for nonpayment who reapply under section 256L.05,
subdivision 3b. Persons disenrolled
for nonpayment or who voluntarily terminate coverage from the program may not
reenroll for four calendar months unless the person demonstrates good cause for
nonpayment. Good cause does not exist
if a person chooses to pay other family expenses instead of the premium. The commissioner shall define good cause in
rule.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1, 2009, or upon federal
approval, whichever is later. The
commissioner of human services shall notify the revisor of statutes when
federal approval is obtained.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes
2007 Supplement, section 256L.07, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. General requirements. (a) Children enrolled in the original
children's health plan as of September 30, 1992, children who enrolled in the
MinnesotaCare program after September 30, 1992, pursuant to Laws 1992, chapter
549, article 4, section 17, and children who have family gross incomes that are
equal to or less than 150 percent of the federal poverty guidelines are
eligible without meeting the requirements of subdivision 2 and the
four-month requirement in subdivision 3, as long as they maintain
continuous coverage in the MinnesotaCare program or medical assistance. Children who apply for MinnesotaCare on or
after the implementation date of the employer-subsidized health coverage program
as described in Laws 1998, chapter 407, article 5, section 45, who have family
gross incomes that are equal to or less than 150 percent of the federal poverty
guidelines, must meet the requirements of subdivision 2 to be eligible for
MinnesotaCare.
Families enrolled in MinnesotaCare under section 256L.04, subdivision
1, whose income increases above 275 300 percent of the federal
poverty guidelines, are no longer eligible for the program and shall be
disenrolled by the commissioner.
Beginning January 1, 2008, individuals enrolled in MinnesotaCare under
section 256L.04, subdivision 7, whose income increases above 200 percent of the
federal poverty guidelines or 215 percent of the federal poverty guidelines on
or after July 1, 2009, or 300 percent of federal poverty guidelines on or
after July 1, 2010, are no longer eligible for the program and shall be
disenrolled by the commissioner. For
persons disenrolled under this subdivision, MinnesotaCare coverage terminates
the last day of the calendar month following the month in which the
commissioner determines that the income of a family or individual exceeds
program income limits.
(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), children may remain enrolled in
MinnesotaCare if ten percent of their gross individual or gross family income
as defined in section 256L.01, subdivision 4, is less than the annual premium
for a policy with a $500 deductible available through the Minnesota
Comprehensive Health Association.
Children who are no longer eligible for MinnesotaCare under this clause
shall be given a 12-month notice period from the date that ineligibility is
determined before disenrollment. The
premium for children remaining eligible under this clause shall be the maximum
premium determined under section 256L.15, subdivision 2, paragraph (b).
(c) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) and (b), parents are not eligible
for MinnesotaCare if gross household income exceeds $50,000 for the 12-month
period of eligibility.
EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date for the amendment to paragraph (a) related
to the four-month requirement is effective January 1, 2009, or upon federal
approval, whichever is later. The
effective date for the amendment of paragraph (a) related to the expansion in
eligibility to 300 percent of federal poverty guidelines, and the amendment to
paragraph (c), are effective July 1, 2010.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 256L.07, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Other health coverage. (a)
Families and individuals enrolled in the MinnesotaCare program must have no
health coverage while enrolled or for at least four months prior to
application and renewal. Children
enrolled in the original children's health plan and children in families with
income equal to or less than 150 percent of the federal poverty guidelines, who
have other health insurance, are eligible if the coverage:
(1) lacks two or more of the following:
(i) basic hospital insurance;
(ii) medical-surgical insurance;
(iii) prescription drug coverage;
(iv) dental coverage; or
(v) vision coverage;
(2) requires a deductible of $100 or more per person per year; or
(3) lacks coverage because the child has exceeded the maximum coverage
for a particular diagnosis or the policy excludes a particular diagnosis.
The commissioner may change this eligibility criterion for sliding scale
premiums in order to remain within the limits of available appropriations. The requirement of no health coverage does
not apply to newborns.
(b) Medical assistance, general assistance medical care, and the
Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Service, CHAMPUS, or other
coverage provided under United States Code, title 10, subtitle A, part II,
chapter 55, are not considered insurance or health coverage for purposes of the
four-month requirement described in this subdivision.
(c)
For purposes of this subdivision, an applicant or enrollee who is entitled to
Medicare Part A or enrolled in Medicare Part B coverage under title XVIII of
the Social Security Act, United States Code, title 42, sections 1395c to
1395w-152, is considered to have health coverage. An applicant or enrollee who is entitled to premium-free Medicare
Part A may not refuse to apply for or enroll in Medicare coverage to establish
eligibility for MinnesotaCare.
(d)
(c)
Applicants who were recipients of medical assistance or general assistance
medical care within one month of application must meet the provisions of this
subdivision and subdivision 2.
(e) Cost-effective health insurance that was paid for by medical
assistance is not considered health coverage for purposes of the four-month
requirement under this section, except if the insurance continued after medical
assistance no longer considered it cost-effective or after medical assistance
closed.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1, 2009, or upon federal
approval, whichever is later. The
commissioner of human services shall notify the revisor of statutes when
federal approval is obtained.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes
2007 Supplement, section 256L.15, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Sliding fee scale; monthly gross individual or family income. (a) The commissioner shall establish a
sliding fee scale to determine the percentage of monthly gross individual or
family income that households at different income levels must pay to obtain
coverage through the MinnesotaCare program.
The sliding fee scale must be based on the enrollee's monthly gross
individual or family income. The
sliding fee scale must contain separate tables based on enrollment of one, two,
or three or more persons. Until June
30, 2009, the sliding fee scale begins with a premium of 1.5 percent of
monthly gross individual or family income for individuals or families with
incomes below the limits for the medical assistance program for families and
children in effect on January 1, 1999, and proceeds through the following
evenly spaced steps: 1.8, 2.3, 3.1,
3.8, 4.8, 5.9, 7.4, and 8.8 percent.
These percentages are matched to evenly spaced income steps ranging from
the medical assistance income limit for families and children in effect on
January 1, 1999, to 275 percent of the federal poverty guidelines for the
applicable family size, up to a family size of five. The sliding fee scale for a family of five must be used for
families of more than five. The sliding
fee scale and percentages are not subject to the provisions of chapter 14. If a family or individual reports increased
income after enrollment, premiums shall be adjusted at the time the change in
income is reported.
(b) Families Children in families whose gross income is
above 275 300 percent of the federal poverty guidelines shall pay
the maximum premium. The maximum
premium is defined as a base charge for one, two, or three or more enrollees so
that if all MinnesotaCare cases paid the maximum premium, the total revenue
would equal the total cost of MinnesotaCare medical coverage and
administration. In this calculation,
administrative costs shall be assumed to equal ten percent of the total. The costs of medical coverage for pregnant
women and children under age two and the enrollees in these groups shall be
excluded from the total. The maximum
premium for two enrollees shall be twice the maximum premium for one, and the
maximum premium for three or more enrollees shall be three times the maximum
premium for one.
(c) Beginning July 1, 2009, MinnesotaCare enrollees shall pay premiums
according to the affordability scale established in section 62U.08 with the
exception that children in families with income at or below 150 percent of the
federal poverty guidelines shall pay a monthly premium of $4. For purposes of this paragraph, and the
affordability standard under section 62U.09, "minimum" means a
monthly premium of $4.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1, 2009, or upon federal
approval, whichever is later, except that the amendment to paragraph (b)
related to the expansion in eligibility to 300 percent of federal poverty
guidelines is effective July 1, 2010, or upon federal approval, whichever is
later. The commissioner of human
services shall notify the revisor of statutes when federal approval is
obtained.
Sec. 14. Laws 2007, chapter
147, article 5, section 19, the effective date, is amended to read:
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2007, or upon federal
approval, whichever is later 2008.
Sec. 15. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 256L.15, subdivision 3, is repealed.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1, 2009, or upon federal
approval of the amendments to Minnesota Statutes, section 256L.15, subdivision
2, paragraph (c), whichever is later.
The commissioner of human services shall notify the revisor of statutes
when federal approval is obtained.
ARTICLE 4
HEALTH INSURANCE PURCHASING AND AFFORDABILITY REFORM
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes
2007 Supplement, section 62J.495, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 3. Interoperable electronic health record requirements. To meet the requirements of subdivision
1, hospitals and health care providers must meet the following criteria when
implementing an interoperable electronic health records system within their
hospital system or clinical practice setting.
(a) The electronic health record must be certified by the Certification
Commission for Healthcare Information Technology, or its successor. This criterion only applies to hospitals and
health care providers whose practice setting is a practice setting covered by
Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology certifications. This criterion shall be considered met if a
hospital or health care provider is using an electronic health records system
that has been certified within the last three years, even if a more current
version of the system has been certified within the three-year period.
(b) A health care provider who is a prescriber or dispenser of
controlled substances must have an electronic health record system that meets
the requirements of section 62J.497.
Sec. 2. [62J.497] ELECTRONIC PRESCRIPTION DRUG PROGRAM.
Subdivision 1. Definitions. For
the purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings given.
(a) "Dispense" or "dispensing" has the meaning
given in section 151.01, subdivision 30.
Dispensing does not include the direct administering of a controlled
substance to a patient by a licensed health care professional.
(b) "Dispenser" means a person authorized by law to dispense
a controlled substance, pursuant to a valid prescription.
(c) "Electronic media" has the same meaning given this term
under Code of Federal Regulations, title 45, part 160.103.
(d) "E-prescribing" means the transmission using electronic
media, of prescription or prescription-related information between a
prescriber, dispenser, pharmacy benefit manager, or group purchaser, either
directly or through an intermediary, including an e-prescribing network. E-prescribing includes, but is not limited
to, two-way transmissions between the point of care and the dispenser.
(e) "Electronic prescription drug program" means a program
that provides for e-prescribing.
(f) "Group purchaser" has the meaning given in section
62J.03, subdivision 6.
(g) "HL7 messages" means a standard approved by the standards
development organization known as Health Level Seven.
(h) "National Provider Identifier" or "NPI" means
the identifier described under Code of Federal Regulations, title 45, part
162.406.
(i) "NCPDP" means the National Council for Prescription Drug
Programs, Inc.
(j) "NCPDP Formulary and Benefits Standard" means the
National Council for Prescription Drug Programs Formulary and Benefits
Standard, Implementation Guide, Version 1, Release 0, October 2005.
(k) "NCPDP SCRIPT Standard" means the National Council for
Prescription Drug Programs Prescriber/Pharmacist Interface SCRIPT Standard,
Implementation Guide Version 8, Release 1 (Version 8.1), October 2005.
(l) "Pharmacy" has the meaning given in section 151.01,
subdivision 2.
(m) "Prescriber" means a licensed health care professional
who is authorized to prescribe a controlled substance under section 152.12,
subdivision 1.
(n) "Prescription-related information" means information
regarding eligibility for drug benefits, medication history, or related health
or drug information.
(o) "Provider" or "health care provider" has the
meaning given in section 62J.03, subdivision 8.
Subd. 2. Requirements for electronic prescribing. (a) Effective January 1, 2011, all
providers, group purchasers, prescribers, and dispensers must establish and
maintain an electronic prescription drug program that complies with the
applicable standards in this section for transmitting, directly or through an
intermediary, prescriptions and prescription-related information using
electronic media.
(b) Nothing in this section requires providers, group purchasers,
prescribers, or dispensers to conduct the transactions described in this
section. If transactions described in
this section are conducted, they must be done electronically using the
standards described in this section.
Nothing in this section requires providers, group purchasers,
prescribers, or dispensers to electronically conduct transactions that are
expressly prohibited by other sections or federal law.
(c) Providers, group purchasers, prescribers, and dispensers must use
either HL7 messages or the NCPDP SCRIPT Standard to transmit prescriptions or
prescription-related information internally when the sender and the recipient
are part of the same legal entity. If
an entity sends prescriptions outside the entity, it must use the NCPDP SCRIPT
Standard or other applicable standards required by this section. Any pharmacy within an entity must be able to
receive electronic prescription transmittals from outside the entity using the
adopted NCPDP SCRIPT Standard. This
exemption does not supersede any Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA) requirement that may require the use of a HIPAA
transaction standard within an organization.
(d) Entities transmitting prescriptions or prescription-related
information where the prescriber is required by law to issue a prescription for
a patient to a nonprescribing provider that in turn forwards the prescription
to a dispenser are exempt from the requirement to use the NCPDP SCRIPT Standard
when transmitting prescriptions or prescription-related information.
Subd. 3. Standards for electronic prescribing. (a) Prescribers and dispensers must use
the NCPDP SCRIPT Standard for the communication of a prescription or
prescription-related information. The
NCPDP SCRIPT Standard shall be used to conduct the following transactions:
(1) get message transaction;
(2) status response transaction;
(3) error response transaction;
(4) new prescription transaction;
(5) prescription change request transaction;
(6) prescription change response transaction;
(7) refill prescription request transaction;
(8) refill prescription response transaction;
(9) verification transaction;
(10) password change transaction;
(11) cancel prescription request transaction; and
(12) cancel prescription response transaction.
(b) Providers, group purchasers, prescribers, and dispensers must use
the NCPDP SCRIPT Standard for communicating and transmitting medication history
information.
(c) Providers, group purchasers, prescribers, and dispensers must use
the NCPDP Formulary and Benefits Standard for communicating and transmitting
formulary and benefit information.
(d) Providers, group purchasers, prescribers, and dispensers must use
the national provider identifier to identify a health care provider in
e-prescribing or prescription related transactions when a health care
provider's identifier is required.
(e) Providers, group purchasers, prescribers, and dispensers must
communicate eligibility information and conduct health care eligibility benefit
inquiry and response transactions according to the requirements of section
62J.536.
Sec. 3. [62U.01] DEFINITIONS.
Subdivision 1. Applicability. For
purposes of this chapter, the terms defined in this section have the meanings
given, unless otherwise specified.
Subd. 2. Basket or baskets of care.
"Basket" or "baskets of care" means a collection
of health care services that are paid separately under a fee-for-service
system, but which are ordinarily combined by a provider in delivering a full
diagnostic or treatment procedure to a patient.
Subd. 3. Clinically effective.
"Clinically effective" means that the use of a particular
health technology or service improves or prevents a decline in patient clinical
status, as measured by medical condition, survival rates, and other variables,
and that the use of the particular technology or service demonstrates a
clinical or outcome advantage over alternative technologies or services. This definition shall not be used to exclude
or deny technology or treatment necessary to preserve life on the basis of an
individual's age or expected length of life or of the individual's present or
predicted disability, degree of medical dependency, or quality of life.
Subd. 4. Cost-effective. "Cost-effective"
means that the economic costs of using a particular service, device, or health
technology to achieve improvement or prevent a decline in a patient's health
outcome are justified given the comparison to both the economic costs and the
improvement or prevention of decline in patient health outcome resulting from
the use of an alternative service, device, or technology, or from not providing
the service, device, or technology.
Subd. 5. Group purchaser. "Group
purchaser" has the meaning provided in section 62J.03.
Subd. 6. Health plan. "Health
plan" means a health plan as defined in section 62A.011.
Subd. 7. Health plan company.
"Health plan company" has the meaning provided in section
62Q.01, subdivision 4.
Subd. 8. Participating provider.
"Participating provider" means a provider who has entered
into a service agreement with a health plan company.
Subd. 9. Provider or health care provider. "Provider" or "health care provider" means
a health care provider as defined in section 62J.03, subdivision 8.
Subd. 10. Service agreement. "Service
agreement" means an agreement, contract, or other arrangement between a
health plan company and a provider under which the provider agrees that when
health services are provided for an enrollee, the provider shall not make a
direct charge against the enrollee for those services or parts of services that
are covered by the enrollee's contract, but shall look to the service plan
corporation for the payment for covered services, to the extent they are
covered.
Subd. 11. State health care program.
"State health care program" means the medical assistance,
MinnesotaCare, and general assistance medical care programs.
Subd. 12. Third-party administrator.
"Third-party administrator" means a vendor of
risk-management services or an entity administering a self-insurance or health
insurance plan under section 60A.23.
Sec. 4. [62U.02] VALUE-BASED BENEFIT SET AND DESIGN.
Subdivision 1. Creation. By
October 15, 2009, the commissioner of health shall make recommendations to the
legislature on the components and design of a value-based set of health
benefits. The commissioner shall
convene an advisory committee to assist in preparing recommendations. Prior to recommending the value-based
benefit set and design, the commissioner and advisory committee shall convene
public hearings throughout the state.
Subd. 2. Operations of advisory committee. The advisory committee shall consist of no more than 11
members. The members shall be appointed
by the commissioner and must have expertise in benefit design and development
in terms of outcomes, actuarial health care analysis, or knowledge relating to
the analysis of the cost impact of coverage
of specified benefits. The commissioner
shall convene the first meeting on or before September 1, 2008, upon the
appointment of the initial committee and must meet at least once a year, and at
other times as necessary. The
commissioner shall provide office space, equipment and supplies, and technical
support to the advisory committee. In
establishing the benefit set, the committee shall consult with organizations
with expertise in formulating scientifically based practice standards. The advisory committee shall be governed by
section 15.059, except the committee shall not expire.
Subd. 3. Immunity of liability.
No member of the advisory committee shall be held civilly liable for
an act or omission by that member if the act or omission was in good faith and
within the scope of the member's responsibilities under this chapter.
Subd. 4. Benefit set design. (a)
The value-based set of health benefits must provide individuals and families
with access to a broad range of health care services, including preventive
health care, without incurring severe financial loss as a result of serious
illness or injury. The benefit set must
include health care services, procedures, and diagnostic tests that are
scientifically proven to be both clinically effective and cost effective. The benefit set may require differentiated
co-pays and deductibles based upon the clinical effectiveness and cost
effectiveness of a particular health care service. The advisory committee must consider including cost effective and
clinically effective dental care, mental health services, chemical dependency
treatment, vision care, language interpreter services, emergency
transportation, and prescription drugs.
The committee shall consider cultural, ethnic, and religious values and
beliefs to ensure that the health care needs of all Minnesota residents are
addressed in the benefit set.
(b) The benefit set must identify and include the following services
with minimal or no cost-sharing requirements, if the committee determines that
the savings and health quality improvements associated with broad access are
equal to or greater than the cost of providing the services: preventive services, chronic care
coordination, early diagnostic tests, and outpatient care for asthma, heart
disease, diabetes, and depression.
(c) The benefit set shall, to the extent possible, be designed to be
affordable to Minnesotans consistent with the affordability standard
established in section 62U.09.
(d) The benefit design must establish a limited number of maximum
cost-sharing variations based upon deductibles and maximum out-of-pocket
costs. There must be no maximum
lifetime benefit.
(e) The commissioners of human services and finance shall, to the
extent possible, consider incorporating the benefit design into the state
public health care programs and the state employee group insurance program.
(f) The commissioners of health and commerce shall report to the
legislature on necessary changes needed to current mandated benefit sets to
incorporate the benefit design developed under this section.
Subd. 5. Continued review. The
commissioner and the committee shall review the benefit set and design on an
ongoing periodic basis and shall adjust the benefit set and design as
necessary, to ensure that the benefit set and design continues to be safe,
effective, and scientifically based.
Sec. 5. [62U.03] HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT REVIEW.
The commissioner of health, in consultation with the Health Advisory
Council, the Institute for Clinical Systems, and practicing health care
providers who either use health technology in their scope of practice or have
an expertise in health technology, shall review the health technology
assessments of new and existing health technologies that have been conducted by
existing programs, including but not limited to, the state of Washington's
health technology assessment program and the Medicaid Evidence-Based Decisions
Project for inclusion to the value-based benefit set and design under section
62U.02.
Sec. 6. [62U.04] PAYMENT RESTRUCTURING; INCENTIVE PAYMENTS BASED ON QUALITY
OF CARE.
Subdivision 1. Development. (a)
The commissioner of health shall develop a standardized set of measures by
which to assess the quality of health care services offered by health care
providers, including health care providers certified as health care homes under
section 256B.0751. Quality measures
must be based on medical evidence and be developed through a process in which providers
participate. The measures shall be used
for the quality incentive payment system developed in subdivision 2 and must:
(1) include uniform definitions, measures, and forms for submission of
data, to the greatest extent possible;
(2) seek to avoid increasing the administrative burden on health care
providers;
(3) be initially based on existing quality indicators for physician and
hospital services, which are measured and reported publicly by quality
measurement organizations including Minnesota Community Measurement and
specialty societies;
(4) place a priority on measures of health care outcomes, rather than
process measures, wherever possible; and
(5) incorporate measures for primary care, including preventive
services, coronary artery and heart disease, diabetes, asthma, depression, and
other measures as determined by the commissioner.
(b) The measures shall be reviewed at least annually by the
commissioner.
Subd. 2. Quality incentive payments.
(a) By July 1, 2009, the commissioner shall develop a system of
quality incentive payments under which providers are eligible for quality-based
payments that are in addition to existing payment levels, based upon a
comparison of provider performance against specified targets, including
improvement over time. The targets must
be based upon and consistent with the quality measures established under
subdivision 1.
(b) To the extent possible, the payment system must adjust for
variations in patient population, in order to reduce incentives to health care
providers to avoid high-risk patients or populations.
(c) The requirements of section 62Q.101 do not apply under this
incentive payment system.
Subd. 3. Quality transparency.
The commissioner shall establish standards for measuring health
outcomes, establish a system for risk adjusting quality measures, and issue
annual public reports on provider quality beginning July 1, 2010. By January 1, 2010, physician clinics and
hospitals shall submit standardized electronic information on the outcomes and
processes associated with patient care to the commissioner or the
commissioner's designee. In addition to
measures of care processes and outcomes, the report may include other measures
designated by the commissioner, including, but not limited to, care infrastructure
and patient satisfaction. The
commissioner shall ensure that any quality data reporting requirements
established under this subdivision are not duplicative of publicly reported,
community-wide quality reporting activities currently under way in
Minnesota. Nothing in this subdivision
is intended to replace or duplicate current privately supported activities
related to quality measurement and reporting in Minnesota.
Subd. 4. Contracting. The
commissioner may contract with a private entity or consortium of private
entities to complete the tasks in subdivisions 1, 2, and 3. The private entity or consortium must be
nonprofit and have governance that includes representatives from the following
stakeholder groups: health care
providers, health plan companies, consumers, employers or other health care
purchasers, and state government. No
one stakeholder group shall have a majority of the votes on any issue or hold
extraordinary powers not granted to any other governance stakeholder.
Subd. 5. Implementation. (a)
By January 1, 2010, health plan companies shall use the standardized quality
measures established under this section and shall not require providers to use
and report health plan company-specific quality and outcome measures.
(b) By July 1, 2010, the commissioner of human services shall implement
this incentive payment system for all enrollees in state health care programs
consistent with relevant state and federal statute and rule.
(c) By July 1, 2010, the commissioner of finance shall implement this
incentive payment system for all participants in the state employee group
insurance program.
(d) By July 1, 2010, all health plan company incentive based
performance payment systems shall comply with subdivision 2 for all
participating providers.
Sec. 7. [62U.05] PAYMENT RESTRUCTURING; CARE COORDINATION PAYMENTS.
By July 1, 2010, health plan companies shall integrate health care
homes into their provider networks and shall develop a payment system that
provides per-person care coordination payments to health care providers for
providing care coordination services and directly managing onsite or employing
care coordinators for their members who choose to enroll in health care homes
certified by the commissioners of health and human services under section
256B.0751. Health plan companies shall
develop payment conditions and terms for the care coordination fee for health
care homes participating in their network in a manner that is consistent with the
system developed under section 256B.0751.
Nothing in this section shall restrict the ability of health plan
companies to selectively contract with health care providers, including health
care homes.
Sec. 8. [62U.06] PAYMENT REFORM TO REDUCE HEALTH CARE COSTS AND IMPROVE
QUALITY.
Subdivision 1. Development of uniform standards. The commissioner of health shall develop the uniform standards
identified in this section needed to implement on a broad scale innovative
payment reform that rewards quality and efficiency. The development of the standards must be completed by January 1,
2010.
Subd. 2. Calculation of health care costs and quality. The commissioner shall develop a method
of calculating providers' relative cost of care, defined as a measure of health
care spending including resource use and unit prices, and relative quality of
care. In developing this method, the
commissioner must address the following issues:
(1) provider attribution of costs and quality;
(2) appropriate adjustment for outlier or catastrophic cases;
(3) appropriate risk adjustment to reflect differences in the
demographics and health status across provider patient populations, using
generally accepted and transparent risk adjustment methodologies;
(4) specific types of providers that should be included in the
calculation;
(5) specific types of services that should be included in the
calculation;
(6) appropriate adjustment for variation in payment rates;
(7) the appropriate provider level for analysis;
(8) payer mix adjustments, including variation across providers in the
percentage of revenue received from government programs; and
(9) other factors that the commissioner determines are needed to ensure
validity and comparability of the analysis.
Subd. 3. Provider peer grouping.
(a) The commissioner shall develop a peer grouping system for
providers based on a measure that incorporates both provider risk-adjusted cost
of care and quality of care for specific conditions as determined by the
commissioner. In developing this
system, the commissioner shall consult and coordinate with health care
providers, health plan companies, state agencies, and organizations that work
to improve health care quality in Minnesota.
However, in the final development of this peer grouping system, the
commissioner shall not contract with any private entity, organization, or
consortium of entities that has or will have a direct financial interest in the
outcome of this system.
(b) Beginning June 1, 2010, the commissioner shall disseminate
information to providers on their cost of care, resource use, quality of care,
and the results of the grouping developed under this subdivision in comparison
to an appropriate peer group. Any
analyses or reports that identify providers may only be published after the
provider has been provided the opportunity by the commissioner to review the
underlying data and submit comments.
The provider shall have 21 days to review the data for accuracy.
(c) The commissioner shall establish an appeals process to resolve
disputes from providers regarding the accuracy of the data used to develop
analyses or reports.
(d) Beginning September 1, 2010, the commissioner shall, no less than
annually, publish information on providers' cost, quality, and the results of
the peer grouping process. The results
that are published must be on a risk-adjusted basis.
Subd. 4. Encounter data. (a)
Beginning July 1, 2009, and every six months thereafter, all health plan
companies and third-party administrators shall submit encounter data to a
private entity designated by the commissioner of health. The data shall be submitted in a form and
manner specified by the commissioner subject to the following requirements:
(1) the data must be de-identified data as described under the Code of
Federal Regulations, title 45, section 164.514;
(2) the data for each encounter must include an identifier for the
patient's health care home if the patient has selected a health care home; and
(3) except for the identifier described in clause (2), the data must
not include information that is not included in a health care claim or
equivalent encounter information transaction that is required under section
62J.536.
(b) The commissioner, or the commissioner's designee, shall only use
the data submitted under paragraph (a) for the purpose of carrying out its
responsibilities in this section, and must maintain the data that it receives
according to the provisions of this section.
(c) Data on providers collected under this subdivision are private data
on individuals or nonpublic data, as defined in section 13.02. Notwithstanding the definition of summary
data in section 13.02, subdivision 19, summary data prepared under this
subdivision may be derived from nonpublic data. The commissioner shall establish procedures and safeguards to
protect the integrity and confidentiality of any data that it maintains.
(d) The commissioner, or the commissioner's designee, shall not publish
analyses or reports that identify, or could potentially identify, individual
patients.
Subd. 5. Pricing data. (a)
Beginning July 1, 2009, and annually on January 1 thereafter, all health plan
companies and third-party administrators shall submit data on their contracted
prices with health care providers to a private entity designated by the
commissioner of health for the purposes of performing the analyses required
under this subdivision. The data shall
be submitted in the form and manner specified by the commissioner of health.
(b) The commissioner shall only use the data submitted under this
subdivision for the purpose of carrying out its responsibilities under this
section.
(c) Data collected under this subdivision are nonpublic data as defined
in section 13.02. Notwithstanding the
definition of summary data in section 13.02, subdivision 19, summary data
prepared under this section may be derived from nonpublic data. The commissioner shall establish procedures
and safeguards to protect the integrity and confidentiality of any data that it
maintains.
Subd. 6. Contracting. The
commissioner may contract with a private entity or consortium of entities to
develop the standards. The private
entity or consortium must be nonprofit and have governance that includes
representatives from the following stakeholder groups: health care providers, health plans,
hospitals, consumers, employers or other health care purchasers, and state
government. The entity or consortium
must ensure that the representatives of stakeholder groups in the aggregate
reflect all geographic areas of the state.
No one stakeholder group shall have a majority of the votes on any issue
or hold extraordinary powers not granted to any other governance stakeholder.
Subd. 7. Provider innovation to reduce health care costs and improve quality. (a) Nothing in this section shall
prohibit group purchasers and health care providers, upon mutual agreement,
from entering into arrangements that establish package prices for a
comprehensive set of services or separately for the cost of care for specific
health conditions in addition to the baskets of care established in section
62U.07, in order to give providers the flexibility to innovate on ways to
reduce health care costs while improving overall quality of care and health
outcomes.
(b) The commissioner of health may convene working groups of private
sector payers and health care providers to discuss and develop new strategies
for reforming health care payment systems to promote innovative care delivery
that reduces health care costs and improves quality.
Subd. 8. Uses of information.
(a) By January 1, 2011:
(1) the commissioner of finance shall use the information and methods
developed under subdivision 3 to strengthen incentives for members of the state
employee group insurance program to use high-quality, low-cost providers;
(2) the commissioner of human services shall use the information and
methods developed under subdivision 3 to establish a payment system that:
(i) rewards high-quality, low-cost providers;
(ii) creates enrollee incentives to receive care from high-quality,
low-cost providers; and
(iii) fosters collaboration among providers to reduce cost shifting
from one part of the health continuum to another;
(3) all political subdivisions, as defined in section 13.02,
subdivision 11, that offer health benefits to their employees must offer plans
that differentiate providers on their cost and quality performance and create
incentives for members to use better-performing providers;
(4) all health plan companies shall use the information and methods
developed under subdivision 3 to develop products that encourage consumers to
use high-quality, low-cost providers; and
(5) health plan companies that issue health plans in the individual
market or the small employer market must offer at least one health plan that
uses the information developed under subdivision 3 to establish financial
incentives for consumers to choose high-quality, low-cost providers through
enrollee cost-sharing or selective provider networks.
(b) By January 1, 2011, the commissioner of health shall report to the
governor and the legislature on recommendations to encourage health plan
companies to promote widespread adoption of products that encourage the use of
high-quality, low-cost providers. The
commissioner's recommendations may include tax incentives, public reporting of
health plan performance, regulatory incentives or changes, and other
strategies.
(c) The commissioner of health shall consult with an advisory group
comprised of employers and consumers to utilize the cost and provider quality
information developed under subdivision 3 to identify ways to improve overall
health care costs and quality for residents of Minnesota.
Sec. 9. [62U.07] PROVIDER PRICING FOR BASKETS OF CARE.
Subdivision 1. Establishment of definitions. (a) The commissioner of health shall establish uniform
definitions for baskets of care beginning with a minimum of 15 baskets of
care. In selecting health conditions
for which baskets of care should be defined, the commissioner shall consider
coronary artery and heart disease, diabetes, asthma, and depression. In selecting health conditions, the
commissioner shall also consider the prevalence of the health conditions, the
cost of treating the health conditions, and the potential for innovations to
reduce cost and improve quality resulting from establishing a basket of care
for a specific health condition.
(b) The commissioner shall convene one or more work groups to assist in
establishing these definitions. Each
work group shall include members appointed by statewide associations
representing relevant health care providers and health plan companies, and
organizations that work to improve health care quality in Minnesota.
(c) The baskets of care shall incorporate a patient-directed,
decision-making support model.
(d) The commissioner shall submit recommendations to the Legislative
Commission on Health Care Access on establishing a uniform definition of a
basket of total cost of care.
Subd. 2. Package prices. (a)
Beginning January 1, 2010, health care providers may establish package prices
for the baskets of care defined under subdivision 1.
(b) Beginning January 1, 2010, no health care provider or group of
providers that has established a package price for a basket of care under this
section shall vary the payment amount that the provider accepts as full payment
for a health care service based upon the identity of the payer, upon a
contractual relationship with a payer, upon the identity of the patient, or
upon whether the patient has coverage through a group purchaser. This paragraph applies only to health care
services provided to Minnesota residents or to non-Minnesota residents who
obtain health insurance through a Minnesota employer. This paragraph does not apply to a variation based upon a payer
being a governmental entity, to workers' compensation, or no-fault automobile
insurance payments. This paragraph does
not affect the right of a provider to provide charity care or care for a
reduced price due to financial hardship of the patient or due to the patient
being a relative or friend of the provider.
Subd. 3. Quality measurements for baskets of care. (a) The commissioner shall establish
quality measurements for the defined baskets of care by December 31, 2009. The commissioner may contract with an
organization that works to improve health care quality to make recommendations
about the use of existing measures or establishing new measures where no
measures currently exist.
(b) Beginning July 1, 2010, the commissioner shall publish comparative
price and quality information on the baskets of care in a manner that is easily
accessible and understandable to the public, as this information becomes
available.
Sec. 10. [62U.08] COORDINATION; LEGISLATIVE
OVERSIGHT ON PAYMENT RESTRUCTURING.
Subdivision 1. Coordination. In
carrying out the responsibilities of this chapter, the commissioner of health
shall ensure that the activities and data collection are implemented in an
integrated and coordinated manner that avoids unnecessary duplication of
effort. To the extent possible, the
commissioner shall use existing data sources and implement methods to
streamline data collection in order to reduce public and private sector
administrative costs.
Subd. 2. Legislative oversight.
Beginning December 1, 2008, the commissioner of health shall submit
to the Legislative Commission on Health Care Access periodic progress reports
on the implementation of this chapter and sections 256B.0751 to 256B.0753 that
includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(1) the standardized set of measures that are to be used to access the
quality of health care services offered by health care providers developed
under section 62U.04;
(2) the identification of the evidence supporting each measure
developed under section 62U.04 as an effective method of improving the quality
of patient care;
(3) the contract terms and the identity of the consortium if the
commissioner contracts with a private entity or consortium of private entities
as permitted under sections 62U.04 and 62U.06;
(4) methodology for peer grouping of providers under section 62U.06,
subdivision 3;
(5) methodology for calculating providers' relative cost of care under
section 62U.06, subdivision 2; and
(6) the uniform definitions of baskets of care under section 62U.07.
Sec. 11. [62U.09] AFFORDABILITY STANDARD.
Subdivision 1. Definition of affordability. For purposes of this section, coverage is
"affordable" if the sum of premiums, deductibles, and other
out-of-pocket costs paid by an individual or family for health coverage does
not exceed the applicable percentage of the individual or family's gross
monthly income specified in subdivision 2.
Subd. 2. Affordability standard.
The following affordability standard is established for individuals
and households with gross family incomes of 400 percent of the federal poverty
guidelines or less:
Federal Poverty Percent of Average
Guideline
Range Gross
Monthly Income
0-45% minimum
46-54% 1.1%
55-81% 1.4%
82-109% 1.9%
110-136% 2.6%
137-164% 3.4%
165-191% 4.4%
192-219% 5.2%
220-248% 5.9%
249-274% 6.5%
275-300% 7.0%
301-325% 7.7%
326-350% 8.4%
351-375% 9.2%
376-400% 10.0%
Subd.
3. Application. The affordability standard in this
section shall apply only to subsidies under the MinnesotaCare program and the
employee subsidy program established under section 62U.10. Nothing in this section shall be construed
to limit or restrict the percentage of premiums, deductibles, and other
out-of-pocket costs paid by an individual or family in the private commercial
health care coverage market.
Sec.
12. [62U.10] EMPLOYEE SUBSIDIES FOR HEALTH COVERAGE.
Subdivision
1. Development
of subsidy program. The
commissioner of health, in coordination with the commissioner of human
services, shall develop a plan and submit recommendations to the legislature by
January 15, 2010, for a subsidy program for eligible individuals and employees
with access to employer-subsidized health coverage. The plan may include direct subsidies or tax credits and
deductions, including refundable tax credits, or a combination. For purposes of this section,
employer-subsidized health coverage has the meaning provided in section
256L.07, subdivision 2, paragraph (c).
Subd.
2. Eligible
employees and dependents; incomes not exceeding 300 percent of federal poverty
guidelines. In order to be
eligible for a subsidy under this plan, an employee or dependent with a gross
household income that does not exceed 300 percent of the federal poverty
guidelines must:
(1)
be covered by employer-subsidized health coverage, as defined in section 256L.07,
subdivision 2, paragraph (c), that meets the value-based benefit set and design
requirements established under section 62U.02; and
(2)
meet all eligibility criteria for the MinnesotaCare program established under
chapter 256L, except for the requirements related to:
(i)
no access to employer-subsidized coverage under section 256L.07, subdivision 2;
and
(ii)
no other health coverage under section 256L.07, subdivision 3.
Subd.
3. Eligible
individuals, employees and dependents; incomes greater than 300 percent but not
exceeding 400 percent of federal poverty guidelines. In order to be eligible for a subsidy
under this plan, an individual, employee, or dependent with a gross household
income that is greater than 300 percent but does not exceed 400 percent of the
federal poverty guidelines must:
(1)
purchase or be covered by health coverage that meets the value-based benefit
set and design requirements established under section 62U.02; and
(2)
meet all eligibility criteria for the MinnesotaCare program established under
chapter 256L, except for the requirements related to:
(i)
no access to employer-subsidized coverage under section 256L.07, subdivision 2;
(ii)
no other health coverage under section 256L.07, subdivision 3; and
(iii)
gross household income under section 256L.04, subdivisions 1 and 7.
Subd.
4. Amount
of subsidy. The subsidy
included in this plan must equal the amount the individual or employee is
required to pay for health coverage for the employee and any dependents,
including premiums, deductibles, and other cost sharing, minus an amount based
on the affordability standard specified in section 62U.09. The maximum subsidy must not exceed the
amount of the subsidy that would have been provided under the MinnesotaCare
program, if the individual or employee and any dependents were eligible for
that program.
Subd.
5. Payment
of subsidy. The subsidy
amount under this plan for an individual or employee and any dependents to the
individual's or employee's health plan company, shall be credited toward the
individual's or employee's share of premium.
Any additional amount paid to the individual's or employee's health plan
company that exceeds the individual's or employee's share of premium must be credited
first toward the individual's or employee's deductible and then toward any
other cost-sharing obligation.
Sec.
13. [62U.11] PROJECTED AND ACTUAL HEALTH CARE SPENDING.
Subdivision
1. Projected
spending baseline. (a) The
commissioner of health shall calculate the annual projected total health care
spending for the state and establish a health care spending baseline beginning
for the calendar year 2008 and for the next ten years based on the annual
projected growth in spending.
(b)
In establishing the health care spending baseline, the commissioner shall use
the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services forecast for total growth in
national health care expenditures, and adjust this forecast to reflect the
demographics, health status, and other factors deemed necessary by the commissioner. The commissioner shall contract with an
actuarial consultant to make recommendations as to the adjustments needed to
specifically reflect projected spending for Minnesota residents.
(c)
On an annual basis, the commissioner may adjust the projected baseline as
necessary to reflect any updated federal projections or account for
unanticipated changes in federal policy.
(d)
Medicare and long-term care spending must not be included in the calculations
required under this section.
Subd.
2. Actual
spending. By February 15 of
each year, beginning February 15, 2010, the commissioner shall determine the
actual private and public health care expenditures for the calendar year two
years prior to the current calendar year based on data collected under chapter
62J and shall determine the difference between the projected spending as
determined under subdivision 1 and the actual spending for that year. The actual spending must be certified by an
independent actuarial consultant.
Subd.
3. Publication
of spending. By February 15
of each year, beginning February 15, 2010, the commissioner shall publish in
the State Register the projected spending baseline, including any adjustments,
and the actual spending for the calendar year two years prior to the current
calendar year.
Sec.
14. [62U.12] HEALTH CARE REFORM REVIEW COUNCIL.
Subdivision
1. Establishment. The Health Care Reform Review Council is
established for the purpose of periodically reviewing the progress of
implementation of this chapter and sections 256B.0751 to 256B.0753.
Subd.
2. Members. (a) The Health Care Reform Review Council
shall consist of ten members who are appointed as follows:
(1)
two members appointed by the Minnesota Medical Association, at least one of
whom must represent rural physicians;
(2)
one member appointed by the Minnesota Nurses Association;
(3)
two members appointed by the Minnesota Hospital Association, at least one of
whom must be a rural hospital administrator;
(4)
one member appointed by the Minnesota Academy of Physician Assistants;
(5)
one member appointed by the Minnesota Business Partnership;
(6)
one member appointed by the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce;
(7)
one member appointed by the SEIU Minnesota State Council; and
(8)
one member appointed by the AFL-CIO.
(b)
If a member is no longer able or eligible to participate, a new member shall be
appointed by the entity that appointed the outgoing member.
Subd.
3. Operations
of council. (a) The
commissioner of health shall convene the first meeting of the council on or
before January 15, 2009, following the initial appointment of the members and
the advisory council must meet at least quarterly thereafter.
(b)
The council is governed by section 15.059, except that members shall not
receive per diems and the council does not expire.
(c)
The commissioner of health shall provide staff, administrative support, and
office space to the council.
Subd.
4. Responsibilities
of council. The council
shall periodically review the implementation of this chapter and sections 256B.0571
to 256B.0573, including but not limited to:
(1)
the development and implementation of certification, process, outcome, and
quality standards for health care homes;
(2)
development and implementation of payment restructuring and payment reform under
sections 62U.04, 62U.05, 62U.06, and 62U.07; and
(3)
development of the plan and recommendations for providing subsidies to
employees for health coverage under section 62U.10.
Sec.
15. [62U.13] SECTION 125 PLANS.
Subdivision
1. Definitions. For purposes of this section, the
following terms have the meanings given them.
(a)
"Employee" means an employee currently on an employer's payroll other
than a retiree or disabled former employee.
(b)
"Employer" means a person, firm, corporation, partnership,
association, business trust, or other entity employing one or more persons,
including a political subdivision of the state, filing payroll tax information
on the employed person or persons.
(c)
"Section 125 Plan" means a cafeteria or premium-only plan under
section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code that allows employees to pay for
health coverage premiums with pretax dollars.
Subd.
2. Section
125 Plan requirement. (a)
Effective July 1, 2009, all employers with 11 or more current full-time
equivalent employees in this state shall establish and maintain a Section 125
Plan to allow their employees to purchase individual market or employer-based
health coverage with pretax dollars.
Nothing in this section requires employers to offer or purchase group health
coverage for their employees. The
following employers are exempt from the Section 125 Plan requirement:
(1)
employers that offer a health plan as defined in section 62A.011, subdivision
3, that is group coverage;
(2)
employers that provide self-insurance as defined in section 62E.02; or
(3)
employers that have no employees who are eligible to participate in a Section
125 Plan.
(b)
Notwithstanding paragraph (a), an employer that has been certified by a
licensed insurance producer as having received education and information on the
benefits and advantages of offering Section 125 Plans is not required to
establish a Section 125 Plan and may opt out of the requirement to establish a
Section 125 Plan by sending a form to the commissioner of commerce. The commissioner of commerce shall create a
simple check-box form for employers to opt out. The commissioner of commerce shall make the form available
through their Web site by April 1, 2009.
Subd.
3. Employer
requirements. (a) Employers
that do not offer a health plan as defined in section 62A.011, subdivision 3,
that is group coverage and are required to offer or choose to offer a Section
125 Plan shall:
(1)
allow employees to purchase an individual market health plan for themselves and
their dependents;
(2)
allow employees to choose any insurance producer licensed in accident and
health insurance under chapter 60K to assist them in purchasing an individual
market health plan;
(3)
upon an employee's request, deduct premium amounts on a pretax basis in an
amount not to exceed an employee's wages, and remit these employee payments to
the health plan; and
(4)
provide written notice to employees that individual market health plans
purchased by employees through payroll deduction are not employer-sponsored or
administered.
(b)
Employers shall be held harmless from any and all claims related to the
individual market health plans purchased by employees under a Section 125 Plan.
Sec.
16. [256B.0751] PAYMENT REFORM.
Subdivision
1. Quality
incentive payments. The
commissioner of human services shall implement quality incentive payments as
required under section 62U.04. This
does not limit the ability of the commissioner of human services to establish
by contract and monitor, as part of its quality assurance obligations for state
health care programs, outcome and performance measures for nonmedical services
and health issues likely to occur in low-income populations or racial or
cultural groups disproportionately represented in state health care program enrollment,
that would likely be underrepresented when using traditional measures that are
based on longer-term enrollment.
Subd.
2. Payment
reform. The commissioner of
human services shall establish a payment system to reduce health care costs and
improve quality as required under section 62U.06.
Sec.
17. HIGH-DEDUCTIBLE HEALTH PLAN OPTION.
The
commissioner of finance shall consider including an option that is compatible
with the definition of a high-deductible health plan in section 223 of the
Internal Revenue Code in the health insurance benefit plans offered under the
managerial plan in Minnesota Statutes, section 43A.18, subdivision 3.
Sec.
18. STUDY OF UNIFORM CLAIMS REVIEW PROCESS.
The commissioner of health shall establish a work group
including representatives of the Minnesota Hospital Association, Minnesota
Medical Association, and Minnesota Council of Health Plans to make
recommendations on the potential for reducing claims adjudication costs of
health care providers and health plan companies by adopting more uniform
payment methods, and the potential impact of establishing uniform prices that
would replace current prices negotiated individually by providers with separate
payers. The work group shall make its
recommendations to the commissioner by January 1, 2010, and shall identify
specific action steps needed to achieve the recommendations.
ARTICLE
5
APPROPRIATIONS
Section 1. SUMMARY OF APPROPRIATIONS.
The amounts shown in this section summarize direct
appropriations, by fund, made in this article.
2009 Total
General Fund $403,000 $403,000
Health Care Access Fund 12,883,000 12,883,000
Total $13,286,000 $13,286,000
Sec.
2. HEALTH
AND HUMAN SERVICES APPROPRIATIONS.
The
sums shown in the columns marked "Appropriations" are added to or, if
shown in parentheses, subtracted from the appropriations in Laws 2007, chapter
147, article 19, or other law to the agencies and for the purposes specified in
this article. The appropriations are from
the general fund, or another named fund, and are available for the fiscal year
indicated for each purpose. The figure
"2009" used in this article means that the addition to or subtraction
from the appropriation listed under it is available for the fiscal year ending
June 30, 2009.
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2009
Sec. 3. HUMAN SERVICES
Subdivision 1. Total Appropriation $6,175,000
Appropriations by Fund
2009
General 1,227,000
Health Care Access 4,948,000
The amounts that may be spent
for each purpose are specified in the following subdivisions.
Subd. 2. Children and Economic Assistance
Management
Health Care Access 6,000
This is a onetime
appropriation.
Subd. 3. Basic Health Care Grants
The amounts that may be
spent from the appropriation for each purpose are as follows:
(a) MinnesotaCare Grants
Health Care Access 1,301,000
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2009
(b) Other Health Care Grants
Health Care Access 200,000
Primary
Care Physician Rate Increases. (1) Of
the general fund appropriation, $200,000 is to the commissioner for the medical
assistance reimbursement rate increase described in Minnesota Statutes, section
256B.766.
(2) Notwithstanding
Minnesota Statutes, section 295.581, the commissioner of finance shall
reimburse the medical assistance general fund account from the health care
access fund the amount of general fund expenditures for this activity. The amount reimbursed under this paragraph
is appropriated to the commissioner.
Subsidies
for Employer-Subsidized Health Coverage. For
the biennium beginning July 1, 2009, base level funding for the subsidy program
described in Minnesota Statutes, section 62U.10, shall be $20,000,000 from the
health care access fund for the first year and $35,000,000 from the health care
access fund for the second year.
Base
Adjustment. The health care access fund
base is increased by $3,000,000 in fiscal year 2010 and increased by $5,000,000
in fiscal year 2011.
Subd. 4. Health Care Management
The amounts that may be
spent from the appropriation for each purpose are as follows:
(a) Health Care Policy Administration
General 1,008,000
Health Care Access 282,000
Base
Adjustment. The health care access fund is decreased by $89,000 in fiscal
year 2010 and decreased by $272,000 in fiscal year 2011.
Base
Adjustment. The general fund base is
decreased by $80,000 in both fiscal years 2010 and 2011.
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2009
Department
of Education Computer System. $50,000
is from the health care access fund for the commissioner to enter into an
agreement with the Department of Education for the modification of the
department's computer system to implement Minnesota Statutes, section
124D.1115. This is a onetime
appropriation.
Public
dental coverage program study. (1) Of
the health care access fund appropriation, $50,000 in fiscal year 2009 is for
the commissioner of human services to undertake a study to determine whether
alternative approaches to offering dental coverage to public program enrollees
would result in:
(i) improved access to
dental care;
(ii) cost savings to
providers and the department; and
(iii) improved quality and
outcomes of care.
Alternatives considered must
include moving to a single dental plan administrator, retaining the current
model, and other innovative approaches.
Issues relating to chronic disease management, medical and dental
interface, plan payment approaches, and provider payment should also be
addressed. The report must make a
recommendation on whether to alter the current approach to contracting for
dental services, and include a detailed plan on how to implement any
changes. The commissioner shall consult
with dentists, safety net dental providers, dental plans, health plans and
county-based purchasing organizations, patients and advocates, and other
interested parties in developing their findings and recommendations.
(2) By December 15, 2008,
the commissioner of human services shall report findings and recommendations to
the chairs of the house of representatives and senate committees having
jurisdiction over health and human services policy and finance.
(b) Health Care Operations
General 219,000
Health Care Access 2,355,000
This is a onetime appropriation.
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2009
Incentive
Program and Outreach Grants. Of the appropriation for the Minnesota health care outreach program in
Laws 2007, chapter 147, article 19, section 3, subdivision 7, paragraph (b):
(1) $400,000 in fiscal year
2009 from the general fund and $200,000 in fiscal year 2009 from the health
care access fund are for the incentive program under Minnesota Statutes,
section 256.962, subdivision 5. For the
biennium beginning July 1, 2009, base level funding for this activity shall be
$360,000 from the general fund and $160,000 from the health care access fund;
and
(2) $100,000 in fiscal year
2009 from the general fund and $50,000 in fiscal year 2009 from the health care
access fund are for the outreach grants under Minnesota Statutes, section
256.962, subdivision 2. For the
biennium beginning July 1, 2009, base level funding for this activity shall be
$90,000 from the general fund and $40,000 from the health care access fund.
Outreach Funding. (1) Of
the health care access fund appropriation, $100,000 is for the incentive
program under Minnesota Statutes, section 256.962, subdivision 5. This is in addition to the base level fund for the
biennium beginning July 1, 2009. For
the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2011, appropriations for this activity shall
be from the health savings reinvestment fund.
(2) Notwithstanding
Minnesota Statutes, section 295.581, the commissioner of finance shall
reimburse the medical assistance general fund account from the health care
access fund by $701,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $1,527,000 in fiscal year 2011
for the cost to the general fund for the increase in enrollment to the medical
assistance program for families with children due to the outreach efforts.
Base
Adjustment. The health care access fund
base is decreased by $387,000 in fiscal year 2010 and increased by $642,000 in
fiscal year 2011.
Subd. 5. Continuing Care Management
Health Care Access 804,000
Long-Term
Care Worker Health Coverage Study. (a) Of
the health care access fund appropriation, $804,000 is for the commissioner to
study and report to the legislature by December 15, 2008, with
recommendations for a rate increase to long-term care employers dedicated to
the purchase of employee health insurance in the private market. The commissioner shall collect necessary
actuarial data, employment data, current coverage data, and other needed
information.
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2009
(b) The commissioner shall
develop cost estimates for three levels of insurance coverage for long-term
care workers:
(1) the coverage provided to
state employees;
(2) the coverage provided to
MinnesotaCare enrollees; and
(3) the benefits provided
under an "average" private market insurance product, but with a
deductible limited to $100 per person.
Premium cost sharing,
waiting periods for eligibility, definitions of full- and part-time employment,
and other parameters under the three options must be identical to those under
the state employees' health plan.
(c) For purposes of this
section, a long-term care worker is a person employed by a nursing facility, an
intermediate care facility for persons with developmental disabilities, or a
service provider that:
(1) is eligible under Laws
2007, chapter 147, article 7, section 71; and
(2) provides long-term care
services.
The commissioner may
recommend a different definition of long-term care worker if this definition
presents insurmountable implementation issues.
(d) The recommendations must
include measures to:
(1) ensure equitable
treatment between employers that currently have different levels of expenditure
for employee health insurance costs; and
(2) enforce the requirement
that the rate increase be expended for the intended purpose.
This is a onetime
appropriation.
Sec. 4. COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH
Subdivision 1. Total Appropriation $7,111,000
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2009
Appropriations by Fund
2009
Health Care Access 7,935,000
General (824,000)
The amounts that may be
spent for each purpose are specified in the following subdivisions.
Subd. 2. Community and Family Health Promotion
Health Care Access 152,000
$152,000 in fiscal year 2009
is for statewide health saving research and measurement.
Statewide Health Improvement Program. The health care access fund base shall be
increased by $19,587,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $26,175,000 in fiscal year
2011 for grants to local communities in accordance with Minnesota Statutes,
section 145.986, subdivision 2; $205,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $424,000 in
fiscal year 2011 is for staffing; $22,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $42,000 in
fiscal year 2011 is for operating costs; $150,000 in fiscal year 2010 and
$300,000 in fiscal year 2011 is for contracts for evaluation; and $36,000 in
fiscal year 2010 and $60,000 in fiscal year 2011 is for administrative
costs. The base for this program in
fiscal year 2012 is $0.
Subd. 3. Policy, Quality, and Compliance
Health Care Access 7,783,000
General (824,000)
Open Door
Health Center. Of the health care access
fund appropriation, $350,000 is to be awarded as a grant to the Open Door
Health Center to act as bridge funding to meet the demand for health care services
in medically underserved areas. This is
a onetime appropriation.
APPROPRIATIONS
Available for the Year
Ending June 30
2009
Of this appropriation,
$84,000 is for the commissioner to make recommendations to the legislature on
community benefit standards to be required of nonprofit health plan companies
doing business in the state. The
expectations of the community benefits provided and reported should be related
to the statutory expectations in Minnesota Statutes, sections 62C.01 and
62D.01, and focus on supporting public health, improving the art and science of
medical care, and addressing the need for financial assistance to access
ongoing coverage, and not related to general philanthropic endeavors. The commissioner shall seek public input
regarding the range of options to be explored and the accountability measures.
The recommendations must
include a procedure by which each nonprofit health plan company would
periodically and uniformly report to the state and to the public regarding the
company's compliance with the requirements.
The commissioner shall
recommend a fair and effective enforcement and remediation mechanism. This is a onetime appropriation.
Federally
Qualified Health Centers. Of the
health care access fund appropriation, $2,824,000 is for subsidies to federally
qualified health centers under Minnesota Statutes, section 145.9269. The health care access fund base shall be
$3,500,000 for fiscal years 2010 and 2011.
The general fund
appropriation for this program shall be reduced by $824,000 for fiscal year
2009, and by $1,500,000 in both fiscal years 2010 and 2011.
Base
Adjustment. The health care access fund
base shall be further reduced by $4,104,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $4,323,000
in fiscal year 2011.
Sec. 5. SUNSET OF UNCODIFIED LANGUAGE.
All uncodified language contained in this article expires on June 30,
2009, unless a different expiration date is specified.
Sec. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE.
The provisions in this article are effective July 1, 2008, unless a
different effective date is specified."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to health care; establishing a
statewide health improvement program; establishing health care homes and
reporting requirements; establishing a care coordination payment; increasing
reimbursements to primary care physicians in certain areas; requiring a
workforce shortage study; establishing requirements for interoperable health
records; establishing electronic prescription drug program; establishing a
value-based benefit set and design for health benefits; providing for health
care payment restructuring; requiring uniform standards; establishing an
affordability standard; requiring development of employee subsidies for health
coverage; requiring a health care spending baseline be developed; establishing
a health care reform review council; establishing Section 125 Plan; providing
for fees; requiring reports; authorizing rulemaking; appropriating money;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 256.01, by adding a subdivision;
256B.057, subdivision 8; 256L.05, by adding a subdivision; 256L.06, subdivision
3; 256L.07, subdivision 3; Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, sections
62J.495, by adding a subdivision; 256.962, subdivisions 5, 6; 256L.04,
subdivisions 1, 7; 256L.05, subdivision 3a; 256L.07, subdivision 1; 256L.15,
subdivision 2; Laws 2007, chapter 147, article 5, section 19; proposing coding
for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 62J; 124D; 145; 256B; proposing
coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 62U; repealing Minnesota
Statutes 2006, section 256L.15, subdivision 3."
We request the adoption of this report and repassage of the
bill.
House Conferees: Thomas Huntley, Paul Thissen, Diane Loeffler
and Kim Norton.
Senate Conferees: Linda Berglin, Ann Lynch, Tony Lourey, Kathy
Sheran and Julie A. Rosen.
Huntley moved that the report of the Conference Committee on
H. F. No. 3391 be adopted and that the bill be repassed as
amended by the Conference Committee.
Abeler moved that the House refuse to adopt the Conference
Committee report on H. F. No. 3391 and that the bill be returned to the
Conference Committee.
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The Speaker called Juhnke to the Chair.
The question was taken on the Abeler motion and the roll was
called. There were 50 yeas and 83 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kohls
Lanning
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Olson
Ozment
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kranz
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail.
The question recurred on the Huntley motion that the report of
the Conference Committee on H. F. No. 3391 be adopted and that
the bill be repassed as amended by the Conference Committee. The motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 3391, A bill for an act relating to health care
reform; increasing affordability and continuity of care for state health care
programs; modifying health care provisions; providing subsidies for employee
share of employer-subsidized insurance in certain cases; establishing the
Health Care Transformation Commission; creating an affordability standard;
implementing a statewide health improvement program; requiring an evaluation of
mandated health benefits; requiring a payment system to encourage provider
innovation; requiring studies and reports; appropriating money; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 62Q.025, by adding a subdivision; 256.01,
subdivision 18; 256B.056, by adding a subdivision; 256B.057, subdivision 8;
256B.69, by adding a subdivision; 256L.05, by adding a subdivision; 256L.06,
subdivision 3; 256L.07, subdivision 3, by adding a subdivision; 256L.15, by
adding a subdivision; Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, sections 256.01,
subdivision 2b; 256B.056, subdivision 10; 256L.03, subdivisions 3, 5; 256L.04,
subdivisions 1, 7; 256L.05, subdivision 3a; 256L.07, subdivision 1; 256L.15,
subdivision 2; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters
145; 256B; proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 62U;
repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 256L.15, subdivision 3.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended by Conference,
and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of the bill and the
roll was called. There were 83 yeas and
50 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kranz
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Berns
Bly
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kohls
Lanning
Madore
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Nornes
Olson
Ozment
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Smith
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was repassed, as amended by Conference, and its title
agreed to.
There being no objection, the order of business reverted to
Reports of Standing Committees and Divisions.
REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES AND DIVISIONS
Carlson
from the Committee on Finance to which was referred:
H. F.
No. 3809, A bill for an act relating to human services; improving management of
state health care programs; modifying managed care contracting; limiting
managed care administrative expenses; modifying county-based purchasing;
requiring mandated reports; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 13.461,
by adding a subdivision; 256B.69, subdivision 5a, by adding subdivisions;
256B.692, subdivision 2, by adding subdivisions; 256L.12, subdivision 9; Laws
2005, First Special Session chapter 4, article 8, section 84, as amended.
Reported
the same back with the following amendments:
Delete
everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section
1. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
13.461, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
24a. Managed
care plans. Data provided to
the commissioner of human services by managed care plans relating to contracts
and provider payment rates are classified under section 256B.69, subdivisions
9a and 9b.
Sec.
2. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.69, subdivision 5a, is amended to read:
Subd.
5a. Managed care contracts. (a)
Managed care contracts under this section and sections 256L.12 and 256D.03,
shall be entered into or renewed on a calendar year basis beginning January 1,
1996. Managed care contracts which were
in effect on June 30, 1995, and set to renew on July 1, 1995, shall be renewed
for the period July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995 at the same terms that
were in effect on June 30, 1995. The
commissioner may issue separate contracts with requirements specific to
services to medical assistance recipients age 65 and older.
(b) A
prepaid health plan providing covered health services for eligible persons
pursuant to chapters 256B, 256D, and 256L, is responsible for complying with
the terms of its contract with the commissioner. Requirements applicable to managed care programs under chapters
256B, 256D, and 256L, established after the effective date of a contract with
the commissioner take effect when the contract is next issued or renewed.
(c)
Effective for services rendered on or after January 1, 2003, the commissioner
shall withhold five percent of managed care plan payments under this section
for the prepaid medical assistance and general assistance medical care programs
pending completion of performance targets.
Each performance target must be quantifiable, objective, measurable, and
reasonably attainable, except in the case of a performance target based on a federal
or state law or rule. Criteria for
assessment of each performance target must be outlined in writing prior to the
contract effective date. The managed
care plan must demonstrate, to the commissioner's satisfaction, that the data
submitted regarding attainment of the performance target is accurate. The commissioner shall periodically change
the administrative measures used as performance targets in order to improve
plan performance across a broader range of administrative services. The performance targets must include
measurement of plan efforts to contain spending on health care services and
administrative activities. The
commissioner may adopt plan-specific performance targets that take into account
factors affecting only one plan, including characteristics of the plan's
enrollee population. The withheld
funds must be returned no sooner than July of the following year if performance
targets in the contract are achieved.
The commissioner may exclude special demonstration projects under
subdivision 23. A managed care plan or
a county-based purchasing plan under section 256B.692 may include as admitted
assets under section 62D.044 any amount withheld under this paragraph that is
reasonably expected to be returned.
Sec.
3. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.69, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
5i. Administrative
expenses. (a) Managed care
plan and county-based purchasing plan administrative costs for a prepaid health
plan provided under this section or section 256B.692 must not exceed by more
than five percent that prepaid health plan's or county-based purchasing plan's
actual calculated administrative spending for the previous calendar year as a
percentage of total revenue. The penalty
for exceeding this limit must be the amount of administrative spending in
excess of 105 percent of the actual calculated amount. The commissioner may waive this penalty if
the excess administrative spending is the result of unexpected shifts in
enrollment or member needs or new program requirements.
(b)
Expenses listed under section 62D.12, subdivision 9a, clause (4), are not
allowable administrative expenses for rate-setting purposes under this section,
unless approved by the commissioner.
Sec.
4. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.69, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
5j. Treatment
of investment earnings. Capitation
rates shall treat investment income and interest earnings as income to the same
extent that investment-related expenses are treated as administrative expenditures.
Sec.
5. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.69, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
9a. Administrative
expense reporting. The
commissioner shall work with the commissioner of health to identify and collect
data on administrative spending for state health care programs reported to the
commissioner of health by managed care plans under section 62D.08 and
county-based purchasing plans under section 256B.692, provided that such data
are consistent with guidelines and standards for administrative spending that
are developed by the commissioner of health, and reported to the legislature
under section 12 of this act. Data
provided to the commissioner under this subdivision are nonpublic data as
defined under section 13.02.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2009.
Sec.
6. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.69, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
9b. Reporting
provider payment rates. (a)
According to guidelines developed by the commissioner, in consultation with
managed care plans and county-based purchasing plans, each managed care plan
and county-based purchasing plan must provide to the commissioner, at the
commissioner's request, detailed or
aggregate information on reimbursement rates paid by the managed care plan
under this section or the county-based purchasing plan under section 256B.692
to provider types and vendors for administrative services under contract with
the plan.
(b)
Data provided to the commissioner under this subdivision are nonpublic data as
defined in section 13.02.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1, 2010.
Sec.
7. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.692, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Duties
of commissioner of health. (a)
Notwithstanding chapters 62D and 62N, a county that elects to purchase medical
assistance and general assistance medical care in return for a fixed sum
without regard to the frequency or extent of services furnished to any
particular enrollee is not required to obtain a certificate of authority under
chapter 62D or 62N. The county board of
commissioners is the governing body of a county-based purchasing program. In a multicounty arrangement, the governing
body is a joint powers board established under section 471.59.
(b) A
county that elects to purchase medical assistance and general assistance
medical care services under this section must satisfy the commissioner of
health that the requirements for assurance of consumer protection, provider
protection, and, effective January 1, 2010, fiscal solvency of chapter
62D, applicable to health maintenance organizations, or chapter 62N,
applicable to community integrated service networks, will be met.
according to the following schedule:
(1)
for a county-based purchasing plan approved on or before June 30, 2008, the
plan must have in reserve:
(i)
at least 50 percent of the minimum amount required under chapter 62D as of
January 1, 2010;
(ii)
at least 75 percent of the minimum amount required under chapter 62D as of
January 1, 2011;
(iii)
at least 87.5 percent of the minimum amount required under chapter 62D as of
January 1, 2012; and
(iv)
at least 100 percent of the minimum amount required under chapter 62D as of
January 1, 2013; and
(2)
for a county-based purchasing plan first approved after June 30, 2008, the plan
must have in reserve:
(i)
at least 50 percent of the minimum amount required under chapter 62D at the
time the plan begins enrolling enrollees;
(ii)
at least 75 percent of the minimum amount required under chapter 62D after the
first full calendar year;
(iii)
at least 87.5 percent of the minimum amount required under chapter 62D after
the second full calendar year; and
(iv)
at least 100 percent of the minimum amount required under chapter 62D after the
third full calendar year.
(c) Until
a plan is required to have reserves equaling at least 100 percent of the
minimum amount required under chapter 62D, the plan may demonstrate its ability
to cover any losses by satisfying the requirements of chapter 62N. A county county-based
purchasing plan must also assure
the commissioner of health that the requirements of sections 62J.041; 62J.48;
62J.71 to 62J.73; 62M.01 to 62M.16; all applicable provisions of chapter 62Q,
including sections 62Q.075; 62Q.1055; 62Q.106; 62Q.12; 62Q.135; 62Q.14;
62Q.145; 62Q.19; 62Q.23, paragraph (c); 62Q.43; 62Q.47; 62Q.50; 62Q.52 to
62Q.56; 62Q.58; 62Q.68 to 62Q.72; and 72A.201 will be met.
(d)
All enforcement and rulemaking powers available under chapters 62D, 62J, 62M,
62N, and 62Q are hereby granted to the commissioner of health with respect to
counties that purchase medical assistance and general assistance medical care
services under this section.
(e)
The commissioner, in consultation with county government, shall develop
administrative and financial reporting requirements for county-based purchasing
programs relating to sections 62D.041, 62D.042, 62D.045, 62D.08, 62N.28,
62N.29, and 62N.31, and other sections as necessary, that are specific to
county administrative, accounting, and reporting systems and consistent with
other statutory requirements of counties.
(f)
The commissioner shall collect from a county-based purchasing plan under this
section the following fees:
(1)
fees attributable to the costs of audits and other examinations of plan
financial operations. These fees are
subject to the provisions of Minnesota Rules, part 4685.2800, subpart 1, item
F;
(2)
an annual fee of $21,500, to be paid by June 15 of each calendar year,
beginning in calendar year 2009; and
(3)
for fiscal year 2009 only, a per-enrollee fee of 14.6 cents, based on the
number of enrollees as of December 31, 2008.
All fees collected under
this paragraph shall be deposited in the state government special revenue fund.
Sec.
8. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256B.692, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd.
4a. Expenditure
of revenues. (a) A county
that has elected to participate in a county-based purchasing plan under this
section shall use any excess revenues over expenses that are received by the
county and are not needed (1) for capital reserves under subdivision 2, (2) to
increase payments to providers, or (3) to repay county investments or
contributions to the county-based purchasing plan, for prevention, early
intervention, and health care programs, services, or activities.
(b)
A county-based purchasing plan under this section is subject to the
unreasonable expense provisions of section 62D.19.
Sec.
9. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
256L.12, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd.
9. Rate
setting; performance withholds. (a)
Rates will be prospective, per capita, where possible. The commissioner may allow health plans to
arrange for inpatient hospital services on a risk or nonrisk basis. The commissioner shall consult with an independent
actuary to determine appropriate rates.
(b)
For services rendered on or after January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2003, the
commissioner shall withhold .5 percent of managed care plan payments under this
section pending completion of performance targets. The withheld funds must be returned no sooner than July 1 and no
later than July 31 of the following year if performance targets in the contract
are achieved. A managed care plan may
include as admitted assets under section 62D.044 any amount withheld under this
paragraph that is reasonably expected to be returned.
(c)
For services rendered on or after January 1, 2004, the commissioner shall
withhold five percent of managed care plan payments under this section pending
completion of performance targets. Each
performance target must be quantifiable, objective, measurable, and reasonably
attainable, except in the case of a performance target based on a federal or
state law or rule. Criteria for
assessment of each performance target must be outlined in writing prior to the
contract effective date. The managed
care plan must demonstrate, to the commissioner's satisfaction, that the data
submitted regarding attainment of the performance target is accurate. The commissioner shall periodically change the
administrative measures used as performance targets in order to improve plan
performance across a broader range of administrative services. The performance targets must include
measurement of plan efforts to contain spending on health care services and
administrative activities. The
commissioner may adopt plan-specific performance targets that take into account
factors affecting only one plan, such as characteristics of the plan's enrollee
population. The withheld funds must
be returned no sooner than July 1 and no later than July 31 of the following
calendar year if performance targets in the contract are achieved. A managed care plan or a county-based
purchasing plan under section 256B.692 may include as admitted assets under
section 62D.044 any amount withheld under this paragraph that is reasonably
expected to be returned.
Sec.
10. Laws 2005, First Special Session
chapter 4, article 8, section 84, as amended by Laws 2006, chapter 264, section
15, is amended to read:
Sec.
84. SOLE-SOURCE OR SINGLE-PLAN MANAGED CARE CONTRACT.
(a)
Notwithstanding
Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.692, subdivision 6, clause (1), paragraph (c),
the commissioner of human services shall approve a county-based purchasing
health plan proposal, submitted on behalf of Cass, Crow Wing, Morrison, Todd,
and Wadena Counties, that requires county-based purchasing on a single-plan
basis contract if the implementation of the single-plan purchasing proposal
does not limit an enrollee's provider choice or access to services and all
other requirements applicable to health plan purchasing are satisfied. The commissioner shall continue single
health plan purchasing arrangements with county-based purchasing entities in
the service areas in existence on May 1, 2006, including arrangements for which
a proposal was submitted by May 1, 2006, on behalf of Cass, Crow Wing,
Morrison, Todd, and Wadena Counties, in response to a request for proposals
issued by the commissioner. The
commissioner shall continue to use single-health plan, county-based purchasing
arrangements for medical assistance and general assistance medical care
programs and products for the counties that were in single-health plan,
county-based purchasing arrangements on March 1, 2008. This paragraph does not require the commissioner
to terminate an existing contract with a noncounty-based purchasing plan that
had enrollment in a medical assistance program or product in these counties on
March 1, 2008. This paragraph expires
on December 31, 2010, or the effective date of a new contract for medical
assistance and general assistance medical care managed care programs entered
into at the conclusion of the commissioner's next scheduled reprocurement
process for the county-based purchasing entities covered by this paragraph, whichever
is later.
(b)
The
commissioner shall consider, and may approve, contracting on a single-health
plan basis with other county-based purchasing plans, or with other
qualified health plans that have coordination arrangements with counties, to
serve persons with a disability who voluntarily enroll, in order to promote
better coordination or integration of health care services, social services and
other community-based services, provided that all requirements applicable to
health plan purchasing, including those in Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.69,
subdivision 23, are satisfied. By
January 15, 2007, the commissioner shall report to the chairs of the
appropriate legislative committees in the house and senate an analysis of the
advantages and disadvantages of using single-health plan purchasing to serve
persons with a disability who are eligible for health care programs. The report shall include consideration of
the impact of federal health care programs and policies for persons who are
eligible for both federal and state health care programs and shall consider
strategies to improve coordination between federal and state health care
programs for those persons. Nothing
in this paragraph supersedes or modifies the requirements in paragraph (a).
Sec.
11. REPORT ON FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF HEALTH CARE PROGRAMS.
Within
the limits of available appropriations, the commissioner of human services
shall report to the legislature under Minnesota Statutes, section 3.195, by
January 15, 2009, with the following information regarding financial management
of health care programs:
(1)
a status report on implementation of the cost containment strategies identified
in the 2005 "Strategies for Savings" report. The report must include:
(i)
information on progress made towards implementation of cost-saving strategies;
(ii)
an explanation of why certain strategies were not implemented; and
(iii)
where appropriate, alternative strategies to those recommended in 2005 for
containing public health care program costs;
(2)
a description of and, to the extent possible, an explanation of recent
differences between the health plan net revenue targets established by the
commissioner for health plans participating in public health care programs and
the actual net revenue realized by the plans from public programs;
(3)
the adequacy of public health care program for fee-for-service rates, including
an identification of service areas or geographical regions where enrollees have
difficulty accessing providers as the result of inadequate provider
payments. This report must include
recommendations to increase rates as needed to eliminate identified access
problems; and
(4)
a progress report on implementation of Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.76,
paragraph (e), requiring payments for physician and professional services to be
based on Medicare relative value units, and an estimated completion date for
implementation of this payment system.
Sec.
12. HEALTH PLAN AND COUNTY-BASED PURCHASING PLAN REQUIREMENTS.
The
commissioner of health shall develop and report to the legislature under
Minnesota Statutes, section 3.195, by January 15, 2009, guidelines to ensure
that health plans, and county-based purchasing plans where applicable, have
consistent procedures for allocating administrative expenses and investment
income across their commercial and public lines of business and across
individual public programs. The
guidelines shall be consistent with generally accepted accounting principles
and principles from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. The guidelines shall not have the effect of
changing allocation for Medicare-related programs as permitted by federal law
and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The report shall include recommendations and cost estimates for
developing detailed standards and procedures for examining the reasonableness
of health plan and county-based purchasing plan administrative expenditures for
publicly funded programs. These
standards and procedures must include a process for detailed examinations of
individual programs and functional areas.
Sec.
13. OMBUDSMAN FOR MANAGED CARE STUDY.
Within
the limits of available appropriations, the commissioner of human services, in
cooperation with the ombudsman for managed care, shall study and report to the
legislature under Minnesota Statutes, section 3.195, by January 15, 2009, with
recommendations on whether the duties of the ombudsman should be expanded to
include advocating on behalf of public health care program fee-for-service
enrollees. The report must include:
(1)
a comparison of the recourse available to managed care clients versus
fee-for-service clients when service problems occur; and
(2)
an estimate of any net cost increase from this change in the ombudsman's
duties, taking into account any reduction in the commissioner's duties.
Sec.
14. REPORTING MANAGED CARE PERFORMANCE DATA.
The
commissioner of human services, in cooperation with the commissioner of health,
shall report to the legislature under Minnesota Statutes, section 3.195, by
January 15, 2009, with recommendations on the adoption of a single method to
compute and publicly report managed health care performance measures in order
to avoid confusion about the plans' performance levels. The study must include recommendations
regarding coordinated use by the two agencies of the following data sources:
(1)
Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) from managed care
organizations;
(2)
data that health plans submit to claim reimbursement for health care
procedures; and
(3)
data collected from medical record reviews of randomly selected individuals.
Sec.
15. CREDENTIALING METHODOLOGY.
The
commissioner of human services shall explore the feasibility of using or
coordinating with the credentialing collaborative between Minnesota payers,
providers, and hospitals in order to make the provider enrollment process for
Minnesota health care programs more efficient.
By December 15, 2009, the commissioner shall inform the chairs of the
senate and house of representatives policy committees and finance divisions
with responsibility for human services of the results of these efforts.
Sec.
16. HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION RENEWAL FEE.
The
health maintenance organization renewal fee under Minnesota Rules, part
4685.2800, subpart 2, shall be increased by 14.6 cents from the level in effect
on June 30, 2008, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2008. The renewal fee shall revert to its previous
level for fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 2009.
Sec.
17. APPROPRIATIONS.
(a)
$261,000 is appropriated from the state government special revenue fund to the
commissioner of health for the purposes of this act for fiscal year 2009. Base level funding for this appropriation
shall be $77,000 for fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 2009.
(b)
Of the appropriation in paragraph (a), $116,000 in fiscal year 2009 is for the
study and report required in section 12, $145,000 in fiscal year 2009 shall be
transferred to the general fund, and $77,000 shall be transferred for each
fiscal year beginning on or after July 1, 2009.
(c)
$145,000 is appropriated from the general fund to the commissioner of human
services for fiscal year 2009 for the actuarial and other department costs
associated with additional reporting requirements for health plans and county-based purchasing plans. Base level funding for this appropriation
for fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 2009, shall be $135,000
each year.
(d)
$96,000 is appropriated from the general fund to the commissioner of human
services for fiscal year 2009 for the study authorized in section 11, clause
(3). This appropriation is onetime."
Delete
the title and insert:
"A
bill for an act relating to human services; improving management of state
health care programs; modifying managed care contracting; modifying
county-based purchasing; requiring reports; appropriating money; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 13.461, by adding a subdivision; 256B.69,
subdivision 5a, by adding subdivisions; 256B.692, subdivision 2, by adding a
subdivision; 256L.12, subdivision 9; Laws 2005, First Special Session chapter
4, article 8, section 84, as amended."
With
the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass and be re-referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was referred:
S. F. No. 3502, A bill for an act relating to traffic
regulations; modifying provisions regulating farm vehicles on highways;
providing for size, weight, and load restrictions on highways; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 169.01, subdivision 55; 169.18, subdivision
5; 169.67, subdivision 3; 169.801; 169.82, subdivision 3; 169.826, subdivision
1a; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 169.145.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill
pass.
The report was adopted.
SECOND READING OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. No. 3502 was read for the second time.
MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE
The following messages were received from the Senate:
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate has reconsidered the vote
whereby S. F. No. 3138 was repassed and has also reconsidered the vote whereby
the recommendations and the Conference Committee report were adopted on May 1,
2008.
S. F. No. 3138, A bill for an act relating to health; changing
provisions for handling genetic information; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006,
sections 13.386, subdivision 3; 144.05, by adding a subdivision; Minnesota
Statutes 2007 Supplement, section 144.125, subdivision 3.
As requested by the House, the Senate has re-referred the
subject matter of said bill to the Conference Committee, as formerly
constituted, for further consideration.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate has concurred in and adopted
the report of the Conference Committee on:
H. F. No. 3222, A bill for an act relating to human services;
amending health care services provisions; making changes to general assistance
medical care, medical assistance, and MinnesotaCare; modifying claims, liens,
and treatment of assets; establishing a statewide information exchange;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 245.462, subdivision 18; 245.470,
subdivision 1; 245.4871, subdivision 27; 245.488, subdivision 1; 256B.056,
subdivisions 2, 4a, 11, by adding a subdivision; 256B.057, subdivision 1;
256B.0571, subdivisions 8, 9, 15, by adding a subdivision; 256B.058; 256B.059,
subdivisions 1, 1a; 256B.0594; 256B.0595, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, by adding
subdivisions; 256B.0624, subdivisions 5, 8; 256B.0625, subdivision 13g;
256B.075, subdivision 2; 256B.0943, subdivision 1; 256B.15, subdivision 4;
256B.69, subdivisions 6, 27, 28; 256J.08, subdivision 73a; 524.3-803; Minnesota
Statutes 2007 Supplement, sections 256.01, subdivision 2b; 256B.055,
subdivision 14; 256B.0623, subdivision 5; 256B.0625, subdivision 49; 256D.03,
subdivision 3; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter
256B.
The Senate has repassed said bill in accordance with the
recommendation and report of the Conference Committee. Said House File is herewith returned to the
House.
Colleen J. Pacheco, Second Assistant Secretary of the Senate
FISCAL CALENDAR
Pursuant to rule 1.22, Solberg requested immediate consideration
of H. F. No. 3082.
H. F. No. 3082 was reported to the House.
Thissen moved to amend H. F.
No. 3082, the third engrossment, as follows:
Page 105, after line 25,
insert:
"ARTICLE 14
TEACHER RETIREMENT BENEFIT
AND
CONTRIBUTION INCREASES
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 127A.50,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Aid
adjustment. Beginning in fiscal
year 1998 and each year thereafter, the commissioner of education shall adjust
state aid payments to school operating funds for Independent School District
No. 625 and Independent School District No. 709 by the net amount of
clauses (1), and (2), and (6), for Special Independent
School District No. 1 709 by the net amount of clauses (1),
(2), and (4) (7), and for all other districts, including charter
schools, but excluding any education organizations that are prohibited from
receiving direct state aids under section 123A.26 or 125A.75, subdivision 7, by
the net amount of clauses (1), (2), (3), and (4), and (5):
(1) a decrease equal to each
district's share of the fiscal year 1997 adjustment effected under Minnesota
Statutes 1996, section 124.2139;
(2) an increase equal to one
percent of the salaries paid to members of the general plan of the Public
Employees Retirement Association in fiscal year 1997, multiplied by 0.35 for
fiscal year 1998 and 0.70 each year thereafter;
(3) a decrease equal to 2.34
percent of the salaries paid to members of the Teachers Retirement Association
in fiscal year 1997; and
(4) an increase equal to 0.5
percent of the salaries paid to members of the Teachers Retirement Association
in fiscal year 2007.;
(5) an increase equal to the
specified percentage of the salaries paid to members of the Teachers Retirement
Association in fiscal year 2010 as follows:
for the 2010-2011
school year 0.25
percent
for the 2011-2012
school year 0.50
percent
for the 2012-2013
school year 0.75
percent
for the 2013-2014
school year 1.00
percent
for the 2014-2015
school year 1.25
percent
for the 2015-2016
school year and each school year thereafter 1.50
percent
(6) an increase equal to the specified percentage of the salaries paid
to members of the St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association in fiscal year
2010 as follows:
for the 2010-2011
school year 0.25
percent
for the 2011-2012
school year 0.50
percent
for the 2012-2013
school year 0.75
percent
for the 2013-2014
school year 1.00
percent
for the 2014-2015
school year 1.25
percent
for the 2015-2016
school year and each school year thereafter 1.50
percent
(7) an increase equal to the specified percentage of the salaries paid
to members of the Duluth Teachers Retirement Fund Association in fiscal year
2010 as follows:
for the 2010-2011
school year 0.25
percent
for the 2011-2012
school year 0.50
percent
for the 2012-2013
school year 0.75
percent
for the 2013-2014
school year 1.00
percent
for the 2014-2015
school year 1.25
percent
for the 2015-2016
school year and each school year thereafter 1.50
percent
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2008.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 354.05, subdivision 38, is amended to read:
Subd. 38. Normal retirement age.
"Normal retirement age" means age 65 for a person who first
became a member of the association or a member of a pension fund listed in
section 356.30, subdivision 3, before July 1, 1989. For a person who first becomes a member of the association after
June 30, 1989, normal retirement age means the higher of age 65 or
"retirement age," as defined in United States Code, title 42, section
416(l), as amended, but not to exceed age 66.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2008.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 354.42, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Employee. (a) The employee
contribution to the fund is an amount equal to the following percentage of the
salary of a member:
(1) after July 1, 2006, for a teacher employed by Special School
District No. 1, Minneapolis, 5.5 percent if the teacher is a coordinated
member, and 9.0 percent if the teacher is a basic member;
(2) for every other teacher, after July 1, 2006, 5.5 percent if the
teacher is a coordinated member and 9.0 percent if the teacher is a basic
member.
period coordinated
member basic
member
(1) before July 1,
2010 5.50
percent 9.00
percent
(2) after June 30,
2010,
and before July 1,
2011 5.75
percent 9.25
percent
(3) after June 30,
2011,
and before July 1,
2012 6.00
percent 9.50
percent
(4) after June 30,
2012,
and before July 1,
2013 6.25
percent 9.75
percent
(5) unless paragraph
(b) applies,
after June 30, 2013,
and
before July 1, 2014 6.50
percent 10.00
percent
(6) unless paragraph
(b) applies,
after June 30, 2014,
and
before July 1, 2015 6.75
percent 10.25
percent
(7) unless paragraph
(b) applies,
after June 30, 2015 7.00
percent 10.50
percent
(b) After July 1, 2012, a scheduled contribution
increase under paragraph (a), clause (5), (6), or (7), is suspended if the most
recent actuarial valuation prepared under section 356.215 indicates that there
is no contribution deficiency when the total employee contributions, employer
contributions under subdivision 3, and direct state aid under section 354A.12
are compared to the total financial requirements of the retirement plan.
(c) This contribution must be made by deduction from
salary. Where any portion of a member's
salary is paid from other than public funds, the member's employee contribution
must be based on the entire salary received.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2008.
Sec. 4.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 354.42, subdivision 3, is amended to
read:
Subd. 3. Employer. (a) The regular employer contribution to the fund by Special
School District No. 1, Minneapolis, after July 1, 2006, and before July 1,
2007, is an amount equal to 5.0 percent of the salary of each of its teachers
who is a coordinated member and 9.0 percent of the salary of each of its
teachers who is a basic member. After
July 1, 2007, and before July 1, 2010, the regular employer contribution
to the fund by Special School District
No. 1, Minneapolis, is an amount equal to 5.5
percent of salary of each coordinated member and 9.5 percent of salary of each
basic member. The regular employer
contribution to the fund by Special School District No. 1, Minneapolis, is an
amount equal to the following percentage of the salary of each teacher:
period coordinated
member basic
member
(1) after June 30,
2010,
and before July 1,
2011 5.75
percent 9.25
percent
(2) after June 30,
2011,
and before July 1,
2012 6.00
percent 9.50
percent
(3) after June 30,
2012,
and before July 1,
2013 6.25
percent 9.75
percent
(4) unless paragraph
(d) applies,
after June 30, 2013,
and
before July 1, 2014 6.50
percent 10.00
percent
(5) unless paragraph
(d) applies,
after June 30, 2014,
and
before July 1, 2015 6.75
percent 10.25
percent
(6) unless paragraph
(d) applies,
after June 30, 2015 7.00
percent 10.50
percent
(b) The additional employer contribution to the fund by
Special School District No. 1, Minneapolis, after July 1, 2006, is an amount
equal to 3.64 percent of the salary of each teacher who is a coordinated member
or is a basic member.
(b) (c) The employer contribution to the fund
for every other employer is an amount equal to 5.0 percent of the salary of
each coordinated member and 9.0 percent of the salary of each basic member
before July 1, 2007, and 5.5 percent of the salary of each coordinated member
and 9.5 percent of the salary of each basic member after June 30, 2007, and
before July 1, 2010. The regular
employer contribution to the fund by every other employer is an amount equal to
the following percentage of the salary of each teacher:
period coordinated
member basic
member
(1) after June 30,
2010, and
before July 1, 2011 5.75
percent 9.25
percent
(2) after June 30,
2011,
and before July 1,
2012 6.00
percent 9.50
percent
(3) after June 30,
2012,
and before July 1,
2013 6.25
percent 9.75
percent
(4) unless paragraph
(d) applies,
after June 30, 2013,
and
before July 1, 2014 6.50
percent 10.00
percent
(5) unless paragraph
(d) applies,
after June 30, 2014,
and
before July 1, 2015 6.75
percent 10.25
percent
(6) unless paragraph
(d) applies,
after June 30, 2015 7.00
percent 10.50
percent
(d) After July 1, 2012, a scheduled contribution
increase under paragraph (a), clause (4), (5), or (6), and paragraph (c),
clause (4), (5), or (6), is suspended if the most recent actuarial valuation
prepared under section 356.215 indicates that there is no contribution
deficiency when the total employee contributions, employer contributions under
subdivision 3, and direct state aid under section 354A.12 are compared to the
total financial requirements of the retirement plan.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2008.
Sec. 5.
Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, section 354.44, subdivision 6, is
amended to read:
Subd. 6. Computation of formula program retirement
annuity. (a) The formula retirement
annuity must be computed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the
formulas stated in paragraph (b) or (d) on the basis of each member's average
salary under section 354.05, subdivision 13a, for the period of the member's
formula service credit.
(b) This paragraph, in conjunction with paragraph
(c), applies to a person who first became a member of the association or a
member of a pension fund listed in section 356.30, subdivision 3, before July
1, 1989, unless paragraph (d), in conjunction with paragraph (e), produces a
higher annuity amount, in which case paragraph (d) applies. The average salary as defined in section
354.05, subdivision 13a, multiplied by the following percentages per year of
formula service credit shall determine the amount of the annuity to which the
member qualifying therefor is entitled for service rendered before July 1,
2006:
Coordinated
Member Basic Member
Each year of service
during first ten the
percent specified the
percent specified in
in
section 356.315, section
356.315,
subdivision
1, per year subdivision 3,
per year
Each year of service
thereafter the
percent specified the
percent specified
in
section 356.315, in
section 356.315,
subdivision
2, per year subdivision 4,
per year
For service rendered on or after July 1, 2006, the average salary as
defined in section 354.05, subdivision 13a, multiplied by the following
percentages per year of service credit, determines the amount the annuity to
which the member qualifying therefor is entitled:
Coordinated
Member Basic Member
Each year of service
during first ten the
percent specified the
percent specified
in
section 356.315, in
section 356.315,
subdivision
1a, per year subdivision 3,
per year
Each year of service
after the
percent specified the
percent specified
ten years of service in
section 356.315, in
section 356.315,
subdivision
2b, per year subdivision 4,
per year
(c)(i) This paragraph applies only to a person who
first became a member of the association or a member of a pension fund listed
in section 356.30, subdivision 3, before July 1, 1989, and whose annuity is
higher when calculated under paragraph (b), in conjunction with this paragraph
than when calculated under paragraph (d), in conjunction with paragraph (e).
(ii) Where any member retires prior to normal
retirement age under a formula annuity, the member shall be paid a retirement
annuity in an amount equal to the normal annuity provided in paragraph (b)
reduced by one-quarter of one percent for each month that the member is under
normal retirement age at the time of retirement except that for any member who
has 30 or more years of allowable service credit, the reduction shall be
applied only for each month that the member is under age 62.
(iii) Any member whose attained age plus credited
allowable service totals 90 years is entitled, upon application, to a
retirement annuity in an amount equal to the normal annuity provided in
paragraph (b), without any reduction by reason of early retirement.
(d) This paragraph applies to a member who has
become at least 55 years old and first became a member of the association after
June 30, 1989, and to any other member who has become at least 55 years old and
whose annuity amount when calculated under this paragraph and in conjunction
with paragraph (e), is higher than it is when calculated under paragraph (b),
in conjunction with paragraph (c). For
a basic member, the average salary, as defined in section 354.05, subdivision
13a, multiplied by the percent specified by section 356.315, subdivision 4, for
each year of service for a basic member shall determine the amount of the
retirement annuity to which the basic member is entitled. The annuity of a basic member who was a
member of the former Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Association as of
June 30, 2006, must be determined according to the annuity formula under the
articles of incorporation of the former Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund
Association in effect as of that date.
For a coordinated member, the average salary, as defined in section 354.05,
subdivision 13a, multiplied by the percent specified in section 356.315,
subdivision 2, for each year of service rendered before July 1, 2006, and
by the percent specified in section 356.315, subdivision 2b, for each year of
service rendered on or after July 1, 2006, and before July 1, 2008, and by
the percent specified in section 356.315, subdivision 2c, for each year of
service rendered after June 30, 2008, determines the amount of the
retirement annuity to which the coordinated member is entitled. If the member has 30 or more years of service
credit, the minimum age requirement of this paragraph does not apply.
(e) This paragraph applies to a person who has
become at least 55 years old and first becomes a member of the association
after June 30, 1989, and to any other member who has become at least 55 years
old and whose annuity is higher when calculated under paragraph (d) in
conjunction with this paragraph than when calculated under paragraph (b), in
conjunction with paragraph (c). An
employee who retires under the formula annuity before the normal retirement age
shall must be paid the normal annuity provided in paragraph (d)
reduced so that the reduced annuity is the actuarial equivalent of the annuity
that would be payable to the employee if the employee deferred receipt of the
annuity and the annuity amount were augmented at an annual rate of three
percent compounded annually from the day the annuity begins to accrue until the
normal retirement age if the employee became an employee before July 1, 2006,
and at 2.5 percent compounded annually if the employee becomes an employee
after June 30, 2006. If the member
has 30 or more years of service credit, the minimum age requirement of this
paragraph does not apply and the reductions and augmentations specified in this
paragraph apply to age 62, rather than to normal retirement age.
(f) No retirement annuity is payable to a former
employee with a salary that exceeds 95 percent of the governor's salary unless
and until the salary figures used in computing the highest five successive
years average salary under paragraph (a) have been audited by the Teachers
Retirement Association and determined by the executive director to comply with
the requirements and limitations of section 354.05, subdivisions 35 and 35a.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2008.
Sec. 6.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 354A.011, subdivision 15a, is amended
to read:
Subd. 15a. Normal retirement age. (a) "Normal retirement age"
means age 65 for a person who first became is a member of the
coordinated program of the St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association or the
new law coordinated program of the Duluth Teachers Retirement Fund Association
or a member of a pension fund listed in section 356.30, subdivision 3, before
July 1, 1989. For a person who first
became a member of the coordinated program of the St. Paul Teachers Retirement
Fund Association or the new law coordinated program of the Duluth Teachers
Retirement Fund Association after June 30, 1989, normal retirement age means
the higher of age 65 or retirement age, as defined in United States Code, title
42, section 416(l), as amended, but not to exceed age 66.
(b) For a person who is a member of the basic program
of the St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association or the old law coordinated
program of the Duluth Teachers Retirement Fund Association, normal retirement
age means the age at which a teacher becomes eligible for a normal retirement
annuity computed upon meeting the age and service requirements specified in the
applicable provisions of the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the
respective teachers retirement fund association.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2008.
Sec. 7.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 354A.12, subdivision 1, is amended to
read:
Subdivision 1.
Employee contributions. (a) The contribution required to be
paid by each member of a teachers retirement fund association shall not be less
than the percentage of total salary specified below for the applicable
association and program:
Percentage
of
Association
and Program Total
Salary
Duluth Teachers Retirement Association
old law and new law
coordinated
programs 5.5
percent
(1) before July 1, 2010 5.50
percent
(2) after June 30, 2010, and before
July 1, 2011 5.75
percent
(3) after June 30, 2011, and before
July 1, 2012 6.00
percent
(4) after June 30, 2012, and before
July 1, 2013 6.25
percent
(5) unless paragraph (b) applies,
after June 30, 2013, and before
July 1, 2014 6.50
percent
(6) unless paragraph (b) applies,
after June 30, 2014, and before
July 1, 2015 6.75
percent
(7) unless paragraph (b) applies,
after June 30, 2015 7.00
percent
St.
Paul Teachers Retirement Association
basic program 8
percent
coordinated program 5.5
percent
(1) before July 1, 2010 5.50
percent
(2) after June 30, 2010, and before
July 1, 2011 5.75
percent
(3) after June 30, 2011, and before
July 1, 2012 6.00
percent
(4) after June 30, 2012, and before
July 1, 2013 6.25
percent
(5) unless paragraph (b) applies,
after June 30, 2013,
and before July 1, 2014 6.50
percent
(6) unless paragraph (b) applies,
after June 30, 2014,
and before July 1, 2015 6.75
percent
(7) unless paragraph (b) applies,
after June 30, 2015 7.00
percent
(b) After July 1, 2012, a scheduled contribution increase under
paragraph (a), clause (5), (6), or (7), is suspended if the most recent
actuarial valuation prepared under section 356.215 indicates that there is no
contribution deficiency when the total employee contributions, employer
contributions under subdivision 3, and direct state aid are compared to the
total financial requirements of the retirement plan.
(c) Contributions
shall be made by deduction from salary and must be remitted directly to the
respective teachers retirement fund association at least once each month.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2008.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 354A.12, subdivision 2a, is amended to read:
Subd. 2a. Employer regular and additional contribution rates. (a) The employing units shall make the
following employer contributions to teachers retirement fund associations:
(1) for any coordinated member of a teachers
retirement fund association in a city of the first class, the employing unit
shall pay the employer Social Security taxes in accordance with section 355.46,
subdivision 3, clause (b);
(2) for any coordinated member of one of the following teachers
retirement fund associations in a city of the first class, the employing unit
shall make a regular employer contribution to the respective retirement fund
association in an amount equal to the designated percentage of the salary of
the coordinated member as provided below:
Duluth Teachers
Retirement
Fund Association 4.50
percent
(A) before July 1, 2010 4.50
percent
(B) after June 30, 2010, and before
July 1, 2011 4.75
percent
(C) after June 30, 2011, and before
July 1, 2012 5.00
percent
(D) after June 30, 2012, and before
July 1, 2013 5.25
percent
(E) unless clause (3) applies,
after June 30, 2013,
and before July 1, 2014 5.50
percent
(F) unless clause (3) applies,
after June 30, 2014,
and before July 1, 2015 5.75
percent
(G) unless clause (3) applies,
after June 30, 2015 6.00
percent
St. Paul Teachers Retirement
Fund Association 4.50
percent
(H) before July 1, 2010 4.50
percent
(I) after June 30, 2010, and before
July 1, 2011 4.75
percent
(J) after June 30, 2011, and before
July 1, 2012 5.00
percent
(K) after June 30, 2012, and before
July 1, 2013 5.25
percent
(L) unless clause (3) applies,
after June 30, 2013,
and before July 1, 2014 5.50
percent
(M) unless clause (3) applies,
after June 30, 2014,
and before July 1, 2015 5.75
percent
(N) unless clause (3) applies,
after June 30, 2015 6.00
percent
(3) After July 1, 2012, a scheduled contribution increase under
paragraph (a), clause (2), item (E), (F), (G), (L), (M), or (N), is suspended
if the most recent actuarial valuation prepared under section 356.215 indicates
that there is no contribution deficiency when the total employee contributions,
employer contributions under subdivision 3, and direct state aid are compared
to the total financial requirements of the retirement plan;
(3)
(4) for any basic member of the St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund
Association, the employing unit shall make a regular employer contribution to
the respective retirement fund in an amount equal to 8.00 percent of the salary
of the basic member;
(4)
(5) for a basic member of the St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund
Association, the employing unit shall make an additional employer contribution
to the respective fund in an amount equal to 3.64 percent of the salary of the
basic member;
(5)
(6) for a coordinated member of a teachers retirement fund association
in a city of the first class, the employing unit shall make an additional employer
contribution to the respective fund in an amount equal to the applicable
percentage of the coordinated member's salary, as provided below:
Duluth Teachers
Retirement
Fund Association 1.29
percent
St. Paul Teachers
Retirement
Fund Association
July
1, 1993 - June 30, 1994 0.50 percent
July
1, 1994 - June 30, 1995 1.50 percent
July
1, 1997, and thereafter 3.84 percent
(b) The regular and additional employer contributions must be remitted
directly to the respective teachers retirement fund association at least once
each month. Delinquent amounts are
payable with interest under the procedure in subdivision 1a.
(c) Payments of regular and additional employer contributions for
school district or technical college employees who are paid from normal
operating funds must be made from the appropriate fund of the district or
technical college.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2008.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 354A.31, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Computation of normal coordinated retirement annuity; St. Paul fund. (a) This subdivision applies to the
coordinated program of the St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association.
(b) The normal coordinated retirement annuity is an amount equal to a
retiring coordinated member's average salary under section 354A.011,
subdivision 7a, multiplied by the retirement annuity formula percentage.
(c) This paragraph, in conjunction with subdivision 6, applies to a
person who first became a member or a member in a pension fund listed in
section 356.30, subdivision 3, before July 1, 1989, unless paragraph (d), in
conjunction with subdivision 7, produces a higher annuity amount, in which case
paragraph (d) will apply. The retirement
annuity formula percentage for purposes of this paragraph is the percent
specified in section 356.315, subdivision 1, per year for each year of
coordinated service for the first ten years and the percent specified in
section 356.315, subdivision 2, for each year of coordinated service thereafter.
(d) This paragraph applies to a person who has become at least 55 years
old and who first becomes a member after June 30, 1989, and to any other member
who has become at least 55 years old and whose annuity amount, when calculated
under this paragraph and in conjunction with subdivision 7 is higher than it is
when calculated under paragraph (c), in conjunction with the provisions of
subdivision 6. The retirement annuity
formula percentage for purposes of this paragraph is the percent specified in
section 356.315, subdivision 2, for each year of coordinated service before
July 1, 2008, and by the percent specified in section 356.315, subdivision 2c,
for each year of service rendered after June 30, 2008. If the member has 30 or more years of
service credit, the minimum age requirement of this paragraph does not apply.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2008.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 354A.31, subdivision 4a, is amended to read:
Subd. 4a. Computation of the normal coordinated retirement annuity; Duluth fund. (a) This subdivision applies to the new law
coordinated program of the Duluth Teachers Retirement Fund Association.
(b) The normal coordinated retirement annuity is an amount equal to a
retiring coordinated member's average salary under section 354A.011,
subdivision 7a, multiplied by the retirement annuity formula percentage.
(c) This paragraph, in conjunction with subdivision 6, applies to a
person who first became a member or a member in a pension fund listed in
section 356.30, subdivision 3, before July 1, 1989, unless paragraph (d), in
conjunction with subdivision 7, produces a higher annuity amount, in which case
paragraph (d) applies. The retirement
annuity formula percentage for purposes of this paragraph is the percent
specified in section 356.315, subdivision 1, per year for each year of
coordinated service for the first ten years and the percent specified in
section 356.315, subdivision 2, for each subsequent year of coordinated
service.
(d) This paragraph applies to a person who is at least 55 years old and
who first becomes a member after June 30, 1989, and to any other member who is
at least 55 years old and whose annuity amount, when calculated under this
paragraph and in conjunction with subdivision 7, is higher than it is when
calculated under paragraph (c) in conjunction with subdivision 6. The retirement annuity formula percentage
for purposes of this paragraph is the percent specified in section 356.315, subdivision
2, for each year of coordinated service before July 1, 2008, and by the
percent specified in section 356.315, subdivision 2c, for each year of service
rendered after June 30, 2008. If the
member has 30 or more years of service credit, the minimum age requirement of
this paragraph does not apply.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2008.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 354A.31, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Actuarial reduction for early retirement. This subdivision applies to a person who has become at least 55
years old and first becomes a coordinated member after June 30, 1989, and to
any other coordinated member who has become at least 55 years old and whose
annuity is higher when calculated using the retirement annuity formula
percentage in subdivision 4, paragraph (d), and subdivision 4a, paragraph (d),
in conjunction with this subdivision than when calculated under subdivision 4,
paragraph (c), or subdivision 4a, paragraph (c), in conjunction with
subdivision 6. A coordinated member who
retires before the full benefit normal retirement age shall
must be paid the retirement annuity calculated using the retirement
annuity formula percentage in subdivision 4, paragraph (d), or subdivision 4a,
paragraph (d), reduced so that the reduced annuity is the actuarial equivalent
of the annuity that would be payable to the member if the member deferred
receipt of the annuity and the annuity amount were augmented at an annual rate
of three percent compounded annually from the day the annuity begins to accrue
until the normal retirement age if the employee became an employee before July
1, 2006, and at 2.5 percent compounded annually from the day the annuity begins
to accrue until the normal retirement age if the person initially becomes a
teacher after June 30, 2006. If the
member has 30 or more years of service credit, the minimum age requirement of
this paragraph does not apply and the reductions and augmentations specified in
this paragraph apply to age 62, rather than to normal retirement age.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2008.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes
2006, section 356.315, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 2c. Certain coordinated members. The applicable benefit accrual rate is 2.0 percent.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2008."
Renumber the articles in sequence
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Thissen amendment and the roll
was called. There were 82 yeas and 51
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Hamilton
Hansen
Haws
Heidgerken
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hosch
Howes
Juhnke
Kalin
Koenen
Kranz
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lillie
Magnus
Mahoney
Marquart
Masin
Morrow
Mullery
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Seifert
Sertich
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Beard
Buesgens
Clark
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erhardt
Erickson
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hortman
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Kahn
Knuth
Kohls
Liebling
Lieder
Loeffler
Madore
Mariani
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Olson
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Poppe
Scalze
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Swails
Tschumper
Wagenius
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Sertich moved to amend H. F.
No. 3082, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 13, line 6, before
"The" insert "(a)"
Page 13, line 7, after
"dissolved" insert "for the retirement plans
administered by the Minnesota State Retirement System and the Public Employees
Retirement Association"
Page 13, after line 12,
insert:
"(b) The
postretirement investment fund established in section 11A.18 continues for the
Teachers Retirement Association even if a composite funded ratio condition set
forth in paragraph (a) occurs."
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Severson moved to amend H.
F. No. 3082, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 141, after line 34,
insert:
"ARTICLE 19
POSTRETIREMENT ADJUSTMENT
MAXIMUMS
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 354A.27, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 7. Maximum postretirement
adjustment. Notwithstanding
any provision of subdivision 1, 5, or 6, to the contrary, an annual
postretirement adjustment under this section may not exceed the percentage
amount under section 11A.18, subdivision 9, paragraph (3), clause (2), or
section 11A.181, subdivision 3, paragraph (a), clause (a).
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 354A.29, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 5a. Maximum postretirement
adjustment. Notwithstanding
any provision of subdivision 3, 4, or 5, or Laws 2007, chapter 134, article 7,
section 1, to the contrary, an annual postretirement adjustment under this
section or under Laws 2007, chapter 134, article 7, section 1, may not exceed
the percentage amount under section 11A.18, subdivision 9, paragraph (3),
clause (2), or section 11A.181, subdivision 3, paragraph (a), clause (a)."
Renumber the articles in
sequence
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Severson amendment and the roll
was called. There were 7 yeas and 125
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Buesgens
Emmer
Hackbarth
Olson
Seifert
Severson
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Finstad
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Kranz
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Emmer offered an amendment to H. F. No. 3082,
the third engrossment, as amended.
POINT
OF ORDER
Kahn raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the
Emmer amendment was not in order.
Speaker pro tempore Juhnke ruled the point of order well taken and the
Emmer amendment out of order.
Garofalo moved to amend H.
F. No. 3082, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 128, line 23, before
the period, insert "and may not be used for political purposes"
Johnson moved to amend the Garofalo amendment to H. F. No.
3082, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 2, after "for" insert "partisan"
The motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was
adopted.
The question recurred on the Garofalo amendment, as amended, to
H. F. No. 3082, the third engrossment, as amended. The motion prevailed and the amendment, as
amended, was adopted.
Pursuant to rule 1.50, Sertich moved that the House be allowed
to continue in session after 12:00 midnight.
The motion prevailed.
Hackbarth moved to amend H.
F. No. 3082, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 125, delete section 12
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Hackbarth amendment and the roll
was called. There were 44 yeas and 89
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Brown
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Erickson
Finstad
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Heidgerken
Hoppe
Kohls
Lanning
Magnus
McNamara
Nornes
Olson
Ozment
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Ruth
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simpson
Tingelstad
Urdahl
Wardlow
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kranz
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Wardlow and Urdahl moved to
amend H. F. No. 3082, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 13, delete article 2
Renumber the articles in
sequence
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Wardlow and Urdahl amendment and
the roll was called. There were 19 yeas
and 114 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Brod
Buesgens
Dean
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Emmer
Finstad
Hackbarth
Heidgerken
Kranz
McNamara
Olson
Paulsen
Seifert
Shimanski
Urdahl
Wardlow
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eastlund
Eken
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Ozment
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Severson
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Emmer moved to amend H. F.
No. 3082, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 105, line 29, delete
"[423A.021]" and insert "[423C.061]"
Page 105, line 30, delete
"a salaried" and insert "the Minneapolis" and
delete "in"
Page 105, line 31, delete
everything before the comma
Page 106, line 17, delete
"a salaried" and insert "the Minneapolis" and
delete "in" and insert ", if it is"
Page 106, line 18, delete
everything before "no" and delete "is"
Page 106, after line 30,
insert:
"EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective the day after the governing body of the city of
Minneapolis and its chief clerical officer timely complete their compliance
with Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021."
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Emmer amendment and the roll was
called. There were 10 yeas and 122 nays
as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Buesgens
Drazkowski
Emmer
Finstad
Garofalo
Olson
Peppin
Severson
Wardlow
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Berns
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eastlund
Eken
Erhardt
Erickson
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Heidgerken
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Kranz
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Paulsen
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, N.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Seifert
Sertich
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Urdahl
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
H. F. No. 3082, A bill for an act relating to retirement;
various retirement plans; adding two employment positions to the correctional
state employees retirement plan; including certain departments of the Rice
Memorial Hospital in Willmar and the Worthington Regional Hospital in
privatized public employee retirement coverage; providing for the potential
dissolution of the Minnesota Post Retirement Investment Fund; increasing
teacher retirement plan reemployed annuitant earnings limitations; temporarily
exempting Metropolitan Airports Commission police officers from reemployed
annuitant earnings limits; mandating joint and survivor optional annuities rather
than single life annuities as basic annuity form; making various changes in
retirement plan administrative provisions; clarifying general state employee
retirement plan alternative coverage elections by certain unclassified state
employees retirement program participants; clarifying direct state aid for the
teacher retirement associations; clarifying the handling of unclaimed
retirement accounts in the individual retirement account plan; providing for a
study of certain Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System tenure track
faculty members; modifying the manner
in which official actuarial work for public pension plans is performed;
allowing pension plans greater latitude in setting salary and payroll assumptions;
extending amortization target dates for various retirement plans; making the
number and identity of tax-sheltered annuity vendors a mandatory bargaining
item for school districts and their employees; allowing a certain firefighter
relief association certain benefit increases; providing for certain teacher
retirement benefit and contribution increases; allowing security broker-dealers
to directly hold local pension plan assets; increasing upmost flexible service
pension maximum amounts for volunteer firefighters; creating a voluntary statewide
volunteer firefighter retirement plan advisory board within the Public
Employees Retirement Association; allowing various retirement plans to accept
labor union retired member dues deduction authorizations; authorizing various
prior service credit purchases; authorizing certain service credit and coverage
transfers; authorizing a disability benefit application to be rescinded;
authorizing a retirement coverage termination; providing an additional benefit
to certain injured Minneapolis bomb squad officers; allowing certain
Independent School District No. 625 school board members to make back defined
contribution retirement plan contributions; revising post-2009 additional
amortization state aid allocations; modifying PERA-P&F duty disability
benefit amounts; authorizing a PERA prior military service credit purchase;
revising the administrative duties of the board and the executive director of
the Minnesota State Retirement System; increasing pension commission
membership; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections
3.85, subdivision 3; 6.67; 11A.18, subdivision 9, by adding subdivisions;
16A.055, subdivision 5; 43A.346, subdivisions 4, 5, 6, 7; 69.011, subdivision
1; 123B.02,
subdivision 15; 127A.50,
subdivision 1; 352.03, subdivisions 4, 5; 352.12, subdivision 2; 352.22,
subdivision 10; 352.931, subdivision 1; 352.97; 352.98, subdivisions 1, 2, 3,
4, 5; 352D.075, subdivision 2a; 353.01, subdivisions 10, 11a, by adding a
subdivision; 353.27, by adding a subdivision; 353.30, subdivision 3; 353.33,
subdivision 5; 353.64, subdivision 11; 353.656, subdivision 2; 353D.05,
subdivision 2; 353D.12, subdivision 4; 353E.07, subdivision 7; 354.05,
subdivisions 37, 38; 354.33, subdivision 5; 354.42, subdivisions 2, 3; 354.44,
subdivision 5; 354A.011, subdivision 15a; 354A.12, subdivisions 1, 2a, 3a;
354A.31, subdivisions 3, 4, 4a, 7; 354B.20, by adding a subdivision; 354B.25,
subdivision 5, by adding a subdivision; 354C.165; 356.20, subdivisions 1, 2, 3,
4, 4a; 356.214, subdivisions 1, 3, by adding a subdivision; 356.215,
subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 8, 11, 18; 356.24, subdivision 1; 356.315, by adding a
subdivision; 356.41; 356.46, as amended; 356.47, subdivision 3; 356.551,
subdivision 2; 356.611, subdivision 2, by adding a subdivision; 356A.06,
subdivisions 1, 7, 8b; 356B.10, subdivision 3; 363A.36, subdivision 1;
383B.914, subdivision 7; 423A.02, subdivision 1b; 424A.001, subdivision 6, by
adding a subdivision; 424A.02, subdivisions 3, 7, 9; 424A.05, subdivision 3;
518.003, subdivision 8; Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, sections 43A.346,
subdivisions 1, 2; 352.01, subdivision 2a; 352.017, subdivision 2; 352.91,
subdivision 3d; 352.955, subdivisions 3, 5; 352D.02, subdivisions 1, 3; 353.01,
subdivision 2b; 353.0161, subdivision 2; 353.27, subdivision 14; 353.32,
subdivision 1a; 353.656, subdivision 1; 353.657, subdivision 2a; 353F.02,
subdivision 4; 354.096, subdivision 2; 354.44, subdivision 6; 354.72,
subdivision 2; 354A.12, subdivision 3c; 354C.12, subdivision 4; 356.96,
subdivision 1; 422A.06, subdivision 8; Laws 2002, chapter 392, article 2,
section 4; Laws 2006, chapter 271, article 5, section 5; proposing coding for
new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 11A; 352; 353D; 353F; 354; 354C; 356;
423A; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 352.96; 354.44, subdivision
6a; 354.465; 354.51, subdivision 4; 354.55, subdivisions 2, 3, 6, 12, 15;
354A.091, subdivisions 1a, 1b; 354A.12, subdivision 3a; 355.629; 356.214,
subdivision 2; 356.215, subdivision 2a; Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement,
section 354A.12, subdivisions 3b, 3c; Laws 1965, chapter 592, sections 3, as
amended; 4, as amended; Laws 1967, chapter 575, sections 2, as amended; 3; 4;
Laws 1969, chapter 352, section 1, subdivisions 3, 4, 5, 6; Laws 1969, chapter
526, sections 3; 4; 5, as amended; 7, as amended; Laws 1971, chapter 140,
sections 2, as amended; 3, as amended; 4, as amended; 5, as amended; Laws 1971,
chapter 214, section 1, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; Laws 1973, chapter 304,
section 1, subdivisions 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9; Laws 1973, chapter 472, section 1,
as amended; Laws 1975, chapter 185, section 1; Laws 1985, chapter 261, section
37, as amended; Laws 1991, chapter 125, section 1; Laws 1993, chapter 244,
article 4, section 1; Laws 2005, First Special Session chapter 8, article 1, section
23; Minnesota Rules, parts 7905.0100; 7905.0200; 7905.0300; 7905.0400;
7905.0500; 7905.0600; 7905.0700; 7905.0800; 7905.0900; 7905.1000; 7905.1100;
7905.1200; 7905.1300; 7905.1400; 7905.1500; 7905.1600; 7905.1700; 7905.1800;
7905.1900; 7905.2000; 7905.2100; 7905.2200; 7905.2300; 7905.2400; 7905.2450;
7905.2500; 7905.2560; 7905.2600; 7905.2700; 7905.2800; 7905.2900.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called.
Pursuant to rule 2.05, Speaker pro tempore Juhnke excused
Buesgens and Erickson from voting on final passage of H. F. No. 3082, the third
engrossment, as amended.
There were 108 yeas and 20 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
DeLaForest
Demmer
Dill
Dittrich
Dominguez
Doty
Eastlund
Eken
Erhardt
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jaros
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kranz
Laine
Lanning
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Madore
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Moe
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Olin
Pelowski
Peterson, A.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruth
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Simpson
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Tingelstad
Tschumper
Wagenius
Walker
Ward
Wardlow
Welti
Winkler
Wollschlager
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Berns
Brod
Dean
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Emmer
Finstad
Garofalo
Heidgerken
Kohls
Olson
Paulsen
Peppin
Peterson, N.
Seifert
Urdahl
Westrom
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
Sertich moved that the House recess subject to the call of the
Chair. The motion prevailed.
RECESS
RECONVENED
The House reconvened and was called to order by the Speaker.
CALENDAR FOR THE DAY
Sertich moved that the remaining bills on the Calendar for the
Day be continued. The motion prevailed.
ADJOURNMENT
Sertich moved that when the House adjourns today it adjourn
until 8:30 a.m., Tuesday, May 13, 2008.
The motion prevailed.
Sertich moved that the House adjourn. The motion prevailed, and the Speaker declared the House stands
adjourned until 8:30 a.m., Tuesday, May 13, 2008.
Albin
A. Mathiowetz,
Chief Clerk, House of Representatives