STATE OF MINNESOTA
EIGHTY-SIXTH SESSION - 2010
_____________________
SEVENTY-NINTH DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Wednesday, March 24,
2010
The House of Representatives convened at 12:30
p.m. and was called to order by Margaret Anderson Kelliher, Speaker of the
House.
Prayer was offered by the Reverend Ilene Blanche,
Rivers of Living Water Christian Center, Lake City, Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge
of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
The roll was called and the following
members were present:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
A quorum was present.
Atkins was excused.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the
Journal of the preceding day. Gottwalt
moved that further reading of the Journal be dispensed with and that the
Journal be approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk. The motion prevailed.
REPORTS OF
STANDING COMMITTEES AND DIVISIONS
Lenczewski
from the Committee on Taxes to which was referred:
H. F. No. 2695,
A bill for an act relating to economic development; encouraging job creation;
allowing tax credits for job growth investment credit and historic structure
rehabilitation; disallowing the deduction of certain dividends; expanding the
use of special assessment for certain energy conservation improvements;
expanding the permitted use of tax increment financing for certain projects;
repealing restrictions on city of Bloomington's development of the Mall of
America site; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections
290.06, by adding a subdivision; 290.21, subdivision 4; 429.011, by adding
subdivisions; 429.021, subdivision 1; 429.031, subdivision 3; 469.174, by
adding a subdivision; 469.175, by adding a subdivision; 469.176, subdivisions
1b, 4c, by adding subdivisions; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
469.153, subdivision 2; Laws 1986, chapter 391, section 1; Laws 1995, chapter
264, article 5, sections 44, subdivision 4, as amended; 45, subdivision 1, as
amended; Laws 2008, chapter 366, article 5, sections 28, subdivision 1; 29,
subdivisions 1, 2, 4; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes,
chapters 116J; 290; 469; repealing Laws 1996, chapter 464, article 1, section
8, subdivision 5.
Reported
the same back with the following amendments:
Delete
everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section
1. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section
13.4967, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 8. SMALL
BUSINESS INVESTMENT TAX CREDIT. Data
related to small business investment tax credit certifications and
certification of qualified small businesses, qualified investors, and qualified
funds, is classified in section 116J.8737.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 2. [116J.8737]
SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT TAX CREDIT.
Subdivision
1. Definitions. (a)
For the purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings given.
(b)
"Qualified small business" means a business that has been certified
by the commissioner under subdivision 2.
(c)
"Qualified investor" means an investor who has been certified by the
commissioner under subdivision 3.
(d)
"Qualified fund" means a pooled angel investment network fund that
has been certified by the commissioner under subdivision 4.
(e)
"Qualified investment" means a cash investment in a qualified small
business of a minimum of:
(1) $10,000
in a calendar year by a qualified investor; or
(2) $30,000
in a calendar year by a qualified fund.
A qualified
investment must be made in exchange for common stock, a partnership or
membership interest, preferred stock, debt with mandatory conversion to equity,
or an equivalent ownership interest as determined by the commissioner.
(f)
"Family" means a family member within the meaning of the Internal
Revenue Code, section 267(c)(4).
(g)
"Pass-through entity" means a corporation that for the applicable
taxable year is treated as an S corporation or a general partnership, limited
partnership, limited liability partnership, trust, or limited liability company
and which for the applicable taxable year is not taxed as a corporation under
chapter 290.
Subd. 2. Certification
of qualified small businesses. (a)
Businesses may apply to the commissioner for certification as a qualified small
business for a calendar year. The
application must be in the form and be made under the procedures specified by
the commissioner, accompanied by an application fee of $150. Application fees are deposited in the small
business investment tax credit administration account in the special revenue
fund. The application for certification
for 2010 must be made available on the department's Web site by August 1, 2010. Applications for subsequent years'
certification must be made available on the department's Web site by November 1
of the preceding year.
(b) Within
30 days of receiving an application for certification under this subdivision,
the commissioner must either certify the business as satisfying the conditions
required of a qualified small business, request additional information from the
business, or reject the application for certification. If the commissioner requests additional
information from the business, the commissioner must either certify the
business or reject the application within 30 days of receiving the additional
information. If the commissioner neither
certifies the business nor rejects the application within 30 days of receiving
the original application or within 30 days of receiving the additional
information requested, whichever is later, then the application is deemed
rejected, and the commissioner must refund the $150 application fee. A business that applies for certification and
is rejected may reapply.
(c) To
receive certification, a business must satisfy all of the following conditions:
(1) the
business has its headquarters in Minnesota;
(2) at least
51 percent of the business's employees are employed in Minnesota, and 51
percent of the business's total payroll is paid or incurred in the state;
(3) the
business is engaged in, or is committed to engage in, innovation in Minnesota
in one of the following as its primary business activity:
(i) using
proprietary technology to add value to a product, process, or service in a
qualified high-technology field;
(ii)
researching or developing a proprietary product, process, or service in a
qualified high-technology field; or
(iii)
researching, developing, or producing a new proprietary technology for use in
the fields of tourism, forestry, mining, manufacturing, or transportation.
(4) other
than the activities specifically listed in clause (3), the business is not
engaged in real estate development, insurance, banking, lending, lobbying,
political consulting, information technology consulting, wholesale or retail
trade, leisure, hospitality, transportation, construction, ethanol production
from corn, or professional services provided by attorneys, accountants,
business consultants, physicians, or health care consultants;
(5) the
business has fewer than 25 employees;
(6) the
business must pay its employees annual wages of at least 175 percent of the
federal poverty guideline for the year for a family of four, except that this
requirement must be reduced proportionately for employees who work less than
full-time, and does not apply to an executive, officer, or member of the board
of the business, or to any employee who owns, controls, or holds power to vote
more than 20 percent of the outstanding securities of the business;
(7) the
business has not been in operation for more than ten years;
(8) the
business has not previously received private equity investments of more than
$2,000,000; and
(9) the
business is not an entity disqualified under section 80A.50, paragraph (b),
clause (3).
(d) In
applying the limit under paragraph (c), clause (5), the employees in all
members of the unitary business, as defined in section 290.17, subdivision 4,
must be included.
(e) In
order for a qualified investment in a business to be eligible for tax credits,
the business must have applied for and received certification for the calendar
year in which the investment was made prior to the date on which the qualified
investment was made.
(f) The
commissioner must maintain a list of businesses certified under this
subdivision for the calendar year and make the list accessible to the public on
the department's Web site.
(g) For
purposes of this subdivision, the following terms have the meanings given:
(1)
"qualified high-technology field" includes aerospace, agricultural
processing, renewable energy, energy efficiency and conservation, environmental
engineering, food technology, cellulosic ethanol, information technology,
materials science technology, nanotechnology, telecommunications,
biotechnology, medical device products, pharmaceuticals, diagnostics,
biologicals, chemistry, veterinary science, and similar fields; and
(2)
"proprietary technology" means the technical innovations that are
unique and legally owned or licensed by a business and includes, without
limitation, those innovations that are patented, patent pending, a subject of
trade secrets, or copyrighted.
Subd. 3. Certification
of qualified investors. (a)
Investors may apply to the commissioner for certification as a qualified
investor for a taxable year. The
application must be in the form and be made under the procedures specified by
the commissioner, accompanied by an application fee of $350. Application fees are deposited in the small
business investment tax credit administration account in the special revenue
fund. The application for certification
for 2010 must be made available on the department's Web site by August 1, 2010. Applications for subsequent years'
certification must be made available on the department's Web site by November 1
of the preceding year.
(b) Within
30 days of receiving an application for certification under this subdivision,
the commissioner must either certify the investor as satisfying the conditions
required of a qualified investor, request additional information from the
investor, or reject the application for certification. If the commissioner requests additional
information from the investor, the commissioner must either certify the
investor or reject the application within 30 days of receiving the additional
information. If the commissioner neither
certifies the investor nor rejects the application within 30 days of receiving
the original application or within 30 days of receiving the additional
information requested, whichever is later, then the application is deemed
rejected, and the commissioner must refund the $350 application fee. An investor who applies for certification and
is rejected may reapply.
(c) To
receive certification, an investor must certify to the commissioner that the
investor will only invest in a transaction that is exempt under section 80A.46,
clause (13) or (14), or in a security registered under section 80A.50,
paragraph (b).
(d) In
order for a qualified investment in a qualified small business to be eligible
for tax credits, a qualified investor who makes the investment must have
applied for and received certification for the calendar year prior to making
the qualified investment, except in the case of an investor who is not an
accredited investor, within the
meaning of
Regulation D of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Code of Federal
Regulations, title 17, section 230.501, paragraph (a), application for
certification may be made within 30 days after making the qualified investment.
Subd. 4. Certification
of qualified funds. (a) A
pass-through entity may apply to the commissioner for certification as a
qualified fund for a calendar year. The
application must be in the form and be made under the procedures specified by
the commissioner, accompanied by an application fee of $1,000. Application fees are deposited in the small
business investment tax credit administration account in the special revenue
fund. The application for certification
for 2010 of qualified funds must be made available on the department's Web site
by August 1, 2010. Applications for
subsequent years' certification must be made available by November 1 of the
preceding year.
(b) Within
30 days of receiving an application for certification under this subdivision,
the commissioner must either certify the fund as satisfying the conditions
required of a qualified fund, request additional information from the fund, or
reject the application for certification.
If the commissioner requests additional information from the fund, the
commissioner must either certify the fund or reject the application within 30
days of receiving the additional information.
If the commissioner neither certifies the fund nor rejects the
application within 30 days of receiving the original application or within 30
days of receiving the additional information requested, whichever is later,
then the application is deemed rejected, and the commissioner must refund the
$1,000 application fee. A fund that
applies for certification and is rejected may reapply.
(c) To
receive certification, a fund must:
(1) invest
or intend to invest in qualified small businesses;
(2) be
organized as a pass-through entity; and
(3) have at
least three separate investors, all of whom satisfy the conditions in
subdivision 3, paragraph (c).
(d)
Investments in the fund may consist of equity investments or notes that pay
interest or other fixed amounts, or any combination of both.
(e) In order
for a qualified investment in a qualified small business to be eligible for tax
credits, a qualified fund that makes the investment must have applied for and
received certification for the calendar year prior to making the qualified
investment.
Subd. 5. Credit
allowed. (a) A qualified
investor or qualified fund is eligible for a credit equal to 25 percent of the
qualified investment in a qualified small business. Investments made by a pass-through entity
qualify for a credit only if the entity is a qualified fund. The commissioner must not allocate more than
$2,500,000 in credits to qualified taxpayers or qualified funds for taxable
years beginning after December 31, 2009, and before January 1, 2011,
and must not allocate more than $5,000,000 in credits per year for taxable
years beginning after December 31, 2010, and before January 1, 2016. Any portion of a taxable year's credits that
is not allocated by the commissioner does not cancel and may be carried forward
to subsequent taxable years until all credits have been allocated.
(b) The
commissioner may not allocate more than a total maximum amount in credits for a
taxable year to a qualified investor for the investor's cumulative qualified
investments as an individual qualified investor and as an investor in a
qualified fund; for married couples filing joint returns the maximum is
$250,000, and for all other filers the maximum is $125,000. The commissioner may not allocate more than a
total of $1,000,000 in credits over all taxable years for qualified investments
in any one qualified small business.
(c) The
commissioner may not allocate a credit to a qualified investor either as an
individual qualified investor or as an investor in a qualified fund if the
investor receives more than 50 percent of the investor's gross annual income
from the qualified small business in which the qualified investment is proposed. A member of the family of an individual
disqualified by this paragraph is not eligible for a credit under this section. For a married couple filing a joint return,
the limitations in this paragraph apply collectively to the investor and spouse. For purposes of determining the ownership
interest of an investor under this paragraph, the rules under section 267(c)
and 267(e) of the Internal Revenue Code apply.
(d)
Applications for tax credits for 2010 must be made available on the department's
Web site by September 1, 2010, and the department must begin
accepting applications by September 1, 2010.
Applications for subsequent years must be made available by November 1
of the preceding year.
(e)
Qualified investors and qualified funds must apply to the commissioner for tax
credits. Tax credits must be allocated
to qualified investors or qualified funds in the order that the tax credit
request applications are filed with the department. The commissioner must approve or reject tax
credit request applications within 15 days of receiving the application. The investment specified in the application
must be made within 60 days of the allocation of the credits. If the investment is not made within 60 days,
the credit allocation is canceled and available for reallocation. A qualified investor or qualified fund that
fails to invest as specified in the application, within 60 days of allocation
of the credits, must notify the commissioner of the failure to invest within
five business days of the expiration of the 60-day investment period.
(f) All tax
credit request applications filed with the department on the same day must be
treated as having been filed contemporaneously.
If two or more qualified investors or qualified funds file tax credit
request applications on the same day, and the aggregate amount of credit
allocation claims exceeds the aggregate limit of credits under this section or
the lesser amount of credits that remain unallocated on that day, then the
credits must be allocated among the qualified investors or qualified funds who
filed on that day on a pro rata basis with respect to the amounts claimed. The pro rata allocation for any one qualified
investor or qualified fund is the product obtained by multiplying a fraction,
the numerator of which is the amount of the credit allocation claim filed on
behalf of a qualified investor and the denominator of which is the total of all
credit allocation claims filed on behalf of all applicants on that day, by the
amount of credits that remain unallocated on that day for the taxable year.
(g) A
qualified investor or qualified fund, or a qualified small business acting on
their behalf, must notify the commissioner when an investment for which credits
were allocated has been made, and the taxable year in which the investment was
made. A qualified fund must also provide
the commissioner with a statement indicating the amount invested by each investor
in the qualified fund based on each investor's share of the assets of the
qualified fund at the time of the qualified investment. After receiving notification that the
investment was made, the commissioner must issue credit certificates for the
taxable year in which the investment was made to the qualified investor or, for
an investment made by a qualified fund, to each qualified investor who is an
investor in the fund. The certificate
must state that the credit is subject to revocation if the qualified investor
or qualified fund does not hold the investment in the qualified small business
for at least three years, consisting of the calendar year in which the
investment was made and the two following years. The three-year holding period does not apply if:
(1) the
investment by the qualified investor or qualified fund becomes worthless before
the end of the three‑year period;
(2) 80
percent or more of the assets of the qualified small business is sold before
the end of the three-year period;
(3) the
qualified small business is sold before the end of the three-year period; or
(4) the
qualified small business's common stock begins trading on a public exchange
before the end of the three‑year period.
(h) The
commissioner must notify the commissioner of revenue of credit certificates
issued under this section.
Subd. 6. Annual
reports. (a) By February 1 of
each year each qualified small business that received an investment that
qualified for a credit, and each qualified investor and qualified fund that
made an investment that qualified for a credit, must submit an annual report to
the commissioner and pay a filing fee of $100 if required under this
subdivision. Each qualified investor and
qualified fund must submit reports for three years following each year in which
it made an investment that qualified for a credit, and each qualified small
business must submit reports for five years following the year in which it
received an investment qualifying for a credit.
Reports must be made in the form required by the commissioner. All filing fees collected are deposited in
the small business investment tax credit administration account in the special
revenue fund.
(b) A
report from a qualified small business must certify that the business satisfies
the following requirements:
(1) the
business has its headquarters in Minnesota;
(2) at
least 51 percent of the business's employees are employed in Minnesota, and 51
percent of the business's total payroll is paid or incurred in the state;
(3) that
the business is engaged in, or is committed to engage in, innovation in
Minnesota as defined under subdivision 2; and
(4) that
the business meets the payroll requirements in subdivision 2, paragraph (c),
clause (6).
(c) Reports
from qualified investors must certify that the investor remains invested in the
qualified small business as required by subdivision 5, paragraph (d).
(d) Reports
from qualified funds must certify that the fund remains invested in the
qualified small business as required by subdivision 5, paragraph (d).
(e) A
qualified small business that ceases all operations and becomes insolvent must
file a final an annual report in the form required by the commissioner
documenting its insolvency. In following
years the business is exempt from the annual reporting requirement, the report
filing fee, and the fine for failure to file a report.
(f) A
qualified small business, qualified investor, or qualified fund that fails to
file an annual report as required under this subdivision is subject to a $500
fine.
Subd. 7. Revocation
of credits. (a) If the
commissioner determines that a qualified investor or qualified fund did not
meet the three-year holding period required in subdivision 5, paragraph (d),
any credit allocated and certified to the investor or fund is revoked and must
be repaid by the investor.
(b) If the
commissioner determines that a business did not meet the employment and payroll
requirements in subdivision 2, paragraph (c), clause (2), in any of the five
calendar years following the year in which an investment in the business that
qualified for a tax credit under this section was made, the business must repay
the following percentage of the credits allowed for qualified investments in
the business:
Year
following the year in which Percentage
of credit
the
investment was made: required
to be repaid:
First 100%
Second 80%
Third 60%
Fourth 40%
Fifth 20%
Sixth
and later 0
(c) The commissioner must notify the commissioner of
revenue of every credit revoked and subject to full or partial repayment under
this section.
(d) For the repayment of credits allowed under this
section and section 290.0692, a qualified small business, qualified investor,
or investor in a qualified fund must file an amended return with the
commissioner of revenue and pay any amounts required to be repaid within 30
days after becoming subject to repayment under this section.
Subd. 8.
Data privacy. (a) Data contained in an application
submitted to the commissioner under subdivision 2, 3, or 4 of this section is
nonpublic data, as defined in section 13.02, subdivision 9, except that the
following data items are public:
(1) the name of a qualified small business upon
approval of the application and certification by the commissioner under
subdivision 2;
(2) the name of a qualified investor upon approval of
the application and certification by the commissioner under subdivision 3;
(3) the name of a qualified fund upon approval of the
application and certification by the commissioner under subdivision 4;
(4) for credit certificates issued under subdivision
5, the amount of the credit certificate issued, amount of the qualifying
investment, the name of the qualifying investor or qualifying fund that
received the certificate, and the name of the qualifying small business in
which the qualifying investment was made;
(5) for credits revoked under subdivision 7, paragraph
(a), the amount revoked and the name of the qualified investor or qualified
fund; and
(6) for credits revoked under subdivision 7,
paragraphs (b) and (c), the amount revoked and the name of the qualified small
business.
(b) The following data, including data classified as
nonpublic, must be provided to the consultant for use in conducting the program
evaluation under subdivision 10:
(1) the commissioner of employment and economic
development shall provide data contained in an application for certification
received from a qualified small business, qualified investor, or qualified
fund, and any annual reporting information received on a qualified small business,
qualified investor, or qualified fund; and
(2) the commissioner of revenue shall provide data
contained in any applicable tax returns of a qualified small business,
qualified investor, or qualified fund.
Subd. 9.
Report to legislature. Beginning in 2011, the commissioner
must annually report by March 15 to the chairs and ranking minority members of
the legislative committees having jurisdiction over taxes and economic
development in the senate and the house of representatives, in compliance with Minnesota
Statutes, sections 3.195 and 3.197, on the tax credits issued under this
section. The report must include:
(1) the number and amount of the credits issued;
(2) the recipients of the credits;
(3) for each qualified small business, its location, line
of business, and if it received an investment resulting in certification of tax
credits;
(4) the total amount of investment in each qualified
small business resulting in certification of tax credits;
(5) for each qualified small business that received
investments resulting in tax credits, the total amount of additional investment
that did not qualify for the tax credit;
(6) the number and amount of credits revoked under
subdivision 7;
(7) the number and amount of credits that are no longer
subject to the three-year holding period because of the exceptions under
subdivision 5, paragraph (g), clauses (1) to (4); and
(8) any other information relevant to evaluating the
effect of these credits.
Subd. 10.
Program evaluation. (a) No later than December 31, 2012,
the commissioner of revenue, after consultation with the commissioners of
management and budget and employment and economic development, shall contract
with a qualified outside entity or individual to evaluate the effects of the
small business investment tax credit on the Minnesota economy. The contractor must not be associated with,
employed by, or have contracts with the entities involved in or associated with
the venture capital, angel investment, life science, or high technology industries. The program evaluation must be completed by
January 2014, and provided to the chairs and ranking minority members of the
legislative commissions having jurisdiction over taxes and economic development
in the senate and the house of representatives, in compliance with sections
3.195 and 3.197. The program evaluation
must include, in addition to any other matters the commissioner considers
relevant to evaluating the effectiveness of the credit, analysis of:
(1) the effect of the credit on the level of equity
investment in qualified small businesses in Minnesota, including investments by
angel investors, venture capital firms, and other sources of equity capital for
startup businesses;
(2) the effect of the credit, if any, on investment in
firms other than qualified small businesses;
(3) the amount of economic activity generated by
qualified small businesses that received investments that qualified for the
credit;
(4) the incremental change in Minnesota state and local
taxes paid as a result of the allowance of the credit; and
(5) the net benefit to the Minnesota economy of
allowance of the credit relative to alternative uses of the resources, such as
increasing the research and development credit or reducing the corporate
franchise tax rate.
(b) $100,000 is appropriated to the commissioner of
revenue from the general fund for fiscal year 2013 for the purposes of this
evaluation. Any unspent amount of this
appropriation carries over to fiscal year 2014.
The allocation of the credit in subdivision 5 for taxable year 2013 is
reduced by $100,000. This appropriation
may be used to hire a consultant or consultants to prepare all or part of the
study.
(c) To the extent necessary to complete the program
evaluation, and as provided in subdivision 8, the consultant or consultants may
request from the commissioner of revenue tax return information of taxpayers
who are qualified small businesses, qualified investors, and qualified funds. To the extent necessary to complete the
program evaluation, the consultant or consultants may request from the
commissioner of employment and economic development applications for
certification and annual reports made by qualified small businesses, qualified
investors, and qualified funds.
The consultant or consultants may not disclose or
release any data received under this section except as permitted for a
government entity under chapter 13, and is subject to the penalties and
remedies provided in law for violation of that chapter.
Subd. 11.
Appropriations. Amounts in the small business
investment tax credit administration account in the special revenue fund are
appropriated to the commissioner of employment and economic development for
costs associated with certifying applications and refunding application fees as
provided in subdivisions 2, 3, and 4, and for personnel and administrative
expenses related to administering the small business investment tax credit in
this section.
Subd. 12.
Sunset. This section expires for taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2015, except that reporting requirements under
subdivision 6 and revocation of credits under subdivision 7 remain in effect
through 2017 for qualified investors and qualified funds, and through 2019 for
qualified small businesses, reporting requirements under subdivision 9 remain
in effect through 2020, and the appropriation in subdivision 11 remains in
effect through 2019.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 3. [216C.435] DEFINITIONS.
Subdivision 1.
Scope. For the purposes of this section and
section 216C.436, the terms defined in this section have the meanings given
them.
Subd. 2.
City. "City" means a home rule
charter or statutory city.
Subd. 3.
Local government. "Local government" means a
city, county, or town.
Subd. 4.
Energy audit. "Energy audit" means a
formal evaluation of the energy consumption of a building by a certified energy
auditor, whose certification is approved by the commissioner, for the purpose
of identifying appropriate energy improvements that could be made to the
building and including an estimate of the length of time a specific energy
improvement will take to repay its purchase and installation costs, based on
the amount of energy saved and estimated future energy prices.
Subd. 5.
Energy improvement. "Energy improvement" means:
(1) any renovation or retrofitting of a building to
improve energy efficiency that is permanently affixed to the property and that
results in a net reduction in energy consumption without altering the principal
source of energy;
(2) permanent installation of new or upgraded
electrical circuits and related equipment to enable electrical vehicle
charging; or
(3) a renewable energy system attached to, installed
within, or proximate to a building that generates electrical or thermal energy
from a renewable energy source.
Subd. 6.
Qualifying real property. "Qualifying real property"
means a single-family or multifamily residential dwelling, or a commercial or
industrial building, that the city has determined, after review of an energy
audit or renewable energy system feasibility study, can be benefited by
installation of energy improvements.
Subd. 7.
Renewable energy. "Renewable energy" means
energy produced by means of solar thermal, solar photovoltaic, wind, or
geothermal resources.
Subd. 8.
Renewable energy system
feasibility study. "Renewable
energy system feasibility study" means a written study, conducted by a
contractor trained to perform that analysis, for the purpose of determining the
feasibility of installing a renewable energy system in a building, including an
estimate of the length of time a specific renewable energy system will take to
repay its purchase and installation costs, based on the amount of energy saved
and estimated future energy prices. For
a geothermal energy improvement, the feasibility study must calculate net
savings in terms of nongeothermal energy and costs.
Subd. 9.
Solar thermal. "Solar thermal" has the
meaning given to "qualifying solar thermal project" in section
216B.2411, subdivision 2, paragraph (e).
Subd. 10.
Solar photovoltaic. "Solar photovoltaic" has the
meaning given in section 216C.06, subdivision 16, and must meet the
requirements of section 216C.25.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 4. [216C.436] VOLUNTARY ENERGY IMPROVEMENTS
FINANCING PROGRAM FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.
Subdivision 1.
Program authority. A local government may establish a
program to finance energy improvements to enable owners of qualifying real
property to pay for cost-effective energy improvements to the qualifying real
property with the net proceeds and interest earnings of revenue bonds
authorized in this section. A local
government may limit the number of qualifying real properties for which a
property owner may receive program financing.
Subd. 2.
Program requirements. A financing program must:
(1) impose requirements and conditions on financing
arrangements to ensure timely repayment;
(2) require an energy audit or renewable energy system
feasibility study to be conducted on the qualifying real property and reviewed
by the local government prior to approval of the financing;
(3) require the inspection of all installations and a
performance verification of at least ten percent of the energy improvements
financed by the program;
(4) require that all cost-effective energy
improvements be made to a qualifying real property prior to, or in conjunction
with, an applicant's repayment of financing for energy improvements for that
property;
(5) have energy improvements financed by the program
performed by licensed contractors as required by chapter 326B or other law or
ordinance;
(6) require disclosures to borrowers by the local
government of the risks involved in borrowing, including the risk of
foreclosure if a tax delinquency results from a default;
(7) provide financing only to those who demonstrate an
ability to repay;
(8) not provide financing for a qualifying real
property in which the owner is not current on mortgage or real property tax
payments;
(9) require a petition by all owners of the qualifying
real property requesting collections of repayments as a special assessment
under section 429.101;
(10) provide that payments and assessments are not
accelerated due to a default and that a tax delinquency exists only for
assessments not paid when due; and
(11) that liability for special assessments related to
the financing runs with the qualifying real property.
Subd. 3.
Retail and end use prohibited. Energy generated by an energy
improvement may not be sold, transmitted, or distributed at retail and may not
be provided for end use from an off-site facility of the electrical energy. On-site generation is allowed to the extent
provided for in section 216B.1611.
This section does not modify the exclusive service
territories or exclusive right to serve as provided in sections 216B.37 to
216B.43.
Subd. 4.
Financing terms. Financing provided under this section
must have:
(1) a term not to exceed the weighted average of the
useful life of the energy improvements installed, as determined by the local
government, but in no event may a term exceed 20 years;
(2) a principal amount not to exceed the lesser of ten
percent of the assessed value of the real property on which the improvements
are to be installed or the actual cost of installing the energy improvements,
including the costs of necessary equipment, materials, and labor, the costs of
each related energy audit or renewable energy system feasibility study, and the
cost of verification of installation; and
(3) an interest rate sufficient to pay the financing
costs of the program, including the issuance of bonds and any financing
delinquencies.
Subd. 5.
Coordination with other
programs. A financing program
must include cooperation and coordination with the conservation improvement
activities of the utility serving the qualifying real property and other public
and private energy improvement programs.
Subd. 6.
Certificate of participation. Upon completion of a project, a local
government shall provide a borrower with a certificate stating participation in
the program and what energy improvements have been made with financing program
proceeds.
Subd. 7.
Repayment. A local government financing an energy
improvement under this section must:
(1) secure payment with a lien against the benefited
qualifying real property; and
(2) collect repayments as a special assessment as
provided for in section 429.101 or by charter.
Subd. 8.
Bond issuance; repayment. (a) A local government may issue revenue
bonds as provided in chapter 475 for the purposes of this section.
(b) The bonds must be payable as to both principal and
interest solely from the revenues from the assessments established in
subdivision 6.
(c) No holder of bonds issued under this subdivision
may compel any exercise of the taxing power of the local government that issued
the bonds to pay principal or interest on the bonds. Bonds issued under this subdivision are not a
debt or obligation of the local government that issued them, nor is the payment
of the bonds enforceable out of any money other than the revenue pledged to the
payment of the bonds.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 5. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 272.02, subdivision 86, is amended to read:
Subd. 86. Apprenticeship training facilities. All or a portion of a building used
exclusively for a state-approved apprenticeship program through the Department
of Labor and Industry is exempt if:
(1) it is owned by a nonprofit organization or a
nonprofit trust, and operated by a nonprofit organization or a nonprofit trust,;
(2) the program participants receive no compensation,;
and
(3) it is located:
(i) in the Minneapolis and St. Paul
standard metropolitan statistical area as determined by the 2000 federal census
or;
(ii) in a city outside the Minneapolis
and St. Paul standard metropolitan statistical area that has a population
of 7,500 or greater according to the most recent federal census; or
(iii) in a township that has a population greater than
2,000 but less than 3,000 determined by the 2000 federal census and the
building was previously used by a school and was exempt for taxes payable in
2010.
Use of the property for advanced skills training of
incumbent workers does not disqualify the property for the exemption under this
subdivision. This exemption includes up
to five acres of the land on which the building is located and associated
parking areas on that land, except that if the building meets the
requirements of clause (3), item (iii), then the exemption includes up to ten
acres of land on which the building is located and associated parking areas on
that land. If a parking area
associated with the facility is used for the purposes of the facility and for
other purposes, a portion of the parking area shall be exempt in proportion to
the square footage of the facility used for purposes of apprenticeship
training.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective for
property taxes payable in 2011 and thereafter.
Sec. 6. [290.0681] CREDIT FOR HISTORIC STRUCTURE
REHABILITATION.
Subdivision 1.
Definitions. (a) For purposes of this section, the
following terms have the meanings given.
(b) "Account" means the historic credit
administration account in the special revenue fund.
(c) "Office" means the State Historic
Preservation Office of the Minnesota Historical Society.
(d) "Project" means rehabilitation of a
certified historic structure, as defined in section 47(c)(3)(A) of the Internal
Revenue Code, that is located in Minnesota and is allowed a federal credit
under section 47(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code.
(e) "Society" means the Minnesota Historical
Society.
Subd. 2.
Credit or grant allowed;
certified historic structure. (a)
A credit is allowed against the tax imposed under this chapter equal to not
more than 100 percent of the credit allowed under section 47(a)(2) of the
Internal Revenue Code for a project. To
qualify for the credit:
(1) the project must receive Part 3 certification and
be placed in service during the taxable year; and
(2) the taxpayer must be allowed the federal credit
and be issued a credit certificate for the taxable year as provided in
subdivision 4.
(b) The society may pay a grant in lieu of the credit. The grant equals 90 percent of the credit
that would be allowed for the project.
(c) In lieu of the credit under paragraph (a), an
insurance company may claim a credit against the insurance premiums tax imposed
under chapter 297I.
Subd. 3.
Maximum limit; applications;
allocations. (a) The total
amount of credits and grants that may be allocated is limited to $5,000,000 in
each fiscal year plus any amounts available for reallocation under paragraphs
(c) and (f), in fiscal years 2011 through 2016 only.
(b) To qualify for a credit or grant under this
section, the developer of a project must apply to the office before the
rehabilitation begins. The application
must contain the information and be in the form prescribed by the office. The office may collect a fee for application
of up to $5,000, based on estimated qualified rehabilitation expenses, to
offset costs associated with personnel and administrative expenses related to
administering the credit and preparing the economic impact report in
subdivision 9. If a project does not
receive an allocation certificate, the office must refund all but $250 of the
application fee. Application fees are
deposited in the account. The
application must indicate if the application is for a credit or a grant in lieu
of the credit or a combination of the two and designate the taxpayer qualifying
for the credit or the recipient of the grant.
(c) The office must implement two credit application
periods each year. The office must
allocate tax credits and grants using an objective scoring system that
evaluates the benefit to the state of each project for which an application is
received. The office may allocate up to
one-half of the amount for the fiscal year in the first application period. Amounts not allocated within a fiscal year do
not cancel but are available for allocation in following fiscal years, except
that amounts not allocated in fiscal year 2016 cancel to the general fund and
are not available for reallocation.
(d) The office must evaluate applications using the
following criteria and priorities:
(1) the amount of additional project investment
leveraged as a result of receiving the state credit, calculated as the ratio of
total project cost to the state tax credit;
(2) if the project has secured the financing necessary
to begin development;
(3) the amount of time expected to pass between
allocation of the credit and completion of the project, with priority given to
projects that are expected to be placed in service within two years of the
start of rehabilitation;
(4) the number of construction jobs expected to be
created by the project;
(5) the number of jobs expected to be created when the
project is completed and placed in service;
(6) if the project will result in one or more vacant
properties being placed in service; and
(7) if the project has the support of the local
government in which the project is located.
(e) Upon approving an application for credit, the
office shall issue allocation certificates that:
(1) verify eligibility for the credit or grant;
(2) state the amount of credit or grant allocated to
the rehabilitation, with the credit amount equal to 100 percent and the grant
amount equal to 90 percent of the federal credit anticipated in the
application;
(3) state that the credit or grant allocated may be
reduced if the federal credit the project receives at the time it is placed in
service is less than the amount anticipated at the time of allocation, but that
neither the credit nor the grant is increased if the federal credit that the
project receives at the time it is placed in service is more than the amount
anticipated at the time of allocation; and
(4) state the fiscal year in which the credit or grant
is allocated, and that the taxpayer or grant recipient is entitled to receive
the credit or grant at the time the project is placed in service, provided that
date is within three calendar years following the issuance of the allocation
certificate.
(f) If a project is not placed in service and issued a
credit certificate under subdivision 4 within three calendar years following
the issuance of the allocation certificate, the credit allocation is canceled
and available for reallocation, except that allocations canceled after fiscal
year 2015 are not available for reallocation.
(g) The office, in consultation with the commissioner
of revenue, shall determine if the project is eligible for a credit or a grant
under this section. Eligibility for the
credit is subject to review and audit by the commissioner of revenue.
(h) The federal credit recapture and repayment
requirements under section 50 of the Internal Revenue Code do not apply to the
credit allowed under this section.
Subd. 4.
Credit certificates. (a)(1) The developer of a project for
which the office has issued an allocation certificate must notify the office
when the project is placed in service. Upon
verifying that the project has been placed in service, and was allowed a
federal credit, the office must issue a credit certificate to the taxpayer designated
in the application or must issue a grant to the recipient designated in the
application. The credit certificate must
state the amount of the credit.
(2) The credit amount may not exceed the lesser of:
(i) the federal credit; or
(ii) the amount on the allocation certificate.
(3) The grant amount may not exceed the lesser of:
(i) 90 percent of the federal credit; or
(ii) the amount on the allocation certificate.
(b) The recipient of a credit certificate may assign
the certificate to another taxpayer, which is then allowed the credit under
this section or section 297I.20, subdivision 3.
The commissioner shall prescribe the forms necessary for claiming a
credit by assignment.
Subd. 5.
Partnerships; multiple owners. Credits granted to a partnership, a
limited liability company taxed as a partnership, S corporation, or multiple
owners of property are passed through to the partners, members, shareholders,
or owners, respectively, pro rata to each partner, member, shareholder, or
owner based on their share of the entity's assets or as specially allocated in
their organizational documents, as of the last day of the taxable year.
Subd. 6.
Credit refundable. If the amount of credit that the
taxpayer is eligible to receive under this section exceeds the liability for
tax under this chapter, the commissioner shall refund the excess to the
taxpayer.
Subd. 7.
Appropriations. (a) An amount sufficient to pay the
refunds authorized under this section is appropriated to the commissioner from
the general fund.
(b) An amount sufficient to pay the grants authorized
under this section is appropriated to the society from the general fund.
(c) Amounts in the account are appropriated to the
society for costs associated with personnel and administrative expenses related
to administering the credit for historic structure rehabilitation in this
section, and for costs associated with preparing the determination of economic
impact report required in subdivision 9.
Subd. 8.
Manner of claiming. (a) The commissioner shall prescribe
the manner in which the credit may be issued or claimed. This may include allowing the credit only as
a separately processed claim for refund.
(b) The office shall prescribe the manner in which
grants are paid.
Subd. 9.
Report; determination of
economic impact. The society
must annually determine the economic impact to the state from the
rehabilitation of property for which credits or grants are provided under this
section and provide a written report on the impact to the chairs and ranking
minority members of the legislative committees on taxes of the senate and house
of representatives, in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, sections 3.195 and
3.197.
Subd. 10.
Sunset. This section expires after fiscal year
2016, except that the office's authority to issue credit certificates under
subdivision 4 based on allocation certificates that were issued before fiscal
year 2017 remains in effect through 2019, and the reporting requirements in
subdivision 9 remain in effect through the year following the year in which all
allocation certificates have either been canceled or resulted in issuance of
credit certificates, or 2020, whichever is earlier.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective for
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009, for certified historic
structures for which qualified costs of rehabilitation are first paid under
construction contracts entered into after May 1, 2010.
Sec. 7. [290.0692] SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT
CREDIT.
Subdivision 1.
Definitions. For purposes of this section, terms
defined in section 116J.8737 have the meaning given in that section.
Subd. 2.
Credit allowed. A qualified investor is allowed a
credit against the tax imposed under this chapter for qualified investments
made in a qualified small business for the taxable year. The credit equals the amount and applies to
the taxable year indicated on the certificate provided to the qualified
investor under section 116J.8737, but the maximum credit in any taxable year is
$250,000 for a married couple filing a joint return, and $125,000 for all other
claimants.
Subd. 3.
Proportional credits. Each pass-through entity must provide
each investor a statement indicating the investor's share of the credit amount
certified to the pass-through entity based on its share of the pass-through
entity's capital assets at the time of the qualified investment.
Subd. 4.
Credit refundable. If the amount of the credit under this
section for any taxable year exceeds the claimant's liability for tax under
this chapter, the commissioner shall refund the excess to the claimant. An amount sufficient to pay the refunds
required by this section is appropriated to the commissioner from the general
fund.
Subd. 5.
Audit powers. Notwithstanding the certification
eligibility issued by the commissioner of employment and economic development
under section 116J.8737, the commissioner may utilize any audit and examination
powers under chapters 270C or 289A to the extent necessary to verify that the
taxpayer is eligible for the credit and to assess for the amount of any
improperly claimed credit.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective for
investments made after July 1, 2010, for taxable years beginning after December
31, 2009, and before January 1, 2016, and only applies to investments made
after the qualified investor or fund making the investment and the qualified
small business receiving the investment have been certified by the commissioner
of employment and economic development.
Sec. 8. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 297I.20, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 3.
Historic structure
rehabilitation credit. An
insurance company may claim a credit against the premiums tax imposed under
this chapter equal to the amount of the credit certificate issued to it, or to
a person who has assigned the credit to the insurance company, under section
290.0681. If the amount of the credit
exceeds the liability for tax under this chapter, the commissioner shall refund
the excess to the insurance company. An
amount sufficient to pay the refunds under this section is appropriated to the
commissioner from the general fund. This
credit does not affect the calculation of police and fire aid under section
69.021.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective for
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009, for certified historic
structures for which qualified costs of rehabilitation are first paid under
construction contracts entered into after May 1, 2010.
Sec. 9. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 298.294, is amended to read:
298.294
INVESTMENT OF FUND.
(a) The trust fund established by section 298.292
shall be invested pursuant to law by the State Board of Investment and the net
interest, dividends, and other earnings arising from the investments shall be
transferred, except as provided in paragraph (b), on the first day of each
month to the trust and shall be included and become part of the trust fund. The amounts transferred, including the
interest, dividends, and other earnings earned prior to July 13, 1982,
together with the additional amount of $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1983, which
is appropriated April 21, 1983, are appropriated from the trust fund
to the commissioner of Iron Range resources and rehabilitation for deposit in a
separate account for expenditure for the purposes set forth in section 298.292. Amounts appropriated pursuant to this section
shall not cancel but shall remain available unless expended.
(b) For fiscal years 2010 and 2011 only, $1,000,000
$1,500,000 of the net interest, dividends, and other earnings under
paragraph (a) shall be transferred to a special account. Funds in the special account are available
for loans or grants to businesses, with priority given to businesses with 25 or
fewer employees. Funds may be used for
wage subsidies for up to 52 weeks of up to $5 per hour or other
activities, including, but not limited to, short-term operating expenses and
purchase of equipment and materials by businesses under financial duress,
that will create additional jobs in the taconite assistance area under section
273.1341. Expenditures from the special
account must be approved by at least seven Iron Range Resources and
Rehabilitation Board members.
(c) To qualify for a grant or loan, a business must be
currently operating and have been operating for one year immediately prior to
its application for a loan or grant, and its corporate headquarters must be
located in the taconite assistance area.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 10. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 429.021, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Improvements authorized. The council of a municipality shall have
power to make the following improvements:
(1) To acquire, open, and widen any street, and to
improve the same by constructing, reconstructing, and maintaining sidewalks,
pavement, gutters, curbs, and vehicle parking strips of any material, or by
grading, graveling, oiling, or otherwise improving the same, including the beautification
thereof and including storm sewers or other street drainage and connections
from sewer, water, or similar mains to curb lines.
(2) To acquire, develop, construct, reconstruct,
extend, and maintain storm and sanitary sewers and systems, including outlets,
holding areas and ponds, treatment plants, pumps, lift stations, service
connections, and other appurtenances of a sewer system, within and without the
corporate limits.
(3) To construct, reconstruct, extend, and maintain
steam heating mains.
(4) To install, replace, extend, and maintain street
lights and street lighting systems and special lighting systems.
(5) To acquire, improve, construct, reconstruct,
extend, and maintain water works systems, including mains, valves, hydrants,
service connections, wells, pumps, reservoirs, tanks, treatment plants, and
other appurtenances of a water works system, within and without the corporate
limits.
(6) To acquire, improve and equip parks, open space
areas, playgrounds, and recreational facilities within or without the corporate
limits.
(7) To plant trees on streets and provide for their
trimming, care, and removal.
(8) To abate nuisances and to drain swamps, marshes,
and ponds on public or private property and to fill the same.
(9) To construct, reconstruct, extend, and maintain
dikes and other flood control works.
(10) To construct, reconstruct, extend, and maintain
retaining walls and area walls.
(11) To acquire, construct, reconstruct, improve,
alter, extend, operate, maintain, and promote a pedestrian skyway system. Such improvement may be made upon a petition
pursuant to section 429.031, subdivision 3.
(12) To acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend,
operate, maintain, and promote underground pedestrian concourses.
(13) To acquire, construct, improve, alter, extend,
operate, maintain, and promote public malls, plazas or courtyards.
(14) To construct, reconstruct, extend, and maintain
district heating systems.
(15) To construct, reconstruct, alter, extend,
operate, maintain, and promote fire protection systems in existing buildings,
but only upon a petition pursuant to section 429.031, subdivision 3.
(16) To acquire, construct, reconstruct, improve,
alter, extend, and maintain highway sound barriers.
(17) To improve, construct, reconstruct, extend, and
maintain gas and electric distribution facilities owned by a municipal gas or
electric utility.
(18) To purchase, install, and maintain signs, posts,
and other markers for addressing related to the operation of enhanced 911
telephone service.
(19) To improve, construct, extend, and maintain
facilities for Internet access and other communications purposes, if the
council finds that:
(i) the facilities are necessary to make available
Internet access or other communications services that are not and will not be
available through other providers or the private market in the reasonably
foreseeable future; and
(ii) the service to be provided by the facilities will
not compete with service provided by private entities.
(20) To assess affected property owners for all or a
portion of the costs agreed to with an electric utility, telecommunications
carrier, or cable system operator to bury or alter a new or existing
distribution system within the public right-of-way that exceeds the utility's design
and construction standards, or those set by law, tariff, or franchise, but only
upon petition under section 429.031, subdivision 3.
(21) To assess affected property owners for repayment
of voluntary energy improvement financings under section 216C.436, subdivision
7.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 11. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 429.101, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Ordinances.
(a) In addition to any other method authorized by law or charter,
the governing body of any municipality may provide for the collection of unpaid
special charges as a special assessment against the property benefited for all
or any part of the cost of:
(1) snow, ice, or rubbish removal from sidewalks;
(2) weed elimination from streets or private property;
(3) removal or elimination of public health or safety
hazards from private property, excluding any structure included under the
provisions of sections 463.15 to 463.26;
(4) installation or repair of water service lines,
street sprinkling or other dust treatment of streets;
(5) the trimming and care of trees and the removal of
unsound trees from any street;
(6) the treatment and removal of insect infested or
diseased trees on private property, the repair of sidewalks and alleys;
(7) the operation of a street lighting system;
(8) the operation and maintenance of a fire protection
or a pedestrian skyway system;
(9) inspections relating to a municipal housing
maintenance code violation;
(10) the recovery of any disbursements under section
504B.445, subdivision 4, clause (5), including disbursements for payment of
utility bills and other services, even if provided by a third party, necessary
to remedy violations as described in section 504B.445, subdivision 4, clause
(2); or
(11) [Repealed, 2004 c 275 s 5]
(12) the recovery of delinquent vacant building
registration fees under a municipal program designed to identify and register
vacant buildings.
(b) The council may by ordinance adopt regulations
consistent with this section to make this authority effective, including, at
the option of the council, provisions for placing primary responsibility upon
the property owner or occupant to do the work personally (except in the case of
street sprinkling or other dust treatment, alley repair, tree trimming, care,
and removal, or the operation of a street lighting system) upon notice
before the work is undertaken, and for collection from the property owner or
other person served of the charges when due before unpaid charges are made a
special assessment.
(c) A home rule charter city, statutory city, county,
or town operating an energy improvements financing program under section
216C.436 has the authority granted to a municipality under paragraph (a) with
respect to energy improvements financed under that section.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 12. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 446A.085, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 15.
Transportation infrastructure
loans. A loan may be made to
a statutory or home rule charter city to finance transportation infrastructure
projects for the purposes described in subdivision 2 but without regard to
whether they are eligible for financing under a federal act or program or state
law. The loan must be repayable under
the terms and conditions provided in this section and established by the
authority and agreed to by the city. The
loan must be repaid by the city from the proceeds of special assessments, tax
increments, or other local taxes, such as sales taxes, lodging taxes, liquor
taxes, admissions and recreation taxes, and food and beverage taxes, authorized
to be used for purposes of the project. In
addition to any method the authority considers to be appropriate, the authority
may fund those loans by issuing Build America Bonds under section 54AA of the
Internal Revenue Code, as amended.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 13. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 469.153, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Project.
(a) "Project" means (1) any properties, real or personal,
used or useful in connection with a revenue producing enterprise, or any
combination of two or more such enterprises engaged or to be engaged in
generating, transmitting, or distributing electricity, assembling, fabricating,
manufacturing, mixing, processing, storing, warehousing, or distributing any
products of agriculture, forestry, mining, or manufacture, or in research and
development activity in this field, or in the manufacturing, creation, or
production of intangible property, including any patent, copyright, formula,
process, design, know-how, format, or other similar item; (2) any properties,
real or personal, used or useful in the abatement or control of noise, air, or
water pollution, or in the disposal of solid wastes, in connection with a
revenue producing enterprise, or any combination of two or more such
enterprises engaged or to be engaged in any business or industry; (3) any
properties, real or personal, used or useful in connection with the business of
telephonic communications, conducted or to be conducted by a telephone company,
including toll lines, poles, cables, switching, and other electronic equipment
and administrative, data processing, garage, and research and development
facilities; (4) any properties, real or personal, used or useful in connection
with a district heating system, consisting of the use of one or more energy
conversion facilities to produce hot water
or steam for distribution to homes and businesses,
including cogeneration facilities, distribution lines, service facilities, and
retrofit facilities for modifying the user's heating or water system to use the
heat energy converted from the steam or hot water.
(b) "Project" also includes any properties,
real or personal, used or useful in connection with a revenue producing
enterprise, or any combination of two or more such enterprises engaged in any
business.
(c) "Project" also includes any properties,
real or personal, used or useful for the promotion of tourism in the state. Properties may include hotels, motels,
lodges, resorts, recreational facilities of the type that may be acquired under
section 471.191, and related facilities.
(d) "Project" also includes any properties,
real or personal, used or useful in connection with a revenue producing
enterprise, whether or not operated for profit, engaged in providing health
care services, including hospitals, nursing homes, and related medical
facilities.
(e) "Project" does not include any property
to be sold or to be affixed to or consumed in the production of property for
sale, and does not include any housing facility to be rented or used as a
permanent residence.
(f) "Project" also means the activities of
any revenue producing enterprise involving the construction, fabrication, sale,
or leasing of equipment or products to be used in gathering, processing,
generating, transmitting, or distributing solar, wind, geothermal, biomass,
agricultural or forestry energy crops, or other alternative energy sources for
use by any person or any residential, commercial, industrial, or governmental
entity in heating, cooling, or otherwise providing energy for a facility owned
or operated by that person or entity.
(g) "Project" also includes any properties,
real or personal, used or useful in connection with a county jail, county
regional jail, community corrections facilities authorized by chapter 401, or
other law enforcement facilities, the plans for which are approved by the
commissioner of corrections; provided that the provisions of section 469.155,
subdivisions 7 and 13, do not apply to those projects.
(h) "Project" also includes any real
properties used or useful in furtherance of the purpose and policy of
section 469.141.
(i) "Project" also includes related
facilities as defined by section 471A.02, subdivision 11.
(j) "Project" also includes an undertaking
to purchase the obligations of local governments located in whole or in part
within the boundaries of the municipality that are issued or to be issued for
public purposes.
(k) "Project" also includes any properties
designated as a qualified green building and sustainable design project under
section 469.1655.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 14. [469.1655] QUALIFIED GREEN BUILDING AND
SUSTAINABLE DESIGN PROJECTS.
Subdivision 1.
Project designation and
eligibility. (a) A
municipality or redevelopment agency issuing revenue bonds under sections
469.152 to 469.165 may designate the project for which the bonds are issued as
a qualified green building and sustainable design project as provided in this
section.
(b) The issuer must ensure that each designated
project substantially:
(1) reduces consumption of electricity compared to
conventional construction;
(2) reduces daily carbon dioxide emissions compared to
energy generated from coal;
(3) increases the use of solar photovoltaic cells or
solar thermal cells in this state; or
(4) increases the use of fuel cells to generate
energy.
(c) Before designating a project under this section,
the issuer must document in writing that the project will satisfy the
eligibility criteria in this section.
(d) At least 75 percent of the square footage of
commercial buildings that are part of the project must be registered with a
recognized green building rating system, including Minnesota's sustainable
building guidelines or the United States Green Building Council's LEED
certification or the Green Building Initiative's Green Globes certification, or
in the case of residential buildings, Minnesota GreenStar rating or the
National Association of Home Builders National Green Building Standard
certification, and must be reasonably expected to receive the certification.
Subd. 2.
Applications. An application for designation under
this section must include a project proposal that describes the
energy-efficiency, renewable energy, and sustainable design features of the
project and demonstrates that the project satisfies the eligibility criteria in
this section. The application must
include a description of:
(1) the amount of electric consumption reduced as
compared to conventional construction;
(2) the amount of carbon dioxide daily emissions
reduced compared to energy generated from coal;
(3) the amount of the gross installed capacity of the
project's solar photovoltaic capacity measured in megawatts; and
(4) the amount in megawatts of the project's energy generated
by fuel cells.
Subd. 3.
Use of bond financing. The project proposal must include a
description of the bond financing that will be allocated for financing of one
or more of the following:
(1) the purchase, construction, integration, or other
use of energy-efficiency, renewable energy, and sustainable design features of
the project; or
(2) compliance with certification standards cited
under subdivision 1, paragraph (d).
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective for bonds
issued after June 30, 2010.
Sec. 15. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 469.174, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 10c.
Compact development district. "Compact development
district" means a type of tax increment financing district consisting of a
project, or portions of a project, within which the authority finds by
resolution that the following conditions are satisfied:
(1) parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of
the district are occupied by buildings or similar structures that are
classified as class 3a property under section 273.13, subdivision 24; and
(2) the planned redevelopment or development of the
district, when completed, will increase the total square footage of buildings,
classified as class 3a under section 273.13, subdivision 24, occupying the
district by three times or more relative to the square footage of similar
buildings occupying the district when the resolution was approved.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective for
districts for which the request for certification is made after June 30, 2009.
Sec. 16. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 469.175, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 2b.
Compact development districts;
sunset. The authority to
establish or approve the tax increment financing plan for a new compact development
district expires on June 30, 2012.
Sec. 17. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 469.176, subdivision 1b, is amended to read:
Subd. 1b. Duration limits; terms. (a) No tax increment shall in any event
be paid to the authority
(1) after 15 years after receipt by the authority of
the first increment for a renewal and renovation district,
(2) after 20 years after receipt by the authority of
the first increment for a soils condition district,
(3) after eight years after receipt by the authority
of the first increment for an economic development district,
(4) for a housing district, a compact development
district, or a redevelopment district, after 25 years from the date of
receipt by the authority of the first increment.
(b) For purposes of determining a duration limit under
this subdivision or subdivision 1e that is based on the receipt of an
increment, any increments from taxes payable in the year in which the district
terminates shall be paid to the authority.
This paragraph does not affect a duration limit calculated from the date
of approval of the tax increment financing plan or based on the recovery of
costs or to a duration limit under subdivision 1c. This paragraph does not supersede the
restrictions on payment of delinquent taxes in subdivision 1f.
(c) An action by the authority to waive or decline to
accept an increment has no effect for purposes of computing a duration limit
based on the receipt of increment under this subdivision or any other provision
of law. The authority is deemed to have
received an increment for any year in which it waived or declined to accept an
increment, regardless of whether the increment was paid to the authority.
(d) Receipt by a hazardous substance subdistrict of an
increment as a result of a reduction in original net tax capacity under section
469.174, subdivision 7, paragraph (b), does not constitute receipt of increment
by the overlying district for the purpose of calculating the duration limit
under this section.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective for
districts for which the request for certification is made after June 30, 2009.
Sec. 18. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 469.176, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 1i.
Compact development districts. Tax increments derived from a compact
development district may be used only to pay:
(1) administrative expenses up to the amount permitted
under subdivision 3;
(2) the cost of acquiring land located in the district
or abutting the boundary of the district;
(3) demolition and removal of buildings or other
improvements and other site preparation costs for lands located in the district
or abutting the boundary of the district; and
(4) installation of public infrastructure or public
improvements serving the district, but excluding the costs of streets, roads,
highways, parking, or other public improvements primarily designed to serve
private passenger motor vehicles.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective for
districts for which the request for certification is made after June 30, 2009.
Sec. 19. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 469.176, subdivision 4c, is amended to read:
Subd. 4c. Economic development districts. (a) Revenue derived from tax increment
from an economic development district may not be used to provide improvements,
loans, subsidies, grants, interest rate subsidies, or assistance in any form to
developments consisting of buildings and ancillary facilities, if more than 15
percent of the buildings and facilities (determined on the basis of square footage)
are used for a purpose other than:
(1) the manufacturing or production of tangible
personal property, including processing resulting in the change in condition of
the property;
(2) warehousing, storage, and distribution of tangible
personal property, excluding retail sales;
(3) research and development related to the activities
listed in clause (1) or (2);
(4) telemarketing if that activity is the exclusive use
of the property;
(5) tourism facilities;
(6) qualified border retail facilities; or
(7) space necessary for and related to the activities
listed in clauses (1) to (6).
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of this subdivision,
revenue derived from tax increment from an economic development district may be
used to pay for site preparation and public improvements, if the following
conditions are met:
(1) bedrock soils conditions are present in 80 percent
or more of the acreage of the district;
(2) the estimated cost of physical preparation of the
site exceeds the fair market value of the land before completion of the
preparation; and
(3) revenues from tax increments are expended only for
the additional costs of preparing the site because of unstable soils and the
bedrock soils condition, the additional cost of installing public improvements because
of unstable soils or the bedrock soils condition, and reasonable administrative
costs.
(c) (b)
Notwithstanding the provisions of this subdivision, revenues derived from tax
increment from an economic development district may be used to provide improvements,
loans, subsidies, grants, interest rate subsidies, or assistance in any form
for up to 15,000 square feet of any separately owned commercial facility
located within the municipal jurisdiction of a small city, if the revenues
derived from increments are spent only to assist the facility directly or for
administrative expenses, the assistance is necessary to develop the facility,
and all of the increments, except those for administrative expenses, are spent
only for activities within the district.
(d) For purposes of this subdivision, a qualified
border retail facility is a development consisting of a shopping center or one
or more retail stores, if the authority finds that all of the following
conditions are satisfied:
(1) the district is in a small city located within one
mile or less of the border of the state;
(2) the development is not located in the seven-county
metropolitan area, as defined in section 473.121, subdivision 2;
(3) the development will contain new buildings or will
substantially rehabilitate existing buildings that together contain at least
25,000 square feet of retail space; and
(4) without the use of tax increment financing for the
development, the development or a similar competing development will instead
occur in the bordering state or province.
(e) (c) A city is a small city
for purposes of this subdivision if the city was a small city in the year in
which the request for certification was made and applies for the rest of the
duration of the district, regardless of whether the city qualifies or ceases to
qualify as a small city.
(d) Notwithstanding the requirements of paragraph (a)
and the finding requirements of section 469.174, subdivision 12, tax increments
from an economic development district may be used to provide improvements,
loans, subsidies, grants, interest rate subsidies, or assistance in any form to
developments consisting of buildings and ancillary facilities, if all the
following conditions are met:
(1) the municipality finds that the project will create
or retain jobs in this state, including construction jobs, and that
construction of the project would not have commenced before July 1, 2011,
without the authority providing assistance under the provisions of this
paragraph;
(2) construction of the project begins no later than
July 1, 2011; and
(3) the request for certification of the district is
made no later than June 30, 2011.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment and applies to any economic development district for
which the request for certification was made after June 30, 2009.
Sec. 20. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 469.176, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 4m.
Temporary authority to
stimulate construction. (a)
Notwithstanding the restrictions in any other subdivision of this section or
any other law to the contrary, except the requirement to pay bonds to which the
increments are pledged and the provisions of subdivisions 4g and 4h, the
authority may spend tax increments for one or more of the following purposes:
(1) to provide improvements, loans, interest rate
subsidies, or assistance in any form to private development consisting of the
construction or substantial rehabilitation of buildings and ancillary
facilities, if doing so will create or retain jobs in this state, including
construction jobs, and that the construction commences before July 1, 2011, and
would not have commenced before that date without the assistance; or
(2) to make an equity or similar investment in a
corporation, partnership, or limited liability company that the authority
determines is necessary to make construction of a development that meets the
requirements of clause (1) financially feasible.
(b) The authority may undertake actions under the
authority of this subdivision only after approval by the municipality of a
written spending plan that specifically authorizes the authority to take the
actions. The municipality shall approve
the spending plan only after a public hearing after published notice in a newspaper
of general circulation in the municipality at least once, not less than ten
days nor more than 30 days prior to the date of the hearing.
(c) The authority to spend tax increments under this
subdivision expires December 31, 2011.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment and applies to tax increments derived from a
district, regardless of when the request for certification was made.
Sec. 21. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 469.310, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Job opportunity building zone or zone. "Job opportunity building zone"
or "zone" means a zone designated by the commissioner under section
469.314, and includes an agricultural processing facility zone and a create
automotive recovery zone.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 22. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 469.310, subdivision 11, is amended to read:
Subd. 11. Qualified business. (a) A person carrying on a trade or
business at a place of business located within a job opportunity building zone
is a qualified business for the purposes of sections 469.310 to 469.320
according to the criteria in paragraphs (b) to (f).
(b) A person is a qualified business only on those
parcels of land for which the person has entered into a business subsidy
agreement, as required under section 469.313, with the appropriate local
government unit in which the parcels are located.
(c) Prior to execution of the business subsidy
agreement, the local government unit must consider the following factors:
(1) how wages compare to the regional industry
average;
(2) the number of jobs that will be provided relative
to overall employment in the community;
(3) the economic outlook for the industry the business
will engage in;
(4) sales that will be generated from outside the
state of Minnesota;
(5) how the business will build on existing regional
strengths or diversify the regional economy;
(6) how the business will increase capital investment
in the zone; and
(7) any other criteria the commissioner deems
necessary.
(d) A person that relocates a trade or business from
outside a job opportunity building zone into a zone is not a qualified business
unless the business meets all of the requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c)
and:
(1) increases full-time employment in the first full
year of operation within the job opportunity building zone by a minimum of five
jobs or 20 percent, whichever is greater, measured relative to the operations
that were relocated and maintains the required level of employment for each
year the zone designation applies; and
(2) enters a binding written agreement with the
commissioner that:
(i) pledges the business will meet the requirements of
clause (1);
(ii) provides for repayment of all tax benefits
enumerated under section 469.315 to the business under the procedures in
section 469.319, if the requirements of clause (1) are not met for the taxable
year or for taxes payable during the year in which the requirements were not met;
and
(iii) contains any other terms the commissioner
determines appropriate.
(e) The commissioner may waive the requirements under
paragraph (d), clause (1), if the commissioner determines that the qualified
business will substantially achieve the factors under this subdivision.
(f) A business is not a qualified business if, at its
location or locations in the zone, the business is primarily engaged in making
retail sales to purchasers who are physically present at the business's zone
location.
(g) A qualifying business must pay each employee
compensation, including benefits not mandated by law, that on an annualized
basis is equal to at least 110 percent of the federal poverty level for a
family of four.
(h) A public utility, as defined in section 336B.01,
is not a qualified business.
(i) A business operating in a create automotive
recovery zone is a qualified business only if it engages in the assembly of
motor vehicles at the zone location.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 23. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 469.310, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 14.
Motor vehicle assembly
facility. "Motor vehicle
assembly facility" means a manufacturing facility with at least 500 employees
that is used to assemble motor vehicles and is located in a city of the first
class.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 24. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 469.310, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 15.
Create automotive recovery
zone. "Create automotive
recovery zone" means a zone designated by the commissioner under section
469.314 that contains a motor vehicle assembly facility.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 25. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 469.312, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Maximum size. A job opportunity building zone may not
exceed 5,000 acres. For a zone
designated as an agricultural processing facility zone, the zone also may not
exceed the size of a site necessary for the agricultural processing facility,
including ancillary operations and space for expansion in the reasonably
foreseeable future.
For a zone designated as a create automotive recovery zone, the zone
also may not exceed the size of the site necessary for the assembly of motor
vehicles, including ancillary operations and space for expansion in the
reasonably foreseeable future.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 26. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 469.312, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Outside metropolitan area. Except for a create automotive
recovery zone, the area of a job opportunity building zone must be located
outside of the metropolitan area, as defined in section 473.121, subdivision 2.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 27. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 469.312, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Duration limit. (a) The maximum duration of a zone is 12
years. The applicant may request a
shorter duration. The commissioner may
specify a shorter duration, regardless of the requested duration.
(b) The duration limit under this subdivision and the
duration of the zone for purposes of allowance of tax incentives described in
section 469.315 is extended by three calendar years for each parcel of property
that meets the following requirements:
(1) the qualified business operates an ethanol plant,
as defined in section 41A.09, on the site that includes the parcel; and
(2) the business subsidy agreement was executed after
April 30, 2006.
(c) The duration limit under this subdivision and the
duration of the zone for purposes of allowance of tax incentives described in
section 469.315 is extended by five calendar years for each parcel of property
that meets the following requirements:
(1) the parcel is located in a county with an
unemployment rate that on the date that the business subsidy agreement is
executed (i) equals or exceeds ten percent or (ii) is ten percent higher than
the statewide average;
(2) the operations of the qualified business on the
site include:
(i) its headquarters;
(ii) facilities for research and development; and
(iii) the manufacturing of products, used by the
building, transport, consumer products, and industrial products sectors, that
reduce the use of or increase the efficiency of the use of energy resources and
that are manufactured using innovative and high technology processes; and
(3) the business subsidy agreement is executed after
July 1, 2009, and before July 1, 2011.
(d) The duration of a create automotive recovery zone
is 12 years from the date of the designation of a zone by the commissioner
under section 469.314, subdivision 4, paragraph (g).
(e) The duration limit under this subdivision and the
duration of the zone for purposes of allowance of tax incentives described in
section 469.315 is extended by five calendar years for each parcel of property
that meets the following requirements:
(1) the parcel is located in a county with an
unemployment rate for any of the twelve months preceding the date on which the
business subsidy agreement is executed that (i) equals or exceeds ten percent or
(ii) is ten percent higher than the statewide average;
(2) the qualified business is engaged in the business
of manufacturing wind turbines and related products for the generation of
energy, and the parcel includes one or more of the following facilities of the
qualified business:
(i) the headquarters of the business in this country;
(ii) training facilities; or
(iii) manufacturing facilities; and
(3) the initial business subsidy agreement is executed
after July 1, 2010, and before November 1, 2011.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 28. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 469.314, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Commissioner to designate. (a) The commissioner, in consultation
with the commissioner of revenue, shall designate not more than ten job
opportunity building zones and not more than one create automotive recovery
zone. In making the designations,
the commissioner shall consider need and likelihood of success to yield the
most economic development and revitalization of economically distressed rural
areas of Minnesota.
(b) In addition to the designations under paragraph
(a), the commissioner may, in consultation with the commissioners of
agriculture and revenue, designate up to five agricultural processing facility
zones.
(c) The commissioner may, upon designation of a zone,
modify the development plan, including the boundaries of the zone or subzones,
if in the commissioner's opinion a modified plan would better meet the
objectives of the job opportunity building zone program. The commissioner shall notify the applicant
of the modification and provide a statement of the reasons for the
modifications.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment, except the designation of a zone under this
authority does not take effect until July 1, 2013.
Sec. 29. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 469.314, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Designation schedule. (a) The schedule in paragraphs (b) to (f)
applies to the designation of job opportunity building zones. Paragraph (g) applies to the designation
of a create automotive recovery zone.
(b) The commissioner shall publish the form for
applications and any procedural, form, or content requirements for applications
by no later than August 1, 2003. The commissioner
may publish these requirements on the Internet, in the State Register, or by
any other means the commissioner determines appropriate to disseminate the
information to potential applicants for designation.
(c) Applications must be submitted by October 15,
2003.
(d) The commissioner shall designate the zones by no
later than December 31, 2003.
(e) The designation of the zones takes effect January
1, 2004.
(f) The commissioner may reserve one or more of the
ten authorized zones for a second round of designations in calendar year 2004. If the commissioner chooses to reserve
designations for this purpose, the commissioner shall establish the schedule
for the second round of designations, notwithstanding the dates in paragraphs
(c), (d), and (e). The commissioner
shall allow a period of at least 90 days for submission of applications after
notification of the second round. A zone
designated in the second round takes effect on January 1, 2005.
(g) The commissioner may accept applications for a create
automotive recovery zone at any time before January 1, 2016. The commissioner may designate a create
automotive recovery zone at any time after December 31, 2011, and before
January 1, 2016, but only if the applicant has entered a written agreement with
a qualified business committing to make a capital investment of at least
$100,000,000 to improve or retrofit a motor vehicle assembly facility located
in the zone.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 30. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 469.315, is amended to read:
469.315 TAX
INCENTIVES AVAILABLE IN ZONES.
Qualified businesses that operate in a job opportunity
building zone, individuals who invest in a qualified business that operates in
a job opportunity building zone, and property located in a job opportunity
building zone qualify for:
(1) exemption from individual income taxes as provided
under section 469.316;
(2) exemption from corporate franchise taxes as
provided under section 469.317;
(3) exemption from the state sales and use tax and any
local sales and use taxes on qualifying purchases as provided in section
297A.68, subdivision 37;
(4) exemption from the state sales tax on motor
vehicles and any local sales tax on motor vehicles as provided under section
297B.03;
(5) exemption from the property tax as provided in
section 272.02, subdivision 64;
(6) exemption from the wind energy production tax
under section 272.029, subdivision 7; and
(7) the jobs credit allowed under section 469.318,
except that a qualified business located in a create automotive recovery zone
is not eligible for the credit under section 469.318 but is eligible for the
credit under section 469.3181.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective for
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2011.
Sec. 31. [469.3181] CREATE AUTOMOTIVE RECOVERY
JOBS CREDIT.
Subdivision 1.
Credit allowed. (a) A qualified business located in a
create automotive recovery zone is allowed a credit against the tax imposed
under chapter 290 equal to $2,500 times the number of full-time equivalent
employees receiving wages from the qualified business for working at the
facility during the taxable year. The
qualified business is allowed an additional credit
equal to $1,000 times the number of full-time equivalent employees receiving
wages from the qualified business for working at the facility during the
taxable year in excess of 750 employees.
(b) For purposes of this section, "employee"
and "wages" have the meanings given them in section 290.92,
subdivisions 1 and 3.
(c) For purposes of this section, "full-time
equivalent employees" means the equivalent of annualized expected hours of
work equal to 2,080 hours.
Subd. 2.
Refundable. If the amount of the credit exceeds
the liability for tax under chapter 290, the commissioner of revenue shall
refund the excess to the qualified business.
Subd. 3.
Appropriation. An amount sufficient to pay the refunds
authorized by this section is appropriated to the commissioner of revenue from
the general fund.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective for
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012.
Sec. 32. Laws
1986, chapter 391, section 1, is amended to read:
Section 1.
The legislature finds that providing areawide and local
financial assistance, including the provision of security for debt financing,
but not including direct subsidies to private interests, in the development of
the former metropolitan stadium site Industrial Development District
1 (Airport South) of the city of Bloomington, as amended, including any phase
of the Mall of America, and the Old Cedar Avenue Bridge, is a public
purpose of state, metropolitan, and local government in Minnesota and that it
is a benefit to the metropolitan area within the purpose of the metropolitan
revenue distribution program pursuant to chapter 473F.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective upon local
approval of and compliance by the governing body of the city of Bloomington
with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021.
Sec. 33. Laws
1995, chapter 264, article 5, section 44, subdivision 4, as amended by Laws
1996, chapter 471, article 7, section 21, and Laws 1997, chapter 231, article
10, section 12, and Laws 2008, chapter 154, article 9, section 18, is amended
to read:
Subd. 4. Authority.
For housing replacement projects in the city of Crystal,
"authority" means the Crystal economic development authority. For housing replacement projects in the city
of Fridley, "authority" means the housing and redevelopment authority
in and for the city of Fridley or a successor in interest. For housing replacement projects in the city
of Minneapolis, "authority" means the Minneapolis community
development agency or its successors and assigns. For housing replacement projects in the city
of St. Paul, "authority" means the St. Paul housing and
redevelopment authority. For housing
replacement projects in the city of Duluth, "authority" means the
Duluth economic development authority. For
housing replacement projects in the city of Richfield, "authority" is
the authority as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 469.174, subdivision 2,
that is designated by the governing body of the city of Richfield. For housing replacement projects in the city
of Columbia Heights, "authority" is the authority as defined in
Minnesota Statutes, section 469.174, subdivision 2, that is designated by the
governing body of the city of Columbia Heights.
For housing replacement projects in the city of Brooklyn Park,
"authority" is the authority as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
section 469.174, subdivision 2, that is designated by the governing body of the
city of Brooklyn Park.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment and applies to the city of Brooklyn Park without
local approval under Minnesota Statutes, section 645.023, subdivision 1,
paragraph (a).
Sec. 34. Laws
1995, chapter 264, article 5, section 45, subdivision 1, as amended by Laws
1996, chapter 471, article 7, section 22, and Laws 1997, chapter 231, article
10, section 13, and Laws 2002, chapter 377, article 7, section 6, and Laws
2008, chapter 154, article 9, section 19, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Creation of projects. (a) An authority may create a housing
replacement project under sections 44 to 47, as provided in this section.
(b) For the cities of Crystal, Fridley, Richfield, and
Columbia Heights, and Brooklyn Park, the authority may designate up to 50
100 parcels in the city to be included in a housing replacement district
over the life of a district or districts.
No more than ten parcels may be included in year one of the district,
with up to ten additional parcels added to the district in each of the
following nine years. For the cities
of St. Paul and Duluth, each authority may designate not more than 200
parcels in the city to be included in a housing replacement district over the
life of the district. For the city of
Minneapolis, the authority may designate not more than 400 parcels in the city
to be included in housing replacement districts over the life of the districts. The only parcels that may be included in a
district are (1) vacant sites, (2) parcels containing vacant houses, or (3)
parcels containing houses that are structurally substandard, as defined in
Minnesota Statutes, section 469.174, subdivision 10.
(c) The city in which the authority is located must
pay at least 25 percent of the housing replacement project costs from its
general fund, a property tax levy, or other unrestricted money, not including
tax increments.
(d) The housing replacement district plan must have as
its sole object the acquisition of parcels for the purpose of preparing the
site to be sold for market rate housing.
As used in this section, "market rate housing" means housing
that has a market value that does not exceed 150 percent of the average market
value of single-family housing in that municipality.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment and applies to the affected cities without local
approval under Minnesota Statutes, section 645.023, subdivision 1, paragraph
(a).
Sec. 35. Laws
2008, chapter 366, article 5, section 28, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Additional taxes authorized; use of
proceeds. (a) Notwithstanding
Minnesota Statutes, section 477A.016, or any other law, ordinance, or charter
provision to the contrary, the governing body of the city of Bloomington may
impose any or all of the taxes described in this section. The proceeds of any taxes imposed under this
section or section 27, less refunds and the cost of collection, must be used to
provide financing for parking facilities or other public improvements for any
phase of the Mall of America phase II. The Port Authority of the city of Bloomington
may, but is not required to, issue or cause the sale of bonds, a developer's
note, or other obligations to finance the improvements. If a governmental entity other than the city
of Bloomington issues the obligations used to finance the parking facilities
and other public improvements, the city may transfer the funds available under
this section and section 27 for financing the project to the entity that issued
the bonds.
(b) As a condition to exercising the authority
provided in this subdivision, the governing bodies of the city of Bloomington
and the Bloomington Port Authority shall require the developers of any phase of
the Mall of America project to enter into a labor peace agreement with the
labor organization which is most actively engaged in representing and
attempting to represent hotel workers in Hennepin and Ramsey Counties. The labor peace agreement must be an
enforceable agreement and must prohibit the labor organization and its members
from engaging in any boycott or other activity advising customers not to
patronize any hotel that is part of any phase of the Mall of America for at
least the first five years of the hotel's operation, and must cover all
operations at the hotel, other than construction, alteration, or repair of the
premises separately owned and operated, which are conducted by lessees or
tenants or under management agreements, except retail operations, including
gift, jewelry, and clothing shops that have annual gross revenues of less than
$250,000.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective upon
local approval of and compliance by the governing body of the city of
Bloomington with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021,
except that the provisions of paragraph (b) are effective if the city of
Bloomington approves any one of sections 35, 36, 37, 38 or 43.
Sec. 36. Laws
2008, chapter 366, article 5, section 28, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Sales tax.
The city of Bloomington may charter a special taxing authority,
which is a separate political subdivision.
The geographic area of the special taxing authority consists of Tax
Increment Financing Districts No. 1-C and No. 1-G in the city. The city council is the governing body of the
special taxing authority. The special
taxing authority may impose, by resolution, a sales tax of not less than
one-half of one percent and not more than one percent within its boundaries. The provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section
297A.99, except for subdivisions 2 and 3, govern the imposition,
administration, collection, and enforcement of the tax authorized in this
subdivision.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective upon
local approval and compliance by the governing body of the city of Bloomington
with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021.
Sec. 37. Laws
2008, chapter 366, article 5, section 29, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Issuing authority. (a) The city of Bloomington may contract
with any of the following authorities to issue and sell revenue bonds for the
purposes and in the amounts specified in subdivision 2:
(1) the commissioner of finance, exercising the
authority granted under this section and Minnesota Statutes, sections 16A.672
to 16A.675;
(2) the Agricultural and Economic Development Board,
exercising the powers granted under this section and Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 41A; or
(3) the Minnesota Public Facilities Authority,
exercising the powers granted under this section and Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 446A.
(b) The authority granted in this section is in
addition to the statutes in paragraph (a) and notwithstanding any contrary
provisions in them.
(c) The contract must include as a party the developer
of any phase II of the Mall of America and may include as a party
any other entity deemed appropriate by the city of Bloomington, the issuing
authority, and the developer.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective upon
local approval of and compliance by the governing body of the city of
Bloomington with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021.
Sec. 38. Laws
2008, chapter 366, article 5, section 29, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Purposes and amounts. (a) The revenue bonds may be issued in a
single or multiple issues and sold for the following purposes:
(1) to pay the costs to design, construct, furnish,
and equip parking facilities and related other public
improvements for any phase II of the Mall of America;
(2) to pay the costs of issuance, debt service, and
bond insurance or other credit enhancements, and to fund reserves; and
(3) to refund bonds issued under this section.
(b) The amount of bonds that may be issued for the
purposes of paragraph (a), clause (1), may not exceed per issue the estimated
cost from time to time of the parking facilities and other public improvements,
including soft costs; the amount of bonds that may be issued for the purposes
of paragraph (a), clauses (2) and (3), is not limited.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective upon
local approval of and compliance by the governing body of the city of
Bloomington with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021.
Sec. 39. Laws
2008, chapter 366, article 5, section 29, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Sale and issuance; proceeds. (a) The issuing authority may sell and
issue the bonds on the terms and conditions the issuing authority determines to
be in the best interests of the state after reviewing an agreement between the
city of Bloomington and the developer of any phase II of the Mall
of America setting out the terms upon which the city of Bloomington will use
the proceeds of the bond sales. The
bonds may be sold at public or private sale at a price or prices the issuing
authority finds appropriate. The issuing
authority may enter any agreements or pledges the issuing authority determines
necessary or useful to sell the bonds that are not inconsistent with this
section.
(b) The city may enter into a preliminary agreement
with the issuing authority under which the city agrees, if the revenue bonds
are not issued, to pay or cause to be paid the costs and expenses incurred by
the issuing authority relating to the proposed issuance of the revenue bonds.
(c) The proceeds of the bonds issued under this
section must be credited to a special Mall of America revenue bond proceeds
account with the issuing authority or a trustee and are appropriated to the
issuing authority for payment to the city of Bloomington for the purposes
specified in subdivision 2.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective upon
local approval of and compliance by the governing body of the city of
Bloomington with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021.
Sec. 40. Laws
2009, chapter 78, article 7, section 2, is amended to read:
Sec. 2. IRON RANGE RESOURCES AND REHABILITATION;
EARLY SEPARATION INCENTIVE PROGRAM AUTHORIZATION.
(a) Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, the
commissioner of Iron Range resources and rehabilitation, in consultation with
the commissioner of management and budget, may shall offer a
targeted early separation incentive program for employees of the commissioner
who have attained the age of 60 years or who have received credit for at least
30 years of allowable service under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 352.
(b) The early separation incentive program may include
one or more of the following:
(1) employer-paid postseparation health, medical, and
dental insurance until age 65; and
(2) cash incentives that may, but are not required to
be, used to purchase additional years of service credit through the Minnesota
State Retirement System, to the extent that the purchases are otherwise
authorized by law.
(c) The commissioner of Iron Range resources and
rehabilitation shall establish eligibility requirements for employees to
receive an incentive.
(d) The commissioner of Iron Range resources and
rehabilitation, consistent with the established program provisions under
paragraph (b), and with the eligibility requirements under paragraph (c), may
designate specific programs or employees as eligible to be offered the
incentive program.
(e) Acceptance of the offered incentive must be
voluntary on the part of the employee and must be in writing. The incentive may only be offered at the sole
discretion of the commissioner of Iron Range resources and rehabilitation.
(f) The cost of the incentive is payable solely by
funds made available to the commissioner of Iron Range resources and
rehabilitation by law, but only on prior approval of the expenditures by a
majority of the Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation Board.
(g) This section and section 3 are repealed June 30,
2011 December 31, 2012.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 41. CITY OF ST. PAUL; AUTHORITY TO EXERCISE
SPECIAL LAW AUTHORITY.
Notwithstanding the failure of the governing body of the
city of St. Paul to approve Laws 1995, chapter 264, article 5, sections 44
to 47, as required by Laws 1995, chapter 264, article 5, section 49, the
provisions of sections 44 to 47, as amended, apply to the city of St. Paul
without local approval under Minnesota Statutes, section 645.023, subdivision
1, paragraph (a).
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 42. OAKDALE; TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
DISTRICT.
Subdivision 1.
Duration of district. Notwithstanding the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes, section 469.176, subdivision 1b, the city of Oakdale may
collect tax increments from Tax Increment Financing District No. 6 (Bergen
Plaza) through December 31, 2024, subject to the conditions described in
subdivision 2.
Subd. 2.
Conditions for extension. (a) Subdivision 1 applies only if the
following conditions are met:
(1) by July 1, 2011, the city of Oakdale has entered
into a development agreement with a private developer for development or redevelopment
of all or a substantial part of the area; and
(2) by November 1, 2011, the city of Oakdale or a
private developer commences construction of streets, traffic improvements,
water, sewer, or related infrastructure that serves one or both of the parcels
with the following parcel identification numbers: 2902921330001 and 2902921330005. For the purposes of this section,
construction commences upon grading or other visible improvements that are part
of the subject infrastructure.
(b) All tax increments received by the city of Oakdale
under subdivision 1 after December 31, 2016, must be used only to pay costs
that are both (1) related to redevelopment of the parcels specified in this
subdivision including, without limitation, any of the infrastructure referenced
in this subdivision; and (2) otherwise eligible under law to be paid with
increments from the specified tax increment financing district, except the
authority under this clause does not apply to increments collected after the
conclusion of the duration limit under general law.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective upon
compliance by the governing body of the city of Oakdale with the requirements
of Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.1782, subdivision 2, and 645.021,
subdivision 3.
Sec. 43. CITY OF NORTH MANKATO; TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING DISTRICT; PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.
Subdivision 1.
Addition of parcel to district. Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes,
sections 469.174, subdivision 10, and 469.175, subdivision 4, paragraph (d), or
any other law to the contrary, the governing body of the city of North Mankato
may elect to expand the boundaries of Tax Increment Financing District No. IDD
1-8 to include real property, described as follows:
Lots 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, B, and C and part of vacated
Cedar Street, Lots A, 1, and 2 lying northwesterly of a line beginning at a
point on the South line of Lot A 74.67 feet West of the southeast corner of Lot
A; thence northeasterly 107.30 feet to a point on the East line of Lot 2;
thence continuing northeasterly 47.47 feet to a point on the East right-of-way
line of vacated Cedar Street; said point being 101.93 feet southerly from the
intersection of the south right-of-way line of Wheeler Avenue and the east
right-of-way line vacated Cedar Street, Lamm's Second Addition, City of North
Mankato, Nicollet County, Minnesota (tax parcel number R 18.614.0040).
Subd. 2.
Five-year rule. Minnesota Statutes, section 469.1763,
subdivision 3, does not apply to Tax Increment Financing District No. IDD
1-8, as enlarged.
Subd. 3.
Original tax capacity of
district. Upon addition of
the property described in subdivision 1 in Tax Increment Financing District No. IDD
1-8, the Nicollet County auditor shall increase the original tax capacity of
Tax Increment Financing District No. IDD 1-8 by the amount required by
Minnesota Statutes, section 469.177.
Subd. 4.
Use of increments. Tax increments and other revenues
derived from any portion of Tax Increment Financing District No. IDD 1-8,
as enlarged, may be used:
(1) to reimburse or otherwise pay the port authority of
the city of North Mankato and the city of North Mankato for allowable
expenditures under the plan budget for Tax Increment Financing District No. IDD
1-8, as amended from time to time; and
(2) to pay the principal, premium, and interest on the
$990,000 city of North Mankato taxable general obligation tax increment bonds,
series 2001D, issued by the city of North Mankato for redevelopment costs in
Tax Increment Financing District No. IDD 1-8 under the tax increment
financing plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. IDD 1-8 as
originally adopted January 16, 1990, and amended April 2, 2001.
Subd. 5.
Approval and effect of
modification. When the
governing body of the city elects to exercise the authority provided in
subdivision 1 to modify the district, the following conditions apply:
(1) it must comply with Minnesota Statutes, section
469.175, subdivision 4, except for paragraph (d); and
(2) beginning with the subsequent calendar year, except
as otherwise explicitly provided in this section, the district is subject to
the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.174 to 469.1794, as if the
request for certification of the entire district had been made on the date the
city elected to exercise the authority provided in subdivision 1.
Subd. 6.
Conditions. The authority granted by this section
may only be exercised by the city if:
(1) by July 1, 2011, the city has entered into a
development agreement with a private developer for redevelopment of all or a
substantial part of the area; and
(2) substantial and ongoing construction of
improvements for the project has begun by November 1, 2011.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective upon
approval by the governing body of the city of North Mankato and upon compliance
by the city with Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdivision 3.
Sec. 44. CITY OF COHASSET; USE OF TAX INCREMENTS.
(a) The authority operating Tax Increment Financing
Districts No. 2-1 and No. 3-1 in the city of Cohasset may transfer
tax increments from each of those districts to the city in an amount equal to
the advances made by the city from its general fund to finance expenditures
under Minnesota Statutes, section 469.176, subdivision 4, for the benefit of
that district.
(b) The authority granted by this section may only be
exercised by the authority if, by July 1, 2011, the authority has entered into
a development agreement with a private developer of property to be served by
the road financed by the expenditures under this section and if substantial and
ongoing construction has begun by November 1, 2011.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment, upon approval by the governing body of the city of
Cohasset and compliance with Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdivision
3.
Sec. 45. 2010 DISTRIBUTIONS ONLY.
For distributions in 2010 only, a special fund is
established to receive 27.544 cents per ton that otherwise would be allocated
under Minnesota Statutes, section 298.28, subdivision 6:
(1) 0.764 cent per ton must be paid to Northern
Minnesota Dental to provide incentives for at least two dentists to establish
dental practices in high-need areas of the taconite tax relief area;
(2) 0.955 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Virginia for repairs and geothermal heat at the Olcott Park Greenhouse/Virginia
Commons project;
(3) 0.796 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Virginia for health and safety repairs at the Miners Memorial;
(4) 1.114 cents per ton must be paid to the city of
Eveleth for the reconstruction of Highway 142/Grant and Park Avenues;
(5) 0.478 cent per ton must be paid to the Greenway
Joint Recreation Board for upgrades and capital improvements to the public
arena in Coleraine;
(6) 0.796 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Calumet for water treatment and pumphouse modifications;
(7) 0.159 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Bovey for residential and commercial claims for water damage due to water and
flood-related damage caused by the Canisteo Pit;
(8) 0.637 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Nashwauk for a community and child care center;
(9) 0.637 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Keewatin for water and sewer upgrades;
(10) 0.637 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Marble for the city hall and library project;
(11) 0.955 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Grand Rapids for extension of water and sewer services for Lakewood Housing;
(12) 0.159 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Grand Rapids for exhibits at the Children's Museum;
(13) 0.637 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Grand Rapids for Block 20/21 soil corrections.
This amount must be matched by local sources;
(14) 0.605 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Aitkin for three water loops;
(15) 0.048 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Aitkin for signage;
(16) 0.159 cent per ton must be paid to Aitkin County
for a trail;
(17) 0.637 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Cohasset for the Beiers Road railroad crossing;
(18) 0.088 cent per ton must be paid to the town of
Clinton for expansion and striping of the community center parking lot;
(19) 0.398 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Kinney for water line replacement;
(20) 0.796 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Gilbert for infrastructure improvements, milling, and overlay for Summit Street
between Alaska Avenue and Highway 135;
(21) 0.318 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Gilbert for sanitary sewer main replacements and improvements in the Northeast
Lower Alley area;
(22) 0.637 cent per ton must be paid to the town of
White for replacement of the Stepetz Road culvert;
(23) 0.637 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Buhl for reconstruction of Sharon Street and associated infrastructure;
(24) 0.637 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Mountain Iron for site improvements at the Park Ridge development;
(25) 0.796 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Mountain Iron for infrastructure and site preparation for its renewable and
sustainable energy park;
(26) 0.637 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Biwabik for sanitary sewer improvements;
(27) 0.796 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Aurora for alley and road rebuilding for the Summit Addition;
(28) 0.955 cent per ton must be paid to the city of Silver
Bay for bioenergy facility improvements;
(29) 0.318 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Grand Marais for water and sewer infrastructure improvements;
(30) 0.318 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Orr for airport, water, and sewer improvements;
(31) 0.318 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Cook for street and bridge improvements;
(32) 0.955 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Ely for street, water, and sewer improvements;
(33) 0.318 cent per ton must be paid to the city of Tower
for water and sewer improvements;
(34) 0.955 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Two Harbors for water and sewer improvements;
(35) 0.637 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Babbitt for water and sewer improvements;
(36) 0.096 cent per ton must be paid to the township
of Duluth for infrastructure improvements;
(37) 0.096 cent per ton must be paid to the township
of Tofte for infrastructure improvements;
(38) 3.184 cents per ton must be paid to the city of
Hibbing for sewer improvements;
(39) 1.273 cents per ton must be paid to the city of
Chisholm for NW Area Project infrastructure improvements;
(40) 0.318 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Chisholm for health and safety improvements at the athletic facility;
(41) 0.796 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Hoyt Lakes for residential street improvements;
(42) 0.796 cent per ton must be paid to the Bois Forte
Indian Reservation for infrastructure related to a housing development;
(43) 0.159 cent per ton must be paid to Balkan
Township for building improvements; and
(44) 0.159 cent per ton must be paid to the city of
Grand Rapids for a grant to a nonprofit for a signage kiosk.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective for the
2010 distribution, all of which must be made in the August 2010 payment.
Sec. 46. IRON RANGE HERITAGE CENTER AND PERPICH
ARCHIVES.
The Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation Board
shall change the name of "Ironworld Discovery Center" to "Iron
Range Heritage Center and Perpich Archives" consistent with the changes in
section 48.
Sec. 47. APPROPRIATION; DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.
Subdivision 1.
Tax system management. (a) $2,428,500 is appropriated to the
commissioner of revenue for additional activities to identify and collect tax
liabilities from individuals and businesses that currently do not pay all taxes
owed. This initiative is expected to
result in new general fund revenues of $6,532,500 for fiscal year 2011.
(b) The department must report to the chairs of the
house of representative Ways and Means and senate Finance Committees by March
15, 2011, and January 15, 2012, on the following performance indicators:
(1) the number of corporations noncompliant with the
corporate tax system each year and the percentage and dollar amounts of valid
tax liabilities collected;
(2) the number of businesses noncompliant with the
sales and use tax system and the percentage and dollar amount of the valid tax
liabilities collected; and
(3) the number of individual noncompliant cases
resolved and the percentage and dollar amount of valid tax liabilities
collected.
(c) The reports must also identify base-level
expenditures and staff positions related to compliance and audit activities,
including baseline information as of January 1, 2009. The information must be provided at the
budget activity level.
Subd. 2.
Debt collection management. $935,000 is for additional activities
to identify and collect tax liabilities from individuals and businesses that
currently do not pay all taxes owed. This
initiative is expected to result in new general fund revenues of $6,900,000 for
fiscal year 2011.
Sec. 48. REVISOR'S INSTRUCTION.
(a) The revisor of statutes shall change the terms
"Douglas J. Johnson economic protection trust fund" or similar terms
to "Mesabi miners' memorial economic development fund" or similar
terms wherever they appear in Minnesota Statutes. The revisor shall also make grammatical
changes related to the changes in terms.
(b) The revisor of statutes shall change the terms
"Ironworld Discovery Center" to "Iron Range Heritage Center and
Perpich Archives" wherever they appear in Minnesota Statutes.
Sec. 49. REPEALER.
Laws 1996, chapter 464, article 1, section 8,
subdivision 5, is repealed.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective upon local
approval of and compliance by the governing body of the city of Bloomington
with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to economic
development; encouraging job creation; allowing tax credits for small business
investment and historic structure rehabilitation; expanding the use of special
assessment for certain energy improvements; expanding the permitted use of tax
increment financing for certain projects; repealing restrictions on city of
Bloomington's development of the Mall of America site; providing for tax system
and debt collection management; establishing voluntary energy improvement
financing program for local governments, transportation infrastructure loans,
qualified green building and sustainable design projects, a create automotive
recovery zone, and tax increment financing districts; modifying apprenticeship
training facility property tax exemption and minerals distributions;
appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 13.4967, by
adding a subdivision; 297I.20, by adding a subdivision; 429.021, subdivision 1;
429.101, subdivision 1; 446A.085, by adding a subdivision; 469.174, by adding a
subdivision; 469.175, by adding a subdivision; 469.176, subdivisions 1b, 4c, by
adding subdivisions; 469.310, subdivisions 6, 11, by adding subdivisions;
469.312, subdivisions 1, 3; 469.314, subdivisions 1, 4; 469.315; Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 272.02, subdivision 86; 298.294; 469.153,
subdivision 2; 469.312, subdivision 5; Laws 1986, chapter 391, section 1; Laws
1995, chapter 264, article 5, sections 44, subdivision 4, as amended; 45,
subdivision 1, as amended; Laws 2008, chapter 366, article 5, sections 28,
subdivisions 1, 2; 29, subdivisions 1, 2, 4; Laws 2009, chapter 78, article 7,
section 2; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 116J;
216C; 290; 469; repealing Laws 1996, chapter 464, article 1, section 8,
subdivision 5."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill
pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The report was adopted.
INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS
The following House File was introduced:
Clark introduced:
H. F. No. 3735, A bill for an act relating
to capital improvements; imposing certain requirements on state bond financed
property.
The bill was read for the first time and referred
to the Committee on Finance.
MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE
The following message was received from
the Senate:
Madam
Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the
Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully
requested:
H. F. No. 3108, A bill for an act relating
to elections; changing and clarifying certain provisions; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2008, sections 201.016, subdivision 1a; 201.061, subdivision 1;
201.11; 201.12; 201.121, subdivision 3; 201.13; 201.14; 201.15, subdivisions 1,
2; 201.155; 201.171; 203B.02, subdivision 3; 203B.04, subdivision 1; 203B.06,
subdivisions 1, as amended, 5; 203B.081, as amended; 203B.16, subdivision 2;
203B.19; 203B.227; 204B.04, subdivision 2; 204B.135, subdivision 4; 204B.14, by
adding a subdivision; 204B.18, subdivision 1; 204B.22, subdivisions 1, 2;
204B.24; 204B.27, subdivisions 2, 3; 204B.28, by adding a subdivision; 204B.38;
204C.02; 204C.04, subdivision 1; 204C.06, subdivision 1; 204C.08; 204C.09,
subdivision 1; 204C.12, subdivision 2; 204C.13, subdivision 2; 204C.24,
subdivision 1; 204C.28, subdivisions 1, 2; 204C.33, subdivision 1; 204C.35,
subdivisions 2, 3; 204C.36, subdivisions 3, 4; 204C.37; 204D.04, subdivision 2;
204D.09, subdivision 2; 204D.10, subdivision 1; 204D.17; 204D.19; 204D.20,
subdivision 1; 205.065, subdivision 1, as amended; 205.07, subdivision 1, by
adding a subdivision; 205.13, subdivisions 1, 2; 205.16, subdivisions 2, 3, 4,
as amended, 5, as amended; 205A.03, subdivision 2, as amended; 205A.04,
subdivision 1; 205A.05, subdivision 1; 205A.07, subdivisions 3, as amended, 3a,
as amended, 3b, as amended; 205A.11, subdivision 3; 206.57, subdivision 6;
208.03; 365.51, subdivision 1; 375.101, subdivisions 1, 2; proposing coding for
new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 201; 204D; 205; 205A; 373; repealing
Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 3.22; 204B.22, subdivision 3; 204D.10,
subdivision 2; 206.57, subdivision 7; 206.805, subdivision 2; 206.91.
Colleen J. Pacheco, First
Assistant Secretary of the Senate
Winkler moved that the House refuse to
concur in the Senate amendments to H. F. No. 3108, that the
Speaker appoint a Conference Committee of 3 members of the House, and that the
House requests that a like committee be appointed by the Senate to confer on
the disagreeing votes of the two houses.
The motion prevailed.
ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER
The Speaker announced the appointment of
the following members of the House to a Conference Committee on
H. F. No. 3108:
Winkler, Pelowski and Kiffmeyer.
CALENDAR FOR THE DAY
S. F. No. 2183, A bill for
an act relating to highways; designating the Corporal Johnathan Benson Memorial
Highway in the city of North Branch; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section
161.14, by adding a subdivision.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 133 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
S. F. No. 2743, A bill for an act relating
to health; modifying a hospital construction moratorium; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 144.551, subdivision 1.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 129 yeas and 4 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk.
Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Falk
Murphy, E.
Ruud
Severson
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
H. F. No. 1692, A bill for an act relating
to dispute resolution; providing for arbitration of disputes; adopting the
Uniform Arbitration Act; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 80C.146,
subdivision 2; 122A.40, subdivision 15; 122A.41, subdivision 13; 179.09;
325E.37, subdivision 5; 325F.665, subdivision 6; 469.1762; 572A.02, subdivision
1; proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 572B; repealing
Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 572.08; 572.09; 572.10; 572.11; 572.12;
572.13; 572.14; 572.15; 572.16; 572.17; 572.18; 572.19; 572.20; 572.21; 572.22;
572.23; 572.24; 572.25; 572.26; 572.27; 572.28; 572.29; 572.30.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 133 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
S. F. No. 2946, A bill for
an act relating to drivers' licenses; allowing collection of fees under the
license reinstatement diversion pilot program to be extended for 18 months;
amending Laws 2009, chapter 59, article 3, section 4, subdivision 9.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 128 yeas and 5 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Eastlund
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Buesgens
Drazkowski
Emmer
Severson
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
H. F. No. 2561, A bill for an act relating
to highways; designating a Veterans Memorial Bridge on marked Trunk Highway 95
in the city of North Branch; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 161.14,
by adding a subdivision.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 133 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
H. F. No. 2907 was reported
to the House.
Gottwalt moved
to amend H. F. No. 2907, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 1, line
18, after the second comma, insert "or by the February 10 following the
effective date of this section, whichever is earlier,"
Page 2, line
1, after the second comma, insert "or by the July 1 following the
effective date of this section, whichever is earlier,"
Page 2,
delete line 9 and insert:
"EFFECTIVE DATE. This act is effective 60 days after
the commissioner of management and budget certifies that legislation has
been enacted providing that probable general fund receipts for the biennium
ending June 30, 2011, will be equal to or greater than probable general
fund expenditures for that biennium."
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
H. F. No. 2907, A bill for an act relating
to communications; setting state goals for the deployment and speed of
high-speed broadband; requiring reports; proposing coding for new law in
Minnesota Statutes, chapter 237.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 118 yeas and 15 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, P.
Anzelc
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Buesgens
Demmer
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Holberg
Kohls
Peppin
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
H. F. No. 2231, A bill for an act relating
to transportation; allowing road authorities to remove snow from certain roads
in uncompleted subdivisions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 160.21,
by adding a subdivision.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 133 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
H. F. No. 776, A bill for an act relating
to judgments; enacting the Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition
Act adopted and recommended for passage by the National Conference of
Commissioners on Uniform State Laws; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota
Statutes, chapter 548; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 548.35.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 133 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
H. F. No. 2639 was reported to the House.
Holberg,
Davids, Abeler, Severson and Eastlund moved to amend H. F. No. 2639, the
first engrossment, as follows:
Page 1, line
19, after the period, insert "If, prior to the time the call location
information is provided to a law enforcement agency, the wireless
telecommunications service provider receives a written notice from the law
enforcement agency rescinding its request because it has determined that the
user is not in an emergency situation that involves the risk of death or
serious physical harm to the user, the call location information must not be
provided to that agency."
Page 1,
after line 22, insert:
"(c)
If a law enforcement agency discovers that the user identified in a call
location information request is not in an emergency situation that involves the
risk of death or serious physical harm to the user, the agency must, as soon as
practicable, notify the wireless telecommunications service provider in writing
that the law enforcement agency's request is rescinded. If the law enforcement agency has already
received the call location information as a result of its request, the law
enforcement agency must treat the information as private data on individuals,
as defined in section 13.02, subdivision 12."
Page 2, line
1, delete "(c)" and insert "(d)"
Page 2, line
8, delete "(d)" and insert "(e)"
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
H. F. No. 2639, A bill for an act relating
to public safety; authorizing wireless telecommunications service providers to
provide call locations for emergencies; proposing coding for new law in
Minnesota Statutes, chapter 237.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 133 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
H. F. No. 3065, A bill for an act relating
to local government; providing for securities lending agreements and holding of
municipal funds; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 118A.05,
subdivision 3; 118A.06.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 133 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
H. F. No. 3128, A bill for an act relating
to probate; clarifying the powers of health care agents, guardians, and others
to make health care decisions for wards and protected persons; modifying
provisions governing guardians and conservators; amending Minnesota Statutes
2008, sections 145C.09, subdivision 3; 524.5-303; 524.5-403; 525A.09; Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 524.5-120; 524.5-304; 524.5-309; 524.5-310;
524.5-315; 524.5-316; 524.5-406; 524.5-420.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 133 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
H. F. No. 3277, A bill for an act relating
to commerce; specifying that advertising of deceptive local telephone numbers
for businesses is a deceptive trade practice; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008,
section 325D.46, by adding a subdivision.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 118 yeas and 15 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Buesgens
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Kohls
Peppin
Severson
Shimanski
Torkelson
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
H. F. No. 3327, A bill for an act relating
to city and county employees; exempting employees of a city-owned or
county-owned hospital from certain reporting requirements; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 471.701.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 94 yeas and 39 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Downey
Eken
Falk
Faust
Gardner
Greiling
Gunther
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Brod
Buesgens
Bunn
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Loon
Magnus
McFarlane
Peppin
Rosenthal
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was passed and its title agreed to.
H. F. No. 3393 was reported to the House.
Jackson moved to amend H. F.
No. 3393, the first engrossment, as follows:
Page 2, line 18, strike the
second semicolon and insert "of"
Page 2, line 22, after
"in" insert a comma
Page 3, line 9, after
"(d)," insert "and" and strike "(f), and
(h),"
Page 11, line 34, delete
"the owner"
Page 11, line 35, delete
"or owners of"
Page 12, delete lines 5 and
6 and insert: "(1) if the vacated property accrues to one or more units
in a condominium or a planned community, title to the vacated property shall
vest in the owner or owners of the unit or the units, but the"
Page 12, line 8, delete
"and"
Page 12, delete lines 9 to
12, and insert:
"(2) if the vacated
property accrues to common elements in a condominium, title to the vacated
property shall vest in the unit owners in accordance with their allocated
interests and the vacated property shall be treated as a part of the common
elements; and
(3) if the vacated property
accrues to common elements in a cooperative or planned community, title to the
vacated property shall vest in the association and the vacated property shall
be treated as a part of the common elements."
Page 18,
line 7, delete the new language
Page 18,
line 8, delete the new language
Page 20,
line 26, delete everything after the stricken "(f)"
Page 20,
line 27, delete the new language and strike the comma
Page 20,
line 31, delete "more than one" and insert "one or
more"
Page 73,
line 33, reinstate the stricken "and"
Page 73,
lines 35 and 36, delete the new language
Page 91,
line 29, reinstate the stricken "(a)"
Page 92,
lines 9 to 12, reinstate the stricken language
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
RECONSIDERATION
Jackson moved that the vote whereby the
Jackson amendment to H. F. No. 3393, the first engrossment, was
adopted be now reconsidered. The motion
prevailed.
Jackson withdrew her amendment to
H. F. No. 3393, the first engrossment.
Jackson moved that H. F. No. 3393 be
temporarily laid over on the Calendar for the Day. The motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 3591 was reported to the House.
Kiffmeyer moved
to amend H. F. No. 3591, the first engrossment, as follows:
Delete
everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section
1. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section
157.15, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. Mobile
food unit. "Mobile food
unit" means a food and beverage service establishment that is a vehicle
mounted unit, either motorized or trailered, operating no more than 21 days
annually at any one place or is operated in conjunction with a permanent
business licensed under this chapter or chapter 28A at the site of the
permanent business by the same individual or company, and readily movable,
without disassembling, for transport to another location. A local government may provide by
ordinance that a mobile food unit may operate for a set number of days greater
than 21 days annually at any one place. The
ordinance must include any requirements or limitations the local government
considers reasonably necessary to protect the health, safety, and general
welfare of the public."
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The Speaker called Seifert to the Chair.
The question was taken on the Kiffmeyer
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 73 yeas and 59 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Brown
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Faust
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hausman
Haws
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Jackson
Juhnke
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Olin
Peppin
Peterson
Reinert
Rosenthal
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Sterner
Swails
Thissen
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Gardner
Hansen
Hayden
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Koenen
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Mahoney
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Thao
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
Spk.
Kelliher
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
H. F. No. 3591, A bill for an act relating
to local government; authorizing the city of Minneapolis to adopt an ordinance
to define the annual duration of operation of mobile food units; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 157.15, subdivision 9.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 133 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
The Speaker resumed the Chair.
H. F. No. 3335 was reported to the House.
Westrom moved
to amend H. F. No. 3335 as follows:
Delete
everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section
1. [375A.15]
APPOINTED COUNTY OFFICES; REFERENDUM REQUIRED.
Any county
in which the office of auditor, treasurer, recorder, or auditor-treasurer was
made appointive without a referendum, must hold a election on whether the
office will remain appointive. The
referendum must be held before the time for filing for election to county
offices opens for the 2012 general election.
If the referendum fails, the office must be filled by election at the
2012 general election."
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Westrom
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 47 yeas and 86 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Juhnke
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Koenen
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Marquart
Murdock
Nornes
Otremba
Paymar
Peppin
Rukavina
Sanders
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Demmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Scott
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
H. F. No. 3335, A bill for an act relating
to Mower County; providing a process for making office of county recorder
appointive.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 88 yeas and 45 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Demmer
Dittrich
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Gunther
Hamilton
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Brod
Buesgens
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Hackbarth
Hansen
Holberg
Juhnke
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Koenen
Loon
Mack
Marquart
Murdock
Murphy, M.
Nornes
Otremba
Peppin
Rukavina
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
Morrow moved that the remaining bills on
the Calendar for the Day be continued.
The motion prevailed.
FISCAL CALENDAR
Pursuant to rule 1.22, Solberg requested
immediate consideration of S. F. No. 460.
S. F. No. 460 was reported
to the House.
Murphy, E., moved
to amend S. F. No. 460, the third engrossment, as follows:
Page 26,
line 29, after "Hospital," insert "Saint Mary's
Medical Center,"
Page 28,
after line 18, insert:
"EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective April 1,
2010."
Page 32,
lines 3 and 5, after "repealed" insert "effective
April 1, 2010"
Page 32,
delete line 12
Page 36,
after line 6, insert:
"Compulsive Gambling Special Revenue
Administration. $6,000 for
fiscal year 2010 and $4,000 for fiscal year 2011 must be transferred from the
lottery prize fund appropriation for compulsive gambling administration to the
general fund by June 30 of each respective fiscal year."
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
S. F. No. 460, as amended,
was read for the third time.
The Speaker called Sertich to the Chair.
CALL OF THE HOUSE
On the motion of Buesgens and on the
demand of 10 members, a call of the House was ordered. The following members answered to their
names:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Hortman moved that further proceedings of
the roll call be suspended and that the Sergeant at Arms be instructed to bring
in the absentees. The motion prevailed
and it was so ordered.
The Speaker resumed the Chair.
S. F. No. 460, A bill for
an act relating to health care; establishing mental health urgent care and
consultation services; creating a new general assistance medical care program;
appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 256.969,
subdivision 27; 256B.0625, subdivision 13f, by adding a subdivision; 256B.0644;
256B.69, subdivision 20; 256L.05, subdivisions 1b, 3, 3a, 3c; 517.08,
subdivision 1c; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 256.969,
subdivision 3a; 256B.0947, subdivision 1; 256B.196, subdivision 2; 256D.03,
subdivision 3; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters
245; 256B; 256D; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 256.742; 256.979,
subdivision 8; 256B.195, subdivisions 4, 5; 256D.03, subdivision 9; 256L.07,
subdivision 6; 256L.15, subdivision 4; 256L.17, subdivision 7; Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 256B.195, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 256D.03,
subdivision 4.
The bill, as amended, was placed upon its
final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 121 yeas and 12
nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Falk
Faust
Jackson
Juhnke
Liebling
Marquart
Norton
Poppe
Reinert
Rukavina
Slocum
Thissen
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
REPORT FROM THE COMMITTEE ON
RULES AND
LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATION
Sertich from the Committee on
Rules and Legislative Administration, pursuant to rule 1.21, designated the
following bills to be placed on the Calendar for the Day for Thursday, March
25, 2010:
H. F. Nos. 2668,
3048, 1217, 3187, 2823, 2828, 2949, 3027, 3061, 3067, 3152, 3362, 3363, 2825,
2958, 3139, 2956, 3164, 3391, 3318, 3286, 3336 and 2914;
S. F. No. 1494; H. F. No. 3259; and
S. F. No. 2494.
MOTIONS AND
RESOLUTIONS
Bly moved that the name of Sailer be added as an author on
H. F. No. 1182. The
motion prevailed.
Fritz moved that the name of Kahn be added as an author on
H. F. No. 1847. The
motion prevailed.
Welti moved that the name of Poppe be added as an author on
H. F. No. 2766. The
motion prevailed.
Torkelson moved that the name of Dill be added as an author on
H. F. No. 2779. The
motion prevailed.
Obermueller moved that the name of Rukavina be added as an
author on H. F. No. 2781.
The motion prevailed.
Murdock moved that the name of Poppe be added as an author on
H. F. No. 3024. The
motion prevailed.
Pelowski moved that the name of Poppe be added as an author on
H. F. No. 3096. The
motion prevailed.
Dettmer moved that the name of Bunn be added as an author on
H. F. No. 3107. The
motion prevailed.
Norton moved that the name of Newton be added as an author on
H. F. No. 3115. The
motion prevailed.
Nornes moved that the name of Sterner be added as an author on
H. F. No. 3143. The
motion prevailed.
Anderson, S., moved that her name be stricken as an author on
H. F. No. 3430. The
motion prevailed.
Poppe moved that the name of Sterner be added as an author on
H. F. No. 3468. The
motion prevailed.
McFarlane moved that the name of Rukavina be added as an author
on H. F. No. 3495. The
motion prevailed.
Abeler moved that the name of Bunn be added as an author on
H. F. No. 3611. The
motion prevailed.
Downey moved that the name of Peterson be added as an author on
H. F. No. 3696. The
motion prevailed.
Greiling moved that the name of Peterson be added as an author
on H. F. No. 3699. The motion
prevailed.
Mariani moved that the name of Peterson be added as an author
on H. F. No. 3706. The
motion prevailed.
Ward moved that H. F. No. 2597 be returned to
its author. The motion prevailed.
ADJOURNMENT
Sertich moved that when the House adjourns today it adjourn
until 12:30 p.m., Thursday, March 25, 2010.
The motion prevailed.
Sertich moved that the House adjourn. The motion prevailed, and the Speaker
declared the House stands adjourned until 12:30 p.m., Thursday, March 25, 2010.
Albin
A. Mathiowetz,
Chief Clerk, House of Representatives