STATE OF MINNESOTA
EIGHTY-SIXTH SESSION - 2010
_____________________
EIGHTY-FIFTH DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Thursday, April 8, 2010
The House of Representatives convened at
1:00 p.m. and was called to order by Tony Sertich, Speaker pro tempore.
Prayer was offered by the Reverend Mark
Skinner, Bethlehem Lutheran Church, Brainerd, Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge of
allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
The roll was called and the following
members were present:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
A quorum was present.
The Speaker assumed the Chair.
Persell was excused.
Mariani was excused until 1:35 p.m. Huntley was excused until 2:05 p.m. Brod was excused until 2:30 p.m.
The
Chief Clerk proceeded to read the Journal of the preceding day. Murphy, E., moved that further reading of the
Journal be dispensed with and that the Journal be approved as corrected by the
Chief Clerk. The motion prevailed.
REPORTS OF
STANDING COMMITTEES AND DIVISIONS
Carlson
from the Committee on Finance to which was referred:
H. F. No. 2470,
A bill for an act relating to crime; including use of scanning device and
reencoder to acquire information from payment cards as identity theft; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 609.527, subdivisions 1, 6, by adding a
subdivision; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 388.23, subdivision 1.
Reported
the same back with the recommendation that the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Carlson
from the Committee on Finance to which was referred:
H. F. No. 2887,
A bill for an act relating to taxation; local government aid; disaster aid to
city of St. Charles; amending Laws 2009, chapter 93, article 4, section 1.
Reported
the same back with the following amendments:
Delete
everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section
1. APPROPRIATIONS.
Subdivision
1. Department of Education. The
sums indicated in this section are appropriated from the general fund to the
Department of Education for the fiscal years designated.
Subd. 2. Declining
pupil and city aid; city of St. Charles and St. Charles School
District. For a declining
pupil aid grant for Independent School District No. 858, St. Charles,
and a grant to the city of St. Charles, for losses related to the April
2009 fire:
$140,000 . .
. . . 2010
$229,000 . .
. . . 2011
The 2010 appropriation
includes $0 for 2009 and $140,000 for 2010.
The 2011 appropriation
includes $52,000 for 2010 and $177,000 for 2011.
The base appropriation for
fiscal year 2012 is $65,000. The base
appropriation for fiscal year 2013 and later is $0.
The district shall certify
its pupil loss due to the April 2009 fire to the commissioner of education for
fiscal year 2010 by June 1, 2010, and for fiscal year 2011 by June 1, 2011. The grant to school district payment is equal
to the district's certification of its pupil loss due to the April 2009 fire
multiplied by $5,124. Each year, the
balance of this appropriation not paid to the school district shall be
transferred by the commissioner of education to the commissioner of revenue for
a grant payable to the city of St. Charles by June 30.
Aid payments made under this
subdivision must be paid in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section
127A.45, subdivision 13.
Subd. 3. General
education aid. General
education aid under Laws 2009, chapter 96, article 1, section 24, subdivision
2, is reduced by $192,000 in fiscal year 2010 and by $229,000 in fiscal year
2011.
Sec. 2. REPEALER.
Laws 2009, chapter 93,
article 4, section 1, is repealed.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment."
Amend the title as follows:
Page 1, line 2, after
"Charles;" insert "appropriating money;"
Correct the title numbers
accordingly
With the recommendation that when so
amended the bill be re-referred to the Committee on Taxes without further
recommendation.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was referred:
H. F. No. 3024, A bill for an act relating to
labor and industry; modifying the requirements of the Manufactured Home
Building Code; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 327.31, subdivision
17, by adding subdivisions; 327.32, subdivision 1, by adding subdivisions;
327.34, subdivision 1; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 327.32,
subdivision 4; 327C.07, subdivisions 3, 3a, 8.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 8, line 11, delete "3, 3a," and insert
"3a"
Correct the title numbers accordingly
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was referred:
H. F. No. 3127, A bill for an act relating to
unemployment insurance; modifying administrative, benefit, and tax provisions;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 268.046, subdivision 1; 268.051,
subdivisions 2, 5, 7; 268.07, as amended; 268.085, subdivision 9; Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 268.052, subdivision 2; 268.053, subdivision
1; 268.085, subdivision 1; 268.136, subdivision 1.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 1, after line 7, insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 268.035, subdivision 19a, is amended to read:
Subd. 19a. Immediate family member. "Immediate family member" means
the applicant's an individual's spouse, parent, stepparent, son
or daughter, stepson or stepdaughter, or grandson or granddaughter.
Sec. 2. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 268.035, subdivision 20, is amended to read:
Subd. 20. Noncovered employment. "Noncovered employment" means:
(1) employment for the United States government or an
instrumentality thereof, including military service;
(2) employment for a state, other than Minnesota, or a
political subdivision or instrumentality thereof;
(3) employment for a foreign government;
(4) employment for an instrumentality wholly owned by a
foreign government, if the employment is of a character similar to that
performed in foreign countries by employees of the United States government or
an instrumentality thereof and the United States Secretary of State has
certified that the foreign government grants an equivalent exemption to similar
employment performed in the foreign country by employees of the United States
government and instrumentalities thereof;
(5) employment covered under United States Code, title 45,
section 351, the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act;
(6) employment covered by a reciprocal arrangement between
the commissioner and another state or the federal government that provides that
all employment performed by an individual for an employer during the period
covered by the reciprocal arrangement is considered performed entirely within
another state;
(7) employment for a church or convention or association of
churches, or an organization operated primarily for religious purposes that is
operated, supervised, controlled, or principally supported by a church or
convention or association of churches described in United States Code, title
26, section 501(c)(3) of the federal Internal Revenue Code and exempt from
income tax under section 501(a);
(8) employment of a duly ordained or licensed minister of a
church in the exercise of a ministry or by a member of a religious order in the
exercise of duties required by the order, for Minnesota or a political
subdivision or an organization described in United States Code, title 26,
section 501(c)(3) of the federal Internal Revenue Code and exempt from income
tax under section 501(a);
(9) employment of an individual receiving rehabilitation of
"sheltered" work in a facility conducted for the purpose of carrying
out a program of rehabilitation for individuals whose earning capacity is
impaired by age or physical or mental deficiency or injury or a program
providing "sheltered" work for individuals who because of an impaired
physical or mental capacity cannot be readily absorbed in the competitive labor
market. This clause applies only to
services performed for Minnesota or a political subdivision or an organization
described in United States Code, title 26, section 501(c)(3) of the federal
Internal Revenue Code and exempt from income tax under section 501(a) in a
facility certified by the Rehabilitation Services Branch of the department or
in a day training or habilitation program licensed by the Department of Human
Services;
(10) employment of an individual receiving work relief or
work training as part of an unemployment work relief or work training program
assisted or financed in whole or in part by any federal agency or an agency of
a state or political subdivision thereof.
This clause applies only to employment for Minnesota or a political
subdivision or an organization described in United States Code, title 26,
section 501(c)(3) of the federal Internal Revenue Code and exempt from income
tax under section 501(a). This clause
does not apply to programs that require unemployment benefit coverage for the
participants;
(11) employment for Minnesota or a political subdivision as
an elected official, a member of a legislative body, or a member of the
judiciary;
(12) employment as a member of the Minnesota National Guard
or Air National Guard;
(13) employment for Minnesota, a political subdivision, or
instrumentality thereof, as an employee serving only on a temporary basis in
case of fire, flood, tornado, or similar emergency;
(14) employment as an election official or election worker
for Minnesota or a political subdivision, but only if the compensation for that
employment was less than $1,000 in a calendar year;
(15) employment for Minnesota that is a major policy-making
or advisory position in the unclassified service, including those positions
established under section 43A.08, subdivision 1a;
(16) employment for a political subdivision of Minnesota that
is a nontenured major policy making or advisory position;
(17) domestic employment in a private household, local
college club, or local chapter of a college fraternity or sorority performed
for a person, only if the wages paid in any calendar quarter in either the
current or prior calendar year to all individuals in domestic employment
totaled less than $1,000.
"Domestic employment" includes all service in the
operation and maintenance of a private household, for a local college club, or
local chapter of a college fraternity or sorority as distinguished from service
as an employee in the pursuit of an employer's trade or business;
(18) employment of an individual by a son, daughter, or
spouse, and employment of a child under the age of 18 by the child's father or
mother;
(19) employment for a personal care assistance provider
agency by an immediate family member of a recipient who provides the direct
care to the recipient through the state personal care assistance program under
section 256B.0659;
(19) (20) employment of an inmate of a custodial or
penal institution;
(20) (21) employment for a school, college, or
university by a student who is enrolled and is regularly attending classes at
the school, college, or university;
(21) (22) employment of an individual who is
enrolled as a student in a full-time program at a nonprofit or public
educational institution that maintains a regular faculty and curriculum and has
a regularly organized body of students in attendance at the place where its
educational activities are carried on, taken for credit at the institution,
that combines academic instruction with work experience, if the employment is
an integral part of the program, and the institution has so certified to the
employer, except that this clause does not apply to employment in a program
established for or on behalf of an employer or group of employers;
(22) (23) employment of university, college, or
professional school students in an internship or other training program with
the city of St. Paul or the city of Minneapolis under Laws 1990, chapter
570, article 6, section 3;
(23) (24) employment for a hospital by a patient of
the hospital. "Hospital" means
an institution that has been licensed by the Department of Health as a
hospital;
(24) (25) employment as a student nurse for a
hospital or a nurses' training school by an individual who is enrolled and is
regularly attending classes in an accredited nurses' training school;
(25) (26) employment as an intern for a hospital by
an individual who has completed a four-year course in an accredited medical
school;
(26) (27) employment as an insurance salesperson,
by other than a corporate officer, if all the wages from the employment is
solely by way of commission. The word
"insurance" includes an annuity and an optional annuity;
(27) (28) employment as an officer of a township
mutual insurance company or farmer's mutual insurance company operating under
chapter 67A;
(28) (29) employment of a corporate officer, if the
officer owns 25 percent or more of the employer corporation, and employment of
a member of a limited liability company, if the member owns 25 percent or more
of the employer limited liability company;
(29) (30) employment as a real estate salesperson,
by other than a corporate officer, if all the wages from the employment is
solely by way of commission;
(30) (31) employment as a direct seller as defined
in United States Code, title 26, section 3508;
(31) (32) employment of an individual under the age
of 18 in the delivery or distribution of newspapers or shopping news, not
including delivery or distribution to any point for subsequent delivery or
distribution;
(32) (33) casual employment performed for an individual,
other than domestic employment under clause (17), that does not promote or
advance that employer's trade or business;
(33) (34) employment in "agricultural
employment" unless considered "covered agricultural employment"
under subdivision 11; or
(34) (35) if employment during one-half or more of
any pay period was covered employment, all the employment for the pay period is
considered covered employment; but if during more than one-half of any pay
period the employment was noncovered employment, then all of the employment for
the pay period is considered noncovered employment. "Pay period" means a period of not
more than a calendar month for which a payment or compensation is ordinarily
made to the employee by the employer."
Page 4, line 27, strike "shall" and insert "must"
Page 5, line 1, delete "last" and insert
"most recent"
Page 7, line 3, strike "shall" and insert "must"
Page 10, delete lines 5 to 6
Page 10, after line 10, insert:
"EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the first Sunday following final enactment."
Page 11, line 11, reinstate the stricken language
Page 11, line 12, reinstate the stricken language and after
"paid" insert "in covered employment"
Page 11, line 13, reinstate the stricken language
Page 11, line 14, reinstate the stricken language and after
"account" insert "and all taxes due on those wages have been
paid"
Page 12, delete lines 15 to 17
Page 12, delete subdivision 1 and insert:
"Subdivision 1.
Eligibility. (a) Special state extended
unemployment insurance benefits are payable under this section to an applicant
who does not qualify for extended unemployment insurance benefits under
Minnesota Statutes, section 268.115, solely because the applicant does not have
wage credits of at least 40 times the applicant's weekly benefit amount.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (a), all requirements for
extended unemployment benefits under Minnesota Statutes, section 268.115, and
all other requirements of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 268, must be met in order
for an applicant to be eligible for special state extended unemployment
insurance benefits under this section.
(c) Except as provided for in paragraph (d), special state
extended unemployment insurance benefits are payable in the same amounts, for
the same duration, and for the same time period as provided for under Minnesota
Statutes, section 268.115.
(d) The maximum amount of special state extended unemployment
insurance benefits under this section available to an applicant is reduced by
the amount of special state emergency unemployment insurance benefits paid the
applicant under Laws 2009, chapter 1, sections 2 and 11."
Page 13, after line 8, insert:
"Sec. 14. LEAVES OF ABSENCE.
Minnesota Statutes, section 268.088, applies to leaves of
absence taken by workers at the New Ulm location of 3M during 2009. The department must, notwithstanding any
prior determination or appeal decision, redetermine an applicant's entitlement
to unemployment benefits under this section.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment."
Page 13, line 14, after the first "applicant"
insert "under that law"
Page 13, line 15, after "compensation"
insert "under that law" and after "maximum"
insert "under that law"
Page 13, line 16, after "paid" insert "pursuant
to this section"
Page 13, after line 17, insert:
"Sec. 16. NEW BENEFIT ACCOUNTS.
If an applicant establishes a new benefit account under
Minnesota Statutes, section 268.07, subdivision 2, paragraph (b), within 39
weeks of the expiration of the benefit year on a prior benefit account,
notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 268.07, subdivision 2a, paragraph
(a), the weekly benefit amount on the new benefit account will not be less than
80 percent of the weekly benefit amount on the prior benefit account.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section applies to benefit
accounts effective on or after the first Sunday following enactment and expires
the earlier of (1) the effective date of any federal legislation allowing an
applicant to continue to collect federal emergency unemployment compensation,
notwithstanding the applicant qualifying for a new regular state benefit
account under Minnesota Statutes, section 268.07, subdivision 2, paragraph (b),
or (2) June 30, 2011."
Renumber the sections in sequence
Correct the title numbers accordingly
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass
and be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was referred:
H. F. No. 3279, A bill for an act relating to
health; amending provisions for electronic health record technology; providing
for administrative penalties; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes
2009 Supplement, section 62J.495, subdivisions 1a, 3; proposing coding for new
law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 62J.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 62J.495, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:
Subd. 1a. Definitions. (a) "Certified electronic health
record technology" means an electronic health record that is certified
pursuant to section 3001(c)(5) of the HITECH Act to meet the standards and
implementation specifications adopted under section 3004 as applicable.
(b) "Commissioner" means the commissioner of
health.
(c) "Pharmaceutical electronic data intermediary"
means any entity that provides the infrastructure to connect computer systems
or other electronic devices utilized by prescribing practitioners with those
used by pharmacies, health plans, third-party administrators, and pharmacy
benefit managers in order to facilitate the secure transmission of electronic
prescriptions, refill authorization requests, communications, and other
prescription-related information between such entities.
(d) "HITECH Act" means the Health Information
Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act in division A, title XIII and
division B, title IV of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009,
including federal regulations adopted under that act.
(e) "Interoperable electronic health record" means
an electronic health record that securely exchanges health information with
another electronic health record system that meets requirements specified in
subdivision 3, and national requirements for certification under the HITECH
Act.
(f) "Qualified electronic health record" means an
electronic record of health-related information on an individual that includes
patient demographic and clinical health information and has the capacity to:
(1) provide clinical decision support;
(2) support physician order entry;
(3) capture and query information relevant to health care
quality; and
(4) exchange electronic health information with, and
integrate such information from, other sources.
Sec. 2. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 62J.495, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Interoperable electronic health record
requirements. To meet the
requirements of subdivision 1, hospitals and health care providers must meet
the following criteria when implementing an interoperable electronic health
records system within their hospital system or clinical practice setting.
(a) The electronic health record must be a qualified
electronic health record.
(b) The electronic health record must be certified by the
Office of the National Coordinator pursuant to the HITECH Act. This criterion only applies to hospitals and
health care providers only if a certified electronic health record
product for the provider's particular practice setting is available. This criterion shall be considered met if a
hospital or health care provider is using an electronic health records system
that has been certified within the last three years, even if a more current
version of the system has been certified within the three-year period.
(c) The electronic health record must meet the standards
established according to section 3004 of the HITECH Act as applicable.
(d) The electronic health record must have the ability to
generate information on clinical quality measures and other measures reported
under sections 4101, 4102, and 4201 of the HITECH Act.
(e) The electronic health record system must be connected to
a state-certified health information organization either directly or through a
connection facilitated by a state-certified health data intermediary as defined
in section 62J.498.
(e) (f) A health care provider who is a
prescriber or dispenser of legend drugs must have an electronic health record
system that meets the requirements of section 62J.497.
Sec. 3. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 62J.495, is amended by adding a subdivision
to read:
Subd. 6.
State agency information
system. Development of state
agency information systems necessary to implement this section is subject to
the authority of the Office of Enterprise Technology in chapter 16E, including,
but not limited to:
(1) evaluation and approval of the system as specified in
section 16E.03, subdivisions 3 and 4;
(2) review of the system to ensure compliance with security
policies, guidelines, and standards as specified in section 16E.03, subdivision
7; and
(3) assurance that the system complies with accessibility
standards developed under section 16E.03, subdivision 9.
Sec. 4. [62J.498] HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE.
Subdivision 1.
Definitions. The following definitions apply to
sections 62J.498 to 62J.4982:
(a) "Clinical transaction" means any meaningful use
transaction that is not covered by section 62J.536.
(b) "Commissioner" means the commissioner of
health.
(c) "Direct health information exchange" means the
electronic transmission of health-related information through a direct
connection between the electronic health record systems of health care
providers without the use of a health data intermediary.
(d) "Health care provider" or "provider"
means a health care provider or provider as defined in section 62J.03,
subdivision 8.
(e) "Health data intermediary" means an entity that
provides the infrastructure to connect computer systems or other electronic
devices used by health care providers, laboratories, pharmacies, health plans,
third-party administrators, or pharmacy benefit managers to facilitate the
secure transmission of health information, including pharmaceutical electronic
data intermediaries as defined in section 62J.495. This does not include health care providers
engaged in direct health information exchange.
(f) "Health information exchange" means the
electronic transmission of health-related information between organizations
according to nationally recognized standards.
(g) "Health information exchange service provider"
means a health data intermediary or health information organization that has
been issued a certificate of authority by the commissioner under section
62J.4981.
(h) "Health information organization" means an
organization that oversees, governs, and facilitates the exchange of
health-related information among organizations according to nationally
recognized standards.
(i) "HITECH Act" means the Health Information
Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act as defined in section 62J.495.
(j) "Major participating entity" means:
(1) a participating entity that receives compensation for
services that is greater than 30 percent of the health information
organization's gross annual revenues from the health information exchange
service provider;
(2) a participating entity providing administrative,
financial, or management services to the health information organization, if
the total payment for all services provided by the participating entity exceeds
three percent of the gross revenue of the health information organization; and
(3) a participating entity that nominates or appoints 30
percent or more of the board of directors of the health information
organization.
(k) "Meaningful use" means use of certified
electronic health record technology that includes e-prescribing, and is
connected in a manner that provides for the electronic exchange of health
information and used for the submission of clinical quality measures as
established by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Minnesota
Department of Human Services pursuant to sections 4101, 4102, and 4201 of the
HITECH Act.
(l) "Meaningful use transaction" means an
electronic transaction that a health care provider must exchange to receive
Medicare or Medicaid incentives or avoid Medicare penalties pursuant to sections
4101, 4102, and 4201 of the HITECH Act.
(m) "Participating entity" means any of the
following persons, health care providers, companies, or other organizations
with which a health information organization or health data intermediary has
contracts or other agreements for the provision of health information exchange
service providers:
(1) a health care facility licensed under sections 144.50 to
144.56, a nursing home licensed under sections 144A.02 to 144A.10, and any
other health care facility otherwise licensed under the laws of this state or
registered with the commissioner;
(2) a health care provider, and any other health care
professional otherwise licensed under the laws of this state or registered with
the commissioner;
(3) a group, professional corporation, or other organization
that provides the services of individuals or entities identified in clause (2),
including but not limited to a medical clinic, a medical group, a home health
care agency, an urgent care center, and an emergent care center;
(4) a health plan as defined in section 62A.011, subdivision
3; and
(5) a state agency as defined in section 13.02, subdivision
17.
(n) "Reciprocal agreement" means an arrangement in
which two or more health information exchange service providers agree to share
in-kind services and resources to allow for the pass-through of meaningful use
transactions.
(o) "State-certified health data intermediary"
means a health data intermediary that:
(1) provides a subset of the meaningful use transaction
capabilities necessary for hospitals and providers to achieve meaningful use of
electronic health records;
(2) is not exclusively engaged in the exchange of meaningful
use transactions covered by section 62J.536; and
(3) has been issued a certificate of authority to operate in
Minnesota.
(p) "State-certified health information
organization" means a nonprofit health information organization that
provides transaction capabilities necessary to fully support clinical
transactions required for meaningful use of electronic health records that has
been issued a certificate of authority to operate in Minnesota.
Subd. 2.
Health information exchange
oversight. (a) The
commissioner shall protect the public interest on matters pertaining to health
information exchange. The commissioner
shall:
(1) review and act on applications from health data
intermediaries and health information organizations for certificates of
authority to operate in Minnesota;
(2) provide ongoing monitoring to ensure compliance with
criteria established under sections 62J.498 to 62J.4982;
(3) respond to public complaints related to health
information exchange services;
(4) take enforcement actions as necessary, including the
imposition of fines, suspension, or revocation of certificates of authority as
outlined in section 62J.4982;
(5) provide a biannual report on the status of health
information exchange services that includes but is not limited to:
(i) recommendations on actions necessary to ensure that
health information exchange services are adequate to meet the needs of
Minnesota citizens and providers statewide;
(ii) recommendations on enforcement actions to ensure that health
information exchange service providers act in the public interest without
causing disruption in health information exchange services;
(iii) recommendations on updates to criteria for obtaining
certificates of authority under this section; and
(iv) recommendations on standard operating procedures for
health information exchange, including but not limited to the management of
consumer preferences;
(6) other duties necessary to protect the public interest.
(b) As part of the application review process for
certification under paragraph (a), prior to issuing a certificate of authority,
the commissioner shall:
(1) hold public hearings that provide an adequate opportunity
for participating entities and consumers to provide feedback and
recommendations on the application under consideration. The commissioner shall make all portions of
the application classified as public data available to the public at least ten
days in advance of the hearing. The
applicant shall participate in the hearing by presenting an overview of their
application and responding to questions from interested parties;
(2) make available all feedback and recommendations from the
hearing available to the public prior to issuing a certificate of authority;
and
(3) consult with hospitals, physicians, and other
professionals eligible to receive meaningful use incentive payments or subject
to penalties as established in the HITECH Act, and their respective statewide
associations, prior to issuing a certificate of authority.
(c)(1) When the commissioner is actively considering a
suspension or revocation of a certificate of authority as described in section
62J.4982, subdivision 3, all investigatory data that are collected, created, or
maintained related to the suspension or revocation are classified as
confidential data on individuals and as protected nonpublic data in the case of
data not on individuals.
(2) The commissioner may disclose data classified as
protected nonpublic or confidential under this paragraph if disclosing the data
will protect the health or safety of patients.
(d) After the commissioner makes a final determination
regarding a suspension or revocation of a certificate of authority, all
minutes, orders for hearing, findings of fact, conclusions of law, and the specification
of the final disciplinary action, are classified as public data.
Sec. 5. [62J.4981] CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY TO
PROVIDE HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE SERVICES.
Subdivision 1.
Authority to require
organizations to apply. The
commissioner shall require an entity providing health information exchange
services to apply for a certificate of authority under this section. An applicant may continue to operate until
the commissioner acts on the application.
If the application is denied, the applicant is considered a health
information organization whose certificate of authority has been revoked under
section 62J.4982, subdivision 2, paragraph (d).
Subd. 2.
Certificate of authority for
health data intermediaries. (a)
A health data intermediary that provides health information exchange services
for the transmission of one or more clinical transactions necessary for
hospitals, providers, or eligible professionals to achieve meaningful use must
be registered with the state and comply with requirements established in this
section.
(b) Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, any corporation
organized to do so may apply to the commissioner for a certificate of authority
to establish and operate as a health data intermediary in compliance with this
section. No person shall establish or
operate a health data intermediary in this state, nor sell or offer to sell, or
solicit offers to purchase or receive advance or periodic consideration in
conjunction with a health data intermediary contract unless the organization
has a certificate of authority or has an application under active consideration
under this section.
(c) In issuing the certificate of authority, the commissioner
shall determine whether the applicant for the certificate of authority has
demonstrated that the applicant meets the following minimum criteria:
(1) interoperate with at least one state-certified health
information organization;
(2) provide an option for Minnesota entities to connect to
their services through at least one state-certified health information
organization;
(3) have a record locator service as defined in section
144.291, subdivision 2, paragraph (i), that is compliant with the requirements
of section 144.293, subdivision 8, when conducting meaningful use transactions;
and
(4) hold reciprocal agreements with at least one
state-certified health information organization to enable access to record
locator services to find patient data, and for the transmission and receipt of
meaningful use transactions consistent with the format and content required by
national standards established by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Reciprocal agreements must meet the
requirements established in subdivision 5.
Subd. 3.
Certificate of authority for
health information organizations. (a)
A health information organization that provides all electronic capabilities for
the transmission of clinical transactions necessary for meaningful use of
electronic health records must obtain a certificate of authority from the
commissioner and demonstrate compliance with the criteria in paragraph (c).
(b) Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, a nonprofit
corporation organized to do so may apply for a certificate of authority to
establish and operate a health information organization under this section. No person shall establish or operate a health
information organization in this state, nor sell or offer to sell, or solicit
offers to purchase or receive advance or periodic consideration in conjunction
with a health information organization or health information contract unless
the organization has a certificate of authority under this section.
(c) In issuing the certificate of authority, the commissioner
shall determine whether the applicant for the certificate of authority has
demonstrated that the applicant meets the following minimum criteria:
(1) the entity is a legally established, nonprofit
organization;
(2) appropriate insurance, including liability insurance, for
the operation of the health information organization is in place and sufficient
to protect the interest of the public and participating entities;
(3) strategic and operational plans clearly address how the
organization will expand technical capacity of the health information
organization to support providers in achieving meaningful use of electronic
health records over time;
(4) the entity addresses the parameters to be used with
participating entities and other health information organizations for
meaningful use transactions, compliance with Minnesota law, and interstate
health information exchange in trust agreements;
(5) the entity's board of directors is comprised of members
that broadly represent the health information organization's participating
entities and consumers;
(6) the entity maintains a professional staff responsible to
the board of directors with the capacity to ensure accountability to the
organization's mission;
(7) the organization is compliant with criteria established
under the Health Information Exchange Accreditation Program of the Electronic
Healthcare Network Accreditation Commission (EHNAC) or equivalent criteria
established by the commissioner;
(8) the entity maintains a record locator service as defined
in section 144.291, subdivision 2, paragraph (i), that is compliant with the
requirements of section 144.293, subdivision 8, when conducting meaningful use
transactions;
(9) the organization demonstrates interoperability with all other
state-certified health information organizations using nationally recognized
standards;
(10) the organization demonstrates compliance with all
privacy and security requirements required by state and federal law; and
(11) the organization uses financial policies and procedures
consistent with generally accepted accounting principles and has an independent
audit of the organization's financials on an annual basis.
(d) Health information organizations that have obtained a
certificate of authority must:
(1) meet the requirements established for connecting to the
Nationwide Health Information Network (NHIN) within the federally mandated
timeline or within a time frame established by the commissioner and published
in the State Register. If the state timeline
for implementation varies from the federal timeline, the State Register notice
shall include an explanation for the variation;
(2) annually submit strategic and operational plans for
review by the commissioner that address:
(i) increasing adoption rates to include a sufficient number
of participating entities to achieve financial sustainability; and
(ii) progress in achieving objectives included in previously
submitted strategic and operational plans across the following domains: business and technical operations, technical
infrastructure, legal and policy issues, finance, and organizational
governance;
(3) develop and maintain a business plan that addresses:
(i) plans for ensuring the necessary capacity to support
meaningful use transactions;
(ii) approach for attaining financial sustainability,
including public and private financing strategies, and rate structures;
(iii) rates of adoption, utilization, and transaction volume,
and mechanisms to support health information exchange; and
(iv) an explanation of methods employed to address the needs
of community clinics, critical access hospitals, and free clinics in accessing
health information exchange services;
(4) annually submit a rate plan outlining fee structures for
health information exchange services for approval by the commissioner. The commissioner shall approve the rate plan
if it:
(i) distributes costs equitably among users of health
information services;
(ii) provides predictable costs for participating entities;
(iii) covers all costs associated with conducting the full
range of meaningful use clinical transactions, including access to health
information retrieved through other state-certified health information exchange
service providers; and
(iv) provides for a predictable revenue stream for the health
information organization and generates sufficient resources to maintain
operating costs and develop technical infrastructure necessary to serve the public
interest;
(5) enter into reciprocal agreements with all other
state-certified health information organizations to enable access to record
locator services to find patient data, and transmission and receipt of
meaningful use transactions consistent with the format and content required by
national standards established by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Reciprocal agreements must meet the
requirements in subdivision 5; and
(6) comply with additional requirements for the certification
or recertification of health information organizations that may be established
by the commissioner.
Subd. 4.
Application for certificate of
authority for health information exchange service providers. (a) Each application for a certificate
of authority shall be in a form prescribed by the commissioner and verified by
an officer or authorized representative of the applicant. Each application shall include the following:
(1) a copy of the basic organizational document, if any, of
the applicant and of each major participating entity, such as the articles of
incorporation, or other applicable documents, and all amendments to it;
(2) a list of the names, addresses, and official positions of
the following:
(i) all members of the board of directors, and the principal
officers and, if applicable, shareholders of the applicant organization; and
(ii) all members of the board of directors, and the principal
officers of each major participating entity and, if applicable, each
shareholder beneficially owning more than ten percent of any voting stock of
the major participating entity;
(3) the name and address of each participating entity and the
agreed-upon duration of each contract or agreement if applicable;
(4) a copy of each standard agreement or contract intended to
bind the participating entities and the health information organization. Contractual provisions shall be consistent
with the purposes of this section, in regard to the services to be performed
under the standard agreement or contract, the manner in which payment for
services is determined, the nature and extent of responsibilities to be
retained by the health information organization, and contractual termination
provisions;
(5) a copy of each contract intended to bind major
participating entities and the health information organization. Contract information filed with the
commissioner under this section shall be nonpublic as defined in section 13.02,
subdivision 9;
(6) a statement generally describing the health information
organization, its health information exchange contracts, facilities, and
personnel, including a statement describing the manner in which the applicant
proposes to provide participants with comprehensive health information exchange
services;
(7) financial statements showing the applicant's assets,
liabilities, and sources of financial support, including a copy of the
applicant's most recent certified financial statement;
(8) strategic and operational plans that specifically address
how the organization will expand technical capacity of the health information
organization to support providers in achieving meaningful use of electronic
health records over time, a description of the proposed method of marketing the
services, a schedule of proposed charges, and a financial plan that includes a
three-year projection of the expenses and income and other sources of future
capital;
(9) a statement reasonably describing the geographic area or
areas to be served and the type or types of participants to be served;
(10) a description of the complaint procedures to be used as
required under this section;
(11) a description of the mechanism by which participating
entities will have an opportunity to participate in matters of policy and
operation;
(12) a copy of any pertinent agreements between the health
information organization and insurers, including liability insurers,
demonstrating coverage is in place;
(13) a copy of the conflict of interest policy that applies
to all members of the board of directors and the principal officers of the
health information organization; and
(14) other information as the commissioner may reasonably
require to be provided.
(b) Thirty days after the receipt of the application for a
certificate of authority, the commissioner shall determine whether or not the
application submitted meets the requirements for completion in paragraph (a),
and notify the applicant of any further information required for the
application to be processed.
(c) Ninety days after the receipt of a complete application
for a certificate of authority, the commissioner shall issue a certificate of
authority to the applicant if the commissioner determines that the applicant
meets the minimum criteria requirements of subdivision 2 for health data
intermediaries or subdivision 3 for health information organizations. If the commissioner determines that the
applicant is not qualified, the commissioner shall notify the applicant and
specify the reasons for disqualification.
(d) Upon being granted a certificate of authority to operate
as a health information organization, the organization must operate in
compliance with the provisions of this section.
Noncompliance may result in the imposition of a fine or the suspension
or revocation of the certificate of authority according to section 62J.4982.
Subd. 5.
Reciprocal agreements between
health information exchange entities.
(a) Reciprocal agreements between two health information
organizations or between a health information organization and a health data
intermediary must include a fair and equitable model for charges between the
entities that:
(1) does not impede the secure transmission of transactions
necessary to achieve meaningful use;
(2) does not charge a fee for the exchange of meaningful use
transactions transmitted according to nationally recognized standards where no
additional value-added service is rendered to the sending or receiving health
information organization or health data intermediary either directly or on
behalf of the client;
(3) is consistent with fair market value and proportionately
reflects the value-added services accessed as a result of the agreement; and
(4) prevents health care stakeholders from being charged
multiple times for the same service.
(b) Reciprocal agreements must include comparable quality of
service standards that ensure equitable levels of services.
(c) Reciprocal agreements are subject to review and approval
by the commissioner.
(d) Nothing in this section precludes a state-certified health
information organization or state-certified health data intermediary from
entering into contractual agreements for the provision of value-added services
beyond meaningful use.
(e) The commissioner of human services or health, when
providing access to data or services through a certified health information
organization, must offer the same data or services directly through any
certified health information organization at the same pricing, if the health
information organization pays for all connection costs to the state data or
service. For all external connectivity
to the respective agencies through existing or future information exchange
implementations, the respective agency shall establish the required
connectivity methods as well as protocol standards to be utilized.
Subd. 6.
State participation in health
information exchange. A state
agency that connects to a health information exchange service provider for the
purpose of exchanging meaningful use transactions must ensure that the
contracted health information exchange service provider has reciprocal
agreements in place as required by this section. The reciprocal agreements must provide equal
access to information supplied by the agency and necessary for meaningful use
by the participating entities of the other health information service
providers.
Sec. 6. [62J.4982] ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY;
COMPLIANCE.
Subdivision 1.
Penalties and enforcement. (a) The commissioner may, for any
violation of statute or rule applicable to a health information exchange
service provider, levy an administrative penalty in an amount up to $25,000 for
each violation. In determining the level
of an administrative penalty, the commissioner shall consider the following
factors:
(1) the number of participating entities affected by the
violation;
(2) the effect of the violation on participating entities'
access to health information exchange services;
(3) if only one participating entity is affected, the effect
of the violation on the patients of that entity;
(4) whether the violation is an isolated incident or part of
a pattern of violations;
(5) the economic benefits derived by the health information
organization or a health data intermediary by virtue of the violation;
(6) whether the violation hindered or facilitated an
individual's ability to obtain health care;
(7) whether the violation was intentional;
(8) whether the violation was beyond the direct control of
the health information exchange service provider;
(9) any history of prior compliance with the provisions of
this section, including violations;
(10) whether and to what extent the health information exchange
service provider attempted to correct previous violations;
(11) how the health information exchange service provider
responded to technical assistance from the commissioner provided in the context
of a compliance effort; and
(12) the financial condition of the health information
exchange service provider including, but not limited to, whether the health
information exchange service provider had financial difficulties that affected
its ability to comply or whether the imposition of an administrative monetary
penalty would jeopardize the ability of the health information exchange service
provider to continue to deliver health information exchange services.
Reasonable notice in writing to the health information
exchange service provider shall be given of the intent to levy the penalty and
the reasons for them. A health
information exchange service provider may have 15 days within which to contest
whether the finding of facts constitute a violation of sections 62J.4981 and
62J.4982, according to the contested case and judicial review provisions of
sections 14.57 to 14.69.
(b) If the commissioner has reason to believe that a
violation of section 62J.4981 or 62J.4982 has occurred or is likely, the
commissioner may confer with the persons involved before commencing action
under subdivision 2. The commissioner
may notify the health information exchange service provider and the
representatives, or other persons who appear to be involved in the suspected
violation, to arrange a voluntary conference with the alleged violators or
their authorized representatives. The
purpose of the conference is to attempt to learn the facts about the suspected
violation and, if it appears that a violation has occurred or is threatened, to
find a way to correct or prevent it. The
conference is not governed by any formal procedural requirements, and may be
conducted as the commissioner considers appropriate.
(c) The commissioner may issue an order directing a health
information exchange service provider or a representative of a health
information exchange service provider to cease and desist from engaging in any
act or practice in violation of sections 62J.4981 and 62J.4982.
(d) Within 20 days after service of the order to cease and
desist, a health information exchange service provider may contest whether the
finding of facts constitutes a violation of sections 62J.4981 and 62J.4982
according to the contested case and judicial review provisions of sections
14.57 to 14.69.
(e) In the event of noncompliance with a cease and desist order
issued under this subdivision, the commissioner may institute a proceeding to
obtain injunctive relief or other appropriate relief in Ramsey County District
Court.
Subd. 2.
Suspension or revocation of
certificates of authority. (a)
The commissioner may suspend or revoke a certificate of authority issued to a
health data intermediary or health information organization under section
62J.4981 if the commissioner finds that:
(1) the health information exchange service provider is
operating significantly in contravention of its basic organizational document,
or in a manner contrary to that described in and reasonably inferred from any
other information submitted under section 62J.4981, unless amendments to the
submissions have been filed with and approved by the commissioner;
(2) the health information exchange service provider is
unable to fulfill its obligations to furnish comprehensive health information
exchange services as required under its health information exchange contract;
(3) the health information exchange service provider is no
longer financially solvent or may not reasonably be expected to meet its
obligations to participating entities;
(4) the health information exchange service provider has
failed to implement the complaint system in a manner designed to reasonably
resolve valid complaints;
(5) the health information exchange service provider, or any
person acting with its sanction, has advertised or merchandised its services in
an untrue, misleading, deceptive, or unfair manner;
(6) the continued operation of the health information
exchange service provider would be hazardous to its participating entities or
the patients served by the participating entities; or
(7) the health information exchange service provider has
otherwise failed to substantially comply with section 62J.4981 or with any
other statute or administrative rule applicable to health information exchange
service providers, or has submitted false information in any report required
under sections 62J.498 to 62J.4982.
(b) A certificate of authority shall be suspended or revoked
only after meeting the requirements of subdivision 3.
(c) If the certificate of authority of a health information
exchange service provider is suspended, the health information exchange service
provider shall not, during the period of suspension, enroll any additional
participating entities, and shall not engage in any advertising or
solicitation.
(d) If the certificate of authority of a health information
exchange service provider is revoked, the organization shall proceed,
immediately following the effective date of the order of revocation, to wind up
its affairs, and shall conduct no further business except as necessary to the
orderly conclusion of the affairs of the organization. The organization shall engage in no further
advertising or solicitation. The
commissioner may, by written order, permit further operation of the
organization as the commissioner finds to be in the best interest of
participating entities, to the end that participating entities will be given
the greatest practical opportunity to access continuing health information
exchange services.
Subd. 3.
Denial, suspension, and
revocation; administrative procedures.
(a) When the commissioner has cause to believe that grounds for
the denial, suspension, or revocation of a certificate of authority exists, the
commissioner shall notify the health information exchange service provider in
writing stating the grounds for denial, suspension, or revocation and setting a
time within 20 days for a hearing on the matter.
(b) After a hearing before the commissioner at which the
health information exchange service provider may respond to the grounds for
denial, suspension, or revocation, or upon the failure of the health
information exchange service provider to appear at the hearing, the
commissioner shall take action as deemed necessary and shall issue written
findings that shall be mailed to the health information exchange service
provider.
(c) If suspension, revocation, or an administrative penalty
is proposed according to this section, the commissioner must deliver, or send
by certified mail with return receipt requested, to the health information
exchange service provider written notice of the commissioner's intent to impose
a penalty. This notice of proposed
determination must include:
(1) a reference to the statutory basis for the penalty;
(2) a description of the findings of fact regarding the
violations with respect to which the penalty is proposed;
(3) the nature and/or amount of the proposed penalty;
(4) any circumstances described in subdivision 1, paragraph
(a), that were considered in determining the amount of the proposed penalty;
(5) instructions for responding to the notice, including a
statement of the health information exchange service provider's right to a
contested case proceeding and a statement that failure to request a contested
case proceeding within 30 calendar days permits the imposition of the proposed
penalty; and
(6) the address to which the contested case proceeding
request must be sent.
Subd. 4.
Coordination. (a) The commissioner shall, to the
extent possible, seek the advice of the Minnesota e‑Health Advisory
Committee, in the review and update of criteria for the certification and
recertification of health information exchange service providers when
implementing sections 62J.498 to 62J.4982.
(b) By January 1, 2011, the commissioner shall report to the
governor and the chairs of the senate and house of representatives committees having
jurisdiction over health information policy issues on the status of health
information exchange in Minnesota, and provide recommendations on further
action necessary to facilitate the secure electronic movement of health
information among health providers that will enable Minnesota providers and
hospitals to meet meaningful use exchange requirements.
Subd. 5.
Fees and monetary penalties. (a) Every health information exchange
service provider subject to sections 62J.4981 and 62J.4982 shall be assessed
fees as follows:
(1) filing an application for certificate of authority to
operate as a health information organization, $10,500;
(2) filing an application for certificate of authority to
operate as a health data intermediary, $7,000;
(3) annual health information organization certificate fee,
$14,000;
(4) annual health data intermediary certificate fee, $7,000;
and
(5) fees for other filings, as specified by rule.
(b) Administrative monetary penalties imposed under this
subdivision shall be deposited into a revolving fund and are appropriated to
the commissioner for the purposes of sections 62J.498 to 62J.4982.
Sec. 7. APPLICATION PROCESS FOR HEALTH
INFORMATION EXCHANGE.
To the extent that the commissioner of health applies for
additional federal funding to support the commissioner's responsibilities of
developing and maintaining state level health information exchange under
section 3013 of the HITECH Act, the commissioner of health shall ensure that
applications are made through an open process that provides health information
exchange service providers equal opportunity to receive funding.
Sec. 8. APPROPRIATION; HEALTH INFORMATION
EXCHANGE OVERSIGHT.
$104,000 in fiscal year 2011 is appropriated from the state
government special revenue fund to the commissioner of health for the duties
required under sections 62J.498 to 62J.4982.
Base funding shall be $97,000 in fiscal year 2012 and $97,000 in fiscal
year 2013."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to health; amending
provisions for electronic health record technology; providing for
administrative penalties; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2009
Supplement, section 62J.495, subdivisions 1a, 3, by adding a subdivision;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 62J."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass
and be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance
to which was referred:
H. F. No. 3310, A bill
for an act relating to transportation; appropriating funds for State Patrol tax
compliance and vehicle crimes investigations; amending Laws 2009, chapter 36,
article 1, sections 1; 5, subdivisions 1, 3.
Reported the same back with the
following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting
clause and insert:
"Section 1. Laws 2009, chapter 36, article 1, section 1,
is amended to read:
Section 1. SUMMARY
OF APPROPRIATIONS.
The amounts
shown in this section summarize direct appropriations, by fund, made in this
article.
2010 2011 Total
General $98,385,000 $95,885,000 $194,270,000
Airports 21,909,000 19,659,000 41,568,000
C.S.A.H. 496,786,000 524,478,000 1,021,264,000
M.S.A.S. 134,003,000 141,400,000 275,403,000
Special Revenue 49,038,000 49,038,000 98,076,000
49,088,000 98,126,000
H.U.T.D. 9,538,000 9,838,000 19,376,000
Trunk Highway 1,264,921,000 1,372,687,000 2,637,608,000
1,372,878,000 2,637,799,000
Total $2,074,580,000 $ 2,212,985,000 $
4,287,565,000
2,213,226,000 4,287,806,000
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2010.
Sec. 2. Laws 2009, chapter 36, article 1, section 5,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Total
Appropriation
$152,478,000 $ 152,578,000
152,819,000
Appropriations
by Fund
2010 2011
General 7,959,000 7,959,000
Special Revenue 49,038,000 49,038,000
49,088,000
H.U.T.D. 9,413,000 9,713,000
Trunk Highway 86,068,000 85,868,000
86,059,000
The amounts that may be spent for
each purpose are specified in the following subdivisions.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2010.
Sec. 3. Laws 2009, chapter 36, article 1, section 5,
subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. State
Patrol
(a) Patrolling Highways 71,522,000 71,522,000
Appropriations
by Fund
General 37,000 37,000
H.U.T.D. 92,000 92,000
Trunk Highway 71,393,000 71,393,000
(b) Commercial Vehicle Enforcement 7,996,000 7,796,000
This appropriation is from the trunk highway
fund.
$800,000 the first year and $600,000
the second year are for the Office of Pupil Transportation Safety.
(c) Capitol Security 3,113,000 3,113,000
This appropriation is from the general
fund.
The commissioner may not: (1) spend any money from the trunk highway
fund for capitol security; or (2) permanently transfer any state trooper from
the patrolling highways activity to capitol security.
The commissioner may not transfer any
money: (1) appropriated for Department
of Public Safety administration, the patrolling of highways, commercial vehicle
enforcement, or driver and vehicle services to capitol security; or (2) from
capitol security.
(d) Vehicle
Crimes Unit 191,000
This appropriation is to investigate
(1) registration tax and motor vehicle sales tax liabilities from individuals
and businesses that currently do not pay all taxes owed; and (2) illegal or
improper activity related to sale, transfer, titling, and registration of motor
vehicles. This initiative is expected to
result in new revenues for the biennium as follows:
(1) $454,000 for the highway user tax
distribution fund;
(2) $303,000 for the transit
assistance fund; and
(3) $50,000 for the general fund.
The base for this program is $693,000
in fiscal year 2012 and $693,000 in fiscal year 2013.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2010.
Sec. 4. Laws 2009, chapter 36, article 1, section 5,
subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Driver
and Vehicle Services
(a) Vehicle Services 26,909,000 27,209,000
27,259,000
Appropriations
by Fund
Special Revenue 18,973,000 18,973,000
19,023,000
H.U.T.D. 7,936,000 8,236,000
The special revenue fund
appropriation is from the vehicle services operating account.
Of the appropriation for fiscal year
2011 from the special revenue fund, $50,000 is for assistance to the Vehicle
Crimes Unit in investigations as provided under subdivision 3, paragraph (d).
(b) Driver Services 28,712,000 28,712,000
Appropriations
by Fund
Special Revenue 28,711,000 28,711,000
Trunk Highway 1,000 1,000
The special revenue fund
appropriation is from the driver services operating account.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1,
2010."
Correct the title numbers accordingly
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass and be
re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The
report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was referred:
H. F. No. 3386, A bill for an act relating to
real property; requiring performance guidelines for certain residential
contracts; modifying statutory warranties; requiring notice and opportunity to
repair; providing for dispute resolution procedures; requiring a report;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 302A.781, subdivision 4; 326B.809;
327A.01, by adding a subdivision; 327A.02, subdivision 4, by adding
subdivisions; 327A.03; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 327A.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 4, line 5, after "commenced" insert
"in district court"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass
and be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was referred:
H. F. No. 3524, A bill for an act relating to
transportation; amending provisions governing authorization and discontinuance
of special plates; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 168.002, by
adding a subdivision; 168.1293.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 168.002, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 31a.
Special plates. Unless otherwise specified,
"special plates" or "special plate" means plates, or a
single motorcycle plate, that are designed with wording or graphics that differ
from a regular Minnesota passenger automobile plate or motorcycle plate.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 2. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 168.123, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 2b.
Eligibility; combat wounded
plate. A member of the United
States armed forces who is serving actively in the military and who is a
recipient of the purple heart medal is also eligible for the license plate
under subdivision 2, paragraph (e). The
commissioner of public safety shall ensure that information regarding the
required proof of eligibility for any applicant under this subdivision who has
not yet been issued military discharge papers is distributed to the public
officials responsible for administering this section.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective August 1,
2010.
Sec. 3. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 168.1293, is amended to read:
168.1293 CERTAIN SPECIAL
PLATES; AUTHORIZATION, DISCONTINUANCE.
Subdivision 1. Definition.
For purposes of this section and section 168.1297, the
following terms have the meanings given them:
(1) "new special plate" or
"proposed special plate" means a special plate authorized
by sections 168.12, subdivisions 2b and 2e; 168.1235; and 168.129, to have
wording and graphics that differ from a Minnesota passenger vehicle plate. that is not authorized under this
chapter and for which legislation authorizing the plate, including but not
limited to a bill or amendment, is introduced or presented to the legislature;
and
(2) "proximate special plate" means a special plate
(i) authorized under section 168.12, subdivisions 2b and 2e; 168.1235; or
168.129; or (ii) authorized in law on or after August 1, 2010.
Subd. 1a.
Establishment of plate. The commissioner may only establish a
special plate as authorized under this chapter.
This requirement does not apply to alternative or additional designs for
a special plate.
Subd. 2. Submissions to commissioner. (a) A person, legal entity, or other
requester, however organized, that plans to seek legislation establishing a new
special plate, or is a proponent of a new special plate, shall
submit the following information and fee to the commissioner:
(1) The requester shall submit a request for the special
plate being sought, describing the proposed special plate in
general terms, the purpose of the plate, and the proposed fee or minimum
contribution required for the plate.
(2) The requester shall submit the results of a scientific
sample survey of Minnesota motor vehicle owners that indicates that at least
10,000 motor vehicle owners intend to purchase the proposed plate with the
proposed fee or minimum contribution. The
requester's plan to undertake the survey must be reported to the commissioner
before the survey is undertaken. The
survey must be performed independently of the requester by another person or
legal entity, however organized, that conducts similar sample surveys in the
normal course of business.
(3) The requester shall submit an application fee of $20,000,
to cover the cost of reviewing the application for a new plate and developing
the new special plate if authorized by law.
State funds may not be used to pay the application fee. This requirement does not apply if
legislation or a bill introduced to the legislature proposing the new special
plate contains a mechanism by which all costs incurred by the commissioner for
development and implementation of the plate are covered, provided that the
application fee subsequently does apply if such a mechanism is not enacted in
the law authorizing the new special plate.
(4) The requester shall submit a marketing strategy that
contains (i) short-term and long-term marketing plans for the requested plate,
and (ii) a financial analysis showing the anticipated revenues and the planned
expenditures of any fee or contribution derived from the requested plate.
(b) The requester shall submit the information required under
paragraph (a) to the commissioner at least 120 days before the convening of the
next regular legislative session at which the requester will submit the
proposal.
Subd. 2a.
Information for legislature. (a) Within 15 days of the introduction
of a bill proposing a new special plate, the commissioner shall submit a
briefing to the chairs and ranking minority members of the house of representatives
and senate committees to which the bill was referred. At a minimum, the briefing must:
(1) summarize the requirements for a special plate under this
section; and
(2) identify which of the requirements have been met for the
proposed special plate.
(b) If a proposed special plate is a topic of discussion at a
legislative committee hearing, the commissioner shall make every reasonable
effort to provide testimony. The
testimony must include the information required in the briefing under paragraph
(a).
(c) Notwithstanding section 3.195, the commissioner may
submit the briefing under paragraph (a) by submitting an electronic version
rather than a printed version.
Subd. 3. Design; redesign. (a) If the proposed new special
plate sought by the requester is approved by law, the requester shall submit
the proposed design for the plate to the commissioner as soon as practicable,
but not later than 120 days after the effective date of the law authorizing
issuance of the plate. The commissioner
is responsible for selecting the final design for the special plate.
(b) The requester that originally requested a new
special plate subsequently approved by law may not submit a new design for the
plate within the five years following the date of first issuance of the plate
unless the inventory of those plates has been exhausted. The requester may deplete the remaining
inventory of the plates by reimbursing the commissioner for the cost of the
plates.
Subd. 4. Refund of fee. If the special plate requested is not
authorized in the legislative session at which authorization was sought, the
commissioner shall, if applicable, refund $17,500 of the application fee
to the requester.
Subd. 5. Discontinuance of plate. (a) The commissioner shall discontinue
the issuance or renewal of any proximate special plate authorized by
sections 168.12, subdivisions 2b and 2e; 168.1235; and 168.129, if (1)
fewer than 1,000 sets of those plates are currently registered at the end of
the first six years during which the plates are available, or (2) fewer than
1,000 sets of those plates are currently registered at the end of any
subsequent two-year period following the first six years of availability.
(b) The commissioner shall discontinue the issuance or
renewal of any proximate special plate authorized by sections 168.12,
subdivisions 2b and 2e; 168.1235; and 168.129, and distribution of any
contributions resulting from that plate, if the commissioner determines that
(1) the fund or requester receiving the contributions no longer exists, (2) the
requester has stopped providing services that are authorized to be funded from
the contribution proceeds, (3) the requester has requested discontinuance, or
(4) contributions have been used in violation of subdivision 6.
(c) Nothing in this subdivision applies to plates issued
under section 168.123, 168.124, 168.125, 168.1251, or 168.1255.
(d) Upon commencing discontinuance of a proximate special
plate under this subdivision, the commissioner (1) shall not issue the plate,
including as a duplicate; and (2) shall allow retention of any existing plate
for the regular period. For purposes of
this paragraph, "regular period" may be, as appropriate, the period
specified under section 168.12, subdivision 1; the time until issuance of a
duplicate plate for that vehicle; or as otherwise provided by law.
Subd. 6. Use of contributions. Contributions made as a condition of
obtaining a proximate special plate authorized by sections 168.12,
subdivisions 2b and 2e; 168.1235; and 168.129, and interest earned on the
contributions, may not be spent for commercial or for-profit purposes.
Subd. 7. Deposit of fee; appropriation. The commissioner shall deposit the application
fee under subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clause (3), in the vehicle services
operating account of the special revenue fund under section 299A.705. An amount sufficient to pay the department's
cost in implementing and administering this section, including payment of
refunds under subdivision 4, is appropriated to the commissioner."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to transportation; amending
provisions governing authorization and discontinuance of special plates;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 168.002, by adding a subdivision;
168.123, by adding a subdivision; 168.1293."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was referred:
S. F. No. 2844, A bill for an act relating to
labor and industry; modifying elevator provisions; amending Minnesota Statutes
2008, section 326B.184, subdivision 2; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement,
section 326B.163, subdivision 5.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill
pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The report was adopted.
SECOND READING OF HOUSE BILLS
H. F. Nos. 2470, 3024 and 3524 were read
for the second time.
MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE
The following messages were received from
the Senate:
Madam
Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the
Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully
requested:
H. F. No. 2231, A bill for
an act relating to transportation; allowing road authorities to remove snow
from certain roads in uncompleted subdivisions; amending Minnesota Statutes
2008, section 160.21, by adding a subdivision.
Colleen J. Pacheco, First Assistant Secretary of the
Senate
Nelson moved that the House refuse to
concur in the Senate amendments to H. F. No. 2231, that the
Speaker appoint a Conference Committee of 3 members of the House, and that the
House requests that a like committee be appointed by the Senate to confer on
the disagreeing votes of the two houses.
The motion prevailed.
Madam
Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the
Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully
requested:
H. F. No. 212, A bill for
an act relating to courts; eliminating the prerequisite of pretrial filing of a
transcript for admission into evidence of law enforcement vehicle recordings;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 634.
Colleen J. Pacheco, First Assistant Secretary of the
Senate
CONCURRENCE
AND REPASSAGE
Simon moved that the House concur in the
Senate amendments to H. F. No. 212 and that the bill be repassed
as amended by the Senate. The motion
prevailed.
H. F. No. 212, A bill for
an act relating to courts; eliminating the prerequisite of pretrial filing of a
transcript for admission into evidence of law enforcement vehicle recordings;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 634.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended by the Senate, and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 130 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was repassed, as amended by the
Senate, and its title agreed to.
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the
Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully
requested:
H. F. No. 2616, A bill for
an act relating to traffic regulations; allowing bicyclist to stop and proceed
through red light under limited circumstances; amending Minnesota Statutes
2008, section 169.06, subdivision 9.
Colleen J. Pacheco, First Assistant Secretary of the Senate
CONCURRENCE
AND REPASSAGE
Kahn moved that the House concur in the
Senate amendments to H. F. No. 2616 and that the bill be
repassed as amended by the Senate. The
motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 2616, A bill for
an act relating to traffic regulations; allowing bicyclist to stop and proceed
through red light under limited circumstances; amending Minnesota Statutes
2008, section 169.06, subdivision 9.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended by the Senate, and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 97 yeas and 32 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davids
Davnie
Demmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Gunther
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Magnus
Mahoney
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Severson
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
Dettmer
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Hackbarth
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Lanning
Mack
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Shimanski
Smith
Sterner
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was repassed, as amended by the
Senate, and its title agreed to.
Madam
Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the
Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully
requested:
H. F. No. 2823, A bill for
an act relating to real property; clarifying certain definitions relating to
filing contracts for deed; making changes relating to common interest community
certificates; amending Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 507.235,
subdivision 1a; 508.351, subdivisions 1, 5, 7; 508A.351, subdivisions 1a, 5, 7.
Colleen J. Pacheco, First Assistant Secretary of the
Senate
CONCURRENCE
AND REPASSAGE
Jackson moved that the House concur in the
Senate amendments to H. F. No. 2823 and that the bill be
repassed as amended by the Senate. The
motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 2823, A bill for
an act relating to real property; clarifying a definition; making changes
relating to common interest community certificates; amending Minnesota Statutes
2009 Supplement, sections 507.235, subdivision 1a; 508.351, subdivisions 1, 5,
7; 508A.351, subdivisions 1a, 5, 7.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended by the Senate, and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 130 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was repassed, as amended by the
Senate, and its title agreed to.
Madam
Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the
Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully requested:
H. F. No. 3065, A bill for
an act relating to local government; providing for securities lending
agreements and holding of municipal funds; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008,
sections 118A.05, subdivision 3; 118A.06.
Colleen J. Pacheco, First Assistant Secretary of the
Senate
CONCURRENCE
AND REPASSAGE
Simon moved that the House concur in the
Senate amendments to H. F. No. 3065 and that the bill be
repassed as amended by the Senate. The
motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 3065, A bill for
an act relating to local government; providing for securities lending
agreements and holding of municipal funds; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008,
sections 118A.05, subdivision 3; 118A.06.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended by the Senate, and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 131 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was repassed, as amended by the
Senate, and its title agreed to.
Hosch was excused between the hours of
1:35 p.m. and 4:10 p.m.
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the
Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully
requested:
H. F. No. 3277, A bill for
an act relating to commerce; specifying that advertising of deceptive local
telephone numbers for businesses is a deceptive trade practice; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 325D.46, by adding a subdivision.
Colleen J. Pacheco, First Assistant Secretary of the
Senate
CONCURRENCE
AND REPASSAGE
Simon moved that the House concur in the
Senate amendments to H. F. No. 3277 and that the bill be
repassed as amended by the Senate. The
motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 3277, A bill for
an act relating to commerce; specifying that advertising of deceptive local
telephone numbers for businesses is a deceptive trade practice; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 325D.46, by adding a subdivision.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended by the Senate, and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 118 yeas and 12 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Demmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howes
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Buesgens
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Peppin
Severson
Shimanski
The bill was repassed, as amended by the
Senate, and its title agreed to.
CALENDAR FOR THE DAY
S. F. No. 2722 was reported
to the House.
Marquart moved to amend
S. F. No. 2722, the first engrossment, as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting
clause and insert the following language of H. F. No. 3085, the
first engrossment:
"Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 549.09, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. When owed; rate. (a) When a judgment or award is for the
recovery of money, including a judgment for the recovery of taxes, interest
from the time of the verdict, award, or report until judgment is finally
entered shall be computed by the court administrator or arbitrator as provided
in paragraph (c) and added to the judgment or award.
(b) Except as otherwise provided by contract or allowed by
law, preverdict, preaward, or prereport interest on pecuniary damages shall be
computed as provided in paragraph (c) from the time of the commencement of the
action or a demand for arbitration, or the time of a written notice of claim,
whichever occurs first, except as provided herein. The action must be commenced within two years
of a written notice of claim for interest to begin to accrue from the time of
the notice of claim. If either party
serves a written offer of settlement, the other party may serve a written
acceptance or a written counteroffer within 30 days. After that time, interest on the judgment or
award shall be calculated by the judge or arbitrator in the following manner. The prevailing party shall receive interest
on any judgment or award from the time of commencement of the action or a
demand for arbitration, or the time of a written notice of claim, or as to
special damages from the time when special damages were incurred, if later,
until the time of verdict, award, or report only if the amount of its offer is
closer to the judgment or award than the amount of the opposing party's offer. If the amount of the losing party's offer was
closer to the judgment or award than the prevailing party's offer, the
prevailing party shall receive interest only on the amount of the settlement
offer or the judgment or award, whichever is less, and only from the time of
commencement of the action or a demand for arbitration, or the time of a
written notice of claim, or as to special damages from when the special damages
were incurred, if later, until the time the settlement offer was made. Subsequent offers and counteroffers supersede
the legal effect of earlier offers and counteroffers. For the purposes of clause (2), the amount of
settlement offer must be allocated between past and future damages in the same
proportion as determined by the trier of fact.
Except as otherwise provided by contract or allowed by law, preverdict,
preaward, or prereport interest shall not be awarded on the following:
(1) judgments, awards, or benefits in workers' compensation
cases, but not including third-party actions;
(2) judgments or awards for future damages;
(3) punitive damages, fines, or other damages that are
noncompensatory in nature;
(4) judgments or awards not in excess of the amount specified
in section 491A.01; and
(5) that portion of any verdict, award, or report which is
founded upon interest, or costs, disbursements, attorney fees, or other similar
items added by the court or arbitrator.
(c)(1) For a judgment or award of $50,000 or less or a
judgment or award for or against the state or a political subdivision of the
state, regardless of the amount, the interest shall be computed as simple
interest per annum. The rate of interest
shall be based on the secondary market yield of one year United States Treasury
bills, calculated on a bank discount basis as provided in this section.
On or before the 20th day of December of each year the state
court administrator shall determine the rate from the one-year constant
maturity treasury yield for the most recent calendar month, reported on a
monthly basis in the latest statistical release of the board of governors of
the Federal Reserve System. This yield,
rounded to the nearest one percent, or four percent, whichever is greater,
shall be the annual interest rate during the succeeding calendar year. The state court administrator shall
communicate the interest rates to the court administrators and sheriffs for use
in computing the interest on verdicts and shall make the interest rates
available to arbitrators.
This clause applies to any section that references section
549.09 by citation for the purposes of computing an interest rate on any amount
owed to or by the state or a political subdivision of the state, regardless of
if the amount is greater than or less than $50,000.
(2) For a judgment or award over $50,000, other than a
judgment or award for or against the state or a political subdivision of the
state, the interest rate shall be ten percent per year until paid.
(3) When a judgment creditor, or the judgment creditor's
attorney or agent, has received a payment after entry of judgment, whether the
payment is made voluntarily by or on behalf of the judgment debtor, or is
collected by legal process other than execution levy where a proper return has
been filed with the court administrator, the judgment creditor, or the judgment
creditor's attorney, before applying to the court administrator for an
execution shall file with the court administrator an affidavit of partial
satisfaction. The affidavit must state
the dates and amounts of payments made upon the judgment after the most recent
affidavit of partial satisfaction filed, if any; the part of each payment that
is applied to taxable disbursements and to accrued interest and to the unpaid
principal balance of the judgment; and the accrued, but the unpaid interest
owing, if any, after application of each payment.
(d) This section does not apply to arbitrations between
employers and employees under chapter 179 or 179A. An arbitrator is neither required to nor
prohibited from awarding interest under chapter 179 or under section 179A.16
for essential employees.
(e) For purposes of this subdivision:
(1) "state" includes a department, board, agency,
commission, court, or other entity in the executive, legislative, or judicial
branch of the state; and
(2) "political subdivision" includes a town,
statutory or home rule charter city, county, school district, or any other
political subdivision of the state.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment and applies to judgments and awards finally entered
on or after that date."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to civil
actions; exempting the state and political subdivisions and others from
increased interest rates on certain judgments and awards; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 549.09, subdivision 1."
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
The Speaker called Liebling to the Chair.
Kohls moved
to amend S. F. No. 2722, the first engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 2,
line 21, strike "of $50,000 or less" and delete the new language
Page 2,
lines 22 to 36, delete the new language
Page 3,
lines 1 to 3, delete the new language and strike the old language
Page 3,
line 4, strike "(3)" and insert "(2)"
Page 3,
lines 18 to 22, delete the new language
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Kohls
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 50 yeas and 80 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Loon
Mack
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Norton
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Sterner
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
S. F. No. 2722,
A bill for an act relating to interest rates; exempting eminent domain awards
and property tax adjustments and refunds from increased interest rates on
certain judgments; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 117.195,
subdivision 1; 278.08.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 87 yeas and 43 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Loon
Mack
Magnus
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Paymar
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
S. F. No. 2616 was reported
to the House.
Juhnke moved to amend
S. F. No. 2616, the second engrossment, as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting
clause and insert the following language of H. F. No. 3097, the
first engrossment:
"Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 237.411, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Reduced rate regulation. The rates, prices, tariffs, or charges to
a business customer in a competitive area by a telephone company or a
telecommunications carrier offering local service are only subject to sections
237.07, subdivision 1; 237.66; and 237.663, and are not subject to any rules
imposing rate or price restrictions beyond those sections or to other order or
investigation of local rates under section 237.081. A telephone company or telecommunications
carrier subject to this subdivision is not required to file specific price
information. However, upon request of
the department, the commission, or the Office of Attorney General, a telephone
company or telecommunications carrier must demonstrate that its pricing
complies with subdivision 4.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective
retroactively from May 12, 2009.
Sec. 2. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 237.74, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. Discontinuance. If a physical connection exists between a
telephone exchange system operated by a telephone company and the toll line or
lines operated by a telecommunications carrier, neither of the companies shall
have the connection severed or the service between the companies discontinued
without first obtaining an order from the commission upon an application for
permission to discontinue the physical connection. Upon the filing of an application for
discontinuance of the connection, the department shall investigate and
ascertain whether public convenience requires the continuance of the physical
connection, and if the department so finds, the commission shall fix the
compensation, terms, and conditions of the continuance of the physical
connection and service between the telephone company and the telecommunications
carrier. Prior commission approval is
not required for severing connections where multiple local exchange companies
are authorized to provide service. However,
the commission may require the connections if it finds that the connections are
in the public interest, but may not require connections with a
telecommunications carrier certified to provide only interexchange service.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 3. [237.681] PRIVATE SHARED SERVICES.
Subdivision 1.
Definitions. For the purposes of this section:
(1) "private shared services" means the provision
of telephone services and equipment, the provision of video programming
services, or the provision of broadband services within a user group located in
discrete private premises, in building complexes, campuses, or high-rise
buildings, by a commercial shared services provider or by a user association,
through privately owned customer premises equipment and associated data
processing and information management services and includes the provision of
connections to the facilities of a local exchange and to long-distance
telephone companies; and
(2) "property owner" means a person who owns or,
under a contract with the owner, manages a building, property, complex, or
other facility where private shared services are provided.
Subd. 2.
Requirements. A property owner shall establish a
single demarcation point for services and facilities provided by a telephone
company providing local exchange service in the area that is mutually agreeable
to the property owner, commercial shared services provider, and the telephone
company. The obligation of a telephone
company to provide service to a customer at a location where private shared
services are operating is limited to providing telephone company service and
facilities up to the demarcation point established for the property where the
private shared services are operating. The
property owner may not (1) impose unreasonable restrictions on access to the
demarcation point on the premises by a telephone company or (2) discriminate
against or in favor of an occupant in any manner, including charging the
occupant higher or lower rental charges, because of the occupant's choice of
telephone company.
Subd. 3.
Access to alternative provider. A tenant of a building, property,
complex, or other facility where private shared services are operating may
establish a direct connection to and receive telephone service from a telephone
company providing local exchange service in the area where the private shared
services are operating. At the request
of a tenant where a private shared system is operated, the property owner shall
make its facilities or conduit space available to the tenant to allow the
tenant to make separate connection to and to receive telephone service directly
from the telephone company operating local exchange service in the area. The tenant has the choice of installing the
tenant's own facilities or using the property owner's existing facilities. The property owner must provide its
facilities or conduit space to the tenant at a reasonable rate and on
reasonable terms and conditions. It is
the obligation of the tenant to arrange for premises wire, cable, or other
equipment necessary to connect the tenant's telephone equipment with the
facilities of the telephone company operating local exchange service at the
location of the demarcation point.
Subd. 4.
Enforcement. If the commission finds that a
property owner has failed to comply with a request under this section, the
commission may order the property owner to make its facilities or conduit space
available sufficient to allow the tenant to make separate connection with the
telephone company, and provide the services at reasonable prices and on
reasonable terms and conditions.
Subd. 5.
Exemption. A commercial shared services provider
is exempt from section 237.16 if the private shared services are only provided
to tenants or for the provider's own use.
Subd. 6.
Service by local telephone
company. A telephone company
providing local exchange service shall provide service to any person in a
property served by a commercial shared services provider at the demarcation
point within a reasonable time upon request.
Subd. 7.
Obligation of property owners. Nothing in this section requires a
commercial shared services provider to share its wiring, cabling, or other
facilities unless the commercial shared services provider is the
property owner.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to
telecommunications; regulating private shared services; modifying regulatory
provisions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 237.411, subdivision 3;
237.74, subdivision 9; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 237."
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Beard moved
to amend S. F. No. 2616, the second engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 3,
after line 30, insert:
"Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 238.08,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Requirement;
conditions. (a) A municipality shall
require a franchise or extension permit of any cable communications system
providing service within the municipality.
(b) No municipality
shall grant an additional franchise for cable service for an area included in
an existing franchise on terms and conditions more favorable or less burdensome
than those in the existing franchise pertaining to: (1) the area served; (2) public, educational,
or governmental access requirements; or (3) franchise fees. The provisions of this paragraph shall not
apply when the area in which the additional franchise is being sought is not
actually being served by any existing cable communications system holding a
franchise for the area. Nothing in this
paragraph prevents a municipality from imposing additional terms and conditions
on any additional franchises.
(c) An area
for an additional cable franchise is not more favorable or less burdensome if
the franchisee is a telephone company, as defined in section 237.01,
subdivision 7, and the area of the franchise is no less than the area within
the municipality in which the telephone company offers local exchange telephone
service. This paragraph is in addition
to and not a limit to the authority of a municipality to grant an additional
franchise for cable service."
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
Beard moved
to amend the Beard amendment to S. F. No. 2616, the second engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 1,
after line 21, insert:
"EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2010,
and does not affect any litigation pending on that date."
The motion prevailed and the amendment to
the amendment was adopted.
The question recurred on the Beard
amendment, as amended, to S. F. No. 2616, the second engrossment,
as amended. The motion prevailed and the
amendment, as amended, was adopted.
S. F. No. 2616,
A bill for an act relating to telecommunications; regulating private shared
services; clarifying reduced-rate regulation of certain competitive business
telecommunication services; authorizing municipalities to grant additional
franchise for cable services in certain cases; amending Minnesota Statutes
2008, sections 237.411, subdivision 3; 238.08, subdivision 1; proposing coding
for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 237.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 131 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
S. F. No. 2755
was reported to the House.
Mullery and Anderson, B., moved
to amend S. F. No. 2755, the first engrossment, as follows:
Page 2, after line 16,
insert:
"Sec. 2. [611.015]
RIGHT TO ARRANGE CARE OF MINOR CHILDREN.
If, upon questioning during
the booking process, the arrested person is identified as a custodial parent
with responsibility for a minor child, the arrested person shall be entitled to
make two calls at no expense if the calls are completed to telephone numbers
within the local calling area to a relative or other person for the purpose of
arranging for the care of the minor child or children in the parent's absence. Calls authorized under this section are in
addition to calls authorized by any other law or rule.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2010."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
S. F. No. 2755,
A bill for an act relating to public safety; clarifying detention placement
options for extended jurisdiction juveniles pending revocation hearings;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 260B.130, subdivision 5.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 132 yeas and 0
nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
S. F. No. 2855 was reported
to the House.
Hayden moved
to amend S. F. No. 2855, the first engrossment, as follows:
Page 10,
line 34, reinstate the stricken "meet" and delete "be
referred to"and insert "with an"
Page 11,
line 1, after "services" insert "job counselor"
Page 13,
line 6, strike "within ten working days after" and insert "in
the month after the month"
Page 13,
line 10, reinstate the stricken "must be tailored to recognize"
Page 13,
line 11, reinstate the stricken "the caregiving needs of the parent"
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Seifert moved
to amend S. F. No. 2855, the first engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 1,
after line 18, insert:
"Section
1. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section
256.01, subdivision 18, is amended to read:
Subd. 18. Immigration
status verifications. (a)
Notwithstanding any waiver of this requirement by the secretary of the United
States Department of Health and Human Services, effective July 1, 2001, the
commissioner shall utilize the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements
(SAVE) program to conduct immigration status verifications:
(1) as
required under United States Code, title 8, section 1642;
(2) for all
applicants for food assistance benefits, whether under the federal food stamp
program, the MFIP or work first program, or the Minnesota food assistance
program;
(3) for all
applicants for general assistance medical care, except assistance for an
emergency medical condition, for immunization with respect to an immunizable
disease, or for testing and treatment of symptoms of a communicable disease;
and
(4) for all
applicants for general assistance, Minnesota supplemental aid, MinnesotaCare,
or group residential housing, when the benefits provided by these programs
would fall under the definition of "federal public benefit" under
United States Code, title 8, section 1642, if federal funds were used to pay
for all or part of the benefits.
(b) The
commissioner shall comply with the reporting requirements under United States
Code, title 42, section 611a, and any federal regulation or guidance adopted
under that law.
(c)
Counties must verify that all applications for MFIP include verification of
citizen eligibility status for both applicants and recipients."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Seifert
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 82 yeas and 50 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Brown
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Faust
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Holberg
Hoppe
Hortman
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lillie
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Murdock
Nornes
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Smith
Sterner
Swails
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Falk
Fritz
Greiling
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Koenen
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Reinert
Rukavina
Sertich
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
S. F. No. 2855,
A bill for an act relating to human services; making changes to children and
family services technical and policy provisions; Minnesota family investment
program and adult supports; early childhood development; child welfare;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 119B.189, by adding subdivisions;
119B.19, subdivision 7; 119B.21, as amended; 245A.04, subdivision 11; 256.01,
by adding a subdivision; 256.046, subdivision 1; 256.82, subdivision 3; 256.98,
subdivision 8; 256J.24, subdivisions 3, 5a, 10; 256J.37, subdivision 3a;
256J.425, subdivision 5; 260C.007, subdivision 4; 260C.193, subdivision 6;
260C.201, subdivision 10; 260C.451; 626.556, subdivision 10; Minnesota Statutes
2009 Supplement, sections 256D.44, subdivision 3; 256J.24, subdivision 5;
256J.425, subdivision 2; 256J.521, subdivision 2; 256J.561, subdivision 3;
256J.66, subdivision 1; 256J.95, subdivisions 3, 11; 260.012; 260C.212,
subdivision 7; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256.82, subdivision
5; Minnesota Rules, part 9560.0660.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 130 yeas and 1 nay as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Buesgens
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
S. F. No. 3147 was reported
to the House.
Jackson moved to amend
S. F. No. 3147, the second engrossment, as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting
clause and insert the following language of H. F. No. 3634, the
second engrossment:
"Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 214.10, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 1a.
Conviction of a felony-level
criminal sexual conduct offense. (a)
A health-related licensing board listed in section 214.01, subdivision 2, shall
not grant a credential to any person who has been convicted of a felony-level
criminal sexual conduct offense.
(b) A license to practice is automatically revoked if the
licensee is convicted of a felony-level criminal sexual conduct offense.
(c) A license that has been denied or revoked under this subdivision
is not subject to chapter 364.
(d) For purposes of this subdivision, "conviction"
means a plea of guilty, a verdict of guilty by a jury, or a finding of guilty
by the court, and "criminal sexual conduct offense" means a violation
of sections 609.342 to 609.345 or a similar statute in another jurisdiction.
Sec. 2. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 364.09, is amended to read:
364.09 EXCEPTIONS.
(a) This chapter does not apply to the licensing process for
peace officers; to law enforcement agencies as defined in section 626.84,
subdivision 1, paragraph (f); to fire protection agencies; to eligibility for a
private detective or protective agent license; to the licensing and background
study process under chapters 245A and 245C; to eligibility for school bus
driver endorsements; to eligibility for special transportation service
endorsements; to eligibility for a commercial driver training instructor
license, which is governed by section 171.35 and rules adopted under that
section; to emergency medical services personnel, or to the licensing by
political subdivisions of taxicab drivers, if the applicant for the license has
been discharged from sentence for a conviction within the ten years immediately
preceding application of a violation of any of the following:
(1) sections 609.185 to 609.21, 609.221 to 609.223, 609.342
to 609.3451, or 617.23, subdivision 2 or 3;
(2) any provision of chapter 152 that is punishable by a
maximum sentence of 15 years or more; or
(3) a violation of chapter 169 or 169A involving driving
under the influence, leaving the scene of an accident, or reckless or careless
driving.
This
chapter also shall not apply to eligibility for juvenile corrections
employment, where the offense involved child physical or sexual abuse or
criminal sexual conduct.
(b) This chapter does not apply to a school district or to
eligibility for a license issued or renewed by the Board of Teaching or the
commissioner of education.
(c) Nothing in this section precludes the Minnesota Police and
Peace Officers Training Board or the state fire marshal from recommending
policies set forth in this chapter to the attorney general for adoption in the
attorney general's discretion to apply to law enforcement or fire protection
agencies.
(d) This chapter does not apply to a license to practice
medicine credential that has been denied or revoked by the Board
of Medical Practice pursuant to section 147.091, subdivision 1a any of
the health-related licensing boards listed in section 214.01, subdivision 2."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to health
occupations; requiring license revocation and license denial for any
health-related licensed professional convicted of a felony-level criminal
sexual conduct offense; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 214.10, by
adding a subdivision; 364.09."
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Scott moved
to amend S. F. No. 3147, the second engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 1,
line 14, after the period, insert "This revocation is permanent, and
the licensee shall not be eligible to reapply for a license."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Scott
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 132 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
S. F. No. 3147,
A bill for an act relating to health occupation; requiring license revocation
for chiropractors convicted of a felony-level criminal sexual conduct offense;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 148.10, by adding a subdivision;
364.09.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 132 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
Abeler was excused between the hours of
2:55 p.m. and 3:45 p.m.
S. F. No. 987,
A bill for an act relating to public safety; eliminating mandate that certain
presentence investigations include a description of any adverse social or
economic effects the offense has had on persons who reside in the neighborhood
where the offense was committed; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section
609.115, subdivision 1.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 131 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
S. F. No. 2713 was reported
to the House.
Morrow moved to amend
S. F. No. 2713, the second engrossment, as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting
clause and insert the following language of H. F. No. 3300, the
third engrossment:
"Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 246B.01, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:
Subd. 1a. Client Civilly committed sex
offender. "Client"
"Civilly committed sex offender" means a person who is admitted
to the Minnesota sex offender program or subject to a court hold order
under section 253B.185 for the purpose of assessment, diagnosis, care,
treatment, supervision, or other services provided by the Minnesota sex
offender program.
Sec. 2. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 246B.01, subdivision 1b, is amended to read:
Subd. 1b. Client's Civilly committed sex
offender's county. "Client's
"Civilly committed sex offender's county" means the county of the
client's civilly committed sex offender's legal settlement for
poor relief purposes at the time of commitment.
If the client civilly committed sex offender has no legal
settlement for poor relief in this state, it means the county of commitment,
except that when a client civilly committed sex offender with no
legal settlement for poor relief is committed while serving a sentence at a
penal institution, it means the county from which the client civilly
committed sex offender was sentenced.
Sec. 3. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 246B.01, subdivision 2a, is amended to read:
Subd. 2a. Community preparation services. Community preparation services are
specialized residential services or programs operated or administered by the
Minnesota sex offender program outside of a secure treatment facility. Community preparation services are designed
to assist clients civilly committed sex offenders in developing
the appropriate skills and resources necessary for an eventual successful
reintegration into a community. A client
civilly committed sex offender may be placed in community preparation
services only upon an order of the judicial appeal panel under section 253B.19.
Sec. 4. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 246B.01, subdivision 2d, is amended to read:
Subd. 2d. Local social services agency. "Local social services agency"
means the local social services agency of the client's civilly
committed sex offender's county as defined in subdivision 1b and of the
county of commitment, and any other local social services agency possessing
information regarding, or requested by the commissioner to investigate, the
financial circumstances of a client civilly committed sex offender.
Sec. 5. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 246B.02, is amended to read:
246B.02 ESTABLISHMENT OF
MINNESOTA SEX OFFENDER PROGRAM.
The commissioner of human services shall establish and
maintain the Minnesota sex offender program.
The program shall provide specialized sex offender assessment,
diagnosis, care, treatment, supervision, and other services to clients
civilly committed sex offenders as defined in section 246B.01, subdivision
1a. Services may include specialized
programs at secure treatment facilities as defined in section 253B.02,
subdivision 18a, consultative services, aftercare services, community-based
services and programs, transition services, or other services consistent with
the mission of the Department of Human Services.
Sec. 6. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 246B.03, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Minnesota sex offender program evaluation. (a) The commissioner shall contract with
national sex offender experts to evaluate the sex offender treatment program. The consultant group shall consist of four
national experts, including:
(1) three experts who are licensed psychologists,
psychiatrists, clinical therapists, or other mental health treatment providers
with established and recognized training and experience in the assessment and
treatment of sexual offenders; and
(2) one nontreatment professional with relevant training and
experience regarding the oversight or licensing of sex offender treatment
programs or other relevant mental health treatment programs.
(b) These experts shall, in consultation with the executive
clinical director of the sex offender treatment program:
(1) review and identify relevant information and
evidence-based best practices and methodologies for effectively assessing,
diagnosing, and treating clients civilly committed sex offenders;
(2) on at least an annual basis, complete a site visit and
comprehensive program evaluation that may include a review of program policies
and procedures to determine the program's level of compliance, address specific
areas of concern brought to the panel's attention by the executive clinical
director or executive director, offer recommendations, and complete a written
report of its findings to the executive director and clinical director; and
(3) in addition to the annual site visit and review, provide
advice, input, and assistance as requested by the executive clinical director
or executive director.
(c) The commissioner or commissioner's designee shall enter
into contracts as necessary to fulfill the responsibilities under this
subdivision.
Sec. 7. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 246B.03, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Client Civilly committed sex
offender grievance resolution process.
(a) The executive director shall establish a grievance policy and
related procedures that address and attempt to resolve client civilly
committed sex offender concerns and complaints. The grievance resolution process must include
procedures for assessing or investigating a client's civilly
committed sex offender's concerns or complaints, for attempting to resolve
issues informally, and for appealing for a review and determination by the
executive director or designee.
(b) Any client civilly committed sex offender
who believes a right that is applicable to a client an individual
under section 144.651 has been violated may file a grievance under paragraph
(a) and attempt to resolve the issue internally, or by a complaint with the
Minnesota Department of Health, Office of Health Facility Complaints, or both. Complaints filed with the Office of Health
Facility Complaints under this paragraph must be processed according to section
144.652.
Sec. 8. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 246B.04, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Access to data. The Minnesota sex offender program shall
have access to private data contained in the statewide supervision system under
section 241.065, as necessary for the administration and management of current Minnesota
sex offender clients civilly committed sex offenders for the
purposes of admissions, treatment, security, and supervision. The program shall develop a policy to allow
individuals who conduct assessment, develop treatment plans, oversee security,
or develop reintegration plans to have access to the data. The commissioner of corrections shall conduct
periodic audits to determine whether the policy is being followed.
Sec. 9. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 246B.05, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Vocational work program option. The commissioner of human services shall
develop a vocational work program for persons admitted to the Minnesota sex
offender program. The vocation vocational
work program is an extension of therapeutic treatment in order for clients
civilly committed sex offenders to learn valuable work skills and work
habits while contributing to their cost of care. The vocational work program may include work
maintaining the center or work that is brought to the center by an outside
source. The earnings generated from the
vocational work program must be deposited into the account created in
subdivision 2.
Sec. 10. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 246B.06, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Establishment; purpose. (a) The commissioner of human services
may establish, equip, maintain, and operate a vocational work program at any
Minnesota sex offender program facility under this chapter. The commissioner may establish vocational
activities for sex offender treatment clients for civilly committed
sex offenders as the commissioner deems necessary and suitable to the
meaningful work skills training, educational training, and development of
proper work habits and extended treatment services for clients
civilly committed sex offenders consistent with the requirements in section
246B.05. The industrial and commercial
activities authorized by this section are designated Minnesota State Industries
and must be for the primary purpose of sustaining and ensuring Minnesota State
Industries' self-sufficiency, providing educational training, meaningful
employment, and the teaching of proper work habits to the patients of
individuals in the Minnesota sex offender program under this chapter, and
not solely as competitive business ventures.
(b) The net profits from the vocational work program must be
used for the benefit of the clients civilly committed sex offenders
as it relates to building education and self-sufficiency skills. Prior to the establishment of any vocational
activity, the commissioner of human services shall consult with stakeholders
including representatives of business, industry, organized labor, the
commissioner of education, the state Apprenticeship Council, the commissioner
of labor and industry, the commissioner of employment and economic development,
the commissioner of administration, and other stakeholders the commissioner
deems qualified. The purpose of the
stakeholder consultation is to determine the quantity and nature of the goods,
wares, merchandise, and services to be made or provided, and the types of
processes to be used in their manufacture, processing, repair, and production
consistent with the greatest opportunity for the reform and educational
training of the clients civilly committed sex offenders, and with
the best interests of the state, business, industry, and labor.
(c) The commissioner of human services shall, at all times in
the conduct of any vocational activity authorized by this section, utilize client
civilly committed sex offender labor to the greatest extent feasible,
provided that the commissioner may employ all administrative, supervisory, and
other skilled workers necessary to the proper instruction of the clients
civilly committed sex offenders and the efficient operation of the
vocational activities authorized by this section.
(d) The commissioner of human services may authorize the
director of any Minnesota sex offender treatment facility under the
commissioner's control to accept work projects from outside sources for
processing, fabrication, or repair, provided that preference is given to the performance
of work projects for state departments and agencies.
Sec. 11. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 246B.06, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Wages.
Notwithstanding section 177.24 or any other law to the contrary, the
commissioner of human services has the discretion to set the pay rate for clients
individuals participating in the vocational work program. The commissioner has the authority to retain
up to 50 percent of any payments made to a client an individual
participating in the vocational work program for the purpose of reducing state
costs associated with operating the Minnesota sex offender program.
Sec. 12. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 246B.06, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Status of clients civilly
committed sex offenders. Clients
Civilly committed sex offenders participating in the vocational work
program are not employees of the Minnesota sex offender program, the Department
of Human Services, or the state, and are not subject to fair labor standards
under sections 177.21 to 177.35; workers compensation under sections 176.011 to
176.862; the Minnesota Human Rights Act under sections 363A.001 to 363A.41;
laws governing state employees under chapter 43A; labor relations under chapter
179A; or the successors to any of these sections and any other laws pertaining
to employees and employment.
Sec. 13. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 246B.06, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Claims.
Claims and demands arising out of injury to or death of a client
civilly committed sex offender while that client individual
is participating in the vocational work program or performing a work assignment
maintaining the facility must be presented to, heard, and determined
exclusively by the legislature as provided in section 3.738.
Sec. 14. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 246B.07, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Procedures.
The commissioner shall determine or redetermine, if necessary, what
amount of the cost of care, if any, the client civilly committed sex
offender is able to pay. The client
civilly committed sex offender shall provide to the commissioner documents
and proof necessary to determine the ability to pay. Failure to provide the commissioner with
sufficient information to determine ability to pay may make the client
civilly committed sex offender liable for the full cost of care until the
time when sufficient information is provided.
Sec. 15. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 246B.07, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Rules.
The commissioner shall use the standards in section 246.51,
subdivision 2, to determine the client's civilly committed sex
offender's liability for the care provided by the Minnesota sex offender
program.
Sec. 16. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 246B.08, is amended to read:
246B.08 PAYMENT FOR CARE;
ORDER; ACTION.
The commissioner shall issue an order to the client
civilly committed sex offender or the guardian of the estate, if there is
one, requiring the client civilly committed sex offender or
guardian to pay to the state the amounts determined, the total of which must
not exceed the full cost of care. The
order must specifically state the commissioner's determination and must be
conclusive, unless appealed. If a client
civilly committed sex offender fails to pay the amount due, the attorney
general, upon request of the commissioner, may institute, or direct the
appropriate county attorney to institute, a civil action to recover the amount.
Sec. 17. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 246B.09, is amended to read:
246B.09 CLAIM AGAINST ESTATE
OF DECEASED CLIENT CIVILLY COMMITTED SEX OFFENDER.
Subdivision 1. Client's Estate of a civilly
committed sex offender. Upon the
death of a client civilly committed sex offender, or a former client
civilly committed sex offender, the total cost of care provided to the client
individual, less the amount actually paid toward the cost of care by the client
civilly committed sex offender, must be filed by the commissioner as a
claim against the estate of the client civilly committed sex offender
with the court having jurisdiction to probate the estate, and all proceeds
collected by the state in the case must be divided between the state and county
in proportion to the cost of care each has borne.
Subd. 2. Preferred status. An estate claim in subdivision 1 must be
considered an expense of the last illness for purposes of section 524.3-805.
If the commissioner determines that the property or estate of
a client civilly committed sex offender is not more than needed
to care for and maintain the spouse and minor or dependent children of a
deceased client civilly committed sex offender, the commissioner
has the power to compromise the claim of the state in a manner deemed just and
proper.
Subd. 3. Exception from statute of limitations. Any statute of limitations that limits
the commissioner in recovering the cost of care obligation incurred by a client
civilly committed sex offender or former client civilly committed
sex offender must not apply to any claim against an estate made under this
section to recover cost of care.
Sec. 18. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 246B.10, is amended to read:
246B.10 LIABILITY OF COUNTY;
REIMBURSEMENT.
The client's civilly committed sex offender's
county shall pay to the state a portion of the cost of care provided in the
Minnesota sex offender program to a client civilly committed sex
offender who has legally settled in that county. A county's payment must be made from the
county's own sources of revenue and payments must equal ten percent of the cost
of care, as determined by the commissioner, for each day or portion of a day,
that the client civilly committed sex offender spends at the
facility. If payments received by the
state under this chapter exceed 90 percent of the cost of care, the county is
responsible for paying the state the remaining amount. The county is not entitled to reimbursement
from the client civilly committed sex offender, the client's
civilly committed sex offender's estate, or from the client's
civilly committed sex offender's relatives, except as provided in
section 246B.07.
Sec. 19. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 253B.05, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Emergency hold. (a) Any person may be admitted or held
for emergency care and treatment in a treatment facility, except to a
facility operated by the Minnesota sex offender program, with the consent
of the head of the treatment facility upon a written statement by an examiner
that:
(1) the examiner has examined the person not more than 15
days prior to admission;
(2) the examiner is of the opinion, for stated reasons, that
the person is mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or chemically dependent,
and is in danger of causing injury to self or others if not immediately
detained; and
(3) an order of the court cannot be obtained in time to
prevent the anticipated injury.
(b) If the proposed patient has been brought to the treatment
facility by another person, the examiner shall make a good faith effort to
obtain a statement of information that is available from that person, which
must be taken into consideration in deciding whether to place the proposed
patient on an emergency hold. The
statement of information must include, to the extent available, direct
observations of the proposed patient's behaviors, reliable knowledge of recent
and past behavior, and information regarding psychiatric history, past
treatment, and current mental health providers.
The examiner shall also inquire into the existence of health care
directives under chapter 145, and advance psychiatric directives under
section 253B.03, subdivision 6d.
(c) The examiner's statement shall be: (1) sufficient authority for a peace or
health officer to transport a patient to a treatment facility, (2) stated in
behavioral terms and not in conclusory language, and (3) of sufficient
specificity to provide an adequate record for review. If danger to specific individuals is a basis
for the emergency hold, the statement must identify those individuals, to the
extent practicable. A copy of the
examiner's statement shall be personally served on the person immediately upon
admission and a copy shall be maintained by the treatment facility.
Sec. 20. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 253B.07, subdivision 2b, is amended to read:
Subd. 2b. Apprehend and hold orders. The court may order the treatment
facility to hold the person in a treatment facility or direct a health officer,
peace officer, or other person to take the proposed patient into custody and
transport the proposed patient to a treatment facility for observation,
evaluation, diagnosis, care, treatment, and, if necessary, confinement, when:
(1) there has been a particularized showing by the petitioner
that serious physical harm to the proposed patient or others is likely unless
the proposed patient is immediately apprehended;
(2) the proposed patient has not voluntarily appeared for the
examination or the commitment hearing pursuant to the summons; or
(3) a person is held pursuant to section 253B.05 and a request
for a petition for commitment has been filed.
The order of
the court may be executed on any day and at any time by the use of all
necessary means including the imposition of necessary restraint upon the
proposed patient. Where possible, a
peace officer taking the proposed patient into custody pursuant to this
subdivision shall not be in uniform and shall not use a motor vehicle visibly
marked as a police vehicle. Except as
provided in section 253B.045, subdivision 1a, in the case of an individual on a
judicial hold due to a petition for civil commitment under section 253B.185,
assignment of custody during the hold is to the commissioner of human services. The commissioner is responsible for
determining the appropriate placement within a secure treatment facility under
the authority of the commissioner.
Sec. 21. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 253B.10, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Transfer to voluntary status. At any time prior to the expiration of
the initial commitment period, a patient who has not been committed as mentally
ill and dangerous to the public or as a sexually dangerous person or as a
sexual psychopathic personality may be transferred to voluntary status upon
the patient's application in writing with the consent of the head of the
facility. Upon transfer, the head of the
treatment facility shall immediately notify the court in writing and the court
shall terminate the proceedings.
Sec. 22. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 253B.14, is amended to read:
253B.14 TRANSFER OF COMMITTED
PERSONS.
The commissioner may transfer any committed person, other than
a person committed as mentally ill and dangerous to the public, or as a
sexually dangerous person or as a sexual psychopathic personality, from one
regional treatment center to any other treatment facility under the
commissioner's jurisdiction which is capable of
providing proper care and treatment. When a committed person is transferred from
one treatment facility to another, written notice shall be given to the
committing court, the county attorney, the patient's counsel, and to the
person's parent, health care agent, or spouse or, if none is known, to an
interested person, and the designated agency.
Sec. 23. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 253B.15, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Provisional discharge. The head of the treatment facility may
provisionally discharge any patient without discharging the commitment, unless
the patient was found by the committing court to be a person who is mentally
ill and dangerous to the public, or a sexually dangerous person or a sexual
psychopathic personality.
Each patient released on provisional discharge shall have a
written aftercare plan developed which specifies the services and treatment to
be provided as part of the aftercare plan, the financial resources available to
pay for the services specified, the expected period of provisional discharge,
the precise goals for the granting of a final discharge, and conditions or
restrictions on the patient during the period of the provisional discharge. The aftercare plan shall be provided to the
patient, the patient's attorney, and the designated agency.
The aftercare plan shall be reviewed on a quarterly basis by
the patient, designated agency and other appropriate persons. The aftercare plan shall contain the grounds
upon which a provisional discharge may be revoked. The provisional discharge shall terminate on
the date specified in the plan unless specific action is taken to revoke or
extend it.
Sec. 24. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 253B.18, subdivision 4a, is amended to read:
Subd. 4a. Release on pass; notification. A patient who has been committed as a
person who is mentally ill and dangerous and who is confined at a secure
treatment facility or has been transferred out of a state-operated services
facility according to section 253B.18, subdivision 6, shall not be released on
a pass unless the pass is part of a pass plan that has been approved by the
medical director of the secure treatment facility. The pass plan must have a specific
therapeutic purpose consistent with the treatment plan, must be established for
a specific period of time, and must have specific levels of liberty delineated. The county case manager must be invited to
participate in the development of the pass plan. At least ten days prior to a determination on
the plan, the medical director shall notify the designated agency, the
committing court, the county attorney of the county of commitment, an
interested person, the local law enforcement agency where the facility is
located, the county attorney and the local law enforcement agency in the
location where the pass is to occur, the petitioner, and the petitioner's
counsel of the plan, the nature of the passes proposed, and their right to
object to the plan. If any notified
person objects prior to the proposed date of implementation, the person shall
have an opportunity to appear, personally or in writing, before the medical
director, within ten days of the objection, to present grounds for opposing the
plan. The pass plan shall not be
implemented until the objecting person has been furnished that opportunity. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed
to give a patient an affirmative right to a pass plan.
Sec. 25. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 253B.18, subdivision 5a, is amended to read:
Subd. 5a. Victim notification of petition and
release; right to submit statement. (a)
As used in this subdivision:
(1) "crime" has the meaning given to "violent
crime" in section 609.1095, and includes criminal sexual conduct in the
fifth degree and offenses within the definition of "crime against the
person" in section 253B.02, subdivision 4a, and also includes offenses
listed in section 253B.02, subdivision 7a, paragraph (b), regardless of whether
they are sexually motivated;
(2) "victim" means a person who has incurred loss
or harm as a result of a crime the behavior for which forms the basis for a commitment
under this section or section 253B.185; and
(3) "convicted" and "conviction" have the
meanings given in section 609.02, subdivision 5, and also include juvenile
court adjudications, findings under Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule
20.02, that the elements of a crime have been proved, and findings in
commitment cases under this section or section 253B.185 that an act or acts
constituting a crime occurred.
(b) A county attorney who files a petition to commit a person
under this section or section 253B.185 shall make a reasonable effort to
provide prompt notice of filing the petition to any victim of a crime for which
the person was convicted. In addition,
the county attorney shall make a reasonable effort to promptly notify the victim
of the resolution of the petition.
(c) Before provisionally discharging, discharging, granting
pass-eligible status, approving a pass plan, or otherwise permanently or
temporarily releasing a person committed under this section or section
253B.185 from a treatment facility, the head of the treatment facility
shall make a reasonable effort to notify any victim of a crime for which the
person was convicted that the person may be discharged or released and that the
victim has a right to submit a written statement regarding decisions of the
medical director, special review board, or commissioner with respect to the
person. To the extent possible, the
notice must be provided at least 14 days before any special review board
hearing or before a determination on a pass plan. Notwithstanding section 611A.06, subdivision
4, the commissioner shall provide the judicial appeal panel with victim
information in order to comply with the provisions of this section. The judicial appeal panel shall ensure that
the data on victims remains private as provided for in section 611A.06,
subdivision 4.
(d) This subdivision applies only to victims who have
requested notification by contacting, in writing, the county attorney in the
county where the conviction for the crime occurred. A county attorney who receives a request for
notification under this paragraph shall promptly forward the request to the
commissioner of human services.
(e) The rights under this subdivision are in addition to
rights available to a victim under chapter 611A. This provision does not give a victim all the
rights of a "notified person" or a person "entitled to statutory
notice" under subdivision 4a, 4b, or 5 or section 253B.185, subdivision
10.
Sec. 26. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 253B.185, is amended to read:
253B.185 SEXUAL PSYCHOPATHIC
PERSONALITY; SEXUALLY DANGEROUS.
Subdivision 1. Commitment generally. (a) Except as otherwise provided
in this section, the provisions of this chapter pertaining to persons who are
mentally ill and dangerous to the public apply with like force and effect to
persons who are alleged or found to be sexually dangerous persons or persons
with a sexual psychopathic personality. For
purposes of this section, "sexual psychopathic personality" includes
any individual committed as a "psychopathic personality" under
Minnesota Statutes 1992, section 526.10.
(b) Before commitment proceedings are instituted, the
facts shall first be submitted to the county attorney, who, if satisfied that
good cause exists, will prepare the petition.
The county attorney may request a prepetition screening report. The petition is to be executed by a person
having knowledge of the facts and filed with the committing court of the county
in which the patient has a settlement or is present. If the patient is in the custody of the
commissioner of corrections, the petition may be filed in the county where the
conviction for which the person is incarcerated was entered.
(c) Upon the filing of a petition alleging that a proposed
patient is a sexually dangerous person or is a person with a sexual
psychopathic personality, the court shall hear the petition as provided in
section 253B.18.
(d) In commitments under this section, the court shall
commit the patient to a secure treatment facility unless the patient
establishes by clear and convincing evidence that a less restrictive treatment
program is available that is consistent with the patient's treatment needs and
the requirements of public safety.
Subd. 1a. Temporary confinement. During any hearing held under this
section, or pending emergency revocation of a provisional discharge, the court
may order the patient or proposed patient temporarily confined in a jail or
lockup but only if:
(1) there is no other feasible place of confinement for the
patient within a reasonable distance;
(2) the confinement is for less than 24 hours or, if during a
hearing, less than 24 hours prior to commencement and after conclusion of the
hearing; and
(3) there are protections in place, including segregation of
the patient, to ensure the safety of the patient.
Subd. 1b. County attorney access to data. Notwithstanding sections 144.291 to
144.298; 245.467, subdivision 6; 245.4876, subdivision 7; 260B.171; 260B.235,
subdivision 8; 260C.171; and 609.749, subdivision 6, or any provision of
chapter 13 or other state law, prior to filing a petition for commitment as a
sexual psychopathic personality or as a sexually dangerous person, and upon
notice to the proposed patient, the county attorney or the county attorney's
designee may move the court for an order granting access to any records or
data, to the extent it relates to the proposed patient, for the purpose of
determining whether good cause exists to file a petition and, if a petition is
filed, to support the allegations set forth in the petition.
The court may grant the motion if: (1) the Department of Corrections refers the
case for commitment as a sexual psychopathic personality or a sexually
dangerous person; or (2) upon a showing that the requested category of data or
records may be relevant to the determination by the county attorney or designee. The court shall decide a motion under this
subdivision within 48 hours after a hearing on the motion. Notice to the proposed patient need not be
given upon a showing that such notice may result in harm or harassment of
interested persons or potential witnesses.
Notwithstanding any provision of chapter 13 or other state
law, a county attorney considering the civil commitment of a person under this
section may obtain records and data from the Department of Corrections or any
probation or parole agency in this state upon request, without a court order,
for the purpose of determining whether good cause exists to file a petition
and, if a petition is filed, to support the allegations set forth in the
petition. At the time of the request for
the records, the county attorney shall provide notice of the request to the
person who is the subject of the records.
Data collected pursuant to this subdivision shall retain
their original status and, if not public, are inadmissible in any court
proceeding unrelated to civil commitment, unless otherwise permitted.
Subd. 2. Transfer to correctional facility. (a) If a person has been committed under
this section and later is committed to the custody of the commissioner of
corrections for any reason, including but not limited to, being sentenced for a
crime or revocation of the person's supervised release or conditional release
under section 244.05; 609.3455, subdivision 6, 7, or 8; Minnesota Statutes
2004, section 609.108, subdivision 6; or Minnesota Statutes 2004, section
609.109, subdivision 7, the person shall be transferred to a facility
designated by the commissioner of corrections without regard to the procedures
provided in section 253B.18 subdivision 11.
(b) If a person is committed under this section after a
commitment to the commissioner of corrections, the person shall first serve the
sentence in a facility designated by the commissioner of corrections. After the person has served the sentence, the
person shall be transferred to a treatment program designated by the
commissioner of human services.
Subd. 3. Not to constitute defense. The existence in any person of a
condition of a sexual psychopathic personality or the fact that a person is a
sexually dangerous person shall not in any case constitute a defense to a
charge of crime, nor relieve such person from liability to be tried upon a
criminal charge.
Subd. 4. Statewide judicial panel; commitment
proceedings. (a) The Supreme Court
may establish a panel of district judges with statewide authority to preside
over commitment proceedings of sexual psychopathic personalities and sexually
dangerous persons. Only one judge of the
panel is required to preside over a particular commitment proceeding. Panel members shall serve for one-year terms. One of the judges shall be designated as the
chief judge of the panel, and is vested with the power to designate the
presiding judge in a particular case, to set the proper venue for the
proceedings, and to otherwise supervise and direct the operation of the panel. The chief judge shall designate one of the
other judges to act as chief judge whenever the chief judge is unable to act.
(b) If the Supreme Court creates the judicial panel
authorized by this section, all petitions for civil commitment brought under
subdivision 1 shall be filed with the supreme court instead of with the
district court in the county where the proposed patient is present, notwithstanding
any provision of subdivision 1 to the contrary.
Otherwise, all of the other applicable procedures contained in this
chapter apply to commitment proceedings conducted by a judge on the panel.
Subd. 5. Financial responsibility. (a) For purposes of this subdivision,
"state facility" has the meaning given in section 246.50 and also
includes a Department of Corrections facility when the proposed patient is
confined in such a facility pursuant to section 253B.045, subdivision 1a.
(b) Notwithstanding sections 246.54, 253B.045, and any other
law to the contrary, when a petition is filed for commitment under this section
pursuant to the notice required in section 244.05, subdivision 7, the state and
county are each responsible for 50 percent of the cost of the person's
confinement at a state facility or county jail, prior to commitment.
(c) The county shall submit an invoice to the state court
administrator for reimbursement of the state's share of the cost of confinement.
(d) Notwithstanding paragraph (b), the state's responsibility
for reimbursement is limited to the amount appropriated for this purpose.
Subd. 6.
Aftercare and case management. The state, in collaboration with the
designated agency, is responsible for arranging and funding the aftercare and
case management services for persons under commitment as sexual psychopathic
personalities and sexually dangerous persons discharged after July 1, 1999.
Subd. 7. Rights of patients committed under this
section. (a) The commissioner or the
commissioner's designee may limit the statutory rights described in paragraph
(b) for patients committed to the Minnesota sex offender program under this
section or with the commissioner's consent under section 246B.02. The statutory rights described in paragraph
(b) may be limited only as necessary to maintain a therapeutic environment or
the security of the facility or to protect the safety and well-being of
patients, staff, and the public.
(b) The statutory rights that may be limited in accordance
with paragraph (a) are those set forth in section 144.651, subdivision 19,
personal privacy; section 144.651, subdivision 21, private communications;
section 144.651, subdivision 22, retain and use of personal property; section
144.651, subdivision 25, manage personal financial affairs; section 144.651,
subdivision 26, meet with visitors and participate in groups; section 253B.03,
subdivision 2, correspond with others; and section 253B.03, subdivision 3,
receive visitors and make telephone calls. Other statutory rights enumerated by sections
144.651 and 253B.03, or any other law, may be limited as provided in those
sections.
Subd. 8. Petition and report required. (a) Within 120 days of receipt of a
preliminary determination from a court under section 609.1351, or a referral
from the commissioner of corrections pursuant to section 244.05, subdivision 7,
a county attorney shall determine whether good cause under this section exists
to file a petition, and if good cause exists, the county attorney or designee
shall file the petition with the court.
(b) Failure to meet the requirements of paragraph (a) does
not bar filing a petition under subdivision 1 any time the county attorney
determines pursuant to subdivision 1 that good cause for such a petition
exists.
(c) By February 1 of each year, the commissioner of human
services shall annually report to the respective chairs of the divisions or
committees of the senate and house of representatives that oversee human
services finance regarding compliance with this subdivision.
Subd. 9. Petition for reduction in custody. (a) This subdivision applies only to
committed persons as defined in paragraph (b).
The procedures in section 253B.18, subdivision 5a, subdivision
10 for victim notification and right to submit a statement under section
253B.18 apply to petitions filed and reductions in custody recommended
under this subdivision.
(b) As used in this subdivision:
(1) "committed person" means an individual
committed under this section, or under this section and under section 253B.18,
as mentally ill and dangerous. It does
not include persons committed only as mentally ill and dangerous under section
253B.18; and
(2) "reduction in custody" means transfer out of a
secure treatment facility, a provisional discharge, or a discharge from
commitment. A reduction in custody is
considered to be a commitment proceeding under section 8.01.
(c) A petition for a reduction in custody or an appeal of a
revocation of provisional discharge may be filed by either the committed person
or by the head of the treatment facility and must be filed with and considered
by a panel of the special review board authorized under section
253B.18, subdivision 4c. A committed
person may not petition the special review board any sooner than six months
following either:
(1) the entry of judgment in the district court of the order
for commitment issued under section 253B.18, subdivision 3, or upon the
exhaustion of all related appeal rights in state court relating to that order,
whichever is later; or
(2) any recommendation of the special review board or order
of the judicial appeal panel, or upon the exhaustion of all appeal rights in
state court, whichever is later. The medical
director head of the treatment facility may petition at any time. The special review board proceedings are not
contested cases as defined in chapter 14.
(d) The special review board shall hold a hearing on each
petition before issuing a recommendation under paragraph (f). Fourteen days before the hearing, the
committing court, the county attorney of the county of commitment, the
designated agency, an interested person, the petitioner and the petitioner's
counsel, and the committed person court; the county attorneys of the
counties of commitment, financial responsibility, and proposed placement; the
designated agency; an interested person; the petitioner and the petitioner's
counsel; and the committed person and the committed person's counsel must
be given written notice by the commissioner of the time and place of the
hearing before the special review board.
Only those entitled to statutory notice of the hearing or those
administratively required to attend may be present at the hearing. The patient may designate interested persons
to receive notice by providing the names and addresses to the commissioner at
least 21 days before the hearing.
(e) A person or agency receiving notice that submits
documentary evidence to the special review board before the hearing must
also provide copies to the committed person, the committed person's counsel,
the county attorney of the county of commitment, the case manager, and the
commissioner. The special review board
must consider any statements special review board before the hearing
must also provide copies to the committed person; the committed person's
counsel; the county attorneys of the counties of commitment, financial
responsibility, and proposed placement; the case manager; and the commissioner. The special review board must consider any
statements received from victims under section 253B.18, subdivision 5a
subdivision 10.
(f) Within 30 days of the hearing, the special review board
shall issue written findings of fact and shall recommend denial or approval of
the petition to the judicial appeal panel established under section 253B.19. The commissioner shall forward the
recommendation of the special review board to the judicial appeal panel and to
every person entitled to statutory notice.
No reduction in custody or reversal of a revocation of provisional
discharge recommended by the special review board is effective until it has
been reviewed by the judicial appeal panel and until 15 days after an order
from the judicial appeal panel affirming, modifying, or denying the
recommendation.
Subd. 10.
Victim notification of
petition and release; right to submit statement. (a) As used in this subdivision:
(1) "crime" has the meaning given to "violent
crime" in section 609.1095, and includes criminal sexual conduct in the
fifth degree and offenses within the definition of "crime against the
person" in section 253B.02, subdivision 4a, and also includes offenses
listed in section 253B.02, subdivision 7a, paragraph (b), regardless of whether
they are sexually motivated;
(2) "victim" means a person who has incurred loss
or harm as a result of a crime, the behavior for which forms the basis for a
commitment under this section or section 253B.18; and
(3) "convicted" and "conviction" have the
meanings given in section 609.02, subdivision 5, and also include juvenile
court adjudications, findings under Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule
20.02, that the elements of a crime have been proved, and findings in
commitment cases under this section or section 253B.18, that an act or acts
constituting a crime occurred.
(b) A county attorney who files a petition to commit a person
under this section shall make a reasonable effort to provide prompt notice of
filing the petition to any victim of a crime for which the person was convicted. In addition, the county attorney shall make a
reasonable effort to promptly notify the victim of the resolution of the
petition.
(c) Before provisionally discharging, discharging, granting
pass-eligible status, approving a pass plan, or otherwise permanently or
temporarily releasing a person committed under this section from a treatment
facility, the head of the treatment facility shall make a reasonable effort to
notify any victim of a crime for which the person was convicted that the person
may be discharged or released and that the victim has a right to submit a
written statement regarding decisions of the head of the treatment facility or
designee, or special review board, with respect to the person. To the extent possible, the notice must be
provided at least 14 days before any special review board hearing or before a
determination on a pass plan. Notwithstanding
section 611A.06, subdivision 4, the commissioner shall provide the judicial
appeal panel with victim information in order to comply with the provisions of
this section. The judicial appeal panel
shall ensure that the data on victims remains private as provided for in
section 611A.06, subdivision 4.
(d) This subdivision applies only to victims who have requested
notification by contacting, in writing, the county attorney in the county where
the criminal conviction occurred or where the civil commitment was filed or,
following commitment, the head of the treatment facility. A county attorney who receives a request for
notification under this paragraph shall promptly forward the request to the
commissioner of human services.
(e) Rights under this subdivision are in addition to rights
available to a victim under chapter 611A.
This provision does not give a victim all the rights of a "notified
person" or a person "entitled to statutory notice" under
subdivision 12 or 13 or section 253B.18, subdivision 4a, 4b, or 5.
Subd. 11.
Transfer. (a) A patient who is committed as a
sexually dangerous person or sexual psychopathic personality shall not be
transferred out of a secure treatment facility unless it appears to the
satisfaction of the judicial appeal panel, after a hearing and recommendation
by a majority of the special review board, that the transfer is appropriate. Transfer may be to other treatment programs
under the commissioner's control.
(b) The following factors must be considered in determining
whether a transfer is appropriate:
(1) the person's clinical progress and present treatment
needs;
(2) the need for security to accomplish continuing treatment;
(3) the need for continued institutionalization;
(4) which facility can best meet the person's needs; and
(5) whether transfer can be accomplished with a reasonable
degree of safety for the public.
Subd. 12.
Provisional discharge. A patient who is committed as a sexual
psychopathic personality or sexually dangerous person shall not be
provisionally discharged unless it appears to the satisfaction of the judicial
appeal panel, after a hearing and a recommendation by a majority of the special
review board, that the patient is capable of making an acceptable adjustment to
open society.
The following factors are to be considered in determining
whether a provisional discharge shall be recommended:
(1) whether the patient's course of treatment and present
mental status indicate there is no longer a need for treatment and supervision
in the patient's current treatment setting; and
(2) whether the conditions of the provisional discharge plan
will provide a reasonable degree of protection to the public and will enable
the patient to adjust successfully to the community.
Subd. 13.
Provisional discharge plan. A provisional discharge plan shall be
developed, implemented, and monitored by the head of the treatment facility or
designee in conjunction with the patient and other appropriate persons. The head of the treatment facility or
designee shall, at least quarterly, review the plan with the patient and submit
a written report to the designated agency concerning the patient's status and compliance
with each term of the plan.
Subd. 14.
Provisional discharge; review. A provisional discharge pursuant to
this section shall not automatically terminate.
A full discharge shall occur only as provided in subdivision 18. The commissioner shall notify the patient
that the terms of a provisional discharge continue unless the patient requests
and is granted a change in the conditions of provisional discharge or unless
the patient petitions the special review board for a full discharge and the
discharge is granted by the judicial appeal panel.
Subd. 15.
Provisional discharge;
revocation. (a) The head of
the treatment facility may revoke a provisional discharge if either of the
following grounds exist:
(1) the patient has departed from the conditions of the
provisional discharge plan; or
(2) the patient is exhibiting behavior which may be dangerous
to self or others.
(b) The head of the treatment facility may revoke the
provisional discharge and, either orally or in writing, order that the patient
be immediately returned to the treatment facility. A report documenting reasons for revocation
shall be issued by the head of the treatment facility within seven days after
the patient is returned to the treatment facility. Advance notice to the patient of the
revocation is not required.
(c) The patient must be provided a copy of the revocation
report and informed, orally and in writing, of the rights of a patient under
this section. The revocation report
shall be served upon the patient, the patient's counsel, and the designated
agency. The report shall outline the
specific reasons for the revocation, including but not limited to the specific
facts upon which the revocation recommendation is based.
(d) An individual who is revoked from provisional discharge
must successfully re-petition the special review board and judicial appeal
panel prior to being placed back on provisional discharge.
Subd. 16.
Return of absent patient. If the patient is absent without
authorization, the head of the treatment facility or designee may request a
peace officer to return the patient to the treatment facility. The head of the treatment facility shall
inform the committing court of the revocation or absence, and the court shall
direct a peace officer in the county where the patient is located to return the
patient to the treatment facility or to another treatment facility. The expense of returning the patient to a
treatment facility shall be paid by the commissioner unless paid by the patient
or other persons on the patient's behalf.
Subd. 17.
Appeal. Any patient aggrieved by a revocation
decision or any interested person may petition the special review board within
seven days, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, after receipt
of the revocation report for a review of the revocation. The matter shall be scheduled within 30 days. The special review board shall review the
circumstances leading to the revocation and shall recommend to the judicial
appeal panel whether or not the revocation shall be upheld. The special review board may also recommend a
new provisional discharge at the time of the revocation hearing.
Subd. 18.
Discharge. A patient who is committed as a sexual
psychopathic personality or sexually dangerous person shall not be discharged
unless it appears to the satisfaction of the judicial appeal panel, after a
hearing and recommendation by a majority of the special review board, that the
patient is capable of making an acceptable adjustment to open society, is no
longer dangerous to the public, and is no longer in need of inpatient treatment
and supervision.
In determining whether a discharge shall be recommended, the
special review board and judicial appeal panel shall consider whether specific
conditions exist to provide a reasonable degree of protection to the public and
to assist the patient in adjusting to the community. If the desired conditions do not exist, the
discharge shall not be granted.
Subd. 19.
Aftercare services. The Minnesota sex offender program
shall provide the supervision, aftercare, and case management services for a
person under commitment as sexual psychopathic personalities and sexually
dangerous persons discharged after July 1, 1999. The designated agency shall assist with
client eligibility for public welfare benefits and will provide those services
that are currently available exclusively through county government.
Prior to the date of discharge or provisional discharge of
any patient committed as a sexual psychopathic personality or sexually
dangerous person, the head of the treatment facility or designee shall
establish a continuing plan of aftercare services for the patient, including a
plan for medical and behavioral health services, financial sustainability, housing,
social supports, or other assistance the patient needs. The Minnesota sex offender program shall
provide case management services and shall assist the patient in finding
employment, suitable shelter, and adequate medical and behavioral health services
and otherwise assist in the patient's readjustment to the community.
Sec. 27. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 253B.19, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Petition; hearing. (a) A person committed as mentally ill
and dangerous to the public under section 253B.18, or the county attorney of
the county from which the person was committed or the county of financial
responsibility, may petition the judicial appeal panel for a rehearing and
reconsideration of a decision by the commissioner under section 253B.18,
subdivision 5. The judicial appeal panel
must not consider petitions for relief other than those considered by the
commissioner from which the appeal is taken.
The petition must be filed with the Supreme Court within 30 days after
the decision of the commissioner is signed.
The hearing must be held within 45 days of the filing of the petition
unless an extension is granted for good cause.
(b) A person committed as a sexual psychopathic personality
or as a sexually dangerous person under section 253B.185, or committed as both
mentally ill and dangerous to the public under section 253B.18 and as a sexual
psychopathic personality or as a sexually dangerous person under section
253B.185; the county attorney of the county from which the person was
committed or the county of commitment, financial responsibility,
or proposed placement; or the commissioner may petition the judicial appeal
panel for a rehearing and reconsideration of a decision of the special review
board under section 253B.185, subdivision 9.
The petition must be filed with the Supreme Court within 30 days after
the decision is mailed by the commissioner as required in section 253B.185,
subdivision 9, paragraph (f). The
hearing must be held within 180 days of the filing of the petition unless an
extension is granted for good cause. If
no party petitions the judicial appeal panel for a rehearing or reconsideration
within 30 days, the judicial appeal panel shall either issue an order adopting
the recommendations of the special review board or set the matter on for a
hearing pursuant to this paragraph.
(c) For an appeal under paragraph (a) or (b), the Supreme
Court shall refer the petition to the chief judge of the judicial appeal panel. The chief judge shall notify the patient,
the county attorney of the county of commitment, the designated agency, the
commissioner, the head of the treatment facility, any interested person, and
other persons patient; the county attorneys of the counties of
commitment, financial responsibility, and proposed placement; the designated
agency; the commissioner; the head of the treatment facility; any interested
persons; and other persons the chief judge designates, of the time
and place of the hearing on the petition.
The notice shall be given at least 14 days prior to the date of the
hearing.
(d) Any person may oppose the petition. The patient, the patient's counsel, the
county attorney of the committing county or the county of financial
responsibility, and the The patient; the patient's counsel; any of the
county attorneys of the committing county, or the county of financial
responsibility and county of placement, and the commissioner shall
participate as parties to the proceeding pending before the judicial appeal
panel and, except when the patient is solely committed as mentally ill and
dangerous, shall, no later than 20 days before the hearing on the petition,
inform the judicial appeal panel and the opposing party in writing whether they
support or oppose the petition and provide a summary of facts in support of
their position. The judicial appeal
panel may appoint examiners and may adjourn the hearing from time to time. It shall hear and receive all relevant
testimony and evidence and make a record of all proceedings. The patient, the patient's counsel, and the
county attorney of the committing county or the county of financial
responsibility attorneys have the right to be present and may
present and cross-examine all witnesses and offer a factual and legal basis in
support of their positions. The
petitioning party seeking discharge or provisional discharge bears the
burden of going forward with the evidence which means presenting a prima
facie case with competent evidence to show that the person is entitled to the
requested relief. If the
petitioning party has met this burden, then the party opposing discharge
bears the burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence that the
respondent is in need of commitment discharge or provisional discharge
should be denied. A party seeking
a transfer pursuant to section 253B.18, subdivision 6, or 253B.185, subdivision
11, must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that transfer is
appropriate."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to human services; modifying
provisions relating to civilly committed sex offenders, sexually dangerous
persons, and sexual psychopathic personalities; amending provisions relating to
judicial holds in commitment cases; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections
253B.05, subdivision 1; 253B.07, subdivision 2b; 253B.10, subdivision 5;
253B.15, subdivision 1; 253B.18, subdivisions 4a, 5a; 253B.185; 253B.19,
subdivision 2; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 246B.01,
subdivisions 1a, 1b, 2a, 2d; 246B.02; 246B.03, subdivisions 2, 3; 246B.04,
subdivision 3; 246B.05, subdivision 1; 246B.06, subdivisions 1, 6, 7, 8;
246B.07, subdivisions 1, 2; 246B.08; 246B.09; 246B.10; 253B.14."
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
S. F. No. 2713,
A bill for an act relating to human services; amending provisions relating to
judicial holds in commitment cases; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section
253B.07, subdivision 2b.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 109 yeas and 22
nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Demmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Gunther
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hornstein
Hortman
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Scott
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Brod
Buesgens
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Hackbarth
Hoppe
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Mack
Peppin
Sanders
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
S. F. No. 2559,
A bill for an act relating to real estate; making a conforming change to
provide for the right of the borrower to obtain a postponement of a foreclosure
sale that has a 12-month redemption period, as is now available for a six-month
redemption period; amending Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 580.07,
subdivisions 2, 3.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 131 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
H. F. No. 3137 was reported
to the House.
Kohls and
Buesgens moved to amend H. F. No. 3137, the first engrossment,
as follows:
Page 2,
line 9, delete the second comma
Page 2,
line 10, delete "in consultation with the child's family," and
after "shall" insert ", if the child's parent or legal
guardian consents,"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Kohls and
Buesgens amendment and the roll was called.
There were 64 yeas and 66 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Bunn
Champion
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Faust
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Jackson
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Kohls
Lanning
Liebling
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Peterson
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Solberg
Swails
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dittrich
Falk
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Sterner
Thao
Tillberry
Wagenius
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
H. F. No. 3137,
A bill for an act relating to public safety; requiring chemical use screen of
juvenile offenders; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 260B.157,
subdivision 1; 260B.176, subdivision 2.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 84 yeas and 44 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
Demmer was excused for the remainder of
today's session.
S. F. No. 2562,
A bill for an act relating to child support enforcement; updating provisions on
access to certain information; authorizing certain actions by a public
authority; requiring a notice; imposing certain duties; providing for survival
of certain child support judgments; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections
256.978, subdivision 2; 518A.46, subdivision 5, by adding a subdivision;
541.04; 548.09, subdivision 1; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, section
548.092.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 130 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
S. F. No. 2517,
A bill for an act relating to judiciary; authorizing the court to furnish
copies of documents in CD Rom or DVD Rom disc to the public defender at no
charge; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 611.271.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 128 yeas and 2 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hornstein
Hortman
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Emmer
Hoppe
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
S. F. No. 2705 was reported
to the House.
Olin moved
to amend S. F. No. 2705, the first engrossment, as follows:
Page 6,
line 28, delete ", each consisting of one or more members of the
committee,"
Page 13,
line 25, delete ", each consisting of one or more members of the
committee,"
Page 24,
line 1, delete "corporation" and insert "business
entity"
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
S. F. No. 2705,
A bill for an act relating to business organizations; regulating the
organization and operation of business corporations, nonprofit corporations,
and limited liability companies; providing for consistent law relating to
registered agents and offices of business entities; repealing the prohibition
against certain business names; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections
5.16, subdivision 1; 222.18, subdivision 1; 302A.011, subdivision 18; 302A.121;
302A.123; 302A.215, subdivision 3; 302A.311; 302A.341, subdivision 2; 302A.402,
subdivisions 3, 4; 302A.429, subdivision 2; 302A.435, subdivision 1; 302A.461,
subdivision 2; 302A.661, subdivision 1; 303.05, subdivision 1; 303.10;
308A.025; 308A.131, subdivision 1; 308B.115; 317A.011, subdivision 15;
317A.111, subdivisions 1, 3, 4, by adding a subdivision; 317A.121; 317A.123;
317A.133, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 317A.181, subdivision 2, by adding a
subdivision; 317A.203; 317A.227; 317A.231, subdivisions 1, 4; 317A.237;
317A.239, subdivisions 1, 3; 317A.241, subdivision 2, by adding a subdivision;
317A.255, subdivision 1; 317A.301; 317A.311; 317A.315; 317A.321; 317A.341,
subdivision 2; 317A.521, subdivision 9; 317A.613, subdivision 2; 317A.661;
317A.721, subdivisions 1, 3; 321.0114; 321.0905; 322B.03, subdivision 29;
322B.13; 322B.135; 322B.34, subdivision 1; 322B.373, subdivision 2; 322B.676;
322B.686, subdivision 2; 322B.77, subdivision 1; 322B.935; 323A.1001;
323A.1102; 333.20, subdivision 1; 333.22, subdivisions 1, 3; Minnesota Statutes
2009 Supplement, sections 5.15; 5.34; 5.35; 303.06, subdivision 2; 321.0809;
321.0902; 321.0906; Laws 2008, chapter 233, article 3, section 8; proposing
coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 5; repealing Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 333.17.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 130 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
S. F. No. 2877 was reported
to the House.
Simon moved
to amend S. F. No. 2877, the first engrossment, as follows:
Delete
everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section
1. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section
148B.54, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 3. Relicensure
following termination. An
individual whose license was terminated prior to August 1, 2010, and who can
demonstrate completion of the graduate credit requirement in subdivision 2,
does not need to comply with the continuing education requirement of Minnesota
Rules, part 2150.2520, subpart 4, or with the continuing education requirements
for relicensure following termination in Minnesota Rules, part 2150.0130,
subpart 2. This section does not apply
to an individual whose license has been canceled."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
S. F. No. 2877,
A bill for an act relating to health-related occupations; providing an
exception for continuing education requirements for licensed professional
counselors; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 148B.54, by adding a
subdivision.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 128 yeas and 2 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Buesgens
Peppin
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
H. F. No. 2899 was reported
to the House.
Holberg,
Pelowski and Paymar moved to amend H. F. No. 2899, the third
engrossment, as follows:
Page 3, line
9, delete everything after the period
Page 3,
delete line 10
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Sanders moved
to amend H. F. No. 2899, the third engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 6,
after line 28, insert:
"Sec. 4. REPORT
TO LEGISLATURE.
No later
than January 15, 2012, the chief administrative law judge must report to the
chairs and ranking minority members of the house of representatives and senate
committees with jurisdiction over data practices issues on the statistics
related to use of the Office of Administrative Hearings for data practices
complaints, including the number and type of complaints filed, the government
entities subject to complaints, the manner in which the complaints were
resolved, and the actual costs incurred by the Office of Administrative
Hearings in receiving complaints and conducting hearings as required by this
act. The report may also include
recommendations to address any issues arising related to implementation of this
act by the office, if necessary."
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Mahoney was excused for the remainder of today's session.
Buesgens moved
to amend H. F. No. 2899, the third engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 6, line
12, delete "less $50,"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Buesgens
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 49 yeas and 81 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Falk
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Juhnke
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lesch
Loon
Mack
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Obermueller
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Sterner
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Gunther
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Mack moved
to amend H. F. No. 2899, the third engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 3,
after line 19, insert:
"The
office may waive the payment of the filing fee, if the individual seeking a
waiver of the fee files with the office an affidavit stating that the
individual is financially unable to pay the fee because the individual's annual income
does not exceed 125 percent of the poverty line established under United States
Code, title 42, section 9902(2)."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Mack amendment and the roll was
called. There were 61 yeas and 69 nays
as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Falk
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Jackson
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Liebling
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Murphy, M.
Nornes
Olin
Paymar
Peppin
Rukavina
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Sterner
Thao
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Eken
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Lillie
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Otremba
Pelowski
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
H. F. No. 2899,
A bill for an act relating to data practices; providing an administrative
remedy for certain data practices law violations; providing civil penalties;
appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 13.072,
subdivision 2; 13.08, subdivision 4; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota
Statutes, chapter 13.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 130 yeas and 0
nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
S. F. No. 2322,
A bill for an act relating to commerce; regulating business screening services;
providing for the correction and deletion of certain criminal records; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 332.70, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 130 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
S. F. No. 863 was reported
to the House.
Mullery moved
to amend S. F. No. 863, the unofficial engrossment, as follows:
Page 7, line
5, after the comma, insert "State Services for the Blind,"
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
S. F. No. 863,
A bill for an act relating to data practices; classifying government data;
modifying provisions governing temporary classifications and personnel data;
amending business screening services provisions; amending Minnesota Statutes
2008, sections 13.05, subdivision 4, by adding a subdivision; 13.06,
subdivisions 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, by adding subdivisions; 13.43, subdivisions 1, 2,
by adding subdivisions; 13.64; 13.643, by adding a subdivision; 13.7931, by
adding a subdivision; 13.87, by adding a subdivision; 13.871, by adding a
subdivision; 13D.05, subdivision 3; 16B.97, by adding a subdivision; 125A.21,
subdivision 5; 270B.14, subdivision 16; 299C.156, subdivision 5; 332.70,
subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes,
chapters 13; 84; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 13.06, subdivision
2; Minnesota Rules, part 1205.1800.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 104 yeas and 26 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hortman
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Buesgens
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Hackbarth
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Peppin
Rukavina
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Zellers
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
S. F. No. 2866 was reported
to the House.
Holberg moved
to amend S. F. No. 2866, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 3, line
17, before "Trauma" insert "(a)"
Page 3,
after line 25, insert:
"(b)
Notwithstanding paragraph (a) or any other law to the contrary, the
commissioner and the trauma hospital are prohibited from collecting data on
individuals regarding lawful firearm ownership in the state or data related to
an individual's right to carry a weapon under section 624.714."
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Holberg
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 92 yeas and 38 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Bigham
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Haws
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Jackson
Juhnke
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Lieder
Lillie
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Murdock
Murphy, M.
Nornes
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rukavina
Sailer
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Benson
Bly
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Greiling
Hausman
Hayden
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Knuth
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Loeffler
Mariani
Masin
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Rosenthal
Ruud
Scalze
Slawik
Slocum
Thao
Thissen
Wagenius
Spk. Kelliher
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
S. F. No. 2866,
A bill for an act relating to health; modifying provisions for the statewide
trauma system; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 13.3806, subdivision
13; 144.603; 144.605, subdivisions 2, 3, by adding a subdivision; 144.608,
subdivision 1; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 144;
repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 144.607.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 101 yeas and 30 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, P.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Brod
Buesgens
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Greiling
Hausman
Hornstein
Hortman
Johnson
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Liebling
Mariani
Murphy, E.
Newton
Paymar
Peppin
Severson
Shimanski
Slocum
Torkelson
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
S. F. No. 2808 was reported
to the House.
Atkins moved to amend
S. F. No. 2808, the second engrossment, as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting
clause and insert the following language of H. F. No. 3186, the
first engrossment:
"Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 37.21, is amended to read:
37.21 SALE OF LIQUORS.
Subdivision 1. Liquor prohibited. Except as provided under Laws 2003,
chapter 126, section 29, as amended by Laws 2005, chapter 25, section 6
in subdivision 2, no person may sell, barter, give away, or otherwise
dispose of or introduce, have, or keep for barter, gift, or sale, any
intoxicating liquors of any kind upon the State Fairgrounds,
or aid and abet any of those acts. The presence and possession of any kind of
these liquors, in any quantity, upon the person or upon the premises leased or
occupied by any person within these limits is a public nuisance and is prima
facie evidence of the purpose of the person to barter, give away, or sell the
liquor. Any person who violates this
section is guilty of a misdemeanor.
Subd. 2. Exceptions.
Notwithstanding subdivision 1, The following exceptions
apply:
(a) The State Agricultural Society may authorize
issue, under terms and conditions it chooses, licenses for the sale,
possession, and consumption of intoxicating liquors at special events taking
place on the fairgrounds at times other than during the annual fair including,
but not limited to, family reunions, class reunions, weddings, conventions, and
similar events. This section does not
authorize the society to issue retail licenses for the sale of alcoholic
beverages. Notwithstanding subdivision
1,
(b) The State Agricultural Society may also authorize
issue, under terms and conditions it chooses, consistent with state law, licenses
for the sale, possession, and consumption of intoxicating malt liquors
during the annual fair or at other times of their choosing, provided that at
least one Minnesota brewed malt liquor is made available for sale at each
allowed location within the grounds.
(c) The State Agricultural Society may issue a license for
the sale and consumption of wine to a holder of a state fair concession's
contract with the State Agricultural Society which authorizes the licensee to
sell Minnesota-produced wine by the glass at the state fair in connection with
the sale of food by the concessionaire. For
the purposes of this subdivision, "Minnesota-produced wine" means
wine produced by a farm winery licensed under section 340A.315 and made from at
least 75 percent Minnesota-grown grapes, grape juice, other fruit bases, other
juices, or honey.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 2. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 340A.404, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Special provision; city of Minneapolis. (a) The city of Minneapolis may issue an
on-sale intoxicating liquor license to the Guthrie Theater, the Cricket
Theatre, the Orpheum Theatre, the State Theatre, and the Historic Pantages
Theatre, notwithstanding the limitations of law, or local ordinance, or charter
provision relating to zoning or school or church distances. The licenses authorize sales on all days of
the week to holders of tickets for performances presented by the theaters and
to members of the nonprofit corporations holding the licenses and to their
guests.
(b) The city of Minneapolis may issue an intoxicating liquor
license to 510 Groveland Associates, a Minnesota cooperative, for use by a
restaurant on the premises owned by 510 Groveland Associates, notwithstanding
limitations of law, or local ordinance, or charter provision.
(c) The city of Minneapolis may issue an on-sale intoxicating
liquor license to Zuhrah Shrine Temple for use on the premises owned by Zuhrah
Shrine Temple at 2540 Park Avenue South in Minneapolis, and to the American
Swedish Institute for use on the premises owned by the American Swedish
Institute at 2600 Park Avenue South, notwithstanding limitations of law, or
local ordinances, or charter provision relating to zoning or school or church
distances.
(d) The city of Minneapolis may issue an on-sale intoxicating
liquor license to the American Association of University Women, Minneapolis
branch, for use on the premises owned by the American Association of University
Women, Minneapolis branch, at 2115 Stevens Avenue South in Minneapolis,
notwithstanding limitations of law, or local ordinances, or charter provisions
relating to zoning or school or church distances.
(e) The city of Minneapolis may issue an on-sale wine license
and an on-sale 3.2 percent malt liquor license to a restaurant located at 5000
Penn Avenue South, and an on-sale wine license and an on-sale malt liquor
license to a restaurant located at 1931 Nicollet Avenue South, notwithstanding
any law or local ordinance or charter provision.
(f) The city of Minneapolis may issue an on-sale wine license
and an on-sale malt liquor license to the Brave New Workshop Theatre located at
3001 Hennepin Avenue South, the Theatre de la Jeune Lune, the Illusion Theatre
located at 528 Hennepin Avenue South, the Hollywood Theatre located at 2815
Johnson Street Northeast, the Loring Playhouse located at 1633 Hennepin Avenue
South, the Jungle Theater located at 2951 Lyndale Avenue South, Brave New
Institute located at 2605 Hennepin Avenue South, the Guthrie Lab located at 700
North First Street, and the Southern Theatre located at 1420 Washington Avenue
South, notwithstanding any law or local ordinance or charter provision. The license authorizes sales on all days of
the week.
(g) The city of Minneapolis may issue an on-sale intoxicating
liquor license to University Gateway Corporation, a Minnesota nonprofit
corporation, for use by a restaurant or catering operator at the building owned
and operated by the University Gateway Corporation on the University of
Minnesota campus, notwithstanding limitations of law, or local ordinance or
charter provision. The license
authorizes sales on all days of the week.
(h) The city of Minneapolis may issue an on-sale intoxicating
liquor license to the Walker Art Center's concessionaire or operator, for a
restaurant and catering operator on the premises of the Walker Art Center,
notwithstanding limitations of law, or local ordinance or charter provisions. The license authorizes sales on all days of
the week.
(i) The city of Minneapolis may issue an on-sale intoxicating
liquor license to the Guthrie Theater's concessionaire or operator for a
restaurant and catering operator on the premises of the Guthrie Theater,
notwithstanding limitations of law, local ordinance, or charter provisions. The license authorizes sales on all days of
the week.
(j) The city of Minneapolis may issue an on-sale wine license
and an on-sale malt liquor license to the Minnesota Book and Literary Arts
Building, Inc.'s concessionaire or operator for a restaurant and catering
operator on the premises of the Minnesota Book and Literary Arts Building, Inc.
(dba Open Book), notwithstanding limitations of law, or local ordinance or
charter provision. The license
authorizes sales on all days of the week.
(k) The city of Minneapolis may issue an on-sale intoxicating
liquor license to a restaurant located at 5411 Penn Avenue South,
notwithstanding any law or local ordinance or charter provision.
(l) The city of Minneapolis may issue an on-sale intoxicating
liquor license to the Museum of Russian Art's concessionaire or operator for a
restaurant and catering operator on the premises of the Museum of Russian Art
located at 5500 Stevens Avenue South, notwithstanding any law or local
ordinance or charter provision.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective upon
approval by the Minneapolis City Council in the manner provided by Minnesota
Statutes, section 645.021, subdivisions 2 and 3.
Sec. 3. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 340A.404, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Wine licenses. (a) A municipality may issue an on-sale
wine license with the approval of the commissioner to a restaurant having
facilities for seating at least 25 guests at one time. A wine license permits the sale of wine of up
to 14 percent alcohol by volume for consumption with the sale of food. A wine license authorizes the sale of wine on
all days of the week unless the issuing authority restricts the license's
authorization to the sale of wine on all days except Sundays.
(b) The governing body of a municipality may by ordinance
authorize a holder of an on-sale wine license issued pursuant to paragraph (a)
who is also licensed to sell 3.2 percent malt liquors at on-sale pursuant to
section 340A.411, and whose gross receipts are at least 60 percent attributable
to the sale of food, to sell intoxicating malt liquors at on-sale without an
additional license.
(c) A municipality may issue an on-sale wine license with the
approval of the commissioner to a licensed bed and breakfast facility. A license under this paragraph authorizes a
bed and breakfast facility to furnish wine only to registered guests of the
facility and, if the facility contains a licensed commercial kitchen, also to
guests attending private events at the facility.
(d) The State Agricultural Society may issue an on-sale wine
license to the holder of a state fair concession contract pursuant to section
37.21, subdivision 2.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 4. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 340A.409, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Insurance required. No retail license may be issued,
maintained or renewed unless the applicant demonstrates proof of financial
responsibility with regard to liability imposed by section 340A.801. The issuing authority must submit to the
commissioner the applicant's proof of financial responsibility. This subdivision does not prohibit a local
unit of government from requiring higher insurance or bond coverages, or a
larger deposit of cash or securities. The
minimum requirement for proof of financial responsibility may be given by
filing:
(1) a certificate that there is in effect for the license
period an insurance policy issued by an insurer required to be licensed under
section 60A.07, subdivision 4, or by an insurer recognized as an eligible
surplus lines carrier pursuant to section 60A.206 or pool providing at least
$50,000 of coverage because of bodily injury to any one person in any one
occurrence, $100,000 because of bodily injury to two or more persons in any one
occurrence, $10,000 because of injury to or destruction of property of others
in any one occurrence, $50,000 for loss of means of support of any one person
in any one occurrence, and $100,000 for loss of means of support of two
or more persons in any one occurrence, $50,000 for other pecuniary loss of
any one person in any one occurrence, and $100,000 for other pecuniary loss of
two or more persons in any one occurrence;
(2) a bond of a surety company with minimum coverages as
provided in clause (1); or
(3) a certificate of the commissioner of management and
budget that the licensee has deposited with the commissioner of management and
budget $100,000 in cash or securities which may legally be purchased by savings
banks or for trust funds having a market value of $100,000.
This subdivision does not prohibit an insurer from providing
the coverage required by this subdivision in combination with other insurance
coverage.
An annual aggregate policy limit for dram shop insurance of
not less than $300,000 per policy year may be included in the policy
provisions.
A liability insurance policy required by this section must
provide that it may not be canceled for:
(1) any cause, except for nonpayment of premium, by either
the insured or the insurer unless the canceling party has first given 30 days'
notice in writing to the issuing authority of intent to cancel the policy; and
(2) nonpayment of premium unless the canceling party has
first given ten days' notice in writing to the issuing authority of intent to
cancel the policy.
All insurance policies which provide coverage with regard to
any liability imposed by section 340A.801 must contain at least the minimum
coverage required by this section.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 5. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 340A.409, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Insurance not required. Subdivision 1 does not apply to licensees
who by affidavit establish that:
(1) they are on-sale 3.2 percent malt liquor licensees with
sales of less than $25,000 of 3.2 percent malt liquor for the preceding year;
(2) they are off-sale 3.2 percent malt liquor licensees with
sales of less than $50,000 of 3.2 percent malt liquor for the preceding year;
(3) they are holders of on-sale wine licenses with sales of
less than $25,000 for wine for the preceding year; or
(4) they are holders of temporary wine licenses issued under
law; or
(5) they are wholesalers who donate wine to an organization
for a wine tasting conducted under section 340A.418 or 340A.419.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 6. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 340A.419, as amended by Laws 2009, chapter 120, section
12, is amended to read:
340A.419 WINE
TASTINGS CONDUCTED BY EXCLUSIVE LIQUOR STORE.
Subdivision 1. Definition.
For purposes of this section, a "wine tasting" is
an event of not more than four hours' duration at which persons pay a fee to
participate and are allowed to consume wine, malt liquor, or spirits by
the glass without paying a separate charge for each glass.
Subd. 2. Tastings.
(a) Notwithstanding any other law, an exclusive liquor store may
conduct a wine, malt liquor, or spirits tasting on the premises of a
holder of an on-sale intoxicating liquor license that is not a temporary
license or on the premises of a holder of a wine license under section
340A.404, subdivision 5, if the exclusive liquor store complies with this
section.
(b) No wine at a wine tasting, malt liquor, or
spirits authorized for use under this section may be sold for off-premises
consumption. A participant in the
tasting may fill out a form indicating preferences for wine, malt liquor, or
spirits. The form may be held on the
premises of the exclusive liquor store to assist the participant in making an
off-sale purchase at a later date.
(c) Notwithstanding any other law, an exclusive liquor store
may purchase or otherwise obtain wine or spirits for a wine
tasting conducted under this section from a wholesaler licensed to sell wine
or spirits. The wholesaler may sell
or give wine or spirits to an exclusive liquor store for a wine
tasting conducted under this section and may provide personnel to assist in the
wine tasting.
(d) An exclusive liquor store that conducts a wine tasting
under this section must use any fees collected from participants in the tasting
only to defray the cost of conducting the tasting.
(e) Notwithstanding section 340A.409, subdivision 4, the
premises on which a wine tasting is conducted must be insured as required by
section 340A.409, subdivision 1.
Subd. 3.
Malt liquor tastings. An exclusive liquor store conducting a
malt liquor tasting under this section must also comply with the requirements
of section 340A.510, subdivision 2.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 7. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 461.12, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Authorization. A town board or the governing body of a
home rule charter or statutory city may license and regulate the retail sale of
tobacco as defined in section 609.685, subdivision 1, and establish a license
fee for sales to recover the estimated cost of enforcing this chapter. The county board shall license and regulate
the sale of tobacco in unorganized territory of the county except on the
State Fairgrounds and in a town or a home rule charter or statutory city if
the town or city does not license and regulate retail tobacco sales. The State Agricultural Society shall
license and regulate the sale of tobacco on the State Fairgrounds. Retail establishments licensed by a town
or city to sell tobacco are not required to obtain a second license for the
same location under the licensing ordinance of the county.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 8. Laws
2009, chapter 120, section 16, is amended to read:
Sec. 16. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS; LIQUOR LICENSE.
Notwithstanding any law, ordinance, or charter provision to
the contrary, the city of Minneapolis may issue an on-sale intoxicating
liquor license to an establishment located at 2124 Como Avenue Southeast.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective on the
effective date of Laws 2009, chapter 120, section 16.
Sec. 9. UNIVERSITY OF ST. THOMAS; ON-SALE
LICENSE.
Notwithstanding any other law, local ordinance, or charter
provision, the city of St. Paul and the city of Minneapolis may issue
on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses to University of St. Thomas, or to an
entity holding a caterer's permit and a contract with University of St. Thomas,
for catering on the premises of the University of St. Thomas campus or
campuses, or for any portion of the premises as described in the approved license
application. The licenses authorized by
this section may be issued for space that is not compact and contiguous,
provided that all the space is within the boundaries of the University of St. Thomas
campus or campuses and is included in the description of the licensed premises
on the approved license application. The
licenses authorize sales on all days of the week to persons attending events at
the college. All other provisions of
Minnesota Statutes, chapter 340A, not inconsistent with this section, apply to
the licenses authorized under this section.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective upon
approval by the appropriate city councils, in the manner provided by Minnesota
Statutes, section 645.021, subdivisions 2 and 3.
Sec. 10. BEMIDJI REGIONAL CENTER; ON-SALE LICENSE.
Notwithstanding any other law, local ordinance, or charter
provision to the contrary, the city of Bemidji may issue an on-sale
intoxicating liquor license, or an on-sale wine and malt liquor license to the
Bemidji Regional Event Center. Any
license authorized by this section may be issued for space that is not compact
and contiguous, provided that all the space is within the boundaries of the
Bemidji Regional Event Center and is included in the description of
the licensed premises on the approved license application. A license issued under this paragraph
authorizes sales on all days of the week to persons attending activities or
events at the event center. All other
provisions of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 340A, not inconsistent with this
section, apply to the license authorized under this section.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 11. EXEMPTION; BEMIDJI STATE UNIVERSITY.
Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes 340A.410, subdivision 10,
paragraph (b), Bemidji State University may be issued temporary liquor licenses
for events at the university authorized under Minnesota Statutes, section
340A.412, subdivision 4, paragraph (a), clause (7), item (iv), on an as needed
basis, provided that the combination of temporary licenses issued not exceed 12
events or a total of 12 days within a 12-month period.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to
liquor; authorizing and clarifying terms of various licenses; modifying certain
insurance requirements; authorizing State Agricultural Society to license and
regulate tobacco sales on State Fairgrounds; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008,
sections 37.21; 340A.404, subdivisions 2, 5; 340A.409, subdivisions 1, 4;
340A.419, as amended; 461.12, subdivision 1; Laws 2009, chapter 120, section
16."
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Atkins moved
to amend S. F. No. 2808, the second engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 7,
line 6, strike "wine"
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Murphy, E.,
moved to amend S. F. No. 2808, the second engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 7,
delete section 9
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Kahn and
Atkins moved to amend S. F. No. 2808, the second engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 7,
after line 30, insert:
"Sec. 9. MINNEAPOLIS
CAMPUS OF ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY; ON-SALE LICENSE.
Notwithstanding
any other law, local ordinance, or charter provision, the city of Minneapolis
may issue an on-sale intoxicating liquor license to St. Thomas University,
for catering on the premises of the Minneapolis campus of St. Thomas
University, or for any portion of the premises as described in the approved
license application. A
license
authorized by this section may be issued for space that is not compact and
contiguous, provided that all the space is within the boundaries of the
Minneapolis campus of St. Thomas University and is included in the
description of the licensed premises on the approved license application. The license authorizes sales on all days of
the week to persons attending events at the college, subject to the hours and
days of sale restrictions in Minnesota Statutes, 340A.504, and any reasonable
license conditions or restrictions imposed by the licensing authority. All other provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 340A, not inconsistent with this section, apply to the license
authorized under this section.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective upon approval by the Minneapolis City Council in the
manner provided by Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdivisions 2 and 3."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Kahn,
Liebling, Rukavina, Drazkowski, McNamara, Anzelc, Kelly and Reinert moved to
amend S. F. No. 2808, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 7,
after line 11, insert:
"Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 340A.504,
subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Intoxicating
liquor; off-sale. No sale of
intoxicating liquor may be made by an off-sale licensee:
(1) on
Sundays;
(2) before
8:00 a.m. or after 10:00 p.m. on Monday through Saturday Sunday;
(3) (2)
on Thanksgiving Day;
(4) (3)
on Christmas Day, December 25; or
(5) (4)
after 8:00 p.m. on Christmas Eve, December 24.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective the day following final enactment."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The Speaker resumed the Chair.
Hansen was excused for the remainder of today's session.
The question was taken on the Kahn et al amendment and the roll
was called. There were 20 yeas and 110
nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Buesgens
Drazkowski
Falk
Greiling
Hausman
Hilstrom
Kahn
Kelly
Kohls
Lesch
Liebling
Loon
McNamara
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Reinert
Scalze
Thao
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Hayden
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kalin
Kath
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mack
Magnus
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Kahn, Liebling, Rukavina,
Drazkowski, McNamara and Anzelc moved to amend S. F. No. 2808,
the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 7, after line 11,
insert:
"Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 340A.504,
subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Intoxicating
liquor; off-sale. No sale of
intoxicating liquor may be made by an off-sale licensee:
(1) on Sundays, except
that sales are allowed on Sundays beginning the first Sunday before
Thanksgiving day, and ending after the first Sunday after New Year's Day;
(2) before 8:00 a.m. or
after 10:00 p.m. on Monday through Saturday;
(3) on Thanksgiving Day;
(4) on
Christmas Day, December 25; or
(5) after
8:00 p.m. on Christmas Eve, December 24.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective the day following final enactment."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
The Speaker called Thissen to the Chair.
Juhnke moved
to amend S. F. No. 2808, the second engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 2,
line 13, delete everything after "340A.315"
Page 2,
line 14, delete everything before the period
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Anderson, P., and Buesgens offered an
amendment to S. F. No. 2808, the second engrossment, as amended.
POINT OF ORDER
Atkins raised a point of order pursuant to
rule 3.21 that the Anderson, P., and Buesgens amendment was not in order. Speaker pro tempore Thissen ruled the point
of order well taken and the Anderson, P., and Buesgens amendment out of order.
Davnie was excused for the remainder of
today's session.
Buesgens moved
to amend S. F. No. 2808, the second engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 9,
after line 1, insert:
"Sec. 12. MUNICIPAL
LIQUOR STORES; TRANSITION.
Municipal
liquor stores licensed under Minnesota Statutes 340A.601 shall cease business
as of January 1, 2011. Municipalities
closing municipal liquor stores in accordance with this section may choose
whether to license privately owned liquor stores by ordnance."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Buesgens
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 19 yeas and 109 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Beard
Buesgens
Dean
Dettmer
Downey
Drazkowski
Gottwalt
Hoppe
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lenczewski
McNamara
Newton
Scalze
Seifert
Severson
Thao
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scott
Sertich
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
S. F. No. 2808,
A bill for an act relating to liquor; clarifying a license provision for the
city of Minneapolis; allowing the State Fair to issue liquor licenses;
authorizing various on-sale licenses; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008,
sections 37.21; 340A.404, subdivisions 2, 5; 340A.419, as amended; Laws 2009,
chapter 120, section 16.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 114 yeas and 13 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Magnus
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Sertich
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Brod
Dean
Dettmer
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Holberg
Kiffmeyer
Peppin
Seifert
Severson
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
Sertich moved that the remaining bills on
the Calendar for the Day be continued.
The motion prevailed.
REPORT FROM
THE COMMITTEE ON RULES AND
LEGISLATIVE
ADMINISTRATION
Sertich from the Committee on Rules and
Legislative Administration, pursuant to rule 1.21, designated the following
bills to be placed on the Calendar for the Day for Monday, April 12, 2010:
H. F. No. 162; and
S. F. Nos. 2152, 2363, 2519, 2717, 2825, 2923, 2475 and 2580.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
BY THE SPEAKER
The Speaker announced the appointment of
the following members of the House to a Conference Committee on
H. F. No. 2231:
Nelson, Kalin and Gunther.
The Speaker announced the appointment of the following members
of the House to a Conference Committee on H. F. No. 3327:
Koenen, Juhnke and Davids.
MOTIONS AND RESOLUTIONS
Lenczewski moved that the name of Dittrich be added as an
author on H. F. No. 2695.
The motion prevailed.
Norton moved that the name of Brynaert be added as an author on
H. F. No. 2849. The
motion prevailed.
Hansen moved that the names of Slocum, Fritz, Bly, Atkins,
Mahoney and Lillie be added as authors on H. F. No. 3759. The motion prevailed.
Brod moved that the names of Westrom, Ward and Sterner be added
as authors on H. F. No. 3766.
The motion prevailed.
Clark moved that S. F. No. 1537, now on the
General Register, be re-referred to the Committee on Finance. The motion prevailed.
ADJOURNMENT
Sertich moved that when the House adjourns today it adjourn
until 11:00 a.m., Monday, April 12, 2010.
The motion prevailed.
Sertich moved that the House adjourn. The motion prevailed, and Speaker pro tempore
Thissen declared the House stands adjourned until 11:00 a.m., Monday, April 12,
2010.
Albin
A. Mathiowetz,
Chief Clerk, House of Representatives