STATE OF MINNESOTA
EIGHTY-SIXTH SESSION - 2009
_____________________
FORTY-EIGHTH DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Wednesday, May 6, 2009
The House of Representatives convened at
9:30 a.m. and was called to order by Alice Hausman, Speaker pro tempore.
Prayer was offered by the Reverend Gary
Dreier, Christ Lutheran Church on Capitol Hill, St. Paul, Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge
of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
The roll was called and the following
members were present:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
A quorum was present.
Magnus was excused.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the
Journal of the preceding day. Ward moved
that further reading of the Journal be dispensed with and that the Journal be
approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk.
The motion prevailed.
REPORTS OF
STANDING COMMITTEES AND DIVISIONS
Lenczewski
from the Committee on Taxes to which was referred:
H. F. No.
17, A bill for an act relating to local government; authorizing the Central
Iron Range Sanitary Sewer District.
Reported
the same back with the recommendation that the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was referred:
H. F. No. 108, A bill for an act relating to traffic regulations; making
seat belt violation a primary offense in all seating positions regardless of
age; making technical changes; providing for surcharge; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2008, sections 169.686, subdivisions 1, 2, by adding a subdivision;
171.05, subdivision 2b; 171.055, subdivision 2; 357.021, subdivisions 6, 7.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 1, line 25, delete the new language
Page 2, line 1, delete the new language
Pages 5 to 6, delete sections 6 to 7
Amend the title as follows:
Page 1, line 3, delete "providing for"
Page 1, line 4, delete "surcharge;"
Correct the title numbers accordingly
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass and be
re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was referred:
H. F. No. 905, A bill for an act relating to the military; providing for
acceptance of certain services by adjutant general; proposing coding for new
law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 190.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was referred:
H. F. No. 1193, A bill for an act relating to claims against the state;
providing for settlement of various claims; appropriating money.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.
The amounts in this section are appropriated from the general
fund to the commissioner of corrections in fiscal year 2010 for full and final
payment under Minnesota Statutes, sections 3.738 and 3.739, of claims against
the state for injuries suffered by and medical services provided to persons
injured while performing community service or sentence-to-service work for
correctional purposes or while incarcerated in a state correctional
facility. This appropriation is available
until June 30, 2010.
(a) For sentence-to-service and community work service claims
under $500 and other claims already paid by the Department of Corrections,
$5,000.48.
(b) For payment to Jorge Arias for permanent injuries
suffered while performing sentence-to-service work in Hennepin County, $2,625,
and for payment to medical providers for treatment of Mr. Arias' injuries,
$6,108.52.
(c) For payment to Roy Biwer for permanent injuries suffered
while performing sentence-to-service work in Hennepin County, $1,875, and for
reimbursement of medical expenses he already paid, $325.75; for payment to
medical providers for treatment of Mr. Biwer's injuries, $408.87.
(d) For payment to Shane T. Bramer for permanent injuries
suffered while performing assigned duties at MCF‑Stillwater, $7,500.
(e) For payment to medical providers for treatment of Richard
Christiansen, who suffered medical problems while performing
sentence-to-service work in Rice County, $1,201.50.
(f) For payment to Harlan Gale for permanent injuries
suffered while performing assigned duties at MCF‑Stillwater, $750.
(g) For payment to Elijah Gosling for permanent injuries
suffered while performing assigned duties at MCF‑Faribault, $2,700.
(h) For payment to Jeffrey J. Hookham for permanent injuries
suffered while performing assigned duties at MCF-Faribault, $1,875.
(i) For payment to Abdihakim Mohamed for permanent injuries
suffered while performing assigned duties at MCF-Faribault, $1,875.
(j) For payment to Cameron B. Nygard for permanent injuries
suffered while performing assigned duties at MCF-Faribault, $4,837.50.
(k) For payment to Curtis Rainey for permanent injuries
suffered while performing assigned duties at MCF‑Stillwater, $3,750.
(l) For payment to Ronnie H. Schultz for permanent
injuries suffered while performing assigned duties at MCF‑Stillwater,
$1,500.
(m) For payment to medical providers for treatment of James
Joseph Serich, who suffered injuries while performing community work service in
Itasca County, $2,844.86.
(n) For payment to medical providers for treatment of Thomas
Spires, who suffered medical problems while performing sentence-to-service work
in Dakota County, $752.27.
(o) For payment to medical providers for treatment of Thomas
P. Streeter, who suffered medical problems while performing sentence-to-service
work in Wright County, $1,012.84.
(p) For payment to Thomas William Tolve for permanent injuries
suffered while performing assigned duties at MCF-Faribault, $4,050.
(q) For payment to medical providers for treatment of Kerri
Wirtz, who suffered injuries while performing sentence-to-service work in Todd
County, $1,559.64.
Sec. 2. DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.
The Department of Employment and Economic Development is
authorized to pay Nancy J. Teklenburg of Solway, Minnesota, $13,517 for
economic loss caused by a departmental error.
This payment must be made from existing departmental funds pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, section 268.196.
EFFECTIVE DATE.
This section is effective retroactively from July 16, 2008.
Sec. 3. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.
$1,412 is appropriated from the general fund to the
commissioner of revenue in fiscal year 2010 for full and final payment of the
claim of Mary K. Egge of Forest Lake, Minnesota, for her 2005 property tax
refund."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass and be
re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was referred:
H. F. No. 1218, A bill for an act relating to state government; ratifying
state labor contracts.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill pass and be
re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was referred:
H. F. No. 1565, A bill for an act relating to health; consolidating and
relocating nursing facility beds to a new site in Goodhue County; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 144A.071, subdivision 4c.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 144A.071, subdivision 4c, is amended to read:
Subd. 4c Exceptions for replacement beds after June 30, 2003. (a) The commissioner of health, in coordination
with the commissioner of human services, may approve the renovation,
replacement, upgrading, or relocation of a nursing home or boarding care home,
under the following conditions:
(1) to license and certify an 80-bed city-owned facility in Nicollet County
to be constructed on the site of a new city-owned hospital to replace an
existing 85-bed facility attached to a hospital that is also being
replaced. The threshold allowed for this
project under section 144A.073 shall be the maximum amount available to pay the
additional medical assistance costs of the new facility;
(2) to license and certify 29 beds to be added to an existing 69-bed
facility in St. Louis County, provided that the 29 beds must be transferred
from active or layaway status at an existing facility in St. Louis County that
had 235 beds on April 1, 2003.
The
licensed capacity at the 235-bed facility must be reduced to 206 beds, but the
payment rate at that facility shall not be adjusted as a result of this
transfer. The operating payment rate of
the facility adding beds after completion of this project shall be the same as
it was on the day prior to the day the beds are licensed and certified. This project shall not proceed unless it is
approved and financed under the provisions of section 144A.073;
(3) to license and certify a new 60-bed facility in Austin, provided
that: (i) 45 of the new beds are transferred from a 45-bed facility in Austin
under common ownership that is closed and 15 of the new beds are transferred
from a 182-bed facility in Albert Lea under common ownership; (ii) the
commissioner of human services is authorized by the 2004 legislature to
negotiate budget-neutral planned nursing facility closures; and (iii) money is
available from planned closures of facilities under common ownership to make
implementation of this clause budget-neutral to the state. The bed capacity of the Albert Lea facility
shall be reduced to 167 beds following the transfer. Of the 60 beds at the new facility, 20 beds
shall be used for a special care unit for persons with Alzheimer's disease or
related dementias;
(4) to license and certify up to 80 beds transferred from an existing
state-owned nursing facility in Cass County to a new facility located on the
grounds of the Ah-Gwah-Ching campus. The
operating cost payment rates for the new facility shall be determined based on
the interim and settle-up payment provisions of Minnesota Rules, part
9549.0057, and the reimbursement provisions of section 256B.431. The property payment rate for the first three
years of operation shall be $35 per day.
For subsequent years, the property payment rate of $35 per day shall be
adjusted for inflation as provided in section 256B.434, subdivision 4,
paragraph (c), as long as the facility has a contract under section 256B.434; and
(5) to initiate a pilot program to license and certify up to 80 beds
transferred from an existing county-owned nursing facility in Steele County
relocated to the site of a new acute care facility as part of the county's
Communities for a Lifetime comprehensive plan to create innovative responses to
the aging of its population. Upon
relocation to the new site, the nursing facility shall delicense 28 beds. The property payment rate for the first three
years of operation of the new facility shall be increased by an amount as
calculated according to items (i) to (v):
(i) compute the estimated decrease in medical assistance residents served
by the nursing facility by multiplying the decrease in licensed beds by the
historical percentage of medical assistance resident days;
(ii) compute the annual savings to the medical assistance program from
the delicensure of 28 beds by multiplying the anticipated decrease in medical
assistance residents, determined in item (i), by the existing facility's
weighted average payment rate multiplied by 365;
(iii) compute the anticipated annual costs for community-based services
by multiplying the anticipated decrease in medical assistance residents served
by the nursing facility, determined in item (i), by the average monthly elderly
waiver service costs for individuals in Steele County multiplied by 12;
(iv) subtract the amount in item (iii) from the amount in item (ii);
(v) divide the amount in item (iv) by an amount equal to the relocated
nursing facility's occupancy factor under section 256B.431, subdivision 3f,
paragraph (c), multiplied by the historical percentage of medical assistance
resident days. For subsequent years,
the adjusted property payment rate shall be adjusted for inflation as provided
in section 256B.434, subdivision 4, paragraph (c), as long as the facility has
a contract under section 256B.434; and
(6) to consolidate and relocate nursing facility beds to a
new site in Goodhue County and to integrate these services with other
community-based programs and services under a communities for a lifetime pilot
program and comprehensive plan to create innovative responses to the aging of
its population. Eighty beds in the city
of Red Wing shall be transferred from the downsizing and relocation of an
existing 84-bed, hospital-owned nursing facility and the entire closure or
downsizing of beds from a 65-bed nonprofit nursing facility in the community
resulting in the delicensure of 69 beds in the two existing facilities. Notwithstanding the carryforward of the
approval authority in section 144A.073, subdivision 11, the funding approved in
April 2009 by the commissioner of health for a project in Goodhue County shall
not carry forward. The closure of the 69
beds shall not be eligible for a planned closure rate adjustment under section
256B.437. The construction project
permitted in this item shall not be eligible for a threshold project rate
adjustment under section 256B.434, subdivision 4f. The property payment rate for the first three
years of operation of the new facility shall be increased by an amount as
calculated according to items (i) to (vi):
(i) compute the estimated decrease in medical assistance
residents served by both nursing facilities by multiplying the difference
between the occupied beds of the two nursing facilities for the reporting year
ended September 30, 2009, and the projected occupancy of the facility at 95
percent occupancy by the historical percentage of medical assistance resident
days;
(ii) compute the annual savings to the medical assistance
program from the delicensure by multiplying the anticipated decrease in the
medical assistance residents, determined in item (i), by the hospital-owned
nursing facility weighted average payment rate multiplied by 365;
(iii) compute the anticipated annual costs for
community-based services by multiplying the anticipated decrease in medical
assistance residents served by the facilities, determined in item (i), by the
average monthly elderly waiver service costs for individuals in Goodhue County
multiplied by 12;
(iv) subtract the amount in item (iii) from the amount in
item (ii);
(v) multiply the amount in item (iv) by 57 percent; and
(vi) divide the difference of the amount in item (iv) and the
amount in item (v) by an amount equal to the relocated nursing facility's
occupancy factor under section 256B.431, subdivision 3f, paragraph (c),
multiplied by the historical percentage of medical assistance resident days.
For subsequent years, the adjusted property payment rate shall be
adjusted for inflation as provided in section 256B.434, subdivision 4,
paragraph (c), as long as the facility has a contract under section 256B.434.
(b) Projects approved under this subdivision shall be treated in a manner
equivalent to projects approved under subdivision 4a."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to health; consolidating and relocating
nursing facility beds to a new site in Goodhue County; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 144A.071, subdivision 4c."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was referred:
H. F. No. 1988, A bill for an act relating to human services; requiring
the commissioner of human services to collect and report information on managed
care plan and county-based purchasing plan provider reimbursement rates;
requiring a report; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.69,
subdivision 9b.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 256B.69, subdivision 9b, is amended to read:
Subd. 9b. Reporting provider payment rates.
(a) According to guidelines developed by the commissioner, in
consultation with health care providers, managed care plans, and
county-based purchasing plans, each managed care plan and county-based
purchasing plan must annually provide to the commissioner, at the
commissioner's request, detailed or aggregate information on reimbursement
rates paid by the managed care plan under this section or the county-based
purchasing plan under section 256B.692 to provider types providers
and vendors for administrative services under contract with the plan.
(b) Each managed care plan and county-based purchasing plan
must annually provide to the commissioner, in the form and manner specified by
the commissioner:
(1) the amount of the payment made to the plan under this
section that is paid to health care providers for patient care;
(2) aggregate provider payment data, categorized by inpatient
payments and outpatient payments, with the outpatient payments categorized by
payments to primary care providers and nonprimary care providers;
(3) the process by which increases or decreases in payments
made to the plan under this section, that are based on actuarial analysis
related to provider cost increases or decreases, or that are required by
legislative action, are passed through to health care providers, categorized by
payments to primary care providers and nonprimary care providers; and
(4) specific information on the methodology used to establish
provider reimbursement rates paid by the managed health care plan and
county-based purchasing plan.
Data provided to the commissioner under this subdivision must
allow the commissioner to conduct the analyses required under paragraph (d).
(b) (c) Data
provided to the commissioner under this subdivision are nonpublic data as
defined in section 13.02.
(d) The commissioner shall analyze data provided under this
subdivision to assist the legislature in providing oversight and accountability
related to expenditures under this section.
The analysis must include information on payments to physicians,
physician extenders, and hospitals, and may include other provider types as
determined by the commissioner. The
commissioner shall also array aggregate provider reimbursement rates by health
plan, by primary care, and nonprimary care categories. The commissioner shall report the analysis to
the legislature annually, beginning December 15, 2010, and each December 15
thereafter. The commissioner shall also
make this information available on the agency's Web site to managed care and
county-based purchasing plans, health care providers, and the public."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to human services; requiring managed care
plans and county-based purchasing plans to report provider payment rate data;
requiring the commissioner to analyze the plans' data; requiring a report;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256B.69, subdivision 9b."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
Lenczewski from the Committee on Taxes to which was referred:
H. F. No. 2341, A bill for an act relating to taxation; providing a tax
credit advance loan program; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota
Statutes, chapter 462A.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. [462A.2094] TAX CREDIT ADVANCE LOAN
PROGRAM FOR FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYERS.
(a) The agency may develop the tax credit advance loan program
for first-time homebuyers, up to the limits of available appropriations and
transfers. The program provides loans to
first-time homebuyers who are eligible for the federal first-time homebuyer
credit. The maximum tax credit advance
loan is the lesser of (i) 8.5 percent of the purchase price of the home, or
(ii) $6,750. The agency may charge a
reasonable fee for the costs associated with making and servicing tax credit
advance loans. The agency shall require
the first-time homebuyer to execute a promissory note secured by a second
mortgage on the property being purchased to secure repayment of the loan as
referenced in paragraph (e). The agency
may use amounts in the first-time homebuyer tax credit advance loan account to
fund the tax credit advance loan program.
(b) For purposes of this section, "federal first-time
homebuyer credit" means the credit allowed under section 36 of the
Internal Revenue Code, and "first-time homebuyer" has the meaning
given in section 36 of the Internal Revenue Code.
(c) To be eligible for a tax credit advance loan, a first-time
homebuyer must:
(i) meet the eligibility requirements for the federal
first-time homebuyer credit;
(ii) have an annual gross income that does not exceed (A) 115
percent of the greater of the state or area median income, as determined by the
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, or (B) the federal first-time
homebuyers tax credit income limits, whichever is less.
(iii) use the tax credit advance loan in conjunction with a
home mortgage loan at a 30-year fixed rate; and
(iv) agree to apply for the federal first-time homebuyer
credit and use the credit refund to repay the tax credit advance loan.
(d) The tax credit advance loan agreement between the agency
and the homebuyer must require repayment of the tax credit advance loan on or
before June 15 of the calendar year following the year in which the tax credit
advance loan is received.
(e) The agency may submit claims for debts owed due to
failure to repay tax credit advance loans as provided under the revenue
recapture act in chapter 270A.
Repayments of tax credit advance loans are deposited in the housing
development fund and credited to the first-time homebuyer taxpayer advance loan
account.
EFFECTIVE DATE.
This section is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2008,
section 462A.21, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 2a. First-time homebuyer tax credit advance loan account. The agency may establish a first-time
homebuyer tax credit advance loan account as a separate account within the
housing development fund for the purposes of section 462A.2094, and may pay
costs and expenses necessary and incidental to the development and operation of
the tax credit advance loan program from the account.
Sec. 3. TRANSFERS.
(a) $....... is transferred in fiscal year 2009 from the real
estate education, research and recovery fund in the state treasury established
in Minnesota Statutes section 82.43 to the first-time homebuyer tax credit
advance loan account in the housing development fund established in Minnesota
Statutes section 462A.21, subdivision 2a.
(b) $....... is transferred in fiscal year 2009 from the contractor
recovery fund in the state treasury established in Minnesota Statutes section
326B.89 to the first-time homebuyer tax credit advance loan account in the
housing development fund established in Minnesota Statutes section 462A.21,
subdivision 2a.
(c) At the end of fiscal year 2010 and each following fiscal
year, a share of the balance in the first-time homebuyer tax credit advance
loan account established in Minnesota Statutes section 462A.21, subdivision 2a
is transferred to the real estate education, research and recovery fund
established in Minnesota Statutes section 82.43. The share equals the amount in the first-time
homebuyer tax credit advance loan account multiplied by the ratio of the amount
transferred in paragraph (a) to the sum of the amounts transferred in
paragraphs (a) and (b). Transfers under
this paragraph continue until the amount transferred from the real estate
education, research and recovery fund to the first-time homebuyer tax credit
advance loan account under paragraph (a) is fully repaid or for ten years,
whichever is sooner. The Minnesota
Housing Finance Agency and the commissioner of commerce may agree to a
different transfer schedule.
(d) At the end of fiscal year 2010 and each following fiscal
year, a share of the balance in the first-time homebuyer tax credit advance
loan account established in Minnesota Statutes section 462A.21, subdivision 2a
is transferred to the contractor recovery fund established in Minnesota
Statutes section 326B.89. The share
equals the amount in the first-time homebuyer tax credit advance loan account
multiplied by the ratio of the amount transferred in paragraph (b) to the sum
of the amounts transferred in paragraphs (a) and (b). Transfers under this paragraph continue until
the amount transferred from the contractor recovery fund to the first-time
homebuyer tax credit advance loan account under paragraph (b) is fully repaid
or for ten years, whichever is sooner.
The Minnesota Housing Finance Agency and the commissioner of labor and
industry may agree to a different transfer schedule."
Amend the title as follows:
Page 1, line 2, after the second semicolon, insert "establishing a
first-time homebuyer tax credit advance loan account;"
Correct the title numbers accordingly
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass and be
re-referred to the Committee on Finance.
The report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on Finance to which was referred:
S. F. No. 666, A bill for an act relating to human services; modifying
provisions related to children aging out of foster care; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 260C.212, subdivision 7; proposing coding for new law in
Minnesota Statutes, chapter 260C.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
SECOND
READING OF HOUSE BILLS
H.
F. Nos. 17, 905, 1565 and 1988 were read for the second time.
SECOND READING OF SENATE
BILLS
S.
F. No. 666 was read for the second time.
Sertich moved that the House recess subject
to the call of the Chair. The motion
prevailed.
RECESS
RECONVENED
The House reconvened and was called to
order by Speaker pro tempore Hortman.
Kelliher was excused between the hours of
11:10 a.m. and 12:25 p.m.
MESSAGES
FROM THE SENATE
The following
messages were received from the Senate:
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce
that the Senate has concurred in and adopted the report of the Conference
Committee on:
S. F. No. 166.
The Senate has
repassed said bill in accordance with the recommendation and report of the
Conference Committee. Said Senate File
is herewith transmitted to the House.
Colleen J. Pacheco, First
Assistant Secretary of the Senate
CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON S. F. NO. 166
A bill for
an act relating to insurance; regulating life insurance; prohibiting
stranger-originated life insurance; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota
Statutes, chapter 60A; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 61A.073;
61A.074.
May 4,
2009
The Honorable James P. Metzen
President of the Senate
The Honorable Margaret Anderson
Kelliher
Speaker of the House of
Representatives
We, the
undersigned conferees for S. F. No. 166 report that we have agreed upon the
items in dispute and recommend as follows:
That the
House recede from its amendments and that S. F. No. 166 be further amended as
follows:
Delete
everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section
1. [60A.078]
SHORT TITLE.
Sections
60A.078 to 60A.0789 may be cited as the "Insurable Interest Act."
Sec. 2. [60A.0782]
DEFINITIONS.
Subdivision
1. Terms. For the purpose of this act, unless the
context clearly indicates otherwise, the terms in this section have the
meanings given them.
Subd.
2. Act. "Act" means sections 60A.078 to
60A.0789.
Subd.
3. Business
entity. "Business
entity" includes, but is not limited to, a joint venture, partnership,
corporation, limited liability company, and business trust.
Subd.
4. Commissioner. "Commissioner" means the
commissioner of commerce.
Subd.
5. Legitimate
settlement contracts. "Legitimate
settlement contracts" mean settlement contracts that comply with Minnesota
law governing viatical settlement contracts and that are not prohibited by
section 60A.0785 or otherwise part of or in furtherance of an act, practice, or
arrangement that is prohibited by this act.
Subd.
6. Life
expectancy evaluation. "Life
expectancy evaluation" means an evaluation conducted by any person other
than the insurer or its authorized representatives for the purpose of
projecting or estimating how long a particular individual is expected to live.
Subd.
7. Person. "Person" means any natural
person or legal entity, including, but not limited to, a partnership, limited
liability company, association, trust, or corporation.
Subd.
8. Policy. "Policy" means an individual or
group policy, group certificate, contract, or arrangement of life insurance
affecting the rights of a resident of this state or bearing a reasonable
relation to this state, regardless of whether delivered or issued for delivery
in this state.
Subd.
9. Policyowner. "Policyowner" means the owner of
a policy.
Subd.
10. Prospective
purchaser. "Prospective
purchaser" means any person that may purchase or acquire the policy or a
beneficial interest in the policy, but excluding individuals closely related to
the insured by blood or law or who have a lawful and substantial interest in
the continued life of the insured, or trusts established for the benefit of
those individuals, provided those trusts meet the requirements of section
60A.0783, subdivision 2, paragraph (d).
Subd.
11. Settlement
contract. (a)
"Settlement contract" means an agreement between a policyowner and
another person establishing the terms under which compensation or anything of
value will be paid or which compensation or value is less than the expected
death benefit of the insurance policy, in return for the owner's assignment,
transfer, sale, devise, or bequest of the death benefit or ownership of any
portion of the policy. Settlement
contract also includes:
(1) the
transfer for compensation or value of ownership or beneficial interest in a
trust or other entity that owns such a policy if the trust or other entity was
formed or availed of for the principal purpose of acquiring one or more policies,
which policy insures the life of an individual who is a resident of this state;
and
(2) a
premium finance loan made for a policy by a lender to a policyowner on, before,
or after the date of issuance of the policy where:
(i) the
policyowner or the insured receives a guarantee of a future settlement value of
the policy; or
(ii)
the policyowner or the insured agrees to sell the policy or any portion of its
death benefit on any date following the issuance of the policy.
(b)
Settlement contract does not include:
(1) a
policy loan or accelerated death benefit made by the insurer under the policy's
terms;
(2)
loan proceeds that are used solely to pay premiums for the policy and
loan-related costs, including, without limitation, interest, arrangement fees,
utilization fees and similar fees, closing costs, legal fees and expenses,
trustee fees and expenses, and third-party collateral provider fees and
expenses, including fees payable to letter of credit issuers;
(3) a
loan made by a bank or other licensed financial institution in which the lender
takes an interest in a policy solely to secure repayment of a loan or, if there
is a default on the loan and the policy is transferred, the transfer of such a
policy by the lender, as long as the default itself is not pursuant to an
agreement or understanding with any other person for the purpose of evading
regulation under this act;
(4) an
agreement in which all the parties are closely related to the insured by blood
or law or have a lawful substantial economic interest in the continued life,
health, and bodily safety of the person insured or are trusts established for
the benefit of such parties;
(5) any
designation, consent, or agreement by an insured who is an employee or an
employer in connection with the purchase by the employer, or by a trust
established by the employer, of life insurance on the life of the employee;
(6) a
bona fide business succession planning arrangement:
(i)
between shareholders in a corporation or between a corporation and one or more
of its shareholders or one or more trusts established by its shareholders;
(ii)
between partners in a partnership or between a partnership and one or more of
its partners or one or more trusts established by its partner; or
(iii)
between members in a limited liability company or between a limited liability
company and one or more of its members or one or more trusts established by its
members; or
(7) an
agreement entered into by a service recipient, or a trust established by the
service recipient, and a service provider, or a trust established by the
service provider, who performs significant services for the service recipient's
trade or business.
Subd.
12. Stranger-originated
life insurance practices. "Stranger-originated
life insurance practices" or "STOLI practices" mean an act,
practice, or arrangement to initiate a life insurance policy for the benefit of
a third-party investor who, at the time of policy origination, has no insurable
interest in the insured. STOLI practices
include, but are not limited to, cases in which life insurance is purchased
with resources or guarantees from or through a person or entity, who, at the
time of policy inception, could not lawfully initiate the policy themselves,
and where, at the time of inception, there is an arrangement or agreement,
whether spoken or written, to directly or indirectly transfer the ownership of
the policy and/or the policy benefits to a third party. Trusts that are created to give the
appearance of insurable interest and are used to initiate policies for
investors violate the insurable interest requirements and the prohibition
against STOLI practices.
Sec.
3. [60A.0783]
INSURABLE INTEREST REQUIRED.
Subdivision
1. Insurance
on life of another. A person
may not procure or cause to be procured or effected a policy upon the life of
another individual unless the benefits under the policy are payable to the
insured, the personal representatives of the insured's estate, or to a person
having, at the time the policy is issued, an insurable interest in the
individual insured.
Subd. 2.
What constitutes an insurable
interest. Insurable interest,
with reference to insurance on the life of another, includes only the following
interests.
(a) An
individual has an insurable interest in the life of another person to whom the
individual is closely related by blood or by law and in whom the individual has
a substantial interest engendered by love and affection.
(b) An
individual has an insurable interest in the life of another person if such
individual has a lawful and substantial interest in the continued life of the
individual insured, as distinguished from an interest that would arise only by
or would be enhanced in value by the death of the individual insured.
(c) An
individual party to a contract for the purchase or sale of an interest in any
business entity and, if applicable, a trust or the trustee of a trust of which
the individual is a settlor, has an insurable interest in the life of each
other individual party to the contract, but only for the purpose of carrying
out the intent and purpose of the contract.
(d) A
trust, or the trustee of a trust, has an insurable interest in the life of an
individual insured under a life insurance policy owned by the trust, or the
trustee of the trust acting in a fiduciary capacity, if the insured is the
settlor of the trust; an individual closely related by blood or law to the
settlor; or an individual in whom the settlor otherwise has an insurable
interest if, in each of the situations described in this paragraph, the life
insurance proceeds are primarily for the benefit of trust beneficiaries having
an insurable interest in the life of the insured and the trust is not used,
directly or indirectly, as part of or in furtherance of an act, practice, or
arrangement that is otherwise prohibited by this act.
(e) A
guardian, trustee, or other fiduciary, acting in a fiduciary capacity, has an
insurable interest in the life of any person for whose benefit the fiduciary
holds property, and in the life of any other individual in whose life the
person has an insurable interest so long as the life insurance proceeds are
used primarily for the benefit of persons having an insurable interest in the
life of the insured and the guardianship or fiduciary relationship is not used,
directly or indirectly, as part of or in furtherance of an act, practice, or
arrangement that is otherwise prohibited by this act.
(f) An
organization in section 170(c) of the United States Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended through December 31, 2008, has an insurable interest in the
life of any person who consents in writing to the organization's ownership or
purchase of that insurance.
(g) A
trustee, sponsor, or custodian of assets held in any plan governed by the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, United States Code, title 29,
section 1001, et seq., or in any other retirement or employee benefit plan, has
an insurable interest in the life of any participant in the plan provided
consent is obtained in writing from the participant before the insurance is
purchased. An employer, trustee,
sponsor, or custodian may not retaliate or take adverse action against any
participant who does not consent to the issuance of insurance on the
participant's life.
(h) A
business entity has an insurable interest in the life of any of the owners,
directors, officers, partners, and managers of the business entity or any
affiliate or subsidiary of the business entity, or key employees or key persons
of the business entity or affiliate or subsidiary, provided consent is obtained
in writing from key employees or persons before the insurance is
purchased. The business entity or
affiliate or subsidiary may not retaliate or take adverse action against any
key employee or person who does not consent to the issuance of insurance on the
key employee or key person's life. For
purposes of this subdivision, a "key employee" or "key
person" means an individual whose position or compensation is described in
section 101(j)(2)(A)(ii) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
through December 31, 2008.
(i) A
financial institution or other person to whom a debt is owed, whether for the
purposes of premium financing or otherwise, has an insurable interest in the
life of the borrower limited to the amount of debt owed plus reasonable
interest and service charges.
Subd. 3.
Insured's own life. An individual has an insurable interest in
the individual's own life and an individual of competent legal capacity that
procures or effects a policy on the individual's own life may designate any
person as the beneficiary, provided the policy is not part of or in furtherance
of an act, practice, or arrangement that is otherwise prohibited by this act.
Subd. 4.
Reliance on statements. An insurer is entitled to rely upon all
reasonable statements, declarations, and representations made by an applicant
for life insurance relative to the existence of an insurable interest; and no
insurer shall incur legal liability, except as set forth in the policy, by
virtue of untrue statements, declarations, or representations so relied upon in
good faith by the insurer.
Subd. 5.
Consent of insured. A policy upon the life of an individual,
other than a policy of noncontributory group life insurance, may not be
effectuated unless, on or before the time the policy is effectuated, the
individual insured, having legal capacity to contract, applies for or consents
in writing to the policy and its terms.
Consent may be given by another in the following cases:
(1) a
parent or a person having legal custody of a minor may consent to the issuance
of a policy on a dependent child;
(2) a
court-appointed guardian of a person may consent to the issuance of a policy on
the person under guardianship;
(3) a
court-appointed conservator of a person's estate may consent to the issuance of
a policy on the person whose estate is under conservatorship;
(4) an
attorney-in-fact may consent to the issuance of a policy on the person that
appointed the attorney-in-fact for the limited purpose of replacing one or more
policies with one or more new policies, provided the aggregate amount of life
insurance on the person as the result of the replacement remains the same or
decreases;
(5) a
trustee of a revocable trust may consent to the issuance of a policy on the
life of a settlor of the trust; and
(6) a
court of general jurisdiction may give consent to the issuance of a policy upon
a showing of facts the court considers sufficient to justify the issuance of
the policy.
Sec.
4. [60A.0784]
PROHIBITED PRACTICES.
It is
unlawful for any person to:
(1)
procure or cause to be procured or effected a policy in violation of section
60A.0783;
(2)
engage in STOLI practices or otherwise wager on life;
(3)
solicit, market, or otherwise promote the purchase of a policy for the purpose
of or with an emphasis on the subsequent sale of the policy in the secondary
market;
(4)
enter into a premium finance agreement with any person or agency, or any person
affiliated with such person or agency, pursuant to which the lender or any
person affiliated with the lender shall receive any proceeds, fees, or other
consideration, directly or indirectly, from the policy or policyowner or any
other person with respect to the premium finance agreement or any settlement
contract or other transaction related to such policy that are in addition to
the amounts required to pay the principal, interest, and service charges
related to policy premiums pursuant to the premium finance agreement or
subsequent sale of such agreement; provided, further, that any payments,
charges, fees, or other amounts in addition to the amounts required to pay the
principal, interest, and service charges related to policy premiums paid under
the premium finance agreement shall be remitted to the insured or to the insured's
estate if the insured is not living at the time of the determination of the
overpayment; or
(5)
enter into or to offer to enter into a settlement contract prior to the
issuance of a policy that is the subject of the settlement contract or proposed
settlement contract.
Sec.
5. [60A.0785]
PROHIBITION; ENTRY INTO SETTLEMENT CONTRACTS.
Subdivision
1. Prohibition. No prospective purchaser of the policy or
beneficial interest in the policy shall, at any time prior to issuance of a
policy, or during a four-year period commencing with the date of issuance of
the policy, enter into a settlement contract or any other agreement the effect
of which is to acquire the policy or a beneficial interest in the policy
regardless of the date the compensation is to be provided and regardless of the
date
the
assignment, transfer, sale, devise, bequest, or surrender of the policy or
beneficial interest in the policy is to occur, unless and until the prospective
purchaser has determined, based on reasonable inquiry, which includes but is
not limited to questioning the insured and reviewing the broker's files, that
none of the following circumstances are present:
(1)
there was an agreement or understanding, before issuance of the policy, between
the insured, policyowner, or owner of a beneficial interest in the policy, and
another person to guarantee any liability or to purchase, or stand ready to
purchase, the policy or an interest therein, including through an assumption or
forgiveness of a loan; or
(2) both
of the following are present:
(i) all
or a portion of the policy premiums were funded by means other than by the
insured's personal assets or assets provided by a person who is closely related
to the insured by blood or law or who has a lawful and substantial economic
interest in the continued life of the insured.
For purposes of this provision, funds from a premium finance loan are
considered assets of the insured or such person only if the insured or such
person is contractually obligated to repay the full amount of the loan and to
pledge personal assets, other than the policy itself, for loan amounts
exceeding the policy's cash value; and
(ii) the
insured underwent a life expectancy evaluation within the 18-month time period
immediately prior to the issuance of the policy and, during the same time
period, the results of the life expectancy evaluation were shared with or used
by any person for the purpose of determining the actual or potential value of
the policy in the secondary market.
Nothing in this paragraph shall prevent such a life expectancy
evaluation from being shared with or used by the insured or the insured's
accountant, attorney, or insurance producer for estate planning purposes so
long as the life expectancy evaluation is not used by such persons to determine
the actual or potential value of the policy in the secondary market.
Subd. 2.
Certification. As part of the prospective purchaser's
responsibility to make reasonable inquiry, the prospective purchaser shall
request, and the settlement broker shall provide, a certification in which the
broker certifies that, to the best of the broker's knowledge, any life
expectancy evaluation performed on the insured prior to the issuance of the
policy was not used by or shared with any other person prior to the issuance of
the policy for the purpose of determining the actual or potential value of the
policy in the secondary market.
Subd. 3.
Legitimate insurance
transactions. Nothing in this
act prevents:
(1) any
policyowner, whether or not the policyowner is also the subject of the
insurance, from entering into a legitimate settlement contract;
(2) any
person from soliciting a person to enter into a legitimate settlement contract;
(3) a
person from enforcing the payment of proceeds from the interest obtained under
a legitimate settlement contract; or
(4) the
assignment, sale, transfer, devise, or bequest with respect to the death
benefit or ownership of any portion of a policy, provided the assignment, sale,
transfer, devise, or bequest is connected to a legitimate settlement contract
and not part of or in furtherance of STOLI practices.
Sec.
6. [60A.0786]
PRESUMPTION OF STOLI PRACTICES.
Subdivision
1. Presumption
of STOLI practices. A
settlement contract, or any agreement the effect of which is to sell or acquire
the policy or a beneficial interest in the policy, entered into within the
four-year period commencing with the date the policy is issued creates a
rebuttable presumption of STOLI practices if either of the following
circumstances are present:
(1)
there was an agreement or understanding, before issuance of the policy, between
the insured, policyowner, or owner of a beneficial interest in the policy, and
another person to guarantee any liability or to purchase, or stand ready to
purchase, the policy or an interest in the policy, including through an
assumption or forgiveness of a loan; or
(2)
both of the following are present:
(i) all
or a portion of the policy premiums were funded by means other than by the
insured's personal assets or assets provided by a person who is closely related
to the insured by blood or law or who has a lawful and substantial economic
interest in the continued life of the insured.
For purposes of this provision, funds from a premium finance loan are
considered assets of the insured or that person only if the insured or that
person is contractually obligated to repay the full amount of the loan and to
pledge personal assets, other than the policy itself, for loan amounts
exceeding the policy's cash value; and
(ii)
the insured underwent a life expectancy evaluation within the 18-month time
period immediately prior to the issuance of the policy and, during the same
time period, the results of the life expectancy evaluation were shared with or
used by any person for the purpose of determining the actual or potential value
of the policy in the secondary market.
Subd.
2. Not
applicable in criminal proceedings.
The rebuttable presumption created in this section does not apply in
any criminal proceeding.
Sec.
7. [60A.0787]
PROCESSING CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP OR BENEFICIARY REQUESTS.
Subdivision
1. Obligation
to process change of ownership or beneficiary requests. Upon receipt of a properly completed
request for change of ownership or beneficiary of a policy and, if applicable,
the completed questionnaire described in this section, the insurer shall
respond in writing within 30 calendar days with written acknowledgment
confirming that the change has been effected or specifying the reasons why the
requested change cannot be processed.
The insurer shall not unreasonably delay effecting change of ownership
or beneficiary and shall not otherwise interfere with any permitted settlement
contract entered into in this state.
Subd.
2. Written
questionnaire. If the insurer
receives a request for change of ownership or beneficiary within the four-year
period commencing with the date the policy is issued, the insurer may require,
as a condition of effecting the requested change, that the policyowner complete
and return a written questionnaire designed to determine whether the change
request relates to or is made in accordance with a settlement contract and if
so, whether the circumstances described in section 60A.0785 are present. The questionnaire shall be in a form approved
by the commissioner and shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
(1) the
definition of settlement contract;
(2) an
inquiry regarding whether the request for change of ownership or beneficiary
relates to or is made in accordance with a settlement contract;
(3) if
the answer to clause (2) is "yes," then an inquiry regarding whether
the circumstances described in section 60A.0785 are present;
(4) a
disclosure that presenting false material information, or concealing material
information, in connection with the questionnaire is defined under the laws of
this state as a fraudulent act; and
(5) a
signed certification by the policyowner that the answers and information
provided in and pursuant to the questionnaire are true and complete to the best
of the policyowner's knowledge and belief.
Subd.
3. Other
inquiries. Nothing in this
section should be interpreted to limit an insurer's ability to make other
inquiries to detect STOLI practices.
Subd.
4. Fraternal
benefit societies. Nothing in
this act shall prohibit a fraternal benefit society regulated under chapter 64B
from enforcing the terms of its bylaws or rules regarding permitted
beneficiaries and owners.
Sec.
8. [60A.0788]
FRAUDULENT ACTS.
Subdivision
1. Fraudulent
acts. A person who commits a
fraudulent act as defined in this section commits insurance fraud and may be
sentenced under section 609.611, subdivision 3.
Subd.
2. List
of fraudulent acts. All of
the following acts are fraudulent when committed by a person who, with intent
to defraud and for the purpose of depriving another of property or for
pecuniary gain, commits, or permits any of its employees or its agents to
commit them:
(1)
failing to disclose to the insurer where the insurer has requested such
disclosure that the prospective insured has undergone a life expectancy
evaluation;
(2)
misrepresenting a person's state of residence or facilitating the change of the
state in which a person resides for the express purpose of evading or avoiding
the provisions of this act;
(3)
presenting, causing to be presented, or preparing with knowledge or belief that
it will be presented to an insurer any false material information, or
concealing any material information, as part of, in support of, or concerning a
fact material to one or more of the following:
(i) a
questionnaire as provided for under section 60A.0787; or
(ii)
any other documents or communications, whether written or verbal, which are
intended to detect STOLI practices or demonstrate compliance with this act;
(4)
encouraging the insured, policyowner, or owner of a beneficial interest in the
policy to falsely state that the circumstances described in section 60A.0785
are not present or aiding in the preparation or execution of documents designed
to create the false impression that those circumstances are not present; and
(5)
failing to request or to provide the broker certification required by section
60A.0785, subdivision 2, or falsely certifying that the life expectancy
evaluation in section 60A.0785, subdivision 2, was not shared with any other
person prior to the issuance of the policy for the purpose of determining the
actual or potential value of the policy in the secondary market.
Sec.
9. [60A.0789]
REMEDIES.
Subdivision
1. Actions
to recover death benefits. (a)
If the beneficiary, assignee, or other payee receives the death benefits under
a life insurance policy initiated by STOLI practices or a policy procured or
effected in violation of section 60A.0783 or section 60A.0785, the personal
representative of the insured's estate or other lawfully acting agent may
maintain an action to recover such benefits from the person receiving them.
(b)
Where a person receives the death benefit as a result of a nonwillful violation
of this act, the court may limit the recovery to unjust enrichment, calculated
as the benefits received plus interest from the date of receipt, less premiums
paid under the policy by the recipient and any consideration paid by the
recipient to the insured in connection with the policy.
(c) Where
a person receives the death benefits as the result of a willful violation of
this act, the court may, in addition to actual damages, order the defendant or
defendants to pay exemplary damages in an amount up to two times the death
benefits. A pattern of violations of
this act and conduct involving one or more fraudulent acts are evidence of
willfulness. The exemplary damages shall
be paid to one or more governmental agencies charged with combating consumer
fraud, including the Department of Commerce.
(d) The
court may award reasonable attorney fees, together with costs and
disbursements, to any party that recovers damages in any action brought under
this subdivision.
(e) An
action under this subdivision must be brought within two years after the death
of the insured.
Subd. 2.
Enforceability of contracts. Any contract, agreement, arrangement, or
transaction prohibited under this act is voidable.
Subd. 3.
Declaratory judgment action. If, prior to payment of death benefits,
the insurer believes the policy was initiated by STOLI practices, the insurer
may bring a declaratory judgment action seeking a court order declaring the
policy void.
Subd. 4.
Effect on other law. This act shall not:
(1)
preempt or limit other civil remedies, including, but not limited to,
declaratory judgments, injunctive relief, and interpleaders;
(2)
preempt the authority or relieve the duty of other law enforcement or
regulatory agencies to investigate, examine, and prosecute suspected violations
of law;
(3)
limit the powers granted elsewhere by the laws of this state to the
commissioner or an insurance fraud unit or the attorney general to investigate
and examine possible violations of law and to take appropriate actions against
wrongdoers; or
(4)
limit the power of this state to punish a person for conduct that constitutes a
crime under other laws of this state.
Sec.
10. REPEALER.
Minnesota
Statutes 2008, sections 61A.073; and 61A.074, are repealed.
Sec.
11. EFFECTIVE
DATE.
This act
is effective for policies issued on or after the day following final enactment."
Delete the
title and insert:
"A
bill for an act relating to insurance; regulating life insurance; prohibiting
stranger-originated life insurance; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 60A; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 61A.073;
61A.074."
We request the adoption of this report and repassage of the bill.
Senate Conferees: Linda Scheid, Tarryl Clark, Mee Moua, Ann H.
Rest and Chris Gerlach.
House Conferees: Kate Knuth, Joe Atkins, Debra Hilstrom,
Melissa Hortman and Jenifer Loon.
Knuth moved that the report of the
Conference Committee on S. F. No. 166 be adopted and that the
bill be repassed as amended by the Conference Committee. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 166, A bill for an act relating to insurance;
regulating life insurance; prohibiting stranger-originated life insurance;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 60A; repealing
Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 61A.073; 61A.074.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended by Conference, and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of
the bill and the roll was called.
Pursuant to rule 2.05, Kohls was excused
from voting on the repassage of S. F. No. 166, as amended by Conference.
There
were 131 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those
who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
The bill was repassed, as amended by
Conference, and its title agreed to.
Madam
Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate refuses
to concur in the House amendments to the following Senate file:
S. F. No. 708, A bill for an act relating to
mortgages; modifying provisions relating to foreclosure consultants; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 325N.01.
The Senate respectfully requests that a Conference
Committee be appointed thereon. The
Senate has appointed as such committee:
Senators Fobbe, Ingebrigtsen and Scheid.
Said Senate File is herewith transmitted to the House
with the request that the House appoint a like committee.
Colleen J. Pacheco, First
Assistant Secretary of the Senate
Mullery moved that
the House accede to the request of the Senate and that the Speaker appoint a
Conference Committee of 3 members of the House to meet with a like committee
appointed by the Senate on the disagreeing votes of the two houses on
S. F. No. 708. The motion
prevailed.
Madam
Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate refuses
to concur in the House amendments to the following Senate file:
S. F. No. 550, A bill for an act relating to energy;
providing for energy conservation; regulating utility rates; removing
prohibition on issuing certificate of need for new nuclear power plant;
providing for various Legislative Energy Commission studies; regulating
utilities; amending Minnesota Statutes
2008, sections 216A.03, subdivision 6, by adding a subdivision; 216B.16,
subdivisions 2, 6c, 7b, by adding a subdivision; 216B.1645, subdivision 2a;
216B.169, subdivision 2; 216B.1691, subdivision 2a; 216B.23, by adding a
subdivision; 216B.241, subdivisions 1c, 5a, 9; 216B.2411, subdivisions 1, 2;
216B.2424, subdivision 5a; 216B.243, subdivisions 3b, 8, 9; 216C.11; proposing
coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 216C; repealing Laws 2007,
chapter 3, section 3.
The Senate respectfully requests that a Conference
Committee be appointed thereon. The
Senate has appointed as such committee:
Senators Prettner Solon, Doll, Dibble, Senjem and
Sparks.
Said Senate File is herewith transmitted to the House
with the request that the House appoint a like committee.
Colleen J. Pacheco, First
Assistant Secretary of the Senate
Hilty moved that
the House accede to the request of the Senate and that the Speaker appoint a
Conference Committee of 5 members of the House to meet with a like committee
appointed by the Senate on the disagreeing votes of the two houses on S. F. No. 550. The motion prevailed.
The following Conference Committee Report
was received:
CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON H. F. NO. 819
A bill for
an act relating to commerce; prohibiting certain unfair Internet ticket sales
by original sellers and resellers; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota
Statutes, chapter 609.
May 5, 2009
The Honorable Margaret Anderson
Kelliher
Speaker of the House of
Representatives
The Honorable James P. Metzen
President of the Senate
We, the
undersigned conferees for H. F. No. 819 report that we have agreed upon the
items in dispute and recommend as follows:
That the
House concur in the Senate amendments.
We request the adoption of this report and repassage of the
bill.
House Conferees:
Joe Atkins, Leon Lillie
and Kurt Zellers.
Senate Conferees:
Ron Latz, Dan Skogen and Michael Jungbauer.
Atkins moved that the report of the
Conference Committee on H. F. No. 819 be adopted and that the
bill be repassed as amended by the Conference Committee. The motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 819, A bill for an act relating
to commerce; prohibiting certain unfair Internet ticket sales by original
sellers and resellers; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 609.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended by Conference, and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 119 yeas and 13 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Demmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Buesgens
Dean
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Garofalo
Holberg
Hoppe
Kohls
Peppin
Severson
Shimanski
The bill was repassed, as amended by
Conference, and its title agreed to.
REPORT FROM THE COMMITTEE ON RULES AND
LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATION
Sertich from the
Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration, pursuant to rule 1.21,
designated the following bills to be placed on the Supplemental Calendar for
the Day for Wednesday, May 6, 2009:
H. F. Nos. 8
and 818; S. F. Nos. 926 and 1425; H. F. No. 885;
S. F. No. 806; H. F. No. 804;
S. F. Nos. 1431 and 1408; H. F. No. 705;
S. F. Nos. 675 and 1217; H. F. No. 1745; and
S. F. Nos. 457 and 1447.
CALENDAR
FOR THE DAY
S. F. No. 1611,
A bill for an act relating to insurance; authorizing the Nonprofit Insurance
Trust to self-insure against certain liabilities; amending Minnesota Statutes
2008, sections 471.98, subdivision 2; 471.982, subdivision 3.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There were 132 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
S. F. No. 1876, A bill for an act relating
to transportation; modifying and updating provisions relating to motor
carriers, highways, and the Department of Transportation; making clarifying and
technical changes; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 168.013,
subdivision 1e; 168.185; 169.025; 169.801, subdivision 10; 169.823, subdivision
1; 169.824; 169.8261; 169.827; 169.85, subdivision 2; 169.862, subdivision 2;
169.864, subdivisions 1, 2; 169.865, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 169.866,
subdivision 1; 169.87, subdivision 2, by adding a subdivision; 174.64,
subdivision 4; 174.66; 221.012, subdivisions 19, 29; 221.021, subdivision 1;
221.022; 221.025; 221.026, subdivisions 2, 5; 221.0269, subdivision 3; 221.031,
subdivisions 1, 3, 3c, 6; 221.0314, subdivisions 2, 3a, 9; 221.033,
subdivisions 1, 2; 221.121, subdivisions 1, 7; 221.122, subdivision 1; 221.123;
221.132; 221.151, subdivision 1; 221.161, subdivisions 1, 4; 221.171; 221.172,
subdivision 3; 221.185, subdivisions 2, 4, 5a, 9; 221.605, subdivision 1;
221.68; 221.81, subdivision 3d; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections
169.67, subdivision 6; 169.826, subdivisions 1b, 5; 169.832, subdivisions 11,
11a; 221.012, subdivisions 2, 3, 6, 7, 11, 12, 21, 23, 24, 30, 32, 39, 40, 41;
221.031, subdivision 2b; 221.072; 221.101; 221.111; 221.121, subdivisions 2, 3,
5, 6, 6a, 6c, 6d, 6e, 6f; 221.131, subdivision 2a; 221.141, subdivision 6;
221.151, subdivisions 2, 3; 221.153; 221.172, subdivisions 4, 5, 6, 7, 8;
221.296, subdivisions 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 132 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
S. F. No. 1539 was reported
to the House.
Atkins moved to
amend S. F. No. 1539, the second engrossment, as follows:
Delete everything
after the enacting clause and insert the following language of H. F. No. 1719,
the second engrossment:
"Section 1.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 13.716, subdivision 7, is amended to
read:
Subd. 7. Viatical settlements data. Viatical settlements data provided to the
commissioner of commerce are classified under section 60A.968, subdivision 2
60A.9575.
Sec. 2. [60A.957] DEFINITIONS.
Subdivision 1. Terms. For purposes of sections 60A.957 to
60A.9585, the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them.
Subd. 2. Advertising. "Advertising" means any written,
electronic, or printed communication or any communication by means of recorded
telephone messages or transmitted on radio, television, the Internet, or
similar communications media, including film strips, motion pictures, and
videos, published, disseminated, circulated, or placed directly before the
public in this state, for the purpose of creating an interest in or inducing a
person to purchase or sell, assign, devise, bequeath, or transfer the death
benefit or ownership of a life insurance policy pursuant to a viatical
settlement contract.
Subd. 3. Business
of viatical settlements. "Business
of viatical settlements" means an activity involved in, but not limited
to, the offering, soliciting, negotiating, procuring, effectuating, purchasing,
investing, financing, monitoring, tracking, underwriting, selling,
transferring, assigning, pledging, hypothecating, or in any other manner
acquiring an interest in a life insurance policy by means of a viatical
settlement contract.
Subd. 4. Chronically
ill. "Chronically
ill" means:
(1) being unable to perform at
least two activities of daily living (for example, eating, toileting,
transferring, bathing, dressing, or continence);
(2) requiring substantial
supervision to protect the individual from threats to health and safety due to
severe cognitive impairment; or
(3) having a level of disability similar
to that described in clause (1) as determined by the United States Secretary of
Health and Human Services.
Subd. 5. Commissioner. "Commissioner" means the
commissioner of commerce.
Subd. 6. Financing
entity. "Financing
entity" means an underwriter, placement agent, lender, purchaser of
securities, purchaser of a policy or certificate from a viatical settlement
provider, credit enhancer, or any entity that has a direct ownership in a
policy or certificate that is the subject of a viatical settlement contract,
but:
(1) whose principal activity
related to the transaction is providing funds to effect the viatical settlement
or purchase of one or more viaticated policies; and
(2) who has an agreement in writing
with one or more licensed viatical settlement providers to finance the
acquisition of viatical settlement contracts.
Financing entity does not include a
nonaccredited investor or a viatical settlement purchaser.
Subd. 7. Fraudulent
viatical settlement act. "Fraudulent
viatical settlement act" includes:
(a) acts or omissions committed by
any person who, knowingly and with intent to defraud, for the purpose of
depriving another of property or for pecuniary gain, commits, or permits its
employees or its agents to engage in acts including:
(1) presenting, causing to be
presented or preparing with knowledge or belief that it will be presented to or
by a viatical settlement provider, viatical settlement broker, viatical
settlement purchaser, viatical settlement investment agent, financing entity,
insurer, insurance producer, or any other person, false material information,
or concealing material information, as part of, in support of, or concerning a
fact material to one or more of the following:
(i) an application for the issuance
of a viatical settlement contract or insurance policy;
(ii) the underwriting of a viatical
settlement contract or insurance policy;
(iii) a claim for payment or benefit
pursuant to a viatical settlement contract or insurance policy;
(iv) premiums paid on an insurance
policy or as a result of a viatical settlement purchase agreement;
(v) payments and changes in
ownership or beneficiary made in accordance with the terms of a viatical
settlement contract, viatical settlement purchase agreement, or insurance
policy;
(vi) the reinstatement or conversion
of an insurance policy;
(vii) the solicitation, offer,
effectuation, or sale of a viatical settlement contract, insurance policy, or
viatical settlement purchase agreement;
(viii) the issuance of written
evidence of viatical settlement contract, viatical settlement purchase
agreement, or insurance; or
(ix) a financing transaction; and
(2) employing any plan, financial
structure, device, scheme, or artifice to defraud related to viaticated
policies;
(b) acts or omissions in the
furtherance of a fraud or to prevent the detection of a fraud committed by any
person, its employees, or its agents, to:
(1) remove, conceal, alter, destroy,
or sequester from the commissioner the assets or records of a licensee or other
person engaged in the business of viatical settlements;
(2) misrepresent or conceal the
financial condition of a licensee, financing entity, insurer, or other person;
(3) transact the business of
viatical settlements in violation of laws requiring a license, certificate of
authority, or other legal authority for the transaction of the business of
viatical settlements; or
(4) file with the commissioner or
the equivalent chief insurance regulatory official of another jurisdiction a
document containing false information or otherwise conceal information about a
material fact from the commissioner;
(c) commit embezzlement, theft,
misappropriation, or conversion of money, funds, premiums, credits, or other
property of a viatical settlement provider, insurer, viator, insurance
policyowner, or any other person engaged in the business of viatical
settlements or insurance; or
(d) attempt to commit, assist, aid,
or abet in the commission of, or conspiracy to commit, the acts or omissions
specified in this subdivision.
Subd. 8. Life
insurance producer. "Life
insurance producer" means any person licensed in this state as a resident
or nonresident insurance producer who has received qualification or authority
for life insurance pursuant to chapter 60K.
Subd. 9. Person. "Person" means a natural person
or a legal entity, including, without limitation, an individual, partnership,
limited liability company, association, trust, or corporation.
Subd. 10. Policy. "Policy" means an individual or
group policy, group certificate, contract, or arrangement of life insurance
owned by a resident of this state, regardless of whether delivered or issued
for delivery in this state.
Subd. 11. Related
provider trust. "Related
provider trust" means a titling trust or other trust established by a
licensed viatical settlement provider or a financing entity for the sole
purpose of holding the ownership or beneficial interest in purchased policies
in connection with a financing transaction.
The trust shall have a written agreement with the licensed viatical
settlement provider under which the licensed viatical settlement provider is
responsible for ensuring compliance with all statutory and regulatory
requirements and under which the trust agrees to make all records and files related
to viatical settlement transactions available to the commissioner as if those
records and files were maintained directly by the licensed viatical settlement
provider.
Subd. 12. Special
purpose entity. "Special
purpose entity" means a corporation, partnership, trust, limited liability
company, or other similar entity formed solely to provide either directly or
indirectly access to institutional capital markets:
(1) for a financing entity or
licensed viatical settlement provider; or
(2) in connection with a
transaction in which:
(i) the securities in the special
purpose entity are acquired by the viator or by "qualified institutional
buyers" as defined in Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended; or
(ii) the securities pay a fixed
rate of return commensurate with established asset-backed institutional capital
markets.
Subd. 13. Terminally
ill. "Terminally
ill" means having an illness or sickness that can reasonably be expected
to result in death in 24 months or less.
Subd. 14. Viatical
settlement broker. "Viatical
settlement broker" means a person, including a life insurance producer as
provided in section 60A.9572, who, working exclusively on behalf of a viator
and for a fee, commission, or other valuable consideration, offers or attempts
to negotiate viatical settlement contracts between a viator and one or more
viatical settlement providers or one or more viatical settlement brokers. Notwithstanding the manner in which the
viatical settlement broker is compensated, a viatical settlement broker is
deemed to represent only the viator, and not the insurer or the viatical
settlement provider, and owes a fiduciary duty to the viator to act according
to the viator's instructions and in the best interests of the viator. Viatical settlement broker does not include
an attorney, certified public accountant, or a financial planner accredited by
a nationally recognized accreditation agency, who is retained to represent the
viator and whose compensation is not paid directly or indirectly by the
viatical settlement provider or purchaser.
Subd. 15. Viatical
settlement contract. (a)
"Viatical settlement contract" means a written agreement between a
viator and a viatical settlement provider establishing the terms under which
compensation or anything of value is or will be paid, which compensation or
value is less than the expected death benefits of the policy, in return for the
viator's present or future
assignment, transfer, sale, devise, or bequest of the death benefit or
ownership of any portion of the insurance policy or certificate of
insurance. Viatical settlement contract
also includes the transfer for compensation or value of ownership or beneficial
interest in a trust or other entity that owns such a policy if the trust or other
entity was formed or availed of for the principal purpose of acquiring one or
more life insurance contracts, which life insurance contract insures the life
of a person residing in this state.
(b) Viatical settlement contract
includes a premium finance loan made for a life insurance policy by a lender to
a viator on, before, or after the date of issuance of the policy where:
(1) the viator or the insured
receives on the date of the premium finance loan a guarantee of a future
viatical settlement value of the policy; or
(2) the viator or the insured agrees
on the date of the premium finance loan to sell the policy or any portion of
its death benefit on any date following the issuance of the policy.
(c) Viatical settlement contract
does not include:
(1) a policy loan or accelerated
death benefit made by the insurer pursuant to the policy's terms;
(2) loan proceeds that are used
solely to pay:
(i) premiums for the policy; and
(ii) the costs of the loan,
including, without limitation, interest, arrangement fees, utilization fees and
similar fees, closing costs, legal fees and expenses, trustee fees and
expenses, and third-party collateral provider fees and expenses, including fees
payable to letter of credit issuers;
(3) a loan made by a bank or other licensed
financial institution in which the lender takes an interest in a life insurance
policy solely to secure repayment of a loan or, if there is a default on the
loan and the policy is transferred, the transfer of a policy by the lender,
provided that neither the default itself nor the transfer of the policy in
connection with the default is pursuant to an agreement or understanding with
any other person for the purposes of evading regulation under sections 60A.957
to 60A.9585;
(4) a loan made by a lender that
does not violate chapter 59A, provided that the premium finance loan is not
described in clause (3);
(5) an agreement where all the
parties (i) are closely related to the insured by blood or law or (ii) have a
lawful substantial economic interest in the continued life, health, and bodily
safety of the person insured, or are trusts established primarily for the
benefit of the parties;
(6) any designation, consent, or
agreement by an insured who is an employee of an employer in connection with
the purchase by the employer, or trust established by the employer, of life
insurance on the life of the employee;
(7) a bona fide business succession
planning arrangement:
(i) between one or more shareholders
in a corporation or between a corporation and one or more of its shareholders
or one or more trusts established by its shareholders;
(ii) between one or more partners in
a partnership or between a partnership and one or more of its partners or one
or more trusts established by its partners; or
(iii) between one or more members in
a limited liability company or between a limited liability company and one or
more of its members or one or more trusts established by its members;
(8) an agreement entered into by a
service recipient, or a trust established by the service recipient, and a
service provider, or a trust established by the service provider, who performs
significant services for the service recipient's trade or business; or
(9) any other contract, transaction,
or arrangement exempted from the definition of viatical settlement contract by
the commissioner based on a determination that the contract, transaction, or
arrangement is not of the type intended to be regulated by sections 60A.957 to
60A.9585.
Subd. 16. Viatical
settlement investment agent. (a)
"Viatical settlement investment agent" means a person who is an
appointed or contracted agent of a licensed viatical settlement provider who
solicits or arranges the funding for the purchase of a viatical settlement by a
viatical settlement purchaser and who is acting on behalf of a viatical
settlement provider.
(b) A viatical settlement investment
agent shall not have any contact directly or indirectly with the viator or
insured or have knowledge of the identity of the viator or insured.
(c) A viatical settlement investment
agent is deemed to represent the viatical settlement provider of whom the
viatical settlement investment agent is an appointed or contracted agent.
Subd. 17. Viatical
settlement provider. (a)
"Viatical settlement provider" means a person, other than a viator,
that enters into or effectuates a viatical settlement contract with a viator
resident in this state.
(b) Viatical settlement provider
does not include:
(1) a bank, savings bank, savings
and loan association, credit union, or other licensed lending institution;
(2) a premium finance company making
premium finance loans and exempted by the commissioner from the licensing
requirement under the premium finance laws that takes an assignment of a life
insurance policy solely as collateral for a loan;
(3) the issuer of the life insurance
policy;
(4) an authorized or eligible
insurer that provides stop-loss coverage or financial guaranty insurance to a
viatical settlement provider, purchaser, financing entity, special purpose
entity, or related provider trust;
(5) a natural person who enters into
or effectuates no more than one agreement in a calendar year for the transfer
of life insurance policies for any value less than the expected death benefit;
(6) a financing entity;
(7) a special purpose entity;
(8) a related provider trust;
(9) a viatical settlement purchaser;
or
(10) any other person that the
commissioner determines is not the type of person intended to be covered by the
definition of viatical settlement provider.
Subd. 18. Viatical
settlement purchase agreement. "Viatical
settlement purchase agreement" means a contract or agreement, entered into
by a viatical settlement purchaser, to which the viator is not a party, to
purchase a life insurance policy or an interest in a life insurance policy,
that is entered into for the purpose of deriving an economic benefit.
Subd. 19. Viatical
settlement purchaser. (a)
"Viatical settlement purchaser" means a person who provides a sum of
money as consideration for a life insurance policy or an interest in the death
benefits of a life insurance policy, or a person who owns or acquires or is
entitled to a beneficial interest in a trust that owns a viatical settlement
contract or is the beneficiary of a life insurance policy that has been or will
be the subject of a viatical settlement contract, for the purpose of deriving
an economic benefit.
(b) Viatical settlement purchaser
does not include:
(1) a licensee under sections
60A.957 to 60A.9585;
(2) an accredited investor or
qualified institutional buyer as defined, respectively, in Rule 501(a) or Rule
144A promulgated under the Federal Securities Act of 1933, as amended;
(3) a financing entity;
(4) a special purpose entity; or
(5) a related provider trust.
Subd. 20. Viaticated
policy. "Viaticated
policy" means a life insurance policy or certificate that has been
acquired by a viatical settlement provider pursuant to a viatical settlement
contract.
Subd. 21. Viator. (a) "Viator" means the owner of
a life insurance policy or a certificate holder under a group policy that
resides in this state and enters or seeks to enter into a viatical settlement
contract. For purposes of sections
60A.957 to 60A.9585, a viator shall not be limited to an owner of a life
insurance policy or a certificate holder under a group policy insuring the life
of an individual with a terminal or chronic illness or condition except where
specifically addressed. If there is more
than one viator on a single policy and the viators are residents of different
states, the transaction is governed by the law of the state in which the viator
having the largest percentage ownership resides or, if the viators hold equal
ownership, the state of residence of one viator agreed upon in writing by all
the viators.
(b) Viator does not include:
(1) a licensee under sections
60A.957 to 60A.9585, including a life insurance producer acting as a viatical
settlement broker pursuant to sections 60A.957 to 60A.9585;
(2) a qualified institutional buyer
as defined in Rule 144A promulgated under the Federal Securities Act of 1933,
as amended;
(3) a financing entity;
(4) a special purpose entity; or
(5) a related provider trust.
Sec. 3. [60A.9572] LICENSE AND BOND
REQUIREMENTS.
Subdivision 1. Provider
or broker license required. A
person shall not operate as a viatical settlement provider or viatical
settlement broker in this state without first obtaining a license from the
commissioner of the state of residence of the viator.
Subd. 2. Agent
license required. A person
shall not operate as a viatical settlement investment agent in this state
without first obtaining a license from the commissioner of the state of
residence of the viatical settlement purchaser.
If there is more than one purchaser of a single policy and the
purchasers are residents of different states, the viatical settlement purchase
agreement shall be governed by the law of the state in which the purchaser
having the largest percentage ownership resides or, if the purchasers hold
equal ownership, the state of residence of one purchaser agreed upon in writing
by all purchasers.
Subd. 3. Life
insurance producer. (a) An
insurance producer who is currently licensed with the life line of authority
and has been licensed in good standing for at least one year is deemed to meet
the licensing requirements of this section and is permitted to operate as a
viatical settlement broker.
(b) Not later than 30 days from the
first day of operating as a viatical settlement broker, the life insurance
producer shall notify the commissioner that the life insurance producer is
acting as a viatical settlement broker on a form prescribed by the
commissioner, and shall pay any applicable fee to be determined by the
commissioner. Notification includes an
acknowledgment by the life insurance producer that the life insurance producer
will operate as a viatical settlement broker in accordance with sections
60A.957 to 60A.9585.
(c) The insurer that issued the
policy being viaticated is not responsible for any act or omission of a
viatical settlement broker or viatical settlement provider arising out of or in
connection with the viatical settlement transaction, unless the insurer
receives compensation for the placement of a viatical settlement contract from
the viatical settlement provider or viatical settlement broker in connection
with the viatical settlement contract.
(d) A person licensed as an
attorney, certified public accountant, or financial planner accredited by a
nationally recognized accreditation agency, who is retained to represent the
viator, whose compensation is not paid directly or indirectly by the viatical
settlement provider, may negotiate viatical settlement contracts on behalf of
the viator without having to obtain a license as a viatical settlement broker.
Subd. 4. Application. An application for a viatical settlement
provider, viatical settlement broker, or viatical settlement investment agent
license shall be made to the commissioner by the applicant on a form prescribed
by the commissioner, and these applications shall be accompanied by the fees
specified in section 60A.964.
Subd. 5. Renewals. A license may be renewed from year to year
on the anniversary date upon payment of the annual renewal fees specified in
section 60A.964. Failure to pay the fees
by the renewal date results in expiration of the license.
Subd. 6. Disclosures. The applicant shall provide information on
forms required by the commissioner. The
commissioner shall have authority, at any time, to require the applicant to
fully disclose the identity of all stockholders who hold more than ten percent
of the shares of the company, partners, officers, members, and employees, and
the commissioner may, in the exercise of the commissioner's discretion, refuse
to issue a license in the name of a legal entity if not satisfied that any
officer, employee, stockholder, partner, or member may materially influence the
applicant's conduct meets the standards of sections 60A.957 to 60A.9585.
Subd. 7. Legal
entity license. A license
issued to a legal entity authorizes all partners, officers, members, and
designated employees to act as viatical settlement providers, viatical
settlement brokers, or viatical settlement investment agents, as applicable,
under the license, and all those persons shall be named in the application and
any supplements to the application.
Subd. 8. Investigation. Upon the filing of an application and the
payment of the license fee, the commissioner shall make an investigation of
each applicant and issue a license if the commissioner finds that the
applicant:
(1) if a viatical settlement
provider, has provided a detailed plan of operation;
(2) is competent and trustworthy
and intends to act in good faith in the capacity involved by the license
applied for;
(3) has a good business reputation
and has had experience, training, or education so as to be qualified in the
business for which the license is applied for;
(4) if a viatical settlement
provider or a viatical settlement broker, has demonstrated evidence of
financial responsibility in a format prescribed by the commissioner through
either a surety bond executed and issued by an insurer authorized to issue
surety bonds in this state or a deposit of cash, certificates of deposit, or
securities or any combination thereof in an amount to be determined by the
commissioner. The commissioner shall
accept, as evidence of financial responsibility, proof that financial
instruments in accordance with the requirements in this clause have been filed
with one or more states where the applicant is licensed as a viatical
settlement provider or a viatical settlement broker. The commissioner may ask for evidence of
financial responsibility at any time the commissioner deems necessary. Any surety bond issued pursuant to this
clause shall be in favor of this state and shall specifically authorize
recovery by the commissioner on behalf of any person in this state who
sustained damages as the result of erroneous acts, failure to act, conviction
of fraud, or conviction of unfair practices by the viatical settlement provider
or a viatical settlement broker;
(5) if a legal entity, provides a
certificate of good standing from the state of its domicile; and
(6) if a viatical settlement
provider or viatical settlement broker, has provided an antifraud plan that
meets the requirements of section 60A.9583.
Subd. 9. Consent
to service of process. The
commissioner shall not issue a license to a nonresident applicant, unless a
written designation of an agent for service of process is filed and maintained
with the commissioner or the applicant has filed with the commissioner the
applicant's written irrevocable consent that any action against the applicant
may be commenced against the applicant by service of process on the
commissioner.
Subd. 10. Duty
to supplement information. A
viatical settlement provider, viatical settlement broker, or viatical
settlement investment agent shall provide to the commissioner new or revised
information about officers, ten percent or more stockholders, partners, directors,
members, or designated employees within 30 days of the change.
Subd. 11. Training
required. An individual
licensed as a viatical settlement broker shall complete on an annual basis six
hours of training related to viatical settlements and viatical settlement
transactions, as required by the commissioner; provided, however, that a life
insurance producer who is operating as a viatical settlement broker pursuant to
subdivision 3 shall not be subject to the requirements of this subdivision. Any person failing to meet the requirements
of this subdivision is subject to the penalties imposed by the commissioner.
Sec. 4. [60A.9573] LICENSE REVOCATION AND
DENIAL.
Subdivision 1. Grounds. The commissioner may suspend, revoke, or
refuse to issue or renew the license of a viatical settlement provider,
viatical settlement broker, or viatical settlement investment agent if the
commissioner finds that:
(1) there was any material
misrepresentation in the application for the license;
(2) the licensee or any officer,
partner, member, or key management personnel has been convicted of fraudulent
or dishonest practices, is subject to a final administrative action, or is
otherwise shown to be untrustworthy or incompetent;
(3) the viatical settlement
provider demonstrates a pattern of unreasonable payments to viators;
(4) the licensee or any officer,
partner, member, or key management personnel has been found guilty of, or has
pleaded guilty or nolo contendere to, any felony, or to a misdemeanor involving
fraud or moral turpitude, regardless of whether a judgment of conviction has
been entered by the court;
(5) the viatical settlement
provider has entered into any viatical settlement contract that has not been
approved pursuant to sections 60A.957 to 60A.9585;
(6) the viatical settlement
provider has failed to honor contractual obligations set out in a viatical
settlement contract or a viatical settlement purchase agreement;
(7) the licensee no longer meets
the requirements for initial licensure;
(8) the viatical settlement
provider has assigned, transferred, or pledged a viaticated policy to a person
other than a viatical settlement provider licensed in this state, a viatical
settlement purchaser, an accredited investor, or qualified institutional buyer
as defined respectively in Rule 501(a) or Rule 144A promulgated under the
Federal Securities Act of 1933, as amended, a financing entity, a special
purpose entity, or a related provider trust; or
(9) the licensee or any officer,
partner, member, or key management personnel has violated any provision of
sections 60A.957 to 60A.9585.
Subd. 2. Bad
faith by broker or producer. The
commissioner may suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew the license of a viatical
settlement broker or a life insurance producer operating as a viatical
settlement broker pursuant to sections 60A.957 to 60A.9585 if the commissioner
finds that the viatical settlement broker or life insurance producer has
violated the provisions of sections 60A.957 to 60A.9585 or has otherwise engaged
in bad faith conduct with one or more viators.
Subd. 3. License
enforcement actions. Section
45.027 applies to any action taken by the commissioner to deny a license
application or suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew the license of a viatical
settlement provider, viatical settlement broker, or viatical settlement
investment agent, or suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew a license of a life
insurance producer operating as a viatical settlement broker pursuant to
sections 60A.957 to 60A.9585.
Sec. 5. [60A.9574] APPROVAL OF VIATICAL
SETTLEMENT CONTRACTS AND DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS.
A person shall not use a viatical
settlement contract form or provide to a viator a disclosure statement form in
this state unless first filed with and approved by the commissioner. The commissioner shall disapprove a viatical
settlement contract form or disclosure statement form if, in the commissioner's
opinion, the contract or provisions fail to meet the requirements of sections
60A.9577, 60A.9579, 60A.9582, and 60A.9583, subdivision 2, or are unreasonable,
contrary to the interests of the public, or otherwise misleading or unfair to
the viator. At the commissioner's
discretion, the commissioner may require the submission of advertising
material.
Sec. 6. [60A.9575] REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND
PRIVACY.
Subdivision 1. Annual
statement. A viatical
settlement provider shall file with the commissioner on or before March 1 of
each year an annual statement containing the following information:
(1) for each policy viaticated, the
date that the viatical settlement was entered into; the life expectancy of the
viator at the time of the contract; the face amount of the policy; the amount
paid by the viatical settlement provider to viaticate the policy; and if the
viator has died, the date of death and the total insurance premiums paid by the
viatical settlement provider to maintain the policy in force;
(2) a breakdown by disease category
of applications received, accepted, and rejected;
(3) a breakdown of policies
viaticated by issuer and policy type;
(4) the number of secondary market
versus primary market transactions;
(5) the portfolio size; and
(6) the amount of outside
borrowings.
The information shall be limited to
only those transactions where the viator is a resident of this state. Individual transaction data regarding the
business of viatical settlements or data that could compromise the privacy of
personal, financial, and health information of the viator or insured shall be
filed with the commissioner on a confidential basis.
Subd. 2. Identity
disclosure restrictions. Except
as otherwise allowed or required by law, a viatical settlement provider,
viatical settlement broker, or viatical settlement investment agent, insurance
company, insurance producer, information bureau, rating agency or company, or
any other person with actual knowledge of an insured's identity, shall not
disclose that identity as an insured, or the insured's financial or medical
information to any other person unless the disclosure:
(1) is necessary to effect a
viatical settlement between the viator and a viatical settlement provider and
the viator and insured have provided prior written consent to the disclosure;
(2) is necessary to effect a
viatical settlement purchase agreement between the viatical settlement
purchaser and a viatical settlement provider and the viator and insured have
provided prior written consent to the disclosure;
(3) is provided in response to an
investigation or examination by the commissioner or any other governmental officer
or agency or pursuant to section 45.027;
(4) is a term of or condition to the
transfer of a policy by one viatical settlement provider to another viatical
settlement provider;
(5) is necessary to permit a
financing entity, related provider trust, or special purpose entity to finance
the purchase of policies by a viatical settlement provider and the viator and
insured have provided prior written consent to the disclosure;
(6) is necessary to allow a viatical
settlement provider or viatical settlement broker or an authorized
representative to make contacts for the purpose of determining health status;
or
(7) is required to purchase
stop-loss coverage or financial guaranty insurance.
Sec. 7. [60A.9577] DISCLOSURE TO VIATOR.
Subdivision 1. Application
disclosures by provider and broker.
With an application for a viatical settlement, a viatical settlement
provider or viatical settlement broker shall provide the viator with at least
the following disclosures no later than the time the application for the
viatical settlement contract is signed by all parties. The disclosures shall be provided in a
separate document that is signed by the viator and the viatical settlement
provider or viatical settlement broker, and shall provide the following information:
(1) that a viatical settlement
broker represents exclusively the viator, and not the insurer or the viatical
settlement provider, and owes a fiduciary duty to the viator, including a duty
to act according to the viator's instructions and in the best interests of the
viator;
(2) some or all of the proceeds of
the viatical settlement may be taxable under federal income tax and state
franchise and income taxes, and assistance should be sought from a professional
tax advisor;
(3) proceeds of the viatical
settlement could be subject to the claims of creditors;
(4) receipt of the proceeds of a
viatical settlement may adversely affect the viator's eligibility for Medicaid
or other government benefits or entitlements, and advice should be obtained
from the appropriate government agencies;
(5) the viator has the right to
rescind a viatical settlement contract before the earlier of 60 calendar days
after the date upon which the viatical settlement contract is executed by all
parties or 30 calendar days after the viatical settlement proceeds have been
paid to the viator, as provided in section 60A.9579, subdivision 5. Rescission, if exercised by the viator, is
effective only if both notice of the rescission is given, and the viator repays
all proceeds and any premiums, loans, and loan interest paid on account of the
viatical settlement within the rescission period. If the insured dies during the rescission
period, the viatical settlement contract shall be deemed to have been
rescinded, subject to repayment by the viator or the viator's estate of all
viatical settlement proceeds and any premiums, loans, and loan interest to the
viatical settlement within 60 days of the insured's death;
(6) funds will be sent to the
viator within three business days after the viatical settlement provider has
received the insurer or group administrator's written acknowledgment that
ownership of the policy or interest in the certificate has been transferred and
the beneficiary has been designated;
(7) entering into a viatical settlement
contract may cause other rights or benefits, including conversion rights and
waiver of premium benefits that may exist under the policy or certificate, to
be forfeited by the viator. Assistance
should be sought from a financial adviser;
(8) the disclosure document shall
contain the following language: "All medical, financial, or personal
information solicited or obtained by a viatical settlement provider or viatical
settlement broker about an insured, including the insured's identity or the identity
of family members, a spouse, or a significant other may be disclosed as
necessary to effect the viatical settlement between the viator and the viatical
settlement provider. If you are asked to
provide this information, you will be asked to consent to the disclosure. The information may be provided to someone
who buys the policy or provides funds for the purchase. You may be asked to renew your permission to
share information every two years."; and
(9) following execution of a
viatical contract, the insured may be contacted for the purpose of determining
the insured's health status and to confirm the insured's residential or
business street address and telephone number, or as otherwise provided in
sections 60A.957 to 60A.9585. This
contact shall be limited to once every three months if the insured has a life
expectancy of more than one year, and no more than once per month if the
insured has a life expectancy of one year or less. Contracts shall be made only by a viatical
settlement provider licensed in the state in which the viator resided at the
time of the viatical settlement, or by the authorized representative of a duly
licensed viatical settlement provider.
Disclosure to a viator under this subdivision includes
distribution of a brochure describing the process of viatical settlements. The National Association of Insurance
Commissioners' form for the brochure shall be used unless another form is
developed or approved by the commissioner.
Subd. 2. Contract
disclosures by provider. A
viatical settlement provider shall provide the viator with at least the
following disclosures no later than the date the viatical settlement contract
is signed by all parties. The
disclosures shall be conspicuously displayed in the viatical settlement
contract or in a separate document signed by the viator and provide the
following information:
(1) the affiliation, if any,
between the viatical settlement provider and the issuer of the insurance policy
to be viaticated;
(2) the document includes the name,
business address, and telephone number of the viatical settlement provider;
(3) any affiliations or contractual
arrangements between the viatical settlement provider and the viatical
settlement broker;
(4) if an insurance policy to be
viaticated has been issued as a joint policy or involves family riders or any
coverage of a life other than the insured under the policy to be viaticated,
the viator shall be informed of the possible loss of coverage on the other
lives under the policy and shall be advised to consult with the viator's
insurance producer or the insurer issuing the policy for advice on the proposed
viatical settlement;
(5) state the dollar amount of the
current death benefit payable to the viatical settlement provider under the
policy or certificate. If known, the
viatical settlement provider shall also disclose the availability of any
additional guaranteed insurance benefits, the dollar amount of any accidental
death and dismemberment benefits under the policy or certificate, and the
extent to which the viator's interest in those benefits will be transferred as
a result of the viatical settlement contract; and
(6) state whether the funds will be
escrowed with an independent third party during the transfer process, and if
so, provide the name, business address, and telephone number of the independent
third-party escrow agent, and the fact that the viator or owner may inspect or
receive copies of the relevant escrow or trust agreements or documents.
Subd. 3. Contract
disclosures by broker. A viatical
settlement broker shall provide the viator with at least the following
disclosures no later than the date the viatical settlement contract is signed
by all parties. The disclosures shall be
conspicuously displayed in the viatical settlement contract or in a separate
document signed by the viator and provide the following information:
(1) the name, business address, and
telephone number of the viatical settlement broker;
(2) a full, complete, and accurate
description of all offers, counteroffers, acceptances, and rejections relating
to the proposed viatical settlement contract;
(3) a written disclosure of any
affiliations or contractual arrangements between the viatical settlement broker
and any person making an offer in connection with the proposed viatical
settlement contracts;
(4) the amount and method of
calculating the broker's compensation, the term "compensation"
includes anything of value paid or given to a viatical settlement broker for
the placement of a policy; and
(5) where any portion of the
viatical settlement broker's compensation, as defined in subdivision 3, clause
(4), is taken from a proposed viatical settlement offer, the broker shall
disclose the total amount of the viatical settlement offer and the percentage
of the viatical settlement offer comprised by the viatical settlement broker's
compensation.
Subd. 4. Ownership
and beneficiary changes. If
the viatical settlement provider transfers ownership or changes the beneficiary
of the insurance policy, the provider shall communicate in writing the change
in ownership or beneficiary to the insured within 20 days after the change.
Subd. 5. Contract
disclosures by provider or agent.
A viatical settlement provider or its viatical settlement investment
agent shall provide the viatical settlement purchaser with at least the
following disclosures prior to the date the viatical settlement purchase
agreement is signed by all parties. The
disclosures shall be conspicuously displayed in any viatical purchase contract
or in a separate document signed by the viatical settlement purchaser and
viatical settlement provider or viatical settlement investment agent, and shall
make the following disclosures to the viatical settlement purchaser:
(1) the purchaser will receive no
returns, for example, dividends and interest, until the insured dies and a
death claim payment is made;
(2) the actual annual rate of return
on a viatical settlement contract is dependent upon an accurate projection of
the insured's life expectancy, and the actual date of the insured's death. An annual guaranteed rate of return is not
determinable;
(3) the viaticated life insurance
contract should not be considered a liquid purchase since it is impossible to
predict the exact timing of its maturity and the funds are probably not
available until the death of the insured.
There is no established secondary market for resale of these products by
the purchaser;
(4) the purchaser may lose all
benefits or may receive substantially reduced benefits if the insurer goes out
of business during the term of the viatical investment;
(5) the purchaser is responsible for
payment of the insurance premium or other costs related to the policy, if
required by the terms of the viatical purchase agreement. These payments may reduce the purchaser's
return. If a party other than the
purchaser is responsible for the payment, the name and address of that party
shall also be disclosed;
(6) the purchaser is responsible for
payment of the insurance premiums or other costs related to the policy if the
insured returns to health. Disclose the
amount of the premiums, if applicable;
(7) the name, business address, and
telephone number of the independent third party providing escrow services and
the relationship to the broker;
(8) the amount of any trust fees or
other expenses to be charged to the viatical settlement purchaser shall be
disclosed;
(9) whether the purchaser is
entitled to a refund of all or part of the purchaser's investment under the
settlement contract if the policy is later determined to be null and void;
(10) that group policies may contain
limitations or caps in the conversion rights, additional premiums may have to
be paid if the policy is converted, name the party responsible for the payment
of the additional premiums and, if a group policy is terminated and replaced by
another group policy, state that there may be no right to convert the original
coverage;
(11) the risks associated with
policy contestability including, but not limited to, the risk that the
purchaser will have no claim or only a partial claim to death benefits should
the insurer rescind the policy within the contestability period;
(12) whether the purchaser will be
the owner of the policy in addition to being the beneficiary, and if the
purchaser is the beneficiary only and not also the owner, the special risks
associated with that status, including, but not limited to, the risk that the
beneficiary may be changed or the premium may not be paid; and
(13) the experience and
qualifications of the person who determines the life expectancy of the insured,
for example, in-house staff, independent physicians, and specialty firms that
weigh medical and actuarial data; the information this projection is based on;
and the relationship of the projection maker to the viatical settlement
provider, if any.
Disclosure to a viatical settlement
purchaser under this subdivision includes the distribution of a brochure
describing the process of investment in viatical settlements. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners'
form for the brochure shall be used unless one is developed by the
commissioner.
Subd. 6. Transfer
or sale disclosures by provider or agent. A viatical settlement provider or its
viatical settlement investment agent shall provide the viatical settlement
purchaser with at least the following disclosures no later than at the time of
the assignment, transfer, or sale of all or a portion of an insurance
policy. The disclosures shall be
contained in a document signed by the viatical settlement purchaser and
viatical settlement provider or viatical settlement investment agent, and shall
make the following disclosures to the viatical settlement purchaser:
(1) disclose all the life expectancy
certifications obtained by the provider in the process of determining the price
paid to the viator;
(2) state whether premium payments
or other costs related to the policy have been escrowed. If escrowed, state the date upon which the
escrowed funds will be depleted and whether the purchaser will be responsible
for payment of premiums thereafter and, if so, the amount of the premiums;
(3) state whether premium payments
or other costs related to the policy have been waived. If waived, disclose whether the investor will
be responsible for payment of the premiums if the insurer that wrote the policy
terminates the waiver after purchase and the amount of those premiums;
(4) disclose the type of policy
offered or sold, for example, whole life, term life, universal life, or a group
policy certificate; any additional benefits contained in the policy; and the
current status of the policy;
(5) if the policy is term insurance,
disclose the special risks associated with term insurance including, but not
limited to, the purchaser's responsibility for additional premiums if the
viator continues the term policy at the end of the current term;
(6) state whether the policy is
contestable;
(7) state whether the insurer that
wrote the policy has any additional rights that could negatively affect or
extinguish the purchaser's rights under the viatical settlement contract, what
these rights are, and under what conditions these rights are activated; and
(8) state the name and address of
the person responsible for monitoring the insured's condition. Describe how often the monitoring of the
insured's condition is done, how the date of death is determined, and how and
when this information will be transmitted to the purchaser.
Subd. 7. Agreement
voidable. The viatical
settlement purchase agreement is voidable by the purchaser at any time within
three days after the disclosures mandated by subdivisions 4 and 5 are received
by the purchaser.
Sec. 8. [60A.9579] GENERAL RULES.
Subdivision 1. Provider
requirements. (a) A viatical
settlement provider entering into a viatical settlement contract shall first
obtain:
(1) if the viator is the insured, a
written statement from a licensed attending physician that the viator is of
sound mind and under no constraint or undue influence to enter into a viatical
settlement contract; and
(2) a document in which the insured
consents to the release of the insured's medical records to a licensed viatical
settlement provider, viatical settlement broker, and the insurance company that
issued the life insurance policy covering the life of the insured.
(b) Within 20 days after a viator
executes documents necessary to transfer any rights under an insurance policy
or within 20 days of entering any agreement, option, promise, or any other form
of understanding, expressed or implied, to viaticate the policy, the viatical
settlement provider shall give written notice to the insurer that issued that
insurance policy that the policy has or will become a viaticated policy. The notice shall be accompanied by the
documents required by paragraph (c).
(c) The viatical provider shall
deliver a copy of the medical release required under paragraph (a), clause (2),
a copy of the viator's application for the viatical settlement contract, the
notice required under paragraph (b), and a request for verification of coverage
to the insurer that issued the life insurance policy that is the subject of the
viatical transaction. The National
Association of Insurance Commissioners' form for verification of coverage shall
be used unless another form is developed or approved by the commissioner.
(d) The insurer shall respond to a
request for verification of coverage submitted on an approved form by a
viatical settlement provider or viatical settlement broker within 30 calendar
days of the date the request is received and shall indicate whether, based on
the medical evidence and documents provided, the insurer intends to pursue an
investigation at this time regarding the validity of the insurance contract or
possible fraud. The insurer shall accept
a request for verification of coverage made on an National Association of
Insurance Commissioners form or any other form approved by the
commissioner. The insurer shall accept
an original or facsimile or electronic copy of a request and any accompanying
authorization signed by the viator.
Failure by the insurer to meet its obligations under this subdivision is
a violation of sections 60A.9581, subdivision 3, and 60A.9585.
(e) Prior to or at the time of
execution of the viatical settlement contract, the viatical settlement provider
shall obtain a witnessed document in which the viator consents to the viatical
settlement contract, represents that the viator has a full and complete
understanding of the viatical settlement contract, that the viator has a full
and complete understanding of the benefits of the life insurance policy,
acknowledges that the viator is entering into the viatical settlement contract
freely and voluntarily and, for persons with a terminal or chronic illness or
condition, acknowledges that the insured has a terminal or chronic illness and
that the terminal or chronic illness or condition was diagnosed after the life
insurance policy was issued.
(f) If a viatical settlement broker
performs any of these activities required of the viatical settlement provider,
the provider is deemed to have fulfilled the requirements of this section.
Subd. 2. Confidentiality
of personal information. All
personal information solicited or obtained by any licensee shall be subject to
sections 72A.49 to 72A.505.
Subd. 3. General
right of rescission. A
viatical settlement contract entered into in this state shall provide the
viator with an absolute right to rescind the contract before the earlier of 30
calendar days after the date upon which the viatical settlement contract is
executed by all parties or 15 calendar days after the viatical settlement
proceeds have been sent to the viator as provided in subdivision 6. Rescission by the viator may be conditioned
upon the viator both giving notice and repaying to the viatical settlement
provider within the rescission period all proceeds of the settlement and any
premiums, loans, and loan interest paid by or on behalf of the viatical
settlement provider in connection with or as a consequence of the viatical
settlement. If the insured dies during
the rescission period, the viatical settlement contract is deemed to have been
rescinded, subject to repayment to the viatical settlement provider or
purchaser of all viatical settlement proceeds, and any premiums, loans, and
loan interest that have been paid by the viatical settlement provider or
purchaser, which shall be paid within 60 calendar days of the death of the
insured. In the event of any rescission,
if the viatical settlement provider has paid commissions or other compensation
to a viatical settlement broker in connection with the rescinded transaction,
the viatical settlement broker shall refund all commissions and compensation to
the viatical settlement provider within five business days following receipt of
written demand from the viatical settlement provider, which demand shall be
accompanied by either the viator's notice of rescission if rescinded at the
election of the viator, or notice of the death of the insured if rescinded by
reason of the death of the insured within the applicable rescission period.
Subd. 4. Right
to rescind after mandated disclosures.
The purchaser shall have the right to rescind a viatical settlement
contract within three days after the disclosures mandated by section 60A.9577,
subdivisions 5 and 6, are received by the purchaser.
Subd. 5. Payment
of settlement proceeds. The
viatical settlement provider shall instruct the viator to send the executed
documents required to effect the change in ownership, assignment, or change in
beneficiary directly to the independent escrow agent. Within three business days after the date the
escrow agent receives the document, or from the date the viatical settlement
provider receives the documents, if the viator erroneously provides the
documents directly to the provider, the provider shall pay or transfer the
proceeds of the viatical settlement into an escrow or trust account maintained
in a state- or federally chartered financial institution whose deposits are
insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Upon payment of the settlement proceeds into
the escrow account, the escrow agent shall deliver the original change in
ownership, assignment, or change in beneficiary forms
to the viatical settlement provider
or related provider trust or other designated representative of the viatical
settlement provider. Upon the escrow
agent's receipt of the acknowledgment of the properly completed transfer of
ownership, assignment, or designation of beneficiary from the insurance
company, the escrow agent shall pay the settlement proceeds to the viator.
Subd. 6. Tendering
consideration. Failure to
tender consideration to the viator for the viatical settlement contract within
the time set forth in the disclosure pursuant to section 60A.9577, subdivision
1, clause (6), renders the viatical settlement contract voidable by the viator
for lack of consideration until the time consideration is tendered to and
accepted by the viator. Funds shall be
deemed sent by a viatical settlement provider to a viator as of the date that
the escrow agent either releases funds for wire transfer to the viator or
places a check for delivery to the viator by United States mail or other
nationally recognized delivery service.
Subd. 7. Health
status contacts. Contacts
with the insured for the purpose of determining the health status of the
insured by the viatical settlement provider or viatical settlement broker after
the viatical settlement has occurred shall only be made by the viatical
settlement provider or broker licensed in this state or its authorized
representatives and shall be limited to once every three months for insureds
with a life expectancy of more than one year, and to no more than once per
month for insureds with a life expectancy of one year or less. The provider or broker shall explain the
procedure for these contacts at the time the viatical settlement contract is
entered into. The limitations in this
subdivision shall not apply to any contacts with an insured for reasons other
than determining the insured's health status.
Viatical settlement providers and viatical settlement brokers shall be
responsible for the actions of their authorized representatives.
Sec. 9. [60A.9581] PROHIBITED PRACTICES AND
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.
Subdivision 1. Solicitations
and sales to controlled person. With
respect to any viatical settlement contract or insurance policy, no viatical
settlement broker knowingly shall solicit an offer from, effectuate a viatical
settlement with, or make a sale to any viatical settlement provider, viatical
settlement purchaser, viatical settlement investment agent, financing entity,
or related provider trust that is controlling, controlled by, or under common
control with a viatical settlement broker unless this relationship is disclosed
to the viator.
Subd. 2. Payment
to controlled broker. With
respect to any viatical settlement contract or insurance policy, no viatical
settlement provider knowingly may enter into a viatical settlement contract
with a viator, if, in connection with a viatical settlement contract, anything
of value will be paid to a viatical settlement broker that is controlling,
controlled by, or under common control with a viatical settlement provider or
the viatical settlement purchaser, viatical settlement investment agent, financing
entity, or related provider trust that is involved in a viatical settlement
contract unless this relationship is disclosed to the viator.
Subd. 3. Fraudulent
viatical settlement act. A
violation of subdivisions 1 and 2 is deemed a fraudulent viatical settlement
act.
Subd. 4. Advertising. (a) No viatical settlement provider shall
enter into a viatical settlement contract unless the viatical settlement
promotional, advertising, and marketing materials, as may be prescribed by
rule, have been filed with the commissioner.
In no event shall any marketing materials expressly reference that the
insurance is "free" for any period of time. The inclusion of any reference in the
marketing materials that would cause a viator to reasonably believe that the
insurance is free for any period of time shall be considered a violation of
sections 60A.957 to 60A.9585.
(b) No life insurance producer,
insurance company, viatical settlement broker, viatical settlement provider, or
viatical settlement investment agent shall make any statement or representation
to the applicant or policyholder in connection with the sale or financing of a
life insurance policy to the effect that the insurance is free or without cost
to the policyholder for any period of time unless provided in the policy.
Sec. 10. [60A.9582] ADVERTISING FOR VIATICAL
SETTLEMENTS AND VIATICAL SETTLEMENTS PURCHASE AGREEMENTS.
Subdivision 1. Application. This section applies to any advertising of
viatical settlement contracts, viatical purchase agreements, or related
products or services intended for dissemination in this state, including
Internet advertising viewed by persons located in this state. Where disclosure requirements are established
pursuant to federal regulation, this section shall be interpreted so as to
minimize or eliminate conflict with federal regulation wherever possible.
Subd. 2. System
of control. Every viatical
settlement licensee shall establish and at all times maintain a system of
control over the content, form, and method of dissemination of all
advertisements of its contracts, products, and services. All advertisements, regardless of by whom
written, created, designed, or presented, shall be the responsibility of the
viatical settlement licensees, as well as the individual who created or
presented the advertisement. A system of
control shall include regular routine notification, at least once a year, to
agents and others authorized by the viatical settlement licensee who disseminate
advertisements of the requirements and procedures for approval prior to the use
of any advertisements not furnished by the viatical settlement licensee.
Subd. 3. Form
and content. Advertisements
shall be truthful and not misleading in fact or by implication. The form and content of an advertisement of a
viatical settlement contract or viatical settlement purchase agreement,
product, or service shall be sufficiently complete and clear so as to avoid
deception and it shall not have the capacity or tendency to mislead or deceive. Whether an advertisement has the capacity or
tendency to mislead or deceive shall be determined by the commissioner from the
overall impression that the advertisement may be reasonably expected to create
upon a person of average education or intelligence within the segment of the
public to which it is directed.
Subd. 4. False
and misleading advertisements. Certain
viatical settlement advertisements are deemed false and misleading on their
face and are prohibited. False and
misleading viatical settlement advertisements include, but are not limited to,
the following representations:
(1) "guaranteed,"
"fully secured," "100 percent secured," "fully
insured," "secure," "safe," "backed by rated
insurance companies," "backed by federal law," "backed by state
law," "state guaranty funds," or similar representations;
(2) "no risk,"
"minimal risk," "low risk," "no speculation,"
"no fluctuation," or similar representations;
(3) "qualified or approved for
individual retirement accounts (IRAs), Roth IRAs, 401(k) plans, simplified
employee pensions (SEP), 403(b), Keogh plans, TSA, other retirement account
rollovers," "tax deferred," or similar representations;
(4) utilization of the word
"guaranteed" to describe the fixed return, annual return, principal,
earnings, profits, investment, or similar representations;
(5) "no sales charges or
fees" or similar representations;
(6) "high yield,"
"superior return," "excellent return," "high
return," "quick profit," or similar representations; and
(7) purported favorable representations
or testimonials about the benefits of viatical settlement contracts or viatical
settlement purchase agreements as an investment, taken out of context from
newspapers, trade papers, journals, radio and television programs, and all
other forms of print and electronic media.
Subd. 5. Disclosures
regulated. (a) The
information required to be disclosed under this section shall not be minimized,
rendered obscure, or presented in ambiguous fashion or intermingled with the
text of the advertisement so as to be confusing or misleading.
(b) An advertisement shall not omit
material information or use words, phrases, statements, references, or
illustrations if the omission or use has the capacity, tendency, or effect of
misleading or deceiving viators, purchasers, or prospective purchasers as to
the nature or extent of any benefit, loss covered, premium payable, or state or
federal tax consequence. The fact that
the viatical settlement contract or viatical settlement purchase agreement
offered is made available for inspection prior to consummation of the sale, or
an offer is made to refund the payment if the viator is not satisfied or that
the viatical settlement contract or viatical settlement purchase agreement
includes a "free look" period that satisfies or exceeds legal
requirements, does not remedy misleading statements.
(c) An advertisement shall not use
the name or title of a life insurance company or a life insurance policy unless
the advertisement has been approved by the insurer.
(d) An advertisement shall not
represent that premium payments will not be required to be paid on the life
insurance policy that is the subject of a viatical settlement contract or
viatical settlement purchase agreement in order to maintain that policy, unless
that is the fact.
(e) An advertisement shall not
state or imply that interest charged on an accelerated death benefit or a
policy loan is unfair, inequitable, or in any manner an incorrect or improper
practice.
(f) The words "free,"
"no cost," "without cost," "no additional cost,"
"at no extra cost," or words of similar import shall not be used with
respect to any benefit or service unless true.
An advertisement may specify the charge for a benefit or a service or
may state that a charge is included in the payment or use other appropriate
language.
(g) Testimonials, appraisals, or
analysis used in advertisements must be genuine; represent the current opinion
of the author; be applicable to the viatical settlement contract or viatical
settlement purchase agreement product or service advertised, if any; and be
accurately reproduced with sufficient completeness to avoid misleading or
deceiving prospective viators or purchasers as to the nature or scope of the
testimonials, appraisal, analysis, or endorsement. In using testimonials, appraisals, or
analysis, a licensee under sections 60A.957 to 60A.9585 makes as its own all
the statements contained therein, and the statements are subject to all the
provisions of this section.
(h) If the individual making a
testimonial, appraisal, analysis, or endorsement has a financial interest in
the party making use of the testimonial, appraisal, analysis, or endorsement,
either directly or through a related entity as a stockholder, director,
officer, employee, or otherwise, or receives any benefit directly or indirectly
other than required union-scale wages, that fact shall be prominently disclosed
in the advertisement.
(i) An advertisement shall not
state or imply that a viatical settlement contract or viatical settlement purchase
agreement, benefit, or service has been approved or endorsed by a group of
individuals, society, association, or other organization unless that is the
fact and unless any relationship between an organization and the viatical
settlement licensee is disclosed. If the
entity making the endorsement or testimonial is owned, controlled, or managed
by the viatical settlement licensee, or receives any payment or other
consideration from the viatical settlement licensee for making an endorsement
or testimonial, that fact shall be disclosed in the advertisement.
(j) When an endorsement refers to
benefits received under a viatical settlement contract or viatical settlement
purchase agreement, all pertinent information shall be retained for a period of
five years after its use.
Subd. 6. Statistics. An advertisement shall not contain
statistical information unless it accurately reflects recent and relevant
facts. The source of all statistics used
in an advertisement shall be identified.
Subd. 7. Disparaging
advertisements. An
advertisement shall not disparage insurers, viatical settlement providers,
viatical settlement brokers, viatical settlement investment agents, insurance
producers, policies, services, or methods of marketing.
Subd. 8. Licensee's
name. The name of the
viatical settlement licensee shall be clearly identified in all advertisements
about the licensee or its viatical settlement contract or viatical settlement
purchase agreements, products, or services, and if any specific viatical
settlement contract or viatical settlement purchase agreement is advertised,
the viatical settlement contract or viatical settlement purchase agreement
shall be identified either by form number or some other appropriate
description. If an application is part
of the advertisement, the name of the viatical settlement provider shall be
shown on the application.
Subd. 9. Licensee
disclosure. An advertisement
shall not use a trade name, group designation, name of the parent company of a
viatical settlement licensee, name of a particular division of the viatical
settlement licensee, service mark, slogan, symbol, or other device or reference
without disclosing the name of the viatical settlement licensee, if the
advertisement would have the capacity or tendency to mislead or deceive as to
the true identity of the viatical settlement licensee, or to create the
impression that a company other than the viatical settlement licensee would
have any responsibility for the financial obligation under a viatical
settlement contract or viatical settlement purchase agreement.
Subd. 10. Government
sponsorship; misleading advertisements.
An advertisement shall not use any combination of words, symbols, or
physical materials that by their content, phraseology, shape, color, or other
characteristics are so similar to a combination of words, symbols, or physical
materials used by a government program or agency or otherwise appear to be of
such a nature that they tend to mislead prospective viators or purchasers into
believing that the solicitation is in some manner connected with a government
program or agency.
Subd. 11. State
licensure. An advertisement
may state that a viatical settlement licensee is licensed in the state where
the advertisement appears, provided it does not exaggerate that fact or suggest
or imply that a competing viatical settlement licensee may not be so
licensed. The advertisement may ask the
audience to consult the licensee's Web site or contact the Department of
Commerce to find out if the state requires licensing and, if so, whether the
viatical settlement provider, viatical settlement broker, or viatical
settlement investment agent is licensed.
Subd. 12. Government
entity endorsement. An
advertisement shall not create the impression that the viatical settlement
provider, its financial condition or status, the payment of its claims, or the
merits, desirability, or advisability of its viatical settlement contracts or
viatical settlement purchase agreement forms are recommended or endorsed by any
government entity.
Subd. 13. Name. The name of the actual licensee shall be
stated in all of its advertisements. An
advertisement shall not use a trade name, any group designation, name of any
affiliate or controlling entity of the licensee, service mark, slogan, symbol,
or other device in a manner that would have the capacity or tendency to mislead
or deceive as to the true identity of the actual licensee or create the false
impression that an affiliate or controlling entity would have any
responsibility for the financial obligation of the licensee.
Subd. 14. Government
approval. An advertisement
shall not directly or indirectly create the impression that any division or
agency of the state or of the United States government endorses, approves, or
favors:
(1) any viatical settlement
licensee or its business practices or methods of operation;
(2) the merits, desirability, or
advisability of any viatical settlement contract or viatical settlement
purchase agreement;
(3) any viatical settlement
contract or viatical settlement purchase agreement; or
(4) any life insurance policy or
life insurance company.
Subd. 15. Time
frame disclosure. If the
advertiser emphasizes the speed with which the viatication will occur, the
advertising must disclose the average time frame from completed application to
the date of offer and from acceptance of the offer to receipt of the funds by
the viator.
Subd. 16. Average
purchase price. If the
advertising emphasizes the dollar amounts available to viators, the advertising
shall disclose the average purchase price as a percent of face value obtained
by viators contracting with the licensee during the past six months.
Sec. 11. [60A.9583] FRAUD PREVENTION AND CONTROL.
Subdivision 1. Fraudulent
viatical settlement acts, interference, and participation of convicted felons
prohibited. (a) A person who
commits a fraudulent viatical settlement act commits insurance fraud and may be
sentenced under section 609.611, subdivision 3.
(b) A person shall not knowingly or
intentionally interfere with the enforcement of the provisions of sections
60A.957 to 60A.9585 or investigations of suspected or actual violations of
sections 60A.957 to 60A.9585.
(c) A person in the business of
viatical settlements shall not knowingly or intentionally permit any person
convicted of a felony involving dishonesty or breach of trust to participate in
the business of viatical settlements.
Subd. 2. Fraud
warning required. (a)
Viatical settlements contracts and purchase agreement forms and applications
for viatical settlements, regardless of the form of transmission, shall contain
the following statement or a substantially similar statement: "Any person
who knowingly presents false information in an application for insurance or
viatical settlement contract or a viatical settlement purchase agreement is
guilty of a crime and may be subject to fines and confinement in prison."
(b) The lack of a statement as
required in paragraph (a) does not constitute a defense in any prosecution for
a fraudulent viatical settlement act.
Subd. 3. Mandatory
reporting of fraudulent viatical settlement acts. Any person engaged in the business of
viatical settlements having knowledge or a reasonable suspicion that a
fraudulent viatical settlement act is being, will be, or has been committed
shall provide to the commissioner such information as required by, and in a
manner prescribed by, the commissioner.
Subd. 4. Viatical
settlement antifraud initiatives.
(a) Viatical settlement providers and viatical settlement brokers
shall have in place antifraud initiatives reasonably calculated to detect,
prosecute, and prevent fraudulent viatical settlement acts. At the discretion of the commissioner, the
commissioner may order, or a licensee may request and the commissioner may
grant, such modifications of the following required initiatives as necessary to
ensure an effective antifraud program.
The modifications may be more or less restrictive than the required
initiatives so long as the modifications may reasonably be expected to
accomplish the purpose of this section.
(b) Antifraud initiatives shall
include:
(1) fraud investigators, who may be
viatical settlement provider or viatical settlement broker employees or
independent contractors; and
(2) an antifraud plan, which shall
be submitted to the commissioner. The
antifraud plan shall include, but not be limited to:
(i) a description of the procedures
for detecting and investigating possible fraudulent viatical settlement acts
and procedures for resolving material inconsistencies between medical records
and insurance applications;
(ii) a description of the
procedures for reporting possible fraudulent viatical settlement acts to the
commissioner;
(iii) a description of the plan for
antifraud education and training of underwriters and other personnel; and
(iv) a description or chart
outlining the organizational arrangement of the antifraud personnel who are
responsible for the investigation and reporting of possible fraudulent viatical
settlement acts and investigating unresolved material inconsistencies between
medical records and insurance applications.
(c) Antifraud plans submitted to
the commissioner shall be privileged and confidential and shall not be a public
record and shall not be subject to discovery or subpoena in a civil or criminal
action.
Sec. 12. [60A.9585] UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES.
A violation of sections 60A.957 to
60A.9585, including the commission of a fraudulent viatical settlement act,
shall be considered an unfair trade practice under section 72A.20.
Sec. 13.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 60A.964, subdivision 1, is amended to
read:
Subdivision 1. Amount.
The licensing fee for a viatical settlement provider, viatical
settlement broker, or viatical settlement investment agent license is $750
for initial licensure and $250 for each annual renewal. The fees must be limited to the cost of
license administration and enforcement and must be deposited in the state
treasury, credited to a special account, and appropriated to the commissioner.
Sec. 14. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections
60A.961; 60A.962; 60A.963; 60A.965; 60A.966; 60A.967; 60A.968; 60A.969;
60A.970; 60A.971; 60A.972; 60A.973; and 60A.974, are repealed.
Sec. 15. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION.
This act is effective August 1,
2009. A viatical settlement provider,
viatical settlement broker, or viatical settlement investment agent transacting
business in this state may continue to do so pending approval or disapproval of
the provider's, broker's, or investment agent's application for a license as
long as the application is filed with the commissioner by December 31, 2009."
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Atkins
moved to amend S. F. No. 1539, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 12,
line 4, delete the second comma
Page 13,
line 1, after "settlement" insert "contract"
Page 14,
line 24, delete "60" and insert "30"
Page 14,
line 25, delete "30" and insert "15"
Page 14,
line 26, delete "5" and insert "3"
Page 15,
line 21, delete "Contracts" and insert "Contacts"
Page 16, delete lines 32 to
34 and insert:
"(4) the name of
each broker who receives compensation and the amount of compensation received
by that broker, which compensation includes anything of value paid or given to
the broker in connection with the life settlement contract; and"
Page 17, line 1, after
"shall" insert "also"
Page 22, line 30, delete
"a" and insert "the"
Page 23, line 1, delete
"a" and insert "the"
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
S. F. No. 1539, A bill for an act relating to insurance;
regulating viatical settlements; enacting and modifying the Viatical
Settlements Model Act of the National Association of Insurance Commissions;
providing criminal penalties; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections
13.716, subdivision 7; 60A.964, subdivision 1; proposing coding for new law in
Minnesota Statutes, chapter 60A; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections
60A.961; 60A.962; 60A.963; 60A.965; 60A.966; 60A.967; 60A.968; 60A.969; 60A.970;
60A.971; 60A.972; 60A.973; 60A.974.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed
upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 132 yeas and 0
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
Brod was excused between the hours of
11:45 a.m. and 1:25 p.m.
S. F. No. 298, A bill for an act relating
to consumer protection; limiting customer liability for unauthorized use of
cellular phones; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter
325F.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 91 yeas and 40 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davids
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brown
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Hackbarth
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Loon
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Reinert
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Sterner
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
S. F. No. 1172, A bill for an act relating
to state government; extending the exemption from alcohol and controlled
substances testing; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 221.031,
subdivision 10.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 131 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
S. F. No. 1569
was reported to the House.
Haws moved to
amend S. F. No. 1569, the first engrossment, as follows:
Delete everything
after the enacting clause and insert the following language of H. F. No. 1850,
the first engrossment:
"Section 1.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 116L.666, subdivision 3, is amended to
read:
Subd. 3. Membership on local workforce councils. In workforce service areas representing only
one home rule charter or statutory city or a county, the chief elected official
must appoint members to the council. In
workforce service areas representing two or more home rule charter or statutory
cities or counties, the chief elected officials of the home rule charter or
statutory cities or counties must appoint members to the council, in accordance
with an agreement entered into by such units of general local government.
A council shall include as members:
(1) representatives of the private sector, who must
constitute a majority of the membership of the council and who are owners of
business concerns, chief executives or chief operating officers of
nongovernmental employers, or other private sector executives who have
substantial management or policy responsibility;
(2) at least two representatives of organized labor;
(3) representatives of the area workforce and
community-based organizations, who shall constitute not less than 15 percent of
the membership of the council; and
(4) representatives of each of the following:
(i) educational agencies that are representative of
all educational agencies within the workforce service area;
(ii) vocational rehabilitation agencies;
(iii) public assistance agencies;
(iv) economic development agencies; and
(v) public employment service agencies.
The chair of each local workforce council shall be
selected from among the members of the council who are representatives of the
private sector.
Private sector representatives on the local workforce
council shall be selected from among individuals nominated by general purpose
business organizations, such as local chambers of commerce, in the workforce
service area.
Education representatives on the local workforce
council must include at least one representative from a local adult basic
education program approved under section 124D.52 and the remaining education
representatives shall be selected from among individuals nominated by
secondary and postsecondary educational institutions within the workforce
service area.
Organized labor representatives on the local workforce
council shall be selected from individuals recommended by recognized state and
local labor federations, organizations, or councils. If the state or local labor federations,
organizations, or councils fail to nominate a sufficient number of individuals
to meet the labor representation requirements, individual workers may be
included on the local workforce council to complete the labor representation.
The commissioner must certify a local workforce
council if the commissioner determines that its composition and appointments
are consistent with this subdivision.
Sec. 2. COLLABORATIVE LOCAL PROJECTS;
COORDINATION OF EMPLOYMENT, TRAINING, AND EDUCATION SERVICES.
Subdivision 1. Collaborative
local projects; selection. The
governor's Workforce Development Council shall convene a meeting with
representatives of the Department of Employment and Economic Development, the Department
of Human Services, the Department of Education with respect to K-12
institutions and adult basic education, the University of Minnesota, and the
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities to identify and establish four
collaborative local projects to plan and coordinate employment, training, and
education programs and services administered by those agencies and
institutions. By August 1, 2009, the
local projects must be selected to represent different configurations of
workforce centers, college campuses, and adult basic education programs. Three of the local projects must be located
in a workforce services area under Minnesota Statutes, section 116L.666, as
follows: one that is an urban area; one in a greater Minnesota regional center;
and one in a rural area. At least one of
these local projects must include a workforce center located on a campus of the
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities.
Each local project selected under this subdivision must be assigned to a
local workforce council to develop a collaboration plan under subdivision 3.
Subd. 2. Employment,
training, and education goals. The
goals of the collaborative local employment, training, and education projects
include, but are not limited to:
(1) engaging low-skilled workers in
increasing their skill levels;
(2) providing skill training while
upgrading basic skill levels;
(3) improving the provision of skill
training to individuals currently working;
(4) integrating employer contact
efforts to improve responsiveness to employer's needs;
(5) strengthening employer input
with training curriculum;
(6) improving access to service and
training to public assistance recipients;
(7) integrating career planning and
job placement efforts among institutions;
(8) maximizing coordination and
reducing duplication among providers;
(9) systematically evaluating
industry training needs; and
(10) providing noncredit remediation
at no cost to students.
Subd. 3. Collaboration
plan. A local workforce
council assigned a project under this section must develop a plan on how
employment, training, and education services offered by the state agencies and
institutions can be collaboratively offered to attain the goals of subdivision
2. The collaboration plan must be
developed through a stakeholder process that includes, at a minimum,
representatives from:
(1) Minnesota State Colleges and
Universities;
(2) local adult basic education;
(3) workforce centers;
(4) local school districts;
(5) community action agencies; and
(6) public housing agencies.
Each local project must report their
plans to the governor's workforce development council which must report on the
plans to the committees of the legislature with responsibility for workforce
development by March 15, 2010. The
report must include each local project plan with recommendations on state
agency and higher education programs and services that should be integrated
into a local project. The report may
also include recommendations on necessary enhancements and improvements of services
and processes, and identification of private and public funding, waivers, and
other program modifications necessary to better achieve the goals of
subdivision 2.
Subd. 4. Plan
implementation. By July 1,
2010, each local collaborative project must implement its plan for at least one
year. Local collaborators, including the
agencies listed in subdivision 3, may modify a plan if the modification would
better achieve plan goals.
Subd. 5. Second
report to legislature. By
February 15, 2011, each local project must report to the governor's workforce
development council on progress in implementing the plan. By March 11, 2011, the governor's workforce
development council must report to the committees of the legislature
responsible for workforce development on the progress of implementing plans
under this section. The report must
include recommendations on funding, system design, and statutory changes that
are reasonable and necessary to achieve the goals of subdivision 2.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment."
Delete the title
and insert:
"A bill for
an act relating to workforce development; amending local workforce council
representative requirements; establishing collaborative local projects;
coordinating employment training and education services; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 116L.666, subdivision 3."
The motion
prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
S. F. No. 1569, A
bill for an act relating to economic development; providing for local collaborative
projects to deliver employment, training, and education services.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 107 yeas and 24 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Downey
Eastlund
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Buesgens
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Drazkowski
Emmer
Hackbarth
Holberg
Hoppe
Kelly
Kohls
McFarlane
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Sterner
Zellers
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
S. F. No. 1910 was reported
to the House.
Zellers and
Atkins moved to amend S. F. No. 1910, the first engrossment, as follows:
Page 26,
after line 2, insert:
"Sec.
43. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section
72B.02, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 22. Emergency
situation. An "emergency
situation" means the occurrence of insured losses of such a number or severity
that the ordinary staff adjuster personnel complement of the insurer and the
available independent adjusters could not adjust all of the losses resulting
from a common cause or related causes in reasonable time."
Page 34,
line 30, after "catastrophe" insert "or the occurrence
of an emergency situation"
Page 34,
lines 32 and 35, after "declared" insert "or an
emergency situation has occurred"
Page 35,
line 2, after "catastrophe" insert "or the occurrence
of an emergency situation"
Page 35,
line 8, after "catastrophe" insert ", emergency
situation,"
Page 35,
line 9, after "catastrophe" insert "or emergency
situation"
Page 35,
delete line 12 and insert "the period of time established by the
commissioner."
Renumber the
sections in sequence
Correct the
internal references
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
S. F. No. 1910, A bill for an act relating
to commerce; providing for the licensing and regulation of certain persons;
establishing prelicense and continuing education requirements; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 45.22; 45.23; 60K.31, by adding a
subdivision; 60K.36, subdivision 4, by adding a subdivision; 60K.37, by adding
a subdivision; 60K.55, subdivision 2; 60K.56; 72B.02, subdivisions 2, 5, 6, 11,
by adding subdivisions; 72B.03; 72B.05; 72B.06; 72B.08, subdivisions 1, 2, 4;
72B.135, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 82.32; 82B.05, subdivision 1; 82B.08, by adding
subdivisions; 82B.09, by adding a subdivision; 82B.10; 82B.13, subdivisions 4,
5, 6; 82B.19, subdivisions 1, 2; 82B.20, by adding a subdivision; proposing
coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 45; 60K; 72B; 82; 82B;
repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 72B.02, subdivision 12; 72B.04;
82B.02; Minnesota Rules, parts 2808.0100; 2808.1000; 2808.1100; 2808.1200;
2808.1300; 2808.1400; 2808.1500; 2808.1600; 2808.1700; 2808.2000; 2808.2100;
2808.6000; 2808.7000; 2808.7100; 2809.0010; 2809.0020; 2809.0030; 2809.0040;
2809.0050; 2809.0060; 2809.0070; 2809.0080; 2809.0090; 2809.0100; 2809.0110;
2809.0120; 2809.0130; 2809.0140; 2809.0150; 2809.0160; 2809.0170; 2809.0180;
2809.0190; 2809.0200; 2809.0210; 2809.0220.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the
bill and the roll was called. There were
130 yeas and 1 nay as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Buesgens
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
H. F. No. 818 was reported
to the House.
Hilstrom
moved to amend H. F. No. 818, the fourth engrossment, as follows:
Page 2, line
19, after "person" insert ", as defined in subdivision 1,
paragraph (h),"
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
H. F. No. 818, A bill for an act relating
to vulnerable adults; authorizing disclosure of financial records in connection
with financial exploitation investigations; modifying procedures and duties for
reporting and investigating maltreatment; specifying duties of financial
institutions in cases alleging financial exploitation; modifying the crime of
financial exploitation; imposing criminal and civil penalties; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 13A.02, subdivisions 1, 2; 13A.04,
subdivision 1; 256B.0595, subdivisions 4, 9; 299A.61, subdivision 1; 388.23,
subdivision 1; 609.2335; 609.52, subdivision 3; 611A.033; 626.557, subdivisions
4, 5, 9b, by adding subdivisions; 626.5572, subdivision 21; 628.26.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 131 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
H. F. No. 1760 was reported
to the House.
Thissen
moved to amend H. F. No. 1760, the first engrossment, as follows:
Page 1,
delete section 1
Page 3, line
29, delete "one"
Pages 4 to
7, delete sections 4 to 11
Page 11,
line 21, delete "A" and insert "An initial violation
of this section shall not be assessed a penalty. A subsequent"
Page 31,
delete section 42
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Huntley
moved to amend H. F. No. 1760, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 9,
delete section 16
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Murphy, E.,
and Thissen moved to amend H. F. No. 1760, the first engrossment, as amended,
as follows:
Page 28,
after line 13, insert:
"Sec.
40. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section
256B.69, subdivision 9b, is amended to read:
Subd.
9b. Reporting
provider payment rates. (a)
According to guidelines developed by the commissioner, in consultation with health
care providers, managed care plans, and county-based purchasing
plans, each managed care plan and county-based purchasing plan must annually
provide to the commissioner, at the commissioner's request, detailed or
aggregate information on reimbursement rates paid by the managed care plan
under this section or the county-based purchasing plan under section 256B.692
to provider types and vendors for administrative services under contract with
the plan.
(b) Each
managed care plan and county-based purchasing plan must annually provide to the
commissioner, in the form and manner specified by the commissioner:
(1)
aggregate provider payment data, categorized by subspecialty and primary care;
(2) evidence
that increases in payments made to the plan under this section are passed
through to health care providers, including information on the proportion of
the increases paid to providers, categorized by subspecialty and primary care;
and
(3) specific
information on the methodology used to establish provider reimbursement rates
paid by the managed health care plan and county-based purchasing plan.
Data
provided to the commissioner under this subdivision must allow the commissioner
to conduct the analyses required under paragraph (d).
(b) Data
provided to the commissioner under this subdivision are nonpublic data as
defined in section 13.02.
(c) The
commissioner shall analyze data provided under this subdivision by procedure
code, provider type, provider size, and geographic location of the
provider. The commissioner shall also
array aggregate provider reimbursement rates across all plans by subspecialty
and primary care category. The
commissioner shall report this information to the legislature annually,
beginning December 15, 2010, and each December 15 thereafter. The commissioner shall also make this
information available on the agency's Web site to managed care and county-based
purchasing plans, health care providers, and the public."
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Hoppe moved
to amend H. F. No. 1760, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 10,
after line 13, insert:
"Sec.
3. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section
148.996, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd.
2. Qualifications. The commissioner shall include on the
registry any individual who:
(1) submits
an application on a form provided by the commissioner. The form must include the applicant's name,
address, and contact information;
(2)
maintains a current certification from one of the organizations listed in
section 146B.01, subdivision 2; and
(3) pays the
fees required under section 148.997.; and
(4) meets a
fee schedule for doula services that is equivalent to the prevailing wage for
similar services. The commissioner may
defer the determination of the wage and services to the commissioner of commerce."
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Emmer moved
to amend H. F. No. 1760, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 11,
after line 22, insert:
"Subd.
5. Restriction; civil liability. The safe patient handling plan required
under this section is not a standard of care for purposes of civil
liability. A court may not consider a
breach of the safe patient handling plan as a breach of duty, a breach of the
standard of care, or as negligence in a civil action."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Gottwalt,
Thissen, Haws, Kahn and Murdock moved to amend H. F. No. 1760, the first
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 31,
after line 30, insert:
"Sec.
44. ALZHEIMER'S
DISEASE WORKING GROUP.
Subdivision
1. Establishment; members.
The commissioner of health, in collaboration with the Minnesota Board
on Aging, must convene an Alzheimer's disease working group that consists of no
more than 15 members including, but not limited to:
(a) at
least one caregiver of a person who has been diagnosed with Alzheimer's
disease;
(b) at
least one person who has been diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease;
(c) a
representative of the nursing facility industry;
(d) a
representative of the assisted living industry;
(e) a
representative of the adult day services industry;
(f) a
representative of the medical care provider community;
(g) an
Alzheimer's researcher;
(h) a
representative of the Alzheimer's Association;
(i) the
commissioner of human services or a designee;
(j) the
commissioner of health or a designee;
(k) the
ombudsman for long-term care or a designee;
(l) the commissioner
of public safety or a designee; and
(m) at
least two members named by the governor.
Subd. 2. Duties;
recommendations. The
Alzheimer's disease working group must examine the array of needs of
individuals diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, services available to meet
these needs, and the capacity of the state and current providers to meet these
and future needs. The working group
shall consider and make recommendations on the following issues:
(a) trends
in the state's Alzheimer's population and service needs including, but not
limited to:
(1) the
state's role in long-term care, family caregiver support, and assistance to
persons with early-stage and early-onset of Alzheimer's disease;
(2) state
policy regarding persons with Alzheimer's disease and dementia; and
(3)
establishment of a surveillance system for the purpose of having proper
estimates of the number of persons in the state with Alzheimer's disease, and
the changing population with dementia;
(b)
existing resources, services, and capacity including, but not limited to:
(1) type,
cost, and availability of dementia services;
(2)
dementia-specific training requirements for long-term care staff;
(3) quality
care measures for residential care facilities;
(4)
capacity of public safety and law enforcement officers to respond to persons
with Alzheimer's disease or dementia;
(5)
availability of home and community-based resources for persons with Alzheimer's
disease, including respite care;
(6) number
and availability of long-term care dementia units;
(7)
adequacy and appropriateness of geriatric psychiatric units for persons with
behavior disorders associated with Alzheimer's and related dementia;
(8)
assisted living residential options for persons with dementia; and
(9) state support
of Alzheimer's research through Minnesota universities and other resources;
(c) needed
policies or responses including, but not limited to, the provision of
coordinated services and supports to persons and families living with
Alzheimer's and related disorders, the capacity to meet these needs, and
strategies to address identified gaps in services.
Subd. 3. Meetings. At least four working group meetings must
be public meetings, and to the extent practicable, technological means, such as
Web casts, should be used to reach the greatest number of people throughout the
state.
Subd. 4. Report. The commissioner of health must submit a
report and recommendations to the governor and chairs and ranking minority
members of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over health care no
later than January 15, 2011.
Subd. 5. Private
funding. To the extent
available, the commissioner of health may utilize funding provided by private
foundations and other private funding sources to complete the duties of the
Alzheimer's disease working group.
Subd. 6. Sunset. The Alzheimer's disease working group
sunsets upon delivery of the required report to the governor and legislative
committees."
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Emmer moved
to amend H. F. No. 1760, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 10,
after line 13, insert:
"Doula
services may not include or interfere with the provision of traditional
midwifery services under chapter 147D."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Emmer
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 37 yeas and 95 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, S.
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lenczewski
Loon
Mack
McFarlane
Nornes
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, P.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davids
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Emmer moved
to amend H. F. No. 1760, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 10,
after line 13, insert:
"Doula
services may not include, incorporate, or reference the beliefs or tenets of
Sharia Law."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Emmer
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 41 yeas and 91 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Buesgens
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Loon
Mack
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Peterson
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Gottwalt
and Bunn moved to amend H. F. No. 1760, the first engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 1,
after line 17, insert:
"ARTICLE
1"
Page 31,
after line 32, insert:
"ARTICLE
2
Section
1. HEALTHY
MINNESOTA PLAN; PRIVATE SECTOR COVERAGE.
It is the
intent of the State of Minnesota to enact a coverage program that utilizes
market-based solutions within the health care sector that provides access to
high quality health care, reduces costs for coverage, and utilizes commercial
reimbursement rates to providers.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1, 2010.
Sec.
2. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section
256L.01, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 6. Qualified
adult. "Qualified
adult" means an individual residing in a household with no children
enrolled under section 256L.04, subdivision 7.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1, 2010.
Sec.
3. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section
256L.03, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Covered
health services. For families
and children, "covered health services" means the health services
reimbursed under chapter 256B, with the exception of inpatient hospital
services, special education services, private duty nursing services, adult
dental care services other than services covered under section 256B.0625,
subdivision 9, orthodontic services, nonemergency medical transportation
services, personal care assistant and case management services, nursing home or
intermediate care facilities services, inpatient mental health services, and
chemical dependency services.
No public
funds shall be used for coverage of abortion under MinnesotaCare except where
the life of the female would be endangered or substantial and irreversible
impairment of a major bodily function would result if the fetus were carried to
term; or where the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest.
Covered
health services shall be expanded as provided in this section.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1, 2010.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 256L.03,
subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd.
3. Inpatient
hospital services. (a) Covered
health services shall include inpatient hospital services, including inpatient
hospital mental health services and inpatient hospital and residential chemical
dependency treatment, subject to those limitations necessary to coordinate the
provision of these services with eligibility under the medical assistance
spenddown. The inpatient hospital
benefit for adult enrollees who qualify under section 256L.04, subdivision
7, or who qualify under section 256L.04, subdivisions 1 and 2, with family
gross income that exceeds 200 percent of the federal poverty guidelines or 215
percent of the federal poverty guidelines on or after July 1, 2009, and who are
not pregnant, is subject to an annual limit of $10,000.
(b)
Admissions for inpatient hospital services paid for under section 256L.11,
subdivision 3, must be certified as medically necessary in accordance with
Minnesota Rules, parts 9505.0500 to 9505.0540, except as provided in clauses
(1) and (2):
(1) all
admissions must be certified, except those authorized under rules established
under section 254A.03, subdivision 3, or approved under Medicare; and
(2) payment
under section 256L.11, subdivision 3, shall be reduced by five percent for
admissions for which certification is requested more than 30 days after the day
of admission. The hospital may not seek
payment from the enrollee for the amount of the payment reduction under this
clause.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1, 2010.
Sec. 5. [256L.031]
COVERED HEALTH SERVICES; QUALIFIED ADULTS.
Subdivision
1. Covered health care services. For qualified adults, "covered health
services" means all services covered under the health plan benefit design
established by the commissioner under section 256L.033.
Subd. 2. Contract
with third-party administrator; enrollment of qualified adults. The commissioner shall contract with
health plan companies, as defined in section 62Q.01, subdivision 4, to provide
to qualified adults the coverage established under section 256L.033. The commissioner shall contract with a
third-party administrator that will distribute premiums to health plan
companies that provide or arrange for high-quality, cost-effective care. The commissioner shall pay an administrative
fee to the contracted third-party administrator for each qualified adult
enrolled in the Healthy Minnesota Plan.
State premium payment rates must be sufficient to allow health plan
companies to reimburse providers at private sector provider payment rates.
Subd. 3. Enrollment
of qualified adults. The
commissioner shall develop and implement procedures to enroll and disenroll
qualified adults with health plan companies that provide the coverage
established under section 256L.033.
Qualified adults are exempt from enrollment with managed care plans
under section 256L.12, but may enroll with managed care plans to obtain the
coverage established under section 256L.033.
An enrollee may change health plans or switch coverage annually during
an open enrollment period. The
commissioner may expand the definition of "qualified adult" to other
eligibility groups as feasible, subject to any necessary federal approval.
Subd. 4. Enrollment;
professional insurance agent associations. (a) The commissioner of human services
shall accept applications, determine eligibility based on the eligibility
criteria in this chapter, translate standardized documents, and refer enrollees
to a certified insurance agent.
(b) The
commissioner of human services, in consultation with the commissioner of
commerce, shall develop an efficient and cost-effective method of referring
eligible applicants to professional insurance agent associations. The commissioner of commerce shall authorize
professional insurance agent associations to recruit, train, and certify all
agents and brokers that intend to administer Healthy Minnesota Plan coverage,
prior to any Minnesota Healthy Plan enrollment activity by agents. For purposes of this requirement,
"professional insurance agent associations" means the Minnesota
National Association of Health Underwriters, the National Association of
Independent Financial Advisors (MN), and the Minnesota Independent Insurance
Agents and Brokers.
Subd. 5. MCHA. MinnesotaCare enrollees who are denied coverage
under an individual health plan by a health plan company are eligible for
coverage through a health plan offered by the Minnesota Comprehensive Health
Association, as provided under section 256L.033. The cost to the Minnesota Comprehensive
Health Association related to coverage of MinnesotaCare enrollees denied
coverage under an individual health plan shall be paid through the health care
access fund.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1, 2010.
Sec.
6. [256L.032]
MINNESOTACARE; HEALTHY MINNESOTA ACCOUNTS.
Subdivision
1. Establishment. The
commissioner shall establish and administer for each recipient a Healthy
Minnesota Plan, which consists of a private sector major medical health plan
combined with a $3,100 deductible that is funded in part by the state through a
health reimbursement arrangement (HRA).
The commissioner shall authorize private sector plan companies to
provide individual major medical health plan coverage to a recipient. The commissioner shall contract with a
third-party administrator to manage the health reimbursement arrangement and to
establish and administer a Healthy Minnesota Plan account for that recipient.
Subd. 2. Funds
available to enrollees for health care expenses. In addition to providing major medical
health coverage, the commissioner shall make available up to $2,100 per plan
year for each enrollee's Healthy Minnesota Plan account for eligible health
care expenses, through the health reimbursement arrangement as defined in
section 213(d) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Subd. 3. Healthy
Minnesota Plan reserve. The
commissioner shall maintain a Healthy Minnesota Plan reserve equal to 30
percent of the state's maximum claim obligations under subdivision 2 for the
current and following fiscal year, as estimated by the commissioner of finance.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1, 2010.
Sec.
7. [256L.033]
HEALTHY MINNESOTA PLAN; PRIVATE SECTOR COVERAGE.
(a)
Qualified adults enrolled in MinnesotaCare shall enroll in their choice of the
individual health plans authorized by the commissioner. The health plans must meet the benefit design
and cost-sharing requirements established by the commissioner. The health plan benefit design and
cost-sharing must be actuarially equivalent to that provided under section
256L.03 to nonpregnant adults without children eligible under section 256L.04,
subdivision 7, and in addition to coverage of physician, inpatient and
outpatient hospital, and other acute care services, must also include:
(1) vision
and eyewear coverage;
(2) dental
coverage;
(3)
prescription drug coverage;
(4)
preventive care; and
(5) a
lifetime maximum benefit of $5,000,000.
(b) The
commissioner shall administer the Healthy Minnesota Plan and Healthy Minnesota
Plan accounts, which must be designed to the extent possible to function in the
same manner as a voluntary employee beneficiary association qualified under
Internal Revenue Code, section 501(c)(9) or a government plan qualified under
Internal Revenue Code, section 115, to the extent practicable for a plan not
providing benefits to employees.
(c) All
payments out of the Healthy Minnesota Plan arrangement must be adjudicated by a
third-party administrator contracted for by the commissioner in the same manner
used for Health Reimbursement Accounts under federal law, except as otherwise
provided in section 256L.032, subdivision 1.
(d)
Providers of individual health plans available for enrollment under paragraph
(a) may decline to cover a prospective enrollee on the basis of medical
underwriting permitted under section 62A.65 in the private market. A person rejected for coverage on that basis
shall apply for and enroll in a plan which must be provided by the Minnesota
Comprehensive Health Association (MCHA) governed under chapter 62E, without a
preexisting condition limitation, even if use of a preexisting condition is
otherwise permitted under chapter 62E.
The plan benefit design must be identical to that established under paragraph
(a). The commissioner shall pay the
premium for the person's coverage.
(e) All
health plan companies offering individual coverage must offer the benefit set
established under this section in the individual market.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1, 2010."
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Wagenius was excused for the remainder of
today's session.
CALL OF THE HOUSE
On the motion of Dean and on the demand of
10 members, a call of the House was ordered.
The following members answered to their names:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Morrow moved that further proceedings of
the roll call be suspended and that the Sergeant at Arms be instructed to bring
in the absentees. The motion prevailed
and it was so ordered.
POINT OF ORDER
Buesgens raised a point of order pursuant
to section 575, paragraph 1, clause g, of "Mason's Manual of Legislative
Procedure," relating to Duties of the Presiding Officer. Speaker pro tempore Hortman ruled the point
of order not well taken.
The question recurred on the Gottwalt and
Bunn amendment and the roll was called.
There were 60 yeas and 72 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Brown
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Howes
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Murdock
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Rosenthal
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Sterner
Swails
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Otremba
Paymar
Persell
Reinert
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
CALL OF THE HOUSE LIFTED
Morrow moved that the call of the House be
lifted. The motion prevailed and it was
so ordered.
H. F. No. 1760, A bill for an act relating
to human services; changing provisions for long-term care, adverse health care
events, suicide prevention, doula services, developmental disabilities, mental
health commitment, alternative care services, self-directed options, nursing
facilities, ICF/MR facilities, and data management; requiring a safe patient
handling plan; establishing a health department work group and an Alzheimer's disease
work group; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 43A.318, subdivision 2;
62Q.525, subdivision 2; 144.7065, subdivisions 8, 10; 145.56, subdivisions 1,
2; 148.995, subdivisions 2, 4; 182.6551; 182.6552, by adding a subdivision;
252.27, subdivision 1a; 252.282, subdivisions 3, 5; 253B.095, subdivision 1;
256B.0657, subdivision 5;
256B.0913,
subdivisions 4, 5a, 12; 256B.0915, subdivision 2; 256B.431, subdivision 10;
256B.433, subdivision 1; 256B.441, subdivisions 5, 11; 256B.5011, subdivision
2; 256B.5012, subdivisions 6, 7; 256B.5013, subdivisions 1, 6; 256B.69,
subdivision 9b; 403.03; 626.557, subdivision 12b; proposing coding for new law
in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 182; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, section
256B.5013, subdivisions 2, 3, 5.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 90 yeas and 42 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Davids
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Holberg
Hoppe
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
McFarlane
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
The Speaker assumed the chair.
S. F. No. 926, A bill for an act relating
to telecommunications; modifying provisions relating to reduced rate regulation
and promotion activities; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 237.411,
subdivision 2; 237.626; repealing Laws 2004, chapter 261, article 6, section 5,
as amended.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 132 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
S. F. No. 431, A bill for an act relating
to mental illness; prohibiting participation in clinical drug trials; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 253B.095, subdivision 1.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 132 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed and its title agreed to.
Sertich moved that the remaining bills on the Calendar for the
Day be continued. The motion prevailed.
MOTIONS AND RESOLUTIONS
Davnie moved that the name of Loeffler be
added as an author on H. F. No. 1198. The motion prevailed.
Murphy, M., moved that the names of
Davids, Brown, Hansen, Morgan, Kahn, Haws, Wagenius and Urdahl be added as
authors on H. F. No. 1231.
The motion prevailed.
Simon moved that the name of Sterner be
added as an author on H. F. No. 1677. The motion prevailed.
Greiling moved that the name of Kahn be
added as an author on H. F. No. 2368. The motion prevailed.
ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE SPEAKER
The Speaker announced the appointment of the following members
of the House to a Conference Committee on S. F. No. 550:
Hilty, Falk, Johnson, Kalin and Beard.
The Speaker announced the appointment of the following members
of the House to a Conference Committee on S. F. No. 708:
Mullery, Johnson and Zellers.
ADJOURNMENT
Sertich moved that when the House adjourns today it adjourn
until 9:30 a.m., Thursday, May 7, 2009.
The motion prevailed.
Sertich moved that the House adjourn. The motion prevailed, and the Speaker
declared the House stands adjourned until 9:30 a.m., Thursday, May 7, 2009.
Albin
A. Mathiowetz,
Chief Clerk, House of Representatives