STATE OF MINNESOTA
EIGHTY-SIXTH SESSION - 2010
_____________________
ONE HUNDRED FOURTH DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Thursday, May 13, 2010
The House of Representatives convened at 11:00
a.m. and was called to order by Margaret Anderson Kelliher, Speaker of the
House.
Prayer was offered by the Reverend Grady
St. Dennis, Director of Church Relations, Gustavus Adolphus College, St. Peter,
Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge
of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
The roll was called and the following
members were present:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
A quorum was present.
Davids and Magnus were excused.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the
Journal of the preceding day. Kalin
moved that further reading of the Journal be dispensed with and that the
Journal be approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk. The motion prevailed.
INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS
The following House Files were introduced:
Morrow, Gardner, Slocum, Loeffler, Masin,
Bunn, Laine and Fritz introduced:
H. F. No. 3841, A bill for an act
proposing an amendment to the Minnesota Constitution, article I, by adding a
section; providing for gender equality under the law.
The bill was read for the first time and
referred to the Committee on State and Local Government Operations Reform,
Technology and Elections.
Hayden, Clark and Norton introduced:
H. F. No. 3842, A bill for an act relating
to families; creating a Council on East African Minnesotans; creating an
ombudsperson for East African Minnesotans; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008,
sections 257.0755, subdivision 1; 257.076, subdivision 3; 257.0768, subdivision
1; 257.0769, subdivision 1; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 3.
The bill was read for the first time and
referred to the Committee on State and Local Government Operations Reform,
Technology and Elections.
Hayden, Clark and Norton introduced:
H. F. No. 3843, A bill for an act relating
to health; creating medical homes for children with autism spectrum disorders.
The bill was read for the first time and
referred to the Committee on Health Care and Human Services Policy and Oversight.
Sterner and Lanning introduced:
H. F. No. 3844, A bill for an act relating
to local government; authorizing counties to designate business days for public
business subject to certain limitations; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008,
section 373.052, subdivisions 1, 2, by adding a subdivision.
The bill was read for the first time and
referred to the Committee on State and Local Government Operations Reform,
Technology and Elections.
Simon introduced:
H. F. No. 3845, A bill for an act relating
to consumer protection; specifying procedures for contract renewals for
telecommunications services for business customers; proposing coding for new
law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 325F.
The bill was read for the first time and
referred to the Committee on Commerce and Labor.
Morgan; Hoppe; Loon; Ruud; Masin; Kohls;
Benson; Anderson, S.; Obermueller; Zellers; Beard; Mack; Hansen; Peppin and
Sterner introduced:
H. F. No. 3846, A bill for an act relating
to metropolitan transit; changing the formula for assistance by the
Metropolitan Council to cities and towns with replacement transit service;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 473.388, subdivision 4.
The bill was read for the first time and
referred to the Committee on Finance.
Hornstein, Clark and Hayden introduced:
H. F. No. 3847, A bill for an act relating
to human services; establishing a proposal to provide grants to organizations
providing care coordination services to medical assistance recipients with HIV
or who are at risk of contracting HIV; appropriating money; proposing coding
for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 256B.
The bill was read for the first time and
referred to the Committee on Health Care and Human Services Policy and
Oversight.
Atkins, Johnson, Sailer, Lillie and Hoppe
introduced:
H. F. No. 3848, A bill for an act relating
to wireless telecommunications; requiring wireless telecommunications service
providers to alert customers whose usage approaches or exceeds their contract
limit; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 325F.
The bill was read for the first time and
referred to the Committee on Commerce and Labor.
Gardner introduced:
H. F. No. 3849, A bill for an act relating
to municipal water services; establishing powers, requirements, and procedures
for residential water service by municipal utilities; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2008, sections 116A.22; 435.193; 444.075, subdivision 3e; 456.33;
504B.215, subdivision 3; proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 444A.
The bill was read for the first time and
referred to the Committee on Environment Policy and Oversight.
Sertich moved that the House recess
subject to the call of the Chair. The
motion prevailed.
RECESS
RECONVENED
The House reconvened and was called to
order by Speaker pro tempore Juhnke.
There being no objection, the order of
business reverted to Reports of Standing Committees and Divisions.
REPORTS OF
STANDING COMMITTEES AND DIVISIONS
Solberg
from the Committee on Ways and Means to which was referred:
S. F. No. 2629,
A bill for an act relating to elections; appropriating money for grants to
counties for voting equipment and vote-counting equipment; specifying grant
terms and procedures; repealing Laws 2005, chapter 162, section 34, subdivision
2, as amended.
Reported
the same back with the recommendation that the bill pass.
The report was adopted.
SECOND READING OF SENATE
BILLS
S. F. No. 2629 was read for the second
time.
The following Conference Committee Report
was received:
CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON H. F. NO. 3106
A bill for an act relating to public safety; amending
first-degree driving while impaired crime to include prior felony convictions
from other states; modifying implied consent, driving while impaired, and
ignition interlock provisions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections
169A.24, subdivision 1; 169A.52, subdivisions 3, 4; 169A.54, subdivisions 2, 5;
169A.55, by adding a subdivision; 169A.60, subdivision 1; 171.09; 171.30,
subdivisions 1, 2a, 4; 171.306, as amended; 609.131, subdivision 2; Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 169A.275, subdivision 7; 169A.54,
subdivision 1; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 169A.54, subdivision
11; 169A.55, subdivision 1; 171.30, subdivision 2c; 171.305, subdivisions 1, 3,
4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11.
May 12, 2010
The
Honorable Margaret Anderson Kelliher
Speaker of
the House of Representatives
The
Honorable James P. Metzen
President
of the Senate
We, the undersigned conferees for H. F. No. 3106
report that we have agreed upon the items in dispute and recommend as follows:
That the Senate recede from its amendments and that H. F. No. 3106
be further amended as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 169A.03, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 24a.
Twice the legal limit. "Twice the legal limit"
means an alcohol concentration of two times the limit specified in section
169A.20, subdivision 1, clause (5).
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective July 1,
2011.
Sec. 2. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 169A.275, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Exception.
(a) A judge is not required to sentence a person as provided
in this section subdivisions 1 to 4 if the judge requires
the person as a condition of probation to drive only motor vehicles equipped
with an ignition interlock device meeting the standards described in section
171.306.
(b) This subdivision expires July 1, 2011.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective July 1,
2011.
Sec. 3. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 169A.52, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Test refusal; license revocation. (a) Upon certification by the peace
officer that there existed probable cause to believe the person had been
driving, operating, or in physical control of a motor vehicle in violation of
section 169A.20 (driving while impaired), and that the person refused to submit
to a test, the commissioner shall revoke the person's license or permit to
drive, or nonresident operating privilege, for a period of one year even
if a test was obtained pursuant to this section after the person refused to
submit to testing. The commissioner
shall revoke the license, permit, or nonresident operating privilege:
(1) for a person with no qualified prior impaired driving
incidents within the past ten years, for a period of not less than one year;
(2) for a person under the age of 21 years and with no
qualified prior impaired driving incidents within the past ten years, for a
period of not less than one year;
(3) for a person with one qualified prior impaired driving
incident within the past ten years, or two qualified prior impaired driving
incidents, for a period of not less than two years;
(4) for a person with two qualified prior impaired driving
incidents within the past ten years, or three qualified prior impaired driving
incidents, for a period of not less than three years;
(5) for a person with three qualified prior impaired driving
incidents within the past ten years, for a period of not less than four years;
or
(6) for a person with four or more
qualified prior impaired driving incidents, for a period of not less than six
years.
(b) Upon certification by the peace officer that there
existed probable cause to believe the person had been driving, operating, or in
physical control of a commercial motor vehicle with the presence of any alcohol
in violation of section 169A.20 (driving while impaired), and that the person
refused to submit to a test, the commissioner shall disqualify the person from
operating a commercial motor vehicle and shall revoke the person's license or
permit to drive or nonresident operating privilege according to the federal
regulations adopted by reference in section 171.165, subdivision 2.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective July 1,
2011.
Sec. 4. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 169A.52, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Test failure; license revocation. (a) Upon certification by the peace
officer that there existed probable cause to believe the person had been
driving, operating, or in physical control of a motor vehicle in violation of
section 169A.20 (driving while impaired) and that the person submitted to a
test and the test results indicate an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more or
the presence of a controlled substance listed in schedule I or II or its
metabolite, other than marijuana or tetrahydrocannabinols, then the commissioner
shall revoke the person's license or permit to drive, or nonresident operating
privilege:
(1) for a period of 90 days, or, if the test results
indicate an alcohol concentration of twice the legal limit or more, not less
than one year;
(2) if the person is under the age of 21 years, for a period
of six months not less than 180 days or, if the test results indicate
an alcohol concentration of twice the legal limit or more, not less than one
year;
(3) for a person with a one qualified prior
impaired driving incident within the past ten years, or two qualified prior
impaired driving incidents, for a period of 180 days not less
than one year, or if the test results indicate an alcohol concentration of
twice the legal limit or more, not less than two years; or
(4) if the test results indicate an alcohol concentration
of 0.20 or more, for twice the applicable period in clauses (1) to (3). for a person with two qualified prior
impaired driving incidents within the past ten years, or three qualified prior
impaired driving incidents, for a period of not less than three years;
(5) for a person with three qualified prior impaired driving
incidents within the past ten years, for a period of not less than four years;
or
(6) for a person with four or more
qualified prior impaired driving incidents, for a period of not less than six
years.
(b) On certification by the peace officer that there existed
probable cause to believe the person had been driving, operating, or in
physical control of a commercial motor vehicle with any presence of alcohol and
that the person submitted to a test and the test results indicated an alcohol
concentration of 0.04 or more, the commissioner shall disqualify the person
from operating a commercial motor vehicle under section 171.165 (commercial
driver's license disqualification).
(c) If the test is of a person's blood or urine by a
laboratory operated by the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, or authorized by
the bureau to conduct the analysis of a blood or urine sample, the laboratory
may directly certify to the commissioner the test results, and the peace
officer shall certify to the commissioner that there existed probable cause to
believe the person had been driving, operating, or in physical control of a
motor vehicle in violation of section 169A.20 and that the person submitted to
a test. Upon receipt of both
certifications, the commissioner shall undertake the license actions described
in paragraphs (a) and (b).
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2011.
Sec. 5. Minnesota
Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 169A.54, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Revocation periods for DWI convictions. Except as provided in subdivision 7, the
commissioner shall revoke the driver's license of a person convicted of
violating section 169A.20 (driving while impaired) or an ordinance in
conformity with it, as follows:
(1) for an offense under section 169A.20, subdivision 1
(driving while impaired crime):, not less than 30 days;
(2) for an offense under section 169A.20, subdivision 2
(refusal to submit to chemical test crime):, not less than 90
days;
(3) for an offense occurring within ten years of a qualified
prior impaired driving incident:, or occurring after two qualified
prior impaired driving incidents,
(i) if the current conviction is for a violation of section
169A.20, subdivision 1, 1a, 1b, or 1c, not less than 180 days one
year, or if the test results indicate an alcohol concentration of twice the
legal limit or more, not less than two years and until the court has
certified that treatment or rehabilitation has been successfully completed
where prescribed in accordance with section 169A.70 (chemical use assessments);
or
(ii) if the current conviction is for a violation of section
169A.20, subdivision 2, not less than one year and until the court has
certified that treatment or rehabilitation has been successfully completed
where prescribed in accordance with section 169A.70;
(4) for an offense occurring within ten years of the first of
two qualified prior impaired driving incidents: or occurring after three qualified
prior impaired driving incidents, not less than one year three
years, together with denial under section 171.04, subdivision 1, clause
(10), until rehabilitation is established in accordance with
according to standards established by the commissioner; or
(5) for an offense occurring within ten years of the first of
three or more qualified prior impaired driving incidents:,
not less than two four years, together with denial under section
171.04, subdivision 1, clause (10), until rehabilitation is established in
accordance with according to standards established by the
commissioner; or
(6) for an offense occurring after four or more qualified
prior impaired driving incidents, not less than six years, together with denial
under section 171.04, subdivision 1, clause (10), until rehabilitation is
established according to standards established by the commissioner.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective July 1,
2011.
Sec. 6. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 169A.54, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Driving while impaired by person under age
21. If the person convicted of
violating section 169A.20 (driving while impaired) is under the age of 21 years
at the time of the violation, the commissioner shall revoke the offender's
driver's license or operating privileges for a period of six months not
less than 180 days or for the appropriate period of time under subdivision
1, clauses (1) to (5) (6), for the offense committed, whichever
is the greatest longer period.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective July 1,
2011.
Sec. 7. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 169A.54, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Violations involving alcohol concentration
of 0.20 twice the legal
limit or more. If the person has
no qualified prior impaired driving incidents within the past ten years and
is convicted of violating section 169A.20 (driving while impaired) while having
an alcohol concentration of 0.20 twice the legal limit or more as
measured at the time, or within two hours of the time, of the offense, the
commissioner shall revoke the person's driver's license for twice the period
of time otherwise provided for in this section not less than one year.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective July 1, 2011.
Sec. 8. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 169A.55, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 4.
Reinstatement of driving
privileges; multiple incidents. (a)
A person whose driver's license has been canceled or denied as a result of
three or more qualified impaired driving incidents shall not be eligible for
reinstatement of driving privileges without an ignition interlock restriction
until the person:
(1) has completed rehabilitation according to rules adopted
by the commissioner or been granted a variance from the rules by the
commissioner; and
(2) has submitted verification of abstinence from alcohol and
controlled substances, as evidenced by the person's use of an ignition
interlock device or other chemical monitoring device approved by the
commissioner.
(b) The verification of abstinence must show that the person
has abstained from the use of alcohol and controlled substances for a period of
not less than:
(1) three years, for a person whose driver's license was
canceled or denied for an offense occurring within ten years of the first of
two qualified prior impaired driving incidents, or occurring after three
qualified prior impaired driving incidents;
(2) four years, for a person whose driver's license was
canceled or denied for an offense occurring within ten years of the first of
three qualified prior impaired driving incidents; or
(3) six years, for a person whose driver's license was
canceled or denied for an offense occurring after four or more qualified prior
impaired driving incidents.
(c) The commissioner shall establish performance standards
and a process for certifying chemical monitoring devices. The standards and procedures are not rules
and are exempt from chapter 14, including section 14.386.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective July 1,
2011.
Sec. 9. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 169A.60, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) As used in this section, the
following terms have the meanings given in this subdivision.
(b) "Family or household member" has the meaning
given in section 169A.63, subdivision 1.
(c) "Motor vehicle" means a self-propelled motor
vehicle other than a motorboat in operation or an off-road recreational
vehicle.
(d) "Plate impoundment violation" includes:
(1) a violation of section 169A.20 (driving while impaired)
or 169A.52 (license revocation for test failure or refusal), or a conforming
an ordinance from this state or a conforming statute or ordinance
from another state in conformity with either of those sections,
that results in the revocation of a person's driver's license or driving
privileges, within ten years of a qualified prior impaired driving incident;
(2) a license disqualification under section 171.165
(commercial driver's license disqualification) resulting from a violation of
section 169A.52 within ten years of a qualified prior impaired driving
incident;
(3) a violation of section 169A.20 or 169A.52 while having an
alcohol concentration of 0.20 twice the legal limit or more as
measured at the time, or within two hours of the time, of the offense;
(4) a violation of section 169A.20 or 169A.52 while having a
child under the age of 16 in the vehicle if the child is more than 36 months
younger than the offender; and or
(5) a violation of section 171.24 (driving without valid
license) by a person whose driver's license or driving privileges have been
canceled or denied under section 171.04, subdivision 1, clause (10)
(persons not eligible for driver's license, inimical to public safety).
(e) "Violator" means a person who was driving,
operating, or in physical control of the motor vehicle when the plate
impoundment violation occurred.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective July 1,
2011.
Sec. 10. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 171.09, is amended to read:
171.09 DRIVING RESTRICTIONS;
AUTHORITY, VIOLATIONS.
Subdivision 1. Authority; violations. (a) The commissioner, when good cause
appears, may impose restrictions suitable to the licensee's driving ability or
other restrictions applicable to the licensee as the commissioner may determine
to be appropriate to assure the safe operation of a motor vehicle by the
licensee.
(b) Pursuant to Code of Federal Regulations, title 49,
section 383.95, if an applicant for a commercial driver's license either does
not successfully complete the air brake component of the knowledge test, or
does not successfully complete the skills test in a vehicle equipped with air
brakes as such tests are prescribed in Code of Federal Regulations, title 49,
part 384, the department shall indicate on the class C, class B, or class A
commercial driver's license, if issued, that the individual is restricted from
operating a commercial motor vehicle equipped with air brakes.
(c) Upon receiving satisfactory evidence of any violation of
the restrictions on the license, the commissioner may suspend or revoke the
license. A license suspension under this
section is subject to section 171.18, subdivisions 2 and 3.
(d) A person who drives, operates, or is in physical control
of a motor vehicle while in violation of the restrictions imposed in a
restricted driver's license issued to that person under this section is guilty
of a crime as follows:
(1) if the restriction relates to the possession or
consumption of alcohol or controlled substances, the person is guilty of a
gross misdemeanor; or
(2) if the restriction relates to another matter, the person
is guilty of a misdemeanor.
(e) It is a misdemeanor for a person who holds a restricted
license issued under section 171.306 to drive, operate, or be in physical
control of any motor vehicle that is not equipped with a functioning ignition
interlock device certified by the commissioner.
Subd. 3.
No-alcohol restriction. (a) As used in this subdivision,
"impaired driving incident" has the meaning given in section 169A.03,
subdivision 22.
(b) Upon proper application by a person having a valid
driver's license containing the restriction that the person must not consume
alcohol or controlled substances, who has not been documented as having
consumed alcohol or having possessed or used a controlled substance within the
past ten years, and whose driving record contains no impaired driving incident
within the past ten years, the commissioner must remove the
no-alcohol/controlled substance restriction on the person's driving record and
issue to the person a duplicate driver's license that does not show that restriction.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective July 1,
2011.
Sec. 11. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 171.30, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Conditions of issuance. (a) In any case where a person's license
has been suspended under section 171.18, 171.173, or 171.186, or;
revoked under section 169.792,; 169.797,; 169A.52, 169A.54,
subdivision 3, paragraph (a), clause (1), (2), (4), (5), or (6), or
subdivision 4, paragraph (a), clause (1) if the test results indicate an alcohol
concentration of less than twice the legal limit, (2) if the test results
indicate an alcohol concentration of less than twice the legal limit, (4), (5),
or (6); 171.17,; or 171.172,; or revoked, canceled,
or denied under section 169A.54, subdivision 1, clause (1), (2), (4), (5), or
(6), or subdivision 2 if the person does not have a qualified prior impaired
driving incident as defined in section 169A.03, subdivision 22, on the person's
record, the commissioner may issue a limited license to the driver
including under the following conditions:
(1) if the driver's livelihood or attendance at a chemical
dependency treatment or counseling program depends upon the use of the driver's
license;
(2) if the use of a driver's license by a homemaker is necessary
to prevent the substantial disruption of the education, medical, or nutritional
needs of the family of the homemaker; or
(3) if attendance at a postsecondary institution of education
by an enrolled student of that institution depends upon the use of the driver's
license.
(b) The commissioner in issuing a limited license may impose
such conditions and limitations as in the commissioner's judgment are necessary
to the interests of the public safety and welfare including reexamination as to
the driver's qualifications. The license
may be limited to the operation of particular vehicles, to particular classes
and times of operation, and to particular conditions of traffic. The commissioner may require that an
applicant for a limited license affirmatively demonstrate that use of public
transportation or carpooling as an alternative to a limited license would be a
significant hardship.
(c) For purposes of this subdivision,: (1) "homemaker" refers to the
person primarily performing the domestic tasks in a household of residents
consisting of at least the person and the person's dependent child or other
dependents; and (2) "twice the legal limit" means an alcohol
concentration of two times the limit specified in section 169A.20, subdivision
1, clause (5).
(d) The limited license issued by the commissioner shall
clearly indicate the limitations imposed and the driver operating under the
limited license shall have the license in possession at all times when
operating as a driver.
(e) In determining whether to issue a limited license, the
commissioner shall consider the number and the seriousness of prior convictions
and the entire driving record of the driver and shall consider the number of
miles driven by the driver annually.
(f) If the person's driver's license or permit to drive has
been revoked under section 169.792 or 169.797, the commissioner may only issue
a limited license to the person after the person has presented an insurance
identification card, policy, or written statement indicating that the driver or
owner has insurance coverage
satisfactory to the commissioner of public safety. The commissioner of public safety may require
the insurance identification card provided to satisfy this subdivision be
certified by the insurance company to be noncancelable for a period not to
exceed 12 months.
(g) The limited license issued by the commissioner to a
person under section 171.186, subdivision 4, must expire 90 days after the date
it is issued. The commissioner must not
issue a limited license to a person who previously has been issued a limited
license under section 171.186, subdivision 4.
(h) The commissioner shall not issue a limited driver's
license to any person described in section 171.04, subdivision 1, clause (6),
(7), (8), (10), (11), or (14).
(i) The commissioner shall not issue a class A, class B, or
class C limited license.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective July 1,
2011.
Sec. 12. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 171.30, subdivision 2a, is amended to read:
Subd. 2a. Other waiting periods. Notwithstanding subdivision 2, a limited
license shall not be issued for a period of:
(1) 15 days, to a person whose license or privilege has been
revoked or suspended for a first violation of section 169A.20, sections
169A.50 to 169A.53, or a statute or ordinance from another state in conformity
with either of those sections; or
(2) 90 days, to a person who submitted to testing under
sections 169A.50 to 169A.53 if the person's license or privilege has been
revoked or suspended for a second violation within ten years or a third or
subsequent violation of section 169A.20, sections 169A.50 to 169A.53, or a
statute or ordinance from another state in conformity with either of those sections;
(3) 180 days, to a person who refused testing under sections
169A.50 to 169A.53 if the person's license or privilege has been revoked or
suspended for a second violation within ten years or a third or subsequent
violation of sections 169A.20, 169A.50 to 169A.53, or a statute or ordinance
from another state in conformity with either of those sections; or
(4) (2) one year, to a person whose license or
privilege has been revoked or suspended for committing manslaughter resulting
from the operation of a motor vehicle, committing criminal vehicular homicide
or injury under section 609.21, or violating a statute or ordinance from
another state in conformity with either of those offenses.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective July 1,
2011.
Sec. 13. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 171.30, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Penalty.
A person who violates a condition or limitation of a limited license
issued under subdivision 1 or fails to have the license in immediate possession
at all times when operating a motor vehicle is guilty of a misdemeanor. In addition, except as otherwise provided
in the ignition interlock program under section 171.306, a person who
violates a condition or limitation of a limited license may not operate a motor
vehicle for the remainder of the period of suspension or revocation, or 30
days, whichever is longer.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective July 1,
2011.
Sec. 14. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 171.306, as amended by Laws 2009, chapter 29, sections 2
and 3, is amended to read:
171.306 IGNITION INTERLOCK
DEVICE PILOT PROJECT PROGRAM.
Subdivision 1. Pilot project established; reports
Definitions. The commissioner
shall conduct a statewide two-year ignition interlock device pilot project as
provided in this section. The pilot
project must begin on July 1, 2009, and continue until June 30, 2011. The commissioner shall submit a preliminary
report by September 30, 2010, and a final report by September 30, 2011, to the
chairs and ranking minority members of the senate and house of representatives
committees having jurisdiction over criminal justice policy and funding. The reports must evaluate the successes and
failures of the pilot project, provide information on participation rates, and
make recommendations on continuing the project. (a) As used in this section, the terms in
this subdivision have the meanings given them.
(b) "Ignition interlock device" or
"device" means equipment that is designed to measure breath alcohol
concentration and to prevent a motor vehicle's ignition from being started by a
person whose breath alcohol concentration measures 0.02 or higher on the
equipment.
(c) "Program participant" means a person whose
driver's license has been revoked, canceled, or denied under section 169A.52,
169A.54, or 171.04, subdivision 1, clause (10), and who has qualified to take
part in the ignition interlock program under this section.
(d) "Qualified prior impaired driving incident" has
the meaning given in section 169A.03, subdivision 22.
Subd. 2. Performance standards; certification;
manufacturer requirements. The
commissioner shall determine appropriate establish performance
standards and a certification process for ignition interlock certifying
devices for used in the pilot project. Only devices certified by the commissioner as
meeting the performance standards may be used in the pilot project. ignition interlock program. The manufacturer of a device must apply
annually for certification of the device by submitting the form prescribed by
the commissioner. The commissioner shall
require manufacturers of certified devices to:
(1) provide device installation, servicing, and monitoring to
indigent program participants at a discounted rate, according to the standards
established by the commissioner; and
(2) include in an ignition interlock device contract a
provision that a program participant who voluntarily terminates participation
in the program is only liable for servicing and monitoring costs incurred
during the time the device is installed on the motor vehicle, regardless of
whether the term of the contract has expired.
Subd. 3. Pilot project components Program requirements. (a) Under the pilot project, the
commissioner shall issue a driver's license to an individual whose driver's
license has been revoked under chapter 169A for an impaired driving incident if
the person qualifies under this section and agrees to all of the conditions of
the project. The commissioner
shall establish guidelines for participation in the ignition interlock program. A person who seeks to participate in the
program shall sign a written acknowledgment that the person has received,
reviewed, and agreed to abide by the program guidelines.
(b) The commissioner must denote the person's driver's
license enter a notation on a person's driving record to indicate that
the person's participation in the person is a program participant. The license must authorize the person to drive only vehicles having functioning ignition
interlock devices conforming with the requirements of subdivision 2.
(c) Notwithstanding any statute or rule to the contrary,
the commissioner has authority to and shall determine the appropriate period
for which a person participating in the ignition interlock pilot program shall
be subject to this program, and when the person is eligible to be issued: A person under the age of 18 years is not
eligible to be a program participant.
(1) a limited driver's license subject to the ignition
interlock restriction;
(2) full driving privileges subject to the ignition interlock
restriction; and
(3) a driver's license without an ignition interlock
restriction.
(d) A program participant shall pay costs associated with
an ignition interlock device on every motor vehicle that the participant
operates or intends to operate.
(e) A person participating in this pilot project program
participant shall agree to participate in any treatment recommended by
in a chemical use assessment report.
(e) The commissioner shall determine guidelines for
participation in the project. A person
participating in the project shall sign a written agreement accepting these
guidelines and agreeing to comply with them.
(f) It is a misdemeanor for a person who is licensed under
this section for driving a vehicle equipped with an ignition interlock device
to drive, operate, or be in physical control of a motor vehicle other than a
vehicle properly equipped with an A program participant shall bring the
device-equipped motor vehicle or vehicles operated by the program participant to
an approved service provider for device calibration and servicing according to
the schedule established by the commissioner and as indicated by the
ignition interlock device.
Subd. 4.
Issuance of restricted license. (a) The commissioner shall issue a
class D driver's license, subject to the applicable limitations and
restrictions of this section, to a program participant who meets the
requirements of this section and the program guidelines. The commissioner shall not issue a license
unless the program participant has provided satisfactory proof that: (1) a certified ignition interlock device has
been installed on the participant's motor vehicle at an installation service
center designated by the device's manufacturer; and (2) the participant has
insurance coverage on the vehicle equipped with the ignition interlock device. The commissioner shall require the
participant to present an insurance identification card, policy, or written
statement as proof of insurance coverage, and may require the insurance
identification card provided be certified by the insurance company to be noncancelable
for a period not to exceed 12 months. A
license issued under authority of this section must contain a restriction
prohibiting the program participant from driving, operating, or being in
physical control of any motor vehicle not equipped with a functioning ignition
interlock device certified by the commissioner.
A participant may drive an employer-owned vehicle not equipped with an
interlock device while in the normal course and scope of employment duties
pursuant to the program guidelines established by the commissioner and with the
employer's written consent.
(b) A program participant whose driver's license has been
revoked under section 169A.52, subdivision 3, paragraph (a), clause (1), (2),
or (3), or subdivision 4, paragraph (a), clause (1), (2), or (3), or section
169A.54, subdivision 1, clause (1), (2), or (3), may apply for conditional
reinstatement of the driver's license, subject to the ignition interlock
restriction.
(c) A program participant whose driver's license has been
revoked, canceled, or denied under section 169A.52, subdivision 3, paragraph
(a), clause (4), (5), or (6), or subdivision 4, paragraph (a), clause (4), (5),
or (6), or section 169A.54, subdivision 1, clause (4), (5), or (6), may apply
for a limited license, subject to the ignition interlock restriction, if the
program participant is enrolled in a licensed chemical dependency treatment or
rehabilitation program as recommended in a chemical use assessment, and if the
participant meets the other applicable requirements of section 171.30. After completing a licensed chemical
dependency treatment or rehabilitation program and one year of limited license
use without violating the ignition interlock restriction, the conditions of
limited license use, or program guidelines, the participant may apply for
conditional reinstatement of the driver's license, subject to the ignition
interlock restriction. If the program
participant's ignition interlock device subsequently registers a positive
breath alcohol concentration of 0.02 or higher, the commissioner shall cancel
the driver's license, and the program participant may apply for another limited
license according to this paragraph.
(d) Notwithstanding any statute or rule to the contrary, the
commissioner has authority to determine when a program participant is eligible
for restoration of full driving privileges, except that the commissioner shall
not reinstate full driving privileges until the program participant has met all
applicable prerequisites for reinstatement under section 169A.55 and until the
program participant's device has registered no positive breath alcohol
concentrations of 0.02 or higher during the preceding 90 days.
Subd. 5.
Penalties; program violations. (a) If a program participant tampers
with, circumvents, or bypasses a device; drives, operates, or exercises
physical control over a motor vehicle not equipped with a device certified by
the commissioner; violates a condition of a limited license issued under
subdivision 4 and section 171.30; or violates the program guidelines of
subdivision 2, the commissioner shall extend the person's revocation period
under section 169A.52 or 169A.54 by:
(1) 180 days for a first violation;
(2) one year for a second violation; or
(3) 545 days for a third and each subsequent violation.
(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), the commissioner may
terminate participation in the program by any person when, in the
commissioner's judgment, termination is necessary to the interests of public
safety and welfare. In the event of
termination, the commissioner shall not reduce the applicable revocation period
under section 169A.52 or 169A.54 by the amount of time during which the person
possessed a limited or restricted driver's license issued under the authority
of subdivision 4.
Subd. 6.
Penalties; tampering. (a) A person who lends, rents, or
leases a motor vehicle that is not equipped with a functioning ignition
interlock device certified by the commissioner to a person with a license
issued under this section knowing that the person is subject to the ignition
interlock restriction is guilty of a misdemeanor.
(b) A person who tampers with, circumvents, or bypasses the
ignition interlock device, or assists another to tamper with, circumvent, or
bypass the device, is guilty of a misdemeanor except when the action was taken
for emergency purposes or for mechanical repair, and the person limited to the
use of an ignition interlock device does not operate the motor vehicle while
the device is disengaged.
Subd. 7.
Venue. In addition to the provisions of Rule
24 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure and section 627.01, a violation of
subdivision 6 or section 171.09, subdivision 1, paragraph (e), may be
prosecuted in:
(1) the county in which the vehicle involved in the offense is
found;
(2) the county in which the accused resides;
(3) any county through which the vehicle traveled in the
course of the trip during or after which the offense was committed; or
(4) the county in which the impaired driving incident
occurred, which resulted in the accused being issued a driver's license with an
ignition interlock restriction.
Subd. 8.
Rulemaking. In establishing the performance
standards and certification process of subdivision 2 and the program guidelines
of subdivision 3, the commissioner is exempt from chapter 14, including section
14.386. If rules are otherwise necessary
to implement this section, the commissioner may adopt, amend, and repeal rules
using the exempt procedures of section 14.386, except that paragraph (b) shall
not apply.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. Subdivisions 1 to 7 are effective
July 1, 2011. Subdivision 8 is effective
August 1, 2010.
Sec. 15. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 609.131, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Certain violations excepted. Subdivision 1 does not apply to a
misdemeanor violation of section 169A.20; 171.09, subdivision 1, paragraph
(e); 171.306, subdivision 6; 609.224; 609.2242; 609.226; 609.324,
subdivision 3; 609.52; or 617.23, or an ordinance that conforms in substantial
part to any of those sections. A
violation described in this subdivision must be treated as a misdemeanor unless
the defendant consents to the certification of the violation as a petty
misdemeanor.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective July 1,
2011.
Sec. 16. RULEMAKING.
The commissioner may adopt, amend, or repeal rules as needed
to administer Minnesota Statutes, section 169A.55, subdivision 4, paragraph
(a), using the exempt procedures of Minnesota Statutes, section 14.386, except
that paragraph (b) shall not apply.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective August 1,
2010.
Sec. 17. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 169A.54, subdivision 11;
169A.55, subdivision 1; 171.30, subdivision 2c; and 171.305, subdivisions 1, 3,
4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11, are repealed effective July 1, 2011."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to public safety; modifying
implied consent, driving while impaired, and ignition interlock provisions;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 169A.03, by adding a subdivision;
169A.52, subdivisions 3, 4; 169A.54, subdivisions 2, 5; 169A.55, by adding a
subdivision; 169A.60, subdivision 1; 171.09; 171.30, subdivisions 1, 2a, 4;
171.306, as amended; 609.131, subdivision 2; Minnesota Statutes 2009
Supplement, sections 169A.275, subdivision 7; 169A.54, subdivision 1; repealing
Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 169A.54, subdivision 11; 169A.55, subdivision
1; 171.30, subdivision 2c; 171.305, subdivisions 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,
11."
We request the adoption of this report and repassage of the
bill.
House Conferees:
Karla Bigham, Debra Hilstrom, Kim
Norton, Tony Cornish and Steve
Drazkowski.
Senate Conferees: Steve Murphy, Mee Moua, Julie Rosen, John
Doll and Jim Carlson.
Bigham moved that the report of the
Conference Committee on H. F. No. 3106 be adopted and that the
bill be repassed as amended by the Conference Committee. The motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 3106 A bill for an act relating to
public safety; amending first-degree driving while impaired crime to include
prior felony convictions from other states; modifying implied consent, driving
while impaired, and ignition interlock provisions; amending Minnesota Statutes
2008, sections 169A.24, subdivision 1; 169A.52, subdivisions 3, 4; 169A.54,
subdivisions 2, 5; 169A.55, by adding a subdivision; 169A.60, subdivision 1;
171.09; 171.30, subdivisions 1, 2a, 4; 171.306, as amended; 609.131,
subdivision 2; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 169A.275,
subdivision 7; 169A.54, subdivision 1; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008,
sections 169A.54, subdivision 11; 169A.55, subdivision 1; 171.30, subdivision
2c; 171.305, subdivisions 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended by Conference, and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of the bill and the
roll was called. There were 131 yeas and
0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk.
Kelliher
The bill was repassed, as amended by Conference, and its title
agreed to.
CALENDAR FOR THE DAY
S. F. No. 2634 was reported to the House.
Mullery moved to amend S. F. No. 2634, the
second engrossment, as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert the
following language of H. F. No. 2610, the first engrossment:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 609.531,
subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Seizure. (a) Property subject to forfeiture
under sections 609.531 to 609.5318 may be seized by the appropriate agency upon
process issued by any court having jurisdiction over the property. Property may be seized without process if:
(1) the seizure is incident
to a lawful arrest or a lawful search;
(2) the property subject to
seizure has been the subject of a prior judgment in favor of the state in a
criminal injunction or forfeiture proceeding under this chapter; or
(3) the appropriate agency has probable cause to believe that
the delay occasioned by the necessity to obtain process would result in the
removal or destruction of the property and that:
(i) the property was used or is intended to be used in
commission of a felony; or
(ii) the property is dangerous to health or safety.
If property is seized without process under item (i), the
county attorney must institute a forfeiture action under section 609.5313 as
soon as is reasonably possible.
(b) When property is seized, the officer must provide a
receipt to the person found in possession of the property; or in the absence of
any person, the officer must leave a receipt in the place where the property
was found, if reasonably possible.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective August 1,
2010, and applies to seizures conducted on or after that date.
Sec. 2. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 609.531, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Right to possession vests immediately;
custody of seized property. All
right, title, and interest in property subject to forfeiture under sections
609.531 to 609.5318 vests in the appropriate agency upon commission of the act
or omission giving rise to the forfeiture.
Any property seized under sections 609.531 to 609.5318 is not subject to
replevin, but is deemed to be in the custody of the appropriate agency subject
to the orders and decrees of the court having jurisdiction over the forfeiture
proceedings. When property is so seized,
the appropriate agency shall use reasonable diligence to secure the property
and prevent waste and may do any of the following:
(1) place the property under seal;
(2) remove the property to a place designated by it; and
(3) in the case of controlled substances, require the state
Board of Pharmacy to take custody of the property and remove it to an
appropriate location for disposition in accordance with law; and.
(4) take other steps reasonable and necessary to secure the
property and prevent waste.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective August 1,
2010, and applies to seizures conducted on or after that date.
Sec. 3. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 609.531, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 7.
Petition for remission or mitigation. Prior to the entry of a court order
disposing with the forfeiture action, any person who has an interest in
forfeited property may file with the county attorney a petition for remission
or mitigation of the forfeiture. The
county attorney may remit or mitigate the forfeiture upon terms and conditions
the county attorney deems reasonable if the county attorney finds that: (1) the forfeiture was incurred without
willful negligence or without any intention on the part of the petitioner to
violate the law; or (2) extenuating circumstances justify the remission or
mitigation of the forfeiture.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective July 1,
2010.
Sec. 4. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 609.531, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 8.
Forfeiture policies; statewide
model policy required. (a) By
December 1, 2010, the Peace Officer Standards and Training Board, after
consulting with the Minnesota County Attorneys Association, the Minnesota
Sheriffs' Association, the Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association, and the
Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association, shall develop a model policy
that articulates best practices for forfeiture and is designed to encourage the
uniform application of forfeiture laws statewide. At a minimum, the policy shall address the
following:
(1) best practices in pursuing, seizing, and tracking
forfeitures;
(2) type and frequency of training for law enforcement on
forfeiture laws; and
(3) situations in which forfeitures should not be pursued.
(b) By December 1, 2010, the Minnesota County Attorneys
Association, after consulting with the Peace Officer Standards and Training
Board, the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association, the Minnesota Chiefs of Police
Association, and the Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association, shall
develop a model policy that articulates best practices for forfeiture and is
designed to encourage the uniform application of forfeiture laws statewide. At a minimum, the policy shall address the
following:
(1) statutory role of prosecutors in forfeiture procedures;
(2) best practices for timely and fair resolution of
forfeiture cases;
(3) type and frequency of training for prosecutors on
forfeiture laws; and
(4) situations in which forfeitures should not be pursued.
(c) By March 1, 2011, the chief law enforcement officer of
every state and local law enforcement agency and every prosecution office in
the state shall adopt and implement a written policy on forfeiture that is
identical or substantially similar to the model policies developed under
paragraphs (a) and (b). The written
policy shall be made available to the public upon request.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective July 1,
2010.
Sec. 5. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 609.5311, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Limitations
on forfeiture of certain property associated with controlled substances. (a) A conveyance device is
subject to forfeiture under this section only if the retail value of the
controlled substance is $25 $50 or more and the conveyance device
is associated with a felony-level controlled substance crime.
(b) Real property is subject to forfeiture under this section
only if the retail value of the controlled substance or contraband is $1,000 or
more.
(c) Property used by any person as a common carrier in the
transaction of business as a common carrier is subject to forfeiture under this
section only if the owner of the property is a consenting party to, or is privy
to, the use or intended use of the property as described in subdivision 2.
(d) Property is subject to forfeiture under this section only
if its owner was privy to the use or intended use described in subdivision 2,
or the unlawful use or intended use of the property otherwise occurred with the
owner's knowledge or consent.
(e) Forfeiture under this section of a conveyance device or
real property encumbered by a bona fide security interest is subject to the
interest of the secured party unless the secured party had knowledge of or
consented to the act or omission upon which the forfeiture is based. A person claiming a security interest bears
the burden of establishing that interest by clear and convincing evidence.
(f) Forfeiture under this section of real property is subject
to the interests of a good faith purchaser for value unless the purchaser had
knowledge of or consented to the act or omission upon which the forfeiture is
based.
(g) Notwithstanding paragraphs (d), (e), and (f), property is
not subject to forfeiture based solely on the owner's or secured party's
knowledge of the unlawful use or intended use of the property if: (1) the owner or secured party took
reasonable steps to terminate use of the property by the offender; or (2) the
property is real property owned by the parent of the offender, unless the
parent actively participated in, or knowingly acquiesced to, a violation of
chapter 152, or the real property constitutes proceeds derived from or traceable
to a use described in subdivision 2.
(h) The Department of Corrections Fugitive Apprehension Unit
shall not seize a conveyance device or real property, for the purposes of
forfeiture under paragraphs (a) to (g).
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective August 1,
2010, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date.
Sec. 6. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 609.5313, is amended to read:
609.5313 FORFEITURE BY
JUDICIAL ACTION; PROCEDURE.
(a) The forfeiture of property under sections 609.5311 and
609.5312 is governed by this section. A
separate complaint must be filed against the property stating the act,
omission, or occurrence giving rise to the forfeiture and the date and place of
the act or occurrence. Within 90 days
from when the seizure occurs, the county attorney shall notify the owner or
possessor of the property of the action, if known or readily ascertainable. The action must be captioned in the name of
the county attorney or the county attorney's designee as plaintiff and the
property as defendant. Upon motion by
the county attorney, a court may extend the time period for sending notice for
a period not to exceed 90 days for good cause shown.
(b) If notice is not sent in accordance with paragraph (a),
and no time extension is granted or the extension period has expired, the
appropriate agency shall return the property to the person from whom the
property was seized, if known. An
agency's return of property due to lack of proper notice does not restrict the
right of the agency to commence a forfeiture proceeding at a later time. The agency shall not be required to return
contraband or other property that the person from whom the property was seized
may not legally possess.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective August 1,
2010, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date.
Sec. 7. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 609.5314, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Administrative forfeiture procedure. (a) Forfeiture of property described in
subdivision 1 that does not exceed $75,000 in value is governed by this
subdivision. Within 90 days from
when seizure occurs, or within a reasonable time after that, all persons
known to have an ownership, possessory, or security interest in seized property
must be notified of the seizure and the intent to forfeit the property. In the case of a motor vehicle required to be
registered under chapter 168, notice mailed by certified mail to the address
shown in Department of Public Safety records is deemed sufficient notice to the
registered owner. The notification to a
person known to have a security interest in seized property required under this
paragraph applies only to motor vehicles required to be registered under
chapter 168 and only if the security interest is listed on the vehicle's title. Upon motion by the appropriate agency or
county attorney, a court may extend the time period for sending notice for a
period not to exceed 90 days for good cause shown.
(b) Notice may otherwise be given in the manner provided by
law for service of a summons in a civil action.
The notice must be in writing and contain:
(1) a description of the property seized;
(2) the date of seizure;
(3) notice of the right to obtain judicial review of the
forfeiture and of the procedure for obtaining that judicial review, printed in
English, Hmong, and Spanish. Substantially
the following language must appear conspicuously: "IF YOU DO NOT DEMAND JUDICIAL REVIEW
EXACTLY AS PRESCRIBED IN MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION 609.5314, SUBDIVISION 3,
YOU LOSE THE RIGHT TO A JUDICIAL DETERMINATION OF THIS FORFEITURE AND YOU LOSE
ANY RIGHT YOU MAY HAVE TO THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. YOU MAY NOT HAVE TO PAY THE FILING FEE FOR
THE DEMAND IF DETERMINED YOU ARE UNABLE TO AFFORD THE FEE. IF THE PROPERTY IS WORTH $7,500 OR LESS, YOU
MAY FILE YOUR CLAIM IN CONCILIATION COURT.
YOU DO NOT HAVE TO PAY THE CONCILIATION COURT FILING FEE IF THE PROPERTY
IS WORTH LESS THAN $500."
(c) If notice is not sent in accordance with paragraph (a),
and no time extension is granted or the extension period has expired, the
appropriate agency shall return the property to the person from whom the
property was seized, if known. An
agency's return of property due to lack of proper notice does not restrict the
right of the agency to commence a forfeiture proceeding at a later time. The agency shall not be required to return
contraband or other property that the person from whom the property was seized
may not legally possess.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective August 1,
2010, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date.
Sec. 8. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 609.5314, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Judicial determination. (a) Within 60 days following service of a
notice of seizure and forfeiture under this section, a claimant may file a
demand for a judicial determination of the forfeiture. The demand must be in the form of a civil
complaint and must be filed with the court administrator in the county in which
the seizure occurred, together with proof of service of a copy of the complaint
on the county attorney for that county, and the standard filing fee for civil
actions unless the petitioner has the right to sue in forma pauperis under
section 563.01. If the value of the
seized property is $7,500 or less, the claimant may file an action in
conciliation court for recovery of the seized property. If the value of the seized property is less
than $500, the claimant does not have to pay the conciliation court filing fee. No responsive pleading is required of the
county attorney and no court fees may be charged for the county attorney's
appearance in the matter. The hearing
must be held at the earliest practicable date, and in any event no later than
180 days following the filing of the demand by the claimant. If a related criminal proceeding is pending,
the hearing shall not be held until the conclusion of the criminal proceedings. The district court administrator shall
schedule the hearing as soon as practicable after adjudication in the criminal
prosecution. The proceedings are
governed by the Rules of Civil Procedure.
(b) The complaint must be captioned in the name of the
claimant as plaintiff and the seized property as defendant, and must state with
specificity the grounds on which the claimant alleges the property was
improperly seized and the plaintiff's interest in the property seized. Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, an
action for the return of property seized under this section may not be
maintained by or on behalf of any person who has been served with a notice of
seizure and forfeiture unless the person has complied with this subdivision.
(c) If the claimant makes a timely demand for judicial
determination under this subdivision, the appropriate agency must conduct the
forfeiture under section 609.531, subdivision 6a. The limitations and defenses set forth in
section 609.5311, subdivision 3, apply to the judicial determination.
(d) If a demand for judicial determination of an
administrative forfeiture is filed under this subdivision and the court orders
the return of the seized property, the court shall order that filing fees be
reimbursed to the person who filed the demand.
In addition, the court may order sanctions under section 549.211. If the court orders payment of these costs,
they must be paid from forfeited money or proceeds from the sale of forfeited
property from the appropriate law enforcement and prosecuting agencies in the
same proportion as they would be distributed under section 609.5315,
subdivision 5.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective August 1,
2010, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date.
Sec. 9. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 609.5315, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Disposition. (a) Subject to paragraph (b), if the
court finds under section 609.5313, 609.5314, or 609.5318 that the property is
subject to forfeiture, it shall order the appropriate agency to do one of the
following:
(1) unless a different disposition is provided under clause
(3) or (4), either destroy firearms, ammunition, and firearm accessories that
the agency decides not to use for law enforcement purposes under clause (8), or
sell them to federally licensed firearms dealers, as defined in section
624.7161, subdivision 1, and distribute the proceeds under subdivision 5 or 5b;
(2) sell property that is not required to be destroyed by law
and is not harmful to the public and distribute the proceeds under subdivision
5 or 5b;
(3) sell antique firearms, as defined in section 624.712,
subdivision 3, to the public and distribute the proceeds under subdivision 5 or
5b;
(4) destroy or use for law enforcement purposes semiautomatic
military-style assault weapons, as defined in section 624.712, subdivision 7;
(5) take custody of the property and remove it for
disposition in accordance with law;
(6) forward the property to the federal drug enforcement
administration;
(7) disburse money as provided under subdivision 5 or 5b; or
(8) keep property other than money for official use by the
agency and the prosecuting agency.
(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), the Hennepin or Ramsey
County sheriff may not sell firearms, ammunition, or firearms accessories if
the policy is disapproved by the applicable county board.
(c) If property is sold under paragraph (a), the appropriate
agency shall not sell property to an officer or employee of the agency that seized the property or to a person related
to the officer or employee by blood or marriage.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective July 1,
2010.
Sec. 10. Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 609.5315, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Disposition of administratively forfeited
property. If property is forfeited
administratively under section 609.5314 or 609.5318 and no demand for judicial
determination is made, the appropriate agency shall provide the county
attorney with a copy of the forfeiture or evidence receipt, the notice of
seizure and intent to forfeit, a statement of probable cause for forfeiture of
the property, and a description of the property and its
estimated value. Upon
review and certification by the county attorney that (1) the appropriate agency
provided a receipt in accordance with section 609.531, subdivision 4, or
626.16; (2) the appropriate agency served notice in accordance with section
609.5314, subdivision 2, or 609.5318, subdivision 2; and (3) probable cause for
forfeiture exists based on the officer's statement, the appropriate agency may
dispose of the property in any of the ways listed in subdivision 1.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective August 1,
2010, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to
forfeiture; requiring officers to give forfeiture receipts upon seizure of
property; implementing timelines for forfeiture notice and hearings; placing a
cap on the value of property that may be forfeited administratively;
authorizing petitions for remission and mitigation of seized property;
requiring certification by prosecutor before property may be forfeited
administratively; requiring forfeiture proceeds to be deposited in special
trust accounts; directing Department of Public Safety to establish model policy
related to forfeiture proceedings; requiring law enforcement to secure seized
property; prohibiting sale of forfeited property to law enforcement officers,
employees, and family members; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections
609.531, subdivisions 4, 5, by adding subdivisions; 609.5311, subdivision 3;
609.5313; 609.5314, subdivisions 2, 3; 609.5315, subdivisions 1, 2."
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Liebling,
Rukavina and Paymar moved to amend S. F. No. 2634, the second
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 2,
after line 23, insert:
"Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 609.531, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 6b. Forfeiture
a civil procedure; conviction as prerequisite. (a) An action for forfeiture under
section 609.5313 is an independent civil in rem action. The appropriate agency handling the
forfeiture has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that:
(1) the
owner of the property was convicted of a crime that subjects the property to
forfeiture;
(2) the
owner's property was used in committing the underlying crime or conduct or
represents proceeds derived proximately from the underlying crime; and
(3) the
forfeiture of any property used to commit a crime or conduct is proportional to
the underlying crime or conduct.
(b) For
purposes of forfeiture under section 609.5311, a judicial stipulation of facts
is considered to be a conviction.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective August 1, 2010, and applies to offenses committed on or
after that date.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 609.531, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 6c. Unclaimed
property; contraband. Notwithstanding
subdivision 6b, a judgment of forfeiture may be entered without an underlying
conviction for the following types of property:
(1) contraband; and
(2) property for which no
person has claimed an interest and, after reasonable investigation, no owner
has been found.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2010, and
applies to offenses committed on or after that date."
Pages 5 to 7, delete
sections 7 and 8
Page 7, line 25, strike
", 609.5314, or 609.5318"
Page 8, delete section 10
and insert:
"Sec. 10. REVISOR'S
INSTRUCTION.
The revisor of statutes
shall make any cross-reference changes, language changes, or both, to Minnesota
Statutes made necessary by this act.
Sec. 11. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2008,
sections 609.531, subdivision 6a; 609.5314; and 609.5318, are repealed.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2010."
Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
CALL OF THE HOUSE
On the motion of Simon and on the demand of 10 members, a call
of the House was ordered. The following
members answered to their names:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hosch
Howes
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Morrow moved that further proceedings of
the roll call be suspended and that the Sergeant at Arms be instructed to bring
in the absentees. The motion prevailed
and it was so ordered.
Severson was excused between the hours of
3:20 p.m. and 4:55 p.m.
The question recurred on the Liebling et
al amendment and the roll was called.
There were 20 yeas and 111 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Bly
Buesgens
Clark
Davnie
Falk
Greiling
Hausman
Hayden
Hilty
Holberg
Kahn
Kalin
Kohls
Liebling
Mariani
Masin
Paymar
Rukavina
Thao
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Cornish
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Haws
Hilstrom
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Beard was excused between the hours of
3:40 p.m. and 5:35 p.m.
Liebling,
Rukavina and Paymar moved to amend S. F. No. 2634, the second
engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 8,
after line 28, insert:
"Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 609.5315,
subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Distribution
of money. The money or proceeds from
the sale of forfeited property, after payment of seizure, storage, forfeiture,
and sale expenses, and satisfaction of valid liens against the property, must
be distributed as follows: forwarded
to the commissioner of management and budget to be deposited into the state
treasury and credited to the general fund.
This money must be appropriated by the legislature for public safety
purposes.
(1) 70
percent of the money or proceeds must be forwarded to the appropriate agency
for deposit as a supplement to the agency's operating fund or similar fund for
use in law enforcement;
(2) 20
percent of the money or proceeds must be forwarded to the county attorney or
other prosecuting agency that handled the forfeiture for deposit as a supplement
to its operating fund or similar fund for prosecutorial purposes; and
(3) the
remaining ten percent of the money or proceeds must be forwarded within 60 days
after resolution of the forfeiture to the state treasury and credited to the
general fund. Any local police relief
association organized under chapter 423 which received or was entitled to
receive the proceeds of any sale made under this section before the effective
date of Laws 1988, chapter 665, sections 1 to 17, shall continue to receive and
retain the proceeds of these sales.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section
is effective July 1, 2010."
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Liebling et
al amendment and the roll was called.
There were 20 yeas and 110 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Atkins
Bly
Brynaert
Davnie
Falk
Greiling
Hausman
Hayden
Hilty
Kahn
Kalin
Laine
Liebling
Mariani
Norton
Paymar
Rukavina
Thao
Welti
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Benson
Bigham
Brod
Brown
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Haws
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Westrom
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
S. F. No. 2634, A bill for
an act relating to public safety; making numerous changes to the controlled
substance forfeiture law; expanding the reporting requirements related to
forfeiture; requiring model policies on forfeiture; addressing the disposition
of forfeiture proceeds; providing for a probable cause determination for
certain forfeitures; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 97A.221, by
adding a subdivision; 97A.223, by adding a subdivision; 97A.225, by adding a
subdivision; 169A.63, by adding a subdivision; 491A.01, subdivision 3; 609.531,
subdivisions 1a, 5, 5a, by adding a subdivision; 609.5311, subdivision 3;
609.5313; 609.5314; 609.5315, subdivisions 5, 6, by adding a subdivision;
609.5318, subdivision 3; 609.762, by adding a subdivision; 609.905, by adding a
subdivision; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 84.7741, by adding a
subdivision; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 388;
626.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 130 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title
agreed to.
MOTION TO LIFT CALL OF THE HOUSE
Howes moved that the call of the House be
lifted. The motion did not prevail.
H. F. No. 2866 was reported
to the House.
Carlson moved
to amend H. F. No. 2866, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 1, line
16, reinstate the stricken language
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Holberg was excused between the hours of
4:15 p.m. and 5:05 p.m.
H. F. No. 2866, A bill for
an act relating to state government; modifying authority of the executive
branch to reduce unexpended allotments; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008,
section 16A.152, subdivision 4; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota
Statutes, chapter 16A.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 87 yeas and 43 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
There being no objection, the order of
business reverted to Messages from the Senate.
MESSAGES FROM
THE SENATE
The following messages were received from
the Senate:
Madam
Speaker:
I hereby announce
that the Senate has concurred in and adopted the report of the Conference
Committee on:
H. F. No. 3106,
A bill for an act relating to public safety; amending first-degree driving
while impaired crime to include prior felony convictions from other states;
modifying implied consent, driving while impaired, and ignition interlock
provisions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 169A.24, subdivision 1;
169A.52, subdivisions 3, 4; 169A.54, subdivisions 2, 5; 169A.55, by adding a
subdivision; 169A.60, subdivision 1; 171.09; 171.30, subdivisions 1, 2a, 4;
171.306, as amended; 609.131, subdivision 2; Minnesota Statutes 2009
Supplement, sections 169A.275, subdivision 7; 169A.54, subdivision 1; repealing
Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 169A.54, subdivision 11; 169A.55, subdivision
1; 171.30, subdivision 2c; 171.305, subdivisions 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,
11.
The Senate has
repassed said bill in accordance with the recommendation and report of the
Conference Committee. Said House File is
herewith returned to the House.
Colleen J. Pacheco, First
Assistant Secretary of the Senate
Madam
Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate refuses
to concur in the House amendments to the following Senate File:
S. F. No. 2634, A bill for an act relating to
public safety; making numerous changes to the controlled substance forfeiture
law; expanding the reporting requirements related to forfeiture; requiring
model policies on forfeiture; addressing the disposition of forfeiture proceeds;
providing for a probable cause determination for certain forfeitures; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 97A.221, by adding a subdivision; 97A.223, by
adding a subdivision; 97A.225, by adding a subdivision; 169A.63, by adding a
subdivision; 491A.01, subdivision 3; 609.531, subdivisions 1a, 5, 5a, by adding
a subdivision; 609.5311, subdivision 3; 609.5313; 609.5314; 609.5315,
subdivisions 5, 6, by adding a subdivision; 609.5318,
subdivision 3; 609.762, by adding a subdivision; 609.905, by adding a
subdivision; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 84.7741, by adding a
subdivision; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 388;
626.
The Senate respectfully requests that a Conference Committee
be appointed thereon. The Senate has
appointed as such committee:
Senators Moua, Higgins and Latz.
Said Senate File is herewith transmitted to the House with the
request that the House appoint a like committee.
Colleen J. Pacheco, First
Assistant Secretary of the Senate
Mullery moved that the House accede to the
request of the Senate and that the Speaker appoint a Conference Committee of 3
members of the House to meet with a like committee appointed by the Senate on
the disagreeing votes of the two houses on S. F. No. 2634. The motion prevailed.
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce
that the Senate has concurred in and adopted the report of the Conference
Committee on:
S. F. No. 184.
The Senate has
repassed said bill in accordance with the recommendation and report of the Conference
Committee. Said Senate File is herewith
transmitted to the House.
Colleen J. Pacheco, First
Assistant Secretary of the Senate
CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON S. F. NO. 184
A bill for
an act relating to higher education; authorizing data matching; modifying
institution eligibility; establishing award procedures; establishing
scholarship priorities; establishing powers and duties; modifying security
requirements; regulating the use of certain revenues; providing for refunds;
defining terms; making technical corrections; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008,
sections 136A.101, subdivision 10; 136A.126, subdivision 1, by adding a
subdivision; 136A.127, subdivision 6, by adding subdivisions; 136A.15,
subdivision 6; 136A.16, subdivision 14; 136A.62, subdivision 3; 136A.645;
136A.646; 136A.65, by adding a subdivision; 136F.581, by adding a subdivision;
141.25, subdivisions 7, 13, by adding a subdivision; 141.251, subdivision 2;
141.28, subdivision 2; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 136A.01,
subdivision 2; 136A.101, subdivision 4; 136A.127, subdivisions 2, 4; 299A.45,
subdivision 1; 340A.404, subdivision 4a; Laws 2009, chapter 95, article 2,
section 40; Laws 2010, chapter 215, article 2, sections 4, subdivision 3; 6;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 136A; 137.
May 12, 2010
The Honorable James P. Metzen
President of the Senate
The Honorable Margaret Anderson
Kelliher
Speaker of the House of
Representatives
We, the
undersigned conferees for S. F. No. 184 report that we have
agreed upon the items in dispute and recommend as follows:
That the
House recede from its amendments and that S. F. No. 184 be
further amended as follows:
Delete
everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section
1. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section
135A.15, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Policy
required. The Board of Trustees of
the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities shall, and the University of
Minnesota is requested to, adopt a clear, understandable written policy on
sexual harassment and sexual violence that informs victims of their rights
under the crime victims bill of rights, including the right to assistance from
the Crime Victims Reparations Board and the commissioner of public safety. The policy must apply to students and
employees and must provide information about their rights and duties. The policy must apply to criminal incidents
occurring on property owned by the postsecondary system or institution in which
the victim is a student or employee of that system or institution. It must include procedures for reporting
incidents of sexual harassment or sexual violence and for disciplinary actions
against violators. During student
registration, each technical college, community college, or state university
shall, and the University of Minnesota is requested to, provide each student
with information regarding its policy. A
copy of the policy also shall be posted at appropriate locations on campus at
all times. Each private postsecondary
institution that is an eligible institution as defined in section 136A.101,
subdivision 4 136A.155, must adopt a policy that meets the
requirements of this section.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 135A.155, is
amended to read:
135A.155 HAZING POLICY.
The Board
of Trustees of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities shall, and the
University of Minnesota is requested to, adopt a clear, understandable written
policy on student conduct, including hazing.
The policy must include procedures for reporting incidents of
inappropriate hazing and for disciplinary actions against individual violators
and organizations. The policy shall be
made available to students by appropriate means as determined by each
institution, which may include publication in a student handbook or other
institutional publication, or posting by electronic display on the Internet,
and shall be posted at appropriate locations on campus. A private postsecondary institution that is
an eligible institution as defined in section 136A.101, subdivision 4
136A.155, must adopt a policy that meets the requirements of this section.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 135A.51,
subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Senior
citizen. "Senior citizen"
means a person who has reached 62 66 years of age before the
beginning of any term, semester or quarter, in which a course of study is
pursued, or a person receiving a railroad retirement annuity who has reached 60
years of age before the beginning of the term.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
136A.01, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Responsibilities. (a) The Minnesota Office of Higher
Education is responsible for:
(1)
necessary state level administration of financial aid programs, including
accounting, auditing, and disbursing state and federal financial aid funds, and
reporting on financial aid programs to the governor and the legislature;
(2)
approval, registration, licensing, and financial aid eligibility of private
collegiate and career schools, under sections 136A.61 to 136A.71 and chapter
141;
(3)
negotiating and administering reciprocity agreements;
(4)
publishing and distributing financial aid information and materials, and other
information and materials under section 136A.87, to students and parents;
(5)
collecting and maintaining student enrollment and financial aid data and
reporting data on students and postsecondary institutions to develop and
implement a process to measure and report on the effectiveness of postsecondary
institutions;
(6)
administering the federal programs that affect students and institutions on a
statewide basis; and
(7)
prescribing policies, procedures, and rules under chapter 14 necessary to
administer the programs under its supervision.
(b) The
office may match individual student data from the student record enrollment
database with individual student financial aid data collected and maintained by
the office in order to audit or evaluate federal or state supported education
programs as permitted by United States Code, title 20, section 1232g(b)(3), and
Code of Federal Regulations, title 34, section 99.35. The office shall not release data that
personally identifies parents or students other than to employees and
contractors of the office.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
136A.101, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Eligible
institution. "Eligible institution"
means a postsecondary educational institution located in this state or in a
state with which the office has entered into a higher education reciprocity
agreement on state student aid programs that (1) is operated by this state or
the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, or (2) is operated
privately and, as determined by the office, meets all of the following: (i) maintains academic standards
substantially equivalent to those of comparable institutions operated in this
state; (ii) is licensed or registered as a postsecondary institution by the
office or another state agency; and (iii) by July 1, 2013, is participating in
the federal Pell Grant program under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of
1965, as amended an institution that meets the eligibility requirements
under section 136A.103.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 136A.101,
subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Satisfactory
academic progress. "Satisfactory
academic progress" means that: satisfactory
academic progress as defined under Code of Federal Regulations, title 34,
sections 668.16(e), 668.32(f), and 668.34.
(1) by the
end of a student's second academic year of attendance at an institution, the
student has at least a cumulative grade point average of C or its equivalent,
or academic standing consistent with the institution's graduation requirements;
and
(2) by the
end of the first term of the third and fourth academic year of attendance, the
student has a cumulative grade point average of at least a C or its equivalent.
Sec. 7. [136A.103]
INSTITUTION ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS.
(a) A
postsecondary institution is eligible for state student aid under chapter 136A
and sections 197.791 and 299A.45, if the institution is located in this state
and:
(1) is
operated by this state or the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota;
or
(2) is
operated privately and, as determined by the office, meets the requirements of
paragraph (b).
(b) A
private institution must:
(1) maintain academic standards substantially equivalent to those of
comparable institutions operated in this state;
(2) be
licensed or registered as a postsecondary institution by the office; and
(3)(i) by
July 1, 2010, participate in the federal Pell Grant program under Title IV of
the Higher Education Act of 1965, Public Law 89-329, as amended; or
(ii) if an
institution was participating in state student aid programs as of June 30,
2010, and the institution did not participate in the federal Pell Grant program
by June 30, 2010, the institution must require every student who enrolls to
sign a disclosure form, provided by the office, stating that the institution is
not participating in the federal Pell Grant program.
(c) An
institution that offers only graduate-level degrees or graduate-level nondegree
programs, or that offers only degrees or programs that do not meet the required
minimum program length to participate in the federal Pell Grant program, is an
eligible institution if the institution is licensed or registered as a
postsecondary institution by the office.
(d) An
eligible institution under paragraph (b), clause (3), item (ii), that changes
ownership as defined in section 136A.63, subdivision 2, must participate in the
federal Pell Grant program within four calendar years of the first ownership
change to continue eligibility.
(e) An
institution that loses its eligibility for the federal Pell Grant program is
not an eligible institution.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 136A.126,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Student
eligibility. The director of the
Office of Higher Education shall establish procedures for the distribution of
scholarships to a Minnesota resident student as defined under section
136A.101, subdivision 8, who:
(1) is of
one-fourth or more Indian ancestry;
(2) has
applied for other existing state and federal scholarship and grant programs;
(3) is
meeting satisfactory academic progress as defined under section 136A.101,
subdivision 10;
(4) is not
in default, as defined by the office, of a federal or state student educational
loan;
(5) if enrolled
in an undergraduate program, is eligible or would be eligible to receive a
federal Pell Grant or a state grant based on the federal needs analysis and is
enrolled for nine semester credits per term or more, or the equivalent;
(4) (6)
if enrolled in a graduate program, demonstrates a remaining financial need in
the award amount calculation and is enrolled, per term, on a half-time basis or
more as defined by the postsecondary institution; and
(5) (7)
in the opinion of the director of the Office of Higher Education, based upon
postsecondary institution recommendations, has the capabilities to benefit from
further education.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 136A.126, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 5. Awarding
procedure. (a) Awards must be
made on a first-come, first-served basis in the order complete applications are
received. If there are multiple
applications with identical completion dates, those applications are further
sorted by application receipt date.
(b) Awards
are made to eligible students until the appropriation is expended.
(c)
Applicants not receiving a grant and for whom the office has received a completed
application are placed on a waiting list in order of application completion
date.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
136A.127, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Definition;
qualifying program. For the purposes
of this section, a "qualifying program" means a rigorous secondary
school program of study defined for Minnesota high school graduates
recognized by the Department of Education under agreement with the
Secretary of Education for the purposes of determining eligibility for the
federal Academic Competitiveness Grant Program under Title IV of the Higher
Education Act of 1965, as amended on August 14, 2008. If a qualifying program includes a foreign
language requirement, the foreign language requirement is waived for a student
whose first language is not English and who attains English language
proficiency.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
136A.127, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Student
eligibility. To be eligible to
receive a scholarship under this section, in addition to the requirements
listed under section 136A.121, a student must:
(1) submit
a Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA);
(2)
complete a qualifying program in a high school or in a home-school setting
under section 120A.22, graduate from a Minnesota high school, and graduate with
an unweighted grade point average of 2.5 or higher;
(3) qualify
for a federal Pell Grant or state grant under section 136A.121;
(4) be a
United States citizen or eligible noncitizen, as defined in section 484 of the
Higher Education Act, United States Code, title 20, sections 1091 et seq., as
amended, and Code of Federal Regulations, title 34, section 668.33;
(5) meet
satisfactory academic progress as defined under section 136A.101, subdivision
10;
(6) be a
Minnesota resident, as defined in section 136A.101, subdivision 8; and
(6) (7)
enroll full-time in a degree, diploma, or certificate program during the
academic year immediately following high school graduation at an eligible
institution as defined under section 136A.101, subdivision 4.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 136A.15,
subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Eligible
institution. "Eligible
institution" means a postsecondary educational institution that (1) is
operated or regulated by this state or the Board of Regents of the University
of Minnesota; (2) is operated publicly or privately in another state, is approved
by the United States Secretary of Education, and, as determined by the office,
maintains academic standards substantially equal to those of comparable
institutions operated in this state; (3) is licensed or registered as a
postsecondary institution by the office or another state agency; and (4) by
July 1, 2011, is participating in the federal Pell Grant program under Title IV
of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended. It also includes any institution chartered in
a province an institution that meets the eligibility requirements under
section 136A.155.
Sec. 13. [136A.155]
ADDITIONAL INSTITUTION ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS.
A
postsecondary institution is an eligible institution for purposes of sections
136A.15 to 136A.1702, if the institution:
(1) meets
the eligibility requirements under section 136A.103; or
(2) is
operated publicly or privately in another state, is approved by the United
States Secretary of Education, and, as determined by the office, maintains
academic standards substantially equal to those of comparable institutions
operated in this state.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 136A.16,
subdivision 14, is amended to read:
Subd. 14. Notes. The office may sell at public or private
sale, at the price or prices determined by the office, any note or other
instrument or obligation evidencing or securing a loan made by the office or
its predecessor, including the Minnesota Higher Education Coordinating
Board and the Minnesota Higher Education Services Office.
Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 136A.62,
subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. School. "School" means:
(1) any
partnership, company, firm, society, trust, association, corporation, or any
combination thereof, which (i) is, owns, or operates a private, nonprofit
postsecondary education institution; (ii) is, owns, or operates a private,
for-profit postsecondary education institution; or (iii) provides a
postsecondary instructional program or course leading to a degree whether or
not for profit;
(2) any public
or private postsecondary educational institution located in another
state or country which offers or makes available to a Minnesota resident any
course, program or educational activity which does not require the leaving of
the state for its completion; or
(3) any
individual, entity, or postsecondary institution located in another state that
contracts with any school located within the state of Minnesota for the purpose
of providing educational programs, training programs, or awarding postsecondary
credits or continuing education credits to Minnesota residents that may be
applied to a degree program.
Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 136A.645, is
amended to read:
136A.645 SCHOOL CLOSURE.
(a) When a
school decides to cease postsecondary education operations, it must cooperate
with the office in assisting students to find alternative means to complete
their studies with a minimum of disruption, and inform the office of the
following:
(1) the
planned date for termination of postsecondary education operations;
(2) the
planned date for the transfer of the student records;
(3)
confirmation of the name and address of the organization to receive and hold
the student records; and
(4) the
official at the organization receiving the student records who is designated to
provide official copies of records or transcripts upon request.
(b) Upon
notice from a school of its intention to cease operations, the office shall
notify the school of the date on which it must cease the enrollment of students
and all postsecondary educational operations.
Without
limitation as to other circumstance, a school shall be deemed to have ceased
operations when the school:
(1) has an
unscheduled nonemergency closure or cancellation of classes for more than 24
hours without prior notice to the office;
(2)
announces it is closed or closing; or
(3) files
for bankruptcy.
Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 136A.646, is
amended to read:
136A.646 ADDITIONAL SECURITY.
(a) In the
event any registered institution is notified by the United States Department of
Education that it has fallen below minimum financial standards and that its
continued participation in Title IV will be conditioned upon its satisfying
either the Zone Alternative, Code of Federal Regulations, title 34, section
668.175, paragraph (f), or a Letter of Credit Alternative, Code of Federal
Regulations, title 34, section 668.175, paragraph (c), the institution shall
provide a surety bond conditioned upon the faithful performance of all
contracts and agreements with students in a sum equal to the "letter of
credit" required by the United States Department of Education in the
Letter of Credit Alternative, but in no event shall such bond be less than
$10,000 nor more than $250,000.
(b) In lieu
of a bond, the applicant may deposit with the commissioner of management and
budget:
(1) a sum
equal to the amount of the required surety bond in cash; or
(2)
securities, as may be legally purchased by savings banks or for trust funds, in
an aggregate market value equal to the amount of the required surety bond.
Sec. 18. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 136F.581, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 5. Food
products grown in state. Colleges
and universities must make a reasonable attempt to identify and purchase food
products that are grown within the state.
Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 141.25, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 2a. Refunds. If a contract is deemed unenforceable
under subdivision 2, a school must refund tuition, fees, and other charges
received from a student or on behalf of a student within 30 days of receiving
written notification and demand for refund from the Minnesota Office of Higher
Education.
Sec. 20. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 141.25,
subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Minimum
standards. A license shall be issued
if the office first determines:
(1) that
the applicant has a sound financial condition with sufficient resources
available to:
(i) meet
the school's financial obligations;
(ii) refund
all tuition and other charges, within a reasonable period of time, in the event
of dissolution of the school or in the event of any justifiable claims for
refund against the school by the student body;
(iii)
provide adequate service to its students and prospective students; and
(iv)
maintain and support the school;
(2) that
the applicant has satisfactory facilities with sufficient tools and equipment
and the necessary number of work stations to prepare adequately the students
currently enrolled, and those proposed to be enrolled;
(3) that
the applicant employs a sufficient number of qualified teaching personnel to
provide the educational programs contemplated;
(4) that
the school has an organizational framework with administrative and
instructional personnel to provide the programs and services it intends to
offer;
(5) that
the premises and conditions under which the students work and study are
sanitary, healthful, and safe, according to modern standards;
(6) that
the quality and content of each occupational course or program of study
provides education and adequate preparation to enrolled students for entry
level positions in the occupation for which prepared;
(7) that
the living quarters which are owned, maintained, recommended, or approved by
the applicant for students are sanitary and safe;
(8) that
the contract or enrollment agreement used by the school complies with the
provisions in section 141.265;
(9) that
contracts and agreements do not contain a wage assignment provision or a
confession of judgment clause; and
(10) that
there has been no adjudication of fraud or misrepresentation in any criminal,
civil, or administrative proceeding in any jurisdiction against the school or
its owner, officers, agents, or sponsoring organization.
Sec. 21. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 141.25,
subdivision 13, is amended to read:
Subd. 13. Schools
licensed by another state agency or board.
A school required to obtain a private career school license due to
the use of "academy," "institute," "college," or
"university" in its name or licensed for the purpose of
participating in state financial aid under chapter 136A, and which is also
licensed by another state agency or board shall be required to satisfy only the
requirements of subdivisions 3, clauses (1), (2), (3), (5), (7), and (10); 4;
5, paragraph (b), clause (2); 7, clauses (1) and (10); 8; 9, clause (13); and
12.
Sec. 22. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 141.251,
subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Conditions. The office shall adopt rules establishing
the conditions for renewal of a license.
The conditions shall permit two levels of renewal based on the record of
the school. A school that has
demonstrated the quality of its program and operation through longevity and
performance in the state may renew its license based on a relaxed standard of
scrutiny. A school that has been in
operation in Minnesota for a limited period of time or that has not performed
adequately on performance indicators shall renew its license based on a strict
standard of scrutiny. The office shall
specify minimum longevity standards and performance indicators that must be met
before
a school
may be permitted to operate under the relaxed standard of scrutiny. The performance indicators used in this
determination shall include, but not be limited to: degree granting status, regional or
national accreditation, loan default rates, placement rate of graduates,
student withdrawal rates, audit results, student complaints, and school status
with the United States Department of Education.
Schools that meet the requirements established in rule shall be required
to submit a full relicensure report once every four years, and in the interim
years will be exempt from the requirements of section 141.25, subdivision 3,
clauses (4), (5), and (8), and Minnesota Rules, parts 4880.1700, subpart 6; and
4880.2100, subpart 4.
Sec. 23. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 141.28,
subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Unlawful
designation. No school organized
after November 15, 1969, shall apply to itself either as a part of its name or
in any other manner the designation of "college" or
"university" unless such school applies for and receives
certification from the office that it meets appropriate standards and is
entitled to such designation. Operating
schools now using such designation may continue use thereof.
Sec. 24. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 474A.04,
subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Entitlement
transfers. An entitlement issuer may
enter into an agreement with another entitlement issuer whereby the recipient
entitlement issuer issues obligations pursuant to bonding authority allocated
to the original entitlement issuer under this section. An entitlement issuer may enter into an
agreement with an issuer which is not an entitlement issuer whereby the
recipient issuer issues qualified mortgage bonds, up to $100,000 of which are
issued pursuant to bonding authority allocated to the original entitlement
issuer under this section. The agreement
may be approved and executed by the mayor of the entitlement issuer with or
without approval or review by the city council.
Notwithstanding section 474A.091, subdivision 4, prior to December 1,
the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, Minnesota Office of Higher Education, and
Minnesota Rural Finance Authority may transfer allocated bonding authority made
available under this chapter to one another under an agreement by each agency
and the commissioner.
Sec. 25. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 474A.091,
subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Allocation
procedure. (a) The commissioner
shall allocate available bonding authority under this section on the Monday of
every other week beginning with the first Monday in August through and on the
last Monday in November. Applications
for allocations must be received by the department by 4:30 p.m. on the Monday
preceding the Monday on which allocations are to be made. If a Monday falls on a holiday, the
allocation will be made or the applications must be received by the next
business day after the holiday.
(b) Prior
to October 1, only the following applications shall be awarded allocations from
the unified pool. Allocations shall be
awarded in the following order of priority:
(1) applications
for residential rental project bonds;
(2)
applications for small issue bonds for manufacturing projects; and
(3)
applications for small issue bonds for agricultural development bond loan
projects.
(c) On the
first Monday in October through the last Monday in November, allocations shall
be awarded from the unified pool in the following order of priority:
(1)
applications for student loan bonds issued by or on behalf of the Minnesota
Office of Higher Education;
(2)
applications for mortgage bonds;
(3)
applications for public facility projects funded by public facility bonds;
(4)
applications for small issue bonds for manufacturing projects;
(5)
applications for small issue bonds for agricultural development bond loan
projects;
(6)
applications for residential rental project bonds;
(7)
applications for enterprise zone facility bonds;
(8)
applications for governmental bonds; and
(9)
applications for redevelopment bonds.
(d) If
there are two or more applications for manufacturing projects from the unified
pool and there is insufficient bonding authority to provide allocations for all
manufacturing projects in any one allocation period, the available bonding
authority shall be awarded based on the number of points awarded a project
under section 474A.045 with those projects receiving the greatest number of
points receiving allocation first. If
two or more applications for manufacturing projects receive an equal amount of
points, available bonding authority shall be awarded by lot unless otherwise
agreed to by the respective issuers.
(e) If
there are two or more applications for enterprise zone facility projects from
the unified pool and there is insufficient bonding authority to provide
allocations for all enterprise zone facility projects in any one allocation
period, the available bonding authority shall be awarded based on the number of
points awarded a project under section 474A.045 with those projects receiving
the greatest number of points receiving allocation first. If two or more applications for enterprise
zone facility projects receive an equal amount of points, available bonding
authority shall be awarded by lot unless otherwise agreed to by the respective
issuers.
(f) If
there are two or more applications for residential rental projects from the
unified pool and there is insufficient bonding authority to provide allocations
for all residential rental projects in any one allocation period, the available
bonding authority shall be awarded in the following order of priority: (1) projects that preserve existing federally
subsidized housing; (2) projects that are not restricted to persons who are 55
years of age or older; and (3) other residential rental projects.
(g) From
the first Monday in August through the last Monday in November, $20,000,000 of
bonding authority or an amount equal to the total annual amount of bonding
authority allocated to the small issue pool under section 474A.03, subdivision
1, less the amount allocated to issuers from the small issue pool for that year,
whichever is less, is reserved within the unified pool for small issue bonds to
the extent such amounts are available within the unified pool.
(h) The
total amount of allocations for mortgage bonds from the housing pool and the
unified pool may not exceed:
(1)
$10,000,000 for any one city; or
(2)
$20,000,000 for any number of cities in any one county.
(i) The
total amount of allocations for student loan bonds from the unified pool may
not exceed $10,000,000 $25,000,000 per year.
(j) If there
is insufficient bonding authority to fund all projects within any qualified
bond category other than enterprise zone facility projects, manufacturing
projects, and residential rental projects, allocations shall be awarded by lot
unless otherwise agreed to by the respective issuers.
(k) If an
application is rejected, the commissioner must notify the applicant and return
the application deposit to the applicant within 30 days unless the applicant
requests in writing that the application be resubmitted.
(l) The granting
of an allocation of bonding authority under this section must be evidenced by
issuance of a certificate of allocation.
Sec. 26. Laws 2009, chapter 95, article 2, section 40,
is amended to read:
Sec. 40. TEACHER
EDUCATION REPORT.
The Minnesota
Office of Higher Education and Minnesota Department of Education must report to
the committees of the legislature with jurisdiction over teacher education on
best practices in innovative teacher education programs and teacher education
research. The report must include, at a
minimum, information on:
(1) teacher
education preparation program curricula that will prepare prospective teachers
to teach an increasingly diverse student population;
(2)
opportunities for mid-career professionals employed in professions in which
there is a shortage of teachers to pursue a teaching career; and
(3)
enhancing the ability of teachers to use technology in the classroom.
The report
must be submitted by June August 15, 2010.
Sec. 27. Laws 2010, chapter 215, article 2, section 4,
subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Operations
and Maintenance -0- (9,967,000)
For fiscal
years 2012 and 2013, the base for operations and maintenance is $592,792,000
$580,802,000 each year.
Sec. 28. Laws 2010, chapter 215, article 2, section 6,
the effective date, is amended to read:
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section
is effective the day following final enactment for grants made on and
after July 1, 2010.
Sec. 29. STUDY
OF CERTIFICATES AND DIPLOMAS; EDUCATIONAL CAREER PATH.
The Board of
Trustees of Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, in conjunction with the
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, representatives of industry groups, and labor
unions, shall study the program requirements for certificates and diplomas
awarded by the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities to determine the
feasibility of designing technical education programs to allow students to have
more opportunities to earn credentials with lower credit requirements that
could be combined into higher level certificates or diplomas. The study must consult with business and
industry representatives as well as labor unions and faculty on the types of
credentials that would be recognized for employment purposes. In addition, the study must address the
feasibility of increasing the capacity to accumulate credentials in related
programs into an educational career path leading to a diploma or degree. The study must also address the need for
workers in other fields and take into account other job training programs provided
by labor unions and business.
The board
must report the study findings to the committees of the legislature with
responsibility for postsecondary education finance by February 15, 2011.
Sec. 30. STREAMLINED
MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES SYSTEM OFFICE.
Notwithstanding
any law or policy to the contrary, the Board of Trustees of Minnesota State
Colleges and Universities shall streamline services provided through the
system's central service office to reduce expenditures, better target the use
of state resources, and provide services at the most appropriate and efficient
level so as not to duplicate any services provided at the institutional level. These actions must be implemented so as to
achieve budgetary savings and efficiencies in delivery of services and the
accomplishment of the academic mission. The
board must revise any board policies in a way that is consistent with the
requirements of this section.
Sec. 31. POSTRETIREMENT
HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM REIMBURSEMENT.
The Minnesota
State Colleges and Universities system shall waive premium reimbursement
payments including any late payment charges, fees, penalties, or interest
payments imposed on overdue health insurance premium reimbursements owed by a
college retiree to the college under a contractual or collective bargaining
agreement providing for postretirement health insurance benefits arising from
employment under a contract or collective bargaining agreement with a school
district or technical college prior to July 1, 1995, and who became an employee
of Minnesota State Colleges and Universities on July 1, 1995. This section applies only if the college has
failed to bill the retiree for the premium reimbursement payments as required
under the applicable collective bargaining or contractual
agreement, or if not otherwise established, within 90 days following the date
on which the premium was due.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section
is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 32. SURGICAL
TECHNOLOGISTS PILOT PROJECT.
Subdivision
1. Surgical technologists; training and employment pilot project. The Board of Trustees of Minnesota
State Colleges and Universities shall establish a pilot project to develop
partnerships and training and employment opportunities for surgical
technologists. The pilot project must
develop partnerships between a health care facility located within 25 miles of
an accredited surgical technologist program offered by a Minnesota State
Colleges and Universities institution and the institution. The partnerships must promote the employment
and retention of surgical technologists, working in accordance with law,
regulations, including Code of Federal Regulations, title 42, section 482.51,
and contract provisions, who have successfully completed an accredited
educational program and who hold and maintain a certified surgical technology
credential from a nationally recognized and accredited surgical technologist
certifying body.
This
subdivision expires June 30, 2014.
Subd. 2. Report. The board of trustees shall report on
the pilot project under this section to the appropriate legislative chairs by
January 1, 2013, with recommendations to enhance surgical technologist training
and to ensure an adequate supply of surgical technologist graduates to meet the
needs of facilities.
Sec. 33. PILOT
PROJECT; LOCAL DEPOSIT OF RESERVES OF MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES.
Subdivision
1. Establishment. To
increase the distribution of potential economic benefit of deposits of reserve
funds of the institutions of Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, a pilot
project is established to transfer certain reserve deposits of selected
institutions from the state treasury to a community financial institution. Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section
16A.27, by January 2, 2011, the commissioner of management and budget shall
transfer the specified amount of board-required reserve funds of colleges and
universities selected by the board of trustees under subdivision 2, to a
community financial institution designated for each of the participating
colleges and universities.
Subd. 2. Participating
colleges and universities. By
August 15, 2010, colleges and universities may apply to the Board of Trustees
of Minnesota State Colleges and Universities for participation in the pilot
project. Each applicant must designate
one or more community financial institutions for the deposit of a specified
amount of board-required reserves, with the terms of the deposit for each
designated community financial institution.
The designated community financial institution must be located in the
geographic area of a participating campus.
From the applicants, the board shall select up to eight postsecondary
institutions to participate in the local deposit pilot project. In making its selection, the board must
consider the size of the institution's reserves and the terms offered by the
designated community financial institutions.
Unless there are not sufficient applicants, two-year and four-year
institutions must be selected to participate in the pilot project and the
majority of the selected institutions must be located in greater Minnesota.
By December
1, 2010, the board must notify the commissioner of management and budget of the
participating colleges and universities, the deposit amount for each
institution and the associated community financial institutions. The pilot project shall provide for the
transfer of deposits for no more than the period January 2, 2011, to
December 31, 2012.
Subd. 3. Community
financial institution. As
used in this section, "community financial institution" means a
federally insured bank or credit union, chartered as a bank or credit union by
the state of Minnesota or the United States, that is headquartered in Minnesota
and that has no more than $2,500,000,000 in assets.
Subd. 4. Evaluation
and report. The commissioner
of management and budget and the board of trustees shall independently evaluate
the effectiveness or harm of the local deposit pilot project in increasing the
use of community financial institutions and providing wider distribution of the
economic benefit of the deposit of postsecondary reserves. Each evaluation must include the
participating colleges, universities, and community financial institutions. The commissioner of management and budget and
the board shall report on the pilot project evaluation to the appropriate
committees of the legislature by February 1, 2013, with recommendations on the
future implementation of the pilot project.
Sec. 34. NANOTECHNOLOGY
REPORT.
By February
1, 2011, the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota are requested to,
and the Board of Trustees of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
shall, study nanotechnology research and education and report to the committees
of the legislature with responsibility for higher education, economic
development, environment, and public health on the ethical issues and the
principles for nanotechnology research and development and education they
utilize in their institutions and nanotechnology initiatives. The report must assess ways they ensure that
nanotechnology is used responsibly through standards and guidelines that
protect public health and the environment and provide for occupational health
and safety.
Sec. 35. FEDERAL
HEALTH CARE REFORM.
The regents
of the University of Minnesota are requested to direct the area health
education centers to conduct public education related to the provisions of
federal health care reform legislation, as enacted under the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111-148, and the Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act, Public Law 111-152, and the potential impacts of federal
health care reform to Minnesota citizens, employers, and health care providers.
Sec. 36. MONITORING
OF FEDERAL POSTSECONDARY TEXTBOOK DISCLOSURE LAW.
The Office
of Higher Education shall monitor the implementation of the Higher Education
Opportunity Act, Public Law 110-315, as it relates to disclosure of textbook
pricing and other information to students.
The monitoring shall be done in a manner that the office determines will
allow it to determine whether students are
receiving
information required or encouraged to be disclosed to students under the act. The office shall report the results of its monitoring
along with any recommendations for legislation to the chairs and ranking
minority members of the legislative
committees with primary jurisdiction over higher education finance and policy
by February 1, 2011.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 37. REDUCTION
IN GRANTS FOR INSUFFICIENT APPROPRIATIONS.
In fiscal
year 2011, the dollar amount reductions in state grants under Minnesota
Statutes, section 136A.121, subdivision 7, may be approximately equal for the
surcharge on family responsibility and the percentage increase on the assigned
student responsibility. The Minnesota
Office of Higher Education may reserve up to five percent of the projected
demand for grant awards in fiscal year 2011 to manage uncertainty of demand
based on enrollment or income changes of applicants. After reduced grant awards are made for
fiscal year 2011, the office must distribute any remaining funds to increase
the living and miscellaneous expenses allowance consistent with the office's
distribution of surplus appropriations under Minnesota Statutes, section
136A.121, subdivision 7a; provided that if the office determines that the
remaining funds are less than $1,500,000 the office may, in lieu of increasing
the allowance, transfer all of the remaining funds to the state work-study
program.
Sec. 38. CREDIT
TRANSFER; MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES.
(a) The
Board of Trustees of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities must develop
and implement a plan to improve credit transfers within the system. At a minimum, the board must:
(1) enhance
information on transferring and tracking credits;
(2) improve
training for all staff involved with credit transfer;
(3)
identify discrepancies in transferring and accepting credits by institutions
within the system and devise methods to improve the uniform treatment of credit
transfers; and
(4)
require, to the extent feasible, institutional rather than student obligation
to provide prompt required documentation for course equivalency determinations.
(b) The
board may convene working groups of affected faculty, staff, students, and
administrators representing institutions and academic and technical disciplines
in the system to work on issues and barriers to credit transfer.
(c) The
board must provide systemwide transfer information on the Internet that is
easily accessible and maintained in a current and accurate status. Each system college and university shall post
information necessary to determine the transferability of course credits on
their institutional Web sites. The
working groups must develop a template to be used by the colleges and
universities to ensure consistency in the information available to students. The links to each institution's informational
Web site shall be submitted to the office of the chancellor for publication on
the MinnesotaTransfer.org Web site.
(d) The
board shall report on February 15, 2011, and annually thereafter through 2014,
on its activities to achieve the credit transfer goals in this section and the
results of those activities. The report
shall be made to the chairs and ranking minority members of the legislative
committees with primary jurisdiction over higher education policy and finance. The goals of this section should be fully
achieved as soon as possible, but no later than the start of the 2015-2016
academic year."
Delete the
title and insert:
"A
bill for an act relating to higher education; authorizing data matching;
modifying institution eligibility; establishing award procedures; establishing
scholarship priorities; establishing powers and duties; providing for school
closures; modifying security requirements; regulating the use of certain
revenues; providing for refunds; modifying licensure provisions related to
certain schools; providing for certain bond transfers and allocations; reducing
appropriation base for MNSCU operations and maintenance; requiring MNSCU to
streamline services; allowing certain postretirement health insurance premium
reimbursement; allowing reserve of grant funds; establishing pilot projects;
defining terms; making technical corrections; requiring studies, reports,
monitoring, and public education; governing reductions in grants; providing for
credit transfer improvements; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections
135A.15, subdivision 1; 135A.155; 135A.51, subdivision 2; 136A.101, subdivision
10; 136A.126, subdivision 1, by adding a subdivision; 136A.15, subdivision 6;
136A.16, subdivision 14; 136A.62, subdivision 3; 136A.645; 136A.646; 136F.581,
by adding a subdivision; 141.25, subdivisions 7, 13, by adding a subdivision;
141.251, subdivision 2; 141.28, subdivision 2; 474A.04, subdivision 6;
474A.091, subdivision 3; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 136A.01,
subdivision 2; 136A.101, subdivision 4; 136A.127, subdivisions 2, 4; Laws 2009,
chapter 95, article 2, section 40; Laws 2010, chapter 215, article 2, sections
4, subdivision 3; 6; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 136A."
We request the adoption of this report and repassage of the
bill.
Senate Conferees:
Sandra Pappas. Claire Robling
and Ron Latz.
House Conferees:
Tom Rukavina, Roger Reinert
and Carol McFarlane.
Rukavina moved that the report of the
Conference Committee on S. F. No. 184 be adopted and that the
bill be repassed as amended by the Conference Committee. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 184,
A bill for an act relating to higher education; authorizing data matching;
modifying institution eligibility; establishing award procedures; establishing
scholarship priorities; establishing powers and duties; modifying security
requirements; regulating the use of certain revenues; providing for refunds;
defining terms; making technical corrections; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008,
sections 136A.101, subdivision 10; 136A.126, subdivision 1, by adding a
subdivision; 136A.127, subdivision 6, by adding subdivisions; 136A.15,
subdivision 6; 136A.16, subdivision 14; 136A.62, subdivision 3; 136A.645;
136A.646; 136A.65, by adding a subdivision; 136F.581, by adding a subdivision;
141.25, subdivisions 7, 13, by adding a subdivision; 141.251, subdivision 2;
141.28, subdivision 2; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 136A.01,
subdivision 2; 136A.101, subdivision 4; 136A.127, subdivisions 2, 4; 299A.45,
subdivision 1; 340A.404, subdivision 4a; Laws 2009, chapter 95, article 2,
section 40; Laws 2010, chapter 215, article 2, sections 4, subdivision 3; 6;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 136A; 137.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended by Conference, and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of
the bill and the roll was called.
Pursuant to rule 2.05, Downey was excused
from voting on the repassage of S. F. No. 184, as amended by
Conference.
There were 113 yeas and 17 nays as
follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Eastlund
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Westrom
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Buesgens
Dean
Drazkowski
Emmer
Garofalo
Hackbarth
Holberg
Kohls
Liebling
Norton
Peppin
Sanders
Severson
Shimanski
Welti
Zellers
The bill was repassed, as amended by
Conference, and its title agreed to.
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce
that the Senate has concurred in and adopted the report of the Conference
Committee on:
S. F. No. 863.
The Senate has
repassed said bill in accordance with the recommendation and report of the
Conference Committee. Said Senate File
is herewith transmitted to the House.
Colleen J. Pacheco, First
Assistant Secretary of the Senate
CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON S. F. NO. 863
A bill for
an act relating to data practices; classifying government data; modifying
provisions governing temporary classifications and personnel data; amending
business screening services provisions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008,
sections 13.05, subdivision 4, by adding a subdivision; 13.06, subdivisions 1,
3, 4, 5, 7, by adding
subdivisions;
13.43, subdivisions 1, 2, by adding subdivisions; 13.64; 13.643, by adding a
subdivision; 13.7931, by adding a subdivision; 13.87, by adding a subdivision;
13.871, by adding a subdivision; 13D.05, subdivision 3; 16B.97, by adding a
subdivision; 125A.21, subdivision 5; 270B.14, subdivision 16; 299C.156,
subdivision 5; 332.70, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; proposing coding for new law in
Minnesota Statutes, chapters 13; 84; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, section
13.06, subdivision 2; Minnesota Rules, part 1205.1800.
May 12, 2010
The
Honorable James P. Metzen
President
of the Senate
The
Honorable Margaret Anderson Kelliher
Speaker
of the House of Representatives
We, the undersigned
conferees for S. F. No. 863 report that we have agreed upon the
items in dispute and recommend as follows:
That the House recede from
its amendment and that S. F. No. 863 be further amended as
follows:
Delete everything after the enacting
clause and insert:
"ARTICLE 1
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 13.05,
subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Limitations
on collection and use of data. Private
or confidential data on an individual shall not be collected, stored, used, or
disseminated by government entities for any purposes other than those stated to
the individual at the time of collection in accordance with section 13.04,
except as provided in this subdivision.
(a) Data collected prior to
August 1, 1975, and which have not been treated as public data, may be used,
stored, and disseminated for the purposes for which the data was originally
collected or for purposes which are specifically approved by the commissioner
as necessary to public health, safety, or welfare.
(b) Private or confidential
data may be used and disseminated to individuals or entities specifically
authorized access to that data by state, local, or federal law enacted or
promulgated after the collection of the data.
(c) Private or confidential
data may be used and disseminated to individuals or entities subsequent to the
collection of the data when the responsible authority maintaining the data has
requested approval for a new or different use or dissemination of the data and
that request has been specifically approved by the commissioner as necessary to
carry out a function assigned by law.
(d) Private data may be used
by and disseminated to any person or entity if the individual subject or
subjects of the data have given their informed consent. Whether a data subject has given informed
consent shall be determined by rules of the commissioner. The format for informed consent is as
follows, unless otherwise prescribed by the HIPAA, Standards for Privacy of
Individually Identifiable Health Information, 65 Fed. Reg. 82,
461 (2000) (to be codified as Code of Federal Regulations, title 45, section
164): informed consent shall not be
deemed to have been given by an individual subject of the data by the signing
of any statement authorizing any person or entity to disclose information about
the individual to an insurer or its authorized representative, unless the
statement is:
(1) in plain language;
(2) dated;
(3)
specific in designating the particular persons or agencies the data subject is
authorizing to disclose information about the data subject;
(4)
specific as to the nature of the information the subject is authorizing to be
disclosed;
(5)
specific as to the persons or entities to whom the subject is authorizing information
to be disclosed;
(6)
specific as to the purpose or purposes for which the information may be used by
any of the parties named in clause (5), both at the time of the disclosure and
at any time in the future;
(7)
specific as to its expiration date which should be within a reasonable period
of time, not to exceed one year except in the case of authorizations given in
connection with applications for (i) life insurance or noncancelable or
guaranteed renewable health insurance and identified as such, two years after
the date of the policy or (ii) medical assistance under chapter 256B or
MinnesotaCare under chapter 256L, which shall be ongoing during all terms of
eligibility, for individual education plan health-related services provided by
a school district under section 125A.21, subdivision 2.
The
responsible authority may require a person requesting copies of data under this
paragraph to pay the actual costs of making, and certifying,
and compiling the copies.
(e) Private
or confidential data on an individual may be discussed at a meeting open to the
public to the extent provided in section 13D.05.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 13.05, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 4a. Informed
consent for insurance purposes. Informed
consent for insurance purposes must comply with this subdivision, unless
otherwise prescribed by the HIPAA Standards for Privacy of Individually
Identifiable Health Information, Code of Federal Regulations, title 45, section
164. Informed consent for insurance
purposes is not considered to have been given by an individual subject of data
by the signing of a statement authorizing a government entity to disclose
information about the individual to an insurer or its authorized
representative, unless the statement is:
(1) in
plain language;
(2) dated;
(3)
specific in designating the government entity the data subject is authorizing
to disclose information about the data subject;
(4)
specific as to the nature of the information the data subject is authorizing to
be disclosed;
(5)
specific as to the persons to whom the data subject is authorizing information
to be disclosed;
(6)
specific as to the purpose or purposes for which the information may be used by
any of the persons named in clause (5), both at the time of the disclosure and
at any time in the future; and
(7)
specific as to its expiration date, which must be within a reasonable period of
time, not to exceed one year.
Notwithstanding
clause (7), in the case of authorizations given in connection with applications
for life insurance or noncancelable or guaranteed renewable health insurance
that is so identified, the expiration date must not exceed two years after the
date of the policy. An authorization in
connection with medical assistance under chapter 256B or MinnesotaCare under
chapter 256L or for individual education plan health-related services provided
by a school district under section 125A.21, subdivision 2, is valid during all
terms of eligibility.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 13.43,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Definition. As used in this section, "personnel
data" means government data on individuals collected maintained
because the individual is or was an employee of or an applicant for employment
by, performs services on a voluntary basis for, or acts as an independent
contractor with a government entity. Personnel
data includes data submitted by an employee to a government entity as part of
an organized self-evaluation effort by the government entity to request
suggestions from all employees on ways to cut costs, make government more
efficient, or improve the operation of government. An employee who is identified in a suggestion
shall have access to all data in the suggestion except the identity of the
employee making the suggestion.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 13.43,
subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Public
data. (a) Except for employees
described in subdivision 5 and subject to the limitations described in subdivision
5a, the following personnel data on current and former employees, volunteers,
and independent contractors of a government entity is public:
(1) name;
employee identification number, which must not be the employee's Social
Security number; actual gross salary; salary range; terms and conditions of
employment relationship; contract fees; actual gross pension; the value and
nature of employer paid fringe benefits; and the basis for and the amount of
any added remuneration, including expense reimbursement, in addition to salary;
(2) job
title and bargaining unit; job description; education and training background;
and previous work experience;
(3) date of
first and last employment;
(4) the
existence and status of any complaints or charges against the employee,
regardless of whether the complaint or charge resulted in a disciplinary
action;
(5) the
final disposition of any disciplinary action together with the specific reasons
for the action and data documenting the basis of the action, excluding data
that would identify confidential sources who are employees of the public body;
(6) the
terms of any agreement settling any dispute arising out of an employment
relationship, including a buyout agreement as defined in section 123B.143,
subdivision 2, paragraph (a); except that the agreement must include specific
reasons for the agreement if it involves the payment of more than $10,000 of
public money;
(7) work
location; a work telephone number; badge number; work-related continuing
education; and honors and awards received; and
(8) payroll
time sheets or other comparable data that are only used to account for
employee's work time for payroll purposes, except to the extent that release of
time sheet data would reveal the employee's reasons for the use of sick or
other medical leave or other not public data.
(b) For
purposes of this subdivision, a final disposition occurs when the government
entity makes its final decision about the disciplinary action, regardless of
the possibility of any later proceedings or court proceedings. In the case of arbitration proceedings
arising under collective bargaining agreements, a final disposition occurs at
the conclusion of the arbitration proceedings, or upon the failure of the
employee to elect arbitration within the time provided by the collective
bargaining agreement. Final
disposition includes a resignation by an individual when the resignation occurs
after the final decision of the government entity, or arbitrator. In the case of arbitration proceedings
arising under collective bargaining agreements, a final disposition occurs at
the conclusion of the arbitration proceedings, or upon the failure of the
employee to elect arbitration within the time provided by the collective
bargaining agreement. A disciplinary
action does not become public data if an arbitrator sustains a grievance and
reverses all aspects of any disciplinary action.
(c) The government
entity may display a photograph of a current or former employee to a
prospective witness as part of the government entity's investigation of any
complaint or charge against the employee.
(d) A
complainant has access to a statement provided by the complainant to a government
entity in connection with a complaint or charge against an employee.
(e) Notwithstanding
paragraph (a), clause (5), upon completion of an investigation of a complaint
or charge against a public official, or if a public official resigns or is
terminated from employment while the complaint or charge is pending, all data
relating to the complaint or charge are public, unless access to the data would
jeopardize an active investigation or reveal confidential sources. For purposes of this paragraph, "public
official" means:
(1) the
head of a state agency and deputy and assistant state agency heads;
(2) members
of boards or commissions required by law to be appointed by the governor or
other elective officers; and
(3)
executive or administrative heads of departments, bureaus, divisions, or
institutions within state government.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
13.64, is amended to read:
13.64 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION; MANAGEMENT AND
BUDGET DATA.
Subdivision
1. Department of Management and Budget. (a) Notes and preliminary drafts of
reports created, collected, or maintained by the Management Analysis Division,
Department of Management and Budget, and prepared during management studies,
audits, reviews, consultations, or investigations are classified as
confidential or protected nonpublic data until the final report has been
published or preparation of the report is no longer being actively pursued.
(b) Data
that support the conclusions of the report and that the commissioner of
management and budget reasonably believes will result in litigation are confidential
or protected nonpublic until the litigation has been completed or until the
litigation is no longer being actively pursued.
(c) Data on
individuals that could reasonably be used to determine the identity of an
individual supplying data for a report are private if:
(1) the
data supplied by the individual were needed for a report; and
(2) the
data would not have been provided to the Management Analysis Division without
an assurance to the individual that the individual's identity would remain
private, or the Management Analysis Division reasonably believes that the
individual would not have provided the data.
Subd. 2. Department
of Administration. Security
features of building plans, building specifications, and building drawings of
state-owned facilities and nonstate-owned facilities leased by the state are
classified as nonpublic data when maintained by the Department of
Administration and may be shared with anyone as needed to perform duties of the
commissioner.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 13.792, is
amended to read:
13.792 PRIVATE DONOR GIFT DATA.
The
following data maintained by the Minnesota Zoological Garden, the University of
Minnesota, the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, the Regional Parks
Foundation of the Twin Cities, State Services for the Blind, and any
related entity subject to chapter 13 are classified as private or nonpublic:
(1)
research information about prospects and donors gathered to aid in determining
appropriateness of solicitation and level of gift request;
(2)
specific data in prospect lists that would identify prospects to be solicited,
dollar amounts to be requested, and name of solicitor;
(3)
portions of solicitation letters and proposals that identify the prospect being
solicited and the dollar amount being requested;
(4)
letters, pledge cards, and other responses received from donors regarding
prospective gifts in response to solicitations;
(5)
portions of thank-you letters and other gift acknowledgment communications that
would identify the name of the donor and the specific amount of the gift,
pledge, or pledge payment;
(6) donor
financial or estate planning information, or portions of memoranda, letters, or
other documents commenting on any donor's financial circumstances; and
(7) data
detailing dates of gifts, payment schedule of gifts, form of gifts, and specific
gift amounts made by donors.
Names of
donors and gift ranges are public data.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 13.87, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 5. Parole
and probation authority access to records.
Parole and county probation authorities may access data
identified in subdivision 2 on an applicant or permit holder who is subject to
the supervision of that parole or county probation authority.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 13D.05,
subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. What
meetings may be closed. (a) A public
body may close a meeting to evaluate the performance of an individual who is
subject to its authority. The public
body shall identify the individual to be evaluated prior to closing a meeting. At its next open meeting, the public body
shall summarize its conclusions regarding the evaluation. A meeting must be open at the request of the
individual who is the subject of the meeting.
(b) Meetings
may be closed if the closure is expressly authorized by statute or permitted by
the attorney-client privilege.
(c) A public
body may close a meeting:
(1) to
determine the asking price for real or personal property to be sold by the
government entity;
(2) to
review confidential or protected nonpublic appraisal data under section
13.44, subdivision 3; and
(3) to
develop or consider offers or counteroffers for the purchase or sale of real or
personal property.
Before holding
a closed meeting under this paragraph, the public body must identify on the
record the particular real or personal property that is the subject of the
closed meeting. The proceedings of a
meeting closed under this paragraph must be tape recorded at the expense of the
public body. The recording must be
preserved for eight years after the date of the meeting and made available to
the public after all real or personal property discussed at the meeting has
been purchased or sold or the governing body has abandoned the purchase or sale. The real or personal property that is the
subject of the closed meeting must be specifically identified on the tape. A list of members and all other persons
present at the closed meeting must be made available to the public after the
closed meeting. If an action is brought
claiming that public business other than discussions allowed under this
paragraph was transacted at a closed meeting held under this paragraph during
the time when the tape is not available to the public, section 13D.03,
subdivision 3, applies.
An agreement
reached that is based on an offer considered at a closed meeting is contingent
on approval of the public body at an open meeting. The actual purchase or sale must be approved
at an open meeting after the notice period required by statute or the governing
body's internal procedures, and the purchase price or sale price is
public data.
(d) Meetings
may be closed to receive security briefings and reports, to discuss issues
related to security systems, to discuss emergency response procedures and to
discuss security deficiencies in or recommendations regarding public services,
infrastructure and facilities, if disclosure of the information discussed would
pose a danger to public safety or compromise security procedures or responses. Financial issues related to security matters
must be discussed and all related financial decisions must be made at an open
meeting. Before closing a meeting under
this paragraph, the public body, in describing the subject to be discussed,
must refer to the facilities, systems, procedures, services, or infrastructures
to be considered during the closed meeting.
A closed meeting must be tape recorded at the expense of the governing
body, and the recording must be preserved for at least four years.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 16B.97, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 5. Data
classification. Data
maintained by the commissioner that identify a person providing comments to the
commissioner under subdivision 4, paragraph (a), clauses (6) and (7), are
private and nonpublic data but may be shared with the executive agency that is
the subject of the comments.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 125A.21,
subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Informed
consent. When obtaining informed
consent, consistent with sections 13.05, subdivision 4, paragraph (d) 4a;
and 256B.77, subdivision 2, paragraph (p), to bill health plans for covered
services, the school district must notify the legal representative (1) that the
cost of the person's private health insurance premium may increase due to
providing the covered service in the school setting, (2) that the school
district may pay certain enrollee health plan costs, including but not limited
to, co-payments, coinsurance, deductibles, premium increases or other enrollee
cost-sharing amounts for health and related services required by an individual
service plan, or individual family service plan, and (3) that the school's
billing for each type of covered service may affect service limits and prior
authorization thresholds. The informed
consent may be revoked in writing at any time by the person authorizing the
billing of the health plan.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 179A.04, subdivision
3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Other
duties. (a) The commissioner shall:
(1) provide
mediation services as requested by the parties until the parties reach
agreement, and may continue to assist parties after they have submitted their
final positions for interest arbitration;
(2) issue
notices, subpoenas, and orders required by law to carry out duties under
sections 179A.01 to 179A.25;
(3) assist
the parties in formulating petitions, notices, and other papers required to be
filed with the commissioner;
(4) conduct
elections;
(5) certify
the final results of any election or other voting procedure conducted under
sections 179A.01 to 179A.25;
(6) adopt
rules relating to the administration of this chapter and the conduct of
hearings and elections;
(7)
receive, catalogue, file, and make available to the public all decisions of
arbitrators and panels authorized by sections 179A.01 to 179A.25, all grievance
arbitration decisions to the extent the decision is public under section
13.43, subdivision 2, paragraph (b), and the commissioner's orders and
decisions;
(8) adopt, subject to chapter 14, a grievance
procedure that fulfills the purposes of section 179A.20, subdivision 4, that
is available to any employee in a unit not covered by a contractual grievance
procedure;
(9)
maintain a schedule of state employee classifications or positions assigned to
each unit established in section 179A.10, subdivision 2;
(10)
collect fees established by rule for empanelment of persons on the labor
arbitrator roster maintained by the commissioner or in conjunction with fair
share fee challenges. Arbitrator
application fees will be $100 per year for initial applications and renewals
effective July 1, 2007;
(11)
provide technical support and assistance to voluntary joint labor-management
committees established for the purpose of improving relationships between
exclusive representatives and employers, at the discretion of the commissioner;
(12)
provide to the parties a list of arbitrators as required by section 179A.16,
subdivision 4; and
(13)
maintain a list of up to 60 arbitrators for referral to employers and exclusive
representatives for the resolution of grievance or interest disputes. Each person on the list must be knowledgeable
about collective bargaining and labor relations in the public sector, well
versed in state and federal labor law, and experienced in and knowledgeable
about labor arbitration. To the extent
practicable, the commissioner shall appoint members to the list so that the
list is gender and racially diverse.
(b) From
the names provided by representative organizations, the commissioner shall
maintain a list of arbitrators to conduct teacher discharge or termination
hearings according to section 122A.40 or 122A.41. The persons on the list must meet at least
one of the following requirements:
(1) be a
former or retired judge;
(2) be a
qualified arbitrator on the list maintained by the bureau;
(3) be a
present, former, or retired administrative law judge; or
(4) be a
neutral individual who is learned in the law and admitted to practice in
Minnesota, who is qualified by experience to conduct these hearings, and who is
without bias to either party.
Each year,
education Minnesota shall provide a list of up to 14 names and the Minnesota
School Boards Association a list of up to 14 names of persons to be on the list. The commissioner may adopt rules about
maintaining and updating the list.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective August 1, 2010, and applies to decisions issued on or
after that date.
Sec. 12. REPEALER.
(a)
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 13.06, subdivision 2, is repealed.
(b)
Minnesota Rules, part 1205.1800, is repealed.
ARTICLE 2
TEMPORARY
CLASSIFICATIONS
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 13.06,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Application
to commissioner. (a) Notwithstanding
the provisions of section 13.03, the responsible authority of a government
entity may apply to the commissioner for permission to classify data or types
of data on individuals as private or confidential, or data not on individuals
as nonpublic or protected nonpublic, for its own use and for the use of other
similar government entities on a temporary basis until a proposed statute can
be acted upon by the legislature. The
application for temporary classification is public.
(b) Upon the
filing receipt by the commissioner of an application for temporary
classification, the data which is the subject of the application shall be
deemed to be classified as set forth in the application for a period of 45
days, or until the application is disapproved, rejected, or granted by the
commissioner, whichever is earlier.
(c) If the
commissioner determines that an application has been submitted for purposes not
consistent with this section, the commissioner may immediately reject the
application, give notice of that rejection to the applicant, and return the
application. When the applicant receives
the notice of rejection from the commissioner, the data which was the subject
of the application shall have the classification it had before the application
was submitted to the commissioner.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 13.06,
subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Contents
of application for nonpublic or nonpublic protected data. An application for temporary
classification of government data not on individuals shall include and
the applicant shall have the burden of clearly establishing that no statute
currently exists which either allows or forbids classification as nonpublic
or protected nonpublic not public; and either one or more
of the following:
(1) that
data similar to that for which the temporary classification is sought has
have been treated classified as nonpublic or protected
nonpublic not public by other government entities, and by the
public; or
(2) public
access to the data would render unworkable a program authorized by law; or.
(3) The
applicant must also clearly establish that a compelling need exists for
immediate temporary classification, which if not granted could adversely affect
the health, safety or welfare of the public, or the data subject's
well-being or reputation.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 13.06,
subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Procedure
when classification affects others. If
the commissioner determines that an application for temporary classification
involves data which would reasonably be classified in the same manner by all
government entities similar to the one which made the application, the
commissioner may approve or disapprove the classification for data of the kind
which is the subject of the application for the use of all government entities
similar to the applicant. If
requested in the application, the commissioner may also determine that the data
classification affects similar government entities. On deeming this approach advisable, the
commissioner shall provide notice of the proposed action by publication in the
State Register within ten 15 days of receiving the application. Within 30 days after publication in the State
Register an affected government entity or the public may submit comments on the
commissioner's proposal application. The commissioner shall consider any comments
received when granting or denying a classification for data of the kind which
is the subject of the application, for the use of all government entities
similar to the applicant. Within 45 days
after the close of the period for submitting comment, the commissioner shall
grant or disapprove the application. Applications
processed under this subdivision shall be either approved or disapproved by the
commissioner within 90 days of the receipt of the application. For purposes of subdivision 1, the data which
is the subject of the classification shall be deemed to be classified as set
forth in the application for a period of 90 days, or until the application is
disapproved or granted by the commissioner, whichever is earlier. If requested in the application, or
determined to be necessary by the commissioner, the data in the application
shall be so classified for all government entities similar to the applicant
until the application is disapproved or granted by the commissioner, whichever
is earlier. Proceedings after the grant
or disapproval shall be governed by the provisions of subdivision 5.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 13.06, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 4a. Withdrawal
of application. Except when
an application is processed under subdivision 4, an application may be
withdrawn by the responsible authority prior to the commissioner granting or
disapproving the temporary classification.
The responsible authority shall notify the commissioner in writing of
the entity's intent to withdraw the application. The written withdrawal must state the reason
the temporary classification is no longer necessary and must be signed by the
responsible authority.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 13.06,
subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Determination. (a) The commissioner shall either grant
or disapprove the application for temporary classification within 45 days after
it is filed received by the commissioner. On disapproving an application, the
commissioner shall set forth in detail reasons for the disapproval, and shall
include a statement of belief as to what classification is appropriate for the
data which is the subject of the application.
Twenty days after the date of the responsible authority
receives the commissioner's disapproval of an application, the data which
is the subject of the application shall become public data, unless the
responsible authority submits an amended application for temporary
classification which requests the classification deemed appropriate by the commissioner
in the statement of disapproval or which sets forth additional information
relating to the original proposed classification. Upon the filing of an amended application,
the data which is the subject of the amended application shall be deemed to be
classified as set forth in the amended application for a period of 20 days or
until the amended application is granted or disapproved by the commissioner,
whichever is earlier. The commissioner
shall either grant or disapprove the amended application within 20 days after
it is filed. Five working days after the
date of the responsible authority receives the commissioner's
disapproval of the amended application, the data which is the subject of the
application shall become public data. No
more than one amended application may be submitted for any single file or
system.
(b) If the
commissioner grants an application for temporary classification under this
section, it shall become effective immediately, and the complete record
relating to the application shall be submitted to the attorney general, who
shall review the classification as to form and legality. Within 25 days after receipt of the record,
the attorney general shall approve the classification, disapprove a
classification as confidential or protected nonpublic but approve a
classification as private or nonpublic, or disapprove the classification. If the attorney general disapproves a
classification, the data which is the subject of the classification shall
become public data five working days after the date of the attorney general's
disapproval.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 13.06, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 6a. Data
use and dissemination. During
the period of the temporary classification, a responsible authority may request
approval from the commissioner for a new or different use or dissemination of
the data as provided in section 13.05, subdivision 4, for any data temporarily
classified under this section.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 13.06, subdivision
7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Legislative
consideration of temporary classifications; expiration. On or before January 15 of each year, the
commissioner shall submit all temporary classifications in effect on January 1
in bill form to the legislature. The
temporary classification expires June August 1 of the year
following its submission to the legislature."
Delete the
title and insert:
"A bill
for an act relating to data practices; classifying government data; requiring
informed consent; amending definitions; allowing disclosure of certain data;
authorizing access to certain records; making technical changes; modifying
provisions governing temporary classifications and personnel data; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 13.05, subdivision 4, by adding a
subdivision; 13.06, subdivisions 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, by adding subdivisions; 13.43,
subdivisions 1, 2; 13.792; 13.87, by adding a subdivision; 13D.05, subdivision
3; 16B.97, by adding a subdivision; 125A.21, subdivision 5; 179A.04, subdivision
3; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section 13.64; repealing Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 13.06, subdivision 2; Minnesota Rules, part
1205.1800."
We request the adoption of this report and repassage of the
bill.
Senate Conferees:
Mary Olson, Warren Limmer
and Mee Moua.
House Conferees:
Joe Mullery, Sheldon Johnson
and Mary Liz Holberg.
Mullery moved that the report of the
Conference Committee on S. F. No. 863 be adopted and that the
bill be repassed as amended by the Conference Committee. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 863,
A bill for an act relating to data practices; classifying government data;
modifying provisions governing temporary classifications and personnel data;
amending business screening services provisions; amending Minnesota Statutes
2008, sections 13.05, subdivision 4, by adding a subdivision; 13.06,
subdivisions 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, by adding subdivisions; 13.43, subdivisions 1, 2,
by adding subdivisions; 13.64; 13.643, by adding a subdivision; 13.7931, by
adding a subdivision; 13.87, by adding a subdivision; 13.871, by adding a
subdivision; 13D.05, subdivision 3; 16B.97, by adding a subdivision; 125A.21,
subdivision 5; 270B.14, subdivision 16; 299C.156, subdivision 5; 332.70,
subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes,
chapters 13; 84; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 13.06, subdivision
2; Minnesota Rules, part 1205.1800.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended by Conference, and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of
the bill and the roll was called.
Sertich moved that those not voting be
excused from voting. The motion
prevailed.
There were 130 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
The bill was repassed, as amended by
Conference, and its title agreed to.
Madam Speaker:
I
hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following Senate Files,
herewith transmitted:
S. F. Nos. 2598
and 3063.
Colleen J. Pacheco, First Assistant Secretary of the Senate
FIRST READING OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. No. 2598,
A bill for an act relating to education; clarifying legislative intent;
modifying provisions related to nonpublic schools, home schools, and charter
schools; adding language to the collaborative urban educator appropriation;
requiring reports; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008,
sections 120A.22, subdivision 11; 120A.24; 121A.15, subdivision 8; 123B.42,
subdivision 1; 123B.44, subdivision 1; 127A.45, by adding a subdivision;
171.05, subdivision 2; 171.17, subdivision 1; 171.22, subdivision 1; 181A.05,
subdivision 1; Laws 2009, chapter 96, article 2, section 67, subdivision 14;
repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 120A.26, subdivisions 1, 2.
The bill was
read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Finance.
S. F. No. 3063,
A bill for an act relating to education finance; permitting fund transfers for
certain school districts; limiting a levy; adjusting the alternative facilities
bonding and levy program to eliminate aid for certain districts; allowing
Independent School District No. 284, Wayzata, and Independent School
District No. 2134, United South Central, to participate in alternative
facilities bonding and levy program in fiscal year 2013 and later; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 126C.40, subdivision 1; Laws 1999, chapter 241,
article 4, section 25.
The bill
was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Finance.
CALENDAR FOR THE DAY
S. F. No. 3145, A bill for
an act relating to public safety; establishing use of weight of fluid used in a
water pipe when determining weight or amount of controlled substance; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 152.01, subdivisions 9a, 16; 152.021,
subdivision 2; 152.022, subdivision 2; 152.023, subdivision 2.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 129 yeas and 2 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Zellers
Spk.
Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Emmer
Westrom
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
S. F. No. 2773 was reported
to the House.
Bigham moved
to amend S. F. No. 2773, the first engrossment, as follows:
Page 1,
after line 5, insert:
"Section
1. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section
152.02, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Schedule
IV. The following items are listed
in Schedule IV: Barbital; Butorphanol;
Carisoprodol; Chloral betaine; Chloral hydrate; Chlordiazepoxide; Clonazepam;
Clorazepate; Diazepam; Diethylpropion; Ethchlorvynol; Ethinamate; Fenfluramine;
Flurazepam; Mebutamate; Methohexital; Meprobamate except when in combination
with the following drugs in the following or lower concentrations: conjugated estrogens, 0.4 mg; tridihexethyl
chloride, 25mg; pentaerythritol tetranitrate, 20 mg; Methylphenobarbital;
Oxazepam; Paraldehyde; Pemoline; Petrichloral; Phenobarbital; and
Phentermine; and Tramadol.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective August 1, 2010, and applies to offenses committed on or
after that date."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Bigham
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 24 yeas and 107 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Bigham
Carlson
Dill
Doty
Falk
Faust
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Jackson
Kahn
Knuth
Lesch
Liebling
Murphy, E.
Newton
Norton
Otremba
Paymar
Persell
Simon
Ward
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Emmer
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Haws
Hayden
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Johnson
Juhnke
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Nornes
Obermueller
Olin
Pelowski
Peppin
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
S. F. No. 2773, A bill for
an act relating to public safety; establishing a sale of or possession of
salvia divinorum crime; providing for a penalty; amending Minnesota Statutes
2008, section 152.027, by adding a subdivision.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 116 yeas and 15 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hamilton
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Brod
Brynaert
Buesgens
Clark
Emmer
Garofalo
Hackbarth
Hansen
Kahn
Lesch
Peppin
Persell
Rukavina
Thao
Thissen
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
Solberg was excused between the hours of
5:30 p.m. and 6:35 p.m.
S. F. No. 3318 was reported
to the House and given its third reading.
Hackbarth moved that
S. F. No. 3318 be re-referred to the Committee on Finance.
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Hackbarth
motion and the roll was called. There
were 44 yeas and 87 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail.
S. F. No. 3318, A bill for
an act relating to state government; imposing a threshold value before
notification of certain legislators is required for disposal of certain
state-owned buildings; changing provisions in the energy improvement financing
program; clarifying responsibility for administration of the state's
responsibilities as a member of the workers' compensation reinsurance
association; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 16B.24, subdivision 3;
16B.322, subdivisions 4, 5; 79.34, subdivision 1; Minnesota Statutes 2009
Supplement, section 16B.322, subdivisions 4a, 4b, 4c.
The bill was placed upon its final
passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 90 yeas and 41 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Reinert
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Westrom
Zellers
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
Kohls moved that the order of business
advance to Motions and Resolutions.
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Kohls motion
and the roll was called. There were 46
yeas and 85 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Brod
Buesgens
Cornish
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Lanning
Loon
Mack
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Nornes
Peppin
Rosenthal
Sanders
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Smith
Torkelson
Urdahl
Westrom
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion did not prevail.
CALENDAR FOR THE DAY,
Continued
S. F. No. 560 was reported
to the House.
Champion moved
to amend S. F. No. 560, the third engrossment, as follows:
Page 1,
line 24, after the period, insert "This clause does not apply to a
diversion or stay of adjudication of the following offenses: 609.185 (murder in the first degree); 609.19
(murder in the second degree); 609.195 (murder in the third degree); 609.20
(manslaughter in the first degree); 609.205 (manslaughter in the second
degree); 609.215 (aiding suicide and aiding attempted suicide); 609.221
(assault in the first degree); 609.222 (assault in the second degree); 609.229
(crimes committed for the benefit of a gang); 609.235 (use of drugs to injure
or facilitate crime); 609.24 (simple robbery); 609.245 (aggravated robbery);
609.25 (kidnapping); 609.255 (false imprisonment); 609.322 (solicitation,
inducement, and promotion of prostitution; sex trafficking); 609.486 (commission
of crime while wearing or possessing a bullet-resistant vest); 609.561 (arson
in the first degree); 609.562 (arson in the second degree); 609.582,
subdivision 1 (burglary in the first degree); 609.66, subdivision 1e (drive-by
shooting); 609.749, subdivision 3, 4, 5, or 8 (stalking with a firearm); and
609.855, subdivision 5 (shooting at a public transit vehicle or facility)."
Page 3,
lines 23 and 24, delete the new language
Page 3,
line 25, strike "prosecution, or sentencing," and restore the
stricken language and delete "without a"
Page 3,
after line 25, insert:
"(2)
an expunged record may be opened upon request by a prosecutor, or a probation
officer for sentencing purposes, without a court order;"
Page 3,
line 26, strike "(2)" and insert "(3)" and after
"conviction" insert "or delinquency proceeding"
Page 3,
line 28, strike "(3)" and insert "(4)" and after
"conviction" insert "or delinquency proceeding"
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Peppin moved to amend
S. F. No. 560, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 24, after the period, insert
"This remedy shall not be available for felony offenses."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Peppin
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 69 yeas and 62 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Bigham
Brod
Brown
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Faust
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Haws
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Jackson
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Loon
Mack
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Murdock
Nelson
Nornes
Obermueller
Peppin
Peterson
Ruud
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Smith
Sterner
Swails
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Westrom
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Eken
Falk
Gardner
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hayden
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Koenen
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Newton
Norton
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Sailer
Sertich
Slawik
Slocum
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Welti
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Kohls offered an amendment to
S. F. No. 560, the third engrossment, as amended.
POINT OF ORDER
Hilstrom raised a point of order pursuant
to rule 3.21 that the Kohls amendment was not in order. Speaker pro tempore Juhnke ruled the point of
order well taken and the Kohls amendment out of order.
S. F. No. 560, A bill for
an act relating to public safety; authorizing the expungement of criminal
records for certain individuals who have received stays of adjudication or
diversion; authorizing expungements without petitions in certain cases where
charges were dismissed against a person upon prosecutorial approval and with
victim notification; requiring persons petitioning for an expungement to
provide a copy of the criminal complaint or police report; authorizing the
opening of certain expunged records without a court hearing; amending Minnesota
Statutes 2008, sections 609A.02, subdivision 3; 609A.03, subdivisions 2, 7;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 609A.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called.
Sertich moved that those not voting be
excused from voting. The motion prevailed.
There were 98 yeas and 31 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brown
Brynaert
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Doty
Eken
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Greiling
Gunther
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Knuth
Koenen
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Scalze
Scott
Sertich
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Spk. Kelliher
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Brod
Buesgens
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Holberg
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Kohls
Loon
Mack
Peppin
Sanders
Seifert
Severson
Shimanski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Zellers
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
S. F. No. 2839 was reported
to the House.
Atkins moved
to amend S. F. No. 2839, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 76,
after line 8, insert:
"Sec. 77. ON-SALE
LICENSE; THEATRE L'HOMME DIEU.
Notwithstanding
any law, ordinance, or charter provision to the contrary, Douglas County may
issue a wine and intoxicating malt liquor license to Theatre L'Homme Dieu. The license authorizes sales on all days of
the week to holders of tickets for performances presented by the theater and to
members of the nonprofit corporations holding the license and to their guests.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective upon approval by the licensing authority in the manner
specified by Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdivisions 2 and 3."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Dill moved
to amend S. F. No. 2839, the second engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 75,
after line 10, insert:
"Sec. 92. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 514.20, is
amended to read:
514.20 SALE.
If any sum
secured by such lien be not paid within 90 days after it becomes due, the
lienholder may sell the property and out of the proceeds of such sale there
shall be paid, first, the disbursements aforesaid; second, all charges against
the property paid by such person to any other person; and, third, the total
indebtedness then secured by the lien. The
remainder, if any, shall be paid on demand to the owner or other person
entitled thereto. If the property
subject to the lien is a motor vehicle registered in this state and subject to
a certificate of title, then the lienholder must provide written notice, by registered
certified mail, to all secured creditors listed on the certificate of
title 45 days before the lienholder's right to sell the motor vehicle is
considered effective. The notice must
state the name, address, and telephone number of the lienholder, the amount of
money owed, and the rate at which storage charges, if any, are accruing. Costs for registered certified
mail and other reasonable costs related to complying with this notice provision
constitute "lawful charges" pursuant to section 514.19. Failure to comply with the notice provision
in this section renders any lien created by this chapter ineffective against
any secured party listed on the certificate of title of the motor vehicle
involved.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective the day following final enactment, and applies to notices
mailed on or after that date, provided however that it is also permissible to
send notices under this section by registered mail prior to August 1, 2010, and
the costs of those notices are lawful charges under this section."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Reinert moved
to amend S. F. No. 2839, the second engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 75,
after line 10, insert:
"Sec. 92. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 471.61,
subdivision 2b, is amended to read:
Subd. 2b. Insurance
continuation. A unit of local
government must allow a former employee and the employee's dependents to
continue to participate indefinitely in the employer-sponsored hospital,
medical, and dental insurance group that the employee participated in
immediately before retirement, under the following conditions:
(a) The
continuation requirement of this subdivision applies only to a former employee
who is receiving a disability benefit or an annuity from a Minnesota public
pension plan other than a volunteer firefighter plan, or who has met age and
service requirements necessary to receive an annuity from such a plan.
(b) Until
the former employee reaches age 65, the former employee and dependents must be
pooled in the same group as active employees for purposes of establishing
premiums and coverage for hospital, medical, and dental insurance. However, a former employee under the age
of 65 who is enrolled in Medicare Parts A and B due to the former employee's
disability and for whom Medicare's obligation to pay claims is primary, and the
former employee's dependents, must be pooled in the same group for purposes of
this paragraph as former employees who have reached age 65.
(c) A
former employee may receive dependent coverage only if the employee received
dependent coverage immediately before leaving employment. This subdivision does not require dependent
coverage to continue after the death of the former employee. For purposes of this subdivision,
"dependent" has the same meaning for former employees as it does for
active employees in the unit of local government.
(d)
Coverage for a former employee and dependents may not discriminate on the basis
of evidence of insurability or preexisting conditions unless identical
conditions are imposed on active employees in the group that the
employee left.
(e) The
former employee must pay the entire premium for continuation coverage, except
as otherwise provided in a collective bargaining agreement or personnel policy. A unit of local government may discontinue
coverage if a former employee fails to pay the premium within the deadline
provided for payment of premiums under federal law governing insurance
continuation.
(f) An
employer must notify an employee before termination of employment of the
options available under this subdivision, and of the deadline for electing to
continue to participate.
(g) A
former employee must notify the employer of intent to participate within the
deadline provided for notice of insurance continuation under federal law. A former employee who does not elect to
continue participation does not have a right to reenter the employer's group
insurance program.
(h) A former
employee who initially selects dependent coverage may later drop dependent
coverage while retaining individual coverage.
A former employee may not drop individual coverage and retain dependent
coverage.
(i) This
subdivision does not limit rights granted to former employees under other state
or federal law, or under collective bargaining agreements or personnel plans.
(j) Unless
otherwise provided by a collective bargaining agreement, if retired employees
were not permitted to remain in the active employee group prior to August 1,
1992, a public employer may assess active employees through payroll deduction
for all or part of the additional premium costs from the inclusion of retired
employees in the active employee group. This
paragraph does not apply to employees covered by section 179A.03, subdivision 7.
(k)
Notwithstanding section 179A.20, subdivision 2a, insurance continuation under
this subdivision may be provided for in a collective bargaining agreement or
personnel policy.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section
is effective August 1, 2010, and applies to coverage in existence on or after
that date."
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Kelliher was excused between the hours of
6:30 p.m. and 6:55 p.m.
Atkins;
Brynaert; Thissen; Hoppe; Lillie; Morrow; Garofalo; Demmer; Mahoney; Juhnke;
Laine; Zellers; Loon; Mariani; Kath; Kahn; Lieder; Knuth; Bunn; Downey;
McNamara; Johnson; Murphy, E.; Hausman and Jackson moved to amend S. F. No. 2839,
the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 68,
after line 25, insert:
"Sec. 82.
Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement,
section 137.0225, is amended to read:
137.0225 UNIVERSITY PROMISE SCHOLARSHIP.
The Board of
Regents may establish a scholarship to help offset the impact of rising tuition
for Minnesota students from middle-income families. To be eligible for a scholarship under this
section, a student must be a Minnesota resident undergraduate from a family that
is not Pell Grant eligible with an annual adjusted gross income not to
exceed $100,000.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section
is effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 83. [137.66]
SCHOLARSHIP FUNDING PROGRAM.
As a
condition of the license under section 340A.404, subdivision 4a, paragraph (a),
clause (3), the University of Minnesota shall deposit at least 75 percent of
the revenue generated through the existence of this license for scholarships
under section 137.0225 for Minnesota resident men and women attending the
University of Minnesota.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section
is effective the day following final enactment."
Page 74,
after line 9, insert:
"Sec. 93. Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, section
340A.404, subdivision 4a, is amended to read:
Subd. 4a. Publicly
owned recreation; entertainment facilities.
(a) Notwithstanding any other law, local ordinance, or charter
provision, the commissioner may issue on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses:
(1) to the
state agency administratively responsible for, or to an entity holding a
concession or facility management contract with such agency for beverage sales
at, the premises of any Giants Ridge Recreation Area building or recreational
improvement area owned by the state in the city of Biwabik, St. Louis
County;
(2) to the
state agency administratively responsible for, or to an entity holding a
concession or facility management contract with such agency for beverage sales
at, the premises of any Ironworld Discovery Center building or facility owned
by the state at Chisholm;
(3) to the
Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for events at Northrop
Auditorium, the intercollegiate football stadium, or at no more than seven
other locations within the boundaries of the University of Minnesota, provided
that the Board of Regents has approved an application for a license for the
specified location and provided that a license for an arena or stadium location
is void unless it requires the sale or service of intoxicating liquor throughout
the arena or stadium if intoxicating liquor is sold or served anywhere in the
arena or stadium in a public portion consisting of at least one-third of
the general seating of a stadium or arena, and provided that areas be
designated where alcohol is not served, to be referred to as family sections;
and
(4) to the
Duluth Entertainment and Convention Center Authority for beverage sales on the
premises of the Duluth Entertainment and Convention Center Arena during
intercollegiate hockey games.
The commissioner
shall charge a fee for licenses issued under this subdivision in an amount
comparable to the fee for comparable licenses issued in surrounding cities.
(b) No
alcoholic beverage may be sold or served at TCF Bank Stadium unless the Board
of Regents holds an on-sale intoxicating liquor license for the stadium as
provided in paragraph (a), clause (3).
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective the day following final enactment."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Severson moved
to amend S. F. No. 2839, the second engrossment, as amended, as
follows:
Page 76,
after line 30, insert:
"Sec. 95. SAUK
RAPIDS; ON-SALE LICENSE.
Notwithstanding
any other law, ordinance, or charter provision to the contrary, the city of
Sauk Rapids may issue an on-sale intoxicating liquor license, or an on-sale 3.2
percent malt liquor license, to the owner of an arena located on the Benton
County Fairgrounds or to an entity holding a concession contract with the owner
for use on the
premises of
that arena. Any license authorized by
this section may be issued for space that is not compact or contiguous, provided
that all of the space is within the boundaries of the arena and is included in
the description of the licensed premises on the approved license application. A license issued under this section
authorizes sales on all days of the week to persons attending activities or
events at the arena. All other
provisions of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 340A not inconsistent with this
section apply to the license authorized under this section.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This
section is effective the day following final enactment."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Howes,
Mahoney, Atkins and Obermueller moved to amend S. F. No. 2839,
the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 70,
after line 9, insert:
"Sec. 84. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 326B.46, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 6. Well
contractor exempt from licensing and bond; conditions. No license, registration, or bond
under sections 326B.42 to 326B.49 is required of a well contractor or a limited
well/boring contractor who is licensed and bonded under section 103I.525 or
103I.531 and is engaged in the work or business of installing (1) water service
pipe from a well to a pressure tank or a frost-free water hydrant with an
antisiphon device which is located entirely outside of a structure requiring
potable water, or (2) a temporary shut-off valve on a well water service pipe. For the purposes of this subdivision,
"temporary" means a time period not to exceed six months. This subdivision expires one year after the
date of enactment."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
Mahoney and
Howes moved to amend the Howes et al amendment, to S. F. No. 2839,
the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1,
after line 13, insert:
"EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment."
The motion prevailed and the amendment to
the amendment was adopted.
The question recurred on the Howes et al
amendment, as amended, to S. F. No. 2839, the second
engrossment, as amended. The motion
prevailed and the amendment, as amended, was adopted.
Loon, Bunn,
Ruud, Dittrich and Scalze moved to amend S. F. No. 2839, the
second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 15,
after line 35, insert:
"Sec. 24. [62L.0561]
FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLANS.
Subdivision
1. Definitions. For
the purposes of this section, the terms used in this section have the meanings
defined in section 62Q.01, except that "health plan" includes
individual and group coverage for employer plans with up to 75 participants.
Subd. 2. Flexible
benefits plan. Notwithstanding
any provision of this chapter, chapter 363A, or any other law to the contrary,
a health plan company may offer, sell, issue, and renew a health plan that is a
flexible benefits plan under this section if the following requirements are
satisfied:
(1) the
health plan must be offered in compliance with the laws of this state, except
as otherwise permitted in this section;
(2) the
health plan must be designed to enable covered persons to better manage costs
and coverage options through the use of co-pays, deductibles, and other cost-sharing
arrangements;
(3) the
health plan may modify or exclude any or all coverages of benefits that would
otherwise be required by law, except for maternity benefits and other benefits
required under federal law;
(4) each
health plan and plan's premiums must be approved by the commissioner of health
or commerce, whichever is appropriate under section 62Q.01, subdivision 2, but
neither commissioner may disapprove a plan on the grounds of a modification or
exclusion permitted under clause (3); and
(5) prior to
the sale of the health plan, the purchaser must be given a written list of the
coverages otherwise required by law that are modified or excluded in the health
plan. The list must include a
description of each coverage in the list and indicate whether the coverage is
modified or excluded. If coverage is
modified, the list must describe the modification. The list may, but is not required to, also
list any or all coverages otherwise required by law that are included in the
health plan and indicate that they are included. The health plan company must require that a
copy of this written list be provided, prior to the effective date of the
health plan, to each enrollee or employee who is eligible for health coverage
under the plan.
Subd. 3. Employer
health plan. An employer may
provide a health plan permitted under this section to its employees, the
employees' dependents, and other persons eligible for coverage under the
employer's plan, notwithstanding chapter 363A or any other law to the contrary.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section
is effective January 1, 2012."
Page 77,
after line 6, insert:
"Minnesota
Statutes 2008, section 62L.056, is repealed effective January 1, 2012."
Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Loon et al amendment and the roll
was called. There were 94 yeas and 37
nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Brod
Brown
Buesgens
Bunn
Cornish
Dean
Demmer
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eastlund
Emmer
Falk
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Haws
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Juhnke
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Kohls
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lieder
Lillie
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Marquart
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Murdock
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Rosenthal
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Zellers
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Eken
Faust
Greiling
Hausman
Hayden
Hilty
Hornstein
Jackson
Johnson
Kahn
Kalin
Koenen
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Loeffler
Mariani
Masin
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Otremba
Paymar
Reinert
Rukavina
Thao
Thissen
Wagenius
Winkler
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Hortman offered an amendment to S. F. No. 2839,
the second engrossment, as amended.
POINT OF ORDER
Buesgens raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the
Hortman amendment was not in order. Speaker
pro tempore Juhnke ruled the point of order well taken and the Hortman
amendment out of order.
Westrom moved to amend S. F. No. 2839,
the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 70, after line 9,
insert:
"Sec. 84. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 326B.46,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. License
required. (a) In any city
or town having 5,000 or more population according to the last federal census,
no person shall engage in or work at the business of a master plumber,
restricted master plumber, journeyman plumber, and restricted journeyman
plumber unless licensed to do so by the state commissioner. A
license is
not required for individuals performing building sewer or water service
installation who have completed pipe laying training as prescribed by the
commissioner of labor and industry. A
master plumber may also work as a journeyman plumber, a restricted journeyman
plumber, and a restricted master plumber.
A journeyman plumber may also work as a restricted journeyman plumber. Anyone not so licensed may do plumbing work
which complies with the provisions of the minimum standards prescribed by the
Plumbing Board on premises or that part of premises owned and actually occupied
by the worker as a residence, unless otherwise forbidden to do so by a local
ordinance.
(b) In any
such city, no person shall engage in the business of planning,
superintending, or installing plumbing or shall install plumbing in connection
with the dealing in and selling of plumbing material and supplies unless at all
times a licensed master plumber, or in cities and towns with a population of
fewer than 5,000 according to the federal census, a restricted master plumber,
who shall be responsible for proper installation, is in charge of the plumbing
work of the person, firm, or corporation."
Renumber
the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the
title accordingly
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
S. F. No. 2839, A bill for
an act relating to commerce; regulating various licensees and other entities;
modifying definitions, informational requirements, continuing education
requirements, information reporting requirements, and notice requirements;
making various housekeeping, technical, and clarifying changes; regulating
securities; reorganizing and modifying various provisions relating to real
estate brokers, salespersons, and closing agents; modifying the membership
requirements of, and appointment authority to, the real estate appraiser advisory
board; regulating certain workers' compensation self-insurers; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2008, sections 45.0112; 60A.031, subdivision 4; 60A.084;
60A.204; 60A.36, by adding a subdivision; 60K.31, subdivision 10; 61A.092,
subdivision 3; 62A.046, subdivision 6, by adding a subdivision; 62A.17,
subdivision 5; 62A.3099, subdivision 17; 62A.65, subdivision 2; 62E.02,
subdivision 15; 62E.14, subdivision 4c; 62L.05, subdivision 4; 62S.24,
subdivision 8; 62S.266, subdivision 4; 62S.29, subdivision 1; 72A.08,
subdivision 4; 72A.12, subdivision 4; 72A.20, subdivisions 10, 36, 37; 72A.492,
subdivision 2; 72A.51, subdivision 2; 72B.01; 72B.08, subdivision 8; 79A.03,
subdivision 8; 79A.06, subdivision 5; 79A.21, subdivision 3; 80A.41; 80A.46;
80A.65, subdivision 6; 82.17, subdivision 15, by adding subdivisions; 82.19;
82.21, subdivision 2; 82.24, subdivision 3; 82.29, subdivisions 4, 5, 8; 82.31,
subdivisions 1, 2; 82.33, subdivisions 1, 2, by adding a subdivision; 82.34,
subdivisions 1, 2, 4, 5, 13; 82.39; 82.41, subdivisions 1, 2, by adding a
subdivision; 82.45, subdivision 3, by adding subdivisions; 82.48, subdivisions
2, 3; 82B.05, as amended; 82B.06; 82B.14; 326.3382, subdivision 3; 326B.33,
subdivision 16; 326B.56, subdivision 2; 326B.86, subdivision 2; 326B.921,
subdivision 6; 327B.04, subdivision 4; 332.34; 340A.409, subdivision 1;
Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 45.027, subdivision 1; 45.30,
subdivision 4; 60A.39, subdivisions 1, 4, 5; 60A.9572, subdivision 6; 60K.361;
62A.3099, subdivision 18; 65A.29, subdivision 13; 72B.03, subdivision 2;
72B.045, subdivision 1; 72B.06; 82.31, subdivision 4; 82.32; 326B.46,
subdivision 2; Laws 2007, chapter 147, article 12, section 14; proposing coding
for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 82; 332; repealing Minnesota
Statutes 2008, sections 72B.04; 82.19, subdivision 3; 82.22, subdivisions 1, 6,
7, 8, 9; 82.31, subdivision 6; 82.34, subdivision 16; 82.41, subdivisions 3, 7;
332.31, subdivision 7; 332.335; Minnesota Statutes 2009 Supplement, sections 65B.133,
subdivision 3; 72B.02, subdivision 11.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll
was called. There were 130 yeas and 2
nays as follows:
Those who
voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson
Bigham
Bly
Brod
Brown
Brynaert
Buesgens
Bunn
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dean
Demmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Doty
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Emmer
Falk
Faust
Fritz
Gardner
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Haws
Hayden
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Jackson
Johnson
Juhnke
Kahn
Kalin
Kath
Kelly
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Koenen
Kohls
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lieder
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McFarlane
McNamara
Morgan
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Obermueller
Olin
Otremba
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson
Poppe
Reinert
Rosenthal
Rukavina
Ruud
Sailer
Sanders
Scalze
Scott
Seifert
Sertich
Severson
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Solberg
Sterner
Swails
Thao
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward
Welti
Westrom
Winkler
Zellers
Spk. Kelliher
Those who
voted in the negative were:
Dettmer
Eastlund
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
Sertich moved that the remaining bills on the Calendar for the
Day be continued. The motion prevailed.
ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER
The Speaker announced the appointment of the following members
of the House to a Conference Committee on S. F. No. 2634:
Mullery, Hilstrom and Cornish.
There being no objection, the order of business reverted to
Messages from the Senate.
MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE
The following message was received from the Senate:
Madam Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following
House File, herewith returned, as amended by the Senate, in which amendments
the concurrence of the House is respectfully requested:
H. F. No. 2227,
A bill for an act relating to local government; establishing Minnesota
Innovation and Research Council; imposing powers and duties of council;
appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 3.971, by adding
a subdivision; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 465;
repealing Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 6.80.
Colleen
J. Pacheco,
First Assistant Secretary of the Senate
Marquart moved that the House refuse to concur in the Senate amendments
to H. F. No. 2227, that the Speaker appoint a Conference
Committee of 3 members of the House, and that the House requests that a like
committee be appointed by the Senate to confer on the disagreeing votes of the
two houses. The motion prevailed.
MOTIONS AND RESOLUTIONS
Thissen moved that the name of Downey be added as an author on
H. F. No. 2922. The
motion prevailed.
Davids moved that the name of Sterner be added as an author on
H. F. No. 3210. The
motion prevailed.
Fritz moved that her name be stricken as an author on
H. F. No. 3841. The
motion prevailed.
Morrow moved that the names of Kalin and Paymar be added as
authors on H. F. No. 3841.
The motion prevailed.
Hayden moved that the names of Slocum and Champion be added as
authors on H. F. No. 3842.
The motion prevailed.
Hayden moved that the name of Champion be added as an author on
H. F. No. 3843. The
motion prevailed.
ADJOURNMENT
Sertich moved that when the House adjourns today it adjourn
until 12:00 noon, Friday, May 14, 2010.
The motion prevailed.
Sertich moved that the House adjourn. The motion prevailed, and Speaker pro tempore
Juhnke declared the House stands adjourned until 12:00 noon, Friday, May 14,
2010.
Albin
A. Mathiowetz,
Chief Clerk, House of Representatives