STATE OF
MINNESOTA
EIGHTY-SEVENTH
SESSION - 2012
_____________________
ONE
HUNDRED FOURTH DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Wednesday, April 18, 2012
The House of
Representatives convened at 10:00 a.m. and was called to order by Greg Davids, Speaker
pro tempore.
Prayer was offered by the Reverend Kurt Kalland,
Mount Olivet Lutheran Church, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge
of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
The roll was called and the following
members were present:
Abeler
Allen
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bills
Brynaert
Buesgens
Carlson
Champion
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Kriesel
Laine
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Simon
Slocum
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
A quorum was present.
Atkins and Slawik were excused until 11:35
a.m. Falk and Greene were excused until 11:50
a.m. Howes was excused until 12:10 p.m. Kelly was excused until 1:00 p.m. Clark was excused until 1:35 p.m. Doepke was excused unit 1:50 p.m. Mariani was excused until 2:05 p.m.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the
Journal of the preceding day. There
being no objection, further reading of the Journal was dispensed with and the
Journal was approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk.
REPORTS OF CHIEF CLERK
S. F. No. 1573 and
H. F. No. 2065, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION
OF RULES
Nornes moved that the rules be so far
suspended that S. F. No. 1573 be substituted for
H. F. No. 2065 and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.
SECOND READING OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. No. 1573 was read for
the second time.
INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS
The
following House File was introduced:
Fritz introduced:
H. F. No. 3003, A bill for an act relating to state
government; requiring preference for purchasing from local growers or
distributors when purchasing fresh produce for consumption in state
correctional facilities; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 16C.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Government Operations and Elections.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
BY THE SPEAKER
The Speaker announced the appointment of
the following members of the House to a Conference Committee on
H. F. No. 1974:
Drazkowski; Benson, M., and Downey.
The Speaker announced the appointment of
the following members of the House to a Conference Committee on
S. F. No. 288:
Kelly, Abeler and Huntley.
Dean moved that the House recess subject
to the call of the Chair. The motion
prevailed.
RECESS
RECONVENED
The House reconvened and was called to
order by the Speaker.
Wagenius was excused between the hours of
11:25 a.m. and 1:05 p.m.
MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE
The following
messages were received from the Senate:
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully requested:
H. F. No. 795, A bill for an act relating to child support; instructing the commissioner to initiate a foreign reciprocal agreement.
Cal R. Ludeman, Secretary of the Senate
CONCURRENCE AND REPASSAGE
Hoppe moved that the House concur in the
Senate amendments to H. F. No. 795 and that the bill be repassed
as amended by the Senate. The motion
prevailed.
H. F. No. 795, A bill for an act relating to child support; instructing the commissioner to initiate a foreign reciprocal agreement.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended by the Senate, and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 122 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bills
Brynaert
Buesgens
Carlson
Champion
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Kriesel
Laine
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Simon
Slocum
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The bill was repassed, as amended by the
Senate, and its title agreed to.
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully requested:
H. F. No. 1850, A bill for an act relating to state government; increasing the maximum award amount in the state employee gainsharing program; amending Minnesota Statutes 2011 Supplement, section 16A.90.
Cal R. Ludeman, Secretary of the Senate
CONCURRENCE AND
REPASSAGE
Downey moved that the House concur in the
Senate amendments to H. F. No. 1850 and that the bill be
repassed as amended by the Senate. The
motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 1850, A bill for an act relating to state government; increasing the maximum award amount in the state employee gainsharing program; amending Minnesota Statutes 2011 Supplement, section 16A.90.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended by the Senate, and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 105 yeas and 17 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bills
Brynaert
Carlson
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Kriesel
Laine
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lesch
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Moran
Morrow
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Pelowski
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Simon
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anderson, B.
Buesgens
Champion
Gauthier
Greiling
Hansen
Lenczewski
Liebling
Melin
Mullery
Norton
Paymar
Persell
Rukavina
Slocum
Ward
The bill was repassed, as amended by the
Senate, and its title agreed to.
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully requested:
H. F. No. 2506, A bill for an act relating to education; striking the requirement to allocate portions of reserved staff development revenue for particular purposes; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 122A.61, subdivision 1.
Cal R. Ludeman, Secretary of the Senate
CONCURRENCE AND REPASSAGE
Loon moved that the House concur in the
Senate amendments to H. F. No. 2506 and that the bill be
repassed as amended by the Senate. The
motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 2506, A bill for an act relating to education; clarifying CPR training and instruction requirements; striking the requirement to allocate portions of reserved staff development revenue for particular purposes; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 120B.236; 122A.61, subdivision 1.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended by the Senate, and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 73 yeas and 54 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Dittrich
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Kath
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Buesgens
Carlson
Champion
Davnie
Dill
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Gauthier
Greene
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Knuth
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Marquart
Melin
Moran
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Thissen
Tillberry
Ward
Westrom
Winkler
The bill was repassed, as amended by the
Senate, and its title agreed to.
Mr.
Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following Senate File, herewith transmitted:
S. F. No. 1694.
Colleen J. Pacheco,
First Assistant Secretary of the Senate
FIRST READING
OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. No. 1694, A bill for an act relating to public safety; regulating the manufacture, sale, and use of fireworks; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 624.20, subdivision 1.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration.
CALENDAR FOR
THE DAY
H. F. No. 2341 was reported
to the House.
Kahn moved to amend H. F. No. 2341 as follows:
Page 1, line 3, delete "abortion-inducing"
Page 1, line 6, delete "ABORTION REGULATION;"
Page 1, line 23, after the comma, insert "or when Viagra or any other drug is used for the purpose of treating penile erectile dysfunction,"
Page 2, line 2, after "abortion" insert "or treating the erectile dysfunction"
Page 2, line 3, after "abortion" insert "or treating the erectile dysfunction"
Page 2, line 4, after "(mifepristone)" insert ", Viagra,"
Page 2, line 6, after "terminated" insert "or that the erectile dysfunction has been successfully treated"
Page 2, line 10, after "abortion" insert "or treats erectile dysfunction"
Page 2,
line 12, after the period, insert "No penalty may be assessed against
the male treated for erectile dysfunction."
Page 2, after line 20, insert:
"(b) For any male who has been treated for penile erectile dysfunction, the woman who potentially could be impregnated and who was married to the man at the time a drug was given, or either parent of the man (potential future grandparent) being treated for erectile dysfunction, may maintain an action against the person who attempted to treat the erectile dysfunction in knowing or reckless violation of this section for actual and punitive damages. Any male upon whom treatment for erectile dysfunction was performed in knowing or reckless violation of this section may maintain an action against the person who attempted to treat erectile dysfunction for actual and punitive damage."
Page 2, line 21, delete "(b)" and insert "(c)"
Page 2, line 23, after the second "performed" insert ", or maintained by the man upon whom treatment for erectile dysfunction has been performed or attempted,"
Page 2, line 26, after "section" insert ", or the man upon whom treatment for erectile dysfunction has been performed or attempted"
Page 2, line 33, after "woman" insert "or impotent man" and after the period, insert "(a)"
Page 2, after line 36, insert:
"(b) No impotent man who obtains or possesses Viagra or other drug or chemical for the purpose of inducing an erection shall be subject to any action brought under subdivision 4."
Page 3, line 3, after "attempted" insert ", or the male upon whom treatment for erectile dysfunction has been performed or attempted,"
Page 3, line 5, after "her" insert "or his"
Page 3, line 8, after "her" insert "or his"
Page 3, line 9, after "female" insert "or male"
Page 3, line 13, after "attempted," insert "or the male upon whom treatment for erectile dysfunction has been performed or attempted,"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Kahn
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 28 yeas and 95 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Davnie
Falk
Greene
Greiling
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Kahn
Knuth
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Melin
Moran
Murphy, E.
Norton
Persell
Slawik
Slocum
Tillberry
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Atkins
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Carlson
Champion
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Kath
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Pelowski
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Simon
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
H. F. No. 2341, A bill for an act relating to health; requiring a prescribing physician be physically present when certain abortion-inducing drugs are administered; providing for criminal penalty; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 145.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 80 yeas and 48 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Hosch
Howes
Kath
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Pelowski
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Davnie
Dittrich
Falk
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Knuth
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Thissen
Tillberry
Winkler
The
bill was passed and its title agreed to.
H. F. No. 2789, A bill for an act relating to public safety; amending the definitions of drug paraphernalia and methamphetamine paraphernalia; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 152.01, subdivision 18; 152.137, subdivision 1.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 118 yeas and 3 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bills
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dettmer
Dittrich
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Falk
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Greene
Greiling
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hancock
Hansen
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Kriesel
Laine
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Buesgens
Petersen, B.
Rukavina
The bill was
passed and its title agreed to.
S. F. No. 1675 was reported
to the House.
Abeler, Gottwalt, Huntley and Liebling moved to amend S. F. No. 1675, the unofficial engrossment, as follows:
Page 56, line 8, delete "24-hour"
Page 56, line 24, delete "24-hour"
Page 122, line 33, delete everything after "shall"
Page 122, delete line 34 and insert "provide notary services for parents who complete the recognition of parentage form; and"
Page 123, line 1, before the period, insert "unless otherwise instructed by the Office of the State Registrar of Vital Statistics"
Page 154, line 10, after "Biennially" insert a comma
Page 155, line 27, delete "licensing or" and delete "and"
Page 155, line 28, delete everything before the semicolon and insert ", until the agency determines those violations have been corrected"
Page 155, after line 28, insert:
"(4) the provider is operating after receipt of an order of suspension or an order of revocation of the provider's license, or the provider has been issued an order citing violations of licensing standards that affect the health and safety of children in care due to the nature, chronicity, or severity of the licensing violations, until the licensing agency determines those violations have been corrected;"
Page 155, line 29, delete "(4)" and insert "(5)"
Page 155, line 31, delete "(5)" and insert "(6)"
Page 157, delete sections 4 and 5
Page 158, delete section 6
Page 159, delete section 7
Page 160, delete section 8
Page 162, line 10, after the third comma, insert "or" and strike ", (9), or (10)"
Page 176, line 32, after "chairs" insert "and ranking minority members"
Page 189, after line 2, insert:
"Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 256B.0659, subdivision 20, is amended to read:
Subd. 20. Personal care assistance choice option; administration. (a) Before services commence under the personal care assistance choice option, and annually thereafter, the personal care assistance choice provider agency and the recipient or responsible party shall enter into a written agreement. The annual agreement must be provided to the recipient or responsible party, each personal care assistant, and the qualified professional when completed, and include at a minimum:
(1) duties of the recipient, qualified professional, personal care assistant, and personal care assistance choice provider agency;
(2) salary and benefits for the personal care assistant and the qualified professional;
(3) administrative fee of the personal care assistance choice provider agency and services paid for with that fee, including background study fees;
(4) grievance procedures to respond to complaints;
(5) procedures for hiring and terminating the personal care assistant; and
(6) documentation requirements including, but not limited to, time sheets, activity records, and the personal care assistance care plan.
(b) Effective January 1, 2010, except for
the administrative fee of the personal care assistance choice provider agency
as reported on the written agreement, the remainder of the rates paid to the
personal care assistance choice provider agency must be used to pay for the
salary and benefits for the personal care assistant or the qualified
professional. The provider agency must
use a minimum of 72.5 percent of the revenue generated by the medical
assistance rate for personal care assistance services for employee personal
care assistant wages and benefits. The
revenue generated by the qualified professional and the reasonable costs
associated with the qualified professional shall not be used in making this
calculation.
(c) The commissioner shall deny, revoke, or suspend the authorization to use the personal care assistance choice option if:
(1) it has been determined by the qualified professional or public health nurse that the use of this option jeopardizes the recipient's health and safety;
(2) the parties have failed to comply with the written agreement specified in this subdivision;
(3) the use of the option has led to abusive or fraudulent billing for personal care assistance services; or
(4) the department terminates the personal care assistance choice option.
(d) The recipient or responsible party may appeal the commissioner's decision in paragraph (c) according to section 256.045. The denial, revocation, or suspension to use the personal care assistance choice option must not affect the recipient's authorized level of personal care assistance services."
Page 190, line 12, after "providers" insert ". The revenue generated by the qualified professional and the reasonable costs associated with the qualified professional shall not be used in making this calculation"
Page 191, after line 11, insert:
"Sec. 20. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 256B.0659, subdivision 24, is amended to read:
Subd. 24. Personal care assistance provider agency; general duties. A personal care assistance provider agency shall:
(1) enroll as a Medicaid provider meeting all provider standards, including completion of the required provider training;
(2) comply with general medical assistance coverage requirements;
(3) demonstrate compliance with law and policies of the personal care assistance program to be determined by the commissioner;
(4) comply with background study requirements;
(5) verify and keep records of hours worked by the personal care assistant and qualified professional;
(6) not engage in any agency-initiated direct contact or marketing in person, by phone, or other electronic means to potential recipients, guardians, or family members;
(7) pay the personal care assistant and qualified professional based on actual hours of services provided;
(8) withhold and pay all applicable federal and state taxes;
(9) effective January 1, 2010, document that the agency uses a minimum of 72.5 percent of the revenue generated by the medical assistance rate for personal care assistance services for employee personal care assistant wages and benefits. The revenue generated by the qualified professional and the reasonable costs associated with the qualified professional shall not be used in making this calculation;
(10) make the arrangements and pay unemployment insurance, taxes, workers' compensation, liability insurance, and other benefits, if any;
(11) enter into a written agreement under subdivision 20 before services are provided;
(12) report suspected neglect and abuse to the common entry point according to section 256B.0651;
(13) provide the recipient with a copy of the home care bill of rights at start of service; and
(14) request reassessments at least 60 days prior to the end of the current authorization for personal care assistance services, on forms provided by the commissioner."
Page 196, after line 20, insert:
"Sec. 29. Minnesota Statutes 2011 Supplement, section 626.557, subdivision 9a, is amended to read:
Subd. 9a. Evaluation and referral of reports made to common entry point unit. The common entry point must screen the reports of alleged or suspected maltreatment for immediate risk and make all necessary referrals as follows:
(1) if the common entry point determines that there is an immediate need for adult protective services, the common entry point agency shall immediately notify the appropriate county agency;
(2) if the report contains suspected criminal activity against a vulnerable adult, the common entry point shall immediately notify the appropriate law enforcement agency;
(3) the common entry point shall refer all
reports of alleged or suspected maltreatment to the appropriate lead
investigative agency as soon as possible, but in any event no longer than two
working days; and
(4) if the report involves services
licensed by the Department of Human Services and subject to chapter 245D, the
common entry point shall refer the report to the county as the lead agency
according to clause (3), but shall also notify the Department of Human Services
of the report; and
(4) (5) if the report contains
information about a suspicious death, the common entry point shall immediately
notify the appropriate law enforcement agencies, the local medical examiner,
and the ombudsman for mental health and developmental disabilities established
under section 245.92. Law enforcement
agencies shall coordinate with the local medical examiner and the ombudsman as
provided by law."
Page 197, after line 12, insert:
"Sec. 30. Laws 2008, chapter 338, section 3, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Establishment. (a) The commissioner of human services,
in cooperation with the commissioners of health and housing finance, shall
develop and implement, beginning July 1, 2009, a three-year five-year
demonstration project for older adult services community consortiums. An older adult services community consortium
may consist of health care and social service providers, county agencies,
health plan companies, and other community stakeholders within a demonstration
site that have established a process for joint decision making. Demonstration sites may include a portion of
a county, an entire county, or multiple counties.
(b) Each community consortium seeking to participate as a demonstration site must submit an application to the commissioner. The application must include:
(1) a description of the entities participating in the consortium, the scope of collaboration, and the process to be used for joint-decision making;
(2) the methods by which the consortium plans to achieve the goals specified in subdivision 2;
(3) a description of the proposed demonstration site; and
(4) other information the commissioner determines to be necessary to evaluate proposals.
(c) The commissioner of human services shall establish a process to review and consider applicants. The commissioner shall designate up to three community consortiums as demonstration projects.
(d) Each community consortium selected to participate shall establish a local group to assist in planning, designing, implementing, and evaluating the coordinated service delivery system within the demonstration site. Planning for each consortium shall build upon current planning processes developed by county gaps analyses and Elder Care Development Partnerships under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.0917.
Sec. 31. Laws 2008, chapter 338, section 3, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Evaluation
and report. The commissioner of
human services, in cooperation with the commissioners of health and housing
finance, shall evaluate the demonstration project, and report preliminary
findings and recommendations to the legislature by November 15, 2011, on
whether the demonstration project should be continued and whether the number of
demonstration project sites increased. The
final report of findings and recommendations shall be delivered to the
legislature by January 15, 2013 2015. The preliminary and final evaluation and
report must include:
(1) a comparison of the performance of demonstration sites relative to nonconsortium communities on the quality measures specified in subdivision 5;
(2) an assessment of the extent to which the demonstration project can be successfully expanded to other parts of the state;
(3) legislative changes necessary to improve the effectiveness of the demonstration project and to expand the projects to other parts of the state; and
(4) any actions taken by the commissioner of health under subdivision 5.
The commissioner of human services may withhold up to $50,000 of the funding provided to each participating community consortium under this section to fund the evaluation and report."
Page 203, line 17, after the semicolon, insert "and"
Page 203, strike lines 18 and 19
Page 203, line 20, strike "(4)" and insert "(3)"
Page 224, line 31, strike "paragraph (b)" and insert "paragraphs (a) and (c)"
Page 272, delete section 16
Page 279, delete section 19
Page 283, delete section 22
Page 290, line 20, delete "and status"
Page 294, line 11, after "245A" insert ", 245B,"
Page 297, line 2, delete everything after the first "a" and insert "notarized signature of the applicant."
Page 297, delete line 3
Page 297, delete lines 4 to 13 and insert:
"(g) When an applicant is a nonindividual, the applicant must provide the applicant's Minnesota tax identification number, the first, middle, and last name, and address for all individuals who will be controlling individuals, including all officers, owners, and managerial officials as defined in section 245A.02, subdivision 5a, and the date that the background study was initiated by the applicant for each controlling individual. The applicant must also provide the first, middle, and last name, mailing address, and notarized signature of the agent authorized by the applicant to accept service on behalf of the controlling individuals."
Page 301, delete section 6
Page 313, lines 26 and 27, delete "180" and insert "90"
Page 317, delete section 24
Page 318, delete section 25
Page 321, delete section 29
Page 332, delete lines 15 to 36
Page 333, delete lines 1 to 3 and insert:
"Subd. 3. Implementation. (a) The commissioner shall implement
the responsibilities of this chapter according to the timelines in paragraphs
(b) and (c) only within the limits of available appropriations or other
administrative cost recovery methodology.
(b)
The licensure of home and community-based services according to this section
shall be implemented January 1, 2014.
License applications shall be received and processed on a phased-in
schedule as determined by the commissioner beginning July 1, 2013. Licenses will be issued thereafter upon the
commissioner's determination that the application is complete according to
section 245A.04.
(c) Within the limits of available
appropriations or other administrative cost recovery methodology, implementation
of compliance monitoring must be phased in after January 1, 2014.
(1) Applicants who do not currently
hold a license issued under this chapter must receive an initial compliance
monitoring visit after 12 months of the effective date of the initial license
for the purpose of providing technical assistance on how to achieve and
maintain compliance with the applicable law or rules governing the provision of
home and community-based services under chapter 245D. If during the review the commissioner finds
that the license holder has failed to achieve compliance with an applicable law
or rule and this failure does not imminently endanger the health, safety, or
rights of the persons served by the program, the commissioner may issue a
licensing review report with recommendations for achieving and maintaining
compliance.
(2) Applicants who do currently hold a
license issued under this chapter must receive a compliance monitoring visit
after 24 months of the effective date of the initial license.
(d) Nothing in this subdivision shall
be construed to limit the commissioner's authority to suspend or revoke a
license or issue a fine at any time under section 245A.07, or make correction
orders and make a license conditional for failure to comply with applicable
laws or rules under section 245A.06, based on the nature, chronicity, or
severity of the violation of law or rule and the effect of the violation on the
health, safety, or rights of persons served by the program.
Subd. 4. Stakeholder consultation. The commissioner shall consult with the existing stakeholder group established as part of the provider standards process to gather input related to the development of an administrative cost recovery methodology to implement the provisions in chapter 245D."
Page 352, line 1, delete everything after "(e)"
Page 352, line 2, delete "information,"
Page 352, line 6, delete "discovery of the death,"
Page 353, line 16, before "The" insert "(a)"
Page 353, line 18, after the period, insert "(b)"
Page 353, line 21, after the period, insert "Applicants and license holders who have reason to believe they may be serving an individual who will need emergency use of restraints or seclusion, may request a variance on the application or reapplication, and the commissioner shall automatically review the request for a variance as part of the application or reapplication process. License holders may also request the variance any time after issuance of a license. In the event a license holder uses restraint or seclusion for any reason without first obtaining a variance as required, the license holder must report the unauthorized use of restraint or seclusion to the commissioner within 24 hours of the occurrence and request the required variance."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
The Speaker called Davids to the Chair.
S. F. No. 1675, A bill for an act relating to human services; modifying provisions related to children and family services; reforming adoptions under guardianship of the commissioner; modifying statutory provisions related to child support, child care, child safety, and MFIP; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 13.46, subdivision 2; 13.461, subdivision 17; 13.465, by adding a subdivision; 119B.09, subdivision 7; 119B.12, subdivisions 1, 2; 119B.125, subdivisions 1a, 2, 6; 119B.13, subdivision 6; 145.902, subdivisions 1, 3; 256.998, subdivisions 1, 5; 256J.08, subdivision 11; 256J.24, subdivisions 2, 5; 256J.32, subdivision 6; 256J.621; 256J.68, subdivision 7; 256J.95, subdivision 3; 257.01; 257.75, subdivision 7; 259.22, subdivision 2; 259.23, subdivision 1; 259.24, subdivisions 1, 3, 5, 6a, 7; 259.29, subdivision 2; 259.69; 259.73; 260.012; 260C.001; 260C.007, subdivision 4, by adding subdivisions; 260C.101, subdivision 2; 260C.150, subdivision 1; 260C.157, subdivision 1; 260C.163, subdivisions 1, 4; 260C.178, subdivisions 1, 7; 260C.193, subdivisions 3, 6; 260C.201, subdivisions 2, 10, 11a; 260C.212, subdivisions 1, 2, 5, 7; 260C.215, subdivisions 4, 6; 260C.217; 260C.301, subdivisions 1, 8; 260C.317, subdivisions 3, 4; 260C.325, subdivisions 1, 3, 4; 260C.328; 260C.451; 260D.08; 518C.205; 541.04; 548.09, subdivision 1; 609.3785; 626.556, subdivisions 2, 10, 10e, 10f, 10i, 10k, 11; Minnesota Statutes 2011 Supplement, sections 119B.13, subdivision 1; 256.01, subdivision 14b; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 260C; 611; proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 259A; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 256.022; 259.67; 259.71; 260C.201, subdivision 11; 260C.215, subdivision 2; 260C.456; Minnesota Rules, parts 9560.0071; 9560.0082; 9560.0083; 9560.0091; 9560.0093, subparts 1, 3, 4; 9560.0101; 9560.0102.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 127 yeas and 1 nay as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bills
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Falk
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Greene
Greiling
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Kriesel
Laine
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Buesgens
The
bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
S. F. No. 1717 was reported
to the House.
LeMieur moved to amend
S. F. No. 1717, the third engrossment, as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting
clause and insert the following language of H. F. No. 2087, the
second engrossment:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 178.01, is amended to read:
178.01
PURPOSES.
The purposes of this chapter are: to open to young all people
regardless of race, sex, creed, color or national origin, the opportunity to
obtain training and on-the-job learning that will equip them for profitable
employment and citizenship; to establish as a means to this end, a program of
voluntary apprenticeship under approved apprentice
apprenticeship agreements providing
facilities for their training and guidance in the arts, skills, and crafts of
industry and trade or occupation, with concurrent, supplementary
instruction in related subjects; to promote apprenticeship opportunities under
conditions providing adequate training and on-the-job learning and reasonable
earnings; to relate the supply of skilled workers to employment demands; to
establish standards for apprentice training; to establish an Apprenticeship
Board and apprenticeship committees to assist in effectuating the purposes of
this chapter; to provide for a Division of Labor Standards and Apprenticeship
within the Department of Labor and Industry; to provide for reports to the
legislature regarding the status of apprentice training in the state; to
establish a procedure for the determination of apprentice apprenticeship
agreement controversies; and to accomplish related ends.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 178.03, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Duties
and functions. The director, under
the supervision of the commissioner, and with the advice and consultation of
the Apprenticeship Board, is authorized:
to administer the provisions of this chapter; to promote apprenticeship
and other forms of on-the-job learning; to establish, in cooperation and
consultation with the Apprenticeship Board and with the apprenticeship
committees, conditions, training, and learning standards for the approval of
apprenticeship programs and agreements, which conditions and standards shall in
no case be lower than those (1) prescribed by this chapter, and (2) established
under Code of Federal Regulations, title 29, part 29; to promote equal
employment opportunity in apprenticeship and other on-the-job learning and to
establish a Minnesota plan for equal employment opportunity in apprenticeship
which shall be consistent with standards established under Code of Federal Regulations,
title 29, part 30, as amended; to issue certificates of registration to
sponsors of approved apprenticeship programs; to act as secretary of the
Apprenticeship Board; to approve, if of the opinion that approval is for the
best interest of the apprentice, any apprenticeship agreement which meets the
standards established hereunder; to terminate any apprenticeship agreement in
accordance with the provisions of such agreement; to keep a record of
apprenticeship agreements and their disposition; to issue certificates of
completion of apprenticeship; and to perform such other duties as the
commissioner deems necessary to carry out the intent of this chapter; provided,
that the administration and supervision of supplementary instruction in related
subjects for apprentices; coordination of instruction on a concurrent basis
with job experiences, and the selection and training of teachers and
coordinators for such instruction shall be the function of state and local
boards responsible for vocational education.
The director shall have the authority to make wage determinations
applicable to the graduated schedule of wages and journeyman journeyworker
wage rate for apprenticeship agreements, giving consideration to the existing
wage rates prevailing throughout the state, except that no wage determination
by the director shall alter an existing wage provision for apprentices or journeymen
journeyworkers that is contained in a bargaining agreement in effect
between an employer and an organization of employees, nor shall the director
make any determination for the beginning rate for an apprentice that is below
the wage minimum established by federal or state law.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 178.03, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Reciprocity
approval. The director, if requested
by a sponsoring entity, shall grant reciprocity approval to apprenticeship
programs of employers and unions who jointly form a sponsoring entity on a
multistate basis in other than the building construction industry if such
programs are in conformity with this chapter and have been registered in
compliance with Code of Federal Regulations, title 29, part 29, by a state
apprenticeship council recognized by or registered with the Bureau of
Apprenticeship and Training, United States Department of Labor, Office
of Apprenticeship, when such approval is necessary for federal purposes
under Code of Federal Regulations, title 29, section 29.13(a) or 29.13(b)(7).
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 178.05, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Establishment of committees. Apprenticeship committees may be established by the director to supervise the operation of apprenticeship programs. Establishment of a committee may be considered justified if either of the following conditions are met:
(a) When the employers and employees in a trade or occupation or trades or occupations are parties to a collective bargaining agreement requiring joint participation in program operation; or
(b) When five or more apprentices are enrolled under a program.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 178.05, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Members. (a) The total number of members on a committee may range from four to twelve.
(b) In joint participation there shall be equal representation of employers and employees.
(c) Members shall be selected by the group or groups they represent subject to approval by the director.
(d) A committee may have as one of its
employee representatives, an active apprentice of record, provided that the
apprentice has completed a minimum of 6,000 hours of an apprenticeship term or
has entered the fourth year of the term.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 178.06, is amended to read:
178.06
APPRENTICE.
The term "apprentice," as used
herein, means a person at least 16 years of age who has entered into a written
agreement, hereinafter called an apprentice apprenticeship
agreement, with a committee, an employer, an association of employers, or an
organization of employees, which apprentice agreement provides for learning
consistent with this chapter and Code of Federal Regulations, title 29, section
29.5(b)(1) and (b)(2):
(1) a time-based approach involving not less than 2,000 hours or one year of reasonably continuous employment for such person and for participation in an approved program of on-the-job learning through employment and through concurrent, supplementary education in related subjects;
(2) a competency-based approach involving successful demonstration of acquired skills and knowledge by an apprentice plus on-the-job learning; or
(3) a hybrid approach involving the completion of a specified minimum number of hours plus the successful demonstration of competency.
Whenever a minimum age exceeding 16 years is prescribed by federal or state law to apply to workers in certain hazardous occupations, the minimum age so prescribed shall be applicable to apprentices.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 178.07, is amended to read:
178.07
APPRENTICE APPRENTICESHIP AGREEMENTS.
Every apprentice apprenticeship
agreement entered into under this chapter shall contain:
(1) the names of the contracting parties;
(2) the date of birth, and information as to the race and sex of the apprentice;
(3) a statement of the trade, craft, occupation, or business which the apprentice is to be taught, and the time at which the apprenticeship will begin and end;
(4) a statement showing the number of hours
to be spent by the apprentice in work and the number of hours to be spent in
concurrent, supplementary instruction in related subjects, which instruction
shall be not less than 144 hours during each year of the apprenticeship term. The maximum number of hours of work per week
not including time spent in related and supplemental instruction for any
apprentice shall not exceed either the number prescribed by law or the
customary regular number of hours per week for the employees of the company by
which the apprentice is employed. An
apprentice may be allowed to work overtime provided that the overtime work does
not conflict with supplementary instruction course attendance. All time in excess of the number of hours of
work per week as specified in the apprenticeship agreement shall be considered
overtime. For overtime, the apprentice's
rate of pay shall be increased by the same percentage as the journeyman's
journeyworker's rate of pay for overtime is increased in the same
industry or establishment;
(5) a statement setting forth a schedule of the processes in the trade, occupation, or industry divisions in which the apprentice is to be taught and the approximate time to be spent at each process;
(6) a statement of the graduated scale of wages to be paid the apprentice and whether the required school time shall be compensated;
(7) a statement providing for a period of
probation of not more than 500 hours of employment and instruction extending
over not more than four months, during which time the apprentice apprenticeship
agreement shall be terminated by the director upon written request of either
party, and providing that after such probationary period the apprentice apprenticeship
agreement may be terminated by the director by mutual agreement of all parties
thereto, or terminated by the director for good and sufficient reason;
(8) a provision that controversies or
differences concerning the terms of the apprentice apprenticeship
agreement which cannot be resolved by the parties thereto, or which are not
covered by a collective bargaining agreement, may be submitted to the director
for determination as provided for in section 178.09;
(9) a provision that an employer who is
unable to fulfill an obligation under the apprentice apprenticeship
agreement may, with the approval of the director, transfer such contract to any
other employer, provided that the apprentice consents and that such other
employer agrees to assume the obligations of the apprentice apprenticeship
agreement; and
(10) such additional terms and conditions as may be prescribed or approved by the director not inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 178.08, is amended to read:
178.08
DIRECTOR TO APPROVE APPRENTICE APPRENTICESHIP AGREEMENTS.
Every apprentice apprenticeship
agreement is subject to approval by the director and shall be signed by the
committee, the employer, an association of employers, or an organization of
employees, and by the apprentice, and if the apprentice is a minor, by a parent
or legal guardian. When a minor enters
into an apprentice apprenticeship agreement under this chapter
for a period of learning extending into majority the apprentice apprenticeship
agreement shall likewise be binding for such a period as may be covered during
the apprentice's majority.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 178.09, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Complaint. Upon the complaint of any interested
person or upon the director's own initiative the director may investigate to
determine if there has been a violation of the terms of an apprentice apprenticeship
agreement made under this chapter. The
director may conduct such proceedings as are necessary for that investigation
and determination. All such proceedings
shall be on a fair and impartial basis and shall be conducted according to
rules promulgated under section 178.041.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 178.09, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Determination;
appeal. The determination of the
director shall be filed with the commissioner and written notice shall be
served on all parties affected by it. Any
person aggrieved by any determination or action of the director may appeal to
the commissioner. If no appeal is filed
with the commissioner within ten days of the date of service, the director's
determination shall become the order of the commissioner. If an appeal is filed, the commissioner shall
appoint and convene a hearing board to be composed of three members of the council
apprenticeship board appointed under section 178.02, one member being a
representative of an employer organization, one representative being a member
of an employee organization, and one member representing the general public. The board shall hold a hearing on the appeal
after due notice to the interested parties and shall submit to the commissioner
findings of fact and a recommended decision accompanied by a memorandum of the
reasons for it. Within 30 days after
submission, the commissioner may adopt the recommended decision of the board,
or disregard the recommended decision of the board and prepare a decision based
on the findings of fact and accompanied by a memorandum of reasons for that
decision. Written notice of the
commissioner's determination and order shall be served on all parties affected
by it. Any person aggrieved or affected
by any determination or order of the commissioner may appeal from it to the
district court having jurisdiction at any time within 30 days after the date of
the order by service of a written notice of appeal on the commissioner. Upon service of the notice of appeal, the
commissioner shall file with the court administrator of the district court to
which the appeal is taken a certified copy of the order appealed from, together
with findings of fact on which it is based.
The person serving a notice of appeal shall, within five days after its
service, file it, with proof of service, with the court administrator of the court
to which the appeal is taken. The
district court shall then have jurisdiction over the appeal and it shall be
entered in the records of the district court and tried de novo according to the
applicable rules. Any person aggrieved
or affected by any determination, order, or decision of the district court may
appeal as in other civil cases.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.092, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Licenses
not requiring examination administered by commissioner. If the applicant for a license is not
required to pass an examination in order to obtain the license, or is required
to pass an examination that is not administered by the commissioner, then the
license fee must accompany the application for the license. If the application is for a license issued
under sections 326B.802 to 326B.885 and is not an application for license
renewal, then the contractor recovery fund fee required under section 326B.89,
subdivision 3, is due after the department has determined that the applicant
meets the qualifications for licensing and before the license is issued.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.092, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. License
fees and license renewal fees. (a)
The license fee for each license except a renewed license shall be the base
license fee plus any applicable board fee, as set forth in this subdivision. The license renewal fee for each renewed
license is the base license fee plus any applicable board fee, continuing
education fee, and contractor recovery fund fee and additional assessment, as
set forth in this subdivision.
(b) For purposes of this section, "license duration" means the number of years for which the license is issued except that:
(1) if the initial license is not issued for a whole number of years, the license duration shall be rounded up to the next whole number; and
(2) if the department receives an application for license renewal after the renewal deadline, license duration means the number of years for which the renewed license would have been issued if the renewal application had been submitted on time and all other requirements for renewal had been met.
(c) The base license fee shall depend on whether the license is classified as an entry level, master, journeyman, or business license, and on the license duration. The base license fee shall be:
License Classification |
License Duration |
||
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year |
2 Years |
3 Years |
|
|
|
|
Entry level |
$10 |
$20 |
$30 |
Journeyman |
$20 |
$40 |
$60 |
Master |
$40 |
$80 |
$120 |
Business |
$90 |
$180 |
$270 |
(d) If there is a continuing education requirement for renewal of the license, then a continuing education fee must be included in the renewal license fee. The continuing education fee for all license classifications shall be: $10 if the renewal license duration is one year; $20 if the renewal license duration is two years; and $30 if the renewal license duration is three years.
(e) If the license is issued under sections 326B.31 to 326B.59 or 326B.90 to 326B.93, then a board fee must be included in the license fee and the renewal license fee. The board fee for all license classifications shall be: $4 if the license duration is one year; $8 if the license duration is two years; and $12 if the license duration is three years.
(f) If the application is for the renewal of a license issued under sections 326B.802 to 326B.885, then the contractor recovery fund fee required under section 326B.89, subdivision 3, and any additional assessment required under section 326B.89, subdivision 16, must be included in the license renewal fee.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 326B.103, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Agricultural
building. "Agricultural
building" means a structure that is:
(1) on agricultural land as defined
in determined by the governing assessor for the municipality or county
under section 273.13, subdivision 23,;
(2) designed, constructed, and used
to house farm implements, livestock, or agricultural produce or products
under section 273.13, subdivision 23; and
(3) used by the owner, lessee, and
sublessee of the building and members of their immediate families, their
employees, and persons engaged in the pickup or delivery of agricultural produce
or products.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2011 Supplement, section 326B.46, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:
Subd. 1a. Exemptions from licensing. (a) An individual without a contractor license may do plumbing work on the individual's residence in accordance with subdivision 1, paragraph (a).
(b) An individual who is an employee working on the maintenance and repair of plumbing equipment, apparatus, or facilities owned or leased by the individual's employer and which is within the limits of property owned or leased, and operated or maintained by the individual's employer, shall not be required to maintain a contractor license as long as the employer has on file with the commissioner a current certificate of responsible individual. The responsible individual must be a master plumber or, in an area of the state that is not a city or town with a population of more than 5,000 according to the last federal census, a restricted master plumber. The certificate must be signed by the responsible individual and must state that the person signing the certificate is responsible for ensuring that the maintenance and repair work performed by the employer's employees complies with sections 326B.41 to 326B.49,
all rules adopted under those sections and
sections 326B.50 to 326B.59, and all orders issued under section 326B.082. The employer must pay a filing fee to file a
certificate of responsible individual with the commissioner. The certificate shall expire two years from
the date of filing. In order to maintain
a current certificate of responsible individual, the employer must resubmit a
certificate of responsible individual, with a filing fee, no later than two
years from the date of the previous submittal.
The filing of the certificate of responsible individual does not exempt
any employee of the employer from the requirements of this chapter regarding
individual licensing as a plumber or registration as a plumber's apprentice
an unlicensed individual.
(c) If a contractor employs a licensed plumber, the licensed plumber does not need a separate contractor license to perform plumbing work on behalf of the employer within the scope of the licensed plumber's license.
(d) A person may perform and offer to perform building sewer or water service installation without a contractor's license if the person is in compliance with the bond and insurance requirements of subdivision 2.
Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2011 Supplement, section 326B.49, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Application, examination, and license fees. (a) Applications for master and journeyman plumber's licenses shall be made to the commissioner, with all fees required by section 326B.092. Unless the applicant is entitled to a renewal, the applicant shall be licensed by the commissioner only after passing a satisfactory examination developed and administered by the commissioner, based upon rules adopted by the Plumbing Board, showing fitness.
(b) All initial journeyman plumber's licenses shall be effective for more than one calendar year and shall expire on December 31 of the year after the year in which the application is made. All master plumber's licenses shall expire on December 31 of each even-numbered year after issuance or renewal. The commissioner shall in a manner determined by the commissioner, without the need for any rulemaking under chapter 14, phase in the renewal of master and journeyman plumber's licenses from one year to two years. By June 30, 2011, all renewed master and journeyman plumber's licenses shall be two-year licenses.
(c) Applications for contractor licenses shall be made to the commissioner, with all fees required by section 326B.092. All contractor licenses shall expire on December 31 of each odd-numbered year after issuance or renewal.
(d) For purposes of calculating license fees and renewal license fees required under section 326B.092:
(1) the following licenses shall be considered business licenses: plumbing contractor and restricted plumbing contractor;
(2) the following licenses shall be considered master licenses: master plumber and restricted master plumber;
(3) the following licenses shall be considered journeyman licenses: journeyman plumber and restricted journeyman plumber; and
(4) the registration of a plumber's
apprentice an unlicensed individual under section 326B.47,
subdivision 3, shall be considered an entry level license.
(e) For each filing of a certificate of responsible individual by an employer, the fee is $100.
(f) The commissioner shall charge each person giving bond under section 326B.46, subdivision 2, paragraph (b), a biennial bond filing fee of $100, unless the person is a licensed contractor.
Sec. 16. REPEALER.
Minnesota Rules, parts 1300.0230,
subpart 4; 1301.1201; 1302.0600; 3801.3640; 3801.3650; 3801.3660; 3801.3670;
3801.3680; 3801.3690; 3801.3700; 3801.3710; 3801.3720; 3801.3730; 3801.3740;
3801.3760; 3801.3790; and 3801.3800, are repealed."
Delete
the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to labor and industry; making changes to the State Building Code; apprenticeship training; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 178.01; 178.03, subdivisions 3, 4; 178.05, subdivisions 1, 2; 178.06; 178.07; 178.08; 178.09, subdivisions 1, 2; 326B.092, subdivisions 2, 7; 326B.103, subdivision 3; Minnesota Statutes 2011 Supplement, sections 326B.46, subdivision 1a; 326B.49, subdivision 1; repealing Minnesota Rules, parts 1300.0230, subpart 4; 1301.1201; 1302.0600; 3801.3640; 3801.3650; 3801.3660; 3801.3670; 3801.3680; 3801.3690; 3801.3700; 3801.3710; 3801.3720; 3801.3730; 3801.3740; 3801.3760; 3801.3790; 3801.3800."
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
S. F. No. 1717, A bill for an act relating to labor and industry; making changes to the State Building Code; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 178.01; 178.03, subdivisions 3, 4; 178.05, subdivisions 1, 2; 178.06; 178.07; 178.08; 178.09, subdivisions 1, 2; 299F.011, by adding a subdivision; 326B.092, subdivisions 2, 7; 326B.103, subdivision 3; 326B.809; Minnesota Statutes 2011 Supplement, sections 326B.0981, subdivision 4; 326B.46, subdivision 1a; 326B.49, subdivision 1; repealing Minnesota Rules, parts 1300.0230, subpart 4; 1301.1201; 1302.0600; 3801.3640; 3801.3650; 3801.3660; 3801.3670; 3801.3680; 3801.3690; 3801.3700; 3801.3710; 3801.3720; 3801.3730; 3801.3740; 3801.3760; 3801.3790; 3801.3800.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 128 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bills
Brynaert
Buesgens
Carlson
Champion
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Falk
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Greene
Greiling
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Kriesel
Laine
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The
bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
S. F. No. 2379, A bill for an act relating to courts; removing limitation on voter list data received by courts for jury selection; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 201.091, subdivision 9.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 128 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bills
Brynaert
Buesgens
Carlson
Champion
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Falk
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Greene
Greiling
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Kriesel
Laine
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The
bill was passed and its title agreed to.
FISCAL CALENDAR
Pursuant to rule 1.22, Holberg requested
immediate consideration of H. F. No. 322.
H. F. No. 322 was reported
to the House.
Hortman moved to amend H. F. No. 322, the third engrossment, as follows:
Page 10, line 10, after the period, insert "Upon making a finding or findings, the court shall report those findings pursuant to the Reporting of Maltreatment of Minors Act, section 626.556."
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Kahn moved to amend H. F. No. 322, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 8, line 24, after "child" insert ", the sole exception to the presumption of joint physical custody being when the mother is breastfeeding the child"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Kahn
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 51 yeas and 76 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kieffer
Knuth
Laine
Lenczewski
Liebling
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Paymar
Persell
Poppe
Rukavina
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Atkins
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hoppe
Howes
Huntley
Kelly
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lesch
Lillie
Lohmer
Mahoney
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Mullery
Murdock
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Pelowski
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Lesch moved to amend H. F. No. 322, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 12, after line 10, insert:
"Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 518.1705, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Plan elements. (a) A parenting plan must include the following:
(1) a schedule of the time each parent spends with the child;
(2) a designation of decision-making
responsibilities regarding the child; and
(3) a method of dispute resolution.;
and
(4) virtual parenting time, if the
equipment necessary for virtual parenting time is reasonably available.
(b) A parenting plan may include other issues and matters the parents agree to regarding the child.
(c) Parents voluntarily agreeing to parenting plans may substitute other terms for physical and legal custody, including designations of joint or sole custody, provided that the terms used in the substitution are defined in the parenting plan.
(d)
For purposes of this subdivision, "virtual parenting time" means
reasonable and uncensored time during which a parent and the parent's child
communicate during reasonable hours by using communication tools such as a
telephone, electronic mail, instant messaging, video conferencing or other
wired or wireless technologies via the Internet, or other medium of
communication. Virtual parenting time
may only be used to supplement parenting time with the child. Virtual parenting time may not be used
as a replacement or as a substitute for parenting time with the child."
Page 12, after line 26, insert:
"(f) If the parents cannot agree
on whether virtual parenting time equipment is reasonably available for
purposes of subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clause (4), the court shall decide
whether the equipment is reasonably available, taking into consideration:
(1) the best interests of the child;
(2) each parent's ability to handle any
additional expenses for virtual parenting time; and
(3) any other factors the court considers material."
Page 13, delete section 14 and insert:
"Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 518.1705, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. Modification of parenting plans. (a) Parents may modify by agreement:
(1) the schedule of the time each
parent spends with the child or;
(2) the decision-making provisions
of a parenting plan by agreement; or
(3) the parenting plan by adding virtual parenting time.
To be enforceable, modifications must be confirmed by court order. A motion to modify decision-making provisions or the time each parent spends with the child may be made only within the time limits provided by section 518.18.
(b) The parties may agree, but the court must not require them, to apply the best interests standard in section 518.17 or 257.025, as applicable, or another standard for deciding a motion for modification that would change the child's primary residence or the physical custodial arrangement for the child, provided that:
(1) both parties were represented by counsel when the parenting plan was approved; or
(2) the court found the parties were fully informed, the agreement was voluntary, and the parties were aware of its implications.
(c) If
the parties do not agree to apply the best interests standard or another
standard, section 518.18, paragraph (d), applies."
Page 14, delete lines 5 to 8 and insert:
"(c) (e) Upon request
of either party, to the extent practicable an order for parenting time must
include:
(1) a specific schedule for
parenting time, including the frequency and duration of visitation and
visitation during holidays and vacations, unless parenting time is restricted,
denied, or reserved.; and
(2) virtual parenting time, as defined
in section 518.1705, subdivision 2, paragraph (d), at reasonable hours and for
a reasonable duration, unless parenting time is restricted, denied, or
reserved, and if the equipment is reasonably available, provided that if the
parties cannot agree on whether the equipment is reasonably available, the court
shall decide whether the equipment for virtual parenting time is reasonably
available, taking into consideration:
(i) the best interests of the child;
(ii) each parent's ability to handle
any additional expenses for virtual parenting time; and
(iii) any other factors the court considers material."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
H. F. No. 322, A bill for an act relating to family law; changing certain custody and parenting time provisions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 257.541; 518.003, subdivision 3; 518.091; 518.131, subdivisions 1, 7; 518.155; 518.156; 518.167, subdivision 2; 518.17, subdivisions 1, 3; 518.1705, subdivisions 2, 3, 5, 9; 518.175, subdivision 1; 518.179, subdivision 1; 518.18; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 518; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 518.17, subdivision 2.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended,
and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 80 yeas and 53 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lesch
Lohmer
Mahoney
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Quam
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Falk
Fritz
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kieffer
Knuth
Laine
Lenczewski
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mariani
Marquart
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Winkler
The
bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
Pursuant to rule 1.22, Holberg requested
immediate consideration of S. F. No. 248.
S. F. No. 248, A bill for an act relating to health; establishing criteria that must be met before a new radiation therapy facility can be constructed; requiring a study of radiation therapy facilities capacity; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 144.5509.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 132 yeas and 1 nay as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bills
Brynaert
Buesgens
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Falk
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Greene
Greiling
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Kriesel
Laine
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Liebling
The bill was passed and its title agreed
to.
Pursuant to rule 1.22, Holberg requested
immediate consideration of S. F. No. 2324.
S. F. No. 2324, A bill for an act relating to occupational licensing; modifying electrical licenses; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 326B.31, subdivision 14, by adding subdivisions; 326B.33, subdivisions 17, 19, by adding a subdivision.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 133 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bills
Brynaert
Buesgens
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Falk
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Greene
Greiling
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Kriesel
Laine
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The
bill was passed and its title agreed to.
Pursuant to rule 1.22, Holberg requested
immediate consideration of S. F. No. 1678.
S. F. No. 1678, A bill for an act relating to public defenders; amending provisions related to public defender representation, appointment, and reimbursement obligations; outlining financial responsibility for public defender costs, cost for counsel in CHIPS cases, pretrial appeals costs, and standby counsel costs; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 244.052, subdivision 6; 257.69, subdivision 1; 260B.163, subdivision 4; 260B.331, subdivision 5; 260C.163, subdivision 3; 260C.331, subdivision 5; 609.115, subdivision 4; 609.131, subdivision 1; 611.14; 611.16; 611.17; 611.18; 611.20, subdivision 4; 611.25, subdivision 1; 611.26, subdivision 6; 611.27, subdivision 5, by adding a subdivision; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 611.20, subdivision 6.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 133 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bills
Brynaert
Buesgens
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean
Dettmer
Dill
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Falk
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Gauthier
Gottwalt
Greene
Greiling
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Howes
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Knuth
Kriesel
Laine
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murdock
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Murray
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Quam
Rukavina
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Thissen
Tillberry
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Ward
Wardlow
Westrom
Winkler
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
The
bill was passed and its title agreed to.
There being no objection, the order of
business reverted to Messages from the Senate.
MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE
The
following messages were received from the Senate:
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned:
H. F. No. 2160, A bill for an act relating to public safety; permitting law enforcement to take fingerprints of an offender interacting with the criminal justice system for any offense to eliminate a suspense record; amending Minnesota Statutes 2011 Supplement, section 299C.10, subdivision 1.
Cal R. Ludeman, Secretary of the Senate
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned:
H. F. No. 2174, A bill for an act relating to local government finance; authorizing certain investments; providing for designated depositories; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 123B.14, subdivision 3; 366.01, subdivision 4; 385.07; 427.06.
Cal R. Ludeman, Secretary of the Senate
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned:
H. F. No. 2373, A bill for an act relating to public safety; extending the felony of fraudulent or other improper finance statements to include retaliation against a sheriff or county recorder for performance of official duties regarding real property; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 609.7475, subdivision 3.
Cal R. Ludeman, Secretary of the Senate
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate has concurred in and adopted the report of the Conference Committee on:
S. F. No. 247.
The Senate has repassed said bill in accordance with the recommendation and report of the Conference Committee. Said Senate File is herewith transmitted to the House.
Cal R. Ludeman, Secretary of the Senate
CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON S. F. NO. 247
A bill for an act relating to insurance; regulating service cooperative refunds; requiring local government employees to approve participation in or withdrawal from the public employees insurance program; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 43A.316, subdivision 5; 123A.21, by adding a subdivision; 471.611, subdivision 2.
April 2, 2012
The Honorable Michelle L. Fischbach
President of the Senate
The Honorable Kurt Zellers
Speaker of the House of Representatives
We, the undersigned conferees for S. F. No. 247 report that we have agreed upon the items in dispute and recommend as follows:
That the House recede from its amendment.
We request the adoption of this report and repassage of the bill.
Senate Conferees: Gary H. Dahms, Claire A. Robling and Kathy Sheran.
House Conferees: Joe Hoppe, Kathy Brynaert and Mindy Greiling.
Hoppe moved that the report of the
Conference Committee on S. F. No. 247 be adopted and that the
bill be repassed as amended by the Conference Committee. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 247, A bill for an act relating to insurance; regulating service cooperative refunds; requiring local government employees to approve participation in or withdrawal from the public employees insurance program; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 43A.316, subdivision 5; 123A.21, by adding a subdivision; 471.611, subdivision 2.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended by Conference, and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 76 yeas and 57 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Brynaert
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Dean
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Greiling
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mariani
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davids
Davnie
Dill
Eken
Falk
Fritz
Gauthier
Greene
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Knuth
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Marquart
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Winkler
The bill was repassed, as amended by
Conference, and its title agreed to.
The
Speaker resumed the Chair.
Mr.
Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following Senate Files, herewith transmitted:
S. F. Nos. 1921, 1199 and 2187.
Cal R. Ludeman,
Secretary of the Senate
FIRST READING OF
SENATE BILLS
S. F. No. 1921, A bill for an act relating to health; requiring licensure of certain facilities that perform abortions; requiring a licensing fee; appropriating money; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 145.
The bill was read for the first time.
Holberg moved that S. F. No. 1921 and H. F. No. 2340, now on the General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 1199, A bill for an act relating to labor and employment; modifying prevailing wage provisions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 177.42, subdivision 4; 177.43, subdivision 7.
The bill was read for the first time.
Scott moved that S. F. No. 1199 and H. F. No. 1476, now on the General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 2187, A resolution memorializing the President and Congress to enact legislation and take other federal government action related to interim storage of used nuclear fuel.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Environment, Energy and Natural Resources Policy and Finance.
CALENDAR FOR THE DAY
H. F. No. 358 was reported to the House.
H. F. No. 358 was read for the third time.
The Speaker called Davids to the Chair.
Fritz and Allen were excused for the
remainder of today's session.
POINT OF
ORDER
Winkler raised a point of order pursuant
to rule 4.13 relating to Bills Affecting State Government Powers and Structure.
Speaker pro tempore Davids submitted the
following question to the House:
"Is it the judgment of the House that the Winkler point of order is
well taken?"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The vote was taken on the question
"Is it the judgment of the House that the Winkler point of order is well
taken?" and the roll was called.
There were 64 yeas and 67 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Downey
Eken
Falk
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Knuth
Laine
Lanning
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Mazorol
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Petersen, B.
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slawik
Slocum
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lohmer
Mack
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
So it was the judgment of the House that the Winkler point of order was not well taken.
The
Speaker resumed the Chair.
Slawik was excused for the remainder of
today's session.
H. F. No. 358, A bill for an act relating to law enforcement; prohibiting immigration law enforcement noncooperation ordinances and policies; providing for use of immigration-related data; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 13; 299A.
The bill was placed upon its final
passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 77 yeas and 52 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Dittrich
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Eken
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kath
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lenczewski
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Marquart
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Scalze
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Falk
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Knuth
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Simon
Slocum
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Winkler
The
bill was passed and its title agreed to.
Knuth was excused for the remainder of
today's session.
FISCAL CALENDAR
Pursuant to rule 1.22, Holberg requested
immediate consideration of H. F. No. 2580.
H. F. No. 2580 was reported
to the House.
Loon moved to amend H. F. No. 2580, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 1, line 18, after "arrangement" insert "in this paragraph" and delete "under section"
Page 1, delete line 19
Page 1, line 20, delete everything before the fourth comma
Page 2, line 24, delete "persistently lowest performing" and insert ""Priority""
Page 2, line 29, delete "persistently low-performing" and insert ""Priority""
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
H. F. No. 2580, A bill for an act relating to education; empowering parents to request a school district intervene in a "Priority" school; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 120B.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 72 yeas and 57 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Anderson, B.
Anderson, D.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Banaian
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bills
Buesgens
Cornish
Crawford
Daudt
Davids
Dean
Dettmer
Doepke
Downey
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Gottwalt
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Holberg
Hoppe
Howes
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kiffmeyer
Kriesel
Lanning
Leidiger
LeMieur
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mazorol
McDonald
McElfatrick
McFarlane
McNamara
Murdock
Murray
Myhra
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Peppin
Petersen, B.
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Shimanski
Smith
Stensrud
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Wardlow
Westrom
Woodard
Spk. Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Brynaert
Carlson
Champion
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dittrich
Eken
Falk
Gauthier
Greene
Greiling
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hilty
Hornstein
Hortman
Hosch
Huntley
Johnson
Kahn
Kath
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Melin
Moran
Morrow
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Peterson, S.
Poppe
Rukavina
Scalze
Simon
Slocum
Thissen
Tillberry
Wagenius
Ward
Winkler
The
bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
CALENDAR FOR THE
DAY, Continued
Dean moved that the remaining bills on the
Calendar for the Day be continued. The
motion prevailed.
REPORTS
FROM THE COMMITTEE ON
RULES
AND LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATION
Dean for the
Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration offered the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
Be It Resolved,
by the House of Representatives of the State of Minnesota, that it retains the
use of the Speaker's parking place in front of the capitol building just east
of the porte-cochère and parking lots B, C, D, N, O and the state office
building parking ramp for members and employees of the House of Representatives
during the time between adjournment in 2012 and the convening of the House of
Representatives in 2013. The Sergeant at
Arms is directed to manage the use of the lots and ramp while the House of
Representatives is adjourned. The
Controller of the House may continue to deduct from the check of any legislator
or legislative employee a sum adequate to cover the exercise of the parking
privilege.
The motion
prevailed and the resolution was adopted.
Dean for the
Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration offered the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
Be It Resolved, by the House of
Representatives of the State of Minnesota, that the Chief Clerk is directed to
correct and approve the Journal of the House for the last day of the 2012 Regular
Session.
Be It Further
Resolved that the Chief Clerk is authorized to include in the Journal for
the last day of the 2012 Regular Session any proceedings, including subsequent
proceedings and any legislative interim committees or commissions created or
appointments made to them by legislative action or by law.
The motion
prevailed and the resolution was adopted.
Dean for the
Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration offered the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
Be It Resolved,
by the House of Representatives of the State of Minnesota, that during the time
between adjournment in 2012 and the convening of the House of Representatives
in 2013, the Chief Clerk and Chief Sergeant at Arms under the direction of the
Speaker shall maintain House facilities in the Capitol Complex. The House chamber, retiring room, hearing and
conference rooms, and offices shall be set up and made ready for legislative
use and reserved for the House and its committees. Those rooms may be reserved for use by others
that are not in conflict with use by the House.
The House Chamber, retiring room, and hearing rooms may be used by YMCA
Youth in Government, Girls' State, Young Leaders Organization, and 4-H Leadership
Conference.
The motion prevailed
and the resolution was adopted.
FISCAL
CALENDAR ANNOUNCEMENT
Pursuant to rule 1.22, Holberg announced
her intention to place S. F. No. 506;
H. F. Nos. 2729, 2958, 2754, 1721 and 2786;
S. F. No. 1573; and H. F. No. 1284 on the Fiscal
Calendar for Thursday, April 19, 2012.
MOTIONS AND
RESOLUTIONS
Leidiger moved that the name of Kiffmeyer
be added as an author on H. F. No. 518. The motion prevailed.
Clark moved that the names of Moran and
Allen be added as authors on H. F. No. 1902. The motion prevailed.
Atkins moved that his name be stricken as
an author on H. F. No. 2500.
The motion prevailed.
Liebling moved that the name of Abeler be
added as an author on H. F. No. 2713. The motion prevailed.
Loon moved that the name of Mack be added
as an author on H. F. No. 2729.
The motion prevailed.
Mahoney moved that the name of McNamara be
added as an author on H. F. No. 2995. The motion prevailed.
Quam moved that the name of Rukavina be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3001. The motion prevailed.
Kriesel moved that
S. F. No. 1856 be recalled from the Committee on Commerce and
Regulatory Reform and be re-referred to the Committee on Taxes. The motion prevailed.
ADJOURNMENT
Dean moved that when the House adjourns
today it adjourn until 10:00 a.m., Thursday, April 19, 2012. The motion prevailed.
Dean moved that the House adjourn. The motion prevailed, and the Speaker
declared the House stands adjourned until 10:00 a.m., Thursday, April 19, 2012.
Albin
A. Mathiowetz,
Chief Clerk, House of Representatives