STATE OF
MINNESOTA
EIGHTY-EIGHTH
SESSION - 2013
_____________________
FORTY-FIRST
DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Monday, April 22, 2013
The House of Representatives convened at
12:00 noon and was called to order by Paul Thissen, Speaker of the House.
Prayer was offered by the Reverend Dwayne
Gibson, Chisago Lakes Baptist Church, Chisago City, Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge
of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
The roll was called and the following
members were present:
Abeler
Albright
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Falk
Faust
Fischer
FitzSimmons
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zellers
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
A quorum was present.
Barrett was excused until 2:10 p.m.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the
Journal of the preceding day. There
being no objection, further reading of the Journal was dispensed with and the
Journal was approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk.
REPORTS OF CHIEF CLERK
S. F. No. 324 and
H. F. No. 441, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical.
Hilstrom moved that
S. F. No. 324 be substituted for H. F. No. 441
and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 422 and
H. F. No. 704, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical.
Hilstrom moved that
S. F. No. 422 be substituted for H. F. No. 704
and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 683 and
H. F. No. 817, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical.
Myhra moved that
S. F. No. 683 be substituted for H. F. No. 817
and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 834 and
H. F. No. 440, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical.
Hilstrom moved that
S. F. No. 834 be substituted for H. F. No. 440
and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.
SECOND READING
OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. Nos. 324, 422, 683
and 834 were read for the second time.
INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF
HOUSE BILLS
The
following House Files were introduced:
Woodard; Erickson, S.; Johnson, B.; Dean, M.; Hoppe and Kresha introduced:
H. F. No. 1793, A bill for an act relating to education finance; prohibiting unfunded mandates; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 126C.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Education Policy.
Dehn, R., and Kahn introduced:
H. F.
No. 1794, A bill for an act relating to liquor; modifying food service
requirements in Minneapolis and St. Paul.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection Finance and Policy.
Bernardy, Erhardt, Sawatzky, Abeler and Atkins introduced:
H. F. No. 1795, A bill for an act relating to transportation; providing for disability parking for vehicles bearing special World War II veteran plates; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 169.345, subdivisions 1, 2; 169.346, subdivision 1.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Transportation Policy.
Erhardt introduced:
H. F. No. 1796, A bill for an act relating to public safety; traffic regulations; modifying speed limits in work zones; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 169.14, subdivision 5d.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Transportation Policy.
McNamar introduced:
H. F. No. 1797, A bill for an act relating to human services; providing an increase to nursing facility rates; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 256B.434, subdivision 19; Laws 2008, chapter 363, article 18, section 3, subdivision 6.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Health and Human Services Finance.
Kiel introduced:
H. F. No. 1798, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; appropriating money for the University of Minnesota, Crookston wellness center; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Higher Education Finance and Policy.
Metsa introduced:
H. F. No. 1799, A bill for an act relating to workers' compensation; adopting recommendations of the Workers' Compensation Advisory Council; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 176.011, subdivisions 15, 16; 176.081, subdivisions 1, 7; 176.101, subdivision 1; 176.102, subdivisions 5, 10; 176.106, subdivision 3; 176.136, subdivision 1b; 176.191, subdivision 3; 176.645; 176.83, subdivision 5.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Labor, Workplace and Regulated Industries.
Kahn introduced:
H. F. No. 1800, A bill for an act relating to pensions; adjusting benefits for certain former members of a local salaried police and fire relief association; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 353A.08, by adding a subdivision.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Government Operations.
MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE
The
following message was received from the Senate:
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following Senate Files, herewith transmitted:
S. F. Nos. 523 and 1307.
JoAnne M. Zoff,
Secretary of the Senate
FIRST READING OF
SENATE BILLS
S. F. No. 523, A bill for an act relating to employment; limiting reliance on criminal history for employment purposes; providing for remedies; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 181.53; 181.981, subdivision 1; 364.021; 364.06; 364.09; 364.10.
The bill was read for the first time.
Mahoney moved that S. F. No. 523 and H. F. No. 690, now on the General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 1307, A bill for an act relating to human rights; changing provisions for certain certificates of compliance; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 363A.36, subdivision 1; 363A.37; repealing Minnesota Rules, part 5000.3560, subparts 2, 3.
The bill was read for the first time.
Schoen moved that S. F. No. 1307 and H. F. No. 1182, now on the General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
Murphy,
E., moved that the House recess subject to the call of the Chair. The motion prevailed.
RECESS
RECONVENED
The House reconvened and was called to
order by the Speaker.
CALENDAR FOR THE DAY
H. F. No. 1233 was reported
to the House.
Morgan moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 157, delete section 3 and insert:
"Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 256.969, subdivision 3a, is amended to read:
Subd. 3a. Payments. (a) Acute care hospital billings under
the medical assistance program must not be submitted until the recipient is
discharged. However, the commissioner
shall establish monthly interim payments for inpatient hospitals that have
individual patient lengths of stay over 30 days regardless of diagnostic
category. Except as provided in section
256.9693, medical assistance reimbursement for treatment of mental illness
shall be reimbursed based on diagnostic classifications. Individual hospital payments established
under this section and sections 256.9685, 256.9686, and 256.9695, in addition
to third-party and recipient liability, for discharges occurring during the
rate year shall not exceed, in aggregate, the charges for the medical
assistance covered inpatient services paid for the same period of time to the
hospital. This payment limitation
shall be calculated separately for medical assistance and general assistance
medical care services. The limitation on
general assistance medical care shall be effective for admissions occurring on
or after July 1, 1991. Services that
have rates established under subdivision 11 or 12, must be limited separately
from other services. After consulting
with the affected hospitals, the commissioner may consider related hospitals
one entity and may merge the payment rates while maintaining separate provider
numbers. The operating and property base
rates per admission or per day shall be derived from the best Medicare and
claims data available when rates are established. The commissioner shall determine the best
Medicare and claims data, taking into consideration variables of recency of the
data, audit disposition, settlement status, and the ability to set rates in a
timely manner. The commissioner shall
notify hospitals of payment rates by December 1 of the year preceding the rate
year. The rate setting data must reflect
the admissions data used to establish relative values. Base year changes from 1981 to the base year
established for the rate year beginning January 1, 1991, and for subsequent
rate years, shall not be limited to the limits ending June 30, 1987, on the
maximum rate of increase under subdivision 1.
The commissioner may adjust base year cost, relative value, and case mix
index data to exclude the costs of services that have been discontinued by the
October 1 of the year preceding the rate year or that are paid separately from
inpatient services. Inpatient stays that
encompass portions of two or more rate years shall have payments established
based on payment rates in effect at the time of admission unless the date of
admission preceded the rate year in effect by six months or more. In this case, operating payment rates for
services rendered during the rate year in effect and established based on the
date of admission shall be adjusted to the rate year in effect by the hospital
cost index.
(b) For fee-for-service admissions occurring on or after July 1, 2002, the total payment, before third-party liability and spenddown, made to hospitals for inpatient services is reduced by .5 percent from the current statutory rates.
(c) In addition to the reduction in paragraph (b), the total payment for fee-for-service admissions occurring on or after July 1, 2003, made to hospitals for inpatient services before third-party liability and spenddown, is reduced five percent from the current statutory rates. Mental health services within diagnosis related groups 424 to 432, and facilities defined under subdivision 16 are excluded from this paragraph.
(d) In addition to the reduction in
paragraphs (b) and (c), the total payment for fee-for-service admissions
occurring on or after August 1, 2005, made to hospitals for inpatient services
before third-party liability and spenddown, is reduced 6.0 percent from the
current statutory rates. Mental health
services within diagnosis related groups 424 to 432 and facilities defined
under subdivision 16 are excluded from this paragraph. Notwithstanding
section 256.9686, subdivision
7, for purposes of this paragraph, medical assistance does not include general
assistance medical care. Payments made
to managed care plans shall be reduced for services provided on or after
January 1, 2006, to reflect this reduction.
(e) In addition to the reductions in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d), the total payment for fee-for-service admissions occurring on or after July 1, 2008, through June 30, 2009, made to hospitals for inpatient services before third-party liability and spenddown, is reduced 3.46 percent from the current statutory rates. Mental health services with diagnosis related groups 424 to 432 and facilities defined under subdivision 16 are excluded from this paragraph. Payments made to managed care plans shall be reduced for services provided on or after January 1, 2009, through June 30, 2009, to reflect this reduction.
(f) In addition to the reductions in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d), the total payment for fee-for-service admissions occurring on or after July 1, 2009, through June 30, 2011, made to hospitals for inpatient services before third-party liability and spenddown, is reduced 1.9 percent from the current statutory rates. Mental health services with diagnosis related groups 424 to 432 and facilities defined under subdivision 16 are excluded from this paragraph. Payments made to managed care plans shall be reduced for services provided on or after July 1, 2009, through June 30, 2011, to reflect this reduction.
(g) In addition to the reductions in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d), the total payment for fee-for-service admissions occurring on or after July 1, 2011, made to hospitals for inpatient services before third-party liability and spenddown, is reduced 1.79 percent from the current statutory rates. Mental health services with diagnosis related groups 424 to 432 and facilities defined under subdivision 16 are excluded from this paragraph. Payments made to managed care plans shall be reduced for services provided on or after July 1, 2011, to reflect this reduction.
(h) In addition to the reductions in paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (f), and (g), the total payment for fee-for-service admissions occurring on or after July 1, 2009, made to hospitals for inpatient services before third-party liability and spenddown, is reduced one percent from the current statutory rates. Facilities defined under subdivision 16 are excluded from this paragraph. Payments made to managed care plans shall be reduced for services provided on or after October 1, 2009, to reflect this reduction.
(i) In addition to the reductions in paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (g), and (h), the total payment for fee-for-service admissions occurring on or after July 1, 2011, made to hospitals for inpatient services before third-party liability and spenddown, is reduced 1.96 percent from the current statutory rates. Facilities defined under subdivision 16 are excluded from this paragraph. Payments made to managed care plans shall be reduced for services provided on or after January 1, 2011, to reflect this reduction.
(j) In order to offset the rateable
reductions provided for in this subdivision, the total payment rate for medical
assistance admissions for non-government-owned hospitals occurring on or after
July 1, 2013, made to Minnesota hospitals for inpatient services before
third-party liability and spenddown, shall be increased by a dollar amount equivalent to 30 percent from the current
statutory rates, but the funds available shall be further distributed as
follows:
(1)
25 percent of available funding under this paragraph shall be for an across the
board inpatient services rate increase;
(2) nine percent of available funding
under this paragraph shall be to increase the medical assistance rates paid for
services at Minnesota non-government-owned hospitals above the 85th percentile
for patient days for patients under 18 years of age in calendar year 2012 of
all Minnesota private, nonprofit hospitals;
(3) two percent of available funding
under this paragraph shall be to increase the rates paid for medical assistance
admissions occurring on or after July 1, 2013, at Minnesota non-government-owned
hospitals above the 90th percentile for patient days for patients under 18
years of age in calendar year 2011 of all Minnesota private, nonprofit
hospitals for diagnosis-related groups 453 to 517, 533 to 541, 906, and 956;
(4) 14 percent of available
funding under this paragraph shall be to increase the medical assistance rates
paid for inpatient mental health and chemical dependency treatment services
under section 256.969, subdivision 21;
(5) 14 percent of available funding
under this paragraph shall be to increase the medical assistance rates paid for
inpatient birth and delivery services under section 256.969, subdivision 30;
(6) two percent of available funding
shall be to increase the rates paid to critical access hospitals, as designated
under section 144.1483, clause (9);
(7) 33 percent of available funding
under this paragraph shall be to increase the medical assistance inpatient
rates paid for services on or after July 1, 2013, at Minnesota non-government-owned
hospitals determined to have experienced the most significant losses of federal
Medicare funding in 2013; and
(8) one percent of available funding
under this paragraph shall be to increase the medical assistance rates paid for
services occurring on or after July 1, 2013, at Minnesota non-government-owned
hospitals verified by the American College of Surgeons as Level I trauma
centers.
The commissioner shall not adjust rates paid to a prepaid
health plan under contract with the commissioner to reflect payments provided
in this paragraph. The commissioner
shall adjust rates and payments in excess of the Medicare upper limits on
payments according to section 256.9685, subdivision 2.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2013."
McNamar moved to amend the Morgan amendment to H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 4, after line 26, insert:
"Page 185, after line 5, insert:
"Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 256.9657, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Nursing home license surcharge. (a) Effective July 1, 1993, each non-state-operated nursing home licensed under chapter 144A shall pay to the commissioner an annual surcharge according to the schedule in subdivision 4. The surcharge shall be calculated as $620 per licensed bed. If the number of licensed beds is reduced, the surcharge shall be based on the number of remaining licensed beds the second month following the receipt of timely notice by the commissioner of human services that beds have been delicensed. The nursing home must notify the commissioner of health in writing when beds are delicensed. The commissioner of health must notify the commissioner of human services within ten working days after receiving written notification. If the notification is received by the commissioner of human services by the 15th of the month, the invoice for the second following month must be reduced to recognize the delicensing of beds. Beds on layaway status continue to be subject to the surcharge. The commissioner of human services must acknowledge a medical care surcharge appeal within 30 days of receipt of the written appeal from the provider.
(b) Effective July 1, 1994, the surcharge in paragraph (a) shall be increased to $625.
(c) Effective August 15, 2002, the surcharge under paragraph (b) shall be increased to $990.
(d) Effective July 15, 2003, the surcharge under paragraph (c) shall be increased to $2,815.
(e) Effective July 15, 2015, the
surcharge under paragraph (d) shall be decreased to $2,375.
(e) (f) The
commissioner may reduce, and may subsequently restore, the surcharge under
paragraph (d) (e) based on the commissioner's determination of a
permissible surcharge.
(f) (g) Between April 1,
2002, and August 15, 2004 July 1, 2015, and June 30, 2016, a
facility governed by this subdivision may elect to assume full participation in
the medical assistance program by agreeing to comply with all of the
requirements of the medical assistance program, including the rate equalization
law in section 256B.48, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), and all other
requirements established in law or rule, and to begin intake of new medical
assistance recipients. Rates will be
determined under Minnesota Rules, parts 9549.0010 to 9549.0080. Rate calculations will be subject to limits
as prescribed in rule and law. Other
than the adjustments in sections 256B.431, subdivisions 30 and 32; 256B.437,
subdivision 3, paragraph (b), Minnesota Rules, part 9549.0057, and any other
applicable legislation enacted prior to the finalization of rates, facilities
assuming full participation in medical assistance under this paragraph are not
eligible for any rate adjustments until the July 1 following their settle-up
period.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2015.""
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
POINT OF
ORDER
Albright raised a point of order pursuant
to rule 3.21 that the McNamar amendment to the Morgan amendment to H. F. No. 1233,
the second engrossment, was
not in order.
The Speaker submitted the following
question to the House: "Is it the
judgment of the House that the Albright point of order is well taken?"
The vote was taken on the question
"Is it the judgment of the House that the Albright point of order is well
taken?" and the roll was called.
There were 60 yeas and 70 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
So it was the judgment of the House that the Albright point of order was not well taken and the McNamar amendment to the Morgan amendment to H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, was in order.
The question recurred on the McNamar amendment
to the Morgan amendment and the roll was called. There were 134 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Falk
Faust
Fischer
FitzSimmons
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zellers
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
The
motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was adopted.
MOTION TO
LAY ON THE TABLE
Daudt moved that the Morgan amendment, as
amended, to H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, be laid on
the table. The motion did not prevail.
Kiel was excused between the hours of 4:00
p.m. and 9:20 p.m.
CALL OF THE HOUSE
On the motion of Daudt and on the demand
of 10 members, a call of the House was ordered.
The following members answered to their names:
Abeler
Albright
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Falk
Faust
Fischer
FitzSimmons
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Laine
Leidiger
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zellers
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
Murphy, E., moved that further proceedings
of the roll call be suspended and that the Sergeant at Arms be instructed to
bring in the absentees. The motion
prevailed and it was so ordered.
The question recurred on the Morgan
amendment, as amended, to H. F. No. 1233, the second
engrossment. The motion prevailed and
the amendment, as amended, was adopted.
CALL OF
THE HOUSE LIFTED
Murphy, E., moved that the call of the
House be lifted. The motion prevailed
and it was so ordered.
Pursuant to rule 1.50, Murphy, E., moved
that the House be allowed to continue in session after 12:00 midnight. The motion prevailed.
Gruenhagen moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 156, line 22, after "2013," insert "through June 30, 2017,"
Page 156, line 23, after the period, insert "Beginning July 1, 2017, the surcharge shall revert to the percentage specified in paragraph (b)."
Page 159, line 31, after "2013," insert "through June 30, 2017,"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the
Gruenhagen amendment and the roll was called.
There were 133 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Falk
Faust
Fischer
FitzSimmons
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Laine
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zellers
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Gruenhagen moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 156, line 22, after "2013," insert "through June 30, 2015,"
Page 155, line 23, after the period, insert "Beginning July 1, 2015, the surcharge shall revert to the percentage specified in paragraph (b)."
Page 159, line 31, after "2013," insert "through June 30, 2015,"
Page 503, after line 17, insert:
"Transfer. $51,150,000 in fiscal year 2016 and $52,881,000 in fiscal year 2017 is transferred from the health care access fund to the general fund."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Gruenhagen amendment and the
roll was called. There were 59 yeas and
73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Norton moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 190, line 6, after "benefit" insert "to provide early intensive intervention to a child with an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis. This benefit shall be"
Page 190, line 9, delete "to"
Page 190, line 10, delete everything before the period
Page 190, line 17, delete everything after "of"
Page 190, delete lines 18 and 19 and insert "18."
Page 190, line 34, after the semicolon, insert "and"
Page 191, line 2, delete "; and" and insert a period
Page 191, delete line 3
Page 191, line 8, after the first comma, insert "or" and delete "or" and insert "and"
Page 191, line 13, delete "medical" and insert "licensed physician or nurse practitioner" and after "and" insert "a"
Page 191, line 16, after "information" insert "may be considered"
Page 191, line 19, delete "may be considered"
Page 192, line 20, delete "gains" and insert "goals"
Page 192, line 31, delete "gains" and insert "goals"
Page 192, line 34, after the first "appeal" insert "pursuant to section 256.045," and delete "have" and insert "has" and delete "pursuant to section" and insert "within ten days of receipt of notice of reduction or termination or before the effective date of the action."
Page 192, delete line 35
Page 193, line 8, after "details" insert "must"
Page 193, line 13, delete "function" and insert "functions"
Page 193, line 18, after "parents" insert "and caregivers"
Page 193, line 27, delete "medical" and insert "physicians, nurse practitioners,"
Page 193, line 29, delete "in order"
Page 193, line 30, delete "medical" and insert "physician or nurse practitioner" and after the first "and" insert "a"
Page 193, line 31, delete "so as to implement subdivision 4, paragraph"
Page 193, line 32, delete "(a),"
Page 194, delete lines 13 to 20
Page 194, line 21, before "9" insert "and" and delete "and 12,"
Page 506, delete lines 10 to 24
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Huntley moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 284, line 34, after "of" insert "30 hours of"
Page 285, line 34, delete everything after "(b)"
Page 285, delete line 35
Page 286, line 1, delete everything before "Training"
Page 286, delete lines 3 to 7
Page 286, line 8, delete "(5)" and insert "(1)"
Page 286, line 10, after "(ADLs)" insert "as defined under section 256B.0659, subdivision 1"
Page 286, line 11, delete "(6)" and insert "(2)"
Page 286, line 13, delete "(7)" and insert "(3)"
Page 286, line 14, after "(IADLs)" insert "as defined under section 256B.0659, subdivision 1"
Page 286, line 15, delete "(8)" and insert "(4)"
Page 287, line 26, delete "providing 24-hour"
Page 287, line 27, delete "care with corporate supervision"
Page 287, line 28, after "staff" insert "with fewer than five years of documented experience and 12 hours of annual training to direct service staff with five or more years of documented experience"
The motion
prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Kieffer and Ward, J.A., moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 490, after line 4, insert:
"Sec. 85. COMMENCE CONSTRUCTION.
The radiation therapy facility in Woodbury under Minnesota Statutes, section 144.5509, paragraph (b), must commence construction before December 31, 2013."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Kieffer and
Ward, J.A., amendment and
the roll was called. There were 58 yeas
and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Ward, J.A.
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Abeler moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 488, delete section 81 and insert:
"Sec. 81. LEVEL-1
TRAUMA CENTERS.
The commissioner of health, through the Office of Rural Health and Primary Care, and in consultation with the commissioner of human services, shall study the cost of maintaining a level of 24-hour readiness in a hospital designated as a level-1 trauma center under Minnesota Statutes, section 144.605, and shall present recommendations to the legislature by December 15, 2013, on a state public programs level of readiness payment modifier for hospitals designated as level-1 trauma centers."
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Mullery moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 353, after line 12, insert:
"Subd. 11. Provider training. New and increased training requirements under this section must not be imposed on providers until the commissioner establishes statewide accessibility to the required provider training."
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Abeler moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 96, line 3, after "(b)" insert "In consultation with the Development and Implementation Council described in subdivision 21 and other stakeholders," and after "develop" insert "recommendations for" and after "ensure" insert "self-direction,"
Page 96, line 4, after "integrity" insert a comma and after the period, insert "The recommendations shall be provided to the chairs and ranking minority members of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over health and human services policy and finance by November 15, 2013."
Page 96, delete lines 26 to 36 and insert:
"Subd. 12. Requirements for initial enrollment of CFSS provider agencies. In consultation with the Development and Implementation Council described in subdivision 21 and other stakeholders, the commissioner shall develop CFSS provider enrollment standards which are consistent with federal requirements, reflect the principles of self-direction, and maintain program integrity. The recommendations shall be provided to the chairs and ranking minority members of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over health and human services policy and finance by November 15, 2013."
Delete page 97
Page 98, delete lines 1 to 11
Page 100, delete lines 29 to 36 and insert:
"Subd. 15. Documentation of support services provided. In consultation with the Development and Implementation Council described in subdivision 21 and other stakeholders, the commissioner shall develop recommendations for CFSS documentation standards which are consistent with federal requirements, reflect the principles of self-direction, and maintain program integrity. The recommendations shall be provided to the chairs and ranking minority members of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over health and human services policy and finance by November 15, 2013."
Page 101, delete lines 1 to 18
Page 102, delete lines 9 to 20 and insert:
"(b) In consultation with the
Development and Implementation Council described in subdivision 21 and other
stakeholders, the commissioner shall establish reasons for denying or
terminating a support worker's provider enrollment which shall:
(1) reflect the principles of
self-direction;
(2) support the participant's choice of
support workers; and
(3) maintain program integrity.
The recommendations for denial or termination of support worker enrollment shall be provided to the chairs and ranking minority members of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over health and human services policy and finance by November 15, 2013."
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Nornes moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 447, after line 3, insert:
"Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 144.551, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Restricted construction or modification. (a) The following construction or modification may not be commenced:
(1) any erection, building, alteration, reconstruction, modernization, improvement, extension, lease, or other acquisition by or on behalf of a hospital that increases the bed capacity of a hospital, relocates hospital beds from one physical facility, complex, or site to another, or otherwise results in an increase or redistribution of hospital beds within the state; and
(2) the establishment of a new hospital.
(b) This section does not apply to:
(1) construction or relocation within a county by a hospital, clinic, or other health care facility that is a national referral center engaged in substantial programs of patient care, medical research, and medical education meeting state and national needs that receives more than 40 percent of its patients from outside the state of Minnesota;
(2) a project for construction or modification for which a health care facility held an approved certificate of need on May 1, 1984, regardless of the date of expiration of the certificate;
(3) a project for which a certificate of need was denied before July 1, 1990, if a timely appeal results in an order reversing the denial;
(4) a project exempted from certificate of need requirements by Laws 1981, chapter 200, section 2;
(5) a project involving consolidation of pediatric specialty hospital services within the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area that would not result in a net increase in the number of pediatric specialty hospital beds among the hospitals being consolidated;
(6) a project involving the temporary relocation of pediatric-orthopedic hospital beds to an existing licensed hospital that will allow for the reconstruction of a new philanthropic, pediatric-orthopedic hospital on an existing site and that will not result in a net increase in the number of hospital beds. Upon completion of the reconstruction, the licenses of both hospitals must be reinstated at the capacity that existed on each site before the relocation;
(7) the relocation or redistribution of hospital beds within a hospital building or identifiable complex of buildings provided the relocation or redistribution does not result in: (i) an increase in the overall bed capacity at that site; (ii) relocation of hospital beds from one physical site or complex to another; or (iii) redistribution of hospital beds within the state or a region of the state;
(8) relocation or redistribution of hospital beds within a hospital corporate system that involves the transfer of beds from a closed facility site or complex to an existing site or complex provided that: (i) no more than 50 percent of the capacity of the closed facility is transferred; (ii) the capacity of the site or complex to which the beds are transferred does not increase by more than 50 percent; (iii) the beds are not transferred outside of a federal health systems agency boundary in place on July 1, 1983; and (iv) the relocation or redistribution does not involve the construction of a new hospital building;
(9) a construction project involving up to 35 new beds in a psychiatric hospital in Rice County that primarily serves adolescents and that receives more than 70 percent of its patients from outside the state of Minnesota;
(10) a project to replace a hospital or hospitals with a combined licensed capacity of 130 beds or less if: (i) the new hospital site is located within five miles of the current site; and (ii) the total licensed capacity of the replacement hospital, either at the time of construction of the initial building or as the result of future expansion, will not exceed 70 licensed hospital beds, or the combined licensed capacity of the hospitals, whichever is less;
(11) the relocation of licensed hospital beds from an existing state facility operated by the commissioner of human services to a new or existing facility, building, or complex operated by the commissioner of human services; from one regional treatment center site to another; or from one building or site to a new or existing building or site on the same campus;
(12) the construction or relocation of hospital beds operated by a hospital having a statutory obligation to provide hospital and medical services for the indigent that does not result in a net increase in the number of hospital beds, notwithstanding section 144.552, 27 beds, of which 12 serve mental health needs, may be transferred from Hennepin County Medical Center to Regions Hospital under this clause;
(13) a construction project involving the addition of up to 31 new beds in an existing nonfederal hospital in Beltrami County;
(14) a construction project involving the addition of up to eight new beds in an existing nonfederal hospital in Otter Tail County with 100 licensed acute care beds;
(15) a construction project involving the addition of 20 new hospital beds used for rehabilitation services in an existing hospital in Carver County serving the southwest suburban metropolitan area. Beds constructed under this clause shall not be eligible for reimbursement under medical assistance, general assistance medical care, or MinnesotaCare;
(16) a project for the construction or relocation of up to 20 hospital beds for the operation of up to two psychiatric facilities or units for children provided that the operation of the facilities or units have received the approval of the commissioner of human services;
(17) a project involving the addition of 14 new hospital beds to be used for rehabilitation services in an existing hospital in Itasca County;
(18) a project to add 20 licensed beds in existing space at a hospital in Hennepin County that closed 20 rehabilitation beds in 2002, provided that the beds are used only for rehabilitation in the hospital's current rehabilitation building. If the beds are used for another purpose or moved to another location, the hospital's licensed capacity is reduced by 20 beds;
(19) a critical access hospital established under section 144.1483, clause (9), and section 1820 of the federal Social Security Act, United States Code, title 42, section 1395i-4, that delicensed beds since enactment of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, Public Law 105-33, to the extent that the critical access hospital does not seek to exceed the maximum number of beds permitted such hospital under federal law;
(20) notwithstanding section 144.552, a project for the construction of a new hospital in the city of Maple Grove with a licensed capacity of up to 300 beds provided that:
(i) the project, including each hospital or health system that will own or control the entity that will hold the new hospital license, is approved by a resolution of the Maple Grove City Council as of March 1, 2006;
(ii) the entity that will hold the new hospital license will be owned or controlled by one or more not-for-profit hospitals or health systems that have previously submitted a plan or plans for a project in Maple Grove as required under section 144.552, and the plan or plans have been found to be in the public interest by the commissioner of health as of April 1, 2005;
(iii) the new hospital's initial inpatient services must include, but are not limited to, medical and surgical services, obstetrical and gynecological services, intensive care services, orthopedic services, pediatric services, noninvasive cardiac diagnostics, behavioral health services, and emergency room services;
(iv) the new hospital:
(A) will have the ability to provide and staff sufficient new beds to meet the growing needs of the Maple Grove service area and the surrounding communities currently being served by the hospital or health system that will own or control the entity that will hold the new hospital license;
(B) will provide uncompensated care;
(C) will provide mental health services, including inpatient beds;
(D) will be a site for workforce development for a broad spectrum of health-care-related occupations and have a commitment to providing clinical training programs for physicians and other health care providers;
(E) will demonstrate a commitment to quality care and patient safety;
(F) will have an electronic medical records system, including physician order entry;
(G) will provide a broad range of senior services;
(H) will provide emergency medical services that will coordinate care with regional providers of trauma services and licensed emergency ambulance services in order to enhance the continuity of care for emergency medical patients; and
(I) will be completed by December 31, 2009, unless delayed by circumstances beyond the control of the entity holding the new hospital license; and
(v) as of 30 days following submission of a written plan, the commissioner of health has not determined that the hospitals or health systems that will own or control the entity that will hold the new hospital license are unable to meet the criteria of this clause;
(21) a project approved under section 144.553;
(22) a project for the construction of a hospital with up to 25 beds in Cass County within a 20-mile radius of the state Ah-Gwah-Ching facility, provided the hospital's license holder is approved by the Cass County Board;
(23) a project for an acute care hospital
in Fergus Falls that will increase the bed capacity from 108 to 110 beds by
increasing the rehabilitation bed capacity from 14 to 16 and closing a
separately licensed 13-bed skilled nursing facility; or
(24) notwithstanding section 144.552, a
project for the construction and expansion of a specialty psychiatric hospital
in Hennepin County for up to 50 beds, exclusively for patients who are under 21
years of age on the date of admission. The
commissioner conducted a public interest review of the mental health needs of
Minnesota and the Twin Cities metropolitan area in 2008. No further public interest review shall be
conducted for the construction or expansion project under this clause; or
(25) a project for the construction of a psychiatric hospital in the Perham Hospital District with up to 12 beds, intended primarily for patients who are 55 years of age and older on the date of admission."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Nornes
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 63 yeas and 70 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Dill
Drazkowski
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dorholt
Erhardt
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Nornes moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 506, after line 5, insert:
"Northern Connections. Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes,
section 295.581, $100,000 in
fiscal 2014 and $100,000 in fiscal year 2015 is appropriated from the health
care access fund to the commissioner of human services for a grant to
Northern Connections in Perham for a workforce program that provides one-stop
supportive services to individuals as they transition into the workforce.
Amend the appropriations by the specified amounts and correct the totals and the appropriations by fund accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Nornes
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 60 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kieffer
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
The Speaker called Hortman to the Chair.
Mack moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 505, after line 13, insert:
"Transfer. The
allocation from the health care access fund to the Minnesota Marketplace for
MinnesotaCare-related operations and technology costs is reduced by $50,000 in
fiscal year 2014 and $101,000 in fiscal year 2015 and transferred to the
general fund.
Adoption and Relative Custody Assistance Rate Increase. $50,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $101,000 in fiscal year 2015 is appropriated from the general fund to the commissioner of human services to provide a two percent rate increase for adoption and relative custody assistance grants."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Mack
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 60 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Abeler moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 184, after line 13, insert:
"Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 252.27, subdivision 2a, is amended to read:
Subd. 2a. Contribution amount. (a) The natural or adoptive parents of a minor child, including a child determined eligible for medical assistance without consideration of parental income, must contribute to the cost of services used by making monthly payments on a sliding scale based on income, unless the child is married or has been married, parental rights have been terminated, or the child's adoption is subsidized according to section 259.67 or through title IV-E of the Social Security Act. The parental contribution is a partial or full payment for medical services provided for diagnostic, therapeutic, curing, treating, mitigating, rehabilitation, maintenance, and personal care services as defined in United States Code, title 26, section 213, needed by the child with a chronic illness or disability.
(b) For households with adjusted gross income equal to or greater than 100 percent of federal poverty guidelines, the parental contribution shall be computed by applying the following schedule of rates to the adjusted gross income of the natural or adoptive parents:
(1) if the adjusted gross income is equal to or greater than 100 percent of federal poverty guidelines and less than 175 percent of federal poverty guidelines, the parental contribution is $4 per month;
(2) if the adjusted gross income is equal to or greater than 175 percent of federal poverty guidelines and less than or equal to 545 percent of federal poverty guidelines, the parental contribution shall be determined using a sliding fee scale established by the commissioner of human services which begins at one percent of adjusted gross income at 175 percent of federal poverty guidelines and increases to 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income for those with adjusted gross income up to 545 percent of federal poverty guidelines;
(3) if the adjusted gross income is greater than 545 percent of federal poverty guidelines and less than 675 percent of federal poverty guidelines, the parental contribution shall be 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income;
(4) if the adjusted gross income is equal to or greater than 675 percent of federal poverty guidelines and less than 975 percent of federal poverty guidelines, the parental contribution shall be determined using a sliding fee scale established by the commissioner of human services which begins at 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income at 675 percent of federal poverty guidelines and increases to ten percent of adjusted gross income for those with adjusted gross income up to 975 percent of federal poverty guidelines; and
(5) if the adjusted gross income is equal to or greater than 975 percent of federal poverty guidelines, the parental contribution shall be 12.5 percent of adjusted gross income.
If the child lives with the parent, the annual adjusted gross income is reduced by $2,400 prior to calculating the parental contribution. If the child resides in an institution specified in section 256B.35, the parent is responsible for the personal needs allowance specified under that section in addition to the parental contribution determined under this section. The parental contribution is reduced by any amount required to be paid directly to the child pursuant to a court order, but only if actually paid.
(c) The household size to be used in determining the amount of contribution under paragraph (b) includes natural and adoptive parents and their dependents, including the child receiving services. Adjustments in the contribution amount due to annual changes in the federal poverty guidelines shall be implemented on the first day of July following publication of the changes.
(d) For purposes of paragraph (b), "income" means the adjusted gross income of the natural or adoptive parents determined according to the previous year's federal tax form, except, effective retroactive to July 1, 2003, taxable capital gains to the extent the funds have been used to purchase a home shall not be counted as income.
(e) The contribution shall be explained in writing to the parents at the time eligibility for services is being determined. The contribution shall be made on a monthly basis effective with the first month in which the child receives services. Annually upon redetermination or at termination of eligibility, if the contribution exceeded the cost of services provided, the local agency or the state shall reimburse that excess amount to the parents, either by direct reimbursement if the parent is no longer required to pay a contribution, or by a reduction in or waiver of parental fees until the excess amount is exhausted. All reimbursements must include a notice that the amount reimbursed may be taxable income if the parent paid for the parent's fees through an employer's health care flexible spending account under the Internal Revenue Code, section 125, and that the parent is responsible for paying the taxes owed on the amount reimbursed.
(f) The monthly contribution amount must be reviewed at least every 12 months; when there is a change in household size; and when there is a loss of or gain in income from one month to another in excess of ten percent. The local agency shall mail a written notice 30 days in advance of the effective date of a change in the contribution amount. A decrease in the contribution amount is effective in the month that the parent verifies a reduction in income or change in household size.
(g) Parents of a minor child who do not live with each other shall each pay the contribution required under paragraph (a). An amount equal to the annual court-ordered child support payment actually paid on behalf of the child receiving services shall be deducted from the adjusted gross income of the parent making the payment prior to calculating the parental contribution under paragraph (b).
(h) The contribution under paragraph (b) shall be increased by an additional five percent if the local agency determines that insurance coverage is available but not obtained for the child. For purposes of this section, "available" means the insurance is a benefit of employment for a family member at an annual cost of no more than five percent of the family's annual income. For purposes of this section, "insurance" means health and accident insurance coverage, enrollment in a nonprofit health service plan, health maintenance organization, self-insured plan, or preferred provider organization.
Parents who have more than one child receiving services shall not be required to pay more than the amount for the child with the highest expenditures. There shall be no resource contribution from the parents. The parent shall not be required to pay a contribution in excess of the cost of the services provided to the child, not counting payments made to school districts for education-related services. Notice of an increase in fee payment must be given at least 30 days before the increased fee is due.
(i) The
contribution under paragraph (b) shall be reduced by $300 per fiscal year if,
in the 12 months prior to July 1:
(1) the parent applied for insurance for the child;
(2) the insurer denied insurance;
(3) the parents submitted a complaint or appeal, in writing to the insurer, submitted a complaint or appeal, in writing, to the commissioner of health or the commissioner of commerce, or litigated the complaint or appeal; and
(4) as a result of the dispute, the insurer reversed its decision and granted insurance.
For purposes of this section, "insurance" has the meaning given in paragraph (h).
A parent who has requested a reduction in the contribution amount under this paragraph shall submit proof in the form and manner prescribed by the commissioner or county agency, including, but not limited to, the insurer's denial of insurance, the written letter or complaint of the parents, court documents, and the written response of the insurer approving insurance. The determinations of the commissioner or county agency under this paragraph are not rules subject to chapter 14.
(j) Notwithstanding paragraph
(b), for the period from July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2015 2013, the
parental contribution shall be computed by applying the following contribution
schedule to the adjusted gross income of the natural or adoptive parents:
(1) if the adjusted gross income is equal to or greater than 100 percent of federal poverty guidelines and less than 175 percent of federal poverty guidelines, the parental contribution is $4 per month;
(2) if the adjusted gross income is equal to or greater than 175 percent of federal poverty guidelines and less than or equal to 525 percent of federal poverty guidelines, the parental contribution shall be determined using a sliding fee scale established by the commissioner of human services which begins at one percent of adjusted gross income at 175 percent of federal poverty guidelines and increases to eight percent of adjusted gross income for those with adjusted gross income up to 525 percent of federal poverty guidelines;
(3) if the adjusted gross income is greater than 525 percent of federal poverty guidelines and less than 675 percent of federal poverty guidelines, the parental contribution shall be 9.5 percent of adjusted gross income;
(4) if the adjusted gross income is equal to or greater than 675 percent of federal poverty guidelines and less than 900 percent of federal poverty guidelines, the parental contribution shall be determined using a sliding fee scale established by the commissioner of human services which begins at 9.5 percent of adjusted gross income at 675 percent of federal poverty guidelines and increases to 12 percent of adjusted gross income for those with adjusted gross income up to 900 percent of federal poverty guidelines; and
(5) if the adjusted gross income is equal to or greater than 900 percent of federal poverty guidelines, the parental contribution shall be 13.5 percent of adjusted gross income. If the child lives with the parent, the annual adjusted gross income is reduced by $2,400 prior to calculating the parental contribution. If the child resides in an institution specified in section 256B.35, the parent is responsible for the personal needs allowance specified under that section in addition to the parental contribution determined under this section. The parental contribution is reduced by any amount required to be paid directly to the child pursuant to a court order, but only if actually paid.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective June 30, 2013."
Page 503, after line 17, insert:
"Transfer
of Reserves. The allocation
from the health care access fund to the Minnesota Insurance Marketplace for
MinnesotaCare-related operations and technology costs is reduced by $556,000 in
fiscal year 2014 and $556,000 in fiscal year 2015. These amounts are transferred from the health
care access fund to the general fund.
TEFRA Parental Fees. $556,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $556,000 in fiscal year 2015 is appropriated from the general fund to the commissioner of human services for the reduction of TEFRA parental fees under Minnesota Statutes, section 252.27, subdivision 2a."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
Adjust amounts accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Abeler amendment and the
roll was called. There were 65 yeas and
68 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Masin
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Franson moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 338, after line 14, insert:
"Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 119B.13, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Subsidy restrictions. (a) Beginning October 31, 2011 July
1, 2013, the maximum rate paid for child care assistance in any county or
multicounty region under the child care fund shall be the rate for like-care
arrangements in the county effective July 1, 2006 2012, decreased
increased by 2.5 two percent.
(b) Biennially, beginning in 2012, the commissioner shall survey rates charged by child care providers in Minnesota to determine the 75th percentile for like-care arrangements in counties. When the commissioner determines that, using the commissioner's established protocol, the number of providers responding to the survey is too small to determine the 75th percentile rate for like-care arrangements in a county or multicounty region, the commissioner may establish the 75th percentile maximum rate based on like-care arrangements in a county, region, or category that the commissioner deems to be similar.
(c) A rate which includes a special needs rate paid under subdivision 3 or under a school readiness service agreement paid under section 119B.231, may be in excess of the maximum rate allowed under this subdivision.
(d) The department shall monitor the effect of this paragraph on provider rates. The county shall pay the provider's full charges for every child in care up to the maximum established. The commissioner shall determine the maximum rate for each type of care on an hourly, full-day, and weekly basis, including special needs and disability care. The maximum payment to a provider for one day of care must not exceed the daily rate. The maximum payment to a provider for one week of care must not exceed the weekly rate.
(e) Child care providers receiving reimbursement under this chapter must not be paid activity fees or an additional amount above the maximum rates for care provided during nonstandard hours for families receiving assistance.
(f) When the provider charge is greater than the maximum provider rate allowed, the parent is responsible for payment of the difference in the rates in addition to any family co-payment fee.
(g) All maximum provider rates changes shall be implemented on the Monday following the effective date of the maximum provider rate."
Page 500, after line 7, insert:
"MAXIS. Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 295.581, $10,000 in fiscal year 2014 is appropriated from the general fund to the commissioner of human services for systems costs associated with the child care provider rate increase under Minnesota Statutes, section 119B.13, subdivision 1."
Page 501, after line 8, insert:
"MinnesotaCare Exchange Transfer. The allocation from the health care access fund to the Minnesota Insurance Marketplace for MinnesotaCare-related operations and technology costs is reduced by $1,945,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $4,658,000 in fiscal year 2015. These amounts are transferred from the health care access fund to the general fund."
Page 501, after line 33, insert:
"MFIP Child Care Provider Increase. $1,777,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $2,839,000 in fiscal year 2015 is appropriated from the general fund to the commissioner of human services for the child care provider rate increase under Minnesota Statutes, section 119B.13, subdivision 1."
Page 504, after line 17, insert:
"Basic Sliding Fee Child Care Provider Increase. $758,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $1,819,000 in fiscal year 2015 is appropriated from the general fund to the commissioner of human services for the child care provider rate increase under Minnesota Statutes, section 119B.13, subdivision 1."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
Adjust amounts accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Franson amendment and the
roll was called. There were 66 yeas and
67 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Dill
Drazkowski
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dorholt
Erhardt
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Rosenthal
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Schomacker moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 501, after line 8, insert:
"Transfer. The allocation from the health care access fund to the Minnesota Insurance Marketplace for MinnesotaCare-related operations and technology costs is reduced by $500,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $500,000 in fiscal year 2015 and an equal amount is transferred from the health care access fund to the general fund."
Page 505, line 31, delete "$25,000" and insert "$500,000"
Adjust amounts accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Schomacker amendment and the
roll was called. There were 60 yeas and
73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
McDonald moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 170, after line 16, insert:
"Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 256B.0625, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 61. Payment for multiple services provided on the same day. The commissioner shall not prohibit payment, including supplemental payments, for mental health services or dental services provided to a patient by a federally qualified health center, federally qualified health center look-alike, or a rural health clinic, solely because the mental health or dental services were provided on the same day as other covered health services furnished by the same provider."
Page 179, delete section 22
Page 503, after line 11, insert:
"Transfer. Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 295.581, $66,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $158,000 in fiscal year 2015 is appropriated from the health care access fund to the commissioner of human services to implement Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.0625, subdivision 61."
Page 510, line 22, delete "$20,000,000" and insert "$19,934,000"
Page 510, line 23, delete "$25,000,000" and insert "$24,842,000"
Adjust amounts accordingly
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the McDonald
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 60 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Albright moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 510, line 22, delete "$20,000,000" and insert "$15,000,000"
Page 510, line 23, delete "$25,000,000" and insert "$20,000,000"
Page 512, after line 4, insert:
"Decade
of Discovery in Diabetes. (a)
$5,000,000 in each year from the health care access fund is for the Decade of
Discovery in Diabetes program to develop and implement a comprehensive program
to prevent, treat, and cure diabetes in Minnesota. The commissioner shall provide grants to the
University of Minnesota and the Mayo Clinic Foundation to enable these two
institutions to leverage expertise in diabetes prevention and treatment to
partner with the state's public and private sectors to develop:
(1) statewide prevention and care delivery
initiatives;
(2) basic, translational, and clinical
research;
(3) public education programs for health
care providers and patients; and
(4)
other transformative initiatives. This
appropriation is available until expended.
(b) The funds in paragraph (a) shall cover direct, indirect, and administrative costs of the program. The University of Minnesota and the Mayo Clinic Foundation shall submit a report annually to the chairs and ranking minority members of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over health and human services by June 30 of 2014 and 2015. The report shall address the progress of the criteria in paragraph (a) and the expenditure of funds."
Adjust amounts accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Albright
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 59 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Fabian
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Schomacker moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 159, after line 36, insert:
"(k) For admissions occurring on
or after July 1, 2014, the rate for inpatient hospital services must be
increased two percent from the rate in effect on June 30, 2014, for hospitals
located outside the eleven-county metropolitan area. Payments made to managed care and
county-based purchasing plans shall be adjusted to reflect payments under this
paragraph.
(l) For admissions occurring on or after July 1, 2015, the rate for inpatient hospital services must be increased five percent from the rate in effect on June 30, 2015, for hospitals located outside the eleven-county metropolitan area. Payments made to managed care and county-based purchasing plans shall be adjusted to reflect payments under this paragraph."
Page 503, after line 11, insert:
"Transfer. Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 295.581, $....... in fiscal year 2015 and $....... in fiscal year 2016 is appropriated from the health care access fund to the commissioner of human services to implement Minnesota Statutes, section 256.969, subdivision 39, paragraphs (k) and (l)."
Page 510, line 22, delete "$20,000,000" and insert "$......."
Page 510, line 23, delete "$25,000,000" and insert "$......."
Adjust amounts accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Schomacker moved to amend his amendment to H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 13, delete "$......." and insert "$2,876,000"
Page 1, line 14, delete everything after "2015" and insert "is"
Page 1, delete lines 20 and 21 and insert:
"Page 503, after line 11, insert:
"MinnesotaCare Exchange Transfer. The allocation from the health care access fund to the Minnesota Insurance Marketplace for MinnesotaCare-related operations and technology costs is reduced by $2,876,000 in fiscal year 2015. This amount is transferred from the health care access fund to the general fund.""
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was
taken on the amendment to the amendment and the roll was called. There
were 62 yeas and 71 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lien
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
The question recurred on the Schomacker amendment and the
roll was called. There were 64 yeas and
69 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lien
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Rosenthal
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Schomacker moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 159, after line 36, insert:
"(k) For admissions occurring on or after January 1, 2014, the rate for inpatient hospital services must be increased 2 percent from the rate in effect on December 31, 2013. Payments made to managed care and county-based purchasing plans shall be adjusted to reflect payments under this paragraph."
Page 503, after line 11, insert:
"Transfer. Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 295.581, $10,011,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $12,897,000 in fiscal year 2015 is appropriated from the health care access fund to the commissioner of human services to implement Minnesota Statutes, section 256.969, subdivision 39, paragraph (k)."
Page 510, line 22, delete "$20,000,000" and insert "$9,989,000"
Page 510, line 23, delete "$25,000,000" and insert "$12,103,000"
Adjust amounts accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Schomacker amendment and the
roll was called. There were 60 yeas and
73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Dean, M., moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 175, line 36, delete "five" and insert "seven"
Page 503, after line 11, insert:
"Transfer. Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 295.581, $641,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $836,000 in fiscal year 2015 is appropriated from the health care access fund to the commissioner of human services to implement Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.76, subdivision 2, paragraph (j)."
Page 510, line 22, delete "$20,000,000" and insert "$19,359,000"
Page 510, line 23, delete "$25,000,000" and insert "$24,164,000"
Adjust amounts accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Dean, M., amendment and the
roll was called. There were 61 yeas and
72 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Franson moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 338, after line 14, insert:
"Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 119B.011, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 19b. Student
parent. "Student
parent" means a person who is:
(1) under 21 years of age and has a
child;
(2) pursuing a high school or general
equivalency diploma;
(3) residing within a county that has a
basic sliding fee waiting list under section 119B.03, subdivision 4; and
(4) not an MFIP participant.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective November 11, 2013.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 119B.02, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 7. Child
care market rate survey. Biennially,
the commissioner shall survey prices charged by child care providers in
Minnesota to determine the 75th percentile for like-care arrangements in county
price clusters.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective September 16, 2013.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 119B.03, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Funding priority. (a) First priority for child care assistance under the basic sliding fee program must be given to eligible non-MFIP families who do not have a high school or general equivalency diploma or who need remedial and basic skill courses in order to pursue employment or to pursue education leading to employment and who need child care assistance to participate in the education program. This includes student parents as defined under section 119B.011, subdivision 19b. Within this priority, the following subpriorities must be used:
(1) child care needs of minor parents;
(2) child care needs of parents under 21 years of age; and
(3) child care needs of other parents within the priority group described in this paragraph.
(b) Second priority must be given to parents who have completed their MFIP or DWP transition year, or parents who are no longer receiving or eligible for diversionary work program supports.
(c) Third priority must be given to families who are eligible for portable basic sliding fee assistance through the portability pool under subdivision 9.
(d)
Fourth priority must be given to families in which at least one parent is a
veteran as defined under section 197.447.
(e) Families under paragraph (b) must be added to the basic sliding fee waiting list on the date they begin the transition year under section 119B.011, subdivision 20, and must be moved into the basic sliding fee program as soon as possible after they complete their transition year.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective November 11, 2013.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 119B.05, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Eligible participants. Families eligible for child care assistance under the MFIP child care program are:
(1) MFIP participants who are employed or in job search and meet the requirements of section 119B.10;
(2) persons who are members of transition year families under section 119B.011, subdivision 20, and meet the requirements of section 119B.10;
(3) families who are participating in employment orientation or job search, or other employment or training activities that are included in an approved employability development plan under section 256J.95;
(4) MFIP families who are participating in work job search, job support, employment, or training activities as required in their employment plan, or in appeals, hearings, assessments, or orientations according to chapter 256J;
(5) MFIP families who are participating in social services activities under chapter 256J as required in their employment plan approved according to chapter 256J;
(6) families who are participating in services or activities that are included in an approved family stabilization plan under section 256J.575;
(7)
families who are participating in programs as required in tribal contracts
under section 119B.02, subdivision 2, or 256.01, subdivision 2; and
(8) families who are participating in the
transition year extension under section 119B.011, subdivision 20a. ; and
(9) student parents as defined under
section 119B.011, subdivision 19b.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective November 11, 2013.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 119B.13, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Subsidy
restrictions. (a) Beginning October
31, 2011 September 16, 2013, the maximum rate paid for child care
assistance in any county or multicounty region county price cluster
under the child care fund shall be the rate for like-care arrangements in
the county effective July 1, 2006, decreased by 2.5 percent greater of
the 25th percentile of the 2011 child care provider rate survey or the maximum
rate effective November 28, 2011. The
commissioner may: (1) assign a county
with no reported provider prices to a similar price cluster; and (2) consider
county level access when determining final price clusters.
(b) Biennially, beginning in 2012, the
commissioner shall survey rates charged by child care providers in Minnesota to
determine the 75th percentile for like-care arrangements in counties. When the commissioner determines that, using
the commissioner's established protocol, the number of providers responding to
the survey is too small to determine the 75th percentile rate for like-care
arrangements in a county or multicounty region, the commissioner may establish
the 75th percentile maximum rate based on like-care arrangements in a county,
region, or category that the commissioner deems to be similar.
(c) (b) A rate which includes
a special needs rate paid under subdivision 3 or under a school readiness
service agreement paid under section 119B.231, may be in excess of the maximum
rate allowed under this subdivision.
(d) (c) The department shall
monitor the effect of this paragraph on provider rates. The county shall pay the provider's full
charges for every child in care up to the maximum established. The commissioner shall determine the maximum
rate for each type of care on an hourly, full-day, and weekly basis, including
special needs and disability care. The
maximum payment to a provider for one day of care must not exceed the daily
rate. The maximum payment to a provider
for one week of care must not exceed the weekly rate.
(e) (d) Child care providers
receiving reimbursement under this chapter must not be paid activity fees or an
additional amount above the maximum rates for care provided during nonstandard
hours for families receiving assistance.
(f) (e) When the provider
charge is greater than the maximum provider rate allowed, the parent is
responsible for payment of the difference in the rates in addition to any
family co-payment fee.
(g) (f) All maximum provider
rates changes shall be implemented on the Monday following the effective date
of the maximum provider rate.
(g) Notwithstanding Minnesota
Rules, part 3400.0130, subpart 7, maximum registration fees in effect on
January 1, 2013, shall remain in effect.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 119B.13, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:
Subd. 1a. Legal nonlicensed family child care provider rates. (a) Legal nonlicensed family child care providers receiving reimbursement under this chapter must be paid on an hourly basis for care provided to families receiving assistance.
(b) The maximum rate paid to legal nonlicensed family child care providers must be 68 percent of the county maximum hourly rate for licensed family child care providers. In counties or county price clusters where the maximum hourly rate for licensed family child care providers is higher than the maximum weekly rate for those providers divided by 50, the maximum hourly rate that may be paid to legal nonlicensed family child care providers is the rate equal to the maximum weekly rate for licensed family child care providers divided by 50 and then multiplied by 0.68. The maximum payment to a provider for one day of care must not exceed the maximum hourly rate times ten. The maximum payment to a provider for one week of care must not exceed the maximum hourly rate times 50.
(c) A rate which includes a special needs rate paid under subdivision 3 may be in excess of the maximum rate allowed under this subdivision.
(d) Legal nonlicensed family child care providers receiving reimbursement under this chapter may not be paid registration fees for families receiving assistance.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective September 16, 2013.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 119B.13, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 3b. Provider
rate differential for Parent Aware. A
family child care provider or child care center shall be paid a 15 percent
differential if they hold a three-star Parent Aware rating or a 20 percent
differential if they hold a four-star Parent Aware rating. A 15 percent or 20 percent rate differential
must be paid above the maximum rate established in subdivision 1, up to the
actual provider rate.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective March 3, 2014.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 119B.13, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 3c. Weekly
rate paid for children attending high-quality care. A licensed child care provider or
license-exempt center may be paid up to the applicable weekly maximum rate, not
to exceed the provider's actual charge, when the following conditions are met:
(1) the child is age birth to five
years, but not yet in kindergarten;
(2)
the child attends a child care provider that qualifies for the rate
differential identified in subdivision 3a or 3b; and
(3) the applicant's activities qualify
for at least 30 hours of care per week under sections 119B.03, 119B.05,
119B.10, and Minnesota Rules, chapter 3400.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 4, 2014."
Page 500, after line 7, insert:
"CCAP MAXIS COSTS. Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 295.581, $40,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $11,000 in fiscal year 2015 is appropriated from the health care access fund to the commissioner of human services for systems costs related to increasing access to quality child care for children with high needs under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 119B."
Page 501, after line 33, insert:
"MFIP Quality Childcare For Children With High Needs. Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 295.581, $4,874,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $9,394,000 in fiscal year 2015 is appropriated from the health care access fund to the commissioner of human services for quality child care for children with high needs under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 119B."
Page 504, after line 17, insert:
"Basic Sliding Fee Child Care For Children With High Needs. Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 295.581, $2,663,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $5,959,000 in fiscal year 2015 is appropriated from the health care access fund to the commissioner of human services for quality child care for children with high needs under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 119B."
Page 510, line 22, delete "$20,000,000" and insert "$12,423,000"
Page 510, line 23, delete "$25,000,000" and insert "$9,636,000"
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Franson
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 60 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Mack moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 338, after line 14, insert:
"Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 119B.05, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Eligible participants. Families eligible for child care assistance under the MFIP child care program are:
(1) MFIP participants who are employed or in job search and meet the requirements of section 119B.10;
(2) persons who are members of transition year families under section 119B.011, subdivision 20, and meet the requirements of section 119B.10;
(3) families who are participating in employment orientation or job search, or other employment or training activities that are included in an approved employability development plan under section 256J.95;
(4) MFIP families who are participating in work job search, job support, employment, or training activities as required in their employment plan, or in appeals, hearings, assessments, or orientations according to chapter 256J;
(5) MFIP families who are participating in social services activities under chapter 256J or mental health treatment as required in their employment plan approved according to chapter 256J;
(6) families who are participating in services or activities that are included in an approved family stabilization plan under section 256J.575;
(7) MFIP child-only cases under section
256J.88, for up to 20 hours of child care per week as approved by the county,
in which the child's primary caregiver has a diagnosis of depression or other
serious mental illness;
(8) families who are participating in programs as required in tribal contracts under section 119B.02, subdivision 2, or 256.01, subdivision 2; and
(8) (9) families who are
participating in the transition year extension under section 119B.011,
subdivision 20a."
Page 500, after line 7, insert:
"MAXIS. Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 295.581, $17,000 in fiscal year 2014 is appropriated from the health care access fund to the commissioner of human services for systems costs related to child care assistance for MFIP child-only cases in which the primary caregiver has a diagnosis of depression or other serious mental illness under Minnesota Statutes, section 119B.05, subdivision 1."
Page 501, after line 33, insert:
"MFIP Caregivers With Depression or Serious Mental Illness. Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 295.581, $595,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $1,825 in fiscal year 2015 is appropriated from the health care access fund to the commissioner of human services for MFIP child-only cases in which the primary caregiver has a diagnosis of depression or other serious mental illness under Minnesota Statutes, section 119B.05, subdivision 1."
Page 510, line 22, delete "$20,000,000" and insert "$19,388,000"
Page 510, line 23, delete "$25,000,000" and insert "$23,175,000"
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Schomacker moved to amend the Mack amendment to H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 2, delete lines 1 to 25 and insert:
"Page 500, after line 7, insert:
"MAXIS. $17,000 in fiscal year 2014 is appropriated from the general fund to the commissioner of human services for systems costs related to providing child care assistance for MFIP child-only cases in which the primary caregiver has a diagnosis of depression or other serious mental illness under Minnesota Statutes, section 119B.05, subdivision1."
Page 501, after line 8, insert:
"MinnesotaCare
Exchange Transfer. The
allocation from the health care access fund to the Minnesota Insurance
Marketplace for MinnesotaCare-related operations and technology costs is
reduced by $612,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $1,825,000 in fiscal year 2015 and equal amounts are transferred from the health care access fund to the general fund."
Page 501, after line 33, insert:
"MFIP Caregivers with Depression or Serious Mental Illness. $595,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $1,825,000 in fiscal year 2015 is appropriated from the general fund to the commissioner of human services to provide child care assistance for MFIP child-only cases in which the primary caregiver has a diagnosis of depression or other serious mental illness under Minnesota Statutes, section 119B.05, subdivision 1.""
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the amendment to
the amendment and the roll was called.
There were 60 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
Mack moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 364, after line 3, insert:
"Sec. 22. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 259A.20, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Reimbursement for special nonmedical expenses. (a) Reimbursement for special nonmedical expenses is available to children, except those eligible for adoption assistance based on being an at-risk child.
(b) Reimbursements under this paragraph shall be made only after the adoptive parent documents that the requested service was denied by the local social service agency, community agencies, the local school district, the local public health department, the parent's insurance provider, or the child's program. The denial must be for an eligible service or qualified item under the program requirements of the applicable agency or organization.
(c) Reimbursements must be previously authorized, adhere to the requirements and procedures prescribed by the commissioner, and be limited to:
(1) child care for a child age 12 and younger, or for a child age 13 or 14 who has a documented disability that requires special instruction for and services by the child care provider. Child care reimbursements may be made if all available adult caregivers are employed or attending educational or vocational training programs, or if an adult caregiver is employed full time and the other caregiver is disabled as defined in section 256.481. If a parent is attending an educational or vocational training program, child care reimbursement is limited to no more than the time necessary to complete the credit requirements for an associate or baccalaureate degree as determined by the educational institution. Child care reimbursement is not limited for an adoptive parent completing basic or remedial education programs needed to prepare for postsecondary education or employment;
(2) respite care provided for the relief of the child's parent up to 504 hours of respite care annually;
(3) camping up to 14 days per state fiscal year for a child to attend a special needs camp. The camp must be accredited by the American Camp Association as a special needs camp in order to be eligible for camp reimbursement;
(4) postadoption counseling to promote the child's integration into the adoptive family that is provided by the placing agency during the first year following the date of the adoption decree. Reimbursement is limited to 12 sessions of postadoption counseling;
(5) family counseling that is required to meet the child's special needs. Reimbursement is limited to the prorated portion of the counseling fees allotted to the family when the adoptive parent's health insurance or Medicaid pays for the child's counseling but does not cover counseling for the rest of the family members;
(6) home modifications to accommodate the child's special needs upon which eligibility for adoption assistance was approved. Reimbursement is limited to once every five years per child;
(7) vehicle modifications to accommodate the child's special needs upon which eligibility for adoption assistance was approved. Reimbursement is limited to once every five years per family; and
(8) burial expenses up to $1,000, if the special needs, upon which eligibility for adoption assistance was approved, resulted in the death of the child.
(d) The adoptive parent shall submit statements for expenses incurred between July 1 and June 30 of a given fiscal year to the state adoption assistance unit within 60 days after the end of the fiscal year in order for reimbursement to occur."
Page 505, after line 13, insert:
"Reimbursement For Special Nonmedical Expenses. Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 295.581, $78,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $78,000 in fiscal year 2015 is appropriated from the health care access fund to the commissioner of human services to implement the provisions of article 10, section 22."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Mack
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 58 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kieffer
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Franson
Page 338, after line 14, insert:
"Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 119B.13, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Subsidy
restrictions. (a) Beginning October
31, 2011, the maximum rate paid for child care assistance in any county or
multicounty region under the child care fund shall be the rate for like-care
arrangements in the county effective July 1, 2006, decreased by 2.5 percent. Beginning July 1, 2014, the maximum rate
paid for child care assistance in any county or multicounty region, except for
counties under section 473.121, subdivision 4, under the child care fund shall
be the rate for like-care arrangements in the county effective July 1, 2012,
increased by a percentage to be established by the commissioner. The commissioner shall increase maximum rates
up to a statewide total increase of $10,000,000 for child care assistance
programs under this chapter.
(b) Biennially, beginning in 2012, the commissioner shall survey rates charged by child care providers in Minnesota to determine the 75th percentile for like-care arrangements in counties. When the commissioner determines that, using the commissioner's established protocol, the number of providers responding to the survey is too small to determine the 75th percentile rate for like-care arrangements in a county or multicounty region, the commissioner may establish the 75th percentile maximum rate based on like-care arrangements in a county, region, or category that the commissioner deems to be similar.
(c) A rate which includes a special needs rate paid under subdivision 3 or under a school readiness service agreement paid under section 119B.231, may be in excess of the maximum rate allowed under this subdivision.
(d) The department shall monitor the effect of this paragraph on provider rates. The county shall pay the provider's full charges for every child in care up to the maximum established. The commissioner shall determine the maximum rate for each type of care on an hourly, full-day, and weekly basis, including special needs and disability care. The maximum payment to a provider for one day of care must not exceed the daily rate. The maximum payment to a provider for one week of care must not exceed the weekly rate.
(e) Child care providers receiving reimbursement under this chapter must not be paid activity fees or an additional amount above the maximum rates for care provided during nonstandard hours for families receiving assistance.
(f) When the provider charge is greater than the maximum provider rate allowed, the parent is responsible for payment of the difference in the rates in addition to any family co-payment fee.
(g) All maximum provider rates changes shall be implemented on the Monday following the effective date of the maximum provider rate."
Page 501, after line 33, insert:
"CCAP Provider Rate Increase. Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 295.581, $10,000,000 in fiscal year 2014 is appropriated from the health care access fund to the commissioner of human services for child care assistance program provider rate increases under Minnesota Statutes, section 119B.13, subdivision 1."
Adjust amounts accordingly
Renumber or reletter in sequence and correct internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Franson amendment and the
roll was called. There were 62 yeas and
70 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Faust
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Swedzinski moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 507, after line 24, insert:
"Alternative To Moose Lake. The allocation from the health care access fund to the Minnesota Insurance Marketplace for MinnesotaCare-related operations and technology costs is reduced by $2,653,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $2,653,000 in fiscal year 2015, transferred to the general fund, and appropriated from the general fund to the commissioner of human services to continue the alternative to Moose Lake grants."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Swedzinski amendment and the
roll was called. There were 64 yeas and
69 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Dean, M., moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 458, after line 7, insert:
"(h) No grant shall be awarded under this section for the purpose of establishing community gardens."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Dean, M.,
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 64 yeas and 68 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Fischer
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Morgan
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Persell
Poppe
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Winkler
Yarusso
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
The
Speaker resumed the Chair.
Zerwas moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 369, after line 16, insert:
"Sec. 30. MINNESOTA
INSURANCE MARKETPLACE.
No employee of the Minnesota Insurance Marketplace, including navigators, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 62V.02, subdivision 9, may request, solicit or offer information related to voter registration to persons seeking to purchase insurance through the exchange."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Zerwas
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 80 yeas and 53 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Faust
FitzSimmons
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lillie
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Erhardt
Falk
Fischer
Freiberg
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Paymar
Persell
Schoen
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Albright moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 42, after line 13, insert:
"Sec. 61. MINNESOTA STATE OPPORTUNITIES FOR
UNDECIDED PURCHASERS.
The commissioner of human services shall review and report to the legislature by January 1, 2015, on the purchasing preferences of Minnesota consumers. The report must examine the purchasing preferences of consumers in MNSure relative to costs, benefits, and provider choices."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Albright
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 62 yeas and 71 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Ward, J.E., moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 455, after line 15, insert:
"Sec. 26. [145.417]
LICENSURE OF CERTAIN FACILITIES THAT PERFORM ABORTIONS.
Subdivision 1. License
required for facilities that perform ten or more abortions per month. (a) A clinic, health center, or other
facility in which the pregnancies of ten or more women known to be pregnant are
willfully terminated or aborted each month shall be licensed by the
commissioner of health and, notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4675.0100,
subparts 8 and 9, subject to the licensure requirements provided in Minnesota
Rules, chapter 4675. The commissioner
shall not require a facility licensed as a hospital or as an outpatient
surgical center, pursuant to sections 144.50 to 144.56, to obtain a separate
license under this section, but may subject these facilities to inspections and
investigations as permitted under subdivision 2.
(b) The establishment or operation of a
facility described in this section without obtaining a license is a misdemeanor
punishable by a fine of not more than $300.
The commissioner of health, the attorney general, an appropriate county
attorney, or a woman upon whom an abortion has been performed or attempted to
be performed at an unlicensed facility may seek an injunction in district court
against the continued operation of the facility. Proceedings for securing an injunction may be
brought by the attorney general or by the appropriate county attorney.
(c) Sanctions provided in this subdivision
do not restrict other available sanctions.
Subd. 2. Inspections;
no notice required. No more
than two times per year, the commissioner of health shall perform routine and
comprehensive inspections and investigations of facilities described under
subdivision 1. Every clinic, health
center, or other facility described under subdivision 1, and any other premise
proposed to be conducted as a facility by an applicant for a license, shall be
open at all reasonable times to inspection authorized in writing by the
commissioner of health. No notice need
be given to any person prior to any inspection.
Subd. 3.
(b) Fees shall be collected and
deposited according to section 144.122.
Subd. 4. Suspension,
revocation, and refusal to renew. The
commissioner of health may refuse to grant or renew, or may suspend or revoke a
license on any of the following grounds:
(1) violation of any of the provisions
of this section or Minnesota Rules, chapter 4675;
(2) permitting, aiding, or abetting the
commission of any illegal act in the facility;
(3) conduct or practices detrimental to
the welfare of the patient;
(4) obtaining or attempting to obtain a
license by fraud or misrepresentation; or
(5) if there is a pattern of conduct
that involves one or more physicians in the facility who have a financial or
economic interest in the facility, as defined in section 144.6521, subdivision
3, and who have not provided notice and disclosure of the financial or economic
interest as required by section 144.6521.
Subd. 5. Hearing. Prior to any suspension, revocation,
or refusal to renew a license, the licensee shall be entitled to notice and a
hearing as provided by sections 14.57 to 14.69.
At each hearing, the commissioner of health shall have the burden of
establishing that a violation described in subdivision 4 has occurred. If a license is revoked, suspended, or not
renewed, a new application for a license may be considered by the commissioner
if the conditions upon which revocation, suspension, or refusal to renew was
based have been corrected and evidence of this fact has been satisfactorily
furnished. A new license may be granted
after proper inspection has been made and all provisions of this section and
Minnesota Rules, chapter 4675, have been complied with and a recommendation for
licensure has been made by the commissioner or by an inspector as an agent of
the commissioner.
Subd. 6. Severability. If any one or more provision, section, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this section or the application of it to any person or circumstance is found to be unconstitutional, it is declared to be severable and the balance of this section shall remain effective notwithstanding such unconstitutionality. The legislature intends that it would have passed this section, and each provision, section, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or word, regardless of the fact that any one provision, section, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or word is declared unconstitutional."
Page 514, after line 32, insert:
"$63,000 is appropriated in fiscal year 2014 from the state government special revenue fund to the commissioner of health for licensing activities under Minnesota Statutes, section 145.417."
Adjust amounts accordingly
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Ward, J.E., moved to amend his amendment to H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 3, delete everything before "from" and insert "$19,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $19,000 in fiscal year 2015 are appropriated"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question
was taken on the amendment to the amendment and the roll was called. There were 71 yeas and 62 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Dill
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Faust
FitzSimmons
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Huntley
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kresha
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Marquart
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Runbeck
Sanders
Sawatzky
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Fischer
Freiberg
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kieffer
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Persell
Poppe
Rosenthal
Savick
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion prevailed and the amendment to
the amendment was adopted.
The question recurred on the Ward, J.E.,
amendment, as amended, and the roll was called.
There were 71 yeas and 62 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Dill
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Faust
FitzSimmons
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Marquart
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Runbeck
Sanders
Sawatzky
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Fischer
Freiberg
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Persell
Poppe
Rosenthal
Savick
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion prevailed and the amendment, as
amended, was adopted.
Abeler moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 161, after line 3, insert:
"Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 256B.056, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Asset limitations for individuals and families. (a) To be eligible for medical assistance, a person must not individually own more than $3,000 in assets, or if a member of a household with two family members, husband and wife, or parent and child, the household must not own more than $6,000 in assets, plus $200 for each additional legal dependent. In addition to these maximum amounts, an eligible individual or family may accrue interest on these amounts, but they must be reduced to the maximum at the time of an eligibility redetermination. The accumulation of the clothing and personal needs allowance according to section 256B.35 must also be reduced to the maximum at the time of the eligibility redetermination. The value of assets that are not considered in determining eligibility for medical assistance is the value of those assets excluded under the supplemental security income program for aged, blind, and disabled persons, with the following exceptions:
(1) household goods and personal effects are not considered;
(2) capital and operating assets of a trade or business that the local agency determines are necessary to the person's ability to earn an income are not considered, except that capital and operating assets used for personal expenses including, but not limited to, mortgage payments, utility payments, motor vehicle payments, and grocery payments paid out of a business account shall be considered earned income to the household;
(3) motor vehicles are excluded to the same extent excluded by the supplemental security income program;
(4) assets designated as burial expenses are excluded to the same extent excluded by the supplemental security income program. Burial expenses funded by annuity contracts or life insurance policies must irrevocably designate the individual's estate as contingent beneficiary to the extent proceeds are not used for payment of selected burial expenses;
(5) for a person who no longer qualifies as an employed person with a disability due to loss of earnings, assets allowed while eligible for medical assistance under section 256B.057, subdivision 9, are not considered for 12 months, beginning with the first month of ineligibility as an employed person with a disability, to the extent that the person's total assets remain within the allowed limits of section 256B.057, subdivision 9, paragraph (d);
(6) when a person enrolled in medical assistance under section 256B.057, subdivision 9, is age 65 or older and has been enrolled during each of the 24 consecutive months before the person's 65th birthday, the assets owned by the person and the person's spouse must be disregarded, up to the limits of section 256B.057, subdivision 9, paragraph (d), when determining eligibility for medical assistance under section 256B.055, subdivision 7. The income of a spouse of a person enrolled in medical assistance under section 256B.057, subdivision 9, during each of the 24 consecutive months before the person's 65th birthday must be disregarded when determining eligibility for medical assistance under section 256B.055, subdivision 7. Persons eligible under this clause are not subject to the provisions in section 256B.059. A person whose 65th birthday occurs in 2012 or 2013 is required to have qualified for medical assistance under section 256B.057, subdivision 9, prior to age 65 for at least 20 months in the 24 months prior to reaching age 65; and
(7) effective July 1, 2009, certain assets owned by American Indians are excluded as required by section 5006 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Public Law 111-5. For purposes of this clause, an American Indian is any person who meets the definition of Indian according to Code of Federal Regulations, title 42, section 447.50.
The assets specified in clauses (1) to (4) must be
disclosed to the local agency at the time of application and at the time of an
eligibility redetermination, and must be verified upon request of the local
agency.
(b) No asset limit shall apply to persons eligible under section 256B.055, subdivision 15.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 256B.056, subdivision 3c, as amended by Laws 2013, chapter 1, section 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 3c. Asset limitations for families and children. (a) A household of two or more persons must not own more than $20,000 in total net assets, and a household of one person must not own more than $10,000 in total net assets. In addition to these maximum amounts, an eligible individual or family may accrue interest on these amounts, but they must be reduced to the maximum at the time of an eligibility redetermination. The value of assets that are not considered in determining eligibility for medical assistance for families and children is the value of those assets excluded under the AFDC state plan as of July 16, 1996, as required by the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA), Public Law 104-193, with the following exceptions:
(1) household goods and personal effects are not considered;
(2) capital and operating assets of a
trade or business up to $200,000 are not considered, except that a bank
account that contains personal income or assets, or is used to pay personal
expenses, is not considered a capital or operating asset of a trade or business
capital and operating assets used for personal expenses including, but not
limited to, mortgage payments, utility payments, motor vehicle payments, and
grocery payments paid out of a business account shall be considered earned
income to the household;
(3) one motor vehicle is excluded for each person of legal driving age who is employed or seeking employment;
(4) assets designated as burial expenses are excluded to the same extent they are excluded by the Supplemental Security Income program;
(5) court-ordered settlements up to $10,000 are not considered;
(6) individual retirement accounts and funds are not considered;
(7) assets owned by children are not considered; and
(8) effective July 1, 2009, certain assets owned by American Indians are excluded as required by section 5006 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Public Law 111-5. For purposes of this clause, an American Indian is any person who meets the definition of Indian according to Code of Federal Regulations, title 42, section 447.50.
The assets specified in clause (2) clauses (1) to
(7) must be disclosed to the local agency at the time of application and at
the time of an eligibility redetermination, and must be verified upon request
of the local agency.
(b) Beginning January 1, 2014, this subdivision applies only to parents and caretaker relatives who qualify for medical assistance under subdivision 5."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
Abeler moved to amend his amendment to H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, delete lines 2 to 27 and insert:
"Page 156, after line 11, insert:
"Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 270B.14, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Disclosure to commissioner of human services. (a) On the request of the commissioner of human services, the commissioner shall disclose return information regarding taxes imposed by chapter 290, and claims for refunds under chapter 290A, to the extent provided in paragraph (b) and for the purposes set forth in paragraph (c).
(b) Data that may be disclosed are limited to data relating to the identity, whereabouts, employment, income, and property of a person owing or alleged to be owing an obligation of child support.
(c) The commissioner of human services may request data only for the purposes of carrying out the child support enforcement program and to assist in the location of parents who have, or appear to have, deserted their children. Data received may be used only as set forth in section 256.978.
(d) The commissioner shall provide the records and information necessary to administer the supplemental housing allowance to the commissioner of human services.
(e) At the request of the commissioner of human services, the commissioner of revenue shall electronically match the Social Security numbers and names of participants in the telephone assistance plan operated under sections 237.69 to 237.711, with those of property tax refund filers, and determine whether each participant's household income is within the eligibility standards for the telephone assistance plan.
(f) The commissioner may provide records and information collected under sections 295.50 to 295.59 to the commissioner of human services for purposes of the Medicaid Voluntary Contribution and Provider-Specific Tax Amendments of 1991, Public Law 102-234. Upon the written agreement by the United States Department of Health and Human Services to maintain the confidentiality of the data, the commissioner may provide records and information collected under sections 295.50 to 295.59 to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services section of the United States Department of Health and Human Services for purposes of meeting federal reporting requirements.
(g) The commissioner may provide records and information to the commissioner of human services as necessary to administer the early refund of refundable tax credits.
(h) The commissioner may disclose information
to the commissioner of human services necessary to verify income for eligibility and premium payment under
the MinnesotaCare program, under section 256L.05, subdivision 2. Similarly, the commissioner may disclose
information necessary to verify income for eligibility of applicants and
recipients of medical assistance, under chapter 256B, and the supplemental nutrition
assistance program, under section 245.771.
(i) The commissioner may disclose information to the commissioner of human services necessary to verify whether applicants or recipients for the Minnesota family investment program, general assistance, food support, Minnesota supplemental aid program, and child care assistance have claimed refundable tax credits under chapter 290 and the property tax refund under chapter 290A, and the amounts of the credits.
(j) The commissioner may disclose information to the commissioner of human services necessary to verify income for purposes of calculating parental contribution amounts under section 252.27, subdivision 2a.""
Page 2, delete lines 1 to 35
Page 3, delete lines 1 to 25
The
motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was adopted.
The question recurred on the Abeler
amendment, as amended, to H. F. No. 1233, the second
engrossment, as amended. The motion prevailed and the amendment, as
amended, was adopted.
Drazkowski moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 504, after line 8, insert:
"Transfer. For the biennium ending June 30, 2015, $8,000,000 is transferred from the health care access fund to the general fund.
Support
Services Grants. For the
biennium ending June 30, 2015, $8,000,000 is appropriated from the general fund
for support services grants under this paragraph."
Adjust amounts accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Drazkowski
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 60 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Drazkowski moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 504, after line 8, insert:
"MinnesotaCare Exchange Transfer. The allocation from the health care access fund to the Minnesota Insurance Marketplace for MinnesotaCare-related operations and technology costs is reduced by $8,000,000 for the biennium ending June 30, 2015 and an equal amount is transferred to the general fund.
Support
Services Grants. For the
biennium ending June 30, 2015, $8,000,000 is appropriated from the general fund
for support services grants under this paragraph."
Adjust amounts accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Drazkowski
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 60 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Schomacker moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 200, delete section 18
Page 502, line 24, delete "4,371,808,000" and insert "4,377,616,000" and delete "4,595,789,000" and insert "4,609,558,000"
Page 503, after line 17, insert:
"Transfer. $5,808,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $13,769,000 in fiscal year 2015 is transferred from the health care access fund to the general fund."
Page 510, line 22, delete "$20,000,000" and insert "$14,192,000"
Page 510, line 23, delete "$25,000,000" and insert "$11,231,000"
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Schomacker amendment and the
roll was called. There were 65 yeas and
68 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Falk
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Rosenthal
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Kresha moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 202, line 21, delete "three" and insert "four"
Page 503, after line 17, insert:
"Nursing facility rate adjustment. Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 295.581, $3,412,000 in fiscal 2014 and $3,707,000 in fiscal year 2015 is appropriated from the health care access fund to the commissioner of human services to implement a portion of the nursing facility rate adjustment under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.434, subdivision 19a."
Page 510, line 22, delete "$20,000,000" and insert "$16,588,000"
Page 510, line 23, delete "$25,000,000" and insert "$21,293,000"
Amend the appropriations by the specified amounts and correct the totals and the appropriations by fund accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Kresha amendment and the
roll was called. There were 66 yeas and
66 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Faust
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Falk
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Erickson, S., moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 200, after line 11, insert:
"Sec. 18. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 256B.431, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 46. Rate increase for a facility in Princeton. Effective October 1, 2013, the operating payment rate of a nursing facility in Princeton with 113 beds as of January 1, 2013, that is reimbursed under this section, section 256B.434, or 256B.441 shall be increased to be equal, for a RUG's rate with a weight of 1.00, to the geographic group III median rate for the same RUG's weight. The calculations under this subdivision shall be added to the rates before any other operating rate adjustments effective on October 1, 2013, are computed. The percentage of the operating payment rate to be case-mix adjusted shall be equal to the percentage that is case-mix adjusted in the September 30, 2013, operating payment rate."
Page 503, after line 17, insert:
"Transfer. $198,000 in fiscal year 2014 and
$298,000 in fiscal year 2015 is transferred from the health care access fund to
the general fund.
Rate increase for a facility in Princeton. $198,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $298,000 in fiscal year 2015 is appropriated from the general fund to the commissioner of human services for a nursing facility rate increase for a facility in Princeton under Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.431, subdivision 46."
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Erickson,
S., amendment and the roll was called.
There were 59 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Nornes moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 202, after line 16, insert:
"Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 256B.434, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 4i.
Rate increase for certain
facilities in Otter Tail County. Effective
October 1, 2013, operating payment rates of two nursing facilities located in
Otter Tail County, one licensed for 124 beds and the other licensed for 105
beds, that are reimbursed under this section, section 256B.441, or any other
section, shall be increased to be
equal, for a RUGS rate with a weight of 1.00, to the peer group 1 median rate for the same RUGS weight. The percentage of the operating payment rate for each facility to be case-mix adjusted shall be equal to the percentage that is case-mix adjusted in that facility's September 30, 2013, operating payment rate. This subdivision shall apply only if it results in a rate increase."
Page 503, after line 17, insert:
"Rate increase For Certain Facilities In Otter Tail County. Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 295.581, $184,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $274,000 in fiscal year 2015 is appropriated from the health care access fund to the commissioner of human services for a rate increase for certain nursing facilities in Otter Tail County under Minnesota Statues, section 256B.434, subdivision 4i."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
Adjust amounts accordingly
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Anderson, P., moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 510, after line 20, insert:
"$150,000 in fiscal year 2014 from the health care access fund is for the commissioner to create and implement a community awareness pilot program for radon testing in the following counties and cities: Pope County, Stearns County, Mower County, Aitkin County, Becker County, and the city of Minneapolis. The program should increase awareness about radon testing for residential homes and may include free radon testing for participation in programs organized by the Department of Health."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question
was taken on the Anderson, P., amendment and the roll was called. There were 60 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kieffer
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Mack moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 490, after line 17, insert:
"ARTICLE 13
NORTHSTAR CARE FOR CHILDREN
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 256.0112, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 10. Contracts
for child foster care services. When
local agencies negotiate lead county contracts or purchase of service contracts
for child foster care services, the foster care maintenance payment made on
behalf of the child shall follow the provisions of Northstar Care for Children,
chapter 256N. Foster care maintenance
payments as defined in section 256N.02, subdivision 15, represents costs for
activities similar in nature to those expected of parents and do not cover
services rendered by the licensed or tribally approved foster parent, facility,
or administrative costs or fees. Payments
made to foster parents must follow the requirements of section 256N.26,
subdivision 15. The legally responsible
agency must provide foster parents with the assessment and notice as specified
in section 256N.24. The financially
responsible agency is permitted to make additional payments for specific
services provided by the foster parents or facility, as permitted in section
256N.21, subdivision 5. These additional
payments are not considered foster care maintenance.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 256.82, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Foster
care maintenance payments. Beginning
January 1, 1986, For the purpose of foster care maintenance payments under
title IV-E of the Social Security Act, United States Code, title 42, sections
670 to 676, the county paying the maintenance costs must be reimbursed for the
costs from the federal money available for the purpose. Beginning July 1, 1997, for the purposes of
determining a child's eligibility under title IV-E of the Social Security Act,
the placing agency shall use AFDC requirements in effect on July 16, 1996.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 256.82, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Setting
foster care standard rates. (a)
The commissioner shall annually establish minimum standard maintenance
rates for foster care maintenance and including supplemental
difficulty of care payments for all children in foster care eligible
for Northstar Care for Children under chapter 256N.
(b) All children entering foster care on or after January 1, 2015, are eligible for Northstar Care for Children under chapter 256N. Any increase in rates shall in no case exceed three percent per annum.
(c) All children in foster care on
December 31, 2014, must remain in the pre-Northstar Care for Children foster
care program under sections 256N.21, subdivision 6, and 260C.4411, subdivision
1. The rates for the pre-Northstar Care
for Children foster care program shall remain those in effect on January 1,
2013.
Sec. 4. [256N.001]
CITATION.
Sections 256N.001 to 256N.28 may be
cited as the "Northstar Care for Children Act." Sections 256N.001 to 256N.28 establish
Northstar Care for Children, which authorizes certain benefits to support a
child in need who is served by the Minnesota child welfare system and who is
the responsibility of the state, local county social service agencies, or
tribal social service agencies authorized under section 256.01, subdivision
14b, or are otherwise eligible for federal adoption assistance. A child eligible under this chapter has
experienced a child welfare intervention that has resulted in the child being
placed away from the child's parents' care and is receiving foster care
services consistent with chapter 260B, 260C, or 260D, or is in the permanent
care of relatives through a transfer of permanent legal and physical custody,
or in the permanent care of adoptive parents.
Sec. 5. [256N.01]
PUBLIC POLICY.
(a) The legislature declares that the
public policy of this state is to keep children safe from harm and to ensure
that when children suffer harmful or injurious experiences in their lives,
appropriate services are immediately available to keep them safe.
(b) Children do best in permanent,
safe, nurturing homes where they can maintain lifelong relationships with
adults. Whenever safely possible,
children are best served when they can be nurtured and raised by their parents. Where services cannot be provided to allow a
child to remain safely at home, an out-of-home placement may be required. When this occurs, reunification should be
sought if it can be accomplished safely.
When it is not possible for parents to provide safety and permanency for
their children, an alternative permanent home must quickly be made available to
the child, drawing from kinship sources whenever possible.
(c) Minnesota understands the
importance of having a comprehensive approach to temporary out-of-home care and
to permanent homes for children who cannot be reunited with their families. It is critical that stable benefits be
available to caregivers to ensure that the child's needs can be met whether the
child's situation and best interests call for temporary foster care, transfer of
permanent legal and physical custody to a relative, or adoption. Northstar Care for Children focuses on the
child's needs and strengths, and the actual level of care provided by the
caregiver, without consideration for the type of placement setting. In this way caregivers are not faced with the
burden of making specific long-term decisions based upon competing financial
incentives.
Sec. 6. [256N.02]
DEFINITIONS.
Subdivision 1. Scope. For the purposes of sections 256N.001
to 256N.28, the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them.
Subd. 2. Adoption
assistance. "Adoption
assistance" means medical coverage as allowable under section 256B.055 and
reimbursement of nonrecurring expenses associated with adoption and may include
financial support provided under agreement with the financially responsible
agency, the commissioner, and the parents of an adoptive child whose special
needs would otherwise make it difficult to place the child for adoption to
assist with the cost of caring for the child.
Financial support may include a basic rate payment and a supplemental
difficulty of care rate.
Subd. 3. Assessment. "Assessment" means the
process under section 256N.24 that determines the benefits an eligible child
may receive under section 256N.26.
Subd. 4. At-risk
child. "At-risk
child" means a child who does not have a documented disability but who is
at risk of developing a physical, mental, emotional, or behavioral disability
based on being related within the first or second degree to persons who have an
inheritable physical, mental, emotional, or behavioral disabling condition, or
from a background which has the potential to cause the child to develop a
physical, mental, emotional, or behavioral disability that the child is at risk
of developing. The disability must
manifest during childhood.
Subd. 5. Basic
rate. "Basic rate"
means the maintenance payment made on behalf of a child to support the costs
caregivers incur to provide for a child's needs consistent with the care parents
customarily provide, including: food,
clothing, shelter, daily supervision, school supplies, and a child's personal
incidentals. It also supports typical
travel to the child's home for visitation, and reasonable travel for the child
to remain in the school in which the child is enrolled at the time of
placement.
Subd. 6. Caregiver. "Caregiver" means the foster
parent or parents of a child in foster care who meet the requirements of
emergency relative placement, licensed foster parents under chapter 245A, or
foster parents licensed or approved by a tribe; the relative custodian or
custodians; or the adoptive parent or parents who have legally adopted a child.
Subd. 7. Commissioner. "Commissioner" means the
commissioner of human services or any employee of the Department of Human
Services to whom the commissioner has delegated appropriate authority.
Subd. 8. County
board. "County
board" means the board of county commissioners in each county.
Subd. 9. Disability. "Disability" means a
physical, mental, emotional, or behavioral impairment that substantially limits
one or more major life activities. Major
life activities include, but are not limited to: thinking, walking, hearing, breathing,
working, seeing, speaking, communicating, learning, developing and maintaining
healthy relationships, safely caring for oneself, and performing manual
tasks. The nature, duration, and
severity of the impairment must be considered in determining if the limitation
is substantial.
Subd. 10. Financially
responsible agency. "Financially
responsible agency" means the agency that is financially responsible for a
child. These agencies include both local
social service agencies under section 393.07 and tribal social service agencies
authorized in section 256.01, subdivision 14b, as part of the American Indian
Child Welfare Initiative, and Minnesota tribes who assume financial
responsibility of children from other states.
Under Northstar Care for Children, the agency that is financially
responsible at the time of placement for foster care continues to be
responsible under section 256N.27 for the local share of any maintenance
payments, even after finalization of the adoption of transfer of permanent
legal and physical custody of a child.
Subd. 11. Guardianship
assistance. "Guardianship
assistance" means medical coverage, as allowable under section 256B.055,
and reimbursement of nonrecurring expenses associated with obtaining permanent
legal and physical custody of a child, and may include financial support provided
under agreement with the financially responsible agency, the commissioner, and
the relative who has received a transfer of permanent legal and physical
custody of a child. Financial support
may include a basic rate payment and a supplemental difficulty of care rate to
assist with the cost of caring for the child.
Subd. 12. Human
services board. "Human
services board" means a board established under section 402.02; Laws 1974,
chapter 293; or Laws 1976, chapter 340.
Subd. 13. Initial
assessment. "Initial
assessment" means the assessment conducted within the first 30 days of a
child's initial placement into foster care under section 256N.24, subdivisions
4 and 5.
Subd. 14. Legally
responsible agency. "Legally
responsible agency" means the Minnesota agency that is assigned
responsibility for placement, care, and supervision of the child through a
court order, voluntary placement agreement, or voluntary relinquishment. These agencies include local social service
agencies under section 393.07, tribal social service agencies authorized in
section 256.01, subdivision 14b, and Minnesota tribes that assume court
jurisdiction when legal responsibility is transferred to the tribal social
service agency through a Minnesota district court order. A Minnesota local social service agency is
otherwise financially responsible.
Subd. 15. Maintenance
payments. "Maintenance
payments" means the basic rate plus any supplemental difficulty of care
rate under Northstar Care for Children. It
specifically does not include the cost of initial clothing allowance, payment
for social services, or administrative payments to a child-placing agency. Payments are paid consistent with section
256N.26.
Subd. 16. Permanent
legal and physical custody. "Permanent
legal and physical custody" means a transfer of permanent legal and
physical custody to a relative ordered by a Minnesota juvenile court under
section 260C.515, subdivision 4, or for a child under jurisdiction of a tribal
court, a judicial determination under a similar provision in tribal code which
means that a relative will assume the duty and authority to provide care,
control, and protection of a child who is residing in foster care, and to make
decisions regarding the child's education, health care, and general welfare
until adulthood.
Subd. 17. Reassessment. "Reassessment" means an
update of a previous assessment through the process under section 256N.24 for a
child who has been continuously eligible for Northstar Care for Children, or
when a child identified as an at-risk child (Level A) under guardianship or
adoption assistance has manifested the disability upon which eligibility for
the agreement was based according to section 256N.25, subdivision 3, paragraph
(b). A reassessment may be used to
update an initial assessment, a special assessment, or a previous reassessment.
Subd. 18. Relative. "Relative," as described in
section 260C.007, subdivision 27, means a person related to the child by blood,
marriage, or adoption, or an individual who is an important friend with whom
the child has resided or had significant contact. For an Indian child, relative includes
members of the extended family as defined by the law or custom of the Indian
child's tribe or, in the absence of law or custom, nieces, nephews, or first or
second cousins, as provided in the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, United
States Code, title 25, section 1903.
Subd. 19. Relative
custodian. "Relative
custodian" means a person to whom permanent legal and physical custody of
a child has been transferred under section 260C.515, subdivision 4, or for a
child under jurisdiction of a tribal court, a judicial determination under a
similar provision in tribal code, which means that a relative will assume the
duty and authority to provide care, control, and protection of a child who is
residing in foster care, and to make decisions regarding the child's education,
health care, and general welfare until adulthood.
Subd. 20. Special
assessment. "Special
assessment" means an assessment performed under section 256N.24 that
determines the benefits that an eligible child may receive under section
256N.26 at the time when a special assessment is required. A special assessment is used in the following
circumstances when a child's status within Northstar Care is shifted from a
pre-Northstar Care program into Northstar Care for Children when the
commissioner determines that a special assessment is appropriate instead of
assigning the transition child to a level under section 256N.28.
Subd. 21. Supplemental
difficulty of care rate. "Supplemental
difficulty of care rate" means the supplemental payment under section
256N.26, if any, as determined by the financially responsible agency or the
state, based upon an assessment under section 256N.24. The rate must support activities consistent
with the care a parent provides a child with special needs and not the
equivalent of a purchased service. The
rate must consider the capacity and intensity of the activities associated with
parenting duties provided in the home to nurture the child, preserve the
child's connections, and support the child's functioning in the home and
community.
Sec. 7. [256N.20]
NORTHSTAR CARE FOR CHILDREN; GENERALLY.
Subdivision 1. Eligibility. A child is eligible for Northstar Care
for Children if the child is eligible for:
(1) foster care under section 256N.21;
(2) guardianship assistance under
section 256N.22; or
(3) adoption assistance under section
256N.23.
Subd. 2. Assessments. Except as otherwise specified, a child
eligible for Northstar Care for Children shall receive an assessment under
section 256N.24.
Subd. 3. Agreements. When a child is eligible for
guardianship assistance or adoption assistance, negotiations with caregivers
and the development of a written, binding agreement must be conducted under
section 256N.25.
Subd. 4. Benefits
and payments. A child
eligible for Northstar Care for Children is entitled to benefits specified in
section 256N.26, based primarily on assessments under section 256N.24, and, if
appropriate, negotiations and agreements under section 256N.25. Although paid to the caregiver, these
benefits must be considered benefits of the child rather than of the caregiver.
Subd. 5. Federal,
state, and local shares. The
cost of Northstar Care for Children must be shared among the federal
government, state, counties of financial responsibility, and certain tribes as
specified in section 256N.27.
Subd. 6. Administration
and appeals. The commissioner
and financially responsible agency, or other agency designated by the
commissioner, shall administer Northstar Care for Children according to section
256N.28. The notification and fair
hearing process applicable to this chapter is defined in section 256N.28.
Subd. 7. Transition. A child in foster care, relative
custody assistance, or adoption assistance prior to January 1,
2015, who remains with the same caregivers continues to receive benefits under
programs preceding Northstar Care for Children, unless the child moves to a new
foster care placement, permanency is obtained for the child, or the
commissioner initiates transition of a child receiving pre-Northstar Care for
Children relative custody assistance, guardianship assistance, or adoption
assistance under this chapter. Provisions
for the transition to Northstar Care for Children for certain children in
preceding programs are specified in section 256N.28, subdivisions 2 and 7. Additional provisions for children in: foster care are specified in section 256N.21,
subdivision 6; relative custody assistance under section 257.85 are specified
in section 256N.22, subdivision 12; and adoption assistance under chapter 259A
are specified in section 256N.23, subdivision 13.
Sec. 8. [256N.21]
ELIGIBILITY FOR FOSTER CARE BENEFITS.
Subdivision 1. General
eligibility requirements. (a)
A child is eligible for foster care benefits under this section if the child
meets the requirements of subdivision 2 on or after January 1, 2015.
(b) The financially responsible
agency shall make a title IV-E eligibility determination for all foster
children meeting the requirements of subdivision 2, provided the agency has
such authority under the state title IV-E plan.
To be eligible for title IV-E foster care, a child must also meet any
additional criteria specified in section 472 of the Social Security Act.
(c) Except as provided under section
256N.26, subdivision 1 or 6, the foster care benefit to the child under this
section must be determined under sections 256N.24 and 256N.26 through an
individual assessment. Information from
this assessment must be used to determine a potential future benefit under
guardianship assistance or adoption assistance, if needed.
(d) When a child is eligible for
additional services, subdivisions 3 and 4 govern the co-occurrence of program
eligibility.
Subd. 2. Placement
in foster care. To be
eligible for foster care benefits under this section, the child must be in
placement away from the child's legal parent or guardian and all of the
following criteria must be met:
(1) the legally responsible agency must
have placement authority and care responsibility, including for a child 18
years old or older and under age 21, who maintains eligibility for foster care
consistent with section 260C.451;
(2) the legally responsible agency must
have authority to place the child with a voluntary placement agreement or a
court order, consistent with sections 260B.198, 260C.001, 260D.01, or continued
eligibility consistent with section 260C.451; and
(3) the child must be placed in an
emergency relative placement under section 245A.035, a licensed foster family
setting, foster residence setting, or treatment foster care setting licensed
under Minnesota Rules, parts 2960.3000 to 2960.3340, a family foster home
licensed or approved by a tribal agency or, for a child 18 years old or older
and under age 21, an unlicensed supervised independent living setting approved
by the agency responsible for the youth's care.
Subd. 3. Minor
parent. A child who is a
minor parent in placement with the minor parent's child in the same home is
eligible for foster care benefits under this section. The foster care benefit is limited to the
minor parent, unless the legally responsible agency has separate legal
authority for placement of the minor parent's child.
Subd. 4. Foster children ages 18 up to 21 placed
in an unlicensed supervised independent living setting. A foster child 18 years old or older
and under age 21 who maintains eligibility consistent with section 260C.451 and
who is placed in an unlicensed supervised independent living setting shall
receive the level of benefit under section 256N.26.
Subd. 5. Excluded activities. The basic and supplemental difficulty
of care payment represents costs for activities similar in nature to those
expected of parents, and does not cover services rendered by the licensed or
tribally approved foster parent, facility, or administrative costs or
fees. The financially responsible agency
may pay an additional fee for specific services provided by the licensed foster
parent or facility. A foster parent or
residence setting must distinguish such a service from the daily care of the
child as assessed through the process under section 256N.24.
Subd. 6. Transition
from pre-Northstar Care for Children program. (a) Section 256.82 establishes the
pre-Northstar Care for Children foster care program for all children residing
in family foster care on December 31, 2014.
Unless transitioned under paragraph (b), a child in foster care with the
same caregiver receives benefits under this pre-Northstar Care for Children
foster care program.
(b) Transition from the pre-Northstar
Care for Children foster care program to Northstar Care for Children takes
place on or after January 1, 2015, when the child:
(1) moves to a different foster
home or unlicensed supervised independent living setting;
(2) has permanent legal and physical
custody transferred and, if applicable, meets eligibility requirements in
section 256N.22;
(3) is adopted and, if applicable, meets
eligibility requirements in section 256N.23; or
(4) re-enters foster care after
reunification or a trial home visit.
(c) Upon becoming eligible, a foster
child must be assessed according to section 256N.24 and then transitioned into
Northstar Care for Children according to section 256N.28.
Sec. 9. [256N.22]
GUARDIANSHIP ASSISTANCE ELIGIBILITY.
Subdivision 1. General
eligibility requirements. (a)
To be eligible for the guardianship assistance under this section, there must
be a judicial determination under section 260C.515, subdivision 4, that a
transfer of permanent legal and physical custody to a relative is in the
child's best interest. For a child under
jurisdiction of a tribal court, a judicial determination under a similar
provision in tribal code indicating that a relative will assume the duty and
authority to provide care, control, and protection of a child who is residing
in foster care, and to make decisions regarding the child's education, health
care, and general welfare until adulthood, and that this is in the child's best
interest is considered equivalent. Additionally,
a child must:
(1) have been removed from the child's
home pursuant to a voluntary placement agreement or court order;
(2)(i) have resided in foster care for
at least six consecutive months in the home of the prospective relative
custodian; or
(ii) have received an exemption from the
requirement in item (i) from the court based on a determination that:
(A) an expedited move to permanency is
in the child's best interest;
(B) expedited permanency cannot be
completed without provision of guardianship assistance; and
(C) the prospective relative custodian
is uniquely qualified to meet the child's needs on a permanent basis;
(3) meet the agency determinations
regarding permanency requirements in subdivision 2;
(4) meet the applicable citizenship and
immigration requirements in subdivision 3; and
(5) have been consulted regarding the
proposed transfer of permanent legal and physical custody to a relative, if the
child is at least 14 years of age or is expected to attain 14 years of age
prior to the transfer of permanent legal and physical custody; and
(6) have a written, binding agreement
under section 256N.25 among the caregiver or caregivers, the financially
responsible agency, and the commissioner established prior to transfer of
permanent legal and physical custody.
(b) In addition to the requirements in
paragraph (a), the child's prospective relative custodian or custodians must meet
the applicable background study requirements in subdivision 4.
(c) To be eligible for title IV-E
guardianship assistance, a child must also meet any additional criteria in
section 473(d) of the Social Security Act.
The sibling of a child who meets the criteria for title IV-E
guardianship assistance in section 473(d) of the Social Security Act is
eligible for title IV-E guardianship assistance if the child and sibling
are placed with the same
prospective relative custodian or custodians, and the legally responsible
agency, relatives, and commissioner agree on the appropriateness of the
arrangement for the sibling. A child who
meets all eligibility criteria except those specific to title IV-E guardianship
assistance is entitled to guardianship assistance paid through funds other than
title IV-E.
Subd. 2. Agency
determinations regarding permanency.
(a) To be eligible for guardianship assistance, the legally
responsible agency must complete the following determinations regarding
permanency for the child prior to the transfer of permanent legal and physical
custody:
(1) a determination that reunification
and adoption are not appropriate permanency options for the child; and
(2) a determination that the child
demonstrates a strong attachment to the prospective relative custodian and the
prospective relative custodian has a strong commitment to caring permanently
for the child.
(b)
The legally responsible agency shall document the determinations in paragraph
(a) and the supporting information for completing each determination in the
case file and make them available for review as requested by the financially
responsible agency and the commissioner during the guardianship assistance eligibility
determination process.
Subd. 3. Citizenship
and immigration status. A
child must be a citizen of the United States or otherwise be eligible for
federal public benefits according to the Personal Responsibility and Work
Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, as amended, in order to be eligible for
guardianship assistance.
Subd. 4. Background
study. (a) A background study
under section 245C.33 must be completed on each prospective relative custodian
and any other adult residing in the home of the prospective relative custodian. A background study on the prospective
relative custodian or adult residing in the household previously completed
under section 245C.04 for the purposes of foster care licensure may be used for
the purposes of this section, provided that the background study is current at
the time of the application for guardianship assistance.
(b) If the background study reveals:
(1) a felony conviction at any time
for:
(i) child abuse or neglect;
(ii) spousal abuse;
(iii) a crime against a child,
including child pornography; or
(iv) a crime involving violence,
including rape, sexual assault, or homicide, but not including other physical
assault or battery; or
(2) a felony conviction within the past
five years for:
(i) physical assault;
(ii) battery; or
(iii) a drug-related offense;
the prospective relative custodian is prohibited from
receiving guardianship assistance on behalf of an otherwise eligible child.
Subd. 5. Responsibility
for determining guardianship assistance eligibility. The commissioner shall determine
eligibility for:
(1) a child under the legal custody or
responsibility of a Minnesota county social service agency who would otherwise
remain in foster care;
(2) a Minnesota child under tribal
court jurisdiction who would otherwise remain in foster care; and
(3) an Indian child being placed in
Minnesota who meets title IV-E eligibility defined in section 473(d) of the
Social Security Act. The agency or
entity assuming responsibility for the child is responsible for the nonfederal
share of the guardianship assistance payment.
Subd. 6. Exclusions. (a) A child with a guardianship
assistance agreement under Northstar Care for Children is not eligible for the
Minnesota family investment program child-only grant under chapter 256J.
(b) The commissioner shall not enter
into a guardianship assistance agreement with:
(1) a child's biological parent;
(2) an individual assuming permanent
legal and physical custody of a child or the equivalent under tribal code without
involvement of the child welfare system; or
(3) an individual assuming permanent
legal and physical custody of a child who was placed in Minnesota by another
state or a tribe outside of Minnesota.
Subd. 7. Guardianship assistance eligibility
determination. The
financially responsible agency shall prepare a guardianship assistance
eligibility determination for review and final approval by the
commissioner. The eligibility
determination must be completed according to requirements and procedures and on
forms prescribed by the commissioner.
Supporting documentation for the eligibility determination must be
provided to the commissioner. The
financially responsible agency and the commissioner must make every effort to
establish a child's eligibility for title IV‑E guardianship
assistance. A child who is determined to
be eligible for guardianship assistance must have a guardianship assistance
agreement negotiated on the child's behalf according to section 256N.25.
Subd. 8. Termination
of agreement. (a) A
guardianship assistance agreement must be terminated in any of the following
circumstances:
(1) the child has attained the age of
18, or up to age 21 when the child meets a condition for extension in
subdivision 11;
(2) the child has not attained the age
of 18 years of age, but the commissioner determines the relative custodian is
no longer legally responsible for support of the child;
(3)
the commissioner determines the relative custodian is no longer providing
financial support to the child up to age 21;
(4) the death of the child; or
(5) the relative custodian requests in
writing termination of the guardianship assistance agreement.
(b) A relative custodian is considered
no longer legally responsible for support of the child in any of the following
circumstances:
(1) permanent legal and
physical custody or guardianship of the child is transferred to another
individual;
(2) death of the relative custodian
under subdivision 9;
(3) child enlists in the military;
(4) child gets married; or
(5) child is determined an emancipated
minor through legal action.
Subd. 9. Death
of relative custodian or dissolution of custody. The guardianship assistance agreement
ends upon death or dissolution of permanent legal and physical custody of both
relative custodians in the case of assignment of custody to two individuals, or
the sole relative custodian in the case of assignment of custody to one
individual. Guardianship assistance
eligibility may be continued according to subdivision 10.
Subd. 10. Assigning
a child's guardianship assistance to a court-appointed guardian or custodian. (a) Guardianship assistance may be
continued with the written consent of the commissioner to an individual who is
a guardian or custodian appointed by a court for the child upon the death of
both relative custodians in the case of assignment of custody to two
individuals, or the sole relative custodian in the case of assignment of
custody to one individual, unless the child is under the custody of a county,
tribal, or child-placing agency.
(b) Temporary assignment of
guardianship assistance may be approved for a maximum of six consecutive months
from the death of the relative custodian or custodians as provided in paragraph
(a) and must adhere to the policies and procedures prescribed by the
commissioner. If a court has not
appointed a permanent legal guardian or custodian within six months, the
guardianship assistance must terminate and must not be resumed.
(c) Upon assignment of assistance
payments under this subdivision, assistance must be provided from funds other
than title IV-E.
Subd. 11. Extension
of guardianship assistance after age 18.
(a) Under the circumstances outlined in paragraph (e), a child
may qualify for extension of the guardianship assistance agreement beyond the
date the child attains age 18, up to the date the child attains the age of 21.
(b) A request for extension of the
guardianship assistance agreement must be completed in writing and submitted,
including all supporting documentation, by the relative custodian to the
commissioner at least 60 calendar days prior to the date that the current
agreement will terminate.
(c) A signed amendment to the current
guardianship assistance agreement must be fully executed between the relative
custodian and the commissioner at least ten business days prior to the
termination of the current agreement. The
request for extension and the fully executed amendment must be made according
to requirements and procedures prescribed by the commissioner, including
documentation of eligibility, and on forms prescribed by the commissioner.
(d) If an agency is certifying a child
for guardianship assistance and the child will attain the age of 18 within 60
calendar days of submission, the request for extension must be completed in
writing and submitted, including all supporting documentation, with the
guardianship assistance application.
(e) A child who has attained the age of
16 prior to the effective date of the guardianship assistance agreement is eligible
for extension of the agreement up to the date the child attains age 21 if the
child:
(1) is dependent on the relative
custodian for care and financial support; and
(2) meets at least one of the
following conditions:
(i) is completing a secondary education
program or a program leading to an equivalent credential;
(ii) is enrolled in an institution
which provides postsecondary or vocational education;
(iii) is participating in a program or
activity designed to promote or remove barriers to employment;
(iv) is employed for at least 80 hours
per month; or
(v) is incapable of doing any of the
activities described in items (i) to (iv) due to a medical condition where
incapability is supported by professional documentation according to the
requirements and procedures prescribed by the commissioner.
(f)
A child who has not attained the age of 16 prior to the effective date of the
guardianship assistance agreement is eligible for extension of the guardianship
assistance agreement up to the date the child attains the age of 21 if the
child is:
(1) dependent on the relative custodian
for care and financial support; and
(2) possesses a physical or mental
disability which impairs the capacity for independent living and warrants
continuation of financial assistance, as determined by the commissioner.
Subd. 12. Beginning
guardianship assistance component of Northstar Care for Children. Effective November 27, 2014, a child
who meets the eligibility criteria for guardianship assistance in subdivision 1
may have a guardianship assistance agreement negotiated on the child's behalf
according to section 256N.25. The
effective date of the agreement must be January 1, 2015, or the date of the
court order transferring permanent legal and physical custody, whichever is
later. Except as provided under section
256N.26, subdivision 1, paragraph (c), the rate schedule for an agreement under
this subdivision is determined under section 256N.26 based on the age of the
child on the date that the prospective relative custodian signs the agreement.
Subd. 13. Transition
to guardianship assistance under Northstar Care for Children. The commissioner may execute
guardianship assistance agreements for a child with a relative custody
agreement under section 257.85 executed on the child's behalf on or before
November 26, 2014, in accordance with the priorities outlined in section
256N.28, subdivision 7, paragraph (b). To
facilitate transition into the guardianship assistance program, the
commissioner may waive any guardianship assistance eligibility requirements for
a child with a relative custody agreement under section 257.85 executed on the
child's behalf on or before November 26, 2014.
Agreements negotiated under this subdivision must be done according to
the process outlined in section 256N.28, subdivision 7. The maximum rate used in the negotiation
process for an agreement under this subdivision must be as outlined in section
256N.28, subdivision 7.
Sec. 10. [256N.23]
ADOPTION ASSISTANCE ELIGIBILITY.
Subdivision 1. General
eligibility requirements. (a)
To be eligible for adoption assistance under this section, a child must:
(1) be determined to be a child with
special needs under subdivision 2;
(2) meet the applicable citizenship and
immigration requirements in subdivision 3;
(3)(i) meet the criteria in section 473
of the Social Security Act; or
(ii)
have had foster care payments paid on the child's behalf while in out-of-home
placement through the county or tribe and be either under the guardianship of
the commissioner or under the jurisdiction of a Minnesota tribe and adoption,
according to tribal law, is in the child's documented permanency plan; and
(4) have a written, binding agreement
under section 256N.25 among the adoptive parent, the financially responsible agency,
or if there is no financially responsible agency, the agency designated by the
commissioner, and the commissioner established prior to finalization of the
adoption.
(b) In addition to the requirements in
paragraph (a), an eligible child's adoptive parent or parents must meet the
applicable background study requirements in subdivision 4.
(c) A child who meets all eligibility
criteria except those specific to title IV-E adoption assistance shall receive
adoption assistance paid through funds other than title IV-E.
Subd. 2. Special
needs determination. (a) A
child is considered a child with special needs under this section if the
requirements in paragraphs (b) to (g) are met.
(b) There must be a determination that
the child must not or should not be returned to the home of the child's parents
as evidenced by:
(1) a court-ordered termination of
parental rights;
(2) a petition to terminate parental
rights;
(3) consent of parent to adoption
accepted by the court under chapter 260C;
(4) in circumstances when tribal law
permits the child to be adopted without a termination of parental rights, a
judicial determination by a tribal court indicating the valid reason why the
child cannot or should not return home;
(5) a voluntary relinquishment under
section 259.25 or 259.47 or, if relinquishment occurred in another state, the
applicable laws in that state; or
(6) the death of the legal parent or
parents if the child has two legal parents.
(c) There exists a specific factor or
condition of which it is reasonable to conclude that the child cannot be placed
with adoptive parents without providing adoption assistance as evidenced by:
(1) a determination by the Social
Security Administration that the child meets all medical or disability
requirements of title XVI of the Social Security Act with respect to
eligibility for Supplemental Security Income benefits;
(2) a documented physical, mental,
emotional, or behavioral disability not covered under clause (1);
(3) a member of a sibling group being
adopted at the same time by the same parent;
(4) an adoptive placement in the home
of a parent who previously adopted a sibling for whom they receive adoption
assistance; or
(5) documentation that the child is an
at-risk child.
(d) A reasonable but
unsuccessful effort must have been made to place the child with adoptive
parents without providing adoption assistance as evidenced by:
(1) a documented search for an
appropriate adoptive placement; or
(2) a determination by the commissioner
that a search under clause (1) is not in the best interests of the child.
(e) The requirement for a documented
search for an appropriate adoptive placement under paragraph (d), including the
registration of the child with the state adoption exchange and other
recruitment methods under paragraph (f), must be waived if:
(1) the child is being adopted by a
relative and it is determined by the child-placing agency that adoption by the
relative is in the best interests of the child;
(2) the child is being adopted by a
foster parent with whom the child has developed significant emotional ties
while in the foster parent's care as a foster child and it is determined by the
child-placing agency that adoption by the foster parent is in the best
interests of the child; or
(3) the child is being adopted by a
parent that previously adopted a sibling of the child, and it is determined by
the child-placing agency that adoption by this parent is in the best interests
of the child.
For an Indian child covered by the
Indian Child Welfare Act, a waiver must not be granted unless the child-placing
agency has complied with the placement preferences required by the Indian Child
Welfare Act, United States Code, title 25, section 1915(a).
(f) To meet the requirement of a
documented search for an appropriate adoptive placement under paragraph (d),
clause (1), the child-placing agency minimally must:
(1) conduct a relative search as
required by section 260C.221 and give consideration to placement with a
relative, as required by section 260C.212, subdivision 2;
(2) comply with the placement
preferences required by the Indian Child Welfare Act when the Indian Child
Welfare Act, United States Code, title 25, section 1915(a), applies;
(3) locate prospective adoptive
families by registering the child on the state adoption exchange, as required
under section 259.75; and
(4) if registration with the state
adoption exchange does not result in the identification of an appropriate
adoptive placement, the agency must employ additional recruitment methods
prescribed by the commissioner.
(g) Once the legally responsible agency
has determined that placement with an identified parent is in the child's best
interests and made full written disclosure about the child's social and medical
history, the agency must ask the prospective adoptive parent if the prospective
adoptive parent is willing to adopt the child without receiving adoption
assistance under this section. If the
identified parent is either unwilling or unable to adopt the child without
adoption assistance, the legally responsible agency must provide documentation
as prescribed by the commissioner to fulfill the requirement to make a
reasonable effort to place the child without adoption assistance. If the identified parent is willing to adopt
the child without adoption assistance, the parent must provide a written
statement to this effect to the legally responsible agency and the statement
must be maintained in the permanent adoption record of the legally responsible
agency. For children under guardianship
of the commissioner, the legally responsible agency shall submit a copy of this
statement to the commissioner to be maintained in the permanent adoption
record.
Subd. 3. Citizenship
and immigration status. (a) A
child must be a citizen of the United States or otherwise eligible for federal
public benefits according to the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity
Reconciliation Act of 1996, as amended, in order to be eligible for the title
IV-E adoption assistance program.
(b) A child must be a citizen of the
United States or meet the qualified alien requirements as defined in the
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, as
amended, in order to be eligible for adoption assistance paid through funds
other than title IV-E.
Subd. 4. Background
study. A background study
under section 259.41 must be completed on each prospective adoptive parent. If the background study reveals:
(1) a felony conviction at any time for:
(i) child abuse or neglect;
(ii) spousal abuse;
(iii) a crime against a child,
including child pornography; or
(iv) a crime involving violence,
including rape, sexual assault, or homicide, but not including other physical
assault or battery; or
(2) a felony conviction within the past
five years for:
(i) physical assault;
(ii) battery; or
(iii) a drug-related offense;
the adoptive parent is prohibited from receiving adoption
assistance on behalf of an otherwise eligible child.
Subd. 5. Responsibility
for determining adoption assistance eligibility. The commissioner must determine
eligibility for:
(1) a child under the guardianship of
the commissioner who would otherwise remain in foster care;
(2)
a child who is not under the guardianship of the commissioner who meets title
IV-E eligibility defined in section 473 of the Social Security Act and no state
agency has legal responsibility for placement and care of the child;
(3) a Minnesota child under tribal
jurisdiction who would otherwise remain in foster care; and
(4) an Indian child being placed in
Minnesota who meets title IV-E eligibility defined in section 473 of the Social
Security Act. The agency or entity
assuming responsibility for the child is responsible for the nonfederal share
of the adoption assistance payment.
Subd. 6. Exclusions. The commissioner must not enter into
an adoption assistance agreement with the following individuals:
(1) a child's biological parent or
stepparent;
(2) a child's relative under
section 260C.007, subdivision 27, with whom the child resided immediately prior
to child welfare involvement unless:
(i) the child was in the custody of a
Minnesota county or tribal agency pursuant to an order under chapter 260C or
equivalent provisions of tribal code and the agency had placement and care
responsibility for permanency planning for the child; and
(ii)
the child is under guardianship of the commissioner of human services according
to the requirements of section 260C.325, subdivision 1 or 3, or is a ward of a
Minnesota tribal court after termination of parental rights, suspension of
parental rights, or a finding by the tribal court that the child cannot safely
return to the care of the parent;
(3) an individual adopting a child who
is the subject of a direct adoptive placement under section 259.47 or the
equivalent in tribal code;
(4) a child's legal custodian or
guardian who is now adopting the child; or
(5) an individual who is adopting a
child who is not a citizen or resident of the United States and was either
adopted in another country or brought to the United States for the purposes of
adoption.
Subd. 7. Adoption
assistance eligibility determination.
(a) The financially responsible agency shall prepare an adoption
assistance eligibility determination for review and final approval by the
commissioner. When there is no
financially responsible agency, the adoption assistance eligibility
determination must be completed by the agency designated by the commissioner. The eligibility determination must be
completed according to requirements and procedures and on forms prescribed by
the commissioner. The financially
responsible agency and the commissioner shall make every effort to establish a
child's eligibility for title IV-E adoption assistance. Documentation from a qualified expert for the
eligibility determination must be provided to the commissioner to verify that a
child meets the special needs criteria in subdivision 2. A child who is determined to be eligible for
adoption assistance must have an adoption assistance agreement negotiated on
the child's behalf according to section 256N.25.
(b) Documentation from a qualified
expert of a disability is limited to evidence deemed appropriate by the
commissioner and must be submitted to the commissioner with the eligibility
determination. Examples of appropriate
documentation include, but are not limited to, medical records, psychological
assessments, educational or early childhood evaluations, court findings, and
social and medical history.
(c) Documentation that the child is at
risk of developing physical, mental, emotional, or behavioral disabilities must
be submitted according to policies and procedures prescribed by the
commissioner.
Subd. 8. Termination
of agreement. (a) An adoption
assistance agreement must terminate in any of the following circumstances:
(1) the child has attained the age of
18, or up to age 21 when the child meets a condition for extension in
subdivision 12;
(2) the child has not attained the age
of 18, but the commissioner determines the adoptive parent is no longer legally
responsible for support of the child;
(3)
the commissioner determines the adoptive parent is no longer providing
financial support to the child up to age 21;
(4) the death of the child; or
(5) the adoptive parent requests in
writing the termination of the adoption assistance agreement.
(b) An adoptive parent is
considered no longer legally responsible for support of the child in any of the
following circumstances:
(1) parental rights to the child are
legally terminated or a court accepted the parent's consent to adoption under
chapter 260C;
(2) permanent legal and physical
custody or guardianship of the child is transferred to another individual;
(3) death of the adoptive parent under
subdivision 9;
(4) the child enlists in the military;
(5) the child gets married; or
(6) the child is determined an
emancipated minor through legal action.
Subd. 9. Death
of adoptive parent or adoption dissolution.
The adoption assistance agreement ends upon death or termination
of parental rights of both adoptive parents in the case of a two-parent
adoption, or the sole adoptive parent in the case of a single-parent adoption. The child's adoption assistance eligibility
may be continued according to subdivision 10.
Subd. 10. Continuing
a child's title IV-E adoption assistance in a subsequent adoption. (a) The child maintains eligibility
for title IV-E adoption assistance in a subsequent adoption if the following criteria
are met:
(1) the child is determined to be a
child with special needs as outlined in subdivision 2; and
(2) the subsequent adoptive parent
resides in Minnesota.
(b)
If a child had a title IV-E adoption assistance agreement in effect prior to
the death of the adoptive parent or dissolution of the adoption, and the
subsequent adoptive parent resides outside of Minnesota, the commissioner is
not responsible for determining whether the child meets the definition of
special needs, entering into the adoption assistance agreement, and making any
adoption assistance payments outlined in the new agreement unless a state
agency in Minnesota has responsibility for placement and care of the child at
the time of the subsequent adoption. If
there is no state agency in Minnesota that has responsibility for placement and
care of the child at the time of the subsequent adoption, the public child
welfare agency in the subsequent adoptive parent's residence is responsible for
determining whether the child meets the definition of special needs and
entering into the adoption assistance agreement.
Subd. 11. Assigning
a child's adoption assistance to a court-appointed guardian or custodian. (a) State-funded adoption assistance
may be continued with the written consent of the commissioner to an individual
who is a guardian appointed by a court for the child upon the death of both the
adoptive parents in the case of a two-parent adoption, or the sole adoptive
parent in the case of a single-parent adoption, unless the child is under the
custody of a state agency.
(b) Temporary assignment of adoption
assistance may be approved by the commissioner for a maximum of six consecutive
months from the death of the adoptive parent or parents under subdivision 9 and
must adhere to the requirements and procedures prescribed by the commissioner. If, within six months, the child has not been
adopted by a person agreed upon by the commissioner, or a court has not
appointed a permanent legal guardian under section 260C.325, 525.5-313, or
similar law of another jurisdiction, the adoption assistance must terminate.
(c) Upon assignment of payments under
this subdivision, assistance must be from funds other than title IV-E.
Subd. 12. Extension
of adoption assistance agreement. (a)
Under certain limited circumstances a child may qualify for extension of the
adoption assistance agreement beyond the date the child attains age 18, up to
the date the child attains the age of 21.
(b) A request for extension of the
adoption assistance agreement must be completed in writing and submitted,
including all supporting documentation, by the adoptive parent to the
commissioner at least 60 calendar days prior to the date that the current
agreement will terminate.
(c) A signed amendment to the current
adoption assistance agreement must be fully executed between the adoptive
parent and the commissioner at least ten business days prior to the termination
of the current agreement. The request
for extension and the fully executed amendment must be made according to the
requirements and procedures prescribed by the commissioner, including
documentation of eligibility, on forms prescribed by the commissioner.
(d) If an agency is certifying a child
for adoption assistance and the child will attain the age of 18 within 60
calendar days of submission, the request for extension must be completed in
writing and submitted, including all supporting documentation, with the
adoption assistance application.
(e) A child who has attained the age of
16 prior to the finalization of the child's adoption is eligible for extension
of the adoption assistance agreement up to the date the child attains age 21 if
the child is:
(1) dependent on the adoptive parent for
care and financial support; and
(2)(i) completing a secondary education
program or a program leading to an equivalent credential;
(ii) enrolled in an institution that
provides postsecondary or vocational education;
(iii) participating in a program or
activity designed to promote or remove barriers to employment;
(iv) employed for at least 80 hours per
month; or
(v) incapable of doing any of the
activities described in items (i) to (iv) due to a medical condition where
incapability is supported by documentation from an expert according to the
requirements and procedures prescribed by the commissioner.
(f) A child who has not attained the age
of 16 prior to finalization of the child's adoption is eligible for extension
of the adoption assistance agreement up to the date the child attains the age
of 21 if the child is:
(1) dependent on the adoptive parent for
care and financial support; and
(2)(i) enrolled in a secondary education
program or a program leading to the equivalent; or
(ii) possesses a physical or mental
disability that impairs the capacity for independent living and warrants
continuation of financial assistance as determined by the commissioner.
Subd. 13. Beginning
adoption assistance under Northstar Care for Children. Effective November 27, 2014, a child
who meets the eligibility criteria for adoption assistance in subdivision 1,
may have an adoption assistance agreement negotiated on the child's behalf
according to section 256N.25, and the effective date of the agreement must be
January 1, 2015, or the date of the court order finalizing the adoption,
whichever is later. Except as provided
under section 256N.26, subdivision 1, paragraph (c), the maximum rate schedule
for the agreement must be determined according to section 256N.26 based on the
age of the child on the date that the prospective adoptive parent or parents
sign the agreement.
Subd. 14. Transition
to adoption assistance under Northstar Care for Children. The commissioner may offer adoption
assistance agreements under this chapter to a child with an adoption assistance
agreement under chapter 259A executed on the child's behalf on or before
November 26, 2014, according to the priorities outlined in section 256N.28,
subdivision 7, paragraph (b). To
facilitate transition into the Northstar Care for Children adoption assistance
program, the commissioner has the authority to waive any Northstar Care for
Children adoption assistance eligibility requirements for a child with an
adoption assistance agreement under chapter 259A executed on the child's behalf
on or before November 26, 2014. Agreements
negotiated under this subdivision must be in accordance with the process in
section 256N.28, subdivision 7. The
maximum rate used in the negotiation process for an agreement under this
subdivision must be as outlined in section 256N.28, subdivision 7.
Sec. 11. [256N.24]
ASSESSMENTS.
Subdivision 1. Assessment. (a) Each child eligible under sections
256N.21, 256N.22, and 256N.23, must be assessed to determine the benefits the
child may receive under section 256N.26, in accordance with the assessment
tool, process, and requirements specified in subdivision 2.
(b) If an agency applies the emergency
foster care rate for initial placement under section 256N.26, the agency may
wait up to 30 days to complete the initial assessment.
(c) Unless otherwise specified in
paragraph (d), a child must be assessed at the basic level, level B, or one of
ten supplemental difficulty of care levels, levels C to L.
(d) An assessment must not be completed
for:
(1) a child eligible for guardianship
assistance under section 256N.22 or adoption assistance under section 256N.23
who is determined to be an at-risk child.
A child under this clause must be assigned level A under section
256N.26, subdivision 1; and
(2) a child transitioning into
Northstar Care for Children under section 256N.28, subdivision 7, unless the
commissioner determines an assessment is appropriate.
Subd. 2. Establishment
of assessment tool, process, and requirements. Consistent with sections 256N.001 to
256N.28, the commissioner shall establish an assessment tool to determine the
basic and supplemental difficulty of care, and shall establish the process to
be followed and other requirements, including appropriate documentation, when
conducting the initial assessment of a child entering Northstar Care for
Children or when the special assessment and reassessments may be needed for
children continuing in the program. The
assessment tool must take into consideration the strengths and needs of the
child and the extra parenting provided by the caregiver to meet the child's
needs.
Subd. 3. Child
care allowance portion of assessment.
(a) The assessment tool established under subdivision 2 must
include consideration of the caregiver's need for child care under this
subdivision, with greater consideration for children of younger ages.
(b) The child's assessment must include
consideration of the caregiver's need for child care if the following criteria
are met:
(1) the child is under age 13;
(2) all available adult caregivers are
employed or attending educational or vocational training programs;
(3) the caregiver does not receive
child care assistance for the child under chapter 119B.
(c) For children younger than
seven years of age, the level determined by the non-child care portions of the
assessment must be adjusted based on the average number of hours child care is
needed each week due to employment or attending a training or educational
program as follows:
(1) fewer than ten hours or if the
caregiver is participating in the child care assistance program under chapter
119B, no adjustment;
(2) ten to 19 hours or if needed during
school summer vacation or equivalent only, increase one level;
(3) 20 to 29 hours, increase two
levels;
(4) 30 to 39 hours, increase three
levels; and
(5) 40 or more hours, increase four
levels.
(d) For children at least seven years
of age but younger than 13, the level determined by the non-child care portions
of the assessment must be adjusted based on the average number of hours child
care is needed each week due to employment or attending a training or
educational program as follows:
(1) fewer than 20 hours, needed during
school summer vacation or equivalent only, or if the caregiver is participating
in the child care assistance program under chapter 119B, no adjustment;
(2) 20 to 39 hours, increase one level;
and
(3) 40 or more hours, increase two
levels.
(e) When the child attains the age of
seven, the child care allowance must be reduced by reducing the level to that
available under paragraph (d). For
children in foster care, benefits under section 256N.26 must be automatically
reduced when the child turns seven. For
children who receive guardianship assistance or adoption assistance, agreements
must include similar provisions to ensure that the benefit provided to these
children does not exceed the benefit provided to children in foster care.
(f) When the child attains the age of
13, the child care allowance must be eliminated by reducing the level to that
available prior to any consideration of the caregiver's need for child care. For children in foster care, benefits under
section 256N.26 must be automatically reduced when the child attains the age of
13. For children who receive
guardianship assistance or adoption assistance, agreements must include similar
provisions to ensure that the benefit provided to these children does not
exceed the benefit provided to children in foster care.
(g) The child care allowance under this
subdivision is not available to caregivers who receive the child care
assistance under chapter 119B. A
caregiver receiving a child care allowance under this subdivision must notify
the commissioner if the caregiver subsequently receives the child care assistance
program under chapter 119B, and the level must be reduced to that available
prior to any consideration of the caregiver's need for child care.
(h) In establishing the assessment tool
under subdivision 2, the commissioner must design the tool so that the levels
applicable to the non-child care portions of the assessment at a given age
accommodate the requirements of this subdivision.
Subd. 4. Timing
of initial assessment. For a
child entering Northstar Care for Children under section 256N.21, the initial
assessment must be completed within 30 days after the child is placed in foster
care.
Subd. 5. Completion
of initial assessment. (a)
The assessment must be completed in consultation with the child's caregiver. Face-to-face contact with the caregiver is
not required to complete the assessment.
(b) Initial assessments are completed
for foster children, eligible under section 256N.21.
(c) The initial assessment must be
completed by the financially responsible agency, in consultation with the legally
responsible agency if different, within 30 days of the child's placement in
foster care.
(d) If the foster parent is unable or
unwilling to cooperate with the assessment process, the child shall be assigned
the basic level, level B under section 256N.26, subdivision 3.
(e) Notice to the foster parent shall
be provided as specified in subdivision 12.
Subd. 6. Timing
of special assessment. (a) A
special assessment is required as part of the negotiation of the guardianship
assistance agreement under section 256N.22 if:
(1) the child was not placed in foster
care with the prospective relative custodian or custodians prior to the
negotiation of the guardianship assistance agreement under section 256N.25; or
(2) any requirement for reassessment under
subdivision 8 is met.
(b) A special assessment is required as
part of the negotiation of the adoption assistance agreement under section
256N.23 if:
(1) the child was not placed in foster
care with the prospective adoptive parent or parents prior to the negotiation
of the adoption assistance agreement under section 256N.25; or
(2) any requirement for reassessment
under subdivision 8 is met.
(c) A special assessment is required
when a child transitions from a pre-Northstar Care for Children program into
Northstar Care for Children if the commissioner determines that a special
assessment is appropriate instead of assigning the transition child to a level
under section 256N.28.
(d) The special assessment must be
completed prior to the establishment of a guardianship assistance or adoption
assistance agreement on behalf of the child.
Subd. 7. Completing the special assessment. (a) The special assessment must be
completed in consultation with the child's caregiver. Face-to-face contact with the caregiver is
not required to complete the special assessment.
(b) If a new special assessment is
required prior to the effective date of the guardianship assistance agreement,
it must be completed by the financially responsible agency, in consultation
with the legally responsible agency if different. If the prospective relative custodian is
unable or unwilling to cooperate with the special assessment process, the child
shall be assigned the basic level, level B under section 256N.26, subdivision
3, unless the child is known to be an at-risk child, in which case, the child
shall be assigned level A under section 256N.26, subdivision 1.
(c) If a special assessment is required
prior to the effective date of the adoption assistance agreement, it must be
completed by the financially responsible agency, in consultation with the
legally responsible agency if different.
If there is no financially responsible agency, the special assessment
must be completed by the agency designated by the commissioner. If the prospective adoptive parent is unable
or unwilling to cooperate with the special assessment process, the child must
be assigned the basic level, level B under section 256N.26, subdivision 3,
unless the child is known to be an at-risk child, in which case, the child
shall be assigned level A under section 256N.26, subdivision 1.
(d) Notice to the prospective
relative custodians or prospective adoptive parents must be provided as
specified in subdivision 12.
Subd. 8. Timing
of and requests for reassessments. Reassessments
for an eligible child must be completed within 30 days of any of the following
events:
(1) for a child in continuous foster
care, when six months have elapsed since completion of the last assessment;
(2) for a child in continuous foster
care, change of placement location;
(3) for a child in foster care, at the
request of the financially responsible agency or legally responsible agency;
(4) at the request of the commissioner;
or
(5) at the request of the caregiver
under subdivision 9.
Subd. 9. Caregiver
requests for reassessments. (a)
A caregiver may initiate a reassessment request for an eligible child in
writing to the financially responsible agency or, if there is no financially
responsible agency, the agency designated by the commissioner. The written request must include the reason
for the request and the name, address, and contact information of the
caregivers. For an eligible child with a
guardianship assistance or adoption assistance agreement, the caregiver may
request a reassessment if at least six months have elapsed since any previously
requested review. For an eligible foster
child, a foster parent may request reassessment in less than six months with
written documentation that there have been significant changes in the child's
needs that necessitate an earlier reassessment.
(b) A caregiver may request a
reassessment of an at-risk child for whom a guardianship assistance or adoption
assistance agreement has been executed if the caregiver has satisfied the
commissioner with written documentation from a qualified expert that the
potential disability upon which eligibility for the agreement was based has
manifested itself, consistent with section 256N.25, subdivision 3, paragraph
(b).
(c) If the reassessment cannot be completed
within 30 days of the caregiver's request, the agency responsible for
reassessment must notify the caregiver of the reason for the delay and a
reasonable estimate of when the reassessment can be completed.
Subd. 10. Completion
of reassessment. (a) The
reassessment must be completed in consultation with the child's caregiver. Face-to-face contact with the caregiver is
not required to complete the reassessment.
(b) For foster children eligible under
section 256N.21, reassessments must be completed by the financially responsible
agency, in consultation with the legally responsible agency if different.
(c) If reassessment is required after
the effective date of the guardianship assistance agreement, the reassessment
must be completed by the financially responsible agency.
(d) If a reassessment is required after
the effective date of the adoption assistance agreement, it must be completed
by the financially responsible agency or, if there is no financially
responsible agency, the agency designated by the commissioner.
(e) If the child's caregiver is unable
or unwilling to cooperate with the reassessment, the child must be assessed at
level B under section 256N.26, subdivision 3, unless the child has an adoption
assistance or guardianship assistance agreement in place and is known to be an
at-risk child, in which case the child must be assessed at level A under
section 256N.26, subdivision 1.
Subd. 11. Approval
of initial assessments, special assessments, and reassessments. (a) Any agency completing initial
assessments, special assessments, or reassessments must designate one or more
supervisors or other staff to examine and approve assessments completed by
others in the agency under subdivision 2.
The person approving an assessment must not be the case manager or staff
member completing that assessment.
(b) In cases where a special assessment
or reassessment for guardian assistance and adoption assistance is required
under subdivision 7 or 10, the commissioner shall review and approve the assessment
as part of the eligibility determination process outlined in section 256N.22,
subdivision 7, for guardianship assistance, or section 256N.23, subdivision 7,
for adoption assistance. The assessment
determines the maximum for the negotiated agreement amount under section
256N.25.
(c) The new rate is effective the
calendar month that the assessment is approved, or the effective date of the
agreement, whichever is later.
Subd. 12. Notice
for caregiver. (a) The agency
as defined in subdivision 5 or 10 that is responsible for completing the
initial assessment or reassessment must provide the child's caregiver with
written notice of the initial assessment or reassessment.
(b) Initial assessment notices must be
sent within 15 days of completion of the initial assessment and must minimally
include the following:
(1) a summary of the child's completed
individual assessment used to determine the initial rating;
(2) statement of rating and benefit
level;
(3) statement of the circumstances
under which the agency must reassess the child;
(4) procedure to seek reassessment;
(5) notice that the caregiver has the
right to a fair hearing review of the assessment and how to request a fair
hearing, consistent with section 256.045, subdivision 3; and
(6)
the name, telephone number, and e-mail, if available, of a contact person at
the agency completing the assessment.
(c) Reassessment notices must be sent
within 15 days after the completion of the reassessment and must minimally
include the following:
(1) a summary of the child's individual
assessment used to determine the new rating;
(2) any change in rating and its
effective date;
(3) procedure to seek reassessment;
(4) notice that if a change in rating
results in a reduction of benefits, the caregiver has the right to a fair
hearing review of the assessment and how to request a fair hearing consistent
with section 256.045, subdivision 3;
(5) notice that a caregiver who requests a fair hearing of the reassessed rating within ten days may continue at the current rate pending the hearing, but the agency may recover any overpayment; and
(6) name, telephone number, and e-mail,
if available, of a contact person at the agency completing the reassessment.
(d) Notice is not required for
special assessments since the notice is part of the guardianship assistance or
adoption assistance negotiated agreement completed according to section
256N.25.
Subd. 13. Assessment
tool determines rate of benefits. The
assessment tool established by the commissioner in subdivision 2 determines the
monthly benefit level for children in foster care. The monthly payment for guardian assistance
or adoption assistance may be negotiated up to the monthly benefit level under
foster care for those children eligible for a payment under section 256N.26,
subdivision 1.
Sec. 12. [256N.25]
AGREEMENTS.
Subdivision
1. Agreement;
guardianship assistance; adoption assistance. (a) In order to receive guardianship
assistance or adoption assistance benefits on behalf of an eligible child, a written,
binding agreement between the caregiver or caregivers, the financially
responsible agency, or, if there is no financially responsible agency, the
agency designated by the commissioner, and the commissioner must be established
prior to finalization of the adoption or a transfer of permanent legal and
physical custody. The agreement must be
negotiated with the caregiver or caregivers under subdivision 2.
(b) The agreement must be on a form
approved by the commissioner and must specify the following:
(1) duration of the agreement;
(2) the nature and amount of any
payment, services, and assistance to be provided under such agreement;
(3) the child's eligibility for
Medicaid services;
(4) the terms of the payment, including
any child care portion as specified in section 256N.24, subdivision 3;
(5) eligibility for reimbursement of
nonrecurring expenses associated with adopting or obtaining permanent legal and
physical custody of the child, to the extent that the total cost does not
exceed $2,000 per child;
(6) that the agreement must remain in
effect regardless of the state of which the adoptive parents or relative
custodians are residents at any given time;
(7) provisions for modification of the
terms of the agreement, including renegotiation of the agreement; and
(8) the effective date of the
agreement.
(c)
The caregivers, the commissioner, and the financially responsible agency, or,
if there is no financially responsible agency, the agency designated by the
commissioner, must sign the agreement. A
copy of the signed agreement must be given to each party. Once signed by all parties, the commissioner
shall maintain the official record of the agreement.
(d) The effective date of the guardianship
assistance agreement must be the date of the court order that transfers
permanent legal and physical custody to the relative. The effective date of the adoption assistance
agreement is the date of the finalized adoption decree.
(e) Termination or disruption of the
preadoptive placement or the foster care placement prior to assignment of
custody makes the agreement with that caregiver void.
Subd. 2. Negotiation
of agreement. (a) When a
child is determined to be eligible for guardianship assistance or adoption
assistance, the financially responsible agency, or, if there is no financially
responsible agency, the agency designated by the commissioner, must negotiate
with the caregiver to develop an agreement under
subdivision 1. If and when the caregiver and agency reach
concurrence as to the terms of the agreement, both parties shall sign the
agreement. The agency must submit the
agreement, along with the eligibility determination outlined in sections
256N.22, subdivision 7, and 256N.23, subdivision 7, to the commissioner for
final review, approval, and signature according to subdivision 1.
(b) A monthly payment is provided as
part of the adoption assistance or guardianship assistance agreement to support
the care of children unless the child is determined to be an at-risk child, in
which case the special at-risk monthly payment under section 256N.26,
subdivision 7, must be made until the caregiver obtains written documentation from
a qualified expert that the potential disability upon which eligibility for the
agreement was based has manifested itself.
(1) The amount of the payment made on
behalf of a child eligible for guardianship assistance or adoption assistance
is determined through agreement between the prospective relative custodian or
the adoptive parent and the financially responsible agency, or, if there is no
financially responsible agency, the agency designated by the commissioner,
using the assessment tool established by the commissioner in section 256N.24,
subdivision 2, and the associated benefit and payments outlined in section
256N.26. Except as provided under
section 256N.24, subdivision 1, paragraph (c), the assessment tool establishes
the monthly benefit level for a child under foster care. The monthly payment under a guardianship
assistance agreement or adoption assistance agreement may be negotiated up to
the monthly benefit level under foster care.
In no case may the amount of the payment under a guardianship assistance
agreement or adoption assistance agreement exceed the foster care maintenance
payment which would have been paid during the month if the child with respect
to whom the guardianship assistance or adoption assistance payment is made had
been in a foster family home in the state.
(2) The rate schedule for the agreement is determined based on the age of the child on the date that the prospective adoptive parent or parents or relative custodian or custodians sign the agreement.
(3) The income of the relative
custodian or custodians or adoptive parent or parents must not be taken into
consideration when determining eligibility for guardianship assistance or
adoption assistance or the amount of the payments under section 256N.26.
(4) With the concurrence of the
relative custodian or adoptive parent, the amount of the payment may be
adjusted periodically using the assessment tool established by the commissioner
in section 256N.24, subdivision 2, and the agreement renegotiated under
subdivision 3 when there is a change in the child's needs or the family's
circumstances.
(5) The guardianship assistance or
adoption assistance agreement of a child who is identified as at-risk receives
the special at-risk monthly payment under section 256N.26, subdivision 7,
unless and until the potential disability manifests itself, as documented by an
appropriate professional, and the commissioner authorizes commencement of
payment by modifying the agreement accordingly.
A relative custodian or adoptive parent of an at-risk child with a
guardianship assistance or adoption assistance agreement may request a
reassessment of the child under section 256N.24, subdivision 9, and
renegotiation of the guardianship assistance or adoption assistance agreement
under subdivision 3 to include a monthly payment, if the caregiver has written
documentation from a qualified expert that the potential disability upon which
eligibility for the agreement was based has manifested itself. Documentation of the disability must be limited
to evidence deemed appropriate by the commissioner.
(c) For guardianship assistance
agreements:
(1) the initial amount of the monthly
guardianship assistance payment must be equivalent to the foster care rate in
effect at the time that the agreement is signed less any offsets under section
256N.26, subdivision 11, or a lesser negotiated amount if agreed to by the
prospective relative custodian and specified in that agreement, unless the
child is identified as at-risk or the guardianship assistance agreement is
entered into when a child is under the age of six;
(2) an at-risk child must be
assigned level A as outlined in section 256N.26 and receive the special at-risk
monthly payment under section 256N.26, subdivision 7, unless and until the
potential disability manifests itself, as documented by a qualified expert and
the commissioner authorizes commencement of payment by modifying the agreement
accordingly; and
(3) the amount of the monthly payment
for a guardianship assistance agreement for a child, other than an at-risk
child, who is under the age of six must be as specified in section 256N.26,
subdivision 5.
(d) For adoption assistance agreements:
(1) for a child in foster care with the
prospective adoptive parent immediately prior to adoptive placement, the
initial amount of the monthly adoption assistance payment must be equivalent to
the foster care rate in effect at the time that the agreement is signed less
any offsets in section 256N.26, subdivision 11, or a lesser negotiated amount
if agreed to by the prospective adoptive parents and specified in that
agreement, unless the child is identified as at-risk or the adoption assistance
agreement is entered into when a child is under the age of six;
(2) an at-risk child must be assigned
level A as outlined in section 256N.26 and receive the special at-risk monthly
payment under section 256N.26, subdivision 7, unless and until the potential
disability manifests itself, as documented by an appropriate professional and
the commissioner authorizes commencement of payment by modifying the agreement
accordingly;
(3) the amount of the monthly payment
for an adoption assistance agreement for a child under the age of six, other
than an at-risk child, must be as specified in section 256N.26, subdivision 5;
(4) for a child who is in the
guardianship assistance program immediately prior to adoptive placement, the
initial amount of the adoption assistance payment must be equivalent to the
guardianship assistance payment in effect at the time that the adoption assistance
agreement is signed or a lesser amount if agreed to by the prospective adoptive
parent and specified in that agreement; and
(5) for a child who is not in foster
care placement or the guardianship assistance program immediately prior to
adoptive placement or negotiation of the adoption assistance agreement, the
initial amount of the adoption assistance agreement must be determined using
the assessment tool and process in this section and the corresponding payment
amount outlined in section 256N.26.
Subd. 3. Renegotiation of agreement. (a) A relative custodian or adoptive
parent of a child with a guardianship assistance or adoption assistance
agreement may request renegotiation of the agreement when there is a change in
the needs of the child or in the family's circumstances. When a relative custodian or adoptive parent
requests renegotiation of the agreement, a reassessment of the child must be
completed consistent with section 256N.24, subdivisions 9 and 10. If the reassessment indicates that the
child's level has changed, the financially responsible agency, or, if there is
no financially responsible agency, the agency designated by the commissioner or
a designee and the caregiver must renegotiate the agreement to include a
payment with the level determined through the reassessment process. The agreement must not be renegotiated unless
the commissioner, the financially responsible agency, and the caregiver
mutually agree to the changes. The
effective date of any renegotiated agreement must be determined by the
commissioner.
(b)
A relative custodian or adoptive parent of an at-risk child with a guardianship
assistance or adoption assistance agreement may request renegotiation of the
agreement to include a monthly payment higher than the special at-risk monthly
payment under section 256N.26, subdivision 7, if the caregiver has written
documentation from a qualified expert that the potential disability upon which
eligibility for the agreement was based has manifested itself. Documentation of the disability must be
limited to evidence deemed appropriate by the commissioner. Prior to renegotiating the agreement, a reassessment of the child must be
conducted as outlined in section 256N.24, subdivision 9. The reassessment must be used
to renegotiate the agreement to include an appropriate monthly payment. The agreement must not be renegotiated unless
the commissioner, the financially responsible agency, and the caregiver
mutually agree to the changes. The
effective date of any renegotiated agreement must be determined by the
commissioner
(c) Renegotiation of a guardianship
assistance or adoption assistance agreement is required when one of the
circumstances outlined in section 256N.26, subdivision 13, occurs.
Sec. 13. [256N.26]
BENEFITS AND PAYMENTS.
Subdivision 1. Benefits. (a) There are three benefits under
Northstar Care for Children: medical
assistance, basic payment, and supplemental difficulty of care payment.
(b) A child is eligible for medical
assistance under subdivision 2.
(c) A child is eligible for the basic payment under subdivision 3, except for a child assigned level A under section 256N.24, subdivision 1, because the child is determined to be an at-risk child receiving guardianship assistance or adoption assistance.
(d) A child, including a foster child
age 18 to 21, is eligible for an additional supplemental difficulty of care
payment under subdivision 4, as determined by the assessment under section
256N.24.
(e) An eligible child entering
guardianship assistance or adoption assistance under the age of six receives a
basic payment and supplemental difficulty of care payment as specified in
subdivision 5.
(f) A
child transitioning in from a pre-Northstar Care for Children program under
section 256N.28, subdivision 7, shall receive basic and difficulty of
care supplemental payments according to those provisions.
Subd. 2. Medical
assistance. Eligibility for
medical assistance under this chapter must be determined according to section
256B.055.
Subd. 3. Basic
monthly rate. From January 1,
2015, to June 30, 2016, the basic monthly rate must be according to the
following schedule:
|
Ages 0-5 |
$565 per month |
|
Ages 6-12 |
$670 per month |
|
Ages 13 and older |
$790 per month |
Subd. 4. Difficulty
of care supplemental monthly rate. From
January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2016, the supplemental difficulty of care monthly
rate is determined by the following schedule:
|
Level A |
none (special rate under
subdivision 7 applies) |
|
Level B |
none (basic under subdivision 3
only) |
|
Level C |
$100 per month |
|
Level D |
$200 per month |
|
Level E |
$300 per month |
|
Level F |
$400 per month |
|
Level G |
$500 per month |
|
Level H |
$600 per month |
|
Level I |
$700 per month |
|
Level J |
$800 per month |
|
Level K |
$900 per month |
|
Level L |
$1,000 per month |
A child assigned level A is not
eligible for either the basic or supplemental difficulty of care payment, while
a child assigned level B is not eligible for the supplemental difficulty of
care payment but is eligible for the basic monthly rate under subdivision 3.
Subd. 5. Alternate
rates for preschool entry and certain transitioned children. A child who entered the guardianship
assistance or adoption assistance components of Northstar Care for Children
while under the age of six shall receive 50 percent of the amount the child
would otherwise be entitled to under subdivisions 3 and 4. The commissioner may also use the 50 percent
rate for a child who was transitioned into those components through declaration
of the commissioner under section 256N.28, subdivision 7.
Subd. 6. Emergency
foster care rate for initial placement.
(a) A child who enters foster care due to immediate custody by a
police officer or court order, consistent with section 260C.175, subdivisions 1
and 2, or equivalent provision under tribal code, shall receive the emergency
foster care rate for up to 30 days. The
emergency foster care rate cannot be extended beyond 30 days of the child's
placement.
(b) For this payment rate to be
applied, at least one of three conditions must apply:
(1) the child's initial placement must
be in foster care in Minnesota;
(2) the child's previous placement was
more than two years ago; or
(3) the child's previous placement was
for fewer than 30 days and an assessment under section 256N.24 was not
completed by an agency under section 256N.24.
(c) The emergency foster care rate
consists of the appropriate basic monthly rate under subdivision 3 plus a
difficulty of care supplemental monthly rate of level D under subdivision 4.
(d) The emergency foster care rate ends
under any of three conditions:
(1) when an assessment under section
256N.24 is completed;
(2) when the placement ends; or
(3) after 30 days have elapsed.
(e) The financially responsible agency,
in consultation with the legally responsible agency, if different, may replace
the emergency foster care rate at any time by completing an initial assessment
on which a revised difficulty of care supplemental monthly rate would be based. Consistent with section 256N.24, subdivision
9, the caregiver may request a reassessment in writing for an initial
assessment to replace the emergency foster care rate. This written request would initiate an
initial assessment under section 256N.24, subdivision 5. If the revised difficulty of care
supplemental level based on the initial assessment is higher than Level D, then
the revised higher rate shall apply retroactively to the beginning of the
placement. If the revised level is
lower, the lower rate shall apply on the date the initial assessment was
completed.
(f) If a child remains in foster care
placement for more than 30 days, the emergency foster care rate ends after the
30th day of placement and an assessment under section 256N.26 must be
completed.
Subd. 7. Special
at-risk monthly payment for at-risk children in guardianship assistance and
adoption assistance. A child
eligible for guardianship assistance under section 256N.22 or adoption
assistance under section 256N.23 who is determined to be an at-risk child shall
receive a special at-risk monthly payment of $1 per month basic, unless and
until the potential disability manifests itself and the agreement is
renegotiated to include
reimbursement. Such an at-risk child shall receive neither a
supplemental difficulty of care monthly rate under subdivision 4 nor home and
vehicle modifications under subdivision 10, but must be considered for medical
assistance under subdivision 2.
Subd. 8. Daily
rates. (a) The commissioner
shall establish prorated daily rates to the nearest cent for the monthly rates
under subdivisions 3 to 7. Daily rates
must be routinely used when a partial month is involved for foster care,
guardianship assistance, or adoption assistance.
(b) A full month payment is permitted
if a foster child is temporarily absent from the foster home if the brief
absence does not exceed 14 days and the child's placement continues with the
same caregiver.
Subd. 9. Revision. By April 1, 2016, for fiscal year
2017, and by each succeeding April 1 for the subsequent fiscal year, the
commissioner shall review and revise the rates under subdivisions 3 to 7 based
on the United States Department of Agriculture, Estimates of the Cost of
Raising a Child, published by the United States Department of Agriculture,
Agricultural Resources Service, Publication 1411. The revision shall be the average percentage
by which costs increase for the age ranges represented in the United States
Department of Agriculture, Estimates of the Cost of Raising a Child, except
that in no instance must the increase be more than three percent per annum. The monthly rates must be revised to the
nearest dollar and the daily rates to the nearest cent.
Subd. 10. Home
and vehicle modifications. (a)
Except for a child assigned level A under section 256N.24, subdivision 1,
paragraph (b), clause (1), a child who is eligible for an adoption assistance
agreement may have reimbursement of home and vehicle modifications necessary to
accommodate the child's special needs upon which eligibility for adoption
assistance was based and included as part of the negotiation of the agreement
under section 256N.25, subdivision 2. Reimbursement
of home and vehicle modifications must not be available for a child who is
assessed at level A under subdivision 1, unless and until the potential
disability manifests itself and the agreement is renegotiated to include
reimbursement.
(b) Application for and reimbursement
of modifications must be completed according to a process specified by the
commissioner. The type and cost of each
modification must be preapproved by the commissioner. The type of home and vehicle modifications
must be limited to those specified by the commissioner.
(c) Reimbursement for home
modifications as outlined in this subdivision is limited to once every five
years per child. Reimbursement for
vehicle modifications as outlined in this subdivision is limited to once every
five years per family.
Subd. 11. Child
income or income attributable to the child.
(a) A monthly guardianship assistance or adoption assistance payment
must be considered as income and resource attributable to the child. Guardianship assistance and adoption
assistance are exempt from garnishment, except as permissible under the laws of
the state where the child resides.
(b) When a child is placed into foster
care, any income and resources attributable to the child are treated as
provided in sections 252.27 and 260C.331, or 260B.331, as applicable to the
child being placed.
(c) Consideration of income and
resources attributable to the child must be part of the negotiation process
outlined in section 256N.25, subdivision 2.
In some circumstances, the receipt of other income on behalf of the
child may impact the amount of the monthly payment received by the relative
custodian or adoptive parent on behalf of the child through Northstar Care for
Children. Supplemental Security Income
(SSI), retirement survivor's disability insurance (RSDI), veteran's benefits,
railroad retirement benefits, and black lung benefits are considered income and
resources attributable to the child.
Subd. 12. Treatment
of Supplemental Security Income. If
a child placed in foster care receives benefits through Supplemental Security
Income (SSI) at the time of foster care placement or subsequent to placement in
foster care, the financially responsible agency may apply to be the payee for
the child for the duration of the child's placement in foster care. If a child continues to be eligible for SSI
after finalization of the adoption or transfer of permanent legal and physical custody
and is determined to be eligible for a payment under Northstar Care for
Children, a permanent caregiver may choose to receive payment from both
programs simultaneously. The permanent
caregiver is responsible to report the amount of the payment to the Social
Security Administration and the SSI payment will be reduced as required by
Social Security.
Subd. 13. Treatment of retirement survivor's
disability insurance, veteran's benefits, railroad retirement benefits, and
black lung benefits. (a) If a
child placed in foster care receives retirement survivor's disability
insurance, veteran's benefits, railroad retirement benefits, or black lung
benefits at the time of foster care placement or subsequent to placement in
foster care, the financially responsible agency may apply to be the payee for
the child for the duration of the child's placement in foster care. If it is anticipated that a child will be
eligible to receive retirement survivor's disability insurance, veteran's
benefits, railroad retirement benefits, or black lung benefits after
finalization of the adoption or assignment of permanent legal and physical
custody, the permanent caregiver shall apply to be the payee of those benefits
on the child's behalf. The monthly
amount of the other benefits must be considered an offset to the amount of the
payment the child is determined eligible for under Northstar Care for Children.
(b) If a child becomes eligible for
retirement survivor's disability insurance, veteran's benefits, railroad
retirement benefits, or black lung benefits, after the initial amount of the
payment under Northstar Care for Children is finalized, the permanent caregiver
shall contact the commissioner to redetermine the payment under Northstar Care
for Children. The monthly amount of the
other benefits must be considered an offset to the amount of the payment the
child is determined eligible for under Northstar Care for Children.
(c) If a child ceases to be eligible
for retirement survivor's disability insurance, veteran's benefits, railroad
retirement benefits, or black lung benefits after the initial amount of the
payment under Northstar Care for Children is finalized, the permanent caregiver
shall contact the commissioner to redetermine the payment under Northstar Care
for Children. The monthly amount of the
payment under Northstar Care for Children must be the amount the child was
determined to be eligible for prior to consideration of any offset.
(d) If the monthly payment received on
behalf of the child under retirement survivor's disability insurance, veteran's
benefits, railroad retirement benefits, or black lung benefits changes after
the adoption assistance or guardianship assistance agreement is finalized, the
permanent caregiver shall notify the commissioner as to the new monthly payment
amount, regardless of the amount of the change in payment. If the monthly payment changes by $75 or
more, even if the change occurs incrementally over the duration of the term of
the adoption assistance or guardianship assistance agreement, the monthly
payment under Northstar Care for Children must be adjusted without further
consent to reflect the amount of the increase or decrease in the offset amount. Any subsequent change to the payment must be
reported and handled in the same manner.
A change of monthly payments of less than $75 is not a permissible
reason to renegotiate the adoption assistance or guardianship assistance
agreement under section 256N.25, subdivision 3.
The commissioner shall review and revise the limit at which the adoption
assistance or guardian assistance agreement must be renegotiated in accordance
with subdivision 9.
Subd. 14. Treatment
of child support and Minnesota family investment program. (a) If a child placed in foster care
receives child support, the child support payment may be redirected to the
financially responsible agency for the duration of the child's placement in
foster care. In cases where the child
qualifies for Northstar Care for Children by meeting the adoption assistance
eligibility criteria or the guardianship assistance eligibility criteria, any
court ordered child support must not be considered income attributable to the
child and must have no impact on the monthly payment.
(b) Consistent with section
256J.24, a child eligible for Northstar Care for Children whose caregiver
receives a payment on the child's behalf is excluded from a Minnesota family
investment program assistance unit.
Subd. 15. Payments. (a) Payments to caregivers under
Northstar Care for Children must be made monthly. Consistent with section 256N.24, subdivision
12, the financially responsible agency must send the caregiver the required
written notice within 15 days of a completed assessment or reassessment.
(b) Unless paragraph (c) or (d)
applies, the financially responsible agency shall pay foster parents directly
for eligible children in foster care.
(c) When the legally responsible agency
is different than the financially responsible agency, the legally responsible
agency may make the payments to the caregiver, provided payments are made on a
timely basis. The financially
responsible agency must pay the legally responsible agency on a timely basis. Caregivers must have access to the
financially and legally responsible agencies' records of the transaction, consistent
with the retention schedule for the payments.
(d) For eligible children in foster
care, the financially responsible agency may pay the foster parent's payment
for a licensed child-placing agency instead of paying the foster parents
directly. The licensed child-placing
agency must timely pay the foster parents and maintain records of the
transaction. Caregivers must have access
to the financially responsible agency's records on the transaction and the
child-placing agency's records of the transaction, consistent with the
retention schedule for the payments.
Subd. 16. Effect
of benefit on other aid. Payments
received under this section must not be considered as income for child care
assistance under chapter 119B or any other financial benefit. Consistent with section 256J.24, a child
receiving a maintenance payment under Northstar Care for Children is excluded
from any Minnesota family investment program assistance unit.
Subd. 17. Home
and community-based services waiver for persons with disabilities. A child in foster care may qualify for
home and community-based waivered services, consistent with section 256B.092
for developmental disabilities, or section 256B.49 for community alternative
care, community alternatives for disabled individuals, or traumatic brain
injury waivers. A waiver service must
not be substituted for the foster care program.
When the child is simultaneously eligible for waivered services and for
benefits under Northstar Care for Children, the financially responsible agency
must assess and provide basic and supplemental difficulty of care rates as
determined by the assessment according to section 256N.24. If it is determined that additional services
are needed to meet the child's needs in the home that is not or cannot be met
by the foster care program, the need would be referred to the local waivered
service program.
Subd. 18. Overpayments. The commissioner has the authority to
collect any amount of foster care payment, adoption assistance, or guardianship
assistance paid to a caregiver in excess of the payment due. Payments covered by this subdivision include
basic maintenance needs payments, supplemental difficulty of care payments, and
reimbursement of home and vehicle modifications under subdivision 10. Prior to any collection, the commissioner or
designee shall notify the caregiver in writing, including:
(1) the amount of the overpayment and
an explanation of the cause of overpayment;
(2) clarification of the corrected
amount;
(3) a statement of the legal authority
for the decision;
(4) information about how the caregiver
can correct the overpayment;
(5) if repayment is required,
when the payment is due and a person to contact to review a repayment plan;
(6) a statement that the caregiver has
a right to a fair hearing review by the department; and
(7) the procedure for seeking a fair
hearing review by the department.
Subd. 19. Payee. For adoption assistance and
guardianship assistance cases, the payment must only be made to the adoptive
parent or relative custodian specified on the agreement. If there is more than one adoptive parent or
relative custodian, both parties will be listed as the payee unless otherwise
specified in writing according to policies outlined by the commissioner. In the event of divorce or separation of the
caregivers, a change of payee must be made in writing according to policies
outlined by the commissioner. If both
caregivers are in agreement as to the change, it may be made according to a
process outlined by the commissioner. If
there is not agreement as to the change, a court order indicating the party who
is to receive the payment is needed before a change can be processed. If the change of payee is disputed, the
commissioner may withhold the payment until agreement is reached. A noncustodial caregiver may request notice
in writing of review, modification, or termination of the adoption assistance
or guardianship assistance agreement. In
the event of the death of a payee, a change of payee consistent with sections
256N.22 and 256N.23 may be made in writing according to policies outlined by
the commissioner.
Subd. 20. Notification of change. (a) A caregiver who has an adoption
assistance agreement or guardianship assistance agreement in place shall keep
the agency administering the program informed of changes in status or
circumstances which would make the child ineligible for the payments or
eligible for payments in a different amount.
(b) For the duration of the agreement,
the caregiver agrees to notify the agency administering the program in writing
within 30 days of any of the following:
(1) a change in the child's or
caregiver's legal name;
(2) a change in the family's address;
(3) a change in the child's legal
custody status;
(4) the child's completion of high
school, if this occurs after the child attains age 18;
(5) the end of the caregiver's legal
responsibility to support the child based on termination of parental rights of
the caregiver, transfer of guardianship to another person, or transfer of
permanent legal and physical custody to another person;
(6) the end of the caregiver's
financial support of the child;
(7) the death of the child;
(8) the death of the caregiver;
(9) the child enlists in the military;
(10) the child gets married;
(11) the child becomes an emancipated
minor through legal action;
(12) the caregiver separates or
divorces; and
(13) the child is residing
outside the caregiver's home for a period of more than 30 consecutive days.
Subd. 21. Correct
and true information. The
caregiver must be investigated for fraud if the caregiver reports information
the caregiver knows is untrue, the caregiver fails to notify the commissioner
of changes that may affect eligibility, or the agency administering the program
receives relevant information that the caregiver did not report.
Subd. 22. Termination
notice for caregiver. The
agency that issues the maintenance payment shall provide the child's caregiver
with written notice of termination of payment.
Termination notices must be sent at least 15 days before the final
payment or in the case of an unplanned termination, the notice is sent within
three days of the end of the payment. The
written notice must minimally include the following:
(1) the date payment will end;
(2) the reason payments will end and
the event that is the basis to terminate payment;
(3) a statement that the provider has a
right to a fair hearing review by the department consistent with section
256.045, subdivision 3;
(4) the procedure to request a fair
hearing; and
(5) name, telephone number, and email
address of a contact person at the agency.
Sec. 14. [256N.27]
FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL SHARES.
Subdivision 1. Federal
share. For the purposes of
determining a child's eligibility under title IV-E of the Social Security Act
for a child in foster care, the financially responsible agency shall use the
eligibility requirements outlined in section 472 of the Social Security Act. For a child who qualifies for guardianship
assistance or adoption assistance, the financially responsible agency and the
commissioner shall use the eligibility requirements outlined in section 473 of
the Social Security Act. In each case,
the agency paying the maintenance payments must be reimbursed for the costs from
the federal money available for this purpose.
Subd. 2. State share. The commissioner shall pay the state
share of the maintenance payments as determined under subdivision 4, and an identical share of the
pre-Northstar Care foster care program under section 260C.4411, subdivision 1, the relative custody assistance program under
section 257.85, and the pre-Northstar Care for Children adoption assistance
program under chapter 259A. The
commissioner may transfer funds into the account if a deficit occurs.
Subd. 3. Local
share. (a) The financially
responsible agency at the time of placement for foster care or finalization of
the agreement for guardianship assistance or adoption assistance shall pay the
local share of the maintenance payments as determined under subdivision 4, and
an identical share of the pre-Northstar Care for Children foster care program
under section 260C.4411, subdivision 1, the relative custody assistance program
under section 257.85, and the pre-Northstar Care for Children adoption
assistance program under chapter 259A.
(b) The financially responsible agency
shall pay the entire cost of any initial clothing allowance, administrative
payments to child caring agencies specified in section 317A.907, or other
support services it authorizes, except as provided under other provisions of
law.
(c) In cases of federally required
adoption assistance where there is no financially responsible agency as
provided in section 256N.24, subdivision 5, the commissioner shall pay the
local share.
(d) When an Indian child being
placed in Minnesota meets title IV-E eligibility defined in section 473(d) of
the Social Security Act and is receiving guardianship assistance or adoption
assistance, the agency or entity assuming responsibility for the child is responsible
for the nonfederal share of the payment.
Subd. 4. Nonfederal
share. (a) The commissioner
shall establish a percentage share of the maintenance payments, reduced by
federal reimbursements under title IV-E of the Social Security Act, to be paid
by the state and to be paid by the financially responsible agency.
(b) These state and local shares must
initially be calculated based on the ratio of the average appropriate
expenditures made by the state and all financially responsible agencies during
calendar years 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014.
For purposes of this calculation, appropriate expenditures for the
financially responsible agencies must include basic and difficulty of care
payments for foster care reduced by federal reimbursements, but not including
any initial clothing allowance, administrative payments to child care agencies
specified in section 317A.907, child care, or other support or ancillary
expenditures. For purposes of this
calculation, appropriate expenditures for the state shall include adoption
assistance and relative custody assistance, reduced by federal reimbursements.
(c) For each of the periods January 1,
2015, to June 30, 2016, fiscal years 2017, 2018, and 2019, the commissioner
shall adjust this initial percentage of state and local shares to reflect the
relative expenditure trends during calendar years 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014,
taking into account appropriations for Northstar Care for Children and the
turnover rates of the components. In
making these adjustments, the commissioner's goal shall be to make these state
and local expenditures other than the appropriations for Northstar Care to be
the same as they would have been had Northstar Care not been implemented, or if
that is not possible, proportionally higher or lower, as appropriate. The state and local share percentages for
fiscal year 2019 must be used for all subsequent years.
Subd. 5. Adjustments
for proportionate shares among financially responsible agencies. (a) The commissioner shall adjust the
expenditures under subdivision 4 by each financially responsible agency so that
its relative share is proportional to its foster care expenditures, with the
goal of making the local share similar to what the county or tribe would have
spent had Northstar Care for Children not been enacted.
(b)
For the period January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2016, the relative shares must be
as determined under subdivision 4 for calendar years 2011, 2012, 2013,
and 2014 compared with similar costs of all financially responsible agencies.
(c) For subsequent fiscal years, the
commissioner shall update the relative shares based on actual utilization of
Northstar Care for Children by the financially responsible agencies during the
previous period, so that those using relatively more than they did historically
are adjusted upward and those using less are adjusted downward.
(d) The commissioner must ensure that
the adjustments are not unduly influenced by onetime events, anomalies, small
changes that appear large compared to a narrow historic base, or fluctuations
that are the results of the transfer of responsibilities to tribal social
service agencies authorized in section 256.01, subdivision 14b, as part of the
American Indian Child Welfare Initiative.
Sec. 15. [256N.28]
ADMINISTRATION AND APPEALS.
Subdivision 1. Responsibilities. (a) The financially responsible agency
shall determine the eligibility for Northstar Care for Children for children in
foster care under section 256N.21, and for those children determined eligible,
shall further determine each child's eligibility for title IV-E of the Social
Security Act, provided the agency has such authority under the state title IV-E
plan.
(b) Subject to commissioner review and
approval, the financially responsible agency shall prepare the eligibility
determination for Northstar Care for Children for children in guardianship
assistance under section 256N.22 and children in adoption assistance under
section 256N.23. The AFDC relatedness
determination, when necessary to determine a child's eligibility for title IV-E
funding, shall be made only by an authorized agency according to policies and
procedures prescribed by the commissioner.
(c) The financially responsible
agency is responsible for the administration of Northstar Care for Children for
children in foster care. The agency
designated by the commissioner is responsible for assisting the commissioner
with the administration of the Northstar Care for Children for children in
guardianship assistance and adoption assistance by conducting assessments,
reassessments, negotiations, and other activities as specified by the
commissioner under subdivision 2.
Subd. 2. Procedures,
requirements, and deadlines. The
commissioner shall specify procedures, requirements, and deadlines for the
administration of Northstar Care for Children in accordance with sections
256N.001 to 256N.28, including for children transitioning into Northstar Care for
Children under subdivision 7. The
commissioner shall periodically review all procedures, requirements, and
deadlines, including the assessment tool and process under section 256N.24, in
consultation with counties, tribes, and representatives of caregivers, and may
alter them as needed.
Subd. 3. Administration
of title IV-E programs. The
title IV-E foster care, guardianship assistance, and adoption assistance
programs must operate within the statutes, rules, and policies set forth by the
federal government in the Social Security Act.
Subd. 4. Reporting. The commissioner shall specify
required fiscal and statistical reports under section 256.01, subdivision 2,
paragraph (q), and other reports as necessary.
Subd. 5. Promotion
of programs. Families who
adopt a child under the commissioner's guardianship must be informed as to the
adoption tax credit. The commissioner
shall actively seek ways to promote the guardianship assistance and adoption
assistance programs, including informing prospective caregivers of eligible
children of the availability of guardianship assistance and adoption
assistance.
Subd. 6. Appeals
and fair hearings. (a) A
caregiver has the right to appeal to the commissioner under section 256.045
when eligibility for Northstar Care for Children is denied, and when payment or
the agreement for an eligible child is modified or terminated.
(b) A relative custodian or adoptive
parent has additional rights to appeal to the commissioner pursuant to section
256.045. These rights include when the
commissioner terminates or modifies the guardianship assistance or adoption
assistance agreement or when the commissioner denies an application for
guardianship assistance or adoption assistance.
A prospective relative custodian or adoptive parent who disagrees with a
decision by the commissioner before transfer of permanent legal and physical
custody or finalization of the adoption may request review of the decision by
the commissioner or may appeal the decision under section 256.045. A guardianship assistance or adoption
assistance agreement must be signed and in effect before the court order that
transfers permanent legal and physical custody or the adoption finalization;
however in some cases, there may be extenuating circumstances as to why an
agreement was not entered into before finalization of permanency for the child. Caregivers who believe that extenuating
circumstances exist in the case of their child may request a fair hearing. Caregivers have the responsibility of proving
that extenuating circumstances exist. Caregivers
must be required to provide written documentation of each eligibility criterion
at the fair hearing. Examples of
extenuating circumstances include: relevant
facts regarding the child were known by the placing agency and not presented to
the caregivers before transfer of permanent legal and physical custody or
finalization of the adoption, or failure by the commissioner or a designee to
advise potential caregivers about the availability of guardianship assistance or
adoption assistance for children in the state foster care system. If an appeals judge finds through the fair
hearing process that extenuating circumstances existed and that the child met
all eligibility criteria at the time the transfer of permanent legal and
physical custody was ordered or the adoption was finalized, the effective date
and any associated federal financial participation shall be retroactive from
the date of the request for a fair hearing.
Subd. 7. Transitions
from pre-Northstar Care for Children programs. (a) A child in foster care who remains
with the same caregiver shall continue to receive benefits under the
pre-Northstar Care for Children foster care program under section 256.82. Transitions to Northstar Care for Children
must occur as provided in section 256N.21, subdivision 6.
(b) The commissioner may seek
to transition into Northstar Care for Children a child who is in pre-Northstar
Care for Children relative custody assistance under section 257.85 or
pre-Northstar Care for Children adoption assistance under chapter 259A, in
accordance with these priorities, in order of priority:
(1) financial and budgetary constraints;
(2) complying with federal regulations;
(3) converting pre-Northstar Care for
Children relative custody assistance under section 257.85 to the guardianship
assistance component of Northstar Care for Children;
(4) improving permanency for a child or
children;
(5) maintaining permanency for a child
or children;
(6) accessing additional federal funds;
and
(7) administrative simplification.
(c) Transitions shall be accomplished
according to procedures, deadlines, and requirements specified by the
commissioner under subdivision 2.
(d)
The commissioner may accomplish a transition of a child from pre-Northstar Care
for Children relative custody assistance under section 257.85 to the
guardianship assistance component of Northstar Care for Children by declaration
and appropriate notice to the caregiver, provided that the benefit for a child
under this paragraph is not reduced.
(e) The commissioner may offer a
transition of a child from pre-Northstar Care for Children adoption assistance
under chapter 259A to the adoption assistance component of Northstar Care for
Children by contacting the caregiver with an offer. The transition must be accomplished only when
the caregiver agrees to the offer. The
caregiver shall have a maximum of 90 days to review and accept the
commissioner's offer. If the
commissioner's offer is not accepted within 90 days, the pre-Northstar Care for
Children adoption assistance agreement remains in effect until it terminates or
a subsequent offer is made by the commissioner.
(f) For a child transitioning into
Northstar Care for Children, the commissioner shall assign an equivalent
assessment level based on the most recently completed supplemental difficulty
of care level assessment, unless the commissioner determines that arranging for
a new assessment under section 256N.24 would be more appropriate based on the
priorities specified in paragraph (b).
(g) For a child transitioning into
Northstar Care for Children, regardless of the age of the child, the
commissioner shall use the rates under section 256N.26, subdivision 5, unless
the rates under section 256N.26, subdivisions 3 and 4, are more appropriate
based on the priorities specified in paragraph (b), as determined by the
commissioner.
Subd. 8. Purchase
of child-specific adoption services.
The commissioner may reimburse the placing agency for appropriate
adoption services for children eligible under section 259A.75.
Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 257.85, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Scope. The provisions of this section apply to those situations in which the legal and physical custody of a child is established with a relative or important friend with whom the child has resided or had significant contact according to section 260C.515, subdivision 4, by a district court order issued on or after July 1, 1997, but on or before November 26, 2014, or a tribal court order issued on or after July 1, 2005, but on or before November 26, 2014, when the child has been removed from the care of the parent by previous district or tribal court order.
Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 257.85, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Relative custody assistance agreement. (a) A relative custody assistance agreement will not be effective, unless it is signed by the local agency and the relative custodian no later than 30 days after the date of the order establishing permanent legal and physical custody, and on or before November 26, 2014, except that a local agency may enter into a relative custody assistance agreement with a relative custodian more than 30 days after the date of the order if it certifies that the delay in entering the agreement was through no fault of the relative custodian and the agreement is signed and in effect on or before November 26, 2014. There must be a separate agreement for each child for whom the relative custodian is receiving relative custody assistance.
(b)
Regardless of when the relative custody assistance agreement is signed by the
local agency and relative custodian, the effective date of the agreement shall
be the date of the order establishing permanent legal and physical custody.
(c) If MFIP is not the applicable program for a child at the time that a relative custody assistance agreement is entered on behalf of the child, when MFIP becomes the applicable program, if the relative custodian had been receiving custody assistance payments calculated based upon a different program, the amount of relative custody assistance payment under subdivision 7 shall be recalculated under the Minnesota family investment program.
(d) The relative custody assistance agreement shall be in a form specified by the commissioner and shall include provisions relating to the following:
(1) the responsibilities of all parties to the agreement;
(2) the payment terms, including the financial circumstances of the relative custodian, the needs of the child, the amount and calculation of the relative custody assistance payments, and that the amount of the payments shall be reevaluated annually;
(3) the effective date of the agreement, which shall also be the anniversary date for the purpose of submitting the annual affidavit under subdivision 8;
(4) that failure to submit the affidavit as required by subdivision 8 will be grounds for terminating the agreement;
(5) the agreement's expected duration, which shall not extend beyond the child's eighteenth birthday;
(6) any specific known circumstances that could cause the agreement or payments to be modified, reduced, or terminated and the relative custodian's appeal rights under subdivision 9;
(7) that the relative custodian must notify the local agency within 30 days of any of the following:
(i) a change in the child's status;
(ii) a change in the relationship between the relative custodian and the child;
(iii) a change in composition or level of income of the relative custodian's family;
(iv) a change in eligibility or receipt of benefits under MFIP, or other assistance program; and
(v) any other change that could affect eligibility for or amount of relative custody assistance;
(8) that failure to provide notice of a change as required by clause (7) will be grounds for terminating the agreement;
(9) that the amount of relative custody assistance is subject to the availability of state funds to reimburse the local agency making the payments;
(10) that the relative custodian may choose to temporarily stop receiving payments under the agreement at any time by providing 30 days' notice to the local agency and may choose to begin receiving payments again by providing the same notice but any payments the relative custodian chooses not to receive are forfeit; and
(11) that the local agency will continue to be responsible for making relative custody assistance payments under the agreement regardless of the relative custodian's place of residence.
Sec. 18. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 257.85, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Eligibility criteria. (a) A local agency shall enter into a relative custody assistance agreement under subdivision 5 if it certifies that the following criteria are met:
(1) the juvenile court has determined or is expected to determine that the child, under the former or current custody of the local agency, cannot return to the home of the child's parents;
(2) the court, upon determining that it is in the child's best interests, has issued or is expected to issue an order transferring permanent legal and physical custody of the child; and
(3) the child either:
(i) is a member of a sibling group to be placed together; or
(ii) has a physical, mental, emotional, or behavioral disability that will require financial support.
When the local agency bases its certification that the criteria in clause (1) or (2) are met upon the expectation that the juvenile court will take a certain action, the relative custody assistance agreement does not become effective until and unless the court acts as expected.
(b) After November 26, 2014, new
relative custody assistance agreements must not be executed. Agreements that were signed by all parties on
or before November 26, 2014, and were not in effect because the proposed
transfer of permanent legal and physical custody of the child did not occur on
or before November 26, 2014, must be renegotiated under the terms of Northstar
Care for Children in chapter 256N.
Sec. 19. [259A.12]
NO NEW EXECUTION OF ADOPTION ASSISTANCE AGREEMENTS.
After November 26, 2014, new adoption assistance
agreements must not be executed under this section. Agreements that were signed on or before
November 26, 2014, and were not in effect because the adoption finalization of
the child did not occur on or before November 26, 2014, must be renegotiated
according to the terms of Northstar Care
for Children under chapter 256N.
Agreements signed and in effect on or before November 26, 2014,
must continue according to the terms of this section and applicable rules for
the duration of the agreement, unless the commissioner and the adoptive parents
choose to renegotiated the agreements under Northstar Care for Children
consistent with section 256N.28, subdivision 7.
After November 26, 2014, this section and associated rules must be
referred to as the pre-Northstar Care for Children adoption assistance program
and shall apply to children whose adoption assistance agreements were in effect
on or before November 26, 2014, and whose adoptive parents have not
renegotiated their agreements according to the terms of Northstar Care for
Children.
Sec. 20. [260C.4411]
PRE-NORTHSTAR CARE FOR CHILDREN FOSTER CARE PROGRAM.
Subdivision 1. Pre-Northstar
Care for Children foster care program.
(a) For a child placed in family foster care on or before
December 31, 2014, the county of financial responsibility under section 256G.02
or tribal agency authorized under section 256.01, subdivision 14b, shall pay
the local share under section 256N.27, subdivision 3, for foster care
maintenance including any difficulty of care as defined in Minnesota Rules,
part 9560.0521, subparts 7 and 10. Family
foster care includes:
(1) emergency relative placement under
section 245A.035;
(2) licensed foster family settings,
foster residence settings, or treatment foster care settings, licensed under
Minnesota Rules, parts 2960.3000 to 2960.3340, served by a public or private
child care agency authorized by Minnesota Rules, parts 9545.0755 to 9545.0845;
(3) family foster care homes approved
by a tribal agency; and
(4) unlicensed supervised settings for
foster youth ages 18 to 21.
(b) The county of financial
responsibility under section 256G.02 or tribal social services agency
authorized in section 256.01, subdivision 14b, shall pay the entire cost of any
initial clothing allowance, administrative payments to child care agencies
specified in section 317A.907, or any other support services it authorizes,
except as otherwise provided by law.
(c) The rates for the pre-Northstar
Care for Children foster care program remain those in effect on January 1,
2013, continuing the preexisting rate structure for foster children who remain
with the same caregivers and do not transition into Northstar Care for Children
under section 256N.21, subdivision 6.
(d) Difficulty of care payments must be
maintained consistent with Minnesota Rules, parts 9560.0652 and 9560.0653,
using the established reassessment tool in part 9560.0654. The preexisting rate structure for the
pre-Northstar Care for Children foster care program must be maintained,
provided that when the number of foster children in the program is less than
ten percent of the population in 2012, the commissioner may apply the same
assessment tool to both the pre-Northstar Care for Children foster care program
and Northstar Care for Children under the authority granted in section 256N.24,
subdivision 2.
(e) The county of financial
responsibility under section 256G.02 or tribal agency authorized under section
256.01, subdivision 14b, shall document the determined pre-Northstar Care for
Children foster care rate in the case record, including a description of each
condition on which the difficulty of care assessment is based. The difficulty of care rate is reassessed:
(1) every 12 months;
(2) at the request of the foster
parent; or
(3) if the child's level of need
changes in the current foster home.
(f)
The pre-Northstar Care for Children foster care program must maintain the
following existing program features:
(1) monthly payments must be made to
the family foster home provider;
(2) notice and appeal procedures must
be consistent with Minnesota Rules, part 9560.0665; and
(3) medical assistance
eligibility for foster children must continue to be determined according to
section 256B.055.
(g) The county of financial
responsibility under section 256G.02 or tribal agency authorized under section
256.01, subdivision 14b, may continue existing program features, including:
(1) establishing a local fund of county
money through which the agency may reimburse foster parents for the cost of
repairing damage done to the home and contents by the foster child and the
additional care insurance premium cost of a child who possesses a permit or
license to drive a car; and
(2) paying a fee for specific services
provided by the foster parent, based on the parent's skills, experience, or
training. This fee must not be
considered foster care maintenance.
(h) The following events end the
child's enrollment in the pre-Northstar Care for Children foster care program:
(1) reunification with parent or other
relative;
(2) adoption or transfer of permanent
legal and physical custody;
(3) removal from the current foster
home to a different foster home;
(4) another event that ends the current
placement episode; or
(5) attaining the age of 21.
Subd. 2. Consideration
of other programs. (a) When a
child in foster care is eligible to receive a grant of Retirement Survivors
Disability Insurance (RSDI) or Supplemental Security Income for the aged,
blind, and disabled, or a foster care
maintenance payment under title IV-E of the Social Security Act, United States
Code, title 42, sections 670 to 676,
the child's needs must be met through these programs. Every effort must be made to establish a
child's eligibility for a title IV-E grant to reimburse the county or tribe
from the federal funds available for this purpose.
(b) When a child in foster care
qualifies for home and community-based waivered services under section 256B.49
for community alternative care (CAC), community alternatives for disabled
individuals (CADI), or traumatic brain injury (TBI) waivers, this service does
not substitute for the child foster care program. When a foster child is receiving waivered
services benefits, the county of financial responsibility under section 256G.02
or tribal agency authorized under section 256.01, subdivision 14b, assesses and
provides foster care maintenance including difficulty of care using the
established tool in Minnesota Rules, part 9560.0654. If it is determined that additional services
are needed to meet the child's needs in the home that are not or cannot be met
by the foster care program, the needs must be referred to the waivered service
program.
Sec. 21. [260C.4412]
PAYMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENTS.
When a child is placed in a foster care
group residential setting under Minnesota Rules, parts 2960.0020 to 2960.0710,
foster care maintenance payments must be made on behalf of the child to cover
the cost of providing food, clothing, shelter, daily supervision, school
supplies, child's personal incidentals and supports, reasonable travel for
visitation, or other transportation needs associated with the items listed. Daily supervision in the group residential
setting includes routine day-to-day direction and arrangements to ensure the
well-being and safety of the child. It
may also include reasonable costs of administration and operation of the
facility.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective January 1, 2015.
Sec. 22. [260C.4413]
INITIAL CLOTHING ALLOWANCE.
(a) An initial clothing allowance must
be available to a child eligible for:
(1) the pre-Northstar Care for Children
foster care program under section 260C.4411, subdivision 1; and
(2) the Northstar Care for Children
benefits under section 256N.21.
(b) An initial clothing allowance must
also be available for a foster child in a group residential setting based on
the child's individual needs during the first 60 days of the child's initial
placement. The agency must consider the
parent's ability to provide for a child's clothing needs and the residential
facility contracts.
(c) The county of financial
responsibility under section 256G.02 or tribal agency authorized under section
256.01, subdivision 14b, shall approve an initial clothing allowance consistent
with the child's needs. The amount of
the initial clothing allowance must not exceed the monthly basic rate for the
child's age group under section 256N.26, subdivision 3.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective January 1, 2015.
Sec. 23. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 260C.446, is amended to read:
260C.446
DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS RECOVERED FOR ASSISTANCE FURNISHED.
When any amount shall be recovered from
any source for assistance furnished under the provisions of sections 260C.001
to 260C.421 and 260C.441, there shall be paid into the treasury of the
state or county in the proportion in which they have respectively contributed
toward the total assistance paid.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective January 1, 2015.
Sec. 24. REPEALER.
(a)
Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 256.82, subdivision 4; and 260C.441, are
repealed effective January 1, 2015.
(b) Minnesota Rules, parts 9560.0650,
subparts 1, 3, and 6; 9560.0651; and 9560.0655, are repealed effective January
1, 2015."
Page 500, after line 22, insert:
"Northstar Care for Children. The allocation from the health care
access fund to the Minnesota Insurance Marketplace for MinnesotaCare-related
operations and technology costs is reduced by $554,000 in fiscal year 2014 and
$2,014,000 in fiscal year 2015, transferred to the general fund, and
appropriated to the commissioner to implement article 13, Northstar Care for
Children."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Mack amendment and the roll
was called. There were 60 yeas and 73
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Paymar moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 501, delete lines 1 to 8 and insert:
"Medical assistance costs for inmates. The commissioner of corrections shall
transfer to the commissioner of human services $646,000 in fiscal year 2014,
$2,022,000 in fiscal year 2015, $2,123,000 in fiscal year 2016, and $2,455,000
in fiscal year 2017 to cover the state share of medical assistance costs
related to implementation of Minnesota Statutes, section 256B.055, subdivision
14, paragraph (c)."
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Dean, M., moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 458, line 25, reinstate the stricken language and delete the new language
Page 458, delete subdivision 5 and insert:
"Subd. 5. Report. The commissioner shall submit a biennial
report to the legislature on the statewide health improvement program funded
under this section. These reports
The report must include information on each grant recipients
recipient, including the activities that were conducted by the
grantee using grant funds, evaluation data, and outcome measures, if
available. the grantee's progress
toward achieving the measurable outcomes established under subdivision 2, and
the data provided to the commissioner by the grantee to measure these outcomes
for grant activities. The commissioner
shall provide information on grants in which a corrective action plan was
required under subdivision 1a, the types of plan action, and the progress that
has been made toward meeting the measurable outcomes. In addition, the commissioner shall provide
recommendations on future areas of focus for health improvement. These reports are due by January 15 of every
other year, beginning in 2010. In the
report due on January 15, 2010, the commissioner shall include recommendations
on a sustainable funding source for the statewide health improvement program
other than the health care access fund In the report due on January 15,
2014, the commissioner shall include a description of the contracts awarded
under subdivision 4, paragraph (c), and the monitoring and evaluation systems
that were designed and implemented under these contracts. The commissioner shall prepare the report
using existing resources."
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Zellers moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 447, after line 3, insert:
"Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 144.5509, as amended by Laws 2013, chapter 11, section 1, is amended to read:
144.5509
RADIATION THERAPY FACILITY CONSTRUCTION.
(a) A radiation therapy facility may be constructed only by an entity owned, operated, or controlled by a hospital licensed according to sections 144.50 to 144.56 either alone or in cooperation with another entity.
(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), there shall be a moratorium on the construction of any radiation therapy facility located in the following counties: Hennepin, Ramsey, Dakota, Washington, Anoka, Carver, Scott, St. Louis, Sherburne, Benton, Stearns, Chisago, Isanti, and Wright. This paragraph does not apply to the relocation or reconstruction of an existing facility owned by a hospital if the relocation or reconstruction is within one mile of the existing facility. This paragraph does not apply to a radiation therapy facility that is being built attached to a community hospital in Wright County and meets the following conditions prior to August 1, 2007: the capital expenditure report required under Minnesota Statutes, section 62J.17, has been filed with the commissioner of health; a timely construction schedule is developed, stipulating dates for beginning, achieving various stages, and completing construction; and all zoning and building permits applied for. Beginning January 1, 2013, this paragraph does not apply to any construction necessary to relocate a radiation therapy machine from a community hospital-owned radiation therapy facility located in the city of Maplewood to a community hospital campus in the city of Woodbury within the same health system. This paragraph expires December 31, 2020.
(c) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), after December 31, 2020, the construction of a radiation therapy facility located in any of the following counties: Hennepin, Ramsey, Dakota, Washington, Anoka, Carver, Scott, St. Louis, Sherburne, Benton, Stearns, Chisago, Isanti, and Wright, may occur only if the following requirements are met:
(1) the entity constructing the radiation therapy facility is controlled by or is under common control with a hospital licensed under sections 144.50 to 144.56; and
(2) the new radiation
therapy facility is located outside of a 15-mile radius from any existing
radiation therapy facility.
(d) Any referring physician located within a county identified in paragraph (c) must provide each patient who is in need of radiation therapy services with a list of all radiation therapy facilities located within the counties identified in paragraph (c). Physicians with a financial interest in any radiation therapy facility must disclose to the patient the existence of the interest.
(e) For purposes of this section, "controlled by" or "under common control with" means the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the policies, operations, or activities of an entity, through the ownership of, or right to vote or to direct the disposition of shares, membership interests, or ownership interests of the entity.
(f) For purposes of this section, "financial interest in any radiation therapy facility" means a direct or indirect ownership or investment interest in a radiation therapy facility or a compensation arrangement with a radiation therapy facility.
(g) Any hospital licensed under sections 144.50 to
144.56 that contracts with another entity to provide radiation therapy
services, must submit to the commissioner of health on a form provided by the
commissioner, information regarding the contract with the third-party entity
providing the services, including the name of the third-party entity, the time
period covered by the contract, and the terms of the contract. Any information submitted to the commissioner
shall be considered nonpublic data as defined in section 13.02. This paragraph applies to all third-party
contracts that are in effect on the date of enactment of this act, and all
contracts entered into following the date of enactment.
(g) (h) This section does not apply to the
relocation or reconstruction of an existing radiation therapy facility if:
(1) the relocation or reconstruction of the facility remains owned by the same entity;
(2) the relocation or reconstruction is located within one mile of the existing facility; and
(3) the period in which the existing facility is closed and the relocated or reconstructed facility begins providing services does not exceed 12 months."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Zellers
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 47 yeas and 80 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Benson, M.
Davids
Dean, M.
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Green
Gruenhagen
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Wills
Zellers
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Drazkowski moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 357, after line 9, insert:
"Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 256D.024, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 5. Person
convicted of certain crimes of violence.
An individual convicted of one of the following crimes is
disqualified from receiving general assistance:
(1) murder in the first degree, as
defined in section 609.185, or as defined under the laws of the jurisdiction in
which the crime was committed;
(2) murder in the second degree as
defined in section 609.19, or as defined under the laws of the jurisdiction in
which the crime was committed; or
(3) criminal sexual conduct in the
first degree, as defined in section 609.342, or as defined under the laws of
the jurisdiction in which the crime was committed.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2013."
Page 360, after line 11, insert:
"Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 256J.26, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 6. Persons
convicted of certain crimes of violence.
An individual convicted of one of the following crimes is
disqualified from receiving MFIP:
(1) murder in the first degree,
as defined in section 609.185, or as defined under the laws of the jurisdiction
in which the crime was committed;
(2) murder in the second degree as
defined in section 609.19, or as defined under the laws of the jurisdiction in
which the crime was committed; or
(3) criminal sexual conduct in the first degree, as defined in section 609.342, or as defined under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the crime was committed."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Drazkowski
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 92 yeas and 39 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Faust
Fischer
FitzSimmons
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hortman
Howe
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lien
Lillie
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Morgan
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Falk
Freiberg
Hausman
Hornstein
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Persell
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Mack moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 135, delete section 11 and insert:
"Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 256B.0625, subdivision 48, is amended to read:
Subd. 48. Psychiatric
consultation to primary care practitioners.
Effective January 1, 2006, Medical assistance covers
consultation provided by a psychiatrist, psychologist, licensed professional
clinical counselor, or licensed independent clinical social worker via
telephone, e-mail, facsimile, or other means of communication to primary care
practitioners, including pediatricians. The
need for consultation and the receipt of the consultation must be documented in
the patient record maintained by the primary care practitioner. If the patient consents, and subject to federal limitations and data privacy
provisions, the consultation may be provided without the patient present."
Dean, M., moved to amend the Mack amendment to H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 7, after the first comma, insert "marriage and family therapist, physician assistant,"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question
was taken on the amendment to the amendment and the roll was called. There were 5 yeas and 120 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
FitzSimmons
Leidiger
Swedzinski
Spk. Thissen
Those who voted in the negative were:
Albright
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Atkins
Barrett
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Dill
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zellers
Zerwas
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
The question recurred on the Mack
amendment to H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as
amended. The motion did not prevail and
the amendment was not adopted.
Drazkowski moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 360, after line 11, insert:
"Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 256J.26, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Fleeing felons. An individual who is fleeing to avoid prosecution, or custody, or confinement after conviction for a crime that is a felony under the laws of the jurisdiction from which the individual flees, or in the case of New Jersey, is a high misdemeanor, is disqualified from receiving MFIP. The county agency must cooperate with law enforcement agencies to determine if an applicant is a fleeing felon under this subdivision."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question
was taken on the Drazkowski amendment and the roll was called. There were 101 yeas and 31 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Brynaert
Carlson
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Faust
Fischer
FitzSimmons
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hortman
Howe
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Morgan
Myhra
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Erhardt
Falk
Hansen
Hornstein
Huntley
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Lesch
Mahoney
Mariani
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Persell
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Spk. Thissen
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Drazkowski moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 360, after line 11, insert:
"Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 256J.15, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 3. Eligibility;
drug testing. (a) To be
eligible for MFIP, a person must undergo drug and alcohol screening, the extent
practicable, following the established procedures and reliability safeguards
provided for screening in sections 181.951, 181.953, and 181.954. A county agency may require a recipient of
benefits to undergo random drug screening.
An applicant must provide evidence of a negative test result to the
appropriate county agency prior to being accepted for MFIP benefits and prior
to receiving an extension of benefits under section 256J.425.
(b) A laboratory must report to the
appropriate county agency any positive test results returned on an applicant or
recipient of MFIP benefits. Upon receipt
of a positive test result, a county agency must deny or discontinue benefits
until the person demonstrates a pattern of negative test results that satisfy
the agency that the person is no longer a drug user.
(c) A person who undergoes testing under
this subdivision shall pay a fee to the laboratory for the cost of the test
prior to testing.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2013."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Liebling moved to amend the Drazkowski amendment to H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, after line 1, insert:
"Page 337, after line 8, insert:
"Section 1. [3.0995]
LEGISLATORS; DRUG TESTING.
(a) To be eligible for compensation and
expense reimbursements, a legislator must undergo drug and alcohol screening,
to the extent practicable, following the established procedures and reliability
safeguards provided for screening in sections 181.951, 181.953, and 181.954. Legislators may be required to undergo random
drug screening. Legislators must provide
evidence of a negative test result to the house controller for members of the
house of representatives or the secretary of the senate for members of the
senate prior to receipt of any compensation or expense reimbursement.
(b) A laboratory must report to the
house controller for members of the house of representatives or the secretary
of the senate for members of the senate any positive test results returned on a
legislator. Upon receipt of a positive
test result, the house controller for members of the house of representatives
and the secretary of the senate for members of the senate must deny or discontinue
compensation and expense reimbursement until the legislator demonstrates a
pattern of negative test results that satisfy the house controller or the
secretary of the senate that the person is no longer a drug user.
(c) A legislator who undergoes
testing under this section shall pay a fee to the laboratory for the cost of
the test prior to testing.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2013.""
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
POINT OF
ORDER
Davids raised a point of order pursuant to
section 124 of "Mason's Manual of Legislative Procedure," relating to
Personalities Not Permitted in Debate.
The Speaker ruled the point of order not well taken.
The question recurred on the amendment to
the amendment and the roll was called.
There were 119 yeas and 12 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Falk
Faust
Fischer
FitzSimmons
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hortman
Howe
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Kahn
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Morgan
Myhra
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Hornstein
Huntley
Johnson, S.
Lesch
Metsa
Moran
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Simonson
Wagenius
Spk. Thissen
The
motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was adopted.
The question recurred on the Drazkowski amendment, as
amended, and the roll was called.
Pursuant to rule 2.05, Barrett was excused
from voting on the Drazkowski amendment, as amended, to
H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended.
There were 83 yeas and 49 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Atkins
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Dill
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Faust
FitzSimmons
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hortman
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lillie
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Morgan
Myhra
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dorholt
Falk
Fischer
Freiberg
Hansen
Hausman
Hornstein
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Paymar
Radinovich
Schoen
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion prevailed and the amendment, as amended, was adopted.
Zerwas moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 219, line 4, delete "two" and insert "2.5"
Page 220, line 9, delete "two" and insert "2.5"
Page 503, after line 17, insert:
"Home and Community-Based Services Rate Increase. Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 295.581, $7,535,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $8,727,000 in fiscal year 2015 is appropriated from the health care access fund to the commissioner of human services for a portion of the provider rate and grant increases under article 7, section 34."
Page 510, line 22, delete "$20,000,000" and insert "$12,465,000"
Page 510, line 23, delete "$25,000,000" and insert "$16,273,000"
Adjust amounts accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Zerwas
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 67 yeas and 67 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Rosenthal
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Dean, M., moved to amend H. F. No. 1233, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 42, after line 13, insert:
"Sec. 61. INTENT.
It is the intent of this act that Minnesota shall pursue market-based solutions to health care delivery reform in Minnesota. It is not the intent of this act to advance or implement policies leading to a single-payer system."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Dean, M., amendment and the
roll was called. There were 68 yeas and
66 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lillie
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Morgan
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
H. F. No. 1233, A bill for an act relating to state government; establishing the health and human services budget; modifying provisions related to health care, continuing care, human services licensing, chemical and mental health, managed care organizations, waiver provider standards, home care, and the Department of Health; redesigning home and community-based services; establishing payment methodologies for home and community-based services; adjusting nursing and ICF/DD facility rates; setting and modifying fees; modifying autism coverage; modifying assistance programs; requiring licensing of certain abortion facilities; requiring drug testing; making technical changes; requiring studies; requiring reports; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 16A.724, subdivisions 2, 3; 16C.10, subdivision 5; 16C.155, subdivision 1; 62A.65, subdivision 2, by adding a subdivision; 62J.692, subdivision 4; 62Q.19, subdivision 1; 103I.005, by adding a subdivision; 103I.521; 119B.13, subdivision 7; 144.051, by adding subdivisions; 144.0724, subdivisions 4, 6; 144.123, subdivision 1; 144.125, subdivision 1; 144.966, subdivisions 2, 3a; 144.98, subdivisions 3, 5, by adding subdivisions; 144.99, subdivision 4; 144A.351; 144A.43; 144A.44; 144A.45; 144A.53, subdivision 2; 144D.01, subdivision 4; 145.986; 145C.01, subdivision 7; 148E.065, subdivision 4a; 149A.02, subdivisions 1a, 2, 3, 4, 5, 16, 23, 27, 34, 35, 37, by adding subdivisions; 149A.03; 149A.65, by adding subdivisions; 149A.70, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 5; 149A.71, subdivisions 2, 4; 149A.72, subdivisions 3, 9, by adding a subdivision; 149A.73, subdivisions 1, 2, 4; 149A.74; 149A.91, subdivision 9; 149A.93, subdivisions 3, 6; 149A.94; 149A.96, subdivision 9; 174.30, subdivision 1; 214.40, subdivision 1; 243.166, subdivisions 4b, 7; 245.4661, subdivisions 5, 6; 245.4682, subdivision 2; 245A.02, subdivisions 1, 9, 10, 14; 245A.03, subdivisions 7, 8, 9; 245A.04, subdivision 13; 245A.042, subdivision 3;
245A.07, subdivisions 2a, 3; 245A.08, subdivision 2a; 245A.10; 245A.11, subdivisions 2a, 7, 7a, 7b, 8; 245A.1435; 245A.144; 245A.1444; 245A.16, subdivision 1; 245A.40, subdivision 5; 245A.50; 245C.04, by adding a subdivision; 245C.08, subdivision 1; 245D.02; 245D.03; 245D.04; 245D.05; 245D.06; 245D.07; 245D.09; 245D.10; 246.18, subdivision 8, by adding a subdivision; 246.54; 254B.04, subdivision 1; 254B.13; 256.01, subdivisions 2, 24, 34, by adding subdivisions; 256.9657, subdivisions 1, 2, 3a; 256.9685, subdivision 2; 256.969, subdivisions 3a, 29; 256.975, subdivision 7, by adding subdivisions; 256.9754, subdivision 5, by adding subdivisions; 256B.02, by adding subdivisions; 256B.021, by adding subdivisions; 256B.04, subdivisions 18, 21, by adding a subdivision; 256B.055, subdivisions 3a, 6, 10, 14, 15, by adding a subdivision; 256B.056, subdivisions 1, 1c, 3, 4, as amended, 5c, 10, by adding a subdivision; 256B.057, subdivisions 1, 8, 10, by adding a subdivision; 256B.06, subdivision 4; 256B.0623, subdivision 2; 256B.0625, subdivisions 9, 13e, 19c, 31, 39, 48, 58, by adding subdivisions; 256B.0631, subdivision 1; 256B.064, subdivisions 1a, 1b, 2; 256B.0659, subdivision 21; 256B.0755, subdivision 3; 256B.0756; 256B.0911, subdivisions 1, 1a, 3a, 4d, 6, 7, by adding a subdivision; 256B.0913, subdivision 4, by adding a subdivision; 256B.0915, subdivisions 3a, 5, by adding a subdivision; 256B.0916, by adding a subdivision; 256B.0917, subdivisions 6, 13, by adding subdivisions; 256B.092, subdivisions 11, 12, by adding subdivisions; 256B.0946; 256B.095; 256B.0951, subdivisions 1, 4; 256B.0952, subdivisions 1, 5; 256B.097, subdivisions 1, 3; 256B.431, subdivision 44; 256B.434, subdivision 4, by adding a subdivision; 256B.437, subdivision 6; 256B.439, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, by adding a subdivision; 256B.441, subdivisions 13, 53; 256B.49, subdivisions 11a, 12, 14, 15, by adding subdivisions; 256B.4912, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 7, by adding subdivisions; 256B.4913, subdivisions 5, 6, by adding a subdivision; 256B.492; 256B.493, subdivision 2; 256B.5011, subdivision 2; 256B.5012, by adding subdivisions; 256B.69, subdivisions 5c, 31, by adding a subdivision; 256B.694; 256B.76, subdivisions 2, 4, by adding a subdivision; 256B.761; 256B.764; 256B.766; 256D.024, by adding a subdivision; 256I.04, subdivision 3; 256I.05, subdivision 1e, by adding a subdivision; 256J.15, by adding a subdivision; 256J.26, subdivision 3, by adding a subdivision; 256J.35; 256K.45; 256L.01, subdivisions 3a, 5, by adding subdivisions; 256L.02, subdivision 2, by adding subdivisions; 256L.03, subdivisions 1, 1a, 3, 5, 6, by adding a subdivision; 256L.04, subdivisions 1, 7, 8, 10, by adding subdivisions; 256L.05, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 256L.06, subdivision 3; 256L.07, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 256L.09, subdivision 2; 256L.11, subdivision 6; 256L.15, subdivisions 1, 2; 257.0755, subdivision 1; 260B.007, subdivisions 6, 16; 260C.007, subdivisions 6, 31; 270B.14, subdivision 1; 471.59, subdivision 1; 626.556, subdivisions 2, 3, 10d; 626.557, subdivisions 4, 9, 9a, 9e; 626.5572, subdivision 13; Laws 1998, chapter 407, article 6, section 116; Laws 2011, First Special Session chapter 9, article 1, section 3; article 2, section 27; article 10, section 3, subdivision 3, as amended; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 3; 62A; 62D; 144; 144A; 145; 149A; 214; 245; 245A; 245D; 254B; 256; 256B; 256L; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 103I.005, subdivision 20; 144.123, subdivision 2; 144A.46; 144A.461; 149A.025; 149A.20, subdivision 8; 149A.30, subdivision 2; 149A.40, subdivision 8; 149A.45, subdivision 6; 149A.50, subdivision 6; 149A.51, subdivision 7; 149A.52, subdivision 5a; 149A.53, subdivision 9; 245A.655; 245B.01; 245B.02; 245B.03; 245B.031; 245B.04; 245B.05, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7; 245B.055; 245B.06; 245B.07; 245B.08; 245D.08; 256B.055, subdivisions 3, 5, 10b; 256B.056, subdivision 5b; 256B.057, subdivisions 1c, 2; 256B.0911, subdivisions 4a, 4b, 4c; 256B.0917, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14; 256B.096, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 256B.14, subdivision 3a; 256B.49, subdivision 16a; 256B.4913, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 256B.5012, subdivision 13; 256J.24, subdivision 6; 256K.45, subdivision 2; 256L.01, subdivision 4a; 256L.031; 256L.04, subdivisions 1b, 9, 10a; 256L.05, subdivision 3b; 256L.07, subdivisions 5, 8, 9; 256L.11, subdivision 5; 256L.12; 256L.17, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; 485.14; 609.093; Laws 2011, First Special Session chapter 9, article 7, section 54, as amended; Minnesota Rules, parts 4668.0002; 4668.0003; 4668.0005; 4668.0008; 4668.0012; 4668.0016; 4668.0017; 4668.0019; 4668.0030; 4668.0035; 4668.0040; 4668.0050; 4668.0060; 4668.0065; 4668.0070; 4668.0075; 4668.0080; 4668.0100; 4668.0110; 4668.0120; 4668.0130; 4668.0140; 4668.0150; 4668.0160; 4668.0170; 4668.0180; 4668.0190; 4668.0200; 4668.0218; 4668.0220; 4668.0230; 4668.0240; 4668.0800; 4668.0805; 4668.0810; 4668.0815; 4668.0820; 4668.0825; 4668.0830; 4668.0835; 4668.0840; 4668.0845; 4668.0855; 4668.0860; 4668.0865; 4668.0870; 4669.0001; 4669.0010; 4669.0020; 4669.0030; 4669.0040; 4669.0050.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the
roll was called. There were 70 yeas and
64 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
Those who voted in the negative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
The Speaker called Hortman to the Chair.
S. F. No. 953,
A bill for an act relating to health; modifying a social work licensure
provision; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 148E.0555, subdivision 2.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 134 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Falk
Faust
Fischer
FitzSimmons
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zellers
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
The bill was
passed and its title agreed to.
H. F. No. 760, A bill for
an act relating to human services; updating outdated terminology; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 15.44; 124D.57; 127A.45, subdivision 12;
144.651, subdivision 4; 145.88; 146A.11, subdivision 1; 148.512, subdivisions
12, 13; 150A.13, subdivision 6; 174.255, subdivision 1; 202A.13; 202A.155;
202A.156; 237.036; 237.16, subdivision 9; 240A.04; 240A.06, subdivisions 1, 2;
256.01, subdivision 2; 256C.24, subdivision 3; 256C.29; 299C.06; 326B.106,
subdivisions 9, 11; 473.608, subdivision 22; 589.35, subdivision 1; 595.02,
subdivision 1; 609.06, subdivision 1; 609.749, subdivision 2; 626.8455,
subdivision 1.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 134 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Falk
Faust
Fischer
FitzSimmons
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zellers
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
The bill was
passed and its title agreed to.
H. F. No. 779 was reported
to the House.
Atkins moved to amend H. F. No. 779, the fourth engrossment, as follows:
Page 82, line 5, delete "2020" and insert "2017"
Page 82, delete lines 33 to 34 and insert:
"(c) Except for qualified health plans sold on the Minnesota Insurance Marketplace, information reported under paragraph (a), clauses (3) and (4), is nonpublic data as defined under section 13.02, subdivision 9. Information reported under paragraph (a), clauses (1) through (8), must be reported by the Minnesota Insurance Marketplace for qualified health plans sold through the Minnesota Insurance Marketplace."
Page 89, after line 31, insert:
"EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment."
The motion
prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Gruenhagen moved to amend H. F. No. 779, the fourth engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 79, after line 33, insert:
"(e) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter or other law to the contrary, this chapter does not apply to any entity that does business only outside of the Minnesota Insurance Marketplace."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Gruenhagen
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 61 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Holberg moved to amend H. F. No. 779, the fourth engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 77, after line 18, insert:
"Subd. 6. Abortion
coverage limited. The essential
health benefits package shall not include abortion coverage except where the
life of the female would be endangered or substantial and irreversible
impairment of a major bodily function would result if the unborn child were
carried to term; or where the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Holberg
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 70 yeas and 64 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Dill
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Faust
FitzSimmons
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Marquart
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Sawatzky
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Fischer
Freiberg
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kieffer
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
Fritz moved to amend H. F. No. 779, the fourth engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 78, after line 13, insert:
"Sec. 92. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 145.414, is amended to read:
145.414
ABORTION NOT MANDATORY.
(a) No person and no hospital or institution shall be coerced, held liable or discriminated against in any manner because of a refusal to perform, accommodate, assist or submit to an abortion for any reason.
(b) It is the policy of the state of Minnesota that no health plan company as defined under section 62Q.01, subdivision 4, or health care cooperative as defined under section 62R.04, subdivision 2, shall be required to provide or provide coverage for an abortion. No provision of this chapter; of chapter 62A, 62C, 62D, 62H, 62L, 62M, 62N, 62R, 62V, 64B, or of any other chapter; of Minnesota Rules; or of Laws 1995, chapter 234, shall be construed as requiring a health plan company as defined under section 62Q.01, subdivision 4, or a health care cooperative as defined under section 62R.04, subdivision 2, to provide or provide coverage for an abortion.
(c) This section supersedes any provision of Laws 1995, chapter 234, or any act enacted prior to enactment of Laws 1995, chapter 234, that in any way limits or is inconsistent with this section. No provision of any act enacted subsequent to Laws 1995, chapter 234 shall be construed as in any way limiting or being inconsistent with this section, unless the act amends this section or expressly provides that it is intended to limit or be inconsistent with this section."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Fritz amendment and the roll
was called. There were 71 yeas and 63
nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Dill
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Faust
FitzSimmons
Franson
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Marquart
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Sawatzky
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Fischer
Freiberg
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion prevailed and the amendment was
adopted.
H. F. No. 779, A bill for
an act relating to health plan regulation; regulating policy and contract
coverages; conforming state law to federal requirements; establishing health
plan market rules; modifying the designation of essential community providers; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 43A.23, subdivision 1; 43A.317, subdivision
6; 60A.08, subdivision 15; 62A.011, subdivision 3, by adding subdivisions;
62A.02, by adding a subdivision; 62A.03, subdivision 1; 62A.04, subdivision 2;
62A.047; 62A.049; 62A.136; 62A.149, subdivision 1; 62A.17, subdivisions 2, 6;
62A.21, subdivision 2b; 62A.28, subdivision 2; 62A.302; 62A.615; 62A.65,
subdivisions 3, 5, 6, 7, by adding subdivisions; 62C.14, subdivision 5;
62C.142, subdivision 2; 62D.07, subdivision 3; 62D.095; 62D.124, subdivision 4;
62D.181, subdivision 7; 62E.02, by adding a subdivision; 62E.04, subdivision 4,
by adding a subdivision; 62E.06, subdivision 1; 62E.09; 62E.10, subdivision 7;
62H.04; 62L.02, subdivisions 11, 14a, 26, by adding a subdivision; 62L.03,
subdivisions 1, 3, 4, 6; 62L.045, subdivisions 2, 4; 62L.05, subdivision 10;
62L.06; 62L.08; 62L.12, subdivision 2; 62M.05, subdivision 3a; 62M.06,
subdivision 1; 62Q.01, by adding subdivisions; 62Q.021; 62Q.17, subdivision 6;
62Q.18, by adding a subdivision; 62Q.19, subdivision 1; 62Q.23; 62Q.43,
subdivision 2; 62Q.47; 62Q.52; 62Q.55; 62Q.68, subdivision 1; 62Q.69,
subdivision 3; 62Q.70, subdivisions 1, 2; 62Q.71;
62Q.73; 62Q.75, subdivision 1; 62Q.80, subdivision 2; 72A.20, subdivision 35; 145.414;
471.61, subdivision 1a; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota
Statutes, chapters 62A; 62Q; proposing coding
for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 62K; repealing Minnesota Statutes
2012, sections 62A.615; 62A.65, subdivision 6; 62E.02, subdivision 7;
62E.16; 62E.20; 62L.02, subdivisions 4, 18, 19, 23, 24; 62L.05, subdivisions 1,
2, 3, 4, 4a, 5, 6, 7, 11, 12, 13; 62L.081; 62L.10, subdivision 5; 62Q.37,
subdivision 5.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the
roll was called. There were 74 yeas and
60 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
Those who voted in the negative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
The
Speaker resumed the Chair.
There being no objection, the order of
business reverted to Messages from the Senate.
MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE
The
following messages were received from the Senate:
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the
Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully
requested:
H. F. No. 976, A bill for an act relating to
state government; appropriating money for environment, natural resources, and
agriculture; modifying and providing for certain fees; modifying and providing
for disposition of certain revenue; creating accounts; modifying payment of
certain costs; modifying grant programs; providing for agricultural
water quality certification; modifying Minnesota Noxious Weed Law; modifying
pesticide control; modifying animal waste technician provisions; modifying
certain renewable energy and biofuel provisions; modifying bonding requirements
for grain buyers and grain storage; making technical changes; modifying certain
permit requirements; providing for federal law compliance; providing for
certain easements; establishing pollinator habitat program; modifying state
trails; modifying all-terrain vehicle operating provisions; modifying State
Timber Act; modifying water use requirements; modifying certain park
boundaries; modifying reporting requirements; modifying Petroleum Tank Release
Cleanup Act; providing for silica sand mining model standards and technical
assistance; establishing criteria for wastewater treatment system projects;
providing for wastewater laboratory certification; providing for product
stewardship programs; modifying Minnesota Power Plant Siting Act; providing for
sanitary districts; requiring groundwater sustainability recommendations;
requiring rulemaking; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 17.03,
subdivision 3; 17.1015; 17.118, subdivision 2; 18.77, subdivisions 3, 4, 10,
12; 18.78, subdivision 3; 18.79, subdivisions 6, 13; 18.82, subdivision 1;
18.91, subdivisions 1, 2; 18B.01, by adding a subdivision; 18B.065, subdivision
2a; 18B.07, subdivisions 4, 5, 7; 18B.26, subdivision 3; 18B.305; 18B.316, subdivisions
1, 3, 4, 8, 9; 18B.37, subdivision 4; 18C.430; 18C.433, subdivision 1; 31.94;
41A.10, subdivision 2, by adding a subdivision; 41A.105, subdivisions 1a, 3, 5;
41A.12, by adding a subdivision; 41B.04, subdivision 9; 41D.01, subdivision 4;
84.027, by adding a subdivision; 84.82, by adding a subdivision; 84.922, by
adding a subdivision; 84.9256, subdivision 1; 84.928, subdivision 1; 84D.108,
subdivision 2; 85.015, subdivision 13; 85.052, subdivision 6; 85.054, by adding
a subdivision; 85.055, subdivisions 1, 2; 85.42; 89.0385; 89.17; 90.01,
subdivisions 4, 5, 6, 8, 11; 90.031, subdivision 4; 90.041, subdivisions 2, 5,
6, 9, by adding subdivisions; 90.045; 90.061, subdivision 8; 90.101,
subdivision 1; 90.121; 90.145; 90.151, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9;
90.161; 90.162; 90.171; 90.181, subdivision 2; 90.191, subdivision 1; 90.193;
90.195; 90.201, subdivision 2a; 90.211; 90.221; 90.252, subdivision 1; 90.301,
subdivisions 2, 4; 90.41, subdivision 1; 92.50; 93.17, subdivision 1; 93.1925,
subdivision 2; 93.25, subdivision 2; 93.285, subdivision 3; 93.46, by adding a
subdivision; 93.481, subdivisions 3, 5, by adding subdivisions; 93.482;
97A.401, subdivision 3; 103G.265, subdivisions 2, 3; 103G.271, subdivisions 1,
4, 6; 103G.282; 103G.287, subdivisions 1, 4, 5; 103G.615, subdivision 2;
103I.205, subdivision 1; 103I.601, by adding a subdivision; 114D.50,
subdivision 4; 115A.1320, subdivision 1; 115B.20, subdivision 6; 115B.28,
subdivision 1; 115C.02, subdivision 4; 115C.08, subdivision 4, by adding a subdivision;
115D.10; 116.48, subdivision 6; 116C.03, subdivisions 2, 4, 5; 116D.04, by
adding a subdivision; 116J.437, subdivision 1; 168.1296, subdivision 1;
216E.12, subdivision 4; 223.17, by adding a subdivision; 232.22, by adding a
subdivision; 239.051, by adding subdivisions; 239.791, subdivisions 1, 2a, 2b;
239.7911; 275.066; 296A.01, subdivision 19, by adding a subdivision; 473.846;
Laws 2012, chapter 249, section 11; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota
Statutes, chapters 17; 18; 84; 90; 93; 115; 115A; 116C; proposing coding for
new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 442A; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2012,
sections 18.91, subdivisions 3, 5; 18B.07, subdivision 6; 90.163; 90.173;
90.41, subdivision 2; 103G.265, subdivision 2a; 115.18, subdivisions 1, 3, 4,
5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; 115.19; 115.20; 115.21; 115.22; 115.23; 115.24; 115.25;
115.26; 115.27; 115.28; 115.29; 115.30; 115.31; 115.32; 115.33; 115.34; 115.35;
115.36; 115.37; 239.791, subdivision 1a; Minnesota Rules, parts 7021.0010,
subparts 1, 2, 4, 5; 7021.0020; 7021.0030; 7021.0040; 7021.0050, subpart 5;
9210.0300; 9210.0310; 9210.0320; 9210.0330; 9210.0340; 9210.0350; 9210.0360;
9210.0370; 9210.0380; 9220.0530, subpart 6.
JoAnne M. Zoff,
Secretary of the Senate
Wagenius moved that the House refuse to
concur in the Senate amendments to H. F. No. 976, that the
Speaker appoint a Conference Committee of 5 members of the House, and that the
House requests that a like committee be appointed by the Senate to confer on
the disagreeing votes of the two houses.
The motion prevailed.
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate refuses
to concur in the House amendments to the following Senate File:
S. F. No. 1589, A bill for an act relating to the operation
of state government finance; allowing the secretary of state authority to
accept funds from local government units for election systems enhancements and
to receive certain funds for the address confidentiality program; allowing the
state auditor to charge a onetime user fee for a small city and town accounting system
software; changing provisions for bid solicitations and proposals; changing
certain provisions for service contracts and the solicitation process; requiring
a determination of the IT cost for agency technology projects; expanding
E-Government initiative and establishing the E-Government Advisory Council;
changing certain audit provisions from the state auditor to the legislative
auditor; repealing the Minnesota Sunset Act; changing provisions for barbering
and cosmetology; changing licensing provisions for accountants; changing a paid
military leave provision; modifying provisions in the Veterans Service Office
grant program; changing provision in the Minnesota GI Bill program;
establishing a veterans home in Beltrami County; making Department of Revenue
changes; making compensation council changes and requiring a compensation
study; adjusting certain salary groups; establishing administrative penalties;
establishing fees; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012,
sections 3.099, subdivision 1; 3.855, subdivision 3; 13.591, subdivision 3;
15A.0815, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 5; 15A.082, subdivision 2; 16A.82; 16C.02,
subdivision 13; 16C.06, subdivision 2; 16C.09; 16C.10, subdivision 6; 16C.145;
16C.33, subdivision 3; 16C.34, subdivision 1; 16E.07, by adding a subdivision;
32C.04; 43A.17, subdivisions 1, 3; 65B.84, subdivision 1; 154.001, by adding a
subdivision; 154.003; 154.02; 154.05; 154.06; 154.065, subdivision 2; 154.07,
subdivision 1; 154.08; 154.09; 154.10, subdivision 1; 154.11, subdivision 1;
154.12; 154.14; 154.15, subdivision 2; 154.26; 155A.23, subdivision 3; 155A.25,
subdivisions 1a, 4; 155A.27, subdivisions 4, 7, 10; 155A.29, subdivision 2;
155A.30, subdivision 1, by adding subdivisions; 192.26; 197.608, subdivisions
1, 3, 4, 5, 6; 197.791, subdivisions 4, 5; 254A.035, subdivision 2; 254A.04;
256B.093, subdivision 1; 260.835, subdivision 2; 270C.69, subdivision 1;
289A.20, subdivisions 2, 4; 289A.26, subdivision 2a; 295.55, subdivision 4;
297F.09, subdivision 7; 297G.09, subdivision 6; 297I.30, by adding a
subdivision; 297I.35, subdivision 2; 326A.04, subdivisions 2, 3, 5, 7; 326A.10;
469.3201; 473.843, subdivision 3; Laws 2012, chapter 278, article 1, section 5;
article 2, sections 27; 34; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes,
chapters 4; 5; 5B; 6; 16E; 154; 155A; 198; 297I; repealing Minnesota Statutes
2012, sections 3D.01; 3D.02; 3D.03; 3D.04; 3D.045; 3D.05; 3D.06; 3D.065; 3D.07;
3D.08; 3D.09; 3D.10; 3D.11; 3D.12; 3D.13; 3D.14; 3D.15; 3D.16; 3D.17; 3D.18;
3D.19; 3D.20; 3D.21, subdivisions 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; 43A.17, subdivision 4;
155A.25, subdivision 1; 168A.40, subdivisions 3, 4; 197.608, subdivision 2a;
270C.145; 326A.03, subdivisions 2, 5, 8; Laws 2012, chapter 278, article 1,
section 6; Minnesota Rules, parts 1105.0600; 1105.2550; 1105.2700.
The Senate respectfully requests that a
Conference Committee be appointed thereon.
The Senate has appointed as such committee:
Senators Saxhaug, Cohen, Eaton, Champion
and Franzen.
Said Senate File is herewith transmitted
to the House with the request that the House appoint a like committee.
JoAnne M. Zoff,
Secretary of the Senate
Murphy, M., moved that the House accede to
the request of the Senate and that the Speaker appoint a Conference Committee
of 5 members of the House to meet with a like committee appointed by the Senate
on the disagreeing votes of the two houses on S. F. No. 1589. The motion prevailed.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
BY THE SPEAKER
The Speaker announced the appointment of
the following members of the House to a Conference Committee on
H. F. No. 729:
Mahoney; Atkins; Clark; Johnson, S., and
Gunther.
The Speaker announced the appointment of
the following members of the House to a Conference Committee on
H. F. No. 976:
Wagenius, Dill, Poppe, Hansen and Falk.
The Speaker announced the appointment of
the following members of the House to a Conference Committee on
S. F. No. 1589:
Murphy, M.; Newton; Nelson; Simon and
Bernardy.
REPORT FROM THE COMMITTEE ON
RULES
AND LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATION
Murphy, E., from the Committee on Rules
and Legislative Administration, pursuant to rules 1.21 and 3.33, designated the
following bills to be placed on the Calendar for the Day for Wednesday, April
24, 2013 and established a prefiling requirement for amendments offered to the
following bills:
H. F. Nos. 677, 1444, 1451,
1510 and 738.
MOTIONS AND RESOLUTIONS
Dehn, R., moved that the name of Bernardy
be added as an author on H. F. No. 276. The motion prevailed.
Davnie moved that the name of Bernardy be
added as an author on H. F. No. 353. The motion prevailed.
Mullery moved that the name of Dehn, R.,
be added as an author on H. F. No. 995. The motion prevailed.
Newton moved that the name of Halverson be
added as an author on H. F. No. 1103. The motion prevailed.
Ward, J.E., moved that the name of
Radinovich be added as an author on H. F. No. 1304. The motion prevailed.
Dettmer moved that the name of Dehn, R.,
be added as an author on H. F. No. 1667. The motion prevailed.
Woodard moved that the names of Fabian and
Zellers be added as authors on H. F. No. 1793. The motion prevailed.
ADJOURNMENT
Murphy, E., moved that when the House adjourns
today it adjourn until 11:00 a.m., Tuesday, April 23, 2013. The motion prevailed.
Murphy, E., moved that the House
adjourn. The motion prevailed, and the
Speaker declared the House stands adjourned until 11:00 a.m., Tuesday, April
23, 2013.
Albin
A. Mathiowetz,
Chief Clerk, House of Representatives