STATE OF
MINNESOTA
EIGHTY-EIGHTH
SESSION - 2013
_____________________
FORTY-SECOND
DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Tuesday, April 23, 2013
The House of Representatives convened at 11:00
a.m. and was called to order by Paul Thissen, Speaker of the House.
Prayer was offered by Representative Linda
Slocum, District 50A, Richfield, Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge
of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
The roll was called and the following
members were present:
Abeler
Albright
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Falk
Faust
Fischer
FitzSimmons
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zellers
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
A quorum was present.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the
Journal of the preceding day. There being
no objection, further reading of the Journal was dispensed with and the Journal
was approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk.
REPORTS OF CHIEF CLERK
S. F. No. 523 and
H. F. No. 690, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION
OF RULES
Mahoney moved that the rules be so far
suspended that S. F. No. 523 be substituted for
H. F. No. 690 and that the House File be indefinitely
postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 1307 and
H. F. No. 1182, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION
OF RULES
Schoen moved that the rules be so far
suspended that S. F. No. 1307 be substituted for
H. F. No. 1182 and that the House File be indefinitely
postponed. The motion prevailed.
REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES AND
DIVISIONS
Murphy, E., from the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration to which was referred:
H. F. No. 683, A bill for an act relating to water; creating Legislative Water Commission; modifying water use requirements; requiring a report on groundwater sustainability recommendations; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 103G.271, subdivisions 1, 4; 103G.287, subdivision 4; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 3.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
Joint Rule 2.03 has been waived for any subsequent committee action on this bill.
The
report was adopted.
Murphy, E., from the Committee
on Rules and Legislative Administration to which was referred:
H. F. No. 814, A bill for an act relating to
environment; requiring report of hazardous substance release to local 911
emergency dispatch center; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 609.671,
subdivision 10.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota
Statutes 2012, section 609.671, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Failure to report release of hazardous
substance or extremely hazardous substance.
(a) A person is, upon conviction, subject to a fine of up to $25,000
or imprisonment for up to two years, or both, who:
(1)
is required to report the release of a hazardous substance under United States
Code, title 42, section 9603, or the release of an extremely hazardous
substance under United States Code, title 42, section 11004;
(2) knows that a hazardous substance or an extremely
hazardous substance has been released; and
(3) fails to provide immediate notification of the release
of a reportable quantity of a hazardous substance or an extremely hazardous
substance to the state emergency response center and, or a
firefighting or law enforcement organization if directed by the center,
to notify a local 911 emergency dispatch center.
For purposes of clause (3), the state emergency response
center shall direct a caller to notify a local 911 emergency dispatch center if
the situation requires an immediate response or the area is unknown to the
center. In all other cases, the state
emergency response center must notify a local firefighting or law enforcement
organization of the situation within 24 hours of receiving the notification.
(b) For a second or subsequent conviction under this
subdivision, the violator is subject to a fine of up to $50,000 or imprisonment
for not more than five years, or both.
(c) For purposes of this subdivision, a "hazardous
substance" means a substance on the list established under United States
Code, title 42, section 9602.
(d) For purposes of this subdivision, an "extremely
hazardous substance" means a substance on the list established under
United States Code, title 42, section 11002.
(e) For purposes of this subdivision, a "reportable
quantity" means a quantity that must be reported under United States Code,
title 42, section 9602 or 11002.
(f) The penalties in paragraphs (a) and (b) do not apply to
an employee of a state emergency response center to the extent that the
employee is acting in the scope of that employee's official duties.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1,
2014, and applies to crimes committed on or after that date."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The
report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on
Ways and Means to which was referred:
H. F. No. 879, A bill for an act relating to
energy; extending funding for research on renewable energy to the University of
Minnesota; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 116C.779, subdivision 3.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 2, line 14, after "enactment" insert
"and requires allocations on July 1, 2013, and July 1, 2014"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The
report was adopted.
Carlson from the Committee on
Ways and Means to which was referred:
H. F. No. 1000, A bill
for an act relating to energy; requiring the commissioner of commerce to make
assessments to fund clean energy resource teams; amending Minnesota Statutes
2012, section 216B.241, subdivision 1e.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 2, line 7, delete "July 15" and insert
"June 30"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill pass.
The
report was adopted.
SECOND READING
OF HOUSE BILLS
H. F. Nos. 814, 879 and
1000 were read for the second time.
SECOND READING
OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. Nos. 523 and 1307 were
read for the second time.
MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE
The
following messages were received from the Senate:
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned:
H. F. No. 369, A bill for an act relating to community property; adopting the Uniform Community Property Rights at Death Act; proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 519A.
JoAnne M. Zoff, Secretary of the Senate
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following Senate Files, herewith transmitted:
S. F. Nos. 345, 658, 825
and 1291.
JoAnne M. Zoff,
Secretary of the Senate
FIRST READING OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. No. 345, A bill for an act relating to crime victims; authorizing a victim's estate to request or enforce an order for restitution; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 611A.04, by adding a subdivision.
The bill was read for the first time.
Hilstrom moved that S. F. No. 345 and H. F. No. 410, now on the General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 658, A bill for an act relating to labor and industry; allowing the commissioner of labor and industry to issue compliance orders for violations of misrepresentations of employment relationships; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 177.27, subdivision 4.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Jobs and Economic Development Finance and Policy.
S. F. No. 825, A bill for an act relating to health; making changes to the Medical Practice Act; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 147.001; 147.01, subdivision 1; 147.02, subdivision 1; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 147.
The bill was read for the first time.
Allen moved that S. F. No. 825 and H. F. No. 1115, now on the General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 1291, A bill for an act relating to mines; making technical, clarifying, and other policy changes to mine inspector provisions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 180.01; 180.02; 180.03; 180.04; 180.05; 180.08; 180.10; 180.11; 180.12; 180.13; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 180; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 180.06; 180.09.
The bill was read for the first time.
Anzelc moved that S. F. No. 1291 and H. F. No. 1320, now on the General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
Murphy, E., moved that the House recess
subject to the call of the Chair. The
motion prevailed.
RECESS
RECONVENED
The House reconvened and was called to
order by the Speaker.
CALENDAR FOR THE DAY
H. F. No. 630 was reported
to the House.
Woodard moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 11, line 23, reinstate the stricken language
Page 11, lines 24 to 29, delete the new language
Page 12, after line 2, insert:
"(i)
A kindergarten pupil included in paragraph (d) is counted as .388 pupil units
for purposes of section 126C.09"
Page 12, delete section 12 and insert:
"Sec. 12. [126C.09]
ENHANCED ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT FOR EARLY LEARNERS.
A school board may allocate any revenue received through the kindergarten pupil enhanced achievement pupil weighting in section 1263C.05, subdivision 1, paragraph (g) for programs approved by the school board including half-day and free full-day kindergarten programs, programs designed to enhance literacy and other academic achievement for kindergarten through third grade students, class size reduction in kindergarten through grade three, or to provide teacher salary increases."
Page 27, line 22, delete "6,440,890,000" and insert "6,446,290,000"
Page 27, line 25, delete "$5,632,430,000" and insert "$5,637,830,000"
Page 161, line 5, delete "19,214,000" and insert "16,514,000"
Page 161, line 6, delete "19,386,000" and insert "16,586,000"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Woodard
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 61 yeas and 71 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Dill
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Woodard moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 153, line 26, after "245A" insert ", a half-day or full-day kindergarten program for which a fee is charged operated by a school district, charter school, or nonpublic school that is accredited by an accrediting agency, recognized according to section 123B.445, or recognized by the commissioner of education,"
Page 155, line 5, after "in" insert "a free" and after "kindergarten" insert "program, first grade,"
Page 155, line 6, delete "six" and insert "seven"
Page
155, line 17, delete "or" and insert a comma and before "for"
insert ", or a qualifying kindergarten program"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Woodard
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 56 yeas and 78 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Daudt
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Erickson, S., moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 50, delete section 15 and insert:
"Sec. 15. [126C.101]
MINNESOTA'S WORLD'S BEST WORKFORCE.
Subdivision 1. Goals
for the world's best workforce. To
create the world's best workforce by 2027, Minnesota must strive to: close entirely the academic achievement gap
among all racial and ethnic groups of students and between students living in
poverty and students not living in poverty; achieve a 100 percent high school
graduation rate; achieve 100 percent grade-level literacy for students in third
grade; and have 100 percent of students attain career and college readiness
before graduating from high school to eliminate the need for postsecondary
developmental or remedial course instruction.
Subd. 2. Strategic
plans for attaining the world's best workforce. (a) A school board must formally
develop, implement, and periodically review and, where appropriate, revise a
comprehensive, long-term strategic education and budget plan for student
achievement premised on research-based strategies and efforts required for a
district and school to make progress toward realizing the goals in subdivision
1. The strategic plan for student achievement
must identify the state, regional, and local structures and systems,
interdistrict, intradistrict, and in-school strategies, inclusive best
education practices, and collaborative partnerships with regional centers under
subdivision 4, postsecondary institutions, and local and regional business and
industry to work effectively and efficiently toward making all students part of
the world's best workforce by 2027.
(b) The components of a board's plan may
include but are not limited to: innovative
and integrated prekindergarten through grade 12 learning environments that
include school enrollment options; family engagement initiatives that involve
families in their students' academic life and career success; professional
development opportunities for teachers, school administrators, and other
licensed school professionals focused on improving all students' academic
achievement and career and college readiness; increased programmatic
opportunities for all students, including historically underserved students,
focused on rigor in learning and career and college readiness, and recruitment
and retention of teachers and school administrators of diverse backgrounds. Plans must include at least formative
assessment practices, consistent with chapter 120B, and other instructional
best practices that inform cost-effective, research-based interventions,
improve student achievement, reduce disparities in students' academic
performance, and foster students' career and college readiness without need for
postsecondary remediation.
(c) The department or a regional center
of excellence, upon request, must assist a school board with developing,
implementing, reviewing, or revising its education and budget plan.
Subd. 3. Budgeting
and public hearing process. (a)
Beginning in the 2014-2015 school year, a school board must hold at least one
formal hearing by March 1 each year to report to the public its progress in
realizing the goals contained in its strategic plan for student achievement, to
review the plan components, and to revise the plan where
appropriate. At the hearing, the board must provide the
public with longitudinal data from at least the three immediately preceding
school years demonstrating district and school progress in realizing its
student achievement goals, consistent with the measures for demonstrating
progress in paragraph (b). At least 30
days before the hearing, the board must post on the district Web site, in an
understandable, readily accessible format, up-to-date longitudinal data on
district and school progress. The
district, by March 1, must submit to the commissioner and its regional center
of excellence in an electronic format the district's annual budget for
continuing to implement its strategic plan for student achievement.
(b) The longitudinal data required under
paragraph (a) at least must be based on one or more of the following measures
and must report outcomes for all students and specific groups of students
identified under section 120B.35, subdivision 3: third grade at-grade-level literacy rates;
reductions in the disparity in academic achievement among all racial and ethnic
student groups and between students living in poverty and students not living
in poverty; high school graduation rates; rates for completing rigorous
coursework; rates for attaining career and college readiness; rates for
receiving postsecondary credit while enrolled in high school; students'
engagement and connection in school; and rates for awarding world language
proficiency or high achievement certificates under section 120B.022,
subdivision 1, paragraphs (b) and (c), and to the extent practicable, the rates
of graduating students required to complete developmental or remedial
instruction before enrolling in a course for credit at a Minnesota public
higher education institution.
(c) For the 2013-2014 school year only,
a board, after providing a 30-day notice on the district Web site, must hold a
formal hearing before March 1, 2014, to inform the public about the content of
its proposed strategic plan for student achievement under this section. The board also must submit its proposed plan
by March 1, 2014, to the commissioner and its regional center of excellence in
an electronic format.
Subd. 4. State
and regional support. (a)
Regional centers of excellence are established to assist and support school
boards, districts, and schools in implementing this section. The centers must collaborate with local and
regional service cooperatives, postsecondary institutions, integrated school
districts, the department, children's mental health providers, and other
interested entities to equitably support school boards, districts, and schools
throughout the region. Center support
may include assisting districts and schools with common principles of effective
practice, defining measurable education goals, implementing evidence-based
practices, engaging in data-driven decision making, reducing the use of
seclusion and restraints, providing multilayered levels of support, supporting
culturally responsive teaching and learning, aligning state and local academic
standards and career and college readiness benchmarks, and engaging parents,
families, youth, and the local community in district and school programs and
activities.
(b) The department must help the
regional centers of excellence meet staff, facilities, and technical needs,
provide the centers with programmatic support, and work with the centers to
establish a coherent statewide system of regional support, including
consulting, training, and technical support, to help school boards, districts,
and schools effectively and efficiently implement state and federal
initiatives.
(c) A school board, district, or a
school may seek assistance from the department directly without the need to
first seek center support.
Subd. 5. Evaluation. (a) The commissioner and each regional
center of excellence must collaborate in evaluating the success of districts
and schools in working effectively and efficiently toward creating the world's
best workforce by 2027. Where districts
and schools demonstrate effective use of resources and adequate progress toward
realizing plan goals, the commissioner and the regional centers of excellence
must promote and disseminate successful strategies to other districts and
schools throughout the state.
(b) If the commissioner, in consultation
with the affected regional center of excellence, determines a district or
charter school is not making adequate progress in realizing its student
achievement goals under this section, the department may reduce the district's
basic general education revenue by up to four percent per fiscal year, and
transfer that amount to the affected regional center of excellence for the
center to use to assist the district to effectively and efficiently realize its
student achievement goals.
(c) If, after a district
receives assistance under paragraph (b) for at least three consecutive school
years, the commissioner, in consultation with the affected regional center of
excellence and the affected district, identifies a school as persistently
failing to make adequate progress toward realizing the student achievement
goals contained in the strategic plan, the commissioner may require the school
to implement a turnaround strategy to improve the school's ability to
effectively and efficiently realize those goals.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for fiscal year 2014 and later."
Erickson, S., moved to amend her amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 3, line 33, after the period, insert "A Minnesota high school graduate who enrolls in a Minnesota public higher education institution within two years after graduating and is required to complete a developmental or remedial course before enrolling in a course for credit at that Minnesota public higher education institution may submit to the department a reimbursement request for the cost of the required developmental or remedial course. The department must transmit revenue to the student in an amount equal to the cost of the completed developmental or remedial course."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question
was taken on the amendment to the amendment and the roll was called. There were 61 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
Marquart moved to amend the Erickson, S., amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 1, delete lines 2 to 27
Page 2, delete lines 1 to 36
Page 3, delete lines 1 to 36
Page 4, delete lines 1 to 4 and insert:
"Page 52, line 2, after "(c)" insert ", and to the extent practicable, the rates of graduating students required to complete developmental or remedial instruction before enrolling in a course or credit at a Minnesota public higher education institution"
Page 52, line 8, after the second period, insert "State and"
Page 52, after line 24, insert:
"(c) A school board, district, or a school may seek assistance from the department directly without the need to first seek center support.""
The
motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was adopted.
Erickson, S., withdrew her amendment, as amended, to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment.
Woodard moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 27, line 14, after the period, insert "The commissioner must notify each district receiving aid under this section that this revenue will be provided through an equalized levy in subsequent years."
Page 27, delete section 29 and insert:
"Sec. 29. APPROPRIATIONS.
Subdivision 1. Department
of Education. The sums
indicated in this section are appropriated from the general fund to the
Department of Education for the fiscal years designated.
Subd. 2. General
education aid. For general
education aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 126C.13, subdivision 4:
|
|
$6,092,415,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$6,440,890,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$781,842,000 for 2013 and $5,310,573,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$808,460,000 for 2014 and $5,632,430,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this
subdivision are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are
required to fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 3. Enrollment
options transportation. For
transportation of pupils attending postsecondary institutions under Minnesota
Statutes, section 124D.09, or for transportation of pupils attending
nonresident districts under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.03:
|
|
$44,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$48,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 4. Abatement
revenue. For abatement aid
under Minnesota Statutes, section 127A.49:
|
|
$2,747,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$3,136,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes $301,000
for 2013 and $2,446,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $385,000
for 2014 and $2,751,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 5. Consolidation
transition. For districts
consolidating under Minnesota Statutes, section 123A.485:
|
|
$472,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$480,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes $40,000
for 2013 and $432,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $68,000
for 2014 and $412,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 6. Nonpublic
pupil education aid. For
nonpublic pupil education aid under Minnesota Statutes, sections 123B.40 to
123B.43 and 123B.87:
|
|
$15,660,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$16,324,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$2,099,000 for 2013 and $13,561,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$2,121,000 for 2014 and $14,203,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 7. Nonpublic
pupil transportation. For
nonpublic pupil transportation aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 123B.92,
subdivision 9:
|
|
$18,656,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$19,127,000 |
. . . . . |
2015 |
The 2014 appropriation includes
$2,668,000 for 2013 and $15,988,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$2,501,000 for 2014 and $16,626,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 8. One-room
schoolhouse. For a grant to
Independent School District No. 690, Warroad, to operate the Angle Inlet
School:
|
|
$65,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$65,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 9. Compensatory
revenue pilot program. For
grants for participation in the compensatory revenue pilot program under Laws
2005, First Special Session chapter 5, article 1, section 50:
|
|
$2,325,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$2,325,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Of this amount, $1,500,000 each year is
for a grant to Independent School District No. 11, Anoka-Hennepin; $75,000
each year is for a grant to Independent School District No. 286, Brooklyn
Center; $210,000 each year is for a grant to Independent School District No. 279,
Osseo; $160,000 each year is for a grant to Independent School District No. 281,
Robbinsdale; $165,000 each year is for a grant to Independent School District No. 535,
Rochester; $65,000 each year is for a grant to Independent School District No. 833,
South Washington County; and $150,000 each year is for a grant to Independent
School District No. 241, Albert Lea.
If a grant to a specific school district
is not awarded, the commissioner may increase the aid amounts to any of the
remaining participating school districts.
This appropriation is part of the base budget for subsequent fiscal years."
Page 83, delete section 26 and insert:
"Sec. 26. APPROPRIATIONS.
Subdivision 1. Department. The sums indicated in this section are
appropriated from the general fund to the Department of Education for the
fiscal years designated.
Subd. 2. Integration
aid. For integration aid
under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.86:
|
|
$17,197,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$0
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$17,197,000 for 2013 and $0 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $0 for
2014 and $0 for 2015.
Subd. 3. Achievement
and integration aid. For
achievement and integration aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.862:
|
|
$58,911,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$68,623,000 |
. . . . . |
2015 |
The 2014 appropriation includes
$0 for 2013 and $58,911,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$9,273,000 for 2014 and $59,350,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 4. Literacy
incentive aid. For literacy
incentive aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.98:
|
|
$52,514,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$53,818,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$6,607,000 for 2013 and $45,907,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$7,225,000 for 2014 and $46,593,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 5. Interdistrict
desegregation or integration transportation grants. For interdistrict desegregation or
integration transportation grants under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.87:
|
|
$13,968,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$14,712,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 6. Success
for the future. For American
Indian success for the future grants under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.81:
|
|
$2,137,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$2,137,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes $290,000
for 2013 and $1,847,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $290,000
for 2014 and $1,847,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 7. American
Indian teacher preparation grants. For
joint grants to assist American Indian people to become teachers under
Minnesota Statutes, section 122A.63:
|
|
$190,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$190,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 8. Tribal
contract schools. For tribal
contract school aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.83:
|
|
$2,090,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$2,252,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes $266,000
for 2013 and $1,824,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $285,000
for 2014 and $1,967,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this
subdivision are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are
required to fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 9. Early
childhood programs at tribal schools.
For early childhood family education programs at tribal contract
schools under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.83, subdivision 4:
|
|
$68,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$68,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 10. Examination
fees; teacher training and support programs. (a) For students' advanced placement
and international baccalaureate examination fees under Minnesota Statutes,
section 120B.13, subdivision 3, and the training and related costs for teachers
and other interested educators under Minnesota Statutes, section 120B.13,
subdivision 1:
|
|
$4,500,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$4,500,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
(b) The advanced placement program
shall receive 75 percent of the appropriation each year and the international
baccalaureate program shall receive 25 percent of the appropriation each year. The department, in consultation with
representatives of the advanced placement and international baccalaureate
programs selected by the Advanced Placement Advisory Council and the Minnesota
Association of IB World Schools, respectively, shall determine the amounts of
the expenditures each year for examination fees and training and support
programs for each program.
(c) Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes,
section 120B.13, subdivision 1, at least $500,000 each year is for teachers to
attend subject matter summer training programs and follow-up support workshops
approved by the advanced placement or international baccalaureate programs. The amount of the subsidy for each teacher
attending an advanced placement or international baccalaureate summer training
program or workshop shall be the same. The
commissioner shall determine the payment process and the amount of the subsidy.
(d) The commissioner shall pay all
examination fees for all students of low-income families under Minnesota
Statutes, section 120B.13, subdivision 3, and to the extent of available
appropriations shall also pay examination fees for students sitting for an advanced
placement examination, international baccalaureate examination, or both.
Any balance in the first year does not
cancel but is available in the second year.
Subd. 11. Concurrent
enrollment program. For
concurrent enrollment programs under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.091:
|
|
$2,000,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$2,000,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
If
the appropriation is insufficient, the commissioner must proportionately reduce
the aid payment to each district.
Any balance in the first year does not
cancel but is available in the second year.
Subd. 12. Collaborative
urban educator. For the
collaborative urban educator grant program:
|
|
$776,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$776,000 |
. . . . . |
2015 |
$224,000 each year is for the
Southeast Asian teacher program at Concordia University, St. Paul;
$184,000 each year is for the collaborative educator program at the University
of St. Thomas; $184,000 each year is for the Center for Excellence in
Urban Teaching at Hamline University; and $184,000 each year is for East
African teacher educator activities at Augsburg College.
Any balance in the first year does not
cancel but is available in the second year.
Each institution shall prepare for the
legislature, by January 15 of each year, a detailed report regarding the funds
used. The report must include the number
of teachers prepared as well as the diversity for each cohort of teachers
produced.
Subd. 13. ServeMinnesota
program. For funding
ServeMinnesota programs under Minnesota Statutes, sections 124D.37 to 124D.45:
|
|
$900,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$900,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
A grantee organization may provide
health and child care coverage to the dependents of each participant enrolled
in a full-time ServeMinnesota program to the extent such coverage is not
otherwise available.
Subd. 14. Student
organizations. For student
organizations:
|
|
$725,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$725,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
$45,695 each year is for student
organizations serving health occupations (HOSA).
$42,830 each year is for student
organizations serving service occupations (HERO).
$100,130 each year is for student
organizations serving trade and industry occupations (Skills USA, secondary and
postsecondary).
$95,355 each year is for student
organizations serving business occupations (BPA, secondary and postsecondary).
$149,790 each year is for student
organizations serving agriculture occupations (FFA, PAS).
$142,150 each year is for student
organizations serving family and consumer science occupations (FCCLA).
$108,725 each year is for student
organizations serving marketing occupations (DECA and DECA collegiate).
$40,325 each year is for the Minnesota
Foundation for Student Organizations.
Any balance in the first year does not
cancel but is available in the second year.
Subd. 15. Early
childhood literacy programs. For
early childhood literacy programs under Minnesota Statutes, section 119A.50,
subdivision 3:
|
|
$4,125,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$4,125,000 |
. . . . . |
2015 |
Up to $4,125,000 each year is
for leveraging federal and private funding to support AmeriCorps members
serving in the Minnesota reading corps program established by ServeMinnesota,
including costs associated with the training and teaching of early literacy
skills to children age three to grade 3 and the evaluation of the impact of the
program under Minnesota Statutes, sections 124D.38, subdivision 2, and 124D.42,
subdivision 6.
Any balance in the first year does not
cancel but is available in the second year.
Subd. 16. Minnesota
math corps program. For the
Minnesota math corps program under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.42,
subdivision 9:
|
|
$250,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$250,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Any unexpended balance in the first year
does not cancel but is available in the second year.
Subd. 17. Minnesota
Principals' Academy. For a
grant to the University of Minnesota, College of Education and Human
Development, for the operation of the Minnesota Principals' Academy:
|
|
$235,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$215,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Any balance in the first year does not
cancel but is available in the second year.
The base appropriation for this program for fiscal year 2016 and later
is $250,000.
Subd. 18. Regional
centers of excellence. For
regional centers of excellence under Minnesota Statutes, section 126C.101,
subdivision 4:
|
|
$1,500,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$3,000,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The base for the regional centers of
excellence in fiscal years 2016 and 2017 is $4,500,000 each year.
Subd. 19. School
Climate Center. For the
School Climate Center under Minnesota Statutes, section 127A.052:
|
|
$500,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$500,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 20. Site
decision-making grant program. For
site decision-making grants under Minnesota Statutes, section 123B.04,
subdivision 2, paragraph (f):
|
|
$200,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
An education site having a written achievement contract under Minnesota Statutes, section 123B.04, subdivision 4, agreed to by the school board and the education site, may apply to the commissioner of education for a two-year grant not to exceed $10 per resident pupil unit at the site in the 2012-2013 school year. Each participating education site and its school board that are the parties to the achievement contract must report annually to the commissioner, in the form and manner determined by the commissioner, on the progress and success of the education site in achieving student or contract goals or other performance expectations or measures contained in the achievement contract. The commissioner must include the substance and an analysis of these reports in the next statewide report under Minnesota Statutes, section 123B.04, subdivision 5, clause (3), evaluating the effectiveness of site management agreements in redesigning learning programs and broadening the definition of student achievement. Any unexpended funds do not cancel but are available in fiscal year 2015."
Page 113, delete section 6 and insert:
"Sec. 6. APPROPRIATIONS.
Subdivision 1. Department. The sums indicated in this section are
appropriated from the general fund to the Department of Education for the
fiscal years designated.
Subd. 2. Charter school building lease aid. For building lease aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.11, subdivision 4:
|
|
$54,484,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$59,533,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$6,819,000 for 2013 and $47,665,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$7,502,000 for 2014 and $52,031,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to fully repay schools for shifted funds."
Page 138, delete section 28 and insert:
"Sec. 28. APPROPRIATIONS.
Subdivision 1. Department
of Education. The sums
indicated in this section are appropriated from the general fund to the
Department of Education for the fiscal years designated.
Subd. 2. Special
education; regular. For
special education aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 125A.75:
|
|
$910,153,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$959,018,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$118,232,000 for 2013 and $791,921,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$124,654,000 for 2014 and $834,364,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 3. Aid
for children with disabilities. For
aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 125A.75, subdivision 3, for children with
disabilities placed in residential facilities within the district boundaries
for whom no district of residence can be determined:
|
|
$1,655,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$1,752,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
If the appropriation for either year is insufficient,
the appropriation for the other year is available.
Subd. 4. Travel
for home-based services. For
aid for teacher travel for home-based services under Minnesota Statutes,
section 125A.75, subdivision 1:
|
|
$345,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$355,000
|
. . . . . |
2015 |
The 2014 appropriation includes
$45,000 for 2013 and $300,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $47,000
for 2014 and $308,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 5. Special
education; excess costs. For
excess cost aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 125A.79, subdivision 7:
|
|
$118,639,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$121,919,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$42,030,000 for 2013 and $76,609,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$43,211,000 for 2014 and $78,708,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 6. Court-placed
special education revenue. For
reimbursing serving school districts for unreimbursed eligible expenditures
attributable to children placed in the serving school district by court action
under Minnesota Statutes, section 125A.79, subdivision 4:
|
|
$54,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$55,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 7. Special
education out-of-state tuition. For
special education out-of-state tuition according to Minnesota Statutes, section
125A.79, subdivision 8:
|
|
$250,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
|
$250,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015" |
Page 142, delete section 5 and insert:
"Sec. 5. APPROPRIATIONS.
Subdivision 1. Department
of Education. The sums
indicated in this section are appropriated from the general fund to the
Department of Education for the fiscal years designated.
Subd. 2. Health
and safety revenue. For
health and safety aid according to Minnesota Statutes, section 123B.57,
subdivision 5:
|
|
$463,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$434,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes $26,000
for 2013 and $437,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $68,000
for 2014 and $366,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this
subdivision are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are
required to fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 3. Debt
service equalization. For
debt service aid according to Minnesota Statutes, section 123B.53, subdivision
6:
|
|
$19,083,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$25,046,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$2,397,000 for 2013 and $16,686,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$2,626,000 for 2014 and $22,420,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 4. Alternative
facilities bonding aid. For
alternative facilities bonding aid, according to Minnesota Statutes, section
123B.59, subdivision 1:
|
|
$19,287,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$19,287,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$2,623,000 for 2013 and $16,664,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$2,623,000 for 2014 and $16,664,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 5. Equity
in telecommunications access. For
equity in telecommunications access:
|
|
$3,750,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$3,750,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
If the appropriation amount is
insufficient, the commissioner shall reduce the reimbursement rate in Minnesota
Statutes, section 125B.26, subdivisions 4 and 5, and the revenue for fiscal
years 2014 and 2015 shall be prorated.
Any balance in the first year does not
cancel but is available in the second year.
Subd. 6. Deferred
maintenance aid. For deferred
maintenance aid, according to Minnesota Statutes, section 123B.591, subdivision
4:
|
|
$3,564,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$3,731,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$456,000 for 2013 and $3,108,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$489,000 for 2014 and $3,242,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to fully repay schools for shifted funds."
Page 150, delete section 18 and insert:
"Sec. 18. APPROPRIATIONS.
Subdivision 1. Department
of Education. The sums
indicated in this section are appropriated from the general fund to the
Department of Education for the fiscal years designated.
Subd. 2. School
lunch. For school lunch aid
according to Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.111, and Code of Federal
Regulations, title 7, section 210.17:
|
|
$13,513,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$13,763,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 3. School
breakfast. For traditional
school breakfast aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.1158:
|
|
$5,711,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$6,022,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 4. Kindergarten
milk. For kindergarten milk
aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.118:
|
|
$1,039,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$1,049,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 5. Summer
food service replacement aid. For
summer food service replacement aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.119:
|
|
$150,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$150,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 6. Basic
system support. For basic
system support grants under Minnesota Statutes, section 134.355:
|
|
$13,570,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$13,570,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$1,845,000 for 2013 and $11,725,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$1,845,000 for 2014 and $11,725,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 7. Multicounty,
multitype library systems. For
grants under Minnesota Statutes, sections 134.353 and 134.354, to multicounty,
multitype library systems:
|
|
$1,300,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$1,300,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$176,000 for 2013 and $1,124,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$176,000 for 2014 and $1,124,000 for 2015.
The
appropriations in this subdivision are subject to the aid payment shift and
future appropriations are required to fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 8. Electronic
library for Minnesota. For
statewide licenses to online databases selected in cooperation with the
Minnesota Office of Higher Education for school media centers, public
libraries, state government agency libraries, and public or private college or
university libraries:
|
|
$900,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$900,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Any balance in the first year does not
cancel but is available in the second year.
Subd. 9. Regional
library telecommunications aid. For
regional library telecommunications aid under Minnesota Statutes, section
134.355:
|
|
$2,300,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$2,300,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$312,000 for 2013 and $1,988,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$312,000 for 2014 and $1,988,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to fully repay schools for shifted funds."
Page 158, delete section 7 and insert:
"Sec. 7. APPROPRIATIONS.
Subdivision 1. Department
of Education. The sums
indicated in this section are appropriated from the general fund to the
Department of Education for the fiscal years designated.
Subd. 2. School
readiness. For revenue for
school readiness programs under Minnesota Statutes, sections 124D.15 and
124D.16:
|
|
$10,095,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$10,159,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$1,372,000 for 2013 and $8,723,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $1,372,000
for 2014 and $8,787,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 3. Early
childhood family education aid. For
early childhood family education aid under Minnesota Statutes, section
124D.135:
|
|
$22,078,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$22,425,000 |
. . . . . |
2015 |
The 2014 appropriation includes
$3,008,000 for 2013 and $19,070,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$3,001,000 for 2014 and $19,424,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 4. Health
and developmental screening aid. For
health and developmental screening aid under Minnesota Statutes, sections
121A.17 and 121A.19:
|
|
$3,421,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$3,344,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes $474,000
for 2013 and $2,947,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $463,000
for 2014 and $2,881,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 5. Head
Start program. For Head Start
programs under Minnesota Statutes, section 119A.52:
|
|
$22,171,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$20,100,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
For the fiscal year 2014 appropriation
only, the lesser of 50 percent of the actual loss of revenue to sequestration
or $2,071,000 must be used to replace a portion of the federal funds lost to
sequestration and must be distributed proportionate to the loss among all
programs.
Subd. 6. Educate
parents partnership. For the
educate parents partnership under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.129:
|
|
$49,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$49,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 7. Kindergarten
entrance assessment initiative and intervention program. For the kindergarten entrance
assessment initiative and intervention program under Minnesota Statutes,
section 124D.162:
|
|
$281,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$281,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 8. Early
childhood education scholarships. For
transfer to the Office of Early Learning for early learning scholarships under
Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.143:
|
|
$25,000,000 |
. . . . . |
2014 |
|
|
$31,000,000 |
. . . . . |
2015 |
Up to $950,000 each year is for
administration of this program.
Any balance in the first year does not
cancel but is available in the second year.
The base for this program is $52,000,000
for fiscal year 2016 and $75,000,000 for fiscal year 2017 and later.
Subd. 9. Parent-child
home program. For a grant for
a parent-child home program:
|
|
$250,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$250,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The grant must be used for an
evidence-based and research-validated early childhood literacy and school
readiness program for children ages 16 months to four years. Any unexpended balance in the first year does
not cancel but is available in the second year.
Subd. 10. Community
education aid. For community
education aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.20:
|
|
$935,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$1,056,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes $118,000
for 2013 and $817,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $128,000
for 2014 and $928,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 11. Adults
with disabilities program aid. For
adults with disabilities programs under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.56:
|
|
$710,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$710,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes $96,000
for 2013 and $614,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $96,000
for 2014 and $614,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 12. Hearing-impaired
adults. For programs for
hearing-impaired adults under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.57:
|
|
$70,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$70,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Subd. 13. School-age
care revenue. For extended
day aid under Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.22:
|
|
$1,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$1,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes $0 for
2013 and $1,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes $0 for
2014 and $1,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision are
subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 14. Adult basic education aid. For adult basic education aid under
Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.531:
|
|
$47,005,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$48,356,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
The 2014 appropriation includes
$6,284,000 for 2013 and $40,721,000 for 2014.
The 2015 appropriation includes
$6,409,000 for 2014 and $41,947,000 for 2015.
The appropriations in this subdivision
are subject to the aid payment shift and future appropriations are required to
fully repay schools for shifted funds.
Subd. 15.
|
|
$125,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
|
$125,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015"
|
Page 160, line 31, delete section 1 and insert:
"Section 1. APPROPRIATIONS;
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
Subdivision 1. Department
of Education. Unless
otherwise indicated, the sums indicated in this section are appropriated from
the general fund to the Department of Education for the fiscal years
designated.
Subd. 2. Department. (a) For the Department of Education:
|
|
$19,214,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$19,386,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Any balance in the first year does not cancel
but is available in the second year.
(b) $260,000 each year is for the
Minnesota Children's Museum.
(c) $41,000 each year is for the
Minnesota Academy of Science.
(d) $50,000 each year is for the Duluth
Children's Museum.
(e) $618,000 each year is for the Board
of Teaching. Any balance in the first
year does not cancel but is available in the second year.
(f) $167,000 each year is for the Board
of School Administrators. Any balance in
the first year does not cancel but is available in the second year.
(g) The expenditures of federal grants
and aids as shown in the biennial budget document and its supplements are
approved and appropriated and shall be spent as indicated.
(h)
None of the amounts appropriated under this subdivision may be used for
Minnesota's Washington, D. C. office.
(i) The commissioner must report to the
education committees of the legislature on the effects of federal sequestration
by July 1, 2014.
Subd. 3. Licensure
by portfolio. For licensure
by portfolio:
|
|
$30,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$30,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
This appropriation is from the educator licensure portfolio account of the special revenue fund."
Page 161, delete sections 2 and 3 and insert:
"Sec. 2. APPROPRIATIONS;
MINNESOTA STATE ACADEMIES.
The sums indicated in this section are
appropriated from the general fund to the Minnesota State Academies for the
Deaf and the Blind for the fiscal years designated:
|
|
$11,897,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$11,910,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
$85,000 of the fiscal year 2014 appropriation
is for costs associated with upgrading kitchen facilities. The funds for kitchen upgrades may be
expended in fiscal year 2014 or fiscal year 2015. Any balance in the first year does not cancel
but is available in the second year.
Sec. 3. APPROPRIATIONS;
PERPICH CENTER FOR ARTS EDUCATION.
The sums in this section are
appropriated from the general fund to the Perpich Center for Arts Education for
the fiscal years designated:
|
|
$6,786,000
|
.
. . . . |
2014
|
|
|
$6,848,000
|
.
. . . . |
2015
|
Any balance in the first year does not
cancel but is available in the second year.
The Perpich Center must report to the education committees of the legislature by January 15, 2014, on its equipment and facility needs for future years."
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Woodard moved to amend his amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 8, delete subdivisions 18 and 19
Page 15, line 1, delete "25,000,000" and insert "28,250,000"
Page 15, line 2, delete "31,000,000" and insert "34,179,000"
Page 16, line 27, delete "19,214,000" and insert "18,772,000"
Page 16, line 28, delete "19,386,000" and insert "18,944,000"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the amendment to the amendment
and the roll was called. There were 62
yeas and
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
Quam moved to amend the Woodard amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 16, line 30, delete everything after "(b)" and insert "$1,000,000 each year is for grants to children's museums located in Minnesota. A nonprofit organization operating a children's museum may apply for a grant under this paragraph in the form and manner specified by the commissioner."
Page 16, delete line 32
Reletter the paragraphs in sequence
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question
was taken on the amendment to the amendment and the roll was called. There were 59 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kieffer
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
McDonald moved to amend the Woodard amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 8, delete subdivisions 18 and 19
Page 11, after line 32, insert:
"Page 143, line 11, strike the first comma and delete "reduced-price," and after "students" insert "and 52 cents for each reduced-price lunch served to students""
Page 12, line 6, delete "13,513,000" and insert "16,969,000"
Page 12, line 7, delete "13,763,000" and insert "17,219,000"
Page 16, line 27, delete "19,214,000" and insert "18,508,000"
Page 16, line 28, delete "19,386,000" and insert "18,680,000"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question
was taken on the amendment to the amendment and the roll was called. There were 66 yeas and 68 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Faust
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Falk
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
Myhra moved to amend the Woodard amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 6, lines 3 and 4, delete "2,000,000" and insert "5,000,000"
Page 17, after line 9, insert:
"(j) This appropriation is reduced by $3,000,000 per year."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the amendment to
the amendment and the roll was called.
There were 62 yeas and 72 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
The Speaker called Hortman to the Chair.
Myhra moved to amend the Woodard amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 7, lines 13 and 14, delete "4,125,000" and insert "4,625,000"
Page 7, line 15, delete "$4,125,000" and insert "$4,625,000"
Page 7, lines 23 and 24, delete "250,000" and insert "500,000"
Page 15, line 8, delete "$250,000" and insert "500,000"
Page 15, line 9, delete "$250,000" and insert "500,000"
Page 17, after line 9, insert:
"(j) This appropriation is reduced by $1,000,000 per year."
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question
was taken on the amendment to the amendment and the roll was called. There were 63 yeas and 71 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
The question recurred on the Woodard
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 61 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Wills moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 52, line 9, after "section" insert "and section 124D.861"
Page 77, line 22, after "students" insert ", including those components of a board's strategic plan under section 126C.101, subdivision 2, paragraph (b), providing direct services to students"
Page 83, after line 15, insert:
"Consistent with Minnesota Statutes, section 124D.862, subdivision 7, paragraph (a), this appropriation may be used to provide direct services to students under Minnesota Statutes, section 126C.101."
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Woodard moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 76, delete section 19 and insert:
"Sec. 19. [124.862]
ACHIEVEMENT GAP ELIMINATION REVENUE.
Subdivision 1. Eligibility. A school district is eligible for
achievement gap elimination revenue under this section if the district has a
biennial plan consistent with section 124D.861 submitted and approved by the
department.
Subd. 2. Achievement
gap elimination revenue. (a)
An eligible district's initial achievement gap elimination revenue equals the
sum of (1) $350 times the district's adjusted pupil units for that year times
the ratio of the district's enrollment of protected students for the previous
year to total enrollment for the previous total school year, and (2) the greater of zero or 65 percent of the
difference between the district's integration revenue for fiscal year 2013
and the district's achievement gap elimination revenue for fiscal year 2014
under clause (1).
(b) In each year, 0.2 percent of each
district's initial achievement gap elimination revenue is transferred to the
department for the oversight and accountability activities required under this
section and section 124D.861.
(c) A district that did not meet its
achievement gap elimination goals established in section 124D.861 for the previous biennium must have its initial
achievement gap elimination revenue reduced by five percent for the current
year.
(d) Any revenue saved by the reductions
in paragraph (c) must be proportionately reallocated on a per-pupil basis to
all districts that met their achievement gap elimination goals in the previous
biennium.
Subd. 3. Achievement
gap elimination aid. A
district's achievement gap elimination aid equals 70 percent of its achievement
gap elimination revenue.
Subd. 4. Achievement
gap elimination levy. A
district's achievement gap elimination levy equals the difference between its
achievement gap elimination revenue and its achievement gap elimination aid. For Special School District No. 1,
Minneapolis, Independent School District No. 625, St. Paul, and
Independent School District No. 709, Duluth, 100 percent of the levy
certified in this subdivision is shifted into the prior calendar year for
purposes of sections 123B.75, subdivision 5, and 127A.441.
Subd. 5. Incentive
revenue. An eligible school
district's maximum incentive revenue equals $10 per adjusted pupil unit. In order to receive this revenue, a district
must be implementing a voluntary plan to reduce racial enrollment disparities
through intradistrict and interdistrict activities, developed with input from
parents and the community, that have been approved as part of the district's
achievement and integration plan. A
district qualifies for incentive revenue if the district demonstrates an
alternative plan, such as community or neighborhood based schools aimed at
reducing the achievement gap.
Subd. 6. Revenue
reserved. Achievement gap
elimination revenue received under this section must be reserved and used only
for the programs authorized in subdivision 7.
Subd. 7. Revenue
uses. (a) At least 80 percent
of the district's achievement gap elimination revenue received under this
section must be used for programs including, but not limited to: innovative learning environments, school
enrollment choices, prioritizing funding for teachers, paraprofessionals, and
tutors providing direct instruction, and other approved programs providing
direct instructional services to students.
(b) Up to 20 percent of the revenue may
be used for paraprofessional development and staff development activities and
placement services.
(c) No more than ten percent of the
total amount of revenue may be spent on administrative services.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for revenue for fiscal year 2014 and later."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Woodard moved to amend his amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 1, line 8, delete "$350" and insert "$235"
Page 1, line 11, delete everything after "(2)"
Page 1, delete lines 12 and 13 and insert "$82.50 times the district's adjusted pupil units."
Page 2, delete subdivision 5
Renumber the subdivisions in sequence
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question
was taken on the amendment to the amendment and the roll was called. There were 64 yeas and 70 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Faust
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Sawatzky
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Gunther
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Savick
Schoen
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
The question recurred on the Woodard
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 62 yeas and 72 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Gunther
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Erickson, S., moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 74, delete section 18, and insert:
"Sec. 18. [124D.861]
ACHIEVEMENT GAP ELIMINATION PROGRAM.
Subdivision
1. Program
to eliminate the academic achievement and opportunity gap. The "Achievement Gap Elimination
Program" established to improve the academic achievement of all students
and eliminate disparities in academic achievement among the nine student
categories identified under the federal 2001 No Child Left Behind Act in
Minnesota public schools. The program
must serve students of varying racial, ethnic, and economic backgrounds, taking
into account unique geographic and demographic particularities affecting
students, schools, and districts including race, neighborhood locations and
characteristics, grades, socioeconomic status, academic performance, and
language barriers. Eligible districts
must use the revenue under section 124D.862 to improve the academic achievement
of all students and eliminate disparities in academic achievement among student
subgroups through:
(1) school choice programs, innovative
academic instruction, and best teaching practices;
(2) opportunity programs proven to
increase students' access to academic rigor and focused on college and career
readiness;
(3) family engagement programs that
promote involvement in students' academic life and success;
(4) professional development focused on
improving students' academic achievement;
(5) increased diversity of teachers and
administrators achieved through teacher and administrator recruitment and
retention policies; and
(6) other programs proven through data
to improve students' academic achievement.
Subd. 2. Plan
components. (a) The school
board of each eligible district must develop and implement a comprehensive plan
consistent, with subdivision 1, containing specific district and school goals
for eliminating the disparities in students' academic achievement and promoting
students' academic success.
(b) Among other requirements, an
eligible district must implement a cost-effective, research-based intervention
that includes formative assessment practices to eliminate the disparity in
student academic achievement between the highest and lowest performing racial
and ethnic categories of students as measured by student demonstration of
proficiency on state reading and math assessments.
(c) Eligible districts may collaborate
in creating efficiencies and eliminating the duplication of programs and
services under this section.
Subd. 3. Biennial
progress; budget process. (a)
To receive revenue under section 124D.862, the school board of an eligible
district must hold at least one formal hearing by March 1 in the year preceding
the current biennium to report to the public its progress in realizing the
goals identified in its plan. At the
hearing, the board must provide the public with longitudinal data demonstrating
district and school progress in eliminating the academic achievement gap,
consistent with its plan and the measures in paragraph (b). The district also must submit to the
commissioner by March 1 in the year preceding the current biennium a detailed
biennial budget for continuing to implement its plan and the commissioner must
review and approve or disapprove the budget by June 1 of that year.
(b) The longitudinal data required
under paragraph (a) must be based on one or more of the following measures:
(1) the number of world
language proficiency or high achievement certificates awarded under section
120B.022, subdivision 1, paragraphs (b) and (c);
(2) student growth
and progress toward proficiency in reading or mathematics as defined under
section 120B.299;
(3) adequate yearly progress under section 120B.35,
subdivision 2;
(4) preparation for postsecondary academic and career
opportunities under section 120B.35, subdivision 3, paragraph (c), clause (1);
(5) rigorous coursework completed under section 120B.35,
subdivision 3, paragraph (c), clause (2); or
(6) school safety and students' engagement and
connection at school under section 120B.35, subdivision 3, paragraph (d).
Subd. 4.
Evaluation. The commissioner must evaluate the
efficacy of district plans in eliminating the disparity in student academic
achievement among all racial and ethnic categories of students and report the
commissioner's findings to the K-12
education committees of the legislature by February 1 every fourth year
beginning February 1, 2017.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for fiscal year 2014 and later."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Erickson,
S., amendment and the roll was called.
There were 60 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
The
Speaker resumed the Chair.
Myhra moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 154, line 19, after the period, insert "Prior to July 1, 2017, the director must not vary scholarship amounts based on a program's star rating. After July 1, 2017,"
Page 154, line 21, after "(g)" insert "except the director may set aside the schedule in those communities or regions with limited rated program options"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Myhra
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 60 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Woodard moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 140, delete sections 2 and 3
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Woodard
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 64 yeas and 70 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Erickson, S., moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 30, line 33, after the period, insert ""Attainment" under this subdivision means a score indicating the student has a 75 percent or higher probability of earning a grade of "C" or higher in corresponding college courses for credit."
Page 40, line 3, after "exam" insert "where "attainment" means a score indicating the student has a 75 percent or higher probability of earning a grade of "C" or higher in corresponding college courses for credit"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Erickson,
S., amendment and the roll was called.
There were 61 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Erickson, S., moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 40, after line 20, insert:
"The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities chancellor, in consultation with the commissioner, must establish, validate, and publish in an electronic or other readily accessible format the minimum scores on the reading, math, and English sections of the college entrance exam that demonstrate preparedness sufficient for a student to enroll in a postsecondary certificate-level program or in a two-year or four-year postsecondary degree granting program and have a reasonable chance to succeed in the program without remediation. Students who successfully complete all state and local course work and credits required for graduation by the school board granting the student the diploma and who achieve the minimum reading, math, and English scores established by the chancellor are eligible to receive a high school diploma."
Page 40, delete lines 31 and 32
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Erickson, S., moved to amend her amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 1, after line 1, insert:
"Page 30, lines 20 to 24, reinstate the stricken language
Page 30, lines 25 and 27, delete the new language and reinstate the stricken language
Page 30, delete lines 29 to 34
Page 37, delete lines 7 to 15
Page 37, line 16, delete "(d)" and insert "(c)"
Page 38 delete lines 23 to 26
Page 39, line 1, delete the new language and reinstate the stricken language and insert "through the 2012-2013" and strike "and"
Page 39, line 2, strike "later" and delete the comma
Page 39, delete line 3
Page 39, line 4, delete the new language
Page 39, lines 5 to 36, reinstate the stricken language
Page 39, after line 36, insert:
"For the 2013-2014 school year and later, the following options fulfill students' state graduation requirements:""
Page 1, after line 13, insert:
"Page 40, lines 33 to 36, reinstate the stricken language
Page 40, line 34, after "2009-2010" insert "to 2012-2013"
Page 41, lines 1 to 5, reinstate the stricken language
Page 53, delete section 16
Page 53, line 28, delete "and"
Page 53, line 30, delete the period and insert "; and"
Page 53, after line 30, insert:
"(5) use differentiated diplomas or an appeals process for the limited numbers of general education students who cannot pass the statewide exams."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the amendment to
the amendment and the roll was called.
There were 61 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
The question recurred on the Erickson, S.,
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 62 yeas and 72 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the amendment
was not adopted.
Quam moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment.
Quam requested a division of his amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment.
Quam further requested that the second portion of his divided amendment be voted on first.
The second portion of the Quam amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, reads as follows:
Page 61, line 10, after the period, insert "Rules under this paragraph must allow a candidate to pass the skills examination by obtaining scores on the individual sections that total a sum higher than the sum of the individual passing scores of the sections. The rules must allow a candidate who has not passed the examination to retake the entire examination or any section that has not been individually passed, but not only already passed sections."
Page 63, line 15, after "pass" insert ", according to section 122A.09, subdivision 4, paragraph (b),"
Page 66, line 3, after "passed" insert ", according to section 122A.09, subdivision 4, paragraph (b),"
The motion did not prevail and the second
portion of the Quam amendment to H. F. No. 630, the
second engrossment, was
not adopted.
The first portion of the Quam amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, reads as follows:
Page 40, line 1, after "attainment" insert ", as defined in paragraph (j),"
Page 40, delete lines 31 and 32
Page 43, after line 35, insert:
"(j) For purposes of this subdivision, "attainment" means obtaining a cumulative score on a student's final examination, required under this subdivision, equivalent to or greater than the cumulative score generated by adding the individual subject scores determined as proficient through a standard setting process."
The motion did not prevail and the first
portion of the Quam amendment to H. F. No. 630, the
second engrossment, was
not adopted.
Erickson, S., moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 61, line 3, after the second "a" insert "college-level"
Page 61, line 9, after "the" insert "college-level"
Page 63, line 15, after "of" insert "college-level"
Page 63, line 24, after "the" insert "college-level"
Page 63, line 35, after the second "the" insert "college-level"
Page 64, line 11, after "the" insert "college-level"
Page 65, line 35, after "a" insert "college-level"
Page 66, line 3, after "the" insert "college-level"
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Erickson, S., moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 66, after line 29, insert:
"Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 122A.40, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Development, evaluation, and peer coaching for continuing contract teachers. (a) To improve student learning and success, a school board and an exclusive representative of the teachers in the district, consistent with paragraph (b), may develop a teacher evaluation and peer review process for probationary and continuing contract teachers through joint agreement. If a school board and the exclusive representative of the teachers do not agree to an annual teacher evaluation and peer review process, then the school board and the exclusive representative of the teachers must implement the plan for evaluation and review under paragraph (c). The process must include having trained observers serve as peer coaches or having teachers participate in professional learning communities, consistent with paragraph (b).
(b) To develop, improve, and support qualified teachers and effective teaching practices and improve student learning and success, the annual evaluation process for teachers:
(1) must, for probationary teachers, provide for all evaluations required under subdivision 5;
(2) must establish a three-year professional review cycle for each teacher that includes an individual growth and development plan, a peer review process, the opportunity to participate in a professional learning community under paragraph (a), and at least one summative evaluation performed by a qualified and trained evaluator such as a school administrator. For the years when a tenured teacher is not evaluated by a qualified and trained evaluator, the teacher must be evaluated by a peer review;
(3) must be based on professional teaching standards established in rule;
(4) must coordinate staff development activities under sections 122A.60 and 122A.61 with this evaluation process and teachers' evaluation outcomes;
(5) may provide time during the school day and school year for peer coaching and teacher collaboration;
(6) may include mentoring and induction programs;
(7) must include an option for teachers to develop and present a portfolio demonstrating evidence of reflection and professional growth, consistent with section 122A.18, subdivision 4, paragraph (b), and include teachers' own performance assessment based on student work samples and examples of teachers' work, which may include video among other activities for the summative evaluation;
(8) must use an agreed upon teacher value-added assessment model for the grade levels and subject areas for which value-added data are available and establish state or local measures of student growth for the grade levels and subject areas for which value-added data are not available as a basis for 35 percent of teacher evaluation results;
(9) must use longitudinal data on student engagement and connection, and other student outcome measures explicitly aligned with the elements of curriculum for which teachers are responsible;
(10) must require qualified and trained evaluators such as school administrators to perform summative evaluations;
(11) must give teachers not meeting professional teaching standards under clauses (3) through (10) support to improve through a teacher improvement process that includes established goals and timelines; and
(12) must discipline a teacher for not making adequate progress in the teacher improvement process under clause (11) that may include a last chance warning, termination, discharge, nonrenewal, transfer to a different position, a leave of absence, or other discipline a school administrator determines is appropriate.
Data on individual teachers generated under this subdivision are personnel data under section 13.43.
(c) The department, in consultation with parents who may represent parent organizations and teacher and administrator representatives appointed by their respective organizations, representing the Board of Teaching, the Minnesota Association of School Administrators, the Minnesota School Boards Association, the Minnesota Elementary and Secondary Principals Associations, Education Minnesota, and representatives of the Minnesota Assessment Group, the Minnesota Business Partnership, the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, and Minnesota postsecondary institutions with research expertise in teacher evaluation, must create and publish a teacher evaluation process that complies with the requirements in paragraph (b) and applies to all teachers under this section and
section 122A.41 for whom no agreement exists under paragraph (a) for an annual teacher evaluation and peer review process. The teacher evaluation process created under this subdivision does not create additional due process rights for probationary teachers under subdivision 5.
(d) Consistent with the measures of
teacher effectiveness under this subdivision:
(1) for students in kindergarten
through grade 4, a school administrator must not place a student in consecutive
school years in the classroom of a teacher with the lowest evaluation rating in
the previous school year unless no other teacher at the school teaches that
grade; and
(2) for students in grades 5 to 12, a
school administrator must not place students in consecutive school years in the
classroom of a teacher with the lowest evaluation rating in the previous school
year unless no other teacher at the school teaches that subject area and grade.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective for the 2016-2017 school year and later.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 122A.41, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Development, evaluation, and peer coaching for continuing contract teachers. (a) To improve student learning and success, a school board and an exclusive representative of the teachers in the district, consistent with paragraph (b), may develop an annual teacher evaluation and peer review process for probationary and nonprobationary teachers through joint agreement. If a school board and the exclusive representative of the teachers in the district do not agree to an annual teacher evaluation and peer review process, then the school board and the exclusive representative of the teachers must implement the plan for evaluation and review developed under paragraph (c). The process must include having trained observers serve as peer coaches or having teachers participate in professional learning communities, consistent with paragraph (b).
(b) To develop, improve, and support qualified teachers and effective teaching practices and improve student learning and success, the annual evaluation process for teachers:
(1) must, for probationary teachers, provide for all evaluations required under subdivision 2;
(2) must establish a three-year professional review cycle for each teacher that includes an individual growth and development plan, a peer review process, the opportunity to participate in a professional learning community under paragraph (a), and at least one summative evaluation performed by a qualified and trained evaluator such as a school administrator;
(3) must be based on professional teaching standards established in rule;
(4) must coordinate staff development activities under sections 122A.60 and 122A.61 with this evaluation process and teachers' evaluation outcomes;
(5) may provide time during the school day and school year for peer coaching and teacher collaboration;
(6) may include mentoring and induction programs;
(7) must include an option for teachers to develop and present a portfolio demonstrating evidence of reflection and professional growth, consistent with section 122A.18, subdivision 4, paragraph (b), and include teachers' own performance assessment based on student work samples and examples of teachers' work, which may include video among other activities for the summative evaluation;
(8) must use an agreed upon teacher value-added assessment model for the grade levels and subject areas for which value-added data are available and establish state or local measures of student growth for the grade levels and subject areas for which value-added data are not available as a basis for 35 percent of teacher evaluation results;
(9) must use longitudinal data on student engagement and connection and other student outcome measures explicitly aligned with the elements of curriculum for which teachers are responsible;
(10) must require qualified and trained evaluators such as school administrators to perform summative evaluations;
(11) must give teachers not meeting professional teaching standards under clauses (3) through (10) support to improve through a teacher improvement process that includes established goals and timelines; and
(12) must discipline a teacher for not making adequate progress in the teacher improvement process under clause (11) that may include a last chance warning, termination, discharge, nonrenewal, transfer to a different position, a leave of absence, or other discipline a school administrator determines is appropriate.
Data on individual teachers generated under this subdivision are personnel data under section 13.43.
(c) The department, in consultation with parents who may represent parent organizations and teacher and administrator representatives appointed by their respective organizations, representing the Board of Teaching, the Minnesota Association of School Administrators, the Minnesota School Boards Association, the Minnesota Elementary and Secondary Principals Associations, Education Minnesota, and representatives of the Minnesota Assessment Group, the Minnesota Business Partnership, the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, and Minnesota postsecondary institutions with research expertise in teacher evaluation, must create and publish a teacher evaluation process that complies with the requirements in paragraph (b) and applies to all teachers under this section and section 122A.40 for whom no agreement exists under paragraph (a) for an annual teacher evaluation and peer review process. The teacher evaluation process created under this subdivision does not create additional due process rights for probationary teachers under subdivision 2.
(d) Consistent with the measures of
teacher effectiveness under this subdivision:
(1) for students in kindergarten
through grade 4, a school administrator must not place a student in consecutive
school years in the classroom of a teacher with the lowest evaluation rating in
the previous school year unless no other teacher at the school teaches that
grade; and
(2) for students in grades 5 to 12, a
school administrator must not place students in consecutive school years in the
classroom of a teacher with the lowest evaluation rating in the previous school
year unless no other teacher at the school teaches that subject area and grade.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for the 2016-2017 school year and later."
Page 80, after line 1, insert:
"Sec. 22. PROHIBITION
AGAINST PLACING STUDENTS WITH INEFFECTIVE TEACHERS; LEGISLATIVE REPORT.
The commissioner must consult with the
education stakeholders listed under Minnesota Statutes, sections 122A.40,
subdivision 8, paragraph (c), in reviewing the policies under Minnesota
Statutes, sections 122A.40,
subdivision 8, paragraph (d),
and 122A.41, subdivision 5, paragraph (d), and recommend to the education
policy and finance committees of the legislature by January 15, 2014, the
funding and other mechanisms required to implement those policies.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Erickson,
S., amendment and the roll was called.
There were 67 yeas and 67 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Moran
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Erickson, S., moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 66, after line 29, insert:
"Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 122A.40, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Negotiated unrequested leave of absence. (a) The school board and the exclusive bargaining representative of the teachers may negotiate a plan providing for unrequested leave of absence without pay or fringe benefits for as many teachers as may be necessary because of discontinuance of position, lack of pupils, financial limitations, or merger of classes caused by consolidation of districts. Failing to successfully negotiate such a plan, the provisions of subdivision 11 shall apply. The negotiated plan must not include provisions which would result in the exercise of seniority by a teacher holding a provisional license, other than a vocational education license, contrary to the provisions of subdivision 11, paragraph (c), or the reinstatement of a teacher holding a provisional license, other than a vocational education license, contrary to the provisions of subdivision 11, paragraph (e). The provisions of section 179A.16 do not apply for the purposes of this subdivision.
(b) For purposes of placing a teacher
on unrequested leave of absence or recalling a teacher from unrequested leave
of absence, a school board is not required to reassign a teacher with more
seniority to accommodate the seniority claims of a teacher who is similarly
licensed and effective but with less seniority.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective beginning in the 2016-2017 school year and later.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 122A.41, subdivision 14, is amended to read:
Subd. 14. Services
terminated by discontinuance or lack of pupils; preference given. (a) A teacher whose services are
terminated on account of discontinuance of position or lack of pupils must
receive first consideration for other positions in the district for which that
teacher is qualified. In the event it becomes
necessary to discontinue one or more positions, in making such discontinuance,
teachers must be discontinued in any department in the inverse order in which
they were employed, unless a board and the exclusive representative of teachers
in the district negotiate a plan providing otherwise. For purposes of discharging, demoting, or
recalling a teacher whose services are discontinued or terminated under this
subdivision, a school board is not required to reassign a teacher with more seniority to accommodate the seniority claims of
a teacher who is similarly licensed and effective but with less seniority.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of clause (a), a teacher is not entitled to exercise any seniority when that exercise results in that teacher being retained by the district in a field for which the teacher holds only a provisional license, as defined by the Board of Teaching, unless that exercise of seniority results in the termination of services, on account of discontinuance of position or lack of pupils, of another teacher who also holds a provisional license in the same field. The provisions of this clause do not apply to vocational education licenses.
(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of clause (a), a teacher must not be reinstated to a position in a field in which the teacher holds only a provisional license, other than a vocational education license, while another teacher who holds a nonprovisional license in the same field is available for reinstatement.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective beginning in the 2016-2017 school year and later."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Erickson, S., moved to amend her amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, after line 18, insert:
"(c) Notwithstanding other law to the contrary, if a school board and the exclusive representative of the teachers do not agree to a plan providing for unrequested leaves of absence under paragraph (a), the school board must base decisions affecting teachers' unrequested leaves of absence and teaching assignments on teacher evaluation outcomes under section 122A.40, subdivision 8."
Page 2, after line 18, insert:
"(d) Notwithstanding other provisions of this subdivision, a school board may base decisions affecting teachers' unrequested leaves of absence and teaching assignments on teacher evaluation outcomes under section 122A.41, subdivision 5."
Page 2, after line 20, insert:
"Page 87, after line 33, insert:
"Sec. 27. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2012, section
122A.40, subdivision 11, is repealed.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for the 2016-2017 school year and later.""
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question
was taken on the amendment to the amendment and the roll was called. There were 60 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davids
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson,
S.
Kahn
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
The question recurred on the Erickson, S.,
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 57 yeas and 77 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Daudt
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Woodard moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 58, after line 8, insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 43A.316, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Public employee participation. (a) Participation in the program is subject to the conditions in this subdivision, except that for school districts, paragraph (b) does not apply. A school district that intends to participate in the program must mutually agree to participate with the exclusive representative of its teachers and must notify the commissioner of that agreement and of its intent to participate at least 30 days before entry into the program.
(b) Each exclusive representative for an eligible employer determines whether the employees it represents will participate in the program. The exclusive representative shall give the employer notice of intent to participate at least 30 days before the expiration date of the collective bargaining agreement preceding the collective bargaining agreement that covers the date of entry into the program. The exclusive representative and the eligible employer shall give notice to the commissioner of the determination to participate in the program at least 30 days before entry into the program. Entry into the program is governed by a schedule established by the commissioner.
(c) Employees not represented by exclusive representatives may become members of the program upon a determination of an eligible employer to include these employees in the program. Either all or none of the employer's unrepresented employees must participate. The eligible employer shall give at least 30 days' notice to the commissioner before entering the program. Entry into the program is governed by a schedule established by the commissioner.
(d) Participation in the program is for a two-year term. Participation is automatically renewed for an additional two-year term unless the exclusive representative, or the employer for unrepresented employees, gives the commissioner notice of withdrawal at least 30 days before expiration of the participation period. A group that withdraws must wait two years before rejoining. An exclusive representative, or employer for unrepresented employees, may also withdraw if premiums increase 50 percent or more from one insurance year to the next.
(e) The exclusive representative shall give the employer notice of intent to withdraw to the commissioner at least 30 days before the expiration date of a collective bargaining agreement that includes the date on which the term of participation expires.
(f) Each participating eligible employer shall notify the commissioner of names of individuals who will be participating within two weeks of the commissioner receiving notice of the parties' intent to participate. The employer shall also submit other information as required by the commissioner for administration of the program.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2013."
Page 67, after line 13, insert:
"Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 123B.02, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 1a. Health
Care for Employees. Notwithstanding
Minnesota Statutes, section 43A.316, or other law to the contrary, the board by
its own discretion may join or participate in a health plan, insurance pool, or
self-insurance program for employee health benefits consistent with any
collective bargaining agreements entered into by the board.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2013."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Woodard amendment and the
roll was called. There were 61 yeas and
73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Daudt
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Woodard moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 109, after line 1, insert:
"(e) Notwithstanding other provisions of this subdivision, the authorizer of a charter school may terminate an existing contract between the authorizer and the charter school at the end of the current school year, after notifying the charter school board of directors by December 1, if in each of the previous three consecutive school years the performance of the charter school based on federal school accountability measures and on state measures of student performance and growth would place the school in the bottom quartile of all public schools as determined by the commissioner. If an authorizer chooses to terminate the contract, the school must be closed according to applicable law and the terms of the contract. The authorizer must work with the charter school's board of directors to ensure parents of children currently enrolled at the school are aware of school choice options and receive assistance in selecting an appropriate choice for the next school year. If the authorizer chooses not to terminate the existing contract under these conditions, the authorizer must submit a public, written justification of the decision to the commissioner by December 1. The commissioner may use this decision as a factor in reviewing the authorizer's performance under subdivision 3, paragraph (i). The federal and state measures identified in this paragraph are minimum conditions and are not intended to discourage and do not prevent an authorizer from closing schools which do not meet these conditions."
Page 111, line 20, after "2013" insert ", and applies to federal school accountability measure and state measure of student performance and growth from the 2010-2011 school year and later"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Woodard
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 63 yeas and 71 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Liebling
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Kresha moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 13, line 33, before "The" insert "(a)"
Page 14, after line 3, insert:
"(b) Notwithstanding other law to the contrary, a school board in any school year may hold a formal hearing to declare an urgent educational need for that school year and resolve to reallocate the district revenue under this section to provide more effective education programs and services and improve the educational outcomes of all students enrolled in the district. A board action under this paragraph must not increase state aid obligations to the district, result in additional property tax authority for the district, or interfere with federally mandated laws or court orders."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Kresha amendment and the
roll was called. There were 61 yeas and
73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davids
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Petersburg was excused for the remainder
of today's session.
Woodard moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 143, after line 27, insert:
"Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 127A.45, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Definitions. (a) "Other district receipts" means payments by county treasurers pursuant to section 276.10, apportionments from the school endowment fund pursuant to section 127A.33, apportionments by the county auditor pursuant to section 127A.34, subdivision 2, and payments to school districts by the commissioner of revenue pursuant to chapter 298.
(b) "Cumulative amount guaranteed" means the product of
(1) the cumulative disbursement percentage shown in subdivision 3; times
(2) the sum of
(i) the current year aid payment percentage of the estimated aid and credit entitlements paid according to subdivision 13; plus
(ii) 100 percent of the entitlements paid according to subdivisions 11 and 12; plus
(iii) the other district receipts.
(c) "Payment date" means the date on which state payments to districts are made by the electronic funds transfer method. If a payment date falls on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a weekday which is a legal holiday, the payment shall be made on the immediately preceding business day. The commissioner may make payments on dates other than those listed in subdivision 3, but only for portions of payments from any preceding payment dates which could not be processed by the electronic funds transfer method due to documented extenuating circumstances.
(d) The current year aid payment percentage equals 73 in
fiscal year 2010 and 70 in fiscal year 2011, and 60 86.4 in fiscal
years 2012 2013 and later.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Woodard offered an amendment to his
amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as amended.
POINT OF ORDER
Murphy, E., raised a point of order
pursuant to rule 4.03, relating to Ways and Means Committee; Budget Resolution;
Effect on Expenditure and Revenue Bills, that the amendment to the amendment
was not in order. The Speaker ruled the
point of order well taken and the amendment to the amendment out of order.
Woodard appealed the decision of the
Speaker.
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The vote was taken on the question
"Shall the decision of the Speaker stand as the judgment of the
House?" and the roll was called.
There were 73 yeas and 60 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
So it was the judgment of the House that
the decision of the Speaker should stand.
The question recurred on the Woodard
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 61 yeas and 72 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
The Speaker called Hortman to the Chair.
Hertaus moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 21, after line 20, insert:
"Sec. 24. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 126C.17, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. Referendum revenue. (a) The revenue authorized by section 126C.10, subdivision 1, may be increased in the amount approved by the voters of the district at a referendum called for the purpose. The referendum may be called by the board. The referendum must be conducted one or two calendar years before the increased levy authority, if approved, first becomes payable. Only one election to approve an increase may be held in a calendar year. Unless the referendum is conducted by mail under subdivision 11, paragraph (a), the referendum must be held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of an even-numbered year. The ballot must state the maximum amount of the increased revenue per resident marginal cost pupil unit. The ballot may state a schedule, determined by the board, of increased revenue per resident marginal cost pupil unit that differs from year to year over the number of years for which the increased revenue is authorized or may state that the amount shall increase annually by the rate of inflation. For this purpose, the rate of inflation shall be the annual inflationary increase calculated under subdivision 2, paragraph (b). The ballot may state that existing referendum levy authority is expiring. In this case, the ballot may also compare the proposed levy authority to the existing expiring levy authority, and express the proposed increase as the amount, if any, over the expiring referendum levy authority. The ballot must designate the specific number of years, not to exceed ten, for which the referendum authorization applies. The ballot, including a ballot on the question to revoke or reduce the increased revenue amount under paragraph (c), must abbreviate the term "per resident marginal cost pupil unit" as "per pupil." The notice required under section 275.60 may be modified to read, in cases of renewing existing levies at the same amount per pupil as in the previous year:
"BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING TO EXTEND AN EXISTING PROPERTY TAX REFERENDUM THAT IS SCHEDULED TO EXPIRE."
The ballot may contain a textual portion with the information required in this subdivision and a question stating substantially the following:
"Shall the increase in the revenue proposed by (petition to) the board of ........., School District No. .., be approved?"
If approved, an amount equal to the approved revenue per resident marginal cost pupil unit times the resident marginal cost pupil units for the school year beginning in the year after the levy is certified shall be authorized for certification for the number of years approved, if applicable, or until revoked or reduced by the voters of the district at a subsequent referendum.
(b) The board must prepare and deliver by first class mail at least 15 days but no more than 30 days before the day of the referendum to each taxpayer a notice of the referendum and the proposed revenue increase. The board need not mail more than one notice to any taxpayer. For the purpose of giving mailed notice under this subdivision,
owners must be those shown to be owners on the records of the county auditor or, in any county where tax statements are mailed by the county treasurer, on the records of the county treasurer. Every property owner whose name does not appear on the records of the county auditor or the county treasurer is deemed to have waived this mailed notice unless the owner has requested in writing that the county auditor or county treasurer, as the case may be, include the name on the records for this purpose. The notice must project the anticipated amount of tax increase in annual dollars for typical residential homesteads, agricultural homesteads, apartments, and commercial-industrial property within the school district.
The notice for a referendum may state that an existing referendum levy is expiring and project the anticipated amount of increase over the existing referendum levy in the first year, if any, in annual dollars for typical residential homesteads, agricultural homesteads, apartments, and commercial-industrial property within the district.
The notice must include the following statement: "Passage of this referendum will result in an increase in your property taxes." However, in cases of renewing existing levies, the notice may include the following statement: "Passage of this referendum extends an existing operating referendum at the same amount per pupil as in the previous year."
(c) A referendum on the question of revoking or reducing the increased revenue amount authorized pursuant to paragraph (a) may be called by the board. A referendum to revoke or reduce the revenue amount must state the amount per resident marginal cost pupil unit by which the authority is to be reduced. Revenue authority approved by the voters of the district pursuant to paragraph (a) must be available to the school district at least once before it is subject to a referendum on its revocation or reduction for subsequent years. Only one revocation or reduction referendum may be held to revoke or reduce referendum revenue for any specific year and for years thereafter.
(d) The approval of 50 percent plus one of those voting on the question is required to pass a referendum authorized by this subdivision.
(e) At least 15 days before the day of the referendum, the district must submit a copy of the notice required under paragraph (b) to the commissioner and to the county auditor of each county in which the district is located. Within 15 days after the results of the referendum have been certified by the board, or in the case of a recount, the certification of the results of the recount by the canvassing board, the district must notify the commissioner of the results of the referendum.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2013, for referenda conducted on or after that date."
Page 27, after line 14, insert:
"Sec. 30. REFERENDUM
ELECTIONS; NOVEMBER 2013.
Notwithstanding section 1, a school district with a referendum first expiring for fiscal year 2015, may conduct an election on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November 2013."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Zerwas moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 21, line 18, delete "66" and insert "70"
Page 27, after line 14, insert:
"Sec. 29. EQUITY
REVENUE; INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 728, ELK RIVER.
(a) Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes,
section 126C.10, subdivision 24, equity revenue for Independent School District
No. 728, Elk River, equals the amount computed under Minnesota Statutes,
section 126C.10, subdivision 24, paragraphs (b) to (d), multiplied by the sum
of one plus .25 times the percentage of the district's students residing in
Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, or Washington County.
(b)
Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 126C.10, subdivision 24, if
Independent School District No. 728, Elk River, is eligible for additional
equity revenue under Minnesota Statutes, section 126C.10, subdivision 24,
paragraph (f), this amount shall be added to the amount calculated under
paragraph (a).
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for fiscal year 2014 and later."
Page 161, line 5, delete "19,214,000" and insert "19,152,000"
Page 161, line 6, delete "19,386,000" and insert "19,324,000"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Zerwas
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 63 yeas and 70 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Metsa
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Quam moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 3, after line 11, insert:
"Sec. 3. [121A.08] STUDENT RELIGIOUS LIBERTIES.
Subdivision 1. Citation. This section shall be known and may be
cited as the "Student Religious Liberties Act of 2013."
Subd. 2.
Student expression. A public school district shall not
discriminate against students or parents on the basis of a religious viewpoint
or religious expression. A school
district shall treat a student's voluntary expression of a religious viewpoint,
if any, on an otherwise permissible subject in the same manner the district
treats a student's voluntary expression of a secular or other viewpoint on an
otherwise permissible subject and may not discriminate against the student
based on a religious viewpoint expressed by the student on an otherwise
permissible subject.
Subd. 3. Religious expression in class
assignments. Students may
express their beliefs about religion in homework, artwork, and other written
and oral assignments free from discrimination based on the religious content of
their submissions. Homework and
classroom assignments must be judged by ordinary academic standards of
substance and relevance and against other legitimate pedagogical concerns
identified by the school district.
Students may not be penalized or rewarded on account of the religious
content of their work. If an assignment
requires a student's viewpoint to be expressed in coursework, artwork, or other
written or oral assignments, a public school shall not penalize or reward a
student on the basis of religious content or a religious viewpoint. In such an assignment, a student's academic
work that expresses a religious viewpoint shall be evaluated based on ordinary
academic standards of substance and relevance to the course curriculum or
requirements of the coursework or assignment.
Subd. 4.
Freedom to organize religious
groups and activities. (a)
Students in public schools may pray or engage in religious activities or religious
expression before, during, and after the school day in the same manner and to
the same extent that students may engage in nonreligious activities or
expression. Students may organize prayer
groups, religious clubs, "see you at the pole" gatherings, or other
religious gatherings before, during, and after school to the same extent that
students are permitted to organize other noncurricular student activities and
groups. Religious groups must be given
the same access to school facilities for assembling as is given to other
noncurricular groups without discrimination based on the religious content of
the students' expression. If student
groups that meet for nonreligious activities are permitted to advertise or
announce meetings of the groups, the school district may not discriminate
against groups that meet for prayer or other religious speech. A school district may disclaim school
sponsorship of noncurricular groups and events in a manner that neither favors
nor disfavors groups that meet to engage in prayer or religious speech.
(b) Students in public schools may wear clothing,
accessories, and jewelry that display religious messages or religious symbols
in the same manner and to the same extent that other types of clothing,
accessories, and jewelry that display messages or symbols are permitted.
Subd. 5.
Limited public forum; school
district policy. (a) To
ensure that the school district does not discriminate against a student's
publicly stated voluntary expression of a religious viewpoint, if any, and to
eliminate any actual or perceived affirmative school sponsorship or attribution
to the district of a student's expression of a
religious viewpoint, if any, a
school district shall adopt a policy, which must include the establishment of a
limited public forum for student speakers at all school events at which a
student is to publicly speak. The policy
regarding the limited public forum must also require the school district to:
(1) provide the forum in a manner that
does not discriminate against a student's voluntary expression of a religious
viewpoint, if any, on an otherwise permissible subject;
(2) provide a method, based on neutral
criteria, for the selection of student speakers at school events and graduation
ceremonies;
(3) ensure that a student speaker does
not engage in obscene, vulgar, offensively lewd, or indecent speech; and
(4) state, in writing, orally, or both,
that the student's speech does not reflect the endorsement, sponsorship,
position, or expression of the district.
(b) The school district disclaimer
required by paragraph (a), clause (4), must be provided at all graduation
ceremonies. The school district must
also continue to provide the disclaimer at any other event in which a student speaks publicly for as long as a need exists to
dispel confusion over the district's nonsponsorship of the student's speech.
(c) Student expression on an otherwise
permissible subject may not be excluded from the limited public forum because
the subject is expressed from a religious viewpoint.
(d) All school districts shall adopt
and implement a local policy regarding a limited public forum and voluntary
student expression of religious viewpoints.
If a school district voluntarily adopts and follows the model policy
governing voluntary religious expression in public schools developed under
subdivision 6, the district is in compliance with the provisions of this
section.
Subd. 6. State
model policy. (a) The
commissioner of education, in consultation with representatives of the
Minnesota School Board Association, the Minnesota Association of School
Administrators, the Minnesota Elementary School Principals' Association, and
the Minnesota Secondary School Principals' Association, shall develop and
maintain a state model policy. The
commissioner must assist districts and schools under this subdivision to
implement the state policy. The state
model policy must:
(1) define school events at which a
limited public forum exists;
(2) set objective criteria for student
selection for the limited public forums under clause (1);
(3) provide wording for the disclaimers
under subdivisions 4 and 5;
(4) provide guidance for graduation
ceremonies;
(5) provide guidance on religious
expression in class assignments under subdivision 3; and
(6) provide guidance on the
organization of religious groups and activities under subdivision 4.
(b) The commissioner shall develop and
post departmental procedures for:
(1) periodically reviewing district and
school programs and policies for compliance with this section;
(2) investigating, reporting, and
responding to noncompliance with this section; and
(3) allowing students, parents,
and educators to file a complaint about noncompliance with the commissioner.
Subd. 7. Statutory
construction. (a) This
section shall not be construed to authorize this state or any of its political
subdivisions to do either of the following:
(1) require any person to participate in
prayer or in any other religious activity; or
(2) violate the constitutional rights of
any person.
(b) This section shall not be construed
to limit the authority of any public school to do any of the following:
(1) maintain order and discipline on the
campus of the public school in a content- and viewpoint-neutral manner;
(2) protect the safety of students,
employees, and visitors of the public school; or
(3) adopt and enforce policies and procedures
regarding student speech at school provided that the policies and procedures do
not violate the rights of students as guaranteed by the Constitutions of the
United States and the state of Minnesota or other applicable law.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for the 2013-2014 school year and later."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Correct the title numbers accordingly
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Gruenhagen moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 138, line 6, after the period, insert "The task force also must identify the special education requirements in state statute and rule that exceed federal requirements for special education and analyze the educational benefits and the cost of those requirements."
Page 138, line 8, after "legislature" insert a colon
Page 138, line 10, after "alternatives" insert "; and analyzing the educational benefits and costs of the state special education statutes and rules that exceed federal requirements"
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Erickson, S., moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 138, after line 11, insert:
"Sec. 27. SPECIAL
EDUCATION EVALUATION.
Subdivision 1. Independent
analysis of proposed changes to state special education laws. The commissioner of education must
solicit a request for proposal to undertake a detailed, independent analysis of
the economic and educational effects of conforming Minnesota's special
education laws with minimum federal
requirements. The report must be structured to help the
K-12 education policy and finance committees of the legislature balance student
outcomes with possible gains in time or cost efficiencies. The commissioner must submit a written report
containing the analysis to the K-12 education policy and finance committees of
the legislature by February 15, 2014.
Subd. 2. Special
education teachers' compliance with legal requirements. The Department of Education must
identify ways to give teachers working with eligible children with disabilities
sufficient written and online resources to make informed decisions about how to
effectively comply with legal requirements related to providing special
education programs and services, including writing individualized education
programs and related documents, among other requirements. The department must work collaboratively with
school and district staff and representatives of affected organizations,
including Education Minnesota and Minnesota Administrators of Special
Education, among others, to identify obstacles to and solutions for teachers'
confusion about complying with legal requirements governing special education
programs and services. The department
must work with schools and districts to provide staff development training to
better comply with applicable legal requirements while meeting the educational
needs and improving the educational progress of eligible children with
disabilities.
Subd. 3. Efficiencies
to reduce paperwork. The
Department of Education, in collaboration with teachers and administrators
working with eligible children with disabilities in schools and districts, must
identify strategies to effectively decrease the amount of time teachers spend
completing paperwork for special education programs and services, evaluate
whether the strategies are cost effective, and determine whether other schools
and districts are able to effectively use the strategies given available staff
and resources. Where an evaluation shows
that particular paperwork reduction strategies are cost effective without
undermining the purpose of the paperwork or the integrity of special education
requirements, the department must electronically disseminate and promote the
strategies to other schools and districts throughout the state.
Subd. 4. Recommended
rule changes to conform with Minnesota Statutes. The commissioner of education must
prepare a written report for the K-12 education policy and finance committees
of the legislature by February 1, 2014, recommending specific substantive and
technical text revisions for amending state special education rules and
repealing obsolete special education rules to make the rules consistent with
Minnesota special education statutes. The
commissioner must consult with the house of representatives and senate
committee chairs and ranking minority members in preparing this report.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
Erickson, S., moved to amend her amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 2, after line 19, insert:
"Page 138, after line 25, insert:
"Sec. 28. SPECIAL
EDUCATION; PAPERWORK; TIME LINES.
(a) Notwithstanding other law to the
contrary, to the extent special education-related paperwork requirements
applicable to school districts exceed what is required by federal special
education law, school districts may satisfy these paperwork requirements by
complying with the federal law only.
(b) Notwithstanding other law
to the contrary, to the extent special education-related time lines applicable
to school districts exceed what is required by federal special education law,
school districts may satisfy these time line requirements by complying with the
federal law only.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment.""
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question
was taken on the amendment to the amendment and the roll was called. There were 61 yeas and 72 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Sawatzky
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
The question recurred on the Erickson, S.,
amendment to H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as
amended. The motion did not prevail and
the amendment was not adopted.
Gruenhagen moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 137, after line 29, insert:
"Sec. 26. [125A.851]
TITLE.
Sections 125A.851 to 125A.857 may be
cited as the Minnesota Special Education Scholarship Act.
Sec. 27. [125A.852]
POLICY AND PURPOSE.
The purpose of the Minnesota Special
Education Scholarship Act is to grant parents the ability to choose the special
education services provider for their children.
Sec. 28. [125A.853]
DEFINITIONS.
Subdivision 1. Terms. For purposes of sections 125A.851 to
125A.857, the terms in this subdivision have the meaning given them.
Subd. 2. Eligible
student. "Eligible
student" means an eligible child with a disability who has an
individualized education program and who was enrolled in a Minnesota school
district or charter school throughout the school year immediately preceding the
school year in which a scholarship is first awarded.
Subd. 3. Eligible
provider. "Eligible
provider" means an organization or individual approved by the commissioner
to provide special education services to a student under section 125A.855,
subdivision 3.
Subd. 4. Parent. "Parent" means the parent or
guardian of an eligible student.
Sec. 29. [125A.854]
STUDENT APPLICATION PROCESS.
Subdivision 1. Initial
application. An eligible
student may apply to the superintendent of the student's resident school
district for a special education scholarship.
Subd. 2. District
official to schedule meeting. Within
30 days after receiving a request for a scholarship application from an
eligible student and the student's parent, the superintendent or other
designated school official must schedule an individualized education program
team meeting for that student. The
meeting must occur within 60 days after the school official receives the
student's request for a scholarship application.
Subd. 3. Meeting. At the meeting, the individualized
education program team and the student's parent must discuss the services
provided by the serving school district and the anticipated changes in service
if the parent selects an eligible provider.
After the meeting, the parent may apply for a special education
scholarship.
Subd. 4. Scholarship
application. The parent must
include with the scholarship application a signed document showing that an
eligible provider approved by the commissioner has agreed to provide the
student with the special education services identified in the student's
individualized education program if the child is awarded a special education
scholarship.
Subd. 5. Scholarship
awarded. Within 30 days after
receiving a scholarship application, the superintendent or other designated
school official must award the special education scholarship to the parent of
the eligible student if the document under subdivision 4 is available and all
other conditions are met.
Sec. 30. [125A.855]
DUTIES OF THE COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION.
Subdivision 1. Uniform
procedures. The commissioner
must establish the form and manner for a parent to request and apply for the
special education scholarship.
Subd. 2. Amount
of scholarship. The
commissioner shall calculate the average rate of salary reimbursement under
section 125A.76 for each category of essential personnel for the previous year
and establish these rates as the scholarship reimbursement amounts for eligible
providers.
Subd. 3. Approved
providers. (a) An
organization or individual may apply to the department for approval as an
eligible provider of special education scholarship services in the form and
manner specified by the commissioner. The
department may review an applicant's fitness to provide special education
services including the applicant's:
(1) past experience providing special
education services;
(2) ability to provide services of the
same quality as those provided by current service providers; and
(3) educational credentials.
The provider must meet the licensing criteria for
essential personnel performing the same services under section 125A.76,
subdivision 1. However, a previously
licensed employee without a current license may apply for a limited-term
license in order to become an approved provider. If the previously licensed employee is a
teacher, the Board of Teaching, after completing a background check under
section 123B.03, must grant the employee a limited-term license to provide
scholarship services under this act. The
commissioner must approve a license for a previously licensed provider in an
essential personnel category and must award a limited-term license to the
otherwise qualified nonlicensed provider.
The commissioner may establish standards for nonlicensed providers that
are comparable to the standards for school district employees who are defined
as essential personnel.
(b) The Board of Teaching and the
commissioner each shall maintain and periodically update an electronic publicly
available list of approved providers.
(c) An applicant that has not been
approved under paragraph (a) may appeal that decision as a contested case under
chapter 14.
Subd. 4. Payment
of scholarships. The
commissioner shall include scholarship payment amounts in the payments to
school districts under section 125A.76.
Sec. 31. [125A.856]
DUTIES OF THE RESIDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Subdivision 1. List
of eligible providers. Upon
request, the resident school district must provide each requesting parent a list of approved eligible providers, beginning with
eligible providers located in proximity to the district.
Subd. 2. Annual
reapproval. Each year after
the first year a scholarship is awarded, the resident district must convene a
meeting of the student's individualized education program team to review the
student's progress and revise the student's individualized education program.
Subd. 3. Payment
of scholarships. The school
district shall make monthly payments to each eligible provider of special
education services to pupils resident to that district upon verification of the
hours of service in a form and manner determined by the commissioner.
Subd. 4. Report
to department. Each school
district must report its contracts and payments to eligible providers to the
Department of Education,
Sec. 32. [125A.857]
WAIVER OF RESPONSIBILITY.
The parent of a student who accepts a special education scholarship is responsible for meeting the special education needs of that student during the scholarship term. The resident school district that awards a student a scholarship and any other Minnesota school district or charter school is not required to provide special education services to that student during the scholarship term."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Gruenhagen
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 51 yeas and 82 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Theis
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davids
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kresha
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Gruenhagen moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 152, delete section 2
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Woodard moved to amend H. F. No. 630, the second engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 160, after line 30, insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 127A.05, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Review
of state laws and rules. The
commissioner shall review all education-related mandates in state law or rule
once every four years to determine which mandates fail to adequately promote
public education in the state. The
commissioner annually must identify the existing and most recently enacted
state laws and rules for which state funding to districts or charter schools to
fully implement the law or rule is unavailable and determine the amount by
which the cost to a district or charter school to comply with the law or rule
exceeds the state funds available for that purpose. A district or charter school may transmit
information to the commissioner to assist in identifying unfunded mandates and
determining their costs to districts and charter schools. The commissioner shall report the findings of
the each review to the education committees of the legislature by
February 1 in the year following the completion of the review.
Subd. 2a. Unfunded
mandates. (a) Notwithstanding
other law to the contrary, beginning January 1, 2013, a school as defined under
section 120A.22, subdivision 4, is not required to comply with a state law or
rule applicable to that school enacted, adopted, or amended after that date if,
under subdivision 2, the commissioner reported that state funding to fully
implement the law or rule is unavailable.
A school that resolves not to comply with a state law or rule under this section must transmit
electronic notice to the commissioner of its intent not to comply with the law
or rule.
(b) This section does not apply to federally-mandated laws or court orders.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for fiscal year 2014 and later."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Woodard
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 60 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
The Speaker
resumed the Chair.
H. F. No. 630, A bill for an act relating to education; providing funding and policy for early childhood and family, prekindergarten through grade 12, and adult education, including general education, student accountability, education excellence, charter schools, special education, facilities, technology, nutrition, libraries, accounting, early childhood, self-sufficiency, lifelong learning, state agencies, and forecast adjustments; authorizing rulemaking; requiring reports; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 13.319, by adding a subdivision; 15.059, subdivision 5b; 120A.20, subdivision 1; 120A.41; 120B.02; 120B.021, subdivision 1; 120B.023; 120B.024; 120B.125; 120B.128; 120B.30, subdivisions 1, 1a; 120B.31, subdivision 1; 120B.35, subdivision 3; 120B.36, subdivision 1; 121A.22, subdivision 2; 121A.2205; 122A.09, subdivision 4; 122A.18, subdivision 2; 122A.23, subdivision 2; 122A.28, subdivision 1; 122A.33, subdivision 3; 122A.61, subdivision 1; 123B.41, subdivision 7; 123B.54; 123B.88, subdivision 22; 123B.92, subdivisions 1, 5; 124D.02, subdivision 1; 124D.095, subdivision 10; 124D.10; 124D.11, subdivision 5; 124D.111, subdivision 1; 124D.119; 124D.122; 124D.128, subdivision 2; 124D.42; 124D.4531, subdivision 1; 124D.52, by adding a subdivision; 124D.531, subdivision 1; 124D.59, subdivision 2; 124D.61; 124D.79, subdivision 1, by adding a subdivision; 125A.0941; 125A.0942; 125A.11, subdivision 1; 125A.27, subdivisions 8, 11, 14; 125A.28; 125A.29; 125A.30; 125A.32; 125A.33; 125A.35, subdivision 1; 125A.36; 125A.43; 125A.76, subdivisions 1, 4a, 8, by adding subdivisions; 125A.78, subdivision 2; 125A.79, subdivisions 1, 5; 126C.01, by adding a subdivision; 126C.05, subdivisions 1, 15; 126C.10, subdivisions 1, 2, 14, 24, 29, 32; 126C.15, subdivisions 1, 2; 126C.17, subdivisions 1, 5, 6; 126C.40, subdivision 6; 126C.44; 126C.48, subdivision 8; 127A.47, subdivision 7; 128D.11, subdivision 3; 134.32; 134.34; 134.351, subdivisions 3, 7; 134.353; 134.354; 134.355, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; 134.36; 260A.02, subdivision 3; 260A.03; 260A.05, subdivision 1; 260A.07, subdivision 1; Laws 2007, chapter 146, article 4, section 12; Laws 2011, First Special Session chapter 11, article 1, section 36, subdivisions 2, as amended, 3, as amended, 4, as amended, 5, as amended, 6, as amended, 7, as amended, 10, as amended; article 2, section 50, subdivisions 2, as amended, 4, as amended, 5, as amended, 6, as amended, 7, as amended, 9, as amended; article 3, section 11, subdivisions 2, as amended, 3, as amended, 4, as amended, 5, as amended; article 4, section 10, subdivisions 2, as amended, 3, as amended, 4, as amended, 6, as amended; article 5, section 12, subdivisions 2, as amended, 3, as amended, 4, as amended; article 6, section 2, subdivisions 2, as amended, 3, as amended, 5, as amended; article 7, section 2, subdivisions 2, as amended, 3, as amended, 4, as amended, 8, as amended; article 8, section 2, subdivisions 2, as amended, 3, as amended; article 9, section 3, subdivision 2, as amended; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 120B; 121A; 124D; 126C; 127A; proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 16F; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 124D.454, subdivisions 3, 10, 11; 125A.35, subdivisions 4, 5; 125A.76, subdivisions 2, 4, 5, 7; 125A.79, subdivisions 6, 7; 126C.17, subdivision 13; Minnesota Rules, parts 3501.0010; 3501.0020; 3501.0030, subparts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16; 3501.0040; 3501.0050; 3501.0060; 3501.0090; 3501.0100; 3501.0110; 3501.0120; 3501.0130; 3501.0140; 3501.0150; 3501.0160; 3501.0170; 3501.0180; 3501.0200; 3501.0210; 3501.0220; 3501.0230; 3501.0240; 3501.0250; 3501.0270; 3501.0280, subparts 1, 2; 3501.0290; 3501.0505; 3501.0510; 3501.0515; 3501.0520;
3501.0525; 3501.0530; 3501.0535; 3501.0540; 3501.0545; 3501.0550; 3501.1000; 3501.1020; 3501.1030; 3501.1040; 3501.1050; 3501.1110; 3501.1120; 3501.1130; 3501.1140; 3501.1150; 3501.1160; 3501.1170; 3501.1180; 3501.1190.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 83 yeas and 50 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anderson, P.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Gunther
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kresha
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
Those who voted in the negative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Benson, M.
Daudt
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
FitzSimmons
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
H. F. No. 1304 was reported
to the House.
Ward, J.E., moved to amend H. F. No. 1304, the first engrossment, as follows:
Page 3, line 1, delete "one-day"
Page 3, line 2, before "organized" insert "of up to two days"
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
H. F. No. 1304, A bill for an act relating
to transportation; amending regulations governing school bus use for special
events; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 168.013, subdivision 18;
169.011, by adding a subdivision; 169.441, subdivision 3; 169.443, subdivision
3; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 169.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 132 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Falk
Faust
Fischer
FitzSimmons
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Myhra
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zellers
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
The
bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
S. F. No. 359 was reported
to the House.
Hornstein moved to amend
S. F. No. 359 as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting
clause and insert the following language of H. F. No. 414, the
first engrossment:
"Section 1. [10.581] GENOCIDE AWARENESS AND PREVENTION MONTH.
Beginning in 2013, the month of April
is designated as Genocide Awareness and Prevention Month in recognition of the
state's desire to combat all acts of genocide and all human rights
atrocities. Following the holocaust, on
December 9, 1948, the United Nations General Assembly adopted Resolution 260
(III) A, the United
Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, declaring genocide to be a crime under international law, and defining genocide to include the commission of certain acts, including killing members of a group, causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of a group, deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about a group's physical destruction in whole or in part, imposing measures intended to prevent births within a group, and forcibly transferring children of a group to another group, with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. The state declares that in order to educate the public and help prevent future genocides, the governor may promote and encourage the observance of Genocide Awareness and Prevention Month.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment."
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
S. F. No. 359, A bill for
an act relating to state government; designating the month of April as Genocide
Awareness and Prevention Month; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota
Statutes, chapter 10.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 133 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Falk
Faust
Fischer
FitzSimmons
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zellers
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
The
bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
IN MEMORIAM
The members of the House of Representatives paused for a moment of silence in memory of former Representative Doug Carlson, of Sandstone, Minnesota, who served from 1971 through 1974, and from 1977 through 1990, who passed away on Monday, April 22, 2013.
H. F. No. 791 was reported to the House.
Hortman moved to amend H. F. No. 791, the first engrossment, as follows:
Page 1, delete section 1
Page 5, line 13, after the period, insert "The producer, upon request, shall provide to the consumer or their legal representative a copy of the information used in the making of the suitability determination."
Page 5, delete line 21
Page 5, line 22, delete "(2)" and insert "(1)"
Page 5, line 24, delete "(3)" and insert "(2)"
Page 5, line 32, delete "customer" and insert "consumer" and delete "customer's" and insert "consumer's"
Page 6, line 17, after "other" insert "reasonable"
Page 6, line 20, after "liquidity," insert "liquid net worth,"
Page 8, line 25, delete everything after the period
Page 8, delete line 26
Page 10, line 5, after "corrective" insert "action"
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Hortman moved to amend H. F. No. 791, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 21, after "to" insert "annuity"
Page 1, delete lines 22 to 23 and insert:
"(1) direct response marketing of group insurance as provided for in section 72A.20, subdivision 34;"
Page 2, line 12, delete everything after "fund" and insert a colon
Page 2, delete lines 13 and 14
Hilstrom moved to amend the
Hortman amendment to H. F. No. 791, the first engrossment, as
amended, as follows:
Page 1, after line 7, insert:
"Page 7, delete subdivision 8 and insert:
"Subd. 8. FINRA
compliance. (a) Sales of
annuities made by broker-dealers satisfy the requirements under sections
72A.203 to 72A.2036, as to the broker-dealer so long as:
(1) those sales comply with FINRA
requirements pertaining to suitability and supervision of annuity transactions;
and
(2) a registered principal reviews and
approves the transaction based on review criteria that include consideration of
the customer's age, income, liquidity needs, and financial situation.
(b) The insurer remains responsible for
the suitability of every transaction and must take reasonably appropriate
corrective action for any consumer harmed by violation of law and is subject to
the penalty provisions described in section 72A.2034, subdivision 1.
(c) For paragraph (a) to apply, an
insurer shall:
(1) monitor the FINRA member
broker-dealer using information collected in the normal course of the insurer's
business; and
(2) provide to the FINRA member
broker-dealer information and reports that are reasonably appropriate to assist
the FINRA member broker-dealer to maintain its supervision system.
(d) Nothing in this subdivision limits
or changes:
(1) the insurer's responsibilities and
duties pursuant to sections 72A.302 to 72A.2036 including, but not limited to,
the insurer's obligation to establish and use a supervision system under
section 72A.2032, subdivision 6, and otherwise independently review and
determine the suitability of the annuity for each particular consumer before
issuing the annuity;
(2) the responsibilities of the insurer
to monitor the broker-dealer as provided in this subdivision; and
(3) the commissioner of commerce's ability to enforce the provisions of sections 72A.203 to 72A.2036 with respect to sales made in compliance with FINRA requirements and federal law.""
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the amendment to
the amendment and the roll was called.
There were 24 yeas and 108 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Benson, J.
Carlson
Cornish
Davnie
Dill
Faust
Fritz
Hilstrom
Isaacson
Lesch
Liebling
Mariani
Marquart
McNamar
Metsa
Moran
Mullery
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Norton
Radinovich
Savick
Wagenius
Ward, J.E.
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Albright
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Clark
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Falk
Fischer
FitzSimmons
Franson
Freiberg
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Masin
McDonald
McNamara
Melin
Morgan
Murphy, E.
Myhra
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Ward, J.A.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zellers
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
The question recurred on the Hortman
amendment to H. F. No. 791, the first engrossment, as
amended. The motion prevailed and the
amendment was adopted.
H. F. No. 791, A bill for
an act relating to insurance; regulating annuity products; enacting and
modifying a model regulation adopted by the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners relating to suitability in annuity transactions; proposing coding
for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 72A.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 126 yeas and 7 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Falk
Faust
Fischer
FitzSimmons
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zellers
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
Those who voted in the negative were:
Benson, J.
Davnie
Hilstrom
Liebling
McNamar
Mullery
Wagenius
The bill was passed, as amended, and its
title agreed to.
There being no objection, the order of
business reverted to Messages from the Senate.
MESSAGES FROM
THE SENATE
The
following messages were received from the Senate:
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate accedes to the request of the House for the appointment of a Conference Committee on the amendments adopted by the Senate to the following House File:
H. F. No. 729, A bill for an act relating to state government; appropriating money for jobs and economic development, commerce and consumer protection, and housing; making changes to labor and industry provisions; modifying and providing for certain fees; modifying employment, economic development, and workforce development provisions; making unemployment insurance changes; reducing the unemployment insurance tax; establishing notice for contracts for deed involving residential property; providing remedies; establishing the Office of Broadband Development in the Department of Commerce and assigning it duties; requiring the Department of Transportation to post a database on its Web site; appropriating money to various boards, departments, and the Housing Finance Agency; requiring reports; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 60A.14, subdivision 1; 116J.70, subdivision 2a; 116J.8731, subdivisions 2, 3, 8, 9; 116L.17, subdivision 4, by adding a subdivision; 116U.26; 136F.37; 154.001, by adding a subdivision; 154.003; 154.02; 154.05; 154.06; 154.065, subdivision 2; 154.07, subdivision 1; 154.08; 154.09; 154.10, subdivision 1; 154.11, subdivision 1; 154.12; 154.14; 154.15, subdivision 2; 154.26; 155A.23, subdivisions 3, 8, 11; 155A.25, subdivisions 1a, 4; 155A.27, subdivisions 4, 10; 155A.29, subdivision 2; 155A.30, by adding a subdivision; 177.27, subdivision 4; 237.012, subdivision 3; 239.101, subdivision 3; 245.4712, subdivision 1; 268.051, subdivision 5; 268.07, subdivision 3b; 268.125, subdivisions 1, 3, 4, 5; 268.136, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, by adding a subdivision; 268.199; 268.23; 268A.13; 268A.14, subdivision 1; 326.02, subdivision 5; 326A.04, subdivisions 2, 3, 5, 7; 326A.10; 326B.081, subdivision 3; 326B.082, subdivision 11; 326B.093, subdivision 4; 326B.101; 326B.103, subdivision 11; 326B.121, subdivision 1; 326B.163, by adding subdivisions; 326B.184, subdivisions 1, 2, by adding a subdivision; 326B.187; 326B.31, by adding a subdivision; 326B.33, subdivisions 19, 21; 326B.36, subdivision 7; 326B.37, by adding a subdivision; 326B.43, subdivision 2; 326B.49, subdivisions 2, 3; 326B.89, subdivision 1; 327B.04, subdivision 4; 341.21, subdivision 3a; 341.221; 341.27; 341.29; 341.30, subdivision 4; 341.32, subdivision 2; 341.321; 507.235, subdivision 2; 559.211, subdivision 2;
Laws 2011, First Special Session chapter 2, article 2, section 3, subdivision 4; Laws 2012, chapter 201, article 1, section 3; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 116J; 116L; 154; 155A; 161; 179; 237; 268; 326B; 383D; 559; proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 80G; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 116W.01; 116W.02; 116W.03; 116W.035; 116W.04; 116W.05; 116W.06; 116W.20; 116W.21; 116W.23; 116W.24; 116W.25; 116W.26; 116W.27; 116W.28; 116W.29; 116W.30; 116W.31; 116W.32; 116W.33; 116W.34; 155A.25, subdivision 1; 326A.03, subdivisions 2, 5, 8; 326B.31, subdivisions 18, 19, 22; 326B.978, subdivision 4; 507.235, subdivision 4; Minnesota Rules, parts 1105.0600; 1105.2550; 1105.2700; 1307.0032; 3800.3520, subpart 5, items C, D; 3800.3602, subpart 2, item B.
The Senate has appointed as such committee:
Senators Tomassoni, Saxhaug, Sparks, Metzen and Westrom.
Said House File is herewith returned to the House.
JoAnne M. Zoff, Secretary of the Senate
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce that the Senate accedes to the request of the House for the appointment of a Conference Committee on the amendments adopted by the Senate to the following House File:
H. F. No. 976, A bill for an act relating to state government; appropriating money for environment, natural resources, and agriculture; modifying and providing for certain fees; modifying and providing for disposition of certain revenue; creating accounts; modifying payment of certain costs; modifying grant programs; providing for agricultural water quality certification; modifying Minnesota Noxious Weed Law; modifying pesticide control; modifying animal waste technician provisions; modifying certain renewable energy and biofuel provisions; modifying bonding requirements for grain buyers and grain storage; making technical changes; modifying certain permit requirements; providing for federal law compliance; providing for certain easements; establishing pollinator habitat program; modifying state trails; modifying all-terrain vehicle operating provisions; modifying State Timber Act; modifying water use requirements; modifying certain park boundaries; modifying reporting requirements; modifying Petroleum Tank Release Cleanup Act; providing for silica sand mining model standards and technical assistance; establishing criteria for wastewater treatment system projects; providing for wastewater laboratory certification; providing for product stewardship programs; modifying Minnesota Power Plant Siting Act; providing for sanitary districts; requiring groundwater sustainability recommendations; requiring rulemaking; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 17.03, subdivision 3; 17.1015; 17.118, subdivision 2; 18.77, subdivisions 3, 4, 10, 12; 18.78, subdivision 3; 18.79, subdivisions 6, 13; 18.82, subdivision 1; 18.91, subdivisions 1, 2; 18B.01, by adding a subdivision; 18B.065, subdivision 2a; 18B.07, subdivisions 4, 5, 7; 18B.26, subdivision 3; 18B.305; 18B.316, subdivisions 1, 3, 4, 8, 9; 18B.37, subdivision 4; 18C.430; 18C.433, subdivision 1; 31.94; 41A.10, subdivision 2, by adding a subdivision; 41A.105, subdivisions 1a, 3, 5; 41A.12, by adding a subdivision; 41B.04, subdivision 9; 41D.01, subdivision 4; 84.027, by adding a subdivision; 84.82, by adding a subdivision; 84.922, by adding a subdivision; 84.9256, subdivision 1; 84.928, subdivision 1; 84D.108, subdivision 2; 85.015, subdivision 13; 85.052, subdivision 6; 85.054, by adding a subdivision; 85.055, subdivisions 1, 2; 85.42; 89.0385; 89.17; 90.01, subdivisions 4, 5, 6, 8, 11; 90.031, subdivision 4; 90.041, subdivisions 2, 5, 6, 9, by adding subdivisions; 90.045; 90.061, subdivision 8; 90.101, subdivision 1; 90.121; 90.145; 90.151, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9; 90.161; 90.162; 90.171; 90.181, subdivision 2; 90.191, subdivision 1; 90.193; 90.195; 90.201, subdivision 2a; 90.211; 90.221; 90.252, subdivision 1; 90.301, subdivisions 2, 4; 90.41, subdivision 1; 92.50; 93.17, subdivision 1; 93.1925, subdivision 2; 93.25, subdivision 2; 93.285, subdivision 3; 93.46, by adding a subdivision; 93.481, subdivisions 3, 5, by adding subdivisions; 93.482; 97A.401, subdivision 3; 103G.265, subdivisions 2, 3; 103G.271, subdivisions 1, 4, 6; 103G.282; 103G.287, subdivisions 1, 4, 5; 103G.615, subdivision 2; 103I.205, subdivision 1; 103I.601, by adding a
subdivision; 114D.50, subdivision 4; 115A.1320, subdivision 1; 115B.20, subdivision 6; 115B.28, subdivision 1; 115C.02, subdivision 4; 115C.08, subdivision 4, by adding a subdivision; 115D.10; 116.48, subdivision 6; 116C.03, subdivisions 2, 4, 5; 116D.04, by adding a subdivision; 116J.437, subdivision 1; 168.1296, subdivision 1; 216E.12, subdivision 4; 223.17, by adding a subdivision; 232.22, by adding a subdivision; 239.051, by adding subdivisions; 239.791, subdivisions 1, 2a, 2b; 239.7911; 275.066; 296A.01, subdivision 19, by adding a subdivision; 473.846; Laws 2012, chapter 249, section 11; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 17; 18; 84; 90; 93; 115; 115A; 116C; proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapter 442A; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 18.91, subdivisions 3, 5; 18B.07, subdivision 6; 90.163; 90.173; 90.41, subdivision 2; 103G.265, subdivision 2a; 115.18, subdivisions 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; 115.19; 115.20; 115.21; 115.22; 115.23; 115.24; 115.25; 115.26; 115.27; 115.28; 115.29; 115.30; 115.31; 115.32; 115.33; 115.34; 115.35; 115.36; 115.37; 239.791, subdivision 1a; Minnesota Rules, parts 7021.0010, subparts 1, 2, 4, 5; 7021.0020; 7021.0030; 7021.0040; 7021.0050, subpart 5; 9210.0300; 9210.0310; 9210.0320; 9210.0330; 9210.0340; 9210.0350; 9210.0360; 9210.0370; 9210.0380; 9220.0530, subpart 6.
The Senate has appointed as such committee:
Senators Tomassoni, Saxhaug, Sparks, Metzen and Westrom.
Said House File is herewith returned to the House.
JoAnne M. Zoff, Secretary of the Senate
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following Senate Files, herewith transmitted:
S. F. Nos. 924 and 1270.
JoAnne M. Zoff,
Secretary of the Senate
FIRST READING
OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. No. 924, A bill for an act relating to
unemployment insurance; regulating the shared work program to conform to
federal law; providing for a program converting layoffs into businesses;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 116L.17, subdivision 4, by adding a
subdivision; 268.051, subdivision 5; 268.07, subdivision 3b; 268.136,
subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, by adding subdivisions; 268.23; Laws 2012, chapter
201, article 1, section 3; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 268.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the
Committee on Jobs and Economic Development Finance and Policy.
S. F. No. 1270, A bill for an act relating to
transportation; modifying provisions governing transportation and public safety
policies, including highway signs, highway jurisdictions, accounts, state-aid
definitions and variances, vehicle registration and license plates, record
retention, conformance with federal law, motor vehicle dealers, type III
vehicles, bicycle lanes, speed limit, disability parking, school bus safety,
vehicle weights, background checks, senior identification cards, Department of
Transportation offices and ombudsperson and surplus land, railroad crossing
signs, bus rapid transit, transit planning, operations, and accessibility, and
land conveyance; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012,
sections 160.80, subdivisions 1, 1a, 2; 161.04, subdivision 5; 161.115,
subdivision 229, by adding a subdivision; 161.1231, subdivision 8; 161.44, by
adding a subdivision; 162.02, subdivision 3a; 162.09, subdivision 3a; 162.13,
subdivision 2; 168.017, subdivisions 2, 3; 168.053, subdivision 1; 168.123,
subdivision 2; 168.183, subdivision 1; 168.187, subdivision 17; 168.27, subdivisions
10, 11, by adding a subdivision; 168A.153, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, by adding a
subdivision; 168B.15; 169.011, subdivision 71; 169.14, subdivision 2; 169.18,
subdivisions 4, 7; 169.19, subdivision 1; 169.34, subdivision 1; 169.346,
subdivision 2, by adding a subdivision; 169.443, subdivision 9; 169.447,
subdivision 2; 169.454, subdivision 12; 169.824, subdivision 2; 171.01,
subdivision 49b; 171.07, subdivisions 3a, 4; 171.12, subdivision 6; 174.02, by
adding a subdivision; 174.24, subdivision 5a; 219.17; 219.18; 219.20; 221.0314,
subdivisions 2, 3a, 9a; 398A.04, by adding a subdivision; Laws 2002, chapter
393, section 85; Laws 2009, chapter 59, article 3, section 4, subdivision 9, as
amended; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 171; 174;
repealing Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 168.094; 174.24, subdivision 5;
Minnesota Rules, parts 8820.3300, subpart 2; 8835.0330, subpart 2.
The
bill was read for the first time.
Erhardt
moved that S. F. No. 1270 and H. F. No. 1416, now
on the General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
REPORT FROM THE COMMITTEE ON
RULES
AND LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATION
Murphy, E., from the Committee on Rules
and Legislative Administration, pursuant to rules 1.21 and 3.33, designated the
following bills to be placed on the Calendar for the Day for Thursday, April
25, 2013 and established a prefiling requirement for amendments offered to the
following bills:
S. F. Nos. 1236, 442, 745,
422 and 1016; H. F. No. 1118; S. F. No. 663;
H. F. No. 841; S. F. Nos. 769 and 840; and
H. F. No. 790.
MOTIONS AND RESOLUTIONS
Norton moved that her name be stricken as
an author on H. F. No. 1687.
The motion prevailed.
ADJOURNMENT
Murphy, E., moved that when the House adjourns
today it adjourn until 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, April 24, 2013. The motion prevailed.
Murphy, E., moved that the House
adjourn. The motion prevailed, and the
Speaker declared the House stands adjourned until 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, April
24, 2013.
Albin
A. Mathiowetz,
Chief Clerk, House of Representatives