STATE OF
MINNESOTA
EIGHTY-EIGHTH
SESSION - 2014
_____________________
ONE
HUNDREDTH DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Thursday, May 8, 2014
The House of Representatives convened at 10:00
a.m. and was called to order by Paul Thissen, Speaker of the House.
Prayer was offered by Pastor Craig Moore,
Life Assembly of God Church, St. Cloud, Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge
of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
The roll was called and the following
members were present:
Abeler
Albright
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zellers
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
A quorum was present.
FitzSimmons was excused.
Beard was excused until 11:20 a.m. Mack was excused until 11:35 a.m.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the
Journal of the preceding day. There
being no objection, further reading of the Journal was dispensed with and the
Journal was approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk.
REPORTS OF CHIEF CLERK
S. F. No. 1722 and
H. F. No. 2324, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical.
Yarusso moved that
S. F. No. 1722 be substituted for H. F. No. 2324
and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 2422 and
H. F. No. 2521, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for
comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
SUSPENSION
OF RULES
Lesch moved that the rules be so far
suspended that S. F. No. 2422 be substituted for
H. F. No. 2521 and that the House File be indefinitely
postponed. The motion prevailed.
SECOND READING OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. Nos. 1722 and 2422
were read for the second time.
INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS
The
following House Files were introduced:
Falk, Sawatzky, McNamar, Torkelson, Swedzinski and Urdahl introduced:
H. F. No. 3378, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; appropriating money for a regional public television station in Appleton; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Jobs and Economic Development Finance and Policy.
Nornes and Franson introduced:
H. F. No. 3379, A bill for an act relating to environment; modifying state permit requirements for certain campgrounds; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 115.55, subdivision 3.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Environment and Natural Resources Policy.
Persell moved that the House recess
subject to the call of the Chair. The
motion prevailed.
RECESS
RECONVENED
The House reconvened and was called to
order by the Speaker.
MESSAGES
FROM THE SENATE
The
following messages were received from the Senate:
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned:
H. F. No. 2318, A bill for an act relating to school board elections; authorizing Special School District No. 6, South St. Paul, to dissolve election districts.
JoAnne M. Zoff, Secretary of the Senate
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned:
H. F. No. 2912, A bill for an act relating to liens; regulating liens on personal property; providing for the sale of a motor vehicle held by a licensed dealer; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 514.21.
JoAnne M. Zoff, Secretary of the Senate
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully requested:
H. F. No. 2446, A bill for an act relating to public safety; granting the Board of Pharmacy cease and desist authority to prevent the sale of synthetic drugs; modifying laws governing misbranding drugs, adulterated drugs; expanding the definition of drug; repealing the sunset and legislative reporting requirement for the Board of Pharmacy's emergency drug scheduling authority; providing for mandatory restitution when a person is convicted for selling controlled substance under false pretense of being legal; establishing a public education plan; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 151.01, subdivision 5; 151.06, subdivision 1a, by adding a subdivision; 151.26, subdivision 1; 151.34; 151.35; 151.36; 152.02, subdivision 8b; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 152.
JoAnne M. Zoff, Secretary of the Senate
Simonson moved that the House refuse to
concur in the Senate amendments to H. F. No. 2446, that the
Speaker appoint a Conference Committee of 3 members of the House, and that the
House requests that a like committee be appointed by the Senate to confer on
the disagreeing votes of the two houses.
The motion prevailed.
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the Senate refuses to concur in the House amendments to the following Senate File:
S. F. No. 693, A bill for an act relating to civil actions; providing for the survival or continuation of an action after the death or disability of a party; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 540; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 573.01.
The Senate respectfully requests that a Conference Committee be appointed thereon. The Senate has appointed as such committee:
Senators Dziedzic, Metzen and Westrom.
Said Senate File is herewith transmitted to the House with the request that the House appoint a like committee.
JoAnne M. Zoff, Secretary of the Senate
Atkins moved that the House accede to the
request of the Senate and that the Speaker appoint a Conference Committee of 3
members of the House to meet with a like committee appointed by the Senate on
the disagreeing votes of the two houses on S. F. No. 693. The motion prevailed.
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the Senate refuses to concur in the House amendments to the following Senate File:
S. F. No. 2642, A bill for an act relating to gambling; making clarifying, conforming, and technical changes relating to lawful gambling; modifying games, prizes, and regulatory provisions; prohibiting sale of lottery tickets online and at play at the pump devices; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 349.12, subdivision 18, by adding subdivisions; 349.16, by adding a subdivision; 349.163, by adding subdivisions; 349.1635, subdivision 4; 349.17, subdivisions 5, 6, 9; 349.1711, subdivisions 1, 2; 349.1721, subdivision 4; 349.173; 349.181, subdivision 3; 349.19, subdivision 11; 349.211, subdivisions 1, 1a, 2, by adding a subdivision; 349A.13; Minnesota Statutes 2013 Supplement, section 349.19, subdivisions 2, 10; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 349.169; 349.19, subdivision 9.
The Senate respectfully requests that a Conference Committee be appointed thereon. The Senate has appointed as such committee:
Senators Pappas, Eaton and Chamberlain.
Said Senate File is herewith transmitted to the House with the request that the House appoint a like committee.
JoAnne M. Zoff, Secretary of the Senate
Atkins moved that the House accede to the
request of the Senate and that the Speaker appoint a Conference Committee of 3
members of the House to meet with a like committee appointed by the Senate on
the disagreeing votes of the two houses on S. F. No. 2642. The motion prevailed.
Mr.
Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the
Senate of the following Senate File, herewith transmitted:
S. F. No. 2546.
JoAnne M. Zoff,
Secretary of the Senate
FIRST READING OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. No. 2546, A bill for an act relating to public safety; modifying and clarifying predatory offender registration requirements; clarifying sentence for crime of criminal sexual conduct in the third degree; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 609.344, subdivisions 1, 2; Minnesota Statutes 2013 Supplement, section 243.166, subdivisions 1b, 3a, 4, 6.
The bill was read for the first time.
Slocum moved that S. F. No. 2546 and H. F. No. 2574, now on the General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
CALENDAR FOR
THE DAY
S. F. No. 2322, A bill for
an act relating to civil actions; regulating certain human rights actions;
requiring jury trials; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 363A.33,
subdivision 6.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 79 yeas and 51 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Gunther
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Torkelson
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
Those who voted in the negative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Benson, M.
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Hackbarth
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
McDonald
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
The
bill was passed and its title agreed to.
S. F. No. 2423 was reported
to the House.
Johnson, B., moved to amend S. F. No. 2423, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 3, line 10, delete "may" and insert "shall" and delete "a representative" and insert "the commissioner of corrections"
Page 3, line 11, delete everything before the period
Page 3, line 15, after the first semicolon, insert "University of Minnesota Department of Pediatrics;"
Page 3, line 16, delete "and" and before the period, insert "; and other parties with interest or relevant subject matter expertise"
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Kahn moved to amend S. F. No. 2423, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 3, line 13, after the period, insert "The committee shall also study the fiscal and practical implications for a correctional facility to implement the following policies:"
Page 3, after line 13, insert:
"(1) allow an infant to remain with the mother during the mother's incarceration; and
(2) allow a mother to breast-feed her infant or express, store, and transport her milk for her infant."
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
S. F. No. 2423, A bill
for an act relating to public safety; addressing the needs of incarcerated
women related to pregnancy and childbirth; authorizing an advisory committee;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 241.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 133 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Holberg
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zellers
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
The bill was
passed and its title agreed to.
S. F. No. 1740 was reported
to the House.
Atkins moved to amend S. F. No. 1740, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 1, delete lines 12 to 16 and insert:
"(b) "Smart phone" means a cellular phone or other mobile device that: (1) is built on a smart phone mobile operating system; (2) possesses advanced computing capability; (3) enables network connectivity; and (4) is capable of operating on a long-term evolution network and successor wireless data network communication standards. Capabilities a smart phone may possess include, but are not limited to, built-in applications, Internet access, digital voice service, text messaging, e-mail, and Web browsing. "Smart phone" does not include a phone commonly referred to as a feature or messaging phone, or a device that has only electronic reading capability."
Page 1, line 20, delete "and easily operable by people with disabilities"
Page 1, delete lines 21 and 22
Page 2, line 8, before the period, insert ", and must describe the technology or functions included to ensure the baseline antitheft tool is easily operable by individuals with disabilities"
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
There
being no objection, S. F. No. 1740 was temporarily laid over on the Calendar
for the Day.
S. F. No. 1740 which was temporarily laid
over earlier today on the Calendar for the Day was again reported to the House.
MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
Atkins moved that the vote whereby the
Atkins amendment to S. F. No. 1740, the second engrossment, as
amended, was adopted be now reconsidered.
The motion prevailed.
Atkins withdrew his amendment to S. F. No.
1740.
Atkins moved to amend S. F. No. 1740, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 1, delete lines 12 to 16 and insert:
"(b) "Smart phone" means a cellular phone or other mobile device that: (1) is built on a smart phone mobile operating system; (2) possesses advanced computing capability; (3) enables network connectivity; and (4) is capable of operating on a long-term evolution network and successor wireless data network communication standards. Capabilities a smart phone may possess include, but are not limited to, built-in applications, Internet access, digital voice service, text messaging, e-mail, and Web browsing. Smart phone does not include a phone commonly referred to as a feature or messaging phone, a laptop computer, a tablet device, or a device that has only electronic reading capability."
Page 1, line 20, delete "and easily operable by people with disabilities"
Page 1, delete lines 21 and 22
Page 2, line 8, before the period, insert ", and must describe the technology or functions included to ensure the baseline antitheft tool is easily operable by individuals with disabilities"
Page 2, after line 21, insert:
"(e) "Repair and refurbishment program" means a program, offered by a CMRS provider, manufacturer, or retailer who is not primarily engaged in purchasing personal property of any type from a person who is not a wholesaler, through which used or previously owned wireless communications devices are restored to good working order."
Page 2, line 22, delete "(e)" and insert "(f)"
Page 2, line 27, delete "(f)" and insert "(g)"
Page 2, line 30, delete "(g)" and insert "(h)"
Page 2, line 32, delete "(h)" and insert "(i)"
Page 6, line 6, after "trade-in" insert "or a repair and refurbishment"
Atkins moved to amend his amendment to S. F. No. 1740, the second engrossment, as follows:
Page 1, after line 21, insert:
"Page 2, line 25, after the first "for" insert "either (1)"
Page 2, line 26, before the period, insert ", or (2) a rebate from a manufacturer on the purchase of one of the manufacturer's wireless communications devices""
The
motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was adopted.
The question recurred on the Atkins
amendment, as amended, to S. F. No. 1740, the second engrossment. The motion prevailed and the amendment, as
amended, was adopted.
S. F. No. 1740, A bill for
an act relating to telecommunications; consumer protection; requiring antitheft
functionality for smart phones to deter theft; establishing requirements for
acquisition and resale of wireless communications devices; proposing coding for
new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 325E; 325F.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 73 yeas and 58 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Uglem
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
Those who voted in the negative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Holberg
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
The
bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
Holberg was excused for the remainder of
today's session.
S. F. No. 2336 was reported
to the House.
Atkins moved to amend S. F. No. 2336 as follows:
Page 1, line 17, after "349" insert "or attempts to convert legal gambling into illegal gambling at an establishment licensed under Chapter 340A"
Zellers was excused between the hours of
12:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m.
Atkins moved to amend his amendment to S. F. No. 2336 as follows:
Page 1, after line 1, insert:
"Page 1, after line 4, insert:
"Section 1. [297G.031]
FARM WINERY.
Farm wineries licensed under section
340A.315 shall be treated as wholesalers for the excise tax imposed on certain
wines. Tax payments and returns are
required in relation to samples given and in relation to the sale of wine on
the farm winery premises permitted under chapter 340A. Returns must be made in a form and manner
prescribed by the commissioner, and must contain any other information required
by the commissioner.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2014.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 297G.07, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Exemptions. The following are not subject to the excise tax:
(1) Sales by a manufacturer, brewer, or wholesaler for shipment outside the state in interstate commerce.
(2) Alcoholic beverages sold or transferred between Minnesota wholesalers.
(3) Sales to common carriers engaged in interstate transportation of passengers, except as provided in this chapter.
(4) Malt beverages served by a brewery for on-premise consumption at no charge, or distributed to brewery employees for on-premise consumption under a labor contract.
(5) Shipments of wine to Minnesota residents under section 340A.417.
(6) Fruit juices naturally fermented or beer naturally brewed in the home for family use and not sold or offered for sale.
(7) Sales of wine for sacramental purposes under section 340A.316.
(8) Alcoholic beverages sold to authorized manufacturers of food products or pharmaceutical firms. The alcoholic beverage must be used exclusively in the manufacture of food products or medicines. For purposes of this clause, "manufacturer" means a person who manufactures food products intended for sale to wholesalers or retailers for ultimate sale to the consumer.
(9) Liqueur-filled candy.
(10) Sales to a federal agency, that the state of Minnesota is prohibited from taxing under the Constitution or laws of the United States or under the Constitution of Minnesota.
(11) Sales to Indian tribes as defined in section 297G.08.
(12) Shipments of intoxicating liquor from foreign countries to diplomatic personnel of foreign countries assigned to service in this state.
(13) Shipments of bulk distilled
spirits or bulk wine to farm wineries licensed under section 340A.315 for input
to the final product.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. The amendment to clause
(6) is effective the day following final enactment. Clause (13) is effective July 1, 2014.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 340A.101, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 4a. Bulk
distilled spirits. "Bulk
distilled spirits" means distilled spirits in a container having a
capacity in excess of one gallon.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2014.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 340A.101, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 4b. Bulk
wine. "Bulk wine"
means wine in a container having a capacity of five or more gallons.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2014.
Sec. 5. [340A.22]
MICRODISTILLERIES.
Subdivision 1. Activities. (a) A microdistillery licensed under
section 340A.301, subdivision 6c, may provide on its premises samples of
distilled spirits manufactured on its premises, in an amount not to exceed 15
milliliters per variety per person. No
more than 45 milliliters may be sampled under this paragraph by any person on
any day.
(b) A microdistillery can sell
cocktails to the public, pursuant to subdivision 2.
Subd. 2. Cocktail
room license. (a) A
municipality, including a city with a municipal liquor store, may issue the
holder of a microdistillery license under section 340A.301, subdivision 6c, a
microdistillery cocktail room license. A
microdistillery cocktail room license authorizes on-sale of distilled liquor
produced by the distiller for consumption on the premises of or adjacent to one
distillery location owned by the distiller.
Nothing in this subdivision precludes the holder of a microdistillery
cocktail room license from also holding a license to operate a restaurant at
the distillery. Section 340A.409 shall
apply to a license issued under this subdivision. All provisions of this chapter that apply to
a retail liquor license shall apply to a license issued under this subdivision
unless the provision is explicitly inconsistent with this subdivision.
(b) A distiller may only have one
cocktail room license under this subdivision, and may not have an ownership
interest in a distillery licensed under section 340A.301, subdivision 6,
paragraph (a).
(c) The municipality shall impose a
licensing fee on a distiller holding a microdistillery cocktail room license
under this subdivision, subject to limitations applicable to license fees under
section 340A.408, subdivision 2, paragraph (a).
(d) A municipality shall, within ten
days of the issuance of a license under this subdivision, inform the
commissioner of the licensee's name and address and trade name, and the
effective date and expiration date of the license. The municipality shall also inform the
commissioner of a license transfer, cancellation, suspension, or revocation
during the license period.
(e) No single entity may hold both a
cocktail room and taproom license, and a cocktail room and taproom may not be
co-located.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2013 Supplement, section 340A.301, subdivision 6b, is amended to read:
Subd. 6b. Brewer taproom license. (a) A municipality, including a city with a municipal liquor store, may issue the holder of a brewer's license under subdivision 6, clause (c), (i), or (j), a brewer taproom license. A brewer taproom license authorizes on-sale of malt liquor produced by the brewer for consumption on the premises of or adjacent to one brewery location owned by the brewer. Nothing in this subdivision precludes the holder of a brewer taproom license from also holding a license to operate a restaurant at the brewery. Section 340A.409 shall apply to a license issued under this subdivision. All provisions of this chapter that apply to a retail liquor license shall apply to a license issued under this subdivision unless the provision is explicitly inconsistent with this subdivision.
(b) A brewer may only have one taproom license under this subdivision, and may not have an ownership interest in a brewery licensed under subdivision 6, clause (d).
(c) A municipality may not issue a brewer taproom license to a brewer if the brewer seeking the license, or any person having an economic interest in the brewer seeking the license or exercising control over the brewer seeking the license, is a brewer that brews more than 250,000 barrels of malt liquor annually or a winery that produces more than 250,000 gallons of wine annually.
(d) The municipality shall impose a licensing fee on a brewer holding a brewer taproom license under this subdivision, subject to limitations applicable to license fees under section 340A.408, subdivision 2, paragraph (a).
(e) A municipality shall, within ten days of the issuance of a license under this subdivision, inform the commissioner of the licensee's name and address and trade name, and the effective date and expiration date of the license. The municipality shall also inform the commissioner of a license transfer, cancellation, suspension, or revocation during the license period.
(f) Notwithstanding section 340A.504,
subdivision 3, a taproom may be open and may conduct on-sale business on
Sundays if authorized by the municipality.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2013 Supplement, section 340A.301, subdivision 6c, is amended to read:
Subd. 6c. Microdistilleries. (a) A microdistillery may provide on
its premises samples of distilled spirits manufactured on its premises, in an
amount not to exceed 15 milliliters per variety per person. No more than 45 milliliters may be sampled
under this paragraph by any person on any day.
(b) The commissioner shall establish
a fee for licensing microdistilleries that adequately covers the cost of
issuing the license and other inspection requirements. The fees shall be deposited in an account in
the special revenue fund and are appropriated to the commissioner for the purposes
of this subdivision.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2013 Supplement, section 340A.301, subdivision 6d, is amended to read:
Subd. 6d. Small brewer license. (a) A brewer licensed under subdivision 6, clause (c), (i), or (j), may be issued a license by a municipality for off-sale of malt liquor at its licensed premises that has been produced and packaged by the brewer. The license must be approved by the commissioner. The amount of malt liquor sold at off-sale may not exceed 500 barrels annually. Off-sale of malt liquor shall be limited to the legal hours for off-sale at exclusive liquor stores in the jurisdiction in which the brewer is located, and the malt liquor sold off-sale must be removed from the premises before the applicable off-sale closing time at exclusive liquor stores. The malt liquor shall be packed in 64-ounce containers commonly known as "growlers" or in 750 milliliter bottles. The containers or bottles shall bear a twist-type closure, cork, stopper, or plug. At the time of the sale, a paper or plastic adhesive band, strip, or sleeve shall be applied to the container or bottle and extended over the top of the twist-type closure, cork, stopper, or plug forming a seal that must be broken upon opening of the container or bottle. The adhesive band, strip, or sleeve shall bear the name and address of the brewer. The containers or bottles shall be identified as malt liquor, contain the name of the malt liquor, bear the name and address of the brewer selling the malt liquor, and shall be considered intoxicating liquor unless the alcoholic content is labeled as otherwise in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Rules, part 7515.1100.
(b) A brewer may, but is not required
to, refill any growler with malt liquor for off-sale at the request of a
customer. A brewer refilling a growler
must do so at its licensed premises and the growler must be filled at the tap
at the time of sale. A growler refilled
under this paragraph must be sealed and labeled in the manner described in
paragraph (a).
(b) (c) A brewer may only
have one license under this subdivision.
(c) (d) A municipality may
not issue a license under this subdivision to a brewer if the brewer seeking the
license, or any person having an economic interest in the brewer seeking the
license or exercising control over the brewer seeking the license, is a brewer
that brews more than 20,000 barrels of its own brands of malt liquor annually
or a winery that produces more than 250,000 gallons of wine annually.
(d) (e) The municipality shall impose a licensing fee on a brewer holding a license under this subdivision, subject to limitations applicable to license fees under section 340A.408, subdivision 3, paragraph (a).
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2013 Supplement, section 340A.301, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Interest in other business. (a) Except as provided in this subdivision, a holder of a license as a manufacturer, brewer, importer, or wholesaler may not have any ownership, in whole or in part, in a business holding a retail intoxicating liquor or 3.2 percent malt liquor license. The commissioner may not issue a license under this section to a manufacturer, brewer, importer, or wholesaler if a retailer of intoxicating liquor has a direct or indirect interest in the manufacturer, brewer, importer, or wholesaler. A manufacturer or wholesaler of intoxicating liquor may use or have property rented for retail intoxicating liquor sales only if the manufacturer or wholesaler has owned the property continuously since November 1, 1933. A retailer of intoxicating liquor may not use or have property rented for the manufacture or wholesaling of intoxicating liquor.
(b) A brewer licensed under subdivision 6, clause (d), may be issued an on-sale intoxicating liquor or 3.2 percent malt liquor license by a municipality for a restaurant operated in the place of manufacture. Notwithstanding section 340A.405, a brewer who holds an on-sale license issued pursuant to this paragraph may, with the approval of the commissioner, be issued a license by a municipality for off-sale of malt liquor produced and packaged on the licensed premises. Off-sale of malt liquor shall be limited to the legal hours for off-sale at exclusive liquor stores in the jurisdiction in which the brewer is located, and the malt liquor sold off-sale must be removed from the premises before the applicable off-sale closing time at exclusive liquor stores. The malt liquor shall be packaged in 64-ounce containers commonly known as "growlers" or in 750 milliliter bottles. The containers or bottles shall bear a twist-type closure, cork, stopper, or plug. At the time of the sale, a paper or plastic adhesive band, strip, or sleeve shall be applied to the container or bottle and extend over the top of the twist-type closure, cork, stopper, or plug forming a seal that must be broken upon opening of the container or bottle. The adhesive band, strip, or sleeve shall bear the name and address of the brewer. The containers or bottles shall be identified as malt liquor, contain the name of the malt liquor, bear the name and address of the brewer selling the malt liquor, and shall be considered intoxicating liquor unless the alcoholic content is labeled as otherwise in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Rules, part 7515.1100. A brewer may, but is not required to, refill any growler with malt liquor for off-sale at the request of a customer. A brewer refilling a growler must do so at its licensed premises and the growler must be filled at the tap at the time of sale. A growler refilled under this paragraph must be sealed and labeled in the manner described in this paragraph. A brewer's total retail sales at on- or off-sale under this paragraph may not exceed 3,500 barrels per year, provided that off-sales may not total more than 500 barrels. A brewer licensed under subdivision 6, clause (d), may hold or have an interest in other retail on-sale licenses, but may not have an ownership interest in whole or in part, or be an officer, director, agent, or employee of, any other manufacturer, brewer, importer, or wholesaler, or be an affiliate thereof whether the affiliation is corporate or by management, direction, or control. Notwithstanding this prohibition, a brewer licensed under subdivision 6, clause (d), may be an affiliate or subsidiary company of a brewer licensed in Minnesota or elsewhere if that brewer's only manufacture of malt liquor is:
(i) manufacture licensed under subdivision 6, clause (d);
(ii)
manufacture in another state for consumption exclusively in a restaurant
located in the place of manufacture; or
(iii) manufacture in another state for consumption primarily in a restaurant located in or immediately adjacent to the place of manufacture if the brewer was licensed under subdivision 6, clause (d), on January 1, 1995.
(c) Except as provided in subdivision 7a, no brewer as defined in subdivision 7a or importer may have any interest, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, in the license, business, assets, or corporate stock of a licensed malt liquor wholesaler.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 340A.301, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. Unlicensed manufacture. (a) Nothing in this chapter requires a license for the natural fermentation of fruit juices or brewing of beer in the home for family use.
(b) Naturally fermented fruit juices or
beer made under this subdivision may be removed from the premises where made for
use at organized affairs, exhibitions, or competitions, including, but not
limited to, homemaker's contests, tastings, or judging.
(c) For purposes of this subdivision,
"tastings" means an event where the general public may sample
unlicensed naturally fermented fruit juices or beer.
(d) Beverages produced pursuant to this
subdivision may be sampled or used in tastings provided that the beverage is
made and transported in containers and equipment that shall not allow the
migration of toxic substances.
(e) Public notice meeting the
requirements of this paragraph must be given in writing or signage at any
tasting. The notice shall include
disclosure that the unlicensed naturally fermented fruit juices or beer being
offered is homemade and not subject to state inspection, and may be consumed by
persons over the age of 21 at their own risk.
The notice must include the name and address of the person who processed
and bottled the beverage.
(f) Naturally fermented fruit juices or
beer removed under this subdivision may not be sold or offered for sale.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 340A.315, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Sales. A license authorizes the sale, on the
farm winery premises, of table, sparkling, or fortified wines produced by that
farm winery at on-sale or off-sale, in retail, or wholesale lots in total
quantities not in excess of 50,000 75,000 gallons in a calendar year,
glassware, wine literature and accessories, cheese and cheese spreads, other
wine-related food items, and the dispensing of free samples of the wines
offered for sale. Sales at on-sale and
off-sale may be made on Sundays between 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 midnight. Labels for each type or brand produced must
be registered with the commissioner, without fee prior to sale. A farm winery may provide samples of
distilled spirits manufactured pursuant to subdivision 7, on the farm winery
premises, but may sell the distilled spirits only through a licensed wholesaler. Samples of distilled spirits may not exceed
15 milliliters per variety.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2014.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 340A.315, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 10. Storage. A farm winery may store finished wine
and distilled spirits in a noncontiguous warehouse location, provided that the
chosen location complies with Minnesota Rules, part 7515.0300, subpart 12, and
any other state or federal requirements.
Cartage of finished goods between the farm winery and warehouse must be
continuously in the possession of a motor carrier of property as defined in
section 221.012, subdivision 27, or carried in a motor vehicle owned, leased,
or rented by the farm winery.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2014.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 340A.315, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 11. Bulk
wine or distilled spirits. If
no wholesaler is able to provide bulk wine or bulk distilled spirits, a farm
winery may purchase either bulk wine or bulk distilled spirits for purposes
allowed under this chapter from any available source allowed under federal law.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective
July 1, 2014.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 340A.316, is amended to read:
340A.316
SACRAMENTAL WINE.
The commissioner may issue a license to a bona fide religious book or supply store for the importation and sale of wine exclusively for sacramental purposes. The holder of a sacramental wine license may sell wine intended by the manufacturer or the wholesaler for sacramental purposes only to a rabbi, priest, or minister of a church, or other established religious organization, if the purchaser certifies in writing that the wine will be used exclusively for sacramental purposes in religious ceremonies. The annual fee for a sacramental wine license is $50, inclusive of a retail card required under Minnesota Rules, part 7515.0210. A seller of sacramental wine does not need insurance required under section 340A.409. A rabbi, priest, or minister of a church or other established religious organization may import wine exclusively for sacramental purposes without a license.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 340A.404, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Special provision; city of Minneapolis. (a) The city of Minneapolis may issue an on-sale intoxicating liquor license to the Guthrie Theater, the Cricket Theatre, the Orpheum Theatre, the State Theatre, and the Historic Pantages Theatre, notwithstanding the limitations of law, or local ordinance, or charter provision relating to zoning or school or church distances. The licenses authorize sales on all days of the week to holders of tickets for performances presented by the theaters and to members of the nonprofit corporations holding the licenses and to their guests.
(b) The city of Minneapolis may issue an intoxicating liquor license to 510 Groveland Associates, a Minnesota cooperative, for use by a restaurant on the premises owned by 510 Groveland Associates, notwithstanding limitations of law, or local ordinance, or charter provision.
(c) The city of Minneapolis may issue an
on-sale intoxicating liquor license to Zuhrah Shrine Temple for use on the
premises owned by Zuhrah Shrine Temple at 2540 Park Avenue South in
Minneapolis, and to the American Swedish Institute for use on the premises
owned by the American Swedish Institute at 2600 Park Avenue South, notwithstanding
limitations of law, or local ordinances, or charter provision relating to
zoning or school or church distances.
(d) The city of Minneapolis may issue an on-sale intoxicating liquor license to the American Association of University Women, Minneapolis branch, for use on the premises owned by the American Association of University Women, Minneapolis branch, at 2115 Stevens Avenue South in Minneapolis, notwithstanding limitations of law, or local ordinances, or charter provisions relating to zoning or school or church distances.
(e) The city of Minneapolis may issue an on-sale wine license and an on-sale 3.2 percent malt liquor license to a restaurant located at 5000 Penn Avenue South, and an on-sale wine license and an on-sale malt liquor license to a restaurant located at 1931 Nicollet Avenue South, notwithstanding any law or local ordinance or charter provision.
(f) The city of Minneapolis may issue an on-sale wine license and an on-sale malt liquor license to the Brave New Workshop Theatre located at 3001 Hennepin Avenue South, the Theatre de la Jeune Lune, the Illusion Theatre located at 528 Hennepin Avenue South, the Hollywood Theatre located at 2815 Johnson Street Northeast, the Loring Playhouse located at 1633 Hennepin Avenue South, the Jungle Theater located at 2951 Lyndale Avenue South, Brave New Institute located at 2605 Hennepin Avenue South, the Guthrie Lab located at 700 North First Street, and the Southern Theatre located at 1420 Washington Avenue South, notwithstanding any law or local ordinance or charter provision. The license authorizes sales on all days of the week.
(g) The city of Minneapolis may issue an on-sale intoxicating liquor license to University Gateway Corporation, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, for use by a restaurant or catering operator at the building owned and operated by the University Gateway Corporation on the University of Minnesota campus, notwithstanding limitations of law, or local ordinance or charter provision. The license authorizes sales on all days of the week.
(h) The city of Minneapolis may issue an on-sale intoxicating liquor license to the Walker Art Center's concessionaire or operator, for a restaurant and catering operator on the premises of the Walker Art Center, notwithstanding limitations of law, or local ordinance or charter provisions. The license authorizes sales on all days of the week.
(i) The city of Minneapolis may issue an on-sale intoxicating liquor license to the Guthrie Theater's concessionaire or operator for a restaurant and catering operator on the premises of the Guthrie Theater, notwithstanding limitations of law, local ordinance, or charter provisions. The license authorizes sales on all days of the week.
(j) The city of Minneapolis may issue an on-sale wine license and an on-sale malt liquor license to the Minnesota Book and Literary Arts Building, Inc.'s concessionaire or operator for a restaurant and catering operator on the premises of the Minnesota Book and Literary Arts Building, Inc. (dba Open Book), notwithstanding limitations of law, or local ordinance or charter provision. The license authorizes sales on all days of the week.
(k) The city of Minneapolis may issue an on-sale intoxicating liquor license to a restaurant located at 5411 Penn Avenue South, notwithstanding any law or local ordinance or charter provision.
(l) The city of Minneapolis may issue an on-sale intoxicating liquor license to the Museum of Russian Art's concessionaire or operator for a restaurant and catering operator on the premises of the Museum of Russian Art located at 5500 Stevens Avenue South, notwithstanding any law or local ordinance or charter provision.
(m) The city of Minneapolis may issue
an on-sale intoxicating liquor license to the American Swedish Institute or to
its concessionaire or operator for use on the premises owned by the American
Swedish Institute at 2600 Park Avenue South, notwithstanding limitations of
law, or local ordinances, or charter provision relating to zoning or school or
church distances.
(n) Notwithstanding any other law,
local ordinance, or charter provision, the city of Minneapolis may issue one or
more on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses to the Minneapolis Society of Fine
Arts (dba Minneapolis Institute of Arts), or to an entity holding a concessions
or catering contract with the Minneapolis Institute of Arts for use on the
premises of the Minneapolis Institute of Arts.
The licenses authorized by this subdivision may be issued for space that
is not compact and contiguous, provided that all such space is included in the
description of the licensed premises on the approved license application. The licenses authorize sales on all days of
the week.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective upon approval by the Minneapolis City Council and compliance with
Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021.
Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 340A.404, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Wine
licenses. (a) A municipality may
issue an on-sale wine license with the approval of the commissioner to a
restaurant having facilities for seating at least 25 guests at one time. A wine license permits the sale of wine of up
to 14 24 percent alcohol by volume for consumption with the
sale of food. A wine license
authorizes the sale of wine on all days of the week unless the issuing
authority restricts the license's authorization to the sale of wine on all days
except Sundays.
(b) The governing body of a municipality
may by ordinance authorize a holder of an on-sale wine license issued pursuant
to paragraph (a) who is also licensed to sell 3.2 percent malt liquors at
on-sale pursuant to section 340A.411, and whose gross receipts are at least
60 percent attributable to the sale of food, to sell intoxicating malt
liquors at on-sale without an additional license.
(c) A municipality may issue an on-sale wine license with the approval of the commissioner to a licensed bed and breakfast facility. A license under this paragraph authorizes a bed and breakfast facility to furnish wine only to registered guests of the facility and, if the facility contains a licensed commercial kitchen, also to guests attending private events at the facility.
(d) The State Agricultural Society may issue an on-sale wine license to the holder of a state fair concession contract pursuant to section 37.21, subdivision 2.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 340A.415, is amended to read:
340A.415
LICENSE REVOCATION OR SUSPENSION; CIVIL PENALTY.
On a finding that the license or permit
holder has (1) sold alcoholic beverages to another retail licensee for the
purpose of resale, (2) purchased alcoholic beverages from another retail
licensee for the purpose of resale, (3) conducted or permitted the conduct of
gambling on the licensed premises in violation of the law, (4) failed to remove
or dispose of alcoholic beverages when ordered by the commissioner to do so
under section 340A.508, subdivision 3, or (5) failed to comply with an
applicable statute, rule, or ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages, or
the operation of the licensed establishment, or failed to comply with a lawful
license condition duly imposed by the authority issuing the license or permit
or agreed to by the license or permit holder, the commissioner or the
authority issuing a retail license or permit under this chapter may revoke the
license or permit, suspend the license or permit for up to 60 days, impose a
civil penalty of up to $2,000 for each violation, or impose any combination of
these sanctions. No suspension or
revocation takes effect until the license or permit holder has been given an
opportunity for a hearing under sections 14.57 to 14.69 of the Administrative
Procedure Act. This section does not
require a political subdivision to conduct the hearing before an employee of
the Office of Administrative Hearings. Imposition
of a penalty or suspension by either the issuing authority or the commissioner
does not preclude imposition of an additional penalty or suspension by the
other so long as the total penalty or suspension does not exceed the stated
maximum. Nothing in this section
shall be construed to limit the applicability of section 340A.509, except that
a local authority may not charge a penalty greater than that allowed in this
section.
Sec. 18. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 340A.508, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 5. Mixed
drinks or cocktails. Mixed
drinks or cocktails mixed on the premises that are not for immediate
consumption may be consumed on the licensed premises subject to the
requirements of this subdivision. For
purposes of this subdivision, a "mixed drink" includes drinks
commonly referred to as cocktails, and "infused beverages" are
alcoholic beverages flavored through infusion with added ingredients. This subdivision requires that:
(1)
the mixed drinks or cocktails be stored, for no longer than 72 hours, in a
labeled container in a quantity that does not exceed five gallons;
(2) infused beverages may be stored in
containers in a quantity not to exceed five gallons;
(3) added flavors and other nonbeverage
ingredients included in the mixed drinks or infused beverages shall not include
hallucinogenic substances or added pure or supplemental caffeine or other added
stimulants including but not limited to guarana, ginseng, and taurine; and
(4) the licensee keep records as to
when the contents in a particular container were mixed and the recipe,
including brand names, used for that mixture.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 340A.510, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Malt liquor samples authorized. (a) Notwithstanding section 340A.308, a brewer may purchase from or furnish at no cost to a licensed retailer malt liquor the brewer manufactures if:
(1) the malt liquor is dispensed by the retailer only for samples in a quantity of less than 100 milliliters of malt liquor per variety per customer;
(2) where the brewer furnishes the malt liquor, the retailer makes available for return to the brewer any unused malt liquor and empty containers;
(3) the samples are dispensed by an employee of the retailer or brewer or by a sampling service retained by the retailer or brewer and not affiliated directly or indirectly with a malt liquor wholesaler;
(4) not more than three cases of malt liquor are purchased from or furnished to the retailer by the brewer for each sampling;
(5) each sampling continues for not more than eight hours;
(6) the brewer has furnished malt liquor
for not more than five 12 samplings for any retailer in any
calendar year;
(7) where the brewer furnishes the malt liquor, the brewer delivers the malt liquor for the sampling to its exclusive wholesaler for that malt liquor;
(8) the brewer has at least seven days before the sampling filed with the commissioner, on a form the commissioner prescribes, written notice of intent to furnish malt liquor for the sampling, which contains (i) the name and address of the retailer conducting the sampling, (ii) the maximum amount of malt liquor to be furnished or purchased by the brewer, (iii) the number of times the brewer has furnished malt liquor to the retailer in the calendar year in which the notice is filed, (iv) the date and time of the sampling, (v) where the brewer furnishes the malt liquor, the exclusive wholesaler to whom the brewer will deliver the malt liquor, and (vi) a statement by the brewer to the effect that to the brewer's knowledge all requirements of this section have been or will be complied with; and
(9) the commissioner has not notified the brewer filing the notice under clause (8) that the commissioner disapproves the notice.
(b) For purposes of this subdivision, "licensed retailer" means a licensed on-sale or off-sale retailer of alcoholic beverages and a municipal liquor store.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment.""
Page 1, after line 3, insert:
"Page 2, after line 12, insert:
"Sec. 21. BROOKLYN
PARK.
Notwithstanding any law or ordinance to
the contrary, the city of Brooklyn Park may issue an on-sale intoxicating
liquor license to a wedding event center located at 9500 West River Road North. The provisions of Minnesota Statutes, chapter
340A, not inconsistent with this section, apply to the license issued under
this section.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective upon approval by the Brooklyn Park City Council and compliance with
Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021.
Sec. 22. CITY
OF RICHFIELD; ON-SALE LICENSE.
Notwithstanding any law or ordinance to
the contrary, in addition to the number of licenses authorized, the city of
Richfield may issue an on-sale wine license and an on-sale malt liquor license to
a person who is the owner of a junior hockey league team or to a person holding
a concessions or management contract with the city or the team owner, for
beverage sales at the Richfield Ice Arena.
The licenses must authorize the dispensing of wine or malt liquor only
to persons attending events at the arena for consumption on the premises. A license issued under this section
authorizes sales on all days of the week to persons attending junior hockey
league games at the arena.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective upon timely compliance by the governing body of the city of Richfield
and its chief clerical officer with Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021,
subdivisions 2 and 3.
Sec. 23. SPECIAL
CLOSING TIMES; 2014 ALL-STAR GAME.
During the 2014 Major League Baseball
All-Star Game at Target Field, licensing jurisdictions that lie fully or
partially within Hennepin County may at their discretion issue special permits
for service of alcohol through extended hours lasting until 4:00 a.m. each day. This section is subject to the following
conditions:
(1) only holders of an existing on-sale
intoxicating liquor license or a 3.2 malt liquor license are eligible for later
closing hours;
(2) later closing hours apply only
during the period from 12:00 p.m. on July 15, 2014, through 4:00 a.m. on July 16,
2014;
(3) local licensing jurisdictions
issuing special permits to operate with extended hours during these days may
charge a fee up to but not to exceed $2,500 for such a permit. In the process of issuing a permit under this
section, the licensing jurisdiction may limit approval to specified geographic,
zoning, or license classifications within its jurisdiction; and
(4) this section is repealed as of 4:01
a.m. on July 16, 2014.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 24. SPECIAL
LICENSE; GOLDEN VALLEY.
Notwithstanding any law or ordinance to
the contrary, the city of Golden Valley may issue an on-sale license for a golf
course and a community center that is located at 200 Brookview Parkway and is
owned by the city. The provisions of
Minnesota Statutes, chapter 340A, not inconsistent with this section, apply to
the license issued under this section. The
city of Golden Valley is deemed the licensee under this section, and the
provisions of Minnesota Statutes, sections 340A.603 and 340A.604, apply to the
license as if the establishment were a municipal liquor store.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective upon approval by the Golden Valley City Council and compliance with
Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021.
Sec. 25. REVISOR'S
INSTRUCTION.
The revisor of statutes, with
cooperation from the House Research Department and the Office of Senate
Counsel, Research, and Fiscal Analysis, shall prepare legislation to create a
separate statute, each, for licensing of brew pubs, small brewers, and other
providers of alcohol where statutes have, in the opinion of the revisor of
statutes, become intermingled beyond sense.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 26. REPEALER.
Laws 2012, chapter 235, section 11, is
repealed.""
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
POINT OF
ORDER
Drazkowski raised a point of order
pursuant to rule 3.21 that the Atkins amendment to the Atkins amendment was not
in order.
The Speaker submitted the following
question to the House: "Is it the
judgment of the House that the Drazkowski point of order is well taken?"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The vote was taken on the question
"Is it the judgment of the House that the Drazkowski point of order is
well taken?" and the roll was called.
There were 65 yeas and 65 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Daudt
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Howe
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Kahn
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Liebling
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Marquart
McDonald
Metsa
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Scott
Selcer
Swedzinski
Uglem
Wills
Woodard
Yarusso
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davids
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hilstrom
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Johnson, S.
Kelly
Laine
Lesch
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Masin
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Moran
Morgan
Nelson
Norton
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
So it was the judgment of the House that
the Drazkowski point of order was not well taken and the Atkins amendment to the
Atkins amendment to S. F. No. 2336 was in order.
Drazkowski moved that rule 3.33 be
suspended as it relates to S. F. No. 2336.
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Drazkowski
motion and the roll was called. There
were 62 yeas and 69 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hamilton
Hertaus
Hoppe
Hortman
Howe
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Liebling
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lesch
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail.
The question recurred on the Atkins
amendment to his amendment and the roll was called.
Pursuant to rule 2.05, Anderson, M., was
excused from voting on the Atkins amendment to the Atkins amendment to
S. F. No. 2336.
There were 114 yeas and 16 nays as
follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Allen
Anderson, P.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Fabian
Faust
Fischer
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kieffer
Laine
Lesch
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, S.
Benson, M.
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Erickson, S.
Falk
Garofalo
Hackbarth
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Liebling
Newberger
Quam
Spk. Thissen
The
motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was adopted.
The question recurred on the Atkins
amendment, as amended, to S. F. No. 2336. The motion prevailed and the amendment, as
amended, was adopted.
S. F. No. 2336, A bill
for an act relating to lawful gambling; providing for lawful gambling fraud;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 609.763.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called.
Pursuant to rule 2.05, Anderson, M., was
excused from voting on final passage of S. F. No. 2336, as
amended.
There were 120 yeas and 10 nays as
follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Allen
Anderson, P.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Fabian
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, S.
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Erickson, S.
Franson
Garofalo
Leidiger
Quam
The
bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
S. F. No. 2192 was reported
to the House.
Hortman moved to amend
S. F. No. 2192, the fourth engrossment, as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting
clause and insert the following language of H. F. No. 2542, the
third engrossment:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 115A.932, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Prohibitions
and recycling requirements. (a) A
person may not place mercury or a thermostat, thermometer, electric switch,
appliance, gauge, medical or scientific instrument, fluorescent or
high-intensity discharge lamp, electric relay, or other electrical mercury-containing
device or product, as defined under section 116.92, subdivision 10, from
which the mercury has not been removed for reuse or recycling:
(1) in solid waste; or
(2) in a wastewater disposal system.
(b) A person may not knowingly place
mercury or a thermostat, thermometer, electric switch, appliance, gauge,
medical or scientific instrument, fluorescent or high-intensity discharge lamp,
electric relay, or other electrical mercury-containing device or
product, as defined under section 116.92, subdivision 10, from which the
mercury has not been removed for reuse or recycling:
(1) in a solid waste processing facility; or
(2) in a solid waste disposal facility.
(c) A fluorescent or high-intensity discharge lamp must be recycled by delivery of the lamp to a lamp recycling facility, as defined in section 116.93, subdivision 1, or to a facility that collects and stores lamps for the purpose of delivering them to a lamp recycling facility, including, but not limited to, a household hazardous waste collection or recycling facility, retailer take-back and utility provider program sites, or other sites designated by an electric utility under section 216B.241, subdivisions 2 and 4.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 116.92, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Removal
from service; products containing mercury.
(a) When an item listed in subdivision 3 this section
is removed from service, the mercury in the item must be reused,
recycled, or otherwise managed to ensure compliance with section 115A.932.
(b) A person who is in the business of
replacing or repairing an item listed in subdivision 3 this section
in households shall ensure, or deliver the item to a facility that will ensure,
that the mercury contained in an item that is replaced or repaired is reused or
recycled or otherwise managed in compliance with section 115A.932.
(c) A person may not crush a motor vehicle unless the person has first made a good faith effort to remove all of the mercury switches in the motor vehicle.
(d) An item managed according to the
requirements of this section must be transported in a container designed to
prevent the escape of mercury into the environment by volatilization or any
other means.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 116.92, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Thermostats. (a) A manufacturer of thermostats that
contain mercury or that may replace thermostats that contain mercury is
responsible for the costs of collecting and managing the replaced
mercury-containing thermostats to ensure that the thermostats do not become
part of the solid waste stream.
(b) A manufacturer of thermostats that contain mercury or that may replace thermostats that contain mercury shall, in addition to the requirements of subdivision 3, provide financial and nonfinancial incentives for and sufficient information to purchasers and consumers of the thermostats for the purchasers or consumers to ensure that mercury in thermostats being removed from service is reused or recycled or otherwise managed in compliance with section 115A.932. A manufacturer that has complied with this subdivision is not liable for improper disposal by purchasers or consumers of thermostats.
(c) A manufacturer subject to this
subdivision, or an organization of such manufacturers and its officers,
members, employees, and agents, may participate in projects or programs to
collect and properly manage waste thermostats.
Any person who participates in such a project or program is immune from
liability under state law relating to antitrust, restraint of trade, unfair
trade practices, and other regulation of trade or commerce for activities
related to the collection and management of the thermostats under this
subdivision.
(d)
A manufacturer or organization of manufacturers that participates in a project
or program under paragraph (c) must report at least annually to the agency. The report must:
(1) describe how the program operates;
(2) describe who is eligible to
participate in the program;
(3) identify participants; and
(4) state the number of thermostats
remitted by each participant.
(e) For the purposes of this
subdivision, "thermostat" means a temperature control device that may
contain elemental mercury in a sealed component that serves as a switch or
temperature-sensing element and a sealed component that has been removed from
such a temperature control device.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 116.92, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Mercury thermometers prohibited. (a) A manufacturer, wholesaler, or retailer may not sell or distribute at no cost a thermometer containing mercury that was manufactured after June 1, 2001.
(b) Paragraph (a) does not apply to:
(1) an electronic thermometer with
a battery containing mercury if the battery is in compliance with section
325E.125;.
(2) a mercury thermometer used for food
research and development or food processing, including meat, dairy products,
and pet food processing;
(3) a mercury thermometer that is a
component of an animal agriculture climate control system or industrial
measurement system until such time as the system is replaced or a nonmercury
component for the system is available; or
(4) a mercury thermometer used for
calibration of other thermometers, apparatus, or equipment, unless a nonmercury
calibration standard is approved for the application by the National Institute
of Standards and Technology.
(c) A manufacturer is in compliance
with this subdivision if the manufacturer:
(1) has received an exclusion or
exemption from a state that is a member of the Interstate Mercury Education and
Reduction Clearinghouse (IMERC) for replacement parts when no alternative is
available or for an application when no feasible alternative is available;
(2) submits a copy of the approved
exclusion or exemption to the commissioner; and
(3) meets all of the requirements in
the approved exclusion or exemption for the manufacturer's activities within
the state.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 116.92, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 8k. Ban;
mercury in balancing and dampening products and equipment. A person may not sell, offer for sale,
distribute, install, or use in the state a mercury-containing product or
mercury-containing equipment that is used for balancing, dampening, or
providing a weight or counterweight function.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective January 1, 2015.
Sec. 6. [116.931]
WHEEL WEIGHTS AND BALANCING PRODUCTS; LEAD AND MERCURY PROHIBITION.
Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For the purposes of this section,
the following terms have the meanings given.
(b) "Motor vehicle" means a
self-propelled vehicle or a vehicle propelled or drawn by a self-propelled
vehicle that is operated on a highway, on a railroad track, on the ground, in
the water, or in the air.
(c) "New motor vehicle" means
a motor vehicle that has not been previously sold to a person except a
distributor, wholesaler, or motor vehicle dealer for resale.
Subd. 2. Tire
service. When replacing or
balancing a tire on a motor vehicle or aircraft, a person may not use a wheel
weight or other product for balancing motor vehicle or aircraft wheels if the
weight or other balancing product contains lead or mercury that was
intentionally added during the manufacture of the product.
Subd. 3. Sales
ban. A person may not sell or
offer to sell or distribute weights or other products for balancing motor
vehicle or aircraft wheels if the weight or other balancing product contains
lead or mercury that was intentionally added during the manufacture of the
product.
Subd. 4. New
motor vehicles. A person may
not sell a new motor vehicle or aircraft that is equipped with a weight or
other product for balancing wheels if the weight or other balancing product
contains lead or mercury that was intentionally added during the manufacture of
the product.
Subd. 5. Salvage. A person may not shred or crush, or
market for shredding or crushing, any motor vehicle, aircraft, watercraft, or
railroad or industrial equipment, or any portion thereof, without:
(1) inspecting the vehicle or equipment; and
(2) removing all weights or other
products for balancing wheels or other equipment if the weights or balancing
products contain lead or mercury that was intentionally added during the
manufacture of the weights or balancing products.
Subd. 6. Management
of wheel weights and balancing products.
Mercury in wheel weights and other balancing products for motor
vehicle and aircraft wheels must be recycled or otherwise managed to comply
with sections 115A.932 and 116.92 and to ensure that it does not become part of
the solid waste stream and is not released to the environment. Lead in wheel weights and other balancing
products for motor vehicle and aircraft wheels must be recycled to ensure that
it does not become part of the solid waste stream and is not released to the
environment.
Subd. 7. Educational
materials; outreach. Prior to
the effective date of this section, the agency shall produce and distribute
educational materials on the prohibitions required under this section to businesses
subject to the prohibitions and shall conduct additional outreach and education
activities to those businesses.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2015.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2013 Supplement, section 325F.176, is amended to read:
325F.176
DEFINITIONS.
(a) For the purposes of sections 325F.176 to 325F.178, the following terms have the meanings given them.
(b) "Child" means a person under eight years of age.
(c) "Children's product" means a product primarily designed or intended by a manufacturer to be physically applied to or introduced into a child's body, including any article used as a component of such a product and excluding a food, beverage, dietary supplement, pharmaceutical product or biologic, children's toys that are covered by the ASTM International F963 standard for Toy Safety, or a medical device as defined in the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, United States Code, title 21, section 321(h), as amended through February 15, 2013.
(d) "Intentionally added
chemical" means a chemical in a product that serves an intended function
in the product.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2013 Supplement, section 325F.177, is amended to read:
325F.177
FORMALDEHYDE IN CHILDREN'S PRODUCTS; BAN.
(a) Beginning August 1, 2014, no manufacturer or wholesaler may sell or offer for sale in this state a children's product that intentionally contains:
(1) formaldehyde, including formaldehyde contained in a solution; or
(2) intentionally added chemical ingredients that chemically degrade under normal conditions of temperature and pressure to release free formaldehyde at levels exceeding a de minimis level of 0.05 percent.
(b) Beginning August 1, 2015, no retailer may sell or offer for sale in this state a children's product that intentionally contains:
(1) formaldehyde, including formaldehyde contained in a solution; or
(2) intentionally added chemical ingredients that chemically degrade under normal conditions of temperature and pressure to release free formaldehyde at levels exceeding a de minimis level of 0.05 percent."
Delete
the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to environment; prohibiting and regulating certain lead and mercury products; modifying ban on formaldehyde in children's products; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 115A.932, subdivision 1; 116.92, subdivisions 4, 5, 6, by adding a subdivision; Minnesota Statutes 2013 Supplement, sections 325F.176; 325F.177; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 116."
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Mullery moved to amend S. F. No. 2192, the fourth engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 2, after line 6, insert:
"Sec. 2. [116.861]
CITATION.
Sections 116.861 to 116.863 may be cited
as the "Environmental Justice Act."
Sec. 3. [116.862]
DEFINITIONS.
For purposes of sections 116.861 to
116.863:
(1) "agency" means the
Pollution Control Agency;
(2) "commissioner" means the
commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency; and
(3) "environmental justice"
means the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of people of all races,
cultures, and income levels in the development, adoption, implementation, and
enforcement of environmental laws and policies.
Sec. 4. [116.863]
CREATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE POLICY.
(a) It is the policy of the state to
ensure that communities are afforded fair treatment and meaningful involvement
in environmental decision making regardless of race, color, ethnicity,
religion, income, or education level.
(b) The agency shall develop, adopt,
and implement an environmental justice policy that promotes fair treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people, regardless of race, color, ethnicity,
religion, income, or education level.
(c) The agency's environmental justice
policy shall:
(1) include procedures and criteria for
evaluating environmental and demographic information to highlight areas of
potential concern for environmental justice;
(2) identify procedures and steps that
the agency will take during permitting, environmental review, rulemaking, and
other actions to identify and remove barriers to the meaningful involvement of
all citizens in areas with potential environmental justice concerns. The procedures shall include processes for
evaluating language proficiencies within a community and determining actions to
take to ensure meaningful access and communication;
(3) develop ways to identify
disproportionate environmental and human health impacts that may affect a given
community as a result of pollution from multiple sources over time;
(4) develop procedures to integrate
awareness of disproportionate environmental and human health impacts into the
agency's decision-making with respect to permitting, compliance and
enforcement, environmental review, environmental monitoring and analysis, and
other agency functions. Such procedures
may include guidance, checklists, best practices, and voluntary reductions in
pollutants by other facilities;
(5) include plans to coordinate the
agency's environmental justice efforts with other state agencies and the
federal Environmental Protection Agency to accomplish the agency's
environmental justice policy;
(6) examine how to develop measures to
evaluate progress and the effectiveness of the agency's environmental justice
policy; and
(7) identify any additional resources
or statutory changes needed to implement the agency's environmental justice
policy.
(d) The agency's environmental justice policy shall be completed and submitted to the chairs and ranking minority members of the senate and house committees with jurisdiction over environmental policy and finance by June 30, 2015."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Loeffler moved to amend S. F. No. 2192, the fourth engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 5, after line 15, insert:
"Sec. 7. [145.945]
CERTAIN SALES OF CLEANING PRODUCTS PROHIBITED.
Subdivision 1. Prohibition. In order to prevent the spread of
infectious disease and avoidable infections and to promote best practices in
sanitation, no person shall offer for retail sale in Minnesota any cleaning
product that contains triclosan and is used for sanitizing or hand and body cleansing.
Subd. 2. Exception. The prohibition in subdivision 1 shall
not apply to individual products for which specific United States Food and Drug
Administration approval for consumer use has been secured.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective January 1, 2016."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Atkins moved to amend the Loeffler amendment to S. F. No. 2192, the fourth engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 8, after "used" insert "by consumers"
Page 1, line 13, delete "2016" and insert "2017"
The
motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was adopted.
The question recurred on the Loeffler
amendment, as amended, and the roll was called.
There were 101 yeas and 29 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
Those who voted in the negative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Benson, M.
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Garofalo
Hackbarth
Hertaus
Kieffer
Leidiger
Lohmer
McDonald
Myhra
Newberger
O'Neill
Peppin
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Torkelson
Woodard
Zerwas
The motion
prevailed and the amendment, as amended, was adopted.
McNamara moved to amend S. F. No. 2192, the fourth engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 5, line 15, delete "2015" and insert "2016"
McNamara moved to amend his amendment to S. F. No. 2192, the fourth engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 3, before "2015" insert "July 1," and before "2016" insert "January 1,"
The motion
prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was adopted.
The question recurred on the McNamara
amendment, as amended, to S. F. No. 2192, the fourth
engrossment, as amended. The motion
prevailed and the amendment, as amended, was adopted.
Hortman moved to amend S. F. No. 2192, the fourth engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 2, line 21, delete the new language and insert "(a) The definitions in this paragraph apply to this subdivision:"
Page 2, delete lines 22 to 24 and insert:
"(1) "contractor" means a person engaged
in the business of installing, servicing, or removing thermostats and other
heating, ventilation, and air conditioning components, including a contractor
removing thermostats in conjunction with renovation and demolition activities
in accordance with Minnesota Rules, part 7035.0805;
(2)
"qualified contractor" means a contractor:
(i) who employs seven or more service
technicians or installers;
(ii) who is located in an area outside
of an urban area, as defined by the United States Census Bureau; or
(iii) whose primary business consists
of renovation and demolition activities;
(3) "retailer" means a person
who sells thermostats of any kind directly to homeowners or other end-users
through any selling or distribution mechanism;
(4) "thermostat" means a
temperature control device that may contain elemental mercury in a sealed
component that serves as a switch or temperature-sensing element and a sealed
component that has been removed from such a temperature control device; and
(5) "wholesaler" means a person engaged in the distribution and wholesale sale of thermostats and other heating, ventilation, and air conditioning components to contractors who install heating, ventilation, and air conditioning components."
Page 2, before line 25, insert:
"(b) A manufacturer of thermostats that contain mercury or that may replace thermostats that contain mercury is responsible for the costs of collecting and managing the replaced mercury-containing thermostats to ensure that the thermostats do not become part of the solid waste stream."
Page 2, line 25, delete "(b)" and insert "(c)"
Page 2, line 27, delete the new language
Page 2, line 32, delete "(c)" and insert "(d)" and after "manufacturer" insert "of thermostats" and delete "such"
Page 2, line 33, after "manufacturers" insert "of thermostats"
Page 3, delete lines 5 to 14 and insert:
"(e) A manufacturer of thermostats
or organization of manufacturers of thermostats that participates in a
thermostat collection and management program under this subdivision must report
at least annually to the agency. The
report must include:
(1) a description of how the program
operates;
(2) a description of program
components, including incentives provided under this subdivision, and an
evaluation of the program components' effectiveness in promoting participation
and recovery of thermostats;
(3) eligibility criteria for program
participants;
(4) a list of program participants; and
(5) the number of thermostats remitted
by each program participant during the reporting period.
(f) A wholesaler, qualified contractor, or retailer may participate as a collection site in a manufacturer's mercury thermostat collection and management program required under this subdivision. A wholesaler or retailer that participates as a collection site in a manufacturer's mercury thermostat collection and management program shall post prominent signs at such wholesaler's or retailer's business location regarding the collection and management of mercury thermostats."
Page 4, after line 2, insert:
"Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 116.92, subdivision 8j, is amended to read:
Subd. 8j. Exclusion for existing equipment. The prohibitions in subdivisions 6 and
8b to 8g do not apply if a thermometer, switch, relay, or measuring
device is used to replace a thermometer, switch, relay, or measuring
device that is a component of a larger product in use prior to January 1,
2008, provided the owner of that equipment has made every reasonable effort to
determine that no compatible nonmercury replacement component exists an
industrial measurement system or control system until the system is replaced or
a nonmercury component for the system is available. The owner of the system shall notify the
commissioner within 30 days of replacing the component and identify the
replacement mercury component that was installed."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion
prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Lillie was excused between the hours of
12:45 p.m. and 1:15 p.m.
S. F. No. 2192, A bill for
an act relating to environment; prohibiting and regulating certain lead and
mercury products; regulating certain products containing formaldehyde; amending
Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 115A.932, subdivision 1; 116.92, subdivisions
4, 5, 6, 8j, by adding a subdivision; Minnesota Statutes 2013 Supplement,
sections 325F.176; 325F.177; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota
Statutes, chapter 116.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 92 yeas and 38 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anderson, P.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Fabian
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Gunther
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
O'Driscoll
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
Those who voted in the negative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, S.
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Hackbarth
Hertaus
Hoppe
Johnson, B.
Leidiger
Lohmer
McDonald
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Neill
Peppin
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Wills
Woodard
Zerwas
The
bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
The Speaker called Hortman to the Chair.
S. F. No. 511 was reported
to the House.
Liebling moved to amend S. F. No. 511, the third engrossment, as follows:
Page 6, line 17, after "upon" insert "written"
Page 6, after line 25, insert:
"(d) Written agreements required under this section shall be maintained at the primary practice site of the registered nurse anesthetist and of the collaborating physician."
Page 10, line 13, after "upon" insert "written"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Liebling
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 18 yeas and 110 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, P.
Davids
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dorholt
Faust
Hansen
Lenczewski
Liebling
Lohmer
Newberger
Norton
Pugh
Rosenthal
Selcer
Swedzinski
Wills
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Albright
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davnie
Dettmer
Dill
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Falk
Fischer
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hausman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Leidiger
Lesch
Lien
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Quam
Radinovich
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Woodard
Yarusso
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Norton moved to amend S. F. No. 511, the third engrossment, as follows:
Page 4, line 27, delete everything after "nurse" and insert "shall be established by the board based on recommendations from the Advanced Practice Nursing Advisory Council and shall be"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Norton amendment
and the roll was called. There were 48
yeas and 81 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Beard
Benson, M.
Davids
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Faust
Franson
Gruenhagen
Hertaus
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kieffer
Laine
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Liebling
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
Myhra
Newberger
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Peppin
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Scott
Selcer
Swedzinski
Theis
Uglem
Wills
Winkler
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davnie
Dill
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Fabian
Falk
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kiel
Kresha
Lesch
Lien
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Pelowski
Persell
Petersburg
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Woodard
Yarusso
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Davnie was excused between the hours of
1:25 p.m. and 1:55 p.m.
Liebling moved to amend S. F. No. 511, the third engrossment, as follows:
Page 10, line 15, delete everything after "147"
Page 10, line 16, delete everything before "that"
Page 10, line 17, delete the comma
Page 10, line 18, delete "or advanced practice registered nurses"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Liebling
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 21 yeas and 107 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson, P.
Davids
Dorholt
Faust
Hoppe
Howe
Kelly
Kieffer
Leidiger
Liebling
Lohmer
Mack
Newberger
Norton
Quam
Rosenthal
Sanders
Selcer
Uglem
Wills
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dill
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Falk
Fischer
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Radinovich
Runbeck
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Liebling moved to amend S. F. No. 511, the third engrossment, as follows:
Page 10, line 8, delete "2,080" and insert "6,240"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Liebling
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 10 yeas and 119 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Davids
Faust
Gruenhagen
Kieffer
Liebling
Lohmer
Newberger
Newton
Norton
Quam
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Albright
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Falk
Fischer
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Nelson
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Liebling moved to amend S. F. No. 511, the third engrossment, as follows:
Page 16, after line 32, insert:
"Sec. 30. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 148.261, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 6. Standard of care. An advanced practice registered nurse licensed under this chapter who is diagnosing, treating, or prescribing under chapter 148 shall be held to the same standard of care as that of a physician licensed under chapter 147 by the state of Minnesota."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Liebling
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 14 yeas and 116 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Anderson, P.
Davids
Erickson, S.
Hoppe
Kelly
Kieffer
Leidiger
Liebling
Mack
Newberger
Norton
Pugh
Quam
Wills
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Albright
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Fabian
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Norton moved to amend S. F. No. 511, the third engrossment, as follows:
Page 22, line 2, delete "and"
Page 22, after line 2, insert:
"(6) review complaints against advanced practice registered nurses and advise the board on disposition of the complaints; and"
Page 22, line 3, delete "(6)" and insert "(7)"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Norton
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 26 yeas and 104 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson, P.
Brynaert
Davids
Faust
Gruenhagen
Hansen
Howe
Kieffer
Laine
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Liebling
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
Newberger
Norton
Paymar
Quam
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Selcer
Wills
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Falk
Fischer
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hausman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kiel
Kresha
Lesch
Lien
Lillie
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Myhra
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Pugh
Radinovich
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
S. F. No. 511, A bill for
an act relating to health; improving access to health care delivered by
advanced practice registered nurses; providing penalties; providing for an
advisory council; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012,
sections 148.171, subdivisions 3, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 17, 21, by adding
subdivisions; 148.181, subdivision 1; 148.191, subdivision 2; 148.211,
subdivision 2, by adding subdivisions; 148.231, subdivisions 1, 4, 5; 148.233,
subdivision 2; 148.234; 148.235, by adding subdivisions; 148.251, subdivision
1; 148.261, subdivision 1; 148.262, subdivisions 1, 2, 4; 148.281, subdivision
1, by adding a subdivision; 148.283; 151.01, subdivision 23; 152.12; Minnesota
Statutes 2013 Supplement, section 148.271; proposing coding for new law in
Minnesota Statutes, chapter 148; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections
148.171, subdivision 6; 148.235, subdivisions 1, 2, 2a, 4, 4a, 4b, 6, 7;
148.243, subdivision 8; 148.284.
The bill was read for the third time and
placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 119 yeas and 13 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Allen
Anderson, M.
Anzelc
Atkins
Barrett
Beard
Benson, J.
Benson, M.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Dill
Dorholt
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Fabian
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Franson
Freiberg
Fritz
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kiel
Kresha
Laine
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lesch
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Loon
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy,
M.
Myhra
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Petersburg
Poppe
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Schomacker
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Wills
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Zellers
Zerwas
Spk. Thissen
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Dean, M.
Erickson, S.
Hackbarth
Kieffer
Liebling
Lohmer
Newberger
Norton
Peppin
Pugh
Scott
The
bill was passed and its title agreed to.
ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE SPEAKER
The Speaker announced the appointment of
the following members of the House to a Conference Committee on
S. F. No. 693:
Atkins, Lesch and Cornish.
The Speaker announced the appointment of
the following members of the House to a Conference Committee on
H. F. No. 2446:
Simonson; Ward, J.E., and Lohmer.
The Speaker announced the appointment of
the following members of the House to a Conference Committee on
S. F. No. 2642:
Atkins, Lillie and Hoppe.
CALENDAR FOR THE
DAY, Continued
H. F. No. 3169 was reported
to the House.
Metsa moved to amend H. F. No. 3169, the third engrossment, as follows:
Page 4, line 5, strike "for" and insert "of"
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Metsa moved to amend H. F. No. 3169, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 20, before the period, insert ", the executive, or the judicial branch"
Page 1, line 23, delete the second "or"
Page 1, line 24, delete the period and insert a semicolon
Page 1, after line 24, insert:
"(4) a current or former judge; or
(5) a current or former governor, lieutenant governor, attorney general, secretary of state, or state auditor."
Page 2, line 27, delete "board" and insert "council"
Page 2, line 27, delete "board" and insert "council"
Page 2, line 34, after "state" insert "and the most recent budget forecast"
Page 2, line 34, after "state" insert "and the most recent budget forecast"
Page 3, line 26, after the period, insert "None of the members of the council may be a current or former judge. None of the members of the council may be a current or former governor, lieutenant governor, attorney general, secretary of state, or state auditor. None of the members of the council may be a current employee of an entity in the executive or judicial branch."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
Metsa moved to amend his amendment to H. F. No. 3169, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, delete line 2
Page 1, delete line 10
Page 1, delete line 12
The
motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was adopted.
The question recurred on the Metsa
amendment, as amended, to H. F. No. 3169, the third engrossment,
as amended. The motion prevailed and the
amendment, as amended, was adopted.
Anderson, S., moved to amend H. F. No. 3169, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 4, line 3, strike "remove"
Page 4, lines 4 and 5, delete the new language and strike the existing language and insert "pay legislators first?"
Page 4, line 9, delete ""Remove Lawmakers' " and insert ""Pay Legislators First.""
Page 4, delete line 10
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The
question was taken on the Anderson, S., amendment and the roll was called. There were 63 yeas and 69 nays as
follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Simonson
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
H. F. No. 3169, A bill for
an act relating to state government; establishing a legislative salary council;
modifying a proposed constitutional amendment to remove lawmakers' power to set
their own pay; amending Laws 2013, chapter 124, sections 1; 2; proposing coding
for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 15A.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 69 yeas and 63 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy,
M.
Nelson
Newton
Norton
Paymar
Persell
Poppe
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
Those who voted in the negative were:
Abeler
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Beard
Benson, M.
Cornish
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kieffer
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lenczewski
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Myhra
Newberger
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wills
Woodard
Zellers
Zerwas
The
bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
The following Conference Committee Report
was received:
CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON H. F. No. 2576
A bill for an act relating to criminal justice; modifying provisions governing expungement of criminal records; requiring business screening services to delete expunged records; allowing expungement of eviction records in certain cases; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 245C.22, subdivision 7; 245C.23, subdivision 1; 260B.198, subdivision 6; 332.70, by adding a subdivision; 504B.345, subdivision 1; 609A.02, subdivision 3; 609A.03, subdivisions 1, 5, 7, 8, by adding subdivisions; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 609A.
May 6, 2014
The Honorable Paul Thissen
Speaker of the House of Representatives
The Honorable Sandra L. Pappas
President of the Senate
We, the undersigned conferees for H. F. No. 2576 report that we have agreed upon the items in dispute and recommend as follows:
That the Senate recede from its amendments and that H. F. No. 2576 be further amended as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 245C.22, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Classification of certain data. (a) Notwithstanding section 13.46, except as provided in paragraph (f), upon setting aside a disqualification under this section, the identity of the disqualified individual who received the set-aside and the individual's disqualifying characteristics are public data if the set-aside was:
(1) for any disqualifying characteristic under section 245C.15, when the set-aside relates to a child care center or a family child care provider licensed under chapter 245A; or
(2) for a disqualifying characteristic under section 245C.15, subdivision 2.
(b) Notwithstanding section 13.46, upon granting a variance to a license holder under section 245C.30, the identity of the disqualified individual who is the subject of the variance, the individual's disqualifying characteristics under section 245C.15, and the terms of the variance are public data, when the variance:
(1) is issued to a child care center or a family child care provider licensed under chapter 245A; or
(2) relates to an individual with a disqualifying characteristic under section 245C.15, subdivision 2.
(c) The identity of a disqualified individual and the reason for disqualification remain private data when:
(1) a disqualification is not set aside and no variance is granted, except as provided under section 13.46, subdivision 4;
(2) the data are not public under paragraph (a) or (b);
(3) the disqualification is rescinded because the information relied upon to disqualify the individual is incorrect;
(4) the disqualification relates to a license to provide relative child foster care. As used in this clause, "relative" has the meaning given it under section 260C.007, subdivision 27; or
(5) the disqualified individual is a household member of a licensed foster care provider and:
(i) the disqualified individual previously received foster care services from this licensed foster care provider;
(ii) the disqualified individual was subsequently adopted by this licensed foster care provider; and
(iii) the disqualifying act occurred before the adoption.
(d) Licensed family child care providers and child care centers must provide notices as required under section 245C.301.
(e) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) and (b), the identity of household members who are the subject of a disqualification related set-aside or variance is not public data if:
(1) the household member resides in the residence where the family child care is provided;
(2) the subject of the set-aside or variance is under the age of 18 years; and
(3) the set-aside or variance only relates to a disqualification under section 245C.15, subdivision 4, for a misdemeanor-level theft crime as defined in section 609.52.
(f) When the commissioner has reason to
know that a disqualified individual has received an order for expungement for
the disqualifying record that does not limit the commissioner's access to the record,
and the record was opened or exchanged with the commissioner for purposes of a
background study under this chapter, the data that would otherwise become
public under paragraph (a) or (b) remain private data.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 245C.23, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Disqualification that is rescinded or set aside. (a) If the commissioner rescinds or sets aside a disqualification, the commissioner shall notify the applicant, license holder, or other entity in writing or by electronic transmission of the decision.
(b) In the notice from the commissioner that a disqualification has been rescinded, the commissioner must inform the applicant, license holder, or other entity that the information relied upon to disqualify the individual was incorrect.
(c) Except as provided in paragraph (d), in the notice from the commissioner that a disqualification has been set aside, the commissioner must inform the applicant, license holder, or other entity of the reason for the individual's disqualification and that information about which factors under section 245C.22, subdivision 4, were the basis of the decision to set aside the disqualification are available to the license holder upon request without the consent of the background study subject.
(d) When the commissioner has reason to
know that a disqualified individual has received an order for expungement for
the disqualifying record that does not limit the commissioner's access to the
record, and the record was opened or exchanged with the commissioner for
purposes of a background study under this chapter, the information provided
under paragraph (c) must only inform the applicant, license holder, or other
entity that the disqualifying criminal record is sealed under a court order.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 260B.198, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Expungement. Except when legal custody is
transferred under the provisions of subdivision 1, clause (4), (a) The
court may expunge the adjudication of all records relating to
delinquency at any time that it deems advisable if the court
determines that expungement of the record would yield a benefit to the subject
of the record that outweighs the detriment to the public and public safety in
sealing the record and the burden on the court and public agencies or
jurisdictions in issuing, enforcing, and monitoring the order.
(b) In making a determination under
this subdivision, the court shall consider:
(1) the age, education, experience, and
background, including mental and emotional development, of the subject of the
record at the time of commission of the offense;
(2) the circumstances and nature and
severity of the offense, including any aggravating or mitigating factors in the
commission of the offense;
(3) victim and community impact,
including age and vulnerability of the victim;
(4) the level of participation of the
subject of the record in the planning and carrying out of the offense,
including familial or peer influence in the commission of the offense;
(5) the juvenile delinquency and
criminal history of the subject of the record;
(6) the programming history of the
subject of the record, including child welfare, school and community-based, and probation interventions, and the subject's willingness
to participate meaningfully in programming, probation, or both;
(7) any other aggravating or mitigating
circumstance bearing on the culpability or potential for rehabilitation of the
subject of the record; and
(8)
the benefit that expungement would yield to the subject of the record in
pursuing education, employment, housing, or other necessities.
(c) A record expunged under this
subdivision prior to the effective date of this act may not be opened or
exchanged. A record expunged under this
subdivision on or after the effective date of this act is sealed and access
only allowed pursuant to paragraph (d).
(d) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), a
record that is expunged under this subdivision on or after the effective date
of this act may be opened, used, or exchanged between criminal justice agencies
in the same manner as a criminal record under section 609A.03, subdivision 7a,
paragraph (b).
(e) Section 609A.03, subdivision 3,
paragraph (d), applies to the disclosure of private or confidential data in a
proceeding under this subdivision. Section
609A.03, subdivision 9, applies to an appeal of an order under this
subdivision.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective January 1, 2015.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 332.70, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 3a. Deletion
of expunged records. If a
business screening service knows that a criminal record has been sealed,
expunged, or is the subject of a pardon, the screening service shall promptly
delete the record.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 504B.345, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. General. (a) If the court or jury finds for the plaintiff, the court shall immediately enter judgment that the plaintiff shall have recovery of the premises, and shall tax the costs against the defendant. The court shall issue execution in favor of the plaintiff for the costs and also immediately issue a writ of recovery of premises and order to vacate.
(b) The court shall give priority in issuing a writ of recovery of premises and order to vacate for an eviction action brought under section 504B.171 or on the basis that the tenant is causing a nuisance or seriously endangers the safety of other residents, their property, or the landlord's property.
(c) If the court or jury finds for the
defendant,:
(1) the court shall enter judgment
for the defendant, tax the costs against the plaintiff, and issue execution in
favor of the defendant; and
(2) the court may expunge the records relating to the action under the provisions of section 484.014 or under the court's inherent authority at the time judgment is entered or after that time upon motion of the defendant.
(d) Except in actions brought: (1) under section 504B.291 as required by section 609.5317, subdivision 1; (2) under section 504B.171; or (3) on the basis that the tenant is causing a nuisance or seriously endangers the safety of other residents, their property, or the landlord's property, upon a showing by the defendant that immediate restitution of the premises would work a substantial hardship upon the defendant or the defendant's family, the court shall stay the writ of recovery of premises and order to vacate for a reasonable period, not to exceed seven days.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 609A.02, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Certain
criminal proceedings not resulting in conviction. (a) A petition may be filed under
section 609A.03 to seal all records relating to an arrest, indictment or
information, trial, or verdict if the records are not subject to section
299C.11, subdivision 1, paragraph (b), and if:
(1) all pending actions or
proceedings were resolved in favor of the petitioner. For purposes of this chapter, a verdict of
not guilty by reason of mental illness is not a resolution in favor of the
petitioner.;
(2) the petitioner has successfully
completed the terms of a diversion program or stay of adjudication and has not
been charged with a new crime for at least one year since completion of the
diversion program or stay of adjudication;
(3) the petitioner was convicted of or received a stayed sentence for a petty misdemeanor or misdemeanor and has not been convicted of a new crime for at least two years since discharge of the sentence for the crime;
(4) the petitioner was convicted of or
received a stayed sentence for a gross misdemeanor and has not been convicted
of a new crime for at least four years since discharge of the sentence for the
crime; or
(5) the petitioner was convicted of or received a stayed sentence for a felony violation of an offense listed in paragraph (b), and has not been convicted of a new crime for at least five years since discharge of the sentence for the crime.
(b) Paragraph (a), clause (5), applies
to the following offenses:
(1) section 35.824 (altering livestock
certificate);
(2) section 62A.41 (insurance
regulations);
(3) section 86B.865, subdivision 1
(certification for title on watercraft);
(4) section 152.025 (controlled
substance in the fifth degree); or 152.097 (sale of simulated controlled
substance);
(5) section 168A.30, subdivision 1
(certificate of title false information); or 169.09, subdivision 14, paragraph
(a), clause (2) (accident resulting in great bodily harm);
(6) chapter 201; 203B; or 204C (voting
violations);
(7) section 228.45; 228.47; 228.49;
228.50; or 228.51 (false bill of lading);
(8) section 256.984 (false declaration
in assistance application);
(9) section 296A.23, subdivision 2
(willful evasion of fuel tax);
(10) section 297D.09, subdivision 1
(failure to affix stamp on scheduled substances);
(11) section 297G.19 (liquor taxation);
or 340A.701 (unlawful acts involving liquor);
(12) section 325F.743 (precious metal
dealers); or 325F.755, subdivision 7 (prize notices and solicitations);
(13)
section 346.155, subdivision 10 (failure to control regulated animal);
(14) section 349.2127; or 349.22
(gambling regulations);
(15) section 588.20 (contempt);
(16) section 609.27, subdivision 1,
clauses (2) to (5) (coercion);
(17) section 609.31 (leaving state to evade establishment of paternity);
(18) section 609.485, subdivision 4,
paragraph (a), clause (2) or (4) (escape from civil commitment for mental
illness);
(19) section 609.49 (failure to appear in court);
(20) section 609.52, subdivision 3,
clause (3)(a) (theft of $5,000 or less), or other theft offense that is
sentenced under this provision; or 609.52, subdivision 3a, clause (1) (theft of
$1,000 or less with risk of bodily harm);
(21) section 609.525 (bringing stolen
goods into state);
(22) section 609.526, subdivision 2,
clause (2) (metal dealer receiving stolen goods);
(23)
section 609.527, subdivision 5b (possession or use of scanning device or
reencoder); 609.528, subdivision 3, clause (3) (possession or sale of
stolen or counterfeit check); or 609.529 (mail theft);
(24) section 609.53 (receiving stolen
goods);
(25) section 609.535, subdivision 2a,
paragraph (a), clause (1) (dishonored check over $500);
(26) section 609.54, clause (1)
(embezzlement of public funds $2,500 or less);
(27) section 609.551 (rustling and
livestock theft);
(28) section 609.5641, subdivision 1a,
paragraph (a) (wildfire arson);
(29) section 609.576, subdivision 1,
clause (3), item (iii) (negligent fires);
(30) section 609.595, subdivision 1,
clauses (2) to (4), and subdivision 1a, paragraph (a) (criminal damage to
property);
(31) section 609.597, subdivision 3,
clause (3) (assaulting or harming police horse);
(32) section 609.625 (aggravated
forgery); 609.63 (forgery); 609.631, subdivision 4, clause (3)(a) (check
forgery $2,500 or less); 609.635 (obtaining signature by false pretense);
609.64 (recording, filing forged instrument); or 609.645 (fraudulent
statements);
(33) section 609.65, clause (1) (false
certification by notary); or 609.651, subdivision 4, paragraph (a) (lottery
fraud);
(34) section 609.652 (fraudulent
driver's license and identification card);
(35)
section 609.66, subdivision 1a, paragraph (a) (discharge of firearm; silencer);
or 609.66, subdivision 1b (furnishing firearm to minor);
(36) section 609.662, subdivision 2,
paragraph (b) (duty to render aid);
(37) section 609.686, subdivision 2
(tampering with fire alarm);
(38) section 609.746, subdivision 1,
paragraph (e) (interference with privacy; subsequent violation or minor victim);
(39) section 609.80, subdivision 2
(interference with cable communications system);
(40) section 609.821, subdivision 2
(financial transaction card fraud);
(41) section 609.822 (residential
mortgage fraud);
(42) section 609.825, subdivision 2
(bribery of participant or official in contest);
(43) section 609.855, subdivision 2,
paragraph (c), clause (1) (interference with transit operator);
(44) section 609.88 (computer damage);
or 609.89 (computer theft);
(45) section 609.893, subdivision 2 (telecommunications
and information services fraud);
(46) section 609.894, subdivision 3 or
4 (cellular counterfeiting);
(47) section 609.895, subdivision 3,
paragraph (a) or (b) (counterfeited intellectual property);
(48) section 609.896 (movie pirating);
(49) section 624.7132, subdivision 15,
paragraph (b) (transfer pistol to minor); 624.714, subdivision 1a (pistol
without permit; subsequent violation); or 624.7141, subdivision 2 (transfer of
pistol to ineligible person); or
(50) section 624.7181 (rifle or shotgun
in public by minor).
(c) Paragraph (a), clause (3) or (4),
does not apply if the crime involved domestic abuse or sexual assault, as
defined in section 518B.01, subdivision 2, or to violation of an order for
protection under section 518B.01, subdivision 14, a harassment restraining
order under section 609.748, subdivision 6, a violation of section 609.749, or
a violation of section 629.75. This
paragraph expires on July 15, 2015.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective January 1, 2015.
Sec. 7. [609A.025]
NO PETITION REQUIRED IN CERTAIN CASES WITH PROSECUTOR AGREEMENT AND
NOTIFICATION.
(a) If the prosecutor agrees to the
sealing of a criminal record, the court shall seal the criminal record for a
person described in section 609A.02, subdivision 3, without the filing of a
petition unless it determines that the interests of the public and public
safety in keeping the record public outweigh the disadvantages to the subject
of the record in not sealing it.
(b)
Before agreeing to the sealing of a record under this section, the prosecutor
shall make a good faith effort to notify any identifiable victims of the
offense of the intended agreement and the opportunity to object to the
agreement.
(c) Subject to paragraph (b), the
agreement of the prosecutor to the sealing of records for a person described in
section 609A.02, subdivision 3, paragraph (a), clause (2), may occur before or
after the criminal charges are dismissed.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective January 1, 2015.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 609A.03, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Petition; filing fee. An individual who is the subject of a criminal record who is seeking the expungement of the record shall file a petition under this section and pay a filing fee in the amount required under section 357.021, subdivision 2, clause (1). The filing fee may be waived in cases of indigency and shall be waived in the cases described in section 609A.02, subdivision 3, paragraph (a), clause (1).
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective January 1, 2015.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 609A.03, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Service of petition and proposed order. (a) The petitioner shall serve by mail the petition for expungement and a proposed expungement order on the prosecutorial office that had jurisdiction over the offense for which expungement is sought and all other state and local government agencies and jurisdictions whose records would be affected by the proposed order. The petitioner shall also serve by mail the attorney for each agency and jurisdiction.
(b) The prosecutorial office that had jurisdiction over the offense for which expungement is sought shall serve by mail the petition for expungement and a proposed expungement order on any victims of the offense for which expungement is sought who have requested notice of expungement pursuant to section 611A.06. Service under this paragraph does not constitute a violation of an existing order for protection, restraining order, or other no contact order.
(c) The prosecutorial office's notice to victims of the offense under this subdivision must specifically inform the victims of the victims' right to be present and to submit an oral or written statement at the expungement hearing described in subdivision 4.
(d) An agency or jurisdiction that is
served with a petition under this subdivision may submit to the court private
or confidential data on the petitioner that the agency or jurisdiction
determines is necessary to respond to the petition. As part of the submission, the agency or
jurisdiction shall inform the court and the petitioner that the submission
contains private or confidential data that may become accessible to the public
as part of the expungement proceeding. The
petitioner may, at the time of filing the petition or after that time, file a
request with the court to seal the private or confidential data that are
submitted by the agency or jurisdiction.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective
the day following final enactment.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 609A.03, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Nature of remedy; standard. (a) Except as otherwise provided by paragraph (b), expungement of a criminal record is an extraordinary remedy to be granted only upon clear and convincing evidence that it would yield a benefit to the petitioner commensurate with the disadvantages to the public and public safety of:
(1) sealing the record; and
(2) burdening the court and public authorities to issue, enforce, and monitor an expungement order.
(b) Except as otherwise provided by this paragraph, if the petitioner is petitioning for the sealing of a criminal record under section 609A.02, subdivision 3, paragraph (a), clause (1) or (2), the court shall grant the petition to seal the record unless the agency or jurisdiction whose records would be affected establishes by clear and convincing evidence that the interests of the public and public safety outweigh the disadvantages to the petitioner of not sealing the record.
(c) In making a determination under
this subdivision, the court shall consider:
(1) the nature and severity of the
underlying crime, the record of which would be sealed;
(2) the risk, if any, the petitioner
poses to individuals or society;
(3) the length of time since the crime
occurred;
(4) the steps taken by the petitioner
toward rehabilitation following the crime;
(5) aggravating or mitigating factors
relating to the underlying crime, including the petitioner's level of
participation and context and circumstances of the underlying crime;
(6) the reasons for the expungement,
including the petitioner's attempts to obtain employment, housing, or other
necessities;
(7) the petitioner's criminal record;
(8) the petitioner's record of
employment and community involvement;
(9) the recommendations of interested
law enforcement, prosecutorial, and corrections officials;
(10) the recommendations of victims or whether victims of the underlying crime were minors;
(11) the amount, if any, of restitution
outstanding, past efforts made by the petitioner toward payment, and the
measures in place to help ensure completion of restitution payment after
expungement of the record if granted; and
(12) other factors deemed relevant by
the court.
(c) (d) Notwithstanding section
13.82, 13.87, or any other law to the contrary, if the court issues an
expungement order it may require that the criminal record be sealed, the
existence of the record not be revealed, and the record not be opened except as
required under subdivision 7. Records
must not be destroyed or returned to the subject of the record.
(e) Information relating to a criminal
history record of an employee, former employee, or tenant that has been
expunged before the occurrence of the act giving rise to the civil action may
not be introduced as evidence in a civil action against a private employer or
landlord or its employees or agents that is based on the conduct of the
employee, former employee, or tenant.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective January 1, 2015.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 609A.03, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 6a. Order
when context and circumstances of the underlying crime indicate a nexus between
the criminal record to be expunged and person's status as a crime victim. If the court finds, under section
609A.03, subdivision 5, paragraph (c), clause (5), that the context and
circumstances of the underlying crime indicate a nexus between the criminal
record to be expunged and the person's status as a crime victim, then the
effect of the court order to seal the record of the proceedings shall be to
restore the person, in the contemplation of the law, to the status the person
occupied before the arrest, indictment, or information. The person shall not be guilty of perjury or
otherwise of giving a false statement if the person fails to acknowledge the
arrest, indictment, information, or trial in response to any inquiry made for
any purpose. The court may request a
sworn statement from a staff member of a state-funded victim services
organization or a licensed health care provider as evidence to support a
determination under section 609A.03, subdivision 5.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective January 1, 2015.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 609A.03, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Limitations of order. (a) Upon issuance of an expungement order related to a charge supported by probable cause, the DNA samples and DNA records held by the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension and collected under authority other than section 299C.105, shall not be sealed, returned to the subject of the record, or destroyed.
(b) Notwithstanding the issuance of an expungement order:
(1) an expunged record may be opened for purposes of a criminal investigation, prosecution, or sentencing, upon an ex parte court order;
(2) an expunged record of a conviction may be opened for purposes of evaluating a prospective employee in a criminal justice agency without a court order; and
(3) an expunged record of a conviction may be opened for purposes of a background study under section 245C.08 unless the court order for expungement is directed specifically to the commissioner of human services.
Upon request by law enforcement, prosecution, or corrections authorities, an agency or jurisdiction subject to an expungement order shall inform the requester of the existence of a sealed record and of the right to obtain access to it as provided by this paragraph. For purposes of this section, a "criminal justice agency" means courts or a government agency that performs the administration of criminal justice under statutory authority.
(c)
This subdivision applies to expungement orders subject to its limitations and
effective before January 1, 2015.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective January 1, 2015.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 609A.03, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 7a. Limitations
of order. (a) Upon issuance
of an expungement order related to a charge supported by probable cause, the
DNA samples and DNA records held by the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension and
collected under authority other than section 299C.105 shall not be sealed,
returned to the subject of the record, or destroyed.
(b) Notwithstanding the issuance of an
expungement order:
(1)
except as provided in clause (2), an expunged record may be opened, used, or
exchanged between criminal justice agencies without a court order for the
purposes of initiating, furthering, or completing a criminal investigation or
prosecution or for sentencing purposes or providing probation or other
correctional services;
(2) when a criminal justice agency
seeks access to a record that was sealed under section 609A.02, subdivision 3,
paragraph (a), clause (1), after an acquittal or a court order dismissing for
lack of probable cause, for purposes of a criminal investigation, prosecution,
or sentencing, the requesting agency must obtain an ex parte court order after
stating a good-faith basis to believe that opening the record may lead to
relevant information;
(3) an expunged record of a conviction
may be opened for purposes of evaluating a prospective employee in a criminal
justice agency without a court order;
(4) an expunged record of a conviction
may be opened for purposes of a background study under section 245C.08 unless
the commissioner had been properly served with notice of the petition for
expungement and the court order for expungement is directed specifically to the
commissioner of human services;
(5) an expunged record of a conviction
may be opened for purposes of a background check required under section
122A.18, subdivision 8, unless the court order for expungement is directed
specifically to the Board of Teaching or the licensing division of the
Department of Education; and
(6) the court may order an expunged
record opened upon request by the victim of the underlying offense if the court
determines that the record is substantially related to a matter for which the
victim is before the court.
(c) An agency or jurisdiction subject
to an expungement order shall maintain the record in a manner that provides
access to the record by a criminal justice agency under paragraph (b), clause
(1) or (2), but notifies the recipient that the record has been sealed. The Bureau of Criminal Apprehension shall
notify the commissioner of human services, the Board of Teaching, or the
licensing division of the Department of Education of the existence of a sealed
record and of the right to obtain access under paragraph (b), clause (4) or (5). Upon request, the agency or jurisdiction
subject to the expungement order shall provide access to the record to the
commissioner of human services, the Board of Teaching, or the licensing
division of the Department of Education under paragraph (b), clause (4) or (5).
(d) An expunged record that is opened
or exchanged under this subdivision remains subject to the expungement order in
the hands of the person receiving the record.
(e) A criminal justice agency that
receives an expunged record under paragraph (b), clause (1) or (2), must
maintain and store the record in a manner that restricts the use of the record
to the investigation, prosecution, or sentencing for which it was obtained.
(f) For purposes of this section, a
"criminal justice agency" means a court or government agency that
performs the administration of criminal justice under statutory authority.
(g)
This subdivision applies to expungement orders subject to its limitations and
effective on or after January 1, 2015.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective January 1, 2015.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 609A.03, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Distribution
and confirmation of expungement orders.
(a) The court administrator shall send a copy of an
expungement order to each agency and jurisdiction whose records are affected by
the terms of the order and send a letter to the petitioner identifying each
agency that received the order.
(b)
If requested in the petition, each agency and jurisdiction receiving the order
must send a letter to the petitioner at an address provided in the petition
confirming the receipt of the expungement order and that the record has been
expunged.
(c) Data on the petitioner in a letter sent under this subdivision are private data on individuals as defined in section 13.02.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective January 1, 2015.
Sec. 15. [609A.04]
REMEDY.
An individual whose record is expunged under this chapter or other law may bring an action under section 13.08 against a government entity that knowingly opens or exchanges the expunged record in a manner not authorized by law."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to criminal justice; modifying provisions governing expungement of criminal records; requiring business screening services to delete expunged records; allowing expungement of eviction records in certain cases; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 245C.22, subdivision 7; 245C.23, subdivision 1; 260B.198, subdivision 6; 332.70, by adding a subdivision; 504B.345, subdivision 1; 609A.02, subdivision 3; 609A.03, subdivisions 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, by adding subdivisions; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 609A."
We request the adoption of this report and repassage of the bill.
House Conferees: Carly Melin, Debra Hilstrom and Tony Cornish.
Senate Conferees: Bobby Joe Champion, Branden Petersen and Barb Goodwin.
Melin moved that the report of the
Conference Committee on H. F. No. 2576 be adopted and that the
bill be repassed as amended by the Conference Committee. The motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 2576, A bill for an act relating to criminal justice; modifying provisions governing expungement of criminal records; requiring business screening services to delete expunged records; allowing expungement of eviction records in certain cases; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 245C.22, subdivision 7; 245C.23, subdivision 1; 260B.198, subdivision 6; 332.70, by adding a subdivision; 504B.345, subdivision 1; 609A.02, subdivision 3; 609A.03, subdivisions 1, 5, 7, 8, by adding subdivisions; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 609A.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended by Conference, and placed upon its repassage.
The question was taken on the repassage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 84 yeas and 48 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Abeler
Allen
Anzelc
Atkins
Beard
Benson, J.
Bernardy
Bly
Brynaert
Carlson
Clark
Cornish
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Dill
Dorholt
Erhardt
Erickson, R.
Falk
Faust
Fischer
Freiberg
Fritz
Gunther
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Huntley
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kieffer
Laine
Lenczewski
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McNamar
McNamara
Melin
Metsa
Moran
Morgan
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
Paymar
Pelowski
Persell
Poppe
Radinovich
Rosenthal
Savick
Sawatzky
Schoen
Selcer
Simon
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Swedzinski
Urdahl
Wagenius
Ward, J.A.
Ward, J.E.
Winkler
Woodard
Yarusso
Spk. Thissen
Those who voted in the negative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Barrett
Benson, M.
Daudt
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson, S.
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hertaus
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kiel
Kresha
Leidiger
Lohmer
Loon
Mack
McDonald
Myhra
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Wills
Zellers
Zerwas
The bill was repassed, as amended by
Conference, and its title agreed to.
There being no objection, the order of
business reverted to Messages from the Senate.
MESSAGES FROM
THE SENATE
The
following messages were received from the Senate:
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned:
H. F. No. 2670, A bill for an act relating to occupations; modifying licensing provisions for architecture, engineering, land surveying, landscape architecture, geoscience, and interior design professions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 326.02, subdivisions 3, 4; 326.04; 326.10, subdivisions 1, 2a, 7, 9; 326.107, subdivisions 1, 2, 7; 326.111, subdivision 3; 326.12, subdivision 2; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 326.107, subdivision 5.
JoAnne M. Zoff, Secretary of the Senate
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully requested:
H. F. No. 2092, A bill for an act relating to motor vehicles; license plates; authorizing a veteran's special motorcycle plate for combat wounded veterans; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 168.123, subdivision 1.
JoAnne M. Zoff, Secretary of the Senate
Brynaert moved that the House refuse to
concur in the Senate amendments to H. F. No. 2092, that the
Speaker appoint a Conference Committee of 3 members of the House, and that the
House requests that a like committee be appointed by the Senate to confer on
the disagreeing votes of the two houses.
The motion prevailed.
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned, as amended by the Senate, in which amendments the concurrence of the House is respectfully requested:
H. F. No. 2214, A bill for an act relating to transportation; making technical changes to provisions affecting the Department of Transportation; clarifying contracting requirements; modifying U-turn rules; providing bridge inspection authority in certain instances; modifying seasonal load restrictions; modifying Web site requirements to advertise for bids; modifying reporting requirements; modifying appropriations; amending Minnesota Statutes 2012, sections 16A.124, subdivision 5; 161.32, subdivision 5; 162.06, subdivision 1; 162.081, subdivision 4; 162.12, subdivision 1; 165.03, subdivision 3; 165.12, subdivision 1; 169.19, subdivision 2; 169.781, subdivision 10; 169.782, subdivision 4; 169.865, subdivision 2; 169.87, subdivision 6; 171.02, subdivision 2; 171.03; 174.37, subdivision 6; 221.031, by adding subdivisions; 331A.12; Minnesota Statutes 2013 Supplement, sections 161.44, subdivision 1a; 169.19, subdivision 1; 174.12, subdivision 2; Laws 2010, chapter 189, sections 15, subdivision 12; 26, subdivision 4; Laws 2012, chapter 287, article 2, sections 1; 3; Laws 2012, First Special Session chapter 1, article 1, section 28; Laws 2013, chapter 127, section 67; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 161.115, subdivision 240; Minnesota Statutes 2013 Supplement, section 221.0314, subdivision 9a.
JoAnne M. Zoff, Secretary of the Senate
Sawatzky moved that the House refuse to
concur in the Senate amendments to H. F. No. 2214, that the
Speaker appoint a Conference Committee of 3 members of the House, and that the
House requests that a like committee be appointed by the Senate to confer on
the disagreeing votes of the two houses.
The motion prevailed.
ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE SPEAKER
The Speaker announced the appointment of
the following members of the House to a Conference Committee on
H. F. No. 2092:
Brynaert, Erhardt and Cornish.
The Speaker announced the appointment of
the following members of the House to a Conference Committee on
H. F. No. 2214:
Sawatzky, Sundin and Hornstein.
REPORT FROM THE COMMITTEE ON
RULES
AND LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATION
Murphy, E., from the Committee on Rules
and Legislative Administration, pursuant to rules 1.21 and 3.33, designated the
following bills to be placed on the Calendar for the Day for Monday, May 12,
2014 and established a prefiling requirement for amendments offered to the
following bills:
S. F. Nos. 1722 and 2422;
and H. F. Nos. 2167, 2491 and 2031.
MOTIONS
AND RESOLUTIONS
Dehn, R., moved that the name of Allen be
added as an author on H. F. No. 276. The motion prevailed.
Persell moved that the name of Falk be
added as an author on H. F. No. 1874. The motion prevailed.
Selcer moved that the name of Fischer be
added as an author on H. F. No. 2284. The motion prevailed.
Schoen moved that the name of Lillie be
added as an author on H. F. No. 2307. The motion prevailed.
Norton moved that the name of Isaacson be
added as an author on H. F. No. 2672. The motion prevailed.
Lesch moved that the name of Metsa be
added as an author on H. F. No. 2925. The motion prevailed.
McDonald moved that the names of Abeler;
Anderson, P.; Nornes; Dettmer; Torkelson and Hertaus be added as authors on
H. F. No. 3371. The
motion prevailed.
Daudt moved that the name of Torkelson be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3375. The motion prevailed.
ADJOURNMENT
Murphy, E., moved that when the House
adjourns today it adjourn until 10:00 a.m., Friday, May 9, 2014. The motion prevailed.
Murphy, E., moved that the House
adjourn. The motion prevailed, and
Speaker pro tempore Hortman declared the House stands adjourned until 10:00
a.m., Friday, May 9, 2014.
Albin
A. Mathiowetz,
Chief Clerk, House of Representatives