STATE OF
MINNESOTA
EIGHTY-NINTH
SESSION - 2016
_____________________
NINETY-SEVENTH
DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Wednesday, May 11, 2016
The House of Representatives convened at
9:00 a.m. and was called to order by Mark Anderson, Speaker pro tempore.
Prayer was offered by Rabbi Sim Glaser,
Temple Israel, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge
of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
The roll was called and the following
members were present:
Albright
Allen
Anderson, C.
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Applebaum
Atkins
Backer
Baker
Barrett
Bennett
Bernardy
Bly
Carlson
Christensen
Considine
Cornish
Daniels
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Erickson
Fabian
Fenton
Fischer
Flanagan
Franson
Freiberg
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kiel
Knoblach
Koznick
Kresha
Laine
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Loonan
Lucero
Lueck
Mahoney
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamara
Metsa
Miller
Moran
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nash
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Peterson
Pierson
Pinto
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Rarick
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simonson
Slocum
Smith
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Thissen
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Whelan
Wills
Yarusso
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Daudt
A quorum was present.
Hausman, Melin and Ward were excused.
Lesch and Mack were excused until 1:15
p.m. Erhardt was excused until 1:20
p.m. Clark was excused until 1:25 p.m. Mariani and Schultz were excused until 1:45
p.m. Garofalo was excused until 1:50
p.m.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the
Journals of the preceding days. There
being no objection, further reading of the Journals was dispensed with and the
Journals were approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk.
REPORTS OF CHIEF CLERK
S. F. No. 1898 and H. F. No. 2451, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
Rarick moved that S. F. No. 1898 be substituted for H. F. No. 2451 and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 2764 and H. F. No. 2932, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
Pugh moved that S. F. No. 2764 be substituted for H. F. No. 2932 and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 3018 and H. F. No. 3231, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
Anderson, P., moved that S. F. No. 3018 be substituted for H. F. No. 3231 and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 3216 and H. F. No. 3512, which had been referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison, were examined and found to be identical with certain exceptions.
O'Neill moved that S. F. No. 3216 be substituted for H. F. No. 3512 and that the House File be indefinitely postponed. The motion prevailed.
PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS
The following communications were received:
STATE OF MINNESOTA
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
SAINT PAUL 55155
May 6, 2016
The Honorable Kurt Daudt
Speaker of the House of Representatives
The State of Minnesota
Dear Speaker Daudt:
Please be advised that I have received, approved, signed, and deposited in the Office of the Secretary of State the following House Files:
H. F. No. 2956, relating to local government; amending the membership of the Dakota County Community Development Agency; amending laws relating to the Washington County Housing and Redevelopment Agency; creating the Washington County Community Development Agency; deleting obsolete language.
H. F. No. 2514, relating to economic development; modifying host community economic development grants.
H. F. No. 1674, relating to state government; modifying procedures for creation, annexation, detachment, and dissolution of sanitary districts; modifying filing and hearing requirements.
Sincerely,
Mark
Dayton
Governor
STATE OF MINNESOTA
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE
ST. PAUL 55155
The Honorable Kurt L. Daudt
Speaker of the House of Representatives
The Honorable Sandra L. Pappas
President of the Senate
I have the honor to inform you that the following enrolled Acts of the 2016 Session of the State Legislature have been received from the Office of the Governor and are deposited in the Office of the Secretary of State for preservation, pursuant to the State Constitution, Article IV, Section 23:
S. F. No. |
H. F. No. |
Session Laws Chapter No. |
Time and Date Approved 2016 |
Date Filed 2016 |
2956 92 3:16 p.m. May 6 May 6
2227 93 3:19 p.m. May 6 May 6
2514 94 3:20 p.m. May 6 May 6
1674 95 3:21 p.m. May 6 May 6
3084 96 3:21 p.m. May 6 May 6
Sincerely,
Steve
Simon
Secretary of State
REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES AND DIVISIONS
Scott from the Committee on Civil Law and Data Practices to which was referred:
S. F. No. 498, A bill for an act relating to data practices; classifying portable recording system data; establishing requirements for the destruction of data; requiring policies; imposing requirements on vendors and providing for damage awards; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 13.82, subdivision 15, by adding subdivisions; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 626.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2015 Supplement, section 13.82, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Arrest data. The following data created or collected by law enforcement agencies which document any actions taken by them to cite, arrest, incarcerate or otherwise substantially deprive an adult individual of liberty shall be public at all times in the originating agency:
(a) time, date and place of the action;
(b) any resistance encountered by the agency;
(c) any pursuit engaged in by the agency;
(d) whether any weapons were used by the agency or other individual;
(e) the charge, arrest or search warrants, or other legal basis for the action;
(f) the identities of the agencies, units within the agencies and individual persons taking the action;
(g) whether and where the individual is being held in custody or is being incarcerated by the agency;
(h) the date, time and legal basis for any transfer of custody and the identity of the agency or person who received custody;
(i) the date, time and legal basis for any release from custody or incarceration;
(j) the name, age, sex and last known address of an adult person or the age and sex of any juvenile person cited, arrested, incarcerated or otherwise substantially deprived of liberty;
(k) whether the agency employed an a
portable recording system, automated license plate reader, wiretaps or
other eavesdropping techniques, unless the release of this specific data would
jeopardize an ongoing investigation;
(l) the manner in which the agencies received the information that led to the arrest and the names of individuals who supplied the information unless the identities of those individuals qualify for protection under subdivision 17; and
(m) response or incident report number.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 13.82, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Response or incident data. The following data created or collected by law enforcement agencies which document the agency's response to a request for service including, but not limited to, responses to traffic accidents, or which describe actions taken by the agency on its own initiative shall be public government data:
(a) date, time and place of the action;
(b) agencies, units of agencies and individual agency personnel participating in the action unless the identities of agency personnel qualify for protection under subdivision 17;
(c) any resistance encountered by the agency;
(d) any pursuit engaged in by the agency;
(e) whether any weapons were used by the agency or other individuals;
(f) a brief factual reconstruction of events associated with the action;
(g) names and addresses of witnesses to the agency action or the incident unless the identity of any witness qualifies for protection under subdivision 17;
(h) names and addresses of any victims or casualties unless the identities of those individuals qualify for protection under subdivision 17;
(i) the name and location of the health care facility to which victims or casualties were taken;
(j) response or incident report number;
(k) dates of birth of the parties involved in a traffic accident;
(l) whether the parties involved were
wearing seat belts; and
(m) the alcohol concentration of each
driver; and
(n) whether the agency used a portable recording system to document the agency's response or actions.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 13.82, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Criminal
investigative data. Except for the
data defined in subdivisions 2, 3, and 6, investigative data collected or
created by a law enforcement agency in order to prepare a case against a
person, whether known or unknown, for the commission of a crime or other
offense for which the agency has primary investigative responsibility are
confidential or protected nonpublic while the investigation is active. Inactive investigative data are public unless
the release of the data would jeopardize another ongoing investigation or would
reveal the identity of individuals protected under subdivision 17. Images and recordings, including
photographs, video, and audio records, which are part of inactive
investigative files and which are clearly offensive to common sensibilities are
classified as private or nonpublic data, provided that the existence of the photographs
images and recordings shall be disclosed to any person requesting access
to the inactive investigative file. An
investigation becomes inactive upon the occurrence of any of the following
events:
(a) a decision by the agency or appropriate prosecutorial authority not to pursue the case;
(b) expiration of the time to bring a charge or file a complaint under the applicable statute of limitations, or 30 years after the commission of the offense, whichever comes earliest; or
(c) exhaustion of or expiration of all rights of appeal by a person convicted on the basis of the investigative data.
Any investigative data presented as evidence in court shall be public. Data determined to be inactive under clause (a) may become active if the agency or appropriate prosecutorial authority decides to renew the investigation.
During the time when an investigation is active, any person may bring an action in the district court located in the county where the data are being maintained to authorize disclosure of investigative data. The court may order that all or part of the data relating to a particular investigation be released to the public or to the person bringing the action. In making the determination as to whether investigative data shall be disclosed, the court shall consider whether the benefit to the person bringing the action or to the public outweighs any harm to the public, to the agency or to any person identified in the data. The data in dispute shall be examined by the court in camera.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 13.82, subdivision 15, is amended to read:
Subd. 15. Public benefit data. Any law enforcement agency may make any data classified as confidential or protected nonpublic pursuant to subdivision 7 or as private or nonpublic under section 13.825 accessible to any person, agency, or the public if the agency determines that the access will aid the law enforcement process, promote public safety, or dispel widespread rumor or unrest.
Sec. 5. [13.825]
PORTABLE RECORDING SYSTEMS.
Subdivision 1. Application;
definition. (a) This section
applies to law enforcement agencies that maintain a portable recording system
for use in investigations, or in response to emergencies, incidents, and requests
for service.
(b) As used in this section,
"portable recording system" means a device worn by a peace officer
that is capable of both video and audio recording of the officer's activities
and interactions with others or collecting digital multimedia evidence as part
of an investigation.
Subd. 2. Data
classification; court-authorized disclosure. (a) Data collected by a portable
recording system are private data on individuals or nonpublic data, except that
the following data are public:
(1) data which document a peace
officer's use of force that results in substantial bodily harm, as defined in
section 609.02, subdivision 7a; and
(2) any data that a subject of the data
requests be made accessible to the public, provided that data on a subject who
is not a peace officer and who does not consent to the release must be
redacted, if practicable.
A law enforcement agency may redact or withhold access to
portions of data that are public under this subdivision, if those portions of
data are clearly offensive to common sensibilities. Section 13.04, subdivision 2, does not apply
to collection of data classified by this subdivision.
(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a):
(1) portable recording system data that
are criminal investigative data are classified as provided in section 13.82,
subdivision 7, except that inactive criminal investigative data are classified
by this subdivision;
(2) portable recording system data that
are public personnel data under section 13.43, subdivision 2, clause (5), are
public; and
(3) data that are not public data under
other provisions of this chapter retain that classification.
(c) Any person may bring an action in
the district court located in the county where portable recording system data
are being maintained to authorize disclosure of data that are private or
nonpublic under this section. The person
bringing the action must give notice of the action to the law enforcement
agency and subjects of the data, if known.
The law enforcement agency must give notice to other subjects of the
data, if known, who did not receive the notice from the person bringing the
action. The court may order that all or
part of the data be released to the public or to the person bringing the action. In making this determination, the court shall
consider whether the benefit to the person bringing the action or to the public
outweighs any harm to the public, to the law enforcement agency, or to a
subject of the data. The data in dispute
must be examined by the court in camera.
This paragraph does not affect the right of a defendant in a criminal
proceeding to obtain access to portable recording system data under the Rules
of Criminal Procedure.
Subd. 3. Retention
of data. Notwithstanding
section 138.17:
(1) portable recording system data that
relate to an active or inactive criminal investigation must be retained for no
longer than any applicable statute of limitations period has expired, or 180
days after the investigation becomes inactive, whichever is later; and
(2) portable recording system data that
do not relate to an active or inactive criminal investigation must be
maintained for at least 90 days, and destroyed within 12 months of the date the
data were collected.
Subd. 4. Access
by data subjects. (a) For
purposes of this chapter, a portable recording system data subject includes the
peace officer who collected the data, and any other individual or entity,
including any other peace officer, whose image or voice is documented in the
data. If an individual subject of
portable recording system data is deceased, a representative of the decedent,
as defined in section 13.10, subdivision 1, is a subject of the data for
purposes of this chapter.
(b) Subjects of portable recording
system data, including peace officers, must be provided access to the data to
the full extent required by this chapter while the data are retained. If a subject of private or nonpublic portable
recording system data requests access to the data, data on any other subjects
documented in the data who have not consented to the data's release must be
redacted, if practicable.
(c) Notwithstanding paragraph (b), a
peace officer involved in an investigation or response to an incident must be
permitted to review any portable recording system data that documents the
investigation or incident response, unrestricted and its original form, prior
to the officer's submission of a written report or formal statement on the
investigation or response.
Subd. 5. Inventory
of portable recording system technology.
A law enforcement agency that uses a portable recording system
must maintain the following information, which is public data:
(1) the total number of recording
devices owned or maintained by the agency;
(2) a daily record of the total number
of recording devices actually deployed and used by officers and, if applicable,
the precincts in which they were used;
(3) the policies and procedures for use
of portable recording systems required by section 626.8473; and
(4) the total amount of recorded audio
and video data collected by the portable recording system and maintained by the
agency, the agency's retention schedule for the data, and the agency's
procedures for destruction of the data.
Subd. 6. Use
of agency-issued portable recording systems. While on duty, a peace officer may
only use a portable recording system issued and maintained by the officer's
agency in documenting the officer's activities.
Subd. 7. Authorization
to access data. (a) A law
enforcement agency must comply with sections 13.05, subdivision 5, and 13.055
in the operation of portable recording systems and in maintaining portable
recording system data.
(b) The responsible authority for a law
enforcement agency must establish written procedures to ensure that law
enforcement personnel have access to the portable recording system data that
are not public only if authorized in writing by the chief of police, sheriff,
or head of the law enforcement agency, or their designee, to obtain access to
the data for a legitimate, specified law enforcement purpose. Consistent with the requirements of paragraph
(c), each access must be based on a reasonable suspicion that the data are
pertinent to an active criminal investigation and must include a record of the
factual basis for the access and any associated case number, complaint, or
incident that is the basis for the access.
(c)
The ability of authorized individuals to enter, update, or access portable
recording system data must be limited through the use of role-based access that
corresponds to the official duties or training level of the individual and the
statutory authorization that grants access for that purpose. All queries and responses, and all actions in
which data are entered, updated, accessed, shared, or disseminated, must be
recorded in a data audit trail. Data
contained in the audit trail are public, to the extent that the data are not
otherwise classified by law.
Subd. 8. Sharing
among agencies. (a) Portable
recording system data that are not public may only be shared with or disseminated
to another law enforcement agency, a government entity, or a federal agency
upon meeting the standards for requesting access to data as provided in
subdivision 7.
(b) If data collected by a portable
recording system are shared with another state or local law enforcement agency
under this subdivision, the agency that receives the data must comply with all
data classification, destruction, and security requirements of this section.
(c) Portable recording system data may
not be shared with, disseminated to, sold to, or traded with any other
individual or entity unless explicitly authorized by this section or other
applicable law.
Subd. 9. Biennial
audit. (a) A law enforcement
agency must maintain records showing the date and time portable recording
system data were collected and the applicable classification of the data. The law enforcement agency shall arrange for
an independent, biennial audit of the data to determine whether data are
appropriately classified according to this section, how the data are used, and
whether they are destroyed as required under this section, and to verify
compliance with subdivisions 7 and 8. If
the commissioner of administration believes that a law enforcement agency is
not complying with this section or other applicable law, the commissioner may
order a law enforcement agency to arrange for additional independent audits. Data in the records required under this
paragraph are classified as provided in subdivision 2.
(b) The results of the audit are public. The commissioner of administration shall
review the results of the audit. If the
commissioner determines that there is a pattern of substantial noncompliance
with this section by the law enforcement agency, the agency must immediately
suspend operation of all portable recording systems until the commissioner has
authorized the agency to reinstate their use.
An order of suspension under this paragraph may be issued by the
commissioner upon review of the results of the audit, upon review of the
applicable provisions of this chapter, and after providing the agency a
reasonable opportunity to respond to the audit's findings.
(c) A report summarizing the results of
each audit must be provided to the commissioner of administration, to the chair
and ranking minority members of the committees of the house of representatives
and the senate with jurisdiction over data practices and public safety issues,
and to the Legislative Commission on Data Practices and Personal Data Privacy
no later than 30 days following completion of the audit.
Subd. 10. Penalties
for violation. In addition to
any other remedies provided by law, in the case of a willful violation of this
section a law enforcement agency is subject to exemplary damages of not less
than twice the minimum, nor more than twice the maximum allowable for exemplary
damages under section 13.08, subdivision 1.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2016. Data collected
before the effective date of this section must be destroyed, if required by
this section, no later than 15 days after the date this section becomes
effective.
Sec. 6. [626.8473]
PORTABLE RECORDING SYSTEMS ADOPTION; WRITTEN POLICY REQUIRED.
Subdivision 1. Definition. As used in this section,
"portable recording system" has the meaning provided in section
13.825, subdivision 1.
Subd. 2. Public
comment. A local law
enforcement agency must provide an opportunity for public comment before it
purchases or implements a portable recording system. At a minimum, the agency must accept public comments
submitted electronically or by mail, and the governing body with jurisdiction
over the law enforcement agency must provide an opportunity for public comment
at a regularly-scheduled meeting.
Subd. 3. Written
policies and procedures required. (a)
The chief officer of every state and local law enforcement agency that uses or
proposes to use a portable recording system must establish and enforce a
written policy governing its use. In
developing and adopting the policy, the law enforcement agency must provide for
public comment and input as provided in subdivision 1. Use of a portable recording system without
adoption of a written policy meeting the requirements of this section is
prohibited. The written policy must be
posted on the agency's Web site.
(b) At a minimum, the written policy
must incorporate the following:
(1) the requirements of section 13.825
and other data classifications, access procedures, retention policies, and data
security safeguards that, at a minimum, meet the requirements of chapter 13 and
other applicable law;
(2) procedures for testing the portable
recording system to ensure adequate functioning;
(3) procedures to address a system
malfunction or failure, including requirements for documentation by the officer
using the system at the time of a malfunction or failure;
(4) circumstances under which recording
is mandatory, prohibited, or at the discretion of the officer using the system;
(5) circumstances under which a data
subject must be given notice of a recording;
(6) circumstances under which a
recording may be ended while an investigation, response, or incident is
ongoing;
(7)
procedures for the secure storage of portable recording system data and the
creation of backup copies of the data;
(8) procedures to ensure compliance and
address violations of the policy, which must include, at a minimum, supervisory
or internal audits and reviews, and the employee discipline standards for
unauthorized access to data contained in section 13.09; and
(9) if applicable, any other standards
for use contained in a uniform policy adopted by the Minnesota Chiefs of Police
Association, the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association, or the Department of Public
Safety.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2016, provided
that a law enforcement agency using a portable recording system on that date
must adopt the policy required under this section no later than January 15,
2017.
Sec. 7. LEGISLATIVE
AUDITOR REVIEW.
Beginning no earlier than January 1,
2019, the legislative auditor is requested to conduct a comprehensive review of
compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, sections 13.825 and
626.8473. Data used for purposes of the
review must include the results of the biennial audits required by Minnesota
Statutes, section 13.825, subdivision 9, and may also include any other data
that, in the judgment of the legislative auditor, assists in
developing a complete understanding of any compliance or implementation issues resulting from enactment of those sections. The legislative auditor is requested to submit the results of the comprehensive review to the legislature no later than January 15, 2020."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to data practices; classifying portable recording system data; establishing requirements for portable recording systems; requiring written policies and procedures; providing for damage awards; requiring a legislative auditor review; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 13.82, subdivisions 6, 7, 15; Minnesota Statutes 2015 Supplement, section 13.82, subdivision 2; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 13; 626."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill be re-referred to the Committee on Public Safety and Crime Prevention Policy and Finance.
The report was adopted.
Pursuant to Joint Rule 2.03 and in accordance with Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 8, S. F. No. 498 was re‑referred to the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration.
SECOND READING OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. Nos. 1898, 2764, 3018 and 3216 were read for the second time.
INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS
The following House Files were introduced:
Baker; Anderson, P., and Hamilton introduced:
H. F. No. 3999, A bill for an act relating to agriculture; establishing an apprentice farmer assistance program; authorizing income tax credits for participating established farmers; requiring rulemaking; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 290.06, by adding a subdivision; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 17.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Agriculture Policy.
Freiberg introduced:
H. F. No. 4000, A bill for an act relating to consumer protection; regulating security freezes on consumer reports; providing for payment of fees; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 13C.016, subdivisions 1, 8.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Commerce and Regulatory Reform.
Mullery introduced:
H. F. No. 4001, A bill for an act relating to taxation; providing credits for hiring certain targeted individuals; providing a sales tax exemption for purchases of certain building materials; providing expanded tax increment financing authority to the city of Minneapolis; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, sections 297A.71, by adding a subdivision; 297A.75, subdivision 1; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 290.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Taxes.
MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE
The following messages were received from the Senate:
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned:
H. F. No. 2870, A bill for an act relating to corrections; authorizing counties to continue participation in the community corrections subsidy program; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 401.02, subdivision 1.
JoAnne M. Zoff, Secretary of the Senate
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned:
H. F. No. 2954, A bill for an act relating to commerce; regulating unfair practices in motor vehicle distribution; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 80E.13.
JoAnne M. Zoff, Secretary of the Senate
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following Senate Files, herewith transmitted:
S. F. Nos. 1075, 1440, 2385, 2405, 2802, 2881, 3047, 3175, 3368.
JoAnne M. Zoff, Secretary of the Senate
FIRST READING OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. No. 1075, A bill for an act relating to game and fish; requiring online applications for hunting and fishing licenses to provide for organ donation; requiring a report; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 13.7931, subdivision 6; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 97A.
The bill was read for the first time.
Anderson, S., moved that S. F. No. 1075 and H. F. No. 1182, now on the General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 1440, A bill for an act relating to health; making changes to the Minnesota prescription monitoring program; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 152.126, subdivisions 1, 3, 5, 6; repealing Laws 2014, chapter 286, article 7, section 4.
The bill was read for the first time.
Baker moved that S. F. No. 1440 and H. F. No. 1652, now on the General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 2385, A bill for an act relating to the Metropolitan Council; providing for staggered terms; expanding the membership of the nomination committee; requiring additional information to be made publicly available as part of the selection process; clarifying council member qualifications; requiring new advisory committee; establishing sewer availability charges stakeholder group; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, sections 473.123, subdivisions 2a, 3; 473.127.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on State Government Finance.
S. F. No. 2405, A bill for an act relating to energy; establishing an electric vehicle promotion program; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 216B.62, subdivision 2; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 216B.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Job Growth and Energy Affordability Policy and Finance.
S. F. No. 2802, A bill for an act relating to cosmetology; regulating eyelash extension services; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 155A.23, by adding subdivisions; Minnesota Statutes 2015 Supplement, sections 155A.23, subdivisions 8, 18; 155A.27, subdivision 1; 155A.271; 155A.29, subdivision 1.
The bill was read for the first time.
Franson moved that S. F. No. 2802 and H. F. No. 2389, now on the General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 2881, A bill for an act relating to human services; extending the sunset of an existing exception to the consumer-directed community supports budget methodology; amending Laws 2012, chapter 247, article 4, section 47, as amended.
The bill was read for the first time.
Mack moved that S. F. No. 2881 and H. F. No. 3276, now on the General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 3047, A bill for an act relating to health care; permitting health carriers to not renew certain conversion individual health plans; requiring notice to affected policyholders; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 62A.17, subdivision 6.
The bill was read for the first time.
Davids moved that S. F. No. 3047 and H. F. No. 3285, now on the General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 3175, A bill for an act relating to commerce; regulating bullion product dealers; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, sections 80G.01; 80G.02; 80G.03; 80G.04; 80G.05; 80G.06; 80G.07, subdivision 1; 80G.08; 80G.10; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 80G.07, subdivision 2.
The bill was read for the first time.
Hoppe moved that S. F. No. 3175 and H. F. No. 3309, now on the General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
S. F. No. 3368, A bill for an act relating to transportation; modifying permit requirements for temporary use of certain rights-of-way; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 160.27, by adding subdivisions; Minnesota Statutes 2015 Supplement, section 160.27, subdivision 10.
The bill was read for the first time.
Drazkowski moved that S. F. No. 3368 and H. F. No. 3723, now on the General Register, be referred to the Chief Clerk for comparison. The motion prevailed.
Peppin moved that the House recess subject to the call of the Chair. The motion prevailed.
RECESS
RECONVENED
The House reconvened and was called to order by the Speaker.
Halverson was excused between the hours of 1:00 p.m. and 1:45 p.m.
There being no objection, the order of business reverted to Reports of Standing Committees and Divisions.
REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES AND DIVISIONS
Peppin from the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration to which was referred:
S. F. No. 498, A bill for an act relating to data practices; classifying portable recording system data; establishing requirements for the destruction of data; requiring policies; imposing requirements on vendors and providing for damage awards; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 13.82, subdivision 15, by adding subdivisions; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 626.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill be re-referred to the Committee on Public Safety and Crime Prevention Policy and Finance.
Joint Rule 2.03 has been waived for any subsequent committee action on this bill.
The report was adopted.
CALENDAR
FOR THE DAY
H. F. No. 1333 was reported to the House.
Scott moved to amend H. F. No. 1333, the second engrossment, as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 518.552, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 6. Cohabitation. (a) Spousal maintenance may be
modified pursuant to section 518A.39, subdivision 2, based on the cohabitation
by the maintenance obligee with another adult following dissolution of the
marriage. The modification may consist
of a reduction, suspension, reservation, or termination of maintenance. In determining if maintenance should be
modified due to cohabitation, the court shall consider:
(1) whether the obligee would marry the
cohabitant but for the maintenance award;
(2) the economic benefit the obligee derives from the cohabitation;
(3) the length of the cohabitation and
the likely future duration of the cohabitation; and
(4) the economic impact on the obligee
if maintenance is modified and the cohabitation ends.
(b) The court must not modify a
maintenance award based solely on cohabitation if a marriage between the
obligee and the cohabitant would be prohibited under section 517.03,
subdivision 1, clause (2) or (3). A
modification under this subdivision must be precluded or limited to the extent
the parties have entered into a private agreement under subdivision 5.
(c) A motion to modify a spousal
maintenance award on the basis of cohabitation may not be brought within one
year of the date of entry of the decree of dissolution or legal separation that
orders spousal maintenance, unless the parties have agreed in writing that a
motion may be brought or the court finds that failing to allow the motion to
proceed would create an extreme hardship for one of the parties.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2016, and applies to modification motions brought on or after that date."
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
H. F. No. 1333, A bill for an act relating to civil law; allowing for modification of spousal maintenance based on the cohabitation of the obligee; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 518.552, by adding a subdivision.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 112 yeas and 9 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Allen
Anderson, C.
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Applebaum
Atkins
Backer
Baker
Barrett
Bennett
Bly
Carlson
Christensen
Cornish
Daniels
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Erickson
Fabian
Fenton
Fischer
Franson
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kelly
Kiel
Knoblach
Koznick
Kresha
Lien
Lillie
Lohmer
Loon
Loonan
Lucero
Lueck
Mahoney
Marquart
McDonald
McNamara
Metsa
Miller
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Nash
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Peterson
Pierson
Pinto
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Rarick
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simonson
Slocum
Smith
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Thissen
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Whelan
Wills
Yarusso
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Daudt
Those who voted in the negative were:
Bernardy
Considine
Flanagan
Freiberg
Laine
Liebling
Loeffler
Masin
Moran
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
H. F. No. 2528, A bill for an act relating to natural resources; establishing David Dill memorial trail; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 85.015, subdivision 13.
The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 125 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Allen
Anderson, C.
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Applebaum
Atkins
Backer
Baker
Barrett
Bennett
Bernardy
Bly
Carlson
Christensen
Considine
Cornish
Daniels
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Erickson
Fabian
Fenton
Fischer
Flanagan
Franson
Freiberg
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kiel
Knoblach
Koznick
Kresha
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Loonan
Lucero
Lueck
Mack
Mahoney
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamara
Metsa
Miller
Moran
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nash
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Peterson
Pierson
Pinto
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Rarick
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simonson
Slocum
Smith
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Thissen
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Whelan
Wills
Yarusso
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Daudt
The bill was passed and its title agreed to.
H. F. No. 3160 was reported to the House.
Anderson, M., moved to amend H. F. No. 3160 as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 97B.086, is amended to read:
97B.086
POSSESSION OF NIGHT VISION OR THERMAL IMAGING EQUIPMENT.
(a) A person may not possess night vision or thermal imaging equipment while taking wild animals or while having in possession, either individually or as one of a group of persons, a firearm, bow, or other implement that could be used to take wild animals.
(b) This section does not apply to a firearm that is:
(1) unloaded;
(2) in a gun case expressly made to contain a firearm that fully encloses the firearm by being zipped, snapped, buckled, tied, or otherwise fastened without any portion of the firearm exposed; and
(3) in the closed trunk of a motor vehicle.
(c) This section does not apply to a bow that is:
(1) completely encased or unstrung; and
(2) in the closed trunk of a motor vehicle.
(d) If the motor vehicle under paragraph (b) or (c) does not have a trunk, the firearm or bow must be placed in the rearmost location of the vehicle.
(e) This section does not apply to night
vision or thermal imaging equipment:
(1)
possessed by peace officers or military personnel while exercising their duties;
or
(2) possessed by an employee of a firearm or ammunition manufacturer for the purposes of testing a firearm, ammunition, or related product."
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
H. F. No. 3160, A bill for an act relating to game and fish; modifying night vision possession restrictions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 97B.086.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 124 yeas and 2 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Allen
Anderson, C.
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Applebaum
Atkins
Backer
Baker
Barrett
Bennett
Bernardy
Bly
Carlson
Christensen
Considine
Cornish
Daniels
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Erhardt
Erickson
Fabian
Fenton
Fischer
Flanagan
Franson
Freiberg
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kiel
Knoblach
Koznick
Kresha
Laine
Lesch
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Loonan
Lucero
Lueck
Mack
Mahoney
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamara
Metsa
Miller
Moran
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nash
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Peterson
Pierson
Pinto
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Rarick
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simonson
Slocum
Smith
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Thissen
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Whelan
Wills
Yarusso
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Daudt
Those who voted in the negative were:
Liebling
Norton
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
H. F. No. 3135 was reported to the House.
Schomacker moved to amend H. F. No. 3135 as follows:
Page 1, line 15, after the period, insert "The commissioner must use existing resources from the game and fish fund to satisfy the requirements of this section."
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
H. F. No. 3135, A bill for an act relating to game and fish; modifying hunter satisfaction survey requirements; amending Minnesota Statutes 2015 Supplement, section 97B.063.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 119 yeas and 7 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson, C.
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Applebaum
Atkins
Backer
Baker
Barrett
Bennett
Bernardy
Bly
Carlson
Christensen
Considine
Cornish
Daniels
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Erhardt
Erickson
Fabian
Fenton
Fischer
Flanagan
Franson
Freiberg
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kiel
Knoblach
Koznick
Kresha
Laine
Lesch
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Loonan
Lucero
Lueck
Mack
Mahoney
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamara
Metsa
Miller
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nash
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Peterson
Pierson
Pinto
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Rarick
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schoen
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simonson
Smith
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Thissen
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Vogel
Whelan
Wills
Yarusso
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Daudt
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Clark
Liebling
Nelson
Norton
Slocum
Wagenius
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
S. F. No. 2760, A bill for an act relating to state lands; providing for valuation of bond-financed property; modifying provisions for sale and exchange of state land; modifying prior sales authorization; providing for release of certain reversionary interest; designating state waysides and forests; adding to and deleting from state forests and parks; authorizing sales, conveyances, and exchange of certain state lands; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014,
sections 85.013, by adding a subdivision; 89.021, by adding a subdivision; 92.115, by adding a subdivision; 94.3495, subdivisions 2, 3, 7; Minnesota Statutes 2015 Supplement, section 94.10, subdivision 2; Laws 2012, chapter 236, section 28, subdivisions 2, 5, 9; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 94.
The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 99 yeas and 28 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson, C.
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Atkins
Backer
Baker
Barrett
Bennett
Carlson
Christensen
Cornish
Daniels
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Erhardt
Erickson
Fabian
Fenton
Franson
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Hamilton
Hancock
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Hoppe
Howe
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Kelly
Kiel
Knoblach
Koznick
Kresha
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lohmer
Loon
Loonan
Lucero
Lueck
Mack
Mahoney
Marquart
McDonald
McNamara
Metsa
Miller
Mullery
Nash
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Petersburg
Peterson
Pierson
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Rarick
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Selcer
Simonson
Smith
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Whelan
Wills
Yarusso
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Daudt
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Applebaum
Bernardy
Bly
Clark
Considine
Fischer
Flanagan
Freiberg
Hansen
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Lesch
Loeffler
Masin
Moran
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Norton
Persell
Pinto
Schoen
Slocum
Thissen
The bill was passed and its title agreed to.
The Speaker called Sanders to the Chair.
Fischer was excused between the hours of 1:50 p.m. and 2:40 p.m.
S. F. No. 2555, A bill for an act relating to local government; regulating zoning of temporary family health care dwellings; establishing temporary dwelling permits; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 144D.01, subdivision 4; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 394; 462.
The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 113 yeas and 17 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Allen
Anderson, C.
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Applebaum
Atkins
Backer
Baker
Barrett
Bennett
Bernardy
Bly
Carlson
Christensen
Clark
Considine
Cornish
Daniels
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Ecklund
Erhardt
Erickson
Fabian
Fenton
Flanagan
Franson
Freiberg
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Heintzeman
Hilstrom
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Kahn
Kelly
Kiel
Knoblach
Koznick
Kresha
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Loonan
Lueck
Mack
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamara
Miller
Moran
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nash
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Peterson
Pierson
Pinto
Poppe
Pugh
Rarick
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Schultz
Selcer
Smith
Swedzinski
Theis
Thissen
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Whelan
Wills
Yarusso
Youakim
Spk. Daudt
Those who voted in the negative were:
Anzelc
Dehn, R.
Drazkowski
Hertaus
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Lucero
Metsa
Nelson
Norton
Quam
Schoen
Scott
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Zerwas
The bill was passed and its title agreed to.
Mahoney was excused for the remainder of today’s session.
H. F. No. 2585 was reported to the House.
Nash moved to amend H. F. No. 2585, the first engrossment, as follows:
Page 1, lines 13 to 14, delete the new language
Page 1, line 22, after "ordinance" insert "by a statutory or home rule charter city"
Amend the title accordingly
The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
H. F. No. 2585, A bill for an act relating to local government; requiring a public hearing after ten-day notice before imposing an interim ordinance relating to housing; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 462.355, subdivision 4.
The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 82 yeas and 47 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson, C.
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Backer
Baker
Barrett
Bennett
Christensen
Cornish
Daniels
Davids
Dean, M.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erhardt
Erickson
Fabian
Fenton
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hancock
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kiel
Knoblach
Koznick
Kresha
Lesch
Lien
Lillie
Lohmer
Loon
Loonan
Lucero
Lueck
Mack
Marquart
McDonald
McNamara
Miller
Nash
Nelson
Newberger
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Peppin
Petersburg
Peterson
Pierson
Pugh
Quam
Rarick
Runbeck
Sanders
Schomacker
Scott
Smith
Swedzinski
Theis
Thissen
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Vogel
Whelan
Wills
Spk. Daudt
Those who voted in the negative were:
Allen
Anzelc
Applebaum
Atkins
Bernardy
Bly
Carlson
Clark
Considine
Davnie
Dehn, R.
Ecklund
Flanagan
Freiberg
Hansen
Hornstein
Hortman
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Laine
Liebling
Loeffler
Mariani
Masin
Metsa
Moran
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Newton
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Rosenthal
Schoen
Schultz
Selcer
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Wagenius
Yarusso
Youakim
Zerwas
The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
H. F. No. 2625, A bill for an act relating to local government; extending the response time residency requirement for Richfield firefighters; amending Laws 2010, chapter 207, section 1.
The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 81 yeas and 49 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Allen
Anderson, C.
Anderson, P.
Anzelc
Applebaum
Atkins
Barrett
Bennett
Bernardy
Bly
Carlson
Clark
Considine
Cornish
Davids
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Ecklund
Erhardt
Fischer
Flanagan
Franson
Freiberg
Gunther
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hilstrom
Hornstein
Hortman
Isaacson
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Knoblach
Kresha
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Loonan
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Metsa
Moran
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nelson
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
Pelowski
Persell
Petersburg
Peterson
Pierson
Pinto
Poppe
Rarick
Rosenthal
Schoen
Schomacker
Schultz
Selcer
Simonson
Slocum
Sundin
Theis
Thissen
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Wagenius
Wills
Yarusso
Youakim
Those who voted in the negative were:
Albright
Anderson, M.
Anderson, S.
Backer
Baker
Christensen
Daniels
Davnie
Dean, M.
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Fenton
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Hackbarth
Hancock
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Hoppe
Howe
Johnson, B.
Kelly
Kiel
Koznick
Lohmer
Loon
Lucero
Lueck
Mack
McDonald
McNamara
Miller
Nash
Newberger
O'Neill
Peppin
Pugh
Quam
Runbeck
Sanders
Scott
Smith
Swedzinski
Vogel
Whelan
Zerwas
Spk. Daudt
The bill was passed and its title agreed to.
H. F. No. 3590, A bill for an act relating to criminal justice; requiring a study on establishing an earned compliance credit program for persons under correctional supervision; requiring a report.
The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 130 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Allen
Anderson, C.
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Applebaum
Atkins
Backer
Baker
Barrett
Bennett
Bernardy
Bly
Carlson
Christensen
Clark
Considine
Cornish
Daniels
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Erhardt
Erickson
Fabian
Fenton
Fischer
Flanagan
Franson
Freiberg
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kiel
Knoblach
Koznick
Kresha
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Loonan
Lucero
Lueck
Mack
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamara
Metsa
Miller
Moran
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nash
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Peterson
Pierson
Pinto
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Rarick
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schoen
Schomacker
Schultz
Scott
Selcer
Simonson
Slocum
Smith
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Thissen
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Whelan
Wills
Yarusso
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Daudt
The bill was passed and its title agreed to.
Speaker pro tempore Sanders called Garofalo to the Chair.
S. F. No. 2426, A bill for an act relating to corrections; excluding medical treatment for mental health from inmate co-payment; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 243.212.
The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 130 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Allen
Anderson, C.
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Applebaum
Atkins
Backer
Baker
Barrett
Bennett
Bernardy
Bly
Carlson
Christensen
Clark
Considine
Cornish
Daniels
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Erhardt
Erickson
Fabian
Fenton
Fischer
Flanagan
Franson
Freiberg
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kiel
Knoblach
Koznick
Kresha
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Loonan
Lucero
Lueck
Mack
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamara
Metsa
Miller
Moran
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nash
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Peterson
Pierson
Pinto
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Rarick
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schoen
Schomacker
Schultz
Scott
Selcer
Simonson
Slocum
Smith
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Thissen
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Whelan
Wills
Yarusso
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Daudt
The bill was passed and its title agreed to.
H. F. No. 2552, A bill for an act relating to orders for protection; eliminating mandatory hearing requirement for subsequent orders and extensions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 518B.01, subdivisions 6a, 11, 18.
The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 130 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Allen
Anderson, C.
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Applebaum
Atkins
Backer
Baker
Barrett
Bennett
Bernardy
Bly
Carlson
Christensen
Clark
Considine
Cornish
Daniels
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Erhardt
Erickson
Fabian
Fenton
Fischer
Flanagan
Franson
Freiberg
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kiel
Knoblach
Koznick
Kresha
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Loonan
Lucero
Lueck
Mack
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamara
Metsa
Miller
Moran
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nash
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Peterson
Pierson
Pinto
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Rarick
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schoen
Schomacker
Schultz
Scott
Selcer
Simonson
Slocum
Smith
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Thissen
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Whelan
Wills
Yarusso
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Daudt
The bill was passed and its title agreed to.
H. F. No. 2553, A bill for an act relating to orders for protection; eliminating respondent filing fee requirements; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 518B.01, subdivision 3a.
The bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called. There were 130 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Allen
Anderson, C.
Anderson, M.
Anderson, P.
Anderson, S.
Anzelc
Applebaum
Atkins
Backer
Baker
Barrett
Bennett
Bernardy
Bly
Carlson
Christensen
Clark
Considine
Cornish
Daniels
Davids
Davnie
Dean, M.
Dehn, R.
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Erhardt
Erickson
Fabian
Fenton
Fischer
Flanagan
Franson
Freiberg
Garofalo
Green
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hackbarth
Halverson
Hamilton
Hancock
Hansen
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Hilstrom
Hoppe
Hornstein
Hortman
Howe
Isaacson
Johnson, B.
Johnson, C.
Johnson, S.
Kahn
Kelly
Kiel
Knoblach
Koznick
Kresha
Laine
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Loeffler
Lohmer
Loon
Loonan
Lucero
Lueck
Mack
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
McNamara
Metsa
Miller
Moran
Mullery
Murphy, E.
Murphy, M.
Nash
Nelson
Newberger
Newton
Nornes
Norton
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Peppin
Persell
Petersburg
Peterson
Pierson
Pinto
Poppe
Pugh
Quam
Rarick
Rosenthal
Runbeck
Sanders
Schoen
Schomacker
Schultz
Scott
Selcer
Simonson
Slocum
Smith
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Thissen
Torkelson
Uglem
Urdahl
Vogel
Wagenius
Whelan
Wills
Yarusso
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Daudt
The bill was passed and its title agreed to.
There being no objection, the order of business reverted to Messages from the Senate.
MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE
The following messages were received from the Senate:
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned:
H. F. No. 71, A bill for an act relating to public safety; creating an enhanced penalty for criminal vehicular homicide occurring within ten years of a qualified offense; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, sections 609.2111; 609.2112, subdivision 1; 609.2114, subdivision 1.
JoAnne M. Zoff, Secretary of the Senate
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned:
H. F. No. 2478, A bill for an act relating to workers' compensation; adopting recommendations of the Workers' Compensation Advisory Council; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, sections 176.011, subdivision 7a; 176.081, subdivisions 1, 3; 176.137, subdivisions 1, 4, by adding a subdivision; 176.331; 176.361, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, by adding a subdivision; 176.471, subdivisions 3, 5; 176.511, subdivisions 2, 3; 176.571, subdivision 1; Minnesota Statutes 2015 Supplement, sections 176.135, subdivision 7a; 176.136, subdivision 1b.
JoAnne M. Zoff, Secretary of the Senate
Mr. Speaker:
I hereby announce the Senate refuses to concur in the House amendments to the following Senate File:
S. F. No. 2527, A bill for an act relating to natural resources; appropriating money from outdoor heritage fund; modifying evaluation provisions; modifying prior appropriations; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 97A.056, subdivision 10; Laws 2015, First Special Session chapter 2, article 1, section 2, subdivisions 2, 3, 5.
The Senate respectfully requests that a Conference Committee be appointed thereon. The Senate has appointed as such committee:
Senators Saxhaug, Sparks, Lourey, Ingebrigtsen and Cohen.
Said Senate File is herewith transmitted to the House with the request that the House appoint a like committee.
JoAnne M. Zoff, Secretary of the Senate
Urdahl moved that the House accede to the request of the Senate and that the Speaker appoint a Conference Committee of 5 members of the House to meet with a like committee appointed by the Senate on the disagreeing votes of the two houses on S. F. No. 2527. The motion prevailed.
ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER
The Speaker announced the appointment of the following members of the House to a Conference Committee on S. F. No. 2527:
Urdahl, McNamara, Torkelson, Heintzeman and Lillie.
REPORTS FROM THE COMMITTEE ON RULES
AND LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATION
Peppin from the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration, pursuant to rules 1.21 and 3.33, designated the following bills to be placed on the Calendar for the Day for Thursday, May 12, 2016 and established a prefiling requirement for amendments offered to the following bills:
H. F. Nos. 1291, 1372, 2607, 3142, 3469, 3588, 3699 and 3925; and S. F. Nos. 2315, 3162 and 3262.
Peppin from the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration, pursuant to rules 1.21 and 3.33, designated the following bills to be placed on the Calendar for the Day for Friday, May 13, 2016 and established a prefiling requirement for amendments offered to the following bills:
H. F. Nos. 1365, 2294, 2554, 3384 and 3489; and S. F. Nos. 1111, 1425, 2428, 2548, 2963 and 3317.
MOTIONS AND RESOLUTIONS
Scott moved that the name of Persell be added as an author on H. F. No. 1333. The motion prevailed.
Peterson moved that the name of Murphy, E., be added as an author on H. F. No. 2222. The motion prevailed.
Johnson, C., moved that his name be stricken as an author on H. F. No. 2955. The motion prevailed.
Vogel moved that the name of Fenton be added as an author on H. F. No. 2970. The motion prevailed.
Quam moved that the name of Murphy, M., be added as an author on H. F. No. 3328. The motion prevailed.
Fabian moved that the name of Fenton be added as an author on H. F. No. 3377. The motion prevailed.
Fabian moved that the name of Hertaus be added as an author on H. F. No. 3409. The motion prevailed.
Runbeck moved that the name of Hertaus be added as an author on H. F. No. 3998. The motion prevailed.
ADJOURNMENT
Peppin moved that when the House adjourns today it adjourn until 9:00 a.m., Thursday, May 12, 2016. The motion prevailed.
Peppin moved that the House adjourn. The motion prevailed, and Speaker pro tempore Garofalo declared the House stands adjourned until 9:00 a.m., Thursday, May 12, 2016.
Patrick D. Murphy, Chief Clerk, House
of Representatives