STATE OF
MINNESOTA
NINETY-FIRST
SESSION - 2020
_____________________
SIXTY-SIXTH
DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Monday, February 24, 2020
The House of Representatives convened at 3:30
p.m. and was called to order by Melissa Hortman, Speaker of the House.
Prayer was offered by the Reverend Oliver G.
White, Clark-Grace United Church of Christ, South St. Paul, Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge
of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
The roll was called and the following
members were present:
Acomb
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahner
Bahr
Baker
Becker-Finn
Bennett
Bernardy
Bierman
Boe
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Daniels
Daudt
Davnie
Dehn
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Erickson
Fabian
Fischer
Franson
Freiberg
Gomez
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Her
Hertaus
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Johnson
Jordan
Jurgens
Kiel
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Koznick
Kresha
Kunesh-Podein
Layman
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Long
Lucero
Lueck
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Munson
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Nelson, N.
Neu
Noor
Nornes
Novotny
O'Driscoll
Olson
O'Neill
Pelowski
Persell
Petersburg
Pierson
Pinto
Poppe
Poston
Pryor
Quam
Richardson
Robbins
Runbeck
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schomacker
Schultz
Scott
Stephenson
Sundin
Swedzinski
Tabke
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vang
Vogel
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
A quorum was present.
Davids, Garofalo, Mahoney, Mann, Nash and
West were excused.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the
Journal of the preceding day. There
being no objection, further reading of the Journal was dispensed with and the
Journal was approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk.
REPORTS
OF STANDING COMMITTEES AND DIVISIONS
Carlson, L., from the Committee on Ways and Means to which was referred:
H. F. No. 8, A bill for an act relating to public safety; requiring criminal background checks for firearms transfers; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 624.7131; 624.7132; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 624.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 624.7131, is amended to read:
624.7131
TRANSFEREE PERMIT; PENALTY.
Subdivision 1. Information. Any person may apply for a transferee permit by providing the following information in writing to the chief of police of an organized full time police department of the municipality in which the person resides or to the county sheriff if there is no such local chief of police:
(1) the name, residence, telephone number, and driver's license number or nonqualification certificate number, if any, of the proposed transferee;
(2) the sex, date of birth, height, weight, and color of eyes, and distinguishing physical characteristics, if any, of the proposed transferee;
(3) a statement that the proposed transferee authorizes the release to the local police authority of commitment information about the proposed transferee maintained by the commissioner of human services, to the extent that the information relates to the proposed transferee's eligibility to possess a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon under section 624.713, subdivision 1; and
(4) a statement by the proposed transferee that the proposed transferee is not prohibited by section 624.713 from possessing a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon.
The statements shall be signed and dated by the person applying for a permit. At the time of application, the local police authority shall provide the applicant with a dated receipt for the application. The statement under clause (3) must comply with any applicable requirements of Code of Federal Regulations, title 42, sections 2.31 to 2.35, with respect to consent to disclosure of alcohol or drug abuse patient records.
Subd. 2. Investigation. The chief of police or sheriff shall check criminal histories, records and warrant information relating to the applicant through the Minnesota Crime Information System, the national criminal record repository, and the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. The chief of police or sheriff shall also make a reasonable effort to check other available state and local record-keeping systems. The chief of police or sheriff shall obtain commitment information from the commissioner of human services as provided in section 245.041.
Subd. 3. Forms. Chiefs of police and sheriffs shall make transferee permit application forms available throughout the community. There shall be no charge for forms, reports, investigations, notifications, waivers or any other act performed or materials provided by a government employee or agency in connection with application for or issuance of a transferee permit.
Subd. 4. Grounds
for disqualification. A
determination by (a) The chief of police or sheriff that shall
refuse to grant a transferee permit if the applicant is prohibited by section
624.713 state or federal law from possessing a pistol or
semiautomatic military-style assault weapon shall be the only basis for
refusal to grant a transferee permit or is determined to be a danger to
self or others under paragraph (b).
(b) A chief of police or sheriff shall
refuse to grant a permit to a person who is a danger to self or others. The decision of the chief of police or
sheriff must be based on documented past contact with law enforcement. A notice of disqualification issued pursuant
to this paragraph must describe and document the specific law enforcement
contact or contacts relied upon to deny the permit.
(c) A person is not eligible to submit
a permit application under this section if the person has had an application
denied pursuant to paragraph (b) and less than six months have elapsed since
the denial was issued or the person's appeal under subdivision 8 was denied,
whichever is later.
(d) A chief of police or sheriff who
denies a permit application pursuant to paragraph (b) must provide a copy of
the notice of disqualification to the chief of police or sheriff with joint-jurisdiction
over the proposed transferee's residence.
Subd. 5. Granting of permits. (a) The chief of police or sheriff shall issue a transferee permit or deny the application within seven days of application for the permit.
(b) In the case of a denial, the chief of police or sheriff shall provide an applicant with written notification of a denial and the specific reason for the denial.
(c) The permits and their renewal shall be granted free of charge.
Subd. 6. Permits valid statewide. Transferee permits issued pursuant to this section are valid statewide and shall expire after one year. A transferee permit may be renewed in the same manner and subject to the same provisions by which the original permit was obtained, except that all renewed permits must comply with the standards adopted by the commissioner under section 624.7151.
Permits issued pursuant to this section are not transferable. A person who transfers a permit in violation of this subdivision is guilty of a misdemeanor.
Subd. 7. Permit voided; revocation. (a) The transferee permit shall be void at the time that the holder becomes prohibited from possessing or receiving a pistol under section 624.713, in which event the holder shall return the permit within five days to the issuing authority. If the chief law enforcement officer who issued the permit has knowledge that the permit holder is ineligible to possess firearms, the chief law enforcement officer must revoke the permit and give notice to the holder in writing. Failure of the holder to return the permit within the five days of learning that the permit is void or revoked is a gross misdemeanor unless the court finds that the circumstances or the physical or mental condition of the permit holder prevented the holder from complying with the return requirement.
(b) When a permit holder receives a
court disposition that prohibits the permit holder from possessing a firearm,
the court must take possession of the permit, if it is available, and send it
to the issuing law enforcement agency. If
the permit holder does not have the permit when the court imposes a firearm
prohibition, the permit holder must surrender the permit to the assigned
probation officer, if applicable. When a
probation officer is assigned upon disposition of the case, the court shall
inform the probation agent of the permit holder's obligation to surrender the
permit. Upon surrender, the probation
officer must send the permit to the issuing law enforcement agency. If a probation officer is not assigned to the
permit holder, the holder shall surrender the permit as provided for in
paragraph (a).
Subd. 8. Hearing upon denial. Any person aggrieved by denial of a transferee permit may appeal the denial to the district court having jurisdiction over the county or municipality in which the denial occurred.
Subd. 9. Permit
to carry. A valid permit to carry
issued pursuant to section 624.714 constitutes a transferee permit for the
purposes of this section and section sections 624.7132 and
624.7134.
Subd. 10. Transfer
report not required. A person
who transfers a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon to a
person exhibiting a valid transferee permit issued pursuant to this section or
a valid permit to carry issued pursuant to section 624.714 is not required to
file a transfer report pursuant to section 624.7132, subdivision 1.
Subd. 11. Penalty. A person who makes a false statement in
order to obtain a transferee permit knowing or having reason to know the
statement is false is guilty of a gross misdemeanor felony.
Subd. 12. Local regulation. This section shall be construed to supersede municipal or county regulation of the issuance of transferee permits.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2020, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 624.7132, is amended to read:
624.7132
REPORT OF TRANSFER.
Subdivision 1. Required information. Except as provided in this section and section 624.7131, every person who agrees to transfer a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon shall report the following information in writing to the chief of police of the organized full-time police department of the municipality where the proposed transferee resides or to the appropriate county sheriff if there is no such local chief of police:
(1) the name, residence, telephone number, and driver's license number or nonqualification certificate number, if any, of the proposed transferee;
(2) the sex, date of birth, height, weight, and color of eyes, and distinguishing physical characteristics, if any, of the proposed transferee;
(3) a statement that the proposed transferee authorizes the release to the local police authority of commitment information about the proposed transferee maintained by the commissioner of human services, to the extent that the information relates to the proposed transferee's eligibility to possess a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon under section 624.713, subdivision 1;
(4) a statement by the proposed transferee that the transferee is not prohibited by section 624.713 from possessing a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon; and
(5) the address of the place of business of the transferor.
The report shall be signed and dated by the transferor and the proposed transferee. The report shall be delivered by the transferor to the chief of police or sheriff no later than three days after the date of the agreement to transfer, excluding weekends and legal holidays. The statement under clause (3) must comply with any applicable requirements of Code of Federal Regulations, title 42, sections 2.31 to 2.35, with respect to consent to disclosure of alcohol or drug abuse patient records.
Subd. 2. Investigation. Upon receipt of a transfer report, the chief of police or sheriff shall check criminal histories, records and warrant information relating to the proposed transferee through the Minnesota Crime Information System, the national criminal record repository, and the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. The chief of police or sheriff shall also make a reasonable effort to check other available state and local record-keeping systems. The chief of police or sheriff shall obtain commitment information from the commissioner of human services as provided in section 245.041.
Subd. 3. Notification. The chief of police or sheriff shall notify the transferor and proposed transferee in writing as soon as possible if the chief or sheriff determines that the proposed transferee is prohibited by section 624.713 from possessing a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon. The notification to the transferee shall specify the grounds for the disqualification of the proposed transferee and shall set forth in detail the transferee's right of appeal under subdivision 13.
Subd. 4. Delivery. Except as otherwise provided in
subdivision 7 or 8, no person shall deliver a pistol or semiautomatic
military-style assault weapon to a proposed transferee until five business days
after the date the agreement to transfer is delivered to a chief of police or
sheriff in accordance with subdivision 1 unless the chief of police or sheriff
waives all or a portion of the seven-day waiting period. The chief of police or sheriff may waive all or
a portion of the five business day waiting period in writing if the
chief of police or sheriff finds that the transferee requires access to a
pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon because of a threat to
the life of the transferee or of any member of the household of the transferee.
No person shall deliver a pistol or
semiautomatic military-style assault weapon firearm to a proposed
transferee after receiving a written notification that the chief of police or
sheriff has determined that the proposed transferee is prohibited by section
624.713 from possessing a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault
weapon firearm.
If the transferor makes a report of
transfer and receives no written notification of disqualification of the
proposed transferee within five business days after delivery of the agreement
to transfer, the pistol or semiautomatic military‑style assault weapon
firearm may be delivered to the transferee.
Subd. 5. Grounds
for disqualification. A
determination by (a) The chief of police or sheriff that shall
deny an application if the proposed transferee is prohibited by section
624.713 state or federal law from possessing a pistol or
semiautomatic military-style assault weapon shall be the sole basis for a
notification of disqualification under this section or is determined to
be a danger to self or others under paragraph (b).
(b) A chief of police or sheriff shall
deny an application if the person is a danger to self or others. The decision of the chief of police or sheriff
must be based on documented past contact with law enforcement. A notice of disqualification issued pursuant
to this paragraph must describe and document the specific law enforcement
contact or contacts relied upon to deny the application.
(c) A chief of police or sheriff need
not process an application under this section if the person has had an
application denied pursuant to paragraph (b) and less than six months have
elapsed since the denial was issued or the person's appeal under subdivision 13
was denied, whichever is later.
(d) A chief of police or sheriff who
denies an application pursuant to paragraph (b) must provide a copy of the
notice of disqualification to the chief of police or sheriff with
joint-jurisdiction over the applicant's residence.
Subd. 6. Transferee
permit. If a chief of police
or sheriff determines that a transferee is not a person prohibited by section
624.713 from possessing a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault
weapon, the transferee may, within 30 days after the determination, apply to
that chief of police or sheriff for a transferee permit, and the permit shall
be issued.
Subd. 8. Report
not required. If the proposed
transferee presents a valid transferee permit issued under section 624.7131
or a valid permit to carry issued under section 624.714, the transferor
need not file a transfer report.
Subd. 9. Number of pistols or semiautomatic military-style assault weapons. Any number of pistols or semiautomatic military-style assault weapons may be the subject of a single transfer agreement and report to the chief of police or sheriff. Nothing in this section or section 624.7131 shall be construed to limit or restrict the number of pistols or semiautomatic military-style assault weapons a person may acquire.
Subd. 10. Restriction on records. If, after a determination that the transferee is not a person prohibited by section 624.713 from possessing a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon, a transferee requests that no record be maintained of the fact of who is the transferee of a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon, the chief of police or sheriff shall sign the transfer report and return it to the transferee as soon as possible. Thereafter, no government employee or agency shall maintain a record of the transfer that identifies the transferee, and the transferee shall retain the report of transfer.
Subd. 11. Forms; cost. Chiefs of police and sheriffs shall make transfer report forms available throughout the community. There shall be no charge for forms, reports, investigations, notifications, waivers or any other act performed or materials provided by a government employee or agency in connection with a transfer.
Subd. 12. Exclusions. Except as otherwise provided in section 609.66, subdivision 1f, this section shall not apply to transfers of antique firearms as curiosities or for their historical significance or value, transfers to or between federally licensed firearms dealers, transfers by order of court, involuntary transfers, transfers at death or the following transfers:
(1) a transfer by a person other than a federally licensed firearms dealer;
(2) a loan to a prospective transferee if the loan is intended for a period of no more than one day;
(3) the delivery of a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon to a person for the purpose of repair, reconditioning or remodeling;
(4) a loan by a teacher to a student in a course designed to teach marksmanship or safety with a pistol and approved by the commissioner of natural resources;
(5) a loan between persons at a firearms collectors exhibition;
(6) a loan between persons lawfully engaged in hunting or target shooting if the loan is intended for a period of no more than 12 hours;
(7) a loan between law enforcement officers who have the power to make arrests other than citizen arrests; and
(8) a loan between employees or between the employer and an employee in a business if the employee is required to carry a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon by reason of employment and is the holder of a valid permit to carry a pistol.
Subd. 13. Appeal. A person aggrieved by the determination of a chief of police or sheriff that the person is prohibited by section 624.713 from possessing a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon may appeal the determination as provided in this subdivision. The district court shall have jurisdiction of proceedings under this subdivision.
On review pursuant to this subdivision, the court shall be limited to a determination of whether the proposed transferee is a person prohibited from possessing a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon by section 624.713.
Subd. 14. Transfer
to unknown party. (a) No
person shall transfer a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon
to another who is not personally known to the transferor unless the proposed
transferee presents evidence of identity to the transferor.
(b) No person who is not personally
known to the transferor shall become a transferee of a pistol or semiautomatic
military-style assault weapon unless the person presents evidence of identity
to the transferor.
(c) The evidence of identity shall
contain the name, residence address, date of birth, and photograph of the
proposed transferee; must be made or issued by or under the authority of the
United States government, a state, a political subdivision of a state, a
foreign government, a political subdivision of a foreign government, an
international governmental or an international quasi-governmental organization;
and must be of a type commonly accepted for the purpose of identification of
individuals.
(d) A person who becomes a transferee
of a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon in violation of this
subdivision is guilty of a misdemeanor.
Subd. 15. Penalties. (a) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b), a person who does any of the following is guilty of a gross misdemeanor:
(1) transfers a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon in violation of subdivisions 1 to 13;
(2) transfers a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon to a person who has made a false statement in order to become a transferee, if the transferor knows or has reason to know the transferee has made the false statement;
(3) knowingly becomes a transferee in violation of subdivisions 1 to 13; or
(4) makes a false statement in order to become a transferee of a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon knowing or having reason to know the statement is false.
(b) A person who does either of the following is guilty of a felony:
(1) transfers a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon to a person under the age of 18 in violation of subdivisions 1 to 13; or
(2) transfers a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon to a person under the age of 18 who has made a false statement in order to become a transferee, if the transferor knows or has reason to know the transferee has made the false statement.
Subd. 16. Local regulation. This section shall be construed to supersede municipal or county regulation of the transfer of pistols.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2020, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 3. [624.7134]
PRIVATE PARTY TRANSFERS; BACKGROUND CHECK REQUIRED.
Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) As used in this section, the
following terms have the meanings provided in this subdivision.
(b) "Firearms dealer" means a
person who is licensed by the United States Department of Justice, Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, under United States Code, title 18,
section 923(a).
(c) "State or federally issued
identification" means a document or card made or issued by or under the
authority of the United States government or the state that contains the
person's name, residence address, date of birth, and photograph and is of a
type commonly accepted for the purpose of identification of individuals.
Subd. 2. Background
check and evidence of identity. A
person who is not a firearms dealer is prohibited from transferring possession
or ownership of a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon to any
other person who is not a firearms dealer, unless the transferee presents a
valid transferee permit issued under section 624.7131 or a valid permit to
carry issued under section 624.714 and a current state or federally issued
identification.
Subd. 3. Record
of transfer; required information. (a)
When two parties complete the transfer of a pistol or semiautomatic military-style
assault weapon under subdivision 2, the transferor and transferee must complete
a record of transfer on a form designed and made publicly available without fee
for this purpose by the superintendent of the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. Each page of the record of transfer must be
signed and dated by the transferor and the transferee and contain the serial
number of the pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon.
(b) The record of transfer must contain
the following information:
(1) a clear copy of each person's
current state or federally issued identification;
(2) a clear copy of the transferee
permit or permit to carry presented by the transferee; and
(3) a signed statement by the
transferee swearing that the transferee is not currently prohibited by state or
federal law from possessing a firearm.
(c) The record of transfer must also
contain the following information regarding the transferred pistol or
semiautomatic military-style assault weapon:
(1) the type of pistol or semiautomatic
military-style assault weapon;
(2) the manufacturer, make, and model
of the pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon; and
(3) the pistol or semiautomatic
military-style assault weapon's manufacturer-assigned serial number.
(d) Both the transferor and the
transferee must retain a copy of the record of transfer and any attachments to
the record of transfer for 20 years from the date of the transfer. A copy in digital form shall be acceptable
for the purposes of this paragraph.
Subd. 4. Compulsory
production of a record of transfer; gross misdemeanor penalty. (a) The transferor and transferee of a
pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon transferred under this
section must produce the record of transfer when a peace officer requests the
record as part of a criminal investigation.
(b)
A person who refuses or is unable to produce a record of transfer for a firearm
transferred under this section in response to a request for production made by
a peace officer pursuant to paragraph (a) is guilty of a gross misdemeanor. A prosecution or conviction for violation of
this subdivision is not a bar to conviction of, or punishment for, any other
crime committed involving the transferred firearm.
Subd. 5. Immunity. A person is immune to a charge of
violating this section if the person presents a record of transfer that
satisfies the requirements of subdivision 3.
Subd. 6. Exclusions. (a) This section shall not apply to
the following transfers:
(1) a transfer by or to a federally
licensed firearms dealer;
(2) a transfer by or to any law
enforcement agency;
(3)
to the extent the transferee is acting within the course and scope of
employment and official duties, a transfer to:
(i) a peace officer, as defined in
section 626.84, subdivision 1, paragraph (c);
(ii) a member of the United States
armed forces, the National Guard, or the Reserves of the United States armed
forces;
(iii) a federal law enforcement
officer; or
(iv) a security guard employed by a
protective agent licensed pursuant to chapter 326;
(4) a transfer between immediate family
members, which for the purposes of this section means spouses, domestic
partners, parents, children, siblings, grandparents, and grandchildren;
(5) a transfer to an executor, administrator,
trustee, or personal representative of an estate or a trust that occurs by
operation of law upon the death of the former owner of the firearm;
(6) a transfer of an antique firearm as
defined in section 624.712, subdivision 3;
(7) a transfer of a curio or relic, as
defined in Code of Federal Regulations, title 27, section 478.11, if the
transfer is between collectors of firearms as curios or relics as defined by
United States Code, title 18, section 921(a)(13), who each have in their possession
a valid collector of curio and relics license issued by the United States
Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives;
(8) the temporary transfer of a firearm
if:
(i) the transfer is necessary to
prevent imminent death or great bodily harm; and
(ii) the person's possession lasts only
as long as immediately necessary to prevent such imminent death or great bodily
harm;
(9) transfers by or to an auctioneer
who is in compliance with chapter 330 and acting in the person's official role
as an auctioneer to facilitate or conduct an auction of the firearm; and
(10) a temporary transfer if the
transferee's possession of the firearm following the transfer is only:
(i)
at a shooting range that operates in compliance with the performance standards
under chapter 87A or is a nonconforming use under section 87A.03, subdivision
2, or, if compliance is not required by the governing body of the jurisdiction,
at an established shooting range operated consistently with local law in the jurisdiction;
(ii) at a lawfully organized
competition involving the use of a firearm, or while participating in or
practicing for a performance by an organized group that uses firearms as part
of the performance;
(iii) while hunting or trapping if the hunting or trapping is legal in all places where the transferee possesses the firearm and the transferee holds all licenses or permits required for hunting or trapping;
(iv) at a lawfully organized
educational or instructional course and under the direct supervision of a
certified instructor, as that term is defined in section 624.714, subdivision
2a, paragraph (d); or
(v) while in the actual presence of the
transferor.
(b) A transfer under this subdivision
is permitted only if the transferor has no reason to believe:
(1) that the transferee is prohibited
by federal law from buying or possessing firearms or not entitled under state
law to possess firearms;
(2) if the transferee is under 18 years
of age and is receiving the firearm under direct supervision and control of an
adult, that the adult is prohibited by federal law from buying or possessing
firearms or not entitled under state law to possess firearms; or
(3) that the transferee will use or
intends to use the firearm in the commission of a crime.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2020, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to public safety; requiring criminal background checks for firearms transfers; modifying grounds for disqualification of transferee permit; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 624.7131; 624.7132; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 624."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill be placed on the General Register.
The
report was adopted.
Carlson, L., from the Committee on Ways and Means to which was referred:
H. F. No. 9, A bill for an act relating to public safety; enabling law enforcement and family members to petition a court to prohibit people from possessing firearms if they pose a significant danger to themselves or others by possessing a firearm; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 624.713, subdivision 1; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 624.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, section 624.713, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Ineligible persons. The following persons shall not be entitled to possess ammunition or a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon or, except for clause (1), any other firearm:
(1) a person under the age of 18 years except that a person under 18 may possess ammunition designed for use in a firearm that the person may lawfully possess and may carry or possess a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon (i) in the actual presence or under the direct supervision of the person's parent or guardian, (ii) for the purpose of military drill under the auspices of a legally recognized military organization and under competent supervision, (iii) for the purpose of instruction, competition, or target practice on a firing range approved by the chief of police or county sheriff in whose jurisdiction the range is located and under direct supervision; or (iv) if the person has successfully completed a course designed to teach marksmanship and safety with a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon and approved by the commissioner of natural resources;
(2) except as otherwise provided in clause (9), a person who has been convicted of, or adjudicated delinquent or convicted as an extended jurisdiction juvenile for committing, in this state or elsewhere, a crime of violence. For purposes of this section, crime of violence includes crimes in other states or jurisdictions which would have been crimes of violence as herein defined if they had been committed in this state;
(3) a person who is or has ever been committed in Minnesota or elsewhere by a judicial determination that the person is mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or mentally ill and dangerous to the public, as defined in section 253B.02, to a treatment facility, or who has ever been found incompetent to stand trial or not guilty by reason of mental illness, unless the person's ability to possess a firearm and ammunition has been restored under subdivision 4;
(4) a person who has been convicted in Minnesota or elsewhere of a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor violation of chapter 152, unless three years have elapsed since the date of conviction and, during that time, the person has not been convicted of any other such violation of chapter 152 or a similar law of another state; or a person who is or has ever been committed by a judicial determination for treatment for the habitual use of a controlled substance or marijuana, as defined in sections 152.01 and 152.02, unless the person's ability to possess a firearm and ammunition has been restored under subdivision 4;
(5) a person who has been committed to a treatment facility in Minnesota or elsewhere by a judicial determination that the person is chemically dependent as defined in section 253B.02, unless the person has completed treatment or the person's ability to possess a firearm and ammunition has been restored under subdivision 4. Property rights may not be abated but access may be restricted by the courts;
(6) a peace officer who is informally admitted to a treatment facility pursuant to section 253B.04 for chemical dependency, unless the officer possesses a certificate from the head of the treatment facility discharging or provisionally discharging the officer from the treatment facility. Property rights may not be abated but access may be restricted by the courts;
(7) a person, including a person under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, who has been charged with committing a crime of violence and has been placed in a pretrial diversion program by the court before disposition, until the person has completed the diversion program and the charge of committing the crime of violence has been dismissed;
(8) except as otherwise provided in clause (9), a person who has been convicted in another state of committing an offense similar to the offense described in section 609.224, subdivision 3, against a family or household member or section 609.2242, subdivision 3, unless three years have elapsed since the date of conviction and, during that time, the person has not been convicted of any other violation of section 609.224, subdivision 3, or 609.2242, subdivision 3, or a similar law of another state;
(9) a person who has been convicted in this state or elsewhere of assaulting a family or household member and who was found by the court to have used a firearm in any way during commission of the assault is prohibited from possessing any type of firearm or ammunition for the period determined by the sentencing court;
(10) a person who:
(i) has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
(ii) is a fugitive from justice as a result of having fled from any state to avoid prosecution for a crime or to avoid giving testimony in any criminal proceeding;
(iii) is an unlawful user of any controlled substance as defined in chapter 152;
(iv) has been judicially committed to a treatment facility in Minnesota or elsewhere as a person who is mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or mentally ill and dangerous to the public, as defined in section 253B.02;
(v) is an alien who is illegally or unlawfully in the United States;
(vi) has been discharged from the armed forces of the United States under dishonorable conditions;
(vii) has renounced the person's citizenship having been a citizen of the United States; or
(viii) is disqualified from possessing a firearm under United States Code, title 18, section 922(g)(8) or (9), as amended through March 1, 2014;
(11) a person who has been convicted of the following offenses at the gross misdemeanor level, unless three years have elapsed since the date of conviction and, during that time, the person has not been convicted of any other violation of these sections: section 609.229 (crimes committed for the benefit of a gang); 609.2231, subdivision 4 (assaults motivated by bias); 609.255 (false imprisonment); 609.378 (neglect or endangerment of a child); 609.582, subdivision 4 (burglary in the fourth degree); 609.665 (setting a spring gun); 609.71 (riot); or 609.749 (harassment or stalking). For purposes of this paragraph, the specified gross misdemeanor convictions include crimes committed in other states or jurisdictions which would have been gross misdemeanors if conviction occurred in this state;
(12) a person who has been convicted of a
violation of section 609.224 if the court determined that the assault was
against a family or household member in accordance with section 609.2242,
subdivision 3 (domestic assault), unless three years have elapsed since the
date of conviction and, during that time, the person has not been convicted of
another violation of section 609.224 or a violation of a section listed in
clause (11); or
(13) a person who is subject to an order
for protection as described in section 260C.201, subdivision 3, paragraph (d),
or 518B.01, subdivision 6, paragraph (g).; or
(14) a person who is subject to an
extreme risk protection order as described in section 624.7162 or 624.7164.
A person who issues a certificate pursuant to this section in good faith is not liable for damages resulting or arising from the actions or misconduct with a firearm or ammunition committed by the individual who is the subject of the certificate.
The prohibition in this subdivision relating to the possession of firearms other than pistols and semiautomatic military-style assault weapons does not apply retroactively to persons who are prohibited from possessing a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon under this subdivision before August 1, 1994.
The lifetime prohibition on possessing, receiving, shipping, or transporting firearms and ammunition for persons convicted or adjudicated delinquent of a crime of violence in clause (2), applies only to offenders who are discharged from sentence or court supervision for a crime of violence on or after August 1, 1993.
For purposes of this section, "judicial determination" means a court proceeding pursuant to sections 253B.07 to 253B.09 or a comparable law from another state.
Sec. 2. [624.7161]
EXTREME RISK PROTECTION ORDERS.
Subdivision 1. Definitions. As used in sections 624.7161 to
624.7168, the term "firearm" has the meaning given in section
609.666, subdivision 1, paragraph (a).
Subd. 2. Court
jurisdiction. An application
for relief under this section shall be filed in the county of residence of the
respondent. Actions under this section
shall be given docket priorities by the court.
Subd. 3. Generally. (a) There shall exist an action known
as a petition for an extreme risk protection order, which order shall enjoin
and prohibit the respondent from possessing firearms for a fixed period.
(b) A petition for relief under
sections 624.7161 to 624.7168 may be made by the chief law enforcement officer
or a designee or a city or county attorney.
(c) A petition for relief shall allege
that the respondent poses a significant danger of bodily harm to self or to
other persons by possessing a firearm. The
petition shall be accompanied by an affidavit made under oath stating specific
facts and circumstances forming a basis to allege that an extreme risk
protection order should be granted. The
affidavit may include, but is not limited to, evidence showing any of the
factors described in section 624.7162, subdivision 2.
(d) A petition for emergency relief
under section 624.7164 shall additionally allege that the respondent presents
an immediate and present danger of bodily harm.
(e) A petition for relief must
describe, to the best of the petitioner's knowledge, the types and location of
any firearms believed by the petitioner to be possessed by the respondent.
(f) The state court administrator shall
create all forms necessary under sections 624.7161 to 624.7168.
(g) The filing fees for an extreme risk
protection order under this section are waived for the petitioner and
respondent.
(h) An extreme risk protection order issued
under sections 624.7161 to 624.7168 applies throughout the state.
(i) Any proceeding under sections
624.7161 to 624.7168 shall be in addition to other civil or criminal remedies.
(j) All health records and other health
information provided in a petition or considered as evidence in a proceeding
under sections 624.7161 to 624.7168 shall be protected from public disclosure
but may be provided to law enforcement agencies as described in this section.
(k) Any extreme risk protection order
or subsequent extension issued under sections 624.7161 to 624.7168 shall be
forwarded by the court administrator within 24 hours to the local law
enforcement agency with jurisdiction over the residence of the respondent. Each appropriate law enforcement agency shall
make available to other law enforcement officers, through a system for
verification, information as to the existence and status of any extreme risk
protection order issued under sections 624.7161 to 624.7168.
Sec. 3. [624.7162]
EXTREME RISK PROTECTION ORDERS ISSUED AFTER HEARING.
Subdivision 1. Hearing. (a) Upon receipt of the petition for
an order after a hearing, the court shall order a hearing which shall be held
not later than 14 days from the date of the order for hearing.
(b) The petitioning agency shall be
responsible for service of an extreme risk protection order issued by the court
and shall further be the agency responsible for the execution of any legal
process required for the seizure and storage of firearms subject to the order. Nothing in this provision limits the ability
of the law enforcement agency of record from cooperating with other law
enforcement entities.
(c) Personal service of notice for the
hearing may be made upon the respondent at any time up to 12 hours prior to the
time set for the hearing, provided that the respondent at the hearing may request
a continuance of up to five days if the respondent is served less than
five days prior to the hearing, which continuance shall be granted unless there
are compelling reasons not to do so. If
the court grants the requested continuance, and an existing emergency order
under section 624.7164 will expire due to the continuance, the court shall also
issue a written order continuing the emergency order pending the new time set
for the hearing.
(d) If personal service cannot be made,
the court may order service of the petition and any order issued under this
section by alternate means. The
application for alternate service must include the last known location of the
respondent; the petitioner's most recent contacts with the respondent; the last
known location of the respondent's employment; the names and locations of the
respondent's parents, siblings, children, and other close relatives; the names
and locations of other persons who are likely to know the respondent's
whereabouts; and a description of efforts to locate those persons. The court shall consider the length of time
the respondent's location has been unknown, the likelihood that the
respondent's location will become known, the nature of the relief sought, and
the nature of efforts made to locate the respondent. The court shall order service by first class
mail, forwarding address requested, to any addresses where there is a
reasonable possibility that mail or information will be forwarded or
communicated to the respondent. The
court may also order publication, within or without the state, but only if it
might reasonably succeed in notifying the respondent of the proceeding. Service shall be deemed complete 14 days
after mailing or 14 days after court-ordered publication.
Subd. 2. Relief
by court. (a) At the hearing,
the petitioner must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the
respondent poses a significant danger of bodily harm to self or other persons
by possessing a firearm.
(b) In determining whether to grant the
order after a hearing, the court shall consider evidence of the following,
whether or not the petitioner has provided evidence of the same:
(1) a history of threats or acts of
violence by the respondent directed toward another person;
(2) the history of use, attempted use,
or threatened use of physical force by the respondent against another person;
(3) a violation of any court order
including, but not limited to, orders issued under sections 624.7161 to
624.7168, or chapter 260C or 518B;
(4) a prior arrest for a felony
offense;
(5) a conviction or prior arrest for a
violent misdemeanor offense, for a stalking offense under section 609.749, or
for domestic assault under section 609.2242;
(6) a conviction for an offense of
cruelty to animals under chapter 343;
(7) the unlawful and reckless use, display, or brandishing of a firearm by the respondent;
(8) a history of self-harm by the
respondent; and
(9) whether the respondent is named in
an existing order in effect under sections 624.7161 to 624.7168, or chapter
260C or 518B, or party to a pending lawsuit, complaint, petition, or other
action under sections 624.7161 to 624.7168, or chapter 518B.
(c) In determining whether to grant the
order after a hearing, the court may consider any other evidence that bears on
whether the respondent poses a danger to the respondent's self or others.
(d) If the court finds there is a
preponderance of the evidence to issue an extreme risk protection order, the
court shall issue the order prohibiting the person from possessing a firearm
for the duration of the order. The court
shall inform the respondent that the respondent is prohibited from possessing
firearms and shall issue a transfer order under section 624.7165. The court shall also give notice to the
county attorney's office, which may take action as it deems appropriate.
(e) The order shall have a fixed
period, to be determined by the court, of not less than six months and not more
than two years, subject to renewal or extension under section 624.7163.
(f) If there is no existing emergency
order under section 624.7164 at the time an order is granted under this
section, the court shall determine by a preponderance of the evidence whether
the respondent presents an immediate and present danger of bodily harm. If the court so determines, the transfer
order shall include the provisions described in section 624.7165, paragraph
(c).
(g) If, after a hearing, the court does
not issue an order of protection, the court shall vacate any emergency extreme
risk protection order currently in effect.
(h) A respondent may waive the
respondent's right to contest the hearing and consent to the court's imposition
of an extreme risk protection order. The
court shall seal the petition filed under this section and section 624.7144, if
a respondent who consents to imposition of an extreme risk protection order
requests that the petition be sealed, unless the court finds that there is
clear and convincing evidence that the interests of the public and public
safety outweigh the disadvantages to the respondent of not sealing the petition. All extreme risk protection orders shall
remain public.
Sec. 4. [624.7163]
SUBSEQUENT EXTENSIONS AND TERMINATION.
(a) Upon application by any party
entitled to petition for an order under section 624.7162, and after notice to
the respondent and a hearing, the court may extend the relief granted in an
existing order granted after a hearing under section 624.7162. Application for an extension may be made any
time within the three months before the expiration of the existing order. The order may be extended for a fixed period
of at least six months and not to exceed two years, if the court makes the
same findings by a preponderance of the evidence as required for granting of an
initial order under section 624.7162, subdivision 2, paragraph (d). The court shall consider the same types of
evidence as required for the initial order under section 624.7162, subdivision
2, paragraphs (b) and (c).
(b) Upon application by the respondent
to an order issued under section 624.7162, the court may terminate an order
after a hearing at which the respondent shall bear the burden of proving by a
preponderance of the evidence that the respondent does not pose a significant
danger of bodily harm to the respondent's self or to other persons by
possessing a firearm. Application may be
made for termination one time for each year an order is in effect. If an order has been issued for a period of
six months, the respondent may apply for termination one time.
Sec. 5. [624.7164]
EMERGENCY ISSUANCE OF EXTREME RISK PROTECTION ORDER.
(a) In determining whether to grant an
emergency extreme risk protection order, the court shall consider evidence of
all facts identified in section 624.7162, subdivision 2, paragraphs (b) and
(c).
(b) If the court finds there is
reasonable grounds that (1) the respondent poses a significant danger of bodily
harm to the respondent's self or to other persons by possessing a firearm, and
(2) the respondent presents an immediate and present danger of bodily harm, the
court shall issue an ex parte emergency order prohibiting the respondent from
possessing a firearm for the duration of the order. The order shall inform the respondent that
the respondent is prohibited from
possessing firearms and shall issue a transfer order under section 624.7165,
paragraph (c).
(c) A finding by the court that there
is a basis for issuing an emergency extreme risk protection order constitutes a
finding that sufficient reasons exist not to require notice under applicable
court rules governing applications for ex parte relief.
(d) The emergency order shall have a
fixed period of 14 days, unless a hearing is set under section 624.7162 on an
earlier date, in which case the order shall expire upon a judge's finding that
no order is issued under section 624.7162.
(e) Except as provided in paragraph
(f), the respondent shall be personally served immediately with a copy of the
emergency order and a copy of the petition and, if a hearing is requested by
the petitioner under section 624.7162, notice of the date set for the hearing. If the petitioner does not request a hearing
under section 624.7162, an order served on a respondent under this subdivision
must include a notice advising the respondent of the right to request a hearing
challenging the issuance of the emergency order, and must be accompanied by a
form that can be used by the respondent to request a hearing.
(f) Service of the emergency order may
be made by alternate service as provided under section 624.7162, subdivision 1,
paragraph (e), provided that the petitioner files the affidavit required under
that subdivision. If the petitioner does
not request a hearing under section 624.7162, the petition mailed to the
respondent's residence, if known, must be accompanied by the form for
requesting a hearing described in paragraph (e).
Sec. 6. [624.7165]
TRANSFER OF FIREARMS.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(b), upon issuance of an extreme risk protection order, the court shall direct
the respondent to transfer any firearms the person possesses as soon as
reasonably practicable, but in no case later than 24 hours, to a federally
licensed firearms dealer or a law enforcement agency. If the respondent elects to transfer the
respondent's firearms to a law enforcement agency, the agency must accept the
transfer. The transfer may be permanent
or temporary. A temporary firearm
transfer only entitles the receiving party to possess the firearm and does not
transfer ownership or title. If the
respondent makes a temporary transfer, a federally licensed firearms dealer or
law enforcement agency may charge the respondent a reasonable fee to store the
firearms and may establish policies for disposal of abandoned firearms, provided
these policies require that the respondent be notified prior to disposal of
abandoned firearms. If a respondent
permanently transfers the respondent's firearms to a law enforcement agency,
the agency is not required to compensate the respondent and may charge the
respondent a reasonable processing fee.
(b) A person directed to transfer any
firearms pursuant to paragraph (a) may transfer any antique firearm, as defined
in United States Code, title 18, section 921, paragraph (a), clause (16), as
amended, or a curio or relic as defined in Code of Federal Regulations, title
27, section 478.11, as amended, to a relative who does not live with the
respondent after confirming that the relative may lawfully own or possess a
firearm.
(c) The respondent must file proof of
transfer as provided in this paragraph.
(1)
A law enforcement agency or federally licensed firearms dealer accepting
transfer of a firearm pursuant to this section shall provide proof of transfer
to the respondent. The proof of transfer
must specify whether the firearms were permanently or temporarily transferred
and must include the name of the respondent, date of transfer, and the serial
number, manufacturer, and model of all transferred firearms. If transfer is made to a federally licensed
firearms dealer, the respondent shall, within two business days after being
served with the order, file a copy of proof of transfer with the law
enforcement agency, and attest that all firearms owned or possessed at the time
of the order have been transferred in accordance with this section and that the
person currently does not possess any firearms.
If the respondent claims not to own or possess firearms, the respondent
shall file a declaration of nonpossession with the law enforcement agency
attesting that, at the time of the order, the respondent neither owned nor
possessed any firearms, and that the respondent currently neither owns nor
possesses any firearms. If the transfer
is made to a relative pursuant to paragraph (b), the relative must sign an
affidavit under oath before a notary public either acknowledging that the
respondent permanently transferred the respondent's antique firearms, curios,
or relics to the relative or agreeing to temporarily store the respondent's
antique firearms, curios, or relics until such time as the respondent is
legally permitted to possess firearms. To
the extent possible, the affidavit shall indicate the serial number, make, and
model of all antique firearms, curios, or relics transferred by the respondent
to the relative.
(2) The court shall seal affidavits,
proofs of transfer, and declarations of nonpossession filed pursuant to this
paragraph.
(d) If a court issues an emergency
order under section 624.7164, or makes a finding of immediate and present
danger under section 624.7162, subdivision 2, paragraph (e), and there is
probable cause to believe the respondent possesses firearms, the court shall
issue a search warrant to the local law enforcement agency to take possession
of all firearms in the respondent's possession as soon as practicable. The local law enforcement agency shall, upon
written notice from the respondent, transfer the firearms to a federally
licensed firearms dealer. Before a local
law enforcement agency transfers a firearm under this paragraph, the agency
shall require the federally licensed firearms dealer receiving the firearm to
submit a proof of transfer that complies with the requirements for proofs of
transfer established in paragraph (c). The
agency shall file all proofs of transfer received by the court within two
business days of the transfer. A
federally licensed firearms dealer who accepts a firearm transfer pursuant to
this paragraph shall comply with paragraphs (a) and (c) as if accepting
transfer directly from the respondent. If
the law enforcement agency does not receive written notice from the respondent
within three business days, the agency may charge a reasonable fee to store the
respondent's firearms. A law enforcement
agency may establish policies for disposal of abandoned firearms, provided
these policies require that the respondent be notified prior to disposal of
abandoned firearms.
Sec. 7. [624.7166]
RETURN OF FIREARMS.
Subdivision 1. Law
enforcement. A local law
enforcement agency that accepted temporary transfer of firearms under section
624.7165 shall return the firearms to the respondent upon request after the
expiration of the order, provided the respondent is not otherwise prohibited
from possessing firearms under state or federal law.
Subd. 2. Firearms
dealer. A federally licensed
firearms dealer that accepted temporary transfer of firearms under section
624.7165 shall return the transferring firearms to the respondent upon request
after the expiration of the order, provided the respondent is not otherwise
prohibited from possessing firearms under state or federal law. A federally licensed firearms dealer
returning firearms shall comply with state and federal law as though
transferring a firearm from the dealer's own inventory.
Sec. 8. [624.7167]
OFFENSES.
Subdivision 1. False
information or harassment. A
person who petitions for an extreme risk protection order under section
624.7162 or 624.7164, knowing any information in the petition to be materially
false or with the intent to harass, abuse, or threaten, is guilty of a
misdemeanor.
Subd. 2. Violation
of order. A person who
possesses a firearm and knows or should have known that the person is
prohibited from doing so by an extreme risk protection order under section
624.7162 or 624.7164, or by an order of protection granted by a judge or
referee pursuant to a substantially similar law of another state, is guilty of
a misdemeanor and shall be prohibited from possessing firearms for a period of
five years. Each extreme risk protection
order granted under this chapter must contain a conspicuous notice to the
respondent regarding the penalty for violation of the order.
Sec. 9. [624.7168]
LIABILITY PROTECTION.
Subdivision 1. Liability
protection for petition. A
chief law enforcement officer, or a designee, or a city or county attorney,
who, in good faith, decides not to petition for an extreme risk protection
order or emergency extreme risk protection order shall be immune from criminal
or civil liability.
Subd. 2. Liability
protection for storage of firearms. A
law enforcement agency shall be immune from civil or criminal liability for any
damage or deterioration of firearms, ammunition, or weapons stored or
transported pursuant to section 624.7165.
This subdivision shall not apply if the damage or deterioration occurred
as a result of recklessness, gross negligence, or intentional misconduct by the
law enforcement agency.
Subd. 3. Liability
protection for harm following service of an order or execution of a search
warrant. A peace officer, law
enforcement agency, and the state or a political subdivision by which a peace
officer is employed has immunity from any liability, civil or criminal, for
harm caused by a person who is the subject of an extreme risk protection order,
a search warrant issued pursuant to section 624.7165, paragraph (d), or both
after service of the order or execution of the warrant, whichever comes first,
if the peace officer acts in good faith in serving the order or executing the
warrant.
Sec. 10. [626.8474]
EXTREME RISK PROTECTION ORDER; DEVELOPMENT OF MODEL PROCEDURES.
By December 1, 2021, the Peace Officer
Standards and Training Board, after consulting with the Minnesota County
Attorneys Association, the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association, the Minnesota
Chiefs of Police Association, and the Minnesota Police and Peace Officers
Association, shall develop model procedures and standards for the storage of
firearms transferred to law enforcement under section 624.7165.
Sec. 11. APPROPRIATIONS.
(a) $43,000 in fiscal year 2021 is
appropriated from the general fund to the supreme court for clerical staff related to extreme risk protection orders. The general fund base shall be $86,000 per
year beginning in fiscal year 2022.
(b) $188,000 in fiscal year 2021 is
appropriated from the general fund to the commissioner of public safety for
programming costs related to extreme risk protection orders. The general fund base to maintain ongoing
functionality shall be $38,000 per year beginning in fiscal year 2022.
(c) $100,000 in fiscal year 2021 is
appropriated from the general fund to the commissioner of public safety for
grants to local or state law enforcement agencies to support the safe and
secure storage of firearms. The general
fund base for this program shall be $100,000 in fiscal year 2022 and $0 in
fiscal year 2023.
Sec. 12. REVISOR
INSTRUCTION.
In the next edition of Minnesota
Statutes, the revisor of statutes shall renumber Minnesota Statutes 2018,
sections 624.7161 to 624.7168, and correct cross-references to those provisions
so as not to conflict with this act.
Sec. 13. EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Sections 1 to 9 and 12 are effective January 1, 2021, and apply to firearm permit background checks made on or after that date."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to public safety; enabling law enforcement and family members to petition a court to prohibit people from possessing firearms if they pose a significant danger to themselves or others by possessing a firearm; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, section 624.713, subdivision 1; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 624; 626."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill be placed on the General Register.
The
report was adopted.
Lesch from the Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Division to which was referred:
H. F. No. 1511, A bill for an act relating to housing; expanding eligibility for discretionary and mandatory expungements for eviction case court files; limiting public access to pending eviction case court actions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 484.014, subdivisions 2, 3; 504B.321, by adding a subdivision.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill be placed on the General Register.
The
report was adopted.
Lesch from the Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Division to which was referred:
H. F. No. 1521, A bill for an act relating to family law; requiring the court to provide certain notices; modifying requirements for parent education program; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 518.157, subdivisions 1, 3.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill be placed on the General Register.
The
report was adopted.
Lesch from the Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Division to which was referred:
H. F. No. 1821, A bill for an act relating to education; creating the Student Data Privacy Act; providing penalties; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 13.32, subdivision 1, by adding subdivisions.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 2, line 25, delete "2019-2020" and insert "2020-2021"
Page 3, line 27, after "any" insert "curriculum, testing, or assessment"
Page 3, line 29, after "each" insert "curriculum, testing, or assessment"
Page 3, line 30, after the second "the" insert "curriculum, testing, or assessment"
Page 4, line 2, after "a" insert "curriculum, testing, or assessment"
Page 4, line 9, delete "2019-2020" and insert "2020-2021"
Page 5, line 4, delete "2019-2020" and insert "2020-2021"
Page 5, line 17, delete "2019-2020" and insert "2020-2021"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill be re-referred to the Committee on Education Policy.
The
report was adopted.
Freiberg from the Committee on Government Operations to which was referred:
H. F. No. 2230, A bill for an act relating to cosmetology; modifying salon licensure requirements and continuing education requirements; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 155A.23, subdivision 9, by adding subdivisions; 155A.271; 155A.29, subdivision 1.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill be re-referred to the State Government Finance Division.
The
report was adopted.
Lesch from the Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Division to which was referred:
H. F. No. 2232, A bill for an act relating to government data practices; requiring public postsecondary institutions to keep certain student information private; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 13.32, subdivision 5.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 1, line 17, after "more" insert "for four years from the date of the request"
Page 1, line 19, after the period, insert "A student whose directory information has been requested must be allowed to review the documentation maintained by the institution regarding that request."
Page 1, after line 19, insert:
"Sec. 2. [135A.146]
STUDENT LOCATION DATA.
Subdivision 1. Definition. "Technology provider" means
a person who:
(1) contracts with a public or private
postsecondary educational institution to provide technological devices for
student use or to provide access to a software or online application; and
(2)
creates, receives, or maintains location data pursuant or incidental to a
contract with a public or private postsecondary educational institution.
Subd. 2. Consent. (a) A public or private postsecondary
educational institution must not collect data on a student's location without
the student consenting to having location data collected. A public or private postsecondary educational institution must not require a student's
consent to location data collection as a condition of:
(1) enrolling in the institution or any
program or class;
(2) receiving a scholarship or other
financial aid award; or
(3) entering into a dining contract,
housing contract, or any other agreement for the provision of a basic
university service, including connecting to campus Wi-Fi.
(b) A student who gives consent to
having location data collected may revoke that consent at any time.
Subd. 3. Notice. (a) Within 30 days of the start of
each school year, a public or private postsecondary educational institution
must give students notice, by United States mail, email, or other direct form
of communication, of any technology provider contract gathering a student's
location data. The notice must:
(1) be written in plain language;
(2) identify each technology provider
collecting location data;
(3) identify the location data gathered
by the technology provider contract;
(4) include information about the
consent required in subdivision 2, including the right to revoke consent; and
(5) include information about how to
access a copy of the contract in accordance with paragraph (b).
(b) A public or private postsecondary
educational institution must publish a complete copy of any contract with a
technology provider on the institution's website for the duration of the
contract.
Subd. 4. Location
data. (a) A technology
provider contracting with a public postsecondary institution is subject to the
provisions of section 13.05, subdivision 11.
An assignee or delegate that creates, receives, or maintains location
data is subject to the same restrictions and obligations under this section as
the technology provider.
(b) Location data created, received, or
maintained by a technology provider pursuant or incidental to a contract with a
public or private postsecondary educational institution are not the technology
provider's property.
(c) If location data maintained by the
technology provider are subject to a breach of the security of the data, as
defined in section 13.055, the technology provider must, following discovery of
the breach, disclose to the public postsecondary educational institution all
information necessary to fulfill the requirements of section 13.055.
(d) Within 30 days of the expiration of
the contract, unless renewal of the contract is reasonably anticipated, a
technology provider must destroy or return to the appropriate public or private
postsecondary educational institution all location data created, received, or
maintained pursuant or incidental to the contract.
(e)
A technology provider must not:
(1) sell, share, or disseminate
location data, except as provided by this section or as part of a valid
delegation or assignment of its contract with a public or private postsecondary
educational institution; or
(2) use location data for any
commercial purpose, including but not limited to marketing or advertising to a
student or parent.
Subd. 5. Procedures. (a) A technology provider must
establish written procedures to ensure appropriate security safeguards are in
place for location data. A technology
provider's written procedures must require that:
(1) only authorized employees or
contractors can access the location data;
(2) a person is authorized to access
location data only if access is necessary to fulfill official duties; and
(3) all actions in which location data
are entered, updated, accessed, shared, or disseminated are recorded in a log
of use that includes the identity of the person interacting with the data and
what action was performed. Information
recorded in the log of use must be retained for at least one year.
(b) A technology provider's written
procedures establishing security safeguards for location data are public data,
unless classified as not public under any other applicable law.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2020."
Amend the title as follows:
Page 1, line 3, after the semicolon, insert "requiring consent before collecting student location data;"
Correct the title numbers accordingly
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill be re-referred to the Higher Education Finance and Policy Division.
The
report was adopted.
Mariani from the Public Safety and Criminal Justice Reform Finance and Policy Division to which was referred:
H. F. No. 2586, A bill for an act relating to public safety; requiring certifying entities to timely process U-Visa certification documents; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 611A.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. [611A.95]
CERTIFICATIONS FOR VICTIMS OF CRIMES.
Subdivision 1. Definitions. For purposes of this section, the
following terms have the meanings given:
(1) "certifying entity" means
a state or local law enforcement agency;
(2)
"criminal activity" means qualifying criminal activity pursuant to
section 101(a)(15)(U)(iii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, and includes
the attempt, conspiracy, or solicitation to commit such crimes; and
(3) "certification" means any
certification or statement required by federal immigration law including but
not limited to the information required by United States Code, title 8, section
1184(p), and United States Code, title 8, section 1184(o), including current
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Form I-918, Supplement B,
and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Form I-914, Supplement
B, and any successor forms.
Subd. 2. Certification
process. (a) A certifying
entity shall process a certification requested by a victim of criminal activity
or a representative of the victim, including but not limited to the victim's
attorney, family member, or domestic violence or sexual assault violence
advocate, within the time period prescribed in paragraph (b).
(b) A certifying entity shall process
the certification within 90 days of request, unless the victim is in removal
proceedings, in which case the certification shall be processed within 14 days
of request. Requests for expedited
certification must be affirmatively raised at the time of the request.
(c) An active investigation, the filing
of charges, or a prosecution or conviction are not required for the victim of
criminal activity to request and obtain the certification.
Subd. 3. Certifying
entity; designate agent. (a)
The head of a certifying entity shall designate an agent to perform the
following responsibilities:
(1) timely process requests for
certification;
(2) provide outreach to victims of
criminal activity to inform them of the entity's certification process; and
(3) keep a written or electronic record
of all certification requests and responses.
(b) All certifying entities shall
implement a language access protocol for non-English-speaking victims of
criminal activity.
Subd. 4. Disclosure
prohibited; data classification. (a)
A certifying entity is prohibited from disclosing the immigration status of a
victim of criminal activity or representative requesting the certification,
except to comply with federal law or legal process, or if authorized by the
victim of criminal activity or representative requesting the certification.
(b) Data provided to a certifying entity
under this section is classified as private data pursuant to section 13.02,
subdivision 12.
EFFECTIVE DATE. Subdivisions 1, 2, and 4 are effective the day following final enactment. Subdivision 3 is effective July 1, 2020."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill be placed on the General Register.
The
report was adopted.
Freiberg from the Committee on Government Operations to which was referred:
H. F. No. 2725, A bill for an act relating to elections; providing for establishment of single-member school board election districts in Independent School District No. 279, Osseo.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 2, line 5, delete "December 31, 2019" and insert "August 10, 2020"
Page 2, line 7, delete "January 1" and insert "August 11"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill be re-referred to the Committee on Education Policy.
The
report was adopted.
Moran from the Committee on Health and Human Services Policy to which was referred:
H. F. No. 2898, A bill for an act relating to civil commitment; modifying provisions governing civil commitment; establishing engagement services pilot project; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 253B.02, subdivisions 4b, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12a, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, by adding subdivisions; 253B.03, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4a, 5, 6, 6b, 6d, 7, 10; 253B.04, subdivisions 1, 1a, 2; 253B.045, subdivisions 2, 3, 5, 6; 253B.06, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 253B.07, subdivisions 1, 2, 2b, 2d, 3, 4, 5, 7; 253B.08, subdivisions 1, 2a, 5, 5a; 253B.09, subdivisions 1, 2, 3a, 5; 253B.092; 253B.0921; 253B.095, subdivision 3; 253B.097, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 6; 253B.10; 253B.12, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 7; 253B.13, subdivision 1; 253B.14; 253B.141; 253B.15, subdivisions 1, 1a, 2, 3, 3a, 3b, 3c, 5, 7, 9, 10, by adding a subdivision; 253B.16; 253B.17; 253B.18, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4a, 4b, 4c, 5, 5a, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15; 253B.19, subdivision 2; 253B.20, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 6; 253B.21, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 253B.212, subdivisions 1, 1a, 1b, 2; 253B.22, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 253B.23, subdivisions 1, 1b, 2; 253B.24; 253D.02, subdivision 6; 253D.07, subdivision 2; 253D.10, subdivision 2; 253D.21; 253D.28, subdivision 2; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 253B; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 253B.02, subdivision 6; 253B.05, subdivisions 1, 2, 2b, 3, 4; 253B.064; 253B.065; 253B.066; 253B.09, subdivision 3; 253B.15, subdivision 11; 253B.20, subdivision 7.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 4b, is amended to read:
Subd. 4b. Community-based
treatment program. "Community-based
treatment program" means treatment and services provided at the
community level, including but not limited to community support services
programs defined in section 245.462, subdivision 6; day treatment services
defined in section 245.462, subdivision 8; outpatient services defined in
section 245.462, subdivision 21; mental health crisis services under section
245.462, subdivision 14c; outpatient services defined in section 245.462,
subdivision 21; assertive community treatment services under section 256B.0622;
adult rehabilitation mental health services under section 256B.0623; home and
community-based waivers, supportive housing, and residential treatment
services as defined in section 245.462, subdivision 23. Community-based treatment program excludes
services provided by a state-operated treatment program.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Examiner. "Examiner" means a person who
is knowledgeable, trained, and practicing in the diagnosis and assessment or in
the treatment of the alleged impairment, and who is: a licensed
physician, a mental health professional as defined in section 245.462,
subdivision 18, clauses (1) to (6), or a licensed physician assistant.
(1) a licensed physician;
(2) a licensed psychologist who has a
doctoral degree in psychology or who became a licensed consulting psychologist
before July 2, 1975; or
(3) an advanced practice registered
nurse certified in mental health or a licensed physician assistant, except that
only a physician or psychologist meeting these requirements may be appointed by
the court as described by sections 253B.07, subdivision 3; 253B.092,
subdivision 8, paragraph (b); 253B.17, subdivision 3; 253B.18, subdivision 2;
and 253B.19, subdivisions 1 and 2, and only a physician or psychologist may
conduct an assessment as described by Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure,
rule 20.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 7a. Court
examiner. "Court
examiner" means a person appointed to serve the court, and who is a
physician or licensed psychologist who has a doctoral degree in psychology.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Head
of the treatment facility or program. "Head of the treatment
facility or program" means the person who is charged with overall
responsibility for the professional program of care and treatment of the facility
or the person's designee treatment facility, state-operated treatment
program, or community-based treatment program.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. Health officer. "Health officer" means:
(1) a licensed physician;
(2) a licensed psychologist a
mental health professional as defined in section 245.462, subdivision 18,
clauses (1) to (6);
(3) a licensed social worker;
(4) (3) a registered nurse
working in an emergency room of a hospital;
(5) a psychiatric or public health
nurse as defined in section 145A.02, subdivision 18;
(6) (4) an advanced practice
registered nurse (APRN) as defined in section 148.171, subdivision 3; or
(7) (5) a mental health professional
practitioner as defined in section 245.462, subdivision 17, providing
mental health mobile crisis intervention services as described under section
256B.0624; or with the consultation and approval by a mental health
professional.
(8) a formally designated member of a
prepetition screening unit established by section 253B.07.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Interested person. "Interested person" means:
(1) an adult who has a specific
interest in the patient or proposed patient, including but not limited to,
a public official, including a local welfare agency acting under section
626.5561, and; a health care or mental health provider or the
provider's employee or agent; the legal guardian, spouse, parent, legal
counsel, adult child, or next of kin,; or other person
designated by a patient or proposed patient; or
(2) a health plan company that is providing coverage for a proposed patient.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 13, is amended to read:
Subd. 13. Person
who is mentally ill poses a risk of harm due to a mental illness. (a) A "person who is mentally ill
poses a risk of harm due to a mental illness" means any person who
has an organic disorder of the brain or a substantial psychiatric disorder of
thought, mood, perception, orientation, or memory which that
grossly impairs judgment, behavior, capacity to recognize reality, or to reason
or understand, which that is manifested by instances of grossly
disturbed behavior or faulty perceptions and who, due to this impairment,
poses a substantial likelihood of physical harm to self or others as
demonstrated by:
(1) a failure to obtain necessary food, clothing, shelter, or medical care as a result of the impairment;
(2) an inability for reasons other than indigence to obtain necessary food, clothing, shelter, or medical care as a result of the impairment and it is more probable than not that the person will suffer substantial harm, significant psychiatric deterioration or debilitation, or serious illness, unless appropriate treatment and services are provided;
(3) a recent attempt or threat to physically harm self or others; or
(4) recent and volitional conduct involving significant damage to substantial property.
(b) A person is not mentally ill does
not pose a risk of harm due to mental illness under this section if the person's
impairment is solely due to:
(1) epilepsy;
(2) developmental disability;
(3) brief periods of intoxication caused by alcohol, drugs, or other mind-altering substances; or
(4) dependence upon or addiction to any alcohol, drugs, or other mind-altering substances.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 16, is amended to read:
Subd. 16. Peace officer. "Peace officer" means a sheriff or deputy sheriff, or municipal or other local police officer, or a State Patrol officer when engaged in the authorized duties of office.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 17, is amended to read:
Subd. 17. Person
who is mentally ill has a mental illness and is dangerous
to the public. (a) A
"person who is mentally ill has a mental illness and is
dangerous to the public" is a person:
(1)
who is mentally ill has an organic disorder of the brain or a
substantial psychiatric disorder of thought, mood, perception, orientation, or
memory that grossly impairs judgment, behavior, capacity to recognize reality,
or to reason or understand, and is manifested by instances of grossly disturbed
behavior or faulty perceptions; and
(2) who as a result of that mental
illness impairment presents a clear danger to the safety of others
as demonstrated by the facts that (i) the person has engaged in an overt act
causing or attempting to cause serious physical harm to another and (ii) there
is a substantial likelihood that the person will engage in acts capable of
inflicting serious physical harm on another.
(b) A person committed as a sexual
psychopathic personality or sexually dangerous person as defined in
subdivisions 18a and 18b is subject to the provisions of this chapter that
apply to persons who are mentally ill and dangerous to the public.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 18, is amended to read:
Subd. 18. Regional
State-operated treatment center program. "Regional State-operated
treatment center program" means any state-operated
facility for persons who are mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or
chemically dependent under the direct administrative authority of the
commissioner means any state-operated program including community
behavioral health hospitals, crisis centers, residential facilities, outpatient
services, and other community-based services developed and operated by the
state and under the commissioner's control for a person who has a mental
illness, developmental disability, or chemical dependency.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 19, is amended to read:
Subd. 19. Treatment
facility. "Treatment
facility" means a non-state-operated hospital, community mental
health center, or other treatment provider residential treatment
provider, crisis residential withdrawal management center, or corporate foster
care home qualified to provide care and treatment for persons who are
mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or chemically dependent who have
a mental illness, developmental disability, or chemical dependency.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 21, is amended to read:
Subd. 21. Pass. "Pass" means any authorized
temporary, unsupervised absence from a state-operated treatment facility
program.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 22, is amended to read:
Subd. 22. Pass
plan. "Pass plan" means
the part of a treatment plan for a person patient who has been
committed as mentally ill and a person who has a mental illness and
is dangerous to the public that specifies the terms and conditions
under which the patient may be released on a pass.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 23, is amended to read:
Subd. 23. Pass-eligible
status. "Pass-eligible
status" means the status under which a person patient
committed as mentally ill and a person who has a mental illness and
is dangerous to the public may be released on passes after approval
of a pass plan by the head of a state-operated treatment facility
program.
Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 27. Psychotropic
medication. "Psychotropic
medication" means antipsychotic medication, mood stabilizing medication,
antidepressants, and anxiolytics.
Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.03, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Restraints.
(a) A patient has the right to be free from restraints. Restraints shall not be applied to a patient
in a treatment facility or state-operated treatment program unless the
head of the treatment facility, head of the state-operated treatment
program, a member of the medical staff, or a licensed peace officer who has
custody of the patient determines that they restraints are
necessary for the safety of the patient or others.
(b) Restraints shall not be applied to patients with
developmental disabilities except as permitted under section 245.825 and rules
of the commissioner of human services. Consent
must be obtained from the person patient or person's patient's
guardian except for emergency procedures as permitted under rules of the
commissioner adopted under section 245.825.
(c) Each use of a restraint and reason for it shall be made part of the clinical record of the patient under the signature of the head of the treatment facility.
Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.03, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Correspondence. A patient has the right to correspond
freely without censorship. The head of
the treatment facility or head of the state-operated treatment program
may restrict correspondence if the patient's medical welfare requires this
restriction. For patients a
patient in regional a state-operated treatment centers
program, that determination may be reviewed by the commissioner. Any limitation imposed on the exercise of a
patient's correspondence rights and the reason for it shall be made a part of
the clinical record of the patient. Any
communication which is not delivered to a patient shall be immediately returned
to the sender.
Sec. 18. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.03, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Visitors and phone calls. Subject to the general rules of the treatment facility or state-operated treatment program, a patient has the right to receive visitors and make phone calls. The head of the treatment facility or head of the state-operated treatment program may restrict visits and phone calls on determining that the medical welfare of the patient requires it. Any limitation imposed on the exercise of the patient's visitation and phone call rights and the reason for it shall be made a part of the clinical record of the patient.
Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.03, subdivision 4a, is amended to read:
Subd. 4a. Disclosure of patient's admission. Upon admission to a treatment facility or state-operated treatment program where federal law prohibits unauthorized disclosure of patient or resident identifying information to callers and visitors, the patient or resident, or the legal guardian of the patient or resident, shall be given the opportunity to authorize disclosure of the patient's or resident's presence in the facility to callers and visitors who may seek to communicate with the patient or resident. To the extent possible, the legal guardian of a patient or resident shall consider the opinions of the patient or resident regarding the disclosure of the patient's or resident's presence in the facility.
Sec. 20. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.03, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Periodic assessment. A patient has the right to periodic medical assessment, including assessment of the medical necessity of continuing care and, if the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program declines to provide continuing care, the right to receive specific written reasons why continuing care is declined at the time of the assessment. The treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program shall assess the physical and mental condition of every patient as frequently as necessary, but not less often than annually. If the patient refuses to be examined, the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program shall document in the
patient's
chart its attempts to examine the patient.
If a person patient is committed as developmentally
disabled for an indeterminate period of time, the three-year judicial review
must include the annual reviews for each year as outlined in Minnesota
Rules, part 9525.0075, subpart 6 regarding the patient's need for continued
commitment.
Sec. 21. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.03, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Consent for medical procedure. (a) A patient has the right to give prior consent to any medical or surgical treatment, other than treatment for chemical dependency or nonintrusive treatment for mental illness.
(b) The following procedures shall be used to obtain consent for any treatment necessary to preserve the life or health of any committed patient:
(a) (1) the written,
informed consent of a competent adult patient for the treatment is sufficient.;
(b) (2) if the patient is
subject to guardianship which includes the provision of medical care, the
written, informed consent of the guardian for the treatment is sufficient.;
(c) (3) if the head of the
treatment facility or state-operated treatment program determines that
the patient is not competent to consent to the treatment and the patient has
not been adjudicated incompetent, written, informed consent for the surgery or
medical treatment shall be obtained from the person appointed the power of
attorney, the patient's agent under the health care directive, or the
nearest proper relative. For this
purpose, the following persons are proper relatives, in the order listed: the patient's spouse, parent, adult child, or
adult sibling. If the nearest proper
relatives cannot be located, refuse to consent to the procedure, or are unable
to consent, the head of the treatment facility or state-operated treatment
program or an interested person may petition the committing court for
approval for the treatment or may petition a court of competent jurisdiction
for the appointment of a guardian. The
determination that the patient is not competent, and the reasons for the
determination, shall be documented in the patient's clinical record.;
(d) (4) consent to treatment
of any minor patient shall be secured in accordance with sections 144.341 to
144.346. A minor 16 years of age or
older may consent to hospitalization, routine diagnostic evaluation, and
emergency or short-term acute care.; and
(e) (5) in the case of an
emergency when the persons ordinarily qualified to give consent cannot be
located in sufficient time to address the emergency need, the head of
the treatment facility or state-operated treatment program may give
consent.
(c) No person who consents to treatment pursuant to the provisions of this subdivision shall be civilly or criminally liable for the performance or the manner of performing the treatment. No person shall be liable for performing treatment without consent if written, informed consent was given pursuant to this subdivision. This provision shall not affect any other liability which may result from the manner in which the treatment is performed.
Sec. 22. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.03, subdivision 6b, is amended to read:
Subd. 6b. Consent
for mental health treatment. A
competent person patient admitted voluntarily to a treatment
facility or state-operated treatment program may be subjected to
intrusive mental health treatment only with the person's patient's
written informed consent. For purposes
of this section, "intrusive mental health treatment" means electroshock
electroconvulsive therapy and neuroleptic psychotropic
medication and does not include treatment for a developmental disability. An incompetent person patient
who has prepared a directive under subdivision 6d regarding intrusive mental
health treatment with intrusive therapies must be treated in
accordance with this section, except in cases of emergencies.
Sec. 23. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.03, subdivision 6d, is amended to read:
Subd. 6d. Adult mental health treatment. (a) A competent adult patient may
make a declaration of preferences or instructions regarding intrusive mental
health treatment. These preferences or
instructions may include, but are not limited to, consent to or refusal of
these treatments. A declaration of
preferences or instructions may include a health care directive under chapter
145C or a psychiatric directive.
(b) A declaration may designate a proxy to make decisions about intrusive mental health treatment. A proxy designated to make decisions about intrusive mental health treatments and who agrees to serve as proxy may make decisions on behalf of a declarant consistent with any desires the declarant expresses in the declaration.
(c) A declaration is effective only if it is signed by the
declarant and two witnesses. The
witnesses must include a statement that they believe the declarant understands
the nature and significance of the declaration.
A declaration becomes operative when it is delivered to the declarant's
physician or other mental health treatment provider. The physician or provider must comply with it
the declaration to the fullest extent possible, consistent with
reasonable medical practice, the availability of treatments requested, and
applicable law. The physician or
provider shall continue to obtain the declarant's informed consent to all
intrusive mental health treatment decisions if the declarant is capable of
informed consent. A treatment provider may
must not require a person patient to make a declaration
under this subdivision as a condition of receiving services.
(d) The physician or other provider shall make the
declaration a part of the declarant's medical record. If the physician or other provider is
unwilling at any time to comply with the declaration, the physician or provider
must promptly notify the declarant and document the notification in the
declarant's medical record. If the
declarant has been committed as a patient under this chapter, the physician or
provider may subject a declarant to intrusive treatment in a manner contrary to
the declarant's expressed wishes, only upon order of the committing court. If the declarant is not a committed patient
under this chapter, The physician or provider may subject the declarant to
intrusive treatment in a manner contrary to the declarant's expressed wishes,
only if the declarant is committed as mentally ill a person who poses
a risk of harm due to mental illness or mentally ill as a person
who has a mental illness and is dangerous to the public and a court
order authorizing the treatment has been issued.
(e) A declaration under this subdivision may be revoked in whole or in part at any time and in any manner by the declarant if the declarant is competent at the time of revocation. A revocation is effective when a competent declarant communicates the revocation to the attending physician or other provider. The attending physician or other provider shall note the revocation as part of the declarant's medical record.
(f) A provider who administers intrusive mental health treatment according to and in good faith reliance upon the validity of a declaration under this subdivision is held harmless from any liability resulting from a subsequent finding of invalidity.
(g) In addition to making a declaration under this subdivision, a competent adult may delegate parental powers under section 524.5-211 or may nominate a guardian under sections 524.5-101 to 524.5-502.
Sec. 24. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.03, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Program Treatment plan. A person patient receiving
services under this chapter has the right to receive proper care and treatment,
best adapted, according to contemporary professional standards, to rendering
further supervision unnecessary. The
treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based
treatment program shall devise a written program treatment
plan for each person patient which describes in behavioral terms
the case problems, the precise goals, including the expected period of time for
treatment, and the specific measures to be employed. Each plan shall be reviewed at least
quarterly to determine progress toward the goals, and to modify the program
plan as necessary. The
development and review of treatment plans must be
conducted
as required under the license or certification of the treatment facility, state-operated
treatment program, or community-based treatment program. If there are no review requirements under the
license or certification, the treatment plan must be reviewed quarterly. The program treatment plan
shall be devised and reviewed with the designated agency and with the patient. The clinical record shall reflect the program
treatment plan review. If the
designated agency or the patient does not participate in the planning and
review, the clinical record shall include reasons for nonparticipation and the
plans for future involvement. The
commissioner shall monitor the program treatment plan and review
process for regional centers state-operated treatment programs to
insure ensure compliance with the provisions of this subdivision.
Sec. 25. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.03, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Notification. (a) All persons patients
admitted or committed to a treatment facility or state-operated treatment
program, or temporarily confined under section 253B.045, shall be notified
in writing of their rights regarding hospitalization and other treatment at
the time of admission.
(b) This notification must include:
(1) patient rights specified in this section and section 144.651, including nursing home discharge rights;
(2) the right to obtain treatment and services voluntarily under this chapter;
(3) the right to voluntary admission and release under section 253B.04;
(4) rights in case of an emergency
admission under section 253B.05 253B.051, including the right to
documentation in support of an emergency hold and the right to a summary
hearing before a judge if the patient believes an emergency hold is improper;
(5) the right to request expedited review under section 62M.05 if additional days of inpatient stay are denied;
(6) the right to continuing benefits pending appeal and to an expedited administrative hearing under section 256.045 if the patient is a recipient of medical assistance or MinnesotaCare; and
(7) the right to an external appeal process under section 62Q.73, including the right to a second opinion.
Sec. 26. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.04, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Voluntary
admission and treatment. (a)
Voluntary admission is preferred over involuntary commitment and treatment. Any person 16 years of age or older may
request to be admitted to a treatment facility or state-operated treatment
program as a voluntary patient for observation, evaluation, diagnosis, care
and treatment without making formal written application. Any person under the age of 16 years may be
admitted as a patient with the consent of a parent or legal guardian if it is
determined by independent examination that there is reasonable evidence that
(1) the proposed patient has a mental illness, or is developmentally
disabled developmental disability, or chemically dependent chemical
dependency; and (2) the proposed patient is suitable for treatment. The head of the treatment facility or head
of the state-operated treatment program shall not arbitrarily refuse any
person seeking admission as a voluntary patient. In making decisions regarding admissions, the
treatment facility or state-operated treatment program shall use
clinical admission criteria consistent with the current applicable inpatient
admission standards established by professional organizations including
the American Psychiatric Association or, the American Academy of
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, the Joint Commission, and the American
Society of Addiction Medicine. These
criteria must be no more restrictive than, and must be consistent with, the
requirements of section 62Q.53. The treatment
facility or head of the state-operated treatment program may not refuse
to admit a person voluntarily solely because the person does not meet the
criteria for involuntary holds under section 253B.05 253B.051 or
the definition of a person who poses a risk of harm due to mental
illness under section 253B.02, subdivision 13.
(b) In addition to the consent provisions of paragraph (a), a person who is 16 or 17 years of age who refuses to consent personally to admission may be admitted as a patient for mental illness or chemical dependency treatment with the consent of a parent or legal guardian if it is determined by an independent examination that there is reasonable evidence that the proposed patient is chemically dependent or has a mental illness and is suitable for treatment. The person conducting the examination shall notify the proposed patient and the parent or legal guardian of this determination.
(c) A person who is voluntarily participating in treatment for a mental illness is not subject to civil commitment under this chapter if the person:
(1) has given informed consent or, if lacking capacity, is a person for whom legally valid substitute consent has been given; and
(2) is participating in a medically
appropriate course of treatment, including clinically appropriate and lawful
use of neuroleptic psychotropic medication and electroconvulsive
therapy. The limitation on commitment in
this paragraph does not apply if, based on clinical assessment, the court finds
that it is unlikely that the person patient will remain in and
cooperate with a medically appropriate course of treatment absent commitment
and the standards for commitment are otherwise met. This paragraph does not apply to a person for
whom commitment proceedings are initiated pursuant to rule 20.01 or 20.02 of
the Rules of Criminal Procedure, or a person found by the court to meet the
requirements under section 253B.02, subdivision 17.
(d) Legally valid substitute consent may be provided by a proxy under a health care directive, a guardian or conservator with authority to consent to mental health treatment, or consent to admission under subdivision 1a or 1b.
Sec. 27. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.04, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:
Subd. 1a. Voluntary
treatment or admission for persons with a mental illness. (a) A person with a mental illness may
seek or voluntarily agree to accept treatment or admission to a state-operated
treatment program or treatment facility.
If the mental health provider determines that the person lacks the
capacity to give informed consent for the treatment or admission, and in the
absence of a health care power of attorney directive or power of
attorney that authorizes consent, the designated agency or its designee may
give informed consent for mental health treatment or admission to a treatment
facility or state-operated treatment program on behalf of the person.
(b) The designated agency shall apply the following criteria in determining the person's ability to give informed consent:
(1) whether the person demonstrates an awareness of the person's illness, and the reasons for treatment, its risks, benefits and alternatives, and the possible consequences of refusing treatment; and
(2) whether the person communicates verbally or nonverbally a clear choice concerning treatment that is a reasoned one, not based on delusion, even though it may not be in the person's best interests.
(c) The basis for the designated agency's decision that the person lacks the capacity to give informed consent for treatment or admission, and that the patient has voluntarily accepted treatment or admission, must be documented in writing.
(d) A mental health provider treatment
facility or state-operated treatment program that provides treatment in
reliance on the written consent given by the designated agency under this
subdivision or by a substitute decision maker appointed by the court is not
civilly or criminally liable for performing treatment without consent. This paragraph does not affect any other
liability that may result from the manner in which the treatment is performed.
(e)
A person patient who receives treatment or is admitted to a treatment
facility or state-operated treatment program under this subdivision or
subdivision 1b has the right to refuse treatment at any time or to be released
from a treatment facility or state-operated treatment program as
provided under subdivision 2. The person
patient or any interested person acting on the person's patient's
behalf may seek court review within five days for a determination of whether
the person's patient's agreement to accept treatment or admission
is voluntary. At the time a person
patient agrees to treatment or admission to a treatment facility or
state-operated treatment program under this subdivision, the designated
agency or its designee shall inform the person patient in writing
of the person's patient's rights under this paragraph.
(f) This subdivision does not authorize
the administration of neuroleptic psychotropic medications. Neuroleptic Psychotropic
medications may be administered only as provided in section 253B.092.
Sec. 28. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.04, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Release. Every patient admitted for mental illness or developmental disability under this section shall be informed in writing at the time of admission that the patient has a right to leave the treatment facility or state‑operated treatment program within 12 hours of making a request, unless held under another provision of this chapter. Every patient admitted for chemical dependency under this section shall be informed in writing at the time of admission that the patient has a right to leave the treatment facility or state-operated treatment program within 72 hours, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, of making a request, unless held under another provision of this chapter. The request shall be submitted in writing to the head of the treatment facility or state‑operated treatment program or the person's designee.
Sec. 29. [253B.041]
SERVICES FOR ENGAGEMENT IN TREATMENT.
Subdivision 1. Eligibility. (a) The purpose of engagement services
is to avoid the need for commitment and to enable the proposed patient to
voluntarily engage in needed treatment. An
interested person may apply to the county where a proposed patient resides to
request engagement services.
(b) To be eligible for engagement
services, the proposed patient must be at least 18 years of age, have a mental
illness, and either:
(1) be exhibiting symptoms of serious
mental illness including hallucinations, mania, delusional thoughts, or be
unable to obtain necessary food, clothing, shelter, medical care, or provide
necessary hygiene due to the patient's mental illness; or
(2) have a history of failing to adhere
to treatment for mental illness, in that:
(i) the proposed patient's mental illness
has been a substantial factor in necessitating hospitalization, or
incarceration in a state or local correctional facility, not including any
period during which the person was hospitalized or incarcerated immediately
preceding filing the application for engagement; or
(ii) the proposed patient is exhibiting
symptoms or behavior that may lead to hospitalization, incarceration, or
court-ordered treatment.
Subd. 2. Administration. (a) Upon receipt of a request for
engagement services, the county's prepetition screening team shall conduct an
investigation to determine whether the proposed patient is eligible. In making this determination, the screening
team shall seek any relevant information from an interested person.
(b) If the screening team determines
that the proposed patient is eligible, engagement services must begin and
include, but are not limited to:
(1)
assertive attempts to engage the patient in voluntary treatment for mental
illness for at least 90 days. Engagement
services must be person-centered and continue even if the patient is an inmate
in a non-state-operated correctional facility;
(2) efforts to engage the patient's
existing systems of support, including interested persons, unless the
engagement provider determines that involvement is not helpful to the patient. This includes education on restricting means
of harm, suicide prevention, and engagement; and
(3) collaboration with the patient to
meet immediate needs including access to housing, food, income, disability
verification, medications, and treatment for medical conditions.
(c) Engagement services regarding
potential treatment options must take into account the patient's preferences
for services and supports. The county
may offer engagement services through the designated agency or another agency
under contract. Engagement services
staff must have training in person-centered care. Engagement services staff may include but are
not limited to mobile crisis teams under section 245.462, certified peer
specialists under section 256B.0615, community-based treatment programs, and
homeless outreach workers.
(d) If the patient voluntarily consents
to receive mental health treatment, the engagement services staff must
facilitate the referral to an appropriate mental health treatment provider
including support obtaining health insurance if the proposed patient is
currently or may become uninsured. If
the proposed patient initially consents to treatment, but fails to initiate or
continue treatment, the engagement services team must continue outreach efforts
to the patient.
Subd. 3. Commitment. Engagement services for a patient to
seek treatment may be stopped if the proposed patient is in need of commitment
and satisfies the commitment criteria under section 253B.09, subdivision 1. In such a case, the engagement services team
must immediately notify the designated agency, initiate the prepetition
screening process under section 253B.07, or seek an emergency hold if necessary
to ensure the safety of the patient or others.
Subd. 4. Evaluation. Counties may, but are not required to,
provide engagement services. The
commissioner shall conduct a pilot project evaluating the impact of engagement
services in decreasing commitments, increasing engagement in treatment, and
other measures.
Sec. 30. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.045, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Facilities. (a) Each county or a group of counties
shall maintain or provide by contract a facility for confinement of persons
held temporarily for observation, evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, and care. When the temporary confinement is provided at
a regional state-operated treatment center program,
the commissioner shall charge the county of financial responsibility for the
costs of confinement of persons patients hospitalized under section
253B.05, subdivisions 1 and 2, sections 253B.051 and section
253B.07, subdivision 2b, except that the commissioner shall bill the
responsible health plan first. Any
charges not covered, including co-pays and deductibles shall be the
responsibility of the county. If the person
patient has health plan coverage, but the hospitalization does not meet
the criteria in subdivision 6 or section 62M.07, 62Q.53, or 62Q.535, the county
is responsible. When a person is temporarily confined in a
Department of Corrections facility solely under subdivision 1a,
and not based on any separate correctional authority:
(1) the commissioner of corrections may
charge the county of financial responsibility for the costs of confinement; and
(2) the Department of Human Services
shall use existing appropriations to fund all remaining nonconfinement costs. The funds received by the commissioner for
the confinement and nonconfinement costs are appropriated to the department for
these purposes.
(b)
For the purposes of this subdivision, "county of financial
responsibility" has the meaning specified in section 253B.02, subdivision
4c, or, if the person patient has no residence in this state, the
county which initiated the confinement. The
charge for confinement in a facility operated by the commissioner of human
services shall be based on the commissioner's determination of the cost of
care pursuant to section 246.50, subdivision 5.
When there is a dispute as to which county is the county of financial
responsibility, the county charged for the costs of confinement shall pay for
them pending final determination of the dispute over financial responsibility.
Sec. 31. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.045, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Cost
of care. Notwithstanding subdivision
2, a county shall be responsible for the cost of care as specified under
section 246.54 for persons a patient hospitalized at a regional
state-operated treatment center program in accordance with
section 253B.09 and the person's patient's legal status has been
changed to a court hold under section 253B.07, subdivision 2b, pending a
judicial determination regarding continued commitment pursuant to sections
253B.12 and 253B.13.
Sec. 32. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.045, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Health
plan company; definition. For
purposes of this section, "health plan company" has the meaning given
it in section 62Q.01, subdivision 4, and also includes a demonstration provider
as defined in section 256B.69, subdivision 2, paragraph (b),; and
a county or group of counties participating in county-based purchasing
according to section 256B.692, and a children's mental health collaborative
under contract to provide medical assistance for individuals enrolled in the
prepaid medical assistance and MinnesotaCare programs according to sections
245.493 to 245.495.
Sec. 33. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.045, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Coverage. (a) For purposes of this section, "mental health services" means all covered services that are intended to treat or ameliorate an emotional, behavioral, or psychiatric condition and that are covered by the policy, contract, or certificate of coverage of the enrollee's health plan company or by law.
(b) All health plan companies that provide
coverage for mental health services must cover or provide mental health
services ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction under a court order
that is issued on the basis of a behavioral care evaluation performed by a
licensed psychiatrist or a doctoral level licensed psychologist, which includes
a diagnosis and an individual treatment plan for care in the most appropriate,
least restrictive environment. The
health plan company must be given a copy of the court order and the behavioral
care evaluation. The health plan company
shall be financially liable for the evaluation if performed by a participating
provider of the health plan company and shall be financially liable for the
care included in the court-ordered individual treatment plan if the care is
covered by the health plan company and ordered to be provided by a
participating provider or another provider as required by rule or law. This court-ordered coverage must not be
subject to a separate medical necessity determination by a health plan company
under its utilization procedures.
Sec. 34. [253B.051]
EMERGENCY ADMISSION.
Subdivision 1. Peace
officer or health officer authority.
(a) If a peace officer or health officer has reason to believe,
either through direct observation of the person's behavior or upon reliable
information of the person's recent behavior and, if available, knowledge or
reliable information concerning the person's past behavior or treatment that
the person:
(1) has a mental illness or
developmental disability and is in danger of harming self or others if the
officer does not immediately detain the patient, the peace officer or health
officer may take the person into custody and transport the person to an
examiner or a treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program;
(2)
is chemically dependent or intoxicated in public and in danger of harming self
or others if the officer does not immediately detain the patient, the peace
officer or health officer may take the person into custody and transport the
person to a treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program; or
(3) is chemically dependent or
intoxicated in public and not in danger of harming self, others, or property,
the peace officer or health officer may take the person into custody and
transport the person to the person's home.
(b) An examiner's written statement or a
health officer's written statement in compliance with the requirements of
subdivision 2 is sufficient authority for a peace officer or health officer to
take the person into custody and transport the person to a treatment facility,
state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program.
(c) A peace officer or health officer
who takes a person into custody and transports the person to a treatment
facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment
program under this subdivision shall make written application for admission of
the person containing:
(1) the officer's statement specifying
the reasons and circumstances under which the person was taken into custody;
(2) identifying information on specific
individuals to the extent practicable, if danger to those individuals is a
basis for the emergency hold; and
(3) the officer's name, the agency that
employs the officer, and the telephone number or other contact information for
purposes of receiving notice under subdivision 3.
(d) A copy of the examiner's written
statement and officer's application shall be made available to the person taken
into custody.
(e) The officer may provide the
transportation personally or may arrange to have the person transported by a
suitable medical or mental health transportation provider. As far as practicable, a peace officer who
provides transportation for a person placed in a treatment facility,
state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program under
this subdivision must not be in uniform and must not use a vehicle visibly
marked as a law enforcement vehicle.
Subd. 2. Emergency hold. (a) A treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program, other than a facility operated by the Minnesota sex offender program, may admit or hold a patient, including a patient transported under subdivision 1, for emergency care and treatment if the head of the facility or program consents to holding the patient and an examiner provides a written statement in support of holding the patient.
(b) The written statement must indicate
that:
(1) the examiner examined the patient
not more than 15 days prior to admission;
(2) the examiner interviewed the
patient, or if not, the specific reasons why the examiner did not interview the
patient;
(3) the examiner has the opinion that
the patient has a mental illness or developmental disability, or is chemically
dependent and is in danger of causing harm to self or others if a facility or
program does not immediately detain the patient. The statement must include observations of
the patient's behavior and avoid conclusory language. The statement must be specific enough to
provide an adequate record for review. If
danger to specific individuals is a basis for the emergency hold, the statement
must identify those individuals to the extent practicable; and
(4)
the facility or program cannot obtain a court order in time to prevent the
anticipated injury.
(c) Prior to an examiner writing a
statement, if another person brought the patient to the treatment facility,
state‑operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program,
the examiner shall make a good-faith effort to obtain information from that
person, which the examiner must consider in deciding whether to place the patient
on an emergency hold. To the extent
available, the statement must include direct observations of the patient's
behaviors, reliable knowledge of the patient's recent and past behavior, and
information regarding the patient's psychiatric history, past treatment, and
current mental health providers. The
examiner shall also inquire about health care directives under chapter 145C and
advance psychiatric directives under section 253B.03, subdivision 6d.
(d) The facility or program must give a
copy of the examiner's written statement to the patient immediately upon
initiating the emergency hold. The
treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based
treatment program shall maintain a copy of the examiner's written statement. The program or facility must inform the
patient in writing of the right to (1) leave after 72 hours, (2) have a medical
examination within 48 hours, and (3) request a change to voluntary status. The facility or program shall assist the
patient in exercising the rights granted in this subdivision.
(e) The facility or program must not
allow the patient nor require the patient's consent to participate in a
clinical drug trial during an emergency admission or hold under this
subdivision. If a patient gives consent
to participate in a drug trial during a period of an emergency admission or
hold, it is void and unenforceable. This
paragraph does not prohibit a patient from continuing participation in a
clinical drug trial if the patient was participating in the clinical drug trial
at the time of the emergency admission or hold.
Subd. 3. Duration
of hold, release procedures, and change of status. (a) If a peace officer or health
officer transports a person to a treatment facility, state-operated treatment
program, or community-based treatment program under subdivision 1, an examiner
at the facility or program must examine the patient and make a determination
about the need for an emergency hold as soon as possible and within 12 hours of
the person's arrival. The peace officer
or health officer hold ends upon whichever occurs first: (1) initiation of an emergency hold on the
person under subdivision 2; (2) the person's voluntary admission; (3) the
examiner's decision not to admit the person; or (4) 12 hours after the person's
arrival.
(b) Under this section, the facility or
program may hold a patient up to 72 hours, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays, and
legal holidays, after the examiner signs the written statement for an emergency
hold of the patient. The facility or program
must release a patient when the emergency hold expires unless the facility or
program obtains a court order to hold the patient. The facility or program may not place the
patient on a consecutive emergency hold under this section.
(c) If the interested person files a
petition to civilly commit the patient, the court may issue a judicial hold
order pursuant to section 253B.07, subdivision 2b.
(d) During the 72-hour hold, a court
must not release a patient under this section unless the court received a
written petition for the patient's release and the court has held a summary
hearing regarding the patient's release.
(e) The written petition for the
patient's release must include the patient's name, the basis for the hold, the
location of the hold, and a statement explaining why the hold is improper. The petition must also include copies of any
written documentation under subdivision 1 or 2 that support the hold, unless
the facility or program holding the patient refuses to supply the documentation. Upon receipt of a petition, the court must
comply with the following:
(1)
the court must hold the hearing as soon as practicable and the court may
conduct the hearing by telephone conference call, interactive video conference,
or similar method by which the participants are able to simultaneously hear
each other;
(2) before deciding to release the
patient, the court shall make every reasonable effort to provide notice of the
proposed release and reasonable opportunity to be heard to:
(i) any specific individuals identified
in a statement under subdivision 1 or 2 or individuals identified in the record
who might be endangered if the person is not held;
(ii) the examiner whose written
statement was the basis for the hold under subdivision 2; and
(iii) the peace officer or health officer who applied for a hold under subdivision 1; and
(3) if the court decides to release the
patient, the court shall direct the patient's release and shall issue written
findings supporting the decision. The
facility or program must not delay the patient's release pending the written
order.
(f) Notwithstanding section 144.293,
subdivisions 2 and 4, if a treatment facility, state-operated treatment
program, or community-based treatment program releases or discharges a patient
during the 72-hour hold; the examiner refuses to admit the patient; or the
patient leaves without the consent of the treatment health care provider, the
head of the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program shall immediately notify the agency that
employs the peace officer or health officer who initiated the transport hold. This paragraph does not apply to the extent
that the notice would violate federal law governing the confidentiality of
alcohol and drug abuse patient records under Code of Federal Regulations, title
42, part 2.
(g) If a patient is intoxicated in
public and a facility or program holds the patient under this section for
detoxification, a treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program may release the patient without providing
notice under paragraph (f) as soon as the treatment facility, state-operated
treatment program, or community-based treating program determines that the
person is no longer in danger of causing harm to self or others. The facility or program must provide notice
to the peace officer or health officer who transported the person, or to the
appropriate law enforcement agency, if the officer or agency requests
notification.
(h) A treatment facility or
state-operated treatment program must change a patient's status to voluntary
status as provided in section 253B.04 upon the patient's request in writing if
the head of the facility or program consents to the change.
Sec. 35. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.06, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Persons
who are mentally ill or developmentally disabled with mental illness
or developmental disability. A
physician must examine every patient hospitalized as mentally ill or
developmentally disabled due to mental illness or developmental
disability pursuant to section 253B.04 or 253B.05 must be examined by a
physician 253B.051 as soon as possible but no more than 48 hours
following the patient's admission.
The physician shall must be knowledgeable and trained in the
diagnosis of diagnosing the alleged disability related to the
need for patient's mental illness or developmental disability, forming
the basis of the patient's admission as a person who is mentally ill or
developmentally disabled.
Sec. 36. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.06, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Chemically
dependent persons. Patients
hospitalized A treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program must examine a patient hospitalized as
chemically dependent pursuant to section 253B.04 or 253B.05 shall also be
examined 253B.051 within 48 hours of admission. At a
minimum,
the examination shall consist of a physical evaluation by facility staff
the facility or program must physically examine the patient according to
procedures established by a physician, and an evaluation by staff
examining the patient must be knowledgeable and trained in the diagnosis
of the alleged disability related to the need for forming the basis
of the patient's admission as a chemically dependent person.
Sec. 37. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.06, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Discharge.
At the end of a 48-hour period, any the facility or
program shall discharge a patient admitted pursuant to section 253B.05
shall be discharged 253B.051 if an examination has not been held or
if the examiner or evaluation staff person fails to notify the head of the treatment
facility or program in writing that in the examiner's or staff person's
opinion the patient is apparently in need of care, treatment, and
evaluation as a mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or chemically
dependent person who has a mental illness, developmental disability, or
chemical dependency.
Sec. 38. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.07, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Prepetition screening. (a) Prior to filing a petition for
commitment of or early intervention for a proposed patient, an
interested person shall apply to the designated agency in the county of
financial responsibility or the county where the proposed patient is present
for conduct of a preliminary investigation as provided in section 253B.23,
subdivision 1b, except when the proposed patient has been acquitted of a
crime under section 611.026 and the county attorney is required to file a
petition for commitment. The designated
agency shall appoint a screening team to conduct an investigation. The petitioner may not be a member of the
screening team. The investigation must
include:
(1) a personal an interview with the proposed
patient and other individuals who appear to have knowledge of the condition of
the proposed patient, if practicable.
In-person interviews with the proposed patient are preferred. If the proposed patient is not interviewed,
specific reasons must be documented;
(2) identification and investigation of specific alleged conduct which is the basis for application;
(3) identification, exploration, and listing of the specific reasons for rejecting or recommending alternatives to involuntary placement;
(4) in the case of a commitment based on mental illness, the
following information, if it is known or available, that may be
relevant to the administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medications, including the existence of a declaration under section 253B.03,
subdivision 6d, or a health care directive under chapter 145C or a guardian,
conservator, proxy, or agent with authority to make health care decisions for
the proposed patient; information regarding the capacity of the proposed
patient to make decisions regarding administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medication; and whether the proposed patient is likely to consent or refuse consent
to administration of the medication;
(5) seeking input from the proposed patient's health plan
company to provide the court with information about services the enrollee
needs and the least restrictive alternatives the patient's relevant
treatment history and current treatment providers; and
(6) in the case of a commitment based on mental illness, information listed in clause (4) for other purposes relevant to treatment.
(b) In conducting the investigation required by this subdivision, the screening team shall have access to all relevant medical records of proposed patients currently in treatment facilities, state-operated treatment programs, or community-based treatment programs. The interviewer shall inform the proposed patient that any information
provided by the proposed patient may be included in the prepetition screening report and may be considered in the commitment proceedings. Data collected pursuant to this clause shall be considered private data on individuals. The prepetition screening report is not admissible as evidence except by agreement of counsel or as permitted by this chapter or the rules of court and is not admissible in any court proceedings unrelated to the commitment proceedings.
(c) The prepetition screening team shall
provide a notice, written in easily understood language, to the proposed
patient, the petitioner, persons named in a declaration under chapter 145C or
section 253B.03, subdivision 6d, and, with the proposed patient's consent,
other interested parties. The team shall
ask the patient if the patient wants the notice read and shall read the notice
to the patient upon request. The notice
must contain information regarding the process, purpose, and legal effects of
civil commitment and early intervention.
The notice must inform the proposed patient that:
(1) if a petition is filed, the patient has certain rights, including the right to a court-appointed attorney, the right to request a second court examiner, the right to attend hearings, and the right to oppose the proceeding and to present and contest evidence; and
(2) if the proposed patient is committed to
a state regional treatment center or group home state-operated
treatment program, the patient may be billed for the cost of care and the
state has the right to make a claim against the patient's estate for this cost.
The ombudsman for mental health and developmental disabilities shall develop a form for the notice which includes the requirements of this paragraph.
(d) When the prepetition screening team recommends commitment, a written report shall be sent to the county attorney for the county in which the petition is to be filed. The statement of facts contained in the written report must meet the requirements of subdivision 2, paragraph (b).
(e) The prepetition screening team shall refuse to support a petition if the investigation does not disclose evidence sufficient to support commitment. Notice of the prepetition screening team's decision shall be provided to the prospective petitioner, any specific individuals identified in the examiner's statement, and to the proposed patient.
(f) If the interested person wishes to proceed with a petition contrary to the recommendation of the prepetition screening team, application may be made directly to the county attorney, who shall determine whether or not to proceed with the petition. Notice of the county attorney's determination shall be provided to the interested party.
(g) If the proposed patient has been acquitted of a crime under section 611.026, the county attorney shall apply to the designated county agency in the county in which the acquittal took place for a preliminary investigation unless substantially the same information relevant to the proposed patient's current mental condition, as could be obtained by a preliminary investigation, is part of the court record in the criminal proceeding or is contained in the report of a mental examination conducted in connection with the criminal proceeding. If a court petitions for commitment pursuant to the Rules of Criminal or Juvenile Procedure or a county attorney petitions pursuant to acquittal of a criminal charge under section 611.026, the prepetition investigation, if required by this section, shall be completed within seven days after the filing of the petition.
Sec. 39. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.07, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. The
petition. (a) Any interested person,
except a member of the prepetition screening team, may file a petition for
commitment in the district court of the county of financial responsibility or
the county where the proposed patient is present. If the head of the treatment facility,
state-operated treatment program, or community‑based treatment program
believes that commitment is required and no petition has been filed, the
head of the treatment facility that person shall petition for the
commitment of the person proposed patient.
(b) The petition shall set forth the name and address of the proposed patient, the name and address of the patient's nearest relatives, and the reasons for the petition. The petition must contain factual descriptions of the proposed patient's recent behavior, including a description of the behavior, where it occurred, and the time period over which it occurred. Each factual allegation must be supported by observations of witnesses named in the petition. Petitions shall be stated in behavioral terms and shall not contain judgmental or conclusory statements.
(c) The petition shall be accompanied by a
written statement by an examiner stating that the examiner has examined the
proposed patient within the 15 days preceding the filing of the petition and is
of the opinion that the proposed patient is suffering has a
designated disability and should be committed to a treatment facility, state‑operated
treatment program, or community-based treatment program. The statement shall include the reasons for
the opinion. In the case of a commitment
based on mental illness, the petition and the examiner's statement shall
include, to the extent this information is available, a statement and
opinion regarding the proposed patient's need for treatment with neuroleptic
psychotropic medication and the patient's capacity to make decisions
regarding the administration of neuroleptic psychotropic medications,
and the reasons for the opinion. If use
of neuroleptic psychotropic medications is recommended by the
treating physician medical practitioner or other qualified medical
provider, the petition for commitment must, if applicable, include or be accompanied
by a request for proceedings under section 253B.092. Failure to include the required information
regarding neuroleptic psychotropic medications in the examiner's
statement, or to include a request for an order regarding neuroleptic psychotropic
medications with the commitment petition, is not a basis for dismissing the
commitment petition. If a petitioner has
been unable to secure a statement from an examiner, the petition shall include
documentation that a reasonable effort has been made to secure the supporting
statement.
Sec. 40. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.07, subdivision 2a, is amended to read:
Subd. 2a. Petition originating from criminal proceedings. (a) If criminal charges are pending against a defendant, the court shall order simultaneous competency and civil commitment examinations in accordance with Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 20.04, when the following conditions are met:
(1) the prosecutor or defense counsel doubts the defendant's competency and a motion is made challenging competency, or the court on its initiative raises the issue under rule 20.01; and
(2) the prosecutor and defense counsel agree simultaneous examinations are appropriate.
No additional examination under subdivision 3 is required in a subsequent civil commitment proceeding unless a second examination is requested by defense counsel appointed following the filing of any petition for commitment.
(b) Only a court examiner may conduct
an assessment as described in Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rules
20.01, subdivision 4, and 20.02, subdivision 2.
(c) Where a county is ordered to
consider civil commitment following a determination of incompetency under
Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 20.01, the county in which the criminal
matter is pending is responsible to conduct prepetition screening and, if
statutory conditions for commitment are satisfied, to file the commitment
petition in that county. By agreement
between county attorneys, prepetition screening and filing the petition may be
handled in the county of financial responsibility or the county where the
proposed patient is present.
(b) (d) Following an
acquittal of a person of a criminal charge under section 611.026, the petition
shall be filed by the county attorney of the county in which the acquittal took
place and the petition shall be filed with the court in which the acquittal
took place, and that court shall be the committing court for purposes of this
chapter. When a petition is filed
pursuant to subdivision 2 with the court in which acquittal of a criminal
charge took place, the court shall assign the judge before whom the acquittal
took place to hear the commitment proceedings unless that judge is unavailable.
Sec. 41. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.07, subdivision 2b, is amended to read:
Subd. 2b. Apprehend
and hold orders. (a) The court may
order the treatment facility or state-operated treatment program to hold
the person in a treatment facility proposed patient or direct a
health officer, peace officer, or other person to take the proposed patient
into custody and transport the proposed patient to a treatment facility or
state-operated treatment program for observation, evaluation, diagnosis,
care, treatment, and, if necessary, confinement, when:
(1) there has been a particularized showing by the petitioner that serious physical harm to the proposed patient or others is likely unless the proposed patient is immediately apprehended;
(2) the proposed patient has not voluntarily appeared for the examination or the commitment hearing pursuant to the summons; or
(3) a person is held pursuant to section 253B.05
253B.051 and a request for a petition for commitment has been filed.
(b) The order of the court may be executed on
any day and at any time by the use of all necessary means including the
imposition of necessary restraint upon the proposed patient. Where possible, a peace officer taking the
proposed patient into custody pursuant to this subdivision shall not be in
uniform and shall not use a motor vehicle visibly marked as a police
law enforcement vehicle. Except
as provided in section 253D.10, subdivision 2, in the case of an individual on
a judicial hold due to a petition for civil commitment under chapter 253D,
assignment of custody during the hold is to the commissioner of human
services. The commissioner is
responsible for determining the appropriate placement within a secure treatment
facility under the authority of the commissioner.
(c) A proposed patient must not be allowed or required to consent to nor participate in a clinical drug trial while an order is in effect under this subdivision. A consent given while an order is in effect is void and unenforceable. This paragraph does not prohibit a patient from continuing participation in a clinical drug trial if the patient was participating in the clinical drug trial at the time the order was issued under this subdivision.
Sec. 42. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.07, subdivision 2d, is amended to read:
Subd. 2d. Change of venue. Either party may move to have the venue of the petition changed to the district court of the Minnesota county where the person currently lives, whether independently or pursuant to a placement. The county attorney of the proposed county of venue must be notified of the motion and provided the opportunity to respond before the court rules on the motion. The court shall grant the motion if it determines that the transfer is appropriate and is in the interests of justice. If the petition has been filed pursuant to the Rules of Criminal or Juvenile Procedure, venue may not be changed without the agreement of the county attorney of the proposed county of venue and the approval of the court in which the juvenile or criminal proceedings are pending.
Sec. 43. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.07, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Court-appointed
examiners. After a petition has been
filed, the court shall appoint an a court examiner. Prior to the hearing, the court shall inform
the proposed patient of the right to an independent second examination. At the proposed patient's request, the court
shall appoint a second court examiner of the patient's choosing to be
paid for by the county at a rate of compensation fixed by the court.
Sec. 44. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.07, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Prehearing examination; report. The examination shall be held at a treatment facility or other suitable place the court determines is not likely to harm the health of the proposed patient. The county attorney and the patient's attorney may be present during the examination. Either party may waive this right. Unless otherwise
agreed
by the parties, a court-appointed court examiner shall file the
report with the court not less than 48 hours prior to the commitment hearing. The court shall ensure that copies of the court
examiner's report are provided to the county attorney, the proposed patient,
and the patient's counsel.
Sec. 45. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.07, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Preliminary
hearing. (a) No proposed patient may
be held in a treatment facility or state-operated treatment program
under a judicial hold pursuant to subdivision 2b longer than 72 hours,
exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, unless the court holds a
preliminary hearing and determines that the standard is met to hold the person
proposed patient.
(b) The proposed patient, patient's counsel, the petitioner, the county attorney, and any other persons as the court directs shall be given at least 24 hours written notice of the preliminary hearing. The notice shall include the alleged grounds for confinement. The proposed patient shall be represented at the preliminary hearing by counsel. The court may admit reliable hearsay evidence, including written reports, for the purpose of the preliminary hearing.
(c) The court, on its motion or on the motion of any party, may exclude or excuse a proposed patient who is seriously disruptive or who is incapable of comprehending and participating in the proceedings. In such instances, the court shall, with specificity on the record, state the behavior of the proposed patient or other circumstances which justify proceeding in the absence of the proposed patient.
(d) The court may continue the judicial hold of the proposed patient if it finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that serious physical harm to the proposed patient or others is likely if the proposed patient is not immediately confined. If a proposed patient was acquitted of a crime against the person under section 611.026 immediately preceding the filing of the petition, the court may presume that serious physical harm to the patient or others is likely if the proposed patient is not immediately confined.
(e) Upon a showing that a person proposed
patient subject to a petition for commitment may need treatment with neuroleptic
psychotropic medications and that the person proposed patient
may lack capacity to make decisions regarding that treatment, the court may
appoint a substitute decision-maker as provided in section 253B.092,
subdivision 6. The substitute
decision-maker shall meet with the proposed patient and provider and make a
report to the court at the hearing under section 253B.08 regarding whether the
administration of neuroleptic psychotropic medications is
appropriate under the criteria of section 253B.092, subdivision 7. If the substitute decision-maker consents to
treatment with neuroleptic psychotropic medications and the
proposed patient does not refuse the medication, neuroleptic psychotropic
medication may be administered to the proposed patient. If the substitute decision-maker does not
consent or the proposed patient refuses, neuroleptic psychotropic
medication may not be administered without a court order, or in an emergency as
set forth in section 253B.092, subdivision 3.
Sec. 46. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.08, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Time for commitment hearing. (a) The hearing on the commitment petition shall be held within 14 days from the date of the filing of the petition, except that the hearing on a commitment petition pursuant to section 253D.07 shall be held within 90 days from the date of the filing of the petition. For good cause shown, the court may extend the time of hearing up to an additional 30 days. The proceeding shall be dismissed if the proposed patient has not had a hearing on a commitment petition within the allowed time.
(b) The proposed patient, or the head of the
treatment facility or state-operated treatment program in which the person
patient is held, may demand in writing at any time that the hearing be
held immediately. Unless the hearing is
held within five days of the date of the demand, exclusive of Saturdays,
Sundays, and legal holidays, the petition shall be automatically
dismissed if the patient is being held in a treatment facility or
state-operated treatment
program pursuant to court order. For good cause shown, the court may extend the time of hearing on the demand for an additional ten days. This paragraph does not apply to a commitment petition brought under section 253B.18 or chapter 253D.
Sec. 47. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.08, subdivision 2a, is amended to read:
Subd. 2a. Place of hearing. The hearing shall be conducted in a manner consistent with orderly procedure. The hearing shall be held at a courtroom meeting standards prescribed by local court rule which may be at a treatment facility or state-operated treatment program. The hearing may be conducted by interactive video conference under General Rules of Practice, rule 131, and Minnesota Rules of Civil Commitment, rule 14.
Sec. 48. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.08, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Absence
permitted. (a) The court may permit
the proposed patient to waive the right to attend the hearing if it determines
that the waiver is freely given. At the
time of the hearing, the proposed patient shall not be so under
the influence of drugs, medication, or other treatment so as to be hampered in
participating in the proceedings. When
the licensed physician or licensed psychologist attending the patient professional
responsible for the proposed patient's treatment is of the opinion that the
discontinuance of drugs, medication, or other treatment is not in
the best interest of the proposed patient, the court, at the time of the
hearing, shall be presented a record of all drugs, medication or other
treatment which the proposed patient has received during the 48 hours
immediately prior to the hearing.
(b) The court, on its own motion or on the motion of any party, may exclude or excuse a proposed patient who is seriously disruptive or who is incapable of comprehending and participating in the proceedings. In such instances, the court shall, with specificity on the record, state the behavior of the proposed patient or other circumstances justifying proceeding in the absence of the proposed patient.
Sec. 49. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.08, subdivision 5a, is amended to read:
Subd. 5a. Witnesses. The proposed patient or the patient's
counsel and the county attorney may present and cross-examine witnesses,
including court examiners, at the hearing. The court may in its discretion receive the
testimony of any other person. Opinions
of court-appointed court examiners may not be admitted into
evidence unless the court examiner is present to testify, except by
agreement of the parties.
Sec. 50. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.09, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Standard
of proof. (a) If the court finds by
clear and convincing evidence that the proposed patient is a person who is
mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or chemically dependent who
poses a risk of harm due to mental illness, or is a person who has a
developmental disability or chemical dependency, and after careful
consideration of reasonable alternative dispositions, including but not
limited to, dismissal of petition,; voluntary outpatient
care,; voluntary admission to a treatment facility, state-operated
treatment program, or community-based treatment program; appointment of a
guardian or conservator,; or release before commitment as
provided for in subdivision 4, it finds that there is no suitable alternative
to judicial commitment, the court shall commit the patient to the least
restrictive treatment program or alternative programs which can meet the
patient's treatment needs consistent with section 253B.03, subdivision 7.
(b) In deciding on the least restrictive
program, the court shall consider a range of treatment alternatives including,
but not limited to, community-based nonresidential treatment, community
residential treatment, partial hospitalization, acute care hospital, assertive
community treatment teams, and regional state-operated treatment
center
services programs. The court
shall also consider the proposed patient's treatment preferences and
willingness to participate voluntarily in the treatment ordered. The court may not commit a patient to a
facility or program that is not capable of meeting the patient's needs.
(c) If, after careful consideration of
reasonable alternative dispositions, the court finds no suitable alternative to
judicial commitment and the court finds that the least restrictive alternative
as determined in paragraph (a) is a treatment facility or community-based
treatment program that is less restrictive or more community based than a
state-operated treatment program, and there is a treatment facility or a
community-based treatment program willing to accept the civilly committed
patient, the court may commit the patient to both the treatment facility or
community-based treatment program and to the commissioner, in the event that
treatment in a state-operated treatment program becomes the least restrictive
alternative. If there is a change in the
patient's level of care, then:
(1) if the patient needs a higher level
of care requiring admission to a state-operated treatment program, custody of
the patient and authority and responsibility for the commitment may be
transferred for as long as the patient needs a higher level of care; and
(2) when the patient no longer needs
treatment in a state-operated treatment program, the program may provisionally
discharge the patient to an appropriate placement or release the patient to the
treatment facility or community-based treatment program if the program
continues to be willing and able to readmit the patient, in which case the
commitment, its authority, and responsibilities revert to the non-state-operated
treatment program. Both agencies
accepting commitment shall coordinate admission and discharge planning to
facilitate timely access to the other's services to meet the patient's needs
and shall coordinate treatment planning consistent with section 253B.03,
subdivision 7.
(c) (d) If the commitment
as mentally ill, chemically dependent, or developmentally disabled is to a
service facility provided by the commissioner of human services a person
is committed to a state-operated treatment program as a person who poses a risk
of harm due to mental illness or as a person who has a developmental disability
or chemical dependency, the court shall order the commitment to the
commissioner. The commissioner shall
designate the placement of the person to the court.
(d) (e) If the court finds a
proposed patient to be a person who is mentally ill poses a risk of
harm due to mental illness under section 253B.02, subdivision 13, paragraph
(a), clause (2) or (4), the court shall commit the patient to
a treatment facility or community-based treatment program that
meets the proposed patient's needs. For
purposes of this paragraph, a community-based program may include inpatient
mental health services at a community hospital.
Sec. 51. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.09, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Findings. (a) The court shall find the facts specifically, and separately state its conclusions of law. Where commitment is ordered, the findings of fact and conclusions of law shall specifically state the proposed patient's conduct which is a basis for determining that each of the requisites for commitment is met.
(b) If commitment is ordered, the findings shall also identify less restrictive alternatives considered and rejected by the court and the reasons for rejecting each alternative.
(c) If the proceedings are dismissed, the court may direct that the person be transported back to a suitable location including to the person's home.
Sec. 52. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.09, subdivision 3a, is amended to read:
Subd. 3a. Reporting
judicial commitments; private treatment program or facility. Notwithstanding section 253B.23,
subdivision 9, when a court commits a patient to a non-state-operated
treatment facility or program or facility other than a state-operated
program or facility, the court shall report the commitment to the
commissioner
through
the supreme court information system for purposes of providing commitment
information for firearm background checks under section 245.041. If the patient is committed to a
state-operated treatment program, the court shall send a copy of the commitment
order to the commissioner.
Sec. 53. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.09, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Initial
commitment period. The initial
commitment begins on the date that the court issues its order or warrant under
section 253B.10, subdivision 1. For persons
a person committed as mentally ill, developmentally disabled, a
person who poses a risk of harm due to mental illness, a developmental
disability, or chemically dependent chemical dependency, the
initial commitment shall not exceed six months.
Sec. 54. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.092, is amended to read:
253B.092
ADMINISTRATION OF NEUROLEPTIC PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION.
Subdivision 1. General. Neuroleptic Psychotropic
medications may be administered, only as provided in this section, to patients
subject to early intervention or civil commitment as mentally ill,
mentally ill and dangerous, a sexually dangerous person, or a person with a
sexual psychopathic personality under this chapter or chapter 253D. For purposes of this section,
"patient" includes a proposed patient who is the subject of a
petition for early intervention or commitment and a committed person as
defined in section 253D.02, subdivision 4.
Subd. 2. Administration
without judicial review. Neuroleptic
(a) Psychotropic medications may be administered without judicial review
in the following circumstances:
(1) the patient has the capacity to make an informed decision under subdivision 4;
(2) the patient does not have the present
capacity to consent to the administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medication, but prepared a power of attorney, a health care directive
under chapter 145C, or a declaration under section 253B.03, subdivision
6d, requesting treatment or authorizing an agent or proxy to request treatment,
and the agent or proxy has requested the treatment;
(3) the patient has been prescribed neuroleptic
psychotropic medication prior to admission to a treatment facility, but
lacks the present capacity to consent to the administration of that neuroleptic
psychotropic medication; continued administration of the medication is
in the patient's best interest; and the patient does not refuse administration
of the medication. In this situation,
the previously prescribed neuroleptic psychotropic medication may
be continued for up to 14 days while the treating physician medical
practitioner:
(i) is obtaining a substitute decision-maker appointed by the court under subdivision 6; or
(ii) is requesting a court order
authorizing administering psychotropic medication or an amendment to a
current court order authorizing administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medication;
(4) a substitute decision-maker appointed
by the court consents to the administration of the neuroleptic psychotropic
medication and the patient does not refuse administration of the medication; or
(5) the substitute decision-maker does not consent or the patient is refusing medication, and the patient is in an emergency situation.
(b) For the purposes of paragraph (a),
clause (3), if a person requests a substitute decision-maker or requests a
court order administering psychotropic medication within 14 days, the treating
medical practitioner may continue administering the medication to the patient
through the hearing date or until the court otherwise issues an order.
Subd. 3. Emergency
administration. A treating physician
medical practitioner may administer neuroleptic psychotropic
medication to a patient who does not have capacity to make a decision regarding
administration of the medication if the patient is in an emergency situation. Medication may be administered for so long as
the emergency continues to exist, up to 14 days, if the treating physician
medical practitioner determines that the medication is necessary to
prevent serious, immediate physical harm to the patient or to others. If a request for authorization to administer
medication is made to the court within the 14 days, the treating physician
medical practitioner may continue the medication through the date of the
first court hearing, if the emergency continues to exist. If the request for authorization to
administer medication is made to the court in conjunction with a petition for
commitment or early intervention and the court makes a determination at
the preliminary hearing under section 253B.07, subdivision 7, that there is
sufficient cause to continue the physician's medical practitioner's
order until the hearing under section 253B.08, the treating physician medical
practitioner may continue the medication until that hearing, if the
emergency continues to exist. The
treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment
program shall document the emergency in the patient's medical record in
specific behavioral terms.
Subd. 4. Patients
with capacity to make informed decision.
A patient who has the capacity to make an informed decision
regarding the administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medication may consent or refuse consent to administration of the medication. The informed consent of a patient must be in
writing.
Subd. 5. Determination
of capacity. (a) There is a
rebuttable presumption that a patient is presumed to have has the
capacity to make decisions regarding administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medication.
(b) In determining A person's
patient has the capacity to make decisions regarding the administration
of neuroleptic psychotropic medication, the court shall
consider if the patient:
(1) whether the person demonstrates
has an awareness of the nature of the person's patient's
situation, including the reasons for hospitalization, and the possible
consequences of refusing treatment with neuroleptic psychotropic
medications;
(2) whether the person demonstrates
has an understanding of treatment with neuroleptic psychotropic
medications and the risks, benefits, and alternatives; and
(3) whether the person communicates
verbally or nonverbally a clear choice regarding treatment with neuroleptic
psychotropic medications that is a reasoned one not based on delusion
a symptom of the patient's mental illness, even though it may not be in
the person's patient's best interests.
(c) Disagreement with the physician's
medical practitioner's recommendation alone is not evidence of an
unreasonable decision.
Subd. 6. Patients
without capacity to make informed decision; substitute decision-maker. (a) Upon request of any person, and upon
a showing that administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medications may be recommended and that the person patient may
lack capacity to make decisions regarding the administration of neuroleptic
psychotropic medication, the court shall appoint a substitute
decision-maker with authority to consent to the administration of neuroleptic
psychotropic medication as provided in this section. A hearing is not required for an appointment
under this paragraph. The substitute
decision-maker must be an individual or a community or institutional
multidisciplinary panel designated by the local mental health authority. In appointing a substitute decision-maker,
the court shall give preference to a guardian or conservator, proxy, or
health care agent with authority to make health care decisions for the patient. The court may provide for the payment of a
reasonable fee to the substitute decision-maker for services under this section
or may appoint a volunteer.
(b)
If the person's treating physician patient's treating medical
practitioner recommends treatment with neuroleptic psychotropic
medication, the substitute decision-maker may give or withhold consent to the
administration of the medication, based on the standards under subdivision 7. If the substitute decision-maker gives
informed consent to the treatment and the person patient does not
refuse, the substitute decision-maker shall provide written consent to the
treating physician medical practitioner and the medication may be
administered. The substitute
decision-maker shall also notify the court that consent has been given. If the substitute decision-maker refuses or
withdraws consent or the person patient refuses the medication, neuroleptic
psychotropic medication may must not be administered to
the person without patient except with a court order or in an
emergency.
(c) A substitute decision-maker appointed under this section has access to the relevant sections of the patient's health records on the past or present administration of medication. The designated agency or a person involved in the patient's physical or mental health care may disclose information to the substitute decision-maker for the sole purpose of performing the responsibilities under this section. The substitute decision-maker may not disclose health records obtained under this paragraph except to the extent necessary to carry out the duties under this section.
(d) At a hearing under section 253B.08, the
petitioner has the burden of proving incapacity by a preponderance of the
evidence. If a substitute decision-maker
has been appointed by the court, the court shall make findings regarding the
patient's capacity to make decisions regarding the administration of neuroleptic
psychotropic medications and affirm or reverse its appointment of a
substitute decision-maker. If the court
affirms the appointment of the substitute decision-maker, and if the substitute
decision-maker has consented to the administration of the medication and the
patient has not refused, the court shall make findings that the substitute
decision-maker has consented and the treatment is authorized. If a substitute decision-maker has not yet
been appointed, upon request the court shall make findings regarding the
patient's capacity and appoint a substitute decision-maker if appropriate.
(e) If an order for civil commitment or
early intervention did not provide for the appointment of a substitute
decision-maker or for the administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medication, the a treatment facility, state‑operated
treatment program, or community-based treatment program may later request
the appointment of a substitute decision-maker upon a showing that
administration of neuroleptic psychotropic medications is
recommended and that the person patient lacks capacity to make
decisions regarding the administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medications. A hearing is not required
in order to administer the neuroleptic psychotropic medication
unless requested under subdivision 10 or if the substitute decision-maker
withholds or refuses consent or the person patient refuses the
medication.
(f) The substitute decision-maker's authority to consent to treatment lasts for the duration of the court's order of appointment or until modified by the court.
If the substitute decision-maker
withdraws consent or the patient refuses consent, neuroleptic medication may
not be administered without a court order.
(g) If there is no hearing after the preliminary hearing, then the court shall, upon the request of any interested party, review the reasonableness of the substitute decision-maker's decision based on the standards under subdivision 7. The court shall enter an order upholding or reversing the decision within seven days.
Subd. 7. When person
patient lacks capacity to make decisions about medication. (a) When a person patient
lacks capacity to make decisions regarding the administration of neuroleptic
psychotropic medication, the substitute decision-maker or the court
shall use the standards in this subdivision in making a decision regarding
administration of the medication.
(b) If the person patient
clearly stated what the person patient would choose to do in this
situation when the person patient had the capacity to make a
reasoned decision, the person's patient's wishes must be followed. Evidence of the person's patient's
wishes may include written instruments, including a durable power of attorney
for health care under chapter 145C or a declaration under section 253B.03,
subdivision 6d.
(c)
If evidence of the person's patient's wishes regarding the
administration of neuroleptic psychotropic medications is
conflicting or lacking, the decision must be based on what a reasonable person
would do, taking into consideration:
(1) the person's patient's
family, community, moral, religious, and social values;
(2) the medical risks, benefits, and alternatives to the proposed treatment;
(3) past efficacy and any extenuating
circumstances of past use of neuroleptic psychotropic
medications; and
(4) any other relevant factors.
Subd. 8. Procedure
when patient refuses psychotropic medication. (a) If the substitute decision-maker or
the patient refuses to consent to treatment with neuroleptic psychotropic
medications, and absent an emergency as set forth in subdivision 3, neuroleptic
psychotropic medications may not be administered without a court order. Upon receiving a written request for a
hearing, the court shall schedule the hearing within 14 days of the request. The matter may be heard as part of any other
district court proceeding under this chapter.
By agreement of the parties or for good cause shown, the court may
extend the time of hearing an additional 30 days.
(b) The patient must be examined by a
court examiner prior to the hearing. If
the patient refuses to participate in an examination, the court examiner
may rely on the patient's medical records to reach an opinion as to the
appropriateness of neuroleptic psychotropic medication. The patient is entitled to counsel and a
second court examiner, if requested by the patient or patient's counsel.
(c) The court may base its decision on
relevant and admissible evidence, including the testimony of a treating physician
medical practitioner or other qualified physician, a member of the
patient's treatment team, a court‑appointed court examiner,
witness testimony, or the patient's medical records.
(d) If the court finds that the patient
has the capacity to decide whether to take neuroleptic psychotropic
medication or that the patient lacks capacity to decide and the standards for
making a decision to administer the medications under subdivision 7 are not
met, the treating treatment facility, state-operated treatment
program, or community-based treatment program may not administer medication
without the patient's informed written consent or without the declaration of an
emergency, or until further review by the court.
(e) If the court finds that the patient
lacks capacity to decide whether to take neuroleptic psychotropic
medication and has applied the standards set forth in subdivision 7, the court
may authorize the treating treatment facility, state‑operated
treatment program, or community-based treatment program and any other community
or treatment facility or program to which the patient may be
transferred or provisionally discharged, to involuntarily administer the
medication to the patient. A copy of the
order must be given to the patient, the patient's attorney, the county
attorney, and the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program. The
treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based
treatment program may not begin administration of the neuroleptic psychotropic
medication until it notifies the patient of the court's order authorizing the
treatment.
(f) A finding of lack of capacity under this section must not be construed to determine the patient's competence for any other purpose.
(g) The court may authorize the
administration of neuroleptic psychotropic medication until the
termination of a determinate commitment.
If the patient is committed for an indeterminate period, the court may
authorize treatment of neuroleptic with psychotropic medication
for not more than two years, subject to the patient's right to petition the
court for review of the order. The treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program must submit annual reports to the court, which shall provide copies to the patient and the respective attorneys.
(h) The court may limit the maximum dosage
of neuroleptic psychotropic medication that may be administered.
(i) If physical force is required to
administer the neuroleptic medication, the facility or program may
only use injectable medications. If
physical force is needed to administer the medication, medication
may only take place be administered in a treatment facility or
therapeutic setting where the person's condition can be reassessed and appropriate
medical staff personnel qualified to administer medication are
available, including in the community, a county jail, or a correctional
facility. The facility or program may
not use a nasogastric tube to administer psychotropic medication involuntarily.
Subd. 9. Immunity. A substitute decision-maker who consents to treatment is not civilly or criminally liable for the performance of or the manner of performing the treatment. A person is not liable for performing treatment without consent if the substitute decision-maker has given written consent. This provision does not affect any other liability that may result from the manner in which the treatment is performed.
Subd. 10. Review. A patient or other person may petition
the court under section 253B.17 for review of any determination under this
section or for a decision regarding the administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medications, appointment of a substitute decision-maker, or the patient's
capacity to make decisions regarding administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medications.
Sec. 55. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.0921, is amended to read:
253B.0921
ACCESS TO MEDICAL RECORDS.
A treating physician medical
practitioner who makes medical decisions regarding the prescription and
administration of medication for treatment of a mental illness has access to
the relevant sections of a patient's health records on past administration of
medication at any treatment facility, program, or treatment provider,
if the patient lacks the capacity to authorize the release of records. Upon request of a treating physician medical
practitioner under this section, a treatment facility, program,
or treatment provider shall supply complete information relating to the
past records on administration of medication of a patient subject to this
chapter. A patient who has the capacity
to authorize the release of data retains the right to make decisions regarding
access to medical records as provided by sections 144.291 to 144.298.
Sec. 56. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.095, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Duration. The maximum duration of a stayed order
under this section is six months. The
court may continue the order for a maximum of an additional 12 months if, after
notice and hearing, under sections 253B.08 and 253B.09 the court finds that (1)
the person continues to be mentally ill, chemically dependent, or
developmentally disabled, have a mental illness, developmental
disability, or chemical dependency, and (2) an order is needed to
protect the patient or others because the person is likely to attempt to
physically harm self or others or fail to obtain necessary food, clothing,
shelter, or medical care unless the person is under the supervision of a stayed
commitment.
Sec. 57. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.097, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Findings. In addition to the findings required under section 253B.09, subdivision 2, an order committing a person to a community-based treatment program must include:
(1) a written plan for services to the patient;
(2) a finding that the proposed treatment is available and accessible to the patient and that public or private financial resources are available to pay for the proposed treatment;
(3) conditions the patient must meet in order to obtain an early release from commitment or to avoid a hearing for further commitment; and
(4) consequences of the patient's failure to follow the commitment order. Consequences may include commitment to another setting for treatment.
Sec. 58. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.097, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Case manager. When a court commits a patient with mental illness to a community-based treatment program, the court shall appoint a case manager from the county agency or other entity under contract with the county agency to provide case management services.
Sec. 59. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.097, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Reports. The case manager shall report to the court at least once every 90 days. The case manager shall immediately report to the court a substantial failure of the patient or provider to comply with the conditions of the commitment.
Sec. 60. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.097, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Immunity
from liability. No treatment
facility, community-based treatment program, or person is financially
liable, personally or otherwise, for the patient's actions of the
patient if the facility or person follows accepted community standards of
professional practice in the management, supervision, and treatment of the
patient. For purposes of this
subdivision, "person" means official, staff, employee of the treatment
facility, community-based treatment program, physician, or other
individual who is responsible for the a patient's management,
supervision, or treatment of a patient's community-based treatment under
this section.
Sec. 61. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.10, is amended to read:
253B.10
PROCEDURES UPON COMMITMENT.
Subdivision 1. Administrative requirements. (a) When a person is committed, the court shall issue a warrant or an order committing the patient to the custody of the head of the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program. The warrant or order shall state that the patient meets the statutory criteria for civil commitment.
(b) The commissioner shall prioritize patients being admitted from jail or a correctional institution who are:
(1) ordered confined in a state
hospital state-operated treatment program for an examination under
Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rules 20.01, subdivision 4, paragraph
(a), and 20.02, subdivision 2;
(2) under civil commitment for competency treatment and continuing supervision under Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 20.01, subdivision 7;
(3) found not guilty by reason of mental
illness under Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 20.02, subdivision 8,
and under civil commitment or are ordered to be detained in a state hospital
or other facility state‑operated treatment program pending
completion of the civil commitment proceedings; or
(4) committed under this chapter to the commissioner after dismissal of the patient's criminal charges.
Patients
described in this paragraph must be admitted to a service operated by the
commissioner state-operated treatment program within 48 hours. The commitment must be ordered by the court
as provided in section 253B.09, subdivision 1, paragraph (c) (d).
(c) Upon the arrival of a patient at the designated
treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based
treatment program, the head of the facility or program shall retain
the duplicate of the warrant and endorse receipt upon the original warrant or
acknowledge receipt of the order. The
endorsed receipt or acknowledgment must be filed in the court of commitment. After arrival, the patient shall be under the
control and custody of the head of the treatment facility or program.
(d) Copies of the petition for commitment, the court's
findings of fact and conclusions of law, the court order committing the
patient, the report of the court examiners, and the prepetition report,
and any medical and behavioral information available shall be provided at the
time of admission of a patient to the designated treatment facility or
program to which the patient is committed.
This information shall also be provided by the head of the treatment
facility to treatment facility staff in a consistent and timely manner and
pursuant to all applicable laws.
Subd. 2. Transportation. (a) When a patient is about to be
placed in a treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program, the court may order the designated
agency, the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program, or any responsible adult to transport
the patient to the treatment facility.
A protected transport provider may transport the patient according to
section 256B.0625, subdivision 17.
Whenever possible, a peace officer who provides the transportation shall
not be in uniform and shall not use a vehicle visibly marked as a police
law enforcement vehicle. The
proposed patient may be accompanied by one or more interested persons.
(b) When a patient who is at a regional state-operated
treatment center program requests a hearing for adjudication of a
patient's status pursuant to section 253B.17, the commissioner shall provide
transportation.
Subd. 3. Notice of admission. Whenever a committed person has been
admitted to a treatment facility, state‑operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program under the provisions of section 253B.09
or 253B.18, the head of the treatment facility or program shall
immediately notify the patient's spouse, health care agent, or parent and the
county of financial responsibility if the county may be liable for a portion of
the cost of treatment. If the committed
person was admitted upon the petition of a spouse, health care agent, or parent,
the head of the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program shall notify an interested person other
than the petitioner.
Subd. 3a.
Interim custody and treatment
of committed person. When the
patient is present in a treatment facility or state-operated treatment program
at the time of the court's commitment order, unless the court orders otherwise,
the commitment order constitutes authority for that facility or program to confine
and provide treatment to the patient until the patient is transferred to the
facility or program to which the patient has been committed.
Subd. 4. Private treatment. Patients or other responsible persons are
required to pay the necessary charges for patients committed or transferred to private
treatment facilities or community-based treatment programs. Private Treatment facilities or
community-based treatment programs may not refuse to accept a committed
person solely based on the person's court-ordered status. Insurers must provide treatment and services
as ordered by the court under section 253B.045, subdivision 6, or as required
under chapter 62M.
Subd. 5. Transfer to voluntary status. At any time prior to the expiration of
the initial commitment period, a patient who has not been committed as mentally
ill a person who has a mental illness and is dangerous to the
public or as a sexually dangerous person or as a sexual
psychopathic personality may be transferred to voluntary status
upon the patient's application in writing with the consent of the head of the facility or program to which the person is committed. Upon transfer, the head of the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program shall immediately notify the court in writing and the court shall terminate the proceedings.
Sec. 62. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.12, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Reports. (a) If a patient who was committed as a
person who is mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or chemically
dependent who poses a risk of harm due to a mental illness, or as a
person who has a developmental disability or chemical dependency, is
discharged from commitment within the first 60 days after the date of the
initial commitment order, the head of the treatment facility, state-operated
treatment program, or community-based treatment program shall file a
written report with the committing court describing the patient's need for
further treatment. A copy of the report
must be provided to the county attorney, the patient, and the patient's
counsel.
(b) If a patient who was committed as a
person who is mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or chemically dependent
who poses a risk of harm due to a mental illness, or as a person who has a
developmental disability or chemical dependency, remains in treatment more
than 60 days after the date of the commitment, then at least 60 days, but
not more than 90 days, after the date of the order, the head of the facility or
program that has custody of the patient shall file a written report with
the committing court and provide a copy to the county attorney, the patient,
and the patient's counsel. The report
must set forth in detailed narrative form at least the following:
(1) the diagnosis of the patient with the supporting data;
(2) the anticipated discharge date;
(3) an individualized treatment plan;
(4) a detailed description of the discharge planning process with suggested after care plan;
(5) whether the patient is in need of
further care and treatment, the treatment facility which,
state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program that
is needed, and evidence to support the response;
(6) whether the patient satisfies the
statutory requirement for continued commitment to a treatment facility, with
documentation to support the opinion; and
(7) a statement from the patient related
to accepting treatment, if possible; and
(7) (8) whether the
administration of neuroleptic psychotropic medication is
clinically indicated, whether the patient is able to give informed consent to
that medication, and the basis for these opinions.
(c) Prior to the termination of the initial
commitment order or final discharge of the patient, the head of the treatment
facility or program that has custody or care of the patient shall file a
written report with the committing court with a copy to the county attorney,
the patient, and the patient's counsel that sets forth the information required
in paragraph (b).
(d) If the patient has been provisionally
discharged from a treatment facility or program, the report shall
be filed by the designated agency, which may submit the discharge report as
part of its report.
(e) If no written report is filed within
the required time, or If a report describes the patient as not in need of
further institutional care and court-ordered treatment, the
proceedings must be terminated by the committing court and the patient
discharged from the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program, unless the patient chooses to voluntarily
receive services.
(f)
If no written report is filed within the required time, the court must notify
the county, facility or program to which the person is committed, and
designated agency and require a report be filed within five business days. If a report is not filed within five business
days a hearing must be held within three business days.
Sec. 63. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.12, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Examination. Prior to the review hearing, the court
shall inform the patient of the right to an independent examination by an
a court examiner chosen by the patient and appointed in accordance with
provisions of section 253B.07, subdivision 3.
The report of the court examiner may be submitted at the hearing.
Sec. 64. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.12, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Hearing;
standard of proof. (a) The
committing court shall not make a final determination of the need to continue
commitment unless the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that (1) the
person patient continues to be mentally ill, developmentally
disabled, or chemically dependent have a mental illness, developmental
disability, or chemical dependency; (2) involuntary commitment is necessary
for the protection of the patient or others; and (3) there is no alternative to
involuntary commitment.
(b) In determining whether a person
patient continues to be mentally ill, chemically dependent, or
developmentally disabled, require commitment due to mental illness,
developmental disability, or chemical dependency, the court need not find
that there has been a recent attempt or threat to physically harm self or
others, or a recent failure to provide necessary personal food,
clothing, shelter, or medical care. Instead,
the court must find that the patient is likely to attempt to physically harm
self or others, or to fail to provide obtain necessary personal
food, clothing, shelter, or medical care unless involuntary commitment is
continued.
Sec. 65. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.12, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Record
required. Where continued commitment
is ordered, the findings of fact and conclusions of law shall specifically
state the conduct of the proposed patient which is the basis for the final
determination, that the statutory criteria of commitment continue to be met,
and that less restrictive alternatives have been considered and rejected by the
court. Reasons for rejecting each
alternative shall be stated. A copy of
the final order for continued commitment shall be forwarded to the head of the treatment
facility or program to which the person is committed and, if the patient has
been provisionally discharged, to the designated agency responsible for
monitoring the provisional discharge.
Sec. 66. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.13, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Mentally
ill or chemically dependent Persons with mental illness or chemical
dependency. (a) If at the
conclusion of a review hearing the court finds that the person continues to be
mentally ill or chemically dependent have mental illness or chemical
dependency and in need of treatment or supervision, the court
shall determine the length of continued commitment. No period of commitment shall exceed this
length of time or 12 months, whichever is less.
(b) At the conclusion of the
prescribed period under paragraph (a), commitment may not be continued
unless a new petition is filed pursuant to section 253B.07 and hearing and
determination made on it. If the
petition was filed before the end of the previous commitment and, for good
cause shown, the court has not completed the hearing and the determination by
the end of the commitment period, the court may for good cause extend the
previous commitment for up to 14 days to allow the completion of the hearing
and the issuance of the determination. The
standard
of proof for the new petition is the standard specified in section 253B.12,
subdivision 4. Notwithstanding the
provisions of section 253B.09, subdivision 5, the initial commitment period under
the new petition shall be the probable length of commitment necessary or 12
months, whichever is less. The
standard of proof at the hearing on the new petition shall be the standard
specified in section 253B.12, subdivision 4.
Sec. 67. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.14, is amended to read:
253B.14
TRANSFER OF COMMITTED PERSONS.
The commissioner may transfer any committed
person, other than a person committed as mentally ill and a person
who has a mental illness and is dangerous to the public, or as a
sexually dangerous person or as a sexual psychopathic personality, from
one regional state-operated treatment center program
to any other state-operated treatment facility under the
commissioner's jurisdiction which is program capable of providing
proper care and treatment. When a
committed person is transferred from one state-operated treatment facility
program to another, written notice shall be given to the committing
court, the county attorney, the patient's counsel, and to the person's parent,
health care agent, or spouse or, if none is known, to an interested person, and
the designated agency.
Sec. 68. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.141, is amended to read:
253B.141
AUTHORITY TO DETAIN AND TRANSPORT A MISSING PATIENT.
Subdivision 1. Report
of absence. (a) If a patient
committed under this chapter or detained in a treatment facility or
state-operated treatment program under a judicial hold is absent without
authorization, and either: (1) does not
return voluntarily within 72 hours of the time the unauthorized absence began;
or (2) is considered by the head of the treatment facility or program
to be a danger to self or others, then the head of the treatment
facility or program shall report the absence to the local law enforcement
agency. The head of the treatment
facility or program shall also notify the committing court that the
patient is absent and that the absence has been reported to the local law
enforcement agency. The committing court
may issue an order directing the law enforcement agency to transport the
patient to an appropriate treatment facility, state-operated
treatment program, or community-based treatment program.
(b) Upon receiving a report that a patient subject to this section is absent without authorization, the local law enforcement agency shall enter information on the patient into the missing persons file of the National Crime Information Center computer according to the missing persons practices.
Subd. 2. Apprehension;
return to facility or program. (a)
Upon receiving the report of absence from the head of the treatment facility,
state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program or
the committing court, a patient may be apprehended and held by a peace officer
in any jurisdiction pending return to the facility or program from which
the patient is absent without authorization.
A patient may also be returned to any facility operated by the
commissioner state-operated treatment program or any other treatment
facility or community-based treatment program willing to accept the person. A person who is mentally ill has a
mental illness and is dangerous to the public and detained
under this subdivision may be held in a jail or lockup only if:
(1) there is no other feasible place of detention for the patient;
(2) the detention is for less than 24 hours; and
(3) there are protections in place, including segregation of the patient, to ensure the safety of the patient.
(b) If a patient is detained under this
subdivision, the head of the treatment facility or program from
which the patient is absent shall arrange to pick up the patient within 24
hours of the time detention was begun and shall be responsible for securing
transportation for the patient to the facility or program. The expense of detaining and
transporting
a patient shall be the responsibility of the treatment facility or
program from which the patient is absent.
The expense of detaining and transporting a patient to a state-operated
treatment facility operated by the Department of Human Services program
shall be paid by the commissioner unless paid by the patient or persons on
behalf of the patient.
Subd. 3. Notice
of apprehension. Immediately after
an absent patient is located, the head of the treatment facility or
program from which the patient is absent, or the law enforcement agency
that located or returned the absent patient, shall notify the law enforcement
agency that first received the absent patient report under this section and
that agency shall cancel the missing persons entry from the National Crime
Information Center computer.
Sec. 69. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Provisional
discharge. (a) The head of
the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based
treatment program may provisionally discharge any patient without
discharging the commitment, unless the patient was found by the committing
court to be a person who is mentally ill and has a mental illness and
is dangerous to the public, or a sexually dangerous person, or
a sexual psychopathic personality.
(b) When a patient committed to the
commissioner becomes ready for provisional discharge before being placed in a
state-operated treatment program, the head of the treatment facility or
community-based treatment program where the patient is placed pending transfer
to the commissioner may provisionally discharge the patient pursuant to this
subdivision.
(c) Each patient released on
provisional discharge shall have a written aftercare provisional
discharge plan developed with input from the patient and the designated
agency which specifies the services and treatment to be provided as part of
the aftercare provisional discharge plan, the financial resources
available to pay for the services specified, the expected period of provisional
discharge, the precise goals for the granting of a final discharge, and
conditions or restrictions on the patient during the period of the provisional
discharge. The aftercare provisional
discharge plan shall be provided to the patient, the patient's attorney,
and the designated agency.
(d) The aftercare provisional
discharge plan shall be reviewed on a quarterly basis by the patient,
designated agency and other appropriate persons. The aftercare provisional discharge
plan shall contain the grounds upon which a provisional discharge may be
revoked. The provisional discharge shall
terminate on the date specified in the plan unless specific action is taken to
revoke or extend it.
Sec. 70. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:
Subd. 1a. Representative of designated agency. Before a provisional discharge is granted, a representative of the designated agency must be identified to ensure continuity of care by being involved with the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program and the patient prior to the provisional discharge. The representative of the designated agency shall coordinate plans for and monitor the patient's aftercare program. When the patient is on a provisional discharge, the representative of the designated agency shall provide the treatment report to the court required under section 253B.12, subdivision 1.
Sec. 71. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Revocation
of provisional discharge. (a)
The designated agency may revoke initiate with the court a revocation
of a provisional discharge if revocation is the least restrictive
alternative and either:
(1) the patient has violated material conditions of the provisional discharge, and the violation creates the need to return the patient to a more restrictive setting or more intensive community services; or
(2)
there exists a serious likelihood that the safety of the patient or others will
be jeopardized, in that either the patient's need for food, clothing, shelter,
or medical care are not being met, or will not be met in the near future, or
the patient has attempted or threatened to seriously physically harm self or
others; and.
(3) revocation is the least restrictive
alternative available.
(b) Any interested person may request that the designated agency revoke the patient's provisional discharge. Any person making a request shall provide the designated agency with a written report setting forth the specific facts, including witnesses, dates and locations, supporting a revocation, demonstrating that every effort has been made to avoid revocation and that revocation is the least restrictive alternative available.
Sec. 72. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Procedure;
notice. Revocation shall be
commenced by the designated agency's written notice of intent to revoke
provisional discharge given or sent to the patient, the patient's attorney, and
the treatment facility or program from which the patient was
provisionally discharged, and the current community services provider. The notice shall set forth the grounds upon
which the intention to revoke is based, and shall inform the patient of the
rights of a patient under this chapter.
Sec. 73. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 3a, is amended to read:
Subd. 3a. Report to the court. Within 48 hours, excluding weekends and legal holidays, of giving notice to the patient, the designated agency shall file with the court a copy of the notice and a report setting forth the specific facts, including witnesses, dates and locations, which (1) support revocation, (2) demonstrate that revocation is the least restrictive alternative available, and (3) show that specific efforts were made to avoid revocation. The designated agency shall provide copies of the report to the patient, the patient's attorney, the county attorney, and the treatment facility or program from which the patient was provisionally discharged within 48 hours of giving notice to the patient under subdivision 3.
Sec. 74. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 3b, is amended to read:
Subd. 3b. Review. The patient or patient's attorney may
request judicial review of the intended revocation by filing a petition for
review and an affidavit with the committing court. The affidavit shall state specific grounds
for opposing the revocation. If the
patient does not file a petition for review within five days of receiving the
notice under subdivision 3, revocation of the provisional discharge is final
and the court, without hearing, may order the patient into a treatment
facility or program from which the patient was provisionally discharged,
another treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based
treatment program that consents to receive the patient, or more intensive
community treatment. If the patient
files a petition for review, the court shall review the petition and determine
whether a genuine issue exists as to the propriety of the revocation. The burden of proof is on the designated
agency to show that no genuine issue exists as to the propriety of the
revocation. If the court finds that no
genuine issue exists as to the propriety of the revocation, the revocation of
the provisional discharge is final.
Sec. 75. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 3c, is amended to read:
Subd. 3c. Hearing. (a) If the court finds under subdivision 3b that a genuine issue exists as to the propriety of the revocation, the court shall hold a hearing on the petition within three days after the patient files the petition. The court may continue the review hearing for an additional five days upon any party's showing of good cause. At the hearing, the burden of proof is on the designated agency to show a factual basis for the revocation. At the conclusion of the hearing, the court shall make specific findings of fact. The court shall affirm the revocation if it finds:
(1) a factual basis for revocation due to:
(i) a violation of the material conditions of the provisional discharge that creates a need for the patient to return to a more restrictive setting or more intensive community services; or
(ii) a probable danger of harm to the patient or others if the provisional discharge is not revoked; and
(2) that revocation is the least restrictive alternative available.
(b) If the court does not affirm the revocation, the court shall order the patient returned to provisional discharge status.
Sec. 76. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Return
to facility. When the designated
agency gives or sends notice of the intent to revoke a patient's provisional
discharge, it may also apply to the committing court for an order directing
that the patient be returned to a the facility or program from
which the patient was provisionally discharged or another treatment facility,
state‑operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program
that consents to receive the patient.
The court may order the patient returned to a facility or program
prior to a review hearing only upon finding that immediate return to a
facility is necessary because there is a serious likelihood that the safety
of the patient or others will be jeopardized, in that (1) the patient's need
for food, clothing, shelter, or medical care is not being met, or will not be
met in the near future, or (2) the patient has attempted or threatened to
seriously harm self or others. If a
voluntary return is not arranged, the head of the treatment facility,
state-operated treatment program, or community‑based treatment program
may request a health officer or a peace officer to return the patient to the treatment
facility or program from which the patient was released or to any other
treatment facility which, state‑operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program that consents to receive the patient. If necessary, the head of the treatment
facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment
program may request the committing court to direct a health officer
or peace officer in the county where the patient is located to return the
patient to the treatment facility or program or to another
treatment facility which, state‑operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program that consents to receive the patient. The expense of returning the patient to a regional
state-operated treatment center program shall be paid by
the commissioner unless paid by the patient or the patient's relatives. If the court orders the patient to return to
the treatment facility or program, or if a health officer
or peace officer returns the patient to the treatment facility or
program, and the patient wants judicial review of the revocation, the
patient or the patient's attorney must file the petition for review and
affidavit required under subdivision 3b within 14 days of receipt of the notice
of the intent to revoke.
Sec. 77. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Modification and extension of provisional discharge. (a) A provisional discharge may be modified upon agreement of the parties.
(b) A provisional discharge may be
extended only in those circumstances where the patient has not achieved the
goals set forth in the provisional discharge plan or continues to need the
supervision or assistance provided by an extension of the provisional discharge. In determining whether the provisional
discharge is to be extended, the head of the facility designated
agency shall consider the willingness and ability of the patient to
voluntarily obtain needed care and treatment.
(c) The designated agency shall
recommend extension of a provisional discharge only after a preliminary
conference with the patient and other appropriate persons. The patient shall be given the opportunity to
object or make suggestions for alternatives to extension.
(d)
(c) The designated agency must provide any recommendation for proposed
extension shall be made in writing to the head of the facility and
to the patient and the patient's attorney at least 30 days prior to the expiration
of the provisional discharge unless the patient cannot be located or is
unavailable to receive the notice. The
written recommendation submitted proposal for extension shall
include: the specific grounds for recommending
proposing the extension, the date of the preliminary conference and
results, the anniversary date of the provisional discharge, the termination
date of the provisional discharge, and the proposed length of extension. If the grounds for recommending proposing
the extension occur less than 30 days before its expiration, the designated
agency must submit the written recommendation shall occur proposal
for extension as soon as practicable.
(e) The head of the facility (d)
The designated agency shall extend a provisional discharge only after providing
the patient an opportunity for a meeting to object or make suggestions for
alternatives to an extension. The
designated agency shall issue provide a written decision to
the patient and the patient's attorney regarding extension within five days
after receiving the recommendation from the designated agency the
patient's input or after holding a meeting with the patient or after the
patient has declined to provide input or participate in the meeting. The designated agency may seek input from the
community-based treatment team or other persons the patient chooses.
Sec. 78. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 8a. Provisional
discharge extension. If the
provisional discharge extends until the end of the period of commitment and,
before the commitment expires, the court extends the commitment under section
253B.12 or issues a new commitment order under section 253B.13, the provisional
discharge shall continue for the duration of the new or extended period of
commitment ordered unless the commitment order provides otherwise or the
designated agency revokes the patient's provisional discharge pursuant to this
section. To continue the patient's
provisional discharge under this subdivision, the designated agency is not
required to comply with the procedures in subdivision 7.
Sec. 79. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. Expiration of provisional discharge. (a) Except as otherwise provided, a provisional discharge is absolute when it expires. If, while on provisional discharge or extended provisional discharge, a patient is discharged as provided in section 253B.16, the discharge shall be absolute.
(b) The designated agency shall give
notice of the expiration of the provisional discharge shall be given by the
head of the treatment facility to the committing court; the petitioner, if
known; the patient's attorney; the county attorney in the county of commitment;
the commissioner; and the designated agency facility or
program that provisionally discharged the patient.
Sec. 80. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Voluntary
return. (a) With the consent
of the head of the treatment facility or state-operated treatment program,
a patient may voluntarily return to inpatient status at the treatment
facility as follows:
(1) as a voluntary patient, in which case the patient's commitment is discharged;
(2) as a committed patient, in which case the patient's provisional discharge is voluntarily revoked; or
(3) on temporary return from provisional discharge, in which case both the commitment and the provisional discharge remain in effect.
(b) Prior to readmission, the patient shall be informed of status upon readmission.
Sec. 81. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.16, is amended to read:
253B.16
DISCHARGE OF COMMITTED PERSONS.
Subdivision 1. Date. The head of a treatment facility, state-operated
treatment program, or community-based treatment program shall discharge any
patient admitted as a person who is mentally ill or chemically dependent, or
a person with a who poses a risk of harm due to mental illness, or a
person who has a chemical dependency or a developmental disability admitted
under Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rules 20.01 and 20.02, to the
secure bed component of the Minnesota extended treatment options when the
head of the facility or program certifies that the person is no longer
in need of care and treatment under commitment or at the conclusion of
any period of time specified in the commitment order, whichever occurs first. The head of a treatment facility or
program shall discharge any person admitted as developmentally disabled,
except those admitted under Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rules 20.01
and 20.02, to the secure bed component of the Minnesota extended treatment
options, a person with a developmental disability when that person's
screening team has determined, under section 256B.092, subdivision 8, that the
person's needs can be met by services provided in the community and a plan has
been developed in consultation with the interdisciplinary team to place the
person in the available community services.
Subd. 2. Notification
of discharge. Prior to the discharge
or provisional discharge of any committed person patient, the
head of the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program shall notify the designated agency and
the patient's spouse or health care agent, or if there is no spouse or health
care agent, then an adult child, or if there is none, the next of kin of the
patient, of the proposed discharge. The
facility or program shall send the notice shall be sent to the last
known address of the person to be notified by certified mail with return
receipt. The notice in writing
and shall include the following: (1)
the proposed date of discharge or provisional discharge; (2) the date, time and
place of the meeting of the staff who have been treating the patient to discuss
discharge and discharge planning; (3) the fact that the patient will be present
at the meeting; and (4) the fact that the next of kin or health care agent may
attend that staff meeting and present any information relevant to the discharge
of the patient. The notice shall be
sent at least one week prior to the date set for the meeting.
Sec. 82. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.17, is amended to read:
253B.17
RELEASE; JUDICIAL DETERMINATION.
Subdivision 1. Petition. Any patient, except one committed as a
sexually dangerous person or a person with a sexual psychopathic personality or
as a person who is mentally ill and has a mental illness and is
dangerous to the public as provided in section 253B.18, subdivision 3, or any
interested person may petition the committing court or the court to which venue
has been transferred for an order that the patient is not in need of continued
care and treatment under commitment or for an order that an individual
is no longer a person who is mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or
chemically dependent who poses a risk of harm due to mental illness, or
a person who has a developmental disability or chemical dependency, or for
any other relief. A patient committed as
a person who is mentally ill or mentally ill and who poses a risk of
harm due to mental illness, a person who has a mental illness and is
dangerous or to the public, a sexually dangerous person, or
a person with a sexual psychopathic personality may petition the
committing court or the court to which venue has been transferred for a hearing
concerning the administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medication.
Subd. 2. Notice
of hearing. Upon the filing of the
petition, the court shall fix the time and place for the hearing on it. Ten days' notice of the hearing shall be
given to the county attorney, the patient, patient's counsel, the person who
filed the initial commitment petition, the head of the treatment
facility or program to which the person is committed, and other persons
as the court directs. Any person may
oppose the petition.
Subd. 3. Court
examiners. The court shall appoint an
a court examiner and, at the patient's request, shall appoint a second court
examiner of the patient's choosing to be paid for by the county at a rate of
compensation to be fixed by the court. Unless
otherwise agreed by the parties, the examiners a court examiner
shall file a report with the court not less than 48 hours prior to the hearing
under this section.
Subd. 4. Evidence. The patient, patient's counsel, the
petitioner, and the county attorney shall be entitled to be present at
the hearing and to present and cross-examine witnesses, including court
examiners. The court may hear any
relevant testimony and evidence which is offered at the hearing.
Subd. 5. Order. Upon completion of the hearing, the court
shall enter an order stating its findings and decision and mail it the
order to the head of the treatment facility, state-operated treatment
program, or community-based treatment program.
Sec. 83. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Procedure. (a) Upon the filing of a petition
alleging that a proposed patient is a person who is mentally ill and has
a mental illness and is dangerous to the public, the court shall hear the
petition as provided in sections 253B.07 and 253B.08. If the court finds by clear and convincing
evidence that the proposed patient is a person who is mentally ill and has
a mental illness and is dangerous to the public, it shall commit the person
to a secure treatment facility or to a treatment facility or state-operated
treatment program willing to accept the patient under commitment. The court shall commit the patient to a
secure treatment facility unless the patient establishes or others
establish by clear and convincing evidence that a less restrictive state-operated
treatment program or treatment program facility is available
that is consistent with the patient's treatment needs and the requirements of
public safety. In any case where the
petition was filed immediately following the acquittal of the proposed patient
for a crime against the person pursuant to a verdict of not guilty by reason of
mental illness, the verdict constitutes evidence that the proposed patient is a
person who is mentally ill and has a mental illness and is
dangerous to the public within the meaning of this section. The proposed patient has the burden of going
forward in the presentation of evidence.
The standard of proof remains as required by this chapter. Upon commitment, admission procedures shall
be carried out pursuant to section 253B.10.
(b) Once a patient is admitted to a treatment facility or state-operated treatment program pursuant to a commitment under this subdivision, treatment must begin regardless of whether a review hearing will be held under subdivision 2.
Sec. 84. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Review;
hearing. (a) A written treatment
report shall be filed by the treatment facility or state‑operated
treatment program with the committing court within 60 days after commitment. If the person is in the custody of the
commissioner of corrections when the initial commitment is ordered under
subdivision 1, the written treatment report must be filed within 60 days after
the person is admitted to a secure the state-operated treatment
program or treatment facility. The
court shall hold a hearing to make a final determination as to whether the person
patient should remain committed as a person who is mentally ill and
has a mental illness and is dangerous to the public. The hearing shall be held within the earlier
of 14 days of the court's receipt of the written treatment report, or within 90
days of the date of initial commitment or admission, unless otherwise agreed by
the parties.
(b) The court may, with agreement of the
county attorney and the patient's attorney for the patient:
(1) waive the review hearing under this subdivision and immediately order an indeterminate commitment under subdivision 3; or
(2) continue the review hearing for up to one year.
(c)
If the court finds that the patient should be committed as a person who is mentally
ill who poses a risk of harm due to mental illness, but not as a
person who is mentally ill and has a mental illness and is
dangerous to the public, the court may commit the person patient
as a person who is mentally ill who poses a risk of harm due to
mental illness and the person shall be deemed court shall deem
the patient not to have been found to be dangerous to the public for
the purposes of subdivisions 4a to 15. Failure
of the treatment facility or state-operated treatment program to provide
the required treatment report at the end of the 60-day period shall not
result in automatic discharge of the patient.
Sec. 85. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Indeterminate
commitment. If the court finds at
the final determination hearing held pursuant to subdivision 2 that the patient
continues to be a person who is mentally ill and has a mental illness
and is dangerous to the public, then the court shall order
commitment of the proposed patient for an indeterminate period of time. After a final determination that a patient is
a person who is mentally ill and has a mental illness and is
dangerous to the public, the patient shall be transferred, provisionally
discharged or discharged, only as provided in this section.
Sec. 86. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 4a, is amended to read:
Subd. 4a. Release
on pass; notification. A patient who
has been committed as a person who is mentally ill and has a mental
illness and is dangerous to the public and who is confined at a
secure treatment facility or has been transferred out of a state-operated
services secure treatment facility according to section 253B.18,
subdivision 6, shall not be released on a pass unless the pass is part of a
pass plan that has been approved by the medical director of the secure
treatment facility. The pass plan must
have a specific therapeutic purpose consistent with the treatment plan, must be
established for a specific period of time, and must have specific levels of
liberty delineated. The county case
manager must be invited to participate in the development of the pass plan. At least ten days prior to a determination on
the plan, the medical director shall notify the designated agency, the committing
court, the county attorney of the county of commitment, an interested person,
the local law enforcement agency where the facility is located, the county
attorney and the local law enforcement agency in the location where the pass is
to occur, the petitioner, and the petitioner's counsel of the plan, the nature
of the passes proposed, and their right to object to the plan. If any notified person objects prior to the
proposed date of implementation, the person shall have an opportunity to
appear, personally or in writing, before the medical director, within ten days
of the objection, to present grounds for opposing the plan. The pass plan shall not be implemented until
the objecting person has been furnished that opportunity. Nothing in this subdivision shall be
construed to give a patient an affirmative right to a pass plan.
Sec. 87. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 4b, is amended to read:
Subd. 4b. Pass-eligible status; notification. (a) The following patients committed to a secure treatment facility shall not be placed on pass-eligible status unless that status has been approved by the medical director of the secure treatment facility:
(a) (1) a patient who has
been committed as a person who is mentally ill and has a mental
illness and is dangerous to the public and who:
(1) (i) was found
incompetent to proceed to trial for a felony or was found not guilty by reason
of mental illness of a felony immediately prior to the filing of the commitment
petition;
(2) (ii) was convicted of a
felony immediately prior to or during commitment as a person who is mentally
ill and has a mental illness and is dangerous to the public;
or
(3) (iii) is subject to a
commitment to the commissioner of corrections; and
(b) (2) a patient who has been committed as a psychopathic personality, a sexually psychopathic personality, or a sexually dangerous person.
(b) At least ten days prior to a determination on the status, the medical director shall notify the committing court, the county attorney of the county of commitment, the designated agency, an interested person, the petitioner, and the petitioner's counsel of the proposed status, and their right to request review by the special review board. If within ten days of receiving notice any notified person requests review by filing a notice of objection with the commissioner and the head of the secure treatment facility, a hearing shall be held before the special review board. The proposed status shall not be implemented unless it receives a favorable recommendation by a majority of the board and approval by the commissioner. The order of the commissioner is appealable as provided in section 253B.19.
(c) Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to give a patient an affirmative right to seek pass-eligible status from the special review board.
Sec. 88. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 4c, is amended to read:
Subd. 4c. Special review board. (a) The commissioner shall establish one or more panels of a special review board. The board shall consist of three members experienced in the field of mental illness. One member of each special review board panel shall be a psychiatrist or a doctoral level psychologist with forensic experience and one member shall be an attorney. No member shall be affiliated with the Department of Human Services. The special review board shall meet at least every six months and at the call of the commissioner. It shall hear and consider all petitions for a reduction in custody or to appeal a revocation of provisional discharge. A "reduction in custody" means transfer from a secure treatment facility, discharge, and provisional discharge. Patients may be transferred by the commissioner between secure treatment facilities without a special review board hearing.
Members of the special review board shall receive compensation and reimbursement for expenses as established by the commissioner.
(b) The special review board must review each denied petition under subdivision 5 for barriers and obstacles preventing the patient from progressing in treatment. Based on the cases before the board in the previous year, the special review board shall provide to the commissioner an annual summation of the barriers to treatment progress, and recommendations to achieve the common goal of making progress in treatment.
(c) A petition filed by a person committed
as mentally ill and a person who has a mental illness and is
dangerous to the public under this section must be heard as provided in
subdivision 5 and, as applicable, subdivision 13. A petition filed by a person committed as a
sexual psychopathic personality or as a sexually dangerous person under chapter
253D, or committed as both mentally ill and a person who has a mental
illness and is dangerous to the public under this section and as a sexual
psychopathic personality or as a sexually dangerous person must be heard as
provided in section 253D.27.
Sec. 89. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Petition; notice of hearing; attendance; order. (a) A petition for a reduction in custody or revocation of provisional discharge shall be filed with the commissioner and may be filed by the patient or by the head of the treatment facility or state-operated treatment program to which the person was committed or has been transferred. A patient may not petition the special review board for six months following commitment under subdivision 3 or following the final disposition of any previous petition and subsequent appeal by the patient. The head of the state‑operated treatment program or head of the treatment facility must schedule a hearing before the special review board for any patient who has not appeared before the special review board in the previous three years, and schedule a hearing at least every three years thereafter. The medical director may petition at any time.
(b)
Fourteen days prior to the hearing, the committing court, the county attorney
of the county of commitment, the designated agency, interested person, the
petitioner, and the petitioner's counsel shall be given written notice by the
commissioner of the time and place of the hearing before the special review
board. Only those entitled to statutory
notice of the hearing or those administratively required to attend may be
present at the hearing. The patient may
designate interested persons to receive notice by providing the names and
addresses to the commissioner at least 21 days before the hearing. The board shall provide the commissioner with
written findings of fact and recommendations within 21 days of the hearing. The commissioner shall issue an order no
later than 14 days after receiving the recommendation of the special review
board. A copy of the order shall be
mailed to every person entitled to statutory notice of the hearing within five
days after it the order is signed. No order by the commissioner shall be
effective sooner than 30 days after the order is signed, unless the county
attorney, the patient, and the commissioner agree that it may become effective
sooner.
(c) The special review board shall hold a hearing on each petition prior to making its recommendation to the commissioner. The special review board proceedings are not contested cases as defined in chapter 14. Any person or agency receiving notice that submits documentary evidence to the special review board prior to the hearing shall also provide copies to the patient, the patient's counsel, the county attorney of the county of commitment, the case manager, and the commissioner.
(d) Prior to the final decision by the commissioner, the special review board may be reconvened to consider events or circumstances that occurred subsequent to the hearing.
(e) In making their recommendations and order, the special review board and commissioner must consider any statements received from victims under subdivision 5a.
Sec. 90. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 5a, is amended to read:
Subd. 5a. Victim notification of petition and release; right to submit statement. (a) As used in this subdivision:
(1) "crime" has the meaning given to "violent crime" in section 609.1095, and includes criminal sexual conduct in the fifth degree and offenses within the definition of "crime against the person" in section 253B.02, subdivision 4a, and also includes offenses listed in section 253D.02, subdivision 8, paragraph (b), regardless of whether they are sexually motivated;
(2) "victim" means a person who has incurred loss or harm as a result of a crime the behavior for which forms the basis for a commitment under this section or chapter 253D; and
(3) "convicted" and "conviction" have the meanings given in section 609.02, subdivision 5, and also include juvenile court adjudications, findings under Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 20.02, that the elements of a crime have been proved, and findings in commitment cases under this section or chapter 253D that an act or acts constituting a crime occurred.
(b) A county attorney who files a petition to commit a person under this section or chapter 253D shall make a reasonable effort to provide prompt notice of filing the petition to any victim of a crime for which the person was convicted. In addition, the county attorney shall make a reasonable effort to promptly notify the victim of the resolution of the petition.
(c) Before provisionally discharging, discharging, granting pass-eligible status, approving a pass plan, or otherwise permanently or temporarily releasing a person committed under this section from a state-operated treatment program or treatment facility, the head of the state-operated treatment program or head of the treatment facility shall make a reasonable effort to notify any victim of a crime for which the person was convicted that the
person may be discharged or released and that the victim has a right to submit a written statement regarding decisions of the medical director, special review board, or commissioner with respect to the person. To the extent possible, the notice must be provided at least 14 days before any special review board hearing or before a determination on a pass plan. Notwithstanding section 611A.06, subdivision 4, the commissioner shall provide the judicial appeal panel with victim information in order to comply with the provisions of this section. The judicial appeal panel shall ensure that the data on victims remains private as provided for in section 611A.06, subdivision 4.
(d) This subdivision applies only to victims who have requested notification through the Department of Corrections electronic victim notification system, or by contacting, in writing, the county attorney in the county where the conviction for the crime occurred. A request for notice under this subdivision received by the commissioner of corrections through the Department of Corrections electronic victim notification system shall be promptly forwarded to the prosecutorial authority with jurisdiction over the offense to which the notice relates or, following commitment, the head of the state-operated treatment program or head of the treatment facility. A county attorney who receives a request for notification under this paragraph following commitment shall promptly forward the request to the commissioner of human services.
(e) The rights under this subdivision are in addition to rights available to a victim under chapter 611A. This provision does not give a victim all the rights of a "notified person" or a person "entitled to statutory notice" under subdivision 4a, 4b, or 5 or section 253D.14.
Sec. 91. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Transfer. (a) A patient who is mentally
ill and a person who has a mental illness and is dangerous to the
public shall not be transferred out of a secure treatment facility unless
it appears to the satisfaction of the commissioner, after a hearing and favorable
recommendation by a majority of the special review board, that the transfer is
appropriate. Transfer may be to other
regional centers under the commissioner's control another state‑operated
treatment program. In those
instances where a commitment also exists to the Department of Corrections,
transfer may be to a facility designated by the commissioner of corrections.
(b) The following factors must be considered in determining whether a transfer is appropriate:
(1) the person's clinical progress and present treatment needs;
(2) the need for security to accomplish continuing treatment;
(3) the need for continued institutionalization;
(4) which facility can best meet the person's needs; and
(5) whether transfer can be accomplished with a reasonable degree of safety for the public.
Sec. 92. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Provisional
discharge. (a) A patient who
is mentally ill and a person who has a mental illness and is
dangerous to the public shall not be provisionally discharged unless it
appears to the satisfaction of the commissioner, after a hearing and a
favorable recommendation by a majority of the special review board, that the
patient is capable of making an acceptable adjustment to open society.
(b) The following factors are to be considered in determining whether a provisional discharge shall be recommended: (1) whether the patient's course of hospitalization and present mental status indicate there is no longer a need for treatment and supervision in the patient's current treatment setting; and (2) whether the conditions of the provisional discharge plan will provide a reasonable degree of protection to the public and will enable the patient to adjust successfully to the community.
Sec. 93. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Provisional
discharge plan. A provisional
discharge plan shall be developed, implemented, and monitored by the
designated agency in conjunction with the patient, the treatment facility or
state-operated treatment program to which the person is committed, and
other appropriate persons. The
designated agency shall, at least quarterly, review the provisional
discharge plan with the patient and submit a written report to the
commissioner and the treatment facility or program concerning
the patient's status and compliance with each term of the provisional
discharge plan.
Sec. 94. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Provisional discharge; revocation. (a) The head of the treatment facility or state-operated treatment program from which the person was provisionally discharged may revoke a provisional discharge if any of the following grounds exist:
(i) the patient has departed from the conditions of the provisional discharge plan;
(ii) the patient is exhibiting signs of a mental illness which may require in-hospital evaluation or treatment; or
(iii) the patient is exhibiting behavior which may be dangerous to self or others.
(b) Revocation shall be commenced by a notice of intent to revoke provisional discharge, which shall be served upon the patient, patient's counsel, and the designated agency. The notice shall set forth the grounds upon which the intention to revoke is based, and shall inform the patient of the rights of a patient under this chapter.
(c) In all nonemergency situations,
prior to revoking a provisional discharge, the head of the treatment
facility or program shall obtain a revocation report from the
designated agency outlining the specific reasons for recommending the
revocation, including but not limited to the specific facts upon which the
revocation recommendation is based.
(d) The patient must be provided a copy of the revocation report and informed orally and in writing of the rights of a patient under this section.
Sec. 95. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 11, is amended to read:
Subd. 11. Exceptions. If an emergency exists, the head of the
treatment facility or state-operated treatment program may revoke the
provisional discharge and, either orally or in writing, order that the patient
be immediately returned to the treatment facility or program. In emergency cases, a revocation
report documenting reasons for revocation shall be submitted by the
designated agency within seven days after the patient is returned to the treatment
facility or program.
Sec. 96. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 12, is amended to read:
Subd. 12. Return
of patient. After revocation of a
provisional discharge or if the patient is absent without authorization, the
head of the treatment facility or state-operated treatment program may
request the patient to return to the treatment facility or program
voluntarily. The head of the treatment
facility or state-operated treatment program may request a health
officer, a welfare officer, or a peace officer to return the patient to
the treatment facility or program. If a voluntary return is not arranged, the
head of the treatment facility or state-operated treatment program shall
inform the committing court of the revocation or absence and the court shall
direct a health or peace officer in the county where the patient is located to
return the patient to the treatment facility or program or
to
another state-operated treatment program or to another treatment
facility willing to accept the patient.
The expense of returning the patient to a regional state-operated
treatment center program shall be paid by the commissioner unless
paid by the patient or other persons on the patient's behalf.
Sec. 97. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 14, is amended to read:
Subd. 14. Voluntary readmission. (a) With the consent of the head of the treatment facility or state-operated treatment program, a patient may voluntarily return from provisional discharge for a period of up to 30 days, or up to 60 days with the consent of the designated agency. If the patient is not returned to provisional discharge status within 60 days, the provisional discharge is revoked. Within 15 days of receiving notice of the change in status, the patient may request a review of the matter before the special review board. The board may recommend a return to a provisional discharge status.
(b) The treatment facility or state-operated treatment program is not required to petition for a further review by the special review board unless the patient's return to the community results in substantive change to the existing provisional discharge plan. All the terms and conditions of the provisional discharge order shall remain unchanged if the patient is released again.
Sec. 98. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 15, is amended to read:
Subd. 15. Discharge.
(a) A patient who is mentally ill and a person who
has a mental illness and is dangerous to the public shall not be
discharged unless it appears to the satisfaction of the commissioner, after a
hearing and a favorable recommendation by a majority of the special review
board, that the patient is capable of making an acceptable adjustment to open
society, is no longer dangerous to the public, and is no longer in need of
treatment and supervision.
(b) In determining whether a discharge shall be recommended, the special review board and commissioner shall consider whether specific conditions exist to provide a reasonable degree of protection to the public and to assist the patient in adjusting to the community. If the desired conditions do not exist, the discharge shall not be granted.
Sec. 99. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.19, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Petition; hearing. (a) A person patient
committed as mentally ill and a person who has a mental illness and
is dangerous to the public under section 253B.18, or the county attorney of
the county from which the person patient was committed or the
county of financial responsibility, may petition the judicial appeal panel for
a rehearing and reconsideration of a decision by the commissioner under section
253B.18, subdivision 5. The judicial
appeal panel must not consider petitions for relief other than those considered
by the commissioner from which the appeal is taken. The petition must be filed with the supreme
court within 30 days after the decision of the commissioner is signed. The hearing must be held within 45 days of
the filing of the petition unless an extension is granted for good cause.
(b) For an appeal under paragraph (a), the supreme court
shall refer the petition to the chief judge of the judicial appeal panel. The chief judge shall notify the patient, the
county attorney of the county of commitment, the designated agency, the
commissioner, the head of the treatment facility or program to which
the patient was committed, any interested person, and other persons the
chief judge designates, of the time and place of the hearing on the petition. The notice shall be given at least 14 days
prior to the date of the hearing.
(c) Any person may oppose the petition. The patient, the patient's counsel, the
county attorney of the committing county or the county of financial
responsibility, and the commissioner shall participate as parties to the
proceeding pending before the judicial appeal panel and shall, except when the
patient is committed solely as mentally ill and a person who has a
mental illness and is dangerous to the public, no later than 20 days
before the hearing on the
petition, inform the judicial appeal panel and the opposing party in writing whether they support or oppose the petition and provide a summary of facts in support of their position. The judicial appeal panel may appoint court examiners and may adjourn the hearing from time to time. It shall hear and receive all relevant testimony and evidence and make a record of all proceedings. The patient, the patient's counsel, and the county attorney of the committing county or the county of financial responsibility have the right to be present and may present and cross‑examine all witnesses and offer a factual and legal basis in support of their positions. The petitioning party seeking discharge or provisional discharge bears the burden of going forward with the evidence, which means presenting a prima facie case with competent evidence to show that the person is entitled to the requested relief. If the petitioning party has met this burden, the party opposing discharge or provisional discharge bears the burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence that the discharge or provisional discharge should be denied. A party seeking transfer under section 253B.18, subdivision 6, must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the transfer is appropriate.
Sec. 100. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.20, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Notice
to court. When a committed person is
discharged, provisionally discharged, or transferred to another
treatment facility, or partially hospitalized state-operated treatment
program, or community‑based treatment program, or when the person
patient dies, is absent without authorization, or is returned, the
treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based
treatment program having custody of the patient shall notify the committing
court, the county attorney, and the patient's attorney.
Sec. 101. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.20, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Necessities. The head of the state-operated
treatment facility program shall make necessary arrangements at
the expense of the state to insure that no patient is discharged or
provisionally discharged without suitable clothing. The head of the state-operated
treatment facility program shall, if necessary, provide the
patient with a sufficient sum of money to secure transportation home, or to
another destination of the patient's choice, if the destination is located
within a reasonable distance of the state-operated treatment facility
program. The commissioner shall
establish procedures by rule to help the patient receive all public assistance
benefits provided by state or federal law to which the patient is entitled by
residence and circumstances. The rule
shall be uniformly applied in all counties.
All counties shall provide temporary relief whenever necessary to meet
the intent of this subdivision.
Sec. 102. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.20, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Notice
to designated agency. The head of
the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based
treatment program, upon the provisional discharge of any committed person,
shall notify the designated agency before the patient leaves the treatment
facility or program. Whenever
possible the notice shall be given at least one week before the patient is to
leave the facility or program.
Sec. 103. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.20, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Aftercare
services. Prior to the date of
discharge or provisional discharge of any committed person, the designated
agency of the county of financial responsibility, in cooperation with the head
of the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program, and the patient's physician mental
health professional, if notified pursuant to subdivision 6, shall establish
a continuing plan of aftercare services for the patient including a plan for
medical and psychiatric treatment, nursing care, vocational assistance, and
other assistance the patient needs. The
designated agency shall provide case management services, supervise and assist
the patient in finding employment, suitable shelter, and adequate medical and
psychiatric treatment, and aid in the patient's readjustment to the community.
Sec. 104. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.20, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Notice
to physician mental health professional. The head of the treatment facility,
state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program
shall notify the physician mental health professional of any
committed person at the time of the patient's discharge or provisional
discharge, unless the patient objects to the notice.
Sec. 105. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.21, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Administrative procedures. If the patient is entitled to care by any agency of the United States in this state, the commitment warrant shall be in triplicate, committing the patient to the joint custody of the head of the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program and the federal agency. If the federal agency is unable or unwilling to receive the patient at the time of commitment, the patient may subsequently be transferred to it upon its request.
Sec. 106. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.21, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Applicable
regulations. Any person, when
admitted to an institution of a federal agency within or without this state,
shall be subject to the rules and regulations of the federal agency, except
that nothing in this section shall deprive any person of rights secured to
patients of state state-operated treatment programs, treatment
facilities, and community-based treatment programs by this chapter.
Sec. 107. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.21, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Powers. The chief officer of any treatment
facility operated by a federal agency to which any person is admitted shall
have the same powers as the heads of treatment facilities state-operated
treatment programs within this state with respect to admission, retention
of custody, transfer, parole, or discharge of the committed person.
Sec. 108. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.212, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Cost
of care; commitment by tribal court order; Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians. The commissioner of human services may
contract with and receive payment from the Indian Health Service of the United
States Department of Health and Human Services for the care and treatment of
those members of the Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians who have been committed
by tribal court order to the Indian Health Service for care and treatment of
mental illness, developmental disability, or chemical dependency. The contract shall provide that the Indian
Health Service may not transfer any person for admission to a regional
center state-operated treatment program unless the commitment
procedure utilized by the tribal court provided due process protections similar
to those afforded by sections 253B.05 253B.051 to 253B.10.
Sec. 109. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.212, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:
Subd. 1a. Cost of care; commitment by tribal court order; White Earth Band of Ojibwe Indians. The commissioner of human services may contract with and receive payment from the Indian Health Service of the United States Department of Health and Human Services for the care and treatment of those members of the White Earth Band of Ojibwe Indians who have been committed by tribal court order to the Indian Health Service for care and treatment of mental illness, developmental disability, or chemical dependency. The tribe may also contract directly with the commissioner for treatment of those members of the White Earth Band who have been committed by tribal court order to the White Earth Department of Health for care and treatment of mental illness, developmental disability, or chemical dependency. The contract shall provide that the Indian Health Service and the
White
Earth Band shall not transfer any person for admission to a regional center
state-operated treatment program unless the commitment procedure
utilized by the tribal court provided due process protections similar to those
afforded by sections 253B.05 253B.051 to 253B.10.
Sec. 110. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.212, subdivision 1b, is amended to read:
Subd. 1b. Cost
of care; commitment by tribal court order; any federally recognized Indian
tribe within the state of Minnesota. The
commissioner of human services may contract with and receive payment from the
Indian Health Service of the United States Department of Health and Human
Services for the care and treatment of those members of any federally recognized
Indian tribe within the state, who have been committed by tribal court order to
the Indian Health Service for care and treatment of mental illness,
developmental disability, or chemical dependency. The tribe may also contract directly with the
commissioner for treatment of those members of any federally recognized Indian
tribe within the state who have been committed by tribal court order to the
respective tribal Department of Health for care and treatment of mental
illness, developmental disability, or chemical dependency. The contract shall provide that the Indian
Health Service and any federally recognized Indian tribe within the state shall
not transfer any person for admission to a regional center state-operated
treatment program unless the commitment procedure utilized by the tribal
court provided due process protections similar to those afforded by sections 253B.05
253B.051 to 253B.10.
Sec. 111. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.212, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Effect
given to tribal commitment order. (a)
When, under an agreement entered into pursuant to subdivision 1, 1a, or 1b, the
Indian Health Service or the placing tribe applies to a regional center state-operated
treatment program for admission of a person committed to the jurisdiction
of the health service by the tribal court as a person who is mentally ill,
developmentally disabled, or chemically dependent due to mental illness,
developmental disability, or chemical dependency, the commissioner may
treat the patient with the consent of the Indian Health Service or the placing
tribe.
(b) A person admitted to a regional
center state-operated treatment program pursuant to this section has
all the rights accorded by section 253B.03.
In addition, treatment reports, prepared in accordance with the
requirements of section 253B.12, subdivision 1, shall be filed with the Indian
Health Service or the placing tribe within 60 days of commencement of the
patient's stay at the facility program. A subsequent treatment report shall be filed
with the Indian Health Service or the placing tribe within six months of the
patient's admission to the facility program or prior to
discharge, whichever comes first. Provisional
discharge or transfer of the patient may be authorized by the head of the treatment
facility program only with the consent of the Indian Health Service
or the placing tribe. Discharge from the
facility program to the Indian Health Service or the placing
tribe may be authorized by the head of the treatment facility program
after notice to and consultation with the Indian Health Service or the placing
tribe.
Sec. 112. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.22, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Establishment. The commissioner shall establish a review
board of three or more persons for each regional center the
Anoka-Metro Regional Treatment Center, Minnesota Security Hospital, and
Minnesota sex offender program to review the admission and retention of its
patients of that program receiving services under this chapter. One member shall be qualified in the
diagnosis of mental illness, developmental disability, or chemical dependency,
and one member shall be an attorney. The
commissioner may, upon written request from the appropriate federal authority,
establish a review panel for any federal treatment facility within the state to
review the admission and retention of patients hospitalized under this chapter. For any review board established for a
federal treatment facility, one of the persons appointed by the commissioner
shall be the commissioner of veterans affairs or the commissioner's designee.
Sec. 113. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.22, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Right
to appear. Each treatment
facility program specified in subdivision 1 shall be visited by the
review board at least once every six months.
Upon request each patient in the treatment facility program
shall have the right to appear before the review board during the visit.
Sec. 114. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.22, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Notice. The head of the treatment facility
each program specified in subdivision 1 shall notify each patient at the
time of admission by a simple written statement of the patient's right to
appear before the review board and the next date when the board will visit the
treatment facility that program.
A request to appear before the board need not be in writing. Any employee of the treatment facility
program receiving a patient's request to appear before the board shall
notify the head of the treatment facility program of the request.
Sec. 115. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.22, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Review. The board shall review the admission and
retention of patients at its respective treatment facility the
program. The board may examine the
records of all patients admitted and may examine personally at its own
instigation all patients who from the records or otherwise appear to justify
reasonable doubt as to continued need of confinement in a treatment facility
the program. The review board
shall report its findings to the commissioner and to the head of the treatment
facility program. The board
may also receive reports from patients, interested persons, and treatment
facility employees of the program, and investigate conditions
affecting the care of patients.
Sec. 116. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.23, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Costs of hearings. (a) In each proceeding under this chapter the court shall allow and order paid to each witness subpoenaed the fees and mileage prescribed by law; to each examiner a reasonable sum for services and for travel; to persons conveying the patient to the place of detention, disbursements for the travel, board, and lodging of the patient and of themselves and their authorized assistants; and to the patient's counsel, when appointed by the court, a reasonable sum for travel and for the time spent in court or in preparing for the hearing. Upon the court's order, the county auditor shall issue a warrant on the county treasurer for payment of the amounts allowed, excluding the costs of the court examiner, which must be paid by the state courts.
(b) Whenever venue of a proceeding has been transferred under this chapter, the costs of the proceedings shall be reimbursed to the county where the proceedings were conducted by the county of financial responsibility.
Sec. 117. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.23, subdivision 1b, is amended to read:
Subd. 1b. Responsibility
for conducting prepetition screening and filing commitment and early
intervention petitions. (a) The
county of financial responsibility is responsible to conduct prepetition
screening pursuant to section 253B.07, subdivision 1, and, if statutory
conditions for early intervention or commitment are satisfied, to file a
petition pursuant to section 253B.064, subdivision 1, paragraph (a);
253B.07, subdivision 1, paragraph (a);, or 253D.07.
(b) Except in cases under chapter 253D, if
the county of financial responsibility refuses or fails to conduct prepetition
screening or file a petition, or if it is unclear which county is the county of
financial responsibility, the county where the proposed patient is present is
responsible to conduct the prepetition screening and, if statutory conditions
for early intervention or commitment are satisfied, file the petition.
(c) In cases under chapter 253D, if the county of financial responsibility refuses or fails to file a petition, or if it is unclear which county is the county of financial responsibility, then (1) the county where the conviction for which the person is incarcerated was entered, or (2) the county where the proposed patient is present, if the person is not currently incarcerated based on conviction, is responsible to file the petition if statutory conditions for commitment are satisfied.
(d) When a proposed patient is an inmate confined to an adult correctional facility under the control of the commissioner of corrections and commitment proceedings are initiated or proposed to be initiated pursuant to section 241.69, the county where the correctional facility is located may agree to perform the responsibilities specified in paragraph (a).
(e) Any dispute concerning financial responsibility for the costs of the proceedings and treatment will be resolved pursuant to chapter 256G.
(f) This subdivision and the sections of law cited in this subdivision address venue only. Nothing in this chapter is intended to limit the statewide jurisdiction of district courts over civil commitment matters.
Sec. 118. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.23, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Legal results of commitment status. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter and in sections 246.15 and 246.16, no person by reason of commitment or treatment pursuant to this chapter shall be deprived of any legal right, including but not limited to the right to dispose of property, sue and be sued, execute instruments, make purchases, enter into contractual relationships, vote, and hold a driver's license. Commitment or treatment of any patient pursuant to this chapter is not a judicial determination of legal incompetency except to the extent provided in section 253B.03, subdivision 6.
(b) Proceedings for determination of legal
incompetency and the appointment of a guardian for a person subject to
commitment under this chapter may be commenced before, during, or after commitment
proceedings have been instituted and may be conducted jointly with the
commitment proceedings. The court shall
notify the head of the treatment facility or program to which the
patient is committed of a finding that the patient is incompetent.
(c) Where the person to be committed is a minor or owns property of value and it appears to the court that the person is not competent to manage a personal estate, the court shall appoint a general conservator of the person's estate as provided by law.
Sec. 119. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.24, is amended to read:
253B.24
TRANSMITTAL OF DATA TO NATIONAL INSTANT CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECK SYSTEM.
When a court:
(1) commits a person under this chapter as
being mentally ill, developmentally disabled, mentally ill and dangerous, or
chemically dependent due to mental illness, developmental disability, or
chemical dependency, or as a person who has a mental illness and is dangerous
to the public;
(2) determines in a criminal case that a person is incompetent to stand trial or not guilty by reason of mental illness; or
(3)
restores a person's ability to possess a firearm under section 609.165,
subdivision 1d, or 624.713, subdivision 4,
the court shall ensure that this information is electronically transmitted within three business days to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.
Sec. 120. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253D.02, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Court
examiner. "Court
examiner" has the meaning given in section 253B.02, subdivision 7 7a.
Sec. 121. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253D.07, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Petition. Upon the filing of a petition alleging
that a proposed respondent is a sexually dangerous person or a person with a
sexual psychopathic personality, the court shall hear the petition as
provided all of the applicable procedures contained in sections
253B.07 and 253B.08 apply to the commitment proceeding.
Sec. 122. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253D.10, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Correctional facilities. (a) A person who is being petitioned for commitment under this chapter and who is placed under a judicial hold order under section 253B.07, subdivision 2b or 7, may be confined at a Department of Corrections or a county correctional or detention facility, rather than a secure treatment facility, until a determination of the commitment petition as specified in this subdivision.
(b) A court may order that a person who is being petitioned for commitment under this chapter be confined in a Department of Corrections facility pursuant to the judicial hold order under the following circumstances and conditions:
(1) The person is currently serving a sentence in a Department of Corrections facility and the court determines that the person has made a knowing and voluntary (i) waiver of the right to be held in a secure treatment facility and (ii) election to be held in a Department of Corrections facility. The order confining the person in the Department of Corrections facility shall remain in effect until the court vacates the order or the person's criminal sentence and conditional release term expire.
In no case may the person be held in a Department of Corrections facility pursuant only to this subdivision, and not pursuant to any separate correctional authority, for more than 210 days.
(2) A person who has elected to be confined in a Department of Corrections facility under this subdivision may revoke the election by filing a written notice of intent to revoke the election with the court and serving the notice upon the Department of Corrections and the county attorney. The court shall order the person transferred to a secure treatment facility within 15 days of the date that the notice of revocation was filed with the court, except that, if the person has additional time to serve in prison at the end of the 15-day period, the person shall not be transferred to a secure treatment facility until the person's prison term expires. After a person has revoked an election to remain in a Department of Corrections facility under this subdivision, the court may not adopt another election to remain in a Department of Corrections facility without the agreement of both parties and the Department of Corrections.
(3) Upon petition by the commissioner of corrections, after notice to the parties and opportunity for hearing and for good cause shown, the court may order that the person's place of confinement be changed from the Department of Corrections to a secure treatment facility.
(4) While at a Department of Corrections
facility pursuant to this subdivision, the person shall remain subject to all
rules and practices applicable to correctional inmates in the facility in which
the person is placed including, but not limited to, the powers
and duties of the commissioner of corrections under section 241.01, powers
relating to use of force under section 243.52, and the right of the
commissioner of corrections to determine the place of confinement in a prison,
reformatory, or other facility.
(5) A person may not be confined in a Department of Corrections facility under this provision beyond the end of the person's executed sentence or the end of any applicable conditional release period, whichever is later. If a person confined in a Department of Corrections facility pursuant to this provision reaches the person's supervised release date and is subject to a period of conditional release, the period of conditional release shall commence on the supervised release date even though the person remains in the Department of Corrections facility pursuant to this provision. At the end of the later of the executed sentence or any applicable conditional release period, the person shall be transferred to a secure treatment facility.
(6) Nothing in this section may be construed to establish a right of an inmate in a state correctional facility to participate in sex offender treatment. This section must be construed in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 244.03.
(c) When a person is temporarily
confined in a Department of Corrections facility solely under this subdivision
and not based on any separate correctional authority, the commissioner of
corrections may charge the county of financial responsibility for the costs of
confinement, and the Department of Human Services shall use existing
appropriations to fund all remaining nonconfinement costs. The funds received by the commissioner for
the confinement and nonconfinement costs are appropriated to the department for
these purposes.
(c) (d) The committing county
may offer a person who is being petitioned for commitment under this chapter
and who is placed under a judicial hold order under section 253B.07,
subdivision 2b or 7, the option to be held in a county correctional or
detention facility rather than a secure treatment facility, under such terms as
may be agreed to by the county, the commitment petitioner, and the commitment
respondent. If a person makes such an
election under this paragraph, the court hold order shall specify the terms of
the agreement, including the conditions for revoking the election.
Sec. 123. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253D.21, is amended to read:
253D.21
NEUROLEPTIC PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION.
Neuroleptic Psychotropic
medications may be administered to a person committed under this chapter only
as provided in section 253B.092.
Sec. 124. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253D.28, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Procedure. (a) The supreme court shall refer a petition for rehearing and reconsideration to the chief judge of the judicial appeal panel. The chief judge shall notify the committed person, the county attorneys of the county of commitment and county of financial responsibility, the commissioner, the executive director, any interested person, and other persons the chief judge designates, of the time and place of the hearing on the petition. The notice shall be given at least 14 days prior to the date of the hearing. The hearing may be conducted by interactive video conference under General Rules of Practice, rule 131, and Minnesota Rules of Civil Commitment, rule 14.
(b) Any person may oppose the petition. The committed person, the committed person's counsel, the county attorneys of the committing county and county of financial responsibility, and the commissioner shall participate as parties to the proceeding pending before the judicial appeal panel and shall, no later than 20 days before the hearing on the petition, inform the judicial appeal panel and the opposing party in writing whether they support or oppose the petition and provide a summary of facts in support of their position.
(c) The judicial appeal panel may appoint court examiners and may adjourn the hearing from time to time. It shall hear and receive all relevant testimony and evidence and make a record of all proceedings. The committed person, the committed person's counsel, and the county attorney of the committing county or the county of financial responsibility have the right to be present and may present and cross-examine all witnesses and offer a factual and legal basis in support of their positions.
(d) The petitioning party seeking discharge or provisional discharge bears the burden of going forward with the evidence, which means presenting a prima facie case with competent evidence to show that the person is entitled to the requested relief. If the petitioning party has met this burden, the party opposing discharge or provisional discharge bears the burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence that the discharge or provisional discharge should be denied.
(e) A party seeking transfer under section 253D.29 must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the transfer is appropriate.
Sec. 125. REVISOR
INSTRUCTION.
The revisor of statutes shall renumber
Minnesota Statutes, section 253B.02, so that the subdivisions are alphabetical. The revisor shall correct any
cross-references that arise as a result of the renumbering.
Sec. 126. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections
253B.02, subdivisions 6 and 12a; 253B.05, subdivisions 1, 2, 2b, 3, and 4;
253B.064; 253B.065; 253B.066; 253B.09, subdivision 3; 253B.12, subdivision 2;
253B.15, subdivision 11; and 253B.20, subdivision 7, are repealed."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to civil commitment; modifying provisions governing civil commitment; establishing engagement services pilot project; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 253B.02, subdivisions 4b, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, by adding subdivisions; 253B.03, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4a, 5, 6, 6b, 6d, 7, 10; 253B.04, subdivisions 1, 1a, 2; 253B.045, subdivisions 2, 3, 5, 6; 253B.06, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 253B.07, subdivisions 1, 2, 2a, 2b, 2d, 3, 5, 7; 253B.08, subdivisions 1, 2a, 5, 5a; 253B.09, subdivisions 1, 2, 3a, 5; 253B.092; 253B.0921; 253B.095, subdivision 3; 253B.097, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 6; 253B.10; 253B.12, subdivisions 1, 3, 4, 7; 253B.13, subdivision 1; 253B.14; 253B.141; 253B.15, subdivisions 1, 1a, 2, 3, 3a, 3b, 3c, 5, 7, 9, 10, by adding a subdivision; 253B.16; 253B.17; 253B.18, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4a, 4b, 4c, 5, 5a, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15; 253B.19, subdivision 2; 253B.20, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 6; 253B.21, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 253B.212, subdivisions 1, 1a, 1b, 2; 253B.22, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 253B.23, subdivisions 1, 1b, 2; 253B.24; 253D.02, subdivision 6; 253D.07, subdivision 2; 253D.10, subdivision 2; 253D.21; 253D.28, subdivision 2; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 253B; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 253B.02, subdivisions 6, 12a; 253B.05, subdivisions 1, 2, 2b, 3, 4; 253B.064; 253B.065; 253B.066; 253B.09, subdivision 3; 253B.12, subdivision 2; 253B.15, subdivision 11; 253B.20, subdivision 7."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill be re-referred to the Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Division.
The
report was adopted.
Hausman from the Housing Finance and Policy Division to which was referred:
H. F. No. 2967, A bill for an act relating to housing; allowing mortgage financing for manufactured homes in manufactured home park cooperatives; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 168A.141, subdivision 1a; 273.125, subdivision 8.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 1, after line 5, insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 168A.141, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Certificates surrendered for cancellation. (a) When a manufactured home is to be affixed or is affixed, as defined in section 273.125, subdivision 8, paragraph (b), to real property, the owner of the manufactured home may surrender the manufacturer's certificate of origin or certificate of title to the department for cancellation so that the manufactured home becomes an improvement to real property and is no longer titled as personal property. The department must not issue a certificate of title for a manufactured home under chapter 168A if the manufacturer's certificate of origin is or has been surrendered under this subdivision, except as provided in section 168A.142. Upon surrender of the manufacturer's certificate of origin or the certificate of title, the department must issue notice of surrender to the owner, and upon recording an affidavit of affixation, which the county recorder or registrar of titles, as applicable, must accept, the manufactured home is deemed to be an improvement to real property. An affidavit of affixation by the owner of the manufactured home must include the following information:
(1) the name, residence address, and mailing address of owner or owners of the manufactured home;
(2) the legal description of the real property in which the manufactured home is, or will be, located;
(3) a copy of the surrendered manufacturer's certificate of origin or certificate of title and the notice of surrender;
(4) a written statement from the county
auditor or county treasurer of the county where the manufactured home is located stating that all property taxes
payable in the current year, as provided under section 273.125, subdivision 8,
paragraph (b), have been paid, or are not applicable; and
(5) the name and address of the person
designated by the applicant to record the original affidavit of affixation with
the county recorder or registrar of titles for the county where the real
property is located; and
(6) (5) the signature of the
person who executes the affidavit, properly executed before a person authorized
to authenticate an affidavit in this state.
(b) The person designated in paragraph
(a), clause (5), must record, or arrange for the recording of, the affidavit of
affixation, accompanied by the fees for recording and for issuing a certified
copy of the notice, including all attachments, showing the recording date. Upon obtaining the certified copy of the
notice under this paragraph, the person designated in the affidavit must
deliver the certified copy A certified copy of the affidavit must be
delivered to the county auditor of the county in which the real property to
which the manufactured home was affixed is located.
(c) The department is not liable for any errors, omissions, misstatements, or other deficiencies or inaccuracies in documents presented to the department under this section, if the documents presented appear to satisfy the requirements of this section. The department has no obligation to investigate the accuracy of statements contained in the documents."
Page 2, line 8, after "cooperative" insert "that owns the land and whose membership entitles the homeowner to occupy a specific portion of the land"
Page 2, line 9, strike "is, or must" and insert "....... is, or ....... will"
Page 2, line 18, strike "must" and insert "is intended to"
Page 2, strike lines 19 to 28 and insert:
"Signed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on ....... (date) by ....... (names of homeowner(s))"
Page 4, after line 5, insert:
"[only if the owner of the land is a Minnesota
nonprofit corporation or cooperative]:
The undersigned is the .............................. of
.................................., a Minnesota [nonprofit corporation or
cooperative], which owns the land described above. I hereby certify that the homeowner described
above is a member of the [nonprofit corporation or cooperative] whose
membership entitles the homeowner to occupy [insert legal description of the
homeowner's lot or, if the corporation or cooperative has filed a scaled
drawing as permitted by subdivision 4, below, Lot ................. shown on
such scaled drawing].
…………………………………………………………………. |
|
Signature block for nonprofit
or cooperative |
|
…………………………………………………………………. |
|
Acknowledgment of officer of
nonprofit or cooperative" |
|
Page 4, before line 6, insert:
"Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 168A.141, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 4. Scaled
drawing. (a) If the portion
of the land occupied by the homeowner has not been subdivided, the nonprofit or
cooperative owner shall have prepared and recorded against the land a scaled
drawing prepared by a licensed professional land surveyor, who shall certify
that:
(1) the scaled drawing accurately
depicts all information required by this subdivision; and
(2) the work was undertaken by, or
reviewed and approved by, the certifying land surveyor.
(b) The scaled drawing shall show:
(1) the dimensions and location of all
existing material structural improvements and roadways;
(2) the extent of any encroachments by
or upon any portion of the land;
(3) the location and dimensions of all
recorded easements within the land burdening any portion of the land;
(4) the distance and direction between
noncontiguous parcels of real estate;
(5) the location and dimensions of the
front, rear, and side boundaries of each lot that a member of the cooperative
or nonprofit corporation has a right to occupy and that lot's unique lot
number; and
(6) the legal description of the land."
Page 4, line 20, after "cooperative" insert "that holds title to the land on which it is situated"
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Correct the title numbers accordingly
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill be re-referred to the Committee on Commerce.
The
report was adopted.
Lesch from the Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Division to which was referred:
H. F. No. 2976, A bill for an act relating to civil law; modifying certain transfer to minors provisions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 527.32; 527.33; 527.40; 527.42.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill be placed on the General Register.
The
report was adopted.
Lesch from the Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Division to which was referred:
H. F. No. 3007, A bill for an act relating to courts; modifying criteria for publishing court of appeals opinions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 480A.08, subdivision 3.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill be placed on the General Register.
The
report was adopted.
Youakim from the Committee on Education Policy to which was referred:
H. F. No. 3065, A bill for an act relating to education; modifying requirements for interpreters; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 122A.31, subdivision 1.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill be re-referred to the Education Finance Division.
The
report was adopted.
Bernardy from the Higher Education Finance and Policy Division to which was referred:
H. F. No. 3087, A bill for an act relating to higher education; appropriating money for critical operating funds for Minnesota State Colleges and Universities.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The
report was adopted.
Mariani from the Public Safety and Criminal Justice Reform Finance and Policy Division to which was referred:
H. F. No. 3105, A bill for an act relating to public safety; providing for probationary sentences for certain nonviolent offenders; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 244.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 1, line 8, after the comma, insert "in addition to considerations set forth in section 244.10 and the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines,"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill be placed on the General Register.
The
report was adopted.
Youakim from the Committee on Education Policy to which was referred:
H. F. No. 3201, A bill for an act relating to education; strengthening the Increase Teachers of Color Act; seeking to increase the percentage of teachers of color and American Indian teachers in Minnesota; requiring reports; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 120B.11, subdivisions 2, 3; 122A.185, subdivision 1; 124D.861, subdivision 2; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 120B; 122A.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 3, line 31, after the first "the" insert "aggregate"
Page 3, line 34, after the period, insert "The board must submit the report to the chairs and ranking minority members of the legislative committees having jurisdiction over kindergarten through grade 12 education. The board must submit the report in accordance with section 3.195."
Page 4, line 16, delete "students of color and American Indian students" and insert "secondary school students and teacher candidates who are of color or American Indian"
Page 4, line 19, after "be" insert "submitted in accordance with section 3.195 and"
Page 6, lines 25, 27, 29, and 30, delete "school" and insert "district"
Page 7, lines 1 and 20, delete "school" and insert "district"
Page 8, line 12, delete "school" and insert "district"
Page 8, line 14, delete "schools" and insert "districts"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill be re-referred to the Education Finance Division.
The
report was adopted.
Mariani from the Public Safety and Criminal Justice Reform Finance and Policy Division to which was referred:
H. F. No. 3218, A bill for an act relating to public safety; requiring the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension to investigate peace officers accused of sexual assault; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 626.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 1, line 16, after "agency" insert ", including the chief law enforcement officer,"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The
report was adopted.
Hausman from the Housing Finance and Policy Division to which was referred:
H. F. No. 3253, A bill for an act relating to taxation; establishing a Minnesota housing tax credit contribution fund; providing a credit against the individual income tax, corporate franchise tax, and insurance premiums for certain contributions; requiring a report; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 297I.20, by adding a subdivision; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 290; 462A.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill be re-referred to the Committee on Taxes.
The
report was adopted.
Hausman from the Housing Finance and Policy Division to which was referred:
H. F. No. 3326, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; authorizing the sale and issuance of housing infrastructure bonds; appropriating money for public housing rehabilitation; increasing the supply of shelters; adding an eligible use of housing infrastructure bonds; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 462A.37, by adding a subdivision; Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, section 462A.37, subdivisions 2, 5.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 2, line 2, reinstate the stricken language
Page 2, line 3, delete the new language
Page 5, line 13, delete everything after the period
Page 5, delete lines 14 to 23
Page 5, line 24, delete everything before "The amounts"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill be re-referred to the Capital Investment Division.
The
report was adopted.
Hausman from the Housing Finance and Policy Division to which was referred:
H. F. No. 3358, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; authorizing the sale and issuance of housing infrastructure bonds; increasing the supply of shelters; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 462A.37, by adding a subdivision; Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, section 462A.37, subdivision 5.
Reported the same back with the recommendation that the bill be re-referred to the Capital Investment Division.
The
report was adopted.
Mariani from the Public Safety and Criminal Justice Reform Finance and Policy Division to which was referred:
H. F. No. 3411, A bill for an act relating to civil commitment; modifying provisions governing civil commitment; establishing engagement services pilot project; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 253B.02, subdivisions 4b, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12a, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, by adding subdivisions; 253B.03, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4a, 5, 6, 6b, 6d, 7, 10; 253B.04, subdivisions 1, 1a, 2; 253B.045, subdivisions 2, 3, 5, 6; 253B.06, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 253B.07, subdivisions 1, 2, 2b, 2d, 3, 4, 5, 7; 253B.08, subdivisions 1, 2a, 5, 5a; 253B.09, subdivisions 1, 2, 3a, 5; 253B.092; 253B.0921; 253B.095, subdivision 3; 253B.097, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 6; 253B.10; 253B.12, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 7; 253B.13, subdivision 1; 253B.14; 253B.141; 253B.15, subdivisions 1, 1a, 2, 3, 3a, 3b, 3c, 5, 7, 9, 10, by adding a subdivision; 253B.16; 253B.17; 253B.18, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4a, 4b, 4c, 5, 5a, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15; 253B.19, subdivision 2; 253B.20, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 6; 253B.21, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 253B.212, subdivisions 1, 1a, 1b, 2; 253B.22, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 253B.23, subdivisions 1, 1b, 2; 253B.24; 253D.02, subdivision 6; 253D.07, subdivision 2; 253D.10, subdivision 2; 253D.21; 253D.28, subdivision 2; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 253B; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 253B.02, subdivision 6; 253B.05, subdivisions 1, 2, 2b, 3, 4; 253B.064; 253B.065; 253B.066; 253B.09, subdivision 3; 253B.15, subdivision 11; 253B.20, subdivision 7.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 4b, is amended to read:
Subd. 4b. Community-based
treatment program. "Community-based
treatment program" means treatment and services provided at the
community level, including but not limited to community support services
programs defined in section 245.462, subdivision 6; day treatment services
defined in section 245.462, subdivision 8; outpatient services defined in
section 245.462, subdivision 21; mental health crisis services under section
245.462, subdivision 14c; outpatient services defined in section 245.462,
subdivision 21; assertive community treatment services under section 256B.0622;
adult rehabilitation mental health services under section 256B.0623; home and
community-based waivers, supportive housing, and residential treatment
services as defined in section 245.462, subdivision 23. Community-based treatment program excludes
services provided by a state-operated treatment program.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Examiner. "Examiner" means a person who
is knowledgeable, trained, and practicing in the diagnosis and assessment or in
the treatment of the alleged impairment, and who is: a licensed
physician, a mental health professional as defined in section 245.462,
subdivision 18, clauses (1) to (6), or a licensed physician assistant.
(1) a licensed physician;
(2)
a licensed psychologist who has a doctoral degree in psychology or who became a
licensed consulting psychologist before July 2, 1975; or
(3) an advanced practice registered
nurse certified in mental health or a licensed physician assistant, except that
only a physician or psychologist meeting these requirements may be appointed by
the court as described by sections 253B.07, subdivision 3; 253B.092,
subdivision 8, paragraph (b); 253B.17, subdivision 3; 253B.18, subdivision 2;
and 253B.19, subdivisions 1 and 2, and only a physician or psychologist may
conduct an assessment as described by Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure,
rule 20.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 7a. Court
examiner. "Court examiner"
means a person appointed to serve the court, and who is a physician or licensed
psychologist who has a doctoral degree in psychology.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Head
of the treatment facility or program. "Head of the treatment
facility or program" means the person who is charged with overall
responsibility for the professional program of care and treatment of the facility
or the person's designee treatment facility, state-operated treatment
program, or community-based treatment program.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. Health officer. "Health officer" means:
(1) a licensed physician;
(2) a licensed psychologist a mental
health professional as defined in section 245.462, subdivision 18, clauses (1)
to (6);
(3) a licensed social worker;
(4) (3) a registered nurse
working in an emergency room of a hospital;
(5) a psychiatric or public health nurse
as defined in section 145A.02, subdivision 18;
(6) (4) an advanced practice
registered nurse (APRN) as defined in section 148.171, subdivision 3; or
(7) (5) a mental health professional
practitioner as defined in section 245.462, subdivision 17, providing
mental health mobile crisis intervention services as described under section
256B.0624; or with the consultation and approval by a mental health
professional.
(8) a formally designated member of a
prepetition screening unit established by section 253B.07.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Interested person. "Interested person" means:
(1) an adult who has a specific interest
in the patient or proposed patient, including but not limited to, a
public official, including a local welfare agency acting under section 626.5561,
and; a health care or mental health provider or the provider's employee
or agent; the legal guardian, spouse, parent, legal counsel, adult child, or
next of kin,; or other person designated by a patient or
proposed patient; or
(2) a health plan company that is providing coverage for a proposed patient.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 13, is amended to read:
Subd. 13. Person
who is mentally ill poses a risk of harm due to a mental illness. (a) A "person who is mentally ill
poses a risk of harm due to a mental illness" means any person who
has an organic disorder of the brain or a substantial psychiatric disorder of
thought, mood, perception, orientation, or memory which that
grossly impairs judgment, behavior, capacity to recognize reality, or to reason
or understand, which that is manifested by instances of grossly
disturbed behavior or faulty perceptions and who, due to this impairment,
poses a substantial likelihood of physical harm to self or others as
demonstrated by:
(1) a failure to obtain necessary food, clothing, shelter, or medical care as a result of the impairment;
(2) an inability for reasons other than indigence to obtain necessary food, clothing, shelter, or medical care as a result of the impairment and it is more probable than not that the person will suffer substantial harm, significant psychiatric deterioration or debilitation, or serious illness, unless appropriate treatment and services are provided;
(3) a recent attempt or threat to physically harm self or others; or
(4) recent and volitional conduct involving significant damage to substantial property.
(b) A person is not mentally ill does
not pose a risk of harm due to mental illness under this section if the person's
impairment is solely due to:
(1) epilepsy;
(2) developmental disability;
(3) brief periods of intoxication caused by alcohol, drugs, or other mind-altering substances; or
(4) dependence upon or addiction to any alcohol, drugs, or other mind-altering substances.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 16, is amended to read:
Subd. 16. Peace officer. "Peace officer" means a sheriff or deputy sheriff, or municipal or other local police officer, or a State Patrol officer when engaged in the authorized duties of office.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 17, is amended to read:
Subd. 17. Person
who is mentally ill has a mental illness and is dangerous
to the public. (a) A
"person who is mentally ill has a mental illness and is
dangerous to the public" is a person:
(1) who is mentally ill has an
organic disorder of the brain or a substantial psychiatric disorder of thought,
mood, perception, orientation, or memory that grossly impairs judgment,
behavior, capacity to recognize reality, or to reason or understand, and is
manifested by instances of grossly disturbed behavior or faulty perceptions;
and
(2) who as a result of that mental
illness impairment presents a clear danger to the safety of others
as demonstrated by the facts that (i) the person has engaged in an overt act
causing or attempting to cause serious physical harm to another and (ii) there
is a substantial likelihood that the person will engage in acts capable of
inflicting serious physical harm on another.
(b)
A person committed as a sexual psychopathic personality or sexually dangerous
person as defined in subdivisions 18a and 18b is subject to the provisions of
this chapter that apply to persons who are mentally ill and dangerous to the
public.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 18, is amended to read:
Subd. 18. Regional
State-operated treatment center program. "Regional State-operated
treatment center program" means any state-operated
facility for persons who are mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or
chemically dependent under the direct administrative authority of the
commissioner means any state-operated program including community
behavioral health hospitals, crisis centers, residential facilities, outpatient
services, and other community-based services developed and operated by the
state and under the commissioner's control for a person who has a mental
illness, developmental disability, or chemical dependency.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 19, is amended to read:
Subd. 19. Treatment
facility. "Treatment
facility" means a non-state-operated hospital, community mental
health center, or other treatment provider residential treatment
provider, crisis residential withdrawal management center, or corporate foster
care home qualified to provide care and treatment for persons who are
mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or chemically dependent who have
a mental illness, developmental disability, or chemical dependency.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 21, is amended to read:
Subd. 21. Pass. "Pass" means any authorized
temporary, unsupervised absence from a state-operated treatment facility
program.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 22, is amended to read:
Subd. 22. Pass
plan. "Pass plan" means
the part of a treatment plan for a person patient who has been
committed as mentally ill and a person who has a mental illness and
is dangerous to the public that specifies the terms and conditions
under which the patient may be released on a pass.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, subdivision 23, is amended to read:
Subd. 23. Pass-eligible
status. "Pass-eligible
status" means the status under which a person patient
committed as mentally ill and a person who has a mental illness and
is dangerous to the public may be released on passes after approval
of a pass plan by the head of a state-operated treatment facility
program.
Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.02, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 27. Psychotropic
medication. "Psychotropic
medication" means antipsychotic medication, mood stabilizing medication,
antidepressants, and anxiolytics.
Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.03, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Restraints. (a) A patient has the right to be free
from restraints. Restraints shall not be
applied to a patient in a treatment facility or state-operated treatment
program unless the head of the treatment facility, head of the
state-operated treatment program, a member of the medical staff, or a
licensed peace officer who has custody of the patient determines that they
restraints are necessary for the safety of the patient or others.
(b)
Restraints shall not be applied to patients with developmental disabilities
except as permitted under section 245.825 and rules of the commissioner of
human services. Consent must be obtained
from the person patient or person's patient's
guardian except for emergency procedures as permitted under rules of the
commissioner adopted under section 245.825.
(c) Each use of a restraint and reason for it shall be made part of the clinical record of the patient under the signature of the head of the treatment facility.
Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.03, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Correspondence. A patient has the right to correspond
freely without censorship. The head of
the treatment facility or head of the state-operated treatment program
may restrict correspondence if the patient's medical welfare requires this
restriction. For patients a
patient in regional a state-operated treatment centers
program, that determination may be reviewed by the commissioner. Any limitation imposed on the exercise of a
patient's correspondence rights and the reason for it shall be made a part of
the clinical record of the patient. Any
communication which is not delivered to a patient shall be immediately returned
to the sender.
Sec. 18. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.03, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Visitors and phone calls. Subject to the general rules of the treatment facility or state-operated treatment program, a patient has the right to receive visitors and make phone calls. The head of the treatment facility or head of the state-operated treatment program may restrict visits and phone calls on determining that the medical welfare of the patient requires it. Any limitation imposed on the exercise of the patient's visitation and phone call rights and the reason for it shall be made a part of the clinical record of the patient.
Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.03, subdivision 4a, is amended to read:
Subd. 4a. Disclosure of patient's admission. Upon admission to a treatment facility or state-operated treatment program where federal law prohibits unauthorized disclosure of patient or resident identifying information to callers and visitors, the patient or resident, or the legal guardian of the patient or resident, shall be given the opportunity to authorize disclosure of the patient's or resident's presence in the facility to callers and visitors who may seek to communicate with the patient or resident. To the extent possible, the legal guardian of a patient or resident shall consider the opinions of the patient or resident regarding the disclosure of the patient's or resident's presence in the facility.
Sec. 20. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.03, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Periodic
assessment. A patient has the right
to periodic medical assessment, including assessment of the medical necessity
of continuing care and, if the treatment facility, state-operated treatment
program, or community-based treatment program declines to provide
continuing care, the right to receive specific written reasons why continuing
care is declined at the time of the assessment.
The treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program shall assess the physical and mental
condition of every patient as frequently as necessary, but not less often than
annually. If the patient refuses to be
examined, the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program,
or community-based treatment program shall document in the patient's chart
its attempts to examine the patient. If
a person patient is committed as developmentally disabled for an
indeterminate period of time, the three-year judicial review must include the
annual reviews for each year as outlined in Minnesota Rules, part 9525.0075,
subpart 6 regarding the patient's need for continued commitment.
Sec. 21. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.03, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Consent for medical procedure. (a) A patient has the right to give prior consent to any medical or surgical treatment, other than treatment for chemical dependency or nonintrusive treatment for mental illness.
(b) The following procedures shall be used to obtain consent for any treatment necessary to preserve the life or health of any committed patient:
(a) (1) the written,
informed consent of a competent adult patient for the treatment is sufficient.;
(b) (2) if the patient is
subject to guardianship which includes the provision of medical care, the
written, informed consent of the guardian for the treatment is sufficient.;
(c) (3) if the head of the
treatment facility or state-operated treatment program determines that
the patient is not competent to consent to the treatment and the patient has
not been adjudicated incompetent, written, informed consent for the surgery or
medical treatment shall be obtained from the person appointed the power of
attorney, the patient's agent under the health care directive, or the
nearest proper relative. For this
purpose, the following persons are proper relatives, in the order listed: the patient's spouse, parent, adult child, or
adult sibling. If the nearest proper
relatives cannot be located, refuse to consent to the procedure, or are unable
to consent, the head of the treatment facility or state-operated treatment
program or an interested person may petition the committing court for
approval for the treatment or may petition a court of competent jurisdiction
for the appointment of a guardian. The
determination that the patient is not competent, and the reasons for the
determination, shall be documented in the patient's clinical record.;
(d) (4) consent to treatment
of any minor patient shall be secured in accordance with sections 144.341 to
144.346. A minor 16 years of age or
older may consent to hospitalization, routine diagnostic evaluation, and
emergency or short-term acute care.; and
(e) (5) in the case of an
emergency when the persons ordinarily qualified to give consent cannot be
located in sufficient time to address the emergency need, the head of
the treatment facility or state-operated treatment program may give
consent.
(c) No person who consents to treatment pursuant to the provisions of this subdivision shall be civilly or criminally liable for the performance or the manner of performing the treatment. No person shall be liable for performing treatment without consent if written, informed consent was given pursuant to this subdivision. This provision shall not affect any other liability which may result from the manner in which the treatment is performed.
Sec. 22. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.03, subdivision 6b, is amended to read:
Subd. 6b. Consent
for mental health treatment. A
competent person patient admitted voluntarily to a treatment
facility or state-operated treatment program may be subjected to
intrusive mental health treatment only with the person's patient's
written informed consent. For purposes
of this section, "intrusive mental health treatment" means electroshock
electroconvulsive therapy and neuroleptic psychotropic
medication and does not include treatment for a developmental disability. An incompetent person patient
who has prepared a directive under subdivision 6d regarding intrusive mental
health treatment with intrusive therapies must be treated in
accordance with this section, except in cases of emergencies.
Sec. 23. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.03, subdivision 6d, is amended to read:
Subd. 6d. Adult mental health treatment. (a) A competent adult patient may
make a declaration of preferences or instructions regarding intrusive mental
health treatment. These preferences or
instructions may include, but are not limited to, consent to or refusal of
these treatments. A declaration of
preferences or instructions may include a health care directive under chapter
145C or a psychiatric directive.
(b) A declaration may designate a proxy to make decisions about intrusive mental health treatment. A proxy designated to make decisions about intrusive mental health treatments and who agrees to serve as proxy may make decisions on behalf of a declarant consistent with any desires the declarant expresses in the declaration.
(c) A declaration is effective only if it is signed by the
declarant and two witnesses. The
witnesses must include a statement that they believe the declarant understands
the nature and significance of the declaration.
A declaration becomes operative when it is delivered to the declarant's
physician or other mental health treatment provider. The physician or provider must comply with it
the declaration to the fullest extent possible, consistent with
reasonable medical practice, the availability of treatments requested, and
applicable law. The physician or
provider shall continue to obtain the declarant's informed consent to all
intrusive mental health treatment decisions if the declarant is capable of
informed consent. A treatment provider may
must not require a person patient to make a declaration
under this subdivision as a condition of receiving services.
(d) The physician or other provider shall make the
declaration a part of the declarant's medical record. If the physician or other provider is
unwilling at any time to comply with the declaration, the physician or provider
must promptly notify the declarant and document the notification in the
declarant's medical record. If the
declarant has been committed as a patient under this chapter, the physician or
provider may subject a declarant to intrusive treatment in a manner contrary to
the declarant's expressed wishes, only upon order of the committing court. If the declarant is not a committed patient
under this chapter, The physician or provider may subject the declarant to
intrusive treatment in a manner contrary to the declarant's expressed wishes,
only if the declarant is committed as mentally ill a person who poses
a risk of harm due to mental illness or mentally ill as a person
who has a mental illness and is dangerous to the public and a court
order authorizing the treatment has been issued.
(e) A declaration under this subdivision may be revoked in whole or in part at any time and in any manner by the declarant if the declarant is competent at the time of revocation. A revocation is effective when a competent declarant communicates the revocation to the attending physician or other provider. The attending physician or other provider shall note the revocation as part of the declarant's medical record.
(f) A provider who administers intrusive mental health treatment according to and in good faith reliance upon the validity of a declaration under this subdivision is held harmless from any liability resulting from a subsequent finding of invalidity.
(g) In addition to making a declaration under this subdivision, a competent adult may delegate parental powers under section 524.5-211 or may nominate a guardian under sections 524.5-101 to 524.5-502.
Sec. 24. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.03, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Program Treatment plan. A person patient receiving
services under this chapter has the right to receive proper care and treatment,
best adapted, according to contemporary professional standards, to rendering
further supervision unnecessary. The
treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based
treatment program shall devise a written program treatment
plan for each person patient which describes in behavioral terms
the case problems, the precise goals, including the expected period of time for
treatment, and the specific measures to be employed. Each plan shall be reviewed at least
quarterly to determine progress toward the goals, and to modify the program
plan as necessary. The
development and review of treatment plans must be
conducted
as required under the license or certification of the treatment facility,
state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program. If there are no review requirements under the
license or certification, the treatment plan must be reviewed quarterly. The program treatment plan
shall be devised and reviewed with the designated agency and with the patient. The clinical record shall reflect the program
treatment plan review. If the
designated agency or the patient does not participate in the planning and
review, the clinical record shall include reasons for nonparticipation and the
plans for future involvement. The
commissioner shall monitor the program treatment plan and review
process for regional centers state-operated treatment programs to
insure ensure compliance with the provisions of this subdivision.
Sec. 25. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.03, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Notification. (a) All persons patients
admitted or committed to a treatment facility or state-operated treatment
program, or temporarily confined under section 253B.045, shall be notified
in writing of their rights regarding hospitalization and other treatment at
the time of admission.
(b) This notification must include:
(1) patient rights specified in this section and section 144.651, including nursing home discharge rights;
(2) the right to obtain treatment and services voluntarily under this chapter;
(3) the right to voluntary admission and release under section 253B.04;
(4) rights in case of an emergency
admission under section 253B.05 253B.051, including the right to
documentation in support of an emergency hold and the right to a summary
hearing before a judge if the patient believes an emergency hold is improper;
(5) the right to request expedited review under section 62M.05 if additional days of inpatient stay are denied;
(6) the right to continuing benefits pending appeal and to an expedited administrative hearing under section 256.045 if the patient is a recipient of medical assistance or MinnesotaCare; and
(7) the right to an external appeal process under section 62Q.73, including the right to a second opinion.
Sec. 26. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.04, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Voluntary
admission and treatment. (a)
Voluntary admission is preferred over involuntary commitment and treatment. Any person 16 years of age or older may
request to be admitted to a treatment facility or state-operated treatment
program as a voluntary patient for observation, evaluation, diagnosis, care
and treatment without making formal written application. Any person under the age of 16 years may be
admitted as a patient with the consent of a parent or legal guardian if it is
determined by independent examination that there is reasonable evidence that
(1) the proposed patient has a mental illness, or is developmentally
disabled developmental disability, or chemically dependent chemical
dependency; and (2) the proposed patient is suitable for treatment. The head of the treatment facility or head
of the state-operated treatment program shall not arbitrarily refuse any
person seeking admission as a voluntary patient. In making decisions regarding admissions, the
treatment facility or state-operated treatment program shall use
clinical admission criteria consistent with the current applicable inpatient
admission standards established by professional organizations including
the American Psychiatric Association or, the American Academy of
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, the Joint Commission, and the American
Society of Addiction Medicine. These
criteria must be no more restrictive than, and must be consistent with, the
requirements of section 62Q.53. The treatment
facility or head of the state-operated treatment program may not refuse
to admit a person voluntarily solely because the person does not meet the
criteria for involuntary holds under section 253B.05 253B.051 or
the definition of a person who poses a risk of harm due to mental
illness under section 253B.02, subdivision 13.
(b) In addition to the consent provisions of paragraph (a), a person who is 16 or 17 years of age who refuses to consent personally to admission may be admitted as a patient for mental illness or chemical dependency treatment with the consent of a parent or legal guardian if it is determined by an independent examination that there is reasonable evidence that the proposed patient is chemically dependent or has a mental illness and is suitable for treatment. The person conducting the examination shall notify the proposed patient and the parent or legal guardian of this determination.
(c) A person who is voluntarily participating in treatment for a mental illness is not subject to civil commitment under this chapter if the person:
(1) has given informed consent or, if lacking capacity, is a person for whom legally valid substitute consent has been given; and
(2) is participating in a medically
appropriate course of treatment, including clinically appropriate and lawful
use of neuroleptic psychotropic medication and electroconvulsive
therapy. The limitation on commitment in
this paragraph does not apply if, based on clinical assessment, the court finds
that it is unlikely that the person patient will remain in and
cooperate with a medically appropriate course of treatment absent commitment
and the standards for commitment are otherwise met. This paragraph does not apply to a person for
whom commitment proceedings are initiated pursuant to rule 20.01 or 20.02 of
the Rules of Criminal Procedure, or a person found by the court to meet the
requirements under section 253B.02, subdivision 17.
(d) Legally valid substitute consent may be provided by a proxy under a health care directive, a guardian or conservator with authority to consent to mental health treatment, or consent to admission under subdivision 1a or 1b.
Sec. 27. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.04, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:
Subd. 1a. Voluntary
treatment or admission for persons with a mental illness. (a) A person with a mental illness may
seek or voluntarily agree to accept treatment or admission to a state-operated
treatment program or treatment facility.
If the mental health provider determines that the person lacks the
capacity to give informed consent for the treatment or admission, and in the
absence of a health care power of attorney directive or power of
attorney that authorizes consent, the designated agency or its designee may
give informed consent for mental health treatment or admission to a treatment
facility or state-operated treatment program on behalf of the person.
(b) The designated agency shall apply the following criteria in determining the person's ability to give informed consent:
(1) whether the person demonstrates an awareness of the person's illness, and the reasons for treatment, its risks, benefits and alternatives, and the possible consequences of refusing treatment; and
(2) whether the person communicates verbally or nonverbally a clear choice concerning treatment that is a reasoned one, not based on delusion, even though it may not be in the person's best interests.
(c) The basis for the designated agency's decision that the person lacks the capacity to give informed consent for treatment or admission, and that the patient has voluntarily accepted treatment or admission, must be documented in writing.
(d) A mental health provider treatment
facility or state-operated treatment program that provides treatment in
reliance on the written consent given by the designated agency under this
subdivision or by a substitute decision maker appointed by the court is not
civilly or criminally liable for performing treatment without consent. This paragraph does not affect any other
liability that may result from the manner in which the treatment is performed.
(e)
A person patient who receives treatment or is admitted to a treatment
facility or state-operated treatment program under this subdivision or
subdivision 1b has the right to refuse treatment at any time or to be released
from a treatment facility or state-operated treatment program as
provided under subdivision 2. The person
patient or any interested person acting on the person's patient's
behalf may seek court review within five days for a determination of whether
the person's patient's agreement to accept treatment or admission
is voluntary. At the time a person
patient agrees to treatment or admission to a treatment facility or
state-operated treatment program under this subdivision, the designated
agency or its designee shall inform the person patient in writing
of the person's patient's rights under this paragraph.
(f) This subdivision does not authorize
the administration of neuroleptic psychotropic medications. Neuroleptic Psychotropic
medications may be administered only as provided in section 253B.092.
Sec. 28. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.04, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Release. Every patient admitted for mental illness or developmental disability under this section shall be informed in writing at the time of admission that the patient has a right to leave the treatment facility or state‑operated treatment program within 12 hours of making a request, unless held under another provision of this chapter. Every patient admitted for chemical dependency under this section shall be informed in writing at the time of admission that the patient has a right to leave the treatment facility or state-operated treatment program within 72 hours, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, of making a request, unless held under another provision of this chapter. The request shall be submitted in writing to the head of the treatment facility or state‑operated treatment program or the person's designee.
Sec. 29. [253B.041]
SERVICES FOR ENGAGEMENT IN TREATMENT.
Subdivision 1. Eligibility. (a) The purpose of engagement services
is to avoid the need for commitment and to enable the proposed patient to
voluntarily engage in needed treatment. An
interested person may apply to the county where a proposed patient resides to
request engagement services.
(b) To be eligible for engagement
services, the proposed patient must be at least 18 years of age, have a mental
illness, and either:
(1) be exhibiting symptoms of serious
mental illness including hallucinations, mania, delusional thoughts, or be
unable to obtain necessary food, clothing, shelter, medical care, or provide
necessary hygiene due to the patient's mental illness; or
(2) have a history of failing to adhere
to treatment for mental illness, in that:
(i) the proposed patient's mental
illness has been a substantial factor in necessitating hospitalization, or
incarceration in a state or local correctional facility, not including any
period during which the person was hospitalized or incarcerated immediately
preceding filing the application for engagement; or
(ii) the proposed patient is exhibiting
symptoms or behavior that may lead to hospitalization, incarceration, or
court-ordered treatment.
Subd. 2. Administration. (a) Upon receipt of a request for
engagement services, the county's prepetition screening team shall conduct an
investigation to determine whether the proposed patient is eligible. In making this determination, the screening
team shall seek any relevant information from an interested person.
(b)
If the screening team determines that the proposed patient is eligible,
engagement services must begin and include, but are not limited to:
(1) assertive attempts to engage the
patient in voluntary treatment for mental illness for at least 90 days. Engagement services must be person-centered
and continue even if the patient is an inmate in a non-state-operated
correctional facility;
(2) efforts to engage the patient's
existing systems of support, including interested persons, unless the
engagement provider determines that involvement is not helpful to the patient. This includes education on restricting means
of harm, suicide prevention, and engagement; and
(3) collaboration with the patient to
meet immediate needs including access to housing, food, income, disability
verification, medications, and treatment for medical conditions.
(c) Engagement services regarding potential
treatment options must take into account the patient's preferences for services
and supports. The county may offer
engagement services through the designated agency or another agency under
contract. Engagement services staff must
have training in person-centered care. Engagement
services staff may include but are not limited to mobile crisis teams under
section 245.462, certified peer specialists under section 256B.0615,
community-based treatment programs, and homeless outreach workers.
(d) If the patient voluntarily consents
to receive mental health treatment, the engagement services staff must
facilitate the referral to an appropriate mental health treatment provider
including support obtaining health insurance if the proposed patient is currently
or may become uninsured. If the proposed
patient initially consents to treatment, but fails to initiate or continue
treatment, the engagement services team must continue outreach efforts to the
patient.
Subd. 3. Commitment. Engagement services for a patient to
seek treatment may be stopped if the proposed patient is in need of commitment
and satisfies the commitment criteria under section 253B.09, subdivision 1. In such a case, the engagement services team
must immediately notify the designated agency, initiate the prepetition
screening process under section 253B.07, or seek an emergency hold if necessary
to ensure the safety of the patient or others.
Subd. 4. Evaluation. Counties may, but are not required to,
provide engagement services. The commissioner
shall conduct a pilot project evaluating the impact of engagement services in
decreasing commitments, increasing engagement in treatment, and other measures.
Sec. 30. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.045, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Facilities. (a) Each county or a group of counties
shall maintain or provide by contract a facility for confinement of persons
held temporarily for observation, evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, and care. When the temporary confinement is provided at
a regional state-operated treatment center program,
the commissioner shall charge the county of financial responsibility for the
costs of confinement of persons patients hospitalized under section
253B.05, subdivisions 1 and 2, sections 253B.051 and section
253B.07, subdivision 2b, except that the commissioner shall bill the
responsible health plan first. Any
charges not covered, including co-pays and deductibles shall be the
responsibility of the county. If the person
patient has health plan coverage, but the hospitalization does not meet
the criteria in subdivision 6 or section 62M.07, 62Q.53, or 62Q.535, the county
is responsible. When a person is temporarily confined in a
Department of Corrections facility solely under subdivision 1a,
and not based on any separate correctional authority:
(1) the commissioner of corrections may
charge the county of financial responsibility for the costs of confinement; and
(2)
the Department of Human Services shall use existing appropriations to fund all remaining
nonconfinement costs. The funds received
by the commissioner for the confinement and nonconfinement costs are
appropriated to the department for these purposes.
(b) For the purposes of this subdivision,
"county of financial responsibility" has the meaning specified in
section 253B.02, subdivision 4c, or, if the person patient has no
residence in this state, the county which initiated the confinement. The charge for confinement in a facility
operated by the commissioner of human services shall be based on the
commissioner's determination of the cost of care pursuant to section 246.50,
subdivision 5. When there is a dispute
as to which county is the county of financial responsibility, the county
charged for the costs of confinement shall pay for them pending final
determination of the dispute over financial responsibility.
Sec. 31. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.045, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Cost
of care. Notwithstanding subdivision
2, a county shall be responsible for the cost of care as specified under
section 246.54 for persons a patient hospitalized at a regional
state-operated treatment center program in accordance with
section 253B.09 and the person's patient's legal status has been
changed to a court hold under section 253B.07, subdivision 2b, pending a
judicial determination regarding continued commitment pursuant to sections
253B.12 and 253B.13.
Sec. 32. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.045, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Health
plan company; definition. For
purposes of this section, "health plan company" has the meaning given
it in section 62Q.01, subdivision 4, and also includes a demonstration provider
as defined in section 256B.69, subdivision 2, paragraph (b),; and
a county or group of counties participating in county-based purchasing
according to section 256B.692, and a children's mental health collaborative
under contract to provide medical assistance for individuals enrolled in the
prepaid medical assistance and MinnesotaCare programs according to sections
245.493 to 245.495.
Sec. 33. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.045, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Coverage. (a) For purposes of this section, "mental health services" means all covered services that are intended to treat or ameliorate an emotional, behavioral, or psychiatric condition and that are covered by the policy, contract, or certificate of coverage of the enrollee's health plan company or by law.
(b) All health plan companies that provide
coverage for mental health services must cover or provide mental health
services ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction under a court order
that is issued on the basis of a behavioral care evaluation performed by a
licensed psychiatrist or a doctoral level licensed psychologist, which includes
a diagnosis and an individual treatment plan for care in the most appropriate,
least restrictive environment. The
health plan company must be given a copy of the court order and the behavioral
care evaluation. The health plan company
shall be financially liable for the evaluation if performed by a participating
provider of the health plan company and shall be financially liable for the
care included in the court-ordered individual treatment plan if the care is
covered by the health plan company and ordered to be provided by a
participating provider or another provider as required by rule or law. This court-ordered coverage must not be
subject to a separate medical necessity determination by a health plan company
under its utilization procedures.
Sec. 34. [253B.051]
EMERGENCY ADMISSION.
Subdivision 1. Peace
officer or health officer authority.
(a) If a peace officer or health officer has reason to believe, either
through direct observation of the person's behavior or upon reliable
information of the person's recent behavior and, if available, knowledge or
reliable information concerning the person's past behavior or treatment that
the person:
(1)
has a mental illness or developmental disability and is in danger of harming
self or others if the officer does not immediately detain the patient, the
peace officer or health officer may take the person into custody and transport
the person to an examiner or a treatment facility, state-operated treatment
program, or community-based treatment program;
(2) is chemically dependent or
intoxicated in public and in danger of harming self or others if the officer
does not immediately detain the patient, the peace officer or health officer
may take the person into custody and transport the person to a treatment
facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment
program; or
(3) is chemically dependent or
intoxicated in public and not in danger of harming self, others, or property,
the peace officer or health officer may take the person into custody and
transport the person to the person's home.
(b) An examiner's written statement or
a health officer's written statement in compliance with the requirements of
subdivision 2 is sufficient authority for a peace officer or health officer to
take the person into custody and transport the person to a treatment facility,
state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program.
(c) A peace officer or health officer
who takes a person into custody and transports the person to a treatment
facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment
program under this subdivision shall make written application for admission of
the person containing:
(1) the officer's statement specifying
the reasons and circumstances under which the person was taken into custody;
(2) identifying information on specific
individuals to the extent practicable, if danger to those individuals is a
basis for the emergency hold; and
(3) the officer's name, the agency that
employs the officer, and the telephone number or other contact information for
purposes of receiving notice under subdivision 3.
(d) A copy of the examiner's written
statement and officer's application shall be made available to the person taken
into custody.
(e) The officer may provide the
transportation personally or may arrange to have the person transported by a
suitable medical or mental health transportation provider. As far as practicable, a peace officer who
provides transportation for a person placed in a treatment facility,
state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program under
this subdivision must not be in uniform and must not use a vehicle visibly
marked as a law enforcement vehicle.
Subd. 2. Emergency hold. (a) A treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program, other than a facility operated by the Minnesota sex offender program, may admit or hold a patient, including a patient transported under subdivision 1, for emergency care and treatment if the head of the facility or program consents to holding the patient and an examiner provides a written statement in support of holding the patient.
(b) The written statement must indicate
that:
(1) the examiner examined the patient
not more than 15 days prior to admission;
(2) the examiner interviewed the
patient, or if not, the specific reasons why the examiner did not interview the
patient;
(3)
the examiner has the opinion that the patient has a mental illness or
developmental disability, or is chemically dependent and is in danger of
causing harm to self or others if a facility or program does not immediately
detain the patient. The statement must
include observations of the patient's behavior and avoid conclusory language. The statement must be specific enough to
provide an adequate record for review. If
danger to specific individuals is a basis for the emergency hold, the statement
must identify those individuals to the extent practicable; and
(4) the facility or program cannot
obtain a court order in time to prevent the anticipated injury.
(c) Prior to an examiner writing a
statement, if another person brought the patient to the treatment facility,
state‑operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program,
the examiner shall make a good-faith effort to obtain information from that
person, which the examiner must consider in deciding whether to place the
patient on an emergency hold. To the
extent available, the statement must include direct observations of the
patient's behaviors, reliable knowledge of the patient's recent and past
behavior, and information regarding the patient's psychiatric history, past
treatment, and current mental health providers.
The examiner shall also inquire about health care directives under
chapter 145C and advance psychiatric directives under section 253B.03,
subdivision 6d.
(d) The facility or program must give a
copy of the examiner's written statement to the patient immediately upon
initiating the emergency hold. The
treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based
treatment program shall maintain a copy of the examiner's written statement. The program or facility must inform the
patient in writing of the right to (1) leave after 72 hours, (2) have a medical
examination within 48 hours, and (3) request a change to voluntary status. The facility or program shall assist the
patient in exercising the rights granted in this subdivision.
(e) The facility or program must not
allow the patient nor require the patient's consent to participate in a
clinical drug trial during an emergency admission or hold under this
subdivision. If a patient gives consent
to participate in a drug trial during a period of an emergency admission or
hold, it is void and unenforceable. This
paragraph does not prohibit a patient from continuing participation in a
clinical drug trial if the patient was participating in the clinical drug trial
at the time of the emergency admission or hold.
Subd. 3. Duration
of hold, release procedures, and change of status. (a) If a peace officer or health
officer transports a person to a treatment facility, state-operated treatment
program, or community-based treatment program under subdivision 1, an examiner
at the facility or program must examine the patient and make a determination
about the need for an emergency hold as soon as possible and within 12 hours of
the person's arrival. The peace officer
or health officer hold ends upon whichever occurs first: (1) initiation of an emergency hold on the
person under subdivision 2; (2) the person's voluntary admission; (3) the
examiner's decision not to admit the person; or (4) 12 hours after the
person's arrival.
(b) Under this section, the facility or
program may hold a patient up to 72 hours, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays, and
legal holidays, after the examiner signs the written statement for an emergency
hold of the patient. The facility or
program must release a patient when the emergency hold expires unless the
facility or program obtains a court order to hold the patient. The facility or program may not place the
patient on a consecutive emergency hold under this section.
(c) If an interested person files a
petition to civilly commit the patient, the court may issue a judicial hold
order pursuant to section 253B.07, subdivision 2b.
(d) During the 72-hour hold, a court
must not release a patient under this section unless the court received a
written petition for the patient's release and the court has held a summary
hearing regarding the patient's release.
(e)
The written petition for the patient's release must include the patient's name,
the basis for the hold, the location of the hold, and a statement explaining
why the hold is improper. The petition
must also include copies of any written documentation under subdivision 1 or 2
that support the hold, unless the facility or program holding the patient
refuses to supply the documentation. Upon
receipt of a petition, the court must comply with the following:
(1) the court must hold the hearing as
soon as practicable and the court may conduct the hearing by telephone
conference call, interactive video conference, or similar method by which the
participants are able to simultaneously hear each other;
(2) before deciding to release the
patient, the court shall make every reasonable effort to provide notice of the
proposed release and reasonable opportunity to be heard to:
(i) any specific individuals identified
in a statement under subdivision 1 or 2 or individuals identified in the record
who might be endangered if the person is not held;
(ii) the examiner whose written
statement was the basis for the hold under subdivision 2; and
(iii) the peace officer or health officer who applied for a hold under subdivision 1; and
(3) if the court decides to release the
patient, the court shall direct the patient's release and shall issue written
findings supporting the decision. The
facility or program must not delay the patient's release pending the written
order.
(f) Notwithstanding section 144.293,
subdivisions 2 and 4, if a treatment facility, state-operated treatment
program, or community-based treatment program releases or discharges a patient
during the 72-hour hold; the examiner refuses to admit the patient; or the
patient leaves without the consent of the treatment health care provider, the
head of the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program shall immediately notify the agency that
employs the peace officer or health officer who initiated the transport hold. This paragraph does not apply to the extent
that the notice would violate federal law governing the confidentiality of
alcohol and drug abuse patient records under Code of Federal Regulations, title
42, part 2.
(g) If a patient is intoxicated in
public and a facility or program holds the patient under this section for
detoxification, a treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program may release the patient without providing
notice under paragraph (f) as soon as the treatment facility, state-operated
treatment program, or community-based treating program determines that the
person is no longer in danger of causing harm to self or others. The facility or program must provide notice
to the peace officer or health officer who transported the person, or to the
appropriate law enforcement agency, if the officer or agency requests
notification.
(h) A treatment facility or
state-operated treatment program must change a patient's status to voluntary
status as provided in section 253B.04 upon the patient's request in writing if
the head of the facility or program consents to the change.
Sec. 35. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.06, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Persons
who are mentally ill or developmentally disabled with mental illness
or developmental disability. A
physician must examine every patient hospitalized as mentally ill or
developmentally disabled due to mental illness or developmental
disability pursuant to section 253B.04 or 253B.05 must be examined by a
physician 253B.051 as soon as possible but no more than 48 hours
following the patient's admission.
The physician shall must be knowledgeable and trained in the
diagnosis of diagnosing the alleged disability related to the
need for patient's mental illness or developmental disability, forming
the basis of the patient's admission as a person who is mentally ill or
developmentally disabled.
Sec. 36. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.06, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Chemically
dependent persons. Patients
hospitalized A treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program must examine a patient hospitalized as
chemically dependent pursuant to section 253B.04 or 253B.05 shall also be
examined 253B.051 within 48 hours of admission. At a minimum, the examination shall
consist of a physical evaluation by facility staff the facility or
program must physically examine the patient according to procedures
established by a physician, and an evaluation by staff examining
the patient must be knowledgeable and trained in the diagnosis of the
alleged disability related to the need for forming the basis of the
patient's admission as a chemically dependent person.
Sec. 37. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.06, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Discharge. At the end of a 48-hour period, any
the facility or program shall discharge a patient admitted pursuant to
section 253B.05 shall be discharged 253B.051 if an examination
has not been held or if the examiner or evaluation staff person fails to notify
the head of the treatment facility or program in writing that in
the examiner's or staff person's opinion the patient is apparently in
need of care, treatment, and evaluation as a mentally ill, developmentally
disabled, or chemically dependent person who has a mental illness,
developmental disability, or chemical dependency.
Sec. 38. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.07, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Prepetition
screening. (a) Prior to filing a
petition for commitment of or early intervention for a proposed patient,
an interested person shall apply to the designated agency in the county of
financial responsibility or the county where the proposed patient is present
for conduct of a preliminary investigation as provided in section 253B.23,
subdivision 1b, except when the proposed patient has been acquitted of a
crime under section 611.026 and the county attorney is required to file a
petition for commitment. The designated
agency shall appoint a screening team to conduct an investigation. The petitioner may not be a member of the
screening team. The investigation must
include:
(1) a personal an interview
with the proposed patient and other individuals who appear to have knowledge of
the condition of the proposed patient, if practicable. In-person interviews with the proposed
patient are preferred. If the
proposed patient is not interviewed, specific reasons must be documented;
(2) identification and investigation of specific alleged conduct which is the basis for application;
(3) identification, exploration, and listing of the specific reasons for rejecting or recommending alternatives to involuntary placement;
(4) in the case of a commitment based on
mental illness, the following information, if it is known or
available, that may be relevant to the administration of neuroleptic
psychotropic medications, including the existence of a declaration under
section 253B.03, subdivision 6d, or a health care directive under chapter 145C
or a guardian, conservator, proxy, or agent with authority to make health care
decisions for the proposed patient; information regarding the capacity of the
proposed patient to make decisions regarding administration of neuroleptic
psychotropic medication; and whether the proposed patient is likely to
consent or refuse consent to administration of the medication;
(5) seeking input from the proposed
patient's health plan company to provide the court with information about services
the enrollee needs and the least restrictive alternatives the patient's
relevant treatment history and current treatment providers; and
(6) in the case of a commitment based on mental illness, information listed in clause (4) for other purposes relevant to treatment.
(b) In conducting the investigation required by this subdivision, the screening team shall have access to all relevant medical records of proposed patients currently in treatment facilities, state-operated treatment programs, or community-based treatment programs. The interviewer shall inform the proposed patient that any information provided by the proposed patient may be included in the prepetition screening report and may be considered in the commitment proceedings. Data collected pursuant to this clause shall be considered private data on individuals. The prepetition screening report is not admissible as evidence except by agreement of counsel or as permitted by this chapter or the rules of court and is not admissible in any court proceedings unrelated to the commitment proceedings.
(c) The prepetition screening team shall
provide a notice, written in easily understood language, to the proposed
patient, the petitioner, persons named in a declaration under chapter 145C or
section 253B.03, subdivision 6d, and, with the proposed patient's consent,
other interested parties. The team shall
ask the patient if the patient wants the notice read and shall read the notice
to the patient upon request. The notice
must contain information regarding the process, purpose, and legal effects of
civil commitment and early intervention.
The notice must inform the proposed patient that:
(1) if a petition is filed, the patient has certain rights, including the right to a court-appointed attorney, the right to request a second court examiner, the right to attend hearings, and the right to oppose the proceeding and to present and contest evidence; and
(2) if the proposed patient is committed
to a state regional treatment center or group home state-operated
treatment program, the patient may be billed for the cost of care and the
state has the right to make a claim against the patient's estate for this cost.
The ombudsman for mental health and developmental disabilities shall develop a form for the notice which includes the requirements of this paragraph.
(d) When the prepetition screening team recommends commitment, a written report shall be sent to the county attorney for the county in which the petition is to be filed. The statement of facts contained in the written report must meet the requirements of subdivision 2, paragraph (b).
(e) The prepetition screening team shall refuse to support a petition if the investigation does not disclose evidence sufficient to support commitment. Notice of the prepetition screening team's decision shall be provided to the prospective petitioner, any specific individuals identified in the examiner's statement, and to the proposed patient.
(f) If the interested person wishes to proceed with a petition contrary to the recommendation of the prepetition screening team, application may be made directly to the county attorney, who shall determine whether or not to proceed with the petition. Notice of the county attorney's determination shall be provided to the interested party.
(g) If the proposed patient has been acquitted of a crime under section 611.026, the county attorney shall apply to the designated county agency in the county in which the acquittal took place for a preliminary investigation unless substantially the same information relevant to the proposed patient's current mental condition, as could be obtained by a preliminary investigation, is part of the court record in the criminal proceeding or is contained in the report of a mental examination conducted in connection with the criminal proceeding. If a court petitions for commitment pursuant to the Rules of Criminal or Juvenile Procedure or a county attorney petitions pursuant to acquittal of a criminal charge under section 611.026, the prepetition investigation, if required by this section, shall be completed within seven days after the filing of the petition.
Sec. 39. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.07, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. The
petition. (a) Any interested person,
except a member of the prepetition screening team, may file a petition for
commitment in the district court of the county of financial responsibility or
the county where the proposed patient is present. If the head of the treatment facility,
state-operated treatment program, or community‑based treatment program
believes that commitment is required and no petition has been filed, the
head of the treatment facility that person shall petition for the
commitment of the person proposed patient.
(b) The petition shall set forth the name and address of the proposed patient, the name and address of the patient's nearest relatives, and the reasons for the petition. The petition must contain factual descriptions of the proposed patient's recent behavior, including a description of the behavior, where it occurred, and the time period over which it occurred. Each factual allegation must be supported by observations of witnesses named in the petition. Petitions shall be stated in behavioral terms and shall not contain judgmental or conclusory statements.
(c) The petition shall be accompanied by a
written statement by an examiner stating that the examiner has examined the
proposed patient within the 15 days preceding the filing of the petition and is
of the opinion that the proposed patient is suffering has a
designated disability and should be committed to a treatment facility, state‑operated
treatment program, or community-based treatment program. The statement shall include the reasons for
the opinion. In the case of a commitment
based on mental illness, the petition and the examiner's statement shall
include, to the extent this information is available, a statement and
opinion regarding the proposed patient's need for treatment with neuroleptic
psychotropic medication and the patient's capacity to make decisions
regarding the administration of neuroleptic psychotropic medications,
and the reasons for the opinion. If use
of neuroleptic psychotropic medications is recommended by the
treating physician medical practitioner or other qualified medical
provider, the petition for commitment must, if applicable, include or be accompanied
by a request for proceedings under section 253B.092. Failure to include the required information
regarding neuroleptic psychotropic medications in the examiner's
statement, or to include a request for an order regarding neuroleptic psychotropic
medications with the commitment petition, is not a basis for dismissing the
commitment petition. If a petitioner has
been unable to secure a statement from an examiner, the petition shall include
documentation that a reasonable effort has been made to secure the supporting
statement.
Sec. 40. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.07, subdivision 2a, is amended to read:
Subd. 2a. Petition originating from criminal proceedings. (a) If criminal charges are pending against a defendant, the court shall order simultaneous competency and civil commitment examinations in accordance with Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 20.04, when the following conditions are met:
(1) the prosecutor or defense counsel doubts the defendant's competency and a motion is made challenging competency, or the court on its initiative raises the issue under rule 20.01; and
(2) the prosecutor and defense counsel agree simultaneous examinations are appropriate.
No additional examination under subdivision 3 is required in a subsequent civil commitment proceeding unless a second examination is requested by defense counsel appointed following the filing of any petition for commitment.
(b) Only a court examiner may conduct
an assessment as described in Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rules
20.01, subdivision 4, and 20.02, subdivision 2.
(c)
Where a county is ordered to consider civil commitment following a
determination of incompetency under Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule
20.01, the county in which the criminal matter is pending is responsible to
conduct prepetition screening and, if statutory conditions for commitment are
satisfied, to file the commitment petition in that county. By agreement between county attorneys,
prepetition screening and filing the petition may be handled in the county of
financial responsibility or the county where the proposed patient is present.
(b) (d) Following an
acquittal of a person of a criminal charge under section 611.026, the petition
shall be filed by the county attorney of the county in which the acquittal took
place and the petition shall be filed with the court in which the acquittal
took place, and that court shall be the committing court for purposes of this
chapter. When a petition is filed
pursuant to subdivision 2 with the court in which acquittal of a criminal
charge took place, the court shall assign the judge before whom the acquittal
took place to hear the commitment proceedings unless that judge is unavailable.
Sec. 41. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.07, subdivision 2b, is amended to read:
Subd. 2b. Apprehend
and hold orders. (a) The court may
order the treatment facility or state-operated treatment program to hold
the person in a treatment facility proposed patient or direct a
health officer, peace officer, or other person to take the proposed patient
into custody and transport the proposed patient to a treatment facility or
state-operated treatment program for observation, evaluation, diagnosis,
care, treatment, and, if necessary, confinement, when:
(1) there has been a particularized showing by the petitioner that serious physical harm to the proposed patient or others is likely unless the proposed patient is immediately apprehended;
(2) the proposed patient has not voluntarily appeared for the examination or the commitment hearing pursuant to the summons; or
(3) a person is held pursuant to section 253B.05
253B.051 and a request for a petition for commitment has been filed.
(b) The order of the court may be executed
on any day and at any time by the use of all necessary means including the
imposition of necessary restraint upon the proposed patient. Where possible, a peace officer taking the
proposed patient into custody pursuant to this subdivision shall not be in
uniform and shall not use a motor vehicle visibly marked as a police
law enforcement vehicle. Except
as provided in section 253D.10, subdivision 2, in the case of an individual on
a judicial hold due to a petition for civil commitment under chapter 253D,
assignment of custody during the hold is to the commissioner of human
services. The commissioner is
responsible for determining the appropriate placement within a secure treatment
facility under the authority of the commissioner.
(c) A proposed patient must not be allowed or required to consent to nor participate in a clinical drug trial while an order is in effect under this subdivision. A consent given while an order is in effect is void and unenforceable. This paragraph does not prohibit a patient from continuing participation in a clinical drug trial if the patient was participating in the clinical drug trial at the time the order was issued under this subdivision.
Sec. 42. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.07, subdivision 2d, is amended to read:
Subd. 2d. Change of venue. Either party may move to have the venue of the petition changed to the district court of the Minnesota county where the person currently lives, whether independently or pursuant to a placement. The county attorney of the proposed county of venue must be notified of the motion and provided the opportunity to respond before the court rules on the motion. The court shall grant the motion if it determines that the transfer is
appropriate and is in the interests of justice. If the petition has been filed pursuant to the Rules of Criminal or Juvenile Procedure, venue may not be changed without the agreement of the county attorney of the proposed county of venue and the approval of the court in which the juvenile or criminal proceedings are pending.
Sec. 43. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.07, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Court-appointed
examiners. After a petition has been
filed, the court shall appoint an a court examiner. Prior to the hearing, the court shall inform
the proposed patient of the right to an independent second examination. At the proposed patient's request, the court
shall appoint a second court examiner of the patient's choosing to be
paid for by the county at a rate of compensation fixed by the court.
Sec. 44. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.07, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Prehearing
examination; report. The examination
shall be held at a treatment facility or other suitable place the court
determines is not likely to harm the health of the proposed patient. The county attorney and the patient's
attorney may be present during the examination.
Either party may waive this right.
Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, a court-appointed court
examiner shall file the report with the court not less than 48 hours prior to
the commitment hearing. The court shall
ensure that copies of the court examiner's report are provided to the
county attorney, the proposed patient, and the patient's counsel.
Sec. 45. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.07, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Preliminary
hearing. (a) No proposed patient may
be held in a treatment facility or state-operated treatment program
under a judicial hold pursuant to subdivision 2b longer than 72 hours,
exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, unless the court holds a
preliminary hearing and determines that the standard is met to hold the person
proposed patient.
(b) The proposed patient, patient's counsel, the petitioner, the county attorney, and any other persons as the court directs shall be given at least 24 hours written notice of the preliminary hearing. The notice shall include the alleged grounds for confinement. The proposed patient shall be represented at the preliminary hearing by counsel. The court may admit reliable hearsay evidence, including written reports, for the purpose of the preliminary hearing.
(c) The court, on its motion or on the motion of any party, may exclude or excuse a proposed patient who is seriously disruptive or who is incapable of comprehending and participating in the proceedings. In such instances, the court shall, with specificity on the record, state the behavior of the proposed patient or other circumstances which justify proceeding in the absence of the proposed patient.
(d) The court may continue the judicial hold of the proposed patient if it finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that serious physical harm to the proposed patient or others is likely if the proposed patient is not immediately confined. If a proposed patient was acquitted of a crime against the person under section 611.026 immediately preceding the filing of the petition, the court may presume that serious physical harm to the patient or others is likely if the proposed patient is not immediately confined.
(e) Upon a showing that a person proposed
patient subject to a petition for commitment may need treatment with neuroleptic
psychotropic medications and that the person proposed patient
may lack capacity to make decisions regarding that treatment, the court may
appoint a substitute decision-maker as provided in section 253B.092,
subdivision 6. The substitute
decision-maker shall meet with the proposed patient and provider and make a
report to the court at the hearing under section 253B.08 regarding whether the
administration of neuroleptic psychotropic medications is
appropriate under the criteria of section 253B.092, subdivision 7. If the substitute decision-maker consents to
treatment with neuroleptic psychotropic medications and the
proposed patient does not refuse the
medication,
neuroleptic psychotropic medication may be administered to the proposed
patient. If the substitute
decision-maker does not consent or the proposed patient refuses, neuroleptic
psychotropic medication may not be administered without a court order,
or in an emergency as set forth in section 253B.092, subdivision 3.
Sec. 46. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.08, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Time for commitment hearing. (a) The hearing on the commitment petition shall be held within 14 days from the date of the filing of the petition, except that the hearing on a commitment petition pursuant to section 253D.07 shall be held within 90 days from the date of the filing of the petition. For good cause shown, the court may extend the time of hearing up to an additional 30 days. The proceeding shall be dismissed if the proposed patient has not had a hearing on a commitment petition within the allowed time.
(b) The proposed patient, or the head of the
treatment facility or state-operated treatment program in which the person
patient is held, may demand in writing at any time that the hearing be
held immediately. Unless the hearing is
held within five days of the date of the demand, exclusive of Saturdays,
Sundays, and legal holidays, the petition shall be automatically
dismissed if the patient is being held in a treatment facility or
state-operated treatment program pursuant to court order. For good cause shown, the court may extend
the time of hearing on the demand for an additional ten days. This paragraph does not apply to a commitment
petition brought under section 253B.18 or chapter 253D.
Sec. 47. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.08, subdivision 2a, is amended to read:
Subd. 2a. Place of hearing. The hearing shall be conducted in a manner consistent with orderly procedure. The hearing shall be held at a courtroom meeting standards prescribed by local court rule which may be at a treatment facility or state-operated treatment program. The hearing may be conducted by interactive video conference under General Rules of Practice, rule 131, and Minnesota Rules of Civil Commitment, rule 14.
Sec. 48. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.08, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Absence
permitted. (a) The court may permit
the proposed patient to waive the right to attend the hearing if it determines
that the waiver is freely given. At the time
of the hearing, the proposed patient shall not be so under the
influence of drugs, medication, or other treatment so as to be hampered in
participating in the proceedings. When
the licensed physician or licensed psychologist attending the patient professional
responsible for the proposed patient's treatment is of the opinion that the
discontinuance of drugs, medication, or other treatment is not in
the best interest of the proposed patient, the court, at the time of the
hearing, shall be presented a record of all drugs, medication or other
treatment which the proposed patient has received during the 48 hours
immediately prior to the hearing.
(b) The court, on its own motion or on the motion of any party, may exclude or excuse a proposed patient who is seriously disruptive or who is incapable of comprehending and participating in the proceedings. In such instances, the court shall, with specificity on the record, state the behavior of the proposed patient or other circumstances justifying proceeding in the absence of the proposed patient.
Sec. 49. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.08, subdivision 5a, is amended to read:
Subd. 5a. Witnesses. The proposed patient or the patient's
counsel and the county attorney may present and cross-examine witnesses,
including court examiners, at the hearing. The court may in its discretion receive the
testimony of any other person. Opinions
of court-appointed court examiners may not be admitted into
evidence unless the court examiner is present to testify, except by
agreement of the parties.
Sec. 50. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.09, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Standard
of proof. (a) If the court finds by
clear and convincing evidence that the proposed patient is a person who is
mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or chemically dependent who
poses a risk of harm due to mental illness, or is a person who has a
developmental disability or chemical dependency, and after careful
consideration of reasonable alternative dispositions, including but not
limited to, dismissal of petition,; voluntary outpatient
care,; voluntary admission to a treatment facility, state-operated
treatment program, or community-based treatment program; appointment of a
guardian or conservator,; or release before commitment as
provided for in subdivision 4, it finds that there is no suitable alternative
to judicial commitment, the court shall commit the patient to the least
restrictive treatment program or alternative programs which can meet the
patient's treatment needs consistent with section 253B.03, subdivision 7.
(b) In deciding on the least restrictive
program, the court shall consider a range of treatment alternatives including,
but not limited to, community-based nonresidential treatment, community
residential treatment, partial hospitalization, acute care hospital, assertive
community treatment teams, and regional state-operated treatment
center services programs. The
court shall also consider the proposed patient's treatment preferences and
willingness to participate voluntarily in the treatment ordered. The court may not commit a patient to a
facility or program that is not capable of meeting the patient's needs.
(c) If, after careful consideration of
reasonable alternative dispositions, the court finds no suitable alternative to
judicial commitment and the court finds that the least restrictive alternative
as determined in paragraph (a) is a treatment facility or community-based
treatment program that is less restrictive or more community based than a
state-operated treatment program, and there is a treatment facility or a
community-based treatment program willing to accept the civilly committed patient,
the court may commit the patient to both the treatment facility or
community-based treatment program and to the commissioner, in the event that
treatment in a state-operated treatment program becomes the least restrictive
alternative. If there is a change in the
patient's level of care, then:
(1) if the patient needs a higher level
of care requiring admission to a state-operated treatment program, custody of
the patient and authority and responsibility for the commitment may be
transferred for as long as the patient needs a higher level of care; and
(2) when the patient no longer needs
treatment in a state-operated treatment program, the program may provisionally
discharge the patient to an appropriate placement or release the patient to the
treatment facility or community-based treatment program if the program
continues to be willing and able to readmit the patient, in which case the
commitment, its authority, and responsibilities revert to the
non-state-operated treatment program. Both
agencies accepting commitment shall coordinate admission and discharge planning
to facilitate timely access to the other's services to meet the patient's needs
and shall coordinate treatment planning consistent with section 253B.03,
subdivision 7.
(c) (d) If the commitment
as mentally ill, chemically dependent, or developmentally disabled is to a
service facility provided by the commissioner of human services a person
is committed to a state-operated treatment program as a person who poses a risk
of harm due to mental illness or as a person who has a developmental disability
or chemical dependency, the court shall order the commitment to the
commissioner. The commissioner shall
designate the placement of the person to the court.
(d) (e) If the court finds a
proposed patient to be a person who is mentally ill poses a risk of
harm due to mental illness under section 253B.02, subdivision 13, paragraph
(a), clause (2) or (4), the court shall commit the patient to
a treatment facility or community-based treatment program that
meets the proposed patient's needs. For
purposes of this paragraph, a community-based program may include inpatient
mental health services at a community hospital.
Sec. 51. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.09, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Findings. (a) The court shall find the facts specifically, and separately state its conclusions of law. Where commitment is ordered, the findings of fact and conclusions of law shall specifically state the proposed patient's conduct which is a basis for determining that each of the requisites for commitment is met.
(b) If commitment is ordered, the findings shall also identify less restrictive alternatives considered and rejected by the court and the reasons for rejecting each alternative.
(c) If the proceedings are dismissed, the court may direct that the person be transported back to a suitable location including to the person's home.
Sec. 52. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.09, subdivision 3a, is amended to read:
Subd. 3a. Reporting
judicial commitments; private treatment program or facility. Notwithstanding section 253B.23,
subdivision 9, when a court commits a patient to a non-state-operated
treatment facility or program or facility other than a state-operated
program or facility, the court shall report the commitment to the
commissioner through the supreme court information system for purposes of
providing commitment information for firearm background checks under section
245.041. If the patient is committed
to a state-operated treatment program, the court shall send a copy of the
commitment order to the commissioner.
Sec. 53. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.09, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Initial
commitment period. The initial
commitment begins on the date that the court issues its order or warrant under
section 253B.10, subdivision 1. For persons
a person committed as mentally ill, developmentally disabled, a
person who poses a risk of harm due to mental illness, a developmental
disability, or chemically dependent chemical dependency, the
initial commitment shall not exceed six months.
Sec. 54. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.092, is amended to read:
253B.092
ADMINISTRATION OF NEUROLEPTIC PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION.
Subdivision 1. General. Neuroleptic Psychotropic
medications may be administered, only as provided in this section, to patients
subject to early intervention or civil commitment as mentally ill,
mentally ill and dangerous, a sexually dangerous person, or a person with a
sexual psychopathic personality under this chapter or chapter 253D. For purposes of this section,
"patient" includes a proposed patient who is the subject of a
petition for early intervention or commitment and a committed person as
defined in section 253D.02, subdivision 4.
Subd. 2. Administration
without judicial review. Neuroleptic
(a) Psychotropic medications may be administered without judicial review
in the following circumstances:
(1) the patient has the capacity to make an informed decision under subdivision 4;
(2) the patient does not have the present
capacity to consent to the administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medication, but prepared a power of attorney, a health care directive
under chapter 145C, or a declaration under section 253B.03, subdivision
6d, requesting treatment or authorizing an agent or proxy to request treatment,
and the agent or proxy has requested the treatment;
(3)
the patient has been prescribed neuroleptic psychotropic
medication prior to admission to a treatment facility, but lacks the present
capacity to consent to the administration of that neuroleptic psychotropic
medication; continued administration of the medication is in the patient's best
interest; and the patient does not refuse administration of the medication. In this situation, the previously prescribed neuroleptic
psychotropic medication may be continued for up to 14 days while the
treating physician medical practitioner:
(i) is obtaining a substitute decision-maker appointed by the court under subdivision 6; or
(ii) is requesting a court order
authorizing administering psychotropic medication or an amendment to a
current court order authorizing administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medication;
(4) a substitute decision-maker appointed
by the court consents to the administration of the neuroleptic psychotropic
medication and the patient does not refuse administration of the medication; or
(5) the substitute decision-maker does not consent or the patient is refusing medication, and the patient is in an emergency situation.
(b) For the purposes of paragraph (a),
clause (3), if a person requests a substitute decision-maker or requests a
court order administering psychotropic medication within 14 days, the treating
medical practitioner may continue administering the medication to the patient
through the hearing date or until the court otherwise issues an order.
Subd. 3. Emergency
administration. A treating physician
medical practitioner may administer neuroleptic psychotropic
medication to a patient who does not have capacity to make a decision regarding
administration of the medication if the patient is in an emergency situation. Medication may be administered for so long as
the emergency continues to exist, up to 14 days, if the treating physician
medical practitioner determines that the medication is necessary to
prevent serious, immediate physical harm to the patient or to others. If a request for authorization to administer
medication is made to the court within the 14 days, the treating physician
medical practitioner may continue the medication through the date of the
first court hearing, if the emergency continues to exist. If the request for authorization to
administer medication is made to the court in conjunction with a petition for
commitment or early intervention and the court makes a determination at
the preliminary hearing under section 253B.07, subdivision 7, that there is
sufficient cause to continue the physician's medical practitioner's
order until the hearing under section 253B.08, the treating physician medical
practitioner may continue the medication until that hearing, if the
emergency continues to exist. The
treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based
treatment program shall document the emergency in the patient's medical
record in specific behavioral terms.
Subd. 4. Patients
with capacity to make informed decision.
A patient who has the capacity to make an informed decision
regarding the administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medication may consent or refuse consent to administration of the medication. The informed consent of a patient must be in
writing.
Subd. 5. Determination
of capacity. (a) There is a
rebuttable presumption that a patient is presumed to have has the
capacity to make decisions regarding administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medication.
(b) In determining A person's
patient has the capacity to make decisions regarding the administration
of neuroleptic psychotropic medication, the court shall
consider if the patient:
(1) whether the person demonstrates
has an awareness of the nature of the person's patient's
situation, including the reasons for hospitalization, and the possible
consequences of refusing treatment with neuroleptic psychotropic
medications;
(2)
whether the person demonstrates has an understanding of treatment
with neuroleptic psychotropic medications and the risks,
benefits, and alternatives; and
(3) whether the person communicates
verbally or nonverbally a clear choice regarding treatment with neuroleptic
psychotropic medications that is a reasoned one not based on delusion
a symptom of the patient's mental illness, even though it may not be in
the person's patient's best interests.
(c) Disagreement with the physician's
medical practitioner's recommendation alone is not evidence of an
unreasonable decision.
Subd. 6. Patients
without capacity to make informed decision; substitute decision-maker. (a) Upon request of any person, and upon
a showing that administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medications may be recommended and that the person patient may
lack capacity to make decisions regarding the administration of neuroleptic
psychotropic medication, the court shall appoint a substitute
decision-maker with authority to consent to the administration of neuroleptic
psychotropic medication as provided in this section. A hearing is not required for an appointment
under this paragraph. The substitute
decision-maker must be an individual or a community or institutional multidisciplinary
panel designated by the local mental health authority. In appointing a substitute decision-maker,
the court shall give preference to a guardian or conservator, proxy, or
health care agent with authority to make health care decisions for the patient. The court may provide for the payment of a
reasonable fee to the substitute decision-maker for services under this section
or may appoint a volunteer.
(b) If the person's treating physician
patient's treating medical practitioner recommends treatment with neuroleptic
psychotropic medication, the substitute decision-maker may give or
withhold consent to the administration of the medication, based on the
standards under subdivision 7. If the
substitute decision-maker gives informed consent to the treatment and the person
patient does not refuse, the substitute decision-maker shall provide
written consent to the treating physician medical practitioner
and the medication may be administered. The
substitute decision-maker shall also notify the court that consent has been
given. If the substitute decision-maker
refuses or withdraws consent or the person patient refuses the
medication, neuroleptic psychotropic medication may must
not be administered to the person without patient except with a
court order or in an emergency.
(c) A substitute decision-maker appointed under this section has access to the relevant sections of the patient's health records on the past or present administration of medication. The designated agency or a person involved in the patient's physical or mental health care may disclose information to the substitute decision-maker for the sole purpose of performing the responsibilities under this section. The substitute decision-maker may not disclose health records obtained under this paragraph except to the extent necessary to carry out the duties under this section.
(d) At a hearing under section 253B.08, the
petitioner has the burden of proving incapacity by a preponderance of the
evidence. If a substitute decision-maker
has been appointed by the court, the court shall make findings regarding the
patient's capacity to make decisions regarding the administration of neuroleptic
psychotropic medications and affirm or reverse its appointment of a
substitute decision-maker. If the court
affirms the appointment of the substitute decision-maker, and if the substitute
decision-maker has consented to the administration of the medication and the
patient has not refused, the court shall make findings that the substitute
decision-maker has consented and the treatment is authorized. If a substitute decision-maker has not yet
been appointed, upon request the court shall make findings regarding the
patient's capacity and appoint a substitute decision-maker if appropriate.
(e) If an order for civil commitment or
early intervention did not provide for the appointment of a substitute
decision-maker or for the administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medication, the a treatment facility, state‑operated
treatment program, or community-based treatment program may later request
the appointment of a substitute decision-maker upon a showing that
administration of neuroleptic psychotropic medications is
recommended and that the person patient lacks capacity to make
decisions regarding the administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medications. A hearing is not required
in order to administer the neuroleptic psychotropic medication
unless requested under subdivision 10 or if the substitute decision-maker
withholds or refuses consent or the person patient refuses the
medication.
(f) The substitute decision-maker's authority to consent to treatment lasts for the duration of the court's order of appointment or until modified by the court.
If the substitute decision-maker
withdraws consent or the patient refuses consent, neuroleptic medication may
not be administered without a court order.
(g) If there is no hearing after the preliminary hearing, then the court shall, upon the request of any interested party, review the reasonableness of the substitute decision-maker's decision based on the standards under subdivision 7. The court shall enter an order upholding or reversing the decision within seven days.
Subd. 7. When person
patient lacks capacity to make decisions about medication. (a) When a person patient
lacks capacity to make decisions regarding the administration of neuroleptic
psychotropic medication, the substitute decision-maker or the court
shall use the standards in this subdivision in making a decision regarding
administration of the medication.
(b) If the person patient
clearly stated what the person patient would choose to do in this
situation when the person patient had the capacity to make a
reasoned decision, the person's patient's wishes must be followed. Evidence of the person's patient's
wishes may include written instruments, including a durable power of attorney
for health care under chapter 145C or a declaration under section 253B.03,
subdivision 6d.
(c) If evidence of the person's patient's
wishes regarding the administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medications is conflicting or lacking, the decision must be based on what a
reasonable person would do, taking into consideration:
(1) the person's patient's
family, community, moral, religious, and social values;
(2) the medical risks, benefits, and alternatives to the proposed treatment;
(3) past efficacy and any extenuating
circumstances of past use of neuroleptic psychotropic
medications; and
(4) any other relevant factors.
Subd. 8. Procedure
when patient refuses psychotropic medication. (a) If the substitute decision-maker or
the patient refuses to consent to treatment with neuroleptic psychotropic
medications, and absent an emergency as set forth in subdivision 3, neuroleptic
psychotropic medications may not be administered without a court order. Upon receiving a written request for a
hearing, the court shall schedule the hearing within 14 days of the request. The matter may be heard as part of any other
district court proceeding under this chapter.
By agreement of the parties or for good cause shown, the court may
extend the time of hearing an additional 30 days.
(b) The patient must be examined by a
court examiner prior to the hearing. If
the patient refuses to participate in an examination, the court examiner
may rely on the patient's medical records to reach an opinion as to the
appropriateness of neuroleptic psychotropic medication. The patient is entitled to counsel and a
second court examiner, if requested by the patient or patient's counsel.
(c) The court may base its decision on
relevant and admissible evidence, including the testimony of a treating physician
medical practitioner or other qualified physician, a member of the
patient's treatment team, a court‑appointed court examiner,
witness testimony, or the patient's medical records.
(d)
If the court finds that the patient has the capacity to decide whether to take neuroleptic
psychotropic medication or that the patient lacks capacity to decide and
the standards for making a decision to administer the medications under
subdivision 7 are not met, the treating treatment facility,
state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program may
not administer medication without the patient's informed written consent or
without the declaration of an emergency, or until further review by the court.
(e) If the court finds that the patient
lacks capacity to decide whether to take neuroleptic psychotropic
medication and has applied the standards set forth in subdivision 7, the court
may authorize the treating treatment facility, state‑operated
treatment program, or community-based treatment program and any other community
or treatment facility or program to which the patient may be
transferred or provisionally discharged, to involuntarily administer the
medication to the patient. A copy of the
order must be given to the patient, the patient's attorney, the county
attorney, and the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program. The
treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based
treatment program may not begin administration of the neuroleptic psychotropic
medication until it notifies the patient of the court's order authorizing the
treatment.
(f) A finding of lack of capacity under this section must not be construed to determine the patient's competence for any other purpose.
(g) The court may authorize the
administration of neuroleptic psychotropic medication until the
termination of a determinate commitment.
If the patient is committed for an indeterminate period, the court may
authorize treatment of neuroleptic with psychotropic medication
for not more than two years, subject to the patient's right to petition the
court for review of the order. The
treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based
treatment program must submit annual reports to the court, which shall
provide copies to the patient and the respective attorneys.
(h) The court may limit the maximum dosage
of neuroleptic psychotropic medication that may be administered.
(i) If physical force is required to
administer the neuroleptic medication, the facility or program may
only use injectable medications. If
physical force is needed to administer the medication, medication
may only take place be administered in a treatment facility or
therapeutic setting where the person's condition can be reassessed and appropriate
medical staff personnel qualified to administer medication are
available, including in the community, a county jail, or a correctional
facility. The facility or program may
not use a nasogastric tube to administer psychotropic medication involuntarily.
Subd. 9. Immunity. A substitute decision-maker who consents to treatment is not civilly or criminally liable for the performance of or the manner of performing the treatment. A person is not liable for performing treatment without consent if the substitute decision-maker has given written consent. This provision does not affect any other liability that may result from the manner in which the treatment is performed.
Subd. 10. Review. A patient or other person may petition
the court under section 253B.17 for review of any determination under this
section or for a decision regarding the administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medications, appointment of a substitute decision-maker, or the patient's
capacity to make decisions regarding administration of neuroleptic psychotropic
medications.
Sec. 55. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.0921, is amended to read:
253B.0921
ACCESS TO MEDICAL RECORDS.
A treating physician medical practitioner
who makes medical decisions regarding the prescription and administration of
medication for treatment of a mental illness has access to the relevant
sections of a patient's health records on past administration of medication at
any treatment facility, program, or treatment provider, if the
patient
lacks
the capacity to authorize the release of records. Upon request of a treating physician medical
practitioner under this section, a treatment facility, program,
or treatment provider shall supply complete information relating to the
past records on administration of medication of a patient subject to this
chapter. A patient who has the capacity
to authorize the release of data retains the right to make decisions regarding
access to medical records as provided by sections 144.291 to 144.298.
Sec. 56. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.095, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Duration. The maximum duration of a stayed order
under this section is six months. The
court may continue the order for a maximum of an additional 12 months if, after
notice and hearing, under sections 253B.08 and 253B.09 the court finds that (1)
the person continues to be mentally ill, chemically dependent, or
developmentally disabled, have a mental illness, developmental
disability, or chemical dependency, and (2) an order is needed to
protect the patient or others because the person is likely to attempt to
physically harm self or others or fail to obtain necessary food, clothing,
shelter, or medical care unless the person is under the supervision of a stayed
commitment.
Sec. 57. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.097, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Findings. In addition to the findings required under section 253B.09, subdivision 2, an order committing a person to a community-based treatment program must include:
(1) a written plan for services to the patient;
(2) a finding that the proposed treatment is available and accessible to the patient and that public or private financial resources are available to pay for the proposed treatment;
(3) conditions the patient must meet in order to obtain an early release from commitment or to avoid a hearing for further commitment; and
(4) consequences of the patient's failure to follow the commitment order. Consequences may include commitment to another setting for treatment.
Sec. 58. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.097, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Case manager. When a court commits a patient with mental illness to a community-based treatment program, the court shall appoint a case manager from the county agency or other entity under contract with the county agency to provide case management services.
Sec. 59. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.097, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Reports. The case manager shall report to the court at least once every 90 days. The case manager shall immediately report to the court a substantial failure of the patient or provider to comply with the conditions of the commitment.
Sec. 60. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.097, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Immunity
from liability. No treatment
facility, community-based treatment program, or person is financially
liable, personally or otherwise, for the patient's actions of the
patient if the facility or person follows accepted community standards of
professional practice in the management, supervision, and treatment of the
patient. For purposes of this
subdivision, "person" means official, staff, employee of the treatment
facility, community-based treatment program, physician, or other
individual who is responsible for the a patient's management,
supervision, or treatment of a patient's community-based treatment under
this section.
Sec. 61. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.10, is amended to read:
253B.10
PROCEDURES UPON COMMITMENT.
Subdivision 1. Administrative requirements. (a) When a person is committed, the court shall issue a warrant or an order committing the patient to the custody of the head of the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program. The warrant or order shall state that the patient meets the statutory criteria for civil commitment.
(b) The commissioner shall prioritize patients being admitted from jail or a correctional institution who are:
(1) ordered confined in a state
hospital state-operated treatment program for an examination under
Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rules 20.01, subdivision 4, paragraph
(a), and 20.02, subdivision 2;
(2) under civil commitment for competency treatment and continuing supervision under Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 20.01, subdivision 7;
(3) found not guilty by reason of mental
illness under Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 20.02, subdivision 8,
and under civil commitment or are ordered to be detained in a state hospital
or other facility state‑operated treatment program pending
completion of the civil commitment proceedings; or
(4) committed under this chapter to the commissioner after dismissal of the patient's criminal charges.
Patients described in this paragraph must be admitted to a service
operated by the commissioner state-operated treatment program within
48 hours. The commitment must be ordered
by the court as provided in section 253B.09, subdivision 1, paragraph (c)
(d).
(c) Upon the arrival of a patient at the
designated treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program, the head of the facility or program
shall retain the duplicate of the warrant and endorse receipt upon the original
warrant or acknowledge receipt of the order.
The endorsed receipt or acknowledgment must be filed in the court of
commitment. After arrival, the patient
shall be under the control and custody of the head of the treatment
facility or program.
(d) Copies of the petition for commitment,
the court's findings of fact and conclusions of law, the court order committing
the patient, the report of the court examiners, and the prepetition
report, and any medical and behavioral information available shall be provided
at the time of admission of a patient to the designated treatment facility or
program to which the patient is committed.
This information shall also be provided by the head of the treatment
facility to treatment facility staff in a consistent and timely manner and
pursuant to all applicable laws.
Subd. 2. Transportation. (a) When a patient is about to be
placed in a treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program, the court may order the designated
agency, the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program, or any responsible adult to transport
the patient to the treatment facility.
A protected transport provider may transport the patient according to
section 256B.0625, subdivision 17.
Whenever possible, a peace officer who provides the transportation shall
not be in uniform and shall not use a vehicle visibly marked as a police
law enforcement vehicle. The
proposed patient may be accompanied by one or more interested persons.
(b) When a patient who is at a regional
state-operated treatment center program requests a hearing
for adjudication of a patient's status pursuant to section 253B.17, the
commissioner shall provide transportation.
Subd. 3. Notice
of admission. Whenever a committed
person has been admitted to a treatment facility, state‑operated
treatment program, or community-based treatment program under the
provisions of section 253B.09 or 253B.18, the head of the treatment
facility or program shall immediately notify the patient's spouse,
health care agent, or parent and the county of financial responsibility if the
county may be liable for a portion of the cost of treatment. If the committed person was admitted upon the
petition of a spouse, health care agent, or parent, the head of the
treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based
treatment program shall notify an interested person other than the
petitioner.
Subd. 3a. Interim
custody and treatment of committed person.
When the patient is present in a treatment facility or
state-operated treatment program at the time of the court's commitment order,
unless the court orders otherwise, the commitment order constitutes authority
for that facility or program to confine and provide treatment to the patient
until the patient is transferred to the facility or program to which the
patient has been committed.
Subd. 4. Private
treatment. Patients or other
responsible persons are required to pay the necessary charges for patients
committed or transferred to private treatment facilities or
community-based treatment programs. Private
Treatment facilities or community-based treatment programs may not
refuse to accept a committed person solely based on the person's court-ordered
status. Insurers must provide treatment
and services as ordered by the court under section 253B.045, subdivision 6, or
as required under chapter 62M.
Subd. 5. Transfer
to voluntary status. At any time
prior to the expiration of the initial commitment period, a patient who has not
been committed as mentally ill a person who has a mental illness
and is dangerous to the public or as a sexually dangerous person
or as a sexual psychopathic personality may be transferred to voluntary
status upon the patient's application in writing with the consent of the head
of the facility or program to which the person is committed. Upon transfer, the head of the treatment
facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment
program shall immediately notify the court in writing and the court shall
terminate the proceedings.
Sec. 62. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.12, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Reports. (a) If a patient who was committed as a
person who is mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or chemically
dependent who poses a risk of harm due to a mental illness, or as a
person who has a developmental disability or chemical dependency, is
discharged from commitment within the first 60 days after the date of the
initial commitment order, the head of the treatment facility, state-operated
treatment program, or community-based treatment program shall file a
written report with the committing court describing the patient's need for
further treatment. A copy of the report
must be provided to the county attorney, the patient, and the patient's
counsel.
(b) If a patient who was committed as a
person who is mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or chemically
dependent who poses a risk of harm due to a mental illness, or as a
person who has a developmental disability or chemical dependency, remains
in treatment more than 60 days after the date of the commitment, then at least
60 days, but not more than 90 days, after the date of the order, the head
of the facility or program that has custody of the patient shall file a
written report with the committing court and provide a copy to the county
attorney, the patient, and the patient's counsel. The report must set forth in detailed
narrative form at least the following:
(1) the diagnosis of the patient with the supporting data;
(2) the anticipated discharge date;
(3) an individualized treatment plan;
(4) a detailed description of the discharge planning process with suggested after care plan;
(5)
whether the patient is in need of further care and treatment, the treatment
facility which, state-operated treatment program, or community-based
treatment program that is needed, and evidence to support the response;
(6) whether the patient satisfies the
statutory requirement for continued commitment to a treatment facility, with
documentation to support the opinion; and
(7) a statement from the patient
related to accepting treatment, if possible; and
(7) (8) whether the
administration of neuroleptic psychotropic medication is
clinically indicated, whether the patient is able to give informed consent to
that medication, and the basis for these opinions.
(c) Prior to the termination of the
initial commitment order or final discharge of the patient, the head of the treatment
facility or program that has custody or care of the patient shall file a
written report with the committing court with a copy to the county attorney,
the patient, and the patient's counsel that sets forth the information required
in paragraph (b).
(d) If the patient has been provisionally
discharged from a treatment facility or program, the report shall
be filed by the designated agency, which may submit the discharge report as
part of its report.
(e) If no written report is filed
within the required time, or If a report describes the patient as not in
need of further institutional care and court-ordered treatment,
the proceedings must be terminated by the committing court and the patient
discharged from the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program, unless the patient chooses to voluntarily
receive services.
(f) If no written report is filed
within the required time, the court must notify the county, facility or program
to which the person is committed, and designated agency and require a report be
filed within five business days. If a
report is not filed within five business days a hearing must be held within
three business days.
Sec. 63. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.12, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Examination. Prior to the review hearing, the court
shall inform the patient of the right to an independent examination by an
a court examiner chosen by the patient and appointed in accordance with
provisions of section 253B.07, subdivision 3.
The report of the court examiner may be submitted at the hearing.
Sec. 64. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.12, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Hearing;
standard of proof. (a) The
committing court shall not make a final determination of the need to continue
commitment unless the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that (1) the
person patient continues to be mentally ill, developmentally
disabled, or chemically dependent have a mental illness, developmental
disability, or chemical dependency; (2) involuntary commitment is necessary
for the protection of the patient or others; and (3) there is no alternative to
involuntary commitment.
(b) In determining whether a person
patient continues to be mentally ill, chemically dependent, or
developmentally disabled, require commitment due to mental illness,
developmental disability, or chemical dependency, the court need not find
that there has been a recent attempt or threat to physically harm self or
others, or a recent failure to provide necessary personal food,
clothing, shelter, or medical care. Instead,
the court must find that the patient is likely to attempt to physically harm
self or others, or to fail to provide obtain necessary personal
food, clothing, shelter, or medical care unless involuntary commitment is
continued.
Sec. 65. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.12, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Record
required. Where continued commitment
is ordered, the findings of fact and conclusions of law shall specifically
state the conduct of the proposed patient which is the basis for the final
determination, that the statutory criteria of commitment continue to be met,
and that less restrictive alternatives have been considered and rejected by the
court. Reasons for rejecting each
alternative shall be stated. A copy of
the final order for continued commitment shall be forwarded to the head of the treatment
facility or program to which the person is committed and, if the patient has
been provisionally discharged, to the designated agency responsible for
monitoring the provisional discharge.
Sec. 66. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.13, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Mentally
ill or chemically dependent Persons with mental illness or chemical
dependency. (a) If at the
conclusion of a review hearing the court finds that the person continues to be
mentally ill or chemically dependent have mental illness or chemical
dependency and in need of treatment or supervision, the court
shall determine the length of continued commitment. No period of commitment shall exceed this
length of time or 12 months, whichever is less.
(b) At the conclusion of the
prescribed period under paragraph (a), commitment may not be continued
unless a new petition is filed pursuant to section 253B.07 and hearing and
determination made on it. If the
petition was filed before the end of the previous commitment and, for good
cause shown, the court has not completed the hearing and the determination by
the end of the commitment period, the court may for good cause extend the
previous commitment for up to 14 days to allow the completion of the hearing
and the issuance of the determination. The
standard of proof for the new petition is the standard specified in section
253B.12, subdivision 4.
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 253B.09, subdivision 5, the
initial commitment period under the new petition shall be the probable length
of commitment necessary or 12 months, whichever is less. The standard of proof at the hearing on
the new petition shall be the standard specified in section 253B.12,
subdivision 4.
Sec. 67. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.14, is amended to read:
253B.14
TRANSFER OF COMMITTED PERSONS.
The commissioner may transfer any committed
person, other than a person committed as mentally ill and a person
who has a mental illness and is dangerous to the public, or as a
sexually dangerous person or as a sexual psychopathic personality, from
one regional state-operated treatment center program
to any other state-operated treatment facility under the
commissioner's jurisdiction which is program capable of providing
proper care and treatment. When a
committed person is transferred from one state-operated treatment facility
program to another, written notice shall be given to the committing
court, the county attorney, the patient's counsel, and to the person's parent,
health care agent, or spouse or, if none is known, to an interested person, and
the designated agency.
Sec. 68. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.141, is amended to read:
253B.141
AUTHORITY TO DETAIN AND TRANSPORT A MISSING PATIENT.
Subdivision 1. Report
of absence. (a) If a patient
committed under this chapter or detained in a treatment facility or
state-operated treatment program under a judicial hold is absent without
authorization, and either: (1) does not
return voluntarily within 72 hours of the time the unauthorized absence began;
or (2) is considered by the head of the treatment facility or program
to be a danger to self or others, then the head of the treatment
facility or program shall report the absence to the local law
enforcement agency. The head of the treatment
facility or program shall also notify the committing court that the
patient is absent and that the absence has been reported to the local
law enforcement agency. The committing court may issue an order directing the law enforcement agency to transport the patient to an appropriate treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program.
(b) Upon receiving a report that a patient subject to this section is absent without authorization, the local law enforcement agency shall enter information on the patient into the missing persons file of the National Crime Information Center computer according to the missing persons practices.
Subd. 2. Apprehension;
return to facility or program. (a)
Upon receiving the report of absence from the head of the treatment facility,
state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program or
the committing court, a patient may be apprehended and held by a peace officer
in any jurisdiction pending return to the facility or program from which
the patient is absent without authorization.
A patient may also be returned to any facility operated by the
commissioner state-operated treatment program or any other treatment
facility or community-based treatment program willing to accept the person. A person who is mentally ill has a mental
illness and is dangerous to the public and detained under
this subdivision may be held in a jail or lockup only if:
(1) there is no other feasible place of detention for the patient;
(2) the detention is for less than 24 hours; and
(3) there are protections in place, including segregation of the patient, to ensure the safety of the patient.
(b) If a patient is detained under this
subdivision, the head of the treatment facility or program from
which the patient is absent shall arrange to pick up the patient within 24
hours of the time detention was begun and shall be responsible for securing
transportation for the patient to the facility or program. The expense of detaining and transporting a
patient shall be the responsibility of the treatment facility or
program from which the patient is absent.
The expense of detaining and transporting a patient to a state-operated
treatment facility operated by the Department of Human Services program
shall be paid by the commissioner unless paid by the patient or persons on
behalf of the patient.
Subd. 3. Notice
of apprehension. Immediately after
an absent patient is located, the head of the treatment facility or
program from which the patient is absent, or the law enforcement agency
that located or returned the absent patient, shall notify the law enforcement
agency that first received the absent patient report under this section and
that agency shall cancel the missing persons entry from the National Crime
Information Center computer.
Sec. 69. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Provisional
discharge. (a) The head of
the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based
treatment program may provisionally discharge any patient without
discharging the commitment, unless the patient was found by the committing
court to be a person who is mentally ill and has a mental illness and
is dangerous to the public, or a sexually dangerous person, or
a sexual psychopathic personality.
(b) When a patient committed to the
commissioner becomes ready for provisional discharge before being placed in a
state-operated treatment program, the head of the treatment facility or
community-based treatment program where the patient is placed pending transfer
to the commissioner may provisionally discharge the patient pursuant to this
subdivision.
(c) Each patient released on
provisional discharge shall have a written aftercare provisional
discharge plan developed with input from the patient and the designated
agency which specifies the services and treatment to be provided as part of
the aftercare provisional discharge plan, the financial resources
available to pay for the services
specified,
the expected period of provisional discharge, the precise goals for the
granting of a final discharge, and conditions or restrictions on the patient
during the period of the provisional discharge.
The aftercare provisional discharge plan shall be provided
to the patient, the patient's attorney, and the designated agency.
(d) The aftercare provisional discharge
plan shall be reviewed on a quarterly basis by the patient, designated agency
and other appropriate persons. The aftercare
provisional discharge plan shall contain the grounds upon which a
provisional discharge may be revoked. The
provisional discharge shall terminate on the date specified in the plan unless
specific action is taken to revoke or extend it.
Sec. 70. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:
Subd. 1a. Representative of designated agency. Before a provisional discharge is granted, a representative of the designated agency must be identified to ensure continuity of care by being involved with the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program and the patient prior to the provisional discharge. The representative of the designated agency shall coordinate plans for and monitor the patient's aftercare program. When the patient is on a provisional discharge, the representative of the designated agency shall provide the treatment report to the court required under section 253B.12, subdivision 1.
Sec. 71. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Revocation of provisional discharge. (a) The designated agency may revoke
initiate with the court a revocation of a provisional discharge if revocation
is the least restrictive alternative and either:
(1) the patient has violated material conditions of the provisional discharge, and the violation creates the need to return the patient to a more restrictive setting or more intensive community services; or
(2) there exists a serious likelihood that the safety of
the patient or others will be jeopardized, in that either the patient's need
for food, clothing, shelter, or medical care are not being met, or will not be
met in the near future, or the patient has attempted or threatened to seriously
physically harm self or others; and.
(3) revocation is the least restrictive alternative
available.
(b) Any interested person may request that the designated agency revoke the patient's provisional discharge. Any person making a request shall provide the designated agency with a written report setting forth the specific facts, including witnesses, dates and locations, supporting a revocation, demonstrating that every effort has been made to avoid revocation and that revocation is the least restrictive alternative available.
Sec. 72. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Procedure; notice. Revocation shall be commenced by the
designated agency's written notice of intent to revoke provisional discharge
given or sent to the patient, the patient's attorney, and the treatment
facility or program from which the patient was provisionally discharged, and
the current community services provider.
The notice shall set forth the grounds upon which the intention to
revoke is based, and shall inform the patient of the rights of a patient under
this chapter.
Sec. 73. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 3a, is amended to read:
Subd. 3a. Report to the court. Within 48 hours, excluding weekends and legal holidays, of giving notice to the patient, the designated agency shall file with the court a copy of the notice and a report setting forth the specific facts, including witnesses, dates and locations, which (1) support revocation, (2) demonstrate that revocation is the least restrictive alternative available, and (3) show that specific efforts were made to avoid revocation. The
designated agency shall provide copies of the report to the patient, the patient's attorney, the county attorney, and the treatment facility or program from which the patient was provisionally discharged within 48 hours of giving notice to the patient under subdivision 3.
Sec. 74. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 3b, is amended to read:
Subd. 3b. Review.
The patient or patient's attorney may request judicial review of the
intended revocation by filing a petition for review and an affidavit with the
committing court. The affidavit shall
state specific grounds for opposing the revocation. If the patient does not file a petition for
review within five days of receiving the notice under subdivision 3, revocation
of the provisional discharge is final and the court, without hearing, may order
the patient into a treatment facility or program from which the
patient was provisionally discharged, another treatment facility,
state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program that
consents to receive the patient, or more intensive community treatment. If the patient files a petition for review,
the court shall review the petition and determine whether a genuine issue
exists as to the propriety of the revocation.
The burden of proof is on the designated agency to show that no genuine
issue exists as to the propriety of the revocation. If the court finds that no genuine issue
exists as to the propriety of the revocation, the revocation of the provisional
discharge is final.
Sec. 75. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 3c, is amended to read:
Subd. 3c. Hearing. (a) If the court finds under subdivision 3b that a genuine issue exists as to the propriety of the revocation, the court shall hold a hearing on the petition within three days after the patient files the petition. The court may continue the review hearing for an additional five days upon any party's showing of good cause. At the hearing, the burden of proof is on the designated agency to show a factual basis for the revocation. At the conclusion of the hearing, the court shall make specific findings of fact. The court shall affirm the revocation if it finds:
(1) a factual basis for revocation due to:
(i) a violation of the material conditions of the provisional discharge that creates a need for the patient to return to a more restrictive setting or more intensive community services; or
(ii) a probable danger of harm to the patient or others if the provisional discharge is not revoked; and
(2) that revocation is the least restrictive alternative available.
(b) If the court does not affirm the revocation, the court shall order the patient returned to provisional discharge status.
Sec. 76. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Return to facility. When the designated agency gives or sends
notice of the intent to revoke a patient's provisional discharge, it may also
apply to the committing court for an order directing that the patient be
returned to a the facility or program from which the patient
was provisionally discharged or another treatment facility, state‑operated
treatment program, or community-based treatment program that consents to
receive the patient. The court may
order the patient returned to a facility or program prior to a review
hearing only upon finding that immediate return to a facility is
necessary because there is a serious likelihood that the safety of the patient
or others will be jeopardized, in that (1) the patient's need for food,
clothing, shelter, or medical care is not being met, or will not be met in the
near future, or (2) the patient has attempted or threatened to seriously harm
self or others. If a voluntary return is
not arranged, the head of the treatment facility, state-operated treatment
program, or community‑based treatment program may request a health
officer or a peace officer to return the patient to the treatment
facility or program from which the patient was released or to any other
treatment facility which,
state‑operated
treatment program, or community-based treatment program that consents to
receive the patient. If necessary, the
head of the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program may request the committing court to
direct a health officer or peace officer in the county where the patient
is located to return the patient to the treatment facility or program
or to another treatment facility which, state‑operated
treatment program, or community-based treatment program that consents to
receive the patient. The expense of returning
the patient to a regional state-operated treatment center program
shall be paid by the commissioner unless paid by the patient or the patient's
relatives. If the court orders the
patient to return to the treatment facility or program, or if a
health officer or peace officer returns the patient to the treatment
facility or program, and the patient wants judicial review of the
revocation, the patient or the patient's attorney must file the petition for
review and affidavit required under subdivision 3b within 14 days of receipt of
the notice of the intent to revoke.
Sec. 77. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Modification and extension of provisional discharge. (a) A provisional discharge may be modified upon agreement of the parties.
(b) A provisional discharge may be
extended only in those circumstances where the patient has not achieved the
goals set forth in the provisional discharge plan or continues to need the
supervision or assistance provided by an extension of the provisional discharge. In determining whether the provisional
discharge is to be extended, the head of the facility designated
agency shall consider the willingness and ability of the patient to
voluntarily obtain needed care and treatment.
(c) The designated agency shall
recommend extension of a provisional discharge only after a preliminary
conference with the patient and other appropriate persons. The patient shall be given the opportunity to
object or make suggestions for alternatives to extension.
(d) (c) The designated agency
must provide any recommendation for proposed extension shall
be made in writing to the head of the facility and to the patient and
the patient's attorney at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the
provisional discharge unless the patient cannot be located or is unavailable
to receive the notice. The written
recommendation submitted proposal for extension shall include: the specific grounds for recommending proposing
the extension, the date of the preliminary conference and results, the
anniversary date of the provisional discharge, the termination date of the
provisional discharge, and the proposed length of extension. If the grounds for recommending proposing
the extension occur less than 30 days before its expiration, the designated
agency must submit the written recommendation shall occur proposal
for extension as soon as practicable.
(e) The head of the facility (d)
The designated agency shall extend a provisional discharge only after providing
the patient an opportunity for a meeting to object or make suggestions for
alternatives to an extension. The
designated agency shall issue provide a written decision to
the patient and the patient's attorney regarding extension within five days
after receiving the recommendation from the designated agency the
patient's input or after holding a meeting with the patient or after the
patient has declined to provide input or participate in the meeting. The designated agency may seek input from the
community-based treatment team or other persons the patient chooses.
Sec. 78. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 8a. Provisional
discharge extension. If the
provisional discharge extends until the end of the period of commitment and,
before the commitment expires, the court extends the commitment under section
253B.12 or issues a new commitment order under section 253B.13, the provisional
discharge shall continue for the duration of the new or extended period of
commitment ordered unless the commitment order provides otherwise or the
designated
agency revokes the patient's provisional discharge pursuant to this section. To continue the patient's provisional
discharge under this subdivision, the designated agency is not required to
comply with the procedures in subdivision 7.
Sec. 79. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. Expiration of provisional discharge. (a) Except as otherwise provided, a provisional discharge is absolute when it expires. If, while on provisional discharge or extended provisional discharge, a patient is discharged as provided in section 253B.16, the discharge shall be absolute.
(b) The designated agency shall give notice of the
expiration of the provisional discharge shall be given by the head of the
treatment facility to the committing court; the petitioner, if known; the
patient's attorney; the county attorney in the county of commitment; the
commissioner; and the designated agency facility or program that
provisionally discharged the patient.
Sec. 80. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.15, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Voluntary return. (a) With the consent of the head
of the treatment facility or state-operated treatment program, a patient
may voluntarily return to inpatient status at the treatment facility as
follows:
(1) as a voluntary patient, in which case the patient's commitment is discharged;
(2) as a committed patient, in which case the patient's provisional discharge is voluntarily revoked; or
(3) on temporary return from provisional discharge, in which case both the commitment and the provisional discharge remain in effect.
(b) Prior to readmission, the patient shall be informed of status upon readmission.
Sec. 81. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.16, is amended to read:
253B.16 DISCHARGE OF
COMMITTED PERSONS.
Subdivision 1. Date.
The head of a treatment facility, state-operated treatment
program, or community-based treatment program shall discharge any patient
admitted as a person who is mentally ill or chemically dependent, or a
person with a who poses a risk of harm due to mental illness, or a
person who has a chemical dependency or a developmental disability admitted
under Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rules 20.01 and 20.02, to the
secure bed component of the Minnesota extended treatment options when the
head of the facility or program certifies that the person is no longer
in need of care and treatment under commitment or at the conclusion of
any period of time specified in the commitment order, whichever occurs first. The head of a treatment facility or
program shall discharge any person admitted as developmentally disabled,
except those admitted under Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rules 20.01
and 20.02, to the secure bed component of the Minnesota extended treatment
options, a person with a developmental disability when that person's
screening team has determined, under section 256B.092, subdivision 8, that the
person's needs can be met by services provided in the community and a plan has
been developed in consultation with the interdisciplinary team to place the
person in the available community services.
Subd. 2. Notification of discharge. Prior to the discharge or provisional
discharge of any committed person patient, the head of the
treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based
treatment program shall notify the designated agency and the patient's
spouse or health care agent, or if there is no spouse or health care agent,
then an adult child, or if there is none, the next of kin of the patient, of
the proposed discharge. The facility
or
program
shall send the notice shall be sent to the last known address of the person
to be notified by certified mail with return receipt. The notice in writing and shall
include the following: (1) the proposed
date of discharge or provisional discharge; (2) the date, time and place of the
meeting of the staff who have been treating the patient to discuss discharge
and discharge planning; (3) the fact that the patient will be present at the
meeting; and (4) the fact that the next of kin or health care agent may attend
that staff meeting and present any information relevant to the discharge of the
patient. The notice shall be sent at
least one week prior to the date set for the meeting.
Sec. 82. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.17, is amended to read:
253B.17 RELEASE;
JUDICIAL DETERMINATION.
Subdivision 1. Petition.
Any patient, except one committed as a sexually dangerous person or
a person with a sexual psychopathic personality or as a person who is
mentally ill and has a mental illness and is dangerous to the public
as provided in section 253B.18, subdivision 3, or any interested person may
petition the committing court or the court to which venue has been transferred
for an order that the patient is not in need of continued care and treatment under
commitment or for an order that an individual is no longer a person who
is mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or chemically dependent who
poses a risk of harm due to mental illness, or a person who has a developmental
disability or chemical dependency, or for any other relief. A patient committed as a person who is mentally
ill or mentally ill and who poses a risk of harm due to mental illness,
a person who has a mental illness and is dangerous or to the
public, a sexually dangerous person, or a person with a
sexual psychopathic personality may petition the committing court or the court
to which venue has been transferred for a hearing concerning the administration
of neuroleptic psychotropic medication.
Subd. 2. Notice of hearing. Upon the filing of the petition, the
court shall fix the time and place for the hearing on it. Ten days' notice of the hearing shall be
given to the county attorney, the patient, patient's counsel, the person who
filed the initial commitment petition, the head of the treatment
facility or program to which the person is committed, and other persons
as the court directs. Any person may
oppose the petition.
Subd. 3. Court examiners. The court shall appoint an a
court examiner and, at the patient's request, shall appoint a second court
examiner of the patient's choosing to be paid for by the county at a rate of
compensation to be fixed by the court. Unless
otherwise agreed by the parties, the examiners a court examiner
shall file a report with the court not less than 48 hours prior to the hearing
under this section.
Subd. 4. Evidence.
The patient, patient's counsel, the petitioner, and the
county attorney shall be entitled to be present at the hearing and to present
and cross-examine witnesses, including court examiners. The court may hear any relevant testimony and
evidence which is offered at the hearing.
Subd. 5. Order.
Upon completion of the hearing, the court shall enter an order
stating its findings and decision and mail it the order to the
head of the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program.
Sec. 83. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Procedure.
(a) Upon the filing of a petition alleging that a proposed patient
is a person who is mentally ill and has a mental illness and is
dangerous to the public, the court shall hear the petition as provided in
sections 253B.07 and 253B.08. If the
court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the proposed patient is a
person who is mentally ill and has a mental illness and is
dangerous to the public, it shall commit the person to a secure treatment
facility or to a treatment facility or state-operated treatment program
willing to accept the patient under commitment.
The court shall commit the patient to a secure treatment facility unless
the patient establishes or others establish by clear and
convincing evidence that a less restrictive state-operated treatment program
or treatment program facility is available that is consistent
with the patient's treatment needs and the requirements of
public
safety. In any case where the petition
was filed immediately following the acquittal of the proposed patient for a
crime against the person pursuant to a verdict of not guilty by reason of
mental illness, the verdict constitutes evidence that the proposed patient is a
person who is mentally ill and has a mental illness and is
dangerous to the public within the meaning of this section. The proposed patient has the burden of going
forward in the presentation of evidence.
The standard of proof remains as required by this chapter. Upon commitment, admission procedures shall
be carried out pursuant to section 253B.10.
(b) Once a patient is admitted to a treatment facility or state-operated treatment program pursuant to a commitment under this subdivision, treatment must begin regardless of whether a review hearing will be held under subdivision 2.
Sec. 84. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Review; hearing. (a) A written treatment report shall be
filed by the treatment facility or state‑operated treatment program
with the committing court within 60 days after commitment. If the person is in the custody of the
commissioner of corrections when the initial commitment is ordered under
subdivision 1, the written treatment report must be filed within 60 days after
the person is admitted to a secure the state-operated treatment
program or treatment facility. The
court shall hold a hearing to make a final determination as to whether the person
patient should remain committed as a person who is mentally ill and
has a mental illness and is dangerous to the public. The hearing shall be held within the earlier
of 14 days of the court's receipt of the written treatment report, or within 90
days of the date of initial commitment or admission, unless otherwise agreed by
the parties.
(b) The court may, with agreement of the county attorney
and the patient's attorney for the patient:
(1) waive the review hearing under this subdivision and immediately order an indeterminate commitment under subdivision 3; or
(2) continue the review hearing for up to one year.
(c) If the court finds that the patient should be committed
as a person who is mentally ill who poses a risk of harm due to
mental illness, but not as a person who is mentally ill and has a
mental illness and is dangerous to the public, the court may commit the person
patient as a person who is mentally ill who poses a risk of
harm due to mental illness and the person shall be deemed court
shall deem the patient not to have been found to be dangerous to the
public for the purposes of subdivisions 4a to 15. Failure of the treatment facility or
state-operated treatment program to provide the required treatment
report at the end of the 60-day period shall not result in automatic discharge
of the patient.
Sec. 85. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Indeterminate commitment. If the court finds at the final
determination hearing held pursuant to subdivision 2 that the patient continues
to be a person who is mentally ill and has a mental illness and is
dangerous to the public, then the court shall order commitment of the proposed
patient for an indeterminate period of time.
After a final determination that a patient is a person who is
mentally ill and has a mental illness and is dangerous to the
public, the patient shall be transferred, provisionally discharged or discharged,
only as provided in this section.
Sec. 86. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 4a, is amended to read:
Subd. 4a. Release on pass; notification. A patient who has been committed as a
person who is mentally ill and has a mental illness and is
dangerous to the public and who is confined at a secure treatment
facility or has been transferred out of a state-operated services secure
treatment facility according to section 253B.18, subdivision 6, shall not
be released on a pass unless the pass is part of a pass plan that has been
approved by the medical director of
the secure treatment facility. The pass plan must have a specific therapeutic purpose consistent with the treatment plan, must be established for a specific period of time, and must have specific levels of liberty delineated. The county case manager must be invited to participate in the development of the pass plan. At least ten days prior to a determination on the plan, the medical director shall notify the designated agency, the committing court, the county attorney of the county of commitment, an interested person, the local law enforcement agency where the facility is located, the county attorney and the local law enforcement agency in the location where the pass is to occur, the petitioner, and the petitioner's counsel of the plan, the nature of the passes proposed, and their right to object to the plan. If any notified person objects prior to the proposed date of implementation, the person shall have an opportunity to appear, personally or in writing, before the medical director, within ten days of the objection, to present grounds for opposing the plan. The pass plan shall not be implemented until the objecting person has been furnished that opportunity. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to give a patient an affirmative right to a pass plan.
Sec. 87. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 4b, is amended to read:
Subd. 4b. Pass-eligible status; notification. (a) The following patients committed to a secure treatment facility shall not be placed on pass-eligible status unless that status has been approved by the medical director of the secure treatment facility:
(a) (1) a patient who has been committed as a
person who is mentally ill and has a mental illness and is
dangerous to the public and who:
(1) (i) was found incompetent to proceed to
trial for a felony or was found not guilty by reason of mental illness of a
felony immediately prior to the filing of the commitment petition;
(2) (ii) was convicted of a felony
immediately prior to or during commitment as a person who is mentally ill
and has a mental illness and is dangerous to the public; or
(3) (iii) is subject to a commitment to the
commissioner of corrections; and
(b) (2) a patient who has been committed as a
psychopathic personality, a sexually psychopathic personality, or a sexually
dangerous person.
(b) At least ten days prior to a determination on the status, the medical director shall notify the committing court, the county attorney of the county of commitment, the designated agency, an interested person, the petitioner, and the petitioner's counsel of the proposed status, and their right to request review by the special review board. If within ten days of receiving notice any notified person requests review by filing a notice of objection with the commissioner and the head of the secure treatment facility, a hearing shall be held before the special review board. The proposed status shall not be implemented unless it receives a favorable recommendation by a majority of the board and approval by the commissioner. The order of the commissioner is appealable as provided in section 253B.19.
(c) Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to give a patient an affirmative right to seek pass-eligible status from the special review board.
Sec. 88. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 4c, is amended to read:
Subd. 4c. Special review board. (a) The commissioner shall establish one or more panels of a special review board. The board shall consist of three members experienced in the field of mental illness. One member of each special review board panel shall be a psychiatrist or a doctoral level psychologist with forensic experience and one member shall be an attorney. No member shall be affiliated with the Department of Human Services. The special
review board shall meet at least every six months and at the call of the commissioner. It shall hear and consider all petitions for a reduction in custody or to appeal a revocation of provisional discharge. A "reduction in custody" means transfer from a secure treatment facility, discharge, and provisional discharge. Patients may be transferred by the commissioner between secure treatment facilities without a special review board hearing.
Members of the special review board shall receive compensation and reimbursement for expenses as established by the commissioner.
(b) The special review board must review each denied petition under subdivision 5 for barriers and obstacles preventing the patient from progressing in treatment. Based on the cases before the board in the previous year, the special review board shall provide to the commissioner an annual summation of the barriers to treatment progress, and recommendations to achieve the common goal of making progress in treatment.
(c) A petition filed by a person committed
as mentally ill and a person who has a mental illness and is
dangerous to the public under this section must be heard as provided in subdivision
5 and, as applicable, subdivision 13. A
petition filed by a person committed as a sexual psychopathic personality or as
a sexually dangerous person under chapter 253D, or committed as both mentally
ill and a person who has a mental illness and is dangerous to the
public under this section and as a sexual psychopathic personality or as a
sexually dangerous person must be heard as provided in section 253D.27.
Sec. 89. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Petition; notice of hearing; attendance; order. (a) A petition for a reduction in custody or revocation of provisional discharge shall be filed with the commissioner and may be filed by the patient or by the head of the treatment facility or state-operated treatment program to which the person was committed or has been transferred. A patient may not petition the special review board for six months following commitment under subdivision 3 or following the final disposition of any previous petition and subsequent appeal by the patient. The head of the state‑operated treatment program or head of the treatment facility must schedule a hearing before the special review board for any patient who has not appeared before the special review board in the previous three years, and schedule a hearing at least every three years thereafter. The medical director may petition at any time.
(b) Fourteen days prior to the hearing, the
committing court, the county attorney of the county of commitment, the
designated agency, interested person, the petitioner, and the petitioner's
counsel shall be given written notice by the commissioner of the time and place
of the hearing before the special review board.
Only those entitled to statutory notice of the hearing or those
administratively required to attend may be present at the hearing. The patient may designate interested persons
to receive notice by providing the names and addresses to the commissioner at
least 21 days before the hearing. The
board shall provide the commissioner with written findings of fact and
recommendations within 21 days of the hearing.
The commissioner shall issue an order no later than 14 days after
receiving the recommendation of the special review board. A copy of the order shall be mailed to every
person entitled to statutory notice of the hearing within five days after it
the order is signed. No order by
the commissioner shall be effective sooner than 30 days after the order is
signed, unless the county attorney, the patient, and the commissioner agree
that it may become effective sooner.
(c) The special review board shall hold a hearing on each petition prior to making its recommendation to the commissioner. The special review board proceedings are not contested cases as defined in chapter 14. Any person or agency receiving notice that submits documentary evidence to the special review board prior to the hearing shall also provide copies to the patient, the patient's counsel, the county attorney of the county of commitment, the case manager, and the commissioner.
(d) Prior to the final decision by the commissioner, the special review board may be reconvened to consider events or circumstances that occurred subsequent to the hearing.
(e) In making their recommendations and order, the special review board and commissioner must consider any statements received from victims under subdivision 5a.
Sec. 90. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 5a, is amended to read:
Subd. 5a. Victim notification of petition and release; right to submit statement. (a) As used in this subdivision:
(1) "crime" has the meaning given to "violent crime" in section 609.1095, and includes criminal sexual conduct in the fifth degree and offenses within the definition of "crime against the person" in section 253B.02, subdivision 4a, and also includes offenses listed in section 253D.02, subdivision 8, paragraph (b), regardless of whether they are sexually motivated;
(2) "victim" means a person who has incurred loss or harm as a result of a crime the behavior for which forms the basis for a commitment under this section or chapter 253D; and
(3) "convicted" and "conviction" have the meanings given in section 609.02, subdivision 5, and also include juvenile court adjudications, findings under Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 20.02, that the elements of a crime have been proved, and findings in commitment cases under this section or chapter 253D that an act or acts constituting a crime occurred.
(b) A county attorney who files a petition to commit a person under this section or chapter 253D shall make a reasonable effort to provide prompt notice of filing the petition to any victim of a crime for which the person was convicted. In addition, the county attorney shall make a reasonable effort to promptly notify the victim of the resolution of the petition.
(c) Before provisionally discharging, discharging, granting pass-eligible status, approving a pass plan, or otherwise permanently or temporarily releasing a person committed under this section from a state-operated treatment program or treatment facility, the head of the state-operated treatment program or head of the treatment facility shall make a reasonable effort to notify any victim of a crime for which the person was convicted that the person may be discharged or released and that the victim has a right to submit a written statement regarding decisions of the medical director, special review board, or commissioner with respect to the person. To the extent possible, the notice must be provided at least 14 days before any special review board hearing or before a determination on a pass plan. Notwithstanding section 611A.06, subdivision 4, the commissioner shall provide the judicial appeal panel with victim information in order to comply with the provisions of this section. The judicial appeal panel shall ensure that the data on victims remains private as provided for in section 611A.06, subdivision 4.
(d) This subdivision applies only to victims who have requested notification through the Department of Corrections electronic victim notification system, or by contacting, in writing, the county attorney in the county where the conviction for the crime occurred. A request for notice under this subdivision received by the commissioner of corrections through the Department of Corrections electronic victim notification system shall be promptly forwarded to the prosecutorial authority with jurisdiction over the offense to which the notice relates or, following commitment, the head of the state-operated treatment program or head of the treatment facility. A county attorney who receives a request for notification under this paragraph following commitment shall promptly forward the request to the commissioner of human services.
(e) The rights under this subdivision are in addition to rights available to a victim under chapter 611A. This provision does not give a victim all the rights of a "notified person" or a person "entitled to statutory notice" under subdivision 4a, 4b, or 5 or section 253D.14.
Sec. 91. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Transfer. (a) A patient who is mentally
ill and a person who has a mental illness and is dangerous to the
public shall not be transferred out of a secure treatment facility unless
it appears to the satisfaction of the commissioner, after a hearing and
favorable recommendation by a majority of the special review board, that the
transfer is appropriate. Transfer may be
to other regional centers under the commissioner's control another
state‑operated treatment program.
In those instances where a commitment also exists to the Department of
Corrections, transfer may be to a facility designated by the commissioner of
corrections.
(b) The following factors must be considered in determining whether a transfer is appropriate:
(1) the person's clinical progress and present treatment needs;
(2) the need for security to accomplish continuing treatment;
(3) the need for continued institutionalization;
(4) which facility can best meet the person's needs; and
(5) whether transfer can be accomplished with a reasonable degree of safety for the public.
Sec. 92. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Provisional
discharge. (a) A patient who
is mentally ill and a person who has a mental illness and is
dangerous to the public shall not be provisionally discharged unless it
appears to the satisfaction of the commissioner, after a hearing and a
favorable recommendation by a majority of the special review board, that the
patient is capable of making an acceptable adjustment to open society.
(b) The following factors are to be considered in determining whether a provisional discharge shall be recommended: (1) whether the patient's course of hospitalization and present mental status indicate there is no longer a need for treatment and supervision in the patient's current treatment setting; and (2) whether the conditions of the provisional discharge plan will provide a reasonable degree of protection to the public and will enable the patient to adjust successfully to the community.
Sec. 93. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Provisional
discharge plan. A provisional
discharge plan shall be developed, implemented, and monitored by the
designated agency in conjunction with the patient, the treatment facility or
state-operated treatment program to which the person is committed, and
other appropriate persons. The
designated agency shall, at least quarterly, review the provisional
discharge plan with the patient and submit a written report to the
commissioner and the treatment facility or program concerning
the patient's status and compliance with each term of the provisional
discharge plan.
Sec. 94. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Provisional discharge; revocation. (a) The head of the treatment facility or state-operated treatment program from which the person was provisionally discharged may revoke a provisional discharge if any of the following grounds exist:
(i) the patient has departed from the conditions of the provisional discharge plan;
(ii) the patient is exhibiting signs of a mental illness which may require in-hospital evaluation or treatment; or
(iii) the patient is exhibiting behavior which may be dangerous to self or others.
(b) Revocation shall be commenced by a notice of intent to revoke provisional discharge, which shall be served upon the patient, patient's counsel, and the designated agency. The notice shall set forth the grounds upon which the intention to revoke is based, and shall inform the patient of the rights of a patient under this chapter.
(c) In all nonemergency situations,
prior to revoking a provisional discharge, the head of the treatment
facility or program shall obtain a revocation report from the
designated agency outlining the specific reasons for recommending the
revocation, including but not limited to the specific facts upon which the
revocation recommendation is based.
(d) The patient must be provided a copy of the revocation report and informed orally and in writing of the rights of a patient under this section.
Sec. 95. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 11, is amended to read:
Subd. 11. Exceptions. If an emergency exists, the head of the
treatment facility or state-operated treatment program may revoke the
provisional discharge and, either orally or in writing, order that the patient
be immediately returned to the treatment facility or program. In emergency cases, a revocation
report documenting reasons for revocation shall be submitted by the
designated agency within seven days after the patient is returned to the treatment
facility or program.
Sec. 96. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 12, is amended to read:
Subd. 12. Return
of patient. After revocation of a
provisional discharge or if the patient is absent without authorization, the
head of the treatment facility or state-operated treatment program may
request the patient to return to the treatment facility or program
voluntarily. The head of the treatment
facility or state-operated treatment program may request a health officer,
a welfare officer, or a peace officer to return the patient to the treatment
facility or program. If a
voluntary return is not arranged, the head of the treatment facility or
state-operated treatment program shall inform the committing court of the
revocation or absence and the court shall direct a health or peace officer in
the county where the patient is located to return the patient to the treatment
facility or program or to another state-operated treatment program or
to another treatment facility willing to accept the patient. The expense of returning the patient to a regional
state-operated treatment center program shall be paid by
the commissioner unless paid by the patient or other persons on the patient's
behalf.
Sec. 97. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 14, is amended to read:
Subd. 14. Voluntary readmission. (a) With the consent of the head of the treatment facility or state-operated treatment program, a patient may voluntarily return from provisional discharge for a period of up to 30 days, or up to 60 days with the consent of the designated agency. If the patient is not returned to provisional discharge status within 60 days, the provisional discharge is revoked. Within 15 days of receiving notice of the change in status, the patient may request a review of the matter before the special review board. The board may recommend a return to a provisional discharge status.
(b) The treatment facility or state-operated treatment program is not required to petition for a further review by the special review board unless the patient's return to the community results in substantive change to the existing provisional discharge plan. All the terms and conditions of the provisional discharge order shall remain unchanged if the patient is released again.
Sec. 98. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.18, subdivision 15, is amended to read:
Subd. 15. Discharge. (a) A patient who is mentally
ill and a person who has a mental illness and is dangerous to the
public shall not be discharged unless it appears to the satisfaction of the
commissioner, after a hearing and a favorable recommendation by a majority of
the special review board, that the patient is capable of making an acceptable adjustment
to open society, is no longer dangerous to the public, and is no longer in need
of treatment and supervision.
(b) In determining whether a discharge shall be recommended, the special review board and commissioner shall consider whether specific conditions exist to provide a reasonable degree of protection to the public and to assist the patient in adjusting to the community. If the desired conditions do not exist, the discharge shall not be granted.
Sec. 99. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.19, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2.
Petition; hearing. (a) A person patient
committed as mentally ill and a person who has a mental illness and
is dangerous to the public under section 253B.18, or the county attorney of
the county from which the person patient was committed or the
county of financial responsibility, may petition the judicial appeal panel for
a rehearing and reconsideration of a decision by the commissioner under section
253B.18, subdivision 5. The judicial
appeal panel must not consider petitions for relief other than those considered
by the commissioner from which the appeal is taken. The petition must be filed with the supreme
court within 30 days after the decision of the commissioner is signed. The hearing must be held within 45 days of
the filing of the petition unless an extension is granted for good cause.
(b) For an appeal under paragraph (a), the
supreme court shall refer the petition to the chief judge of the judicial
appeal panel. The chief judge shall
notify the patient, the county attorney of the county of commitment, the
designated agency, the commissioner, the head of the treatment facility or
program to which the patient was committed, any interested person, and
other persons the chief judge designates, of the time and place of the hearing
on the petition. The notice shall be
given at least 14 days prior to the date of the hearing.
(c) Any person may oppose the petition. The patient, the patient's counsel, the
county attorney of the committing county or the county of financial
responsibility, and the commissioner shall participate as parties to the
proceeding pending before the judicial appeal panel and shall, except when the
patient is committed solely as mentally ill and a person who has a
mental illness and is dangerous to the public, no later than 20 days
before the hearing on the petition, inform the judicial appeal panel and the
opposing party in writing whether they support or oppose the petition and
provide a summary of facts in support of their position. The judicial appeal panel may appoint court
examiners and may adjourn the hearing from time to time. It shall hear and receive all relevant
testimony and evidence and make a record of all proceedings. The patient, the patient's counsel, and the
county attorney of the committing county or the county of financial
responsibility have the right to be present and may present and cross‑examine
all witnesses and offer a factual and legal basis in support of their positions.
The petitioning party seeking discharge
or provisional discharge bears the burden of going forward with the evidence,
which means presenting a prima facie case with competent evidence to show that
the person is entitled to the requested relief.
If the petitioning party has met this burden, the party opposing
discharge or provisional discharge bears the burden of proof by clear and
convincing evidence that the discharge or provisional discharge should be
denied. A party seeking transfer under
section 253B.18, subdivision 6, must establish by a preponderance of the
evidence that the transfer is appropriate.
Sec. 100. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.20, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Notice
to court. When a committed person is
discharged, provisionally discharged, or transferred to another
treatment facility, or partially hospitalized state-operated treatment
program, or community‑based treatment program, or when the person
patient dies, is absent without authorization, or is returned, the
treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based
treatment program having custody of the patient shall notify the committing
court, the county attorney, and the patient's attorney.
Sec. 101. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.20, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Necessities. The head of the state-operated
treatment facility program shall make necessary arrangements at
the expense of the state to insure that no patient is discharged or
provisionally discharged without suitable clothing. The head of the state-operated
treatment facility program shall, if necessary, provide the
patient with a sufficient sum of money to secure transportation home, or to
another destination of the patient's choice, if the destination is located
within a reasonable distance of the state-operated treatment facility
program. The commissioner shall
establish procedures by rule to help the patient receive all public assistance
benefits provided by state or federal law to which the patient is entitled by
residence and circumstances. The rule
shall be uniformly applied in all counties.
All counties shall provide temporary relief whenever necessary to meet
the intent of this subdivision.
Sec. 102. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.20, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Notice
to designated agency. The head of
the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based
treatment program, upon the provisional discharge of any committed person,
shall notify the designated agency before the patient leaves the treatment
facility or program. Whenever
possible the notice shall be given at least one week before the patient is to
leave the facility or program.
Sec. 103. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.20, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Aftercare
services. Prior to the date of
discharge or provisional discharge of any committed person, the designated
agency of the county of financial responsibility, in cooperation with the head
of the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or
community-based treatment program, and the patient's physician mental
health professional, if notified pursuant to subdivision 6, shall establish
a continuing plan of aftercare services for the patient including a plan for
medical and psychiatric treatment, nursing care, vocational assistance, and
other assistance the patient needs. The
designated agency shall provide case management services, supervise and assist
the patient in finding employment, suitable shelter, and adequate medical and
psychiatric treatment, and aid in the patient's readjustment to the community.
Sec. 104. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.20, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Notice
to physician mental health professional. The head of the treatment facility,
state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program
shall notify the physician mental health professional of any
committed person at the time of the patient's discharge or provisional
discharge, unless the patient objects to the notice.
Sec. 105. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.21, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Administrative procedures. If the patient is entitled to care by any agency of the United States in this state, the commitment warrant shall be in triplicate, committing the patient to the joint custody of the head of the treatment facility, state-operated treatment program, or community-based treatment program and the federal agency. If the federal agency is unable or unwilling to receive the patient at the time of commitment, the patient may subsequently be transferred to it upon its request.
Sec. 106. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.21, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Applicable
regulations. Any person, when
admitted to an institution of a federal agency within or without this state,
shall be subject to the rules and regulations of the federal agency, except
that nothing in this section shall deprive any person of rights secured to
patients of state state-operated treatment programs, treatment
facilities, and community-based treatment programs by this chapter.
Sec. 107. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.21, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Powers.
The chief officer of any treatment facility operated by a federal
agency to which any person is admitted shall have the same powers as the heads of
treatment facilities state-operated treatment programs within
this state with respect to admission, retention of custody, transfer, parole,
or discharge of the committed person.
Sec. 108. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.212, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Cost of care; commitment by tribal court
order; Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians.
The commissioner of human services may contract with and receive
payment from the Indian Health Service of the United States Department of Health
and Human Services for the care and treatment of those members of the Red Lake
Band of Chippewa Indians who have been committed by tribal court order to the
Indian Health Service for care and treatment of mental illness, developmental
disability, or chemical dependency. The
contract shall provide that the Indian Health Service may not transfer any
person for admission to a regional center state-operated treatment
program unless the commitment procedure utilized by the tribal court
provided due process protections similar to those afforded by sections 253B.05
253B.051 to 253B.10.
Sec. 109. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.212, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:
Subd. 1a. Cost of care; commitment by tribal court
order; White Earth Band of Ojibwe Indians.
The commissioner of human services may contract with and receive
payment from the Indian Health Service of the United States Department of
Health and Human Services for the care and treatment of those members of the
White Earth Band of Ojibwe Indians who have been committed by tribal court
order to the Indian Health Service for care and treatment of mental illness,
developmental disability, or chemical dependency. The tribe may also contract directly with the
commissioner for treatment of those members of the White Earth Band who have
been committed by tribal court order to the White Earth Department of Health
for care and treatment of mental illness, developmental disability, or chemical
dependency. The contract shall provide
that the Indian Health Service and the White Earth Band shall not transfer any
person for admission to a regional center state-operated treatment
program unless the commitment procedure utilized by the tribal court
provided due process protections similar to those afforded by sections 253B.05
253B.051 to 253B.10.
Sec. 110. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.212, subdivision 1b, is amended to read:
Subd. 1b. Cost of care; commitment by tribal court
order; any federally recognized Indian tribe within the state of Minnesota. The commissioner of human services may
contract with and receive payment from the Indian Health Service of the United
States Department of Health and Human Services for the care and treatment of
those members of any federally recognized Indian tribe within the state, who
have been committed by tribal court order to the Indian Health Service for care
and treatment of mental illness, developmental disability, or chemical
dependency. The tribe may also contract
directly with the commissioner for treatment of those members of any federally
recognized Indian tribe within the state who have been committed by tribal
court order to the respective tribal Department of Health for care and
treatment of mental illness, developmental disability, or chemical dependency. The contract shall provide that the Indian
Health Service and any federally recognized Indian tribe within the state shall
not transfer any person for admission to a regional center state-operated
treatment program unless the commitment procedure utilized by the tribal
court provided due process protections similar to those afforded by sections 253B.05
253B.051 to 253B.10.
Sec. 111. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.212, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Effect given to tribal commitment order. (a) When, under an agreement
entered into pursuant to subdivision 1, 1a, or 1b, the Indian Health Service or
the placing tribe applies to a regional center state-operated
treatment program for admission of a person committed to the jurisdiction
of the health service by the tribal court as
a person who is mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or chemically dependent due to mental illness, developmental disability, or chemical dependency, the commissioner may treat the patient with the consent of the Indian Health Service or the placing tribe.
(b) A person admitted to a regional
center state-operated treatment program pursuant to this section has
all the rights accorded by section 253B.03.
In addition, treatment reports, prepared in accordance with the
requirements of section 253B.12, subdivision 1, shall be filed with the Indian
Health Service or the placing tribe within 60 days of commencement of the
patient's stay at the facility program. A subsequent treatment report shall be filed
with the Indian Health Service or the placing tribe within six months of the
patient's admission to the facility program or prior to discharge,
whichever comes first. Provisional
discharge or transfer of the patient may be authorized by the head of the treatment
facility program only with the consent of the Indian Health Service
or the placing tribe. Discharge from the
facility program to the Indian Health Service or the placing
tribe may be authorized by the head of the treatment facility program
after notice to and consultation with the Indian Health Service or the placing
tribe.
Sec. 112. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.22, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Establishment. The commissioner shall establish a review
board of three or more persons for each regional center the
Anoka-Metro Regional Treatment Center, Minnesota Security Hospital, and
Minnesota sex offender program to review the admission and retention of its
patients of that program receiving services under this chapter. One member shall be qualified in the
diagnosis of mental illness, developmental disability, or chemical dependency,
and one member shall be an attorney. The
commissioner may, upon written request from the appropriate federal authority,
establish a review panel for any federal treatment facility within the state to
review the admission and retention of patients hospitalized under this chapter. For any review board established for a
federal treatment facility, one of the persons appointed by the commissioner
shall be the commissioner of veterans affairs or the commissioner's designee.
Sec. 113. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.22, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Right
to appear. Each treatment
facility program specified in subdivision 1 shall be visited by the
review board at least once every six months.
Upon request each patient in the treatment facility program
shall have the right to appear before the review board during the visit.
Sec. 114. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.22, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Notice. The head of the treatment facility
each program specified in subdivision 1 shall notify each patient at the
time of admission by a simple written statement of the patient's right to
appear before the review board and the next date when the board will visit the
treatment facility that program.
A request to appear before the board need not be in writing. Any employee of the treatment facility
program receiving a patient's request to appear before the board shall
notify the head of the treatment facility program of the request.
Sec. 115. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.22, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Review. The board shall review the admission and
retention of patients at its respective treatment facility the
program. The board may examine the
records of all patients admitted and may examine personally at its own
instigation all patients who from the records or otherwise appear to justify
reasonable doubt as to continued need of confinement in a treatment facility
the program. The review board
shall report its findings to the commissioner and to the head of the treatment
facility program. The board
may also receive reports from patients, interested persons, and treatment
facility employees of the program, and investigate conditions
affecting the care of patients.
Sec. 116. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.23, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Costs of hearings. (a) In each proceeding under this chapter the court shall allow and order paid to each witness subpoenaed the fees and mileage prescribed by law; to each examiner a reasonable sum for services and for travel; to persons conveying the patient to the place of detention, disbursements for the travel, board, and lodging of the patient and of themselves and their authorized assistants; and to the patient's counsel, when appointed by the court, a reasonable sum for travel and for the time spent in court or in preparing for the hearing. Upon the court's order, the county auditor shall issue a warrant on the county treasurer for payment of the amounts allowed, excluding the costs of the court examiner, which must be paid by the state courts.
(b) Whenever venue of a proceeding has been transferred under this chapter, the costs of the proceedings shall be reimbursed to the county where the proceedings were conducted by the county of financial responsibility.
Sec. 117. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.23, subdivision 1b, is amended to read:
Subd. 1b. Responsibility
for conducting prepetition screening and filing commitment and early
intervention petitions. (a) The
county of financial responsibility is responsible to conduct prepetition
screening pursuant to section 253B.07, subdivision 1, and, if statutory
conditions for early intervention or commitment are satisfied, to file a
petition pursuant to section 253B.064, subdivision 1, paragraph (a);
253B.07, subdivision 1, paragraph (a);, or 253D.07.
(b) Except in cases under chapter 253D, if
the county of financial responsibility refuses or fails to conduct prepetition
screening or file a petition, or if it is unclear which county is the county of
financial responsibility, the county where the proposed patient is present is
responsible to conduct the prepetition screening and, if statutory conditions
for early intervention or commitment are satisfied, file the petition.
(c) In cases under chapter 253D, if the county of financial responsibility refuses or fails to file a petition, or if it is unclear which county is the county of financial responsibility, then (1) the county where the conviction for which the person is incarcerated was entered, or (2) the county where the proposed patient is present, if the person is not currently incarcerated based on conviction, is responsible to file the petition if statutory conditions for commitment are satisfied.
(d) When a proposed patient is an inmate confined to an adult correctional facility under the control of the commissioner of corrections and commitment proceedings are initiated or proposed to be initiated pursuant to section 241.69, the county where the correctional facility is located may agree to perform the responsibilities specified in paragraph (a).
(e) Any dispute concerning financial responsibility for the costs of the proceedings and treatment will be resolved pursuant to chapter 256G.
(f) This subdivision and the sections of law cited in this subdivision address venue only. Nothing in this chapter is intended to limit the statewide jurisdiction of district courts over civil commitment matters.
Sec. 118. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.23, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Legal results of commitment status. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter and in sections 246.15 and 246.16, no person by reason of commitment or treatment pursuant to this chapter shall be deprived of any legal right, including but not limited to the right to dispose of property, sue and be sued, execute instruments, make purchases, enter into contractual relationships, vote, and hold a driver's license. Commitment or treatment of any patient pursuant to this chapter is not a judicial determination of legal incompetency except to the extent provided in section 253B.03, subdivision 6.
(b)
Proceedings for determination of legal incompetency and the appointment of a
guardian for a person subject to commitment under this chapter may be commenced
before, during, or after commitment proceedings have been instituted and may be
conducted jointly with the commitment proceedings. The court shall notify the head of the treatment
facility or program to which the patient is committed of a finding that
the patient is incompetent.
(c) Where the person to be committed is a minor or owns property of value and it appears to the court that the person is not competent to manage a personal estate, the court shall appoint a general conservator of the person's estate as provided by law.
Sec. 119. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253B.24, is amended to read:
253B.24
TRANSMITTAL OF DATA TO NATIONAL INSTANT CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECK SYSTEM.
When a court:
(1) commits a person under this chapter as
being mentally ill, developmentally disabled, mentally ill and dangerous, or
chemically dependent due to mental illness, developmental disability, or
chemical dependency, or as a person who has a mental illness and is dangerous
to the public;
(2) determines in a criminal case that a person is incompetent to stand trial or not guilty by reason of mental illness; or
(3) restores
a person's ability to possess a firearm under section 609.165, subdivision 1d,
or 624.713, subdivision 4,
the court shall ensure that this information is electronically transmitted within three business days to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.
Sec. 120. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253D.02, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Court
examiner. "Court
examiner" has the meaning given in section 253B.02, subdivision 7 7a.
Sec. 121. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253D.07, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Petition. Upon the filing of a petition alleging
that a proposed respondent is a sexually dangerous person or a person with a
sexual psychopathic personality, the court shall hear the petition as provided
all of the applicable procedures contained in sections 253B.07 and
253B.08 apply to the commitment proceeding.
Sec. 122. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253D.10, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Correctional facilities. (a) A person who is being petitioned for commitment under this chapter and who is placed under a judicial hold order under section 253B.07, subdivision 2b or 7, may be confined at a Department of Corrections or a county correctional or detention facility, rather than a secure treatment facility, until a determination of the commitment petition as specified in this subdivision.
(b) A court may order that a person who is being petitioned for commitment under this chapter be confined in a Department of Corrections facility pursuant to the judicial hold order under the following circumstances and conditions:
(1) The person is currently serving a sentence in a Department of Corrections facility and the court determines that the person has made a knowing and voluntary (i) waiver of the right to be held in a secure treatment facility and (ii) election to be held in a Department of Corrections facility. The order confining the person in the Department of Corrections facility shall remain in effect until the court vacates the order or the person's criminal sentence and conditional release term expire.
In no case may the person be held in a Department of Corrections facility pursuant only to this subdivision, and not pursuant to any separate correctional authority, for more than 210 days.
(2) A person who has elected to be confined in a Department of Corrections facility under this subdivision may revoke the election by filing a written notice of intent to revoke the election with the court and serving the notice upon the Department of Corrections and the county attorney. The court shall order the person transferred to a secure treatment facility within 15 days of the date that the notice of revocation was filed with the court, except that, if the person has additional time to serve in prison at the end of the 15-day period, the person shall not be transferred to a secure treatment facility until the person's prison term expires. After a person has revoked an election to remain in a Department of Corrections facility under this subdivision, the court may not adopt another election to remain in a Department of Corrections facility without the agreement of both parties and the Department of Corrections.
(3) Upon petition by the commissioner of corrections, after notice to the parties and opportunity for hearing and for good cause shown, the court may order that the person's place of confinement be changed from the Department of Corrections to a secure treatment facility.
(4) While at a Department of Corrections
facility pursuant to this subdivision, the person shall remain subject to all
rules and practices applicable to correctional inmates in the facility in which
the person is placed including, but not limited to, the powers
and duties of the commissioner of corrections under section 241.01, powers
relating to use of force under section 243.52, and the right of the
commissioner of corrections to determine the place of confinement in a prison,
reformatory, or other facility.
(5) A person may not be confined in a Department of Corrections facility under this provision beyond the end of the person's executed sentence or the end of any applicable conditional release period, whichever is later. If a person confined in a Department of Corrections facility pursuant to this provision reaches the person's supervised release date and is subject to a period of conditional release, the period of conditional release shall commence on the supervised release date even though the person remains in the Department of Corrections facility pursuant to this provision. At the end of the later of the executed sentence or any applicable conditional release period, the person shall be transferred to a secure treatment facility.
(6) Nothing in this section may be construed to establish a right of an inmate in a state correctional facility to participate in sex offender treatment. This section must be construed in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 244.03.
(c) When a person is temporarily
confined in a Department of Corrections facility solely under this subdivision
and not based on any separate correctional authority, the commissioner of
corrections may charge the county of financial responsibility for the costs of
confinement, and the Department of Human Services shall use existing
appropriations to fund all remaining nonconfinement costs. The funds received by the commissioner for
the confinement and nonconfinement costs are appropriated to the department for
these purposes.
(c) (d) The committing county
may offer a person who is being petitioned for commitment under this chapter
and who is placed under a judicial hold order under section 253B.07,
subdivision 2b or 7, the option to be held in a county correctional or
detention facility rather than a secure treatment facility, under such terms as
may be agreed to by the county, the commitment petitioner, and the commitment
respondent. If a person makes such an
election under this paragraph, the court hold order shall specify the terms of
the agreement, including the conditions for revoking the election.
Sec. 123. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253D.21, is amended to read:
253D.21
NEUROLEPTIC PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION.
Neuroleptic Psychotropic
medications may be administered to a person committed under this chapter only
as provided in section 253B.092.
Sec. 124. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 253D.28, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Procedure. (a) The supreme court shall refer a petition for rehearing and reconsideration to the chief judge of the judicial appeal panel. The chief judge shall notify the committed person, the county attorneys of the county of commitment and county of financial responsibility, the commissioner, the executive director, any interested person, and other persons the chief judge designates, of the time and place of the hearing on the petition. The notice shall be given at least 14 days prior to the date of the hearing. The hearing may be conducted by interactive video conference under General Rules of Practice, rule 131, and Minnesota Rules of Civil Commitment, rule 14.
(b) Any person may oppose the petition. The committed person, the committed person's counsel, the county attorneys of the committing county and county of financial responsibility, and the commissioner shall participate as parties to the proceeding pending before the judicial appeal panel and shall, no later than 20 days before the hearing on the petition, inform the judicial appeal panel and the opposing party in writing whether they support or oppose the petition and provide a summary of facts in support of their position.
(c) The judicial appeal panel may appoint court examiners and may adjourn the hearing from time to time. It shall hear and receive all relevant testimony and evidence and make a record of all proceedings. The committed person, the committed person's counsel, and the county attorney of the committing county or the county of financial responsibility have the right to be present and may present and cross-examine all witnesses and offer a factual and legal basis in support of their positions.
(d) The petitioning party seeking discharge or provisional discharge bears the burden of going forward with the evidence, which means presenting a prima facie case with competent evidence to show that the person is entitled to the requested relief. If the petitioning party has met this burden, the party opposing discharge or provisional discharge bears the burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence that the discharge or provisional discharge should be denied.
(e) A party seeking transfer under section 253D.29 must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the transfer is appropriate.
Sec. 125. REVISOR
INSTRUCTION.
The revisor of statutes shall renumber
Minnesota Statutes, section 253B.02, so that the subdivisions are alphabetical. The revisor shall correct any erroneous
cross-references that arise as a result of the renumbering.
Sec. 126. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections
253B.02, subdivisions 6 and 12a; 253B.05, subdivisions 1, 2, 2b, 3, and 4;
253B.064; 253B.065; 253B.066; 253B.09, subdivision 3; 253B.12, subdivision 2;
253B.15, subdivision 11; and 253B.20, subdivision 7, are repealed."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to civil commitment; modifying provisions governing civil commitment; establishing engagement services pilot project; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 253B.02, subdivisions 4b, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, by adding subdivisions; 253B.03, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4a, 5, 6, 6b, 6d, 7, 10; 253B.04, subdivisions 1, 1a, 2; 253B.045, subdivisions 2, 3, 5, 6; 253B.06, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 253B.07, subdivisions 1, 2, 2a, 2b, 2d, 3, 5, 7; 253B.08, subdivisions 1, 2a, 5, 5a; 253B.09, subdivisions 1, 2, 3a, 5; 253B.092; 253B.0921; 253B.095, subdivision 3; 253B.097, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 6; 253B.10; 253B.12, subdivisions 1, 3, 4, 7; 253B.13, subdivision 1; 253B.14; 253B.141; 253B.15, subdivisions 1, 1a, 2, 3, 3a, 3b, 3c, 5, 7, 9, 10, by adding a subdivision; 253B.16; 253B.17; 253B.18, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4a, 4b, 4c, 5, 5a, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15; 253B.19, subdivision 2; 253B.20, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 6; 253B.21, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 253B.212, subdivisions 1, 1a, 1b, 2; 253B.22, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 253B.23, subdivisions 1, 1b, 2; 253B.24; 253D.02, subdivision 6; 253D.07, subdivision 2; 253D.10, subdivision 2; 253D.21; 253D.28, subdivision 2; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 253B; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 253B.02, subdivisions 6, 12a; 253B.05, subdivisions 1, 2, 2b, 3, 4; 253B.064; 253B.065; 253B.066; 253B.09, subdivision 3; 253B.12, subdivision 2; 253B.15, subdivision 11; 253B.20, subdivision 7."
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill be re-referred to the Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Division.
The
report was adopted.
Lesch from the Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Division to which was referred:
H. F. No. 3430, A bill for an act relating to elections; regulating access to certain lists of voter data related to the presidential nomination primary; allowing voters to request that their data be excluded from the lists; amending Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, section 201.091, subdivision 4a.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 1, line 17, after the period, insert "Within ten days after a list is received by a party's representative, the secretary of state must destroy any data identifying a voter's party choice maintained within the statewide voter registration system that was used to compile the list. The secretary must request that the party's representative provide a written confirmation of receipt for this purpose."
Page 1, line 23, before the period, insert "in the same manner as would apply to a responsible authority, and a major political party is subject to the remedies and penalties in the same manner as would apply to a government entity under those sections"
Page 2, line 4, delete "subdivision 1" and insert "paragraph (a)"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill be re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
The
report was adopted.
Mariani from the Public Safety and Criminal Justice Reform Finance and Policy Division to which was referred:
H. F. No. 3453, A bill for an act relating to juvenile justice; providing for juvenile risk assessments; addressing issues relating to juveniles including alternatives to arrest and use of restraints; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 260B.176, by adding a subdivision; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 260B.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 2, line 20, after "commissioner" insert "of corrections"
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill be placed on the General Register.
The
report was adopted.
Lesch from the Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Division to which was referred:
S. F. No. 1706, A bill for an act relating to civil actions; extending the 70-day period from date of service of garnishment to 90 days for earnings; modifying amount of earnings subject to garnishment; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 571.72, subdivisions 2, 7; 571.73, subdivision 3; 571.74; 571.75, subdivisions 1, 2; 571.922; 571.923.
Reported the same back with the following amendments:
Page 1, after line 6, insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 550.136, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Limitation on levy on earnings. (a) Unless the judgment is for child support, the maximum part of the aggregate disposable earnings of an individual for any pay period subjected to an execution levy may not exceed the lesser of:
(1) 25 percent of the judgment debtor's disposable earnings; or
(2) the amount by which the judgment
debtor's disposable earnings exceed the following product greater of: (i) 40 times $9.50 or 40 times the
federal minimum hourly wages prescribed by section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor
Standards Act of 1938, United States Code, title 29, section 206(a)(1), in
effect at the time the earnings are payable, times the number of work weeks in
the pay period. When a pay period
consists of other than a whole number of work weeks, each day of that pay
period in excess of the number of completed work weeks shall be counted as a
fraction of a work week equal to the number of excess workdays divided by the
number of days in the normal work week.
(b) If the judgment is for child support, the levy may not exceed:
(1) 50 percent of the judgment debtor's disposable income, if the judgment debtor is supporting a spouse or dependent child and the judgment is 12 weeks old or less (12 weeks to be calculated to the beginning of the work week in which the execution levy is received);
(2) 55 percent of the judgment debtor's disposable income, if the judgment debtor is supporting a spouse or dependent child, and the judgment is over 12 weeks old (12 weeks to be calculated to the beginning of the work week in which the execution levy is received);
(3) 60 percent of the judgment debtor's disposable income, if the judgment debtor is not supporting a spouse or dependent child and the judgment is 12 weeks old or less (12 weeks to be calculated to the beginning of the work week in which the execution levy is received); or
(4) 65 percent of the judgment debtor's disposable income, if the judgment debtor is not supporting a spouse or dependent child, and the judgment is over 12 weeks old (12 weeks to be calculated to the beginning of the work week in which the execution levy is received).
Execution levies under this section on judgments for child support are effective until the judgments are satisfied if the judgment creditor is a county and the employer is notified by the county when the judgment is satisfied.
(c) No court may make, execute, or enforce an order or any process in violation of this section.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 550.136, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Multiple
levies on earnings. Except as
otherwise provided in this chapter or section 518A.53, the priority of multiple
earnings execution levies is determined by the order in which the execution
levies were served on the employer. If
the employer is served with two or more writs of execution at the same time on
the same day, the writ of execution issued pursuant to the first judgment
entered has priority. If two or more
execution levies are served on the same day and are based on judgments entered
on the same day, then the employer shall select the priority of the earnings
levies. However, in all cases except
earnings execution levies on judgments for child support if the judgment
creditor is a county and the employer is notified by the county when the
judgment is satisfied, the execution levies shall be effective no longer than 70
90 days from the date of the service of the writ of execution.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 550.136, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Earnings
attachable. (a) Subject to the
exemptions provided by sections 550.37 and 571.922, and any other applicable
statute, and except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b), the service of a
writ of execution under this chapter attaches all unpaid nonexempt disposable
earnings owing or to be owed by the third party and earned or to be earned by
the judgment debtor before and within the pay period in which the writ of
execution is served and within all subsequent pay periods whose paydays occur
within the 70 90 days after the date of service of the writ of
execution. "Paydays" means the
days upon which the third party pays earnings to the judgment debtor in the
ordinary course of business. If the
judgment debtor has no regular paydays, paydays means the 15th day and the last
day of each month. If the levy attaches
less than $10, the third party shall not retain and remit the sum.
(b) The service of a writ of execution on a judgment for child support attaches to all unpaid nonexempt disposable earnings owing or to be owed by the third party and earned or to be earned by the judgment debtor before and within the pay period in which the writ of execution is served and within all subsequent pay periods until the judgment is satisfied if the judgment creditor is a county and the third party is notified by the county when the judgment is satisfied.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 550.136, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. Execution earnings disclosure form and worksheet. The judgment creditor shall provide to the sheriff for service upon the judgment debtor's employer an execution earnings disclosure form and an earnings disclosure worksheet with the writ of execution, that must be substantially in the form set forth below.
DEFINITIONS
"EARNINGS": For the purpose of execution, "earnings" means compensation paid or payable to an employee for personal services or compensation paid or payable to the producer for the sale of agricultural products; milk or milk products; or fruit or other horticultural products produced when the producer is operating a family farm, a family farm corporation, or an authorized farm corporation, as defined in section 500.24, subdivision 2, whether denominated as wages, salary, commission, bonus, or otherwise, and includes periodic payments pursuant to a pension or retirement.
"DISPOSABLE EARNINGS": Means that part of the earnings of an individual remaining after the deduction from those earnings of amounts required by law to be withheld. (Amounts required by law to be withheld do not include items such as health insurance, charitable contributions, or other voluntary wage deductions.)
"PAYDAY": For the purpose of execution, "payday(s)" means the date(s) upon which the employer pays earnings to the debtor in the ordinary course of business. If the judgment debtor has no regular payday, payday(s) means the 15th and the last day of each month.
THE THIRD PARTY/EMPLOYER MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
(1) Do you now owe, or within 70 90
days from the date the execution levy was served on you, will you or may you
owe money to the judgment debtor for earnings?
Yes ..... |
No ..... |
|
(2) Does the judgment debtor earn more than $... per week? (this amount is the federal minimum wage per week)
Yes ..... |
No ..... |
|
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE
EARNINGS DISCLOSURE
A. If your answer to either question 1 or 2 is "No," then you must sign the affirmation below and return this disclosure to the sheriff within 20 days after it was served on you, and you do not need to answer the remaining questions.
B. If your answers to both questions 1 and 2 are "Yes," you must complete this form and the Earnings Disclosure Worksheet as follows:
For each payday that falls within 70 90
days from the date the execution levy was served on you, YOU MUST calculate the
amount of earnings to be retained by completing steps 3 through 11 on page 2,
and enter the amounts on the Earnings Disclosure Worksheet. UPON REQUEST, THE EMPLOYER MUST PROVIDE THE
DEBTOR WITH INFORMATION AS TO HOW THE CALCULATIONS REQUIRED BY THIS DISCLOSURE
WERE MADE.
Each payday, you must retain the amount of earnings listed in column I on the Earnings Disclosure Worksheet.
You must pay the attached earnings and return
this earnings disclosure form and the Earnings Disclosure Worksheet to the
sheriff and deliver a copy of the disclosure and worksheet to the judgment
debtor within ten days after the last payday that falls within the 70-day
90-day period. If the judgment is
wholly satisfied or if the judgment debtor's employment ends before the
expiration of the 70-day 90-day period, your disclosure and
remittance should be made within ten days after the last payday for which
earnings were attached.
For steps 3 through 11, "columns" refers to columns on the Earnings Disclosure Worksheet.
(3) |
COLUMN A. |
|
Enter the date of judgment debtor's payday. |
(4) |
COLUMN B. |
|
Enter judgment debtor's gross earnings for each payday. |
(5) |
COLUMN C. |
|
Enter judgment debtor's disposable earnings for each payday. |
(6) |
COLUMN D. |
|
Enter 25 percent of
disposable earnings. (Multiply column
C by .25.) |
(7) |
COLUMN E. |
|
Enter here the greater
of 40 times $9.50 or 40 times the hourly federal minimum wage
($..........) times the number of work weeks included in each payday. (Note:
If a payday includes days in excess of whole work weeks, the
additional days should be counted as a fraction of a work week equal to the
number of workdays in excess of a whole work week divided by the number of
workdays in a normal work week.) |
(8) |
COLUMN F. |
|
Subtract the amount in column E from the amount in column C, and enter here. |
(9) |
COLUMN G. |
|
Enter here the lesser of the amount in column D and the amount in column F. |
(10) |
COLUMN H. |
|
Enter here any amount claimed by you as a setoff, defense, lien, or claim, or any amount claimed by any other person as an exemption or adverse interest which would reduce the amount of earnings owing to the judgment debtor. (Note: Any indebtedness to you incurred within ten days prior to your receipt of the first execution levy on a debt may not be set off against the earnings otherwise subject to this levy. Any wage assignment made by the judgment debtor within ten days prior to your receipt of the first execution levy on a debt is void.) |
|
|
|
You must also describe your claim(s) and the claims of others, if known, in the space provided below the worksheet and state the name(s) and address(es) of these persons. |
|
|
|
Enter zero in column H if there are no claims by you or others which would reduce the amount of earnings owing to the judgment debtor.
|
(11) |
COLUMN I. |
|
Subtract the amount in column H from the amount in column G and enter here. This is the amount of earnings that you must remit for the payday for which the calculations were made. |
AFFIRMATION
I, ................... (person signing Affirmation), am the third party/employer or I am authorized by the third party/employer to complete this earnings disclosure, and have done so truthfully and to the best of my knowledge.
DATED: ……………………………………………… |
|
………………………………………………... |
|
|
Signature |
|
|
………………………………………………... |
|
|
Title |
|
|
………………………………………………... |
|
|
Telephone Number |
EARNINGS DISCLOSURE WORKSHEET |
|
………………………………………………... |
|
|
Debtor's Name |
A |
|
|
B |
|
C |
Payday Date |
|
Gross Earnings |
|
Disposable Earnings |
|
1. |
…………………... |
|
$ ….……………... |
|
$ ….……………... |
2. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
3. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
4. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
5. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
6. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
7. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
8. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
9. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
10. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
D |
|
|
E |
|
F |
25% of Column C |
|
Greater of 40 x $9.50 or
40 X Fed. Min. Wage |
|
Column C minus Column E |
|
1. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
2. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
3. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
4. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
5. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
6. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
7. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
8. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
9. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
10. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
*If you entered any amount in column H for any payday(s), you must describe below either your claims, or the claims of others. For amounts claimed by others, you must both state the names and addresses of such persons, and the nature of their claim, if known.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...
AFFIRMATION
I, ................. (person signing Affirmation), am the third party or I am authorized by the third party to complete this earnings disclosure worksheet, and have done so truthfully and to the best of my knowledge.
|
|
……………………………………. |
|
|
Signature |
Dated: …………………………… |
……………………………………... |
(...) ……………………………….. |
|
Title |
Phone Number |
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 550.136, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Execution earnings disclosure form and worksheet for child support judgments. The judgment creditor shall provide to the sheriff for service upon a child support judgment debtor's employer an execution earnings disclosure form and an earnings disclosure worksheet with the writ of execution, that must be substantially in the form set forth below.
STATE OF MINNESOTA |
|
|
DISTRICT COURT |
||
COUNTY OF ……………….. |
|
|
….……………. JUDICIAL DISTRICT |
||
|
|
|
|
|
FILE NO. …….. |
…………………………………….… (Judgment Creditor) |
|
|
|
||
against |
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS |
.……………………………….…….… (Judgment Debtor) |
|
|
EXECUTION |
||
and |
|
|
|
|
DISCLOSURE |
…………………………………….….….…. (Third Party) |
|
|
|
DEFINITIONS
"EARNINGS": For the purpose of execution, "earnings" means compensation paid or payable to an employee for personal services or compensation paid or payable to the producer for the sale of agricultural products; milk or milk products; or fruit or other horticultural products produced when the producer is operating a family farm, a family farm corporation, or an authorized farm corporation, as defined in section 500.24, subdivision 2, whether denominated as wages, salary, commission, bonus, or otherwise, and includes periodic payments pursuant to a pension or retirement, workers' compensation, or unemployment benefits.
"DISPOSABLE EARNINGS": Means that part of the earnings of an individual remaining after the deduction from those earnings of amounts required by law to be withheld. (Amounts required by law to be withheld do not include items such as health insurance, charitable contributions, or other voluntary wage deductions.)
"PAYDAY": For the purpose of execution, "payday(s)" means the date(s) upon which the employer pays earnings to the debtor in the ordinary course of business. If the judgment debtor has no regular payday, payday(s) means the 15th and the last day of each month.
THE THIRD PARTY/EMPLOYER MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTION:
(1) Do you now owe, or within 70 90
days from the date the execution levy was served on you, will you or may you
owe money to the judgment debtor for earnings?
Yes ..... |
No ..... |
|
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE
EARNINGS DISCLOSURE
A. If your answer to question 1 is "No," then you must sign the affirmation below and return this disclosure to the sheriff within 20 days after it was served on you, and you do not need to answer the remaining questions.
B. If your answer to question 1 is "Yes," you must complete this form and the Earnings Disclosure Worksheet as follows:
For each payday that falls within 70 90
days from the date the execution levy was served on you, YOU MUST calculate the
amount of earnings to be retained by completing steps 2 through 8 on page 2,
and enter the amounts on the Earnings Disclosure Worksheet. UPON REQUEST, THE EMPLOYER MUST PROVIDE THE
DEBTOR WITH INFORMATION AS TO HOW THE CALCULATIONS REQUIRED BY THIS DISCLOSURE
WERE MADE.
Each payday, you must retain the amount of earnings listed in column G on the Earnings Disclosure Worksheet.
You must pay the attached earnings and return
this earnings disclosure form and the Earnings Disclosure Worksheet to the
sheriff and deliver a copy of the disclosure and worksheet to the judgment
debtor within ten days after the last payday that falls within the 70-day
90-day period. If the judgment is
wholly satisfied or if the judgment debtor's employment ends before the
expiration of the 70-day 90-day period, your disclosure and
remittance should be made within ten days after the last payday for which
earnings were attached.
For steps 2 through 8, "columns" refers to columns on the Earnings Disclosure Worksheet.
(2) COLUMN A. Enter the date of judgment debtor's payday.
(3) COLUMN B. Enter judgment debtor's gross earnings for each payday.
(4) COLUMN C. Enter judgment debtor's disposable earnings for each payday.
(5) COLUMN D. Enter either 50, 55, 60, or 65 percent of disposable earnings, based on which of the following descriptions fits the child support judgment debtor:
(a) 50 percent of the judgment debtor's disposable income, if the judgment debtor is supporting a spouse or dependent child and the judgment is 12 weeks old or less (12 weeks to be calculated to the beginning of the work week in which the execution levy is received);
(b) 55 percent of the judgment debtor's disposable income, if the judgment debtor is supporting a spouse or dependent child, and the judgment is over 12 weeks old (12 weeks to be calculated to the beginning of the work week in which the execution levy is received);
(c) 60 percent of the judgment debtor's disposable income, if the judgment debtor is not supporting a spouse or dependent child and the judgment is 12 weeks old or less (12 weeks to be calculated to the beginning of the work week in which the execution levy is received); or
(d) 65 percent of the judgment debtor's disposable income, if the judgment debtor is not supporting a spouse or dependent child, and the judgment is over 12 weeks old (12 weeks to be calculated to the beginning of the work week in which the execution levy is received). (Multiply column C by .50, .55, .60, or .65, as appropriate.)
(6) COLUMN E. Enter here any amount claimed by you as a setoff, defense, lien, or claim, or any amount claimed by any other person as an exemption or adverse interest that would reduce the amount of earnings owing to the judgment debtor. (Note: Any indebtedness to you incurred within ten days prior to your receipt of the first execution levy may not be set off against the earnings otherwise subject to this levy. Any wage assignment made by the judgment debtor within ten days prior to your receipt of the first execution levy is void.)
You must also describe your claim(s) and the claims of others, if known, in the space provided below the worksheet and state the name(s) and address(es) of these persons.
Enter zero in column E if there are no claims by you or others that would reduce the amount of earnings owing to the judgment debtor.
(7) COLUMN F. Subtract the amount in column E from the amount in column D and enter here. This is the amount of earnings that you must remit for the payday for which the calculations were made.
AFFIRMATION
I, ................... (person signing Affirmation), am the third party/employer or I am authorized by the third party/employer to complete this earnings disclosure, and have done so truthfully and to the best of my knowledge.
DATED: ……………………………………………… |
|
………………………………………………... |
|
|
Signature |
|
|
………………………………………………... |
|
|
Title |
|
|
………………………………………………... |
|
|
Telephone Number |
EARNINGS DISCLOSURE WORKSHEET |
|
………………………………………………... |
|
|
Debtor's Name |
D |
|
|
E |
|
F |
Either 50, 55, 60, or 65% of Column C |
|
Setoff, Lien, Adverse Interest, or Other Claims |
|
Column D minus Column E |
|
1. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
2. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
3. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
4. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
5. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
6. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
7. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
8. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
9. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
10. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
|
|
TOTAL OF COLUMN F |
$ ….……………... |
*If you entered any amount in column E for any payday(s), you must describe below either your claims, or the claims of others. For amounts claimed by others, you must both state the names and addresses of such persons, and the nature of their claim, if known.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...
AFFIRMATION
I, ................. (person signing Affirmation), am the third party or I am authorized by the third party to complete this earnings disclosure worksheet, and have done so truthfully and to the best of my knowledge.
|
|
……………………………………. |
|
|
Signature |
Dated: …………………………… |
……………………………………... |
(...) ……………………………….. |
|
Title |
Phone Number |
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 550.136, subdivision 12, is amended to read:
Subd. 12. Third-party disclosure and remittance
obligation. If there are no
attachable earnings, the third party shall serve the execution earnings disclosure
form upon the sheriff within 20 days after service of the writ of execution. However, if the judgment debtor has
attachable earnings, the third party shall serve the execution earnings
disclosure form and remit to the sheriff the attached earnings within ten days
of the last payday to occur within the 70 90 days after the date
of the service of the execution. If the
judgment is wholly satisfied or if the judgment debtor's employment ends before
the expiration of the 70-day 90-day period, the disclosure and
remittance should be made within ten days after the last payday for which
earnings were attached. The amount of
the third party's execution earnings disclosure form and remittance need not
exceed 110 percent of the amount of the
judgment creditor's judgment that remains unpaid, after subtracting the total of setoffs, defenses, exemption, or other adverse interests. If the disclosure is by a corporation, it shall be made by an officer or an authorized agent having knowledge of the facts.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 551.04, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Property attachable. Subject to the exemptions provided by subdivision 3 and section 550.37, and any other applicable statute, the service of a writ of execution under this chapter attaches:
(a) Except as otherwise provided in
paragraph (c), all unpaid nonexempt disposable earnings owing or to be owed by
the third party and earned or to be earned by the judgment debtor within the
pay period in which the writ of execution is served and within all subsequent
pay periods whose paydays occur within the 70 90 days after the
date of service of the writ of execution.
"Payday" means the day upon which the third party pays
earnings to the judgment debtor in the ordinary course of business. If the judgment debtor has no regular
paydays, payday means the 15th day and the last day of each month.
(b) All other nonexempt indebtedness or money due or belonging to the judgment debtor and owing by the third party or in the possession or under the control of the third party at the time of service of the writ of execution, whether or not the same, has become payable. The third party shall not be compelled to pay or deliver the same before the time specified by any agreement unless the agreement was fraudulently contracted to defeat an execution levy or other collection remedy.
(c) For an execution on a judgment for child support, all unpaid nonexempt disposable earnings owing or to be owed by the third party and earned or to be earned by the judgment debtor within the pay period in which the writ of execution is served and within all subsequent pay periods until the judgment is satisfied if the judgment creditor is a county and the third party is notified by the county when the judgment is satisfied.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 551.04, subdivision 11, is amended to read:
Subd. 11. Forms. No judgment creditor shall use a form that contains alterations or changes from the statutory forms that mislead judgment debtors as to their rights and the execution procedure generally. If a court finds that a judgment creditor has used a misleading form, the judgment debtor shall be awarded actual damages, costs, reasonable attorney's fees resulting from additional proceedings, and an amount not to exceed $100. All forms must be clearly legible and printed in not less than the equivalent of 10-point type. A form that uses both sides of a sheet must clearly indicate on the front side that there is additional information on the back side of the sheet.
Forms, including the statutory forms, used
in executions upon earnings for the satisfaction of judgments for child support
must be changed by the creditor to reflect the fact that the 70-day 90-day
period of effectiveness does not apply to these executions if the judgment
creditor is a county and the employer is notified by the county when the
judgment is satisfied.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 551.06, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Limitation on levy on earnings. (a) Unless the judgment is for child support, the maximum part of the aggregate disposable earnings of an individual for any pay period subjected to an execution levy may not exceed the lesser of:
(1) 25 percent of the judgment debtor's disposable earnings; or
(2) the amount by which the judgment
debtor's disposable earnings exceed the following product greater of: (i) 40 times $9.50 or 40 times the
federal minimum hourly wages prescribed by section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor
Standards Act of 1938, United States Code, title 29, section 206(a)(1), in
effect at the time the earnings are payable,
times the number of work weeks in the pay period. When a pay period consists of other than a whole number of work weeks, each day of that pay period in excess of the number of completed work weeks shall be counted as a fraction of a work week equal to the number of excess workdays divided by the number of days in the normal work week.
(b) If the judgment is for child support, the levy may not exceed:
(1) 50 percent of the judgment debtor's disposable income, if the judgment debtor is supporting a spouse or dependent child and the judgment is 12 weeks old or less (12 weeks to be calculated to the beginning of the work week in which the execution levy is received);
(2) 55 percent of the judgment debtor's disposable income, if the judgment debtor is supporting a spouse or dependent child, and the judgment is over 12 weeks old (12 weeks to be calculated to the beginning of the work week in which the execution levy is received);
(3) 60 percent of the judgment debtor's disposable income, if the judgment debtor is not supporting a spouse or dependent child and the judgment is 12 weeks old or less (12 weeks to be calculated to the beginning of the work week in which the execution levy is received); or
(4) 65 percent of the judgment debtor's disposable income, if the judgment debtor is not supporting a spouse or dependent child, and the judgment is over 12 weeks old (12 weeks to be calculated to the beginning of the work week in which the execution levy is received).
Execution levies under this section on judgments for child support are effective until the judgments are satisfied if the judgment creditor is a county and the employer is notified by the county when the judgment is satisfied.
(c) No court may make, execute, or enforce an order or any process in violation of this section.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 551.06, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Multiple
levies on earnings. Except as
otherwise provided in this chapter or section 518A.53, the priority of multiple
earnings execution levies is determined by the order in which the execution
levies were served on the employer. If
the employer is served with two or more writs of execution at the same time on
the same day, the writ of execution issued pursuant to the first judgment
entered has priority. If two or more
execution levies are served on the same day and are based on judgments entered
on the same day, then the employer shall select the priority of the earnings
levies. However, in all cases except
earnings execution levies on judgments for child support if the judgment
creditor is a county and the employer is notified by the county when the
judgment is satisfied, the execution levies shall be effective no longer than 70
90 days from the date of the service of the writ of execution.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 551.06, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Earnings
attachable. (a) Subject to the exemptions
provided by subdivision 3 and section 550.37, and any other applicable statute,
and except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b), the service of a writ of
execution under this chapter attaches all unpaid nonexempt disposable earnings
owing or to be owed by the third party and earned or to be earned by the
judgment debtor before and within the pay period in which the writ of execution
is served and within all subsequent pay periods whose paydays occur within the 70
90 days after the date of service of the writ of execution. "Paydays" means the days upon which
the third party pays earnings to the judgment debtor in the ordinary course of
business. If the judgment debtor has no
regular paydays, paydays means the 15th day and the last day of each month. If the levy attaches less than $10, the third
party shall not retain and remit the sum.
(b) The service of a writ of execution on a judgment for child support attaches to all unpaid nonexempt disposable earnings owing or to be owed by the third party and earned or to be earned by the judgment debtor before and within the pay period in which the writ of execution is served and within all subsequent pay periods until the judgment is satisfied if the judgment creditor is a county and the third party is notified by the county when the judgment is satisfied.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 551.06, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. Notice of levy on earnings, disclosure, and worksheet. The attorney for the judgment creditor shall serve upon the judgment debtor's employer a notice of levy on earnings and an execution earnings disclosure form and an earnings disclosure worksheet with the writ of execution, that must be substantially in the form set forth below.
STATE OF MINNESOTA |
|
|
DISTRICT COURT |
||
COUNTY OF ……………….. |
|
|
….……………. JUDICIAL DISTRICT |
||
|
|
|
|
|
FILE NO. …….. |
…………………………………….… (Judgment Creditor) |
|
|
|
||
against |
|
|
|
NOTICE OF LEVY ON |
|
.……………………………….…….… (Judgment Debtor) |
|
EARNINGS AND DISCLOSURE |
|||
and |
|
|
|
|
|
…………………………………….….….…. (Third Party) |
|
|
|
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, sections 551.04 and 551.06, the undersigned, as attorney for the judgment creditor, hereby makes demand and levies execution upon all earnings due and owing by you (up to $10,000) to the judgment debtor for the amount of the judgment specified below. A copy of the writ of execution issued by the court is enclosed. The unpaid judgment balance is $.....
This levy attaches all unpaid nonexempt
disposable earnings owing or to be owed by you and earned or to be earned by
the judgment debtor before and within the pay period in which the writ of
execution is served and within all subsequent pay periods whose paydays occur
within the 70 90 days after the service of this levy.
In responding to this levy, you are to complete the attached disclosure form and worksheet and mail it to the undersigned attorney for the judgment creditor, together with your check payable to the above-named judgment creditor, for the nonexempt amount owed by you to the judgment debtor or for which you are obligated to the judgment debtor, within the time limits set forth in the aforementioned statutes.
|
…………………………………………... |
|
Attorney for the Judgment Creditor |
|
…………………………………………... |
|
…………………………………………... |
|
…………………………………………... |
|
Address |
|
(...) ………………………………………. |
|
Phone Number |
DISCLOSURE
DEFINITIONS
"EARNINGS": For the purpose of execution, "earnings" means compensation paid or payable to an employee for personal services or compensation paid or payable to the producer for the sale of agricultural products; milk or milk products; or fruit or other horticultural products produced when the producer is operating a family farm, a
family farm corporation, or an authorized farm corporation, as defined in section 500.24, subdivision 2, whether denominated as wages, salary, commission, bonus, or otherwise, and includes periodic payments pursuant to a pension or retirement.
"DISPOSABLE EARNINGS": Means that part of the earnings of an individual remaining after the deduction from those earnings of amounts required by law to be withheld. (Amounts required by law to be withheld do not include items such as health insurance, charitable contributions, or other voluntary wage deductions.)
"PAYDAY": For the purpose of execution, "payday(s)" means the date(s) upon which the employer pays earnings to the judgment debtor in the ordinary course of business. If the judgment debtor has no regular payday, payday(s) means the 15th and the last day of each month.
THE THIRD PARTY/EMPLOYER MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
1. Do
you now owe, or within 70 90 days from the date the execution
levy was served on you, will you or may you owe money to the judgment debtor
for earnings?
Yes ..... |
No ..... |
|
2. Does the judgment debtor earn more than $... per week? (This amount is the greater of $9.50 per hour or the federal minimum wage per week.)
Yes ..... |
No ..... |
|
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE
EARNINGS DISCLOSURE
A. If your answer to either question 1 or 2 is "No," then you must sign the affirmation on page 2 and return this disclosure to the judgment creditor's attorney within 20 days after it was served on you, and you do not need to answer the remaining questions.
B. If your answers to both questions 1 and 2 are "Yes," you must complete this form and the Earnings Disclosure Worksheet as follows:
For each payday that falls within 70 90
days from the date the execution levy was served on you, YOU MUST calculate the
amount of earnings to be retained by completing steps 3 through 11 on page 2,
and enter the amounts on the Earnings Disclosure Worksheet. UPON REQUEST, THE EMPLOYER MUST PROVIDE THE
DEBTOR WITH INFORMATION AS TO HOW THE CALCULATIONS REQUIRED BY THIS DISCLOSURE
WERE MADE.
Each payday, you must retain the amount of earnings listed in column I on the Earnings Disclosure Worksheet.
You must pay the attached earnings and return
this Earnings Disclosure Form and the Earnings Disclosure Worksheet to the
judgment creditor's attorney and deliver a copy to the judgment debtor within
ten days after the last payday that falls within the 70-day 90-day
period.
If the judgment is wholly satisfied or if the
judgment debtor's employment ends before the expiration of the 70‑day
90-day period, your disclosure and remittance should be made within ten
days after the last payday for which earnings were attached.
For steps 3 through 11, "columns" refers to columns on the Earnings Disclosure Worksheet.
3. |
COLUMN A. |
|
Enter the date of judgment debtor's payday. |
4. |
COLUMN B. |
|
Enter judgment debtor's gross earnings for each payday. |
5. |
COLUMN C. |
|
Enter judgment debtor's disposable earnings for each payday. |
6. |
COLUMN D. |
|
Enter 25 percent of disposable earnings. (Multiply Column C by .25.) |
7. |
COLUMN E. |
|
Enter here the greater of 40 times $9.50 or 40 times the hourly federal minimum wage ($.......) times the number of work weeks included in each payday. (Note: If a pay period includes days in excess of whole work weeks, the additional days should be counted as a fraction of a work week equal to the number of workdays in excess of a whole work week divided by the number of workdays in a normal work week.) |
8. |
COLUMN F. |
|
Subtract the amount in Column E from the amount in Column C, and enter here. |
9. |
COLUMN G. |
|
Enter here the lesser of the amount in Column D and the amount in Column F. |
10. |
COLUMN H. |
|
Enter here any amount claimed by you as a setoff, defense, lien, or claim, or any amount claimed by any other person as an exemption or adverse interest which would reduce the amount of earnings owing to the judgment debtor. (Note: Any indebtedness to you incurred within ten days prior to your receipt of the first execution levy on a debt may not be set off against the earnings otherwise subject to this levy. Any wage assignment made by the judgment debtor within ten days prior to your receipt of the first execution levy on a debt is void.) |
|
|
|
You must also describe your claim(s) and the claims of others, if known, in the space provided below the worksheet and state the name(s) and address(es) of these persons. |
|
|
|
Enter zero in Column H if there are no claims by you or others which would reduce the amount of earnings owing to the judgment debtor. |
11. |
COLUMN I. |
|
Subtract the amount in Column H from the amount in Column G and enter here. This is the amount of earnings that you must retain for the payday for which the calculations were made. The total of all amounts entered in Column I is the amount to be remitted to the attorney for the judgment creditor. |
AFFIRMATION
I, ................... (person signing Affirmation), am the third party/employer or I am authorized by the third party/employer to complete this earnings disclosure, and have done so truthfully and to the best of my knowledge.
Dated: ……………………………………………. |
|
…………………………………………... |
|
|
Signature |
|
|
…………………………………………... |
|
|
Title |
|
|
…………………………………………... |
|
|
Telephone Number |
EARNINGS DISCLOSURE WORKSHEET
…………………...
Judgment Debtor's Name
A |
|
|
B |
|
C |
Payday Date |
|
Gross Earnings |
|
Disposable Earnings |
|
1. |
…………………... |
|
$ ….……………... |
|
$ ….……………... |
2. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
3. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
4. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
5. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
6. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
7. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
8. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
9. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
10. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
D |
|
|
E |
|
F |
25% of Column C |
|
Greater of 40 x $9.50 or 40
X Fed. Min. Wage |
|
Column C minus Column E |
|
1. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
2. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
3. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
4. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
5. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
6. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
7. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
8. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
9. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
10. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
*If you entered any amount in Column H for any payday(s), you must describe below either your claims, or the claims of others. For amounts claimed by others, you must both state the names and addresses of these persons, and the nature of their claim, if known.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...
AFFIRMATION
I, ................. (person signing Affirmation), am the third party or I am authorized by the third party to complete this earnings disclosure worksheet, and have done so truthfully and to the best of my knowledge.
|
|
……………………………………. |
|
|
Title |
Dated: …………………………… |
……………………………………. |
(...) ……………………………….. |
|
Signature |
Phone Number |
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 551.06, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Notice of levy on earnings, disclosure, and worksheet for child support judgment. The attorney for the judgment creditor shall serve upon the judgment debtor's employer a notice of levy on earnings and an execution earnings disclosure form and an earnings disclosure worksheet with the writ of execution, that must be substantially in the form set forth below.
STATE OF MINNESOTA |
|
|
DISTRICT COURT |
||
COUNTY OF ……………….. |
|
|
….……………. JUDICIAL DISTRICT |
||
|
|
|
|
|
FILE NO. …….. |
…………………………………….… (Judgment Creditor) |
|
|
|
||
against |
|
|
|
NOTICE OF LEVY ON |
|
.……………………………….…….… (Judgment Debtor) |
|
EARNINGS AND DISCLOSURE |
|||
and |
|
|
|
|
|
…………………………………….….….…. (Third Party) |
|
|
|
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, sections 551.04 and 551.06, the undersigned, as attorney for the judgment creditor, hereby makes demand and levies execution upon all earnings due and owing by you (up to $10,000) to the judgment debtor for the amount of the judgment specified below. A copy of the writ of execution issued by the court is enclosed. The unpaid judgment balance is $.....
This levy attaches all unpaid nonexempt
disposable earnings owing or to be owed by you and earned or to be earned by
the judgment debtor before and within the pay period in which the writ of
execution is served and within all subsequent pay periods whose paydays occur
within the 70 90 days after the service of this levy.
In responding to this levy, you are to complete the attached disclosure form and worksheet and mail it to the undersigned attorney for the judgment creditor, together with your check payable to the above-named judgment creditor, for the nonexempt amount owed by you to the judgment debtor or for which you are obligated to the judgment debtor, within the time limits set forth in the aforementioned statutes.
|
……………………………………………………………… |
|
Attorney for the Judgment Creditor |
|
……………………………………………………………… |
|
……………………………………………………………… |
|
……………………………………………………………… |
|
Address |
|
(...) …………………………………………………………. |
|
Phone Number |
DISCLOSURE
DEFINITIONS
"EARNINGS": For the purpose of execution, "earnings" means compensation paid or payable to an employee for personal services or compensation paid or payable to the producer for the sale of agricultural products; milk or milk products; or fruit or other horticultural products produced when the producer is operating a family farm, a family farm corporation, or an authorized farm corporation, as defined in section 500.24, subdivision 2, whether denominated as wages, salary, commission, bonus, or otherwise, and includes periodic payments pursuant to a pension or retirement, workers' compensation, or unemployment benefits.
"DISPOSABLE EARNINGS": Means that part of the earnings of an individual remaining after the deduction from those earnings of amounts required by law to be withheld. (Amounts required by law to be withheld do not include items such as health insurance, charitable contributions, or other voluntary wage deductions.)
"PAYDAY": For the purpose of execution, "payday(s)" means the date(s) upon which the employer pays earnings to the debtor in the ordinary course of business. If the judgment debtor has no regular payday, payday(s) means the 15th and the last day of each month.
THE THIRD PARTY/EMPLOYER MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTION:
(1) Do you now owe, or within 70 90
days from the date the execution levy was served on you, will you or may you
owe money to the judgment debtor for earnings?
Yes ..... |
No ..... |
|
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE
EARNINGS DISCLOSURE
A. If your answer to question 1 is "No," then you must sign the affirmation below and return this disclosure to the judgment creditor's attorney within 20 days after it was served on you, and you do not need to answer the remaining questions.
B. If your answer to question 1 is "Yes," you must complete this form and the Earnings Disclosure Worksheet as follows:
For each payday that falls within 70 90
days from the date the execution levy was served on you, YOU MUST calculate the
amount of earnings to be retained by completing steps 2 through 8 on page 2,
and enter the amounts on the Earnings Disclosure Worksheet. UPON REQUEST, THE EMPLOYER MUST PROVIDE THE
DEBTOR WITH INFORMATION AS TO HOW THE CALCULATIONS REQUIRED BY THIS DISCLOSURE
WERE MADE.
Each payday, you must retain the amount of earnings listed in column G on the Earnings Disclosure Worksheet.
You must pay the attached earnings and return
this earnings disclosure form and the Earnings Disclosure Worksheet to the
judgment creditor's attorney and deliver a copy of the disclosure and worksheet
to the judgment debtor within ten days after the last payday that falls within
the 70-day 90-day period. If
the judgment is wholly satisfied or if the judgment debtor's employment ends
before the expiration of the 70-day 90-day period, your
disclosure and remittance should be made within ten days after the last payday
for which earnings were attached.
For steps 2 through 8, "columns" refers to columns on the Earnings Disclosure Worksheet.
(2) COLUMN A. Enter the date of judgment debtor's payday.
(3) COLUMN B. Enter judgment debtor's gross earnings for each payday.
(4) COLUMN C. Enter judgment debtor's disposable earnings for each payday.
(5) COLUMN D. Enter either 50, 55, 60, or 65 percent of disposable earnings, based on which of the following descriptions fits the child support judgment debtor:
(a) 50 percent of the judgment debtor's disposable income, if the judgment debtor is supporting a spouse or dependent child and the judgment is 12 weeks old or less (12 weeks to be calculated to the beginning of the work week in which the execution levy is received);
(b) 55 percent of the judgment debtor's disposable income, if the judgment debtor is supporting a spouse or dependent child, and the judgment is over 12 weeks old (12 weeks to be calculated to the beginning of the work week in which the execution levy is received);
(c) 60 percent of the judgment debtor's disposable income, if the judgment debtor is not supporting a spouse or dependent child and the judgment is 12 weeks old or less (12 weeks to be calculated to the beginning of the work week in which the execution levy is received); or
(d) 65 percent of the judgment debtor's disposable income, if the judgment debtor is not supporting a spouse or dependent child, and the judgment is over 12 weeks old (12 weeks to be calculated to the beginning of the work week in which the execution levy is received). (Multiply column C by .50, .55, .60, or .65, as appropriate.)
(6) COLUMN E. Enter here any amount claimed by you as a setoff, defense, lien, or claim, or any amount claimed by any other person as an exemption or adverse interest that would reduce the amount of earnings owing to the judgment debtor. (Note: Any indebtedness to you incurred within ten days prior to your receipt of the first execution levy on a debt may not be set off against the earnings otherwise subject to this levy. Any wage assignment made by the judgment debtor within ten days prior to your receipt of the first execution levy on a debt is void.)
You must also describe your claim(s) and the claims of others, if known, in the space provided below the worksheet and state the name(s) and address(es) of these persons.
Enter zero in column E if there are no claims by you or others that would reduce the amount of earnings owing to the judgment debtor.
(7) COLUMN F. Subtract the amount in column E from the amount in column D and enter here. This is the amount of earnings that you must remit for the payday for which the calculations were made.
AFFIRMATION
I, ................... (person signing Affirmation), am the third party/employer or I am authorized by the third party/employer to complete this earnings disclosure, and have done so truthfully and to the best of my knowledge.
DATED: ……………………………………………… |
|
………………………………………………... |
|
|
Signature |
|
|
………………………………………………... |
|
|
Title |
|
|
………………………………………………... |
|
|
Telephone Number |
EARNINGS DISCLOSURE WORKSHEET |
|
………………………………………………... |
|
|
Debtor's Name |
A |
|
|
B |
|
C |
Payday Date |
|
Gross Earnings |
|
Disposable Earnings |
|
1. |
…………………... |
|
$ ….……………... |
|
$ ….……………... |
2. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
3. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
4. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
5. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
6. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
7. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
8. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
9. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
10. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
D |
|
|
E |
|
F |
Either 50, 55, 60, or 65% of Column C |
|
Setoff, Lien, Adverse Interest, or Other Claims |
|
Column D minus Column E |
|
1. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
2. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
3. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
4. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
5. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
6. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
7. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
8. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
9. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
10. |
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
…………………... |
|
|
|
TOTAL OF COLUMN F |
$ ….……………... |
*If you entered any amount in column E for any payday(s), you must describe below either your claims, or the claims of others. For amounts claimed by others, you must both state the names and addresses of such persons, and the nature of their claim, if known.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...
AFFIRMATION
I, ................. (person signing Affirmation), am the third party or I am authorized by the third party to complete this earnings disclosure worksheet, and have done so truthfully and to the best of my knowledge.
|
|
……………………………………. |
|
|
Signature |
Dated: …………………………… |
……………………………………... |
(...) ……………………………….. |
|
Title |
Phone Number |
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 551.06, subdivision 12, is amended to read:
Subd. 12. Third-party
disclosure and remittance obligation. If
there are no attachable earnings, the third party shall serve the execution
earnings disclosure form upon the attorney for the judgment creditor within 20
days after service of the writ of execution.
However, if the judgment debtor has attachable earnings, the third party
shall serve the execution earnings disclosure form upon both the attorney for
the judgment creditor and the judgment debtor and remit to the attorney for the
judgment creditor the attached earnings within ten days of the last payday to
occur within the 70 90 days after the date of the service of the
writ of execution. If the judgment is
wholly satisfied or if the judgment debtor's employment ends before the
expiration of the 70-day 90-day period, the disclosure and
remittance should be made within ten days after the last payday for which
earnings were attached. The amount of
the third party's execution earnings disclosure form and remittance need not
exceed 100 percent of the amount of the judgment creditor's judgment that
remains unpaid, after subtracting the total of setoffs, defenses, exemption, or
other adverse interests. If the
disclosure is by a corporation, it shall be made by an officer or an authorized
agent having knowledge of the facts."
Page 8, line 8, after the second "the" insert "greater of $9.50 per hour or the"
Page 9, line 10, after "here" insert "the greater of 40 times $9.50 or"
Page 10, line 27, strike "40 X Min. Wage" and insert "Greater of 40 X $9.50 or 40 X Fed. Min. Wage"
Page 19, delete section 9 and insert:
"Sec. 23. EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Sections 1 to 22 are effective August 1, 2021, and apply to all earnings garnished or levied, or all attorney's summary executions upon earnings on or after that date."
Renumber the sections in sequence
Amend the title as follows:
Page 1, lines 3 and 4, after "garnishment" insert "and execution levy"
Correct the title numbers accordingly
With the recommendation that when so amended the bill be placed on the General Register.
The
report was adopted.
SECOND
READING OF HOUSE BILLS
H. F. Nos. 8, 9, 1511,
1521, 2586, 2976, 3007, 3105 and 3453 were read for the second time.
SECOND READING
OF SENATE BILLS
S. F. No. 1706 was read for
the second time.
INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS
The
following House Files were introduced:
Moran; Kresha; Vang; Xiong, J.; Erickson; Richardson; Hassan; Mariani; Albright; Bennett; Considine; Xiong, T.; Backer; Theis; Demuth; Fabian; Neu; Torkelson; O'Driscoll; West; Koznick; Daniels; Gunther; Petersburg; Baker; Schomacker; Vogel; Grossell; Poston; Dettmer; Swedzinski; Boe and Anderson introduced:
H. F. No. 3658, A bill for an act proposing an amendment to the Minnesota Constitution, article XIII, section 1; providing for a fundamental right to quality public education for all children.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Education Policy.
Lesch introduced:
H. F. No. 3659, A bill for an act relating to government data; modifying certain Safe at Home provisions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 13.045, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4a.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Division.
Moran introduced:
H. F. No. 3660, A bill for an act relating to economic development; appropriating money for a grant to the FATHER Project.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Jobs and Economic Development Finance Division.
Kresha introduced:
H. F. No. 3661, A bill for an act relating to taxation; local sales and use; authorizing the city of Little Falls to impose a local sales and use tax.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Capital Investment Division.
Lillie and Hansen introduced:
H. F. No. 3662, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; appropriating money for state trails; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Capital Investment Division.
Wolgamott, Cantrell, Vang, Klevorn, Bernardy and Lee introduced:
H. F. No. 3663, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; authorizing the use of general fund appropriations that pay debt service on University of Minnesota debt for the biomedical research facilities to also be used to pay for debt service on bonds issued for the clinical research facility; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 137.61; 137.62, subdivision 2, by adding a subdivision; 137.63; 137.64.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Higher Education Finance and Policy Division.
Miller and Baker introduced:
H. F. No. 3664, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; appropriating money for public infrastructure in the city of Lake Lillian; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Capital Investment Division.
Koegel, Pelowski and West introduced:
H. F. No. 3665, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; appropriating money for the state emergency operations center in Blaine; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Capital Investment Division.
Klevorn, Freiberg, Acomb, Dehn and Carlson, L., introduced:
H. F. No. 3666, A bill for an act relating to transportation; appropriating money for an alternatives analysis of transit service in the marked Trunk Highway 55 corridor from Medina to Minneapolis.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Transportation Finance and Policy Division.
Becker-Finn introduced:
H. F. No. 3667, A bill for an act relating to public safety; establishing a program to provide payments to firefighters with cancer or heart disease, counseling for firefighters, and firefighter training; appropriating money; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 299A.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Public Safety and Criminal Justice Reform Finance and Policy Division.
Novotny; McDonald; Poston; Nelson, N., and Daniels introduced:
H. F. No. 3668, A bill for an act relating to public safety; creating liability and vicarious liability for trespass to critical infrastructure; creating a crime for recruiting or educating individuals to trespass on or damage critical infrastructure; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 609.594, subdivision 2; 609.6055, subdivision 2; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 604.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Public Safety and Criminal Justice Reform Finance and Policy Division.
Novotny, Koznick, Demuth, McDonald, Poston and Daniels introduced:
H. F. No. 3669, A bill for an act relating to public safety; appropriating money to the Department of Public Safety to increase the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension's capacity to investigate gang-related crime.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Public Safety and Criminal Justice Reform Finance and Policy Division.
Becker-Finn, Brand and Xiong, T., introduced:
H. F. No. 3670, A bill for an act relating to taxation; individual income; excluding from gross income student loans discharged in tax year 2018; amending Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, section 290.993.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Taxes.
Wolgamott and Tabke introduced:
H. F. No. 3671, A bill for an act relating to corrections; authorizing placement in county jail or detention center for defendants with 90 days or less remaining in term of imprisonment; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.105, subdivision 2.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Corrections Division.
Noor, Gomez, Vang, Richardson, Kunesh-Podein, Pryor and Long introduced:
H. F. No. 3672, A bill for an act relating to children and families; modifying child care assistance funding priorities for eligible families; adjusting allocation of funds; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 119B.03, subdivisions 4, 6.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Early Childhood Finance and Policy Division.
Mann; Elkins; Stephenson; Mahoney; Lesch; Lee; Wolgamott; Tabke; Xiong, J.; Gomez; Jordan; Morrison; Noor; Kunesh-Podein; Considine; Hassan; Schultz; Liebling; Hausman; Lippert; Claflin; Mariani; Nelson, M.; Sandell; Dehn; Lillie; Fischer; Davnie; Richardson and Murphy introduced:
H. F. No. 3673, A bill for an act relating to labor standards; prohibiting covenants not to compete; imposing penalties; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 177.27, subdivision 4; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 181.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Labor.
Urdahl introduced:
H. F. No. 3674, A bill for an act relating to taxation; local sales and use; authorizing the city of Litchfield to impose a local sales and use tax.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Property and Local Tax Division.
Edelson introduced:
H. F. No. 3675, A bill for an act relating to public safety; authorizing Department of Public Safety to accept grant funding.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Public Safety and Criminal Justice Reform Finance and Policy Division.
Koegel; Sundin; Ecklund; Nelson, M.; Persell; Stephenson; Brand and Noor introduced:
H. F. No. 3676, A bill for an act relating to construction codes; establishing a thermal system insulation board; requiring licensing of thermal system insulation mechanics; authorizing rulemaking; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 326B.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Labor.
Bahner and Kiel introduced:
H. F. No. 3677, A bill for an act relating to health; occupational therapy; making clarifying, technical, and conforming changes; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 148.6402, subdivisions 5, 21; 148.6403, subdivisions 1, 5, 6; 148.6404; 148.6405; 148.6412, subdivision 2; 148.6415; 148.6418, subdivision 4; 148.6420, subdivisions 4, 5; 148.6423; 148.6425, subdivision 2; 148.6428; 148.6430; 148.6432, subdivision 3; 148.6435; 148.6443, as amended; 148.6445, subdivision 11; 148.6448, subdivision 2; 148.6449, subdivision 2; Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, sections 148.6420, subdivision 1; 148.6448, subdivision 1; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 148.6402, subdivisions 10, 15; 148.6412, subdivision 1; Minnesota Rules, part 4664.0003, subpart 28.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Health and Human Services Policy.
Bahner, Pinto, Vang, Morrison, Pryor and Gomez introduced:
H. F. No. 3678, A bill for an act relating to human services; extending the expiration date of an income and asset exclusion for certain public assistance program eligibility as part of the income and child development in the first three years of life demonstration project; amending Laws 2016, chapter 189, article 15, section 29.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Health and Human Services Policy.
Considine introduced:
H. F. No. 3679, A bill for an act relating to natural resources; appropriating money for flood warning gauge.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Environment and Natural Resources Finance Division.
Considine introduced:
H. F. No. 3680, A bill for an act relating to environment; appropriating money for flood study.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Environment and Natural Resources Finance Division.
Considine introduced:
H. F. No. 3681, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; appropriating money for river and stream bank stabilization and restoration and expansion of riverfront recreational amenities in Mankato; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Capital Investment Division.
Considine introduced:
H. F. No. 3682, A bill for an act relating to taxes; property taxes; homestead determination; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 273.124, subdivision 1.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Property and Local Tax Division.
Considine introduced:
H. F. No. 3683, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; appropriating money for water quality mitigation of the Minnesota River-Mankato watershed; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Capital Investment Division.
Sandstede, Ecklund, Persell and Sundin introduced:
H. F. No. 3684, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; appropriating money for water infrastructure in Buhl; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Capital Investment Division.
Sandstede, Layman, Daniels, Hamilton, Ecklund, Persell and Sundin introduced:
H. F. No. 3685, A bill for an act relating to economic development; appropriating money for grant to Minnesota Diversified Industries.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Jobs and Economic Development Finance Division.
Sandstede, Ecklund, Persell and Sundin introduced:
H. F. No. 3686, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; appropriating money for a wastewater treatment facility and related infrastructure for the region including Keewatin, Nashwauk, Lone Pine Township, and Greenway Township; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Capital Investment Division.
Lislegard, Ecklund, Sandstede and Sundin introduced:
H. F. No. 3687, A bill for an act relating to transportation; making technical corrections to the designation for the Specialist Noah Pierce Bridge in Eveleth; amending Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, section 161.14, subdivision 94.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Transportation Finance and Policy Division.
Considine introduced:
H. F. No. 3688, A bill for an act relating to environment; appropriating money to study flood control and storm water management options for South Bend Township.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Environment and Natural Resources Finance Division.
Lippert, Mann, Anderson, Hamilton, Olson, Poppe, Schultz, Vang and Winkler introduced:
H. F. No. 3689, A bill for an act relating to human services; exempting farmers who have received a mediation notice from the MinnesotaCare income limit; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 256L.04, by adding a subdivision; 256L.15, subdivision 2.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Health and Human Services Policy.
Persell, Sundin, Ecklund and Sandstede introduced:
H. F. No. 3690, A bill for an act relating to economic development; establishing the northern resorts relief loan program; requiring reports; appropriating money; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 116J.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Jobs and Economic Development Finance Division.
Considine introduced:
H. F. No. 3691, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; appropriating money for Minnesota State University, Mankato; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Capital Investment Division.
Munson, Drazkowski, Miller, Poston, Heinrich and Johnson introduced:
H. F. No. 3692, A bill for an act relating to public safety; prohibiting the enactment or enforcement of extreme risk protection orders against individuals regarding firearms; establishing criminal penalty for violation; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 624.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Public Safety and Criminal Justice Reform Finance and Policy Division.
Mann and Baker introduced:
H. F. No. 3693, A bill for an act relating to child care; authorizing grants to expand access to child care for children with disabilities; appropriating money.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Early Childhood Finance and Policy Division.
Mahoney and Gunther introduced:
H. F. No. 3694, A bill for an act relating to labor; modifying provisions affecting the Bureau of Mediation Services; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 179A.04, subdivision 3; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 179A.102; 179A.103.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Jobs and Economic Development Finance Division.
Davids introduced:
H. F. No. 3695, A bill for an act relating to health care facility finance; restructuring and renaming the Minnesota Higher Education Facilities Authority as the Minnesota Health and Education Facilities Authority; authorizing the authority to construct and finance health care facilities; increasing bonding capacity; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 3.732, subdivision 1; 10A.01, subdivision 35; 136A.25; 136A.26; 136A.27;
136A.28; 136A.29, subdivisions 1, 3, 6, 9, 10, 14, 19, 20, 21, 22, by adding a subdivision; 136A.32, subdivision 4; 136A.33; 136A.34, subdivisions 3, 4; 136A.36; 136A.38; 136A.41; 136A.42; 136F.67, subdivision 1; Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, section 354B.20, subdivision 7; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 136A.29, subdivision 4.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Higher Education Finance and Policy Division.
Poppe introduced:
H. F. No. 3696, A bill for an act relating to education; establishing standards for preventing sudden cardiac arrest in student athletes; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 124E.03, subdivision 7; 128C.02, by adding a subdivision; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 121A.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Education Policy.
Bennett, Kresha, Hamilton, Demuth, Theis, Albright, O'Neill, Runbeck, Scott and Daniels introduced:
H. F. No. 3697, A bill for an act relating to health records; modifying circumstances in which a parent, guardian, or other person may access health records of a minor; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 144.291, subdivision 2; 144.292, by adding a subdivision.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Health and Human Services Policy.
West introduced:
H. F. No. 3698, A bill for an act relating to retirement; public employees police and fire retirement plan; providing duty disability benefits in certain cases.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Government Operations.
Poppe, Anderson, Tabke, Davids, Brand, Torkelson, Poston, Lippert and Hamilton introduced:
H. F. No. 3699, A bill for an act relating to agriculture; increasing the minimum biofuel content in gasoline to 15 percent; requiring fuel retailers to offer blends of ten percent biofuel for use by certain motorists; modifying certain dates; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 239.791.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Agriculture and Food Finance and Policy Division.
Green introduced:
H. F. No. 3700, A bill for an act relating to public safety; extending restraining orders for minors who are victims of harassment; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 518B.01, subdivision 6; 609.748, subdivision 5.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Division.
Lee introduced:
H. F. No. 3701, A bill for an act relating to natural resources; standardizing review of certain capital projects; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 16B.335, subdivision 2.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Environment and Natural Resources Finance Division.
Hornstein; Ecklund; Moller; Stephenson; Xiong, J., and Lueck introduced:
H. F. No. 3702, A bill for an act relating to environment; appropriating money for study to examine costs and benefits of requiring environmental assessments of certain building materials used in state buildings to be included in bids.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Environment and Natural Resources Finance Division.
Marquart introduced:
H. F. No. 3703, A bill for an act relating to water; increasing soil and water conservation district supervisor compensation; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 103C.315, subdivision 4.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Environment and Natural Resources Policy.
Wazlawik introduced:
H. F. No. 3704, A bill for an act relating to environment; prohibiting using trichloroethylene; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 116.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Environment and Natural Resources Policy.
Vang, Wazlawik and Jordan introduced:
H. F. No. 3705, A bill for an act relating to state government; establishing State General Election Day as a holiday in even-numbered years; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 645.44, subdivision 5.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Government Operations.
Vang introduced:
H. F. No. 3706, A bill for an act relating to agriculture; modifying industrial hemp provisions; providing definitions; classifying industrial hemp data; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 13.6435, subdivision 4a; 18K.02, by adding subdivisions; 18K.04, subdivisions 1, 3, by adding a subdivision; 18K.06.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Agriculture and Food Finance and Policy Division.
Hausman, Lillie, Bernardy, Urdahl, Lesch and Kunesh-Podein introduced:
H. F. No. 3707, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; appropriating money for improvements to the Gibbs Farm Museum; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Capital Investment Division.
Sandell and Xiong, T., introduced:
H. F.
No. 3708, A bill for an act relating to taxation; authorizing the city of
Woodbury to impose a local lodging tax.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Property and Local Tax Division.
Wazlawik introduced:
H. F. No. 3709, A bill for an act relating to human services; revising applicability of family day care training hour requirements; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 245A.50, subdivisions 2, 7, 9.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Early Childhood Finance and Policy Division.
Mann, Morrison, Edelson, Acomb and Richardson introduced:
H. F. No. 3710, A bill for an act relating to health; modifying and expanding medical assistance coverage of tobacco and nicotine cessation treatment; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 256B.0625, by adding a subdivision; 256B.0631, subdivision 1; 256L.03, subdivision 5.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Health and Human Services Policy.
Nornes introduced:
H. F. No. 3711, A bill for an act relating to taxation; local sales and use; authorizing the city of Fergus Falls to impose a local sales and use tax.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Property and Local Tax Division.
Garofalo and Hansen introduced:
H. F. No. 3712, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; appropriating money for the Byllesby Dam; authorizing the sale and issuance of bonds.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Capital Investment Division.
Schultz and Davids introduced:
H. F. No. 3713, A bill for an act relating to taxation; modifying the tobacco products excise tax; amending the definition of tobacco products to include electronic delivery devices; creating a definition of electronic delivery devices; imposing the tobacco products excise tax on electronic delivery devices; establishing a tobacco prevention and cessation account in the special revenue fund; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 297F.01, by adding a subdivision; 297F.10, subdivision 2, by adding a subdivision; Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, section 297F.01, subdivisions 19, 23; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 144; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, section 297F.01, subdivision 22b.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Taxes.
Dehn, Gomez, Edelson, Stephenson and Long introduced:
H. F. No. 3714, A bill for an act relating to public safety; rescheduling marijuana and tetrahydrocannabinols; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 152.02, subdivisions 2, 3.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Public Safety and Criminal Justice Reform Finance and Policy Division.
Davids introduced:
H. F. No. 3715, A bill for an act relating to taxation; modifying individual income and corporate franchise taxes, special taxes, and property taxes; modifying individual income tax brackets, the K-12 education expense credit, and section 179 expensing provisions; providing for a full subtraction of taxable Social Security income and ongoing funding for the small business investment tax credit; modifying certain lawful gambling tax and other provisions; modifying referendum equalization levy; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 273.13, subdivision 25; 290.0674, subdivision 2; 297E.02, subdivision 6; 297E.021, subdivisions 2, 3, 4, by adding a subdivision; 349.15, subdivision 1; 349.151, subdivision 4; Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, sections 116J.8737, subdivision 5; 126C.17, subdivision 6; 290.0132, subdivision 26; 290.06, subdivision 2c; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 290.0131, subdivision 10; 290.0133, subdivision 12; 290.0674, subdivision 2a; 290.0692, subdivision 6; Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, section 116J.8737, subdivision 12.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Property and Local Tax Division.
Marquart introduced:
H. F. No. 3716, A bill for an act relating to health occupations; exempting a nurse licensed by a border state from obtaining a Minnesota license when providing aftercare; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 148.211, subdivision 2a.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Health and Human Services Policy.
Elkins, Richardson, Schultz, Howard and Freiberg introduced:
H. F. No. 3717, A bill for an act relating to tobacco products; modifying the application of registration and reporting requirements for out-of-state retailers of tobacco products; modifying requirements for tobacco product delivery sales; modifying the definition of electronic delivery device; making changes to criminal penalties; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 297F.01, subdivision 10a; 297F.031; 297F.09, subdivision 4a; 325F.781; 609.685, subdivision 1; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 325F.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Commerce.
Lucero and Garofalo introduced:
H. F. No. 3718, A bill for an act relating to energy; abolishing prohibition on issuing certificate of need for new nuclear power plant; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 216B.243, subdivision 3b.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Energy and Climate Finance and Policy Division.
Elkins introduced:
H. F. No. 3719, A bill for an act relating to transportation; requiring commissioners of transportation and employment and economic development to develop a statewide freight network optimization tool; appropriating money.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Transportation Finance and Policy Division.
Tabke, Heintzeman, Daudt and Lesch introduced:
H. F. No. 3720, A bill for an act relating to employment; providing for the minimum age for safe amusement ride operation; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 181A.04, subdivision 5; 184B.021.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Labor.
Hausman; Gomez; Xiong, J.; Becker-Finn; Davnie; Schultz; Liebling; Richardson; Hassan; Olson; Carlson, L.; Poston; Hamilton and Carlson, A., introduced:
H. F. No. 3721, A bill for an act relating to taxes; property; providing additional identification information for homestead determination; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 273.124, subdivisions 6, 13a, 13c, 13d; Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, section 273.124, subdivisions 13, 14.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Property and Local Tax Division.
Hassan introduced:
H. F. No. 3722, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; appropriating money for a grant to Simpson Housing Services for shelter facilities.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Housing Finance and Policy Division.
Marquart introduced:
H. F. No. 3723, A bill for an act relating to limited liability partnerships; standardizing filing fee requirements; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 323A.0101.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Taxes.
Nelson, N., and Sundin introduced:
H. F. No. 3724, A bill for an act relating to human services; directing the commissioner to make recommendations for paperwork reduction relating to out-of-home placement of American Indian children.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Early Childhood Finance and Policy Division.
Nelson, N., and Sundin introduced:
H. F. No. 3725, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; appropriating money for a city hall and fire station in Sturgeon Lake; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Capital Investment Division.
Nelson, N., and Sundin introduced:
H. F. No. 3726, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; appropriating money for Pine Technical and Community College; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Capital Investment Division.
Moran introduced:
H. F. No. 3727, A bill for an act relating to human services; modifying policy provisions governing health care; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 62U.03; 62U.04, subdivision 11; 256.01, subdivision 29; 256B.056, subdivisions 1a, 4, 7, 10; 256B.0561, subdivision 2; 256B.057, subdivision 1; 256B.0575, subdivisions 1, 2; 256B.0625, subdivisions 1, 27, 58; 256B.0751; 256B.0753, subdivision 1, by adding a subdivision; 256B.75; 256L.03, subdivision 1; 256L.15, subdivision 1; Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, section 256B.056, subdivision 7a.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Health and Human Services Policy.
Gruenhagen, Masin, Mekeland, Heinrich, Heintzeman and Fischer introduced:
H. F. No. 3728, A bill for an act relating to employment; prohibiting employers from discipline or discharge for employee or applicant refusal to immunize; providing civil action remedies; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 181.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Labor.
Gruenhagen introduced:
H. F. No. 3729, A bill for an act relating to insurance; health; modifying requirements for health insurance underwriting, renewability, and benefits; creating the Minnesota health risk pool program; allowing the creation of unified personal health premium accounts; creating the Minnesota health contribution program; eliminating certain health plan market rules; requesting waivers; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 3.971, subdivision 6; 13.7191, by adding a subdivision; 60A.235, by adding a subdivision; 62A.65, subdivisions 3, 5, by adding a subdivision; 62L.03, subdivision 3, by adding a subdivision; 62L.08, subdivision 7, by adding a subdivision; 62Q.18, subdivision 10; 62V.05, subdivision 3; 290.0132, by adding a subdivision; 297I.05, subdivisions 1, 5; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 62A; 62K; 62Q; 256L; proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, chapters 62X; 62Y; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 62A.303; 62A.65, subdivision 2; 62K.01; 62K.02; 62K.03; 62K.04; 62K.05; 62K.06; 62K.08; 62K.09; 62K.10, subdivisions 1, 1a, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8; 62K.11; 62K.12; 62K.13; 62K.14; 62K.15; 62L.08, subdivision 4; 62L.12, subdivisions 3, 4; Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, sections 62K.07; 62K.075; 62K.10, subdivision 5.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Commerce.
Long introduced:
H. F. No. 3730, A bill for an act relating to public safety; giving a coroner or medical examiner access to the criminal justice data communications network for purposes of identifying unknown deceased persons; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299C.46, subdivision 3.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Public Safety and Criminal Justice Reform Finance and Policy Division.
Lesch, Hausman and Pinto introduced:
H. F. No. 3731, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; appropriating money for asset preservation at Como Zoo; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Capital Investment Division.
Lillie; Koegel; Sundin; O'Neill; Hortman; Stephenson; Pinto; Kunesh-Podein; Wagenius; Xiong, J.; Cantrell; Schultz; Claflin; Elkins; Jordan; Lee; Becker-Finn; Moran and Winkler introduced:
H. F.
No. 3732, A bill for an act relating to state government; ratifying labor
agreements and a compensation plan.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Government Operations.
Cantrell introduced:
H. F. No. 3733, A bill for an act relating to animals; prohibiting the declawing of cats except for therapeutic purposes; providing penalties; requiring reports; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 156.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Agriculture and Food Finance and Policy Division.
Xiong, J.; Moran; Vang; Klevorn and Persell introduced:
H. F. No. 3734, A bill for an act relating to consumer protection; requiring debt collectors to provide information in the preferred language of the debtor; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 332.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Commerce.
Becker-Finn introduced:
H. F. No. 3735, A bill for an act relating to human services; modifying policy provisions governing recreational license suspension; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 518A.68.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Environment and Natural Resources Policy.
Moran introduced:
H. F. No. 3736, A bill for an act relating to education finance; appropriating money for a program grant to Network for the Development of Children of African Descent.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Education Finance Division.
Pryor introduced:
H. F. No. 3737, A bill for an act relating to human services; modifying provisions regarding human services hearing procedures, human services crimes, background studies, and requirements for licensure; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 245A.02, subdivision 2c; 245A.50, as amended; 245H.08, subdivisions 4, 5; Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, sections 245A.149; 245A.40, subdivision 7; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 245A.144; 245A.175; Minnesota Rules, parts 2960.3070; 2960.3210.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Early Childhood Finance and Policy Division.
Howard, Elkins and Carlson, A., introduced:
H. F. No. 3738, A bill for an act relating to taxation; sales and use; providing an exemption for construction materials used in a Bloomington fire station; amending Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, section 297A.71, subdivision 52.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Taxes.
Lippert, Hamilton, Lueck, Poppe, Gunther, Lee and Klevorn introduced:
H. F. No. 3739, A bill for an act relating to agriculture; appropriating money for grants to farmers for certain loan origination fees.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Agriculture and Food Finance and Policy Division.
Koznick, Scott, Novotny, Torkelson, Pelowski, Poston, Johnson, Jurgens, West, Urdahl, Davids, Theis, Haley, Heinrich, Albright, McDonald and Robbins introduced:
H. F. No. 3740, A bill for an act relating to transportation; governing transit safety, fare payment compliance, and administrative citations; requiring grants and allocation of funds; establishing penalties; requiring a report; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 473.4051, by adding a subdivision; 473.407, by adding a subdivision; 609.855, by adding subdivisions; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 473.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Transportation Finance and Policy Division.
Bierman, Huot, Christensen, Kunesh-Podein and Acomb introduced:
H. F. No. 3741, A bill for an act relating to teachers; reducing school district reporting; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 122A.091, subdivision 3.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Education Policy.
Wolgamott and Mekeland introduced:
H. F. No. 3742, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; appropriating money for wastewater infrastructure for the city of Foley; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Capital Investment Division.
Noor; Theis; Freiberg; Kresha; Nelson, M.; Morrison; Olson; Huot; Bierman; Albright; Schultz; Schomacker and Davids introduced:
H. F. No. 3743, A bill for an act relating to human services; increasing minimum wage for providers of direct support services.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Health and Human Services Finance Division.
Dehn, Mann, Gomez, Hamilton and Schultz introduced:
H. F. No. 3744, A bill for an act relating to health; preserving access to affordable drugs; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 151.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Commerce.
Youakim introduced:
H. F. No. 3745, A bill for an act relating to education; requiring financial aid information to be provided to high school students; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 120B.02, by adding a subdivision.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Education Policy.
Munson introduced:
H. F. No. 3746, A bill for an act relating to health; changing intractable pain provisions; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 152.125.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Health and Human Services Policy.
Jordan; Urdahl; Kunesh-Podein; Noor; Davnie; Wolgamott; Xiong, J., and Murphy introduced:
H. F. No. 3747, A bill for an act relating to education finance; appropriating money for the collaborative urban and greater Minnesota educators of color grants; amending Laws 2019, First Special Session chapter 11, article 3, section 22, subdivision 2.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Education Finance Division.
Murphy; Lee; Urdahl; Lillie; Davids; Nornes; Gunther; Baker; Torkelson; Carlson, L.; Swedzinski; Hausman; Persell; Poppe; Dettmer; Sandstede; Bennett; Huot and Lien introduced:
H. F. No. 3748, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; authorizing the sale and issuance of state appropriation bonds; appropriating money for public television equipment grants; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 16A.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Capital Investment Division.
Edelson introduced:
H. F. No. 3749, A bill for an act relating to public safety; prohibiting persons from interfering with access to reproductive health services and facilities; establishing criminal penalties; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 609.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Division.
Lillie introduced:
H. F. No. 3750, A bill for an act relating to state government; establishing Tamil Language and Heritage Month; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 10.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Government Operations.
Her; Gomez; Long; Xiong, J.; Becker-Finn and Lee introduced:
H. F. No. 3751, A bill for an act relating to human rights; adding a penalty clause to the contracting provisions of the Human Rights Act; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 363A.36, subdivision 3; 363A.44, subdivision 4.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Division.
Her and Lee introduced:
H. F. No. 3752, A bill for an act relating to retirement; Teachers Retirement Association; clarifying interest and service credit provisions; correcting a statutory reference and early retirement provisions for plan operation compliance; deleting obsolete provisions; making other changes of an administrative nature; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 354.05, subdivisions 2, 41; 354.44, subdivisions 4, 6; 354.46, subdivision 2; 354.49, subdivision 2; 354.543, subdivision 3; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 354.55, subdivision 10.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Government Operations.
Her; Hornstein; Hassan; Gomez; Lee; Acomb; Persell; Dehn; Wazlawik; Davnie; Pinto; Moller; Long; Xiong, J., and Becker-Finn introduced:
H. F. No. 3753, A bill for an act relating to environment; requiring analysis of certain demographic factors in permits and environmental review documents; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 116.07, subdivision 4a, by adding a subdivision; 116D.04, by adding a subdivision.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Environment and Natural Resources Policy.
Swedzinski introduced:
H. F. No. 3754, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; appropriating money for capital improvements of roads and public utilities in the city of Wood Lake; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Capital Investment Division.
Swedzinski introduced:
H. F. No. 3755, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; appropriating money for street and public infrastructure work in Hanley Falls; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Capital Investment Division.
Fabian, Green, Albright, Neu, Johnson, Nornes, Gunther and Lueck introduced:
H. F. No. 3756, A bill for an act relating to environment; repealing certain authority of the Pollution Control Agency related to automobile emissions; requiring a study; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 116.07, subdivision 2.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Environment and Natural Resources Policy.
Halverson, Davids and Stephenson introduced:
H. F. No. 3757, A bill for an act relating to health; determining payment parameters for emergency services; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 62Q.556.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Commerce.
Wolgamott and Christensen introduced:
H. F. No. 3758, A bill for an act relating to liquor; small brewer off-sale prohibition; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 340A.28, subdivision 2.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Commerce.
Her; Hausman; Xiong, J.; Becker-Finn; Lee and Cantrell introduced:
H. F. No. 3759, A bill for an act relating to housing; requiring prorated rent for the last month of tenancy; prohibiting early renewal of leases when the lease will last ten months; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 504B.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Housing Finance and Policy Division.
Quam, Gruenhagen, Garofalo, Lucero and Bennett introduced:
H. F. No. 3760, A bill for an act relating to education finance; establishing the funding for success incentive aid program; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 124D.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Education Finance Division.
Anderson and Backer introduced:
H. F. No. 3761, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; appropriating money for a regional cultural and civic center in Glenwood; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Capital Investment Division.
Anderson, Backer, Lueck, Gunther and Hamilton introduced:
H. F. No. 3762, A bill for an act relating to agriculture; establishing a grain storage facility safety grant program; appropriating money; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 17.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Agriculture and Food Finance and Policy Division.
Swedzinski introduced:
H. F. No. 3763, A bill for an act relating to education finance; authorizing a referendum to revoke or reduce operating referendum authority upon receipt of a petition; authorizing a referendum to revoke or reduce local optional revenue; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 126C.17, subdivision 9, by adding a subdivision; Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, section 126C.10, subdivision 2e.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Education Finance Division.
Kotyza-Witthuhn, O'Neill, Stephenson, Morrison and Elkins introduced:
H. F. No. 3764, A bill for an act relating to transportation; amending requirements on use of child passenger restraint systems; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 169.685, subdivision 5.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Transportation Finance and Policy Division.
Robbins, Erickson, Daudt, Mekeland, Scott, Albright, Garofalo, Kresha, Demuth, Kiel, Vogel, Nash, Runbeck, Gruenhagen, Heintzeman, Gunther and Novotny introduced:
H. F. No. 3765, A bill for an act relating to taxation; individual income; modifying the K-12 education expense subtraction and credit; extending the credit to tuition; increasing the subtraction and credit amounts; increasing the income phaseout for the credit; adjusting the credit and subtraction amounts and credit phaseout thresholds for inflation; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 290.0132, subdivision 4; 290.0674, subdivision 2; Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, section 290.0674, subdivision 1.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Taxes.
Robbins, Baker and Gunther introduced:
H. F. No. 3766, A bill for an act relating to elections; modifying standards related to presidential nomination primary voter data; amending Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, section 201.091, subdivision 4a.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Government Operations.
Brand introduced:
H. F. No. 3767, A bill for an act relating to county agricultural societies; modifying the required use for a portion of revenues; amending Minnesota Statutes 2019 Supplement, section 38.27, subdivision 4.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Agriculture and Food Finance and Policy Division.
REPORT FROM THE COMMITTEE ON
RULES
AND LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATION
Winkler from the Committee on Rules and
Legislative Administration, pursuant to rules 1.21 and 3.33, designated the
following bills to be placed on the Calendar for the Day for Wednesday,
February 26, 2020 and established a prefiling requirement for amendments
offered to the following bills:
H. F. Nos. 3100 and 3068.
MOTIONS AND RESOLUTIONS
Nelson, M., moved that the name of Boe be
added as an author on H. F. No. 14. The motion prevailed.
Schultz moved that the name of Tabke
be added as an author on H. F. No. 150. The motion prevailed.
Kunesh-Podein moved that the name of
Jordan be added as chief author on H. F. No. 250. The motion prevailed.
Pinto moved that the name of Moller be
added as an author on H. F. No. 627. The motion prevailed.
Cantrell moved that the names of Jordan,
Sandell, Her and Moller be added as authors on
H. F. No. 724. The motion
prevailed.
Elkins moved that the name of Bierman be added
as an author on H. F. No. 983.
The motion prevailed.
Lesch moved that the name of Her be added
as an author on H. F. No. 1060.
The motion prevailed.
Becker-Finn moved that the name of Tabke
be added as an author on H. F. No. 1280. The motion prevailed.
Demuth moved that the name of Ecklund be
added as an author on H. F. No. 1323. The motion prevailed.
Mekeland moved that the name of Novotny be
added as an author on H. F. No. 1452. The motion prevailed.
Fischer moved that the name of Jordan be
added as an author on H. F. No. 1502. The motion prevailed.
Munson moved that the name of Tabke be
added as an author on H. F. No. 1864. The motion prevailed.
Mann moved that the name of Jordan be
added as an author on H. F. No. 1878. The motion prevailed.
Noor moved that the name of Schomacker be
added as an author on H. F. No. 1913. The motion prevailed.
Cantrell moved that the name of Jordan be
added as an author on H. F. No. 2041. The motion prevailed.
Klevorn moved that the name of Moller be
added as an author on H. F. No. 2061. The motion prevailed.
Mariani moved that the names of Tabke and
Vang be added as authors on H. F. No. 2139. The motion prevailed.
Klevorn moved that the name of Acomb be
added as an author on H. F. No. 2182. The motion prevailed.
Ecklund moved that his name be stricken as
an author on H. F. No. 2241.
The motion prevailed.
Carlson, A., moved that the name of
Halverson be added as chief author on H. F. No. 2290. The motion prevailed.
Xiong, T., moved that the name of Jordan
be added as an author on H. F. No. 2349. The motion prevailed.
Wolgamott moved that the names of
O'Driscoll and Anderson be added as authors on
H. F. No. 2377. The
motion prevailed.
Swedzinski moved that the name of Jordan
be added as an author on H. F. No. 2390. The motion prevailed.
Mann moved that the names of Cantrell,
Hornstein and Edelson be added as authors on
H. F. No. 2635. The
motion prevailed.
Dehn moved that the name of Moller be
added as an author on H. F. No. 2701. The motion prevailed.
Masin moved that the name of Hausman
be added as an author on H. F. No. 2703. The motion prevailed.
Bernardy moved that the name of Jordan be
added as an author on H. F. No. 2707. The motion prevailed.
Masin moved that the name of Jordan be
added as an author on H. F. No. 2708. The motion prevailed.
Dehn moved that the name of Jordan be
added as an author on H. F. No. 2891. The motion prevailed.
Edelson moved that the names of O'Neill
and Baker be added as authors on H. F. No. 2898. The motion prevailed.
Kotyza-Witthuhn moved that the name of
Jordan be added as an author on H. F. No. 2903. The motion prevailed.
Morrison moved that the names of Miller
and Moller be added as authors on H. F. No. 2920. The motion prevailed.
Kresha moved that the name of O'Driscoll
be added as an author on H. F. No. 2942. The motion prevailed.
Poppe moved that the name of Jurgens be
added as an author on H. F. No. 2959. The motion prevailed.
Cantrell moved that the name of Schomacker
be added as an author on H. F. No. 2971. The motion prevailed.
Lesch moved that the names of Davnie,
Claflin and Wolgamott be added as authors on
H. F. No. 3008. The
motion prevailed.
Ecklund moved that the name of Wolgamott
be added as an author on H. F. No. 3029. The motion prevailed.
Halverson moved that the name of Howard be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3032. The motion prevailed.
Hansen moved that the names of Albright
and Bernardy be added as authors on H. F. No. 3037. The motion prevailed.
Edelson moved that the name of Jordan be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3041. The motion prevailed.
Richardson moved that the name of Huot be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3053. The motion prevailed.
Lee moved that the name of Huot be added
as an author on H. F. No. 3056.
The motion prevailed.
Lee moved that the name of Huot be added
as an author on H. F. No. 3058.
The motion prevailed.
Dehn moved that the name of Stephenson be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3068. The motion prevailed.
Richardson moved that the name of Huot be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3078. The motion prevailed.
Richardson moved that the name of Huot be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3079. The motion prevailed.
Wazlawik moved that the name of Huot be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3083. The motion prevailed.
Tabke moved that the name of Jordan be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3085. The motion prevailed.
Christensen moved that the name of
Becker-Finn be added as an author on H. F. No. 3095. The motion prevailed.
Noor moved that the name of Huot be added
as an author on H. F. No. 3098.
The motion prevailed.
Stephenson moved that the name of Huot be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3099. The motion prevailed.
Christensen moved that the name of Huot be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3101. The motion prevailed.
Edelson moved that the name of Jordan be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3108. The motion prevailed.
Quam moved that the name of Cantrell be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3122. The motion prevailed.
Christensen moved that the name of Her be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3123. The motion prevailed.
Kunesh-Podein moved that the name of Huot
be added as an author on H. F. No. 3139. The motion prevailed.
Kunesh-Podein moved that the name of
Bernardy be added as an author on H. F. No. 3141. The motion prevailed.
Kunesh-Podein moved that the name of
Bernardy be added as an author on H. F. No. 3142. The motion prevailed.
Richardson moved that the name of Huot be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3159. The motion prevailed.
Claflin moved that the name of Lislegard
be added as an author on H. F. No. 3181. The motion prevailed.
Kunesh-Podein moved that the names of
Jordan and Huot be added as authors on H. F. No. 3201. The motion prevailed.
Christensen moved that the name of Elkins
be added as an author on H. F. No. 3202. The motion prevailed.
Richardson moved that the name of Youakim
be added as an author on H. F. No. 3203. The motion prevailed.
Howard moved that the name of Wolgamott be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3205. The motion prevailed.
Schultz moved that the name of Bierman be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3223. The motion prevailed.
Morrison moved that the name of Bierman be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3228. The motion prevailed.
Hornstein moved that the names of Pryor
and Jordan be added as authors on H. F. No. 3252. The motion prevailed.
Schomacker moved that the name of Robbins
be added as an author on H. F. No. 3267. The motion prevailed.
Christensen moved that the name of Huot be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3271. The motion prevailed.
Hornstein moved that the name of Huot be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3297. The motion prevailed.
Lucero moved that the name of Jurgens be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3300. The motion prevailed.
Kunesh-Podein moved that the name of
Pryor be added as an author on H. F. No. 3322. The motion prevailed.
Hausman moved that the name of Brand be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3326. The motion prevailed.
Kiel moved that the names of Huot and
Moller be added as authors on H. F. No. 3345. The motion prevailed.
Kotyza-Witthuhn moved that the names of
Freiberg, Wolgamott, Stephenson and Elkins be added as authors on
H. F. No. 3369. The
motion prevailed.
Wazlawik moved that the names of Moller
and Jordan be added as authors on H. F. No. 3376. The motion prevailed.
Wazlawik moved that the name of Moller be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3377. The motion prevailed.
Morrison moved that the name of Pryor be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3398. The motion prevailed.
Lippert moved that the name of Ecklund be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3420. The motion prevailed.
Lee moved that the name of Huot be added
as an author on H. F. No. 3424.
The motion prevailed.
Winkler moved that the name of Huot be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3427. The motion prevailed.
Cantrell moved that the name of Jordan be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3433. The motion prevailed.
Edelson moved that the name of Freiberg be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3439. The motion prevailed.
Acomb moved that the name of Moller be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3479. The motion prevailed.
Mann moved that the names of Youakim,
Jordan and Lesch be added as authors on H. F. No. 3506. The motion prevailed.
Acomb moved that the name of Christensen
be added as an author on H. F. No. 3519. The motion prevailed.
Becker-Finn moved that the name of
Swedzinski be added as an author on H. F. No. 3535. The motion prevailed.
Lien moved that the name of Haley be added
as an author on H. F. No. 3566.
The motion prevailed.
Morrison moved that the name of Schultz be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3570. The motion prevailed.
Poston moved that the name of Kresha be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3571. The motion prevailed.
Pinto moved that the name of Schomacker be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3575. The motion prevailed.
Lesch moved that the name of Hansen be added
as an author on H. F. No. 3584.
The motion prevailed.
Torkelson moved that the name of Boe be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3595. The motion prevailed.
Moller moved that the name of Becker-Finn
be added as an author on H. F. No. 3603. The motion prevailed.
Murphy moved that the names of
Becker-Finn and Youakim be added as authors on
H. F. No. 3622. The
motion prevailed.
Pelowski moved that the names of Albright,
Jurgens and Anderson be added as authors on H. F. No. 3633. The motion prevailed.
Gruenhagen moved that the names of
Dettmer, Runbeck, Erickson and Munson be added as authors on
H. F. No. 3645. The
motion prevailed.
Lee moved that the name of Becker-Finn be
added as an author on H. F. No. 3649. The motion prevailed.
Haley moved that the name of Lien be added
as an author on H. F. No. 3656.
The motion prevailed.
Hansen moved that the names of Lee,
Ecklund, Wagenius, Sundin and Gunther be added as authors on
H. F. No. 3657. The
motion prevailed.
Hornstein moved that H. F. No. 3252
be recalled from the Higher Education Finance and Policy Division and be
re-referred to the Transportation Finance and Policy Division. The motion prevailed.
Bernardy moved that
H. F. No. 3135 be returned to its author. The motion prevailed.
REQUEST PURSUANT TO RULE 4.31
Considine invoked rule 4.31 relating to
the return to the House of H. F. No. 1298 from the Health and Human Services
Finance Division.
POINT OF ORDER
Winkler raised a point of order pursuant
to rule 4.31, relating to Time Limit to Consider Bills. The Speaker ruled the point of order well
taken.
ADJOURNMENT
Winkler moved that when the House adjourns
today it adjourn until 4:15 p.m., Wednesday, February 26, 2020. The motion prevailed.
Winkler moved that the House adjourn. The motion prevailed, and the Speaker
declared the House stands adjourned until 4:15 p.m., Wednesday, February 26,
2020.
Patrick
D. Murphy, Chief
Clerk, House of Representatives