STATE OF
MINNESOTA
NINETY-FIRST
SESSION - 2019
_____________________
FORTY-THIRD
DAY
Saint Paul, Minnesota, Monday, April 29, 2019
The House of Representatives convened at 9:00
a.m. and was called to order by Liz Olson, Speaker pro tempore.
Prayer was offered by the Reverend Lauren
Baske Davis, First United Church of Christ, Northfield, Minnesota.
The members of the House gave the pledge
of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
The Speaker assumed the Chair.
The roll was called and the following
members were present:
Acomb
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahner
Bahr
Baker
Becker-Finn
Bennett
Bernardy
Bierman
Boe
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Daniels
Davids
Davnie
Dehn
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Erickson
Fabian
Fischer
Franson
Garofalo
Gomez
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Her
Hertaus
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Koznick
Kunesh-Podein
Layman
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Lucero
Lueck
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Munson
Murphy
Nash
Nelson, M.
Nelson, N.
Neu
Noor
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Olson
O'Neill
Pelowski
Persell
Petersburg
Pierson
Pinto
Poppe
Poston
Pryor
Quam
Richardson
Robbins
Runbeck
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schomacker
Schultz
Scott
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vang
Vogel
Wagenius
Wazlawik
West
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Hortman
A quorum was present.
Freiberg was
excused until 12:00 noon. Kresha was
excused until 12:50 p.m. Daudt was
excused until 8:15 p.m.
The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the
Journal of the preceding day. There
being no objection, further reading of the Journal was dispensed with and the
Journal was approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk.
INTRODUCTION
AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS
The following
House Files were introduced:
Her introduced:
H. F. No. 2859, A bill for an act relating to human services; providing a grant for a culturally specific food shelf in the east metro; appropriating money.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
Her introduced:
H. F. No. 2860, A bill for an act relating to education finance; appropriating money for a grant to an American Indian youth enrichment program.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
Drazkowski, Bahr, Munson, Miller and Quam introduced:
H. F. No. 2861, A bill for an act relating to taxation; eliminating income and business taxes and replacing the sales tax with a fair tax; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 297A.61, subdivisions 2, 7, 24; 297A.62, subdivisions 1, 1a; 297A.63, by adding a subdivision; 297A.66, subdivision 3; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 297A; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 290.01, subdivisions 1, 1a, 2, 3, 3a, 3b, 4, 4a, 4c, 5, 5a, 5b, 6, 7, 7a, 7b, 8, 8a, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 29, 29a, 30, 31; 290.0131, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14; 290.0132, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26; 290.0133, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14; 290.0134; 290.0135; 290.0136; 290.0137; 290.014; 290.015; 290.02; 290.03; 290.032, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 290.04; 290.05, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 8; 290.06, subdivisions 1, 2c, 2d, 2g, 2h, 22, 23, 27, 28, 29, 33, 35, 37, 38; 290.067, subdivisions 1, 2b, 3, 4; 290.0671, subdivisions 1, 1a, 2, 4, 5, 6, 6a, 7; 290.0672, subdivisions 1, 2; 290.0674, subdivisions 1, 2, 2a, 4, 5; 290.0675, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 290.0677; 290.0679; 290.068, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6a, 7; 290.0681, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; 290.0682; 290.0684; 290.0685; 290.0686; 290.0692, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; 290.07, subdivisions 1, 2, 4, 7; 290.0802; 290.081; 290.091, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; 290.0921, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 3a, 4, 6, 8; 290.0922, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 290.093; 290.095, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 11; 290.10; 290.17, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; 290.172; 290.191, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12; 290.20; 290.21, subdivisions 1, 4; 290.22; 290.26, subdivision 6; 290.281, subdivision 1; 290.30; 290.31, subdivisions 1, 27; 290.311, subdivision 1; 290.32; 290.34, subdivisions 1, 2; 290.36; 290.371, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 290.431; 290.432; 290.48, subdivision 10; 290.491; 290.62; 290.92, subdivisions 1, 2a, 3, 4, 4a, 4b, 4c, 5, 5a, 9, 10, 12, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30; 290.9201, subdivisions 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 11; 290.923, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11; 290.9705, subdivisions 1, 3, 4; 290.9725; 290.9726, subdivisions 1, 2, 4; 290.9727; 290.9728; 290.9729; 290.9741; 290.9742; 297A.61, subdivisions 3, 4, 6, 10, 12, 13, 16a, 16b, 16c, 17, 17a, 17b, 18, 25, 26, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 49, 58; 297A.62, subdivision 3; 297A.63, subdivision 2; 297A.64; 297A.65; 297A.67, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7a, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 13a, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36; 297A.68, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 3a, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35a, 36, 37, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45; 297A.69, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7; 297A.70, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9a, 10, 11, 11a, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20; 297A.71, subdivisions 1, 3, 6, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 22, 23, 34, 35, 40, 43, 44, 45, 48, 49, 50; 297A.75,
subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; 297A.825; 297D.01; 297D.02; 297D.03; 297D.04; 297D.05; 297D.06; 297D.07; 297D.08; 297D.085; 297D.09; 297D.10; 297D.11; 297D.12; 297D.13; 297F.01, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9a, 10, 10a, 10b, 11, 12, 13, 13a, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 21a, 22, 22a, 23; 297F.02; 297F.03; 297F.031; 297F.04; 297F.05, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 3a, 4, 4a, 5, 6, 7; 297F.06; 297F.07; 297F.08, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 8a, 9, 10, 12, 13; 297F.09, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 4a, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10; 297F.10, subdivisions 1, 2; 297F.11; 297F.12; 297F.13; 297F.14; 297F.15, subdivisions 9, 10; 297F.17; 297F.18; 297F.185; 297F.19, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9; 297F.20; 297F.21, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 297F.23; 297F.24; 297F.25; 297G.01; 297G.02; 297G.03, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; 297G.031; 297G.032; 297G.04; 297G.05; 297G.06; 297G.07; 297G.08; 297G.09, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; 297G.10; 297G.11; 297G.12; 297G.13; 297G.14, subdivision 9; 297G.16; 297G.17; 297G.18, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11; 297G.19; 297G.20, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 297G.22; 297H.01; 297H.02; 297H.03; 297H.04, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4; 297H.05; 297H.06, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 297H.07; 297H.08; 297H.09; 297H.10, subdivision 1; 297H.11; 297H.115; 297H.12; 297H.13, subdivisions 1, 2, 5; 297I.01; 297I.05, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14; 297I.06, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 297I.10, subdivisions 1, 3, 4; 297I.11, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 297I.15, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12; 297I.20; 297I.25; 297I.30, subdivisions 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11; 297I.35; 297I.40; 297I.60, subdivisions 1, 2; 297I.65; 297I.70; 297I.75; 297I.80; 297I.85; 297I.90; 462D.01; 462D.02; 462D.03; 462D.04; 462D.05; 462D.06.
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Taxes.
Winkler moved that the House recess
subject to the call of the Chair. The
motion prevailed.
RECESS
RECONVENED
The House reconvened and was called to
order by Speaker pro tempore Halverson.
REPORT
FROM THE COMMITTEE ON RULES
AND
LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATION
Winkler from the Committee on Rules and
Legislative Administration, pursuant to rules 1.21 and 3.33, designated the
following bills to be placed on the Calendar for the Day for Wednesday, May 1,
2019 and established a prefiling requirement for amendments offered to the
following bills:
H. F. Nos. 1733 and 2032.
CALENDAR FOR
THE DAY
TAKEN FROM
TABLE
Becker-Finn moved that
H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, be taken from
the table. The motion prevailed.
H. F. No. 1555, the first
engrossment, as amended, was again reported to the House.
Grossell moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 105, after line 11, insert:
"Sec. 73. [169.975] OPERATION OF LIGHT RAIL
TRANSIT VEHICLE.
Subdivision 1.
Consent to testing. Any person who drives, operates, or is
in physical control of a light rail transit vehicle consents to a chemical test
of that person's blood, breath, or urine for the purpose of determining the
presence of alcohol, a controlled substance or its metabolite, or an
intoxicating substance. The test must be
administered pursuant to law at the direction of a peace officer.
Subd. 2.
Report of testing. The results of a test administered
pursuant to this section must be reported to the commissioner, the chair of the
Metropolitan Council, and the authority having responsibility for prosecution
of criminal offenses for the jurisdiction in which the acts occurred if the
test results indicate the presence of any amount of alcohol.
Subd. 3.
Crime. Any person who drives, operates, or is
in physical control of a light rail transit vehicle when the person's body
contains physical evidence of the consumption of alcohol is guilty of a gross
misdemeanor.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Grossell
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 56 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Hamilton was excused between the hours of
11:15 a.m. and 12:30 p.m.
Runbeck moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 132, after line 3, insert:
"Sec. 116. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 473.4056, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Minimum standards. Standards adopted under this section must include, but are not limited to:
(1) two dedicated spaces for wheelchair users in each car;
(2) seating for a companion adjacent to at least two
wheelchair-dedicated spaces; and
(3) further
specifications that meet or exceed the standards established in the Americans
with Disabilities Act; and
(4) a camera that is capable of recording the light rail transit vehicle operator and the interior of the vehicle in vicinity of the operator.
EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION. This section is effective the day following final enactment and applies for light rail transit vehicles procured on and after August 1, 2019. This section applies in the counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington."
Amend the title accordingly
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Runbeck
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 53 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Schomacker
Scott
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Runbeck moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 137, after line 9, insert:
"Sec. 125. BUS
RAPID TRANSIT TRANSITION.
(a) By October 1, 2020, the Metropolitan
Council must transition any corridor and project planning for light rail
transit to planning for bus rapid transit.
The requirements of this section include but are not limited to corridor
analysis or studies, feasibility studies, and project development.
(b) This section does not apply to a
segment of a light rail transit line or line extension in which the project
formally entered the engineering phase of the Federal Transit Administration's
"New Starts" capital investment grant program prior to January 1,
2019.
EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION. This section is effective the day following final enactment and applies in the counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Runbeck
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 55 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
The
Speaker resumed the Chair.
Lucero moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 88, after line 12, insert:
"Sec. 51. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 169.035, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 6. Light
rail transit. (a) Except for
those provisions which by their nature cannot reasonably apply to light rail
transit vehicles, every person operating a light rail transit vehicle has the
rights and duties applicable to the driver of any other vehicle pursuant to
sections 169.06; 169.09; 169.14; 169.15; 169.20; 169.202, subdivision 2;
169.21, subdivision 2; 169.444; and 169.475.
(b) Notwithstanding any provision of
this subdivision, a person operating a light rail transit vehicle that is
subject to regulation by the United States Department of Transportation must
comply with the more stringent or additional requirement imposed by federal
regulation.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and applies to violations committed on or after that date."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Lucero
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 55 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Heinrich moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 4, line 33, delete "Passenger"
Page 5, line 5, before the period, insert ", and for any additional state rail safety inspection program inspectors under Minnesota Statutes, section 219.015"
Page 119, line 26, after the period, insert "Subject to paragraph (c),"
Page 119, after line 30, insert:
"(c) The assessment under this subdivision must exclude any costs that are for more than four positions under the inspection program. Excluded costs include travel, equipment, training, and ongoing duties related to the additional positions."
Page 119, line 31, strike "(c)" and insert "(d)"
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Bahr moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 6, delete lines 4 to 7
Page 137, delete section 126
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Correct the title numbers accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Bahr
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 56 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Runbeck moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 6, line 6, delete "user fee" and insert "tax"
Page 137, line 19, delete "USER FEE" and insert "TAX"
Page 137, lines 21, 22, 26, and 28, delete "user fee" and insert "tax"
Page 138, lines 2, 4, 11, and 13, delete "user fee" and insert "tax"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Runbeck
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 55 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Nash moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 33, after line 20, insert:
"Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 239.7511, is amended to read:
239.7511
GAS TAX SIGN ON PETROLEUM DISPENSER.
(a) The director must ensure that signs having 12-point font or greater are affixed on retail petroleum dispensers as follows:
(1) for regular or premium gasoline, a sign that reads: "The price for each gallon of gasoline includes the current state gasoline tax of 28.5 cents per gallon and federal gasoline tax of 18.4 cents per gallon. Revenue from the state fuel tax may be used only for roads and bridges, according to the Minnesota Constitution. Due to the actions of the Minnesota legislature, by January 2022, Minnesotans will pay at least 48.5 cents per gallon in state gas tax, which is currently the fourth highest gas tax rate in the nation. This will then increase annually by an automatic inflation factor to help build One Minnesota."; and
(2) for diesel fuel, a sign that reads: "The price for each gallon of diesel fuel includes the current state gasoline tax of 28.5 cents per gallon and federal gasoline tax of 24.4 cents per gallon. Revenue from the state fuel tax may be used only for roads and bridges, according to the Minnesota Constitution. Due to the actions of the Minnesota legislature, by January 2022, Minnesotans will pay at least 48.5 cents per gallon in state gas tax, which is currently the fourth highest gas tax rate in the nation. This will then increase annually by an automatic inflation factor to help build One Minnesota."
(b) The director must distribute the signs under this section to the owner or operator of retail petroleum dispensers. To the extent possible, the director must coordinate the distribution of signs with other duties the director may have involving retail petroleum dispensers.
(c) If the amount of the gasoline tax described in paragraph (a), clauses (1) and (2), changes, the director must distribute revised signs to reflect the updated gasoline tax amounts within 12 calendar months of the change.
(d) The director is prohibited from assessing any penalty, fine, or fee on the owner or operator of a retail petroleum dispenser that has a missing, destroyed, defaced, or otherwise damaged gas tax sign."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Nash moved to amend the Nash amendment to H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, after line 20, insert:
"(b) In addition to the text specified in paragraph (a), clauses (1) and (2), each sign must include a map of Minnesota and the neighboring states that identifies the current corresponding tax rate, in cents per gallon, in each state."
Page 1, line 21, strike "(b)" and insert "(c)"
Page 2, line 1, strike "(c)" and insert "(d)" and strike "gasoline" and insert "Minnesota motor fuels"
Page 2, line 2, strike "gasoline" and after "amounts" insert ", including for neighboring states,"
Page 2, line 4, strike "(d)" and insert "(e)"
A roll call was requested and properly seconded.
The question was taken on the Nash
amendment to the Nash amendment and the roll was called. There were 55 yeas and 75 nays as
follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
The question recurred on the Nash
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 56 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Mekeland moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 34, after line 20, insert:
"(f) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) to (e), the rates established under this subdivision are optional except that the gasoline excise tax imposed at the rates of (1) 17.75 cents per gallon for E85, (2) 14.25 cents per gallon for M85, and (3) 25 cents per gallon for all other gasoline. The optional additional tax must be collected if the consumer consents to the additional tax. At the point of sale of gasoline to a consumer, the retailer must ask the consumer if the consumer wishes to pay an additional tax and must identify the current additional tax amount. If the consumer chooses to pay the additional tax, the retailer must collect the additional tax and remit it quarterly to the commissioner of revenue. The commissioner must deposit the revenue from the additional gasoline excise tax into the highway user tax distribution fund."
Page 34, line 21, delete "(f)" and insert "(g)"
Page 34, line 23, delete "(g)" and insert "(h)"
Page 34, line 27, after the period, insert "Paragraph (f) is effective July 1, 2023."
Page 36, after line 19, insert:
"(g) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) to (f), the rates established under this subdivision are optional except that the special fuel excise tax is imposed at the rates of (1) 18.75 cents per gallon for liquefied petroleum gas, (2) 15 cents per gallon for liquefied natural gas, and (3) $1.974 per thousand cubic feet or 30 cents per gasoline equivalent for compressed natural gas. The optional additional tax must be collected if the consumer consents to the additional tax. At the point of sale of special fuel to a consumer, the retailer must ask the consumer if the consumer wishes to pay an additional tax and must identify the current additional tax amount. If the consumer chooses to pay the additional tax, the retailer must collect the additional tax and remit it quarterly to the commissioner of revenue. The commissioner must deposit the revenue from the additional special fuel excise tax into the highway user tax distribution fund."
Page 36, line 20, delete "(g)" and insert "(h)"
Page 36, line 23, delete "(h)" and insert "(i)"
Page 36, line 26, after the period, insert "Paragraph (g) is effective July 1, 2023."
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Torkelson moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 33, line 22, delete "September" and insert "November"
Page 33, line 23, delete "October" and insert "December"
Page 34, line 26, after "effective" insert "upon voter approval as provided in section 16," and delete "September" and insert "November"
Page 34, line 29, delete "September" and insert "November"
Page 34, line 31, delete "October" and insert "December"
Page 36, line 25, after "effective" insert "upon voter approval as provided in section 16," and delete "September" and insert "November"
Page 45, after line 7, insert:
"Sec. 16. MOTOR VEHICLE FUELS TAX VOTER APPROVAL.
(a) The amendments contained in sections 8 and 9 must be
submitted for approval by the voters at the 2020 state general election. The question submitted must be:
"Should the state tax on motor fuels be increased
by 20 cents per gallon for gasoline and diesel and increased proportionally for
other types of fuel?
|
Yes ………………… |
|
No …………………" |
(b) To the extent practicable, the question required
under paragraph (a) must be placed on the state general election ballot, and
the results canvassed, in the manner provided by law for state constitutional
amendments. The title of the ballot
question must be "Motor Fuels Tax Increase."
(c) The secretary of state must absorb costs associated
with implementation of this section.
Sec. 17. CONDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS REDUCTIONS.
If the amendments contained in sections 8 and 9 do not take effect, the commissioner of management and budget, in consultation with the commissioner of transportation and fiscal staff of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over transportation finance, must accordingly reduce the relevant appropriations in article 1, section 2, from each of the affected funds. As necessary, the commissioner of management and budget must make reductions in proportional amounts based on the percentage of each applicable appropriation in comparison to total applicable appropriations, provided that a reduction must not reduce the appropriation to below the base appropriation for that fiscal year. The commissioner of management and budget must notify the chairs, ranking minority members, and staff of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over transportation finance of the specific reductions and amounts."
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Poppe was excused between the hours
of 12:20 p.m. and 1:40 p.m.
The question was taken on the Torkelson
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 56 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Koznick moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 42, line 14, before the period, insert ", but excluding a county identified under paragraph (c)"
Page 42, after line 19, insert:
"(c) The transportation sales tax
under this section is not imposed in a county that:
(1) imposes the sales and use tax under
section 297A.993, subdivision 1, at a rate that is below the maximum rate
authorized in that section; or
(2) meets the requirements under clause (1) on the effective date of this section and it is within 15 years of the date that the county adjusted the rate of the sales and use tax under section 297A.993, subdivision 1, to the maximum rate authorized in that section."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Koznick
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 58 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Runbeck moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 42, line 12, before the second "the" insert "and subject to the approval in paragraph (c),"
Page 42, after line 19, insert:
"(c) The council must not impose the transportation sales tax unless a majority of the voters voting on the question submitted at the 2020 general election vote in favor of imposition of the tax."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Lucero moved to amend the Runbeck amendment to H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, delete line 6 and insert "statutory and home rule charter cities located within the metropolitan area, by resolution, approve"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
McDonald was excused between the
hours of 1:30 p.m. and 8:35 p.m.
The question was taken on the Lucero
amendment to the Runbeck amendment and the roll was called. There were 57 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
The question recurred on the Runbeck
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 57 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Torkelson moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 37, line 7, delete "75" and insert "60"
Page 37, line 9, reinstate the stricken "Minnesota state transportation fund; and" and delete "small cities assistance"
Page 37, line 10, before "account" insert "(4) 15 percent to the small cities assistance"
Page 37, line 19, delete "0.2" and insert "0.04"
Page 37, line 20, delete "0.35" and insert "0.08"
Adjust amounts accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The Speaker called Olson to the Chair.
The question was taken on the Torkelson
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 55 yeas and 76 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hertaus
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Pryor
Richardson
Robbins
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Torkelson moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 36, line 30, delete everything after "section" and insert a period
Page 37, line 6, after "fund" insert "such that the first $32,000,000 each year is allocated to the highway user tax distribution fund, and the remaining funds are distributed"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Torkelson
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 56 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
West moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 28, after line 10, insert:
"Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 168.013, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 23. Tax
adjustment. (a) For purposes
of this subdivision, "qualifying owner" means the owner of a motor
vehicle subject to the registration tax under subdivision 1a who meets any of
the following requirements:
(1) had a household income equal to or
less than 185 percent of federal poverty level income in the previous calendar
year;
(2) claimed the Minnesota working
family credit under section 290.0671 in the preceding taxable year; or
(3) is able to document a child's
current participation in the free and reduced-price lunch program or Child and
Adult Care Food Program, National School Lunch Act, United States Code, title
42, sections 1751 and 1766; the Food Distribution Program on Indian
Reservations, Food and Nutrition Act, United States Code, title 7, sections
2011-2036; Head Start under the federal Improving Head Start for School
Readiness Act of 2007; Minnesota family investment program under chapter 256J;
child care assistance programs under chapter 119B; or the supplemental
nutrition assistance program.
(b) The registration tax under
subdivision 1a due on the motor vehicle of a qualifying owner is adjusted to
0.75 multiplied by the tax amount calculated under that subdivision.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2021, and applies to taxes payable for a registration period starting on or after that date."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the West
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 58 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Stephenson
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Torkelson moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 44, line 31, delete "57" and insert "60"
Page 45, line 1, delete "34.5" and insert "31.5"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Torkelson
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 57 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Petersburg moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, follows:
Page 24, line 10, delete "1,700,000,000" and insert "1,500,000,000"
Page 24, line 21, delete "$300,000,000" and insert "$100,000,000"
Page 24, line 25, delete "300,000,000" and insert "500,000,000"
Page 24, line 32, delete "2024" and insert "2026"
Page 25, line 23, delete "2024" and insert "2026"
Page 25, line 25, delete "2025" and insert "2027"
Page 25, line 26, delete "300,000" and insert "100,000"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Petersburg
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 56 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Torkelson moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 5, after line 5, insert:
"(f) Minnesota Rail Service Improvement |
|
5,000,000
|
|
5,000,000
|
This appropriation is from the general fund for the Minnesota rail service improvement program under Minnesota Statutes, sections 222.49 and 222.50. This is a onetime appropriation."
Page 5, line 6, delete "(f)" and insert "(g)"
Page 14, line 24, delete "22,336,000" and insert "12,336,000"
Adjust amounts accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Torkelson
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 58 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Murphy
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Torkelson moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 40, line 29, after "DATE" insert "; EXPIRATION"
Page
40, line 30, before the period, insert "and before July 1, 2021. The changes in this section expire June 30,
2021"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Torkelson
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 57 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Munson offered an amendment to
H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended.
POINT OF ORDER
Carlson, L., raised a point of order
pursuant to rule 4.03, relating to Ways and Means Committee; Budget Resolution;
Effect on Expenditure and Revenue Bills, that the Munson amendment was not in
order. Speaker pro tempore Olson ruled
the point of order well taken and the Munson amendment out of order.
Johnson moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 4, line 11, delete "19,001,000" and insert "18,151,000"
Page 4, delete lines 16 to 19
Page 4, delete lines 24 to 32
Reletter the paragraphs in sequence
Page 5, line 17, delete "33,742,000" and insert "32,667,000" and delete "31,025,000" and insert "30,950,000"
Page 6, delete lines 1 to 3
Page 11, line 18, delete "43,834,000" and insert "42,944,000"
Page 12, delete lines 5 to 7
Page 14, line 24, delete "22,336,000" and insert "22,306,000" and delete "7,213,000" and insert "7,183,000"
Page 15, delete lines 10 to 15
Reletter the paragraphs in sequence
Page 16, line 31, delete the first "640,000" and insert "1,992,000" and delete "640,000" and insert "1,992,000"
Page 17, after line 4, insert:
"The base appropriation is $640,000 in each of fiscal years 2022 and 2023."
Page 18, line 4, delete "100,258,000" and insert "100,008,000"
Page 18, delete lines 10 to 15
Page 19, line 14, delete "36,752,000" and insert "36,485,000"
Page 19, delete lines 23 to 24 and insert "This appropriation includes money for implementation costs"
Page 19, delete lines 26 to 30
Page 46, delete section 2
Page 131, line 14, after "(a)" insert "Using existing resources,"
Page 139, delete section 127
Adjust amounts accordingly
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Johnson
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 56 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Petersburg moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 4, line 11, delete "19,001,000" and insert "18,151,000"
Page 4, delete lines 16 to 19
Page 4, delete lines 24 to 32
Reletter the paragraphs in sequence
Page 5, line 17, delete "33,742,000" and insert "32,667,000" and delete "31,025,000" and insert "30,950,000"
Page 6, delete lines 1 to 3
Page 11, after line 2, insert:
"(d) Townships |
|
1,352,000
|
|
1,352,000
|
This appropriation is from the general fund for distribution to towns in the manner provided under Minnesota Statutes, section 162.081. This is a onetime appropriation."
Page 11, line 18, delete "43,834,000" and insert "42,944,000"
Page 12, delete lines 5 to 7
Page 14, line 24, delete "22,336,000" and insert "22,306,000" and delete "7,213,000" and insert "7,183,000"
Page 15, delete lines 10 to 15
Reletter the paragraphs in sequence
Page 18, line 4, delete "100,258,000" and insert "100,008,000"
Page 18, delete lines 10 to 15
Page 19, line 14, delete "36,752,000" and insert "36,485,000"
Page 19, delete lines 23 to 24 and insert "This appropriation includes money for implementation costs"
Page 19, delete lines 26 to 30
Page 46, delete section 2
Page 131, line 14, after "(a)" insert "Using existing resources,"
Page 139, delete section 127
Adjust amounts accordingly
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Speaker pro tempore Olson called Halverson
to the Chair.
The question was taken on the Petersburg
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 57 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.
Petersburg moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 4, line 11, delete "19,001,000" and insert "18,151,000"
Page 4, delete lines 16 to 19
Page 4, delete lines 24 to 32
Reletter the paragraphs in sequence
Page 5, line 17, delete "33,742,000" and insert "32,667,000" and delete "31,025,000" and insert "30,950,000"
Page 6, delete lines 1 to 3
Page 11, line 18, delete "43,834,000" and insert "42,944,000"
Page 12, delete lines 5 to 7
Page 14, line 24, delete "22,336,000" and insert "22,306,000" and delete "7,213,000" and insert "7,183,000"
Page 15, delete lines 10 to 15
Reletter the paragraphs in sequence
Page 18, line 4, delete "100,258,000" and insert "100,008,000"
Page 18, delete lines 10 to 15
Page 19, line 14, delete "36,752,000" and insert "36,485,000"
Page 19, delete lines 23 to 24 and insert "This appropriation includes money for implementation costs"
Page 19, delete lines 26 to 30
Page 20, line 30, delete "$10,000,000" and insert "$12,704,000"
Page 23, after line 22, insert:
"Subd. 8. Indemnification. (a) The state shall defend, save
harmless, and indemnify any deputy registrar acting in good faith and in their
official capacity pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, chapter 168, against any
claim or demand related to transactions completed by MNLARS or transactions
that could not be completed because MNLARS lacked the functionality to complete
the transaction for: (1) reasonable
expenses; (2) reasonable attorney fees; and (3) judgments and fines. This subdivision does not apply to acts
constituting willful or wanton misconduct.
(b) The deputy registrar must cooperate with the state to the fullest extent possible in the investigation, preparation, or defense of a claim or demand subject to paragraph (a). A deputy registrar must notify the state as soon as possible of any potential or pending litigation subject to paragraph (a)."
Page 23, line 23, after the second period, insert "Subdivision 8 applies to causes of action arising on or after July 1, 2017, but before January 1, 2022."
Page 46, delete section 2
Page 131, line 14, after "(a)" insert "Using existing resources,"
Page 139, delete section 127
Adjust amounts accordingly
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Petersburg
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 56 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Grossell moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 4, line 11, delete "19,001,000" and insert "18,151,000"
Page 4, delete lines 16 to 19
Page 4, delete lines 24 to 32
Reletter the paragraphs in sequence
Page 5, line 17, delete "33,742,000" and insert "32,667,000" and delete "31,025,000" and insert "30,950,000"
Page 6, delete lines 1 to 3
Page 11, line 18, delete "43,834,000" and insert "42,944,000"
Page 12, delete lines 5 to 7
Page 14, line 24, delete "22,336,000" and insert "22,306,000" and delete "7,213,000" and insert "7,183,000"
Page 15, delete lines 10 to 15
Reletter the paragraphs in sequence
Page 17, line 11, delete the first "745,000" and insert "2,097,000" and delete "745,000" and insert "2,097,000"
Page 17, line 14, delete the first "645,000" and insert "1,997,000" and delete "645,000" and insert "1,997,000"
Page 17, after line 22, insert:
"The base appropriation from the general fund is $645,000 in each of fiscal years 2022 and 2023."
Page 18, line 4, delete "100,258,000" and insert "100,008,000"
Page 18, delete lines 10 to 15
Page 19, line 14, delete "36,752,000" and insert "36,485,000"
Page 19, delete lines 23 to 24 and insert "This appropriation includes money for implementation costs"
Page 19, delete lines 26 to 30
Page 46, delete section 2
Page 131, line 14, after "(a)" insert "Using existing resources,"
Page 139, delete section 127
Adjust amounts accordingly
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the
Grossell amendment and the roll was called.
There were 57 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Koznick moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 142, line 2, delete "(a)"
Page 142, delete line 4
Amend the title accordingly
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Nornes moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 137, after line 18, insert:
"Sec. 126. SIGN
AUTHORIZATION.
(a) For purposes of this section, the
terms defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 173.02, have the meanings given them.
(b)
An advertising device may be erected and maintained in an adjacent area if the
device:
(1) is located at or in the vicinity of
the intersection of marked Trunk Highway 78 and Otter Tail County Highway 81,
known as 160th Street;
(2) relates to the meetings or location
of an established religious organization's religious services;
(3) contains an advertising area that
does not exceed 65 square feet;
(4) is located on private property; and
(5) does not violate Minnesota
Statutes, section 160.2715.
(c) An advertising device authorized
under this section is a religious notice under Minnesota Statutes, section
173.08, subdivision 1, clause (6).
(d) The commissioner and a local zoning
authority are prohibited from requiring a permit or imposing a fee under this
section.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Vogel moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 68, after line 23, insert:
"Sec. 9. [161.1225]
MARKED INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35 REQUIREMENTS.
Notwithstanding section 169.14, the
commissioner must establish a speed limit of 55 miles per hour on the segment
of marked Interstate Highway 35E from the Mississippi River to the interchange
with marked Interstate Highway 94.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Urdahl moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 107, after line 23, insert:
"Sec. 78. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 171.12, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Certain
convictions not recorded. (a) Except
as provided in paragraph (c) (d), the department must not keep on
the record of a driver any conviction for a violation of a speed limit of 55
miles per hour unless the violation consisted of a speed greater than ten miles
per hour in excess of the speed limit.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c)
(d), the department must not keep on the record of a driver any
conviction for a violation of a speed limit of 60 miles per hour unless the
violation consisted of a speed greater than five miles per hour in excess of
the speed limit.
(c) Except as provided in paragraph
(d), the department must not keep on the record of a driver any conviction for
a violation of a speed limit of 45 miles per hour on a segment of interstate
highway located within a city of the first class, unless the violation
consisted of a speed greater than ten miles per hour in excess of the speed
limit.
(d) This subdivision does not apply to (1) a violation that occurs in a commercial motor vehicle, or (2) a violation committed by a holder of a class A, B, or C commercial driver's license or commercial driver learner's permit, without regard to whether the violation was committed in a commercial motor vehicle or another vehicle.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and applies to violations committed on or after that date."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Koznick moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 90, after line 19, insert:
"Sec. 54. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 169.18, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Slow-moving
vehicle. Upon all roadways any
(a) A person operating a vehicle proceeding at less than the normal
speed of traffic at the time and place and under the existing
conditions then existing shall be driven must drive in the
right-hand lane then available for traffic, or as close as practicable
to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway, except when. A person who violates this paragraph must pay
a fine of not less than $100.
(b) Paragraph (a) does not apply if:
(1) the vehicle is overtaking and
passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction, or when;
(2) the vehicle is preparing for
a left to turn left at an intersection or into a private road
or driveway, or when;
(3) a specific lane is designated
and posted for a specific type of traffic.; or
(4) the vehicle is preparing to exit a controlled access highway by using an exit on the left side of the road."
Page 135, after line 14, insert:
"Sec. 122. PUBLIC
AWARENESS CAMPAIGN.
The commissioner of public safety must conduct a public awareness campaign to increase public knowledge about Minnesota Statutes, section 169.18, subdivision 10."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Speaker pro tempore Halverson called Olson
to the Chair.
Bahr moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 15, delete lines 16 to 20
Page 15, line 21, delete "(e)" and insert "(d)"
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Speaker pro tempore Olson called Halverson
to the Chair.
Grossell offered an amendment to
H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended.
POINT OF
ORDER
Olson raised a point of order pursuant to
rule 3.21(a) that the Grossell amendment was not in order. Speaker pro tempore Halverson ruled the point
of order well taken and the Grossell amendment out of order.
Grossell appealed the decision of Speaker
pro tempore Halverson.
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The vote was taken on the question
"Shall the decision of Speaker pro tempore Halverson stand as the judgment
of the House?" and the roll was called.
There were 75 yeas and 57 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
Those who voted in the negative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
So it was the judgment of the House that
the decision of Speaker pro tempore Halverson should stand.
Runbeck moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 131, after line 25, insert:
"Sec. 115. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 473.3994, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 5a.
Colocation requirements. A responsible authority is prohibited
from constructing a light rail transit facility that colocates light rail
transit service with freight rail service, whether using the same rail track or
operating in the same right-of-way.
EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION. This section is effective the day following final enactment and applies in the counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Runbeck moved to amend H. F. No. 1555, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 137, after line 9, insert:
"Sec. 125. SOUTHWEST
LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.
The Metropolitan Council is prohibited
from removing any tree, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 160.22,
subdivision 7a, for the Southwest light rail transit project unless the council
has entered into a full funding grant agreement with the Federal Transit
Administration for the project.
EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION. This section is effective the day following final enactment and applies in the counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Runbeck
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 59 yeas and 72 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Daniels
Davids
Dehn
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Hornstein
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Loeffler
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Boe
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Ecklund
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
The Speaker resumed the Chair.
CALL OF
THE HOUSE
On the motion of Koznick and on the demand
of 10 members, a call of the House was ordered.
The following members answered to their names:
Acomb
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahner
Bahr
Baker
Becker-Finn
Bennett
Bernardy
Bierman
Boe
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Daniels
Davids
Davnie
Dehn
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Erickson
Fabian
Fischer
Franson
Freiberg
Garofalo
Gomez
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Her
Hertaus
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Koznick
Kresha
Kunesh-Podein
Layman
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Lucero
Lueck
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Mekeland
Miller
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Munson
Murphy
Nash
Nelson, M.
Nelson, N.
Neu
Noor
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Olson
O'Neill
Pelowski
Persell
Petersburg
Pierson
Pinto
Poppe
Poston
Pryor
Quam
Richardson
Robbins
Runbeck
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schomacker
Schultz
Scott
Stephenson
Sundin
Swedzinski
Tabke
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vang
Vogel
Wagenius
Wazlawik
West
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Hortman
All members answered to the call and it
was so ordered.
H. F. No. 1555, A bill for an act relating to transportation; establishing a budget for transportation; appropriating money for transportation purposes, including Department of Transportation, Metropolitan Council, and Department of Public Safety activities; modifying driver's licenses and identification cards; modifying motor vehicle taxes and fees; modifying various provisions governing transportation policy and finance; allocating certain sales and use tax revenue; establishing accounts; making technical changes; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds; requiring reports; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 13.461, by adding a subdivision; 13.6905, by adding a subdivision; 13.72, subdivision 10; 80E.13; 160.02, subdivision 1a; 160.262, subdivision 3; 160.263, subdivision 2; 160.266, subdivision 1b, by adding a subdivision; 161.115, subdivision 46; 161.14, subdivision 16, by adding subdivisions; 161.45, subdivision 2; 161.46, subdivision 2; 168.013, subdivisions 1a, 1m, 3, 6, 21; 168.10, subdivision 1h; 168.123, subdivision 2; 168.27, by adding subdivisions; 168.301, subdivision 3; 168.33, subdivisions 7, 8a; 168.346, subdivision 1; 168A.02, subdivision 1; 168A.085, by adding a subdivision; 168A.09, subdivision 1; 168A.12, subdivision 2; 168A.17, by adding a subdivision; 168A.29, subdivision 1; 169.011, subdivisions 5, 9, 64, by adding subdivisions; 169.035, by adding a subdivision; 169.06, subdivision 4a; 169.18, subdivisions 3, 8, 11; 169.20, subdivision 7; 169.222, subdivisions 1, 4; 169.26, subdivisions 1, 4; 169.28; 169.29; 169.443, subdivision 2; 169.4503, subdivision 5; 169.58, by adding a subdivision; 169.64, subdivision 9; 169.71, subdivisions 1, 4; 169.81, by adding a subdivision; 169.864; 169.865, subdivisions 1, 2, by adding a subdivision; 169.92, subdivision 4; 171.01, by adding subdivisions; 171.04, subdivision 5; 171.06, subdivisions 2, 3, by adding subdivisions; 171.061, subdivision 4; 171.07, subdivisions 1, 3, by adding a subdivision; 171.12, subdivisions 7a, 9,
by adding subdivisions; 171.16, subdivisions 2, 3;
171.18, subdivision 1; 174.01, subdivision 2; 174.03, subdivision 7, by
adding subdivisions; 174.24, subdivision 2; 174.37; 174.57; 201.061,
subdivision 3; 219.015, subdivisions 1, 2, by
adding a subdivision; 219.1651; 221.031, by adding a subdivision; 296A.07,
subdivision 3; 296A.08, subdivision 2; 297A.815, subdivision 3; 297A.94;
297A.99, subdivision 1; 297B.02, subdivision 1; 297B.09; 299A.12, subdivisions
1, 2, 3; 299A.13; 299A.14, subdivision 3; 299D.03, subdivision 5; 325F.185; 360.013,
by adding subdivisions; 360.024; 360.55, by adding a subdivision; 360.59,
subdivision 10; 360.62; 473.386, subdivision 3, by adding a subdivision;
473.388, subdivision 4a; 473.39, subdivision 6, by adding a subdivision;
473.391, by adding a subdivision; 473.4052, subdivision 4; 473.408, by adding a
subdivision; 480.15, by adding a subdivision; Laws 1994, chapter 643, section
15, subdivision 8; Laws 2014, chapter 312, article 11, section 38, subdivisions
5, 6; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 161; 168;
168A; 169; 171; 174; 219; 297A; 360; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2018,
sections 3.972, subdivision 4; 169.18, subdivision 12; 171.015, subdivision 7;
299A.12, subdivision 4; 299A.18; Laws 2002, chapter 393, section 85.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 74 yeas and 58 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Acomb
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
Those who voted in the negative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahner
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
The
bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
S. F. No. 802 was reported
to the House.
Mariani moved to amend
S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as follows:
Delete everything after the enacting
clause and insert the following language of H. F. No. 2792, the
first engrossment:
"ARTICLE 1
PUBLIC SAFETY APPROPRIATIONS
Section 1. APPROPRIATIONS. |
The sums shown in the columns marked
"Appropriations" are appropriated to the agencies and for the
purposes specified in this article. The
appropriations are from the general fund, or another named fund, and are
available for the fiscal years indicated for each purpose. The figures "2020" and
"2021" used in this article mean that the appropriations listed under
them are available for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020, or June 30, 2021,
respectively. "The first year"
is fiscal year 2020. "The second
year" is fiscal year 2021. "The
biennium" is fiscal years 2020 and 2021.
Appropriations for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019, are effective
the day following final enactment.
|
|
|
APPROPRIATIONS |
||
|
|
|
Available for the Year |
||
|
|
|
Ending June 30 |
||
|
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
||
Sec. 2. SENTENCING
GUIDELINES |
|
$1,330,000 |
|
$988,000 |
$651,000 the first year and $301,000 the
second year are to establish early discharge targets. The base for this program is $223,000
beginning in fiscal year 2022.
Sec. 3. PUBLIC
SAFETY |
|
|
|
|
Subdivision
1. Total
Appropriation |
$160,000 |
|
$202,143,000 |
|
$201,171,000 |
Appropriations
by Fund |
|||
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
General |
160,000
|
108,637,000
|
107,665,000
|
Special Revenue |
|
13,926,000
|
13,926,000
|
State Government Special Revenue |
|
103,000
|
103,000
|
Environmental |
|
73,000
|
73,000
|
Trunk Highway |
|
2,429,000
|
2,429,000
|
911 Fund |
|
77,650,000
|
77,650,000
|
The amounts that may be spent for each
purpose are specified in the following subdivisions.
Subd. 2. Deficiency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$160,000 in fiscal year 2019 is to pay
systems costs related to license reinstatement fee changes, driver diversion
programs, and ignition interlock.
Subd. 3. Emergency
Management |
|
5,343,000
|
|
5,093,000
|
Appropriations
by Fund |
||
General |
3,745,000
|
3,495,000
|
Environmental |
73,000
|
73,000
|
Special Revenue Fund |
1,525,000
|
1,525,000
|
(a) Hazmat and Chemical Assessment Teams
$850,000 each year is from the fire safety
account in the special revenue fund. These
amounts must be used to fund the hazardous materials and chemical assessment
teams. Of this amount, $100,000 the
first year is for cases for which there is no identified responsible party.
(b) Supplemental Nonprofit Security Grants
$300,000 each year is for supplemental
nonprofit security grants under this paragraph.
Nonprofit organizations whose applications
for funding through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's nonprofit
security grant program have been approved by the Division of Homeland Security
and Emergency Management are eligible for grants under this paragraph. No additional application shall be required
for grants under this paragraph, and an application for a grant from the
federal program is also an application for funding from the state supplemental
program.
Eligible organizations may receive grants
of up to $75,000, except that the total received by any individual from both
the federal nonprofit security grant program and the state supplemental
nonprofit security grant program shall not exceed $75,000. Grants shall be awarded in an order
consistent with the ranking given to applicants for the federal nonprofit
security grant program. No grants under
the state supplemental nonprofit security grant program shall be awarded until
the announcement of the recipients and the amount of the grants awarded under
the federal nonprofit security grant program.
The commissioner may use up to one percent
of the appropriation received under this paragraph to pay costs incurred by the
department in administering the supplemental nonprofit security grant program. This program shall have a base of $150,000 in
fiscal year 2022 and $0 in fiscal year 2023.
(c)
$250,000 the first year is for a grant or grants to a
person or entity to train emergency responders and utilize applications for
cell phones and mobile electronic devices to improve and de-escalate emergency
encounters and crisis situations with individuals who have an autism spectrum
disorder or related disability, or other nonvisible health issue, and to
acquire these applications. By February
15, 2023, the commissioner shall report to the chairs and ranking minority
members of the senate and house of representatives committees and divisions
having jurisdiction over criminal justice policy and finance on how this
appropriation was spent and what results were achieved.
(d) Local
Government Emergency Management
$300,000 each year is for the director of the Homeland Security and Emergency Management Division (HSEM) to award grants to emergency management departments for planning and preparedness activities including capital purchases.
A grant in the amount of $20,000 shall be awarded each fiscal year to each of the following, subject to HSEM's final approval:
(1) 12 counties with two counties recommended by each Homeland Security Emergency Management Region;
(2) two tribal governments recommended by the Indian Affairs Council; and
(3) one city of the first class chosen by HSEM.
Current local funding for emergency management and
preparedness activities may not be supplanted by these additional state funds. These appropriations are onetime.
(e) Bomb
Squad Reimbursements
$50,000 each year is for reimbursements to local governments
for bomb squad services.
(f) School
Safety Center
$250,000 each year is to hire two additional school safety
specialists in the school safety center.
(g) Emergency
Response Teams
$675,000 each year is to maintain four emergency response teams: one under the jurisdiction of the St. Cloud
Fire Department or a similarly located fire department if necessary; one under
the
jurisdiction
of the Duluth Fire Department; one under the jurisdiction of the St. Paul
Fire Department; and one under the jurisdiction of the Moorhead Fire Department. The commissioner must allocate the
appropriation as follows:
(1) $225,000 each year to the St. Cloud
Fire Department;
(2) $225,000 each year to the Duluth Fire
Department;
(3) $125,000 each year to the St. Paul
Fire Department; and
(4) $100,000 each year to the Moorhead
Fire Department.
These are onetime appropriations.
Subd. 4. Criminal
Apprehension |
|
63,229,000
|
|
62,974,000
|
Appropriations
by Fund |
||
General |
60,793,000
|
60,538,000
|
State Government Special Revenue |
7,000
|
7,000
|
Trunk Highway |
2,429,000
|
2,429,000
|
(a) DWI Lab Analysis; Trunk Highway Fund
Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes,
section 161.20, subdivision 3, $2,429,000 each year is from the trunk highway
fund for laboratory analysis related to driving-while-impaired cases.
(b) FBI Cybersecurity Compliance |
|
|
|
|
$1,501,000 the first year and $1,325,000
the second year are for staff and technology costs to meet FBI cybersecurity
requirements. The base for fiscal year
2022 and thereafter is $1,175,000.
(c) Automated Fingerprint Identification System
$1,500,000 each year is to replace the
current automated fingerprint identification system with a new leased
technology system.
(d) Equipment
$50,000 the first year is for information
and technology to receive and store data related to complaints made against an
employed peace officer.
(e)
Base Adjustment
To account for the base adjustments
provided in Laws 2018, chapter 211, article 21, section 1, paragraph (a), the
general fund base is increased by $131,000 in fiscal years 2022 and 2023.
Subd. 5. Fire
Marshal |
|
6,622,000
|
|
6,622,000
|
Appropriations
by Fund |
||
Special Revenue |
6,622,000
|
6,622,000
|
The special revenue fund appropriation is
from the fire safety account in the special revenue fund and is for activities
under Minnesota Statutes, section 299F.012.
Inspections. $300,000 each year is for inspection
of nursing homes and boarding care facilities.
Subd. 6. Firefighter
Training and Education Board |
|
5,015,000
|
|
5,015,000
|
Appropriations
by Fund |
||
Special Revenue |
5,015,000
|
5,015,000
|
The special revenue fund appropriation is
from the fire safety account in the special revenue fund and is for activities
under Minnesota Statutes, section 299F.012.
(a) Firefighter Training and Education |
|
|
|
|
$4,265,000 each year is for firefighter
training and education.
(b) Task Force 1
$500,000 each year is for the Minnesota
Task Force 1.
(c) Air Rescue
$250,000 each year is for the Minnesota
Air Rescue Team.
(d) Unappropriated Revenue |
|
|
|
|
Any additional unappropriated money
collected in fiscal year 2019 is appropriated to the commissioner of public
safety for the purposes of Minnesota Statutes, section 299F.012. The commissioner may transfer appropriations
and base amounts between activities in this subdivision.
Subd. 7. Alcohol
and Gambling Enforcement |
|
2,929,000
|
|
2,927,000
|
Appropriations
by Fund |
||
General |
2,165,000
|
2,163,000
|
Special Revenue |
764,000
|
764,000
|
$694,000 each year is from the alcohol
enforcement account in the special revenue fund. Of this appropriation, $500,000 each year
shall be transferred to the general fund.
$70,000 each year is from the lawful
gambling regulation account in the special revenue fund.
$175,000 the first year and $165,000 the
second year are for costs related to enforcement of laws regulating
out-of-state direct wine shippers.
To account for the base adjustments
provided in Laws 2018, chapter 211, article 21, section 1, paragraph (a), the
general fund base is increased by $8,000 in fiscal years 2022 and 2023.
Subd. 8. Office
of Justice Programs |
|
41,730,000
|
|
41,365,000
|
Appropriations
by Fund |
||
General |
41,634,000
|
41,269,000
|
State Government Special Revenue |
96,000
|
96,000
|
To account for the base adjustments
provided in Laws 2018, chapter 211, article 21, section 1, paragraph (a), the
general fund base is increased by $2,000 in fiscal years 2022 and 2023.
(a) Administration Costs |
|
|
|
|
Up to 2.5 percent of the grant funds appropriated
in this subdivision may be used by the commissioner to administer the grant
program.
(b) Indigenous Women Task Force |
|
|
|
|
$105,000 the first year and $45,000 the
second year are to convene a task force on the causes and extent of victimization
of indigenous women and girls and strategies to reduce violence. A report on policies and recommendations to
reduce and end violence against indigenous women and girls is due to the
legislature on December 15, 2020. These
are onetime appropriations.
(c)
Domestic Abuse Prevention Grants
$200,000 each year is for a grant to a
domestic abuse prevention program that provides interdisciplinary,
trauma-informed treatment and evidence-informed intervention for veterans and
current or former service members and their families affected by domestic
violence. The grantee must offer a
combination of services for perpetrators of domestic violence and their
families, including individual and group therapy, evaluation and research of
programming, and short- and long-term case management services to ensure
stabilization and increase their overall mental health functioning and
well-being. These appropriations are
onetime.
(d) Criminal
Sexual Conduct Statutory Reform Working Group
$20,000 the first year and $14,000 the
second year are to convene, administer, and implement the criminal sexual
conduct statutory reform working group.
(e) Legal Representation for Children
$150,000 each year is for a grant to an
organization that provides legal representation for children in need of
protection or services and children in out-of-home placement. The grant is contingent upon a match in an
equal amount from nonstate funds. The
match may be in kind, including the value of volunteer attorney time, or in
cash, or a combination of the two. These
appropriations are onetime.
(f) Youth Intervention Programs
$500,000 each year is for youth
intervention programs under Minnesota Statutes, section 299A.73. One-half of the money is for community-based
youth intervention programs that work with African American and African
immigrant youth.
These appropriations are onetime.
(g) Domestic Abuse Transformation Programs
$783,000 each year is for grants to
domestic abuse transformation programs that demonstrate meaningful and
effective programming to reduce and eliminate domestic abuse within intimate
partner relationships. The requirements
for grant recipients shall be developed by the Office of Justice Programs in
consultation with stakeholders impacted by domestic abuse and working to end
domestic abuse. The base in fiscal year
2022 is $0.
(h)
Peace Officer Community Policing
Excellence Report Database
(1) $200,000 the first year is for a grant
to a qualified community‑based research organization to develop a system to
classify and report peace officer discipline by category, severity, type,
demographic data of those involved in the incident, and any other factor
determined to be appropriate by the Peace Officers Standards and Training Board. As part of the system, the grant recipient
must develop and incorporate:
(i) a protocol to assign a unique
identifier for each peace officer;
(ii) safeguards to protect personal
identifying information of peace officers; and
(iii) guidelines for data retention and
user audit trails.
(2) The grant recipient, in consultation
with the stakeholder group identified in clause (3), may recommend changes on
how to adapt the system under clause (1) to collect additional policing data
that corresponds with peace officer interactions with the public generally and
suspects, arrests, and victims specifically.
(3) In developing the system described in
clause (1), the grant recipient shall consult with:
(i) the superintendent of the Bureau of
Criminal Apprehension;
(ii) the Peace Officer Standards and
Training Board;
(iii) the Minnesota Police and Peace
Officers Association;
(iv) the Minnesota Sheriff's Association;
(v) the Minnesota Chiefs of Police
Association; and
(vi) six community members appointed by the
commissioner of public safety, of which:
(A) at least two members must be from
communities represented by boards established under section 257.0768;
(B) at least two members must be mental health advocates; and
(C) at least two members must be advocates
for domestic abuse victims.
(4) The grant recipient and citizens must
be permitted ongoing direct access to the data maintained in the system. Access to the data under this clause must be
strictly regulated and monitored to ensure compliance with the data privacy
classifications assigned to the data.
(i)
Sex Trafficking Investigations
Coordinator
$100,000 each year is for a statewide Sex
Trafficking Investigations Coordinator.
(j) Cannabis Task Force
$100,000 the first year is to provide
support staff, office space, and administrative services for the Cannabis Task
Force.
(k) Safe and Secure Storage of Firearms
$100,000 each year is for grants to local
or state law enforcement agencies to support the safe and secure storage of
firearms.
(l) Community Policing Database Maintenance
$50,000 the second year is for the Bureau
of Criminal Apprehension to maintain the community policing database. Any unused amount remaining in the account on
June 1 is for a grant to a community-based research organization to maintain
and update software to monitor peace officer discipline.
Subd. 9. Emergency
Communication Networks |
|
77,750,000
|
|
77,750,000
|
Appropriations
by Fund |
||
General |
100,000
|
100,000
|
Special Revenue |
77,650,000
|
77,650,000
|
This appropriation is from the state
government special revenue fund for 911 emergency telecommunications services.
This appropriation includes funds for
information technology project services and support subject to the provisions
of Minnesota Statutes, section 16E.0466.
Any ongoing information technology costs will be incorporated into the
service level agreement and will be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services by the
Department of Public Safety under the rates and mechanism specified in that
agreement.
(a) Public Safety Answering Points |
|
|
|
|
$13,664,000 each year is to be distributed
as provided in Minnesota Statutes, section 403.113, subdivision 2.
(b) Medical Resource Communication Centers |
|
|
|
|
$683,000 each year is for grants to the
Minnesota Emergency Medical Services Regulatory Board for the Metro East and
Metro West Medical Resource Communication Centers that were in operation before
January 1, 2000.
(c)
Medical Resource Control Centers
$100,000 the first year and $100,000 the
second year are appropriated from the general fund to the commissioner of
public safety for grants to the Minnesota Emergency Medical Services Regulatory
Board for the East Metro and West Metro Medical Resource Control Centers that
were in operation before January 1, 2000.
These appropriations are onetime.
(d) ARMER Debt Service |
|
|
|
|
$23,261,000 each year is transferred to
the commissioner of management and budget to pay debt service on revenue bonds
issued under Minnesota Statutes, section 403.275.
Any portion of this appropriation not
needed to pay debt service in a fiscal year may be used by the commissioner of
public safety to pay cash for any of the capital improvements for which bond
proceeds were appropriated by Laws 2005, chapter 136, article 1, section 9, subdivision 8; or Laws 2007, chapter 54, article
1, section 10, subdivision 8.
(e) ARMER State Backbone Operating Costs
$9,675,000 each year is transferred to the
commissioner of transportation for costs of maintaining and operating the statewide
radio system backbone.
(f) ARMER Improvements
$1,000,000 each year is to the Statewide
Emergency Communications Board for improvements to those elements of the
statewide public safety radio and communication system that support mutual aid
communications and emergency medical services or provide interim enhancement of
public safety communication interoperability in those areas of the state where
the statewide public safety radio and communication system is not yet
implemented, and grants to local units of government to further the strategic
goals set forth by the Statewide Emergency Communications Board strategic plan.
(g) Telephone Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Program
$50,000 the first year is appropriated
from the general fund for grants to reimburse public safety answering points
for the cost of 911 telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation training. This is a onetime appropriation.
Subd. 10. Traffic
Safety |
|
200,000
|
|
100,000
|
$200,000 the first year and $100,000 the
second year are for a study to report on the use of screening tests that
measure the level of marijuana or tetrahydrocannabinols in the blood of a
person stopped or arrested for driving while impaired.
Sec. 4. PEACE
OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING (POST) BOARD |
|
|
|
Subdivision
1. Total
Appropriation |
$500,000 |
|
$10,563,000 |
|
$10,316,000 |
The amounts that may be spent for each
purpose are specified in the following subdivisions.
Subd. 2. Deficiency
|
|
|
|
|
$500,000 in fiscal year 2019 is from the
general fund to pay for a projected deficiency in operating expenses.
Subd. 3. Peace
Officer Training Reimbursements |
|
|
|
|
$2,859,000 each year is for reimbursements
to local governments for peace officer training costs.
Subd. 4. Peace
Officer Training Assistance |
|
|
|
|
(a) $6,000,000 the first year is from the
general fund to the Peace Officer Standards and Training Board for grants to
support and strengthen law enforcement training and implement best practices. After January 2, 2021, these funds may only
be used to reimburse training expenses for peace officers who are employed by
law enforcement agencies that the superintendent of the Bureau of Criminal
Apprehension has certified are:
(1) compliant with the Federal Bureau of
Investigation's National Incident-Based Report System (NIBRS), which requires
recording the age, sex, and race of the arrestee and the relationship of the
arrestee and victim if this information is known to the officer;
(2) in compliance with the peace officer
discipline reporting requirements established in Minnesota Statutes, section
626.8435;
(3) in compliance with the Bureau of
Criminal Apprehension's use of force data collection policy to include
reporting whether the incident was officer generated or in response to a call
for assistance; and
(4) in compliance with the report required
by Minnesota Statutes, sections 299C.22, subdivision 2, and 626.553,
subdivision 2. This report includes the
Federal Bureau of Investigation's use of force data collection and whether the
incident was officer generated or in response to a request for service.
The
base for this activity is $6,000,000 in fiscal years 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023
and $0 in fiscal year 2024 and thereafter.
(b) The superintendent of the Bureau of
Criminal Apprehension may grant up to one additional year for an agency to
become substantially compliant with NIBRS if the agency establishes good cause
for delayed compliance.
(c) The superintendent of the Bureau of
Criminal Apprehension shall modify the Supplemental Reporting System on the
agency submissions page to provide fields for agencies to report the data
required under paragraph (a), clause (3).
Subd. 5. De-escalation
Training |
|
|
|
|
$100,000 each year is for training state
and local community safety personnel in the use of crisis de-escalation
techniques. When selecting a service
provider for this training, the board may consult with any postsecondary
institution, any state or local government official, or any nongovernment
authority the board determines to be relevant.
Among any other criteria the board may establish, the training provider
must have a demonstrated understanding of the transitions and challenges that
veterans may experience during their re-entry into society following combat
service. The board must ensure that
training opportunities provided are reasonably distributed statewide.
Subd. 6. Peace
Officer Excellence Task Force |
|
|
|
|
$250,000 the first year is to provide
support staff, office space, and administrative services for the Peace Officer
Excellence Task Force.
Sec. 5. PRIVATE
DETECTIVE BOARD |
|
$277,000 |
|
$277,000 |
Sec. 6. CORRECTIONS
|
|
|
|
|
Subdivision 1. Total
Appropriation |
|
$633,129,000 |
|
$655,572,000 |
The amounts that may be spent for each
purpose are specified in the following subdivisions.
Subd. 2. Correctional
Institutions |
|
460,026,000
|
|
475,654,000
|
(a) Base Adjustment
To account for the base adjustments
provided in Laws 2018, chapter 211, article 21, section 1, paragraph (a), the
base is increased by $2,342,000 in fiscal year 2022 and $2,342,000 in fiscal
year 2023.
(b)
Prison Population
To account for projected prison population
changes, the base is increased by $1,910,000 in fiscal year 2022 and $3,641,000
in fiscal year 2023.
(c) Facility Staff Positions
$2,518,000 the first year and $5,980,000 the second year are to add up to 110 full-time equivalent positions for correctional officers and six full-time equivalent positions for corrections lieutenants located in correctional facilities by fiscal year 2023. The base is increased to $7,707,000 in fiscal year 2022 and $8,418,000 in fiscal year 2023.
(d) Staffing Recruitment and Retention
$4,000,000 each year is for staffing
recruitment and retention.
(e) Offender Health Care
$2,072,000 the first year and $3,272,000
the second year are to maintain full funding of the offender health care
contract.
(f) Security
$5,250,000 the first year and $3,935,000
the second year are to upgrade critical security infrastructure and modernize
critical security systems. Of the second
year amount, $3,335,000 is onetime funding.
(g) Safety and Security Staff
$891,000 the first year and $1,426,000 the
second year are to add full-time equivalent positions deemed critical to
facility safety and security.
(h) Office of Ombudsperson for Corrections
$900,000 each year is to reestablish and
operate the Office of Ombudsperson for Corrections.
(i) Restrictive Housing Reform
$844,000 the first year and $1,688,000 the
second year are to implement restrictive housing reforms that will reduce the
risk of future misconduct and comply with federal guidelines and accreditation
standards.
(j)
Offender Medical Services
$879,000 the first year and $2,160,000 the
second year are to expand and improve offender medical services.
(k) Juvenile Correction Management
$544,000 the first year and $206,000 the
second year are to replace the Juvenile Correctional Management System. These are onetime appropriations.
Subd. 3. Community
Services |
|
141,145,000
|
|
146,459,000
|
(a) Base Adjustment
To account for the base adjustments
provided in Laws 2018, chapter 211, article 21, section 1, paragraph (a), the
base is increased by $168,000 in fiscal year 2022 and $168,000 in fiscal year
2023.
(b) Pretrial Services and Supervision
$617,000 the first year and $1,234,000 the
second year are to provide pretrial services and pretrial supervision to
offenders.
(c) Community Corrections Act Subsidy
$1,044,000 the first year and $2,088,000
the second year are added to the Community Corrections Act subsidy, as
described in Minnesota Statutes, section 401.14, to provide pretrial services
and pretrial supervision to offenders.
$1,588,000 the first year and $3,176,000
the second year are added to the Community Corrections Act subsidy, as
described in Minnesota Statutes, section 401.14, to provide intensive
supervised release to offenders in the community.
(d) County Probation Officers
$64,000 the first year and $128,000 the
second year are for county probation officers reimbursement as described in
Minnesota Statutes, section 244.19, subdivision 6, to provide pretrial services
and pretrial supervision to offenders.
(e) Intensive Supervision Agents
$912,000 the first year and $1,824,000 the
second year are to increase the number of supervision agents for offenders on
intensive supervised release through the Department of Corrections.
(f)
Integrated Offender Case Management
Services
$321,000 the first year and $831,000 the
second year are to expand and improve integrated offender case management
services. $193,000 is added to the base
in each of fiscal years 2022 and 2023.
(g) Victim Notification System Replacement
$300,000 the first year and $100,000 the
second year are to complete the replacement of the Department of Corrections'
Victim Notification System. These
appropriations are onetime.
(h) High-Risk Offenders
$1,500,000 each year is to provide
electronic monitoring services and transitional housing for high-risk offenders
under supervision by the Department of Corrections.
(i) Transportation Services to Children of Incarcerated Parents
$150,000 each year is for grants to
nonprofit organizations to provide transportation services to children of
incarcerated parents at up to three correctional facilities.
(j) Culturally Specific Reintegration Services for Adult American Indian
Offenders
$425,000 each year is for grants to
community-based providers to deliver culturally specific reintegration services
for adult American Indian offenders.
(k) Parenting Skills
$425,000 each year is to improve parenting
skills at four correctional facilities.
(l) Juvenile Justice Reform
(1) $280,000 each year is to provide
juvenile justice services and resources to Minnesota counties.
(2) $220,000 each year is for grants to
local agencies to establish juvenile detention alternatives.
(m) Alternatives to Incarceration
$240,000 each year is for grants to
counties that are not metropolitan counties as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
section 473.121, subdivision 4, to facilitate access to community treatment
options under the alternatives to incarceration program. These appropriations are onetime.
(n)
Mental Health Community Supervision
$400,000 each year is to award grants to
two or more counties for establishment of a mental health community supervision
caseload pilot project. These
appropriations are onetime.
(o) Exit from Supervised Release
$200,000 each year is for grants to
government agencies that supervise offenders placed on probation to be used to
connect offenders with community treatment options including, but not limited
to, inpatient chemical dependency treatment for the purpose of addressing and
correcting behavior that is, or is likely to result in, a violation of the
terms and conditions of probation. Each
fiscal year, these funds are available only to entities outside the seven-county metropolitan area until March
15. After March 15, entities
inside the seven-county metropolitan area also may apply for grants. These appropriations are onetime.
Subd. 4. Operations
Support |
|
31,958,000
|
|
33,459,000
|
(a) Base Adjustment
To account for the base adjustments
provided in Laws 2018, chapter 211, article 21, section 1, paragraph (a), the
base is increased by $64,000 in fiscal year 2022 and $64,000 in fiscal year
2023.
(b) Critical Technology Needs
$3,100,000 the first year and $4,300,000
the second year are to support critical technology needs.
(c) Staff Recruiting
$160,000 each year is to fund positions
responsible for recruiting staff to work for the Department of Corrections.
Sec. 7. PUBLIC
DEFENSE BOARD |
|
$164,000 |
|
$204,000 |
$164,000 the first year and $204,000 the
second year are for additional staffing necessitated by changes to criminal
vehicular homicide and criminal vehicular operation offenses.
Sec. 8. DISTRICT
COURT |
|
$259,000 |
|
$379,000 |
$259,000 the first year and $379,000 the
second year are for costs related to petitions for an order of relief from one
or more collateral sanctions.
Sec. 9. DEPARTMENT
OF HUMAN SERVICES |
|
$404,000 |
|
$461,000 |
$404,000 the first year and $461,000 the
second year are for costs related to petitions for an order of relief from one
or more collateral sanctions.
Sec. 10. Laws 2017, chapter 95, article 1, section 11, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Office
of Justice Programs |
|
39,580,000 |
|
40,036,000 |
Appropriations by Fund |
||
General |
39,484,000 |
39,940,000 |
State Government Special Revenue |
96,000 |
96,000 |
(a) OJP Administration Costs |
|
|
|
|
Up to 2.5 percent of the grant funds appropriated in this subdivision may be used by the commissioner to administer the grant program.
(b) Combating Terrorism Recruitment |
|
|
|
|
$250,000 each year is for grants to local law enforcement agencies to develop strategies and make efforts to combat the recruitment of Minnesota residents by terrorist organizations such as ISIS and al‑Shabaab. This is a onetime appropriation.
(c) Sex Trafficking Prevention Grants |
|
|
|
|
$180,000 each year is for grants to state and local units of government for the following purposes:
(1) to support new or existing multijurisdictional entities to investigate sex trafficking crimes; and
(2) to provide technical assistance, including training and case consultation, to law enforcement agencies statewide.
(d) Pathway to Policing Reimbursement Grants |
|
|
|
|
$400,000 the second year is for reimbursement
grants to local units of government that operate pathway to policing programs
intended to bring persons with nontraditional backgrounds into law enforcement. Applicants for reimbursement grants may
receive up to 50 percent of the cost of compensating and training pathway to
policing participants. Reimbursement
grants shall be proportionally allocated based on the number of grant
applications approved by the commissioner.
This is a onetime appropriation.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 11. TRANSFER.
$453,000 in fiscal year 2020 and
$474,000 in fiscal year 2021 and annually thereafter are appropriated to the commissioner
of management and budget for transfer to the driver services account in the
special revenue fund.
Sec. 12. INTERPRETATION.
If an appropriation in this act is
enacted more than once in the 2019 regular legislative session, the
appropriation must be given effect only once.
ARTICLE 2
PUBLIC SAFETY
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 13.6905, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 36. Direct
wine shipments. Data obtained
and shared by the commissioner of public safety relating to direct shipments of
wine are governed by sections 340A.550 and 340A.555.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299A.55, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Railroad and pipeline safety account. (a) A railroad and pipeline safety account is created in the special revenue fund. The account consists of funds collected under subdivision 4 and funds donated, allotted, transferred, or otherwise provided to the account.
(b) $104,000 $250,000 is
annually appropriated from the railroad and pipeline safety account to the
commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency for environmental protection
activities related to railroad discharge preparedness under chapter 115E.
(c) $600,000 in fiscal year 2018 and
$600,000 in fiscal year 2019 are appropriated from the railroad and pipeline
safety account to the commissioner of transportation for improving safety at
railroad grade crossings.
(d) (c) Following the
appropriation in paragraphs paragraph (b) and (c), the
remaining money in the account is annually appropriated to the commissioner of
public safety for the purposes specified in subdivision 3.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299A.55, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Assessments. (a) The commissioner of public safety shall annually assess $2,500,000 to railroad and pipeline companies based on the formula specified in paragraph (b). The commissioner shall deposit funds collected under this subdivision in the railroad and pipeline safety account under subdivision 2.
(b) The assessment for each railroad is 50 percent of the total annual assessment amount, divided in equal proportion between applicable rail carriers based on route miles operated in Minnesota. The assessment for each pipeline company is 50 percent of the total annual assessment amount, divided in equal proportion between companies based on the yearly aggregate gallons of oil and hazardous substance transported by pipeline in Minnesota.
(c) The assessments under this
subdivision expire July 1, 2017.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299A.706, is amended to read:
299A.706
ALCOHOL ENFORCEMENT ACCOUNT; APPROPRIATION.
An alcohol enforcement account is created
in the special revenue fund, consisting of money credited to the account by law. Money in the account may be appropriated by
law for (1) costs of the Alcohol and Gambling Division related to
administration and enforcement of sections 340A.403, subdivision 4; 340A.414,
subdivision 1a; and 340A.504, subdivision 7; and 340A.550,
subdivisions 2, 4, 5, and 6; and (2) costs of the State Patrol.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299A.707, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 6. Annual
transfer. In fiscal year 2019
and each year thereafter, the commissioner of management and budget shall
transfer $461,000 from the general fund to the community justice reinvestment
account.
Sec. 6. [299A.783]
STATEWIDE SEX TRAFFICKING INVESTIGATION COORDINATOR.
Subdivision 1. Sex
trafficking investigation coordinator.
The commissioner of public safety must appoint a statewide sex
trafficking investigation coordinator who shall work in the Office of Justice
Programs. The coordinator must be a
current or former law enforcement officer or prosecutor with experience
investigating or prosecuting trafficking-related offenses. The coordinator must also have knowledge of
services available to victims of sex trafficking and Minnesota's child
protection system. The coordinator
serves at the pleasure of the commissioner in the unclassified service.
Subd. 2. Coordinator's
responsibilities. The
coordinator shall have the following duties:
(1) develop, coordinate, and facilitate
training for law enforcement officers, prosecutors, courts, child protection
workers, social service providers, medical providers, and other community
members;
(2) establish standards for approved
training and review compliance with those standards;
(3) coordinate and monitor
multijurisdictional sex trafficking task forces;
(4) review, develop, promote, and
monitor compliance with investigative protocols to assure that law enforcement
officers and prosecutors engage in best practices;
(5) provide technical assistance and
advice related to the investigation and prosecution of trafficking offenses and
the treatment of victims;
(6) promote the efficient use of
resources by addressing issues of deconfliction, providing advice regarding
questions of jurisdiction, and promoting the sharing of data between entities
investigating and prosecuting trafficking offenses;
(7) assist in the appropriate
distribution of grants; and
(8) perform other duties necessary to
ensure effective and efficient investigation and prosecution of trafficking‑related
offenses.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299C.46, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Authorized
use, fee. (a) The criminal justice
data communications network shall be used exclusively by:
(1) criminal justice agencies in connection with the performance of duties required by law;
(2) agencies investigating federal security clearances of individuals for assignment or retention in federal employment with duties related to national security, as required by United States Code, title 5, section 9101;
(3) other agencies to the extent necessary to provide for protection of the public or property in a declared emergency or disaster situation;
(4) noncriminal justice agencies statutorily mandated, by state or national law, to conduct checks into state databases prior to disbursing licenses or providing benefits;
(5) the public authority responsible for child support enforcement in connection with the performance of its duties;
(6) the public defender, as provided in section 611.272;
(7) a county attorney or the attorney general, as the county attorney's designee, for the purpose of determining whether a petition for the civil commitment of a proposed patient as a sexual psychopathic personality or as a sexually dangerous person should be filed, and during the pendency of the commitment proceedings;
(8) an agency of the state or a political subdivision whose access to systems or services provided from or through the bureau is specifically authorized by federal law or regulation or state statute; and
(9) a court for access to data as authorized by federal law or regulation or state statute and related to the disposition of a pending case.
(b) The commissioner of public safety shall establish a monthly network access charge to be paid by each participating criminal justice agency. The network access charge shall be a standard fee established for each terminal, computer, or other equipment directly addressable by the data communications network, as follows: January 1, 1984 to December 31, 1984, $40 connect fee per month; January 1, 1985 and thereafter, $50 connect fee per month.
(c) The commissioner of public safety is authorized to arrange for the connection of the data communications network with the criminal justice information system of the federal government, any state, or country for the secure exchange of information for any of the purposes authorized in paragraph (a), clauses (1), (2), (3), (8) and (9).
(d) Prior to establishing a secure connection, a criminal justice agency that is not part of the Minnesota judicial branch must:
(1) agree to comply with all applicable policies governing access to, submission of or use of the data and Minnesota law governing the classification of the data;
(2) meet the bureau's security requirements;
(3) agree to pay any required fees; and
(4) conduct fingerprint-based state and national background checks on its employees and contractors as required by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
(e) Prior to establishing a secure connection, a criminal justice agency that is part of the Minnesota judicial branch must:
(1) agree to comply with all applicable policies governing access to, submission of or use of the data and Minnesota law governing the classification of the data to the extent applicable and with the Rules of Public Access to Records of the Judicial Branch promulgated by the Minnesota Supreme Court;
(2) meet the bureau's security requirements;
(3) agree to pay any required fees; and
(4) conduct fingerprint-based state and national background checks on its employees and contractors as required by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
(f) Prior to establishing a secure connection, a noncriminal justice agency must:
(1) agree to comply with all applicable policies governing access to, submission of or use of the data and Minnesota law governing the classification of the data;
(2) meet the bureau's security requirements;
(3) agree to pay any required fees; and
(4) conduct fingerprint-based state and national background checks on its employees and contractors.
(g) Those noncriminal justice agencies that do not have a secure network connection yet receive data either retrieved over the secure network by an authorized criminal justice agency or as a result of a state or federal criminal history records check shall conduct a background check as provided in paragraph (h) of those individuals who receive and review the data to determine another individual's eligibility for employment, housing, a license, or another legal right dependent on a statutorily mandated background check and on any contractor with access to the results of a federal criminal history records check.
(h) The background check required by paragraph (f) or (g) is accomplished by submitting a request to the superintendent of the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension that includes a signed, written consent for the Minnesota and national criminal history records check, fingerprints, and the required fee. The superintendent may exchange the fingerprints with the Federal Bureau of Investigation for purposes of obtaining the individual's national criminal history record information.
The superintendent shall return the results of the national criminal history records check to the noncriminal justice agency to determine if the individual is qualified to have access to state and federal criminal history record information or the secure network. An individual is disqualified when the state and federal criminal history record information show any of the disqualifiers that the individual will apply to the records of others.
When the individual is to have access to the secure network, the noncriminal justice agency shall review the criminal history of each employee or contractor with the Criminal Justice Information Services systems officer at the bureau, or the officer's designee, to determine if the employee or contractor qualifies for access to the secure network. The Criminal Justice Information Services systems officer or the designee shall make the access determination based on Federal Bureau of Investigation policy and Bureau of Criminal Apprehension policy.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299F.857, is amended to read:
299F.857
REDUCED CIGARETTE IGNITION PROPENSITY ACCOUNT.
The reduced cigarette ignition propensity account is established in the state treasury. The account consists of all money recovered as penalties under section 299F.854 and fees collected under section 299F.852, subdivision 5. The money must be deposited to the credit of the account and, in addition to any other money made available for such purpose, is appropriated to the state fire marshal for costs associated with the development and presentation of fire and life safety education programs throughout Minnesota, and all costs associated with sections 299F.850 to 299F.859.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 340A.22, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Off-sale license. A microdistillery may be issued a license by the local licensing authority for off-sale of distilled spirits, with the approval of the commissioner. The license may allow the sale of one 375 milliliter bottle per customer per day of product manufactured on site, subject to the following requirements:
(1)
off-sale hours of sale must conform to hours of sale for retail off-sale
licensees in the licensing municipality; and
(2) no brand may be sold at the microdistillery unless it is also available for distribution by wholesalers.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 340A.304, is amended to read:
340A.304
LICENSE SUSPENSION AND REVOCATION.
The commissioner shall revoke, or suspend
for up to 60 days, a license issued under section 340A.301 or,
340A.302, or 340A.550, or impose a fine of up to $2,000 for each
violation, on a finding that the licensee has violated a state law or rule of
the commissioner relating to the possession, sale, transportation, or
importation of alcoholic beverages. A
license revocation or suspension under this section is a contested case under
sections 14.57 to 14.69 of the Administrative Procedure Act.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 340A.417, is amended to read:
340A.417
SHIPMENTS INTO MINNESOTA.
(a) Notwithstanding section 297G.07,
subdivision 2, or any provision of this chapter except for section 340A.550,
a winery licensed in a state other than Minnesota, or a winery located in
Minnesota, may ship, for personal use and not for resale, not more than two
cases 12 cases of wine, containing a maximum of nine liters per
case, in any calendar year to any resident of Minnesota age 21 or over. Delivery of a shipment under this section
may not be deemed a sale in this state.
(b) The shipping container of any wine sent under this section must be clearly marked "Alcoholic Beverages: adult signature (over 21 years of age) required."
(c) It is not the intent of this section to impair the distribution of wine through distributors or importing distributors, but only to permit shipments of wine for personal use.
(d) Except for a violation of section
295.75 or chapters 297A and 297G, no criminal penalty may be imposed on a
person for a violation of this section or section 340A.550 other than a
violation described in paragraph (e) or (f).
Whenever it appears to the commissioner that any person has engaged in
any act or practice constituting a violation of this section, or
section 340A.550 and the violation is not within two years of any previous
violation of this section, the commissioner shall issue and cause to be served
upon the person an order requiring the person to cease
and
desist from violating this section. The
order must give reasonable notice of the rights of the person to request a
hearing and must state the reason for the entry of the order. Unless otherwise agreed between the parties,
a hearing shall be held not later than seven 20 days after the
request for the hearing is received by the commissioner after which and within
20 days after the receipt of the administrative law judge's report and
subsequent exceptions and argument, the commissioner shall issue an order
vacating the cease and desist order, modifying it, or making it permanent as
the facts require. If no hearing is
requested within 30 days of the service of the order, the order becomes final
and remains in effect until modified or vacated by the commissioner. All hearings shall be conducted in accordance
with the provisions of chapter 14. If
the person to whom a cease and desist order is issued fails to appear at the
hearing after being duly notified, the person shall be deemed in default, and
the proceeding may be determined against the person upon consideration of the
cease and desist order, the allegations of which may be deemed to be true.
(e) Any person who violates this section or section 340A.550 within two years of a violation for which a cease and desist order was issued under paragraph (d), is guilty of a misdemeanor.
(f) Any person who commits a third or subsequent violation of this section or section 340A.550 within any subsequent two-year period is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 12. [340A.550]
DIRECT SHIPMENTS OF WINE; LICENSING, TAXATION, AND RESTRICTIONS.
Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) "Direct ship purchaser"
means a person who purchases wine for personal use and not for resale from a
winery located in a state other than Minnesota for delivery to a Minnesota
address.
(b) "Direct ship winery"
means a winery licensed in a state other than Minnesota that manufactures and
makes a retail sale of wine and ships the wine to a direct ship purchaser as
authorized under section 340A.417.
Subd. 2. License
requirements. (a) A direct
ship winery must apply to the commissioner for a direct ship license. The commissioner must not issue a license
under this section unless the applicant:
(1) is a licensed winery in a state
other than Minnesota and provides a copy of its current license in any state in
which it is licensed to manufacture wine;
(2) provides a shipping address list,
including all addresses from which it intends to ship wine;
(3) agrees to comply with the
requirements of subdivision 4; and
(4) consents to the jurisdiction of the
Departments of Public Safety and Revenue, the courts of this state, and any
statute, law, or rule in this state related to the administration or
enforcement of this section, including any provision authorizing the
commissioners of public safety and revenue to audit a direct ship winery for
compliance with this and any related section.
(b) A direct ship winery obtaining a
license under this section must annually renew its license by January 1 of each
year and must inform the commissioner at the time of renewal of any changes to
the information previously provided in paragraph (a).
(c) The application fee for a license
is $170. The fee for a license renewal
is $170. The commissioner must deposit
all fees received under this subdivision in the alcohol enforcement account in
the special revenue fund established under section 299A.706.
Subd. 3. Direct
ship wineries; restrictions. (a)
A direct ship winery may only ship wine from an address provided to the
commissioner as required in subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clause (2), or
through a third-party provider whose name and address the licensee provided to
the commissioner in its application for a license.
(b) A direct ship winery or its
third-party provider may only ship wine from the direct ship winery's own
production.
Subd. 4. Taxation. A direct ship winery must:
(1) collect and remit the liquor gross
receipts tax as required in section 295.75;
(2) apply for a permit as required in
section 297A.83 and collect and remit the sales and use tax imposed as required
in chapter 297A;
(3) remit the tax as required in
chapter 297G; and
(4) provide a statement to the
commissioner, on a form prescribed by the commissioner, detailing each shipment
of wine made to a resident of this state and any other information required by
the commissioner.
Subd. 5. Private
or nonpublic data; classification and sharing. (a) Data collected, created, or
maintained by the commissioner as required under this section are classified as
private data on individuals or nonpublic data, as defined in section 13.02,
subdivisions 9 and 12.
(b) The commissioner must share data
classified as private or nonpublic under this section with the commissioner of
revenue for purposes of administering section 295.75 and chapters 289A, 297A,
and 297G.
Subd. 6. Enforcement;
penalties. Section 340A.417,
paragraphs (d) to (f), apply to this section.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 13. [340A.555]
COMMON CARRIER REGULATIONS FOR DIRECT SHIPMENTS OF WINE.
Subdivision 1. Monthly
report required. Each common
carrier that contracts with a winery under section 340A.417 for delivery of
wine into this state must file with the commissioner a monthly report of known
wine shipments made by the carrier. The
report must be made in a form and manner as prescribed by the commissioner and
must contain:
(1) the name of the common carrier
making the report;
(2) the period of time covered by the
report;
(3) the name and business address of
the consignor;
(4) the name and address of the
consignee;
(5) the weight of the package delivered
to the consignee;
(6) a unique tracking number; and
(7) the date of delivery.
Subd. 2. Record
availability and retention. Upon
written request by the commissioner, any records supporting the report in
subdivision 1 must be made available to the commissioner within 30 days of the
request. Any records containing
information relating to a required report must be retained and preserved for a
period of two years, unless destruction of the records prior to the end of
the two-year period is authorized in writing by the commissioner. All retained records must be open and
available for inspection by the commissioner upon written request. The commissioner must make the required
reports available to any law enforcement agency or regulatory body of any local
government in this state in which the common carrier making the report resides
or does business.
Subd. 3. Penalty. If a common carrier willfully violates
the requirement to report a delivery as required under this section or violates
any rule related to the administration and enforcement of this section, the
commissioner must notify the common carrier in writing of the violation. The commissioner may impose a fine in an
amount not to exceed $500 for each subsequent violation.
Subd. 4. Exemptions. This section does not apply to common
carriers regulated as provided by United States Code, title 49, section 10101,
et. seq., or to rail trailer-on-flatcar/container-on-flatcar (TOFC/COFC)
service, as provided by Code of Federal Regulations, title 49, section 1090.1,
or highway TOFC/COFC service provided by a rail carrier, either itself or
jointly with a motor carrier, as part of continuous intermodal freight
transportation, including, without limitation, any other TOFC/COFC
transportation as defined under federal law.
Subd. 5. Private
or nonpublic data; classification and sharing. (a) Data collected, created, or
maintained by the commissioner as required under subdivision 1, clauses (4) to
(6), are classified as private data on individuals or nonpublic data, as
defined in section 13.02, subdivisions 9 and 12.
(b) The commissioner must share data
classified as private or nonpublic under this section with the commissioner of
revenue for purposes of administering section 295.75 and chapters 289A, 297A,
and 297G.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 403.02, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 17c. 911
telecommunicator. "911
telecommunicator" means a person employed by a public safety answering
point, an emergency medical dispatch service provider, or both, who is
qualified to answer incoming emergency telephone calls or provide for the
appropriate emergency response either directly or through communication with
the appropriate public safety answering point.
Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 403.03, is amended to read:
403.03
911 SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED.
Subdivision 1. Emergency response services. Services available through a 911 system must include police, firefighting, and emergency medical and ambulance services. Other emergency and civil defense services may be incorporated into the 911 system at the discretion of the public agency operating the public safety answering point. The 911 system may include a referral to mental health crisis teams, where available.
Subd. 2. Telephone
cardiopulmonary resuscitation program.
(a) On or before July 1, 2021, every public safety answering
point must maintain a telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation program by
either:
(1) providing each 911 telecommunicator
with training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation; or
(2) transferring callers to another
public safety answering point with 911 telecommunicators that have received
training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
(b)
Training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation must, at a minimum, include:
(1) use of an evidence-based protocol
or script for providing cardiopulmonary resuscitation instruction that has been
recommended by an academic institution or a nationally recognized organization
specializing in medical dispatch and, if the public safety answering point has
a medical director, approved by that medical director; and
(2) appropriate continuing education,
as determined by the evidence-based protocol for providing cardiopulmonary
resuscitation instruction and, if the public safety answering point has a
medical director, approved by that medical director.
(c) A public safety answering point
that transfers callers to another public safety answering point must, at a
minimum:
(1) use an evidence-based protocol for
the identification of a person in need of cardiopulmonary resuscitation;
(2) provide each 911 telecommunicator
with appropriate training and continuing education to identify a person in need
of cardiopulmonary resuscitation through the use of an evidence-based protocol;
and
(3) ensure that any public safety
answering point to which calls are transferred uses 911 telecommunicators who
meet the training requirements under paragraph (b).
(d) Each public safety answering point
shall conduct ongoing quality assurance of its telephone cardiopulmonary
resuscitation program.
Subd. 3. Monitoring
and enforcing training requirements.
The Statewide Emergency Communications Board shall adopt protocols to ensure that operators of every public
safety answering point comply with subdivision 2.
Subd. 4. Liability
exemption. (a) If a caller
refuses or is otherwise unwilling or unable to provide cardiopulmonary
resuscitation or receive telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation instruction,
the 911 telecommunicator is not required to provide cardiopulmonary
resuscitation instruction and is immune from civil liability for any damages
resulting from the fact that such instruction was not provided.
(b) Telephone cardiopulmonary
resuscitation instruction is a general duty to the public rather than a special
duty owed to individuals, and a 911 telecommunicator must exercise judgment and
discretion in performing actions including but not limited to:
(1) determining whether a particular
situation requires instituting the cardiopulmonary resuscitation program;
(2) determining whether a caller
refuses or is otherwise unable or unwilling to provide cardiopulmonary
resuscitation or receive telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation instruction;
(3) using and appropriately adapting an
evidence-based protocol or script for providing cardiopulmonary resuscitation
instruction based on individual callers and emergency situations presented by
callers; and
(4) determining when to transfer a
caller to another public safety answering point with 911 telecommunicators that
have received training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.582, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Burglary in the third degree. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever enters a building without consent and with intent to steal or commit any felony or gross misdemeanor while in the building, or enters a building without consent and steals or commits a felony or gross misdemeanor while in the building, either directly or as an accomplice, commits burglary in the third degree and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both.
(b) Whoever enters a building while it
is open to the public, other than a building identified in subdivision 2,
paragraph (b), with intent to steal while in the building, or enters a building
while it is open to the public, other than a building identified in subdivision
2, paragraph (b), and steals while in the building, either directly or as an accomplice,
commits burglary in the third degree and may be sentenced to imprisonment for
not more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000,
or both, if:
(1) the person enters the building
within one year after being served with a valid civil trespass notice
instructing the person to leave the building and not return; and
(2) the person has been convicted
within the preceding five years for an offense under this section, section
256.98, 268.182, 609.24, 609.245, 609.52, 609.53, 609.625, 609.63, 609.631, or
609.821, or a statute from another state, the United States, or a foreign
jurisdiction, in conformity with any of those sections, and the person received
a felony sentence for the offense, or a sentence that was stayed under section
609.135 if the offense to which a plea was entered would allow imposition of a
felony sentence.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.582, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Burglary in the fourth degree. (a) Whoever enters a building without consent and with intent to commit a misdemeanor other than to steal, or enters a building without consent and commits a misdemeanor other than to steal while in the building, either directly or as an accomplice, commits burglary in the fourth degree and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both.
(b) Whoever enters a building while it
is open to the public, other than a building identified in subdivision 2,
paragraph (b), with intent to steal while in the building, or enters a building
while it is open to the public, other than a building identified in subdivision
2, paragraph (b), and steals while in the building, either directly or as an
accomplice, commits burglary in the fourth degree and may be sentenced to
imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more
than $3,000, or both if the person enters the building within one year after
being served with a valid civil trespass notice instructing the person to leave
the building and not return.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 18. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.749, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Definition. As used in this section, "stalking"
"harass" means to engage in conduct which the actor knows or
has reason to know would cause the victim under the circumstances to feel
frightened, threatened, oppressed, persecuted, or intimidated, and causes this
reaction on the part of the victim regardless of the relationship between the
actor and victim.
Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.749, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Stalking
Harassment crimes. A person
who stalks harasses another by committing any of the following
acts is guilty of a gross misdemeanor:
(1) directly or indirectly, or through third parties, manifests a purpose or intent to injure the person, property, or rights of another by the commission of an unlawful act;
(2) follows, monitors, or pursues another, whether in person or through any available technological or other means;
(3) returns to the property of another if the actor is without claim of right to the property or consent of one with authority to consent;
(4) repeatedly makes telephone calls, sends text messages, or induces a victim to make telephone calls to the actor, whether or not conversation ensues;
(5) makes or causes the telephone of another repeatedly or continuously to ring;
(6) repeatedly mails or delivers or causes the delivery by any means, including electronically, of letters, telegrams, messages, packages, through assistive devices for people with vision impairments or hearing loss, or any communication made through any available technologies or other objects;
(7) knowingly makes false allegations against a peace officer concerning the officer's performance of official duties with intent to influence or tamper with the officer's performance of official duties; or
(8) uses another's personal information, without consent, to invite, encourage, or solicit a third party to engage in a sexual act with the person.
For purposes of this clause, "personal information" and "sexual act" have the meanings given in section 617.261, subdivision 7.
Sec. 20. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.749, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Aggravated violations. (a) A person who commits any of the following acts is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both:
(1) commits any offense described in subdivision 2 because of the victim's or another's actual or perceived race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, disability as defined in section 363A.03, age, or national origin;
(2) commits any offense described in subdivision 2 by falsely impersonating another;
(3) commits any offense described in subdivision 2 and possesses a dangerous weapon at the time of the offense;
(4) stalks harasses another,
as defined in subdivision 1, with intent to influence or otherwise tamper with
a juror or a judicial proceeding or with intent to retaliate against a judicial
officer, as defined in section 609.415, or a prosecutor, defense attorney, or
officer of the court, because of that person's performance of official duties
in connection with a judicial proceeding; or
(5) commits any offense described in subdivision 2 against a victim under the age of 18, if the actor is more than 36 months older than the victim.
(b) A person who commits any offense described in subdivision 2 against a victim under the age of 18, if the actor is more than 36 months older than the victim, and the act is committed with sexual or aggressive intent, is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than ten years or to payment of a fine of not more than $20,000, or both.
Sec. 21. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.749, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Pattern
of Stalking conduct. (a)
A person who engages in a pattern of stalking conduct with
respect to a single victim or one or more members of a single household which
the actor knows or has reason to know would cause the victim under the
circumstances to feel terrorized or to fear bodily harm and which does cause
this reaction on the part of the victim, is guilty of a felony and may be
sentenced to imprisonment for not more than ten years or to payment of a fine
of not more than $20,000, or both.
(b) For purposes of this subdivision, a
"pattern of stalking conduct" "stalking" means
two or more acts within a five-year period that violate or attempt to violate
the provisions of any of the following or a similar law of another state, the
United States, the District of Columbia, tribe, or United States territories:
(1) this section;
(2) sections 609.185 to 609.205 (first- to third-degree murder and first- and second-degree manslaughter);
(3) section 609.713 (terroristic threats);
(4) section 609.224 (fifth-degree assault);
(5) section 609.2242 (domestic assault);
(6) section 518B.01, subdivision 14 (violations of domestic abuse orders for protection);
(7) section 609.748, subdivision 6 (violations of harassment restraining orders);
(8) section 609.605, subdivision 1, paragraph (b), clauses (3), (4), and (7) (certain trespass offenses);
(9) section 609.78, subdivision 2 (interference with an emergency call);
(10) section 609.79 (obscene or harassing telephone calls);
(11) section 609.795 (letter, telegram, or package; opening; harassment);
(12) section 609.582 (burglary);
(13) section 609.595 (damage to property);
(14) section 609.765 (criminal defamation);
(15) sections 609.342 to 609.3451 (first- to fifth-degree criminal sexual conduct); or
(16) section 629.75, subdivision 2 (violations of domestic abuse no contact orders).
(c) Words set forth in parentheses after references to statutory sections in paragraph (b) are mere catchwords included solely for convenience in reference. They are not substantive and may not be used to construe or limit the meaning of the cited statutory provision.
Sec. 22. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.749, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Harassment;
stalking; firearms. (a) When a
person is convicted of a harassment or stalking crime
under this section and the court determines that the person used a firearm in
any way during commission of the crime, the court may order that the person is
prohibited from possessing any type of firearm for any period longer than three
years or for the remainder of the person's life. A person who violates this paragraph is
guilty of a gross misdemeanor. At the
time of the conviction, the court shall inform the defendant for how long the
defendant is prohibited from possessing a firearm and that it is a gross
misdemeanor to violate this paragraph. The
failure of the court to provide this information to a defendant does not affect
the applicability of the firearm possession prohibition or the gross
misdemeanor penalty to that defendant.
(b) Except as otherwise provided in
paragraph (a), when a person is convicted of a harassment or
stalking crime under this section, the court shall inform the defendant
that the defendant is prohibited from possessing a firearm for three years from
the date of conviction and that it is a gross misdemeanor offense to violate
this prohibition. The failure of the court
to provide this information to a defendant does not affect the applicability of
the firearm possession prohibition or the gross misdemeanor penalty to that
defendant.
(c) Except as otherwise provided in
paragraph (a), a person is not entitled to possess a pistol if the person has
been convicted after August 1, 1996, of a harassment or stalking crime
under this section, or to possess a firearm if the person has been convicted on
or after August 1, 2014, of a harassment or stalking crime
under this section, unless three years have elapsed from the date of conviction
and, during that time, the person has not been convicted of any other violation
of this section. Property rights may not
be abated but access may be restricted by the courts. A person who possesses a firearm in violation
of this paragraph is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
(d) If the court determines that a person
convicted of a harassment or stalking crime under this
section owns or possesses a firearm and used it in any way during the commission
of the crime, it shall order that the firearm be summarily forfeited under
section 609.5316, subdivision 3.
(e) Except as otherwise provided in
paragraphs (d) and (g), when a person is convicted of a harassment or
stalking crime under this section, the court shall order the defendant
to transfer any firearms that the person possesses, within three business days,
to a federally licensed firearms dealer, a law enforcement agency, or a third
party who may lawfully receive them. The
transfer may be permanent or temporary. A
temporary firearm transfer only entitles the receiving party to possess the
firearm. A temporary transfer does not
transfer ownership or title. A defendant
may not transfer firearms to a third party who resides with the defendant. If a defendant makes a temporary transfer, a
federally licensed firearms dealer or law enforcement agency may charge the
defendant a reasonable fee to store the person's firearms and may establish
policies for disposal of abandoned firearms, provided such policies require
that the person be notified via certified mail prior to disposal of abandoned
firearms. For temporary firearms
transfers under this paragraph, a law enforcement agency, federally licensed
firearms dealer, or third party shall exercise due care to preserve the quality
and function of the transferred firearms and shall return the transferred
firearms to the person upon request after the expiration of the prohibiting
time period imposed under this subdivision, provided the person is not otherwise
prohibited from possessing firearms under state or federal law. The return of temporarily transferred
firearms to a defendant shall comply with state and federal law. If a defendant permanently transfers the
defendant's firearms to a law enforcement agency, the agency is not required to
compensate the defendant and may charge the defendant a reasonable processing
fee. A law enforcement agency is not
required to accept a person's firearm under this paragraph. The court shall order that the person surrender
all permits to carry and purchase firearms to the sheriff.
(f) A defendant who is ordered to transfer firearms under paragraph (e) must file proof of transfer as provided for in this paragraph. If the transfer is made to a third party, the third party must sign an affidavit under oath before a notary public either acknowledging that the defendant permanently transferred the defendant's firearms to the third party or agreeing to temporarily store the defendant's firearms until such time as the defendant is legally permitted to possess firearms. The affidavit shall indicate the serial number, make, and model of all firearms transferred by the defendant to the third party. The third party shall acknowledge in the affidavit that the third party may be held criminally and civilly responsible under section 624.7144 if the defendant gains access to a transferred firearm while the firearm is in the custody of the third party. If the transfer is to a law enforcement agency or federally licensed firearms dealer, the law enforcement agency or federally licensed firearms dealer shall provide proof of transfer to the defendant. The proof of transfer must specify whether the firearms were permanently or temporarily transferred and include the name of the defendant, date of transfer, and the serial number, make, and model of all transferred firearms. The defendant shall provide the court with a signed and notarized affidavit or proof of transfer as described in this section within two business days of the firearms transfer. The court shall seal affidavits and proofs of transfer filed pursuant to this paragraph.
(g) When a person is convicted of a harassment or
stalking crime under this section, the court shall determine by a
preponderance of the evidence if the person poses an imminent risk of causing
another person substantial bodily harm. Upon
a finding of imminent risk, the court shall order that the local law
enforcement agency take immediate possession of all firearms in the person's
possession. The local law enforcement
agency shall exercise due care to preserve the quality and function of the
defendant's firearms and shall return the firearms to the person upon request
after the expiration of the prohibiting time period, provided the person is not
otherwise prohibited from possessing firearms under state or federal law. The local law enforcement agency shall, upon
written notice from the person, transfer the firearms to a federally licensed
firearms dealer or a third party who may lawfully receive them. Before a local law enforcement agency
transfers a firearm under this paragraph, the agency shall require the third
party or federally licensed firearms dealer receiving the firearm to submit an
affidavit or proof of transfer that complies with the requirements for
affidavits or proofs of transfer established in paragraph (f). The agency shall file all affidavits or
proofs of transfer received with the court within two business days of the
transfer. The court shall seal all
affidavits or proofs of transfer filed pursuant to this paragraph. A federally licensed firearms dealer or third
party who accepts a firearm transfer pursuant to this paragraph shall comply
with paragraphs (e) and (f) as if accepting transfer from the defendant. If the law enforcement agency does not
receive written notice from the defendant within three business days, the
agency may charge a reasonable fee to store the defendant's firearms. A law enforcement agency may establish
policies for disposal of abandoned firearms, provided such policies require
that the person be notified via certified mail prior to disposal of abandoned
firearms.
Sec. 23. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 624.712, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Crime of violence. "Crime of violence" means: felony convictions of the following offenses: sections 609.185 (murder in the first degree); 609.19 (murder in the second degree); 609.195 (murder in the third degree); 609.20 (manslaughter in the first degree); 609.205 (manslaughter in the second degree); 609.215 (aiding suicide and aiding attempted suicide); 609.221 (assault in the first degree); 609.222 (assault in the second degree); 609.223 (assault in the third degree); 609.2231 (assault in the fourth degree); 609.224 (assault in the fifth degree); 609.2242 (domestic assault); 609.2247 (domestic assault by strangulation); 609.229 (crimes committed for the benefit of a gang); 609.235 (use of drugs to injure or facilitate crime); 609.24 (simple robbery); 609.245 (aggravated robbery); 609.25 (kidnapping); 609.255 (false imprisonment); 609.322 (solicitation, inducement, and promotion of prostitution; sex trafficking); 609.342 (criminal sexual conduct in the first degree); 609.343 (criminal sexual conduct in the second degree); 609.344 (criminal sexual conduct in the third degree); 609.345 (criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree); 609.377 (malicious punishment of a child); 609.378 (neglect or endangerment of a child); 609.486 (commission of crime while wearing or possessing a bullet-resistant vest); 609.52 (involving theft of a firearm and theft involving the theft of a controlled substance, an explosive, or an incendiary device); 609.561 (arson in the first degree); 609.562 (arson in the second degree); 609.582, subdivision 1 or 2 (burglary in the first and second degrees); 609.66, subdivision 1e (drive-by shooting); 609.67 (unlawfully owning, possessing, operating a machine gun or
short-barreled
shotgun); 609.71 (riot); 609.713 (terroristic threats); 609.749 (stalking)
(harassment); 609.855, subdivision 5 (shooting at a public transit
vehicle or facility); and chapter 152 (drugs, controlled substances); and an
attempt to commit any of these offenses.
Sec. 24. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 634.20, is amended to read:
634.20
EVIDENCE OF CONDUCT.
Evidence of domestic conduct by the accused against the victim of domestic conduct, or against other family or household members, is admissible unless the probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issue, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. "Domestic conduct" includes, but is not limited to, evidence of domestic abuse, violation of an order for protection under section 518B.01; violation of a harassment restraining order under section 609.748; violation of a domestic abuse no contact order under section 629.75; or violation of section 609.749 or 609.79, subdivision 1. "Domestic abuse" and "family or household members" have the meanings given under section 518B.01, subdivision 2.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 25. TASK
FORCE ON MISSING AND MURDERED INDIGENOUS WOMEN.
Subdivision 1. Creation
and duties. (a) By September
1, 2019, the commissioner, in consultation with the Minnesota Indian Affairs
Council, shall appoint members to the Task Force on Missing and Murdered
Indigenous Women to advise the commissioner and report to the legislature on
recommendations to reduce and end violence against indigenous women and girls
in Minnesota, including members of the two spirit community. The task force may also serve as a liaison
between the commissioner and agencies and nongovernmental organizations that
provide services to victims, victims' families, and victims' communities. Task force members may receive expense
reimbursement as specified in Minnesota Statutes, section 15.059, subdivision
6.
(b) The Task Force on Missing and
Murdered Indigenous Women must examine and report on the following:
(1) the systemic causes behind violence
that indigenous women and girls experience, including patterns and underlying
factors that explain why disproportionately high levels of violence occur
against indigenous women and girls, including underlying historical, social,
economic, institutional, and cultural factors which may contribute to the
violence;
(2) appropriate methods for tracking
and collecting data on violence against indigenous women and girls, including
data on missing and murdered indigenous women and girls;
(3) policies and institutions such as
policing, child welfare, coroner practices, and other governmental practices
that impact violence against indigenous women and girls and the investigation
and prosecution of crimes of gender violence against indigenous people;
(4) measures necessary to address and
reduce violence against indigenous women and girls; and
(5) measures to help victims, victims'
families, and victims' communities prevent and heal from violence that occurs
against indigenous women and girls.
(c) For the purposes of this section,
"commissioner" means the commissioner of public safety and
"nongovernmental organizations" means nonprofit, nongovernmental
organizations that provide legal, social, or other community services.
Subd. 2. Membership. (a) To the extent practicable, the
Task Force on Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women shall consist of the
following individuals, or their designees, who are knowledgeable in crime
victims' rights or violence protection and, unless otherwise specified, members
shall be appointed by the commissioner:
(1) two members of the senate, one
appointed by the majority leader and one appointed by the minority leader;
(2) two members of the house of
representatives, one appointed by the speaker of the house and one appointed by
the minority leader;
(3) two representatives from among the following:
(i) the Minnesota Chiefs of Police
Association;
(ii) the Minnesota Sheriffs'
Association;
(iii) the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension;
(iv) the Minnesota Police and Peace
Officers Association; or
(v) a peace officer who works for and
resides on a federally recognized American Indian reservation in Minnesota;
(4) one or more representatives from
among the following:
(i) the Minnesota County Attorneys
Association;
(ii) the United States Attorney's
Office; or
(iii) a judge or attorney working in
juvenile court;
(5) a county coroner or a representative
from a statewide coroner's association or a representative of the Department of
Health;
(6) one representative from each of the
11 federally recognized tribal governments, with a preference for individuals
who work with victims of violence or their families; and
(7) four or more representatives from
among the following:
(i) a tribal, statewide, or local
organization that provides legal services to indigenous women and girls;
(ii) a tribal, statewide, or local
organization that provides advocacy or counseling for indigenous women and
girls who have been victims of violence;
(iii) a tribal, statewide, or local
organization that provides services to indigenous women and girls;
(iv) the Minnesota Indian Women's Sexual
Assault Coalition;
(v) Mending the Sacred Hoop;
(vi) an Indian health organization or
agency; or
(vii) an indigenous woman who is a
survivor of gender violence.
(b)
Members of the task force serve at the pleasure of the appointing authority or
until the task force expires. Vacancies
in commissioner appointed positions shall be filled by the commissioner consistent
with the qualifications of the vacating member required by this subdivision.
Subd. 3. Officers;
meetings. (a) The task force
members shall annually elect a chair and vice-chair from among the task force's
members, and may elect other officers as necessary. The task force shall meet at least quarterly,
or upon the call of its chair, and may hold meetings throughout the state. The task force shall meet sufficiently enough
to accomplish the tasks identified in this section. Meetings of the task force are subject to
Minnesota Statutes, chapter 13D. The
task force shall seek out and enlist the cooperation and assistance of
nongovernmental organizations, community and advocacy organizations working
with the American Indian community, and academic researchers and experts,
specifically those specializing in violence against indigenous women and girls,
representing diverse communities disproportionately affected by violence
against women and girls, or focusing on issues related to gender violence and
violence against indigenous women and girls.
(b) The commissioner shall convene the
first meeting of the task force no later than October 1, 2019, and shall
provide meeting space and administrative assistance as necessary for the task
force to conduct its work.
Subd. 4. Report. The task force shall report to the
chairs and ranking minority members of the legislative committees with
jurisdiction over public safety, human services, and state government on the
work of the task force, including but not limited to the issues to be examined
in subdivision 1, and shall include in the report institutional policies and
practices or proposed institutional policies and practices that are effective
in reducing gender violence and increasing the safety of indigenous women and
girls. The report shall include
recommendations to reduce and end violence against indigenous women and girls
and help victims and communities heal from gender violence and violence against
indigenous women and girls. The report
shall be submitted to the legislative committees by December 15, 2020.
Subd. 5. Expiration. Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes,
section 15.059, the task force expires December 31, 2020.
Sec. 26. INTERAGENCY
OPIOID ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR.
The governor is encouraged to appoint
an interagency opioid enforcement coordinator to perform the following duties:
(1) coordinate the statewide response
to opioid abuse;
(2) develop, coordinate, and facilitate
training for law enforcement officers, prosecutors, courts, child protection
workers, social service providers, medical providers, and other community
members;
(3) promote the efficient use of
resources; and
(4) consult with local government
officials, representatives from other states, and federal officials to monitor local
and national trends relating to opioid abuse and responses to that abuse.
Sec. 27. REVISOR
INSTRUCTION.
The revisor of statutes shall make any
cross-reference changes, language changes, or both to Minnesota Statutes made
necessary by section 18.
ARTICLE 3
CORRECTIONS
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 13.851, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 12. Mental
health screening. The
treatment of data collected by a sheriff or local corrections agency related to
individuals who may have a mental illness is governed by section 641.15,
subdivision 3a.
Sec. 2. [13.856]
OMBUDSPERSON FOR CORRECTIONS; DATA.
Subdivision 1. Private
data. The following data
maintained by the ombudsperson for corrections are classified as private data,
pursuant to section 13.02, subdivision 12:
(1) all data on individuals pertaining to contacts made by clients seeking the assistance of the ombudsperson, except as specified in subdivisions 2 and 3;
(2) data recorded from personal and
phone conversations and in correspondence between the ombudsperson's staff and
persons interviewed during the course of an investigation;
(3) client index cards;
(4) case assignment data; and
(5) monthly closeout data.
Subd. 2. Confidential
data. The written summary of
the investigation maintained by the ombudsperson is, to the extent it
identifies individuals, classified as confidential data, pursuant to section
13.02, subdivision 3.
Subd. 3. Public
data. The following data
maintained by the ombudsperson are classified as public data pursuant to
section 13.02, subdivision 15:
(1) client name;
(2) client location; and
(3) the inmate identification number
assigned by the Department of Corrections.
Subd. 4. Access
to data. The ombudsperson for
corrections has access to corrections and detention data and medical data as
provided under section 241.94.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 15A.0815, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Group II salary limits. The salary for a position listed in this subdivision shall not exceed 120 percent of the salary of the governor. This limit must be adjusted annually on January 1. The new limit must equal the limit for the prior year increased by the percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers from October of the second prior year to October of the immediately prior year. The commissioner of management and budget must publish the limit on the department's website. This subdivision applies to the following positions:
Executive director of Gambling Control Board;
Commissioner of Iron Range resources and rehabilitation;
Commissioner, Bureau of Mediation Services;
Ombudsman for mental health and developmental disabilities;
Ombudsperson for corrections;
Chair, Metropolitan Council;
School trust lands director;
Executive director of pari-mutuel racing; and
Commissioner, Public Utilities Commission.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 144.121, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:
Subd. 1a. Fees for ionizing radiation-producing equipment. (a) A facility with ionizing radiation-producing equipment must pay an annual initial or annual renewal registration fee consisting of a base facility fee of $100 and an additional fee for each radiation source, as follows:
(1) |
medical or veterinary equipment |
|
$100 |
|
(2) |
dental x-ray equipment |
|
$40 |
|
(3) |
x-ray equipment not used on humans or animals |
|
$100 |
|
(4) |
devices with sources of ionizing radiation not used on humans or animals |
|
$100 |
|
(5)
|
security screening system |
|
$100
|
|
(b) A facility with radiation therapy and accelerator equipment must pay an annual registration fee of $500. A facility with an industrial accelerator must pay an annual registration fee of $150.
(c) Electron microscopy equipment is exempt from the registration fee requirements of this section.
(d) For purposes of this section, a
security screening system means radiation-producing equipment designed and used
for security screening of humans who are in the custody of a correctional or
detention facility, and used by the facility to image and identify contraband
items concealed within or on all sides of a human body. For purposes of this section, a correctional
or detention facility is a facility licensed under section 241.021 and operated
by a state agency or political subdivision charged with detection, enforcement,
or incarceration in respect to state criminal and traffic laws.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 144.121, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 9. Exemption
from examination requirements; operators of security screening systems. (a) An employee of a correctional or
detention facility who operates a security screening system and the facility in
which the system is being operated are exempt from the requirements of
subdivisions 5 and 6.
(b) An employee of a correctional or
detention facility who operates a security screening system and the facility in
which the system is being operated must meet the requirements of a variance to
Minnesota Rules, parts 4732.0305 and
4732.0565, issued under Minnesota Rules, parts 4717.7000 to 4717.7050. This paragraph expires on December 31
of the year that the permanent rules adopted by the commissioner governing
security screening systems are published in the State Register.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 151.37, subdivision 12, is amended to read:
Subd. 12. Administration of opiate antagonists for drug overdose. (a) A licensed physician, a licensed advanced practice registered nurse authorized to prescribe drugs pursuant to section 148.235, or a licensed physician assistant authorized to prescribe drugs pursuant to section 147A.18 may authorize the following individuals to administer opiate antagonists, as defined in section 604A.04, subdivision 1:
(1) an emergency medical responder registered pursuant to section 144E.27;
(2) a peace officer as defined in section
626.84, subdivision 1, paragraphs (c) and (d); and
(3) employees of a correctional
facility; and
(4) staff of community-based health disease prevention or social service programs.
(b) For
the purposes of this subdivision, opiate antagonists may be administered by one
of these individuals only if:
(1) the licensed physician, licensed physician assistant, or licensed advanced practice registered nurse has issued a standing order to, or entered into a protocol with, the individual; and
(2) the individual has training in the recognition of signs of opiate overdose and the use of opiate antagonists as part of the emergency response to opiate overdose.
(c) Nothing in this section prohibits the possession and administration of naloxone pursuant to section 604A.04.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 241.01, subdivision 3a, is amended to read:
Subd. 3a. Commissioner, powers and duties. The commissioner of corrections has the following powers and duties:
(a) To accept persons committed to the commissioner by the courts of this state for care, custody, and rehabilitation.
(b) To determine the place of confinement of committed persons in a correctional facility or other facility of the Department of Corrections and to prescribe reasonable conditions and rules for their employment, conduct, instruction, and discipline within or outside the facility. After July 1, 2019, the commissioner shall not allow inmates to be housed in facilities that are not owned and operated by the state, a local unit of government, or a group of local units of government. Inmates shall not exercise custodial functions or have authority over other inmates.
(c) To administer the money and property of the department.
(d) To administer, maintain, and inspect all state correctional facilities.
(e) To transfer authorized positions and personnel between state correctional facilities as necessary to properly staff facilities and programs.
(f) To utilize state correctional facilities in the manner deemed to be most efficient and beneficial to accomplish the purposes of this section, but not to close the Minnesota Correctional Facility-Stillwater or the Minnesota Correctional Facility-St. Cloud without legislative approval. The commissioner may place juveniles and adults at the same state minimum security correctional facilities, if there is total separation of and no regular contact between juveniles and adults, except contact incidental to admission, classification, and mental and physical health care.
(g) To organize the department and employ personnel the commissioner deems necessary to discharge the functions of the department, including a chief executive officer for each facility under the commissioner's control who shall serve in the unclassified civil service and may, under the provisions of section 43A.33, be removed only for cause.
(h) To define the duties of these employees and to delegate to them any of the commissioner's powers, duties and responsibilities, subject to the commissioner's control and the conditions the commissioner prescribes.
(i) To annually develop a comprehensive set of goals and objectives designed to clearly establish the priorities of the Department of Corrections. This report shall be submitted to the governor commencing January 1, 1976. The commissioner may establish ad hoc advisory committees.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 241.025, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Authorization. The commissioner of corrections may
appoint peace officers, as defined in section 626.84, subdivision 1, paragraph
(c), who shall serve in the classified service subject to the provisions of
section 43A.01, subdivision 2, and establish a law enforcement agency, as
defined in section 626.84, subdivision 1, paragraph (f), known as the
Department of Corrections Fugitive Apprehension Unit, to perform the duties
necessary to make statewide arrests under sections 629.30 and 629.34. The jurisdiction of the law enforcement
agency is limited to the activities related to the arrest of Department
of Corrections' discretionary and statutory released violators and Department
of Corrections' escapees. The
Department of Corrections Fugitive Apprehension Unit may exercise general law
enforcement duties upon request for assistance from a law enforcement agency
and subject to availability and resources of the Department of Corrections
Fugitive Apprehension Unit.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 241.025, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Limitations. The initial processing of a person
arrested by the fugitive apprehension unit for an offense within the
agency's jurisdiction is the responsibility of the fugitive apprehension
unit unless otherwise directed by the law enforcement agency with primary
jurisdiction. A subsequent investigation
is the responsibility of the law enforcement agency of the jurisdiction in
which a new crime is committed.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 241.75, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Health care decisions. The medical director of the Department of Corrections may make a health care decision for an inmate incarcerated in a state correctional facility or placed in an outside facility on conditional medical release if the inmate's attending physician determines that the inmate lacks decision-making capacity and:
(1) there is not a documented health care agent designated by the inmate or the health care agent is not reasonably available to make the health care decision;
(2) if there is a documented health care directive, the decision is consistent with that directive;
(3) the decision is consistent with reasonable medical practice and other applicable law; and
(4) the medical director has made a good faith attempt to consult with the inmate's next of kin or emergency contact person in making the decision, to the extent those persons are reasonably available.
Sec. 11. [241.90]
OFFICE OF OMBUDSPERSON; CREATION; QUALIFICATIONS; FUNCTION.
The Office of Ombudsperson for the
Department of Corrections is hereby created.
The ombudsperson shall serve at the pleasure of the governor in the
unclassified service, shall be selected without regard to political
affiliation, and shall be a person highly competent and qualified to analyze
questions of law, administration, and public policy. No person may serve as ombudsperson while
holding any other public office. The
ombudsperson for corrections shall be accountable to the governor and shall
have the authority to investigate decisions, acts, and other matters of the
Department of Corrections so as to promote the highest attainable standards of
competence, efficiency, and justice in the administration of corrections.
Sec. 12. [241.91]
DEFINITION.
For the purposes of sections 241.90 to
241.95, "administrative agency" or "agency" means any
division, official, or employee of the Department of Corrections, including the
commissioner of corrections, charged with the care and custody of inmates and
any regional or local correctional facility licensed or inspected by the
commissioner of corrections, whether public or private, established and
operated for the detention and confinement of adults or juveniles, including
but not limited to programs or facilities operating under chapter 401, secure
juvenile detention facilities, municipal holding facilities, juvenile temporary
holdover facilities, regional or local jails, lockups, work houses, work farms,
and detention facilities, but does not include:
(1) any court or judge;
(2) any member of the senate or house
of representatives;
(3) the governor or the governor's
personal staff;
(4) any instrumentality of the federal government;
(5) any interstate compact; or
(6) any person responsible for the
supervision of offenders placed on supervised release, parole, or probation.
Sec. 13. [241.92]
ORGANIZATION OF OFFICE OF OMBUDSPERSON.
Subdivision 1. Employee
selection. The ombudsperson
may select, appoint, and compensate out of available funds assistants and
employees as deemed necessary to discharge responsibilities. The ombudsperson and full-time staff shall be
members of the Minnesota State Retirement Association.
Subd. 2. Assistant
ombudsperson. The
ombudsperson may appoint an assistant ombudsperson in the unclassified service.
Subd. 3. Delegation
of duties. The ombudsperson
may delegate to staff members any of the ombudsperson's authority or duties
except the duty of formally making recommendations to an administrative agency
or reports to the Office of the Governor or to the legislature.
Sec. 14. [241.93]
POWERS OF OMBUDSPERSON; INVESTIGATIONS; ACTION ON COMPLAINTS; RECOMMENDATIONS.
Subdivision 1. Powers. The ombudsperson may:
(1)
prescribe the methods by which complaints are to be made, reviewed, and acted
upon; provided, however, that the ombudsperson may not levy a complaint fee;
(2) determine the scope and manner of
investigations to be made;
(3) except as otherwise provided, determine
the form, frequency, and distribution of conclusions, recommendations, and
proposals; provided, however, that the governor or a representative may, at any
time the governor deems necessary, request and receive information from the
ombudsperson. Neither the ombudsperson
nor any member of the ombudsperson's staff shall be compelled to testify or to
produce evidence in any judicial or administrative proceeding with respect to
any matter involving the exercise of the ombudsperson's official duties except
as may be necessary to enforce the provisions of sections 241.90 to 241.95;
(4) investigate, upon a complaint or
upon personal initiative, any action of an administrative agency;
(5) request and be given access to
information in the possession of an administrative agency deemed necessary for
the discharge of responsibilities;
(6) examine the records and documents
of an administrative agency;
(7) enter and inspect, at any time,
premises within the control of an administrative agency;
(8) subpoena any person to appear, give
testimony, or produce documentary or other evidence that the ombudsperson deems
relevant to a matter under inquiry, and may petition the appropriate state
court to seek enforcement with the subpoena; provided, however, that any witness
at a hearing or before an investigation shall possess the same privileges
reserved to a witness in the courts or under the laws of this state;
(9) bring an action in an appropriate
state court to provide the operation of the powers provided in this subdivision. The ombudsperson may use the services of
legal assistance to Minnesota prisoners for legal counsel. The provisions of sections 241.90 to 241.95
are in addition to other provisions of law under which any remedy or right of
appeal or objection is provided for any person, or any procedure provided for
inquiry or investigation concerning any matter.
Nothing in sections 241.90 to 241.95 shall be construed to limit or
affect any other remedy or right of appeal or objection nor shall it be deemed
part of an exclusionary process; and
(10) be present at commissioner of
corrections parole, supervised release, and parole revocation hearings and
deliberations.
Subd. 2. Actions
against ombudsperson. No
proceeding or civil action except removal from office or a proceeding brought
pursuant to chapter 13 shall be commenced against the ombudsperson for actions
taken under the provisions of sections 241.90 to 241.95, unless the act or
omission is actuated by malice or is grossly negligent.
Subd. 3. Matters
appropriate for investigation. (a)
In selecting matters for attention, the ombudsperson should particularly
address actions of an administrative agency that may be:
(1) contrary to law or rule;
(2) unreasonable, unfair, oppressive,
or inconsistent with any policy or judgment of an administrative agency;
(3) mistaken in law or arbitrary in the
ascertainment of facts;
(4) unclear or inadequately explained
when reasons should have been revealed; or
(5)
inefficiently performed.
(b) The ombudsperson may also be
concerned with strengthening procedures and practices that lessen the risk that
objectionable actions of the administrative agency will occur.
Subd. 4. Complaints. (a) The ombudsperson may receive a
complaint from any source concerning an action of an administrative agency. The ombudsperson may, on personal motion or
at the request of another, investigate any action of an administrative agency.
(b) The ombudsperson may exercise
powers without regard to the finality of any action of an administrative
agency; however, the ombudsperson may require a complainant to pursue other
remedies or channels of complaint open to the complainant before accepting or
investigating the complaint.
(c) After completing investigation of a
complaint, the ombudsperson shall inform the complainant, the administrative
agency, and the official or employee of the action taken.
(d) A letter to the ombudsperson from a
person in an institution under the control of an administrative agency shall be
forwarded immediately and unopened to the ombudsperson's office. A reply from the ombudsperson to the person
shall be promptly delivered unopened to the person after its receipt by the
institution.
(e) No complainant shall be punished
nor shall the general condition of the complainant's confinement or treatment
be unfavorably altered as a result of the complainant having made a complaint
to the ombudsperson.
Subd. 5. Investigation
of adult local jails and detention facilities. Either the ombudsperson or the jail
inspection unit of the Department of Corrections may investigate complaints
involving local adult jails and detention facilities. The ombudsperson and Department of
Corrections must enter into an arrangement with one another that ensures they
are not duplicating services.
Subd. 6. Recommendations. (a) If, after duly considering a
complaint and whatever material the ombudsperson deems pertinent, the
ombudsperson is of the opinion that the complaint is valid, the ombudsperson
may recommend that an administrative agency should:
(1) consider the matter further;
(2) modify or cancel its actions;
(3) alter a ruling;
(4) explain more fully the action in
question; or
(5) take any other step that the
ombudsperson recommends to the administrative agency involved.
If the ombudsperson so requests, the agency shall, within
the time the ombudsperson specifies, inform the ombudsperson about the action
taken on the ombudsperson's recommendations or the reasons for not complying
with it.
(b) If the ombudsperson has reason to
believe that any public official or employee has acted in a manner warranting
criminal or disciplinary proceedings, the ombudsperson may refer the matter to
the appropriate authorities.
(c)
If the ombudsperson believes that an action upon which a valid complaint is
founded has been dictated by a statute, and that the statute produces results
or effects that are unfair or otherwise objectionable, the ombudsperson shall
bring to the attention of the governor and the legislature the ombudsperson's
view concerning desirable statutory change.
Subd. 7. Grants. The ombudsperson may apply for and
receive grants from public and private entities for purposes of carrying out
the ombudsperson's powers and duties under sections 241.90 to 241.95.
Sec. 15. [241.94]
ACCESS BY OMBUDSPERSON TO DATA.
Notwithstanding section 13.384 or
13.85, the ombudsperson has access to corrections and detention data and
medical data maintained by an agency and classified as private data on
individuals or confidential data on individuals when access to the data is
necessary for the ombudsperson to perform the powers under section 241.93.
Sec. 16. [241.95]
PUBLICATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS; REPORTS.
Subdivision 1. Publication. The ombudsperson may publish
conclusions and suggestions by transmitting them to the Office of the Governor. Before announcing a conclusion or
recommendation that expressly or impliedly criticizes an administrative agency
or any person, the ombudsperson shall consult with that agency or person. When publishing an opinion adverse to an
administrative agency or any person, the ombudsperson shall include in the
publication any statement of reasonable length made to the ombudsperson by that
agency or person in defense or mitigation of the action.
Subd. 2. Annual
report. In addition to
whatever reports the ombudsperson may make on an ad hoc basis, the ombudsperson
shall report to the governor and the senate and house committee chairs and
ranking minority members for the committees and divisions with fiscal and policy
jurisdiction over public safety and corrections at the end of each year on the
ombudsperson's functions during the preceding year.
Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 242.192, is amended to read:
242.192
CHARGES TO COUNTIES.
The commissioner shall charge counties or
other appropriate jurisdictions 65 percent of the per diem cost of confinement,
excluding educational costs and nonbillable service, of juveniles at the
Minnesota Correctional Facility-Red Wing and of juvenile females committed to the
commissioner of corrections. This charge
applies to juveniles committed to the commissioner of corrections and juveniles
admitted to the Minnesota Correctional Facility-Red Wing under established
admissions criteria. This charge applies
to both counties that participate in the Community Corrections Act and those
that do not. The commissioner shall
determine the per diem cost of confinement based on projected population,
pricing incentives, and market conditions, and the requirement that
expense and revenue balance out over a period of two years. All money received under this section must be
deposited in the state treasury and credited to the general fund.
Sec. 18. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 243.48, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. General
searches. The commissioner of
corrections, the governor, lieutenant governor, members of the legislature, and
state officers, and the ombudsperson for corrections may visit the
inmates at pleasure, but no other persons without permission of the chief
executive officer of the facility, under rules prescribed by the commissioner. A moderate fee may be required of visitors,
other than those allowed to visit at pleasure.
All fees so collected shall be reported and remitted to the commissioner
of management and budget under rules as the commissioner may deem proper, and
when so remitted shall be placed to the credit of the general fund.
Sec. 19. [243.521]
ADMINISTRATIVE AND DISCIPLINARY SEGREGATION.
Subdivision 1. Authorization. In any adult correctional facility
under the control of the commissioner of corrections, the commissioner may
require an inmate to be placed on disciplinary segregation status for rule
violations or on administrative segregation status when the continued presence
of the inmate in general population would pose a serious threat to life,
property, self, staff, or other inmates or to the security or orderly running
of the institution. Inmates pending
investigation for trial on a criminal act or pending transfer may be included,
provided the warden's written approval is sought and granted within seven
business days of placing the inmate in restrictive housing under this provision. The warden of each facility must document any
time approval is granted and the reason for it, and submit a quarterly report
to the commissioner of corrections.
Subd. 2. Conditions
in segregated housing. The
restrictive housing unit shall provide living conditions that are approximate
to those offenders in general population, including reduced lighting during
nighttime hours.
Subd. 3. Review
of disciplinary segregation status. The
commissioner of corrections shall receive notification of all inmates with
consecutive placement in a restrictive housing setting for more than 30 days. This notification shall occur on a monthly
basis. In the event an inmate is placed
into restrictive housing for more than 120 days, the reason for the placement
and the behavior management plan for the inmate shall be submitted to the
commissioner of corrections.
Subd. 4. Graduated
interventions. The
commissioner shall design and implement a continuum of interventions, including
informal sanctions, administrative segregation, formal discipline, disciplinary
segregation, and step-down management. The
commissioner shall implement a method of due process for all offenders with
formal discipline proceedings.
Subd. 5. Mental
health screening. (a) If it
is apparent that the inmate is exhibiting serious symptoms of a mental illness
that prevents the inmate from understanding or fully participating in the
disciplinary process, a mental health professional shall be consulted regarding
appropriate treatment and placement. For
other inmates placed in a restrictive setting, an inmate shall be screened by a
health services staff member within 24 hours of placement in a restrictive
housing setting. If the screening
indicates symptoms of a mental illness, a qualified mental health professional
shall be consulted regarding appropriate treatment and placement. The health services staff member shall
document any time an inmate screens in for symptoms of a mental health illness
and whether or not the health services staff member connected with a mental
health professional.
(b) If mental health staff believe the
inmate's behavior may be more appropriately treated through alternative
interventions or programming, or determine that the inmate's actions were the
result of mental illness, this information must be considered during the
disciplinary process.
Subd. 6. Mental
health care within segregated housing.
A health services staff member shall perform a daily wellness
round in the restrictive housing setting.
If a health services staff member indicates symptoms of a mental
illness, a qualified mental health professional shall be consulted regarding
appropriate treatment and placement.
Subd. 7. Incentives
for return to the general population.
The commissioner shall design and implement a system of
incentives so that an inmate who demonstrates appropriate behavior can earn
additional privileges and an accelerated return to the general population.
Subd. 8. Discharge
from segregated housing. An
inmate shall not be released into the community directly from a stay in
restrictive housing for 60 or more days absent a compelling reason. In cases where there is a compelling reason,
the commissioner of corrections or deputy commissioner shall directly authorize
the inmate's release into the community from restrictive housing.
Subd. 9. Reporting. (a) By January 15, 2020, and by January
15 each year thereafter, the commissioner of corrections shall report to the
chairs and ranking minority members of the house of representatives and senate
committees and divisions with jurisdiction over public safety and judiciary on
the status of the implementation of the provisions in this section. This report shall include but not be limited
to data regarding:
(1) the number of inmates in each
institution placed in restrictive housing during the past year;
(2) the ages of inmates placed in restrictive
housing during the past year;
(3) the number of inmates transferred
from restrictive housing to the mental health unit;
(4) disciplinary sanctions by
infraction;
(5) the lengths of terms served in
restrictive housing, including terms served consecutively; and
(6) the number of inmates by race in
restrictive housing.
(b) The Department of Corrections shall
submit a qualitative report detailing outcomes, measures, and challenges to
implementation of a step-down management program by April 1, 2020.
Sec. 20. [243.95]
PRIVATE PRISON CONTRACTS PROHIBITED.
The commissioner may not contract with
privately owned and operated prisons for the care, custody, and rehabilitation
of offenders committed to the custody of the commissioner.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 21. [244.049]
INDETERMINATE SENTENCE RELEASE BOARD.
Subdivision 1. Establishment;
membership. (a) The
Indeterminate Sentence Release Board is established to review eligible cases
and make release decisions for inmates serving indeterminate sentences under
the authority of the commissioner.
(b) The board shall consist of five
members as follows:
(1) four persons appointed by the
governor from two recommendations of each of the majority leaders and minority
leaders of the house of representatives and the senate; and
(2) the commissioner of corrections who
shall serve as chair.
(c) The members appointed from the
legislative recommendations must meet the following qualifications at a minimum:
(1) a bachelor's degree;
(2) five years of experience in
corrections, a criminal justice or community corrections field, rehabilitation
programming, behavioral health, or criminal law; and
(3) demonstrated knowledge of victim
issues and correctional processes.
Subd. 2. Terms;
compensation. (a) Members of
the board shall serve four-year staggered terms except that the terms of the
initial members of the board must be as follows:
(1) two members must be appointed for
terms that expire January 1, 2022; and
(2) two members must be appointed for terms that expire January 1, 2024.
(b) A member is eligible for
reappointment.
(c) Vacancies on the board shall be
filled in the same manner as the initial appointments under subdivision 1.
(d) Member compensation and removal of
members on the board shall be as provided in section 15.0575.
Subd. 3. Quorum; administrative duties. (a) The majority of members constitutes a quorum.
(b) The commissioner of corrections
shall provide the board with all other personnel, supplies, equipment, office
space, and other administrative services necessary and incident to the
discharge of the functions of the board.
Subd. 4. Majority
vote. An inmate may not be
placed on supervised release unless a majority of the board members present
vote in favor of the action.
Subd. 5. Limitation. Nothing in this section supersedes the
commissioner's authority to revoke an inmate's release for a violation of the
inmate's terms of release or impairs the power of the Board of Pardons to grant
a pardon or commutation in any case.
Subd. 6. Report. On or before February 15 each year,
the board shall submit to the legislative committees with jurisdiction over
criminal justice policy a written report detailing the number of inmates
reviewed and identifying persons granted release in the preceding year. The report shall also include the board's
recommendations for policy modifications that influence the board's duties.
Sec. 22. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 244.05, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Supervised
release, life sentence. (a) Upon
a majority vote of the board members present, the commissioner of
corrections board may, under rules promulgated by the commissioner,
give supervised release to an inmate serving a mandatory life sentence under
section 609.185, paragraph (a), clause (3), (5), or (6); 609.3455, subdivision
3 or 4; 609.385; or Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 609.109, subdivision 3,
after the inmate has served the minimum term of imprisonment specified in
subdivision 4.
(b) The commissioner board
shall require the preparation of a community investigation report and shall
consider the findings of the report when making a supervised release decision
under this subdivision. The report shall
reflect the sentiment of the various elements of the community toward the
inmate, both at the time of the offense and at the present time. The report shall include the views of the
sentencing judge, the prosecutor, any law enforcement personnel who may have been
involved in the case, and any successors to these individuals who may have
information relevant to the supervised release decision. The report shall also include the views of
the victim and the victim's family unless the victim or the victim's family chooses
not to participate.
(c) The commissioner shall make reasonable
efforts to notify the victim, in advance, of the time and place of the inmate's
supervised release review hearing. The
victim has a right to submit an oral or written statement at the review hearing. The statement may summarize the harm suffered
by the victim as a result of the crime and give the victim's recommendation on
whether the inmate should be given supervised release at this time. The commissioner board must
consider the victim's statement when making the supervised release decision.
(d)
When considering whether to give supervised release to an inmate serving a life
sentence under section 609.3455, subdivision 3 or 4, the commissioner board
shall consider, at a minimum, the following:
the risk the inmate poses to the community if released, the inmate's
progress in treatment, the inmate's behavior while incarcerated, psychological
or other diagnostic evaluations of the inmate, the inmate's criminal history,
and any other relevant conduct of the inmate while incarcerated or before
incarceration. The commissioner board
may not give supervised release to the inmate unless:
(1) while in prison:
(i) the inmate has successfully completed appropriate sex offender treatment;
(ii) the inmate has been assessed for chemical dependency needs and, if appropriate, has successfully completed chemical dependency treatment; and
(iii) the inmate has been assessed for mental health needs and, if appropriate, has successfully completed mental health treatment; and
(2) a comprehensive individual release plan is in place for the inmate that ensures that, after release, the inmate will have suitable housing and receive appropriate aftercare and community-based treatment. The comprehensive plan also must include a postprison employment or education plan for the inmate.
(e) As used in this subdivision,:
(1) "board" means the
Indeterminate Sentence Release Board under section 244.049; and
(2) "victim" means the individual who suffered harm as a result of the inmate's crime or, if the individual is deceased, the deceased's surviving spouse or next of kin.
Sec. 23. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299C.091, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Removal
of data from system. Notwithstanding
section 138.17, the bureau shall destroy data entered into the system when
three years have elapsed since the data were entered into the system, except as
otherwise provided in this subdivision. If
the bureau has information that the individual has been convicted as an adult,
or has been adjudicated or has a stayed adjudication as a juvenile for an
offense that would be a crime if committed by an adult, since entry of the data
into the system, the data must be maintained until three years have elapsed since
the last record of a conviction or adjudication or stayed adjudication of the
individual., except that if the individual is committed to the
custody of the commissioner of corrections and the commissioner documents
activities meeting the criminal gang identification criteria that take place
while the individual is confined in a state correctional facility, the
three-year period begins after release from incarceration. Upon request of the law enforcement agency
that submitted data to the system, the bureau shall destroy the data regardless
of whether three years have elapsed since the data were entered into the
system.
Sec. 24. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 631.412, is amended to read:
631.412
SAME SEX ESCORT FOR INMATES BEING TRANSFERRED.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), when a sheriff or other correctional officer has custody of a person charged with or convicted of a crime and transfers that person more than 100 miles, that sheriff or other correctional officer shall provide the transferee with a custodial escort of the same sex as the transferee. A sheriff may employ, when the occasion exists, a suitable person to carry out this section. The expenses of the person's employment must be paid out of county funds not otherwise appropriated.
(b)
A sheriff or other correctional officer is not required to provide a same sex
escort if: (1) the vehicle used to
transport the transferee has video and audio recording equipment installed; (2)
the vehicle's video and audio recording equipment is operational and positioned
to record the portion of the vehicle where the transferee is held during the
transfer; and (3) the video and audio equipment records the duration of the
transfer. A recording of an inmate
transfer made under this paragraph must be maintained by the sheriff or agency
employing the correctional officer for at least 12 months after the date of the
transfer.
Sec. 25. [641.015] PLACEMENT IN PRIVATE PRISONS
PROHIBITED.
Subdivision 1.
Placement prohibited. After August 1, 2019, a sheriff shall
not allow inmates committed to the custody of the sheriff to be housed in
facilities that are not owned and operated by a local government or a group of
local units of government.
Subd. 2.
Contracts prohibited. The county board may not authorize the
sheriff to contract with privately owned and operated prisons for the care,
custody, and rehabilitation of offenders committed to the custody of the
sheriff.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 26. [641.061] LOCAL CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS
DISCIPLINE PROCEDURES.
Subdivision 1.
Definitions. (a) For purposes of this section, the
terms defined in this subdivision have the meanings given them.
(b) "Correctional officer" or
"officer" means a person employed in a security capacity by a local
correctional or detention facility.
(c) "Exclusive representative" means an
employee organization which has been certified by the commissioner of the
Bureau of Mediation Services to meet and negotiate with an employer on behalf
of all employees in the appropriate unit.
(d) "Formal statement" means the questioning
of an officer in the course of obtaining a recorded, stenographic, or signed
statement to be used as evidence in a disciplinary proceeding against the officer.
Subd. 2.
Applicability. This section applies to local
correctional authorities.
Subd. 3.
Formal statement; procedures. A formal statement of a correctional
officer must be taken according to subdivisions 4 to 15.
Subd. 4.
Place of formal statement. A formal statement must be taken at a
facility of the employing or investigating agency or at a place agreed to by
the investigating individual and the investigated correctional officer and
exclusive representative.
Subd. 5.
Complaint. A correctional officer's formal
statement may not be taken unless a written complaint signed by the complainant
stating the complainant's knowledge is filed with the employing or
investigating agency and the correctional officer and exclusive representative
have been given a summary of the allegations.
Subd. 6.
Witnesses; investigative
reports. Upon request, the
investigating agency or the correctional officer shall provide the other party
with a list of witnesses the agency or correctional officer expects to testify
at an administrative hearing or arbitration authorized to recommend, approve,
or order discipline and the substance of the testimony. A party is entitled to copies of any witness
statements in the possession of the other party and an officer
is
entitled to a copy of the investigating agency's investigative report, provided
that any references in a witness statement or investigative report that would
reveal the identity of confidential informants need not be disclosed except for
good cause shown upon order of the person presiding over the administrative
hearing or arbitration.
Subd. 7. Sessions. Sessions at which a formal statement
is taken must be of reasonable duration and must give the correctional officer
reasonable periods for rest and personal necessities. When practicable, sessions must be held
during the correctional officer's regularly scheduled work shift. If the session is not held during the
correctional officer's regularly scheduled work shift, the correctional officer
must be paid by the employing agency at the officer's current compensation rate
for time spent attending the session. Notification
of a formal statement must also be provided to the correctional officer's
exclusive representative and the exclusive representative shall be allowed to
be present during the session.
Subd. 8. Record. A complete record of sessions at which
a formal statement is taken must be made by electronic recording or otherwise. A complete copy or transcript must be
provided to the correctional officer and the officer's exclusive representative
without charge or undue delay. The
session may be recorded by the investigating officer and by the correctional
officer under investigation.
Subd. 9. Presence
of attorney and union representative.
The correctional officer whose formal statement is taken has the
right to have a union representative or an attorney retained by the officer, or
both, present during the session. The
correctional officer may request the presence of a union representative, attorney,
or both, at any time before or during the session. When a request under this subdivision is
made, no formal statement may be taken until a reasonable opportunity is
provided for the correctional officer to obtain the presence of a union
representative or attorney.
Subd. 10. Admissions. Before an officer's formal statement
is taken, the officer shall be advised in writing or on the record that
admissions made in the course of the formal statement may be used as evidence
of misconduct or as a basis for discipline.
Subd. 11. Disclosure
of financial records. No
employer may require an officer to produce or disclose the officer's personal
financial records except pursuant to a valid search warrant or subpoena.
Subd. 12. Release
of photographs. No local
correctional facility or governmental unit may publicly release photographs of
an officer without the written permission of the officer, except that the
facility or unit may display a photograph of an officer to a prospective
witness as part of an agency or unit investigation.
Subd. 13. Disciplinary
letter. No disciplinary
letter or reprimand may be included in an officer's personnel record unless the
officer has been given a copy of the letter or reprimand.
Subd. 14. Retaliatory
action prohibited. No officer
may be discharged, disciplined, or threatened with discharge or discipline as
retaliation for or solely by reason of the officer's exercise of the rights
provided by this section.
Subd. 15. Rights
not reduced. The rights of
officers provided by this section are in addition to and do not diminish the
rights and privileges of officers that are provided under an applicable
collective bargaining agreement or any other applicable law.
Sec. 27. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 641.15, subdivision 3a, is amended to read:
Subd. 3a. Intake
procedure; approved mental health screening.
(a) As part of its intake procedure for new prisoners inmates,
the sheriff or local corrections shall use a mental health screening tool
approved by the commissioner of corrections in consultation with the
commissioner of human services and local corrections staff to identify persons
who may have mental illness.
(b)
Names of persons who have screened positive or may have a mental illness may be
shared with the local county social services agency. The jail may refer an offender to county
personnel of the welfare system, as defined in section 13.46, subdivision 1,
paragraph (c), in order to arrange for services upon discharge and may share
private data on the offender as necessary to:
(1) provide assistance in filling out an application for
medical assistance or MinnesotaCare;
(2) make a referral for case management as provided
under section 245.467, subdivision 4;
(3) provide assistance in obtaining a state photo
identification;
(4) secure a timely appointment with a psychiatrist or
other appropriate community mental health provider;
(5) provide prescriptions for a 30-day supply of all necessary medications; or
(6) coordinate behavioral health services.
(c) Notwithstanding section 138.17, if an offender is
referred to a government entity within the welfare system pursuant to paragraph
(b), and the offender refuses all services from the entity, the entity must,
within 15 days of the refusal, destroy all private data on the offender that it
created or received because of the referral.
Sec. 28. COORDINATED CRISIS RESPONSE PLAN.
(a) By January 15, 2021, the commissioner of corrections
shall develop and implement a coordinated crisis response plan to support
facility, central office, and field services staff.
(b) In developing the response plan, the commissioner
may consult with the Department of Corrections Office of Special
Investigations, the Department of Corrections Victim Assistance Program, human
resources offices, facility and field services administration, peer support
programs, county attorneys, victim witness coordinators, community based victim
advocates, the Crime Victim Reparations Board, employee assistance programs,
offices or organizations assisting with workers' compensation claims and
benefits, mental health services, central office administration, and
supervisors.
(c) To increase support to staff in crisis, the
coordinated crisis response plan shall, at a minimum, include the following:
(1) a protocol
establishing collaboration between the offices, services, and organizations
identified in paragraph (b);
(2) a process to develop and implement individualized
support plans based on the identified needs of staff members in crisis;
(3) identification or development of training on
trauma-informed victim and crisis response; and
(4) a plan to implement training on trauma-informed
victim and crisis response including initial training, refresher courses, and
training for new employees.
Sec. 29. PILOT PROGRAM TO ADDRESS MENTAL HEALTH
IN CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES.
Subdivision 1.
Pilot program established. The commissioner of corrections shall
establish and administer a pilot program in Minnesota Correctional
Facility-Stillwater to address mental health issues among correctional officers
and inmates. The program shall offer, at
a minimum, support to correctional officers through skill
refreshers,
mental health training and techniques, and mental health services. The program shall conduct, at a minimum,
mental health interventions for inmates and educate inmates on mental health
resources available to them. The pilot
program is from July 1, 2019, to June 30, 2020.
Subd. 2. Report. By October 1, 2020, the commissioner
shall report to the legislative committees with jurisdiction over corrections
on the impact and outcomes of the program.
Sec. 30. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2018, section
401.13, is repealed.
ARTICLE 4
LAW ENFORCEMENT
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 171.20, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Reinstatement fee. (a) Before the license is reinstated, (1) an individual whose driver's license has been suspended under section 171.16, subdivisions 2 and 3; 171.175; 171.18; or 171.182, or who has been disqualified from holding a commercial driver's license under section 171.165, and (2) an individual whose driver's license has been suspended under section 171.186 and who is not exempt from such a fee, must pay a fee of $20.
(b) Before the license is reinstated, an individual whose license has been suspended under sections 169.791 to 169.798 must pay a $20 reinstatement fee.
(c) When fees are collected by a licensing agent appointed under section 171.061, a handling charge is imposed in the amount specified under section 171.061, subdivision 4. The reinstatement fee and surcharge must be deposited in an approved state depository as directed under section 171.061, subdivision 4.
(d) Reinstatement fees collected under
paragraph (a) for suspensions under sections 171.16, subdivision 3, and 171.18,
subdivision 1, clause (10), must be deposited in the special revenue fund and
are appropriated to the Peace Officer Standards and Training Board for peace
officer training reimbursement to local units of government.
(e) (d) A suspension may be
rescinded without fee for good cause.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 171.26, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Driver
services operating account. All
money received under this chapter must be paid into the state treasury and
credited to the driver services operating account in the special revenue fund
specified under sections 299A.705, except as
provided in subdivision 2; 171.06, subdivision 2a; 171.07, subdivision 11,
paragraph (g); 171.20, subdivision 4, paragraph (d); and 171.29,
subdivision 2, paragraph (b).
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 357.021, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Disbursement
of surcharges by commissioner of management and budget. (a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b),
(c), and to (d), the commissioner of management and budget shall
disburse surcharges received under subdivision 6 and section 97A.065,
subdivision 2, as follows:
(1) one percent shall be credited to the
peace officer training account in the game and fish fund to provide peace
officer training for employees of the Department of Natural Resources who are
licensed under sections 626.84 to 626.863, and who possess peace officer
authority for the purpose of enforcing game and fish laws; and
(2)
39 percent shall be credited to the peace officers training account in the
special revenue fund; and
(3) 60 (2) 99 percent shall be
credited to the general fund.
(b) The commissioner of management and budget shall credit $3 of each surcharge received under subdivision 6 and section 97A.065, subdivision 2, to the general fund.
(c) In addition to any amounts credited under paragraph (a), the commissioner of management and budget shall credit $47 of each surcharge received under subdivision 6 and section 97A.065, subdivision 2, and the $12 parking surcharge, to the general fund.
(d) If the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners authorizes imposition of the additional $1 surcharge provided for in subdivision 6, paragraph (a), the court administrator in the Second Judicial District shall transmit the surcharge to the commissioner of management and budget. The $1 special surcharge is deposited in a Ramsey County surcharge account in the special revenue fund and amounts in the account are appropriated to the trial courts for the administration of the petty misdemeanor diversion program operated by the Second Judicial District Ramsey County Violations Bureau.
Sec. 4. [611A.95]
CERTIFICATIONS FOR VICTIMS OF CRIMES.
Subdivision 1. Definitions. For purposes of this section, the
following terms have the meanings given:
(1) "certifying entity" means
a state or local law enforcement agency;
(2) "criminal activity" means
qualifying criminal activity pursuant to section 101(a)(15)(U)(iii) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act, and includes the attempt, conspiracy, or
solicitation to commit such crimes; and
(3) "certification" means any
certification or statement required by federal immigration law including, but
not limited to, the information required by United States Code, title 8,
section 1184(p), and United States Code, title 8, section 1184(o), including
current United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Form I-918,
Supplement B, and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Form
I-914, Supplement B, and any successor forms.
Subd. 2. Certification
process. (a) A certifying
entity shall process a certification requested by a victim of criminal activity
or a representative of the victim, including but not limited to the victim's
attorney, family member, or domestic violence or sexual assault violence
advocate, within the time period prescribed in paragraph (b).
(b) A certifying entity shall process
the certification within 60 days of request, unless the victim is in removal
proceedings, in which case the certification shall be processed within 14 days
of request. Requests for expedited
certification must be affirmatively raised at the time of the request.
(c) An active investigation, the filing
of charges, or a prosecution or conviction are not required for the victim of
criminal activity to request and obtain the certification.
Subd. 3. Certifying
entity; designate agent. (a)
The head of a certifying entity shall designate an agent to perform the
following responsibilities:
(1) timely process requests for
certification;
(2) provide outreach to victims of
criminal activity to inform them of the entity's certification process; and
(3) keep a written or electronic record
of all certification requests and responses.
(b)
All certifying entities shall implement a language access protocol for
non-English-speaking victims of criminal activity.
Subd. 4. Disclosure
prohibited; data classification. (a)
A certifying entity is prohibited from disclosing the immigration status of a
victim of criminal activity or representative requesting the certification,
except to comply with federal law or legal process, or if authorized by the
victim of criminal activity or representative requesting the certification.
(b) Data provided to a certifying
entity under this section is classified as private data pursuant to section
13.02, subdivision 12.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. Subdivisions 1, 2, and
4 are effective the day following final enactment. Subdivision 3 is effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 5. [626.19]
USE OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES.
Subdivision 1. Application;
definitions. (a) This section
applies to law enforcement agencies that maintain, use, or plan to use an
unmanned aerial vehicle in investigations, for training, or in response to
emergencies, incidents, and requests for service.
(b) For purposes of this section, the
following terms have the meanings given:
(1) "law enforcement agency"
has the meaning given in section 626.84, subdivision 1; and
(2) "unmanned aerial vehicle"
or "UAV" means an aircraft that is operated without the possibility
of direct human intervention from within or on the aircraft.
Subd. 2. Use
of unmanned aerial vehicles limited.
Except as provided in subdivision 3, a law enforcement agency may
not operate a UAV without a search warrant issued under this chapter.
Subd. 3. Authorized
use. (a) A law enforcement
agency may use a UAV during or immediately after an emergency situation that
involves the risk of death or serious physical harm to a person.
(b) A law enforcement agency may use a
UAV over a public event where there is a substantial risk to the safety of
participants or bystanders. If a law
enforcement agency collects information under this paragraph, it must document
each use, connect each deployment to a unique case number, and provide a
description of the facts giving rise to a substantial risk.
(c) A law enforcement agency may
operate a UAV to counter a high risk of a terrorist attack by a specific
individual or organization if the agency determines that credible intelligence
indicates this risk.
(d) A law enforcement agency may use a
UAV to prevent the loss of life and property in natural or man-made disasters
and to facilitate the operational planning, rescue, and recovery operations in
the aftermath of these disasters.
(e) A law enforcement agency may use a
UAV for officer training purposes.
(f) A law enforcement agency may
operate a UAV for a non-law-enforcement purpose at the request of a government entity,
as defined in section 13.02, subdivision 7a, provided that the government
entity makes the request in writing and specifies the reason for the request
and proposed period of use.
Subd. 4. Limitations
on use. (a) A law enforcement
agency operating a UAV must fully comply with all Federal Aviation
Administration requirements and guidelines.
(b)
The governing body overseeing the law enforcement agency must approve the
agency's acquisition of a UAV.
(c) Unless specifically authorized in a
warrant, a law enforcement agency must use a UAV to collect data only on a
clearly and narrowly defined target and avoid data collection on individuals,
homes, or areas other than the defined target.
(d) A law enforcement agency may not
deploy a UAV with facial recognition or other biometric-matching technology
unless expressly authorized by a warrant.
(e) A law enforcement agency may not
equip a UAV with weapons.
(f) A law enforcement agency may not
use a UAV to collect data on public protests or demonstrations unless expressly
authorized by a warrant or an exception applies under subdivision 3. A law enforcement agency must document which
exception applies or whether a warrant was obtained.
Subd. 5. Access
by data subjects. An
individual who is the subject of data collected through use of a UAV has access
to the data. If the individual requests
a copy of the recording, data on other individuals who do not consent to its
release must be redacted from the copy.
Subd. 6. Data
classification; retention. (a)
Data collected by a UAV are private data on individuals or nonpublic data,
subject to the following:
(1) UAV data may be disclosed as
necessary in an emergency situation under subdivision 3, paragraph (a);
(2) UAV data may be disclosed to the
government entity making a request for UAV use under subdivision 3, paragraph
(f);
(3) UAV data that are criminal
investigative data are governed by section 13.82, subdivision 7; and
(4) UAV data that are not public data
under other provisions of chapter 13 retain that classification.
(b) Section 13.04, subdivision 2, does
not apply to data collected by a UAV.
(c) Notwithstanding section 138.17, the
data must be deleted by a UAV as soon as possible, and in no event later than
seven days after collection unless the data is part of an active criminal
investigation.
Subd. 7. Evidence. Information obtained or collected by a
law enforcement agency in violation of this section is not admissible as
evidence in a criminal, administrative, or civil proceeding against the data
subject.
Subd. 8. Remedies. An aggrieved party may initiate a
civil action against a law enforcement agency to obtain all appropriate relief
to prevent or remedy a violation of this section, including remedies available
under chapter 13.
Subd. 9. Written
policies required. The chief
officer of every state and local law enforcement agency that uses or plans to
use a UAV must establish and enforce a written policy governing UAV use. The agency must post the written policy on
its website if the agency has a website.
Subd. 10. Notice;
disclosure of warrant. (a)
Within a reasonable time but not later than 90 days after the court unseals a
warrant under this subdivision, the issuing or denying judge shall cause to be
served on the persons named in the warrant and the application an inventory
that shall include notice of:
(1) the fact of the issuance of the
warrant or the application;
(2) the date of the issuance and the
period of authorized, approved, or disapproved collection of information, or the
denial of the application; and
(3) the fact that during the period
information was or was not collected.
(b) A warrant authorizing collection of
information with a UAV must direct that:
(1) the warrant be sealed for a period
of 90 days or until the objective of the warrant has been accomplished,
whichever is shorter; and
(2) the warrant be filed with the court
administrator within ten days of the expiration of the warrant.
(c) The prosecutor may request that the
warrant, supporting affidavits, and any order granting the request not be filed. An order must be issued granting the request
in whole or in part if, from affidavits, sworn testimony, or other evidence,
the court finds reasonable grounds exist to believe that filing the warrant may
cause the search or a related search to be unsuccessful, create a substantial
risk of injury to an innocent person, or severely hamper an ongoing
investigation.
(d) The warrant must direct that
following the commencement of any criminal proceeding using evidence obtained
in or as a result of the search, the supporting application or affidavit must
be filed either immediately or at any other time as the court directs. Until such filing, the documents and
materials ordered withheld from filing must be retained by the judge or the
judge's designee.
Subd. 11. Reporting. (a) By January 15 of each year, each
law enforcement agency that deploys a UAV shall report to the commissioner of
public safety the following information for the preceding calendar year:
(1) the number of times a UAV was
deployed, organized by the types of incidents and the types of justification
for deployment;
(2) the number of criminal investigations aided by the deployment of UAVs;
(3) the number of deployments of UAVs for reasons other than criminal investigations; and
(4) the total cost of the agency's UAV
program.
(b) By June 15 of each year, the
commissioner of public safety shall compile a full and complete report
summarizing the information submitted to the commissioner under paragraph (a),
and submit the report to the chairs and ranking minority members of the senate
and house of representatives committees having jurisdiction over criminal
justice and public safety issues and make the report public on the department's
website.
(c) By January 15 of each year, any
judge who has issued a warrant under this section that expired during the
preceding year, or who has denied approval during that year, shall report to
the state court administrator:
(1) the fact that a warrant or
extension was applied for;
(2)
the kind of warrant or extension applied for;
(3) the fact that the warrant or
extension was granted as applied for, was modified, or was denied;
(4) the period of UAV use authorized by
the warrant and the number and duration of any extensions of the warrant;
(5) the offense specified in the
warrant or application or extension of a warrant; and
(6) the identity of the law enforcement
agency making the application and the person authorizing the application.
(d) By June 15 of each year, the state
court administrator shall transmit to the chairs and ranking minority members
of the senate and house of representatives committees having jurisdiction over
criminal justice and public safety issues and post on the supreme court's
website a full and complete report concerning the number of applications for
warrants authorizing or approving operation of UAVs or disclosure of
information from the operation of UAVs under this section and the number of
warrants and extensions granted or denied under this section during the
preceding calendar year. The report must
include a summary and analysis of the data required to be filed with the state
court administrator by paragraph (c).
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 626.841, is amended to read:
626.841
BOARD; MEMBERS.
The Board of Peace Officer Standards and
Training shall be composed of the following 15 17 members:
(1) two members to be appointed by the governor from among the county sheriffs in Minnesota;
(2) four members to be appointed by the governor from among peace officers in Minnesota municipalities, at least two of whom shall be chiefs of police;
(3) two members to be appointed by the governor from among peace officers, at least one of whom shall be a member of the Minnesota State Patrol Association;
(4) the superintendent of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension or a designee;
(5) two members appointed by the governor from among peace officers, or former peace officers, who are currently employed on a full-time basis in a professional peace officer education program;
(6) two members to be appointed by the governor, one member to be appointed from among administrators of Minnesota colleges or universities that offer professional peace officer education, and one member to be appointed from among the elected city officials in statutory or home rule charter cities of under 5,000 population outside the metropolitan area, as defined in section 473.121, subdivision 2; and
(7) two four members
appointed by the governor from among the general public, of which at least
one member must be a representative of a statewide crime victim coalition and
at least two members must be residents of a county other than a metropolitan
county as defined in section 473.121, subdivision 4.
A chair shall be appointed by the governor from among the members. In making appointments the governor shall strive to achieve representation from among the geographic areas of the state.
Sec. 7. [626.8433]
EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION POLICIES REQUIRED.
Subdivision 1. Statewide
model policy required. By
November 1, 2019, the board, in consultation with stakeholders, shall develop a
model policy that articulates best practices for eyewitness identification and
promotes uniform practices statewide. The
board shall distribute this model policy to all chief law enforcement officers. At a minimum, the policy must require that:
(1) a person administering a lineup be
unaware of the suspect's identity, or, if that is not practical, the person be
shielded so as to prevent the person from seeing which lineup member is being
viewed by the eyewitness;
(2) before the procedure, the
eyewitness be instructed that the perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup;
(3) nonsuspect "fillers" used
in the lineup match the eyewitness's description of the perpetrator; and
(4) immediately after an identification
is made, the eyewitness provide a statement in the eyewitness's own words that
articulates the level of the eyewitness's confidence in the identification.
Subd. 2. Agency
policies required. By
February 1, 2020, the chief law enforcement officers of every state and local
law enforcement agency shall adopt and implement a written policy on eyewitness
identification practices that is identical or substantially similar to the
model policy developed under subdivision 1.
Sec. 8. [626.8435]
PEACE OFFICER COMMUNITY POLICING EXCELLENCE DATA.
Subdivision 1. Purpose. The purpose of this section is:
(1) to create data profiles for
stakeholders to conduct needs assessments and make appropriate recommendations
to drive improvements in police effectiveness, efficiency, training,
supervision, procedural justice, accountability, and community relations;
(2) for police departments to more
effectively manage their risks and improve transparency; and
(3) for community members and
advocates, as well as policy-makers, decision-makers, and funders to have
access to accurate relevant information to help improve policing practices in
Minnesota.
Subd. 2. Annual
data; submission. (a) Beginning
January 15, 2020, and annually thereafter, the chief law enforcement officer of
a law enforcement agency that receives grants from the Peace Officers Standards
and Training Board for peace officer training assistance under article 1,
section 4, subdivision 4, shall submit the following data regarding peace
officers employed by the law enforcement agency in the previous calendar year
to the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension:
(1) the unique identifier of an
employed peace officer;
(2) the existence and status of a
complaint made against an employed peace officer including:
(i) the peace officer's unique
identifier;
(ii) the nature of the complaint;
(iii) whether the complaint was filed
by a member of the public, a law enforcement agency, or another source;
(iv) whether the complaint resulted in
disciplinary action;
(v)
the final disposition of a complaint when disciplinary action was taken
including:
(A) the specific reason for the action
taken; and
(B) data documenting the basis of the
action taken, except that data that would identify confidential sources who are
employees of the public body shall not be disclosed; and
(vi) the final disposition of any
complaint:
(A) determined to be unfounded or
otherwise not sustained;
(B) for which a peace officer was later
exonerated; or
(C) which resulted in a nondisciplinary
resolution including, but not limited to, employee counseling;
(3) the unique identifier of any peace
officer pending criminal prosecution, excluding traffic violations;
(4) the unique identifier of any peace
officer who was terminated due to substantiated findings of officer misconduct
and a summary of the basis for that termination; and
(5) the unique identifier of any peace
officer, other than one terminated for performance issues during a probationary
period, whose employment was terminated by resignation in lieu of termination
as a result of officer misconduct, and a summary of the basis for the action.
(b) For purposes of this section
"complaint" means all allegations involving:
(1) public-reported misconduct;
(2) excessive force;
(3) the integrity or truthfulness of an
officer;
(4) violations of the law; and
(5) sexual misconduct or harassment.
(c) The reporting requirements in
paragraph (a) are in addition to any other officer discipline reporting
requirements established in law.
Subd. 3. Data
storage and access. (a) The
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension may store the data collected under this section
on the agency's servers.
(b) The Peace Officers Standards and
Training Board must have direct access to the data collected under this
section.
Subd. 4. Updated
data. Within 30 days of final
disposition of a complaint, as defined in section 13.43, subdivision 2,
paragraph (b), the chief law enforcement officer of the law enforcement agency
that employs the officer shall submit a supplemental report containing the
information identified in subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clauses (2) to (5).
Subd. 5. Confidentiality
agreement prohibited. Law
enforcement agencies and political subdivisions are prohibited from entering
into a confidentiality agreement that would prevent disclosure of the data
identified in subdivision 2 to the board.
Any such confidentiality agreement is void as to the requirements of
this section.
Subd. 6. Data
classification. Data received
by the board pursuant to subdivisions 2 and 3 is private data on individuals as
defined in section 13.02, subdivision 12.
This classification does not restrict the board's authority to publish
summary data as defined in section 13.02, subdivision 19.
Subd. 7. Penalty
for noncompliance. For
agencies that receive peace officer training reimbursements from the Police
Officer Standards and Training Board under article 1, section 4, subdivision 4,
substantial noncompliance with the
reporting requirements of subdivisions 2 and 3 shall serve as a bar to further
reimbursements under article 1, section 4, subdivision 4, and the board
may require the agency to refund the state for grants received during the period
of noncompliance. For purposes of this
section, "substantial noncompliance" means a failure to (1) meet the
deadlines established in subdivisions 2 and 3, and (2) respond to two
subsequent requests from the board.
Subd. 8. Board
report. At least annually,
the board shall publish a summary of data submitted pursuant to subdivisions 1
and 2. The summary shall be available on
the board's website and shall be included in any written publication reporting
board activities. The summary shall
exclude peace officers' names and license numbers and any other not public data
as defined by section 13.02, subdivision 8a.
Sec. 9. [626.8474]
INVESTIGATING SEXUAL ASSAULT CASES; POLICIES REQUIRED.
(a) By January 1, 2020, the chief law
enforcement officer of every state and local law enforcement agency must
develop, adopt, and implement a written policy governing the investigation of
sexual assault cases within the agency. In
the development of a policy, each law enforcement agency shall consult with
local sexual assault counselors, domestic abuse advocates, community
organizations, and other law enforcement agencies with expertise in the
recognition and handling of sexual assault cases. A law enforcement agency may adopt the model
policy created by the board in lieu of developing its own policy under this
provision. At a minimum, a law
enforcement policy must address each of the procedures covered in the board's
model policy. The chief law enforcement
officer must ensure that each peace officer investigating a sexual assault case
follows the agency's policy.
(b) Every state and local law
enforcement agency must certify to the board by January 1, 2020, that it has
adopted a written policy in compliance with this subdivision.
(c) The board must assist the chief law
enforcement officer of each state and local law enforcement agency in
developing and implementing policies under this subdivision.
(d) The board may impose licensing
sanctions and seek injunctive relief under section 214.11 for failure to adopt
a policy in compliance with the requirements of this section.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 626.93, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Concurrent
jurisdiction. If the requirements of
subdivision 2 are met and the tribe enters into a cooperative agreement
pursuant to subdivision 4, the tribe shall have has
concurrent jurisdictional authority under this section with the local county
sheriff within the geographical boundaries of the tribe's reservation to
enforce state criminal law.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 626.93, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Cooperative
agreements. In order to coordinate,
define, and regulate the provision of law enforcement services and to provide
for mutual aid and cooperation, governmental units and the tribe shall may
enter into agreements under section 471.59.
For the purposes of entering into these agreements, the tribe shall
be is considered a "governmental unit" as that term is
defined in section 471.59, subdivision 1.
Sec. 12. PEACE
OFFICER EXCELLENCE TASK FORCE.
Subdivision 1. Establishment;
purpose. There is established
a Peace Officer Excellence Task Force. The
purpose of the task force is to study the laws, rules, contracts, and policies
that govern the employer-employee relationship between political subdivisions
and peace officers.
Subd. 2. Members. (a) The task force must consist of:
(1) two members of the house of
representatives, one appointed by the speaker of the house and one appointed by
the minority leader;
(2) two members of the senate, one
appointed by the majority leader and one appointed by the minority leader;
(3) the attorney general, or a
designee;
(4) the executive director of the
Minnesota Peace Officer Standards and Training Board, or a designee;
(5) the commissioner of public safety,
or a designee;
(6) the commissioner of the Minnesota
Bureau of Mediation Services;
(7) one representative from the
Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association;
(8) one representative from the
Minnesota Sheriffs Association;
(9) two representatives from the
Minnesota Peace and Police Officers Association, one of whom must be employed
by a law enforcement agency located outside of the seven-county metropolitan
area;
(10) one representative from the League
of Minnesota Cities;
(11) one representative from the
Association of Minnesota Counties;
(12) two representatives from organized
labor, including at least one representative of an organization comprised of
peace officers; and
(13) two members of the public appointed
by the governor.
(b) Unless otherwise specified, members
will be appointed by the commissioner of public safety. Appointments must be made no later than July
1, 2019. Members of the task force shall
not be compensated or receive reimbursement for expenses, except for
compensation or expense reimbursements received in the member's ordinary scope
of employment.
(c) Vacancies shall be filled by the
appointing authority consistent with the requirements of the position that
becomes open.
Subd. 3. Organization. (a) The executive director of the
Peace Officer Standards and Training Board shall convene the first meeting of
the task force no later than August 1, 2019.
(b) The members of the task force may
elect a chair and other officers as the members deem necessary.
(c)
The task force shall meet at least monthly, with one meeting devoted to
collecting input from the public and local units of government that employ
peace officers.
Subd. 4. Staff. The executive director of the Peace
Officer Standards and Training Board shall provide support staff, office space,
and administrative services for the task force.
Subd. 5. Open
meetings. Except as otherwise
provided in this section, the task force is subject to Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 13D. A meeting of the task force
occurs when a quorum is present and the members receive information, discuss,
or take action on any matter relating to the duties of the task force. The task force may conduct meetings as
provided in Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.015 or 13D.02. The task force may conduct meetings at any
location in the state that is appropriate for the purposes of the task force as
long as the location is open and accessible to the public. For legislative members of the task force,
enforcement of this subdivision is governed by Minnesota Statutes, section
3.055, subdivision 2. For nonlegislative
members of the task force, enforcement of this subdivision is governed by
Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.06, subdivisions 1 and 2.
Subd. 6. Duties
of task force. The task force
must review, assess, and make recommendations for reforms to the laws, rules,
contracts, and policies that govern the employer-employee relationship between
political subdivisions and peace officers.
In formulating recommendations, the task force must seek to balance the
employment rights of peace officers and the need for chief law enforcement
officers and political subdivisions to maintain the integrity and excellence of
peace officers they employ.
Subd. 7. Report
and recommendations. By
January 15, 2020, the task force shall prepare and submit to the chairs and
ranking minority members of the committees and divisions of the house of
representatives and senate with jurisdiction over public safety and labor and
employment a report that summarizes the activities of the task force, issues
identified by the task force, reform recommendations to address the issues, and
recommendations for legislative action, if needed.
Subd. 8. Expiration. The task force expires upon submission
of the report required by subdivision 6.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
ARTICLE 5
SEXUAL OFFENDERS
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.341, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Current
or recent position of authority. "Current
or recent position of authority" includes but is not limited to any
person who is a parent or acting in the place of a parent and charged with or
assumes any of a parent's rights, duties or responsibilities to a child, or
a person who is charged with or assumes any duty or responsibility for
the health, welfare, or supervision of a child, either independently or through
another, no matter how brief, at the time of or within 120 days immediately
preceding the act. For the purposes
of subdivision 11, "position of authority" includes a psychotherapist. For the purposes of sections 609.344,
subdivision 1, paragraph (e), clause (2), and 609.345, subdivision 1, paragraph
(e), clause (2), the term extends to a person having the described authority
over a student in a secondary school who is at least 16 but less than 21 years
of age under the circumstances described in those two clauses.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.341, subdivision 11, is amended to read:
Subd. 11. Sexual contact. (a) "Sexual contact," for the purposes of sections 609.343, subdivision 1, clauses (a) to (f), and 609.345, subdivision 1, clauses (a) to (e), and (h) to (o), includes any of the following acts committed without the complainant's consent, except in those cases where consent is not a defense, and committed with sexual or aggressive intent:
(i) the intentional touching by the actor of the complainant's intimate parts, or
(ii) the touching by the complainant of the actor's, the complainant's, or another's intimate parts effected by a person in a current or recent position of authority, or by coercion, or by inducement if the complainant is under 13 years of age or mentally impaired, or
(iii) the touching by another of the complainant's intimate parts effected by coercion or by a person in a current or recent position of authority, or
(iv) in any of the cases above, the touching of the clothing covering the immediate area of the intimate parts, or
(v) the intentional touching with seminal fluid or sperm by the actor of the complainant's body or the clothing covering the complainant's body.
(b) "Sexual contact," for the purposes of sections 609.343, subdivision 1, clauses (g) and (h), and 609.345, subdivision 1, clauses (f) and (g), includes any of the following acts committed with sexual or aggressive intent:
(i) the intentional touching by the actor of the complainant's intimate parts;
(ii) the touching by the complainant of the actor's, the complainant's, or another's intimate parts;
(iii) the touching by another of the complainant's intimate parts;
(iv) in any
of the cases listed above, touching of the clothing covering the immediate area
of the intimate parts; or
(v) the intentional touching with seminal fluid or sperm by the actor of the complainant's body or the clothing covering the complainant's body.
(c) "Sexual contact with a person under 13" means the intentional touching of the complainant's bare genitals or anal opening by the actor's bare genitals or anal opening with sexual or aggressive intent or the touching by the complainant's bare genitals or anal opening of the actor's or another's bare genitals or anal opening with sexual or aggressive intent.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.341, subdivision 12, is amended to read:
Subd. 12. Sexual penetration. "Sexual penetration" means any of the following acts committed without the complainant's consent, except in those cases where consent is not a defense, whether or not emission of semen occurs:
(1) sexual intercourse, cunnilingus, fellatio, or anal intercourse; or
(2) any intrusion however slight into the genital or anal openings:
(i) of the complainant's body by any part of the actor's body or any object used by the actor for this purpose;
(ii) of the complainant's body by any part of the body of the complainant, by any part of the body of another person, or by any object used by the complainant or another person for this purpose, when effected by a person in a current or recent position of authority, or by coercion, or by inducement if the child is under 13 years of age or mentally impaired; or
(iii) of the body of the actor or another person by any part of the body of the complainant or by any object used by the complainant for this purpose, when effected by a person in a current or recent position of authority, or by coercion, or by inducement if the child is under 13 years of age or mentally impaired.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.341, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 24. Secondary
school. For the purposes of
sections 609.344 and 609.345, "secondary school" means a public or
nonpublic school, church or religious organization, or home school where a
student may legally fulfill the compulsory instruction requirements of section
120A.22.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.341, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 25. Independent
contractor. For the purposes
of sections 609.344 and 609.345, "independent contractor" means any
person who contracts with or is a volunteer for a secondary school or any
person employed by a business which contracts with a secondary school.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.342, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Crime defined. A person who engages in sexual penetration with another person, or in sexual contact with a person under 13 years of age as defined in section 609.341, subdivision 11, paragraph (c), is guilty of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree if any of the following circumstances exists:
(a) the complainant is under 13 years of age and the actor is more than 36 months older than the complainant. Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a defense;
(b) the complainant is at least 13 years of age but less than 16 years of age and the actor is more than 48 months older than the complainant and in a current or recent position of authority over the complainant. Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a defense;
(c) circumstances existing at the time of the act cause the complainant to have a reasonable fear of imminent great bodily harm to the complainant or another;
(d) the actor is armed with a dangerous weapon or any article used or fashioned in a manner to lead the complainant to reasonably believe it to be a dangerous weapon and uses or threatens to use the weapon or article to cause the complainant to submit;
(e) the actor causes personal injury to the complainant, and either of the following circumstances exist:
(i)
the actor uses force or coercion to accomplish sexual penetration the
act; or
(ii) the actor knows or has reason to know that the complainant is mentally impaired, mentally incapacitated, or physically helpless;
(f) the actor is aided or abetted by one or more accomplices within the meaning of section 609.05, and either of the following circumstances exists:
(i) an accomplice uses force or coercion to cause the complainant to submit; or
(ii) an accomplice is armed with a dangerous weapon or any article used or fashioned in a manner to lead the complainant reasonably to believe it to be a dangerous weapon and uses or threatens to use the weapon or article to cause the complainant to submit;
(g) the actor has a significant
relationship to the complainant and the complainant was under 16 years of age
at the time of the sexual penetration act. Neither mistake as to the complainant's age
nor consent to the act by the complainant is a defense; or
(h) the actor has a significant
relationship to the complainant, the complainant was under 16 years of age at
the time of the sexual penetration act, and:
(i) the actor or an accomplice used force
or coercion to accomplish the penetration act;
(ii) the complainant suffered personal injury; or
(iii) the sexual abuse involved multiple acts committed over an extended period of time.
Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a defense.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.343, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Crime defined. A person who engages in sexual contact with another person is guilty of criminal sexual conduct in the second degree if any of the following circumstances exists:
(a) the complainant is under 13 years of age and the actor is more than 36 months older than the complainant. Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a defense. In a prosecution under this clause, the state is not required to prove that the sexual contact was coerced;
(b) the complainant is at least 13 but less than 16 years of age and the actor is more than 48 months older than the complainant and in a current or recent position of authority over the complainant. Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a defense;
(c) circumstances existing at the time of the act cause the complainant to have a reasonable fear of imminent great bodily harm to the complainant or another;
(d) the actor is armed with a dangerous weapon or any article used or fashioned in a manner to lead the complainant to reasonably believe it to be a dangerous weapon and uses or threatens to use the dangerous weapon to cause the complainant to submit;
(e) the actor causes personal injury to the complainant, and either of the following circumstances exist:
(i) the actor uses force or coercion to accomplish the sexual contact; or
(ii) the actor knows or has reason to know that the complainant is mentally impaired, mentally incapacitated, or physically helpless;
(f) the actor is aided or abetted by one or more accomplices within the meaning of section 609.05, and either of the following circumstances exists:
(i) an accomplice uses force or coercion to cause the complainant to submit; or
(ii) an accomplice is armed with a dangerous weapon or any article used or fashioned in a manner to lead the complainant to reasonably believe it to be a dangerous weapon and uses or threatens to use the weapon or article to cause the complainant to submit;
(g) the actor has a significant relationship to the complainant and the complainant was under 16 years of age at the time of the sexual contact. Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a defense; or
(h) the actor has a significant relationship to the complainant, the complainant was under 16 years of age at the time of the sexual contact, and:
(i) the actor or an accomplice used force or coercion to accomplish the contact;
(ii) the complainant suffered personal injury; or
(iii) the sexual abuse involved multiple acts committed over an extended period of time.
Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a defense.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.344, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Crime defined. A person who engages in sexual penetration with another person is guilty of criminal sexual conduct in the third degree if any of the following circumstances exists:
(a) the complainant is under 13 years of age and the actor is no more than 36 months older than the complainant. Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant shall be a defense;
(b) the complainant is at least 13 but less
than 16 years of age and the actor is more than 24 months older than the
complainant. In any such case if the
actor is no more than 120 36 months older than the complainant,
it shall be an affirmative defense, which must be proved by a preponderance of
the evidence, that the actor reasonably believes the complainant to be 16 years
of age or older. In all other cases,
mistake as to the complainant's age shall not be a defense. consent by the complainant is not a defense;
(c) the actor uses force or coercion to accomplish the penetration;
(d) the actor knows or has reason to know that the complainant is mentally impaired, mentally incapacitated, or physically helpless;
(e) (1) the complainant is at least 16 but less than 18 years of age and the actor is more than 48 months older than the complainant and in a current or recent position of authority over the complainant, or (2) the complainant is at least 16 years of age but less than 21 years of age and a student in a secondary school who has not graduated and received a diploma and the actor is an employee or independent contractor of the secondary school and in a current or recent position of authority over the complainant. Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a defense;
(f) the actor has a significant relationship to the complainant and the complainant was at least 16 but under 18 years of age at the time of the sexual penetration. Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a defense;
(g) the actor has a significant relationship to the complainant, the complainant was at least 16 but under 18 years of age at the time of the sexual penetration, and:
(i) the actor or an accomplice used force or coercion to accomplish the penetration;
(ii) the complainant suffered personal injury; or
(iii) the sexual abuse involved multiple acts committed over an extended period of time.
Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a defense;
(h) the actor is a psychotherapist and the complainant is a patient of the psychotherapist and the sexual penetration occurred:
(i) during the psychotherapy session; or
(ii) outside the psychotherapy session if an ongoing psychotherapist-patient relationship exists.
Consent by the complainant is not a defense;
(i) the actor is a psychotherapist and the complainant is a former patient of the psychotherapist and the former patient is emotionally dependent upon the psychotherapist;
(j) the actor is a psychotherapist and the complainant is a patient or former patient and the sexual penetration occurred by means of therapeutic deception. Consent by the complainant is not a defense;
(k) the actor accomplishes the sexual penetration by means of deception or false representation that the penetration is for a bona fide medical purpose. Consent by the complainant is not a defense;
(l) the actor is or purports to be a member of the clergy, the complainant is not married to the actor, and:
(i) the sexual penetration occurred during the course of a meeting in which the complainant sought or received religious or spiritual advice, aid, or comfort from the actor in private; or
(ii) the sexual penetration occurred during a period of time in which the complainant was meeting on an ongoing basis with the actor to seek or receive religious or spiritual advice, aid, or comfort in private. Consent by the complainant is not a defense;
(m) the actor is an employee, independent contractor, or volunteer of a state, county, city, or privately operated adult or juvenile correctional system, or secure treatment facility, or treatment facility providing services to clients civilly committed as mentally ill and dangerous, sexually dangerous persons, or sexual psychopathic personalities, including, but not limited to, jails, prisons, detention centers, or work release facilities, and the complainant is a resident of a facility or under supervision of the correctional system. Consent by the complainant is not a defense;
(n) the actor provides or is an agent of an
entity that provides special transportation service, the complainant used the
special transportation service, and the sexual penetration occurred during or
immediately before or after the actor transported the complainant. Consent by the complainant is not a defense; or
(o) the actor performs massage or other
bodywork for hire, the complainant was a user of one of those services, and
nonconsensual sexual penetration occurred during or immediately before or after
the actor performed or was hired to perform one of those services for the
complainant.; or
(p) the actor is a peace officer, as
defined in section 626.84, and the peace officer physically or constructively
restrains the complainant or the complainant does not reasonably feel free to
leave the peace officer's presence. Consent
by the complainant is not a defense. This
paragraph does not apply to any penetration of the mouth, genitals, or anus
during a lawful search.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.345, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Crime defined. A person who engages in sexual contact with another person is guilty of criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree if any of the following circumstances exists:
(a) the complainant is under 13 years of age and the actor is no more than 36 months older than the complainant. Neither mistake as to the complainant's age or consent to the act by the complainant is a defense. In a prosecution under this clause, the state is not required to prove that the sexual contact was coerced;
(b) the complainant is at least 13 but less
than 16 years of age and the actor is more than 48 months older than the
complainant or in a current or recent position of authority over the
complainant. Consent by the complainant
to the act is not a defense. In any
such case, if the actor is no more than 120 months older than the complainant,
it shall be an affirmative defense which must be proved by a preponderance of
the evidence that the actor reasonably believes the complainant to be 16 years
of age or older. In all other cases,
Neither mistake as to the complainant's age shall not be nor
consent to the act by the complainant shall be a defense;
(c) the actor uses force or coercion to accomplish the sexual contact;
(d) the actor knows or has reason to know that the complainant is mentally impaired, mentally incapacitated, or physically helpless;
(e)(1) the complainant is at least 16 but less than 18 years of age and the actor is more than 48 months older than the complainant and in a current or recent position of authority over the complainant, or (2) the complainant is at least 16 years of age but less than 21 years of age and a student in a secondary school who has not graduated and received a diploma and the actor is an employee or independent contractor of the secondary school and in a current or recent position of authority over the complainant. Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a defense;
(f) the actor has a significant relationship to the complainant and the complainant was at least 16 but under 18 years of age at the time of the sexual contact. Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a defense;
(g) the actor has a significant relationship to the complainant, the complainant was at least 16 but under 18 years of age at the time of the sexual contact, and:
(i) the actor or an accomplice used force or coercion to accomplish the contact;
(ii) the complainant suffered personal injury; or
(iii) the sexual abuse involved multiple acts committed over an extended period of time.
Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a defense;
(h) the actor is a psychotherapist and the complainant is a patient of the psychotherapist and the sexual contact occurred:
(i) during the psychotherapy session; or
(ii) outside the psychotherapy session if an ongoing psychotherapist-patient relationship exists. Consent by the complainant is not a defense;
(i) the actor is a psychotherapist and the complainant is a former patient of the psychotherapist and the former patient is emotionally dependent upon the psychotherapist;
(j) the actor is a psychotherapist and the complainant is a patient or former patient and the sexual contact occurred by means of therapeutic deception. Consent by the complainant is not a defense;
(k) the actor accomplishes the sexual contact by means of deception or false representation that the contact is for a bona fide medical purpose. Consent by the complainant is not a defense;
(1) the actor is or purports to be a member of the clergy, the complainant is not married to the actor, and:
(i) the sexual contact occurred during the course of a meeting in which the complainant sought or received religious or spiritual advice, aid, or comfort from the actor in private; or
(ii) the sexual contact occurred during a period of time in which the complainant was meeting on an ongoing basis with the actor to seek or receive religious or spiritual advice, aid, or comfort in private. Consent by the complainant is not a defense;
(m) the actor is an employee, independent contractor, or volunteer of a state, county, city, or privately operated adult or juvenile correctional system, or secure treatment facility, or treatment facility providing services to clients civilly committed as mentally ill and dangerous, sexually dangerous persons, or sexual psychopathic personalities, including, but not limited to, jails, prisons, detention centers, or work release facilities, and the complainant is a resident of a facility or under supervision of the correctional system. Consent by the complainant is not a defense;
(n) the actor provides or is an agent of an
entity that provides special transportation service, the complainant used the
special transportation service, the complainant is not married to the actor,
and the sexual contact occurred during or
immediately before or after the actor transported the complainant. Consent by the complainant is not a defense; or
(o)
the actor performs massage or other bodywork for hire, the complainant was a
user of one of those services, and nonconsensual sexual contact occurred during
or immediately before or after the actor performed or was hired to perform one
of those services for the complainant.; or
(p) the actor is a peace officer, as
defined in section 626.84, and the peace officer physically or constructively
restrains the complainant or the complainant does not reasonably feel free to
leave the peace officer's presence. Consent
by the complainant is not a defense.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.3451, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Crime defined. A person is guilty of criminal sexual conduct in the fifth degree:
(1) if the person engages in nonconsensual sexual contact; or
(2) the person engages in masturbation or lewd exhibition of the genitals in the presence of a minor under the age of 16, knowing or having reason to know the minor is present.
For purposes of this section, "sexual
contact" has the meaning given in section 609.341, subdivision 11,
paragraph (a), clauses (i), (iv), and (v), but does not include the
intentional touching of the clothing covering the immediate area of the
buttocks. Sexual contact also
includes the intentional removal or attempted removal of clothing covering the
complainant's intimate parts or undergarments, and the nonconsensual touching
by the complainant of the actor's intimate parts, effected by the actor, if the
action is performed with sexual or aggressive intent.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 617.246, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Use of minor. It is unlawful for a person to promote, employ, use or permit a minor to engage in or assist others to engage minors in posing or modeling alone or with others in any sexual performance or pornographic work if the person knows or has reason to know that the conduct intended is a sexual performance or a pornographic work.
Any person who violates this subdivision
is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than ten
15 years or to payment of a fine of not more than $20,000 for the first
offense and $40,000 for a second or subsequent offense, or both.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 617.246, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Operation
or ownership of business. A person
who owns or operates a business in which a pornographic work, as defined in
this section, is disseminated to an adult or a minor or is reproduced, and who
knows the content and character of the pornographic work disseminated or
reproduced, is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not
more than ten 15 years, or to payment of a fine of not more than
$20,000 for the first offense and $40,000 for a second or subsequent offense,
or both.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 617.246, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Dissemination. A person who, knowing or with reason to
know its content and character, disseminates for profit to an adult or a minor
a pornographic work, as defined in this section, is guilty of a felony and may
be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than ten 15 years, or
to payment of a fine of not more than $20,000 for the first offense and $40,000
for a second or subsequent offense, or both.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 617.246, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Conditional
release term. Notwithstanding the
statutory maximum sentence otherwise applicable to the offense or any provision
of the sentencing guidelines, when a court commits a person to the custody of
the commissioner of corrections for violating this section, the court shall
provide that after the person has been released from prison, the commissioner
shall place the person on conditional release for five ten years. If the person has previously been convicted
of a violation of this section, section 609.342, 609.343, 609.344, 609.345,
609.3451, 609.3453, or 617.247, or any similar statute of the United States,
this state, or any state, the commissioner shall place the person on
conditional release for ten 15 years. The terms of conditional release are governed
by section 609.3455, subdivision 8.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 617.246, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 8. Mandatory
minimum sentence. A person
convicted under this section must serve a minimum of six months of
incarceration. If the person has a prior
conviction under this section or section 617.247, or is required to register as
a predatory offender, the person must serve a minimum of 12 months of
incarceration.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 617.247, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Dissemination
prohibited. (a) A person who
disseminates pornographic work to an adult or a minor, knowing or with reason
to know its content and character, is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced
to imprisonment for not more than seven ten years and a fine of
not more than $10,000 for a first offense and for not more than 15 20
years and a fine of not more than $20,000 for a second or subsequent offense.
(b) A person who violates paragraph (a) is
guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 15
20 years if the violation occurs when the person is a registered
predatory offender under section 243.166.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 617.247, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Possession
prohibited. (a) A person who
possesses a pornographic work or a computer disk or computer or other
electronic, magnetic, or optical storage system or a storage system of any
other type, containing a pornographic work, knowing or with reason to know its
content and character, is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to
imprisonment for not more than five seven years and a fine of not
more than $5,000 $7,500 for a first offense and for not more than
ten 15 years and a fine of not more than $10,000 $15,000
for a second or subsequent offense.
(b)
A person who violates paragraph (a) is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced
to imprisonment for not more than ten 15 years if the violation
occurs when the person is a registered predatory offender under section
243.166.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 18. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 617.247, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. Conditional
release term. Notwithstanding the
statutory maximum sentence otherwise applicable to the offense or any provision
of the sentencing guidelines, when a court commits a person to the custody of
the commissioner of corrections for violating this section, the court shall provide
that after the person has been released from prison, the commissioner shall
place the person on conditional release for five ten years. If the person has previously been convicted
of a violation of this section, section 609.342, 609.343, 609.344, 609.345,
609.3451, 609.3453, or 617.246, or any similar statute of the United States,
this state, or any state, the commissioner shall place the person on
conditional release for ten 15 years. The terms of conditional release are governed
by section 609.3455, subdivision 8.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 617.247, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 10. Mandatory
minimum sentence. A person
convicted under this section must serve a minimum of six months of
incarceration. If the person has a prior
conviction under this section or section 617.246, or is required to register as
a predatory offender, the person must serve a minimum of 12 months of
incarceration.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 20. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 626.556, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Definitions. As used in this section, the following terms have the meanings given them unless the specific content indicates otherwise:
(a) "Accidental" means a sudden, not reasonably foreseeable, and unexpected occurrence or event which:
(1) is not likely to occur and could not have been prevented by exercise of due care; and
(2) if occurring while a child is receiving services from a facility, happens when the facility and the employee or person providing services in the facility are in compliance with the laws and rules relevant to the occurrence or event.
(b) "Commissioner" means the commissioner of human services.
(c) "Facility" means:
(1) a licensed or unlicensed day care facility, certified license-exempt child care center, residential facility, agency, hospital, sanitarium, or other facility or institution required to be licensed under sections 144.50 to 144.58, 241.021, or 245A.01 to 245A.16, or chapter 144H, 245D, or 245H;
(2) a school as defined in section 120A.05, subdivisions 9, 11, and 13; and chapter 124E; or
(3) a nonlicensed personal care provider organization as defined in section 256B.0625, subdivision 19a.
(d) "Family assessment" means a comprehensive assessment of child safety, risk of subsequent child maltreatment, and family strengths and needs that is applied to a child maltreatment report that does not allege sexual abuse or substantial child endangerment. Family assessment does not include a determination as to whether child maltreatment occurred but does determine the need for services to address the safety of family members and the risk of subsequent maltreatment.
(e) "Investigation" means fact gathering related to the current safety of a child and the risk of subsequent maltreatment that determines whether child maltreatment occurred and whether child protective services are needed. An investigation must be used when reports involve sexual abuse or substantial child endangerment, and for reports of maltreatment in facilities required to be licensed or certified under chapter 245A, 245D, or 245H; under sections 144.50 to 144.58 and 241.021; in a school as defined in section 120A.05, subdivisions 9, 11, and 13, and chapter 124E; or in a nonlicensed personal care provider association as defined in section 256B.0625, subdivision 19a.
(f) "Mental injury" means an injury to the psychological capacity or emotional stability of a child as evidenced by an observable or substantial impairment in the child's ability to function within a normal range of performance and behavior with due regard to the child's culture.
(g) "Neglect" means the commission or omission of any of the acts specified under clauses (1) to (9), other than by accidental means:
(1) failure by a person responsible for a child's care to supply a child with necessary food, clothing, shelter, health, medical, or other care required for the child's physical or mental health when reasonably able to do so;
(2) failure to protect a child from conditions or actions that seriously endanger the child's physical or mental health when reasonably able to do so, including a growth delay, which may be referred to as a failure to thrive, that has been diagnosed by a physician and is due to parental neglect;
(3) failure to provide for necessary supervision or child care arrangements appropriate for a child after considering factors as the child's age, mental ability, physical condition, length of absence, or environment, when the child is unable to care for the child's own basic needs or safety, or the basic needs or safety of another child in their care;
(4) failure to ensure that the child is educated as defined in sections 120A.22 and 260C.163, subdivision 11, which does not include a parent's refusal to provide the parent's child with sympathomimetic medications, consistent with section 125A.091, subdivision 5;
(5) nothing in this section shall be construed to mean that a child is neglected solely because the child's parent, guardian, or other person responsible for the child's care in good faith selects and depends upon spiritual means or prayer for treatment or care of disease or remedial care of the child in lieu of medical care; except that a parent, guardian, or caretaker, or a person mandated to report pursuant to subdivision 3, has a duty to report if a lack of medical care may cause serious danger to the child's health. This section does not impose upon persons, not otherwise legally responsible for providing a child with necessary food, clothing, shelter, education, or medical care, a duty to provide that care;
(6) prenatal exposure to a controlled substance, as defined in section 253B.02, subdivision 2, used by the mother for a nonmedical purpose, as evidenced by withdrawal symptoms in the child at birth, results of a toxicology test performed on the mother at delivery or the child at birth, medical effects or developmental delays during the child's first year of life that medically indicate prenatal exposure to a controlled substance, or the presence of a fetal alcohol spectrum disorder;
(7) "medical neglect" as defined in section 260C.007, subdivision 6, clause (5);
(8) chronic and severe use of alcohol or a controlled substance by a parent or person responsible for the care of the child that adversely affects the child's basic needs and safety; or
(9) emotional harm from a pattern of behavior which contributes to impaired emotional functioning of the child which may be demonstrated by a substantial and observable effect in the child's behavior, emotional response, or cognition that is not within the normal range for the child's age and stage of development, with due regard to the child's culture.
(h) "Nonmaltreatment mistake" means:
(1) at the time of the incident, the individual was performing duties identified in the center's child care program plan required under Minnesota Rules, part 9503.0045;
(2) the individual has not been determined responsible for a similar incident that resulted in a finding of maltreatment for at least seven years;
(3) the individual has not been determined to have committed a similar nonmaltreatment mistake under this paragraph for at least four years;
(4) any injury to a child resulting from the incident, if treated, is treated only with remedies that are available over the counter, whether ordered by a medical professional or not; and
(5) except for the period when the incident occurred, the facility and the individual providing services were both in compliance with all licensing requirements relevant to the incident.
This definition only applies to child care centers licensed under Minnesota Rules, chapter 9503. If clauses (1) to (5) apply, rather than making a determination of substantiated maltreatment by the individual, the commissioner of human services shall determine that a nonmaltreatment mistake was made by the individual.
(i) "Operator" means an operator or agency as defined in section 245A.02.
(j) "Person responsible for the child's care" means (1) an individual functioning within the family unit and having responsibilities for the care of the child such as a parent, guardian, or other person having similar care responsibilities, or (2) an individual functioning outside the family unit and having responsibilities for the care of the child such as a teacher, school administrator, other school employees or agents, or other lawful custodian of a child having either full-time or short-term care responsibilities including, but not limited to, day care, babysitting whether paid or unpaid, counseling, teaching, and coaching.
(k) "Physical abuse" means any physical injury, mental injury, or threatened injury, inflicted by a person responsible for the child's care on a child other than by accidental means, or any physical or mental injury that cannot reasonably be explained by the child's history of injuries, or any aversive or deprivation procedures, or regulated interventions, that have not been authorized under section 125A.0942 or 245.825.
Abuse does not include reasonable and moderate physical discipline of a child administered by a parent or legal guardian which does not result in an injury. Abuse does not include the use of reasonable force by a teacher, principal, or school employee as allowed by section 121A.582. Actions which are not reasonable and moderate include, but are not limited to, any of the following:
(1) throwing, kicking, burning, biting, or cutting a child;
(2) striking a child with a closed fist;
(3) shaking a child under age three;
(4) striking or other actions which result in any nonaccidental injury to a child under 18 months of age;
(5) unreasonable interference with a child's breathing;
(6) threatening a child with a weapon, as defined in section 609.02, subdivision 6;
(7) striking a child under age one on the face or head;
(8) striking a child who is at least age one but under age four on the face or head, which results in an injury;
(9) purposely giving a child poison, alcohol, or dangerous, harmful, or controlled substances which were not prescribed for the child by a practitioner, in order to control or punish the child; or other substances that substantially affect the child's behavior, motor coordination, or judgment or that results in sickness or internal injury, or subjects the child to medical procedures that would be unnecessary if the child were not exposed to the substances;
(10) unreasonable physical confinement or restraint not permitted under section 609.379, including but not limited to tying, caging, or chaining; or
(11) in a school facility or school zone, an act by a person responsible for the child's care that is a violation under section 121A.58.
(l) "Practice of social services," for the purposes of subdivision 3, includes but is not limited to employee assistance counseling and the provision of guardian ad litem and parenting time expeditor services.
(m) "Report" means any communication received by the local welfare agency, police department, county sheriff, or agency responsible for child protection pursuant to this section that describes neglect or physical or sexual abuse of a child and contains sufficient content to identify the child and any person believed to be responsible for the neglect or abuse, if known.
(n) "Sexual abuse" means the subjection of a child by a person responsible for the child's care, by a person who has a significant relationship to the child, as defined in section 609.341, or by a person in a current or recent position of authority, as defined in section 609.341, subdivision 10, to any act which constitutes a violation of section 609.342 (criminal sexual conduct in the first degree), 609.343 (criminal sexual conduct in the second degree), 609.344 (criminal sexual conduct in the third degree), 609.345 (criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree), or 609.3451 (criminal sexual conduct in the fifth degree). Sexual abuse also includes any act which involves a minor which constitutes a violation of prostitution offenses under sections 609.321 to 609.324 or 617.246. Effective May 29, 2017, sexual abuse includes all reports of known or suspected child sex trafficking involving a child who is identified as a victim of sex trafficking. Sexual abuse includes child sex trafficking as defined in section 609.321, subdivisions 7a and 7b. Sexual abuse includes threatened sexual abuse which includes the status of a parent or household member who has committed a violation which requires registration as an offender under section 243.166, subdivision 1b, paragraph (a) or (b), or required registration under section 243.166, subdivision 1b, paragraph (a) or (b).
(o) "Substantial child endangerment" means a person responsible for a child's care, by act or omission, commits or attempts to commit an act against a child under their care that constitutes any of the following:
(1) egregious harm as defined in section 260C.007, subdivision 14;
(2) abandonment under section 260C.301, subdivision 2;
(3) neglect as defined in paragraph (g), clause (2), that substantially endangers the child's physical or mental health, including a growth delay, which may be referred to as failure to thrive, that has been diagnosed by a physician and is due to parental neglect;
(4) murder in the first, second, or third degree under section 609.185, 609.19, or 609.195;
(5) manslaughter in the first or second degree under section 609.20 or 609.205;
(6) assault in the first, second, or third degree under section 609.221, 609.222, or 609.223;
(7) solicitation, inducement, and promotion of prostitution under section 609.322;
(8) criminal sexual conduct under sections 609.342 to 609.3451;
(9) solicitation of children to engage in sexual conduct under section 609.352;
(10) malicious punishment or neglect or endangerment of a child under section 609.377 or 609.378;
(11) use of a minor in sexual performance under section 617.246; or
(12) parental behavior, status, or condition which mandates that the county attorney file a termination of parental rights petition under section 260C.503, subdivision 2.
(p) "Threatened injury" means a statement, overt act, condition, or status that represents a substantial risk of physical or sexual abuse or mental injury. Threatened injury includes, but is not limited to, exposing a child to a person responsible for the child's care, as defined in paragraph (j), clause (1), who has:
(1) subjected a child to, or failed to protect a child from, an overt act or condition that constitutes egregious harm, as defined in section 260C.007, subdivision 14, or a similar law of another jurisdiction;
(2) been found to be palpably unfit under section 260C.301, subdivision 1, paragraph (b), clause (4), or a similar law of another jurisdiction;
(3) committed an act that has resulted in an involuntary termination of parental rights under section 260C.301, or a similar law of another jurisdiction; or
(4) committed an act that has resulted in the involuntary transfer of permanent legal and physical custody of a child to a relative under Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 260C.201, subdivision 11, paragraph (d), clause (1), section 260C.515, subdivision 4, or a similar law of another jurisdiction.
A child is the subject of a report of threatened injury when the responsible social services agency receives birth match data under paragraph (q) from the Department of Human Services.
(q) Upon receiving data under section 144.225, subdivision 2b, contained in a birth record or recognition of parentage identifying a child who is subject to threatened injury under paragraph (p), the Department of Human Services shall send the data to the responsible social services agency. The data is known as "birth match" data. Unless the responsible social services agency has already begun an investigation or assessment of the report due to the birth of the child or execution of the recognition of parentage and the parent's previous history with child protection, the agency shall accept the birth match data as a report under this section. The agency may use either a family assessment or investigation to determine whether the child is safe. All of the provisions of this section apply. If the child is determined to be safe, the agency shall consult with the county attorney to determine the
appropriateness of filing a petition alleging the child is in need of protection or services under section 260C.007, subdivision 6, clause (16), in order to deliver needed services. If the child is determined not to be safe, the agency and the county attorney shall take appropriate action as required under section 260C.503, subdivision 2.
(r) Persons who conduct assessments or investigations under this section shall take into account accepted child‑rearing practices of the culture in which a child participates and accepted teacher discipline practices, which are not injurious to the child's health, welfare, and safety.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2019.
Sec. 21. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 628.26, is amended to read:
628.26
LIMITATIONS.
(a) Indictments or complaints for any crime resulting in the death of the victim may be found or made at any time after the death of the person killed.
(b) Indictments or complaints for a violation of section 609.25 may be found or made at any time after the commission of the offense.
(c) Indictments or complaints for violation of section 609.282 may be found or made at any time after the commission of the offense if the victim was under the age of 18 at the time of the offense.
(d) Indictments or complaints for violation of section 609.282 where the victim was 18 years of age or older at the time of the offense, or 609.42, subdivision 1, clause (1) or (2), shall be found or made and filed in the proper court within six years after the commission of the offense.
(e) Indictments or complaints for
violation of sections 609.322 and 609.342 to 609.345, if the victim was
under the age of 18 years at the time the offense was committed, shall may
be found or made and filed in the proper court within the later of nine
years after the commission of the offense or three years after the offense was
reported to law enforcement authorities at any time after the commission
of the offense.
(f) Notwithstanding the limitations in
paragraph (e), indictments or complaints for violation of sections 609.322 and
609.342 to 609.344 may be found or made and filed in the proper court at any
time after commission of the offense, if physical evidence is collected and
preserved that is capable of being tested for its DNA characteristics. If this evidence is not collected and
preserved and the victim was 18 years old or older at the time of the offense,
the prosecution must be commenced within nine years after the commission of the
offense.
(g) (f) Indictments or
complaints for violation of sections 609.466 and 609.52, subdivision 2, clause
(3), item (iii), shall be found or made and filed in the proper court within
six years after the commission of the offense.
(h) (g) Indictments or
complaints for violation of section 609.2335, 609.52, subdivision 2, clause
(3), items (i) and (ii), (4), (15), or (16), 609.631, or 609.821, where the
value of the property or services stolen is more than $35,000, or for violation
of section 609.527 where the offense involves eight or more direct victims or
the total combined loss to the direct and indirect victims is more than
$35,000, shall be found or made and filed in the proper court within five years
after the commission of the offense.
(i) (h) Except for
violations relating to false material statements, representations or omissions,
indictments or complaints for violations of section 609.671 shall be found or
made and filed in the proper court within five years after the commission of
the offense.
(j) (i) Indictments or complaints for violation of sections 609.561 to 609.563, shall be found or made and filed in the proper court within five years after the commission of the offense.
(k) (j) In all other cases,
indictments or complaints shall be found or made and filed in the proper court
within three years after the commission of the offense.
(l) (k) The limitations
periods contained in this section shall exclude any period of time during which
the defendant was not an inhabitant of or usually resident within this state.
(m) (l) The limitations
periods contained in this section for an offense shall not include any period
during which the alleged offender participated under a written agreement in a
pretrial diversion program relating to that offense.
(n) (m) The limitations
periods contained in this section shall not include any period of time during
which physical evidence relating to the offense was undergoing DNA analysis, as
defined in section 299C.155, unless the defendant demonstrates that the
prosecuting or law enforcement agency purposefully delayed the DNA analysis
process in order to gain an unfair advantage.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2019, and applies to crimes committed on or after that date
and to crimes committed before that date if the limitations period for the
crime did not expire before August 1, 2019.
Sec. 22. SENTENCING
GUIDELINES MODIFICATION.
The Sentencing Guidelines Commission
shall comprehensively review and consider modifying how the Sentencing
Guidelines and the sex offender grid address the crimes described in Minnesota
Statutes, sections 617.246 and 617.247, as compared to similar crimes,
including other sex offenses and other offenses with similar maximum penalties.
Sec. 23. CRIMINAL
SEXUAL CONDUCT STATUTORY REFORM WORKING GROUP; REPORT.
Subdivision 1. Direction. By September 1, 2019, the commissioner
of public safety shall convene a working group on criminal sexual conduct
statutory reform. The commissioner shall
invite representatives from city and county prosecuting agencies, statewide
crime victim coalitions, the Minnesota judicial branch, the Minnesota Board of
Public Defense, the Department of Public Safety, the Department of Human
Services, the Sentencing Guidelines Commission, state and local law enforcement
agencies, and other interested parties to participate in the working group. The commissioner shall ensure that the
working group is inclusive of marginalized communities as well as victim and
survivor voices.
Subd. 2. Duties. The working group must review, assess,
and make specific recommendations with regard to substantive and technical
amendments to Minnesota Statutes, sections 609.341 to 609.3451, 609.3453 to
609.3455, 609.349, 628.26, and any other related criminal laws.
Subd. 3. Report
to legislature. The
commissioner shall file a report detailing the working group's findings and
recommendations with the chairs and ranking minority members of the house of
representatives and senate committees and divisions having jurisdiction over
public safety and judiciary policy and finance by October 15, 2020.
Sec. 24. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2018, section
609.349, is repealed.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
ARTICLE 6
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 152.021, subdivision 2a, is amended to read:
Subd. 2a. Methamphetamine; dimethyltryptamine; manufacture crime. Notwithstanding subdivision 1, sections 152.022, subdivision 1, 152.023, subdivision 1, and 152.024, subdivision 1, a person is guilty of controlled substance crime in the first degree if the person manufactures any amount of methamphetamine or dimethyltryptamine.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 152.025, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Sale crimes. A person is guilty of a controlled substance crime in the fifth degree and upon conviction may be sentenced as provided in subdivision 4 if:
(1) the person unlawfully sells one or more
mixtures containing marijuana or tetrahydrocannabinols, except a small amount
of marijuana for no remuneration; or
(2) the person unlawfully sells one or more mixtures containing a controlled substance classified in Schedule IV.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and applies
to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 152.025, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Possession and other crimes. A person is guilty of controlled substance crime in the fifth degree and upon conviction may be sentenced as provided in subdivision 4 if:
(1) the person unlawfully possesses one or
more mixtures containing a controlled substance classified in Schedule I, II,
III, or IV, except the nonresinous form a small amount of
marijuana; or
(2) the person procures, attempts to procure, possesses, or has control over a controlled substance by any of the following means:
(i) fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, or subterfuge;
(ii) using a false name or giving false credit; or
(iii) falsely assuming the title of, or
falsely representing any person to be, a manufacturer, wholesaler, pharmacist,
physician, doctor of osteopathic medicine licensed to practice medicine,
dentist, podiatrist, veterinarian, or other authorized person for the purpose of
obtaining a controlled substance.; or
(3) the person unlawfully possesses a
total weight of more than 250 grams of the nonresinous form of marijuana.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 152.025, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Penalty. (a) A person convicted under the provisions of subdivision 2, clause (1), who has not been previously convicted of a violation of this chapter or a similar offense in another jurisdiction, is guilty of a gross misdemeanor if: (1) the amount of the controlled substance possessed, other than heroin, is less than 0.25 grams or one dosage unit or less if the controlled substance was possessed in dosage units; or (2) the controlled substance possessed is heroin and the amount possessed is less than 0.05 grams.
(b) A person convicted under the provisions of subdivision 1; subdivision 2, clause (1), unless the conduct is described in paragraph (a); or subdivision 2, clause (2) or (3), may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 5. [152.0251]
NONFELONY CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OFFENSES; MARIJUANA.
Subdivision 1. Sale
crimes. Except as provided in
subdivision 5, a person is guilty of a crime if on one or more occasions within
a 90-day period the person unlawfully sells:
(1) a total weight of more than ten
grams but not more than 42.5 grams of the nonresinous form of marijuana; or
(2) a total weight of ten grams or less
of the nonresinous form of marijuana, except a small amount of marijuana for no
remuneration.
Subd. 2. Possession
crimes. A person is guilty of
a crime if the person unlawfully possesses:
(1) a total weight of more than 100
grams but not more than 250 grams of the nonresinous form of marijuana; or
(2) a total weight of more than 42.5
grams but not more than 100 grams of the nonresinous form of marijuana.
Subd. 3. Penalty. (a) A person is guilty of a gross
misdemeanor if convicted under subdivision 1, clause (1), or subdivision 2,
clause (1).
(b) A person is guilty of a misdemeanor
if convicted under subdivision 1, clause (2), or subdivision 2, clause (2).
Subd. 4. Possession
of marijuana in a motor vehicle. A
person is guilty of a misdemeanor if the person is the owner of a private motor
vehicle, or is the driver of the motor vehicle if the owner is not present, and
possesses on the person, or knowingly keeps or allows to be kept within the
area of the vehicle normally occupied by the driver or passengers, more than
five grams of marijuana. This area of
the vehicle does not include the trunk of the motor vehicle if the vehicle is
equipped with a trunk or another area of the vehicle not normally occupied by
the driver or passengers if the vehicle is not equipped with a trunk. A utility or glove compartment is deemed to
be within the area occupied by the driver and passengers.
Subd. 5. Petty
misdemeanors. A person who
does any of the following is guilty of a petty misdemeanor:
(1) unlawfully sells a small amount of
marijuana for no remuneration; or
(2) unlawfully possesses a small amount
of marijuana.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 152.0275, is amended to read:
152.0275
CERTAIN CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OFFENSES; RESTITUTION; PROHIBITIONS ON PROPERTY
USE; NOTICE PROVISIONS.
Subdivision 1. Restitution. (a) As used in this subdivision:
(1) "clandestine lab site" means any structure or conveyance or outdoor location occupied or affected by conditions or chemicals typically associated with the manufacturing of methamphetamine or dimethyltryptamine;
(2) "emergency response" includes, but is not limited to, removing and collecting evidence, securing the site, removal, remediation, and hazardous chemical assessment or inspection of the site where the relevant offense or offenses took place, regardless of whether these actions are performed by the public entities themselves or by private contractors paid by the public entities, or the property owner;
(3) "remediation" means proper
cleanup, treatment, or containment of hazardous substances or, methamphetamine,
or dimethyltryptamine at or in a clandestine lab site, and may include
demolition or disposal of structures or other property when an assessment so
indicates; and
(4) "removal" means the removal from the clandestine lab site of precursor or waste chemicals, chemical containers, or equipment associated with the manufacture, packaging, or storage of illegal drugs.
(b) A court may require a person convicted of manufacturing or attempting to manufacture a controlled substance or of an illegal activity involving a precursor substance, where the response to the crime involved an emergency response, to pay restitution to all public entities that participated in the response. The restitution ordered may cover the reasonable costs of their participation in the response.
(c) In addition to the restitution authorized in paragraph (b), a court may require a person convicted of manufacturing or attempting to manufacture a controlled substance or of illegal activity involving a precursor substance to pay restitution to a property owner who incurred removal or remediation costs because of the crime.
Subd. 2. Property-related prohibitions; notice; website. (a) As used in this subdivision:
(1) "clandestine lab site" has the meaning given in subdivision 1, paragraph (a);
(2) "property" means publicly or privately owned real property including buildings and other structures, motor vehicles as defined in section 609.487, subdivision 2a, public waters, and public rights-of-way;
(3) "remediation" has the meaning given in subdivision 1, paragraph (a); and
(4) "removal" has the meaning given in subdivision 1, paragraph (a).
(b) A peace officer who arrests a person at a clandestine lab site shall notify the appropriate county or local health department, state duty officer, and child protection services of the arrest and the location of the site.
(c) A county or local health department or sheriff shall order that any property or portion of a property that has been found to be a clandestine lab site and contaminated by substances, chemicals, or items of any kind used in the manufacture of methamphetamine or dimethyltryptamine or any part of the manufacturing process, or the by‑products or degradates of manufacturing methamphetamine or dimethyltryptamine be prohibited from being occupied or used until it has been assessed and remediated as provided in the Department of Health's clandestine drug labs general cleanup guidelines. The remediation shall be accomplished by a contractor who will make the verification required under paragraph (e).
(d) Unless clearly inapplicable, the procedures specified in chapter 145A and any related rules adopted under that chapter addressing the enforcement of public health laws, the removal and abatement of public health nuisances, and the remedies available to property owners or occupants apply to this subdivision.
(e) Upon the proper removal and remediation of any property used as a clandestine lab site, the contractor shall verify to the property owner and the applicable authority that issued the order under paragraph (c) that the work was completed according to the Department of Health's clandestine drug labs general cleanup guidelines and best practices. The contractor shall provide the verification to the property owner and the applicable authority within five days from the completion of the remediation. Following this, the applicable authority shall vacate its order.
(f) If a contractor issues a verification and the property was not remediated according to the Department of Health's clandestine drug labs general cleanup guidelines, the contractor is liable to the property owner for the additional costs relating to the proper remediation of the property according to the guidelines and for reasonable attorney fees for collection of costs by the property owner. An action under this paragraph must be commenced within six years from the date on which the verification was issued by the contractor.
(g) If the applicable authority determines under paragraph (c) that a motor vehicle has been contaminated by substances, chemicals, or items of any kind used in the manufacture of methamphetamine or dimethyltryptamine or any part of the manufacturing process, or the by-products or degradates of manufacturing methamphetamine or dimethyltryptamine and if the authority is able to obtain the certificate of title for the motor vehicle, the authority shall notify the registrar of motor vehicles of this fact and in addition, forward the certificate of title to the registrar. The authority shall also notify the registrar when it vacates its order under paragraph (e).
(h) The applicable authority issuing an order under paragraph (c) shall record with the county recorder or registrar of titles of the county where the clandestine lab is located an affidavit containing the name of the owner, a legal description of the property where the clandestine lab was located, and a map drawn from available information showing the boundary of the property and the location of the contaminated area on the property that is prohibited from being occupied or used that discloses to any potential transferee:
(1) that the property, or portion of the property, was the site of a clandestine lab;
(2) the location, condition, and circumstances of the clandestine lab, to the full extent known or reasonably ascertainable; and
(3) that the use of the property or some portion of it may be restricted as provided by paragraph (c).
If an inaccurate drawing or description is filed, the authority, on request of the owner or another interested person, shall file a supplemental affidavit with a corrected drawing or description.
If the authority vacates its order under paragraph (e), the authority shall record an affidavit that contains the recording information of the above affidavit and states that the order is vacated. Upon filing the affidavit vacating the order, the affidavit and the affidavit filed under this paragraph, together with the information set forth in the affidavits, cease to constitute either actual or constructive notice.
(i) If proper removal and remediation has occurred on the property, an interested party may record an affidavit indicating that this has occurred. Upon filing the affidavit described in this paragraph, the affidavit and the affidavit filed under paragraph (h), together with the information set forth in the affidavits, cease to constitute either actual or constructive notice. Failure to record an affidavit under this section does not affect or prevent any transfer of ownership of the property.
(j) The county recorder or registrar of titles must record all affidavits presented under paragraph (h) or (i) in a manner that ensures their disclosure in the ordinary course of a title search of the subject property.
(k) The commissioner of health shall post on the Internet contact information for each local community health services administrator.
(l) Each local community health services administrator shall maintain information related to property within the administrator's jurisdiction that is currently or was previously subject to an order issued under paragraph (c). The information maintained must include the name of the owner, the location of the property, the extent of the contamination, the status of the removal and remediation work on the property, and whether the order has been vacated. The administrator shall make this information available to the public either upon request or by other means.
(m) Before signing an agreement to sell or transfer real property, the seller or transferor must disclose in writing to the buyer or transferee if, to the seller's or transferor's knowledge, methamphetamine production has occurred on the property. If methamphetamine or dimethyltryptamine production has occurred on the property, the disclosure shall include a statement to the buyer or transferee informing the buyer or transferee:
(1) whether an order has been issued on the property as described in paragraph (c);
(2) whether any orders issued against the property under paragraph (c) have been vacated under paragraph (j); or
(3) if there was no order issued against the property and the seller or transferor is aware that methamphetamine or dimethyltryptamine production has occurred on the property, the status of removal and remediation on the property.
(n) Unless the buyer or transferee and seller or transferor agree to the contrary in writing before the closing of the sale, a seller or transferor who fails to disclose, to the best of their knowledge, at the time of sale any of the facts required, and who knew or had reason to know of methamphetamine or dimethyltryptamine production on the property, is liable to the buyer or transferee for:
(1) costs relating to remediation of the property according to the Department of Health's clandestine drug labs general cleanup guidelines and best practices; and
(2) reasonable attorney fees for collection of costs from the seller or transferor.
An action under this paragraph must be commenced within six years after the date on which the buyer or transferee closed the purchase or transfer of the real property where the methamphetamine or dimethyltryptamine production occurred.
(o) This section preempts all local ordinances relating to the sale or transfer of real property designated as a clandestine lab site.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 152.18, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Deferring
prosecution for certain first time drug offenders. (a) A court may defer prosecution as
provided in paragraph (c) for any person found guilty, after trial or upon a
plea of guilty, of a violation of section 152.023, subdivision 2, 152.024,
subdivision 2, 152.025, subdivision 2, 152.0251, subdivision 2, 4, or 5,
or 152.027, subdivision 2, 3, 4, or 6, paragraph (d), for possession of
a controlled substance, who:
(1) has not previously participated in or completed a diversion program authorized under section 401.065;
(2) has not previously been placed on probation without a judgment of guilty and thereafter been discharged from probation under this section; and
(3) has not been convicted of a felony violation of this chapter, including a felony-level attempt or conspiracy, or been convicted by the United States or another state of a similar offense that would have been a felony under this chapter if committed in Minnesota, unless ten years have elapsed since discharge from sentence.
(b) The court must defer prosecution as provided in paragraph (c) for any person found guilty of a violation of section 152.025, subdivision 2, who:
(1) meets the criteria listed in paragraph (a), clauses (1) to (3); and
(2) has not previously been convicted of a felony offense under any state or federal law or of a gross misdemeanor under section 152.025 or 152.0251.
(c) In granting relief under this section, the court shall, without entering a judgment of guilty and with the consent of the person, defer further proceedings and place the person on probation upon such reasonable conditions as it may require and for a period, not to exceed the maximum sentence provided for the violation. The court may give the person the opportunity to attend and participate in an appropriate program of education regarding the nature and effects of alcohol and drug abuse as a stipulation of probation. Upon violation of a condition of the probation, the court may enter an adjudication of guilt and proceed as otherwise provided. The court may, in its discretion, dismiss the proceedings against the person and discharge the person from probation before the expiration of the maximum period prescribed for the person's probation. If during the period of probation the person does not violate any of the conditions of the probation, then upon expiration of the period the court shall discharge the person and dismiss the proceedings against that person. Discharge and dismissal under this subdivision shall be without court adjudication of guilt, but a not public record of it shall be retained by the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension for the purpose of use by the courts in determining the merits of subsequent proceedings against the person. The not public record may also be opened only upon court order for purposes of a criminal investigation, prosecution, or sentencing. Upon request by law enforcement, prosecution, or corrections authorities, the bureau shall notify the requesting party of the existence of the not public record and the right to seek a court order to open it pursuant to this section. The court shall forward a record of any discharge and dismissal under this subdivision to the bureau which shall make and maintain the not public record of it as provided under this subdivision. The discharge or dismissal shall not be deemed a conviction for purposes of disqualifications or disabilities imposed by law upon conviction of a crime or for any other purpose.
For purposes of this subdivision, "not public" has the meaning given in section 13.02, subdivision 8a.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and applies
to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 8. [152.185]
POSSESSION OR SALE OF CANNABIDIOL.
(a) Cannabidiol (CBD) that is derived
from industrial hemp as defined in section 18K.02, subdivision 3, is not a
controlled substance.
(b) A person does not violate this
chapter simply by possessing or selling CBD as described in paragraph (a).
(c) Paragraph (b) does not prevent a
person from being charged with or convicted of a violation of this chapter or
any other crime if the person's conduct is criminalized elsewhere.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to acts committed on or after that date.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 446A.083, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Account established. The authority shall establish a methamphetamine and dimethyltryptamine laboratory cleanup revolving account in the public facility authority fund to provide loans to counties and cities to remediate clandestine lab sites. The account must be credited with repayments.
Sec. 10. CANNABIS
TASK FORCE.
Subdivision 1. Establishment;
purpose. (a) The Cannabis
Task Force is established to advise the legislature on the legal and policy
issues associated with the legalization, taxation, and regulation of cannabis
production, sale, and use by those 21 years of age or older in the state.
(b)
It is not the purpose of this task force to provide a recommendation on whether
or not to legalize cannabis. The purpose
of this task force is to gather facts and report them to the legislature.
Subd. 2. Membership. (a) The Cannabis Task Force consists
of:
(1) two senators appointed by the
president of the senate;
(2) two senators appointed by the
minority leader of the senate;
(3) two members of the house of representatives
appointed by the speaker of the house;
(4) two members of the house of
representatives appointed by the minority leader of the house of
representatives;
(5) the commissioner of agriculture or
a designee;
(6) the commissioner of health or a
designee;
(7) the commissioner of public safety
or a designee;
(8) the attorney general or a designee;
(9) the state public defender or a
designee;
(10) the commissioner of revenue or a
designee;
(11) the commissioner of human services
or a designee;
(12) the commissioner of commerce or a designee;
(13) eight members appointed by the
governor who have relevant knowledge and experience, including:
(i) one person with experience working
in the medical cannabis industry;
(ii) one person with expertise in the
treatment of substance abuse disorder;
(iii) one medical cannabis patient;
(iv) one person directly involved in
the cultivation and distribution of medical cannabis in Minnesota;
(v) one person with experience working
in public health policy;
(vi) two persons from separate
noncannabis industry organizations who advocate for cannabis legalization;
(vii) one person convicted of a nonfelony drug-related offense; and
(viii) one person with expertise on
business liability, such as work hazards, insurance, human resources, and
employee rights, arising from employees working after the use of legal
recreational marijuana;
(14) one person who is an elected
official in a statutory or home rule charter city appointed by the League of
Minnesota Cities;
(15)
one medical doctor appointed by the Board of Medical Practice;
(16) one person who is an elected
county official or administrator appointed by the Association of Minnesota
Counties;
(17) one person who is a defense
attorney appointed by the Minnesota Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers;
(18) one person who is a county
attorney appointed by the Minnesota County Attorneys Association;
(19) one person who is a sheriff
appointed by the Minnesota Sheriff's Association;
(20) one person who is a chief of
police appointed by the Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association; and
(21) one rank and file peace officer
appointed by the Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association.
(b) Members shall serve without
compensation.
Subd. 3. Organization. (a) The commissioner of public safety
or the commissioner's designee shall convene the first meeting of the task
force. Meetings of the task force are
subject to Minnesota Statutes, chapter 13D.
(b) The task force shall meet monthly
or as determined by the chair.
(c) The members of the task force shall
elect a chair and other officers as the members deem necessary.
(d) A majority of members constitutes a
quorum.
Subd. 4. Staff. The commissioner of public safety
shall provide support staff, office space, and administrative services for the
task force.
Subd. 5. Duties. (a) The task force shall:
(1) identify and study the potential
effects of cannabis legalization including but not limited to impacts on public
safety, public health, tax policy, and regulatory oversight; and
(2) consult with experts and government
officials involved with the legalization of cannabis in other states.
(b) The task force shall develop a
comprehensive plan that covers:
(1) statutory changes necessary for the
legalization of cannabis;
(2) taxation of cannabis sales and
appropriate dedicated uses for the tax revenue raised;
(3) state and local regulation of
cannabis growth, processing, transport, packaging, labeling, sale, possession,
and use, and the governing body that would enforce the regulation;
(4) federal law, policy, and regulation
of cannabis;
(5) education of the public on
scientific knowledge of the effects of cannabis, especially with regards to use
by minors;
(6)
funding for, and provision of, treatment to persons with substance abuse
disorder as it relates to cannabis;
(7) expungement and pardon of nonviolent marijuana
convictions;
(8) security of cannabis retail and manufacturing
locations and the safe handling of proceeds from cannabis sales, including
banking options;
(9) policies that promote access to the legal cannabis market to persons from communities that are disproportionately impacted by the ban on cannabis including incentives for minority-owned businesses to participate in the cannabis industry;
(10) statutory and policy changes designed to discourage
operating motor vehicles while under the influence of cannabis; and
(11) recommendations to the legislature and others about
necessary and appropriate actions related to legalization of cannabis in the
state.
Subd. 6.
Report. By February 1, 2020, the task force
shall submit a report to the chairs and ranking minority members of the senate
and house of representatives committees and divisions having jurisdiction over
public safety, health, human services, revenue, labor and industry, and
agriculture policy and finance that details the task force's findings regarding the legalization of cannabis
including the comprehensive plan developed pursuant to subdivision 5.
Subd. 7.
Expiration. This section expires the earlier of
February 1, 2020, or the date the report is submitted under subdivision 6.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day
following final enactment.
Sec. 11. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 152.027, subdivisions 3
and 4, are repealed.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1,
2019.
ARTICLE 7
DWI
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 84.91, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Acts prohibited. (a) No owner or other person having charge or control of any snowmobile or all-terrain vehicle shall authorize or permit any individual the person knows or has reason to believe is under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance or other substance to operate the snowmobile or all-terrain vehicle anywhere in this state or on the ice of any boundary water of this state.
(b) No owner or other person having charge or control of any snowmobile or all-terrain vehicle shall knowingly authorize or permit any person, who by reason of any physical or mental disability is incapable of operating the vehicle, to operate the snowmobile or all-terrain vehicle anywhere in this state or on the ice of any boundary water of this state.
(c) A person who operates or is in physical control of a snowmobile or all-terrain vehicle anywhere in this state or on the ice of any boundary water of this state is subject to chapter 169A. In addition to the applicable sanctions under chapter 169A, a person who is convicted of violating section 169A.20 or an ordinance in conformity with it,
or
who refuses to comply with a lawful request to submit to testing or fails a
test lawfully administered under sections 169A.50 to 169A.53 or 171.177, or
an ordinance in conformity with it any of these sections, shall
be is prohibited from operating a snowmobile or all-terrain vehicle
for a period of one year. The
commissioner shall notify the person of the time period during which the
person is prohibited from operating a snowmobile or all-terrain vehicle.
(d) Administrative and judicial review of the operating privileges prohibition is governed by section 169A.53 or 171.177.
(e) The court shall promptly forward to the commissioner and the Department of Public Safety copies of all convictions and criminal and civil sanctions imposed under:
(1) this section;
(2) chapter 169 relating to snowmobiles and all-terrain vehicles;
(3) chapter 169A; and
(4) section 171.177.
(f) A person who violates paragraph (a) or (b), or an ordinance in conformity with either of them, is guilty of a misdemeanor. A person who operates a snowmobile or all-terrain vehicle during the time period the person is prohibited from operating a vehicle under paragraph (c) is guilty of a misdemeanor.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 86B.331, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Acts prohibited. (a) An owner or other person having charge or control of a motorboat may not authorize or allow an individual the person knows or has reason to believe is under the influence of alcohol or a controlled or other substance to operate the motorboat in operation on the waters of this state.
(b) An owner or other person having charge or control of a motorboat may not knowingly authorize or allow a person, who by reason of a physical or mental disability is incapable of operating the motorboat, to operate the motorboat in operation on the waters of this state.
(c) A person who operates or is in
physical control of a motorboat on the waters of this state is subject to
chapter 169A. In addition to the
applicable sanctions under chapter 169A, a person who is convicted of violating
section 169A.20 or an ordinance in conformity with it, or who fails a test
lawfully administered under sections 169A.50 to 169A.53 or 17l.177, or an
ordinance in conformity with it any of these sections, shall
be is prohibited from operating a motorboat on the waters of this
state for a period of 90 days between May 1 and October 31, extending
over two consecutive years if necessary.
If the person refuses to comply with a lawful demand to submit to
testing under sections 169A.50 to 169A.53 or 171.177, or an ordinance in
conformity with it any of these sections, the person shall be
is prohibited from operating a motorboat for a period of one year. The commissioner shall notify the person of
the period during which the person is prohibited from operating a motorboat.
(d) Administrative and judicial review of the operating privileges prohibition is governed by section 169A.53 or 171.177.
(e) The court shall promptly forward to the commissioner and the Department of Public Safety copies of all convictions and criminal and civil sanctions imposed under: (1) this section; (2) chapter 169 relating to motorboats; (3) chapter 169A; and (4) section 171.177.
(f) A person who violates paragraph (a) or (b), or an ordinance in conformity with either of them, is guilty of a misdemeanor.
(g) For purposes of this subdivision, a motorboat "in operation" does not include a motorboat that is anchored, beached, or securely fastened to a dock or other permanent mooring, or a motorboat that is being rowed or propelled by other than mechanical means.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 169A.03, subdivision 18, is amended to read:
Subd. 18. Peace officer. "Peace officer" means:
(1) a State Patrol officer;
(2) a University of Minnesota peace officer;
(3) a police officer of any municipality, including towns having powers under section 368.01, or county; and
(4) for purposes of violations of this
chapter in or on an off-road recreational vehicle or motorboat, or for
violations of section 97B.065 or 97B.066, a state conservation officer.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 169A.37, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Crime described. It is a crime for a person:
(1) to fail to comply with an impoundment order under section 169A.60 (administrative plate impoundment);
(2) to file a false statement under section 169A.60, subdivision 7, 8, or 14;
(3) to operate a self-propelled motor vehicle on a street or highway when the vehicle is subject to an impoundment order issued under section 169A.60, unless specially coded plates have been issued for the vehicle pursuant to section 169A.60, subdivision 13;
(4) to fail to notify the commissioner of the impoundment order when requesting new plates;
(5) who is subject to a plate impoundment
order under section 169A.60, to drive, operate, or be in control of any motor
vehicle during the impoundment period, unless the vehicle is employer-owned and
is not required to be equipped with an ignition interlock device pursuant to
section 171.306, subdivision 4, paragraph (b), or Laws 2013, chapter 127,
section 70, or has specially coded plates issued pursuant to section 169A.60,
subdivision 13, and the person is validly licensed to drive; or
(6) who is the transferee of a motor
vehicle and who has signed a sworn statement under section 169A.60, subdivision
14, to allow the previously registered owner to drive, operate, or be in
control of the vehicle during the impoundment period.; or
(7)
to intentionally remove all or a portion of or to otherwise obliterate or
damage a permanent sticker affixed on and invalidating a registration plate
under section 169A.60, subdivision 4.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 169A.55, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Reinstatement
of driving privileges; notice. Upon
expiration of a period of revocation under section 169A.52 (license revocation
for test failure or refusal), 169A.54 (impaired driving convictions and
adjudications; administrative penalties), or 171.177 (revocation; search
warrant), the commissioner shall notify the person of the terms upon which
driving privileges can be reinstated, and new registration plates issued, which
terms are: (1) successful completion
of an examination and proof of compliance with any terms of alcohol
treatment or counseling previously prescribed, if any; and (2) any other
requirements imposed by the commissioner and applicable to that particular case. The commissioner shall notify the owner of a
motor vehicle subject to an impoundment order under section 169A.60 (administrative
impoundment of plates) as a result of the violation of the procedures for
obtaining new registration plates, if the owner is not the violator. The commissioner shall also notify the person
that if driving is resumed without reinstatement of driving privileges or
without valid registration plates and registration certificate, the person will
be subject to criminal penalties.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 169A.60, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Peace officer as agent for notice of impoundment. On behalf of the commissioner, a peace officer issuing a notice of intent to revoke and of revocation for a plate impoundment violation shall also serve a notice of intent to impound and an order of impoundment. On behalf of the commissioner, a peace officer who is arresting a person for or charging a person with a plate impoundment violation described in subdivision 1, paragraph (d), clause (5), shall also serve a notice of intent to impound and an order of impoundment. If the vehicle involved in the plate impoundment violation is accessible to the officer at the time the impoundment order is issued, the officer shall seize the registration plates subject to the impoundment order. The officer shall destroy all plates seized or impounded under this section. Alternatively, the officer may invalidate the plates by affixing a permanent sticker on them. The officer shall send to the commissioner copies of the notice of intent to impound and the order of impoundment and a notice that registration plates impounded and seized under this section have been destroyed or have been affixed with the permanent sticker.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 169A.60, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Temporary
permit. If the motor vehicle is
registered to the violator and the plate impoundment violation is predicated
on the results of a chemical test of the violator's breath or on a refusal to
submit to a chemical test, the officer shall issue a temporary vehicle
permit that is valid for seven 14 days when the officer issues
the notices under subdivision 4. The
temporary permit is valid for 45 days if the violator submits to a chemical
test of the violator's blood or urine.
If the motor vehicle is registered in the name of another, the officer
shall issue a temporary vehicle permit that is valid for 45 days when the
notices are issued under subdivision 3. The
permit must be in a form determined by the registrar and whenever practicable
must be posted on the left side of the inside rear window of the vehicle. A permit is valid only for the vehicle for
which it is issued.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 169A.60, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Reissuance of registration plates. (a) The commissioner shall rescind the impoundment order of a person subject to an order under this section, other than the violator, if:
(1) the violator had a valid driver's license on the date of the plate impoundment violation and the person files with the commissioner an acceptable sworn statement containing the following information:
(i) that the person is the registered owner of the vehicle from which the plates have been impounded under this section;
(ii) that the person is the current owner and possessor of the vehicle used in the violation;
(iii) the date on which the violator obtained the vehicle from the registered owner;
(iv) the residence addresses of the registered owner and the violator on the date the violator obtained the vehicle from the registered owner;
(v) that the person was not a passenger in the vehicle at the time of the plate impoundment violation; and
(vi) that the person knows that the violator may not drive, operate, or be in physical control of a vehicle without a valid driver's license; or
(2) the violator did not have a valid driver's license on the date of the plate impoundment violation and the person made a report to law enforcement before the violation stating that the vehicle had been taken from the person's possession or was being used without permission.
(b) A person who has failed to make a report as provided in paragraph (a), clause (2), may be issued special registration plates under subdivision 13 for a period of one year from the effective date of the impoundment order. Following this period, the person may apply for regular registration plates.
(c) If the order is rescinded, the owner shall receive new registration plates at no cost, if the plates were seized and destroyed or have been affixed with a permanent sticker.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 169A.63, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 13. Exception. (a) This section does not apply if the
driver who committed the designated offense or whose conduct resulted in the
designated license revocation becomes a program participant in the ignition
interlock program under section 171.306 within 60 days following service of the
Notice of Seizure and Intent to Forfeit under this section.
(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), if
the program participant described in paragraph (a) subsequently operates the
motor vehicle to commit a designated offense or in a manner that results in a
designated license revocation, the vehicle must be seized and summarily
forfeited.
(c) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), if
the program participant described in paragraph (a) either voluntarily or
involuntarily ceases to participate in the program, or fails to successfully
complete it, the vehicle used in the underlying designated offense must be
seized and summarily forfeited.
(d) Paragraph (b) applies only if the
described subsequent vehicle operation occurs before the participant has been
restored to full driving privileges or within three years of the original
designated offense or designated license revocation, whichever occurs latest.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2019.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 171.29, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision
1. Examination
required. (a) No person whose
driver's license has been revoked by reason of conviction, plea of guilty, or
forfeiture of bail not vacated, under section 169.791, 169.797, 171.17, or
171.172, or revoked under section 169.792, 169A.52, or 171.177 shall be
issued another license unless and until that person shall have successfully
passed an examination as required by the commissioner of public safety. This subdivision does not apply to an
applicant for early reinstatement under section 169.792, subdivision 7a.
(b) The requirement to successfully
pass the examination described in paragraph (a) does not apply to a person
whose driver's license has been revoked because of an impaired driving offense.
Sec. 11. DWI
STUDY; MEASUREMENT OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES.
(a) The commissioner of public safety,
in consultation with stakeholders and experts, shall study and report on the
use of screening tests that measure the marijuana or tetrahydrocannabinols
level of a person stopped or arrested for driving while impaired. The commissioner shall also study the
threshold measurement level for the legal impairment of persons who are driving
under the influence of marijuana or tetrahydrocannabinols. The study must include the identification,
review, and evaluation of:
(1) marijuana or tetrahydrocannabinols
screening tests, including at a minimum oral fluid roadside tests;
(2) the measured amount of marijuana or
tetrahydrocannabinols in a driver's blood or urine that is the legal threshold
for impairment of the driver;
(3) the practices and laws in other
states for drug screening tests and measurement of marijuana or
tetrahydrocannabinols in persons suspected of driving while impaired by
controlled substances; and
(4) any other necessary information
relating to the measurement of marijuana or tetrahydrocannabinols in persons
who are suspected of driving under the influence of a controlled substance.
(b) The commissioner shall submit a
report of its study by March 15, 2020, to the chairs and ranking minority members
of the legislative committees and divisions with jurisdiction over public
safety.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
ARTICLE 8
VEHICLE OPERATIONS
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 169.92, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Suspension
of driver's license. (a) Upon
receiving a report from the court, or from the driver licensing authority of a
state, district, territory, or possession of the United States or a province of
a foreign country which has an agreement in effect with this state pursuant to
section 169.91, that a resident of this state or a person licensed as a driver
in this state did not appear in court in compliance with the terms of a
citation, the commissioner of public safety shall notify the driver that the
driver's license will be suspended unless the commissioner receives notice
within 30 days that the driver has appeared in the appropriate court or, if
the offense is a petty misdemeanor for which a guilty plea was entered under
section 609.491, that the person has paid any fine imposed by the court. If the commissioner does not receive notice
of the appearance in the appropriate court or payment of the fine within
30 days of the date of the commissioner's notice to the driver, the
commissioner may suspend the driver's license, subject to the notice
requirements of section 171.18, subdivision 2.
Notwithstanding the requirements in this section, the commissioner is
prohibited from suspending the driver's license of a person based solely on the
fact that the person did not appear in court (1) in compliance with the terms
of a citation for a petty misdemeanor, or (2) for a violation of section
171.24, subdivision 1.
(b)
The order of suspension shall indicate the reason for the order and shall
notify the driver that the driver's license shall remain remains
suspended until the driver has furnished evidence, satisfactory to the
commissioner, of compliance with any order entered by the court.
(c) Suspension shall be ordered under this subdivision only when the report clearly identifies the person arrested; describes the violation, specifying the section of the traffic law, ordinance or rule violated; indicates the location and date of the offense; and describes the vehicle involved and its registration number.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 171.16, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Commissioner
shall suspend. (a) The court
may recommend the suspension of the driver's license of the person so
convicted, and the commissioner shall suspend such license as recommended by
the court, without a hearing as provided herein.
(b) The commissioner is prohibited from
suspending a person's driver's license if the person was convicted only under
section 171.24, subdivision 1 or 2.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 171.16, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Suspension
for Failure to pay fine. When
any court reports to The commissioner must not suspend a person's
driver's license based solely on the fact that a person: (1) has been convicted of violating a law of
this state or an ordinance of a political subdivision which regulates the
operation or parking of motor vehicles, (2) has been sentenced to the payment
of a fine or had a surcharge levied against that person, or sentenced to a fine
upon which a surcharge was levied, and (3) has refused or failed to comply with
that sentence or to pay the surcharge, notwithstanding the fact that the
court has determined that the person has the ability to pay the fine or
surcharge, the commissioner shall suspend the driver's license of such person
for 30 days for a refusal or failure to pay or until notified by the court that
the fine or surcharge, or both if a fine and surcharge were not paid, has been
paid.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 171.18, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Offenses. (a) The commissioner may suspend the license of a driver without preliminary hearing upon a showing by department records or other sufficient evidence that the licensee:
(1) has committed an offense for which mandatory revocation of license is required upon conviction;
(2) has been convicted by a court for violating a provision of chapter 169 or an ordinance regulating traffic, other than a conviction for a petty misdemeanor, and department records show that the violation contributed in causing an accident resulting in the death or personal injury of another, or serious property damage;
(3) is an habitually reckless or negligent driver of a motor vehicle;
(4) is an habitual violator of the traffic laws;
(5) is incompetent to drive a motor vehicle as determined in a judicial proceeding;
(6) has permitted an unlawful or fraudulent use of the license;
(7) has committed an offense in another state that, if committed in this state, would be grounds for suspension;
(8) has committed a violation of section 169.444, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), within five years of a prior conviction under that section;
(9) has committed a violation of section 171.22, except that the commissioner may not suspend a person's driver's license based solely on the fact that the person possessed a fictitious or fraudulently altered Minnesota identification card;
(10) has failed to appear in court as provided in section 169.92, subdivision 4;
(11) has failed to report a medical condition that, if reported, would have resulted in cancellation of driving privileges;
(12) has been found to have committed an offense under section 169A.33; or
(13) has paid or attempted to pay a fee required under this chapter for a license or permit by means of a dishonored check issued to the state or a driver's license agent, which must be continued until the registrar determines or is informed by the agent that the dishonored check has been paid in full.
However, an action taken by the commissioner under clause (2) or (5) must conform to the recommendation of the court when made in connection with the prosecution of the licensee.
(b) The commissioner may not suspend
is prohibited from suspending the driver's license of an individual
under paragraph (a) who was convicted of a violation of section 171.24,
subdivision 1, whose license was under suspension at the time solely because
of the individual's failure to appear in court or failure to pay a fine or
2.
Sec. 5. [171.2405]
LICENSE REINSTATEMENT DIVERSION PROGRAM.
Subdivision 1. Establishment. (a) A city or county may establish a
license reinstatement diversion program for holders of class D drivers'
licenses who have been charged with violating section 171.24, subdivision 1 or
2. An individual charged with driving
after revocation under section 171.24, subdivision 2, is eligible for diversion
only if the revocation was due to a violation of section 169.791; 169.797;
169A.52; 169A.54; 171.17, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (6); or 171.177. An individual who is a holder of a commercial
driver's license or who has committed an offense in a commercial motor vehicle
is not eligible to participate in the diversion program. Nothing in this section authorizes the
issuance of a driver's license to a diversion program participant during the
underlying suspension or revocation period at issue in the violation of section
171.24, subdivision 1 or 2.
(b) Notwithstanding any law or
ordinance to the contrary, a city or county may contract with a third party to
create and administer the diversion program under this section. Any participating city or county, at its own
expense, may request an audit of the administrator.
(c) For purposes of this section,
"administrator" means the city, county, or administrator of the
program.
Subd. 2. Diversion
of an individual. (a) A
prosecutor for a participating city or county may determine whether to accept
an individual for diversion. When making
the determination, the prosecutor must consider:
(1) whether the individual has a record
of driving without a valid license or other criminal record, or has previously
participated in a diversion program;
(2) the strength of the evidence
against the individual, along with any mitigating factors; and
(3) the apparent ability and willingness of the individual to participate in the diversion program and comply with program requirements.
(b)
A city or county attorney may request that an individual be reviewed for a
diversion program without a formal city or county diversion program being
established. The city or county attorney
must follow the requirements of subdivisions 1 and 2 and may submit the
individual's application to an administrator for processing in collaboration
with DVS to determine if an individual is eligible for approval into the
diversion program. The participant must
meet the requirements in subdivision 4.
(c) A judge may submit a request for an
individual to apply for entry into a diversion program under subdivisions 1 and
2. The participant must meet the
requirements in subdivision 4.
Subd. 3. Diversion
driver's license. (a)
Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, the commissioner may issue a diversion
driver's license to a person who is a participant in a diversion program, after
receiving an application and payment of:
(1) the reinstatement fee under section
171.20, subdivision 4, by a participant whose driver's license has been
suspended;
(2) the reinstatement fee under section
171.29, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), by a participant whose driver's license
has been revoked under section 169.791; 169.797; or 171.17, subdivision 1, paragraph
(a), clause (6); or
(3) the reinstatement fee under section
171.29, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), by a participant whose driver's license
has been revoked under section 169A.52, 169A.54, or 171.177. The reinstatement fee and surcharge under
section 171.29, subdivision 2, paragraph (b), must also be paid during the
course of and as a condition of the diversion program.
(b) The commissioner may impose
restrictions on a diversion driver's license that are suitable to the
licensee's driving ability or applicable to the licensee as the commissioner
deems appropriate to ensure the safe operation of a motor vehicle by the
licensee. The participant must follow
all requirements of this section, the requirements set out by DVS and court
restrictions.
(c) Payments made by participants in
the diversion program of the reinstatement fee and surcharge under section
171.29, subdivision 2, paragraph (b), must be applied first toward payment of
the reinstatement fee and, after the reinstatement fee has been fully paid,
toward payment of the surcharge. Each
payment that is applied toward the reinstatement fee must be credited as
provided in section 171.29, subdivision 2, paragraph (b), and each payment that
is applied toward the surcharge must be credited as provided in section 171.29,
subdivision 2, paragraphs (c) and (d). After the reinstatement fee and surcharge are
satisfied, the participant must pay the program participation fee.
(d) Notwithstanding any law to the
contrary, a diversion driver's license issued to a participant in the program
must not be revoked or suspended for convictions entered due to payments made
under subdivision 4.
Subd. 4. Program
components. (a) At a minimum,
the diversion program must require individuals to:
(1) successfully attend and complete,
at the individual's expense, educational classes that provide, among other
things, information on driver's licensure;
(2) pay to the administrator, under a
schedule approved by the prosecutor, all required related fees, fines, and
charges, including applicable statutory license reinstatement fees and costs of
participation in the program;
(3) comply with all traffic laws; and
(4) demonstrate compliance with motor
vehicle insurance requirements.
(b)
Individuals whose underlying citations cost less than $250 shall receive a 60
percent discount on the diversion program fee.
Individuals whose underlying citations cost $250 to $500 shall receive a
40 percent discount on the diversion program fee.
Subd. 5. Termination
of participation; reinstatement of driver's license. (a) An individual's participation in
the diversion program must be terminated if:
(1) the individual is found guilty of a
moving traffic violation;
(2) the individual fails to provide
proof of vehicle insurance; or
(3) the administrator of the diversion
program informs the commissioner that the individual is no longer satisfying
the conditions of the diversion program.
(b) The commissioner must cancel an
individual's diversion driver's license upon receiving notice from the
administrator that the individual is not complying with the requirements of the
program.
(c) The original charge against the
individual of a violation of section 171.24 may be reinstated against an
individual whose participation in the diversion program terminates under
paragraph (a), clause (1) or (2).
(d) If an individual satisfies all
requirements of the diversion program, including, at a minimum, satisfactory
fulfillment of the components under subdivision 4, the administrator must
inform the court, the prosecutor, and the commissioner of the individual's
satisfactory completion of the diversion program.
(e) Upon receiving notice under
paragraph (d), the commissioner must reinstate the individual's driver's
license.
(f) Upon receiving notice under paragraph
(d), the court must dismiss the charge or the prosecutor must decline to
prosecute the individual.
Subd. 6. Fees
held on termination of participant. (a)
Upon termination of the participant in the program under subdivision 5, where
there are any held funds and only after the administrator has made payouts on
citations and fees, the third-party administrator shall hold remaining
participant fees for 12 months from the date of termination under subdivision
5, paragraph (a), clause (1) or (2).
(b) A participant who meets DVS
requirements to re-enter the diversion program may use held funds to pay fees
to be reinstated into the program.
(c) After 12 months, the administrator shall retain the funds for the work performed during the participant's enrollment period, prior to the participant's termination date in the diversion program.
Subd. 7. Biennial
report. (a) By February 1 of
each even-numbered year, the administrator must report on each city and county
that participated in the diversion program and provide a report to each
participating city and county, the commissioner, and the legislative committees
with jurisdiction over transportation and the judiciary concerning the results
of the program. The report must be made
available electronically and, upon request, in print. The report must include, without limitation,
the effect of the program on:
(1) recidivism rates for participants
in the diversion program;
(2) the number of participants who
successfully completed the program;
(3) the amount charged to individuals
for program fees;
(4)
payment of the fees and fines collected in the diversion program to cities,
counties, and the state;
(5) the total amount of money collected
from participants in the program;
(6) the total amount of money, by
category, paid or applied to reinstatement;
(7) educational support provided to
participants in the diversion program;
(8) the total number of participants in
the diversion program;
(9)
the total number of participants terminated from the program under subdivision
5, paragraph (a), clauses (1) to (3);
(10) the reimbursement policy for all payments listed under clause (4); and
(11) the amount of all payments listed
under clause (4) retained from participants who were terminated from the
program.
(b) The report must include all
recommendations made by cities or counties regarding the future of the program
and any necessary or suggested legislative changes.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2019. A city or county
participating in the diversion program may accept an individual into the
program until June 30, 2019. The third
party administering the diversion program may collect and disperse fees
collected pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 171.2405, subdivision 6,
paragraph (a), clause (2), through June 30, 2019.
Sec. 6. [171.325]
DRIVER'S LICENSE SUSPENSIONS AND REVOCATIONS; REPORTS.
Subdivision 1. Issuance, suspensions, and revocations. (a) Annually by February 15, the commissioner of public safety must report to the chairs and ranking minority members of the house of representatives and senate committees and divisions with jurisdiction over public safety and transportation on the status of driver's licenses issued, suspended, and revoked. The commissioner must make the report available on the department's website.
(b) At a minimum, the report must
include:
(1) the total number of driver's
licenses issued, suspended, and revoked as of January 1 the year the report is
submitted, broken down by county;
(2) for each of the previous eight
calendar years, the total number of driver's licenses suspended and the number
of suspended licenses reinstated; and
(3) for each of the previous eight
calendar years, the total number of driver's licenses revoked and the number of
revoked licenses reinstated.
(c) For purposes of paragraph (b),
clauses (1), (2), and (3), the report must identify each type of suspension or
revocation authorized by statute or rule and include the number of licenses
suspended or revoked for each type.
Subd. 2. Charges,
convictions, and fines. (a)
Annually by February 15, the state court administrator must report to the
chairs and ranking minority members of the house of representatives and senate
committees and divisions with jurisdiction over public safety and
transportation on (1) charges and convictions for driving after suspension or
revocation, and (2) payment of fines for violations related to operation of a
motor vehicle. The administrator must
make the report available on the state court's website.
(b)
At a minimum, the report must include:
(1)
for each of the previous eight calendar years, the number of charges under
section 171.24, subdivisions 1 and 2, broken down by the charges for
each subdivision and indicating whether the court appointed the public defender
to represent the defendant;
(2) for each of the previous eight
calendar years, the number of convictions under section 171.24, subdivisions 1
and 2, broken down by the convictions for each subdivision and indicating
whether the court appointed the public defender to represent the defendant; and
(3) for the past calendar year, for all
charges on violations related to the operation of a motor vehicle and included
on the uniform fine schedule authorized under section 609.101, subdivision 4,
the percentage of fines, broken down by whether the court appointed the public
defender to represent the defendant, which:
(i) were paid in full by the due date on
the citation;
(ii) were paid in full through a payment
plan;
(iii) accrued late charges;
(iv) were sent to court collections; and
(v) were sent to the Department of
Revenue for collection.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299A.12, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. General
requirements. Except as provided
in subdivision 4, Any vehicle used by an operator to provide transportation
service shall must be equipped with wheelchair securement devices
which are approved by the commissioner of public safety as meeting that
meet the specifications of subdivisions 1 and 2. Only securement devices that meet the
requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act may be used. A wheelchair securement device shall
prevent any forward, backward, or lateral movement of an occupied wheelchair
when the device is engaged and the vehicle is in motion, accelerating or
braking, and shall attach to the frame of the wheelchair without damaging it
must be installed and used according to the manufacturer's instructions and
Code of Federal Regulations, title 49, section 38.23. Wheelchair securement devices installed in
any vehicle shall must be maintained in working order and
according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299A.12, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Strength
Design requirements. The strength
design requirements for securing the part of a wheelchair that is
forward in the vehicle shall be one-half of those required for the rear. Where the wheelchair securement device and
the seat belt are combined in a common system, those parts which provide the
combined restraining force shall have a combined strength of both according to
the strength requirements of each as adopted by the commissioner of public
safety securement devices must meet the specifications in Code of
Federal Regulations, title 49, section 38.23.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299A.12, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Maximum
number of persons transported. A
vehicle used to provide transportation service shall must carry
only as many persons seated in wheelchairs as the number of securement devices
approved by the commissioner of public safety as meeting the specifications of
subdivisions 1 and 2 with which the vehicle is equipped, and each occupied
wheelchair shall must be secured by such a securement device
before the vehicle is set in motion.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299A.13, is amended to read:
299A.13
ADDITIONAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS.
Subdivision 1. Seat
belt. Any vehicle used to provide
transportation service shall must be equipped with seat belts which
that are approved by the commissioner of public safety. The seat belts required by this subdivision shall
must be adequate to secure the occupant of a wheelchair who is being
transported by the vehicle. These
The seat belts shall must be used only to secure the
person and shall must not be used to secure the wheelchair unless
the wheelchair securement force is not cumulative to the seat belt. The seat belts shall must meet
all other applicable state and federal requirements for safety.
Subd. 2. Electric
wheelchair. When transportation
service is provided to an individual in an electrically powered wheelchair, the
main power switch of the wheelchair shall must be placed in the
"off" position at all times while the vehicle is in motion.
Subd. 3. Mobility
aid accessibility. (a)
Vehicles equipped with wheelchair securement devices must provide a
level-change mechanism or boarding device such as a lift or ramp that complies
with Code of Federal Regulations, title 49, section 38.23.
(b) Wheelchair lifts must comply with
the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standards for public use lifts as outlined in Code of Federal Regulations,
title 49, sections 571.403 and 571.404.
Subd. 4. Driver's
responsibility. (a) The
driver of a vehicle equipped with a wheelchair securement device has the duties
outlined in this subdivision.
(b) The driver or a person designated
by the driver shall ensure that an occupied wheelchair is properly secured
before the driver sets the vehicle in motion.
(c) The driver or a person designated
by the driver shall ensure that the seat belt assembly is properly adjusted and
fastened around the wheelchair user in a manner consistent with the
manufacturer's recommendations before the driver sets the vehicle in motion
when:
(1) requested by the wheelchair user;
(2) the wheelchair user is unable to
communicate;
(3) seat belt usage is required of all
passengers in the vehicle; or
(4) the vehicle is a school bus.
The seat belt assembly must not be fastened if the
wheelchair user or other responsible person advises the driver that to do so
would aggravate a physical condition of the wheelchair user. If a restraint device is available that would
not aggravate the physical condition of the user, it must be fastened in the
required manner.
(d) The driver or a person designated
by the driver shall ensure that securement devices and seat belt assemblies are
retracted, removed, or otherwise stored when not in use to prevent tripping of
persons and damage to devices.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299A.14, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Standards. The inspection shall be made to determine
that the vehicle complies with the provisions of sections 299A.12,
subdivisions 1 and 4, and 299A.13, subdivision 1; and that
the securement device is and level‑change mechanism or boarding
device such as a lift or ramp are in working order; and that the
securement device is not in need of obvious repair. The inspection may include testing the use of
a securement device while the vehicle is in motion.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 480.15, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 8a. Motor
vehicle charges and conviction data; report. The court administrator shall collect,
compile, and report the data on (1) charges and convictions for driving after
suspension or revocation, and (2) payment of fines for violations related to
operation of a motor vehicle, as required under section 171.325.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.2112, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Criminal vehicular homicide. (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a person is guilty of criminal vehicular homicide and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than ten years or to payment of a fine of not more than $20,000, or both, if the person causes the death of a human being not constituting murder or manslaughter as a result of operating a motor vehicle:
(1) in a grossly negligent manner;
(2) in a negligent manner while under the influence of:
(i) alcohol;
(ii) a controlled substance; or
(iii) any combination of those elements;
(3) while having an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more;
(4) while having an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more, as measured within two hours of the time of driving;
(5) in a negligent manner while under the influence of an intoxicating substance and the person knows or has reason to know that the substance has the capacity to cause impairment;
(6) in a negligent manner while any amount of a controlled substance listed in Schedule I or II, or its metabolite, other than marijuana or tetrahydrocannabinols, is present in the person's body;
(7) where the driver who causes the
collision leaves the scene of the collision in violation of section 169.09,
subdivision 1 or 6; or
(8) where the driver had actual knowledge
that a peace officer had previously issued a citation or warning that the motor
vehicle was defectively maintained, the driver had actual knowledge that
remedial action was not taken, the driver had reason to know that the defect
created a present danger to others, and the death was caused by the defective
maintenance.;
(9) in a negligent manner while the
driver is in violation of section 169.475; or
(10)
in a negligent manner while the person's driver's license or driving privilege
has been suspended, revoked, or canceled or the person has been disqualified
from holding a commercial driver's license or been denied the privilege to
operate a commercial motor vehicle pursuant to:
(i) section 169.89, subdivision 5;
169A.52; 169A.54; 171.05, subdivision 2b, paragraph (d); 171.13, subdivision 3
or 4; 171.17, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (1) or (10); 171.177;
171.18, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (2), (3), (4), (5), or (11);
171.32; or 260B.225, subdivision 9; or a violation of section 169.13; 169.21;
169.444; 609.19, subdivision 1, clause (2); or 609.487, subdivisions 3 to 5; or
any violation of chapter 169A; or
(ii) a law from another state similar to
those described in item (i).
(b) If a person is sentenced under paragraph (a) for a violation under paragraph (a), clauses (2) to (6), occurring within ten years of a qualified prior driving offense, the statutory maximum sentence of imprisonment is 15 years.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.2113, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Great bodily harm. A person is guilty of criminal vehicular operation resulting in great bodily harm and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both, if the person causes great bodily harm to another not constituting attempted murder or assault as a result of operating a motor vehicle:
(1) in a grossly negligent manner;
(2) in a negligent manner while under the influence of:
(i) alcohol;
(ii) a controlled substance; or
(iii) any combination of those elements;
(3) while having an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more;
(4) while having an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more, as measured within two hours of the time of driving;
(5) in a negligent manner while under the influence of an intoxicating substance and the person knows or has reason to know that the substance has the capacity to cause impairment;
(6) in a negligent manner while any amount of a controlled substance listed in Schedule I or II, or its metabolite, other than marijuana or tetrahydrocannabinols, is present in the person's body;
(7) where the driver who causes the accident
leaves the scene of the accident in violation of section 169.09, subdivision 1
or 6; or
(8) where the driver had actual knowledge
that a peace officer had previously issued a citation or warning that the motor
vehicle was defectively maintained, the driver had actual knowledge that
remedial action was not taken, the driver had reason to know that the defect
created a present danger to others, and the injury was caused by the defective
maintenance.;
(9)
in a negligent manner while the driver is in violation of section 169.475; or
(10) in a negligent manner while the
person's driver's license or driving privilege has been suspended, revoked, or
canceled or the person has been disqualified from holding a commercial driver's
license or been denied the privilege to operate a commercial motor vehicle
pursuant to:
(i) section 169.89, subdivision 5;
169A.52; 169A.54; 171.05, subdivision 2b, paragraph (d); 171.13, subdivision 3
or 4; 171.17, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (1) or (10); 171.177;
171.18, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (2), (3), (4), (5), or (11);
171.32; or 260B.225, subdivision 9; or a violation of section 169.13; 169.21;
169.444; 609.19, subdivision 1, clause (2); or 609.487, subdivisions 3 to 5; or
any violation of chapter 169A; or
(ii) a law from another state similar to
those described in item (i).
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.2113, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Substantial bodily harm. A person is guilty of criminal vehicular operation resulting in substantial bodily harm and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than three years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both, if the person causes substantial bodily harm to another as a result of operating a motor vehicle:
(1) in a grossly negligent manner;
(2) in a negligent manner while under the influence of:
(i) alcohol;
(ii) a controlled substance; or
(iii) any combination of those elements;
(3) while having an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more;
(4) while having an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more, as measured within two hours of the time of driving;
(5) in a negligent manner while under the influence of an intoxicating substance and the person knows or has reason to know that the substance has the capacity to cause impairment;
(6) in a negligent manner while any amount of a controlled substance listed in Schedule I or II, or its metabolite, other than marijuana or tetrahydrocannabinols, is present in the person's body;
(7) where the driver who causes the accident
leaves the scene of the accident in violation of section 169.09, subdivision 1
or 6; or
(8) where the driver had actual knowledge
that a peace officer had previously issued a citation or warning that the motor
vehicle was defectively maintained, the driver had actual knowledge that
remedial action was not taken, the driver had reason to know that the defect
created a present danger to others, and the injury was caused by the defective
maintenance.;
(9) in a negligent manner while the
driver is in violation of section 169.475; or
(10)
in a negligent manner while the person's driver's license or driving privilege
has been suspended, revoked, or canceled or the person has been disqualified
from holding a commercial driver's license or been denied the privilege to
operate a commercial motor vehicle pursuant to:
(i) section 169.89, subdivision 5;
169A.52; 169A.54; 171.05, subdivision 2b, paragraph (d); 171.13, subdivision 3
or 4; 171.17, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (1) or (10); 171.177;
171.18, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (2), (3), (4), (5), or (11);
171.32; or 260B.225, subdivision 9; or a violation of section 169.13; 169.21;
169.444; 609.19, subdivision 1, clause (2); or 609.487, subdivisions 3 to 5; or
any violation of chapter 169A; or
(ii) a law from another state similar to
those described in item (i).
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.2113, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Bodily harm. A person is guilty of criminal vehicular operation resulting in bodily harm and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both, if the person causes bodily harm to another as a result of operating a motor vehicle:
(1) in a grossly negligent manner;
(2) in a negligent manner while under the influence of:
(i) alcohol;
(ii) a controlled substance; or
(iii) any combination of those elements;
(3) while having an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more;
(4) while having an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more, as measured within two hours of the time of driving;
(5) in a negligent manner while under the influence of an intoxicating substance and the person knows or has reason to know that the substance has the capacity to cause impairment;
(6) in a negligent manner while any amount of a controlled substance listed in Schedule I or II, or its metabolite, other than marijuana or tetrahydrocannabinols, is present in the person's body;
(7) where the driver who causes the accident
leaves the scene of the accident in violation of section 169.09, subdivision 1
or 6; or
(8) where the driver had actual knowledge
that a peace officer had previously issued a citation or warning that the motor
vehicle was defectively maintained, the driver had actual knowledge that
remedial action was not taken, the driver had reason to know that the defect
created a present danger to others, and the injury was caused by the defective
maintenance.;
(9) in a negligent manner while the
driver is in violation of section 169.475; or
(10)
in a negligent manner while the person's driver's license or driving privilege
has been suspended, revoked, or canceled or the person has been disqualified
from holding a commercial driver's license or been denied the privilege to
operate a commercial motor vehicle pursuant to:
(i) section 169.89, subdivision 5;
169A.52; 169A.54; 171.05, subdivision 2b, paragraph (d); 171.13, subdivision 3
or 4; 171.17, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (1) or (10); 171.177;
171.18, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (2), (3), (4), (5), or (11);
171.32; or 260B.225, subdivision 9; or a violation of section 169.13; 169.21;
169.444; 609.19, subdivision 1, clause (2); or 609.487, subdivisions 3 to 5; or
any violation of chapter 169A; or
(ii) a law from another state similar to
those described in item (i).
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 17. Laws 2009, chapter 59, article 3, section 4, subdivision 9, as amended by Laws 2010, chapter 197, section 1, Laws 2011, chapter 87, section 1, subdivision 9, Laws 2013, chapter 127, section 60, and Laws 2017, chapter 95, article 3, section 29, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. Sunset;
transition. A city or county
participating in this pilot program may accept an individual for diversion into
the pilot program until June 30, 2019.
and the third party administering the diversion program may
collect and disburse fees collected pursuant to subdivision 6, paragraph (a),
clause (2), through December 31, 2020 until the day following the
date the permanent diversion program established under Minnesota Statutes,
section 171.2405, is effective, at which time the pilot program under this
section expires. An individual
participating in but who has not completed the pilot program on the date the
pilot program expires is automatically transferred and enrolled in the
permanent diversion program under Minnesota Statutes, section 171.2405, and
credited for any fees paid or activities completed under the pilot program.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Sec. 18. RETROACTIVE
DRIVER'S LICENSE REINSTATEMENT.
(a) The commissioner of public safety
must make an individual's driver's license eligible for reinstatement if the
license is solely suspended pursuant to:
(1) Minnesota Statutes 2018, section
169.92, subdivision 4;
(2) Minnesota Statutes 2018, section
171.16, subdivision 2, if the person was convicted only under Minnesota
Statutes, section 171.24, subdivision 1 or 2;
(3) Minnesota Statutes 2018, section
171.16, subdivision 3; or
(4) any combination of clauses (1),
(2), and (3).
(b) By December 1, 2019, the
commissioner must provide written notice to an individual whose license has
been made eligible for reinstatement under paragraph (a), addressed to the
licensee at the licensee's last known address.
(c) Notwithstanding any law to the
contrary, before the license is reinstated, an individual whose driver's
license is eligible for reinstatement under paragraph (a) must pay a
reinstatement fee of $20.
(d) The following applies for an
individual who is eligible for reinstatement under paragraph (a), and whose
license was suspended, revoked, or canceled under any other provision in
Minnesota Statutes:
(1)
the suspension, revocation, or cancellation under any other provision in
Minnesota Statutes remains in effect;
(2) subject to clause (1), the
individual may become eligible for reinstatement under paragraph (a); and
(3) the commissioner is not required to
send the notice described in paragraph (b).
(e) Paragraph (a) applies
notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 169.92, subdivision 4;
171.16, subdivision 2 or 3; or any other law to the contrary.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2019.
Sec. 19. TRAFFIC
STOP STUDY.
Subdivision 1. Study
requirements. (a) The
commissioner of public safety must identify a qualified research organization
which shall conduct a study to determine what impact, if any, changes in
traffic laws since 2003 have had on traffic stops in Minnesota including
whether changes resulted in a disproportionate impact in any geographic area or
on any demographic group.
(b) The study shall identify
significant changes in traffic law enacted since 2003 including, but not
limited to:
(1) the adoption of Minnesota Statutes,
section 169.475;
(2) amendments to Minnesota Statutes,
section 169.475, effective August 1, 2019;
(3) changes to Minnesota Statutes,
section 169.686, enacted pursuant to Laws 2009, chapter 165, section 2; and
(4) changes to Minnesota Statutes,
section 169A.20, enacted pursuant to Laws 2004, chapter 283, section 3.
(c) The grant recipient shall
coordinate with local law enforcement agencies and the Minnesota State Patrol
to obtain and collect relevant data on traffic stops. Data shall be collected as provided by law,
rule, or policy of the law enforcement agency.
Nothing in this section requires any law enforcement agency to collect
additional data.
(d) The grant recipient shall analyze
the data obtained or collected based on factors including, but not limited to,
the geographic area in which the stop took place and demographic information of
the driver.
(e) To the extent possible, the study
shall compare data obtained and collected under paragraph (c) with data
collected pursuant to Laws 2001, First Special Session chapter 8, article 7,
section 6.
(f) The grant recipient shall
coordinate with the commissioner of public safety and law enforcement agencies
to ensure the confidentiality of data obtained or collected.
Subd. 2. Report. By February 15, 2021, the grant
recipient must provide a report to the commissioner of public safety and the
chairs and ranking minority members of the legislative committees and divisions
with jurisdiction over transportation and criminal justice policy on the
results of the study.
Sec. 20. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections
299A.12, subdivision 4; and 299A.18, are repealed.
ARTICLE 9
PRETRIAL RELEASE, SENTENCING, PROBATION, AND DIVERSION
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 244.05, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Minimum imprisonment, life sentence. (a) An inmate serving a mandatory life sentence under section 609.106, subdivision 2, or 609.3455, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), must not be given supervised release under this section.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (f), an inmate serving a mandatory life sentence under section 609.185, paragraph (a), clause (3), (5), or (6); or Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 609.109, subdivision 3, must not be given supervised release under this section without having served a minimum term of 30 years.
(c) An inmate serving a mandatory life sentence under section 609.385 must not be given supervised release under this section without having served a minimum term of imprisonment of 17 years.
(d) An inmate serving a mandatory life sentence under section 609.3455, subdivision 3 or 4, must not be given supervised release under this section without having served the minimum term of imprisonment specified by the court in its sentence.
(e)
An inmate serving a mandatory life sentence under section 609.106, subdivision
3, or 609.3455, subdivision 2, paragraph (c), must not be given
supervised release under this section without having served a minimum term of
imprisonment of 25 years.
(f) An inmate serving a mandatory life
sentence for a crime described in paragraph (b) who was under 18 years of age
at the time of the commission of the offense must not be given supervised
release under this section without having served a minimum term of imprisonment
of 25 years.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 244.05, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Supervised release, life sentence. (a) The commissioner of corrections may, under rules promulgated by the commissioner, give supervised release to an inmate serving a mandatory life sentence under section 609.106, subdivision 3; 609.185, paragraph (a), clause (3), (5), or (6); 609.3455, subdivision 2, paragraph (c), 3, or 4; 609.385; or Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 609.109, subdivision 3, after the inmate has served the minimum term of imprisonment specified in subdivision 4.
(b) The commissioner shall require the preparation of a community investigation report and shall consider the findings of the report when making a supervised release decision under this subdivision. The report shall reflect the sentiment of the various elements of the community toward the inmate, both at the time of the offense and at the present time. The report shall include the views of the sentencing judge, the prosecutor, any law enforcement personnel who may have been involved in the case, and any successors to these individuals who may have information relevant to the supervised release decision. The report shall also include the views of the victim and the victim's family unless the victim or the victim's family chooses not to participate.
(c) The commissioner shall make reasonable efforts to notify the victim, in advance, of the time and place of the inmate's supervised release review hearing. The victim has a right to submit an oral or written statement at the review hearing. The statement may summarize the harm suffered by the victim as a result of the crime and give the victim's recommendation on whether the inmate should be given supervised release at this time. The commissioner must consider the victim's statement when making the supervised release decision.
(d) When considering whether to give supervised release to an inmate serving a life sentence under section 609.3455, subdivision 3 or 4, the commissioner shall consider, at a minimum, the following: the risk the inmate poses to the community if released, the inmate's progress in treatment, the inmate's behavior while incarcerated, psychological or other diagnostic evaluations of the inmate, the inmate's criminal history, and any other relevant conduct of the inmate while incarcerated or before incarceration. The commissioner may not give supervised release to the inmate unless:
(1) while in prison:
(i) the inmate has successfully completed appropriate sex offender treatment;
(ii) the inmate has been assessed for chemical dependency needs and, if appropriate, has successfully completed chemical dependency treatment; and
(iii) the inmate has been assessed for mental health needs and, if appropriate, has successfully completed mental health treatment; and
(2) a comprehensive individual release plan is in place for the inmate that ensures that, after release, the inmate will have suitable housing and receive appropriate aftercare and community-based treatment. The comprehensive plan also must include a postprison employment or education plan for the inmate.
(e) As used in this subdivision, "victim" means the individual who suffered harm as a result of the inmate's crime or, if the individual is deceased, the deceased's surviving spouse or next of kin.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 244.09, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Clearinghouse and information center. The commission, in addition to establishing Sentencing Guidelines, shall serve as a clearinghouse and information center for the collection, preparation, analysis and dissemination of information on state and local sentencing and probation practices, and shall conduct ongoing research regarding Sentencing Guidelines, use of imprisonment and alternatives to imprisonment, probation terms, conditions of probation, probation revocations, plea bargaining, recidivism, and other matters relating to the improvement of the criminal justice system. The commission shall from time to time make recommendations to the legislature regarding changes in the Criminal Code, criminal procedures, and other aspects of sentencing and probation.
This information shall include information regarding the impact of statutory changes to the state's criminal laws related to controlled substances, including those changes enacted by the legislature in Laws 2016, chapter 160.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 244.09, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Administrative services. The commissioner of corrections shall provide adequate office space and administrative services for the commission, and the commission shall reimburse the commissioner for the space and services provided. The commission may also utilize, with their consent, the services, equipment, personnel, information and resources of other state agencies; and may accept voluntary and uncompensated services, contract with individuals, public and private agencies, and request information, reports and data from, and establish data integrations with, any agency of the state, or any of its political subdivisions, to the extent authorized by law.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 5. [260B.008]
USE OF RESTRAINTS.
(a) As used in this section,
"restraints" means a mechanical or other device that constrains the
movement of a person's body or limbs.
(b) Restraints may not be used on a
child appearing in court in a proceeding under this chapter unless the court
finds that:
(1) the use of restraints is necessary:
(i) to prevent physical harm to the
child or another; or
(ii) to prevent the child from fleeing
in situations in which the child presents a substantial risk of flight from the
courtroom; and
(2) there are no less restrictive
alternatives to restraints that will prevent flight or physical harm to the
child or another, including but not limited to the presence of court personnel,
law enforcement officers, or bailiffs.
The finding in clause (1), item (i), may be based, among
other things, on the child having a history of disruptive courtroom behavior or
behavior while in custody for any current or prior offense that has placed
others in potentially harmful situations, or presenting a substantial risk of
inflicting physical harm on the child or others as evidenced by past behavior. The court may take into account the physical
structure of the courthouse in assessing the applicability of the above factors
to the individual child.
(c) The court shall be provided the
child's behavior history and shall provide the child an opportunity to be heard
in person or through counsel before ordering the use of restraints. If restraints are ordered, the court shall
make findings of fact in support of the order.
Sec. 6. [260B.1755]
ALTERNATIVE TO ARREST OF CERTAIN JUVENILE OFFENDERS AUTHORIZED.
(a) A peace officer may refer a child
that the officer has the lawful authority to arrest or has arrested to a
program that the law enforcement agency with jurisdiction over the child deems
appropriate.
(b) This section does not apply to
violent felony offenses or to peace officers acting pursuant to an order or
warrant described in section 260B.175, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), or other
court order to take a child into custody.
(c) A program authorized by this
section may defer prosecution of juvenile offenders who agree to complete
appropriate conditions. Upon completion
of the conditions, the charge shall be dismissed. Both petty offenders and delinquents are
eligible for referrals under this section.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 260B.176, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 1a. Risk
assessment instrument. A
person making a release decision under subdivision 1 shall use an objective and
racially, ethnically, and gender-responsive juvenile detention risk assessment
instrument developed by the commissioner, county, group of counties, or
judicial district, in consultation with the state coordinator or coordinators
of the Minnesota Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiative. The risk assessment instrument must assess
the likelihood that a child released from preadjudication detention under this
section or section 260B.178 would endanger others or not return for a court
hearing. The instrument must identify
the appropriate setting for a child who might endanger others or not return for
a court hearing pending adjudication, with either continued detention or
placement
in a noncustodial community-based supervision setting. The instrument must also identify the type of
noncustodial community-based supervision setting necessary to minimize the risk
that a child who is released from custody will endanger others or not return
for a court hearing.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective January 1, 2020.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 590.01, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Time
limit. (a) No petition for
postconviction relief may be filed more than two years after the later of:
(1) the entry of judgment of conviction or sentence if no direct appeal is filed; or
(2) an appellate court's disposition of petitioner's direct appeal.
(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), a court may hear a petition for postconviction relief if:
(1) the petitioner establishes that a physical disability or mental disease precluded a timely assertion of the claim;
(2) the petitioner alleges the existence of newly discovered evidence, including scientific evidence, that could not have been ascertained by the exercise of due diligence by the petitioner or petitioner's attorney within the two‑year time period for filing a postconviction petition, and the evidence is not cumulative to evidence presented at trial, is not for impeachment purposes, and establishes by a clear and convincing standard that the petitioner is innocent of the offense or offenses for which the petitioner was convicted;
(3) the petitioner asserts a new interpretation of federal or state constitutional or statutory law by either the United States Supreme Court or a Minnesota appellate court and the petitioner establishes that this interpretation is retroactively applicable to the petitioner's case;
(4) the petition is brought pursuant to
subdivision 3; or
(5) the petitioner establishes to the
satisfaction of the court that the petition is not frivolous and is in the
interests of justice.; or
(6) the petitioner: (i) is placed into immigration removal
proceedings; (ii) is detained for the purpose of removal from the United
States; (iii) can provide evidence showing that removal from the United States
has become more likely than not; or (iv) is unable to apply for an immigration
benefit, such as naturalization or travel, due to the criminal conviction.
(c) Any petition invoking an exception
provided in paragraph (b) must be filed within two years of the date the claim
arises. A claim arises when the
petitioner has actual knowledge of the legal or factual basis for that claim.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 590.11, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Definition
Definitions. (a) For
purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings given them.
(b) "Exonerated" means that:
(1) a court of this state:
(i)
vacated or, reversed, or set aside a judgment of
conviction on grounds consistent with innocence and there are no remaining
felony charges in effect against the petitioner from the same behavioral
incident, or if there are remaining felony charges against the petitioner from
the same behavioral incident, the prosecutor dismissed the dismisses
those remaining felony charges; or
(ii) ordered a new trial on grounds
consistent with innocence and the prosecutor dismissed the charges or the
petitioner was found not guilty at the new trial all felony charges
against the petitioner arising from the same behavioral incident or the
petitioner was found not guilty of all felony charges arising from the same
behavioral incident at the new trial; and
(2) the time for appeal of the order
resulting in exoneration has expired or the order has been affirmed and is
final.; and
(3) 60 days have passed since the
judgment of conviction was reversed or vacated, and the prosecutor has not
filed any felony charges against the petitioner from the same behavioral
incident, or if the prosecutor did file felony charges against the petitioner
from the same behavioral incident, those felony charges were dismissed or the
defendant was found not guilty of those charges at the new trial.
(c) "On grounds consistent with
innocence" means either:
(1) exonerated, through a pardon or
sentence commutation, based on factual innocence; or
(2) exonerated because the judgment of
conviction was vacated or reversed, or a new trial was ordered, and there is
any evidence of factual innocence whether it was available at the time of
investigation or trial or is newly discovered evidence.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 590.11, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Procedure. A petition for an order declaring
eligibility for compensation based on exoneration under sections 611.362 to
611.368 must be brought before the district court where the original conviction
was obtained. The state must be
represented by the office of the prosecutor that obtained the conviction or the
prosecutor's successor. Within 60 days
after the filing of the petition, the prosecutor must respond to the petition. A petition must be brought within two years,
but no less than 60 days after the petitioner is exonerated. Persons released from custody after being
exonerated before July 1, 2014, must commence an action under this section
within two years of July 1, 2014. If
before July 1, 2019, a person did not meet both requirements of Minnesota
Statutes 2018, section 590.11, subdivision 1, clause (1), item (i), and did not
file a petition or the petition was denied, that person may commence an action
meeting the requirements under subdivision 1, paragraph (b), clause (1), item
(i), on or after July 1, 2019, and before July 1, 2021.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 590.11, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Elements. (a) A claim for compensation arises if a person is eligible for compensation under subdivision 3 and:
(1) the person was convicted of a felony
and served any part of the imposed sentence in prison;
(2) in cases where the person was convicted of multiple charges arising out of the same behavioral incident, the person was exonerated for all of those charges;
(3) the person did not commit or induce another person to commit perjury or fabricate evidence to cause or bring about the conviction; and
(4) the person was not serving a term of imprisonment
incarceration for another crime at the same time, provided that except:
(i) if the person served additional
time in prison or jail due to the conviction that is the basis of the
claim, the person may make a claim for that portion of time served in prison or
jail during which the person was serving no other sentence.; or
(ii) if the person served additional
executed sentences that had been previously stayed, and the reason the
additional stayed sentences were executed was due to the conviction that is the
basis for the claim.
(b) A claimant may make a claim only for that portion of time served in prison or jail during which the claimant was serving no other sentence, unless the other sentence arose from the circumstances described in paragraph (a), clause (4), item (ii).
(c) A confession or admission later found to be false or a guilty plea to a crime the claimant did not commit does not constitute bringing about the claimant's conviction for purposes of paragraph (a), clause (3).
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 590.11, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Order. If, after considering all the files and
records admitted and any evidence admitted at a hearing held pursuant to
subdivision 4, the court determines that the petitioner is eligible for
compensation, the court shall issue an order containing its findings and, if
applicable, indicate the portion of the term of imprisonment incarceration
for which the petitioner is entitled to make a claim. The court shall notify the petitioner of the
right to file a claim for compensation under sections 611.362 to 611.368 and
provide the petitioner with a copy of those sections. The petitioner must acknowledge receipt of
the notice and a copy of those sections in writing or on the record before the
court.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.106, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Life without release. Except as provided in subdivision 3, the court shall sentence a person to life imprisonment without possibility of release under the following circumstances:
(1)
the person is convicted of first-degree murder under section 609.185, paragraph
(a), clause (1), (2), (4), or (7);
(2) the person is convicted of committing first-degree murder in the course of a kidnapping under section 609.185, paragraph (a), clause (3); or
(3) the person is convicted of first-degree murder under section 609.185, paragraph (a), clause (3), (5), or (6), and the court determines on the record at the time of sentencing that the person has one or more previous convictions for a heinous crime.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.106, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 3. Offender
under age 18; life imprisonment. The
court shall sentence a person who was under 18 years of age at the time of
the commission of an offense under the circumstances described in subdivision 2
to imprisonment for life.
Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.115, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 11. Family
impact statement. (a) If the
defendant is a parent, guardian, or caregiver of a minor child, and if the
defendant may be sentenced to a term of imprisonment, the court may order that
the officer preparing the report under subdivision 1 prepare a family impact
statement for the purpose of providing the court with information regarding
sentencing options other than a term of imprisonment. The family impact statement must address the
impact on any minor child and other family members that would result if the
defendant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment including, but not limited to,
the impact on the financial needs of the child and other family members; the
relationship between the defendant and the child; the defendant's duties and
responsibilities as a parent, guardian, or caregiver of the child; the
availability of community and family support for the child; and the likely
impact on the child's health, safety, and education.
(b) At sentencing, the court may
consider whether, based on the information in the family impact statement, the
defendant is particularly amenable to probation.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and applies to presentence investigation reports caused to be made on or after that date.
Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.135, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:
Subd. 1a. Failure
to pay restitution. If the court
orders payment of restitution as a condition of probation and if the defendant
fails to pay the restitution in accordance with the payment schedule or
structure established by the court or the probation officer, the prosecutor or
the defendant's probation officer may, on the prosecutor's or the officer's own
motion or at the request of the victim, ask the court to hold a hearing to
determine whether or not the conditions of probation should be changed or
probation should be revoked. The
defendant's probation officer shall ask for the hearing if the restitution
ordered has not been paid prior to 60 days before the term of probation expires. The court shall schedule and hold this
hearing and take appropriate action, including action under subdivision 2,
paragraph (g) (i), before the defendant's term of probation
expires.
Nothing in this subdivision limits the court's ability to refer the case to collections under section 609.104 when a defendant fails to pay court-ordered restitution.
Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.135, subdivision 1c, is amended to read:
Subd. 1c. Failure
to complete court-ordered treatment. If
the court orders a defendant to undergo treatment as a condition of probation
and if the defendant fails to successfully complete treatment at least 60 days
before the term of probation expires, the prosecutor or the defendant's
probation officer may ask the court to hold a hearing to determine whether the
conditions of probation should be changed or probation should be revoked. The court shall schedule and hold this
hearing and take appropriate action, including action under subdivision 2,
paragraph (h) (i), before the defendant's term of probation
expires.
Sec. 18. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.135, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Stay
of sentence maximum periods. (a) If
the conviction is for a felony other than section 609.2113, subdivision 1 or
2, or 609.2114, subdivision 2, or Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 609.21,
subdivision 1a, paragraph (b) or (c) an offense listed in paragraph (b),
the stay shall be for not more than four five years or the
maximum period for which the sentence of imprisonment might have been imposed,
whichever is longer.
(b)
If the conviction is for a felony violation of section 609.19, 609.195, 609.20,
609.2662, 609.2663, 609.2664, 609.268, 609.342, 609.343, 609.344, 609.345, or
609.3451, the stay shall be for the maximum time period for which the sentence
of imprisonment might have been imposed by the court.
(b) (c) If the conviction is
for a gross misdemeanor violation of section 169A.20, 609.2113, subdivision
3, or 609.3451, or for a felony described in section 609.2113,
subdivision 1 or 2, or 609.2114, subdivision 2, the stay shall be for not
more than six five years. The
court shall provide for unsupervised probation for the last year of the stay
unless the court finds that the defendant needs supervised probation for all or
part of the last year.
(c) (d) If the conviction is
for a gross misdemeanor not specified in paragraph (b) (c), the
stay shall be for not more than two years.
(d) (e) If the conviction is
for any misdemeanor under section 169A.20; 609.746, subdivision 1; 609.79; or
617.23; or for a misdemeanor under section 609.2242 or 609.224, subdivision 1,
in which the victim of the crime was a family or household member as defined in
section 518B.01, the stay shall be for not more than two years. The court shall provide for unsupervised
probation for the second year of the stay unless the court finds that the
defendant needs supervised probation for all or part of the second year.
(e) (f) If the conviction is
for a misdemeanor not specified in paragraph (d) (e), the stay
shall be for not more than one year.
(f) (g) The defendant shall
be discharged six months after the term of the stay expires, unless the stay
has been revoked or extended under paragraph (g) paragraphs (h)
through (l), or the defendant has already been discharged.
(h) If the defendant has received a
stayed sentence for a conviction of a felony offense and as a condition of
probation was ordered by the court to pay restitution, the probation officer,
or the court if the defendant is on unsupervised probation, shall notify the
prosecuting authority six months prior to the expiration or early discharge of
a stayed sentence, the amount of any unpaid court-ordered restitution. Notwithstanding the maximum periods specified
for stays of sentences under paragraph (a) or (b), a court may extend a
defendant's term of probation for up to three years if it finds, at a hearing
conducted under subdivision 1a, that:
(1)
the defendant has not paid court-ordered restitution in accordance with the
payment schedule or structure; and
(2) the defendant is likely to not pay
the restitution the defendant owes before the term of probation expires.
The extension of probation for failure to pay restitution
may be extended by the court for up to two additional years if the court finds,
at another hearing conducted under subdivision 1a, that the defendant still has
not paid the court‑ordered restitution that the defendant owes. Nothing in this subdivision limits the
court's ability to refer the case to collections under section 609.104.
(i) If the defendant has received a
stayed sentence for a conviction of a felony offense and as a condition of
probation was ordered to successfully complete treatment, the probation
officer, or the court if the defendant is on unsupervised probation, shall
notify the prosecuting authority six months prior to the expiration or early
discharge of a stayed sentence as to whether the defendant has successfully
completed court-ordered treatment. Notwithstanding
the maximum periods specified for stays of sentences under paragraph (a) or
(b), a court may extend a defendant's term of probation for up to three years
if it finds, at a hearing conducted under subdivision 1c, that:
(1) the defendant has failed to
complete court-ordered treatment successfully; and
(2) the defendant is likely not to
complete court-ordered treatment before the term of probation expires.
The
extension of probation for failure to successfully complete court-ordered
treatment may be extended by the court for up to an additional two years if the
court finds, at another hearing conducted under subdivision 1c, that the
defendant still has not successfully completed the court-ordered treatment.
(g) (j) Notwithstanding the
maximum periods specified for stays of sentences under paragraphs (a) (c)
to (f), a court may extend a defendant's term of probation for up to one year
if it finds, at a hearing conducted under subdivision 1a, that:
(1)
the defendant has not paid court-ordered restitution in accordance with the
payment schedule or structure; and
(2) the defendant is likely to not pay the restitution the defendant owes before the term of probation expires.
This one-year extension of probation for failure to pay restitution may be extended by the court for up to one additional year if the court finds, at another hearing conducted under subdivision 1a, that the defendant still has not paid the court-ordered restitution that the defendant owes.
Nothing in this subdivision limits the court's ability to refer the case to collections under section 609.104.
(h) (k) Notwithstanding the
maximum periods specified for stays of sentences under paragraphs (a) (c)
to (f), a court may extend a defendant's term of probation for up to three
years if it finds, at a hearing conducted under subdivision 1c, that:
(1) the defendant has failed to complete court-ordered treatment successfully; and
(2) the defendant is likely not to complete court-ordered treatment before the term of probation expires.
(l) If the defendant has received a
stayed sentence for a conviction of a violent crime as defined under section
609.1095, subdivision 1, paragraph (d), except violations of any provisions of
chapter 152, the probation officer, or the court if the defendant is on
unsupervised probation, shall notify the prosecuting authority six months prior
to the expiration or early discharge of a stayed sentence that the stayed
sentence will expire or that the defendant will be discharged early from a
stayed sentence. Notwithstanding the
maximum periods specified for stays of sentences under paragraph (a) or (b),
upon motion by the prosecuting authority and hearing, a court may extend a
defendant's term of probation up to three years if it finds by a preponderance
of the evidence that the defendant remains a threat to public safety. In making this determination, the court shall
consider the following:
(1) the seriousness and frequency of
any previous violations of the conditions of probation;
(2) any pending probation violations or
criminal offenses for which a violation report or criminal charge has been
filed with a court;
(3) whether the defendant has been
convicted of additional criminal offenses while on probation; and
(4) whether the court issued a domestic
abuse no contact order pursuant to section 629.75, subdivision 1, and whether
such an order remains in effect.
Upon motion of the prosecuting authority and hearing, the
extension of probation on the basis that the defendant remains a threat to
public safety may be extended by the court for up to two additional years if
the court, using the same factors as above, finds by a preponderance of the
evidence that the defendant remains a threat to public safety. Any extensions of probation ordered by the
court under this subdivision may not exceed the maximum period for which the
sentence of imprisonment might have been imposed.
(m)
Notwithstanding the time periods for stays of sentences under paragraphs (a) to
(f), a court may discharge a defendant from probation before the expiration of
the maximum period prescribed for the probation. If the defendant is discharged from probation
before the expiration of the maximum period prescribed for probation, the
defendant shall not be subject to a custody status point if charged and
convicted of a subsequent crime during the original pronounced probationary
sentence.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2019, and applies to stays of sentence granted on or after
that date.
Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.135, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 2a. Stay
of sentence maximum periods; sentence stayed before August 1, 2019. (a) Notwithstanding the sentence
announced by the court, an eligible offender shall be discharged from probation
on August 1, 2024, unless the court extends the defendant's term of probation
consistent with subdivision 2, paragraph (h), (i), or (l).
(b) As used in this section,
"eligible offender" means a person who:
(1) was sentenced prior to August 1,
2019, for a felony offense other than an offense listed in subdivision 2,
paragraph (b);
(2) received a stay of imposition or
execution of sentence pursuant to subdivision 1;
(3) has not been discharged from
probation; and
(4) is serving a sentence that has not
otherwise expired or been executed.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2019.
Sec. 20. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.3455, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Mandatory life sentence without release; egregious first-time and repeat offenders. (a) Except as provided in paragraph (c), notwithstanding the statutory maximum penalty otherwise applicable to the offense, the court shall sentence a person convicted under section 609.342, subdivision 1, paragraph (c), (d), (e), (f), or (h); or 609.343, subdivision 1, paragraph (c), (d), (e), (f), or (h), to life without the possibility of release if:
(1) the fact finder determines that two or more heinous elements exist; or
(2) the person has a previous sex offense conviction for a violation of section 609.342, 609.343, or 609.344, and the fact finder determines that a heinous element exists for the present offense.
(b) A fact finder may not consider a heinous element if it is an element of the underlying specified violation of section 609.342 or 609.343. In addition, when determining whether two or more heinous elements exist, the fact finder may not use the same underlying facts to support a determination that more than one element exists.
(c) The court shall sentence a person
who was under 18 years of age at the time of the commission of an offense
described in paragraph (a) to imprisonment for life.
Sec. 21. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609A.02, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 1a. Identity
theft or mistaken identity. (a)
Upon the dismissal and discharge of criminal proceedings brought against a
person as a result of mistaken identity or another person using the identifying
information of the named person by identity theft under section 609.527, the
prosecutor shall notify the court of the dismissal and
discharge under section 609A.025. The court administrator under section 609A.03, subdivision 8, shall send a copy of the expungement order to each state and federal agency and jurisdiction, including but not limited to the Departments of Corrections and Public Safety and law enforcement agencies, whose records are affected by the order.
(b) The condition under section
299C.11, subdivision 1, that an arrested person's criminal records may only be
destroyed or sealed if the arrested person has not been convicted of any felony
or gross misdemeanor within ten years immediately preceding the determination
of all criminal actions or proceedings in favor of the arrested person, does
not apply to a person who, as a result of mistaken identity or identity theft,
is charged and:
(1) the charges are dismissed prior to
a determination of probable cause or the prosecutor declined to file charges
and a grand jury did not return an indictment; or
(2) all criminal actions or proceedings
are determined in favor of the arrested person.
(c) The effect of the court order to
seal the record of the proceedings under paragraph (a) shall be to restore the
person, under the law, to the status the person occupied before the arrest,
indictment or information, trial, and dismissal and discharge. The person shall not be guilty of perjury or
otherwise of giving a false statement if the person fails to acknowledge the
arrest, indictment, information, or trial in response to any inquiry made for
any purpose. The person shall not be
responsible for any fees or costs resulting from the court order including but
not limited to reinstatement fees of any licenses or the costs of sealing
records.
(d) For the purposes of this section,
the following terms have the meanings given them:
(1) "law enforcement agency"
means a Minnesota municipal police department, the Metropolitan Transit Police,
the Metropolitan Airports Police, the University of Minnesota Police
Department, the Department of Corrections Fugitive Apprehension Unit, a
Minnesota county sheriff's department, the Enforcement Division of the
Department of Natural Resources, the Commerce Fraud Bureau, the Bureau of
Criminal Apprehension, or the Minnesota State Patrol; and
(2) "mistaken identity" means
the erroneous arrest of a person for a crime as a result of misidentification
by a witness or law enforcement, confusion on the part of a witness or law
enforcement as to the identity of the person who committed the crime,
misinformation provided to law enforcement as to the identity of the person who
committed the crime, or some other mistake on the part of a witness or law
enforcement as to the identity of the person who committed the crime.
Sec. 22. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609A.025, is amended to read:
609A.025
NO PETITION REQUIRED IN CERTAIN CASES WITH PROSECUTOR AGREEMENT AND
NOTIFICATION.
(a) If the prosecutor agrees to the sealing of a criminal record, the court shall seal the criminal record for a person described in section 609A.02, subdivision 1a or 3, without the filing of a petition unless it determines that the interests of the public and public safety in keeping the record public outweigh the disadvantages to the subject of the record in not sealing it.
(b) Before agreeing to the sealing of a record under this section, the prosecutor shall make a good faith effort to notify any identifiable victims of the offense of the intended agreement and the opportunity to object to the agreement.
(c) Subject to paragraph (b), the agreement of the prosecutor to the sealing of records for a person described in section 609A.02, subdivision 1a or 3, paragraph (a), clause (2), may occur before or after the criminal charges are dismissed.
Sec. 23. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 611.365, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Reimbursement;
monetary damages; attorney fees. (a)
The claimant is entitled to reimbursement for all restitution, assessments,
fees, court costs, and other sums paid by the claimant as required by the
judgment and sentence. In addition, the
claimant is entitled to monetary damages of not less than $50,000 for each year
of imprisonment incarceration, and not less than $25,000 for each
year served on supervised release or probation or as a registered
predatory offender, to be prorated for partial years served. In calculating additional monetary
damages, the panel shall consider:
(1) economic damages, including reasonable attorney fees, lost wages, reimbursement for costs associated with the claimant's criminal defense;
(2) reimbursement for medical and dental
expenses that the claimant already incurred and future unpaid expenses expected
to be incurred as a result of the claimant's imprisonment incarceration;
(3) noneconomic damages for personal
physical injuries or sickness and any nonphysical injuries or sickness incurred
as a result of imprisonment incarceration;
(4) reimbursement for any tuition and fees paid for each semester successfully completed by the claimant in an educational program or for employment skills and development training, up to the equivalent value of a four-year degree at a public university, and reasonable payment for future unpaid costs for education and training, not to exceed the anticipated cost of a four-year degree at a public university;
(5) reimbursement for paid or unpaid child support payments owed by the claimant that became due, and interest on child support arrearages that accrued, during the time served in prison provided that there shall be no reimbursement for any child support payments already owed before the claimant's incarceration; and
(6) reimbursement for reasonable costs of paid or unpaid reintegrative expenses for immediate services secured by the claimant upon exoneration and release, including housing, transportation and subsistence, reintegrative services, and medical and dental health care costs.
(b) The panel shall award the claimant reasonable attorney fees incurred in bringing a claim under sections 611.362 to 611.368 and in obtaining an order of eligibility for compensation based on exoneration under chapter 590.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 24. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 611.365, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Limits
on damages. There is no limit on the
aggregate amount of damages that may be awarded under this section. Damages that may be awarded under subdivision
2, paragraph (a), clauses (1) and (4) to (6), are limited to $100,000 per year
of imprisonment incarceration and $50,000 per year served on
supervised release or probation or as a registered predatory offender.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 25. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 611.367, is amended to read:
611.367
COMPENSATING EXONERATED PERSONS; APPROPRIATIONS PROCESS.
The compensation panel established in
section 611.363 shall forward an award of damages under section 611.365 to the
commissioner of management and budget. The
commissioner shall submit the amount of the award to the legislature for
consideration as an appropriation during the next session of the legislature.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 26. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 611.368, is amended to read:
611.368
SHORT TITLE.
Sections 611.362 to 611.368 shall be cited
as the "Imprisonment Incarceration and Exoneration Remedies
Act."
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 27. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 611A.039, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Notice required. (a) Except as otherwise provided in subdivision 2, within 15 working days after a conviction, acquittal, or dismissal in a criminal case in which there is an identifiable crime victim, the prosecutor shall make reasonable good faith efforts to provide to each affected crime victim oral or written notice of the final disposition of the case.
(b) The probation agent or office
responsible for supervising an offender, or the agent's or office's designee,
shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to notify each affected crime
victim within a reasonable time after the court orders an offender discharged
early from probation.
(c) When the court is considering modifying the sentence for a felony or a crime of violence or an attempted crime of violence, the court or its designee shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to notify the victim of the crime. If the victim is incapacitated or deceased, notice must be given to the victim's family. If the victim is a minor, notice must be given to the victim's parent or guardian. The notice must include:
(1) the date and approximate time of the review;
(2) the location where the review will occur;
(3) the name and telephone number of a person to contact for additional information; and
(4) a statement that the victim and victim's family may provide input to the court concerning the sentence modification.
(d) As used in this section, "crime of violence" has the meaning given in section 624.712, subdivision 5, and also includes gross misdemeanor violations of section 609.224, and nonfelony violations of sections 518B.01, 609.2231, 609.3451, 609.748, and 609.749.
Sec. 28. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 629.53, is amended to read:
629.53
PROVIDING RELEASE ON BAIL; COMMITMENT.
Subdivision 1. Pretrial release. A person charged with a criminal offense may be released with or without bail in accordance with rule 6.02 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure and this section. To the extent a court determines there is a conflict between rule 6.02 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure and this section, this section shall control.
Subd. 2. Release
of a person charged with a misdemeanor offense. (a) A defendant charged with a
misdemeanor offense, other than a violation identified in paragraph (e), must
be released on personal recognizance unless the court determines that there is
a substantial likelihood that the defendant will not appear at future court
proceedings or poses a threat to a victim's safety.
(b) If the court determines that there
is a substantial likelihood that a defendant will not appear at future court
appearances, the court must impose the least restrictive conditions of release
that will reasonably assure the person's appearance as ordered. These conditions of release include but are
not limited to an unsecured appearance bond or money bail on which the
defendant may be released by posting cash or sureties. If the court sets conditions of release other
than an unsecured appearance bond or money bail, it must also set money bail
without other conditions on which the defendant may be released.
(c) The court must not impose a
financial condition of release on a defendant subject to this subdivision that results in the pretrial detention of the
defendant. Financial conditions of
release include but are not limited to money bail.
(d) If a defendant subject to this
subdivision remains in custody for more than 48 hours after the court imposes a
financial condition of release, the court must review the conditions of release
and there exists a rebuttable presumption that the financial condition resulted
in the pretrial detention of the defendant.
(e) This subdivision does not apply to
violations of:
(1) section 169A.20;
(2) section 518B.01;
(3) section 609.224;
(4) section 609.2242;
(5) section 609.748;
(6) section 609.749; and
(7) section 629.75.
(f) If a defendant released pursuant to
paragraph (a) or (b) fails to appear at a required court hearing, the court
shall issue a summons or warrant directing that the defendant appear in court
pursuant to rule 6.03 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Subd. 3. Presumption
of release on personal recognizance.
Except as described in subdivision 2, on appearance before the
court, a defendant charged with a misdemeanor must be released on personal
recognizance or an unsecured appearance bond unless otherwise provided by law,
or a court determines that release will endanger the public safety, a victim's
safety, or will not reasonably assure the defendant's appearance.
Subd. 4. Money bail; disposition. Money bail is the property of the accused, whether deposited by that person or by a third person on the accused's behalf. When money bail is accepted by a judge, that judge shall order it to be deposited with the court administrator. The court administrator shall retain it until the final disposition of the case and the final order of the court disposing of the case. Upon release, the amount released must be paid to the accused personally or upon that person's written order. In case of conviction, the judge may order the money bail deposit to be applied to any fine or restitution imposed on the defendant by the court and, if the fine or restitution is less than the deposit, order the balance to be paid to the defendant. Money bail deposited with the court or any officer of it is exempt from garnishment or levy under attachment or execution.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2019.
Sec. 29. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 638.02, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Pardon
extraordinary; filing; copies sent. Upon
granting a pardon extraordinary, the Board of Pardons shall file a copy
of it with the district court of the county in which the conviction occurred,
and the court shall order the conviction set aside and include a copy of the pardon
in the court file. The court
shall order all records wherever held relating to the arrest, indictment or
information, trial, verdict, and pardon sealed and prohibit the disclosure of
the existence of the records or the opening of the records except under court
order or pursuant to section 609A.03, subdivision 7a, paragraph (b), clause (1). The court shall send a copy of its order and
the pardon to the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension and all other government
entities that hold affected records.
Sec. 30. Laws 2017, chapter 95, article 3, section 30, is amended to read:
Sec. 30. ALTERNATIVES
TO INCARCERATION PILOT PROGRAM FUND.
(a) Agencies providing supervision to offenders on probation,
parole, or supervised release are eligible for grants to facilitate access to
community options including, but not limited to, inpatient chemical dependency
treatment for nonviolent controlled substance offenders to address and correct
behavior that is, or is likely to result in, a technical violation of the conditions
of release. For purposes of this
section, "nonviolent controlled substance offender" is a person who
meets the criteria described under Minnesota Statutes, section 244.0513,
subdivision 2, clauses (1), (2), and (5), and "technical violation"
means a violation of a court order of probation, condition of parole, or
condition of supervised release, except an allegation of a subsequent criminal
act that is alleged in a formal complaint, citation, or petition.
(b) The Department of Corrections shall establish criteria for selecting grant recipients and the amount awarded to each grant recipient.
(c) By January 15, 2019, The
commissioner of corrections shall submit a an annual report to
the chairs of the house of representatives and senate committees with jurisdiction
over public safety policy and finance by January 15 of each year. At a minimum, the report must include:
(1) the total number of grants issued under this program;
(2) the average amount of each grant;
(3) the community services accessed as a result of the grants;
(4) a summary of the type of supervision offenders were under when a grant was used to help access a community option;
(5) the number of individuals who
completed, and the number who failed to complete, programs accessed as a result
of this grant; and
(6)
the number of individuals who violated the terms of release following
participation in a program accessed as a result of this grant, separating
technical violations and new criminal offenses.;
(7) the number of individuals who completed
or were discharged from probation after participating in the program;
(8) the number of individuals
identified in clause (7) who committed a new offense within four years after
discharge from the program;
(9) identification of barriers nonviolent
controlled substance offenders face in accessing community services and a
description of how the program navigates those barriers; and
(10) identification of gaps in existing
community services for nonviolent controlled substance offenders.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 31. GRANTS
TO FACILITATE EXIT FROM SUPERVISED RELEASE.
(a) The commissioner of corrections
shall provide grants to facilitate access to community options for supervised
offenders. The commissioner shall
establish criteria for selecting grant recipients and the amount awarded to
each grant recipient, with a preference for how recipients will enhance
existing supervision and services.
(b) By January 15, 2021, the
commissioner of corrections shall submit a report to the chairs and ranking
minority members of the senate and house of representatives committees and
divisions having jurisdiction over public safety policy and finance. At a minimum, the report must include:
(1) the total number of grants issued
under this program;
(2) the average amount of each grant;
(3) the community services accessed as
a result of the grants;
(4) a summary of the type of
supervision offenders were under when a grant was used to help access a
community option;
(5) the number of individuals who
completed, and the number who failed to complete, programs accessed as a result
of this grant; and
(6) the number of individuals who
violated the terms of release following participation in a program accessed as
a result of this grant, separating technical violations and new criminal
offenses.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 32. RULE
SUPERSEDED.
Minnesota Rules of Juvenile Delinquency
Procedure, rule 2.03, subdivision 1, is superseded to the extent it conflicts
with Minnesota Statutes, section 260B.008.
Sec. 33. COMPLIANCE
WITH JUVENILE RESTRAINT PROVISION.
By July 1, 2020, each judicial district
shall develop a protocol to address how to implement and comply with Minnesota
Statutes, section 260B.008. In
developing the protocol, a district shall consult with law enforcement
agencies, prosecutors, and public defenders within the district, as well as any
other entity deemed necessary by the district's chief judge.
Sec. 34. ADOPTION
OF JUVENILE DETENTION RISK ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT.
Subdivision 1. Adoption
required. By September 15,
2020, the commissioner of corrections shall adopt an objective and racially,
ethnically, and gender-responsive juvenile detention risk assessment
instrument.
Subd. 2. Consultation
required. In adopting the
risk assessment instrument required in subdivision 1, the commissioner shall
consult and collaborate with the commissioners of public safety and human
services, state coordinator or coordinators of the Minnesota Juvenile Detention
Alternative Initiative, and individuals throughout the state who are
knowledgeable in matters relating to the detention and treatment of juvenile
offenders and at-risk juveniles including but not limited to individuals from
the courts, probation, law enforcement, prosecutorial offices, public
defender's offices, communities of color, social services, juvenile detention
and shelter care facilities, and juvenile residential treatment and
correctional facilities. The
commissioner shall also review similar risk assessment instruments in use both
inside and outside of the state.
Sec. 35. SPECIALIZED
MENTAL HEALTH COMMUNITY SUPERVISION.
Subdivision 1. Authorization. The commissioner of corrections shall
award grants to up to two counties with no mental health specialty court to
develop and implement a pilot project to evaluate the impact of a coordinated,
multidisciplinary service delivery approach for offenders on probation, parole,
supervised release, or pretrial status struggling with mental illness in the
community. The pilot project is from
July 1, 2019, to June 30, 2021.
Subd. 2. Pilot
project goals and design. (a)
The pilot project must provide enhanced assessment, case management, treatment
services, and community supervision for criminal justice clients with mental
illness struggling to manage symptoms and behavior resulting in heightened risk
to harm self or others, recidivate, commit violations of supervision, or face
incarceration or reincarceration.
(b) The goals of the pilot project are
to:
(1) improve mental health service
delivery and supervision coordination through the establishment of a
multidisciplinary caseload management team that must include at least one
probation officer and one social services professional who share case
management responsibilities;
(2) provide expedited assessment,
diagnosis, and community-based treatment and programming for acute symptom and
behavior management;
(3) enhance community supervision
through a specialized caseload and team specifically trained to work with
individuals with mental illness;
(4) offer community-based mental health
treatment and programming alternatives to jail or prison incarceration if
available and appropriate;
(5) reduce the number of incarceration
days related to unmanaged mental illness and technical violations;
(6) eliminate or reduce duplication of
services between county social services and corrections; and
(7) improve collaboration and reduce
barriers among criminal justice system partners, county social services, and
community service providers.
Subd. 3. Target
population. The target
population of the pilot project is:
(1) adult offenders on probation,
parole, supervised release, or pretrial status assessed with significant or
unmanaged mental illness or acute symptoms who may pose a risk to self or
others, pose an increased risk to recidivate, or commit technical violations of
supervision;
(2) adult offenders receiving county
social service case management for mental illness and under correctional supervision
in a county with no mental health specialty court; and
(3) adult offenders incarcerated in
jail with significant or unmanaged mental illness who may be safely treated in
a community setting under correctional supervision.
Subd. 4. Evaluation
and report. By October 1,
2021, grant recipients must report to the chairs and ranking members of the
legislative committees and divisions with jurisdiction over public safety and
corrections, and the commissioner of corrections, on the impact and outcomes of
the project.
Sec. 36. TASK
FORCE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DOSAGE PROBATION.
Subdivision 1. Establishment. A task force on the implementation of
dosage probation is established to analyze dosage probation and earned time
credit programs, develop a comprehensive plan for implementation of dosage
probation in Minnesota, and recommend possible legislative action.
Subd. 2. Membership. (a) The task force consists of 16
members as follows:
(1) the chief justice of the supreme
court or a designee;
(2) one district court judge appointed
by the chief justice of the supreme court;
(3) the state public defender or a
designee;
(4) one county attorney appointed by
the board of directors of the Minnesota County Attorneys Association;
(5) one city attorney;
(6) the commissioner of corrections or
a designee;
(7) one probation officer from a
Community Corrections Act county in the metropolitan area;
(8) one probation officer from a
Community Corrections Act county in greater Minnesota;
(9) one probation officer from the
Department of Corrections;
(10) one county probation officer as
described in Minnesota Statutes, section 244.19;
(11) one peace officer, as defined in
Minnesota Statutes, section 626.84, from the metropolitan area;
(12) one peace officer, as defined in
Minnesota Statutes, section 626.84, from greater Minnesota;
(13) two individuals who have been
convicted of a felony offense and served a sentence of probation;
(14)
a representative from a nonprofit agency providing treatment services to
individuals on probation in the metropolitan area; and
(15) a representative from a nonprofit
agency providing treatment services to individuals on probation in greater
Minnesota.
(b) For purposes of this subdivision,
"metropolitan area" has the meaning given in Minnesota Statutes,
section 473.121, subdivision 2, and "greater Minnesota" has the
meaning given in Minnesota Statutes, section 116J.8738, subdivision 1,
paragraph (e).
(c) Members of the task force serve
without compensation.
(d) Unless otherwise specified, members
shall be appointed by the commissioner of corrections. Members of the task force serve at the
pleasure of the appointing authority or until the task force expires. Vacancies shall be filled by the appointing
authority consistent with the qualifications of the vacating member required by
this subdivision.
Subd. 3. Officers;
meetings. (a) The task force
shall elect a chair and vice-chair and may elect other officers as necessary.
(b) The commissioner of corrections
shall convene the first meeting of the task force no later than August 1, 2019, and shall provide meeting space and
administrative assistance as necessary for the task force to conduct its work.
(c) The task force shall meet at least
quarterly or upon the call of its chair.
The task force shall meet sufficiently enough to accomplish the tasks
identified in this section. Meetings of
the task force are subject to Minnesota Statutes, chapter 13D.
(d) The task force shall request the
cooperation and assistance of tribal governments, nongovernmental
organizations, community and advocacy organizations working with adults on
probation, and academic researchers and experts.
Subd. 4. Duties. (a) The duties of the task force shall,
at a minimum, include:
(1) reviewing and examining the dosage
probation model of the National Institute of Corrections;
(2) reviewing and assessing current
supervision models in use in Minnesota, including specialty courts and any
pilot projects;
(3) reviewing and assessing probation
models in use in other states;
(4) recommending training for judges,
county attorneys, city attorneys, public defenders, and probation agents;
(5) identifying gaps in existing
services, supports, and housing for individuals on probation;
(6) developing a comprehensive plan to
implement a dosage probation model in Minnesota; and
(7) reviewing existing Minnesota law and
proposing amendments or new statutory provisions.
(b) At its discretion, the task force
may examine other related issues consistent with this section.
Subd. 5. Report. On or before January 15, 2020, the
task force shall report to the chairs and ranking members of the legislative
committees and divisions with jurisdiction over public safety on the work of
the task force including but not limited to the issues to be examined in
subdivision 1. The report shall include
an assessment of the
effect
adopting dosage probation would be expected to have on public safety, probation
supervision, and the Department of Corrections; the comprehensive plan
developed under subdivision 4; and any recommended legislative action.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 37. SENTENCING
GUIDELINES; MODIFICATIONS.
(a) By January 15, 2020, the Sentencing
Guidelines Commission shall propose to the legislature modifications to the
sentencing guidelines, including the guidelines grid, establishing probation
guidelines or early discharge targets. When
proposing the modifications, the commission must advise the legislature how the
probation guidelines or early discharge targets will work in conjunction with
the procedural requirements imposed by the U.S. Supreme Court decision in
Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), and make recommendations regarding
statutory changes that may be needed to facilitate their operation.
(b) Modifications proposed by the
commission under this section are effective August 1, 2020, unless the
legislature by law provides otherwise.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is effective
the day following final enactment.
Sec. 38. EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Sections 1, 2, 13, 14, and 20 are
effective the day following final enactment and apply to offenders sentenced on
or after that date, and retroactively to offenders sentenced to life imprisonment
without possibility of release following a conviction under Minnesota Statutes,
section 609.185, paragraph (a), clause (1), (2), (4), or (7), for an offense
committed when the offender was under 18 years of age and when a sentence was
imposed pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 609.106, subdivision 2, clause
(1).
ARTICLE 10
FIREFIGHTERS
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299N.01, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Fire
department. "Fire
department" means a regularly organized fire department, fire protection
district, or fire company, as defined in the State Fire Code adopted under
section 326B.02, subdivision 6, regularly charged with the responsibility
of providing fire protection to the state or a local government and includes a
private nonprofit fire department directly serving a local government. It does not include industrial fire brigades that
do not have a fire department identification number issued by the state fire
marshal.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299N.01, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Firefighter. "Firefighter" means a
volunteer, paid on-call, part-time, or career full-time
firefighter serving a general population within the boundaries of the state.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299N.02, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Membership. Notwithstanding any provision of chapter 15 to the contrary, the Board of Firefighter Training and Education consists of the following members:
(1) five members representing the
Minnesota State Fire Department Association, four of whom must be volunteer
firefighters and one of whom may be a career full-time
firefighter, appointed by the governor;
(2) two members representing the Minnesota State Fire Chiefs Association, one of whom must be a volunteer fire chief, appointed by the governor;
(3) two members representing the Minnesota Professional Firefighters Association, appointed by the governor;
(4) two members representing Minnesota home rule charter and statutory cities, appointed by the governor;
(5) two members representing Minnesota towns, appointed by the governor;
(6) the commissioner of public safety or the commissioner's designee; and
(7) one public member not affiliated or associated with any member or interest represented in clauses (1) to (6), appointed by the governor.
The Minnesota State Fire Department Association shall recommend five persons to be the members described in clause (1), the Minnesota State Fire Chiefs Association shall recommend two persons to be the members described in clause (2), the Minnesota Professional Firefighters Association shall recommend two persons to be the members described in clause (3), the League of Minnesota Cities shall recommend two persons to be the members described in clause (4), and the Minnesota Association of Townships shall recommend two persons to be the members described in clause (5). In making the appointments the governor shall try to achieve representation from all geographic areas of the state.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299N.02, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Terms;
chair; compensation. Members of the
board shall serve for terms of four years and annually biennially
elect a chair from among the members. Terms
and filling of vacancies are subject to section 15.0575, subdivisions 2, 4, and
5. Members serve without compensation.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299N.02, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Powers and duties. (a) The board shall:
(1) review fire service training needs and make recommendations on training to Minnesota fire service organizations;
(2) establish standards for educational programs for the fire service and develop procedures for continuing oversight of the programs;
(3) establish qualifications for fire
service training instructors in programs established under clause (2); and
(4) maintain a list of instructors that
have met the qualifications established under clause (3), subject to
application procedures and requirements established by the board; and
(4) (5) license full-time
firefighters and volunteer firefighters under this chapter.
(b) The board may:
(1) hire or contract for technical or professional services according to section 15.061;
(2) pay expenses necessary to carry out its duties;
(3) apply for, receive, and accept grants, gifts, devises, and endowments that any entity may make to the board for the purposes of this chapter and may use any money given to it consistent with the terms and conditions under which the money was received and for the purposes stated;
(4) accept funding from the fire safety
account and allocate funding to Minnesota fire departments in the form of
reimbursements that are consistent with the board's recommendations and the Department
of Public Safety firefighter training;
(5) set guidelines regarding how the
allocated reimbursement funds must be disbursed;
(6) set and make available to the fire
service standards governing the use of funds reimbursed under this section;
(4) (7) make recommendations
to the legislature to improve the quality of firefighter training;
(5) (8) collect and provide
data, subject to section 13.03;
(6) (9) conduct studies and
surveys and make reports; and
(7) (10) conduct other
activities necessary to carry out its duties.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299N.03, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Fire
department. "Fire
department" has the meaning given it in section 299F.092, subdivision 6. For purposes of sections 299N.04 and 299N.05,
fire department also includes a division of a state agency, regularly charged
with the responsibility of providing fire protection to the state or a local
government, to include a private, nonprofit fire department directly serving a
local government, but does not include an industrial fire brigade
brigades that do not have a fire department identification number issued by
the state fire marshal.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299N.03, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Full-time
firefighter. A "full-time
firefighter" means a person who is employed and charged with the
prevention and or suppression of fires within the boundaries of
the state on a full-time, salaried basis and who is directly engaged in
the hazards of firefighting or is in charge of a designated fire company
or companies, as defined in section 299N.01, subdivision 2, that are
directly engaged in the hazards of firefighting. Full-time firefighter does not include a
volunteer, part-time, or paid-on-call firefighter.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299N.03, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Licensed firefighter. "Licensed firefighter" means a full-time firefighter, to include a fire department employee, member, supervisor, state employee, or appointed official, who is licensed by the board and charged with the prevention or suppression of fires within the boundaries of the state. Licensed firefighter may also include a volunteer firefighter.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299N.03, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 8. NFPA
1001 standard. "NFPA
1001 standard" means the standard for firefighter professional
qualifications established by the National Fire Protection Association.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299N.04, is amended to read:
299N.04
FIREFIGHTER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATION.
Subdivision 1. Certification
Examination; requirements. (a) The
board must appoint an organization that is accredited by the International Fire
Service Accreditation Congress to prepare and administer firefighter
certification examinations. Firefighter
certification examinations shall must be designed to ensure and
demonstrate competency in at least the following areas: that
meets the NFPA 1001 standard or a national standard in areas including but not
limited to:
(1) fire prevention;
(2) fire suppression; and
(3) hazardous materials operations.
(b) To receive a certificate, an
individual must demonstrate competency in fire prevention and fire suppression.
(b) Certification must be obtained by
the individual demonstrating competency in fire prevention and protection under
the NFPA 1001 standard.
(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit any requirement imposed by a local fire department for more comprehensive training.
Subd. 2. Eligibility for certification examination. Except as provided in subdivision 3, any person may take the firefighter certification examination who has successfully completed the following:
(1)(i) a firefighter course from a
postsecondary educational institution, an accredited institution of higher
learning, or another entity that teaches a course that has been approved by the
board; or (ii) an apprenticeship or cadet program maintained by a Minnesota
fire department employing the person that has been approved by the
board; and
(2) a skills-oriented basic training course.
Subd. 3. Certain baccalaureate or associate degree holders eligible to take certification examination. A person with a baccalaureate degree or an associate degree in applied fire science technology from an accredited college or university, who has successfully completed the skills-oriented basic training course under subdivision 2, clause (2), is eligible to take the firefighter certification examination notwithstanding the requirements of subdivision 2, clause (1).
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299N.05, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Licensure
requirement. A firefighter employed
full time by a fire department is not eligible for permanent employment without
being licensed by the board. and meeting the following requirements:
(1) the firefighter successfully
completes a firefighter examination under section 299N.04 or completes the
examination while serving a probationary period, if any, as determined by the
hiring authority; and
(2) the chief firefighting officer or
the chief designee completes the employment verification portion of the
licensing process.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299N.05, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Optional
licensing. A volunteer firefighter affiliated
with a department may receive or apply for licensure under this section
subdivision 1 and section 299N.04 under the same terms as full-time
firefighters.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299N.05, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Obtaining a firefighter license. To obtain a license, a firefighter must be affiliated with a fire department, complete the board application process, and meet the requirements of this section or section 299N.04 or 299N.06. A license is valid for a three-year period determined by the board, and the fee for the license is $75. Fees under this subdivision may be prorated by the board for licenses issued with a three-year licensure period.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299N.05, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. License
renewal; expiration and reinstatement. (a)
A license shall must be renewed so long as if the
firefighter and the chief firefighting officer provide evidence to the board
that the licensed firefighter has had 72 hours of approved firefighting
training in the preceding three years and the firefighter completes the renewal
application. The fee for renewing a
firefighter license is $75, and the license is valid for an additional three
years. or chief designee
completes the renewal application and:
(1) attests to the board that the
licensed firefighter has met the required 72 hours of approved firefighter
training in the preceding three years;
(2) upon request, provides evidence the
licensed firefighter completed the required 72 hours of approved firefighter
training in the preceding three years;
(3) verifies that the licensed
firefighter is actively serving on a department; and
(4) attests that the licensed
firefighter has not been convicted of or pled guilty or nolo contendere to a
felony, any arson-related charge, or another offense arising from the same set
of circumstances.
(b) The fee to renew a firefighter
license is $75. The license is valid for
an additional three-year period, unless submitted within the triennial period. Fees under this subdivision may be prorated
by the board for licenses reinstated or renewed within the three-year licensure
period.
(b) (c) If a license
expires, a firefighter may apply to have it reinstated. In order to receive reinstatement, the
firefighter must:
(1) complete a reinstatement application;
(2) satisfy all prior firefighter
training requirements listed in paragraph (a);
(3) pay any outstanding renewal fees; and
(4) pay the delayed renewal fee set by the board.
(c) (d) In lieu of a
reinstatement application under paragraph (b) (c), a firefighter
may complete a new application for licensure under section 299N.04.
Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299N.05, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Duties of chief firefighting officer. (a) Every chief firefighting officer has a duty to ensure that every full-time firefighter has a license issued by the board.
(b) Every chief firefighting officer or
designee has the duty to verify that every full-time and volunteer individual
applying, reinstating, or renewing a license is affiliated with a Minnesota
fire department.
(b) (c) Every chief
firefighting officer, provider, and individual licensee has a duty to ensure
proper training records and reports are
retained. Records must include, for the
three-year period subsequent to the license renewal date:
(1) the dates, subjects, and duration of programs;
(2) sponsoring organizations;
(3) fire training hours earned;
(4) registration receipts to prove attendance at training sessions; and
(5) other pertinent information.
(c) (d) The board may require a licensee,
provider, or fire department to provide the information under paragraph (b)
(c) to demonstrate compliance with the 72-hour firefighting training
requirement under subdivision 6, paragraph (a).
Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299N.05, subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. Fees;
appropriation. Fees collected under
this section must be deposited in the state treasury and credited to a special
account and are appropriated to the board to pay costs incurred under this
section and sections 299N.04 and 299N.05 and 299N.06.
Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299N.06, is amended to read:
299N.06
ELIGIBILITY FOR RECIPROCITY AND EXAMINATION BASED ON RELEVANT MILITARY
EXPERIENCE.
Subdivision 1. Reciprocity
license requirements for out-of-state certified applicants. A person may apply for licensure if
the person (1) becomes employed by or becomes an active member of a fire
department, (2) has the appropriately certified accreditation by the
International Fire Service Accreditation Congress or Pro Board, and (3) has met
the requirements of section 299N.04.
Subd. 2. Examination based on relevant military experience. (a) For purposes of this section:
(1) "active service" has the meaning given in section 190.05, subdivision 5; and
(2) "relevant military experience" means:
(i) four years' cumulative service experience in a military firefighting occupational specialty;
(ii) two years' cumulative service experience in a military firefighting occupational specialty, and completion of at least a two-year degree from a regionally accredited postsecondary education institution; or
(iii) four years' cumulative experience as a full-time firefighter in another state combined with cumulative service experience in a military firefighting occupational specialty.
(b) A person is eligible to take the
reciprocity a firefighter examination and does not have to otherwise
meet the requirements of section 299N.04, subdivisions 2 and 3, if the person
has:
(1) relevant military experience; and
(2) been honorably discharged from military active service as evidenced by the most recent form DD-214 or is currently in active service, as evidenced by:
(i) active duty orders providing service time in a military firefighting specialty;
(ii) a United States Department of Defense Manpower Data Center status report pursuant to the Service Members Civil Relief Act, active duty status report; or
(iii) Military Personnel Center assignment information.
(c) A person who passed the examination under paragraph (b), clause (2), shall not be eligible to be licensed as a firefighter until honorably discharged as evidenced by the most recent form DD-214.
(d) To receive a firefighter license, a
person who passed the reciprocity certification a firefighter
examination must meet the requirements of section 299N.05, subdivision 4.
ARTICLE 11
STATEWIDE EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 403.21, subdivision 7a, is amended to read:
Subd. 7a. Statewide
Radio Emergency Communication Board. "Statewide Radio Emergency
Communication Board," "radio emergency communication
board," or "board" means the Statewide Radio Board
established under section 403.36 and where the Statewide Radio Board has
affirmatively elected to become a Statewide Emergency Communication Board
as provided in section 403.382 it shall mean the Statewide Emergency
Communication Board as and is the successor to the Statewide Radio
Board.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 403.36, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Membership. (a) The commissioner of public safety
shall convene and chair the Statewide Radio Emergency Communication
Board to develop a project plan for a statewide, shared, trunked public safety
radio communication system. The system
may be referred to as "Allied Radio Matrix for Emergency Response,"
or "ARMER."
(b) The board consists of the following members or their designees:
(1) the commissioner of public safety;
(2) the commissioner of transportation;
(3) the state chief information officer;
(4) the commissioner of natural resources;
(5) the chief of the Minnesota State Patrol;
(6) the chair of the Metropolitan Council;
(7) the commissioner of corrections;
(8) a representative from the Minnesota
Indian Affairs Council;
(7) (9) two elected city
officials, one from the nine-county ten-county metropolitan area
and one from Greater Minnesota, appointed by the governing body of the League
of Minnesota Cities;
(8) (10) two elected county
officials, one from the nine-county ten-county metropolitan area
and one from Greater Minnesota, appointed by the governing body of the
Association of Minnesota Counties;
(9) (11) two sheriffs, one
from the nine-county ten-county metropolitan area and one from
Greater Minnesota, appointed by the governing body of the Minnesota Sheriffs'
Association;
(10) (12) two chiefs of
police, one from the nine-county ten-county metropolitan area and
one from Greater Minnesota, appointed by the governor after considering recommendations
made by the Minnesota Chiefs' of Police Association;
(11) (13) two fire chiefs,
one from the nine-county ten-county metropolitan area and one
from Greater Minnesota, appointed by the governor after considering recommendations
made by the Minnesota Fire Chiefs' Association;
(12) (14) two
representatives of emergency medical service providers, one from the nine-county
ten-county metropolitan area and one from Greater Minnesota, appointed
by the governor after considering recommendations made by the Minnesota
Ambulance Association;
(13) (15) the chair of the regional radio
board for the metropolitan area Metropolitan Emergency Services Board;
and
(14) (16) a representative
of Greater Minnesota elected by those units of government in phase three and
any subsequent phase of development as defined in the statewide, shared radio
and communication plan, who have submitted a plan to the Statewide Radio
Emergency Communication Board and where development has been initiated.
(c) The Statewide Radio Emergency
Communication Board shall coordinate the appointment of board members
representing Greater Minnesota with the appointing authorities and may
designate the geographic region or regions from which an appointed board member
is selected where necessary to provide representation from throughout the
state.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 403.36, subdivision 1b, is amended to read:
Subd. 1b. Compensation;
removal; vacancies. Compensation,
removal, and filling of vacancies of board members are governed by section
15.0575, except that appointments to the board are not subject to the open
appointments process of sections 15.0597 to 15.0599. Pursuant to subdivision 1a, members
appointed to fill vacancies under this subdivision shall have no set term.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 403.36, subdivision 1c, is amended to read:
Subd. 1c. Voting. Each member has one vote. The majority of the voting power of the board
constitutes a quorum, although a smaller number may adjourn from time to time. Any motion, other than adjournment, must be
favored by a majority of the voting power of the board in order to carry. In the event of a conflict between the
board's bylaws and state law, state law shall prevail.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 403.36, subdivision 1d, is amended to read:
Subd. 1d. Calling meeting. The board shall convene upon the call of the chair, vice-chair, other officer, or any six members of the board.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 403.37, subdivision 12, is amended to read:
Subd. 12. Allocation
of money. (a) The board shall
allocate money available to the Statewide Radio Emergency
Communication Board among regional radio boards or to local entities within
a region to encourage local and regional participation in the system. This does not limit the authority of regional
radio boards and local entities to individually or collectively seek funding of
local and regional enhancements and subsystems to the system backbone.
(b) The Statewide Emergency
Communication Board, which encompasses other emergency communication networks,
including but not limited to wireless broadband, the Integrated Public Alert
and Warning System, 911 service, and the
ARMER system, may grant money as available to support the goals set forth in
the board's strategic plan.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 403.382, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Statewide
Emergency Communication Board. (a)
By an affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the Statewide Radio
Board, the board may elect to become a Statewide Emergency Communication Board.
(b) As a The Statewide
Emergency Communication Board, the board shall be is responsible
for the statewide coordination of 911 service in addition to, existing
responsibilities for the ARMER system provided for in sections 403.21 to 403.37,
wireless broadband, and the Integrated Public Alert and Warning System.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 403.382, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Other emergency communication system planning and coordination. In addition to powers provided for in this section for the coordination of 911 service, the board shall be responsible for planning and coordination of the following public safety emergency communication networks:
(1) developing and maintaining a plan for
the implementation of a statewide public safety broadband network the
National Public Safety Broadband Network, as approved by the board,
including the definition of technical and operational standards for that
network; and
(2) other wireless communication technologies or wireless communication networks for public safety communications, such as the Integrated Public Alert and Warning System, where the board finds that coordination and planning on a regional or statewide basis is appropriate or where regional or statewide coordination has been requested by the Federal Communications Commission or the Department of Homeland Security which is coordinating the technology or network on a national level.
Sec. 9. REVISOR
INSTRUCTION.
In Minnesota Statutes, the revisor of
statutes shall substitute the term "Statewide Emergency Communication
Board" for "Statewide Radio Board" or "radio board"
wherever the term refers to the powers, duties, and responsibilities of the
Statewide Radio Board, consistent with the changes in this article. The revisor shall also make grammatical
changes related to the change in terms.
ARTICLE 12
UNIFORM COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES OF
CONVICTION ACT
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 245C.22, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 4a. Disqualification
decisions related to chapter 638. The
requirements regarding a decision to disqualify an individual under section
638.17 are met by the commissioner when implementing the requirements of this
section and the exclusion under section 245C.24, subdivision 4a.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 245C.24, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 4a. Disqualification
decisions related to chapter 638. (a)
Notwithstanding statutory limits on the commissioner's authority to set aside
an individual's disqualification under this section, the commissioner may
consider issuing a set-aside according to section 245C.22 if the disqualified
individual has been issued an order of limited relief under section 638.19 that
provides this specific relief.
(b) An individual who received a
set-aside of a disqualification as a result of paragraph (a) must immediately
inform the commissioner upon restriction or revocation of an order of limited
relief under section 638.22.
(c) Upon receipt of information
regarding a restriction or revocation of an order of limited relief according
to section 638.22, the commissioner shall rescind a set-aside of a
disqualification and the individual shall have the appeal rights stated in
section 245C.22, subdivision 6.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 364.07, is amended to read:
364.07
APPLICATION.
The provisions of sections 364.01 to 364.10 shall prevail over any other laws and rules, except for sections 638.10 to 638.25, which purport to govern the granting, denial, renewal, suspension, or revocation of a license or the initiation, suspension, or termination of public employment on the grounds of conviction of a crime or crimes. In deciding to grant, deny, revoke, suspend, or renew a license, or to deny, suspend, or terminate public employment for a lack of good moral character or the like, the hiring or licensing authority may consider evidence of conviction of a crime or crimes but only in the same manner and to the same effect as provided for in sections 364.01 to 364.10. Nothing in sections 364.01 to 364.10 shall be construed to otherwise affect relevant proceedings involving the granting, denial, renewal, suspension, or revocation of a license or the initiation, suspension, or termination of public employment.
Sec. 4. [638.10]
SHORT TITLE.
Sections 638.10 to 638.25 may be cited
as the "Uniform Collateral Consequences of Conviction Act."
Sec. 5. [638.11]
DEFINITIONS.
(a)
For the purposes of sections 638.10 to 638.25, the terms defined in this
section have the meanings given them.
(b) "Collateral consequence"
means a collateral sanction or a disqualification.
(c) "Collateral sanction"
means a penalty, disability, or disadvantage, however denominated, imposed on
an individual as a result of the individual's conviction of an offense which
applies by operation of law whether or not the penalty, disability, or
disadvantage is included in the judgment or sentence. The term does not include imprisonment,
probation, parole, supervised release, forfeiture, restitution, fine,
assessment, or costs of prosecution.
(d) "Conviction" or "convicted"
includes a child adjudicated delinquent.
(e) "Decision maker" means
the state acting through a department, agency, officer, or instrumentality,
including a political subdivision, educational institution, board, or
commission, or its employees, or a government contractor, including a
subcontractor, made subject to sections 638.10 to 638.25 by contract, other
law, or ordinance.
(f) "Disqualification" means
a penalty, disability, or disadvantage, however denominated, that an
administrative agency, governmental official, or court in a civil proceeding is
authorized, but not required, to impose on an individual on grounds relating to
the individual's conviction of an offense.
(g) "Offense" means a felony,
gross misdemeanor, misdemeanor, or adjudication as a delinquent under the laws
of this state, another state, or the United States.
(h) "Person" means an
individual, corporation, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, limited
liability company, association, joint venture, public corporation, government
or governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality, or any other legal or
commercial entity.
(i) "State" means a state of
the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States
Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States.
Sec. 6. [638.12]
LIMITATION ON SCOPE.
(a) Sections 638.10 to 638.25 do not
provide a basis for:
(1) invalidating a plea, conviction, or
sentence;
(2) a cause of action for money
damages; or
(3) a claim for relief from or defense
to the application of a collateral consequence based on a failure to comply
with section 638.13, 638.14, or 638.15.
(b) Sections 638.10 to 638.25 do not
affect:
(1) the duty an individual's attorney
owes to the individual; or
(2) a right or remedy under law other
than sections 638.10 to 638.25 available to an individual convicted of an
offense.
Sec. 7. [638.13]
IDENTIFICATION, COLLECTION, AND PUBLICATION OF LAWS REGARDING COLLATERAL
CONSEQUENCES.
(a) The revisor of statutes shall:
(1) identify or cause to be identified
any provision in this state's constitution, statutes, and administrative rules
which imposes a collateral sanction or authorizes the imposition of a
disqualification, and any provision of law that may afford relief from a
collateral consequence;
(2) in a timely manner after the
effective date of sections 638.10 to 638.25, prepare a collection of citations
to, and the text or short descriptions of, the provisions identified under
clause (1); and
(3) annually update the collection in a
timely manner after the regular or last special session of the legislature in a
calendar year.
In complying with clauses (1) and (2),
the revisor may rely on the study of this state's collateral sanctions,
disqualifications, and relief provisions prepared by the National Institute of
Justice described in section 510 of the Court Security Improvement Act of 2007,
Public Law 110-177.
(b) The revisor of statutes shall
include the following statements or substantially similar language in a
prominent manner at the beginning of the collection required under paragraph
(a):
(1) This collection has not been
enacted into law and does not have the force of law.
(2) An error or omission in this
collection or in any reference work cited in this collection is not a reason
for invalidating a plea, conviction, or sentence or for not imposing a
collateral sanction or authorizing a disqualification.
(3) The laws of other jurisdictions and
local governments which impose additional collateral sanctions and authorize
additional disqualifications are not included in this collection.
(4) This collection does not include
any law or other provision regarding the imposition of or relief from a
collateral sanction or a disqualification enacted or adopted after (date the
collection was prepared or last updated.)
(c) The Office of the Revisor of
Statutes shall publish the collection prepared and updated as required under
paragraph (a). If available, it shall
publish as part of the collection the title and website address of the most
recent collection of:
(1) the collateral consequences imposed
by federal law; and
(2) any provision of federal law that
may afford relief from a collateral consequence.
(d) The collection described under paragraph
(c) must be available to the public on the Internet without charge in a
reasonable time after it is created or updated.
Sec. 8. [638.14]
NOTICE OF COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES IN CITATION, PRETRIAL PROCEEDING, AND AT
GUILTY PLEA.
(a) When a peace officer issues a
citation to a person for an offense, the officer shall ensure that the person
receives a notice of additional legal consequences substantially similar to
that described in paragraph (b). This
requirement may be satisfied by using the uniform traffic ticket described in
section 169.99 or the statewide standard citation if that document addresses
collateral consequences of a criminal conviction.
(b)
When an individual receives formal notice that the individual is charged with
an offense, the prosecuting attorney of the county or city in which the
individual is charged shall provide information substantially similar to the
following to the individual:
NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL LEGAL CONSEQUENCES
If you pled guilty or are convicted of an offense you may
suffer additional legal consequences beyond the sentence imposed by the court. These consequences may include, among many others, ineligibility to
keep or obtain some licenses, permits or jobs, public housing or education
benefits, and to vote or possess a firearm.
You may be denied citizenship and be deported. It
is your responsibility to learn what consequences may apply to you. Ask your attorney. Most consequences can be found at
https://niccc.csgjusticecenter.org/about/.
(c) Before the court accepts a plea of
guilty from an individual, the court shall confirm that the individual received
and understands the notice required by paragraphs (a) and (b), and had an
opportunity to discuss the notice with counsel.
Sec. 9. [638.15]
NOTICE OF COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES AT SENTENCING AND UPON RELEASE.
(a) As provided in paragraphs (b) and
(c), an individual convicted of an offense shall be given the following notice:
(1) that collateral consequences may
apply because of this conviction;
(2) the website address of the
collection of laws published under section 638.13, paragraph (c);
(3) that there may be ways to obtain
relief from collateral consequences;
(4) contact information for government
or nonprofit agencies, groups, or organizations, if any, offering assistance to
individuals seeking relief from collateral consequences; and
(5) when an individual convicted of an
offense may vote under state law.
(b) The court shall provide the notice
in paragraph (a) as a part of sentencing.
(c) If an individual is sentenced to
imprisonment or other incarceration, the officer or agency releasing the
individual shall provide the notice in paragraph (a) not more than 30 days and,
if practicable, at least ten days before release.
Sec. 10. [638.16]
AUTHORIZATION REQUIRED FOR COLLATERAL SANCTION; AMBIGUITY.
(a) A collateral sanction may be imposed
only by statute or ordinance, or by rule authorized by law and adopted under
chapter 14.
(b) A law creating a collateral
consequence that is ambiguous as to whether it imposes a collateral sanction or
authorizes a disqualification must be construed as authorizing a
disqualification.
Sec. 11. [638.17]
DECISION TO DISQUALIFY.
In deciding whether to impose a
disqualification, a decision maker shall undertake an individualized assessment
to determine whether the benefit or opportunity at issue shall be denied the
individual. In making that decision, the
decision maker may consider, if substantially related to the benefit or
opportunity at issue, the particular facts and
circumstances
involved in the offense and the essential elements of the offense. A conviction itself may not be considered
except as having established the elements of the offense. The decision maker shall also consider other
relevant information including, at a minimum, the effect on third parties of
granting the benefit or opportunity and whether the individual has been granted
relief such as an order of limited relief.
Sec. 12. [638.18]
EFFECT OF CONVICTION BY ANOTHER STATE OR THE UNITED STATES; RELIEVED OR
PARDONED CONVICTION.
(a) For purposes of authorizing or
imposing a collateral consequence in this state, a conviction of an offense in
a court of another state or the United States is deemed a conviction of the
offense in this state with the same elements.
If there is no offense in this state with the same elements, the
conviction is deemed a conviction of the most serious offense in this state
which is established by the elements of the offense. A misdemeanor in the jurisdiction of conviction
may not be deemed a felony in this state, and an offense lesser than a
misdemeanor in the jurisdiction of conviction may not be deemed a conviction of
a felony, gross misdemeanor, or misdemeanor in this state.
(b) For purposes of authorizing or
imposing a collateral consequence in this state, a juvenile adjudication in
another state or the United States may not be deemed a conviction of a felony,
gross misdemeanor, misdemeanor, or offense lesser than a misdemeanor in this
state, but may be deemed a juvenile adjudication for the delinquent act in this
state with the same elements. If there
is no delinquent act in this state with the same elements, the juvenile
adjudication is deemed an adjudication of the most serious delinquent act in
this state which is established by the elements of the offense.
(c) A conviction that is reversed,
overturned, or otherwise vacated by a court of competent jurisdiction of this
state, another state, or the United States on grounds other than rehabilitation
or good behavior may not serve as the basis for authorizing or imposing a
collateral consequence in this state.
(d) A pardon issued by another state or
the United States has the same effect for purposes of authorizing, imposing,
and relieving a collateral consequence in this state as it has in the issuing
jurisdiction.
(e) A conviction that has been relieved
by expungement, sealing, annulment, set-aside, or vacation by a court of
competent jurisdiction of another state or the United States on grounds of
rehabilitation or good behavior, or for which civil rights are restored
pursuant to statute, has the same effect for purposes of authorizing or
imposing collateral consequences in this state as it has in the jurisdiction of
conviction. However, this relief or restoration
of civil rights does not relieve collateral consequences applicable under the
law of this state for which relief could not be granted under section 638.21 or
for which relief was expressly withheld by the court order or by the law of the
jurisdiction that relieved the conviction.
An individual convicted in another jurisdiction may seek relief under
section 638.19 from any collateral consequence for which relief was not granted
in the issuing jurisdiction, other than those listed in section 638.21, and the
judge shall consider that the conviction was relieved or civil rights restored
in deciding whether to issue an order of limited relief.
(f) A charge or prosecution in any
jurisdiction which has been finally terminated without a conviction and imposition
of sentence based on participation in a deferred adjudication or diversion
program may not serve as the basis for authorizing or imposing a collateral
consequence in this state. This
paragraph does not affect the validity of any restriction or condition imposed
by law as part of participation in the deferred adjudication or diversion
program, before or after the termination of the charge or prosecution.
Sec. 13. [638.19]
ORDER OF LIMITED RELIEF.
(a) The court shall conduct
proceedings, make determinations, and issue orders on petitions for orders of
limited relief filed under this section.
(b)
An individual convicted of an offense may petition for an order of limited
relief from one or more collateral sanctions related to employment, education,
housing, public benefits, or occupational licensing. The petition may be brought before the court
at any time after sentencing.
(c) Except as otherwise provided in
section 638.21, the judge may issue an order of limited relief relieving one or
more of the collateral sanctions described in paragraph (b) if, after reviewing
the petition, the individual's criminal history, and any other relevant
evidence, the judge finds the individual has established by a preponderance of
the evidence that:
(1) granting the petition will
materially assist the individual in obtaining or maintaining employment,
education, housing, public benefits, or occupational licensing;
(2) the individual has substantial need
for the relief requested in order to live a law-abiding life; and
(3) granting the petition would not
pose an unreasonable risk to the safety or welfare of the public.
(d) The order of limited relief must
specify:
(1) the collateral sanction from which
relief is granted; and
(2) any restriction imposed pursuant to
section 638.22, paragraph (a).
(e) An order of limited relief relieves
a collateral sanction to the extent provided in the order.
(f) If a collateral sanction has been
relieved pursuant to this section, a decision maker may consider the conduct underlying
a conviction as provided in section 638.17.
Sec. 14. [638.21]
COLLATERAL SANCTIONS NOT SUBJECT TO ORDER OF LIMITED RELIEF.
An order of limited relief may not be
issued to relieve the following collateral sanctions:
(1) requirements imposed by sections
243.166 and 243.167;
(2) a motor vehicle license suspension, revocation, limitation, or ineligibility for driving while intoxicated pursuant to section 169A.20, or sections 169.792, 169.797, 169A.52, 169A.54, 171.17, 171.172, 171.173, 171.18, and 171.186, for which restoration or relief is available pursuant to sections 171.30 and 171.306;
(3) ineligibility for employment
pursuant to sections 387.36 and 419.06 or other law restricting employment of
convicted individuals by law enforcement agencies, such as the Department of
Corrections, Department of Public Safety, Office of the Attorney General,
sheriff's offices, police departments, and judicial offices; or
(4) eligibility to purchase, possess,
use, transfer, or own a firearm.
Sec. 15. [638.22]
ISSUANCE, MODIFICATION, AND REVOCATION OF ORDER OF LIMITED RELIEF.
(a) When a petition is filed under
section 638.19, including a petition for enlargement of an existing order of
limited relief, the judge may issue an order subject to restriction, condition,
or additional requirement. When issuing,
denying, modifying, or revoking an order, the judge may impose conditions for
reapplication.
(b) The judge may restrict or revoke an
order of limited relief issued by a court in this state if it finds just cause
by a preponderance of the evidence. An
order of restriction or revocation may be issued:
(1)
on motion of the judge;
(2) after notice to the individual; and
(3) after a hearing if requested by the individual.
(c) The judge shall order any test, report,
investigation, or disclosure by the individual it reasonably believes necessary
to its decision to issue, modify, or revoke an order of limited relief.
(d) The court shall maintain a public record of the
issuance, modification, and revocation of orders of limited relief and
certificates of restoration of rights. The
criminal history record system of the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension must
include issuance, modification, and revocation of orders and certificates.
Sec. 16. [638.23] RELIANCE ON ORDER AS EVIDENCE
OF DUE CARE.
In a judicial or administrative proceeding alleging
negligence or other fault, an order of limited relief may be introduced as
evidence of a person's due care in hiring, retaining, licensing, leasing to,
admitting to a school or program, or otherwise transacting business or engaging
in activity with the individual to whom the order was issued, if the person
knew of the order at the time of the alleged negligence or other fault.
Sec. 17. [638.24] UNIFORMITY OF APPLICATION AND
CONSTRUCTION.
In applying and construing this uniform act,
consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with
respect to its subject matter among states that enact it.
Sec. 18. [638.25] SAVINGS AND TRANSITIONAL
PROVISIONS.
(a) Sections 638.10 to 638.25 apply to collateral
consequences whenever enacted or imposed, unless the law creating the
collateral consequence expressly states that sections 638.10 to 638.25 do not
apply.
(b) Sections 638.10 to 638.25 do not invalidate the
imposition of a collateral sanction on an individual before the effective date
of sections 638.10 to 638.25, but a collateral sanction validly imposed before
the effective date of sections 638.10 to 638.25 may be the subject of relief
under these sections.
Sec. 19. CHANGE TO UNIFORM TRAFFIC TICKET AND
STATEWIDE STANDARD CITATION.
By January 1, 2021, the uniform traffic ticket described
in Minnesota Statutes, section 169.99, and the statewide standard citation must
include a notice of additional legal consequences substantially similar to that
described in Minnesota Statutes, section 638.14, paragraph (b). If this is determined not to be feasible, the
ticket and citation must, at a minimum, inform the offender generally of the
issue of potential collateral consequences and provide the following website
address: https://niccc.csgjusticecenter.org/about/.
Sec. 20. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 609B.050; 609B.100;
609B.101; 609B.102; 609B.103; 609B.104; 609B.105; 609B.106; 609B.107; 609B.108;
609B.109; 609B.110; 609B.111; 609B.112; 609B.113; 609B.120; 609B.121; 609B.122;
609B.123; 609B.124; 609B.125; 609B.126; 609B.127; 609B.128; 609B.129; 609B.130;
609B.132; 609B.133; 609B.134; 609B.135; 609B.136; 609B.139; 609B.140; 609B.141;
609B.142; 609B.143; 609B.144; 609B.146; 609B.147; 609B.148; 609B.149;
609B.1495; 609B.150; 609B.151; 609B.152; 609B.153; 609B.155; 609B.157;
609B.158; 609B.159; 609B.160; 609B.161; 609B.162; 609B.164; 609B.1641;
609B.1645; 609B.165; 609B.168; 609B.170; 609B.171; 609B.172; 609B.173;
609B.174; 609B.175; 609B.176; 609B.177; 609B.179;
609B.180;
609B.181; 609B.183; 609B.184; 609B.185; 609B.187; 609B.188; 609B.189; 609B.191;
609B.192; 609B.193; 609B.194; 609B.195; 609B.200; 609B.201; 609B.203; 609B.205;
609B.206; 609B.216; 609B.231; 609B.235; 609B.237; 609B.241; 609B.245; 609B.255;
609B.262; 609B.263; 609B.265; 609B.271; 609B.273; 609B.275; 609B.277; 609B.301;
609B.310; 609B.311; 609B.312; 609B.320; 609B.321; 609B.330; 609B.331; 609B.332;
609B.333; 609B.340; 609B.341; 609B.342; 609B.343; 609B.344; 609B.345; 609B.400;
609B.405; 609B.410; 609B.415; 609B.425; 609B.430; 609B.435; 609B.445; 609B.450;
609B.455; 609B.460; 609B.465; 609B.500; 609B.505; 609B.510; 609B.515; 609B.518;
609B.520; 609B.525; 609B.530; 609B.535; 609B.540; 609B.545; 609B.600; 609B.610;
609B.611; 609B.612; 609B.613; 609B.614; 609B.615; 609B.700; 609B.710; 609B.720;
609B.721; 609B.722; 609B.723; 609B.724; and 609B.725, are repealed.
Sec. 21. EFFECTIVE DATE.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), sections 1 to
20 are effective January 1, 2020.
(b) Section 8, paragraph (a), is effective July 1, 2024.
ARTICLE 13
PREDATORY OFFENDERS
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 171.07, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:
Subd. 1a. Filing photograph or image; data classification. The department shall file, or contract to file, all photographs or electronically produced images obtained in the process of issuing drivers' licenses or Minnesota identification cards. The photographs or electronically produced images shall be private data pursuant to section 13.02, subdivision 12. Notwithstanding section 13.04, subdivision 3, the department shall not be required to provide copies of photographs or electronically produced images to data subjects. The use of the files is restricted:
(1) to the issuance and control of drivers' licenses;
(2) to criminal justice agencies, as defined in section 299C.46, subdivision 2, for the investigation and prosecution of crimes, service of process, enforcement of no contact orders, location of missing persons, investigation and preparation of cases for criminal, juvenile, and traffic court, location of individuals required to register under section 243.166 or 243.167, and supervision of offenders;
(3) to public defenders, as defined in section 611.272, for the investigation and preparation of cases for criminal, juvenile, and traffic courts;
(4) to child support enforcement purposes under section 256.978; and
(5) to a county medical examiner or coroner as required by section 390.005 as necessary to fulfill the duties under sections 390.11 and 390.25.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 243.166, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:
Subd. 1a. Definitions. (a) As used in this section, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the following terms have the meanings given them.
(b) "Bureau" means the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension.
(c) "Corrections agent" means a county or
state probation agent or other corrections employee. Corrections agent also includes employees of
the federal government who work with a person subject to this section.
(c) (d) "Dwelling" means the building where the person lives under a formal or informal agreement to do so. However, dwelling does not include a supervised publicly or privately operated shelter or facility designed to provide temporary living accommodations for homeless individuals as defined in section 116L.361, subdivision 5.
(d) (e) "Incarceration" and
"confinement" do not include electronic home monitoring.
(e) (f) "Law enforcement authority"
or "authority" means, with respect to the chief of police
of a home rule charter or statutory city, the chief of police, and with
respect to the county sheriff of an unincorporated area, the
county sheriff in that county.
An authority must be located in Minnesota.
(f) (g) "Motor vehicle" has the
meaning given in section 169.011, subdivision 92.
(g) (h) "Primary address" means the
mailing address of the person's dwelling.
If the mailing address is different from the actual location of the
dwelling, primary address also includes the physical location of the dwelling
described with as much specificity as possible.
(h) (i) "School" includes any
public or private educational institution, including any secondary school,
trade, or professional institution, or institution of higher education, that
the person is enrolled in on a full-time or part-time basis.
(i) (j) "Secondary address" means
the mailing address of any place where the person regularly or occasionally
stays overnight when not staying at the person's primary address. If the mailing address is different from the
actual location of the place, secondary address also includes the physical
location of the place described with as much specificity as possible. However, the location of a supervised
publicly or privately operated shelter or facility designated to provide
temporary living accommodations for homeless individuals as defined in section
116L.361, subdivision 5, does not constitute a secondary address.
(j) (k) "Treatment facility" means
a residential facility, as defined in section 244.052, subdivision 1, and
residential chemical dependency treatment programs and halfway houses licensed
under chapter 245A, including, but not limited to, those facilities directly or
indirectly assisted by any department or agency of the United States.
(k) (l) "Work" includes employment
that is full time or part time for a period of time exceeding 14 days or for an
aggregate period of time exceeding 30 days during any calendar year, whether financially
compensated, volunteered, or for the purpose of government or educational
benefit.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 243.166, subdivision 1b, is amended to read:
Subd. 1b. Registration required. (a) A person shall register under this section if:
(1) the person was charged with or petitioned for a felony violation of or attempt to violate, or aiding, abetting, or conspiracy to commit, any of the following, and convicted of or adjudicated delinquent for that offense or another offense arising out of the same set of circumstances:
(i) murder under section 609.185, paragraph (a), clause (2);
(ii) kidnapping under section 609.25;
(iii) criminal sexual conduct under section 609.342; 609.343; 609.344; 609.345; 609.3451, subdivision 3; or 609.3453; or
(iv) indecent exposure under section 617.23, subdivision 3;
(2)
the person was charged with or petitioned for a violation of, or attempt to
violate, or aiding, abetting, or conspiring to commit any of the following
and convicted of or adjudicated delinquent for that offense or another offense
arising out of the same set of circumstances:
(i) criminal abuse in violation of section 609.2325, subdivision 1, paragraph (b);
(ii) false imprisonment in violation of section 609.255, subdivision 2;
(iii) solicitation, inducement, or promotion of the prostitution of a minor or engaging in the sex trafficking of a minor in violation of section 609.322;
(iv) a prostitution offense in violation of section 609.324, subdivision 1, paragraph (a);
(v) soliciting a minor to engage in sexual conduct in violation of section 609.352, subdivision 2 or 2a, clause (1);
(vi) using a minor in a sexual performance in violation of section 617.246; or
(vii) possessing pornographic work
involving a minor in violation of section 617.247, and convicted of or
adjudicated delinquent for that offense or another offense arising out of the
same set of circumstances;
(3) the person was sentenced as a
patterned sex offender under section 609.3455, subdivision 3a; or
(4) the person was charged with or
petitioned for, including pursuant to a court martial, violating a law of the United States, including the Uniform Code of
Military Justice, similar to the offenses described in clause (1), (2), or (3),
and convicted of or adjudicated delinquent for that offense or another offense
arising out of the same set of circumstances.; or
(5) the person was charged with or
petitioned for a violation of a law similar to an offense described in
clause (1), (2), (3), or (4) in another country where there are sufficient
safeguards for fundamental fairness and due process for the accused and the
person was convicted of or adjudicated delinquent for that offense or another
offense arising out of the same set of circumstances.
(b) A person also shall register under this section if:
(1) the person was charged with or petitioned for an offense in another state that would be a violation of a law described in paragraph (a) if committed in this state and convicted of or adjudicated delinquent for that offense or another offense arising out of the same set of circumstances;
(2) the person enters this state to reside, work, or attend school, or enters this state and remains for 14 days or longer or for an aggregate period of time exceeding 30 days during any calendar year; and
(3) ten years have not elapsed since the person was released from confinement or, if the person was not confined, since the person was convicted of or adjudicated delinquent for the offense that triggers registration, unless the person is subject to a longer registration period under the laws of another state or country in which the person has been convicted or adjudicated, or is subject to lifetime registration.
If a person described in this paragraph is subject to a longer registration period in another state or country or is subject to lifetime registration, the person shall register for that time period regardless of when the person was released from confinement, convicted, or adjudicated delinquent.
(c)
A person also shall register under this section if the person was committed
pursuant to a court commitment order under Minnesota Statutes 2012, section
253B.185, chapter 253D, Minnesota Statutes 1992, section 526.10, or a similar
law of another state or, the United States, or another
country, regardless of whether the person was convicted of any offense.
(d) A person also shall register under this section if:
(1) the person was charged with or
petitioned for a felony violation or attempt to violate any of the offenses
listed in paragraph (a), clause (1), or a similar law of another state or,
the United States, or another country, or the person was charged with or
petitioned for a violation of any of the offenses listed in paragraph (a),
clause (2), or a similar law of another state or, the United
States, or another country;
(2) the person was found not guilty by reason of mental illness or mental deficiency after a trial for that offense, or found guilty but mentally ill after a trial for that offense, in states or countries with a guilty but mentally ill verdict; and
(3) the person was committed pursuant to a
court commitment order under section 253B.18 or a similar law of another state or,
the United States, or another country.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 243.166, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Notice. When a person who is required to register
under subdivision 1b, paragraph (a), is sentenced or becomes subject to a
juvenile court disposition order, the court shall tell the person of the duty
to register under this section and that, if the person fails to comply with the
registration requirements, information about the offender may be made available
to the public through electronic, computerized, or other accessible means. The court may not modify the person's duty to
register in the pronounced sentence or disposition order. The court shall require the person to read
and sign a form stating that the duty of the person to register under this
section has been explained. The court
shall forward make available the signed sex offender
registration court notification form, the complaint, and sentencing
documents to the bureau. If a person
required to register under subdivision 1b, paragraph (a), was not notified by
the court of the registration requirement at the time of sentencing or
disposition, the assigned corrections agent shall notify the person of the
requirements of this section. If a
person required to register under subdivision 1b, paragraph (a), was not
notified by the court of the registration requirement at the time of sentencing
or disposition and does not have a corrections agent, the law enforcement
authority with jurisdiction over the person's primary address shall notify the
person of the requirements. When a
person who is required to register under subdivision 1b, paragraph (c) or (d),
is released from commitment, the treatment facility shall notify the person of
the requirements of this section. The
treatment facility shall also obtain the registration information required
under this section and forward it to the bureau.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 243.166, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Contents of registration. (a) The registration provided to the corrections agent or law enforcement authority, must consist of a statement in writing signed by the person, giving information required by the bureau, fingerprints, biological specimen for DNA analysis as defined under section 299C.155, subdivision 1, and photograph of the person taken at the time of the person's release from incarceration or, if the person was not incarcerated, at the time the person initially registered under this section. The registration information also must include a written consent form signed by the person allowing a treatment facility or residential housing unit or shelter to release information to a law enforcement officer about the person's admission to, or residence in, a treatment facility or residential housing unit or shelter. Registration information on adults and juveniles may be maintained together notwithstanding section 260B.171, subdivision 3.
(b)
For persons required to register under subdivision 1b, paragraph (c), following
commitment pursuant to a court commitment under Minnesota Statutes 2012,
section 253B.185, chapter 253D, Minnesota Statutes 1992, section 526.10, or a
similar law of another state or, the United States, or another
country, in addition to other information required by this section, the
registration provided to the corrections agent or law enforcement authority
must include the person's offense history and documentation of treatment
received during the person's commitment.
This documentation is limited to a statement of how far the person
progressed in treatment during commitment.
(c) Within three days of receipt, the corrections
agent or law enforcement authority shall forward the registration information
to the bureau. The bureau shall
ascertain whether the person has registered with the law enforcement authority
in the area of the person's primary address, if any, or if the person lacks a
primary address, where the person is staying, as required by subdivision 3a. If the person has not registered with the law
enforcement authority, the bureau shall send one copy to notify
that authority.
(d) The corrections agent or law enforcement
authority may require that a person required to register under this section
appear before the agent or authority to be photographed. The agent or authority shall forward submit
the photograph to the bureau.
(1) Except as provided in clause (2), the agent or authority may photograph any offender at a time and frequency chosen by the agent or authority.
(2) The requirements of this paragraph shall not apply during any period where the person to be photographed is: (i) committed to the commissioner of corrections and incarcerated, (ii) incarcerated in a regional jail or county jail, or (iii) committed to the commissioner of human services and receiving treatment in a secure treatment facility.
(e) During the period a person is required to register under this section, the following provisions apply:
(1) Except for persons registering under
subdivision 3a, the bureau shall mail a verification form to the person's last
reported primary address. This
verification form must provide notice to the offender that, if the offender
does not return the verification form as required, information about the
offender may be made available to the public through electronic, computerized,
or other accessible means. For persons
who are registered under subdivision 3a, the bureau shall mail an annual
verification form to the law enforcement authority where the offender most
recently reported. The authority shall
provide the verification form to the person at the next weekly meeting and
ensure that the person completes and signs the form and returns it to the
bureau. Notice is sufficient under this
paragraph, if the verification form is sent by first class mail to the
person's last reported primary address, or for persons registered under
subdivision 3a, to the law enforcement authority where the offender most
recently reported.
(2) The person shall mail the signed
verification form back to the bureau within ten days after receipt of the form,
stating on the form the current and last address of the person's residence and
the other information required under subdivision 4a. The person cannot change any registration
information as part of the verification process.
(3) In addition to the requirements listed in this section, an offender who is no longer under correctional supervision for a registration offense, or a failure to register offense, but who resides, works, or attends school in Minnesota, shall have an in-person contact with a law enforcement authority as provided in this section. If the person resides in Minnesota, the in-person contact shall be with the law enforcement authority that has jurisdiction over the person's primary address or, if the person has no address, the location where the person is staying. If the person does not reside in Minnesota but works or attends school in this state, the person shall have an in-person contact with the law enforcement authority or authorities with jurisdiction over the person's school or workplace. During the month of the person's birth date, the person shall report to the authority to verify the accuracy of the registration information and to be photographed. Within three days of this contact, the authority shall enter information as required by the bureau into the predatory offender registration database and submit an updated photograph of the person to the bureau's predatory offender registration unit.
(4) If the person fails to mail the completed and signed verification form to the bureau within ten days after receipt of the form, or if the person fails to report to the law enforcement authority during the month of the person's birth date, the person is in violation of this section.
(5) For any person who fails to mail the
completed and signed verification form to the bureau within ten days after receipt
of the form and who has been determined to be subject to community
notification pursuant to section 253D.32 or is a risk level III offender
under section 244.052, the bureau shall immediately investigate and notify
local law enforcement authorities to investigate the person's location and to
ensure compliance with this section. The
bureau also shall immediately give notice of the person's violation of this
section to the law enforcement authority having jurisdiction over the person's
last registered primary address or addresses.
(6) A law enforcement authority may
determine whether the person is at that person's primary address, secondary
address, or school or work location, if any, or the accuracy of any other
information required under subdivision 4a if the person whose primary address,
secondary address, or school or work location, if any, is within the
authority's jurisdiction, regardless of the assignment of a corrections agent.
For persons required to register under
subdivision 1b, paragraph (c), following commitment pursuant to a court
commitment under Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 253B.185, chapter 253D,
Minnesota Statutes 1992, section 526.10, or a similar law of another state or,
the United States, or another country, the bureau shall comply with
clause (1) at least four two times each year. For persons who, under section 244.052, are
assigned to risk level III and who are no longer under correctional supervision
for a registration offense or a failure to register offense, the bureau shall comply
with clause (1) at least two times each year.
For all other persons required to register under this section, the
bureau shall comply with clause (1) each year within 30 days of the anniversary
date of the person's initial registration.
(f) When sending out a verification form,
the bureau shall determine whether the person to whom the verification form is
being sent has signed a written consent form as provided for in paragraph (a). If the person has not signed such a consent
form, the bureau shall send a written consent form to the person along with the
verification form. A person who receives
this written consent form shall sign and return it to the bureau at the same
time as the verification form. For
persons registered under this section on the effective date of this section,
each person, on or before one year from that date, must provide a biological
specimen for the purpose of DNA analysis to the probation agency or law
enforcement authority where that person is registered. A person who provides or has provided a
biological specimen for the purpose of DNA analysis under chapter 299C or
section 609.117 meets the requirements of this paragraph.
(g) For persons registered under this
section on the effective date of this section, each person, on or before one
year from that date, must provide fingerprints to the probation agency or law
enforcement authority where that person is registered.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 243.166, subdivision 4a, is amended to read:
Subd. 4a. Information required to be provided. (a) A person required to register under this section shall provide to the corrections agent or law enforcement authority the following information:
(1) the person's primary address;
(2) all of the person's secondary addresses in Minnesota, including all addresses used for residential or recreational purposes;
(3) the addresses of all Minnesota property owned, leased, or rented by the person;
(4) the addresses of all locations where the person is employed;
(5) the addresses of all schools where the
person is enrolled; and
(6) the year, model, make, license plate
number, and color of all motor vehicles owned or regularly driven by the person.;
(7) the expiration year for the motor
vehicle license plate tabs of all motor vehicles owned by the person; and
(8) all telephone numbers including
work, school, and home and any cellular telephone service.
(b) The person shall report to the agent
or authority the information required to be provided under paragraph (a),
clauses (2) to (6) (8), within five days of the date the clause
becomes applicable. If because of a
change in circumstances any information reported under paragraph (a), clauses
(1) to (6) (8), no longer applies, the person shall immediately
inform the agent or authority that the information is no longer valid. If the person leaves a primary address and
does not have a new primary address, the person shall register as provided in
subdivision 3a.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 243.166, subdivision 4b, is amended to read:
Subd. 4b. Health
care facility; notice of status. (a)
For the purposes of this subdivision,:
(1) "health care facility" means a facility:
(1) (i) licensed by the
commissioner of health as a hospital, boarding care home or supervised living
facility under sections 144.50 to 144.58, or a nursing home under chapter 144A;
(2) (ii) registered by the
commissioner of health as a housing with services establishment as defined in
section 144D.01; or
(3) (iii) licensed by the
commissioner of human services as a residential facility under chapter 245A to
provide adult foster care, adult mental health treatment, chemical dependency
treatment to adults, or residential services to persons with disabilities.;
and
(2) "home care provider" has
the meaning given in section 144A.43.
(b) Prior to admission to a health care facility or home care services from a home care provider, a person required to register under this section shall disclose to:
(1) the health care facility employee or the home care provider processing the admission the person's status as a registered predatory offender under this section; and
(2) the person's corrections agent, or if
the person does not have an assigned corrections agent, the law enforcement
authority with whom the person is currently required to register, that inpatient
admission will occur.
(c) A law enforcement authority or corrections agent who receives notice under paragraph (b) or who knows that a person required to register under this section is planning to be admitted and receive, or has been admitted and is receiving health care at a health care facility or home care services from a home care provider, shall notify the administrator of the facility or the home care provider and deliver a fact sheet to the administrator or provider containing the following information: (1) name and physical description of the offender; (2) the offender's conviction history, including the dates of conviction; (3) the risk level classification assigned to the offender under section 244.052, if any; and (4) the profile of likely victims.
(d) Except for a hospital licensed under sections 144.50 to 144.58, if a health care facility receives a fact sheet under paragraph (c) that includes a risk level classification for the offender, and if the facility admits the offender, the facility shall distribute the fact sheet to all residents at the facility. If the facility determines that distribution to a resident is not appropriate given the resident's medical, emotional, or mental status, the facility shall distribute the fact sheet to the patient's next of kin or emergency contact.
(e) If a home care provider receives a
fact sheet under paragraph (c) that includes a risk level classification for
the offender, the provider shall distribute the fact sheet to any individual
who will provide direct services to the offender before the individual begins
to provide the service.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 243.166, subdivision 4c, is amended to read:
Subd. 4c. Notices
in writing; signed. All notices
required by this section must be in writing and signed by the person required
to register. For purposes of this
section, a signature is as defined in section 645.44, subdivision 14, by an
electronic method established by the bureau, or by use of a biometric for the
person. If a biometric is used, the
person must provide a sample that is forwarded to the bureau so that it can be
maintained for comparison purposes to verify the person's identity.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 243.166, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 4d. Travel. (a) A person required to register
under this section who intends to travel outside the boundaries of the United
States must appear in person to notify the person's corrections agent or the
law enforcement authority with jurisdiction over the person's primary address
of the travel plans. The person must
provide:
(1) anticipated departure date;
(2) place of departure;
(3) place of arrival or return;
(4) carrier and flight numbers for air
travel;
(5) destination country and address or
other contact information;
(6) means and purpose of travel;
(7) visa information, if any; and
(8) any other itinerary information
requested by the corrections agent or law enforcement authority.
(b) The notice must be provided at least
21 calendar days before the departure date and forwarded to the bureau within
one business day of receipt. If it is
not possible to give 21 calendar days' notice due to an emergency or a work
assignment, the person is required to notify the corrections agent or the law
enforcement authority with jurisdiction over the person's primary address as
soon as possible prior to departure. If
the travel is due to an emergency, the person must provide a copy of the
message conveying the emergency that includes the date and time sent and the
source of the information. If the travel
is the result of a work assignment, the employer must provide the date the
employee was informed of the need to travel and the nature of the work to be
performed.
(c)
The corrections agent or law enforcement authority must forward the
notification to the bureau as soon as possible after receipt. The bureau must forward the international
travel information to the United States Marshals Service pursuant to
International Megan's Law, Public Law 114-119.
(d) A person required to register under
this section who is assigned a corrections agent must receive the corrections
agent's approval for all international travel.
Nothing in this subdivision requires a corrections agent to approve of
travel that is inconsistent with the terms of the offender's supervision.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 243.166, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Criminal
penalty. (a) A person required to
register under this section who was given notice, knows, or reasonably
should know of the duty to register and who:
(1) knowingly commits an act or
fails to fulfill a requirement that violates any of its provisions provision
of this section; or
(2) intentionally provides false information to a corrections agent, law enforcement authority, or the bureau is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c), a person convicted of violating paragraph (a) shall be committed to the custody of the commissioner of corrections for not less than a year and a day, nor more than five years.
(c) A person convicted of violating
paragraph (a), who has previously been convicted of or adjudicated delinquent
for violating this section or a similar statute of another state or,
the United States, or another country, shall be committed to the custody
of the commissioner of corrections for not less than two years, nor more than
five years.
(d) Prior to the time of sentencing, the prosecutor may file a motion to have the person sentenced without regard to the mandatory minimum sentence established by this subdivision. The motion must be accompanied by a statement on the record of the reasons for it. When presented with the motion, or on its own motion, the court may sentence the person without regard to the mandatory minimum sentence if the court finds substantial and compelling reasons to do so. Sentencing a person in the manner described in this paragraph is a departure from the Sentencing Guidelines.
(e) A person convicted and sentenced as required by this subdivision is not eligible for probation, parole, discharge, work release, conditional release, or supervised release, until that person has served the full term of imprisonment as provided by law, notwithstanding the provisions of sections 241.26, 242.19, 243.05, 244.04, 609.12, and 609.135.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 243.166, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Registration period. (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 609.165, subdivision 1, and except as provided in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d), a person required to register under this section shall continue to comply with this section until ten years have elapsed since the person initially registered in connection with the offense, or until the probation, supervised release, or conditional release period expires, whichever occurs later. For a person required to register under this section who is committed under section 253B.18, Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 253B.185, or chapter 253D, the ten-year registration period does not include the period of commitment.
(b)
The commissioner of public safety shall require a person to continue to
register for an additional period of five years if a the person
required to register under this section fails to:
(1) provide the person's primary
address as required by subdivision 3, paragraph (b), fails to;
(2) comply with the requirements of
subdivision 3a, fails to;
(3) provide information as required
by subdivision subdivisions 4a, or fails to and 4d;
(4) return the verification form
referenced in subdivision 4 within ten days, the commissioner of public
safety shall require the person to continue to register for an additional
period of five years.;
(5) remain at the primary address of
record; or
(6) sign a registration form, verification form, or change of information form.
This five-year period is added to the end of the offender's
registration period. In addition, if
the person is not in compliance at the end of the registration period, the
commissioner shall require the person to continue to register for an additional
period of two years.
(c) If a person required to register under this section is incarcerated due to a conviction for a new offense, or following a revocation of probation, supervised release, or conditional release for any offense, the person shall continue to register until ten years have elapsed since the person was last released from incarceration or until the person's probation, supervised release, or conditional release period expires, whichever occurs later.
(d) A person shall continue to comply with this section for the life of that person:
(1) if the person is convicted of or adjudicated delinquent for any offense for which registration is required under subdivision 1b, or any offense from another state, another country, or any federal offense similar to the offenses described in subdivision 1b, and the person has a prior conviction or adjudication for an offense for which registration was or would have been required under subdivision 1b, or an offense from another state, another country, or a federal offense similar to an offense described in subdivision 1b;
(2) if the person is required to register
based upon a conviction or delinquency adjudication for an offense under
section 609.185, paragraph (a), clause (2), or a similar statute from another
state or, the United States, or another country;
(3) if
the person is required to register based upon a conviction for an offense under
section 609.342, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), (c), (d), (e), (f), or
(h); 609.343, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), (c), (d), (e), (f), or (h);
609.344, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), (c), or (g); or 609.345, subdivision 1,
paragraph (a), (c), or (g); or a statute from another state or, the
United States, or another country similar to the offenses described in
this clause; or
(4) if the person is required to register
under subdivision 1b, paragraph (c), following commitment pursuant to a court
commitment under Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 253B.185, chapter 253D,
Minnesota Statutes 1992, section 526.10, or a similar law of another state or,
the United States, or another country.
(e) A person described in subdivision 1b, paragraph (b), who is required to register under the laws of a state or another country in which the person has been previously convicted or adjudicated delinquent, shall register under this section for the time period required by the state of conviction or adjudication unless a longer time period is required elsewhere in this section.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 243.166, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Use of data. (a) Except as otherwise provided in subdivision 4b or 7a or sections 244.052 and 299C.093, the data provided under this section is private data on individuals under section 13.02, subdivision 12.
(b) The data may be used only by law
enforcement and corrections agencies for law enforcement and corrections
purposes. Law enforcement or a
corrections agent may disclose the status of an individual as a predatory
offender to a child protection worker with a local welfare agency for purposes
of doing a family assessment under section 626.556. A corrections agent may also disclose the
status of an individual as a predatory offender to comply with section 244.057.
(c) The commissioner of human services is authorized to have access to the data for:
(1) state-operated services, as defined in section 246.014, for the purposes described in section 246.13, subdivision 2, paragraph (b); and
(2) purposes of completing background studies under chapter 245C.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 243.166, subdivision 7a, is amended to read:
Subd. 7a. Availability
of information on offenders who are out of compliance with registration law. (a) The bureau may make information
available to the public about offenders who are 16 years of age or older and
who are out of compliance with this section for 30 days or longer for failure
to:
(1) provide the offenders' primary or
secondary addresses.;
(2) comply with the requirements of
subdivision 3a;
(3) provide information as required by
subdivisions 4a and 4d;
(4) return the verification form
referenced in subdivision 4 within 15 days;
(5) remain at the primary address of
record; or
(6) sign a registration form,
verification form, or change of information form.
This information may be made available to the public through electronic, computerized, or other accessible means. The amount and type of information made available is limited to the information necessary for the public to assist law enforcement in locating the offender.
(b) An offender who comes into compliance with this section after the bureau discloses information about the offender to the public may send a written request to the bureau requesting the bureau to treat information about the offender as private data, consistent with subdivision 7. The bureau shall review the request and promptly take reasonable action to treat the data as private, if the offender has complied with the requirement that the offender provide the offender's primary and secondary addresses, has returned the verification form or has returned to the primary address, or promptly notify the offender that the information will continue to be treated as public information and the reasons for the bureau's decision.
(c) If an offender believes the information made public about the offender is inaccurate or incomplete, the offender may challenge the data under section 13.04, subdivision 4.
(d) The bureau is immune from any civil or criminal liability that might otherwise arise, based on the accuracy or completeness of any information made public under this subdivision, if the bureau acts in good faith.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299C.093, is amended to read:
299C.093
DATABASE OF REGISTERED PREDATORY OFFENDERS.
The superintendent of the Bureau of
Criminal Apprehension shall maintain a computerized data system relating to
individuals required to register as predatory offenders under section 243.166. To the degree feasible, the system must
include the data required to be provided under section 243.166, subdivisions 4,
4a, and 4a 4b, and indicate the time period that the person
is required to register. The
superintendent shall maintain this data in a manner that ensures that it is
readily available to law enforcement agencies.
This data is private data on individuals under section 13.02,
subdivision 12, but may be used for law enforcement and corrections purposes. Law enforcement or a corrections agent
may disclose the status of an individual as a predatory offender to a child
protection worker with a local welfare agency for purposes of doing a family
assessment under section 626.556. A
corrections agent may also disclose the status of an individual as a predatory
offender to comply with section 244.057.
The commissioner of human services has access to the data for
state-operated services, as defined in section 246.014, for the purposes
described in section 246.13, subdivision 2, paragraph (b), and for purposes of
conducting background studies under chapter 245C. In addition, the data may be used as
provided in section 243.166, subdivisions 4b and 7a.
ARTICLE 14
FIREARM BACKGROUND CHECKS AND TRANSFERS
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 624.7131, is amended to read:
624.7131
TRANSFEREE PERMIT; PENALTY.
Subdivision 1. Information. Any person may apply for a transferee permit by providing the following information in writing to the chief of police of an organized full time police department of the municipality in which the person resides or to the county sheriff if there is no such local chief of police:
(1) the name, residence, telephone number, and driver's license number or nonqualification certificate number, if any, of the proposed transferee;
(2) the sex, date of birth, height, weight, and color of eyes, and distinguishing physical characteristics, if any, of the proposed transferee;
(3) a statement that the proposed transferee authorizes the release to the local police authority of commitment information about the proposed transferee maintained by the commissioner of human services, to the extent that the information relates to the proposed transferee's eligibility to possess a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon under section 624.713, subdivision 1; and
(4) a statement by the proposed transferee that the proposed transferee is not prohibited by section 624.713 from possessing a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon.
The statements shall be signed and dated by the person applying for a permit. At the time of application, the local police authority shall provide the applicant with a dated receipt for the application. The statement under clause (3) must comply with any applicable requirements of Code of Federal Regulations, title 42, sections 2.31 to 2.35, with respect to consent to disclosure of alcohol or drug abuse patient records.
Subd. 2. Investigation. The chief of police or sheriff shall check criminal histories, records and warrant information relating to the applicant through the Minnesota Crime Information System, the national criminal record repository, and the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. The chief of police or sheriff shall also make a reasonable effort to check other available state and local record-keeping systems. The chief of police or sheriff shall obtain commitment information from the commissioner of human services as provided in section 245.041.
Subd. 3. Forms. Chiefs of police and sheriffs shall make transferee permit application forms available throughout the community. There shall be no charge for forms, reports, investigations, notifications, waivers or any other act performed or materials provided by a government employee or agency in connection with application for or issuance of a transferee permit.
Subd. 4. Grounds for disqualification. A determination by (a) The
chief of police or sheriff that shall refuse to grant a transferee
permit if the applicant is prohibited by section 624.713 state or
federal law from possessing a pistol or semiautomatic military-style
assault weapon shall be the only basis for refusal to grant a transferee
permit or is determined to be a danger to self or others under paragraph
(b).
(b) A chief of police or sheriff shall refuse to grant a
permit to a person who is a danger to self or others. The decision of the chief of police or
sheriff must be based on documented past contact with law enforcement. A notice of disqualification issued pursuant
to this paragraph must describe and document the specific law enforcement
contact or contacts relied upon to deny the permit.
(c) A person is not eligible to submit a permit
application under this section if the person has had an application denied
pursuant to paragraph (b) and less than six months have elapsed since the
denial was issued or the person's appeal under subdivision 8 was denied,
whichever is later.
(d) A chief of police or sheriff who denies a permit application
pursuant to paragraph (b) must provide a copy of the notice of disqualification
to the chief of police or sheriff with joint jurisdiction over the proposed
transferee's residence.
Subd. 5. Granting of permits. (a) The chief of police or sheriff shall issue a transferee permit or deny the application within seven days of application for the permit.
(b) In the case of a denial, the chief of police or sheriff shall provide an applicant with written notification of a denial and the specific reason for the denial.
(c) The permits and their renewal shall be granted free of charge.
Subd. 6. Permits valid statewide. Transferee permits issued pursuant to this section are valid statewide and shall expire after one year. A transferee permit may be renewed in the same manner and subject to the same provisions by which the original permit was obtained, except that all renewed permits must comply with the standards adopted by the commissioner under section 624.7151.
Permits issued pursuant to this section are not transferable. A person who transfers a permit in violation of this subdivision is guilty of a misdemeanor.
Subd. 7. Permit voided; revocation. (a) The transferee permit shall be
void at the time that the holder becomes prohibited from possessing or
receiving a pistol under section 624.713, in which event the holder shall
return the permit within five days to the issuing authority. If the chief law enforcement officer who
issued the permit has knowledge that the permit holder is ineligible to possess
firearms, the chief law enforcement officer must revoke the permit and give
notice to the holder in writing.
Failure of the holder to return the permit within the five days of
learning that the permit is void or revoked is a gross misdemeanor unless the court finds that the circumstances or the physical or mental condition of the permit holder prevented the holder from complying with the return requirement.
(b) When a permit holder receives a
court disposition that prohibits the permit holder from possessing a firearm,
the court must take possession of the permit, if it is available, and send it
to the issuing law enforcement agency. If
the permit holder does not have the permit when the court imposes a firearm
prohibition, the permit holder must surrender the permit to the assigned
probation officer, if applicable. When a
probation officer is assigned upon disposition of the case, the court shall
inform the probation agent of the permit holder's obligation to surrender the
permit. Upon surrender, the probation
officer must send the permit to the issuing law enforcement agency. If a probation officer is not assigned to the
permit holder, the holder shall surrender the permit as provided for in
paragraph (a).
Subd. 8. Hearing upon denial. Any person aggrieved by denial of a transferee permit may appeal the denial to the district court having jurisdiction over the county or municipality in which the denial occurred.
Subd. 9. Permit
to carry. A valid permit to
carry issued pursuant to section 624.714 constitutes a transferee permit for
the purposes of this section and section 624.7132.
Subd. 10. Transfer
report not required. A person
who transfers a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon to a
person exhibiting a valid transferee permit issued pursuant to this section or
a valid permit to carry issued pursuant to section 624.714 is not required to
file a transfer report pursuant to section 624.7132, subdivision 1.
Subd. 11. Penalty. A person who makes a false statement in
order to obtain a transferee permit knowing or having reason to know the
statement is false is guilty of a gross misdemeanor felony.
Subd. 12. Local regulation. This section shall be construed to supersede municipal or county regulation of the issuance of transferee permits.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 624.7132, is amended to read:
624.7132
REPORT OF TRANSFER.
Subdivision 1. Required information. Except as provided in this section and section 624.7131, every person who agrees to transfer a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon shall report the following information in writing to the chief of police of the organized full-time police department of the municipality where the proposed transferee resides or to the appropriate county sheriff if there is no such local chief of police:
(1) the name, residence, telephone number, and driver's license number or nonqualification certificate number, if any, of the proposed transferee;
(2) the sex, date of birth, height, weight, and color of eyes, and distinguishing physical characteristics, if any, of the proposed transferee;
(3) a statement that the proposed transferee authorizes the release to the local police authority of commitment information about the proposed transferee maintained by the commissioner of human services, to the extent that the information relates to the proposed transferee's eligibility to possess a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon under section 624.713, subdivision 1;
(4) a statement by the proposed transferee that the transferee is not prohibited by section 624.713 from possessing a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon; and
(5) the address of the place of business of the transferor.
The report shall be signed and dated by the transferor and the proposed transferee. The report shall be delivered by the transferor to the chief of police or sheriff no later than three days after the date of the agreement to transfer, excluding weekends and legal holidays. The statement under clause (3) must comply with any applicable requirements of Code of Federal Regulations, title 42, sections 2.31 to 2.35, with respect to consent to disclosure of alcohol or drug abuse patient records.
Subd. 2. Investigation. Upon receipt of a transfer report, the chief of police or sheriff shall check criminal histories, records and warrant information relating to the proposed transferee through the Minnesota Crime Information System, the national criminal record repository, and the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. The chief of police or sheriff shall also make a reasonable effort to check other available state and local record-keeping systems. The chief of police or sheriff shall obtain commitment information from the commissioner of human services as provided in section 245.041.
Subd. 3. Notification. The chief of police or sheriff shall notify the transferor and proposed transferee in writing as soon as possible if the chief or sheriff determines that the proposed transferee is prohibited by section 624.713 from possessing a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon. The notification to the transferee shall specify the grounds for the disqualification of the proposed transferee and shall set forth in detail the transferee's right of appeal under subdivision 13.
Subd. 4. Delivery. Except as otherwise provided in
subdivision 7 or 8, no person shall deliver a pistol or semiautomatic
military-style assault weapon to a proposed transferee until five business days
after the date the agreement to transfer is delivered to a chief of police or
sheriff in accordance with subdivision 1 unless the chief of police or sheriff
waives all or a portion of the seven-day waiting period. The chief of police or sheriff may waive all
or a portion of the five business day waiting period in writing if the
chief of police or sheriff finds that the transferee requires access to a
pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon because of a threat to
the life of the transferee or of any member of the household of the transferee.
No person shall deliver a pistol or
semiautomatic military-style assault weapon firearm to a proposed
transferee after receiving a written notification that the chief of police or
sheriff has determined that the proposed transferee is prohibited by section
624.713 from possessing a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon
firearm.
If the transferor makes a report of
transfer and receives no written notification of disqualification of the
proposed transferee within five business days after delivery of the agreement
to transfer, the pistol or semiautomatic military‑style assault weapon
firearm may be delivered to the transferee.
Subd. 5. Grounds
for disqualification. A
determination by (a) The chief of police or sheriff that shall
deny an application if the proposed transferee is prohibited by section
624.713 state or federal law from possessing a pistol or
semiautomatic military-style assault weapon shall be the sole basis for a
notification of disqualification under this section or is determined to
be a danger to self or others under paragraph (b).
(b) A chief of police or sheriff shall
deny an application if the person is a danger to self or others. The decision of the chief of police or
sheriff must be based on documented past contact with law enforcement. A notice of disqualification issued pursuant
to this paragraph must describe and document the specific law enforcement
contact or contacts relied upon to deny the application.
(c)
A chief of police or sheriff need not process an application under this section
if the person has had an application denied pursuant to paragraph (b) and less
than six months have elapsed since the denial was issued or the person's appeal
under subdivision 13 was denied, whichever is later.
(d) A chief of police or sheriff who
denies an application pursuant to paragraph (b) must provide a copy of the
notice of disqualification to the chief of police or sheriff with joint
jurisdiction over the applicant's residence.
Subd. 6. Transferee
permit. If a chief of police
or sheriff determines that a transferee is not a person prohibited by section
624.713 from possessing a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault
weapon, the transferee may, within 30 days after the determination, apply to
that chief of police or sheriff for a transferee permit, and the permit shall
be issued.
Subd. 8. Report
not required. If the proposed
transferee presents a valid transferee permit issued under section 624.7131
or a valid permit to carry issued under section 624.714, the transferor
need not file a transfer report.
Subd. 9. Number of pistols or semiautomatic military-style assault weapons. Any number of pistols or semiautomatic military-style assault weapons may be the subject of a single transfer agreement and report to the chief of police or sheriff. Nothing in this section or section 624.7131 shall be construed to limit or restrict the number of pistols or semiautomatic military-style assault weapons a person may acquire.
Subd. 10. Restriction on records. If, after a determination that the transferee is not a person prohibited by section 624.713 from possessing a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon, a transferee requests that no record be maintained of the fact of who is the transferee of a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon, the chief of police or sheriff shall sign the transfer report and return it to the transferee as soon as possible. Thereafter, no government employee or agency shall maintain a record of the transfer that identifies the transferee, and the transferee shall retain the report of transfer.
Subd. 11. Forms; cost. Chiefs of police and sheriffs shall make transfer report forms available throughout the community. There shall be no charge for forms, reports, investigations, notifications, waivers or any other act performed or materials provided by a government employee or agency in connection with a transfer.
Subd. 12. Exclusions. Except as otherwise provided in section 609.66, subdivision 1f, this section shall not apply to transfers of antique firearms as curiosities or for their historical significance or value, transfers to or between federally licensed firearms dealers, transfers by order of court, involuntary transfers, transfers at death or the following transfers:
(1) a transfer by a person other than a federally licensed firearms dealer;
(2) a loan to a prospective transferee if the loan is intended for a period of no more than one day;
(3) the delivery of a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon to a person for the purpose of repair, reconditioning or remodeling;
(4) a loan by a teacher to a student in a course designed to teach marksmanship or safety with a pistol and approved by the commissioner of natural resources;
(5) a loan between persons at a firearms collectors exhibition;
(6) a loan between persons lawfully engaged in hunting or target shooting if the loan is intended for a period of no more than 12 hours;
(7) a loan between law enforcement officers who have the power to make arrests other than citizen arrests; and
(8) a loan between employees or between the employer and an employee in a business if the employee is required to carry a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon by reason of employment and is the holder of a valid permit to carry a pistol.
Subd. 13. Appeal. A person aggrieved by the determination of a chief of police or sheriff that the person is prohibited by section 624.713 from possessing a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon may appeal the determination as provided in this subdivision. The district court shall have jurisdiction of proceedings under this subdivision.
On review pursuant to this subdivision, the court shall be limited to a determination of whether the proposed transferee is a person prohibited from possessing a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon by section 624.713.
Subd. 14. Transfer
to unknown party. (a) No
person shall transfer a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon
to another who is not personally known to the transferor unless the proposed
transferee presents evidence of identity to the transferor.
(b) No person who is not personally
known to the transferor shall become a transferee of a pistol or semiautomatic
military-style assault weapon unless the person presents evidence of identity
to the transferor.
(c) The evidence of identity shall
contain the name, residence address, date of birth, and photograph of the
proposed transferee; must be made or issued by or under the authority of the
United States government, a state, a political subdivision of a state, a
foreign government, a political subdivision of a foreign government, an
international governmental or an international quasi-governmental organization;
and must be of a type commonly accepted for the purpose of identification of
individuals.
(d) A person who becomes a transferee
of a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon in violation of this
subdivision is guilty of a misdemeanor.
Subd. 15. Penalties. (a) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b), a person who does any of the following is guilty of a gross misdemeanor:
(1) transfers a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon in violation of subdivisions 1 to 13;
(2) transfers a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon to a person who has made a false statement in order to become a transferee, if the transferor knows or has reason to know the transferee has made the false statement;
(3) knowingly becomes a transferee in violation of subdivisions 1 to 13; or
(4) makes a false statement in order to become a transferee of a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon knowing or having reason to know the statement is false.
(b) A person who does either of the following is guilty of a felony:
(1) transfers a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon to a person under the age of 18 in violation of subdivisions 1 to 13; or
(2) transfers a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon to a person under the age of 18 who has made a false statement in order to become a transferee, if the transferor knows or has reason to know the transferee has made the false statement.
Subd. 16. Local regulation. This section shall be construed to supersede municipal or county regulation of the transfer of pistols.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
Sec. 3. [624.7134]
PRIVATE PARTY TRANSFERS; BACKGROUND CHECK REQUIRED.
Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) As used in this section, the terms
in this subdivision have the meanings given.
(b) "Firearms dealer" means a
person who is licensed by the United States Department of Justice, Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, under United States Code, title 18,
section 923(a).
(c) "State or federally issued
identification" means a document or card made or issued by or under the
authority of the United States government or the state that contains the
person's name, residence address, date of birth, and photograph and is of a
type commonly accepted for the purpose of identification of individuals.
Subd. 2. Background
check and evidence of identity. A
person who is not a firearms dealer is prohibited from transferring possession
or ownership of a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon to any
other person who is not a firearms dealer unless the transferee presents a
valid transferee permit issued under section 624.7131 and a current state or
federally issued identification.
Subd. 3. Record
of transfer; required information. (a)
When two parties complete the transfer of a pistol or semiautomatic
military-style assault weapon under subdivision 2, the transferor and
transferee must complete a record of transfer on a form designed and made
publicly available without fee for this purpose by the superintendent of the
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. Each
page of the record of transfer must be signed and dated by the transferor and
the transferee and contain the serial number of the pistol or semiautomatic
military-style assault weapon.
(b) The record of transfer must contain
the following information:
(1) a clear copy of each person's
current state or federally issued identification;
(2) a clear copy of the transferee
permit presented by the transferee; and
(3) a signed statement by the
transferee swearing that the transferee is not currently prohibited by state or
federal law from possessing a firearm.
(c) The record of transfer must also
contain the following information regarding the transferred pistol or
semiautomatic military-style assault weapon:
(1) the type of pistol or semiautomatic
military-style assault weapon;
(2) the manufacturer, make, and model
of the pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon; and
(3) the pistol or semiautomatic
military-style assault weapon's manufacturer-assigned serial number.
(d)
Both the transferor and the transferee must retain a copy of the record of
transfer and any attachments to the record of transfer for 20 years from the
date of the transfer. A copy in digital
form shall be acceptable for the purposes of this paragraph.
Subd. 4. Compulsory
production of record of transfer; gross misdemeanor penalty. (a) The transferor and transferee of a
pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon transferred under this
section must produce the record of transfer when a peace officer requests the
record as part of a criminal investigation.
(b) A person who refuses or is unable
to produce a record of transfer for a firearm transferred under this section in
response to a request for production made by a peace officer pursuant to
paragraph (a) is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
A prosecution or conviction for violation of this subdivision is not a
bar to conviction of, or punishment for, any other crime committed involving
the transferred firearm.
Subd. 5. Immunity. A person is immune to a charge of
violating this section if the person presents a record of transfer that
satisfies the requirements of subdivision 3.
Subd. 6. Exclusions. (a) This section shall not apply to
the following transfers:
(1) a transfer by or to a federally
licensed firearms dealer;
(2) a transfer by or to any law
enforcement agency;
(3)
to the extent the transferee is acting within the course and scope of
employment and official duties, a transfer to:
(i) a peace officer, as defined in
section 626.84, subdivision 1, paragraph (c);
(ii) a member of the United States
armed forces, the National Guard, or the reserves of the United States armed
forces;
(iii) a federal law enforcement
officer; or
(iv) a security guard employed by a
protective agent licensed pursuant to chapter 326;
(4) a transfer between immediate family
members, which for the purposes of this section means spouses, domestic
partners, parents, children, siblings, grandparents, and grandchildren;
(5) a transfer to an executor,
administrator, trustee, or personal representative of an estate or a trust that
occurs by operation of law upon the death of the former owner of the firearm;
(6) a transfer of an antique firearm as
defined in section 624.712, subdivision 3;
(7) a transfer of a curio or relic, as
defined in Code of Federal Regulations, title 27, section 478.11, if the
transfer is between collectors of firearms as curios or relics as defined by
United States Code, title 18, section 921(a)(13), who each have in their
possession a valid collector of curio and relics license issued by the United
States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and
Explosives;
(8) the temporary transfer of a firearm
if:
(i) the transfer is necessary to
prevent imminent death or great bodily harm; and
(ii)
the person's possession lasts only as long as immediately necessary to prevent
such imminent death or great bodily harm;
(9) transfers by or to an auctioneer
who is in compliance with chapter 330 and acting in the person's official role
as an auctioneer to facilitate or conduct an auction of the firearm; and
(10) a temporary transfer if the
transferee's possession of the firearm following the transfer is only:
(i) at a shooting range that operates
in compliance with the performance standards under chapter 87A or is a
nonconforming use under section 87A.03, subdivision 2, or, if compliance is not
required by the governing body of the jurisdiction, at an established shooting
range operated consistently with local law in the jurisdiction;
(ii) at a lawfully organized
competition involving the use of a firearm, or while participating in or
practicing for a performance by an organized group that uses firearms as part
of the performance;
(iii) while hunting or trapping if the
hunting or trapping is legal in all places where the transferee possesses the
firearm and the transferee holds all licenses or permits required for hunting
or trapping; or
(iv) while in the actual presence of
the transferor.
(b) A transfer under this subdivision
is permitted only if the transferor has no reason to believe:
(1) that the transferee is prohibited
by federal law from buying or possessing firearms or not entitled under state
law to possess firearms;
(2) if the transferee is under 18 years
of age and is receiving the firearm under direct supervision and control of an
adult, that the adult is prohibited by federal law from buying or possessing
firearms or not entitled under state law to possess firearms; or
(3) that the transferee will use or
intends to use the firearm in the commission of a crime.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date.
ARTICLE 15
POSSESSION OF FIREARMS
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 624.713, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Ineligible persons. The following persons shall not be entitled to possess ammunition or a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon or, except for clause (1), any other firearm:
(1) a person under the age of 18 years except that a person under 18 may possess ammunition designed for use in a firearm that the person may lawfully possess and may carry or possess a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon (i) in the actual presence or under the direct supervision of the person's parent or guardian, (ii) for the purpose of military drill under the auspices of a legally recognized military organization and under competent supervision, (iii) for the purpose of instruction, competition, or target practice on a firing range approved by the chief of police or county sheriff in whose jurisdiction the range is located and under direct supervision; or (iv) if the person has successfully completed a course designed to teach marksmanship and safety with a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon and approved by the commissioner of natural resources;
(2) except as otherwise provided in clause (9), a person who has been convicted of, or adjudicated delinquent or convicted as an extended jurisdiction juvenile for committing, in this state or elsewhere, a crime of violence. For purposes of this section, crime of violence includes crimes in other states or jurisdictions which would have been crimes of violence as herein defined if they had been committed in this state;
(3) a person who is or has ever been committed in Minnesota or elsewhere by a judicial determination that the person is mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or mentally ill and dangerous to the public, as defined in section 253B.02, to a treatment facility, or who has ever been found incompetent to stand trial or not guilty by reason of mental illness, unless the person's ability to possess a firearm and ammunition has been restored under subdivision 4;
(4) a person who has been convicted in Minnesota or elsewhere of a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor violation of chapter 152, unless three years have elapsed since the date of conviction and, during that time, the person has not been convicted of any other such violation of chapter 152 or a similar law of another state; or a person who is or has ever been committed by a judicial determination for treatment for the habitual use of a controlled substance or marijuana, as defined in sections 152.01 and 152.02, unless the person's ability to possess a firearm and ammunition has been restored under subdivision 4;
(5) a person who has been committed to a treatment facility in Minnesota or elsewhere by a judicial determination that the person is chemically dependent as defined in section 253B.02, unless the person has completed treatment or the person's ability to possess a firearm and ammunition has been restored under subdivision 4. Property rights may not be abated but access may be restricted by the courts;
(6) a peace officer who is informally admitted to a treatment facility pursuant to section 253B.04 for chemical dependency, unless the officer possesses a certificate from the head of the treatment facility discharging or provisionally discharging the officer from the treatment facility. Property rights may not be abated but access may be restricted by the courts;
(7) a person, including a person under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, who has been charged with committing a crime of violence and has been placed in a pretrial diversion program by the court before disposition, until the person has completed the diversion program and the charge of committing the crime of violence has been dismissed;
(8) except as otherwise provided in clause (9), a person who has been convicted in another state of committing an offense similar to the offense described in section 609.224, subdivision 3, against a family or household member or section 609.2242, subdivision 3, unless three years have elapsed since the date of conviction and, during that time, the person has not been convicted of any other violation of section 609.224, subdivision 3, or 609.2242, subdivision 3, or a similar law of another state;
(9) a person who has been convicted in this state or elsewhere of assaulting a family or household member and who was found by the court to have used a firearm in any way during commission of the assault is prohibited from possessing any type of firearm or ammunition for the period determined by the sentencing court;
(10) a person who:
(i) has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
(ii) is a fugitive from justice as a result of having fled from any state to avoid prosecution for a crime or to avoid giving testimony in any criminal proceeding;
(iii) is an unlawful user of any controlled substance as defined in chapter 152;
(iv) has been judicially committed to a treatment facility in Minnesota or elsewhere as a person who is mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or mentally ill and dangerous to the public, as defined in section 253B.02;
(v) is an alien who is illegally or unlawfully in the United States;
(vi) has been discharged from the armed forces of the United States under dishonorable conditions;
(vii) has renounced the person's citizenship having been a citizen of the United States; or
(viii) is disqualified from possessing a firearm under United States Code, title 18, section 922(g)(8) or (9), as amended through March 1, 2014;
(11) a person who has been convicted of the following offenses at the gross misdemeanor level, unless three years have elapsed since the date of conviction and, during that time, the person has not been convicted of any other violation of these sections: section 609.229 (crimes committed for the benefit of a gang); 609.2231, subdivision 4 (assaults motivated by bias); 609.255 (false imprisonment); 609.378 (neglect or endangerment of a child); 609.582, subdivision 4 (burglary in the fourth degree); 609.665 (setting a spring gun); 609.71 (riot); or 609.749 (stalking). For purposes of this paragraph, the specified gross misdemeanor convictions include crimes committed in other states or jurisdictions which would have been gross misdemeanors if conviction occurred in this state;
(12) a person who has been convicted of a
violation of section 609.224 if the court determined that the assault was
against a family or household member in accordance with section 609.2242,
subdivision 3 (domestic assault), unless three years have elapsed since the
date of conviction and, during that time, the person has not been convicted of
another violation of section 609.224 or a violation of a section listed in
clause (11); or
(13) a person who is subject to an order
for protection as described in section 260C.201, subdivision 3, paragraph (d),
or 518B.01, subdivision 6, paragraph (g); or
(14) a person who is subject to an extreme risk protection order as described in section 624.7162 or 624.7164.
A person who issues a certificate pursuant to this section in good faith is not liable for damages resulting or arising from the actions or misconduct with a firearm or ammunition committed by the individual who is the subject of the certificate.
The prohibition in this subdivision relating to the possession of firearms other than pistols and semiautomatic military-style assault weapons does not apply retroactively to persons who are prohibited from possessing a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon under this subdivision before August 1, 1994.
The lifetime prohibition on possessing, receiving, shipping, or transporting firearms and ammunition for persons convicted or adjudicated delinquent of a crime of violence in clause (2), applies only to offenders who are discharged from sentence or court supervision for a crime of violence on or after August 1, 1993.
For purposes of this section, "judicial determination" means a court proceeding pursuant to sections 253B.07 to 253B.09 or a comparable law from another state.
Sec. 2. [624.7161]
EXTREME RISK PROTECTION ORDERS.
Subdivision 1. Definitions. As used in sections 624.7161 to
624.7168, "firearm" has the meaning given in section 609.666,
subdivision 1, paragraph (a).
Subd. 2. Court
jurisdiction. An application
for relief under this section shall be filed in the county of residence of the
respondent. Actions under this section
shall be given docket priorities by the court.
Subd. 3. Generally. (a) There shall exist an action known
as a petition for an extreme risk protection order, which order shall enjoin
and prohibit the respondent from possessing firearms for a fixed period.
(b) A petition for relief under
sections 624.7161 to 624.7168 may be made by the chief law enforcement officer
or a designee or a city or county attorney.
(c) A petition for relief shall allege
that the respondent poses a significant danger of bodily harm to self or to
other persons by possessing a firearm. The
petition shall be accompanied by an affidavit made under oath stating specific
facts and circumstances forming a basis to allege that an extreme risk
protection order should be granted. The
affidavit may include but is not limited to evidence showing any of the factors
described in section 624.7162, subdivision 2.
(d) A petition for emergency relief
under section 624.7164 shall additionally allege that the respondent presents
an immediate and present danger of bodily harm.
(e) A petition for relief must
describe, to the best of the petitioner's knowledge, the types and location of
any firearms believed by the petitioner to be possessed by the respondent.
(f) The state court administrator shall
create all forms necessary under sections 624.7161 to 624.7168.
(g) The filing fees for an extreme risk
protection order under this section are waived for the petitioner and
respondent.
(h) An extreme risk protection order
issued under sections 624.7161 to 624.7168 applies throughout the state.
(i) Any proceeding under sections
624.7161 to 624.7168 shall be in addition to other civil or criminal remedies.
(j) All health records and other health
information provided in a petition or considered as evidence in a proceeding
under sections 624.7161 to 624.7168 shall be protected from public disclosure
but may be provided to law enforcement agencies as described in this section.
(k) Any extreme risk protection order
or subsequent extension issued under sections 624.7161 to 624.7168 shall be
forwarded by the court administrator within 24 hours to the local law enforcement
agency with jurisdiction over the residence of the respondent. Each appropriate law enforcement agency shall
make available to other law enforcement officers, through a system for
verification, information as to the existence and status of any extreme risk
protection order issued under sections 624.7161 to 624.7168.
Sec. 3. [624.7162]
EXTREME RISK PROTECTION ORDERS ISSUED AFTER HEARING.
Subdivision 1. Hearing. (a) Upon receipt of the petition for
an order after a hearing, the court shall order a hearing which shall be held
not later than 14 days from the date of the order for hearing.
(b) The petitioning agency shall be
responsible for service of an extreme risk protection order issued by the court
and shall further be the agency responsible for the execution of any legal
process required for the seizure and storage of firearms subject to the order. Nothing in this provision limits the ability
of the law enforcement agency of record from cooperating with other law
enforcement entities.
(c)
Personal service of notice for the hearing may be made upon the respondent at
any time up to 12 hours prior to the time set for the hearing, provided that
the respondent at the hearing may request a continuance of up to five days if
the respondent is served less than five days prior to the hearing, which
continuance shall be granted unless there are compelling reasons not to do so. If the court grants the requested
continuance, and an existing emergency order under section 624.7164 will expire
due to the continuance, the court shall also issue a written order continuing
the emergency order pending the new time set for the hearing.
(d) If personal service cannot be made,
the court may order service of the petition and any order issued under this
section by alternate means. The
application for alternate service must include the last known location of the
respondent; the petitioner's most recent contacts with the respondent; the last
known location of the respondent's employment; the names and locations of the
respondent's parents, siblings, children, and other close relatives; the names
and locations of other persons who are likely to know the respondent's
whereabouts; and a description of efforts to locate those persons. The court shall consider the length of time
the respondent's location has been unknown, the likelihood that the
respondent's location will become known, the nature of the relief sought, and
the nature of efforts made to locate the respondent. The court shall order service by first class
mail, forwarding address requested, to any addresses where there is a
reasonable possibility that mail or information will be forwarded or
communicated to the respondent. The
court may also order publication, within or without the state, but only if it
might reasonably succeed in notifying the respondent of the proceeding. Service shall be deemed complete 14 days
after mailing or 14 days after court-ordered publication.
Subd. 2. Relief
by court. (a) At the hearing,
the petitioner must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the
respondent poses a significant danger of bodily harm to self or other persons
by possessing a firearm.
(b) In determining whether to grant the
order after a hearing, the court shall consider evidence of the following, whether
or not the petitioner has provided evidence of the same:
(1) a history of threats or acts of
violence by the respondent directed toward another person;
(2) the history of use, attempted use,
or threatened use of physical force by the respondent against another person;
(3) a violation of any court order,
including but not limited to orders issued under sections 624.7161 to 624.7168
or chapter 260C or 518B;
(4) a prior arrest for a felony
offense;
(5) a conviction or prior arrest for a
violent misdemeanor offense, for a stalking offense under section 609.749, or
for domestic assault under section 609.2242;
(6) a conviction for an offense of
cruelty to animals under chapter 343;
(7) the unlawful and reckless use,
display, or brandishing of a firearm by the respondent;
(8) a history of self-harm by the
respondent; and
(9) whether the respondent is named in
an existing order in effect under sections 624.7161 to 624.7168 or chapter 260C
or 518B, or party to a pending lawsuit, complaint, petition, or other action
under sections 624.7161 to 624.7168 or chapter 518B.
(c) In determining whether to grant the
order after a hearing, the court may consider any other evidence that bears on
whether the respondent poses a danger to the respondent's self or others.
(d)
If the court finds there is a preponderance of the evidence to issue an extreme
risk protection order, the court shall issue the order prohibiting the person
from possessing a firearm for the duration of the order. The court shall inform the respondent that
the respondent is prohibited from possessing firearms and shall issue a
transfer order under section 624.7165. The
court shall also give notice to the county attorney's office, which may take
action as it deems appropriate.
(e) The order shall have a fixed
period, to be determined by the court, of not less than six months and not more
than two years, subject to renewal or extension under section 624.7163.
(f) If there is no existing emergency
order under section 624.7164 at the time an order is granted under this
section, the court shall determine by a preponderance of the evidence whether
the respondent presents an immediate and present danger of bodily harm. If the court so determines, the transfer
order shall include the provisions described in section 624.7165, paragraph
(c).
(g) If, after a hearing, the court does
not issue an order of protection, the court shall vacate any emergency extreme
risk protection order currently in effect.
(h) A respondent may waive the
respondent's right to contest the hearing and consent to the court's imposition
of an extreme risk protection order. The
court shall seal the petition filed under this section and section 624.7144 if
a respondent who consents to imposition of an extreme risk protection order requests
that the petition be sealed, unless the court finds that there is clear and
convincing evidence that the interests of the public and public safety outweigh
the disadvantages to the respondent of not sealing the petition. All extreme risk protection orders shall
remain public.
Sec. 4. [624.7163]
SUBSEQUENT EXTENSIONS AND TERMINATION.
(a) Upon application by any party
entitled to petition for an order under section 624.7162, and after notice to
the respondent and a hearing, the court may extend the relief granted in an
existing order granted after a hearing under section 624.7162. Application for an extension may be made any
time within the three months before the expiration of the existing order. The order may be extended for a fixed period
of at least six months and not to exceed two years, if the court makes the same
findings by a preponderance of the evidence as required for granting of an
initial order under section 624.7162, subdivision 2, paragraph (d). The court shall consider the same types of
evidence as required for the initial order under section 624.7162, subdivision
2, paragraphs (b) and (c).
(b) Upon application by the respondent
to an order issued under section 624.7162, the court may terminate an order
after a hearing at which the respondent shall bear the burden of proving by a
preponderance of the evidence that the respondent does not pose a significant
danger of bodily harm to the respondent's self or to other persons by
possessing a firearm. Application for
termination may be made one time for each year an order is in effect. If an order has been issued for a period of
six months, the respondent may apply for termination one time.
Sec. 5. [624.7164]
EMERGENCY ISSUANCE OF EXTREME RISK PROTECTION ORDER.
(a) In determining whether to grant an
emergency extreme risk protection order, the court shall consider evidence of
all facts identified in section 624.7162, subdivision 2, paragraphs (b) and
(c).
(b) If the court finds there is
reasonable grounds that (1) the respondent poses a significant danger of bodily
harm to the respondent's self or to other persons by possessing a firearm, and
(2) the respondent presents an immediate and present danger of bodily harm, the
court shall issue an ex parte emergency order prohibiting the respondent from
possessing a firearm for the duration of the order. The order shall inform the respondent that
the respondent is prohibited from
possessing firearms and shall issue a transfer order under section 624.7165,
paragraph (c).
(c)
A finding by the court that there is a basis for issuing an emergency extreme
risk protection order constitutes a finding that sufficient reasons exist not
to require notice under applicable court rules governing applications for ex
parte relief.
(d) The emergency order shall have a fixed period of 14
days unless a hearing is set under section 624.7162 on an earlier date, in
which case the order shall expire upon a judge's finding that no order is
issued under section 624.7162.
(e) Except as provided in paragraph (f), the respondent
shall be personally served immediately with a copy of the emergency order and a
copy of the petition and, if a hearing is requested by the petitioner under
section 624.7162, notice of the date set for the hearing. If the petitioner does not request a hearing
under section 624.7162, an order served on a respondent under this subdivision
must include a notice advising the respondent of the right to request a hearing
challenging the issuance of the emergency order, and must be accompanied by a
form that can be used by the respondent to request a hearing.
(f) Service of the emergency order may be made by
alternate service as provided under section 624.7162, subdivision 1, paragraph
(d), provided that the petitioner files the affidavit required under that
subdivision. If the petitioner does not
request a hearing under section 624.7162, the petition mailed to the
respondent's residence, if known, must be accompanied by the form for
requesting a hearing described in paragraph (e).
Sec. 6. [624.7165] TRANSFER OF FIREARMS.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), upon issuance
of an extreme risk protection order, the court shall direct the respondent to
transfer any firearms the person possesses as soon as reasonably practicable,
but in no case later than 24 hours, to a federally licensed firearms dealer or
a law enforcement agency. If the
respondent elects to transfer the respondent's firearms to a law enforcement
agency, the agency must accept the transfer.
The transfer may be permanent or temporary. A temporary firearm transfer only entitles
the receiving party to possess the firearm and does not transfer ownership or
title. If the respondent makes a
temporary transfer, a federally licensed firearms dealer or law enforcement
agency may charge the respondent a reasonable fee to store the firearms and may
establish policies for disposal of abandoned firearms, provided these policies
require that the respondent be notified prior to disposal of abandoned firearms. If a respondent permanently transfers the
respondent's firearms to a law enforcement agency, the agency is not required
to compensate the respondent and may charge the respondent a reasonable
processing fee.
(b) A person directed to transfer any firearms pursuant
to paragraph (a) may transfer any antique firearm, as defined in United States
Code, title 18, section 921, paragraph (a), clause (16), as amended, or a curio
or relic as defined in Code of Federal Regulations, title 27, section 478.11,
as amended, to a relative who does not live with the respondent after
confirming that the relative may lawfully own or possess a firearm.
(c) The respondent must file proof of transfer as
provided in this paragraph.
(1) A law enforcement agency or federally licensed
firearms dealer accepting transfer of a firearm pursuant to this section shall
provide proof of transfer to the respondent.
The proof of transfer must specify whether the firearms were permanently
or temporarily transferred and must include the name of the respondent, date of
transfer, and the serial number, manufacturer, and model of all transferred
firearms. If transfer is made to a
federally licensed firearms dealer, the respondent shall, within two business
days after being served with the order, file a copy of proof of transfer with
the law enforcement agency and attest that all firearms owned or possessed at
the time of the order have been transferred in accordance with this section and
that the person currently does not possess any firearms. If the respondent claims not to own or
possess firearms, the respondent shall file a declaration of nonpossession with
the law enforcement agency attesting that, at the time of the order, the
respondent neither owned nor possessed any firearms, and that the respondent
currently neither owns nor possesses any firearms. If the transfer is made to a
relative
pursuant to paragraph (b), the relative must sign an affidavit under oath
before a notary public either acknowledging that the respondent permanently
transferred the respondent's antique firearms, curios, or relics to the
relative or agreeing to temporarily store the respondent's antique firearms,
curios, or relics until such time as the respondent is legally permitted to
possess firearms. To the extent
possible, the affidavit shall indicate the serial number, make, and model of
all antique firearms, curios, or relics transferred by the respondent to the
relative.
(2) The court shall seal affidavits,
proofs of transfer, and declarations of nonpossession filed pursuant to this
paragraph.
(d) If a court issues an emergency
order under section 624.7164, or makes a finding of immediate and present
danger under section 624.7162, subdivision 2, paragraph (e), and there is
probable cause to believe the respondent possesses firearms, the court shall
issue a search warrant to the local law enforcement agency to take possession
of all firearms in the respondent's possession as soon as practicable. The local law enforcement agency shall, upon
written notice from the respondent, transfer the firearms to a federally
licensed firearms dealer. Before a local
law enforcement agency transfers a firearm under this paragraph, the agency
shall require the federally licensed firearms dealer receiving the firearm to
submit a proof of transfer that complies with the requirements for proofs of
transfer established in paragraph (c). The
agency shall file all proofs of transfer received by the court within two
business days of the transfer. A
federally licensed firearms dealer who accepts a firearm transfer pursuant to
this paragraph shall comply with paragraphs (a) and (c) as if accepting
transfer directly from the respondent. If
the law enforcement agency does not receive written notice from the respondent
within three business days, the agency may charge a reasonable fee to store the
respondent's firearms. A law enforcement
agency may establish policies for disposal of abandoned firearms, provided
these policies require that the respondent be notified prior to disposal of
abandoned firearms.
Sec. 7. [624.7166]
RETURN OF FIREARMS.
Subdivision 1. Law
enforcement. A local law
enforcement agency that accepted temporary transfer of firearms under section
624.7165 shall return the firearms to the respondent upon request after the
expiration of the order, provided the respondent is not otherwise prohibited
from possessing firearms under state or federal law.
Subd. 2. Firearms
dealer. A federally licensed
firearms dealer that accepted temporary transfer of firearms under section
624.7165 shall return the transferring firearms to the respondent upon request
after the expiration of the order, provided the respondent is not otherwise
prohibited from possessing firearms under state or federal law. A federally licensed firearms dealer
returning firearms shall comply with state and federal law as though
transferring a firearm from the dealer's own inventory.
Sec. 8. [624.7167]
OFFENSES.
Subdivision 1. False
information or harassment. A
person who petitions for an extreme risk protection order under section 624.7162
or 624.7164, knowing any information in the petition to be materially false or
with the intent to harass, abuse, or threaten, is guilty of a misdemeanor.
Subd. 2. Violation
of order. A person who
possesses a firearm and knows or should have known that the person is
prohibited from doing so by an extreme risk protection order under section
624.7162 or 624.7164, or by an order of protection granted by a judge or
referee pursuant to a substantially similar law of another state, is guilty of
a misdemeanor and shall be prohibited from possessing firearms for a period of
five years. Each extreme risk protection
order granted under this chapter must contain a conspicuous notice to the
respondent regarding the penalty for violation of the order.
Sec. 9. [624.7168]
LIABILITY PROTECTION.
Subdivision 1. Liability
protection for petition. A
chief law enforcement officer, or a designee, or a city or county attorney,
who, in good faith, decides not to petition for an extreme risk protection
order or emergency extreme risk protection order shall be immune from criminal
or civil liability.
Subd. 2. Liability
protection for storage of firearms. A
law enforcement agency shall be immune from civil or criminal liability for any
damage or deterioration of firearms, ammunition, or weapons stored or
transported pursuant to section 624.7165.
This subdivision shall not apply if the damage or deterioration occurred
as a result of recklessness, gross negligence, or intentional misconduct by the
law enforcement agency.
Subd. 3. Liability
protection for harm following service of an order or execution of a search
warrant. A peace officer, law
enforcement agency, and the state or a political subdivision by which a peace
officer is employed has immunity from any liability, civil or criminal, for
harm caused by a person who is the subject of an extreme risk protection order,
a search warrant issued pursuant to section 624.7165, paragraph (d), or both
after service of the order or execution of the warrant, whichever comes first,
if the peace officer acts in good faith in serving the order or executing the
warrant.
Sec. 10. [626.8474]
EXTREME RISK PROTECTION ORDER; DEVELOPMENT OF MODEL PROCEDURES.
By December 1, 2020, the Peace Officer
Standards and Training Board, after consulting with the Minnesota County
Attorneys Association, the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association, the Minnesota
Chiefs of Police Association, and the Minnesota Police and Peace Officers
Association, shall develop model procedures and standards for the storage of
firearms transferred to law enforcement under section 624.7165.
Sec. 11. REVISOR
INSTRUCTION.
In the next edition of Minnesota
Statutes, the revisor of statutes shall renumber Minnesota Statutes 2018,
sections 624.7161 to 624.7168, and correct cross-references to those provisions
so as not to conflict with this act.
Sec. 12. EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Sections 1 to 9 and 11 are effective
January 1, 2020, and apply to firearm permit background checks made on or after
that date.
ARTICLE 16
DISASTER ASSISTANCE
Section 1.
DISASTER ASSISTANCE
CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT; TRANSFER.
$10,000,000 in fiscal year 2020 and
$10,000,000 in fiscal year 2021 are transferred from the general fund to the
commissioner of public safety for deposit in the disaster assistance contingency
account established under Minnesota Statutes, section 12.221, subdivision 6. These are onetime transfers.
ARTICLE 17
JUDICIARY APPROPRIATIONS
Section 1. APPROPRIATIONS. |
The sums shown in the columns marked
"Appropriations" are appropriated to the agencies and for the
purposes specified in this act. The
appropriations are from the general fund, or another named fund, and are
available for the fiscal years indicated for each purpose. The figures "2020" and
"2021" used in this act mean that the appropriations listed under
them are available for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020, or June 30, 2021,
respectively. "The first year"
is fiscal year 2020. "The second
year" is fiscal year 2021. "The
biennium" is fiscal years 2020 and 2021.
|
|
|
APPROPRIATIONS |
||
|
|
|
Available for the Year |
||
|
|
|
Ending June 30 |
||
|
|
|
2020 |
2021 |
|
Sec. 2. SUPREME
COURT |
|
|
|
|
Subdivision 1. Total
Appropriation |
|
$59,131,000 |
|
$61,304,000 |
The amounts that may be spent for each purpose are
specified in the following subdivisions.
Subd. 2. Supreme
Court Operations |
|
43,608,000 |
|
44,858,000 |
(a) Contingent Account
$5,000 each year is for a contingent account for expenses
necessary for the normal operation of the court for which no other
reimbursement is provided.
(b) Judges' Compensation
Judges' compensation is increased by three percent each
year.
(c) Cybersecurity Program
$2,500,000 each year is for a cybersecurity program.
(d) Early Neutral Evaluation
$50,000 the first year is to contract with the Board of
Regents of the University of Minnesota for its Extension Service to develop and
conduct a survey of all early neutral evaluation participants and provide a report to the legislature pursuant
to article 2, section 8.
Subd. 3. Civil
Legal Services |
|
15,523,000 |
|
16,446,000 |
Legal Services to
Low-Income Clients in Family Law Matters.
$1,062,000 the first year and $1,125,000 the second year are to
improve the access of low-income clients to legal representation in
family
law matters. This appropriation must be
distributed under Minnesota Statutes, section 480.242, to the qualified legal
services program described in Minnesota Statutes, section 480.242, subdivision
2, paragraph (a). Any unencumbered
balance remaining in the first year does not cancel and is available in the
second year.
Sec. 3. COURT
OF APPEALS |
|
$12,878,000 |
|
$13,258,000 |
Judges'
Compensation. Judges'
compensation is increased by three percent each year.
Sec. 4. DISTRICT
COURTS |
|
$311,201,000 |
|
$321,140,000 |
(a) Judges' Compensation
Judges' compensation is increased by four
percent each year.
(b) New Trial Judges
$912,000 the first year and $846,000 the
second year are for two new trial court judge units in the Seventh Judicial
District.
(c) Mandated Psychological Services
$1,070,000 each year is for mandated court
services.
(d) Treatment Courts Stability
$306,000 each year is for treatment courts
stability.
(e) Gun Violence Prevention
$81,000 each year is to process petitions
for extreme risk protection orders.
Sec. 5. GUARDIAN
AD LITEM BOARD |
|
$21,876,000 |
|
$22,578,000 |
Compliance
Positions. $4,205,000 the
first year and $4,443,000 the second year are for new positions to maintain
compliance with federal and state mandates.
Sec. 6. TAX
COURT |
|
$1,807,000 |
|
$1,808,000 |
Sec. 7. UNIFORM
LAWS COMMISSION |
|
$98,000 |
|
$98,000 |
Sec. 8. BOARD
ON JUDICIAL STANDARDS |
|
$535,000 |
|
$509,000 |
Major
Disciplinary Actions. $125,000
each year is for special investigative and hearing costs for major disciplinary
actions undertaken by the board. This
appropriation does not cancel. Any
unencumbered and unspent balances remain available for these expenditures until
June 30, 2023.
Sec. 9. BOARD
OF PUBLIC DEFENSE |
|
$100,029,000 |
|
$111,657,000 |
(a) New Positions
$3,296,000 the first year and $9,472,000
the second year are contingent on participation in veteran's specialty courts.
(b) Forfeiture Representation
$205,000 the first year and $515,000 the
second year are for providing representation in forfeiture proceedings for
individuals entitled to be represented in criminal matters.
(c) Base Adjustment
The general fund base is increased by
$108,000 beginning in fiscal year 2022.
Sec. 10. HUMAN
RIGHTS |
|
$6,421,000 |
|
$6,698,000 |
$10,000 the second year is for a
microgrant program for capacity building by local units of government and local
groups.
Sec. 11. BUREAU
OF MEDIATION SERVICES |
|
$2,200,000 |
|
$413,000 |
$2,200,000 the first year and $413,000 the
second year are to develop and implement the online cooperative private divorce
program under article 5, section 4. The cooperative
private divorce program must be made available on the Bureau of Mediation
Services website by January 1, 2021.
Sec. 12. LEGISLATIVE
COORDINATING COMMISSION |
$7,000 |
|
$7,000 |
$7,000 each year is for the Legislative
Commission on Intelligence and Technology under article 4, section 1.
Sec. 13. TRANSFER.
$10,000 the first year and $20,000 the
second year and annually thereafter are appropriated to the commissioner of
management and budget for transfer to the special revenue fund for use by the
displaced homemaker program.
Sec. 14. TRANSFER.
$1,075,000 annually is appropriated to
the commissioner of management and budget for transfer to the Minnesota State
Patrol's forfeited property account in the special revenue fund for use by the Minnesota
State Patrol as a supplement to the agency's operating fund.
Sec. 15. TRANSFER.
$763,000 annually is appropriated to
the commissioner of management and budget for transfer to the Bureau of
Criminal Apprehension's forfeited property account for use by the Bureau of
Criminal Apprehension as a supplement to the agency's operating fund.
ARTICLE 18
COURTS
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 169.99, subdivision 1c, is amended to read:
Subd. 1c. Notice
of surcharge. All parts of the
uniform traffic ticket must give provide conspicuous notice of
the fact that, if convicted, the person to whom it was issued must may
be required to pay a state-imposed surcharge under section 357.021,
subdivision 6, and the current amount of the required surcharge.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2019. The changes to
the uniform traffic ticket described in this section must be reflected on the
ticket the next time it is revised.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 169.99, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 1d. Financial
hardship. The first paragraph
on the reverse side of the summons on the uniform traffic ticket must include
the following, or substantially similar, language: "All or part of the cost of this summons
may be waived on a showing of indigency or undue hardship on you or your family. You may schedule a court appearance to
request a waiver based on your ability to pay by calling the Minnesota Court
Payment Center (CPC) [followed by the Court Payment Center telephone number]. For more information, call the CPC or visit
www.mncourts.gov/fines."
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2019. The changes to
the uniform traffic ticket described in this section must be reflected on the
ticket the next time it is revised.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 357.021, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Fee amounts. The fees to be charged and collected by the court administrator shall be as follows:
(1) In every civil action or proceeding in
said court, including any case arising under the tax laws of the state that
could be transferred or appealed to the Tax Court, the plaintiff, petitioner,
or other moving party shall pay, when the first
paper is filed for that party in said action, a fee of $285 $335,
except in marriage dissolution actions the fee is $315.
The defendant or other adverse or
intervening party, or any one or more of several defendants or other adverse or
intervening parties appearing separately from the others, shall pay, when the
first paper is filed for that party in said action, a fee of $285 $335,
except in marriage dissolution actions the fee is $315. This subdivision does not apply to the filing
of an Application for Discharge of Judgment.
Section 548.181 applies to an Application for Discharge of Judgment.
The party requesting a trial by jury shall pay $100.
The fees above stated shall be the full trial fee chargeable to said parties irrespective of whether trial be to the court alone, to the court and jury, or disposed of without trial, and shall include the entry of judgment in the action, but does not include copies or certified copies of any papers so filed or proceedings under chapter 103E, except the provisions therein as to appeals.
(2) Certified copy of any instrument from a civil or criminal proceeding, $14, and $8 for an uncertified copy.
(3) Issuing a subpoena, $16 for each name.
(4) Filing a motion or response to a motion in civil, family, excluding child support, and guardianship cases, $75.
(5) Issuing an execution and filing the return thereof; issuing a writ of attachment, injunction, habeas corpus, mandamus, quo warranto, certiorari, or other writs not specifically mentioned, $55.
(6) Issuing a transcript of judgment, or for filing and docketing a transcript of judgment from another court, $40.
(7) Filing and entering a satisfaction of judgment, partial satisfaction, or assignment of judgment, $5.
(8) Certificate as to existence or nonexistence of judgments docketed, $5 for each name certified to.
(9) Filing and indexing trade name; or recording basic science certificate; or recording certificate of physicians, osteopathic physicians, chiropractors, veterinarians, or optometrists, $5.
(10) For the filing of each partial, final, or annual account in all trusteeships, $55.
(11) For the deposit of a will, $27.
(12) For recording notary commission, $20.
(13) Filing a motion or response to a motion for modification of child support, a fee of $50.
(14) All other services required by law for which no fee is provided, such fee as compares favorably with those herein provided, or such as may be fixed by rule or order of the court.
(15) In addition to any other filing fees under this chapter, a surcharge in the amount of $75 must be assessed in accordance with section 259.52, subdivision 14, for each adoption petition filed in district court to fund the fathers' adoption registry under section 259.52.
The fees in clauses (3) and (5) need not be paid by a public authority or the party the public authority represents.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1,
2019.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 357.021, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 2c.
Court cybersecurity fee. In addition to any other filing fee
under this chapter, the court administrator shall collect a $1 cybersecurity
fee on filings made under subdivision 2, clauses (1) to (13). The court administrator shall transmit the
fee monthly to the commissioner of management and budget for deposit in the
general fund. This subdivision expires
June 30, 2021.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1,
2019.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 357.021, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Surcharges on criminal and traffic
offenders. (a) Except as provided in
this paragraph subdivision, the court shall impose and the court
administrator shall collect a $75 surcharge on every person convicted of any
felony, gross misdemeanor, misdemeanor, or petty misdemeanor offense, other
than a violation of a law or
ordinance relating to vehicle parking, for which there shall be a $12 surcharge. When a defendant is convicted of more than one offense in a case, the surcharge shall be imposed only once in that case. In the Second Judicial District, the court shall impose, and the court administrator shall collect, an additional $1 surcharge on every person convicted of any felony, gross misdemeanor, misdemeanor, or petty misdemeanor offense, including a violation of a law or ordinance relating to vehicle parking, if the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners authorizes the $1 surcharge. The surcharge shall be imposed whether or not the person is sentenced to imprisonment or the sentence is stayed. The surcharge shall not be imposed when a person is convicted of a petty misdemeanor for which no fine is imposed.
(b) If the court fails to impose a
surcharge as required by this subdivision, the court administrator shall show
the imposition of the surcharge, collect the surcharge, and correct the record.
(c) (b) The court may not
reduce the amount or waive payment of the surcharge required under this
subdivision. Upon on a
showing of indigency or undue hardship upon the convicted person or the
convicted person's immediate family, the sentencing court may authorize
payment of the surcharge in installments.
Additionally, the court may permit the defendant to perform community
work service in lieu of a surcharge.
(d) (c) The court
administrator or other entity collecting a surcharge shall forward it to the
commissioner of management and budget.
(e) (d) If the convicted
person is sentenced to imprisonment and has not paid the surcharge before the
term of imprisonment begins, the chief executive officer of the correctional
facility in which the convicted person is incarcerated shall collect the
surcharge from any earnings the inmate accrues from work performed in the
facility or while on conditional release.
The chief executive officer shall forward the amount collected to the
court administrator or other entity collecting the surcharge imposed by the court.
(f) (e) A person who enters
a diversion program, continuance without prosecution, continuance for
dismissal, or stay of adjudication for a violation of chapter 169 must pay the
surcharge described in this subdivision.
A surcharge imposed under this paragraph shall be imposed only once per
case.
(g) (f) The surcharge does
not apply to administrative citations issued pursuant to section 169.999.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 484.85, is amended to read:
484.85
DISPOSITION OF FINES, FEES, AND OTHER MONEY; ACCOUNTS; RAMSEY COUNTY DISTRICT
COURT.
(a) In all cases prosecuted in Ramsey County District Court by an attorney for a municipality or subdivision of government within Ramsey County for violation of a statute; an ordinance; or a charter provision, rule, or regulation of a city; all fines, penalties, and forfeitures collected by the court administrator shall be deposited in the state treasury and distributed according to this paragraph. Except where a different disposition is provided by section 299D.03, subdivision 5, or other law, on or before the last day of each month, the court shall pay over all fines, penalties, and forfeitures collected by the court administrator during the previous month as follows:
(1) for offenses committed within the
city of St. Paul, two-thirds paid to the treasurer of the city of St. Paul
municipality or subdivision of government
within Ramsey County and
one-third credited to the state general fund; and.
(2) for offenses committed within any
other municipality or subdivision of government within Ramsey County, one-half
paid to the treasurer of the municipality or subdivision of government and
one-half credited to the state general fund.
All other fines, penalties, and forfeitures collected by the district court shall be distributed by the courts as provided by law.
(b) Fines, penalties, and forfeitures shall be distributed as provided in paragraph (a) when:
(1) a city contracts with the county attorney for prosecutorial services under section 484.87, subdivision 3; or
(2) the attorney general provides assistance to the city attorney under section 484.87, subdivision 5.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective July 1, 2019.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.101, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Waiver prohibited; reduction and installment payments. (a) The court may not waive payment of the minimum fine required by this section.
(b) If the defendant qualifies for the services of a public defender or the court finds on the record that the convicted person is indigent or that immediate payment of the fine would create undue hardship for the convicted person or that person's immediate family, the court may reduce the amount of the minimum fine to not less than $50. Additionally, the court may permit the defendant to perform community work service in lieu of a fine.
(c) The court also may authorize payment of the fine in installments.
(d) Before sentencing a person
convicted of a felony, gross misdemeanor, misdemeanor, or petty misdemeanor to
pay money for a fine, fee, or surcharge, the court shall make a finding on the
record as to indigency or the convicted person's ability to comply with an
order to pay without undue hardship for the convicted person or that person's
immediate family. In determining
indigency or whether the defendant is able to comply with an order to pay a
fine, fee, or surcharge without undue hardship to the convicted person or that
person's immediate family, the court shall consider:
(1) income;
(2) dependents;
(3) financial resources, including
assets and liabilities;
(4) basic living expenses;
(5) receipt of means-tested public
assistance program; and
(6) any special circumstances that may
bear on the person's ability to pay.
(e) Paragraph (d) shall not apply when
a conviction for a violation that is included on the uniform fine schedule
authorized under section 609.101, subdivision 4, is entered without a hearing
before the court.
Sec. 8. EARLY
NEUTRAL EVALUATION STUDY AND REPORT.
(a) The supreme court is requested to
contract with the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to develop
and conduct a survey and report as provided in this section.
(b)
The board, through its Extension Service, is requested to develop and conduct a
survey of all early neutral evaluation participants from November 1, 2019, to
November 1, 2020. At a minimum, the
survey must seek the following information:
(1) the participant's demographic
information, including age, gender, and race;
(2) a participant's satisfaction levels
with the early neutral evaluation process and outcome as it relates to the
following:
(i) custody arrangements;
(ii) parenting time;
(iii) property division;
(iv) legal expenses;
(v) length of time of the process;
(vi) level of cooperation of each
party; and
(vii) the effectiveness of the neutral
or neutrals;
(3) the participant's opinion regarding
fairness of the early neutral evaluation process, whether the participant's
expectations were met, whether the participant made decisions voluntarily, and
whether the participant would recommend the early neutral evaluation to others;
and
(4) the participant's recommendations
related to the early neutral evaluation process and outcome.
(c) The Extension Service is requested
to aggregate the results of the survey and report summary data, as defined in
Minnesota Statutes, section 13.03, subdivision 19, to the chairs and ranking
minority members of the legislative committees and divisions with jurisdiction
over children, families, and the judiciary by January 15, 2021. The report is requested to include the
following:
(1) the total number of early neutral
evaluation participants;
(2) the total number of social-early
neutral evaluation participants;
(3) the total number of financial-early
neutral evaluation participants;
(4) all disaggregated data, including
survey data, collected by judicial district;
(5) a description of the methods used
to collect data; and
(6) a description of general trends,
findings, and conclusions based on data collected.
(d) Data collected by the Extension
Service in individual participant surveys are private data on individuals, as
defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 13.02, subdivision 12.
ARTICLE 19
FORFEITURE
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 84.7741, subdivision 13, is amended to read:
Subd. 13. Reporting. The appropriate agency and prosecuting
authority shall report on forfeitures occurring under this section as described
in section 609.5315, subdivision 6 609.112, subdivision 35.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 97A.221, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Reporting. The appropriate agency and prosecuting
authority shall report on forfeitures of firearms, bows, and motor vehicles
occurring under this section as described in section 609.5315, subdivision 6
609.112, subdivision 35.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 97A.223, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Reporting. The appropriate agency and prosecuting
authority shall report on forfeitures of firearms, bows, and motor vehicles
occurring under this section as described in section 609.5315, subdivision 6
609.112, subdivision 35.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 97A.225, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Reporting. The appropriate agency and prosecuting
authority shall report on forfeitures occurring under this section as described
in section 609.5315, subdivision 6 609.112, subdivision 35.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 152.21, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Exemption from criminal sanctions. For the purposes of this section, the following are not violations under this chapter:
(1) use or possession of THC, or both, by a patient in the research program;
(2) possession, prescribing use of, administering, or dispensing THC, or any combination of these actions, by the principal investigator or by any clinical investigator; and
(3) possession or distribution of THC, or both, by a pharmacy registered to handle Schedule I substances which stores THC on behalf of the principal investigator or a clinical investigator.
THC obtained and distributed pursuant to
this section is not subject to forfeiture under sections 609.531 to 609.5316
section 609.112.
For the purposes of this section, THC is removed from Schedule I contained in section 152.02, subdivision 2, and inserted in Schedule II contained in section 152.02, subdivision 3.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 152.32, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Criminal and civil protections. (a) Subject to section 152.23, the following are not violations under this chapter:
(1) use or possession of medical cannabis or medical cannabis products by a patient enrolled in the registry program, or possession by a registered designated caregiver or the parent or legal guardian of a patient if the parent or legal guardian is listed on the registry verification;
(2) possession, dosage determination, or sale of medical cannabis or medical cannabis products by a medical cannabis manufacturer, employees of a manufacturer, a laboratory conducting testing on medical cannabis, or employees of the laboratory; and
(3) possession of medical cannabis or medical cannabis products by any person while carrying out the duties required under sections 152.22 to 152.37.
(b) Medical cannabis obtained and
distributed pursuant to sections 152.22 to 152.37 and associated property is
not subject to forfeiture under sections 609.531 to 609.5316 section
609.112.
(c) The commissioner, the commissioner's staff, the commissioner's agents or contractors, and any health care practitioner are not subject to any civil or disciplinary penalties by the Board of Medical Practice, the Board of Nursing, or by any business, occupational, or professional licensing board or entity, solely for the participation in the registry program under sections 152.22 to 152.37. A pharmacist licensed under chapter 151 is not subject to any civil or disciplinary penalties by the Board of Pharmacy when acting in accordance with the provisions of sections 152.22 to 152.37. Nothing in this section affects a professional licensing board from taking action in response to violations of any other section of law.
(d) Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, the commissioner, the governor of Minnesota, or an employee of any state agency may not be held civilly or criminally liable for any injury, loss of property, personal injury, or death caused by any act or omission while acting within the scope of office or employment under sections 152.22 to 152.37.
(e) Federal, state, and local law enforcement authorities are prohibited from accessing the patient registry under sections 152.22 to 152.37 except when acting pursuant to a valid search warrant.
(f) Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, neither the commissioner nor a public employee may release data or information about an individual contained in any report, document, or registry created under sections 152.22 to 152.37 or any information obtained about a patient participating in the program, except as provided in sections 152.22 to 152.37.
(g) No information contained in a report, document, or registry or obtained from a patient under sections 152.22 to 152.37 may be admitted as evidence in a criminal proceeding unless independently obtained or in connection with a proceeding involving a violation of sections 152.22 to 152.37.
(h) Notwithstanding section 13.09, any person who violates paragraph (e) or (f) is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
(i) An attorney may not be subject to disciplinary action by the Minnesota Supreme Court or professional responsibility board for providing legal assistance to prospective or registered manufacturers or others related to activity that is no longer subject to criminal penalties under state law pursuant to sections 152.22 to 152.37.
(j) Possession of a registry verification or application for enrollment in the program by a person entitled to possess or apply for enrollment in the registry program does not constitute probable cause or reasonable suspicion, nor shall it be used to support a search of the person or property of the person possessing or applying for the registry verification, or otherwise subject the person or property of the person to inspection by any governmental agency.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 299A.681, subdivision 11, is amended to read:
Subd. 11. Forfeiture. Property seized by the task force is
subject to forfeiture pursuant to sections 609.531, 609.5312, 609.5313, and
609.5315 if ownership cannot be established.
The task force shall receive the proceeds from the sale of all property
properly seized and forfeited under section 609.112.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 357.021, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:
Subd. 1a. Transmittal of fees to commissioner of management and budget. (a) Every person, including the state of Minnesota and all bodies politic and corporate, who shall transact any business in the district court, shall pay to the court administrator of said court the sundry fees prescribed in subdivision 2. Except as provided in paragraph (d), the court administrator shall transmit the fees monthly to the commissioner of management and budget for deposit in the state treasury and credit to the general fund. $30 of each fee collected in a dissolution action under subdivision 2, clause (1), must be deposited by the commissioner of management and budget in the special revenue fund and is appropriated to the commissioner of employment and economic development for the displaced homemaker program under section 116L.96.
(b) In a county which has a screener-collector position, fees paid by a county pursuant to this subdivision shall be transmitted monthly to the county treasurer, who shall apply the fees first to reimburse the county for the amount of the salary paid for the screener-collector position. The balance of the fees collected shall then be forwarded to the commissioner of management and budget for deposit in the state treasury and credited to the general fund. In a county in a judicial district under section 480.181, subdivision 1, paragraph (b), which has a screener-collector position, the fees paid by a county shall be transmitted monthly to the commissioner of management and budget for deposit in the state treasury and credited to the general fund. A screener-collector position for purposes of this paragraph is an employee whose function is to increase the collection of fines and to review the incomes of potential clients of the public defender, in order to verify eligibility for that service.
(c) No fee is required under this section from the public authority or the party the public authority represents in an action for:
(1) child support enforcement or modification, medical assistance enforcement, or establishment of parentage in the district court, or in a proceeding under section 484.702;
(2) civil commitment under chapter 253B;
(3) the appointment of a public conservator or public guardian or any other action under chapters 252A and 525;
(4) wrongfully obtaining public assistance under section 256.98 or 256D.07, or recovery of overpayments of public assistance;
(5) court relief under chapters 260, 260A, 260B, and 260C;
(6) forfeiture of property under sections
169A.63 and 609.531 to 609.5317 section 609.112;
(7) recovery of amounts issued by political subdivisions or public institutions under sections 246.52, 252.27, 256.045, 256.25, 256.87, 256B.042, 256B.14, 256B.15, 256B.37, 260B.331, and 260C.331, or other sections referring to other forms of public assistance;
(8) restitution under section 611A.04; or
(9) actions seeking monetary relief in favor of the state pursuant to section 16D.14, subdivision 5.
(d) $20 from each fee collected for child support modifications under subdivision 2, clause (13), must be transmitted to the county treasurer for deposit in the county general fund and $35 from each fee shall be credited to the state general fund. The fees must be used by the county to pay for child support enforcement efforts by county attorneys.
Sec. 9. [609.112]
CRIMINAL FORFEITURE.
Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) As used in this section, the
following terms have the meanings given them.
(b) "Abandoned property"
means personal property left by an owner who relinquishes all rights to its
control. Real property may not be
abandoned.
(c) "Actual knowledge" means
direct and clear awareness of information, a fact, or a condition.
(d) "Appropriate agency"
means the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension; the Department of Commerce Fraud
Bureau; the Minnesota Division of Driver and Vehicle Services; the Minnesota
State Patrol; a county sheriff's department; the Three Rivers Park District
park rangers; the University of Minnesota Police Department; the Department of
Corrections Fugitive Apprehension Unit; a city, metropolitan transit, or
airport police department; or a multijurisdictional entity established under
section 299A.642 or 299A.681.
(e) "Contraband" means goods
that, in themselves, are unlawful to possess.
Contraband includes but is not limited to scheduled drugs without a
valid prescription; bullet-resistant vests, as defined in section 609.486, worn
or possessed during the commission or attempted commission of a crime; and
weapons upon conviction of the weapon's owner or possessor for:
(1) a controlled substance crime;
(2) any offense of this chapter or chapter 624; or
(3) a violation of an order for
protection under section 518B.01, subdivision 14.
In this chapter, contraband does not include proceeds
derived from an alleged crime or an instrumentality used in an alleged crime.
(f) "Conveyance" means a
device used for transportation and includes a motor vehicle, trailer,
snowmobile, airplane, vessel, or any equipment attached to one of these devices. The term does not include property that is
stolen or taken in violation of the law.
(g) "Designated offense"
means:
(1) for weapons used, any violation of
this chapter or chapter 152 or 624;
(2) for driver's license or
identification card transactions, any violation of section 171.22;
(3) all controlled substances that were
manufactured, distributed, dispensed, or acquired in violation of chapter 152,
and all property, real and personal, that has been used or is intended for use,
or has in any way facilitated, in whole or in part, the manufacturing,
compounding, processing, delivering, importing, cultivating, exporting,
transporting, or exchanging of contraband, or a controlled substance that has
not been lawfully manufactured, distributed, dispensed, and acquired, is
subject to forfeiture under this section, except as provided in this section;
(4) a violation of section 169A.20 (driving while impaired) under the circumstances described in section 169A.24 (first-degree driving while impaired) or 169A.25 (second-degree driving while impaired);
(5) a violation of section 169A.20 or an
ordinance in conformity with it:
(i) by a person whose driver's license
or driving privileges have been canceled as inimical to public safety under
section 171.04, subdivision 1, clause (10), and not reinstated; or
(ii) by a person who is subject to a
restriction on the person's driver's license under section 171.09
(commissioner's license restrictions), which provides that the person may not
use or consume any amount of alcohol or a controlled substance; or
(6) for all other purposes, a felony
violation of or a felony-level attempt or conspiracy to violate section
325E.17; 325E.18; 609.185; 609.19; 609.195; 609.2112; 609.2113; 609.2114;
609.221; 609.222; 609.223; 609.2231; 609.2335; 609.24; 609.245; 609.25;
609.255; 609.282; 609.283; 609.322; 609.342, subdivision 1, clauses (a) to (f);
609.343, subdivision 1, clauses (a) to (f); 609.344, subdivision 1, clauses (a)
to (e) and (h) to (j); 609.345, subdivision 1, clauses (a) to (e) and (h) to
(j); 609.352; 609.42; 609.425; 609.466; 609.485; 609.487; 609.52; 609.525;
609.527; 609.528; 609.53; 609.54; 609.551; 609.561; 609.562; 609.563; 609.582;
609.59; 609.595; 609.611; 609.631; 609.66, subdivision 1e; 609.671,
subdivisions 3, 4, 5, 8, and 12; 609.687; 609.821; 609.825; 609.86; 609.88;
609.89; 609.893; 609.895; 617.246; or 617.247; or a gross misdemeanor or felony
violation of section 609.891 or 624.7181; or any violation of section 609.324;
or a felony violation of or a felony-level attempt or conspiracy to violate
Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 609.21.
(h) "Instrumentality" means
property otherwise lawful to possess that is used in the commission of a
designated offense. An instrumentality
includes but is not limited to land, buildings, a container, a conveyance,
equipment, materials, products, a tool, a computer, computer software, a
telecommunications device, a firearm, or ammunition.
(i) "Proceeds" means money,
securities, negotiable instruments, or other means of exchange obtained by the
sale of property.
Subd. 2. Purpose. Forfeiture is disfavored. The purpose of this chapter is to:
(1) deter criminal activity by reducing
its economic incentives;
(2) confiscate property used in
violation of the law and disgorge the fruits of illegal conduct; and
(3) protect rights due to defendants and
innocent owners.
Subd. 3. Seizure
of personal property with process. At
the request of the state at any time, a court may issue an ex parte preliminary
order to attach, seize, or secure personal property for which forfeiture is
sought and to provide for its custody. Application,
issuance, execution, and return are subject to state statute and court rules.
Subd. 4. Seizure
of personal property without process.
(a) Personal property is subject to forfeiture and may be seized
without a court order if:
(1) the personal property is the subject
of a prior judgment in favor of the state;
(2) the seizure of personal property is
incident to a lawful arrest for a designated offense, the property was
discovered in a lawful search, and the appropriate agency has probable cause to
believe the property:
(i) was used in any manner or part to commit or to facilitate the commission of the designated offense; or
(ii) constitutes or was derived directly
from proceeds of a designated offense; or
(3)
the appropriate agency has probable cause to believe that the delay occasioned
by the necessity to obtain process would result in the removal or destruction
of the property and that:
(i) the property was used or is
intended to be used in commission of a felony; or
(ii) the property is dangerous to
health or safety.
(b) Mere presence or possession of
United States currency, without other indicia of an offense that authorizes
forfeiture of property, is insufficient probable cause for seizure of United
States currency.
Subd. 5. Seizure
or restraint of real property with process.
(a) Seizure or restraint of real property requires a court order. Except as provided in subdivision 6, a court
may issue an order to seize or secure real property for which forfeiture is
sought only after proper notice to property owners and an opportunity for a
contested hearing to determine the sufficiency of probable cause for the
seizure.
(b) Except as provided in subdivision
6, nothing in this section prohibits the prosecuting authority from seeking a
lis pendens or restraining order to hinder the sale or destruction of the real
property. However, if the prosecuting
attorney obtains a lis pendens or restraining order, the prosecuting authority
shall notify any party with an interest in any real property within 30 days.
(c) Application, filing, issuance,
execution, and return of any order are subject to state law.
Subd. 6. Rental
property. (a) When contraband
or a controlled substance manufactured, distributed, or acquired in violation
of chapter 152 is seized on residential rental property incident to a lawful
search or arrest, the prosecuting authority shall give the notice required by
this subdivision to (1) the landlord of the property or the fee owner
identified in the records of the county assessor, and (2) the agent authorized
by the owner to accept service pursuant to section 504B.181. The notice is not required during an ongoing
investigation. The notice shall state
what has been seized and specify the applicable duties and penalties under this
subdivision. The notice shall state that
the landlord who chooses to assign the right to bring an eviction action
retains all rights and duties, including removal of a tenant's personal
property following issuance of the writ of recovery and delivery of the writ to
the sheriff for execution. The notice
shall also state that the landlord may contact the prosecuting authority if
threatened by the tenant. Notice shall
be sent by certified letter, return receipt requested, within 30 days of the
seizure. If receipt is not returned,
notice shall be given in the manner provided by law for service of summons in a
civil action.
(b) Within 15 days after notice of the
first occurrence, the landlord shall bring or assign to the prosecuting
authority of the county in which the real property is located the right to
bring an eviction action against the tenant.
The assignment must be in writing on a form prepared by the prosecuting
authority. If the landlord chooses to
assign the right to bring an eviction action, the assignment shall be limited
to those rights and duties up to and including delivery of the writ of recovery
to the sheriff for execution.
(c) Upon notice of a second occurrence
on any residential rental property owned by the same landlord in the same
county and involving the same tenant, and within one year after notice of the
first occurrence, the property is subject to forfeiture under this section
unless an eviction action has been commenced as provided in paragraph (b) or
the right to bring an eviction action was assigned to the prosecuting authority
as provided in paragraph (b). If the
right has been assigned and not previously exercised, or if the prosecuting
authority requests an assignment and the landlord makes an assignment, the
prosecuting authority may bring an eviction action rather than an action for
forfeiture.
(d) The Department of Corrections
Fugitive Apprehension Unit shall not seize real property for the purposes of
forfeiture as described in paragraphs (a) to (c).
(e)
It is a defense against a proceeding under paragraph (b) that the tenant had no
knowledge or reason to know of the presence of the contraband or controlled
substance or could not prevent its being brought onto the property. It is a defense against a proceeding under
paragraph (c) that the landlord made every reasonable attempt to evict a tenant
or to assign the prosecuting authority the right to bring an eviction action
against the tenant or that the landlord did not receive notice of the seizure.
(f) This subdivision shall not apply if
the retail value of the controlled substance is less than $100, but this
subdivision does not subject real property to forfeiture unless (1) the retail
value of the controlled substance is $1,000 or more, or (2) there have been two
previous controlled substance seizures involving the same tenant.
Subd. 7. Exemptions. (a) The following property is exempt
from seizure and forfeiture:
(1) homestead real property;
(2) United States currency totaling no
more than $300; and
(3) a motor vehicle of no more than
$2,500 in market value, except that this provision does not apply to a motor
vehicle used in violation of section 609.66, subdivision 1e.
(b) A prosecuting authority may
establish an exemption with a minimum dollar amount larger than those in
paragraph (a), clauses (2) and (3), in the prosecuting authority's
jurisdiction.
Subd. 8. Contraband. No property right exists in contraband. Contraband is subject to seizure and shall be
disposed of according to law.
Subd. 9. Waiver
prohibition. (a) An
appropriate agency may not request, require, or in any manner induce any person
to execute a document purporting to waive, for purposes of forfeiture under
this section, the person's interest in or rights to property seized. This prohibition does not apply to the
prosecuting agency responsible for the litigation of the forfeiture case.
(b) Any document in violation of
paragraph (a) purporting to waive a person's interest in, or right to, property
seized under this chapter is null, void, and inadmissible in court.
Subd. 10. Receipt. When property is seized, the
appropriate agency shall give an itemized receipt to the person possessing the
property or, in the absence of any person, leave a receipt in the place where
the property was found, if reasonably possible.
Subd. 11. Criminal
forfeiture; property subject to forfeiture.
When a person is convicted of violating a designated offense, the
court, consistent with this chapter, may order the person to forfeit:
(1) any property constituting or
derived directly from proceeds of the underlying offense for which the person
is convicted; or
(2) any of the person's property used
in any manner or part to commit or to facilitate the commission of the offense
for which the person is convicted.
Subd. 12. Conviction
required; standard of proof. (a)
There shall be no civil forfeiture under this chapter.
(b) Property may be forfeited if (1)
the offense is a designated offense, (2) the offense is established by proof of
a criminal conviction, and (3) the state establishes that the property is
subject to forfeiture under subdivision 11 by clear and convincing evidence.
(c)
Nothing in this section prevents property from being forfeited by plea
agreement approved by the presiding criminal court except the court shall not
accept a plea agreement or other arrangement that prevents the claims of any
person who filed a statement of interest or ownership pursuant to subdivision
20 or 21 from being adjudicated.
(d) The court may waive the conviction
requirement if the prosecuting authority shows by clear and convincing evidence
that, before conviction, the defendant:
(1) died;
(2) no longer resides in the United
States;
(3) was granted immunity or reduced
punishment in exchange for testifying or assisting a law enforcement
investigation or prosecution;
(4) fled state jurisdiction; or
(5) abandoned the property.
(e) Notwithstanding any law to the
contrary, the court shall order the sale of personal property that is (1)
seized from a person who flees state jurisdiction, or (2) abandoned to be
credited to the state general fund.
(f) The court shall order currency that
is (1) seized from a person who flees the jurisdiction, or (2) abandoned to be
credited to the state general fund.
Subd. 13. Forfeiture indictment. (a) In any case in which the state seeks forfeiture of property except through a complaint as provided in subdivision 14, the prosecuting authority shall file an indictment or information that includes:
(1) a criminal charge; and
(2) a charge for which forfeiture of
property under this chapter may be ordered.
This property-related charge shall identify the specific assets to be
forfeited, if known, or the relevant forfeiture statutes if specific assets to be
forfeited are not known at the time the prosecuting authority requests the
issuance of the indictment.
(b) Upon application of the prosecuting
authority, the court may enter a restraining order or injunction, or take other
action to preserve the availability of property only:
(1) upon the issuance of an indictment
or information according to paragraph (a); or
(2) prior to the issuance of such an
indictment or information if the court determines there is a substantial
probability the state will prevail on the issue of criminal forfeiture and that
failure to enter the order will result in property being destroyed, removed
from the jurisdiction, or otherwise made unavailable for forfeiture.
(c) Any order entered pursuant to
paragraph (b) shall be effective for not more than 90 days, unless extended by
the court for good cause shown or unless an indictment or information described
in paragraph (b), clause (1), has been subsequently issued.
(d) Notice must be provided as set
forth in the complaint process provided in subdivision 14 to all persons known
to have an interest in the property who are not named in the indictment or
information.
Subd. 14. Forfeiture
complaint; service of process. (a)
In any case in which the state seeks forfeiture of property, except when the
state seeks forfeiture through indictment or information as provided in
subdivision 13, the prosecuting authority shall file a criminal complaint that
includes (1) criminal charges, and (2) the information identified in paragraph
(b) before the defendant's first appearance in court. Upon motion by the prosecuting authority, a
court may permit the filing of an amended criminal complaint within seven days
of the first appearance for good cause shown.
Service of an amended criminal complaint on a represented party must be
made on the attorney. Service on the
attorney or party must be made in the manner provided by the rules of practice
of the court, including by electronic means as authorized by the court. The court shall verify service at the
defendant's next appearance.
(b) A complaint in any case in which
the state seeks forfeiture of property must include:
(1) a description of the property
seized;
(2) the date and place of the seizure;
(3) the name and address of the
appropriate agency responsible for the seizure;
(4) a statement of facts establishing
probable cause to believe that the charged offense has been committed, that the
defendant committed it, and that the seized property is an instrument or
represents the proceeds of the underlying offense;
(5) the name of any person known to the
prosecuting authority to have an interest in the property and the nature of
that interest; and
(6) references to the relevant
statutory provisions required to show the property is the type of property that
may be forfeited under subdivision 11.
(c) If notice is not served in
accordance with paragraphs (a) and (b) to all persons appearing to have an
interest in the property and no time extension is granted or the extension
period has expired, the appropriate agency shall, upon the owner's request,
return the property to the person from whom the property was seized, if known. The agency shall not be required to return
contraband.
(d) Failure to file a forfeiture
complaint required by this subdivision shall not invalidate prosecution for the
underlying criminal offense.
(e) Unless otherwise specified in law,
the prosecuting authority shall provide notice of the forfeiture proceeding to
the registered owner of any vehicle and any other individual known to have an
interest in any property subject to forfeiture under this section who is not
charged with a crime in the complaint. Notice
must be given within seven days of the filing of the complaint pursuant to
paragraph (a) or, if an interest was not known at the time of the filing,
within seven days of discovery of an individual with an interest in the
property and may be made by personal service if the owner is a resident of this
state, or by certified mail if the person is a resident of another state.
(f) The notice must be in writing and
contain:
(1) a description of the property
seized;
(2) the date of seizure; and
(3) a copy of the complaint filed
pursuant to paragraph (a).
(g)
Substantially, the following language must appear conspicuously in the notice:
"WARNING: You may lose the right to be heard in court
if you do not file a petition pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 609.112,
subdivision 20 or 21. You do not have to
pay a filing fee to file your notice."
Subd. 15. Title. (a) Title to the property subject to
forfeiture vests with the state when the court issues a forfeiture judgment and
relates back to the time when the state seizes or restrains the property.
(b) Title to substitute assets vests
when the court issues an order forfeiting substitute assets.
(c) For either paragraph (a) or (b),
title is subject to claims by third parties adjudicated under this chapter.
Subd. 16. Defendant's
pretrial replevin hearing. (a)
Following the seizure of property, a defendant has a right to a pretrial
hearing to determine the validity of the seizure.
(b) The court shall hold the hearing at
the time the defendant enters a plea or no later than 14 days after the
defendant's first appearance under rule 5 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure.
(c) Either party may, by agreement or
for good cause, move the court for one extension of no more than ten days. This motion may be supported by affidavits or
other submissions.
(d) The court shall issue a writ of
replevin if it finds that:
(1) it is likely the final judgment
will be that the state must return the property to the defendant;
(2) the property is not reasonably
required to be held for evidentiary reasons; and
(3) the property is the only reasonable
means for the defendant to pay for legal representation and minimum living
expenses in the forfeiture or criminal proceeding unless the prosecuting
authority shows by clear and convincing evidence that the property is the
instrument or proceeds of an offense for which the defendant is charged. At the court's discretion, it may order the
return of funds or property sufficient to obtain counsel of choice but less
than the total amount seized.
Subd. 17. Discovery. Discovery is subject to the Rules of
Criminal Procedure.
Subd. 18. Venue;
trial proceedings. (a) The
district court with jurisdiction over the related criminal matter has
jurisdiction over the forfeiture proceeding.
(b) The litigation related to the
forfeiture of property shall be held in a single proceeding following entry of
a plea of guilty or the trial of the related alleged offense. The litigation associated with the forfeiture
of property of less than $10,000 in value shall be held before only a judge.
(c) The court is not bound by the rules
of evidence or technical or formal rules of pleading or procedure in the
litigation related to the forfeiture of property when a property owner engages
in pro se representation in a case before a judge.
(d) If the defendant in the related
criminal matter was represented by the public defender, the state public
defender or chief public defender of the judicial district may authorize
representation of the defendant in the forfeiture proceeding.
Subd. 19. Proportionality
hearing. (a) At any time
during a hearing pursuant to subdivision 16 or 18, the defendant may petition
the court to determine whether the forfeiture is unconstitutionally excessive
under the state or federal constitution.
(b) The defendant has the burden of
proving the forfeiture is disproportional to the seriousness of the offense by
a preponderance of the evidence at a hearing conducted by the court without a
jury.
(c) In determining whether the
forfeiture of an instrumentality is unconstitutionally excessive, the court may
consider all relevant factors, including but not limited to:
(1) the seriousness of the offense and
its impact on the community, including the duration of the activity and the
harm caused by the defendant;
(2) the extent to which the defendant
participated in the offense;
(3) the extent to which the property
was used in committing the offense;
(4) the sentence imposed for committing
the crime authorizing forfeiture; and
(5) whether the offense was completed
or attempted.
(d) In determining the value of the
instrumentality subject to forfeiture, the court may consider the fair market
value of the property.
(e) The court may also consider:
(1) the hardship to the defendant if
the forfeiture is realized and if the forfeiture would deprive the property
owner of the owner's livelihood; and
(2) the hardship from the loss of a
primary residence, motor vehicle, or other property to the defendant's family
members or others if the property is forfeited.
(f) The court may not consider the
value of the instrumentality to the state in determining whether the forfeiture
of an instrumentality is constitutionally excessive.
Subd. 20. Secured
interest. (a) Property
encumbered by a bona fide security interest is not subject to forfeiture. A person claiming a security interest must
establish by clear and convincing evidence the validity of the interest.
(b) The prosecuting authority summarily
and without unreasonable delay shall return seized property to the person with
a bona fide security interest, up to the value of the secured interest.
(c) If the person alleges a valid
security interest but the state seeks to proceed with the forfeiture against
the property claimed by the person, the state shall prove by clear and
convincing evidence that the person had actual knowledge of the underlying
crime giving rise to the forfeiture. Either
party may ask the court for a hearing at any time before the court enters a
judgment in the criminal prosecution.
Subd. 21. Innocent
owner. (a) Any person,
including an heir but excluding the defendant or a secured-interest holder,
asserting a legal interest in property that has been seized or restrained may,
at any time before the court enters judgment in the criminal prosecution,
petition the court for a hearing to adjudicate the validity of the person's
alleged interest in the property. The
hearing shall be held before the court without a jury.
(b)
The petitioner shall file a simple statement of interest or ownership. The petitioner shall sign the petition under
penalty of perjury and shall set forth the nature and extent of the
petitioner's right, title, or interest in the property; the time and
circumstances of the petitioner's acquisition of the right, title, or interest
in the property; any additional facts supporting the petitioner's claim; and
the relief sought.
(c) The filing fee for the statement under this
subdivision is waived.
(d) The hearing on the petition shall, to the extent
practicable and consistent with the interests of justice, be held within 30
days of the filing of the petition. The
court may consolidate the hearing on the petition with a hearing on any other
petition filed by a person other than the defendant under this subdivision.
(e) At the hearing, the petitioner may testify and
present evidence and witnesses on the petitioner's own behalf and cross-examine
witnesses who appear at the hearing. The
state may present evidence and witnesses in rebuttal and in defense of its
claim to the property and cross-examine witnesses who appear at the hearing.
(f) The petitioner who has an ownership interest in
property subject to forfeiture at the time the commission of the crime giving
rise to forfeiture occurred and who claims to be an innocent owner bears the
burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the person has a legal
right, title, or interest in the property seized under this chapter.
(g) If paragraph (f) is satisfied and the state seeks to
proceed with the forfeiture of the property, the state shall prove by clear and
convincing evidence that the petitioner had actual knowledge of the underlying
crime giving rise to the forfeiture.
(h) A petitioner who acquired an ownership interest in
property subject to forfeiture after the commission of the crime giving rise to
the forfeiture and who claims to be an innocent owner bears the burden of
proving by clear and convincing evidence that the person has a legal right,
title, or interest in the property seized under this chapter.
(i) If paragraph (h) is satisfied and the state seeks to
proceed with the forfeiture of the property, the state shall prove by clear and
convincing evidence that, at the time the petitioner acquired the property, the
person:
(1) had actual knowledge that the property was subject
to forfeiture; or
(2) was not a bona fide purchaser without notice of any
defect in title and for valuable consideration.
(j) If the state fails to meet its burden in paragraph
(g) or (i), the court shall find that the petitioner is an innocent owner and
shall order the state to relinquish all claims of title to the property.
(k) No information in the statement of interest or
ownership filed pursuant to this section shall be used as evidence in the
criminal matter. Nothing in this section
prohibits the petitioner who has filed a statement of interest or ownership
under this section from providing information to any prosecuting authority or
defendant involved in the related criminal matter or representatives of any
prosecuting authority or defendant, or from testifying in any criminal trial as
to facts within the petitioner's knowledge.
(l) The defendant or convicted offender may invoke the
right against self-incrimination or the marital privilege during the
forfeiture-related stage of the prosecution.
The trier of fact at the hearing may draw an adverse inference from the
invocation of the right or privilege.
Subd. 22.
Judgment. (a) If the prosecuting authority fails
to meet its burden as to any claimant, the court must enter judgment dismissing
the forfeiture proceeding and delivering the property to the prevailing owner,
unless the owner's possession of the property is illegal.
(b)
If the prosecuting authority meets its burden as to all claimants, the court
shall enter judgment forfeiting the seized property.
(c) A court may enter judgment
following a hearing or pursuant to a stipulation or plea agreement.
Subd. 23. Substitution
of assets. Upon the state's
motion following conviction, the court may order the forfeiture of substitute
property owned by the defendant up to the value of unreachable property that is
beyond the court's jurisdiction or cannot be located through due diligence only
if the state proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant
intentionally:
(1) dissipated property;
(2) transferred, sold, or deposited
property with a third party to avoid forfeiture;
(3) diminished substantially the value
of the property; or
(4) commingled property with other
property that cannot be divided without difficulty.
Subd. 24. No
additional remedies. The
state may not seek personal money judgments or other remedies related to the
forfeiture of property not provided for in this section.
Subd. 25. No
joint and several liability. A
defendant is not jointly and severally liable for forfeiture awards owed by
other defendants. When ownership is
unclear, a court may order each defendant to forfeit property on a pro rata
basis or by another means the court finds equitable.
Subd. 26. Appeal. (a) A party to forfeiture litigation,
other than the defendant, may appeal the district court's decision regarding
the seizure, on an interlocutory basis, or forfeiture of property under this
chapter.
(b) The defendant may appeal the
district court's decision regarding the seizure or forfeiture of property
following judgment in the forfeiture litigation.
Subd. 27. Attorney
fees. In any proceeding in
which a property owner's claims prevail by recovering at least half, by value,
of the property or currency claimed, the seizing agency shall be liable for:
(1) attorney fees and other litigation
costs reasonably incurred by the claimant;
(2) postjudgment interest; and
(3) in cases involving currency, other
negotiable instruments, or the proceeds of an interlocutory sale, any interest
actually paid from the date of seizure.
Subd. 28. Return
of property; damages; costs. (a)
If the court orders the return of property, the appropriate agency that holds
the property shall return the property to the owner or other prevailing
claimant within a reasonable period of time not to exceed five days after entry
of judgment.
(b) Any owner to whom property is
returned shall not be subject to any charges for storage of the property or
expenses incurred in the preservation of the property.
(c) The appropriate agency that holds
the property is responsible for any damages, storage fees, and related costs
applicable to property returned under this section.
Subd. 29. Disposition
of property and proceeds. (a)
At any time when contraband held for evidentiary purposes is no longer needed
for that purpose, the court may order that it be destroyed pursuant to state
law.
(b) At any time when abandoned property
held for evidentiary purposes is no longer needed for that purpose, the court may order the property to be sold and the
proceeds distributed pursuant to subdivision 12, paragraphs (e) and (f).
(c) If forfeiture is granted, the
proceeds from the sale of forfeited personal property shall first be used to
pay all outstanding recorded liens on the forfeited property.
(d) The court may then order that a
portion of the currency seized or proceeds from the sale of forfeited property
be used to (1) pay the victim of the crime for which the defendant is
convicted, and (2) pay reasonable nonpersonnel expenses for the seizure,
storage, and maintenance of any forfeited property.
(e) The court must then order remaining
funds be credited equally to:
(1) the justice programs forfeiture
account in the special revenue fund and is appropriated to the commissioner of
public safety for grants administered through the Office of Justice Programs;
(2) the commissioner of health to be
deposited in the safe harbor for youth account in the special revenue fund and
is appropriated to the commissioner of health for distribution to crime victims
services organizations that provide services to sexually exploited youth, as
defined in section 260C.007, subdivision 31;
(3) the public defender forfeiture
account in the special revenue fund and is appropriated to the Minnesota Board
of Public Defense; and
(4) the state general fund.
(f) A justice programs forfeiture
account is established as a special account in the state treasury.
(g) A public defender forfeiture
account is established as a special account in the state treasury.
Subd. 30. Prohibition
on retaining property; sale restrictions.
No appropriate agency may retain forfeited or abandoned property
for its own use or sell it directly or indirectly to any employee of the
agency, to a person related to an employee by blood or marriage, or to another
appropriate agency or any other law enforcement agency.
Subd. 31. Prohibition
of federal adoption. A local,
county, or state law enforcement agency shall not refer, transfer, or otherwise
relinquish possession of property seized under state law to a federal agency by
way of adoption of the seized property or other means by the federal agency for
the purpose of the property's forfeiture under the federal Controlled
Substances Act, United States Code, title 21, section 881, or the Comprehensive
Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-513, section 413.
Subd. 32. Limit
on receiving forfeiture proceeds from joint task forces. (a) In a case in which the aggregate
net equity value of the property and currency seized has a value of $50,000 or
less, excluding the value of contraband, a local, county, or state law
enforcement agency or participant in a joint task force or other
multijurisdictional collaboration with the federal government shall transfer
responsibility for the seized property to the state prosecuting authority for
forfeiture under state law.
(b) If the federal government prohibits
the transfer of seized property and currency to the state prosecuting authority
as required by paragraph (a) and instead requires the property be transferred
to the federal government for forfeiture under federal law, the agency is
prohibited from accepting payment of any kind or distribution of forfeiture
proceeds from the federal government.
(c)
Nothing in paragraph (a) or (b) shall be construed to restrict an agency from
transferring responsibility to the federal government for forfeiture of seized
property and currency that has an aggregate net equity value of greater than
$50,000, excluding the value of contraband.
(d) Nothing in paragraph (a) or (b) or
subdivision 31 shall be construed to restrict a local, county, or state law
enforcement agency from acting alone or collaborating with a federal agency or
other agency to seize contraband or property a law enforcement agent has
probable cause to believe is the proceeds or instruments of a crime that subjects
property to forfeiture.
(e) Nothing in paragraph (a) or (b) or
subdivision 31 shall be construed to prohibit the federal government, acting
without the involvement of a local, county, or state law enforcement agency,
from seizing property and seeking forfeiture under federal law.
Subd. 33. Preemption. This chapter preempts laws by other
governments in the state that regulate forfeiture of property in crimes related
to controlled substances and driving while impaired.
Subd. 34. Exception. The provisions of this section other
than the reporting requirement under subdivision 35 do not apply to seizure or
forfeiture proceedings under chapter 84 or 97A.
Subd. 35. Reporting
requirement. (a) For each
forfeiture occurring in the state, the appropriate agency and the prosecuting
authority shall provide a written record of the forfeiture incident to the
state auditor. The record shall include
the amount forfeited, the statutory authority for the forfeiture, the date, a
brief description of the circumstances involved, and whether the forfeiture was
contested. The record shall also list
the number of firearms forfeited and the make, model, and serial number of each
firearm forfeited. The record shall
indicate how the property was or is to be disposed of.
(b) An appropriate agency or the
prosecuting authority shall report to the state auditor all instances in which
property seized for forfeiture is returned to its owner either because
forfeiture is not pursued or for any other reason.
(c) Reports shall be made on a monthly
basis in a manner prescribed by the state auditor. The state auditor shall report annually to
the legislature on the nature and extent of forfeitures.
(d) For forfeitures resulting from the
activities of multijurisdictional law enforcement entities, the entity on its
own behalf shall report the information required in this subdivision.
(e) The prosecuting authority is not
required to report information required by this subdivision unless the
prosecuting authority has been notified by the state auditor that the
appropriate agency has not reported it.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.66, subdivision 1d, is amended to read:
Subd. 1d. Possession on school property; penalty. (a) Except as provided under paragraphs (d) and (f), whoever possesses, stores, or keeps a dangerous weapon while knowingly on school property is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both.
(b) Whoever uses or brandishes a replica firearm or a BB gun while knowingly on school property is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
(c) Whoever possesses, stores, or keeps a replica firearm or a BB gun while knowingly on school property is guilty of a misdemeanor.
(d)
Notwithstanding paragraph (a), (b), or (c), it is a misdemeanor for a person
authorized to carry a firearm under the provisions of a permit or otherwise to
carry a firearm on or about the person's clothes or person in a location the
person knows is school property. Notwithstanding
section 609.531 any law to the contrary, a firearm carried in
violation of this paragraph is not subject to forfeiture.
(e) As used in this subdivision:
(1) "BB gun" means a device that fires or ejects a shot measuring .18 of an inch or less in diameter;
(2) "dangerous weapon" has the meaning given it in section 609.02, subdivision 6;
(3) "replica firearm" has the meaning given it in section 609.713; and
(4) "school property" means:
(i) a public or private elementary, middle, or secondary school building and its improved grounds, whether leased or owned by the school;
(ii) a child care center licensed under chapter 245A during the period children are present and participating in a child care program;
(iii) the area within a school bus when that bus is being used by a school to transport one or more elementary, middle, or secondary school students to and from school-related activities, including curricular, cocurricular, noncurricular, extracurricular, and supplementary activities; and
(iv) that portion of a building or facility under the temporary, exclusive control of a public or private school, a school district, or an association of such entities where conspicuous signs are prominently posted at each entrance that give actual notice to persons of the school-related use.
(f) This subdivision does not apply to:
(1) active licensed peace officers;
(2) military personnel or students participating in military training, who are on-duty, performing official duties;
(3) persons authorized to carry a pistol under section 624.714 while in a motor vehicle or outside of a motor vehicle to directly place a firearm in, or retrieve it from, the trunk or rear area of the vehicle;
(4) persons who keep or store in a motor vehicle pistols in accordance with section 624.714 or 624.715 or other firearms in accordance with section 97B.045;
(5) firearm safety or marksmanship courses or activities conducted on school property;
(6) possession of dangerous weapons, BB guns, or replica firearms by a ceremonial color guard;
(7) a gun or knife show held on school property;
(8) possession of dangerous weapons, BB guns, or replica firearms with written permission of the principal or other person having general control and supervision of the school or the director of a child care center; or
(9) persons who are on unimproved property owned or leased by a child care center, school, or school district unless the person knows that a student is currently present on the land for a school-related activity.
(g) Notwithstanding section 471.634, a school district or other entity composed exclusively of school districts may not regulate firearms, ammunition, or their respective components, when possessed or carried by nonstudents or nonemployees, in a manner that is inconsistent with this subdivision.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.762, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Seizure. Forfeiture of property subject
to forfeiture under identified in subdivision 1 may be seized by any
law enforcement agency upon process issued by any court having jurisdiction
over the property. Seizure without
process may be made if: must be made pursuant to section 609.112.
(1) the seizure is incident to an
arrest or a search under a search warrant;
(2) the property subject to seizure has
been the subject of a prior judgment in favor of the state in a criminal
injunction or forfeiture proceeding; or
(3) the law enforcement agency has
probable cause to believe that the property was used or is intended to be used
in a gambling violation and the delay occasioned by the necessity to obtain
process would result in the removal, loss, or destruction of the property.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.856, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Forfeiture. A radio or device defined in subdivision
1 that is used in the commission of a felony or violation of section 609.487 or
attempt to commit a felony or violation of section 609.487 is contraband
property and subject to the forfeiture provisions of section 609.531 609.112.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.895, subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. Forfeiture. Property used to commit or facilitate the
commission of a violation of this section, and all money and property
representing proceeds of a violation of this section, shall be forfeited in
accordance with sections 609.531 to 609.5316 section 609.112. Notwithstanding any provision of section 609.5315
609.112 to the contrary, forfeited items bearing or identified by a
counterfeit mark must be destroyed unless the intellectual property owner
consents to another disposition.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.908, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Sale proceeds. The proceeds of a sale or other disposition of forfeited property under this section whether by final judgment, settlement, or otherwise, must be applied as follows:
(1) to the fees and costs of the forfeiture and sale including expenses of seizure, maintenance, and custody of the property pending its disposition, advertising, and court costs;
(2) to all costs and expenses of investigation and prosecution including costs of resources and personnel incurred in investigation and prosecution; and
(3) the balance to the appropriate
agencies under section 609.5315, subdivision 5 609.112, subdivision
28.
Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609B.515, is amended to read:
609B.515
DWI; VEHICLE FORFEITURE.
Under section 169A.63 609.112,
a motor vehicle is subject to forfeiture if a driver is convicted of a
"designated offense," as defined in section 169A.63, subdivision 1
609.112, subdivision 1.
Section 169A.63, subdivision 7, 609.112
specifies limitations on vehicle forfeiture.
Section 169A.63, subdivisions 8 and 9, provide for administrative
forfeiture procedure and judicial forfeiture procedure. Section 169A.63, subdivisions 10 and 11,
provide for disposition of a forfeited vehicle.
Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 611.32, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Proceedings
at time of apprehension or arrest. Following
the apprehension or arrest of a person disabled in communication for an alleged
violation of a criminal law, the arresting officer, sheriff or other law
enforcement official shall immediately make necessary contacts to obtain a
qualified interpreter and shall obtain an interpreter at the earliest possible
time at the place of detention. A law
enforcement officer shall, with the assistance of the interpreter, explain to
the person disabled in communication, all charges filed against the person, and
all procedures relating to the person's detainment and release. If the property of a person is seized under
section 609.531, subdivision 4 609.112, the seizing officer,
sheriff, or other law enforcement official shall, upon request, make available
to the person at the earliest possible time a qualified interpreter to assist
the person in understanding the possible consequences of the seizure and the
person's right to judicial review. If
the seizure is governed by section 609.5314, subdivision 2, a request for an
interpreter must be made within 15 days after service of the notice of seizure
and forfeiture. For a person who
requests an interpreter under this section because of a seizure of property
under section 609.5314, the 60 days for filing a demand for a judicial
determination of a forfeiture begins when the interpreter is provided. The interpreter shall also assist the person
with all other communications, including communications relating to needed
medical attention. Prior to
interrogating or taking the statement of the person disabled in communication,
the arresting officer, sheriff, or other law enforcement official shall make
available to the person a qualified interpreter to assist the person throughout
the interrogation or taking of a statement.
Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 624.714, subdivision 1b, is amended to read:
Subd. 1b. Display
of permit; penalty. (a) The holder
of a permit to carry must have the permit card and a driver's license, state
identification card, or other government-issued photo identification in
immediate possession at all times when carrying a pistol and must display the
permit card and identification document upon lawful demand by a peace officer,
as defined in section 626.84, subdivision 1.
A violation of this paragraph is a petty misdemeanor. The fine for a first offense must not exceed
$25. Notwithstanding section 609.531
609.112, a firearm carried in violation of this paragraph is not subject
to forfeiture.
(b) A citation issued for violating paragraph (a) must be dismissed if the person demonstrates, in court or in the office of the arresting officer, that the person was authorized to carry the pistol at the time of the alleged violation.
(c) Upon the request of a peace officer, a permit holder must write a sample signature in the officer's presence to aid in verifying the person's identity.
(d) Upon the request of a peace officer, a permit holder shall disclose to the officer whether or not the permit holder is currently carrying a firearm.
Sec. 18. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 624.714, subdivision 7a, is amended to read:
Subd. 7a. Change
of address; loss or destruction of permit.
(a) Within 30 days after changing permanent address, or within 30
days of having lost or destroyed the permit card, the permit holder must notify
the issuing sheriff of the change, loss, or destruction. Failure to provide notification as required
by this subdivision is a petty misdemeanor.
The fine for a first offense must not exceed $25. Notwithstanding section 609.531 609.112,
a firearm carried in violation of this paragraph is not subject to forfeiture.
(b) After notice is given under paragraph (a), a permit holder may obtain a replacement permit card by paying $10 to the sheriff. The request for a replacement permit card must be made on an official, standardized application adopted for this purpose under section 624.7151, and, except in the case of an address change, must include a notarized statement that the permit card has been lost or destroyed.
Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 624.714, subdivision 17, is amended to read:
Subd. 17. Posting;
trespass. (a) A person carrying a
firearm on or about his or her person or clothes under a permit or otherwise
who remains at a private establishment knowing that the operator of the
establishment or its agent has made a reasonable request that firearms not be
brought into the establishment may be ordered to leave the premises. A person who fails to leave when so requested
is guilty of a petty misdemeanor. The
fine for a first offense must not exceed $25.
Notwithstanding section 609.531 609.112, a firearm carried
in violation of this subdivision is not subject to forfeiture.
(b) As used in this subdivision, the terms in this paragraph have the meanings given.
(1) "Reasonable request" means a request made under the following circumstances:
(i) the requester has prominently posted a conspicuous sign at every entrance to the establishment containing the following language: "(INDICATE IDENTITY OF OPERATOR) BANS GUNS IN THESE PREMISES."; or
(ii) the requester or the requester's agent personally informs the person that guns are prohibited in the premises and demands compliance.
(2) "Prominently" means readily visible and within four feet laterally of the entrance with the bottom of the sign at a height of four to six feet above the floor.
(3) "Conspicuous" means lettering in black arial typeface at least 1-1/2 inches in height against a bright contrasting background that is at least 187 square inches in area.
(4) "Private establishment" means a building, structure, or portion thereof that is owned, leased, controlled, or operated by a nongovernmental entity for a nongovernmental purpose.
(c) The owner or operator of a private establishment may not prohibit the lawful carry or possession of firearms in a parking facility or parking area.
(d) The owner or operator of a private establishment may not prohibit the lawful carry or possession of firearms by a peace officer, as defined in section 626.84, subdivision 1, paragraph (c), within the private establishment or deny the officer access thereto, except when specifically authorized by statute. The owner or operator of the private establishment may require the display of official credentials issued by the agency that employs the peace officer prior to granting the officer entry into the private establishment.
(e) This subdivision does not apply to private residences. The lawful possessor of a private residence may prohibit firearms, and provide notice thereof, in any lawful manner.
(f) A landlord may not restrict the lawful carry or possession of firearms by tenants or their guests.
(g) Notwithstanding any inconsistent provisions in section 609.605, this subdivision sets forth the exclusive criteria to notify a permit holder when otherwise lawful firearm possession is not allowed in a private establishment and sets forth the exclusive penalty for such activity.
(h) This subdivision does not apply to a security guard acting in the course and scope of employment. The owner or operator of a private establishment may require the display of official credentials issued by the company, which must be licensed by the Private Detective and Protective Agent Services Board, that employs the security guard and the guard's permit card prior to granting the guard entrance into the private establishment.
Sec. 20. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 624.7142, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Penalties. (a) A person who violates a prohibition under subdivision 1, clauses (1) to (5), is guilty of a misdemeanor. A second or subsequent violation is a gross misdemeanor.
(b) A person who violates subdivision 1, clause (6), is guilty of a misdemeanor.
(c) In addition to the penalty imposed under paragraph (a), if a person violates subdivision 1, clauses (1) to (5), the person's authority to carry a pistol in a public place on or about the person's clothes or person under the provisions of a permit or otherwise is revoked and the person may not reapply for a period of one year from the date of conviction.
(d) In addition to the penalty imposed under paragraph (b), if a person violates subdivision 1, clause (6), the person's authority to carry a pistol in a public place on or about the person's clothes or person under the provisions of a permit or otherwise is suspended for 180 days from the date of conviction.
(e) Notwithstanding section 609.531 609.112,
a firearm carried in violation of subdivision 1, clause (6), is not subject to
forfeiture.
Sec. 21. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 629.715, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Surrender
of firearms. The judge may order as
a condition of release that the person surrender to the local law enforcement
agency all firearms, destructive devices, or dangerous weapons owned or
possessed by the person, and may not live in a residence where others possess
firearms. Any firearm, destructive
device, or dangerous weapon surrendered under this subdivision shall be
inventoried and retained, with due care to preserve its quality and function,
by the local law enforcement agency, and must be returned to the person upon
the person's acquittal, when charges are dismissed, or if no charges are filed. If the person is convicted, the firearm must
be returned when the court orders the return or when the person is discharged
from probation and restored to civil rights.
If the person is convicted of a designated an offense as
defined in section 609.531, under which the firearm is subject to
forfeiture, it is subject to forfeiture as provided under that
section 609.112. This condition
may be imposed in addition to any other condition authorized by rule 6.02 of
the Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Sec. 22. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections
169A.63; 609.531, subdivisions 1, 1a, 4, 5, 5a, 6a, 7, and 8; 609.5311;
609.5312; 609.5313; 609.5314; 609.5315; 609.5316; 609.5317; 609.5318; 609.5319;
609.762, subdivisions 3, 4, 5, and 6; and 609.905, subdivision 3, are repealed.
Sec. 23. EFFECTIVE
DATE.
This article is effective July 1, 2019.
ARTICLE 20
CIVIL POLICY
Section 1.
[3.8844] LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION ON INTELLIGENCE AND TECHNOLOGY.
Subdivision 1. Established. The Legislative Commission on
Intelligence and Technology is created to study and make recommendations on
issues relating to the effect of emerging technology on privacy. The commission has investigatory and
oversight jurisdiction over government surveillance programs and technology,
including subpoena power.
Subd. 2. Membership. The commission consists of four
members of the senate, two appointed by the majority leader and two appointed by
the minority leader, and four members of the house of representatives, two
appointed by the speaker of the house and two appointed by the minority leader. Each appointing authority must make
appointments as soon as possible after the beginning of the regular legislative
session in an odd-numbered year. Each
member of the commission must take an oath, swearing to faithfully discharge
the duties of members of the commission in compliance with the laws governing
the commission.
Subd. 3. Terms;
vacancies. Commission member
terms begin upon appointment and end at the beginning of the regular
legislative session in the next odd-numbered year. In the case of a vacancy, the appropriate
appointing authority must fill the vacancy for the remainder of the unexpired
term.
Subd. 4. Officers. The commission must elect a chair and
vice-chair and may elect other officers as the commission determines is
necessary. The chair alternates between
a member of the senate and a member of the house of representatives in January
of each odd-numbered year.
Subd. 5. Staff. Legislative staff must provide
administrative and research assistance to the commission.
Subd. 6. Meetings;
data. Notwithstanding any
other laws or legislative rules to the contrary, the commission may determine
that a meeting shall not be open to the public.
Notwithstanding any contrary provision of chapter 13 or other law, the
commission may require a law enforcement official to disclose not public data
to the commission, as the commission determines is necessary for performance of
the commission's duties. If data
provided to the commission is disseminated by the commission or its members or
agents in violation of section 13.05, subdivision 4, the commission is subject
to liability under section 13.08, subdivisions 1 and 3. Disclosure of not public data by a member of
the commission is grounds for an ethics complaint to the committee with
jurisdiction over ethics in the chamber in which the member serves.
Subd. 7. Subpoena
power. The chair or vice-chair
or a member of the commission designated by the chair may issue subpoenas
requiring the appearance of persons, producing relevant records, and giving
relevant testimony on matters within the jurisdiction of the commission. The person issuing the subpoena may request
the issuance of an attachment to compel the attendance of a witness who, having
been duly subpoenaed to attend, fails to do so.
Section 3.153 applies to issuance of subpoenas under this section,
except as otherwise provided in this section.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective the day following final enactment.
Appointing authorities must make initial appointments by June 1, 2019. The speaker of the house must designate one
member of the commission to convene the first meeting of the commission by June
15, 2019.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 13.599, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 5. State
Arts Board. Notwithstanding
subdivision 3, responses submitted by a grantee to the State Arts Board or to a
regional arts council under chapter 129D become public data at the public
review meeting at which they are considered, except for trade secret data as
defined and classified in section 13.37.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 257.56, is amended to read:
257.56
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION ASSISTED REPRODUCTION.
Subdivision 1. Husband
Spouse treated as biological father parent. If, under the supervision of a licensed
physician and with the consent of her husband spouse, a wife
is inseminated artificially woman conceives through assisted
reproduction with semen or ova or both, donated by a man not her
husband donor or donors not her spouse, the husband spouse
is treated in law as if he were the biological father the parent
of a child thereby conceived. The husband's
spouse's consent must be in writing and signed by him and his wife
the spouse and the woman conceiving through assisted reproduction. The consent must be retained by the physician
for at least four years after the confirmation of a pregnancy that occurs
during the process of artificial insemination assisted reproduction.
All papers and records pertaining to the insemination
assisted reproduction, whether part of the permanent record of a court
or of a file held by the supervising physician or elsewhere, are subject to
inspection only upon an order of the court for good cause shown.
Subd. 2. Donor
not treated as biological father parent. The donor of semen or ova provided
to a licensed physician for use in artificial insemination of assisted
reproduction by a married woman other than the donor's wife spouse
is treated in law as if he were the donor is not the biological
father parent of a child thereby conceived, unless a court finds
satisfactory evidence that the donor and the woman intended for the donor to be
a parent.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 363A.03, subdivision 43, is amended to read:
Subd. 43. Sexual harassment. (a) "Sexual harassment" includes unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, sexually motivated physical contact or other verbal or physical conduct or communication of a sexual nature when:
(1) submission to that conduct or communication is made a term or condition, either explicitly or implicitly, of obtaining employment, public accommodations or public services, education, or housing;
(2) submission to or rejection of that conduct or communication by an individual is used as a factor in decisions affecting that individual's employment, public accommodations or public services, education, or housing; or
(3) that conduct or communication has the purpose or effect of substantially interfering with an individual's employment, public accommodations or public services, education, or housing, or creating an intimidating, hostile, or materially offensive employment, public accommodations, public services, educational, or housing environment.
(b) Paragraph (a), clause (3), does not
require the harassing conduct or communication to be severe or pervasive. Conduct or communication has the purpose or
effect of creating an intimidating, hostile, or materially offensive
environment when:
(1) a reasonable person in similar
circumstances to the plaintiff would find the environment intimidating,
hostile, or materially offensive; and
(2) the plaintiff found the environment
intimidating, hostile, or materially offensive.
The intimidating, hostile, or materially offensive
environment must be determined based on the totality of the circumstances.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2019, and applies to causes of action arising on or after
that date.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 363A.35, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Access to closed files. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this subdivision, human rights investigative data contained in a closed case file are private data on individuals or nonpublic data. The name and address of the charging party and respondent, factual basis of the allegations, the statute under which the action is brought, the part of the summary of the investigation that does not contain identifying data on a person other than the complainant or respondent, and the commissioner's memorandum determining whether probable cause has been shown are public data.
(b) The commissioner may make human rights investigative data contained in a closed case file inaccessible to the charging party or the respondent in order to protect medical or other security interests of the parties or third persons.
(c) Except for paragraph (b), when the
charging party files a case in district court, the commissioner may provide
private data or nonpublic data in a closed case file to the charging party and
respondent.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 363A.36, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Scope
of application. (a) For all
contracts for goods and services in excess of $100,000, no department or agency
of the state shall accept any bid or proposal for a contract or agreement from
any business having more than 40 full-time employees within this state on a
single working day during the previous 12 months, unless the commissioner is in
receipt of the business' affirmative action plan for the employment of minority
persons, women, and qualified disabled individuals. No department or agency of the state shall
execute any such contract or agreement until the affirmative action plan has
been approved by the commissioner. Receipt
of a certificate of compliance issued by the commissioner shall signify that a
firm or business has an affirmative action plan that has been approved by the
commissioner. A certificate shall be
valid for a period of four years. A
department, an agency of the state, the Metropolitan Council, an agency subject
to section 473.143, subdivision 1, or a public officer or agency subject to
section 16A.695 shall not execute a contract for goods or services in excess of
$100,000 with a business that has 40 or more full-time employees in this state
or a state where the business has its primary place of business on a single day
during the prior 12 months, unless the business has a workforce certificate, as
created in sections 363A.36 and 363A.37, from the commissioner of human rights
or has certified in writing that it is exempt.
Determinations of exempt status shall be made by the commissioner of
human rights. A certificate is valid for
four years. A municipality as
defined in section 466.01, subdivision 1, that receives state money for any
reason is encouraged to prepare and implement an affirmative action plan for
the employment of minority persons, people with disabilities, people
of color, and women, and the qualified disabled and to submit
the plan to the commissioner.
(b) This paragraph applies to a contract
for goods or services in excess of $100,000 to be entered into between a
department or agency of the state and a business that is not subject to
paragraph (a), but that has more than 40 full‑time employees on a
single working day during the previous 12 months in the state where the
business has its primary place of business.
A department or agency of the state may not execute a contract or
agreement with a business covered by this paragraph unless the business has a certificate
of compliance issued by the commissioner under paragraph (a) or the business
certifies that it is in compliance with federal affirmative action
requirements.
(c) (b) This section does not
apply to contracts entered into by the State Board of Investment for investment
options under section 356.645.
(d) (c) The commissioner
shall issue a certificate of compliance or notice of denial within 15 days of
the application submitted by the business or firm.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 363A.36, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Revocation of contract. A contract awarded by a department or agency of the state, the Metropolitan Council, an agency subject to section 473.143, subdivision 1, or a public officer or agency subject to section 16A.695, may be terminated or abridged by the department or agency, the Metropolitan Council, an agency subject to section 473.143, subdivision 1, or a public officer or agency subject to section 16A.695, because of suspension or revocation of a certificate based upon a contractor's failure to implement or make a good faith effort to implement an affirmative action plan approved by the commissioner under this section. If a contract is awarded to a person who does not have a contract compliance certificate required under subdivision 1, the commissioner may void the contract on behalf of the state.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 363A.36, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 6. Access
to data. Data created,
collected, and maintained by the commissioner for a business to receive and
retain a certificate of compliance under this section is private data or
nonpublic data. Applications, forms, or
similar documents submitted by a business seeking a certificate of compliance
is public data. A letter that states the
commissioner's decision to issue, not issue, revoke, or suspend a certificate
of compliance is public data.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 363A.44, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Scope. (a) No A department, an
agency of the state, the Metropolitan Council, or an agency subject to
section 473.143, subdivision 1, or a public officer or agency subject to
section 16A.695 shall not execute a contract for goods or services
or an agreement for goods or services in excess of $500,000 with a business
that has 40 or more full-time employees in this state or a state where the
business has its primary place of business on a single day during the prior 12
months, unless the business has an equal pay certificate or it has certified in
writing that it is exempt. A certificate
is valid for four years.
(b) This section does not apply to a business with respect to a specific contract if the commissioner of administration determines that application of this section would cause undue hardship to the contracting entity. This section does not apply to a contract to provide goods and services to individuals under chapters 43A, 62A, 62C, 62D, 62E, 256B, 256I, 256L, and 268A, with a business that has a license, certification, registration, provider agreement, or provider enrollment contract that is prerequisite to providing those goods and services. This section does not apply to contracts entered into by the State Board of Investment for investment options under section 352.965, subdivision 4.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 517.02, is amended to read:
517.02
PERSONS CAPABLE OF CONTRACTING.
Every A person who has
attained the full age of 18 years is capable in law of contracting into a civil
marriage, if otherwise competent. A
person of the full age of 16 years may, with the consent of the person's legal
custodial parents, guardian, or the court, as provided in section 517.08,
receive a license to marry, when, after a careful inquiry into the facts and
the surrounding circumstances, the person's application for a license and
consent for civil marriage of a minor form is approved by the judge of the
district court of the county in which the person resides. If the judge of the district court of the
county in which the person resides is absent from the county and has not by
order assigned another judge or a retired judge to act in the judge's stead,
then the court commissioner or any judge of district court of the county may
approve the application for a license.
The consent for civil marriage of a
minor must be in the following form:
STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY OF
.................... (insert county name)
I/We
........................... (insert legal custodial parent or guardian names)
under oath or affirmation say:
That I/we are the legal custodial
parent(s) or guardian of ........................... (insert name of minor),
who was born at ........................... (insert place of birth) on
........................... (insert date of birth) who is presently the age of
....... (insert age).
That the minor has not been previously
married.
That I/we consent to the civil marriage
of this minor to ........................... (insert name of the person minor
intends to marry) who is of the age of ....... (insert age).
That affidavit is being made for the
purpose of requesting the judge's consent to allow this minor to marry and make
this civil marriage legal.
Date:
.............................
.....................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................
(Signature of legal custodial parents
or guardian)
Sworn to or affirmed and acknowledged
before me on this ....... day of .................... .
..........................................
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY OF
.................... (insert county name).
The undersigned is the judge of the
district court where the minor resides and grants the request for the minor to
marry.
................................ (judge
of district court)
................................ (date).
EFFECTIVE
DATE; APPLICATION. This
section is effective August 1, 2019, and applies to marriages entered into on
or after that date.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 517.03, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. General. (a) The following civil marriages are prohibited:
(1) a civil marriage entered into before the dissolution of an earlier civil marriage of one of the parties becomes final, as provided in section 518.145 or by the law of the jurisdiction where the dissolution was granted;
(2) a civil marriage between an ancestor
and a descendant, or between siblings, whether the relationship is by the half
or the whole blood or by adoption; and
(3)
a civil marriage between an uncle or aunt and a niece or nephew, or between
first cousins, whether the relationship is by the half or the whole blood,
except as to civil marriages permitted by the established customs of aboriginal
cultures.; and
(4) a civil marriage entered into
between persons when both have not attained the full age of 18 years.
(b) A civil marriage prohibited under
paragraph (a), clause (4), that is recognized by another state or foreign
jurisdiction under common law or statute is void and against the public policy
of this state unless neither party was a resident of this state at the time the
marriage was entered into.
EFFECTIVE
DATE; APPLICATION. This
section is effective August 1, 2019, and applies to marriages entered into on
or after that date.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 517.08, subdivision 1a, is amended to read:
Subd. 1a. Form. Application for a civil marriage license shall be made by both of the parties upon a form provided for the purpose and shall contain the following information:
(1) the full names of the parties and the sex of each party;
(2) their post office addresses and county and state of residence;
(3) their full ages;
(4) if either party has previously been married, the party's married name, and the date, place and court in which the civil marriage was dissolved or annulled or the date and place of death of the former spouse;
(5) if either party is a minor, the
name and address of the minor's parents or guardian;
(6) (5) whether the parties
are related to each other, and, if so, their relationship;
(7) (6) the address of the
parties after the civil marriage is entered into to which the local registrar
shall send a certified copy of the civil marriage certificate;
(8) (7) the full names the
parties will have after the civil marriage is entered into and the parties'
Social Security numbers. The Social
Security numbers must be collected for the application but must not appear on
the civil marriage license. If a party
listed on a civil marriage application does not have a Social Security number,
the party must certify on the application, or a supplement to the application,
that the party does not have a Social Security number;
(9) (8) if one or both of
the parties to the civil marriage license has a felony conviction under
Minnesota law or the law of another state or federal jurisdiction, the parties
shall provide to the county proof of service upon the prosecuting authority
and, if applicable, the attorney general, as required by section 259.13; and
(10) (9) notice that a party
who has a felony conviction under Minnesota law or the law of another state or
federal jurisdiction may not use a different name after a civil marriage except
as authorized by section 259.13, and that doing so is a gross misdemeanor.
EFFECTIVE
DATE; APPLICATION. This
section is effective August 1, 2019, and applies to applications submitted to
the local registrar on or after that date.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 517.08, subdivision 1b, is amended to read:
Subd. 1b. Term of license; fee; premarital education. (a) The local registrar shall examine upon oath the parties applying for a license relative to the legality of the contemplated civil marriage. Both parties must present proof of age to the local registrar. If one party is unable to appear in person, the party appearing may complete the absent applicant's information. The local registrar shall provide a copy of the civil marriage application to the party who is unable to appear, who must verify the accuracy of the appearing party's information in a notarized statement. The verification statement must be accompanied by a copy of proof of age of the party. The civil marriage license must not be released until the verification statement and proof of age has been received by the local registrar. If the local registrar is satisfied that there is no legal impediment to it, including the restriction contained in section 259.13, the local registrar shall issue the license, containing the full names of the parties before and after the civil marriage, and county and state of residence, with the county seal attached, and make a record of the date of issuance. The license shall be valid for a period of six months. Except as provided in paragraph (b), the local registrar shall collect from the applicant a fee of $115 for administering the oath, issuing, recording, and filing all papers required, and preparing and transmitting to the state registrar of vital records the reports of civil marriage required by this section. If the license should not be used within the period of six months due to illness or other extenuating circumstances, it may be surrendered to the local registrar for cancellation, and in that case a new license shall issue upon request of the parties of the original license without fee. A local registrar who knowingly issues or signs a civil marriage license in any manner other than as provided in this section shall pay to the parties aggrieved an amount not to exceed $1,000.
(b) The civil marriage license fee for parties who have completed at least 12 hours of premarital education is $40. In order to qualify for the reduced license fee, the parties must submit at the time of applying for the civil marriage license a statement that is signed, dated, and notarized or marked with a church seal from the person who provided the premarital education on their letterhead confirming that it was received. The premarital education must be provided by a licensed or ordained minister or the minister's designee, a person authorized to solemnize civil marriages under section 517.18, or a person authorized to practice marriage and family therapy under section 148B.33. The education must include the use of a premarital inventory and the teaching of communication and conflict management skills.
(c) The statement from the person who provided the premarital education under paragraph (b) must be in the following form:
"I, .......................... (name of educator), confirm that .......................... (names of both parties) received at least 12 hours of premarital education that included the use of a premarital inventory and the teaching of communication and conflict management skills. I am a licensed or ordained minister, a person authorized to solemnize civil marriages under Minnesota Statutes, section 517.18, or a person licensed to practice marriage and family therapy under Minnesota Statutes, section 148B.33."
The names of the parties in the educator's statement must be identical to the legal names of the parties as they appear in the civil marriage license application. Notwithstanding section 138.17, the educator's statement must be retained for seven years, after which time it may be destroyed.
(d) If section 259.13 applies to the request for a civil marriage license, the local registrar shall grant the civil marriage license without the requested name change. Alternatively, the local registrar may delay the granting of the civil marriage license until the party with the conviction:
(1) certifies under oath that 30 days have
passed since service of the notice for a name change upon the prosecuting authority and, if applicable, the
attorney general and no objection has been filed under section 259.13; or
(2) provides a certified copy of the court order granting it. The parties seeking the civil marriage license shall have the right to choose to have the license granted without the name change or to delay its granting pending further action on the name change request.
EFFECTIVE
DATE; APPLICATION. This
section is effective August 1, 2019, and applies to applications submitted to
the local registrar on or after that date.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 517.08, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 1d. Proof
of age. For purposes of this
section, proof of age of a party may be established in the form of:
(1) an original or certified copy of a
birth certificate or birth record;
(2) a driver's license or other
identification card issued by a government entity or school; or
(3) a school record, immigration record,
naturalization record, court record, or other document or record issued by a
government entity that contains the date of birth of a party.
ARTICLE 21
COOPERATIVE PRIVATE DIVORCE PROGRAM
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 62A.21, subdivision 2a, is amended to read:
Subd. 2a. Continuation privilege. Every policy described in subdivision 1 shall contain a provision which permits continuation of coverage under the policy for the insured's dependent children, which is defined as required by section 62A.302, and former spouse, who was covered on the day before the entry of a valid decree of dissolution of marriage or a certificate of marital dissolution. The coverage shall be continued until the earlier of the following dates:
(a) (1) the date the
insured's former spouse becomes covered under any other group health plan; or
(b) (2) the date coverage
would otherwise terminate under the policy.
If the coverage is provided under a group policy, any required premium contributions for the coverage shall be paid by the insured on a monthly basis to the group policyholder for remittance to the insurer. The policy must require the group policyholder to, upon request, provide the insured with written verification from the insurer of the cost of this coverage promptly at the time of eligibility for this coverage and at any time during the continuation period. In no event shall the amount of premium charged exceed 102 percent of the cost to the plan for such period of coverage for other similarly situated spouses and dependent children with respect to whom the marital relationship has not dissolved, without regard to whether such cost is paid by the employer or employee.
Upon request by the insured's former spouse, who was covered on the day before the entry of a valid decree of dissolution, or dependent child, a health carrier must provide the instructions necessary to enable the child or former spouse to elect continuation of coverage.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 518.191, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 6. Summary
real estate disposition judgment following certificate of marital dissolution. A summary real estate disposition
judgment may also be obtained after a certificate of marital dissolution is
issued in accordance with section 518.80, subdivision 5. Upon the filing of the certificate the
district court administrator may provide to a participant upon request
certified copies of a summary real estate disposition judgment submitted by the
participants that contains the following information:
(1)
the dates of the participants' marriage and of the issuance of the certificate
of marital dissolution;
(2) the legal description of each
parcel of real estate;
(3) the name or names of the persons
awarded an interest in each parcel of real estate and a description of the
interest awarded;
(4)
liens, mortgages, encumbrances, or other interests in the real estate described
in the declaration of divorce; and
(5) triggering or contingent events set
forth in the declaration of divorce affecting the disposition of each parcel of
real estate.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 518.195, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 5. Issuance
of qualified domestic relations order following certificate of marital
dissolution. A certificate of
marital dissolution issued in accordance with section 518.80, subdivision 5,
may be filed with the district court administrator. Upon the filing of the certificate, the
district court administrator may enter a decree of dissolution and may issue a
qualified domestic relations order submitted by the participants and approved
by the retirement plan administrator for the assignment of an interest in a
retirement plan as provided in the declaration of divorce.
Sec. 4. [518.80]
COOPERATIVE PRIVATE DIVORCE PROGRAM.
Subdivision 1. Commissioner. For purposes of this section,
"commissioner" means the commissioner of the Bureau of Mediation
Services.
Subd. 2. Establishment. The commissioner shall establish a cooperative private divorce program as provided in this section.
Subd. 3. Requirements. The cooperative private divorce
program must, at a minimum:
(1) be made available on the Bureau of
Mediation Services website;
(2) make available to the participants
of the program the notices and instructions provided under subdivisions 9 and
10 and section 518.82;
(3) allow participants of the program
to electronically complete and submit to the commissioner an intent to divorce
and a declaration of divorce as provided under subdivision 11;
(4) require a separate unique login and
password for each participant to access the program;
(5) provide a notification system that
automatically contacts one participant when the other participant accesses the
program;
(6) provide a list of supportive
services and service providers that may be helpful to participants;
(7) provide a method to authenticate
the identities of the signatories of the forms required under subdivision 11;
(8) employ security measures to protect
the confidentiality and personal information of the participants submitting
information through the program; and
(9)
encrypt all data sent and received through the program website.
Subd. 4. Residency
requirement. Married
participants seeking dissolution under this section qualify for the cooperative
private divorce program if the residency requirements under section 518.07 have
been met by the participants.
Subd. 5. Procedure. (a) Notwithstanding any law to the
contrary, married participants who meet the criteria under subdivision 4 may
dissolve their marital status through the cooperative private divorce program
made available on the Bureau of Mediation Services website by:
(1) signing and submitting the intent
to divorce under subdivision 11; and
(2) completing, signing, and submitting
the declaration of divorce under subdivision 11 at least 90 days after but not
more than two years after the intent to divorce was submitted by both
participants.
(b) Upon receipt of the completed
declaration of divorce, the commissioner shall issue a certificate of marital
dissolution that includes the following information:
(1) the name and any prior names of the
two participants to the cooperative private divorce dissolution;
(2) the name of any living minor or
dependent children of the participants;
(3) that the marriage of the participants is dissolved and the date of the dissolution; and
(4) the Social Security numbers of the
participants and any living minor or dependent children of the participants.
(c) A certificate of marital dissolution
issued under this section completely dissolves the marital status of the
participants.
(d) Upon receipt of a declaration of divorce, the commissioner shall issue a certificate of marital dissolution that is accessible to each participant through the online cooperative private divorce program. The certificate of marital dissolution is conclusive evidence of the divorce.
(e) The commissioner shall maintain a
public registry containing the following:
(1) the name and any prior names of any
participant of the cooperative private divorce program;
(2) the name of any living minor or
dependent children of a participant; and
(3) that the marriage of the
participants is dissolved and the date of the dissolution.
(f) Before the commissioner issues a
certificate of marital dissolution to married participants who are parents of
minor children, the married participants must attend a four-hour parent
education program as required under section 518.81.
Subd. 6. Certain
agreements. (a) Any agreement
made by the participants as part of the declaration of divorce that allocates
expenses for their child or children is an enforceable contract between the
participants under section 518.1705.
(b)
It is the intent of this paragraph that agreements recorded in a declaration of
divorce shall be deemed to be a decree of divorce wherever a decree of divorce
is referred to in the Internal Revenue Code, and agreements between the
participants in a declaration of divorce regarding alimony or maintenance shall
be deemed to be a divorce or separation agreement for purposes of deductibility
under the Internal Revenue Code.
(c) Any issue that is not specifically addressed by the
participants in the declaration of divorce agreement is considered to be
reserved for future agreement by the participants or de novo review by the
court.
Subd. 7.
Modification. Any agreement made by the participants
in their declaration of divorce may be modified at any time after a declaration
of divorce agreement is submitted to the commissioner through the cooperative private divorce program, but prior to
the parties modifying or vacating an agreement under subdivision 8, if
both participants agree to the amendment and submit an amended declaration of
divorce.
Subd. 8.
Court involvement. (a) At any time prior to the
submission of a declaration of divorce, participants in a cooperative private
divorce may initiate an action for marriage dissolution under this chapter in
district court. Any action under this
chapter pending in district court must be resolved or dismissed before
participants may submit a declaration of divorce.
(b) Cooperative private divorce agreements contained in
a declaration of divorce may be enforced, modified, or vacated by the district
court, or the court may address issues that were reserved by the participants
according to the provisions of this chapter.
Review of a cooperative private divorce agreement under paragraph (e) in
district court are de novo and determined by existing statute.
(c) Upon the filing of a certificate of marital
dissolution by the participants, the court administrator shall enter a decree
of dissolution as provided in section 518.195 without necessity of court
approval or a judgment and decree and without regard to the criteria or procedures
in section 518.195, subdivisions 1 and 2.
(d) By executing a declaration of divorce with the
Bureau of Mediation Services that may be filed with the court, each participant
consents to the continuing personal jurisdiction of the Minnesota courts as to
all matters related to the declaration of divorce.
(e) A participant in a cooperative private divorce may
by petition initiate an action in district court to:
(1) enforce, modify, or vacate the declaration of
divorce;
(2) petition the court to address any issue reserved by
the participants;
(3) obtain a summary real estate disposition judgment;
(4) obtain a qualified domestic relations order; or
(5) obtain a court decree of dissolution when necessary
to comply with state or federal law involving interstate enforcement of the
participants' divorce.
A
participant initiating an action under this paragraph must, by personal
service, provide to the other participant notice of filing the certificate of
marital dissolution with the district court together with any motion for relief. Any subsequent court action related to the
certificate of marital dissolution may be initiated by notice of motion and
motion. An action initiated under this
paragraph shall be venued in a county located in this state where either
participant was residing at the time the certificate of marital dissolution was
issued by the Bureau of Mediation Services.
Matters reviewed by the court under this section are reviewed by the
court de novo and governed by this chapter, chapter 518A, and other applicable
laws. The filing fee for any action
under this paragraph is $315. For a
motion
to vacate the declaration of divorce under section 518.145, the one-year period
of limitation begins on the date of the participants' dissolution, which is the
date of the certificate of marital dissolution in subdivision 5, paragraph (d).
Subd. 9. Notices;
introduction to private divorce; form.
The commissioner shall make available the following form for use
in the cooperative private divorce program:
NOTICE:
Introduction to Cooperative Private Divorce
You are considering obtaining a
Cooperative Private Divorce rather than going to court to get divorced. Cooperative Private Divorce is a simplified
procedure for couples who want to avoid the expense, emotional strain, and
arbitrary time frames that often accompany adversarial court proceedings. To obtain a Cooperative Private Divorce you
will need to reach an agreement with your spouse about the issues in your
divorce. Many public and private services
are available to help you.
The Cooperative Private Divorce process
is based on the assumption that most people have the capacity to divorce with
respect and fairness if they are supported in that direction. To that end, a Cooperative Private Divorce differs
in two important ways from a court divorce.
First, the two of you have total control over your divorce and no one
will oversee or scrutinize the decisions you make. Second, it is a completely private process.
This leaves you with a great deal of flexibility. After you have educated yourself, you can
choose how detailed or simple to make your divorce decisions, and whether to
postpone some decisions to a later time.
You can also create your own understanding of fairness unique to your
own situation.
These special features of a Cooperative
Private Divorce, eliminating the anxiety of someone else having control over
your family, and lessening the pressure to resolve everything all at once
during a very stressful time are intended to replace conflict with your spouse
by creating a healthy transition for you and your family. You are encouraged to view each other as
partners in creating the best solution for you and your family in parenting and
financial matters.
Basic Principles
Cooperative Private Divorce is not for
everyone. Because of the need to create
a fair and healthy plan without coercion or oversight, it is intended for
couples who can work together in good faith for the best interests of everyone
in the family.
Here are the six principles underlying
Cooperative Private Divorce. If you and
your spouse believe you can fashion your
divorce according to these principles, then a Cooperative Private Divorce may
be the best procedure for you.
1. The preventing unnecessary divorce
principle: You have reached a decision
to initiate a divorce only after exhausting other options to solve your
problems within your marriage, particularly if you have children.
2. The healthy relationships principle: If you have children, your parenting plan
promotes safe, nurturing, and stable relationships among the children and with
both of their parents.
3. The maximum parent involvement
principle: Your parenting plan promotes
high levels of involvement of both parents with the children when that is
feasible and consistent with the needs of the children.
4. The equity principle: Your financial plan promotes equitable and
sustainable lifestyles for all family members in light of the unique
circumstances of your marriage and family.
5.
The flexibility principle: Your divorce
agreements take into account both the value of having stable arrangements and
the likelihood that the needs and circumstances of your family will change over
time.
6. The optimal timing principle: You create partial or comprehensive agreements
with the timing and sequence that work best for you and your family.
Two Cautions
First, if you feel pressured or
intimidated by your spouse to use this process or to agree to specific matters
in your divorce, or if you have doubts generally about your spouse's
willingness to reach agreements that are best for everyone in your family,
consider getting professional assistance before going further.
Second, the flexibility of a Cooperative
Private Divorce also leaves you with an important responsibility. Some couples have relatively simple issues to
address in their divorce. But some
couples have more complex financial and parenting matters to resolve. Financial matters are often more complex if
you are self-employed or a business owner.
If you do not consider such matters carefully, you may face problems
such as having agreements that do not work over time or that are not
enforceable. You are responsible to
educate yourself about the issues in your divorce and to obtain professional
assistance if you need it.
Professional and Community Resources
To begin with, recognize that going ahead
with a divorce is a significant decision, especially if you have children. Many research studies have shown that divorce
can have an adverse effect on children. If
you want help to make sure you are making the right decision for you and your
family, you can make use of services available in local communities.
If you have made the decision to go ahead
with the divorce, you may choose to work with an advocate or with a facilitator
who can guide you and your spouse in cooperative processes that focus on your
interests and needs and what will work for your family. You may want to consult with an adviser on
parenting or financial issues. From
private sources you can obtain sample agreements that may help you frame all of
the issues you will likely encounter. Although
divorce can seem complex and difficult, these resources and professional
services can help make it easier for you and your spouse to reach an agreement.
The Bureau of Mediation Services serves
as a clearinghouse for information about the types of resources available. It can also provide information about
services that are offered for free or on a sliding fee.
Subd. 10. Instructions;
form. The commissioner shall
make available the following form for use in the cooperative private divorce
program:
Instructions for Cooperative Private
Divorce
1. Both spouses obtain unique identifiers from the Bureau
of Mediation Services.
2. Both spouses sign and submit the INTENT TO DIVORCE form
with their unique identifiers to register with the Bureau of Mediation
Services.
3. At any time at least 90 days after but not more than
two years after submitting the INTENT TO DIVORCE form, submit the Declaration
of Divorce form signed by both spouses.
4. Upon submitting the Declaration of Divorce form, both
spouses will receive a certification that your marriage is dissolved.
5.
Most complete divorce agreements address the issues set forth in the
Declaration of Divorce form. It is up to
you whether you want to record agreements in all or any of these areas. But recognize that if your agreements are
vague or incomplete or if you do not record your agreements, it may be
difficult for you to recall them, live up to your obligations, or later ask a
court to enforce an agreement. Use
attachments if you want to record agreements that are longer than space here
permits. No one will review or approve
the agreements you set forth here before your divorce is certified. They are for your use only.
6. At any time, either spouse can retrieve the Declaration
of Divorce form containing your agreements by providing your unique identifier. No one except you and your spouse will have
access to this form.
7. At any time, you and your former spouse can retrieve
the Declaration of Divorce form, make additions or modifications that you both
agree to, and resubmit it.
8. If you want to modify your previous agreements but you
and your former spouse cannot agree on the modifications, or if you want to
seek enforcement of a previous agreement, you are encouraged to seek assistance
from professionals in the community who specialize in helping former spouses
reach fair agreements. You also have the
option of going to court to submit your Declaration of Divorce form.
9. Remember that by creating a smooth family transition
now and working on issues that may arise in the future, developing a
trustworthy working relationship with your spouse will be just as helpful as
written agreements.
Subd. 11. Intent
to divorce; declaration of divorce; form.
The commissioner shall make available the following form for use
in the cooperative private divorce program:
Intent to Divorce
We hereby declare that we are legally married, have both been residents of Minnesota for at least 180 days, and intend to divorce. We understand that our divorce will be certified if we submit the Declaration of Divorce form signed by both spouses at least 90 days after but not more than two years after the date this INTENT TO DIVORCE form is submitted.
Date and place of marriage: |
…………………………….. |
|
Signature, date: |
…………………………….. |
|
E-mail address: |
…………………………….. |
|
Social Security number: |
…………………………….. |
|
Signature, date: |
…………………………….. |
|
E-mail address: |
…………………………….. |
|
Social Security number: |
…………………………….. |
|
Declaration of Divorce |
Facts |
1. We agree that the following is a list of
all our assets and their approximate value:
|
2. We agree that the following is a list of
all our debts: |
3. Spouse A name, previous name(s) if any, and
yearly income, including any bonuses: |
4. Spouse B name, previous name(s) if any, and
yearly income, including any bonuses: |
5. The names, dates of birth, and Social
Security numbers of our minor or dependent children covered by this agreement
are: |
Agreements
1. We agree to the following plan for parenting our child
or children together after the divorce. If
our plan is temporary, we agree to the following process for updating it. (A comprehensive plan would include: (a) how you will make important decisions
like those about school, health care, and religion; (b) how you will allocate
your time with the children during the school year, summer, holidays, and
vacations to provide a nurturing environment and rich relationships with both
of you; and (c) how you will communicate with each other and work out
differences of opinion.)
2. We agree to the following plan for sharing the expenses
of raising our child or children.
Guideline
Child Support
The guideline child support for our
child(ren) is $........ We agree that
............... will pay the guideline child support amount.
(The Minnesota Child Support guidelines
calculator can be accessed at ...............)
Attach the guidelines printout.
Non-Guideline
Child Support
We agree to deviate from the guideline
child support amount after considering the following factors that support
deviation (Make a check or "X" on all that apply):
|
.... |
each of our earnings, income, circumstances, and resources, including
our real and personal property, but excluding income from excess employment
of the obligor or obligee that meets the criteria of Minnesota Statutes,
section 518A.29, paragraph (b); |
|
.... |
the extraordinary financial needs and resources, physical and
emotional condition, and educational needs of our child(ren) to be supported;
|
|
.... |
the standard of living our child would enjoy if we were currently
living together, but recognizing that we now have separate households; |
|
.... |
whether our child resides for more than one year in a foreign country
that has a substantially higher or lower cost of living than this country; |
|
.... |
the income taxation dependency exemption and the financial benefit
that one of us receives from it; |
|
.... |
our agreed-upon plan for paying
off our debts under paragraph 4; |
|
.... |
the obligor's total payments for court-ordered child support exceed
the limitations set forth in Minnesota Statutes, section 571.922; |
|
.... |
an allocation of the expenses of our children that enables us to
maintain a suitable place for our children, taking into account our current
standard of living; |
|
.... |
the following factor: ............... |
Make a check or "X" on one of
the following:
|
.... |
Because of the factor(s) we have checked above, we agree that
............... will pay $....... in child support on the ............... of
each month; |
|
.... |
We will be sharing the following children's expenses: (list items) with ............... paying
... percent and ............... paying ... percent; or |
|
.... |
We agree that no child support will be exchanged between us, as we
are each paying the children's expenses directly. |
Make
a check or "X" on all that apply:
|
.... |
We agree to modify the amount of child support from time to time as
our circumstances may change. |
|
.... |
We agree to a biennial adjustment in the amount of child support to
be paid based on cost-of-living changes using a cost-of-living index
published by the Department of Labor.
|
(If either parent is receiving public
assistance, the county attorney must approve this agreement or it is not
enforceable. The county attorney may ask
the court to modify any child support agreement you make if a minor or
dependent child receives or begins to receive public assistance.)
Caution
If your former spouse does not pay you
the child support agreed upon in the declaration of divorce, you should act
promptly to address the matter because if you decide to go to court, the court
may not order the payment of arrears.
3. We agree to the following plan for providing health
insurance for our children.
4. We agree to the following plan for paying off our debts. (This agreement will not change your
obligations to any creditor. It is
simply an agreement between the two of you about who will be paying a debt.)
5. We agree to the following plan for dividing our
property and assets. (If an allocation
of assets or debts, or both, deviates from a nearly equal division, provide the
reasons for the allocation. Educate
yourself about the difference between marital and nonmarital property.)
a. Real estate (Include who will pay any
mortgages or agreements to refinance a mortgage, and make provisions for
recording necessary documents with the county recorder. This declaration of divorce does not transfer
an interest in real estate. To transfer
interest in real estate, you must prepare a quitclaim deed or a summary real
estate disposition judgment for the court administrator, either of which you would
need to file with the county recorder. It
is advisable to seek professional assistance about this process.)
b. Personal property, such as household
furnishings, vehicles, and other objects you own.
c. Financial assets, such as retirements,
investments, stock, bank accounts, and business interests. (This declaration of divorce has no effect on
the division of a retirement account or pension plan unless the account or plan
receives proper instructions. Many
retirement assets cannot be divided unless they receive a qualified domestic
relations order from a court. Often a
draft of such an order is approved by the pension plan administrator before it
is submitted to the court. It is
advisable to seek professional assistance about this process.)
6. We agree to the following schedule of payments for
spousal support (alimony) which ends upon the death of either of us or the
remarriage of the payee spouse. (If
there is a large difference in your incomes and you agree to a minimal amount
or no amount of spousal support, provide the reasons for the spousal support
agreement. For purposes of federal tax
deductibility, this agreement is deemed to be a divorce or separation
instrument. Be aware that, upon motion,
a court has the authority to modify the amount of spousal support you agree on
here at any time during the time period in which spousal support is being
paid.)
7.
We agree to the following plan to maintain health insurance coverage for both
spouses. (If one spouse is interested in
continuing health insurance coverage under the other spouse's employer-provided
policy, certain laws apply, including a requirement that an election must be
made and submitted to the other spouse's employer and health insurance carrier
within 60 days of your divorce.)
8. We agree to the following plan for paying any past
joint tax liability or future tax liability, or both, and we agree to the
following plan for who will claim the child or dependency exemptions or credits
for our child or children.
9. We have reached the following additional agreements
which we wish to record.
(You may not use the cooperative private divorce program
to legally change a name. A name can be
changed only by a court.)
Dissolution
We hereby agree to the dissolution of our
marriage according to the preceding terms.
We hereby warrant that we have made complete disclosure to each other of
all information and documents that are important to these agreements, and that
the list of assets and debts contained in paragraph (1) are complete and accurate
and there are no open court cases involving these issues.
Signature, date: |
…………………………………………… |
Signature, date: |
…………………………………………… |
Subd. 12. Fee. The commissioner shall charge the
participants of the cooperative private divorce program a fee of $1,062. Collected fees must be deposited in the
cooperative divorce account established under subdivision 13. The commissioner may reduce the fee to ensure
that revenue more closely matches the expenses of the program.
Subd. 13. Cooperative
divorce account. The
cooperative divorce account is established as a separate account in the special
revenue fund in the state treasury. Money
in the account is appropriated to the commissioner to administer and manage the
online program under this section.
Subd. 14. Data. Data collected under this section is classified as private data on individuals as defined in section 13.02, subdivision 12.
Subd. 15. Notice;
translations. Notices
provided in this section and section 518.82 must be provided in languages that
participants can understand and versions of the notices must be available
online in languages commonly spoken in Minnesota.
Sec. 5. [518.81]
PARENT EDUCATION; COOPERATIVE PRIVATE DIVORCE.
Subdivision 1. Parent
education requirements. Married
participants who are parents of minor children shall attend a four-hour parent
education program prior to receiving a certificate of marital dissolution under
section 518.80, subdivision 5. The
parent education program must provide information on:
(1) constructive parenting in the
dissolution process, including risk factors for families, how marriage
dissolution affects children of different ages, and skills that parents can
learn to increase cooperation and minimize conflict, particularly conflict arising
when parents place children in the middle, creating conflicting loyalty. This component of the program must be aimed
at increasing a parent's sensitivity to a child's needs and at giving a parent
skills to improve the parent's and the child's adjustment to the dissolution of
the marriage. The primary emphasis of
the program must be on constructive parenting information, and its content must
be consistent with and promote the principles of cooperative private divorce as
described in section 518.80, subdivision 9;
(2)
assessing if a parent is perpetrating domestic violence against the other parent
and when cooperation in co‑parenting may not be desirable because of
safety risks, and providing information on local domestic violence resources;
(3) information on the option of
reconciliation, including research on reconciliation interests among couples
considering marriage dissolution, the potential benefits of avoiding marriage
dissolution, resources to assist with reconciliation for interested couples, and
information on when the risk of domestic violence should exclude consideration
of reconciliation; and
(4) an overview of the legal process of
marital dissolution and the advantages and disadvantages of litigation and
alternative processes, including but not limited to mediation, collaborative
and cooperative law, and restorative circles.
Subd. 2. Program
requirements. A parent
education program under this section may be conducted in person or online.
Subd. 3. Confidentiality. Unless all parties agree in writing,
statements made by a party during participation in a parent education program
are inadmissible as evidence for any purpose, including impeachment. No record may be made regarding a party's
participation in a parent education program, except a record of completion of
the program as required under this section.
Instructors shall not disclose information regarding an individual
participant obtained as a result of participation in a parent education program. Parent education instructors may not be
subpoenaed or called as witnesses in court proceedings.
Subd. 4. Costs
and program providers. Each
parent education program must enable persons to have timely and reasonable
access to education sessions. A party
who qualifies for a waiver of filing fees under section 563.01 is exempt from
paying the parent education program fee.
Program providers shall implement a sliding fee scale.
Sec. 6. [518.82]
COOPERATIVE PRIVATE DIVORCE SCREENING; NOTICE; FORM.
The commissioner of the Bureau of
Mediation Services shall make available the following notice for use in the
cooperative private divorce program under section 518.80 before full access to
the program is granted to a user. The
data maintained by the coercion screening tool are private data on individuals,
as defined in section 13.02, subdivision 12, and shall not be tracked or
recorded by any means at any time.
COERCION
SCREENING TOOL
WHEN
NOT TO USE COOPERATIVE PRIVATE DIVORCE
Cooperative private divorce is not for everyone. It is probably not appropriate for you if any
of the following statements are true. Choices
you make in this section are private. No
record of any choice you make in this section will be recorded or tracked.
... |
You are feeling undue pressure
or intimidation from your spouse to use cooperative private divorce. |
... |
You have serious doubts about your spouse's willingness to reach
agreements that are best for everyone in the family. |
... |
Your spouse has made threats
of physical or emotional harm during discussions of divorce. |
... |
Your spouse has unilaterally ruled out involving any professionals
in your divorce process even though you want this kind of support. |
... |
Your spouse is telling you not
to discuss your divorce options with anyone. |
Information on resources can be provided upon request if
any of the above risks are occurring.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 518A.43, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. General factors. Among other reasons, deviation from the presumptive child support obligation computed under section 518A.34 is intended to encourage prompt and regular payments of child support and to prevent either parent or the joint children from living in poverty. In addition to the child support guidelines and other factors used to calculate the child support obligation under section 518A.34, the court must take into consideration the following factors in setting or modifying child support or in determining whether to deviate upward or downward from the presumptive child support obligation:
(1) all earnings, income, circumstances, and resources of each parent, including real and personal property, but excluding income from excess employment of the obligor or obligee that meets the criteria of section 518A.29, paragraph (b);
(2) the extraordinary financial needs and resources, physical and emotional condition, and educational needs of the child to be supported;
(3) the standard of living the child would enjoy if the parents were currently living together, but recognizing that the parents now have separate households;
(4) whether the child resides in a foreign country for more than one year that has a substantially higher or lower cost of living than this country;
(5) which parent receives the income taxation dependency exemption and the financial benefit the parent receives from it;
(6) the parents' debts as provided in
subdivision 2; and
(7) the obligor's total payments for
court-ordered child support exceed the limitations set forth in section 571.922.;
and
(8) an allocation of expenses of the
children in a parenting plan under section 518.1705, subdivision 8, or in a
declaration of dissolution under section 518.80, subdivision 6, paragraph (a),
that enables both parents to maintain a suitable place for their children,
taking into account their current standard of living.
Sec. 8. REPORT.
The commissioner of the Bureau of
Mediation Services shall conduct an evaluation of the cooperative private
divorce program after the first and second years of operation. The areas of evaluation shall include but not
be limited to:
(1) number of users of the cooperative
private divorce program, both initially and transferring to and from a court
divorce;
(2) costs of the cooperative private
divorce program to government and families in comparison to court divorces;
(3) user satisfaction with the cooperative private divorce program process and with their agreements; and
(4) any correlation between use of the
cooperative private divorce program system and subsequent use of court services
for the same case or related cases."
Delete the title and insert:
"A bill for an act relating to judiciary; modifying certain provisions relating to public safety; courts; corrections; law enforcement; sexual offenders; controlled substances; DWI; vehicle operations; pretrial release; offender sentencing, probation, and diversion; firefighters; statewide emergency communication; predatory offenders; and forfeiture; modifying ex-offender voting rights; enacting the Uniform Collateral Consequences of Conviction Act; raising the age of marriage to 18; establishing a cooperative private divorce program; requiring reports; providing for task forces; providing for studies; providing for criminal penalties; appropriating money for sentencing guidelines, public safety, courts, corrections, Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) Board, Private Detective Board, human services, health, civil legal services, human rights, Guardian Ad Litem Board, Uniform Laws Commission, Board on Judicial Standards, Board of Public Defense, Bureau of Mediation Services, and Legislative Coordinating Commission; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 13.599, by adding a subdivision; 13.6905, by adding a subdivision; 13.851, by adding a subdivision; 15A.0815, subdivision 3; 62A.21, subdivision 2a; 84.7741, subdivision 13; 84.91, subdivision 1; 86B.331, subdivision 1; 97A.221, subdivision 5; 97A.223, subdivision 6; 97A.225, subdivision 10; 144.121, subdivision 1a, by adding a subdivision; 151.37, subdivision 12; 152.021, subdivision 2a; 152.025, subdivisions 1, 2, 4; 152.0275; 152.18, subdivision 1; 152.21, subdivision 6; 152.32, subdivision 2; 169.92, subdivision 4; 169.99, subdivision 1c, by adding a subdivision; 169A.03, subdivision 18; 169A.37, subdivision 1; 169A.55, subdivision 2; 169A.60, subdivisions 4, 5, 8; 169A.63, by adding a subdivision; 171.07, subdivision 1a; 171.16, subdivisions 2, 3; 171.18, subdivision 1; 171.20, subdivision 4; 171.26, subdivision 1; 171.29, subdivision 1; 241.01, subdivision 3a; 241.025, subdivisions 1, 2; 241.75, subdivision 2; 242.192; 243.166, subdivisions 1a, 1b, 2, 4, 4a, 4b, 4c, 5, 6, 7, 7a, by adding a subdivision; 243.48, subdivision 1; 244.05, subdivisions 4, 5; 244.09, subdivisions 6, 8; 245C.22, by adding a subdivision; 245C.24, by adding a subdivision; 257.56; 260B.176, by adding a subdivision; 299A.12, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 299A.13; 299A.14, subdivision 3; 299A.55, subdivisions 2, 4; 299A.681, subdivision 11; 299A.706; 299A.707, by adding a subdivision; 299C.091, subdivision 5; 299C.093; 299C.46, subdivision 3; 299F.857; 299N.01, subdivisions 2, 3; 299N.02, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 299N.03, subdivisions 4, 5, 6, by adding a subdivision; 299N.04; 299N.05, subdivisions 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 9; 299N.06; 340A.22, subdivision 4; 340A.304; 340A.417; 357.021, subdivisions 1a, 2, 6, 7, by adding a subdivision; 363A.03, subdivision 43; 363A.35, subdivision 3; 363A.36, subdivisions 1, 4, by adding a subdivision; 363A.44, subdivision 1; 364.07; 403.02, by adding a subdivision; 403.03; 403.21, subdivision 7a; 403.36, subdivisions 1, 1b, 1c, 1d; 403.37, subdivision 12; 403.382, subdivisions 1, 8; 446A.083, subdivision 2; 480.15, by adding a subdivision; 484.85; 517.02; 517.03, subdivision 1; 517.08, subdivisions 1a, 1b, by adding a subdivision; 518.191, by adding a subdivision; 518.195, by adding a subdivision; 518A.43, subdivision 1; 590.01, subdivision 4; 590.11, subdivisions 1, 2, 5, 7; 609.101, subdivision 5; 609.106, subdivision 2, by adding a subdivision; 609.115, by adding a subdivision; 609.135, subdivisions 1a, 1c, 2, by adding a subdivision; 609.2112, subdivision 1; 609.2113, subdivisions 1, 2, 3; 609.341, subdivisions 10, 11, 12, by adding subdivisions; 609.342, subdivision 1; 609.343, subdivision 1; 609.344, subdivision 1; 609.345, subdivision 1; 609.3451, subdivision 1; 609.3455, subdivision 2; 609.582, subdivisions 3, 4; 609.66, subdivision 1d; 609.749, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 5, 8; 609.762, subdivision 2; 609.856, subdivision 2; 609.895, subdivision 5; 609.908, subdivision 3; 609A.02, by adding a subdivision; 609A.025; 609B.515; 611.32, subdivision 2; 611.365, subdivisions 2, 3; 611.367; 611.368; 611A.039, subdivision 1; 617.246, subdivisions 2, 3, 4, 7, by adding a subdivision; 617.247, subdivisions 3, 4, 9, by adding a subdivision; 624.712, subdivision 5; 624.713, subdivision 1; 624.7131; 624.7132; 624.714, subdivisions 1b, 7a, 17; 624.7142, subdivision 6; 626.556, subdivision 2; 626.841; 626.93, subdivisions 3, 4; 628.26; 629.53; 629.715, subdivision 2; 631.412; 634.20; 638.02, subdivision 3; 641.15, subdivision 3a; Laws 2009, chapter 59, article 3, section 4, subdivision 9, as amended; Laws 2017, chapter 95, article 1, section 11, subdivision 7; article 3, section 30; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 3; 13; 152; 171; 241; 243; 244; 260B; 299A; 340A; 518; 609; 611A; 624; 626; 638; 641; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 152.027, subdivisions 3, 4; 169A.63; 299A.12, subdivision 4; 299A.18; 401.13; 609.349; 609.531, subdivisions 1, 1a, 4, 5, 5a, 6a, 7, 8; 609.5311; 609.5312; 609.5313; 609.5314; 609.5315; 609.5316; 609.5317; 609.5318; 609.5319; 609.762, subdivisions 3, 4, 5, 6; 609.905, subdivision 3; 609B.050; 609B.100; 609B.101; 609B.102; 609B.103; 609B.104; 609B.105; 609B.106; 609B.107; 609B.108; 609B.109; 609B.110; 609B.111; 609B.112; 609B.113; 609B.120;
609B.121; 609B.122; 609B.123; 609B.124; 609B.125; 609B.126; 609B.127; 609B.128; 609B.129; 609B.130; 609B.132; 609B.133; 609B.134; 609B.135; 609B.136; 609B.139; 609B.140; 609B.141; 609B.142; 609B.143; 609B.144; 609B.146; 609B.147; 609B.148; 609B.149; 609B.1495; 609B.150; 609B.151; 609B.152; 609B.153; 609B.155; 609B.157; 609B.158; 609B.159; 609B.160; 609B.161; 609B.162; 609B.164; 609B.1641; 609B.1645; 609B.165; 609B.168; 609B.170; 609B.171; 609B.172; 609B.173; 609B.174; 609B.175; 609B.176; 609B.177; 609B.179; 609B.180; 609B.181; 609B.183; 609B.184; 609B.185; 609B.187; 609B.188; 609B.189; 609B.191; 609B.192; 609B.193; 609B.194; 609B.195; 609B.200; 609B.201; 609B.203; 609B.205; 609B.206; 609B.216; 609B.231; 609B.235; 609B.237; 609B.241; 609B.245; 609B.255; 609B.262; 609B.263; 609B.265; 609B.271; 609B.273; 609B.275; 609B.277; 609B.301; 609B.310; 609B.311; 609B.312; 609B.320; 609B.321; 609B.330; 609B.331; 609B.332; 609B.333; 609B.340; 609B.341; 609B.342; 609B.343; 609B.344; 609B.345; 609B.400; 609B.405; 609B.410; 609B.415; 609B.425; 609B.430; 609B.435; 609B.445; 609B.450; 609B.455; 609B.460; 609B.465; 609B.500; 609B.505; 609B.510; 609B.515; 609B.518; 609B.520; 609B.525; 609B.530; 609B.535; 609B.540; 609B.545; 609B.600; 609B.610; 609B.611; 609B.612; 609B.613; 609B.614; 609B.615; 609B.700; 609B.710; 609B.720; 609B.721; 609B.722; 609B.723; 609B.724; 609B.725."
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
CALL OF THE HOUSE LIFTED
Winkler moved that the call of the House
be lifted. The motion prevailed and it
was so ordered.
Mariani moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 3, line 20, delete "202,143,000" and insert "203,148,000" and delete "201,171,000" and insert "202,132,000"
Page 3, line 23, delete "108,637,000" and insert "108,572,000" and delete "107,665,000" and insert "107,600,000"
Page 3, line 24, delete "13,926,000" and insert "14,321,000" and delete "13,926,000" and insert "14,277,000"
Page 10, line 12, delete "41,730,000" and insert "41,715,000" and delete "41,365,000" and insert "41,400,000"
Page 10, line 14, delete "41,634,000" and insert "41,619,000" and delete "41,269,000" and insert "41,304,000"
Page 12, line 11, delete "$783,000" and insert "$868,000"
Page 17, delete subdivision 10 and insert:
"Subd. 10. Traffic
Safety |
|
100,000
|
|
|
$100,000 the first year is for a study on
the use of roadside screening instruments that determine the presence of
controlled substances, including marijuana or tetrahydrocannabinols, in
individuals stopped or arrested for driving while impaired. The study shall determine the practicality,
accuracy, and efficacy of those screening instruments. All oral fluid samples obtained for
the
purpose of this pilot project shall be obtained by a certified drug recognition
expert and may only be collected with the express voluntary consent of the
person stopped or arrested for suspicion of driving while impaired. The commissioner of public safety shall
report to the chairs and ranking members of the committees or divisions of the
house of representatives and senate with jurisdiction over public safety.
Subd. 11. Driver
and Vehicle Services |
|
395,000
|
|
351,000
|
$395,000 the first year and $351,000 the second year from the driver services account in the special revenue fund are for costs associated with additional participants in the ignition interlock program."
Page 17, line 19, delete "10,563,000" and insert "10,419,000"
Page 19, line 29, delete "$250,000" and insert "$106,000"
Page 19, line 34, delete "633,129,000" and insert "632,707,000" and delete "655,572,000" and insert "654,687,000"
Page 20, line 4, delete "460,026,000" and insert "459,604,000" and delete "475,654,000" and insert "474,769,000"
Page 27, line 16, delete "$453,000" and insert "$830,000" and delete "$474,000" and insert "$825,000"
Page 117, delete section 8
Page 120, line 18, after "appropriate" insert "statutory, constitutional, or other"
Page 123, after line 15, insert:
"Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 169A.24, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Degree described. A person who violates section 169A.20 (driving while impaired) is guilty of first-degree driving while impaired if the person:
(1) commits the violation within ten years of the first of three or more qualified prior impaired driving incidents;
(2) has previously been convicted of a felony under this section; or
(3) has previously been convicted of a felony under:
(i) Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 609.21 (criminal vehicular homicide and injury, substance-related offenses), subdivision 1, clauses (2) to (6);
(ii) Minnesota Statutes 2006, section
609.21 (criminal vehicular homicide and injury, substance-related offenses),
subdivision 1, clauses (2) to (6); subdivision 2, clauses (2) to (6);
subdivision 2a, clauses (2) to (6); subdivision 3, clauses (2) to (6); or
subdivision 4, clauses (2) to (6); or
(iii)
section 609.2112, subdivision 1, clauses (2) to (6); 609.2113, subdivision 1,
clauses (2) to (6), subdivision 2, clauses (2) to (6), or subdivision 3,
clauses (2) to (6); or 609.2114, subdivision 1, clauses (2) to (6), or subdivision
2, clauses (2) to (6).; or
(iv) a statute from this state or
another state in conformity with any provision listed in item (i), (ii), or
(iii).
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date."
Page 124, after line 25, insert:
"Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 169A.55, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. Reinstatement
of driving privileges; multiple incidents.
(a) A person whose driver's license has been revoked as a result
of an offense listed under clause (1) or (2) shall not be eligible for
reinstatement of driving privileges without an ignition interlock restriction
until the commissioner certifies that the person has used the ignition
interlock device and complied with section 171.306 for a period of not less
than:
(1) one year, for a person whose
driver's license was revoked for:
(i) an offense occurring within ten
years of a qualified prior impaired driving incident; or
(ii) an offense occurring after two
qualified prior impaired driving incidents; or
(2) two years, for a person whose
driver's license was revoked for:
(i) an offense occurring under clause
(1), and where the test results indicated an alcohol concentration of twice the
legal limit or more; or
(ii) an offense occurring under clause
(1), and where the current offense is for a violation of section 169A.20,
subdivision 2 (test refusal).
As used in this paragraph, "family or household
member" has the meaning given in section 169A.63, subdivision 1, paragraph
(f).
(b) A person whose driver's license has been canceled or denied as a result of three or more qualified impaired driving incidents shall not be eligible for reinstatement of driving privileges without an ignition interlock restriction until the person:
(1) has completed rehabilitation according to rules adopted by the commissioner or been granted a variance from the rules by the commissioner; and
(2) has submitted verification of abstinence from alcohol and controlled substances under paragraph (c), as evidenced by the person's use of an ignition interlock device or other chemical monitoring device approved by the commissioner.
(b) (c) The verification of
abstinence must show that the person has abstained from the use of alcohol and
controlled substances for a period of not less than:
(1) three years, for a person whose driver's license was canceled or denied for an offense occurring within ten years of the first of two qualified prior impaired driving incidents, or occurring after three qualified prior impaired driving incidents;
(2) four years, for a person whose driver's license was canceled or denied for an offense occurring within ten years of the first of three qualified prior impaired driving incidents; or
(3) six years, for a person whose driver's license was canceled or denied for an offense occurring after four or more qualified prior impaired driving incidents.
(c) The commissioner shall establish
performance standards and a process for certifying chemical monitoring devices. The standards and procedures are not rules
and are exempt from chapter 14, including section 14.386.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date."
Page 127, delete section 11 and insert:
"Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 171.306, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Performance standards; certification; manufacturer and provider requirements. (a) The commissioner shall establish performance standards and a process for certifying devices used in the ignition interlock program, except that the commissioner may not establish standards that, directly or indirectly, require devices to use or enable location tracking capabilities without a court order.
(b) The manufacturer of a device must apply annually for certification of the device by submitting the form prescribed by the commissioner. The commissioner shall require manufacturers of certified devices to:
(1) provide device installation,
servicing, and monitoring to indigent program participants at a discounted
rate, according to the standards established by the commissioner; and
(2) include in an ignition interlock
device contract a provision that a program participant who voluntarily
terminates participation in the program is only liable for servicing and
monitoring costs incurred during the time the device is installed on the motor
vehicle, regardless of whether the term of the contract has expired; and
(3) include in an ignition interlock device contract a provision that requires manufacturers of certified devices to pay any towing or repair costs caused by device failure or malfunction, or by damage caused during device installation, servicing, or monitoring.
(c) The manufacturer of a certified device must include with an ignition interlock device contract a separate notice to the program participant regarding any location tracking capabilities of the device."
Page 220, line 21, delete the second "or"
Page 220, after line 21, insert:
"(iv) at a lawfully organized educational or instructional course and under the direct supervision of a certified instructor, as that term is defined in section 624.714, subdivision 2a, paragraph (d); or"
Page 220, line 22, delete "(iv)" and insert "(v)"
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
Dehn moved to amend the Mariani amendment to S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 2, after line 25, insert:
"Page 110, line 5, delete "250" and insert "200"
Page 110, line 26, delete "ten" and insert "1.5"
Page 110, line 28, delete "ten" and insert "1.5"
Page 110, line 31, delete the colon and insert "a total weight of more than 42.5 grams but not more than 200 grams of the nonresinous form of marijuana."
Page 111, delete lines 1 to 4
Page 111, line 6, delete the second ", clause (1)"
Page 111, line 7, delete ", or"
Page 111, line 8, delete everything before the period"
The
motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was adopted.
The question recurred on the Mariani
amendment, as amended, to S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment,
as amended. The motion prevailed and the
amendment, as amended, was adopted.
Munson moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 109, after line 3, insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 152.01, subdivision 18, is amended to read:
Subd. 18. Drug
paraphernalia. (a) Except as
otherwise provided in paragraph (b), "drug paraphernalia" means all
equipment, products, and materials of any kind, except those items used in
conjunction with permitted uses of controlled substances under this chapter or
the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, which are knowingly or intentionally
used primarily in (1) manufacturing a controlled substance, (2) injecting,
ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing into the human body a controlled
substance, (3) testing the strength, effectiveness, or purity of a
controlled substance, or (4) (3) enhancing the effect of a
controlled substance.
(b) "Drug paraphernalia" does not include the possession, manufacture, delivery, or sale of hypodermic needles or syringes in accordance with section 151.40, subdivision 2."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Quam moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 128, after line 2, insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 168.1294, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Contributions;
memorial account; appropriation. Contributions
collected under subdivision 1, clause (4), must be deposited in the Minnesota
law enforcement memorial account, which is established in the special revenue
fund. Money in the account is
appropriated to the commissioner of public safety. This appropriation is first for the annual
cost of administering the account funds, and the remaining funds are for
distribution to the Minnesota Law Enforcement Memorial Association, to be
used. By July 15 of each year,
the commissioner must distribute all funds remaining to the association. The association must use the funds to
further the mission of the association in assisting the families and home
agencies of Minnesota law enforcement officers who have died in the line of
duty. By August 15 of each year, the
association must report to the commissioner of public safety and to the chairs
and ranking minority members of the legislative committees with jurisdiction
over transportation policy and finance. The
report must include an itemized list of each expenditure the association made
with the funds received under this section.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2019."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Correct the title numbers accordingly
Mariani moved to amend the Quam amendment to S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 9, delete "July 15" and insert "August 1"
The
motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was adopted.
The question recurred on the Quam
amendment, as amended, to S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment,
as amended. The motion prevailed and the
amendment, as amended, was adopted.
Lucero moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 158, after line 20, insert:
"(m) If the defendant has received a stayed sentence for a conviction of a felony offense, the period of the stayed sentence shall be tolled during any period of incarceration imposed as a sanction for violating a condition of probation."
Reletter the paragraphs in sequence
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Lucero
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 57 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Marquart
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Johnson moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 90, after line 6, insert:
"Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.342, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Penalty. (a) Except as otherwise provided in section 609.3455; or Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 609.109, a person convicted under subdivision 1 may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 30 years or to a payment of a fine of not more than $40,000, or both.
(b) Unless a longer mandatory minimum sentence is otherwise required by law or the Sentencing Guidelines provide for a longer presumptive executed sentence, the court shall presume that an executed sentence of 144 months must be imposed on an offender convicted of violating this section. Sentencing a person in a manner other than that described in this paragraph is a departure from the Sentencing Guidelines.
(c) A person convicted under this section is also subject to conditional release, extended probation, and intensive probation under section 609.3455.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date."
Page 91, after line 15, insert:
"Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.343, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Penalty. (a) Except as otherwise provided in section 609.3455; or Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 609.109, a person convicted under subdivision 1 may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 25 years or to a payment of a fine of not more than $35,000, or both.
(b) Unless a longer mandatory minimum sentence is otherwise required by law or the Sentencing Guidelines provide for a longer presumptive executed sentence, the court shall presume that an executed sentence of 90 months must be imposed on an offender convicted of violating subdivision 1, clause (c), (d), (e), (f), or (h). Sentencing a person in a manner other than that described in this paragraph is a departure from the Sentencing Guidelines.
(c) A person convicted under this section is also subject to conditional release, extended probation, and intensive probation under section 609.3455.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date."
Page 93, after line 30, insert:
"Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.344, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Penalty. Except as otherwise provided in section 609.3455, a person convicted under subdivision 1 may be sentenced:
(1) to imprisonment for not more than 15 years or to a payment of a fine of not more than $30,000, or both; or
(2) if the person was convicted under subdivision 1, paragraph (b), and if the actor was no more than 48 months but more than 24 months older than the complainant, to imprisonment for not more than five years or a fine of not more than $30,000, or both.
A person convicted under this section is also subject to conditional release, extended probation, and intensive probation under section 609.3455.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date."
Page 96, after line 11, insert:
"Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.345, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Penalty. Except as otherwise provided in section 609.3455, a person convicted under subdivision 1 may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than ten years or to a payment of a fine of not more than $20,000, or both. A person convicted under this section is also subject to conditional release, extended probation, and intensive probation under section 609.3455.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date."
Page 96, after line 26, insert:
"Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.3451, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Felony. (a) A person is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than seven years or to payment of a fine of not more than $14,000, or both, if the person violates this section within seven years of:
(1) a previous conviction for violating subdivision 1, clause (2), a crime described in paragraph (b), or a statute from another state in conformity with any of these offenses; or
(2) the first of two or more previous convictions for violating subdivision 1, clause (1), or a statute from another state in conformity with this offense.
(b) A previous conviction for violating section 609.342; 609.343; 609.344; 609.345; 609.3453; 617.23, subdivision 2, clause (2), or subdivision 3; or 617.247 may be used to enhance a criminal penalty as provided in paragraph (a).
(c) A person convicted under this subdivision is also
subject to conditional release, extended probation, and intensive probation
under section 609.3455.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1,
2019, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.3455, subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. Mandatory ten-year 20-year
conditional release term. (a)
Notwithstanding the statutory maximum sentence
otherwise applicable to the offense and unless a longer conditional release
term is required in subdivision 7, when a court commits an offender to
the custody of the commissioner of corrections for a violation of section
609.342, 609.343, 609.344, 609.345, or 609.3453, the court shall provide that,
after the offender has been released from prison, the commissioner shall place
the offender on conditional release for ten 20 years.
(b) After ten years, the sentencing court shall
terminate an offender's conditional release term if the offender has (1)
remained law abiding, and (2) the commissioner has not revoked the offender's
conditional release, unless the county attorney files a motion to continue
conditional release and proves by clear and convincing evidence that the
offender is a continued threat to public safety. The prosecuting attorney must provide notice
of a petition to continue conditional release to victims who requested
notification under section 611A.06. The
court must hold a hearing on a petition.
The court must consider the testimony of the offender's victims before
ruling on the county attorney's petition.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.3455, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 7a.
Extended probation. (a) Notwithstanding the statutory
maximum sentence otherwise applicable to the offense and otherwise provided in
section 609.135, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), when the court does not commit
an offender to the commissioner of corrections for a felony violation of
section 609.342, 609.343, 609.344, 609.345, 609.3451, or 609.3453, the court
shall, after the offender has been released from any term of confinement
imposed by the court, place the offender on probation for 20 years.
(b) After ten years, the sentencing court shall
terminate an offender's extended probation if the offender has (1) remained law
abiding, and (2) the court has not revoked the offender's probation, unless the
county attorney files a motion to continue extended probation and proves by
clear and convincing evidence that the offender is a continued
threat
to public safety. The prosecuting
attorney must provide notice of a petition to continue extended probation to
victims who requested notification under section 611A.06. The court must hold a hearing on a petition. The court must consider the testimony of the
offender's victims before ruling on the county attorney's petition.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2019, and applies to offenses committed on or after that
date.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.3455, subdivision 8, is amended to read:
Subd. 8. Terms of conditional release; applicable to all sex offenders. (a) The provisions of this subdivision relating to conditional release apply to all sex offenders sentenced to prison for a violation of section 609.342, 609.343, 609.344, 609.345, 609.3451, or 609.3453. Except as provided in this subdivision, conditional release of sex offenders is governed by provisions relating to supervised release. The commissioner of corrections may not dismiss an offender on conditional release from supervision until the offender's conditional release term expires.
(b) The conditions of release may include successful completion of treatment and aftercare in a program approved by the commissioner, satisfaction of the release conditions specified in section 244.05, subdivision 6, and any other conditions the commissioner considers appropriate. The commissioner shall develop a plan to pay the cost of treatment of a person released under this subdivision. The plan may include co-payments from offenders, third‑party payers, local agencies, or other funding sources as they are identified. This section does not require the commissioner to accept or retain an offender in a treatment program. Before the offender is placed on conditional release, the commissioner shall notify the sentencing court and the prosecutor in the jurisdiction where the offender was sentenced of the terms of the offender's conditional release. The commissioner also shall make reasonable efforts to notify the victim of the offender's crime of the terms of the offender's conditional release.
(c) If the offender fails to meet any condition of release, the commissioner may revoke the offender's conditional release and order that the offender serve all or a part of the remaining portion of the conditional release term in prison. An offender, while on supervised release, is not entitled to credit against the offender's conditional release term for time served in confinement for a violation of release.
EFFECTIVE
DATE. This section is
effective August 1, 2019, and applies to offenses committed on or after that
date.
Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.3455, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 8a. Intensive
probation. (a) When the court
does not commit an offender to the commissioner of corrections after a
conviction for a felony violation of section 609.342, 609.343, 609.344,
609.345, 609.3451, or 609.3453, the court may place the offender on intensive
probation as provided in this subdivision.
(b) Phase I of intensive probation is
six months and begins after the offender is released from confinement, if
ordered by the court. Phase II lasts for
at least one-third of the time remaining in the offender's imposed sentence at
the beginning of phase II. Phase III
lasts for at least one-third of the time remaining in the offender's imposed
sentence at the beginning of phase III. Phase
IV continues until the offender's imposed sentence expires.
(c) During phase I, the offender will
be under house arrest in a residence approved by the offender's probation agent
and may not move to another residence without permission. "House arrest" means that the
offender's movements will be severely restricted and continually monitored by
the assigned agent. During phase II,
modified house arrest is imposed. During
phases III and IV, the offender is subjected to a daily curfew instead of house
arrest.
(d)
During phase I, the assigned probation agent shall have at least four
face-to-face contacts with the offender each week. During phase II, two face-to-face contacts a
week are required. During phase III, one
face-to-face contact a week is required.
During phase IV, two face-to-face contacts a month are required. When an offender is an inmate of a jail or a
resident of a facility that is staffed full time, at least one face-to-face contact
a week is required.
(e) During phases I, II, III, and IV, the offender must
spend at least 40 hours a week performing approved work, undertaking
constructive activity designed to obtain employment, or attending a treatment
or education program as directed by the agent.
An offender may not spend more than six months in a residential
treatment program that does not require the offender to spend at least 40 hours
a week performing approved work or undertaking constructive activity designed
to obtain employment.
(f) During any phase, the offender may be placed on
electronic surveillance if the probation agent so directs. If electronic surveillance is directed during
phase I, the court must require that the offender be kept in custody, or that
the offender's probation agent or the agent's designee directly supervise the
offender, until electronic surveillance is activated. It is the responsibility of the offender
placed on electronic surveillance to ensure that the offender's residence is
properly equipped and the offender's telecommunications system is properly
configured to support electronic surveillance prior to being released from
custody or the direct supervision of a probation agent. It is a violation of an offender's probation
to fail to comply with this paragraph.
(g) Throughout all phases of intensive probation, the
offender shall submit at any time to an unannounced search of the offender's
person, vehicle, computer and other devices that access the Internet or store
data, or premises by a probation agent.
(h) The court may include any other conditions in the
various phases of intensive probation that the court finds necessary and
appropriate.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Johnson
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 57 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mann
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Stephenson
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Hertaus moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 184, line 24, delete everything after "(b)"
Page 184, line 25, delete "(a)" and insert "The court"
Page 184, line 26, after the period, insert "Notice from the court must contain sufficient information for the commissioner to determine if the individual received a set-aside of a disqualification as a result of paragraph (a)."
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Johnson moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 65, after line 17, insert:
"Sec. 22. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 244.05, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Supervised release required. (a) Except as provided in subdivisions 1b, 4, and 5, every inmate shall serve a supervised release term upon completion of the inmate's term of imprisonment as reduced by any good time earned by the inmate or extended by confinement in punitive segregation pursuant to section 244.04, subdivision 2. Except for a sex offender conditionally released under Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 609.108, subdivision 5, the supervised release term shall be equal to the period of good time the inmate has earned, and shall not exceed the length of time remaining in the inmate's sentence.
(b) An inmate of a state correctional
facility who is convicted of violating section 609.221, 609.222, 609.223,
609.2231, or 609.224 for assaulting an employee of the Department of
Corrections forfeits any good time earned prior to the assault conviction.
Sec. 23. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 244.05, subdivision 1b, is amended to read:
Subd. 1b. Supervised release; offenders who commit crimes on or after August 1, 1993. (a) Except as provided in subdivisions 4 and 5, every inmate sentenced to prison for a felony offense committed on or after August 1, 1993, shall serve a supervised release term upon completion of the inmate's term of imprisonment and any disciplinary confinement period imposed by the commissioner due to the inmate's violation of any disciplinary rule adopted by the commissioner or refusal to participate in a rehabilitative program required under section 244.03. The amount of time the inmate serves on supervised release shall be equal in length to the amount of time remaining in the inmate's executed sentence after the inmate has served the term of imprisonment and any disciplinary confinement period imposed by the commissioner.
(b) No inmate who violates a disciplinary rule or refuses to participate in a rehabilitative program as required under section 244.03 shall be placed on supervised release until the inmate has served the disciplinary confinement period for that disciplinary sanction or until the inmate is discharged or released from punitive segregation confinement, whichever is later. The imposition of a disciplinary confinement period shall be considered to be a disciplinary sanction imposed upon an inmate, and the procedure for imposing the disciplinary confinement period and the rights of the inmate in the procedure shall be those in effect for the imposition of other disciplinary sanctions at each state correctional institution.
(c) An inmate of a state correctional facility who is convicted of violating section 609.221, 609.222, 609.223, 609.2231, or 609.224 for assaulting an employee of the Department of Corrections forfeits any good time earned prior to the assault conviction."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
The Speaker called Olson to the Chair.
O’Neill moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 20, after line 27, insert:
"The commissioner of corrections shall increase the minimum starting salary for correctional officer positions to $19.95 per hour."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the O'Neill
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 58 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mann
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Zerwas moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 70, after line 30, insert:
"Sec. 28. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WAGE SCALE
CONDENSED.
The commissioner of management and budget must bargain
to condense the step wage increase scale for correctional officers so that
correctional officers reach the top of the wage scale after six years of
qualified service.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective July 1, 2019, and
applies to contracts entered on or after that date."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Zerwas
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 57 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Nash moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 164, line 26, after "apply" insert "to violations of section 169A.20 or person offenses. For the purpose of this section, person offenses are crimes that involve actual or threatened violence, force, fear, or intimidation and include, but are not limited"
Page 164, delete line 27
Renumber the clauses in sequence and correct the internal references
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Speaker pro tempore Olson called Halverson
to the Chair.
The question was taken on the Nash
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 58 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Marquart
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
O’Neill moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 74, line 4, delete everything after "or" and insert "an attorney representing the victim"
Page 74, delete line 5
Page 74, line 6, delete everything before the comma
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the O'Neill
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 57 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Poston moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 74, line 11, before "An" insert "The certifying entity must initiate an investigation upon request or there must be" and delete "are not"
Page 74, line 12, delete "required" and delete "request and"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The Speaker
resumed the Chair.
The question was taken on the Poston
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 59 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Marquart
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Johnson moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 74, line 22, delete "or representative"
Page 74, line 24, delete "or representative"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Johnson
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 58 yeas and 76 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Grossell moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 86, after line 7, insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.095, is amended to read:
609.095
LIMITS OF SENTENCES.
(a) The legislature has the exclusive authority to define crimes and offenses and the range of the sentences or punishments for their violation. No other or different sentence or punishment shall be imposed for the commission of a crime than is authorized by this chapter or other applicable law.
(b) Except as provided in section 152.18
or 609.375, or upon agreement of the parties, a court may not refuse to
adjudicate the guilt of a defendant who tenders a guilty plea in accordance
with Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 15, or who has been found
guilty by a court or jury following a trial.
A decision by the court to issue a stay of adjudication under this
paragraph for a charge of violating section 243.166, 609.342, 609.343, 609.344,
609.345, 609.3451, subdivision 3, or 609.3453, must be justified in writing and
on the record.
(c) Paragraph (b) does not supersede Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 26.04.
(d) The rules promulgated by the
supreme court shall provide for remote access, searchable by defendant name, to
the publicly accessible portions of the district court register of actions,
orders, notices prepared by the court, and any other documents in a case:
(1) that includes a charge for
violating section 243.166, 609.342, 609.343, 609.344, 609.345, 609.3451,
subdivision 3, or 609.3453; and
(2) in which a court did not adjudicate
the guilt of a defendant who tendered a guilty plea in accordance with
Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 15, or who has been found guilty by
a court or jury following a trial.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date."
Page 198, after line 16, insert:
"(e) A person also shall register under this section if the person received a stay of adjudication under section 609.095, paragraph (b), for a charge of violating section 243.166, 609.342, 609.343, 609.344, 609.345, 609.3451, subdivision 3, or 609.3453, unless the offender is a juvenile and the court finds, on the record, that there is good cause to waive the registration requirement."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the
Grossell amendment and the roll was called.
There were 60 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Marquart
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Zerwas moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 39, after line 23, insert:
"Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.505, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 3.
False reporting of bias crime. (a) Whoever causes information to be
communicated to a peace officer, knowing that the person is a peace officer,
that a crime motivated by bias has been committed, knowing that the information
is false, is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
(b) For purposes of this subdivision, "peace
officer" has the meaning given in section 626.84, subdivision 1, paragraph
(c).
(c) For purposes of this subdivision, "crime
motivated by bias" means that the offender intentionally selected the
victim or the property against which the offense was committed, in whole or in
part, because of the victim's, the property owner's, or another's actual or
perceived race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, disability as defined
in section 363A.03, age, or national origin.
A crime motivated by bias includes, but is not limited to, violations of
section 609.221; 609.222; 609.223; 609.2231, subdivision 4; 609.595,
subdivision 1a; 609.748, subdivision 6, paragraph (d), clause (2); or 609.749,
subdivision 3, paragraph (a), clause (1).
EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Zerwas
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 59 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Poston moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 27, after line 14, insert:
"Sec. 11. REPORTS BY GRANT RECIPIENTS.
(a) As a condition to
receiving a grant under section 3, subdivision 3, paragraph (b) or (c); section
3, subdivision 8, paragraph (c), (e), (f), (g), or (h); or section 6,
subdivision 3, paragraph (i), (j), or (l), clause (2), a recipient must provide
the following information to the authority administering the grant:
(1)
a detailed description of the recipient's budget;
(2) an accounting of how grant funds
were spent;
(3) a list of staff salaries;
(4) identification of newly hired staff;
and
(5) a list of board members, indicating
the amount of compensation, if any, provided to each board member.
(b) By February 15 of each year, the authority administering the grant must forward reports received under paragraph (a) and a list of any grant recipients who failed to provide the report required under paragraph (a) to the chairs and ranking members of the legislative committees and divisions with jurisdiction over public safety."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Poston
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 58 yeas and 72 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Franson offered an amendment to
S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended.
CALL OF
THE HOUSE
On the motion of Franson and on the demand
of 10 members, a call of the House was ordered.
The following members answered to their names:
Acomb
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahner
Bahr
Baker
Becker-Finn
Bennett
Bernardy
Bierman
Boe
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dehn
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Erickson
Fabian
Fischer
Franson
Freiberg
Garofalo
Gomez
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Her
Hertaus
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Koznick
Kresha
Kunesh-Podein
Layman
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Lucero
Lueck
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Munson
Murphy
Nash
Nelson, M.
Nelson, N.
Neu
Noor
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Olson
O'Neill
Pelowski
Persell
Petersburg
Pierson
Pinto
Poppe
Poston
Pryor
Quam
Richardson
Robbins
Runbeck
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schomacker
Schultz
Scott
Stephenson
Sundin
Swedzinski
Tabke
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vang
Vogel
Wagenius
Wazlawik
West
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Hortman
Garofalo moved that further proceedings of
the roll call be suspended and that the Sergeant at Arms be instructed to bring
in the absentees. The motion did not
prevail.
All members answered to the call and it
was so ordered.
POINT OF
ORDER
Moran raised a point of order pursuant to
rule 4.03, relating to Ways and Means Committee; Budget Resolution; Effect on
Expenditure and Revenue Bills, that the Franson amendment was not in
order. The Speaker ruled the point of
order well taken and the Franson amendment out of order.
Neu appealed the decision of the Speaker.
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The vote was taken on the question
"Shall the decision of the Speaker stand as the judgment of the
House?" and the roll was called.
There were 76 yeas and 58 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Runbeck
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
Those who voted in the negative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
So it was the judgment of the House that
the decision of the Speaker should stand.
Lucero moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 154, delete section 15
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
CALL OF
THE HOUSE LIFTED
Winkler moved that the call of the House
be lifted. The motion prevailed and it
was so ordered.
The question recurred on the Lucero
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 57 yeas and 76 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Heintzeman moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 130, after line 17, insert:
"Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 171.24, is amended to read:
171.24
VIOLATIONS; DRIVING WITHOUT VALID LICENSE.
Subdivision 1. Driving after suspension; misdemeanor. Except as otherwise provided in subdivision 5, a person is guilty of a misdemeanor if:
(1) the person's driver's license or driving privilege has been suspended;
(2) the person has been given notice of or reasonably should know of the suspension; and
(3) the person disobeys the order by operating in this state any motor vehicle, the operation of which requires a driver's license, while the person's license or privilege is suspended.
Subd. 2. Driving after revocation; misdemeanor. Except as otherwise provided in subdivision 5, a person is guilty of a misdemeanor if:
(1) the person's driver's license or driving privilege has been revoked;
(2) the person has been given notice of or reasonably should know of the revocation; and
(3) the person disobeys the order by operating in this state any motor vehicle, the operation of which requires a driver's license, while the person's license or privilege is revoked.
Subd. 3. Driving after cancellation; misdemeanor. Except as otherwise provided in subdivision 5, a person is guilty of a misdemeanor if:
(1) the person's driver's license or driving privilege has been canceled;
(2) the person has been given notice of or reasonably should know of the cancellation; and
(3) the person disobeys the order by operating in this state any motor vehicle, the operation of which requires a driver's license, while the person's license or privilege is canceled.
Subd. 4. Driving after disqualification; misdemeanor. Except as otherwise provided in subdivision 5, a person is guilty of a misdemeanor if the person:
(1) has been disqualified from holding a commercial driver's license or been denied the privilege to operate a commercial motor vehicle;
(2) has been given notice of or reasonably should know of the disqualification; and
(3) disobeys the order by operating in this state a commercial motor vehicle while the person is disqualified to hold the license or privilege.
Subd. 5. Gross misdemeanor violations. (a) A person is guilty of a gross misdemeanor if:
(1) the person's driver's license or driving privilege has been canceled or denied under section 171.04, subdivision 1, clause (10);
(2) the person has been given notice of or reasonably should know of the cancellation or denial; and
(3) the person disobeys the order by operating in this state any motor vehicle, the operation of which requires a driver's license, while the person's license or privilege is canceled or denied.
(b) A person is guilty of a gross
misdemeanor if the person:
(1) violates this section:
(i) and causes a collision resulting in
substantial bodily harm, as defined in section 609.02, subdivision 7a, or death
to another; or
(ii) within ten years of the first of
two prior convictions under this section; and
(2)
at the time of the violation the person's driver's license or driving privilege
has been suspended, revoked, or canceled or the person has been disqualified
from holding a commercial driver's license or been denied the privilege to
operate a commercial motor vehicle:
(i) pursuant to section 169.89, subdivision 5; 169A.52;
169A.54; 171.05, subdivision 2b, paragraph (d); 171.13, subdivision 3 or 4;
171.17, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (1) or (10); 171.177; 171.18,
subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (2), (3), (4), (5), or (11); 171.32; or
260B.225, subdivision 9; or a violation of section 169.13; 169.21; 169.444;
609.19, subdivision 1, clause (2); or 609.487, subdivisions 3 to 5; or any
violation of chapter 169A; or
(ii) pursuant to a law from another state similar to
those described in item (i).
Subd. 6. Responsibility for prosecution. (a) The attorney in the jurisdiction in which the violation occurred who is responsible for prosecution of misdemeanor violations of this section is also responsible for prosecution of gross misdemeanor violations of this section.
(b) Nothing in this section or section 609.035 or 609.04
shall limit the power of the state to prosecute or punish a person for conduct
that constitutes any other crime under any other law of this state.
Subd. 7. Sufficiency of notice. (a) Notice of revocation, suspension, cancellation, or disqualification is sufficient if personally served, or if mailed by first class mail to the person's last known address or to the address listed on the person's driver's license. Notice is also sufficient if the person was informed that revocation, suspension, cancellation, or disqualification would be imposed upon a condition occurring or failing to occur, and where the condition has in fact occurred or failed to occur.
(b) It is not a defense that a person failed to file a change of address with the post office, or failed to notify the Department of Public Safety of a change of name or address as required under section 171.11.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Heintzeman
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 64 yeas and 70 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Brand
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Marquart
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Petersburg
Pierson
Poppe
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Sandell
Schomacker
Scott
Stephenson
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Persell
Pinto
Pryor
Richardson
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Zerwas moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 40, after line 31, insert:
"Sec. 18. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.74, is amended to read:
609.74
PUBLIC NUISANCE.
(a) Whoever by an act or failure to perform a legal duty intentionally does any of the following is guilty of maintaining a public nuisance, which is a misdemeanor:
(1) maintains or permits a condition which unreasonably annoys, injures or endangers the safety, health, morals, comfort, or repose of any considerable number of members of the public; or
(2) except as provided in paragraph (b), interferes with, obstructs, or renders dangerous for passage, any public highway or right-of-way, or waters used by the public; or
(3) is guilty of any other act or omission declared by law to be a public nuisance and for which no sentence is specifically provided.
(b) It is a gross misdemeanor for a
person to interfere with or obstruct traffic that is entering, exiting, or on a
freeway or entering, exiting, or on a public roadway within the boundaries of
airport property with the intent to interfere with, obstruct, or otherwise
disrupt traffic. This paragraph does not
apply to the actions of law enforcement or other emergency responders, road or
airport authorities, or utility officials, or their agents, employees, or
contractors when carrying out duties imposed by law or contract. For purposes of this paragraph: (1) "airport" means an airport that
has a control tower and airline service; and (2) "freeway" means any
section of a divided highway where the only access and egress for vehicular
traffic is from entrance and exit ramps.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date."
Page 46, after line 16, insert:
"Sec. 23. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.855, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Unlawful interference with transit operator. (a) Whoever intentionally commits an act
that interferes with or obstructs, or tends to interfere with or obstruct, the
operation of a transit vehicle is guilty of unlawful interference with a
transit operator a crime and may be sentenced as provided in paragraph
(c).
(b) An act that is committed on a transit vehicle that
distracts the driver from the safe operation of the vehicle, restricts
passenger access to the transit vehicle, or that endangers
passengers is a violation of this subdivision if an authorized transit
representative has clearly warned the person once to stop the act.
(c) A person who violates this subdivision may be sentenced as follows:
(1) to imprisonment for not more than three years or to payment of a fine of not more than $5,000, or both, if the violation was accompanied by force or violence or a communication of a threat of force or violence; or
(2) to imprisonment for not more than 90 days one
year or to payment of a fine of not more than $1,000 $3,000,
or both, if the violation was not accompanied by force or violence or a
communication of a threat of force or violence.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and
applies to crimes committed on or after that date."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Zerwas
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 60 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Marquart
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Erickson moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 4, line 3, delete "5,343,000" and insert "6,222,000" and delete "5,093,000" and insert "7,253,000"
Page 4, line 5, delete "3,745,000" and insert "4,624,000" and delete "3,495,000" and insert "5,655,000"
Page 6, after line 30, insert:
"(g) Physical Security Audit Grants for Public Schools
$879,000 in the first year and $2,160,000 in the second year are for reimbursement grants to public school districts that contract for audits of the physical security of public school campuses. Applicants for reimbursement grants may receive up to 100 percent of the cost of physical security audits of public school campuses conducted by security consultants holding a certified protection professional certification from the American Society for Industrial Security or other professional certification deemed acceptable by the commissioner of public safety."
Reletter the paragraphs in sequence
Page 19, line 34, delete "633,129,000" and insert "632,250,000" and delete "655,572,000" and insert "653,412,000"
Page 20, line 4, delete "460,026,000" and insert "459,147,000" and delete "475,654,000" and insert "473,494,000"
Page 21, delete lines 21 to 24
Reletter the paragraphs in sequence
Adjust fund and bill totals accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the
Erickson amendment and the roll was called.
There were 59 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Runbeck moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 32, after line 23, insert:
"Sec. 8. [299C.77]
FEDERAL BACKGROUND CHECKS BY POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS.
Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For purposes of this section, the
following terms have the meanings given them.
(b) "Applicant for
employment" means an individual who seeks either county or city employment
where the job duties include access to residential property or business
property.
(c) "Applicant for licensure"
means an individual who seeks a license issued by a county or city to:
(1) operate a cabaret;
(2) provide massage services;
(3) operate a business providing
massage services;
(4)
operate as a solicitor or peddler;
(5) operate a lawful gambling business other than
charitable gambling;
(6) obtain a premise permit for lawful gambling;
(7) operate a taxi service; or
(8) operate as a pawnbroker or precious metal or
secondhand goods dealer.
Subd. 2.
Background check authorized. (a) A county or city may investigate
the criminal history background of any applicant for employment or applicant
for licensure.
(b) The investigation must consist of a criminal history check of the state criminal records repository and a national criminal history check. The county or city shall accept the applicant's signed informed consent form for the state and national criminal history check request, fingerprints, and required fees. The county or city shall submit the applicant's signed informed consent form, fingerprints, and fees to the superintendent of the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, who is authorized to exchange the fingerprints with the Federal Bureau of Investigation to obtain the applicant's national criminal history record information. The superintendent shall also retrieve Minnesota criminal history data and provide the results of both checks to the county or city. Using the criminal history data provided by the superintendent, the county or city shall determine whether the applicant is disqualified from employment or licensure. The applicant's failure to cooperate with the county or city in conducting the records check is reasonable cause to deny an application."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Runbeck
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 58 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Brand
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Elkins
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Moller
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Bahr
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Edelson
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hertaus
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moran
Morrison
Munson
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Grossell moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 83, after line 5, insert:
"Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 626.8452, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 6. Prohibition on disarming local law enforcement officers. Unless expressly authorized under another section of law, a mayor, city council, county board, or chief law enforcement officer may not disarm a peace officer who is in good standing and not currently under investigation or subject to disciplinary action."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
Mariani moved to amend the Grossell amendment to S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 6, before "Unless" insert "(a)"
Page 1, line 7, before the first comma, insert "or paragraph (b)" and before "county" insert "or" and delete ", or chief law"
Page 1, line 8, delete "enforcement officer"
Page 1, after line 9, insert:
"(b) A local municipality may institute a pilot program where peace officers employed by the municipality voluntarily perform their duties without carrying a firearm."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Mariani
amendment to the Grossell amendment and the roll was called. There were 75 yeas and 58 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Bahr
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Munson
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Vogel
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
Those who voted in the negative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lien
Lucero
Lueck
Marquart
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
West
Zerwas
The
motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was adopted.
Grossell withdrew his amendment, as amended, to S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended.
Grossell moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 75, line 11, after "UAV" insert "within the airspace 200 feet above the curtilage of a residence or any other location or property at which a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy"
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Daudt offered an amendment to
S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended.
POINT OF
ORDER
Carlson, L., raised a point of order
pursuant to rule 4.03, relating to Ways and Means Committee; Budget Resolution;
Effect on Expenditure and Revenue Bills, that the Daudt amendment was not in
order. The Speaker ruled the point of
order well taken and the Daudt amendment out of order.
Lien moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 212, lines 22 and 23, reinstate the stricken language
Page 212, line 23, strike the second "section" and insert "sections" and before the period, insert ", and 624.7134"
Page 218, line 8, after "624.7131" insert "or a valid permit to carry issued under section 624.714"
Page 218, line 19, after "permit" insert "or permit to carry"
Drazkowski moved to amend the Lien amendment to S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, after line 8, insert:
"Page 221, after line 2, insert:
"Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 624.714, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 1c. No
permit required. (a) The
legislature of the state of Minnesota recognizes and declares that the second amendment of the United States
Constitution guarantees the fundamental, individual right to keep and bear
arms.
(b) A person who is not prohibited from
possessing a firearm by any law of this state or any federal law shall have the
right to carry, hold, or possess a firearm in a motor vehicle, snowmobile, or
boat, or on or about the person's clothes or the person, or otherwise in
possession or control in a public place.
(c) For the purposes of this section,
"public place" means property owned, leased, or controlled by a
governmental unit and private property that is regularly and frequently open to
or made available for use by the public in sufficient numbers to give clear
notice of the property's current dedication to public use but does not include: a person's dwelling house or premises, the
place of business owned or managed by the person, or land possessed by the
person; a gun show, gun shop, or hunting or target shooting facility; or the
woods, fields, or waters of this state where the person is present lawfully for
the purpose of hunting or target shooting or other lawful activity involving
firearms.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 624.714, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 1d. Optional
carry permit. A person may
apply for an optional permit to carry a pistol as provided in this section.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 624.714, subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. Where application made; authority to issue permit; criteria; scope. (a) Applications by Minnesota residents for optional permits to carry shall be made to the county sheriff where the applicant resides. Nonresidents, as defined in section 171.01, subdivision 42, may apply to any sheriff.
(b) Unless a sheriff denies a permit under the exception set forth in subdivision 6, paragraph (a), clause (3), a sheriff must issue a permit to an applicant if the person:
(1) has training in the safe use of a pistol;
(2) is at least 21 years old and a citizen or a permanent resident of the United States;
(3) completes an application for a permit;
(4) is not prohibited from possessing a firearm under the following sections:
(i) 518B.01, subdivision 14;
(ii) 609.224, subdivision 3;
(iii) 609.2242, subdivision 3;
(iv) 609.749, subdivision 8;
(v) 624.713;
(vi) 624.719;
(vii) 629.715, subdivision 2;
(viii) 629.72, subdivision 2; or
(ix) any federal law; and
(5) is not listed in the criminal gang investigative data system under section 299C.091.
(c) A permit to carry a pistol issued or recognized under this section is a state permit and is effective throughout the state.
(d) A sheriff may contract with a police chief to process permit applications under this section. If a sheriff contracts with a police chief, the sheriff remains the issuing authority and the police chief acts as the sheriff's agent. If a sheriff contracts with a police chief, all of the provisions of this section will apply.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 624.714, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. Form and contents of application. (a) Applications for optional permits to carry must be an official, standardized application form, adopted under section 624.7151, and must set forth in writing only the following information:
(1) the applicant's name, residence, telephone number, if any, and driver's license number or state identification card number;
(2) the applicant's sex, date of birth, height, weight, and color of eyes and hair, and distinguishing physical characteristics, if any;
(3) the township or statutory city or home rule charter city, and county, of all Minnesota residences of the applicant in the last five years, though not including specific addresses;
(4) the township or city, county, and state of all non-Minnesota residences of the applicant in the last five years, though not including specific addresses;
(5) a statement that the applicant authorizes the release to the sheriff of commitment information about the applicant maintained by the commissioner of human services or any similar agency or department of another state where the applicant has resided, to the extent that the information relates to the applicant's eligibility to possess a firearm; and
(6) a statement by the applicant that, to the best of the applicant's knowledge and belief, the applicant is not prohibited by law from possessing a firearm.
(b) The statement under paragraph (a), clause (5), must comply with any applicable requirements of Code of Federal Regulations, title 42, sections 2.31 to 2.35, with respect to consent to disclosure of alcohol or drug abuse patient records.
(c) An applicant must submit to the sheriff an application packet consisting only of the following items:
(1) a completed application form, signed and dated by the applicant;
(2) an accurate photocopy of the certificate described in subdivision 2a, paragraph (c), that is submitted as the applicant's evidence of training in the safe use of a pistol; and
(3) an accurate photocopy of the applicant's current driver's license, state identification card, or the photo page of the applicant's passport.
(d) In addition to the other application materials, a person who is otherwise ineligible for a permit due to a criminal conviction but who has obtained a pardon or expungement setting aside the conviction, sealing the conviction, or otherwise restoring applicable rights, must submit a copy of the relevant order.
(e) Applications must be submitted in person.
(f) The sheriff may charge a new application processing fee in an amount not to exceed the actual and reasonable direct cost of processing the application or $100, whichever is less. Of this amount, $10 must be submitted to the commissioner and deposited into the general fund.
(g) This subdivision prescribes the complete and exclusive set of items an applicant is required to submit in order to apply for a new or renewal permit to carry. The applicant must not be asked or required to submit, voluntarily or involuntarily, any information, fees, or documentation beyond that specifically required by this subdivision. This paragraph does not apply to alternate training evidence accepted by the sheriff under subdivision 2a, paragraph (d).
(h) Forms for new and renewal applications must be available at all sheriffs' offices and the commissioner must make the forms available on the Internet.
(i) Application forms must clearly display a notice that a permit, if granted, is void and must be immediately returned to the sheriff if the permit holder is or becomes prohibited by law from possessing a firearm. The notice must list the applicable state criminal offenses and civil categories that prohibit a person from possessing a firearm.
(j) Upon receipt of an application packet and any required fee, the sheriff must provide a signed receipt indicating the date of submission.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 624.714, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Permit card contents; expiration; renewal. (a) Optional permits to carry must be on an official, standardized permit card adopted by the commissioner, containing only the name, residence, and driver's license number or state identification card number of the permit holder, if any.
(b) The permit card must also identify the issuing sheriff and state the expiration date of the permit. The permit card must clearly display a notice that a permit, if granted, is void and must be immediately returned to the sheriff if the permit holder becomes prohibited by law from possessing a firearm.
(c) A permit to carry a pistol issued under this section expires five years after the date of issue. It may be renewed in the same manner and under the same criteria which the original permit was obtained, subject to the following procedures:
(1) no earlier than 90 days prior to the expiration date on the permit, the permit holder may renew the permit by submitting to the appropriate sheriff the application packet described in subdivision 3 and a renewal processing fee not to exceed the actual and reasonable direct cost of processing the application or $75, whichever is less. Of this amount, $5 must be submitted to the commissioner and deposited into the general fund. The sheriff must process the renewal application in accordance with subdivisions 4 and 6; and
(2) a permit holder who submits a renewal application packet after the expiration date of the permit, but within 30 days after expiration, may renew the permit as provided in clause (1) by paying an additional late fee of $10.
(d) The renewal permit is effective beginning on the expiration date of the prior permit to carry.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 624.714, subdivision 15, is amended to read:
Subd. 15. Commissioner;
contracts; database. (a) The
commissioner must maintain an automated database of persons authorized to carry
pistols issued an optional permit to carry a pistol under this
section that is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, only to law
enforcement agencies, including prosecutors carrying out their duties under
subdivision 8a, to verify the validity of a permit.
(b) The commissioner may maintain a separate automated database of denied applications for optional permits to carry and of revoked permits that is available only to sheriffs performing their duties under this section containing the date of, the statutory basis for, and the initiating agency for any permit application denied or permit revoked for a period of six years from the date of the denial or revocation.
(c) The commissioner may contract with one or more vendors to implement the commissioner's duties under this section.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 624.714, subdivision 20, is amended to read:
Subd. 20. Monitoring. (a) By March 1, 2004, and each year thereafter, the commissioner must report to the legislature on:
(1) the number of optional permits applied for, issued, suspended, revoked, and denied, further categorized by the age, sex, and zip code of the applicant or permit holder, since the previous submission, and in total;
(2) the number of optional permits currently valid;
(3) the specific reasons for each suspension, revocation, and denial and the number of reversed, canceled, or corrected actions;
(4) without expressly identifying an applicant, the number of denials or revocations based on the grounds under subdivision 6, paragraph (a), clause (3), the factual basis for each denial or revocation, and the result of an appeal, if any, including the court's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order;
(5)
the number of convictions and types of crimes committed since the previous
submission, and in total, by individuals with permits legally
carrying pistols as provided by this section including data as to whether a
firearm lawfully carried solely by virtue of a permit this section
was actually used in furtherance of the crime;
(6) to the extent known or determinable, data on the lawful
and justifiable use of firearms by permit holders individuals legally
carrying pistols as provided by this section; and
(7) the status of the segregated funds reported to the commissioner under subdivision 21.
(b) Sheriffs and police chiefs must supply the Department of Public Safety with the basic data the department requires to complete the report under paragraph (a). Sheriffs and police chiefs may submit data classified as private to the Department of Public Safety under this paragraph.
(c) Copies of the report under paragraph (a) must be made available to the public at the actual cost of duplication.
(d) Nothing contained in any provision of this section or any other law requires or authorizes the registration, documentation, collection, or providing of serial numbers or other data on firearms or on firearms' owners.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 624.714, subdivision 23, is amended to read:
Subd. 23. Exclusivity. This section sets forth the complete and
exclusive criteria and procedures for the issuance of optional permits
to carry and establishes their nature and scope. No sheriff, police chief, governmental unit,
government official, government employee, or other person or body acting under
color of law or governmental authority may change, modify, or supplement these
criteria or procedures, or limit the exercise of a permit the right
to carry a firearm.
Sec. 12. REPEALER.
Minnesota Statutes 2018, sections 624.714, subdivisions
1a, 1b, and 16; and 624.7181, are repealed."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Drazkowski
amendment to the Lien amendment and the roll was called. There were 61 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Boe
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lislegard
Lucero
Lueck
Marquart
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bennett
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
West
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
Drazkowski moved to amend the Lien amendment to S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, after line 8, insert:
"Page 221, after line 2, insert:
"Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 624.714, subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. Permit
card contents; expiration; renewal.
(a) Permits to carry must be on an official, standardized permit
card adopted by the commissioner, containing only the name, residence, and
driver's license number or state identification card number of the permit
holder, if any.
(b) The permit card must also identify the
issuing sheriff and state the expiration date of the permit. The permit card must clearly display a notice
that a permit, if granted, is void and must be immediately returned to the
sheriff if the permit holder becomes prohibited by law from possessing a
firearm.
(c) A permit to carry a pistol issued
under this section expires five years after the date of issue. It may be renewed in the same manner and
under the same criteria which the original permit was obtained, subject to the
following procedures:
(1) no earlier than 90 days prior to
the expiration date on the permit, the permit holder may renew the permit by
submitting to the appropriate sheriff the application packet described in
subdivision 3 and a renewal processing fee not to exceed the actual and
reasonable direct cost of processing the application or $75, whichever is less. Of this amount, $5 must be submitted to the
commissioner and deposited into the general fund. The sheriff must process the renewal
application in accordance with subdivisions 4 and 6; and
(2) a permit holder who submits a
renewal application packet after the expiration date of the permit, but within
30 days after expiration, may renew the permit as provided in clause (1) by
paying an additional late fee of $10.
(d)
The renewal permit is effective beginning on the expiration date of the prior
permit to carry."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Drazkowski
amendment to the Lien amendment and the roll was called. There were 62 yeas and 72 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lislegard
Lucero
Lueck
Marquart
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
The question recurred on the Lien
amendment to S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as
amended. The motion prevailed and the
amendment was adopted.
Drazkowski moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 220, line 4, after "harm" insert "or for the justifiable taking of a life as authorized by section 609.065"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Drazkowski moved to amend the Drazkowski amendment to S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, after line 2, insert:
"Page 39, after line 23, insert:
"Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.065, is amended to read:
609.065
JUSTIFIABLE TAKING OF LIFE USE OF DEADLY FORCE IN DEFENSE OF HOME AND
PERSON.
Subdivision 1. Definitions. The intentional taking of the life of
another is not authorized by section 609.06, except when necessary in resisting
or preventing an offense which the actor reasonably believes exposes the actor
or another to great bodily harm or death, or preventing the commission of a
felony in the actor's place of abode.
(a) For purposes of this section, the terms in this subdivision have
the meanings given them.
(b) "Court order" means an order
for protection issued under section 518B.01, a restraining order issued under
section 609.748, a no contact order issued under section 629.75, or a
substantively similar order issued by any court in this state, another state,
the United States, or any subordinate jurisdiction of the United States.
(c) "Deadly force" means
force used by an individual with the purpose of causing, or which the
individual should reasonably know creates a substantial risk of causing, great
bodily harm or death. The intentional
discharge of a firearm by an individual at another person, or at a vehicle in
which another person is believed to be, constitutes deadly force. A threat to cause great bodily harm or death,
by the production of a weapon or otherwise, constitutes reasonable force and
not deadly force, when the individual's objective is limited to creating an
expectation that the individual will use deadly force only if authorized by
law.
(d) "Dwelling" means a
building defined under section 609.556, subdivision 3, an overnight stopping
accommodation of any kind, or a place of abode, that an individual temporarily
or permanently is occupying or intending to occupy as a habitation or home. A dwelling includes but is not limited to a
building or conveyance and that building's or conveyance's curtilage and any
attached or adjacent deck, porch, appurtenance, or other structure, whether the
building or conveyance is used temporarily or permanently for these purposes,
is mobile or immobile, or is a motor vehicle, watercraft, motor home, tent, or
the equivalent.
(e) "Forcible felony" means
any crime punishable by imprisonment exceeding one year the elements of which
include the use or threatened use of physical force or a deadly weapon against
the person of another, including but not limited to: murder in the first degree under section
609.185; murder in the second degree under section 609.19; manslaughter in the
first degree under section 609.20; assault in the first degree under section
609.221; assault in the second degree under section 609.222; assault in the
third degree under section 609.223; criminal sexual conduct in the first degree
under section 609.342; criminal sexual conduct in the second degree under
section 609.343; arson in the first degree under section 609.561; burglary in
the first, second, and third degrees under section 609.582; robbery under
sections 609.24 and 609.245; and kidnapping under section 609.25.
(f) "Good faith" includes
honesty in fact in the conduct of the act concerned.
(g) "Great bodily harm" has
the meaning given in section 609.02, subdivision 8.
(h) "Imminent" means the
actor infers from all the facts and circumstances that the course of conduct
has commenced.
(i)
"Substantial bodily harm" has the meaning given in section 609.02,
subdivision 7a.
(j) "Vehicle" means a
conveyance of any type.
Subd. 2. Circumstances
when authorized. (a) The use
of deadly force by an individual is justified under this section when the act
is undertaken:
(1) to resist or prevent the commission
of a felony in the individual's dwelling;
(2) to resist or prevent what the
individual reasonably believes is an offense or attempted offense that
imminently exposes the individual or another person to substantial bodily harm,
great bodily harm, or death; or
(3) to resist or prevent what the
individual reasonably believes is the commission or imminent commission of a
forcible felony.
(b) The use of deadly force is not
authorized under this section if the individual knows that the person against
whom force is being used is a licensed peace officer from this state, another
state, the United States, or any subordinate jurisdiction of the United States,
who is acting lawfully.
Subd. 3. Degree
of force; retreat. An
individual taking defensive action pursuant to subdivision 2 may use all force
and means, including deadly force, that the individual in good faith believes
is required to succeed in defense. The
individual may meet force with superior force when the individual's objective
is defensive; the individual is not required to retreat; and the individual may
continue defensive actions against an assailant until the danger has ended.
Subd. 4. Presumptions. (a) An individual using deadly force
is presumed to possess a reasonable belief that there exists an imminent threat
of substantial bodily harm, great bodily harm, or death to the individual or
another person, if the individual knows or has reason to know that:
(1) the person against whom the
defensive action is being taken is unlawfully entering or attempting to enter
by force or by stealth, or has unlawfully entered by force or by stealth and
remains within, the dwelling or occupied vehicle of the individual; or
(2) the person against whom the
defensive action is being taken is in the process of removing, or attempting to
remove, the individual or another person from the dwelling or occupied vehicle
of the individual.
(b) An individual is not entitled to
the benefit of the presumption in paragraph (a) if the individual knows that
the person against whom the defensive action is being taken:
(1) is a lawful resident of the
dwelling or a lawful possessor of the vehicle, or is otherwise lawfully
permitted to enter the dwelling or vehicle; or
(2) is a person who has lawful custody
of the person being removed from the dwelling or vehicle or whose removal from
the dwelling or vehicle is being attempted.
A person who is prohibited by a court order from contacting another
individual or from entering a dwelling or possessing a vehicle of another
individual is not a lawful resident of that individual's dwelling and is not a
lawful possessor of that individual's vehicle.
(c) An individual using defensive force
is not entitled to the benefit of the presumption in paragraph (a) if the
individual is presently engaged in a crime or attempting to escape from the
scene of a crime, or is presently using the dwelling or occupied vehicle in
furtherance of a crime.
(d)
An individual is not entitled to the benefit of the presumption in paragraph
(a) if the individual knows or has reason to know that the person against whom
the defensive action is being taken is a licensed peace officer from this
state, another state, the United States, or any subordinate jurisdiction of the
United States, who is acting lawfully.
Subd. 5.
Criminal investigation;
immunity from prosecution. (a)
An individual who uses force, including deadly force, according to this section
or as otherwise provided by law in defense of the individual, the individual's dwelling, or another individual is justified in
using such force and is immune from any criminal prosecution for that act.
(b) A law enforcement agency may arrest an individual
using force under circumstances described in this section only after
considering any claims or circumstances supporting self-defense or lawful
defense of another individual.
Subd. 6.
Justifiable use of force;
burden of proof. In a
criminal trial, when there is any evidence of justifiable use of force under
this section or section 609.06, the state has the burden of proving beyond a
reasonable doubt that the defendant's actions were not justifiable.
Subd. 7.
Short title. This section may be cited as the
"Defense of Dwelling and Person Act of 2019."
EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective August 1, 2019, and applies to uses of deadly force occurring on or after that date.""
Page 1, after line 4, insert:
"Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Drazkowski
amendment to the Drazkowski amendment and the roll was called. There were 59 yeas and 74 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Marquart
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
The question recurred on the Drazkowski
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 63 yeas and 71 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lislegard
Lucero
Lueck
Marquart
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Sandstede
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Munson offered an amendment to
S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended.
POINT OF
ORDER
Carlson, L., raised a point of order
pursuant to rule 4.03, relating to Ways and Means Committee; Budget Resolution;
Effect on Expenditure and Revenue Bills, that the Munson amendment was not in
order. The Speaker ruled the point of
order well taken and the Munson amendment out of order.
Lucero moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 230, line 26, after the period, insert "The court shall also order law enforcement to take possession of the respondent's motor vehicles; knives; axes; rope; baseball bats, golf clubs, and other sporting equipment; tools; household chemicals; antifreeze; and any other item that may be used as a weapon."
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Lucero
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 0 yeas and 134 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahner
Bahr
Baker
Becker-Finn
Bennett
Bernardy
Bierman
Boe
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dehn
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Erickson
Fabian
Fischer
Franson
Freiberg
Garofalo
Gomez
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Her
Hertaus
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Koznick
Kresha
Kunesh-Podein
Layman
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Lucero
Lueck
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Munson
Murphy
Nash
Nelson, M.
Nelson, N.
Neu
Noor
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Olson
O'Neill
Pelowski
Persell
Petersburg
Pierson
Pinto
Poppe
Poston
Pryor
Quam
Richardson
Robbins
Runbeck
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schomacker
Schultz
Scott
Stephenson
Sundin
Swedzinski
Tabke
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vang
Vogel
Wagenius
Wazlawik
West
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Bennett moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 231, line 19, before "misdemeanor" insert "gross"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Bennett
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 61 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Brand
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Marquart
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Heintzeman moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 212, after line 32, insert:
"Subd. 13.
Monitoring. (a) Beginning September 1, 2019, and
each year thereafter, the commissioner of public safety must report to the
legislature on:
(1) the number of permits applied for, issued,
suspended, revoked, and denied, further categorized by the age, sex, and zip
code of the applicant or permit holder, since the previous submission, and in
total;
(2) the number of permits currently valid;
(3) the specific reasons for each suspension,
revocation, and denial and the number of reversed, canceled, or corrected
actions; and
(4) without expressly identifying an applicant, the
number of denials or terminations based on the grounds under subdivisions 4 and
7, the factual basis for each denial or revocation, and the result of an
appeal, if any, including the court's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and
order.
(b) Sheriffs and police chiefs must supply the
Department of Public Safety with the basic data the department requires to
complete the report under paragraph (a).
Sheriffs and police chiefs may submit data classified as private to the
Department of Public Safety under this paragraph.
(c) Copies of the report under paragraph (a) must be
made available to the public at the actual cost of duplication.
(d) Nothing contained in any provision of this section or any other law requires or authorizes the registration, documentation, collection, or providing of serial numbers or other data on firearms or on firearms' owners."
Amend the title accordingly
Pinto moved to amend the Heintzeman amendment to S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 4, delete "2019" and insert "2020"
The motion
prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was adopted.
The question recurred on the Heintzeman
amendment, as amended, to S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment,
as amended. The motion prevailed and the
amendment, as amended, was adopted.
Heintzeman moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 210, after line 2, insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 624.711, is amended to read:
624.711 DECLARATION
OF POLICY.
It is not the intent of the legislature to regulate
shotguns, rifles and other longguns of the type commonly used for hunting and
not defined as pistols or semiautomatic military-style assault weapons, or to
place costs of administration upon those citizens who wish to possess or,
carry, or transfer pistols or semiautomatic military-style assault
weapons lawfully, or to confiscate or otherwise restrict the use or transfer
of pistols or semiautomatic military-style assault weapons by law-abiding
citizens."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Heintzeman
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 64 yeas and 70 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lislegard
Lucero
Lueck
Marquart
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Sandstede
Schomacker
Scott
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Johnson moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 211, after line 20, insert:
"(e) A chief of police or sheriff who learns that a permit applicant does not have lawful immigration status must report the person to Immigration and Customs Enforcement."
Mariani moved to amend the Johnson amendment to S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 4, before "lawful" insert "a"
Page 1, delete line 5 and insert "right to possess a firearm may pursue all appropriate remedies."
The
motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was adopted.
The question recurred on the Johnson
amendment, as amended, to S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment,
as amended. The motion prevailed and the
amendment, as amended, was adopted.
Scott offered an amendment to
S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended.
POINT OF
ORDER
Carlson, L., raised a point of order
pursuant to rule 4.03, relating to Ways and Means Committee; Budget Resolution;
Effect on Expenditure and Revenue Bills, that the Scott amendment was not in
order. The Speaker ruled the point of
order well taken and the Scott amendment out of order.
Scott appealed the decision of the
Speaker.
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The vote was taken on the question
"Shall the decision of the Speaker stand as the judgment of the
House?" and the roll was called.
There were 75 yeas and 59 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
Those who voted in the negative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
So it was the judgment of the House that
the decision of the Speaker should stand.
Nash moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 221, after line 2, insert:
"Sec. 3. PROHIBITED
PERSONS IN POSSESSION OF FIREARMS STUDY; REPORT.
The commissioner of public safety shall study the issue of convictions of prohibited persons in possession of firearms and how the prohibited persons obtained possession of the firearms. By December 15, 2019, the commissioner must file a report detailing the commissioner's study with the chairs and ranking minority members of the house and senate committees with jurisdiction over public safety policy and finance."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
Mariani moved to amend the Nash amendment to S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 8, delete "2019" and insert "2020"
The
motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was adopted.
The question recurred on the Nash
amendment, as amended, to S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment,
as amended. The motion prevailed and the
amendment, as amended, was adopted.
Nash moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 210, after line 2, insert:
"Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 609.11, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. Report on criminal cases involving firearm. Beginning on July 1, 1994, every county attorney shall collect and maintain the following information on criminal complaints and prosecutions within the county attorney's office in which the defendant is alleged to have committed an offense listed in subdivision 9 while possessing or using a firearm:
(1) whether the case was charged or dismissed;
(2) whether the defendant was convicted of
the offense or a lesser offense; and
(3) whether the mandatory minimum sentence
required under this section was imposed and executed or was waived by the
prosecutor or court; and
(4) whether the defendant had previously been convicted of an offense under subdivision 9 while possessing a firearm.
No later than July 1 of each year, beginning on July 1, 1995, the county attorney shall forward this information to the Sentencing Guidelines commission upon forms prescribed by the commission."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Nash moved to amend the Nash amendment to S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, line 18, after the period, insert "As part of the report required under this subdivision, the Sentencing Guidelines Commission, in consultation with the commissioner of public safety, shall study and make findings on the prevalence of strawman firearm purchases in states that have universal background checks for firearm transfers."
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
The question recurred on the Nash
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 134 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Acomb
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahner
Bahr
Baker
Becker-Finn
Bennett
Bernardy
Bierman
Boe
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dehn
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Erickson
Fabian
Fischer
Franson
Freiberg
Garofalo
Gomez
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Her
Hertaus
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Koznick
Kresha
Kunesh-Podein
Layman
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Lucero
Lueck
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Munson
Murphy
Nash
Nelson, M.
Nelson, N.
Neu
Noor
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Olson
O'Neill
Pelowski
Persell
Petersburg
Pierson
Pinto
Poppe
Poston
Pryor
Quam
Richardson
Robbins
Runbeck
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schomacker
Schultz
Scott
Stephenson
Sundin
Swedzinski
Tabke
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vang
Vogel
Wagenius
Wazlawik
West
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Hortman
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Becker-Finn moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 281, delete article 21
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Pursuant to rule 1.50, Winkler moved that
the House be allowed to continue in session after 12:00 midnight. The motion prevailed.
The question recurred on the Becker-Finn
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 63 yeas and 69 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Davnie
Dehn
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Loeffler
Long
Mann
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandstede
Schultz
Stephenson
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
Those who voted in the negative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Brand
Considine
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lesch
Lislegard
Lucero
Lueck
Mahoney
Mariani
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Sandell
Sauke
Schomacker
Scott
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
O’Neill moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 285, line 20, before the period, insert "including chapters 518A and 518, and sections 518.17 and 518.175"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Scott moved to amend the O’Neill amendment to S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, after line 2, insert:
"Page 282, after line 3, insert:
"Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 518.175, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. General. (a) In all proceedings for dissolution or legal separation, subsequent to the commencement of the proceeding and continuing thereafter during the minority of the child, the court shall, upon the request of either parent, grant such parenting time on behalf of the child and a parent as will enable the child and the parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interests of the child. The court shall use a rebuttable presumption that it is in the best interests of the child to protect each individual parent-child relationship by maximizing the child's time with each parent. The court, when issuing a parenting time order, may reserve a determination as to the future establishment or expansion of a parent's parenting time. In that event, the best interest standard set forth in subdivision 5, paragraph (a), shall be applied to a subsequent motion to establish or expand parenting time.
(b) If the court finds, after a hearing, that parenting time with a parent is likely to endanger the child's physical, mental, or emotional health or safety or impair the child's emotional development, the court shall restrict parenting time with that parent as to time, place, duration, or supervision and may deny parenting time entirely, as the circumstances warrant. The court shall consider the age of the child and the child's relationship with the parent prior to the commencement of the proceeding.
(c) A parent's failure to pay support because of the parent's inability to do so shall not be sufficient cause for denial of parenting time.
(d) The court may provide that a law enforcement officer or other appropriate person will accompany a party seeking to enforce or comply with parenting time.
(e) Upon request of either party, to the
extent practicable an order for parenting time must include a specific schedule
for regular parenting time, including the frequency and duration of visitation
parenting time and visitation parenting time during
holidays and, vacations, and school breaks, unless
parenting time is restricted, denied, or reserved.
(f) The court administrator shall provide a form for a pro se motion regarding parenting time disputes, which includes provisions for indicating the relief requested, an affidavit in which the party may state the facts of the dispute, and a brief description of the parenting time expeditor process under section 518.1751. The form may not include a request for a change of custody. The court shall provide instructions on serving and filing the motion.
(g) In the absence of other evidence,
Unless otherwise agreed, there is a rebuttable presumption that a
the court shall award each parent is entitled to receive a minimum of
25 50 percent of the parenting time for the child. If it is not practicable to award 50
percent parenting time to each parent, the court shall maximize parenting time
for each parent as close as possible to the 50 percent presumption. For purposes of this paragraph, the
percentage of parenting time may be determined by calculating the number of
overnights that a child spends with a parent or by using a method other than
overnights if the parent has significant time periods on separate days when the
child is in the parent's physical custody but does not stay overnight. The court may consider the age of the
child in determining whether a child is with a parent for a significant period
of time.
(h) The court must include in a
parenting time order the following:
(1) the ability of each parent to
comply with the awarded parenting time schedule; and
(2) if a court deviates from the
parenting time presumption under paragraph (g) and the parties have not
otherwise made a parenting time agreement, the court shall make written
findings of fact supported by clear and convincing evidence that the deviation
results from one or more of the following:
(i) a parent has a mental illness that
was diagnosed by a licensed physician or by a licensed psychologist, and the
mental illness endangers the safety of the child based on the opinion of the
licensed physician or the licensed psychologist treating the parent;
(ii) a parent refuses or fails to
complete a chemical dependency evaluation or assessment ordered by a court, or
a parent refuses or fails to complete chemical dependency recommendations as
ordered by a licensed physician or by a licensed drug or alcohol counselor;
(iii) a parent is unable to care for
the child 50 percent of the time because of the parent's inability to modify
the parent's schedule to accommodate having a child 50 percent of the time. An inability to modify a parent's schedule
includes but is not limited to work, school, child care, or medical appointment
scheduling conflicts that prevent a
parent
from maintaining parenting time with a child to accommodate the presumption
under this section. A parent's provision
for safe alternative care when the parent is not available during the parent's
scheduled parenting time is not an inability of a parent to participate in a
parenting time schedule under this paragraph;
(iv) a parent's repeated willful failure
to comply with parenting time awarded pursuant to a temporary order;
(v) the distance required to travel between each parent's residence is so great that it makes the parenting time presumption impractical to meet;
(vi) the child has a diagnosed medical
or educational special need that cannot be accommodated by the parenting time
presumption; or
(vii) a child protection finding that
the child is currently not safe under a parent's care.
(i) In assessing whether to deviate from
the parenting time presumption in paragraph (g), the court shall consider that
a reduction in a parent's parenting time may impair the parent's ability to
parent the child, which may have negative impacts on the child.
(j) If a child does not have a
relationship with a parent due to an absence of one year or more with minimal
or no contact with the child, or if the child is one year old or younger, the
court may order a gradual increase in parenting time. If the court orders a gradual increase in
parenting time, the gradual increase shall only be in effect for a period of
one year or less, at which time the order shall provide for a parenting time
schedule based on the parenting time presumption in paragraph (g).
(k) The court shall not limit parenting
time for a parent based solely on the age of the child. If the child is five years old or younger at
the time the parenting time schedule is established and the order does not
provide for equal parenting time, the order must include a provision for a
possible future modification of the parenting time order.
(l) The court shall not consider the
gender of a parent or a parent's marital or relationship status in making
parenting time determinations under this section.
(m) An award of parenting time of up to
53 percent for one parent and not below 47 percent for the other parent or a
finding that domestic abuse has occurred, as defined in section 518B.01,
subdivision 2, or a qualified domestic violence-related offense, as defined in
section 609.02, subdivision 16, between the parents or between a parent and the
child does not constitute a deviation from the parenting time presumption in
paragraph (g).
(n) In awarding parenting time, the
court shall evaluate whether:
(1) one parent has engaged in
unwarranted interference between the child and the other parent;
(2) one parent has made false
allegations of domestic abuse; and
(3) one parent has chronically denied or minimized parenting time to the other parent in order to gain advantage in custody matters.""
Page 1, after line 4, insert:
"Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly"
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Scott
amendment to the O'Neill amendment and the roll was called. There were 67 yeas and 67 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Considine
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Elkins
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lien
Lucero
Lueck
Mahoney
Marquart
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Moran
Munson
Murphy
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Pelowski
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Sauke
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Heintzeman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mann
Mariani
Masin
Moller
Morrison
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The motion did
not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
The question recurred on the O'Neill
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 120 yeas and 11 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Acomb
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Becker-Finn
Bennett
Bernardy
Bierman
Boe
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dehn
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Freiberg
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hausman
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Her
Hertaus
Hornstein
Howard
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Koznick
Kresha
Kunesh-Podein
Layman
Lee
Lesch
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Long
Lucero
Lueck
Mahoney
Mariani
Marquart
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Moller
Moran
Munson
Murphy
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Noor
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Olson
O'Neill
Pelowski
Persell
Petersburg
Pierson
Pinto
Poppe
Poston
Pryor
Quam
Richardson
Robbins
Runbeck
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schomacker
Scott
Stephenson
Sundin
Swedzinski
Tabke
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vang
Vogel
Wagenius
Wazlawik
West
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Bahner
Fischer
Gomez
Hassan
Huot
Liebling
Loeffler
Mann
Morrison
Nelson, M.
Spk. Hortman
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
Moller moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 235, line 25, delete "100,029,000" and insert "99,904,000"
Page 235, delete line 30
Page 236, delete lines 1 to 4
Page 236, line 5, delete "(c)" and insert "(b)"
Page 236, after line 25, insert:
"Sec. 13. PUBLIC
SAFETY |
|
$125,000 |
|
$-0- |
$125,000 the first year is to convene, administer, and implement the Forfeiture Reform Task Force."
Page 237, delete sections 14 and 15
Page 243, delete article 19 and insert:
"ARTICLE 19
FORFEITURE TASK FORCE
Section 1. FORFEITURE
REFORM TASK FORCE.
Subdivision 1. Establishment. A task force on forfeiture reform is
established to develop a comprehensive plan to reform procedures relating to
the seizure and forfeiture of property associated with criminal activity in
Minnesota, including proposals for model policies and legislative action. Proposed legislation and model policies must
be consistent with the goals that no forfeiture be completed without sufficient
proof of criminal activity; all owners have access to a meaningful hearing
within a reasonable time after property is seized; the value of forfeited
property is not excessive in relation to the underlying criminal offense; proceeds
from forfeiture proceedings do not directly fund the entity that seized the
property or represented the government agency in forfeiture proceedings; local
law enforcement agencies are prohibited from circumventing state laws; and
local law enforcement agencies have access to sufficient sources of funding
that are not connected to forfeiture.
Subd. 2. Membership. (a) The task force consists of the
following members:
(1) the commissioner of public safety
or a designee;
(2) one chief of police appointed by
the Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association;
(3) one sheriff appointed by the
Minnesota Sheriffs' Association;
(4) two rank and file peace officers,
at least one of whom must serve a jurisdiction outside the seven-county
metropolitan area, appointed by the Minnesota Police and Peace Officers
Association;
(5) one conservation officer appointed
by the commissioner of natural resources;
(6) the superintendent of the Bureau of
Criminal Apprehension or a designee;
(7) the state public defender or a designee;
(8) one defense attorney appointed by
the Minnesota Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers;
(9) one county attorney appointed by
the Minnesota County Attorneys Association;
(10) one member of the Violent Crime
Coordinating Council appointed by the council's chair;
(11) one attorney representing the ACLU
of Minnesota, appointed by its executive director;
(12) one attorney with a nonprofit
public interest law firm focusing on property rights, free speech, educational
choice, and economic liberty; and
(13) the director of the Office of
Justice Programs or a designee.
(b) Unless otherwise specified, members
shall be appointed by the commissioner of public safety. Appointments must be made no later than July
30, 2019.
(c) Members shall serve without
compensation.
(d) Members of the task force serve at
the pleasure of the appointing authority or until the task force expires. Vacancies shall be filled by the appointing
authority consistent with the qualifications of the vacating member required by
this subdivision.
Subd. 3. Officers;
meetings. (a) The task force
shall elect a chair and vice-chair and may elect other officers as necessary.
(b) The commissioner of public safety
shall convene the first meeting of the task force no later than August 1, 2019,
and shall provide meeting space and administrative assistance as necessary for
the task force to conduct its work.
(c) The task force shall meet at least
monthly, or upon the call of its chair. The
task force shall meet sufficiently enough to accomplish the tasks identified in
this section. Meetings of the task force
are subject to Minnesota Statutes, chapter 13D.
Subd. 4. Duties. (a) The duties of the task force
shall, at a minimum, include:
(1) reviewing current state laws relating to the
forfeiture of property in connection with criminal activity;
(2) reviewing state and federal court decisions relating
to forfeiture of property in connection with criminal activity;
(3) reviewing the financial impact of forfeiture on state
and local law enforcement agencies;
(4) receiving input from individuals who had property
seized pursuant to Minnesota's forfeiture laws;
(5) reviewing laws and policies adopted and proposed in
other jurisdictions relating to forfeiture of property in connection with
criminal activity; and
(6) developing proposed model policies and legislation
which are consistent with the goals identified in subdivision 1.
(b) At its discretion, the task force may examine other
related issues consistent with this section as necessary.
Subd. 5.
Report. On or before February 15, 2020, the
task force shall report to the chairs and ranking minority members of the
legislative committees and divisions with jurisdiction over public safety
finance and policy on the work of the task force. The report shall include proposed model
policies and legislation.
Subd. 6.
Expiration. This task force expires upon
submission of the report required under subdivision 5.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This article is effective July 1, 2019."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Moller
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 95 yeas and 35 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Baker
Becker-Finn
Bennett
Bernardy
Bierman
Boe
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Daniels
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Franson
Freiberg
Gomez
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Halverson
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Her
Hertaus
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Johnson
Jurgens
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Layman
Lee
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Lueck
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nash
Nelson, M.
Noor
O'Driscoll
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Petersburg
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Quam
Richardson
Runbeck
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Hortman
Those who voted in the negative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Garofalo
Green
Hansen
Hausman
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Lesch
Liebling
Long
Lucero
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nelson, N.
Neu
Pierson
Poston
Robbins
Schomacker
Swedzinski
Vogel
West
The
motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
O’Neill moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 234, line 26, delete "311,201,000" and insert "312,512,000" and delete "321,140,000" and insert "322,503,000"
Page 235, after line 6, insert:
"(e) Establishment of New Treatment Courts
$1,311,000 the first year and $1,363,000 the second year are to support existing treatment courts and establish new treatment courts."
Reletter the paragraphs in sequence
Page 236, line 8, delete "6,421,000" and insert "5,110,000" and delete "6,698,000" and insert "5,335,000"
Adjust amounts accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the O'Neill
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 56 yeas and 75 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lucero
Lueck
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.
Lucero moved to amend S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 272, line 2, after the period, insert "Disclosure of not public data by a member of the commission also constitutes a breach of the security of the data under section 13.055 and the commission must provide notice of the breach as required by that section."
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
Scott moved to amend the Lucero amendment to S. F. No. 802, the third engrossment, as amended, as follows:
Page 1, after line 2, insert:
"Page 272, after line 13, insert:
"Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 13.055, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings given to them.
(a) "Breach of the security of the data" means unauthorized acquisition of data maintained by a government entity that compromises the security and classification of the data. Good faith acquisition of or access to government data by an employee, contractor, or agent of a government entity for the purposes of the entity is not a breach of the security of the data, if the government data is not provided to or viewable by an unauthorized person, or accessed for a purpose not described in the procedures required by section 13.05, subdivision 5. For purposes of this paragraph, data maintained by a government entity includes data maintained by a person under a contract with the government entity that provides for the acquisition of or access to the data by an employee, contractor, or agent of the government entity.
(b) "Contact information" means either name and mailing address or name and email address for each individual who is the subject of data maintained by the government entity.
(c) "Unauthorized acquisition"
means that a person has obtained, accessed, or viewed government data without
the informed consent of the individuals who are the subjects of the data or
statutory authority and with the intent to use the data for nongovernmental
purposes.
(d) "Unauthorized person" means any person who accesses government data without a work assignment that reasonably requires access, or regardless of the person's work assignment, for a purpose not described in the procedures required by section 13.05, subdivision 5.""
Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references
Amend the title accordingly
A roll call was requested and properly
seconded.
The question was taken on the Scott
amendment to the Lucero amendment and the roll was called. There were 60 yeas and 73 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lesch
Lucero
Lueck
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Schomacker
Scott
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
Those who voted in the negative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Sundin
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
The
motion did not prevail and the amendment to the amendment was not adopted.
The question recurred on the Lucero
amendment and the roll was called. There
were 134 yeas and 0 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Acomb
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahner
Bahr
Baker
Becker-Finn
Bennett
Bernardy
Bierman
Boe
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dehn
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Erickson
Fabian
Fischer
Franson
Freiberg
Garofalo
Gomez
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Her
Hertaus
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Koznick
Kresha
Kunesh-Podein
Layman
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Lucero
Lueck
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Munson
Murphy
Nash
Nelson, M.
Nelson, N.
Neu
Noor
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Olson
O'Neill
Pelowski
Persell
Petersburg
Pierson
Pinto
Poppe
Poston
Pryor
Quam
Richardson
Robbins
Runbeck
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schomacker
Schultz
Scott
Stephenson
Sundin
Swedzinski
Tabke
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vang
Vogel
Wagenius
Wazlawik
West
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Hortman
The motion
prevailed and the amendment was adopted.
CALL OF THE HOUSE
On the motion of Daudt and on the demand
of 10 members, a call of the House was ordered.
The following members answered to their names:
Acomb
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahner
Bahr
Baker
Becker-Finn
Bennett
Bernardy
Bierman
Boe
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Davnie
Dehn
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Edelson
Elkins
Erickson
Fabian
Fischer
Franson
Freiberg
Garofalo
Gomez
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Halverson
Hamilton
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Her
Hertaus
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Koznick
Kresha
Kunesh-Podein
Layman
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Lislegard
Loeffler
Long
Lucero
Lueck
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Marquart
Masin
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Munson
Murphy
Nash
Nelson, M.
Nelson, N.
Neu
Noor
Nornes
O'Driscoll
Olson
O'Neill
Pelowski
Persell
Petersburg
Pierson
Pinto
Poppe
Poston
Pryor
Quam
Richardson
Robbins
Runbeck
Sandell
Sandstede
Sauke
Schomacker
Schultz
Scott
Stephenson
Sundin
Swedzinski
Tabke
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vang
Vogel
Wagenius
Wazlawik
West
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Zerwas
Spk. Hortman
All members answered to the call and it
was so ordered.
S. F. No. 802, A bill for
an act relating to public safety; appropriating money for public safety,
courts, corrections, human rights, Guardian Ad Litem Board, Uniform Laws
Commission, Board on Judicial Standards, Board of Public Defense, Sentencing
Guidelines, Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) Board, and Private
Detective Board; increasing the maximum penalty and requiring predatory
offender registration for certain invasion of privacy crimes involving minors;
increasing penalties for child pornography offenses; expanding criminal sexual
conduct offenses for persons in current or recent positions of authority over
juveniles and for peace officers who engage
in sexual activity with those in custody; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018,
sections 243.166, subdivision 1b; 299A.707, by adding a subdivision;
357.021, subdivision 7; 609.341, subdivisions 10, 11; 609.342, subdivision 1;
609.343, subdivision 1; 609.344, subdivision 1; 609.345, subdivision 1;
609.746, subdivision 1; 617.246, subdivisions 2, 3, 4, 7; 617.247, subdivisions
3, 4, 9.
The bill was read for the third time, as
amended, and placed upon its final passage.
The question was taken on the passage of
the bill and the roll was called. There
were 70 yeas and 64 nays as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Acomb
Bahner
Becker-Finn
Bernardy
Bierman
Brand
Cantrell
Carlson, A.
Carlson, L.
Christensen
Claflin
Considine
Davnie
Dehn
Edelson
Elkins
Fischer
Freiberg
Gomez
Halverson
Hansen
Hassan
Hausman
Her
Hornstein
Howard
Huot
Klevorn
Koegel
Kotyza-Witthuhn
Kunesh-Podein
Lee
Lesch
Liebling
Lien
Lillie
Lippert
Loeffler
Long
Mahoney
Mann
Mariani
Masin
Moller
Moran
Morrison
Murphy
Nelson, M.
Noor
Olson
Pelowski
Persell
Pinto
Poppe
Pryor
Richardson
Sandell
Sauke
Schultz
Stephenson
Tabke
Vang
Wagenius
Wazlawik
Winkler
Wolgamott
Xiong, J.
Xiong, T.
Youakim
Spk. Hortman
Those who voted in the negative were:
Albright
Anderson
Backer
Bahr
Baker
Bennett
Boe
Daniels
Daudt
Davids
Demuth
Dettmer
Drazkowski
Ecklund
Erickson
Fabian
Franson
Garofalo
Green
Grossell
Gruenhagen
Gunther
Haley
Hamilton
Heinrich
Heintzeman
Hertaus
Johnson
Jurgens
Kiel
Koznick
Kresha
Layman
Lislegard
Lucero
Lueck
Marquart
McDonald
Mekeland
Miller
Munson
Nash
Nelson, N.
Neu
Nornes
O'Driscoll
O'Neill
Petersburg
Pierson
Poston
Quam
Robbins
Runbeck
Sandstede
Schomacker
Scott
Sundin
Swedzinski
Theis
Torkelson
Urdahl
Vogel
West
Zerwas
The
bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.
S. F. No. 2415 was
reported to the House.
LAY ON THE
TABLE
Winkler moved that S. F. No. 2415
be laid on the table. The motion
prevailed.
ADJOURNMENT
Winkler moved that when the House adjourns
today it adjourn until 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, April 30, 2019. The motion prevailed.
Winkler moved that the House adjourn. The motion prevailed, and the Speaker
declared the House stands adjourned until 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, April 30, 2019.
Patrick
D. Murphy, Chief
Clerk, House of Representatives