<HR><a name=741></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 741</b></center><HR><p>

 

 

STATE OF MINNESOTA

 

 

SPECIAL SESSION - 2021

 

_____________________

 

FIFTEENTH DAY

 

Saint Paul, Minnesota, Tuesday, June 29, 2021

 

 

      The House of Representatives convened at 10:00 a.m. and was called to order by Andrew Carlson, Speaker pro tempore.

 

      Prayer was offered by the Reverend Craig Hanson, Our Savior's Lutheran Church, Circle Pines, Minnesota.

 

      The members of the House gave the pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.

 

      The roll was called and the following members were present:

 


Acomb

Agbaje

Akland

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Bahner

Bahr

Baker

Becker-Finn

Bennett

Berg

Bernardy

Bierman

Bliss

Boe

Boldon

Burkel

Carlson

Christensen

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Davnie

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Erickson

Feist

Fischer

Franke

Franson

Frazier

Frederick

Freiberg

Garofalo

Gomez

Green

Greenman

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Haley

Hamilton

Hansen, R.

Hanson, J.

Hassan

Hausman

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Her

Hertaus

Hollins

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Igo

Johnson

Jordan

Jurgens

Keeler

Kiel

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Koznick

Kresha

Lee

Liebling

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Long

Lucero

Lueck

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Mortensen

Mueller

Munson

Murphy

Nash

Nelson, M.

Nelson, N.

Neu Brindley

Noor

Novotny

O'Driscoll

Olson, B.

Olson, L.

O'Neill

Pelowski

Petersburg

Pfarr

Pierson

Pinto

Poston

Pryor

Quam

Raleigh

Rasmusson

Reyer

Richardson

Robbins

Sandell

Sandstede

Schomacker

Schultz

Scott

Stephenson

Sundin

Swedzinski

Theis

Thompson

Torkelson

Urdahl

Vang

Wazlawik

West

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman


 

      A quorum was present.

 

      The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the Journal of the preceding day.  There being no objection, further reading of the Journal was dispensed with and the Journal was approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk.

<HR><a name=742></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 742</b></center><HR><p>              The Speaker assumed the Chair.

 

 

REPORT FROM THE COMMITTEE ON RULES

AND LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATION

 

      Winkler from the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration, pursuant to rules 1.21 and 3.33, designated the following bill to be placed on the Calendar for the Day for Wednesday, June 30, 2021 and established a prefiling requirement for amendments offered to the following bill:

 

      H. F. No. 9.

 

 

      Winkler moved that the House recess subject to the call of the Chair.  The motion prevailed.

 

 

RECESS

 

 

RECONVENED

 

      The House reconvened and was called to order by the Speaker.

 

 

MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE

 

 

      The following messages were received from the Senate:

 

 

Madam Speaker:

 

I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned: 

 

H. F. No. 4, A bill for an act relating to state government; establishing a budget for the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency; modifying various housing policy provisions; expanding requirements and uses of housing infrastructure bonds and rehabilitation loans; expanding accommodation requirements for service and support animals; expanding property ownership options to owners of manufactured homes; providing for an eviction moratorium phaseout; establishing a task force on shelter; making technical and conforming changes; requiring a report; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2020, sections 12A.09, subdivision 3; 256C.02; 273.11, subdivision 12; 273.125, subdivision 8; 326B.106, subdivision 7; 363A.09, subdivision 5; 462A.05, subdivisions 14, 14a; 462A.07, subdivision 2; 462A.30, subdivision 9; 462A.37, subdivision 5, by adding a subdivision; 474A.21; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 168A; 504B; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 168A.141.

 

Cal R. Ludeman, Secretary of the Senate

 

 

Madam Speaker:

 

I hereby announce the passage by the Senate of the following House File, herewith returned: 

 

H. F. No. 52, A bill for an act relating to capital investment; amending prior appropriations for capital improvement projects; authorizing the conveyance of state lands; amending Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 469.53; Laws 2009, chapter 93, article 1, section 14, subdivision 3, as amended; Laws 2014, chapter 294, article 1, <HR><a name=743></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 743</b></center><HR><p>sections 21, subdivisions 21, 23, as amended; 22, subdivision 5, as amended; Laws 2017, First Special Session chapter 8, article 1, sections 7, subdivision 2; 15, subdivision 3, as amended; 20, subdivisions 8, 14, 15; Laws 2018, chapter 214, article 1, sections 16, subdivision 2, as amended; 17, subdivision 6; 18, subdivisions 3, 4; 21, subdivisions 16, 28, as amended; 22, subdivision 6; Laws 2019, chapter 2, article 1, section 2, subdivision 5; Laws 2020, Fifth Special Session chapter 3, article 1, sections 7, subdivisions 3, 18; 13, subdivision 5; 16, subdivisions 5, 7, 15, 36; 20, subdivisions 5, 7; 21, subdivisions 14, 20, 23, 37, 44, 47; 22, subdivisions 6, 8, 18, 19, 21, 23, 28, 30, 33; article 2, section 2, subdivisions 2, 4.

 

Cal R. Ludeman, Secretary of the Senate

 

 

Madam Speaker:

 

I hereby announce that the Senate has concurred in and adopted the report of the Conference Committee on: 

 

S. F. No. 9, A bill for an act relating to state government; establishing a biennial budget for Department of Employment and Economic Development, Department of Labor and Industry, Bureau of Mediation Services, and Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals; modifying various provisions governing economic development, labor and industry, unemployment insurance, and higher education; establishing Main Street Economic Revitalization Loan Program; establishing Main Street COVID-19 Relief grants; modifying fees; classifying data; requiring reports; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2020, sections 13.7905, by adding a subdivision; 116J.035, subdivision 6; 116J.431, subdivisions 2, 3, by adding a subdivision; 116L.40, subdivisions 5, 6, 9, 10, by adding a subdivision; 116L.41, subdivisions 1, 2, by adding subdivisions; 116L.42, subdivisions 1, 2; 178.012, subdivision 1; 181.939; 268.035, subdivision 21c; 268.085, subdivisions 2, 4a; 268.133; 268.136, subdivision 1; 326B.07, subdivision 1; 326B.092, subdivision 7; 326B.108, subdivisions 1, 3, by adding a subdivision; 326B.133, subdivision 8; 326B.42, by adding subdivisions; 326B.46, subdivision 1; 326B.89, subdivisions 1, 4, 5, 9; Laws 2014, chapter 211, section 13, as amended; Laws 2017, chapter 94, article 1, section 2, subdivision 2, as amended; Laws 2019, First Special Session chapter 7, article 1, sections 2, subdivision 2, as amended; 3, subdivision 4; article 2, section 8; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 116J; 181A; 299F; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2020, sections 181.9414; 268.085, subdivision 4.

 

The Senate has repassed said bill in accordance with the recommendation and report of the Conference Committee.  Said Senate File is herewith transmitted to the House.

 

Cal R. Ludeman, Secretary of the Senate

 

 

 

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON S. F. No. 9

 

A bill for an act relating to state government; establishing a biennial budget for Department of Employment and Economic Development, Department of Labor and Industry, Bureau of Mediation Services, and Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals; modifying various provisions governing economic development, labor and industry, unemployment insurance, and higher education; establishing Main Street Economic Revitalization Loan Program; establishing Main Street COVID-19 Relief grants; modifying fees; classifying data; requiring reports; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2020, sections 13.7905, by adding a subdivision; 116J.035, subdivision 6; 116J.431, subdivisions 2, 3, by adding a subdivision; 116L.40, subdivisions 5, 6, 9, 10, by adding a subdivision; 116L.41, subdivisions 1, 2, by adding subdivisions; 116L.42, subdivisions 1, 2; 178.012, subdivision 1; 181.939; 268.035, subdivision 21c; 268.085, subdivisions 2, 4a; 268.133; 268.136, subdivision 1; 326B.07, subdivision 1; 326B.092, subdivision 7; 326B.108, subdivisions 1, 3, by adding a subdivision; 326B.133, subdivision 8; 326B.42, by adding subdivisions; 326B.46, subdivision 1; 326B.89, subdivisions 1, 4, 5, 9; Laws 2014, chapter 211, section 13, as amended; Laws 2017, chapter 94, article 1, section 2, subdivision 2, as amended; Laws 2019, First Special Session chapter 7, article 1, sections 2, subdivision 2, as amended; 3, subdivision 4; article 2, section 8; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 116J; 181A; 299F; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2020, sections 181.9414; 268.085, subdivision 4.

<HR><a name=744></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 744</b></center><HR><p>June 28, 2021

The Honorable Jeremy R. Miller

President of the Senate

 

The Honorable Melissa Hortman

Speaker of the House of Representatives

 

We, the undersigned conferees for S. F. No. 9 report that we have agreed upon the items in dispute and recommend as follows:

 

That the House recede from its amendments and that S. F. No. 9, the fourth engrossment, be further amended as follows:

 

Page 2, line 11, delete "289,150,000" and insert "294,150,000"

 

Page 2, line 14, delete "248,701,000" and insert "253,701,000"

 

Page 2, line 21, delete "203,015,000" and insert "208,015,000"

 

Page 2, line 23, delete "200,215,000" and insert "205,215,000"

 

Page 10, after line 4, insert:

 

"(z) $5,000,000 in the first year is for a grant to Lake of the Woods County for the forgivable loan program for remote recreational businesses.  This appropriation is available until April 1, 2022."

 

Page 31, line 17, delete "25" and insert "23"

 

Page 31, line 19, delete "25" and insert "23"

 

Page 32, after line 3, insert:

 

"(c) The commissioner of employment and economic development may temporarily modify program standards under Minnesota Statutes, section 116J.395, to the degree necessary to comply with federal standards for funding received under this section."

 

Page 74, after line 2, insert:

 

"Sec. 24.  FORGIVABLE LOAN PROGRAM FOR REMOTE RECREATIONAL BUSINESSES.

 

Subdivision 1.  Establishment.  Lake of the Woods County shall establish a loan program to make forgivable loans to eligible remote recreational businesses that experienced a loss in revenue that is greater than 30 percent during the period between March 15, 2020, and March 15, 2021, as compared with the previous year.

 

Subd. 2.  Definition.  For the purposes of this section, "remote recreational business" means a business in the contiguous United States that is:

 

(1) a small business concern as defined under section 3 of the Small Business Act, United States Code, title 15, section 632, operating in the recreational industry;

 

(2) located within 75 miles of the United States and Canadian border; and

 

(3) only accessible by land via Canada.

<HR><a name=745></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 745</b></center><HR><p>Subd. 3.  Eligibility.  To be eligible for a forgivable loan, a remote recreational business must:

 

(1) have been in operation on March 15, 2020;

 

(2) show that the closure of the United States and Canadian border restricted the ability of American customers to access the location of the remote recreational business; and

 

(3) not have received a grant under the Main Street COVID-19 relief grant program.

 

Subd. 4.  Application.  (a) Lake of the Woods County shall develop forms and procedures for soliciting and reviewing applications for loans under this section.

 

(b) Loans shall be made before April 1, 2022.  Any funds not spent by April 1, 2022, must be returned to the state general fund.

 

Subd. 5.  Maximum loan amount.  The maximum loan amount shall be equal to 75 percent of the remote recreational business's gross annual receipts for fiscal year 2020, not to exceed $500,000 per eligible remote recreational business.

 

Subd. 6.  Forgiveness.  Loans are forgiven for a remote recreational business if the business remains in operation for at least one year after the date of the loan.  Lake of the Woods County shall forgive 100 percent of the value of a loan received less the amount the borrower received from:

 

(1) any other loan forgiveness program, including any program established under the CARES Act, Public Law 116-136; and

 

(2) an advance received under section 1110 of the CARES Act, United States Code, title 15, section 9009.

 

Subd. 7.  Report to legislature.  By January 15, 2023, Lake of the Woods County shall report to the legislative committees with jurisdiction over economic development policy and finance on the loans provided to remote recreational businesses under this section.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective the day following final enactment."

 

 

We request the adoption of this report and repassage of the bill. 

 

Senate Conferees:  Eric Pratt, Jason Rarick, Karin Housley and Rich Draheim.

 

House Conferees:  Mohamud Noor, Rob Ecklund and Liz Olson.

 

 

      Noor moved that the report of the Conference Committee on S. F. No. 9 be adopted and that the bill be repassed as amended by the Conference Committee.  The motion prevailed.

 

 

      S. F. No. 9, A bill for an act relating to state government; establishing a biennial budget for Department of Employment and Economic Development, Department of Labor and Industry, Bureau of Mediation Services, and Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals; modifying various provisions governing economic development, labor and industry, unemployment insurance, and higher education; establishing Main Street Economic Revitalization Loan Program; establishing Main Street COVID-19 Relief grants; modifying fees; classifying data; requiring reports; appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2020, sections 13.7905, by adding a subdivision; <HR><a name=746></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 746</b></center><HR><p>116J.035, subdivision 6; 116J.431, subdivisions 2, 3, by adding a subdivision; 116L.40, subdivisions 5, 6, 9, 10, by adding a subdivision; 116L.41, subdivisions 1, 2, by adding subdivisions; 116L.42, subdivisions 1, 2; 178.012, subdivision 1; 181.939; 268.035, subdivision 21c; 268.085, subdivisions 2, 4a; 268.133; 268.136, subdivision 1; 326B.07, subdivision 1; 326B.092, subdivision 7; 326B.108, subdivisions 1, 3, by adding a subdivision; 326B.133, subdivision 8; 326B.42, by adding subdivisions; 326B.46, subdivision 1; 326B.89, subdivisions 1, 4, 5, 9; Laws 2014, chapter 211, section 13, as amended; Laws 2017, chapter 94, article 1, section 2, subdivision 2, as amended; Laws 2019, First Special Session chapter 7, article 1, sections 2, subdivision 2, as amended; 3, subdivision 4; article 2, section 8; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 116J; 181A; 299F; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2020, sections 181.9414; 268.085, subdivision 4.

 

 

      The bill was read for the third time, as amended by Conference, and placed upon its repassage.

 

      The question was taken on the repassage of the bill and the roll was called.  There were 71 yeas and 62 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Acomb

Agbaje

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Berg

Bernardy

Bierman

Boldon

Carlson

Christensen

Davnie

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Feist

Fischer

Frazier

Frederick

Freiberg

Gomez

Greenman

Grossell

Hanson, J.

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hollins

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Jordan

Keeler

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Lee

Liebling

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Long

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Noor

Olson, L.

Pelowski

Petersburg

Pinto

Pryor

Reyer

Richardson

Sandell

Sandstede

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Thompson

Vang

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman


 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Akland

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Bahr

Baker

Bennett

Bliss

Boe

Burkel

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Franke

Franson

Garofalo

Green

Gruenhagen

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Igo

Johnson

Jurgens

Kiel

Koznick

Kresha

Lucero

Lueck

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Mortensen

Mueller

Munson

Nash

Nelson, N.

Neu Brindley

Novotny

O'Driscoll

Olson, B.

O'Neill

Pfarr

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Raleigh

Rasmusson

Robbins

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

West


 

 

      The bill was repassed, as amended by Conference, and its title agreed to.

 

 

      Winkler moved that the House recess subject to the call of the Chair.  The motion prevailed.

 

 

RECESS

 

 

RECONVENED

 

      The House reconvened and was called to order by the Speaker.

<HR><a name=747></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 747</b></center><HR><p>CALENDAR FOR THE DAY

 

 

      H. F. No. 63 was reported to the House.

 

 

Mariani moved to amend H. F. No. 63, the first engrossment, as follows:

 

Page 5, line 15, delete "each" and insert "the first" and delete "is" and insert "and $30,000 the second year are"

 

Page 5, line 26, delete "214,667,000" and insert "214,167,000" and delete "213,505,000" and insert "213,005,000"

 

Page 5, line 27, delete "129,264,000" and insert "128,764,000" and delete "128,121,000" and insert "127,621,000"

 

Page 11, line 18, delete "47,817,000" and insert "47,317,000" and delete "47,737,000" and insert "47,237,000"

 

Page 11, line 20, delete "47,721,000" and insert "47,221,000" and delete "47,641,000" and insert "47,141,000"

 

Page 14, delete line 33

 

Page 15, delete lines 1 to 19

 

Reletter the paragraphs in sequence

 

Page 26, after line 27, insert:

 

"EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective June 30, 2021."

 

Page 46, after line 19, insert:

 

"Sec. 18. [299F.3605] PETROLEUM REFINERIES.

 

(a) As used in this section, "petroleum refinery" has the meaning given in section 115C.02, subdivision 10a.

 

(b) By January 1, 2022, each petroleum refinery operating in the state shall maintain or contract for a full-time paid on-site fire department regularly charged with the responsibility of providing fire protection to the refinery that is sufficiently trained, equipped, and staffed to respond to fires at the refinery and to conduct inspections to prevent fires."

 

Page 46, line 22, delete "shall" and insert "may" and delete "for"

 

Page 46, line 23, delete "elements of" and insert "from" and delete "that" and insert "if there is"

 

Page 77, delete lines 22 to 24

 

Page 79, after line 11, insert:

 

"Sec. 54. TITLE.

 

Section 32 shall be known as "Officer Arik Matson's Law.""

<HR><a name=748></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 748</b></center><HR><p>Page 98, delete section 28

 

Page 159, line 23, delete "if" and insert "was the driver," and after the second comma, insert "and"

 

Page 217, line 4, delete "5" and insert "4"

 

Page 223, after line 26, insert:

 

"Sec. 30. Laws 2017, chapter 95, article 3, section 30, is amended to read:

 

Sec. 30.  ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCERATION PILOT PROGRAM FUND.  (a) Agencies providing supervision to offenders on probation, parole, or supervised release are eligible for grants funding to facilitate access to community options including, but not limited to, inpatient chemical dependency treatment for nonviolent controlled substance offenders to address and correct behavior that is, or is likely to result in, a technical violation of the conditions of release.  For purposes of this section, "nonviolent controlled substance offender" is a person who meets the criteria described under Minnesota Statutes, section 244.0513, subdivision 2, clauses (1), (2), and (5), and "technical violation" means a violation of a court order of probation, condition of parole, or condition of supervised release, except an allegation of a subsequent criminal act that is alleged in a formal complaint, citation, or petition.

 

(b) The Department of Corrections shall establish criteria for selecting grant recipients and the amount awarded to each grant recipient issue annual funding of $160,000 to each recipient.

 

(c) By January 15, 2019, The commissioner of corrections shall submit a an annual report to the chairs of the house of representatives and senate committees with jurisdiction over public safety policy and finance by January 15 of each year.  At a minimum, the report must include:

 

(1) the total number of grants issued under this program;

 

(2) the average amount of each grant;

 

(3) (1) the community services accessed as a result of the grants funding;

 

(4) (2) a summary of the type of supervision offenders were under when a grant funding was used to help access a community option;

 

(5) (3) the number of individuals who completed, and the number who failed to complete, programs accessed as a result of this grant funding; and

 

(6) (4) the number of individuals who violated the terms of release following participation in a program accessed as a result of this grant funding, separating technical violations and new criminal offenses.;

 

(5) the number of individuals who completed or were discharged from probation after participating in the program;

 

(6) the number of individuals identified in clause (5) who committed a new offense after discharge from the program;

 

(7) identification of barriers nonviolent controlled substance offenders face in accessing community services and a description of how the program navigates those barriers; and

 

(8) identification of gaps in existing community services for nonviolent controlled substance offenders."

<HR><a name=749></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 749</b></center><HR><p>Page 224, after line 1, insert:

 

"Sec. 32. REVISOR INSTRUCTION.

 

In the next edition of Minnesota Statutes, the revisor of statutes shall codify the alternatives to incarceration pilot project under section 12 to reflect that it is a permanent program.  The revisor may make editorial and other nonsubstantive language changes to accomplish this.

 

ARTICLE 10

EFFECTIVE DATE

 

Section 1.  EFFECTIVE DATES FOR CERTAIN ENACTMENTS.

 

Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, sections 645.02 and 645.21, or any other law to the contrary, articles 1 to 9 are effective on or retroactively from July 1, 2021.  If a provision in an article specifies an effective date different than July 1, 2021, for purposes of the provision the effective date specified in the article prevails.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective the day following final enactment."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

Mariani moved to amend the Mariani amendment to H. F. No. 63, the first engrossment, as follows:

 

Page 1, line 16, after "effective" insert "retroactively from"

 

Page 4, line 7, after the period, insert "Any fiscal year 2021 appropriation made in this act is effective retroactively from June 30, 2021."

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was adopted.

 

 

Becker-Finn moved to amend the Mariani amendment, as amended, to H. F. No. 63, the first engrossment, as follows:

 

Page 1, after line 16, insert:

 

"Page 45, line 28, delete "shall" and insert "may" and delete "for elements of" and insert "from"

 

Page 45, line 29, delete "that" and insert "if there is""

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment, as amended, was adopted.

 

 

      The question recurred on the Mariani amendment, as amended, to H. F. No. 63, the first engrossment.  The motion prevailed and the amendment, as amended, was adopted.

<HR><a name=750></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 750</b></center><HR><p>Long moved to amend H. F. No. 63, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 223, after line 26, insert:

 

"Sec. 30. [629.415] PROCEEDINGS ON SUMMONS TO APPEAR.

 

Subdivision 1.  Issuance of summons to appear.  A court may issue a summons in accordance with rule 3.01 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure to notify a person charged with a criminal offense of the need to appear at a certain time and place to answer the charge.

 

Subd. 2.  Service of summons.  A summons may be served in accordance with rule 3.03 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure.  The court shall record the manner in which the summons was served and, if the summons was served by mailing it to the defendant's last known address, the court shall record whether the summons was returned as undeliverable.

 

Subd. 3.  Failure to appear; issuance of a sign and release warrant.  (a) Unless a prosecutor makes the showing described in subdivision 4, the court shall issue a sign and release warrant if:

 

(1) the court issued a summons;

 

(2) the summons was served by mailing it to the defendant's last known address and was returned as undeliverable;

 

(3) the defendant failed to appear at the time and place identified in the summons;

 

(4) the defendant had not previously failed to appear in the same case; and

 

(5) the defendant is charged with a misdemeanor offense other than a targeted misdemeanor, as defined in section 299C.10, subdivision 1, or a gross misdemeanor offense other than a violation of section 169A.20 (driving while impaired); 518B.01, subdivision 14 (violation of domestic abuse order for protection); 609.2231 (fourth‑degree assault); 609.224 (fifth-degree assault); 609.2242 (domestic assault); 609.3451 (fifth-degree criminal sexual conduct); 609.377 (malicious punishment of a child); 609.378 (neglect or endangerment of a child); 609.748, subdivision 6 (violation of harassment restraining order); 609.749 (harassment or stalking); 609.78, subdivision 2 (interference with an emergency call); 617.261 (nonconsensual dissemination of private sexual images); or 629.75 (violation of domestic abuse no contact order).

 

(b) A sign and release warrant shall not require the defendant to post bail or comply with any other conditions of release.  A sign and release warrant does not authorize the arrest of the defendant.

 

(c) Any court record provided or made available to a law enforcement agency shall indicate that the warrant is a sign and release warrant.

 

Subd. 4.  When bail may be required.  The court may issue a warrant that requires the defendant to post bail or comply with other conditions of release if a prosecutor shows, by a preponderance of the evidence, that bail is necessary:

 

(1) for the safety of a victim;

 

(2) because a defendant poses a risk to public safety; or

 

(3) because the defendant otherwise poses a danger to self or others.

<HR><a name=751></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 751</b></center><HR><p>Subd. 5.  Sign and release warrant; law enforcement duties.  (a) When a peace officer encounters a defendant who is the subject of a sign and release warrant, the officer shall inform the defendant of the missed court appearance and provide a new notice that includes a time to appear.

 

(b) Notice of the new time to appear shall be made in writing and must include the court file number or the warrant number.  The defendant may be asked to sign a form acknowledging receipt of the notice.  A defendant may not be required to sign the acknowledgment, but the peace officer or other employee may indicate that a notice was given and that the defendant refused to sign.

 

(c) After providing the notice, the peace officer shall release the defendant at the scene.

 

(d) As soon as practicable after providing the notice, the peace officer shall:

 

(1) inactivate the warrant or direct the appropriate office or department to inactivate the warrant; and

 

(2) submit a form or other notification that can be filed in the court's electronic filing system that includes the court case number, updates the defendant's personal contact information, and indicates that the defendant received notice of the new time to appear.

 

Subd. 6.  Exception; lawful arrest.  Nothing in this section prohibits a peace officer from arresting a defendant for any lawful reason.

 

Subd. 7.  Procedure to notify peace officers; scheduling new court dates.  (a) By January 1, 2024, the sheriff of every county, in coordination with the district court of that county, shall develop a procedure to inform peace officers about the type of warrant issued by the court and provide hearing dates for sign and release warrants.

 

(b) At a minimum, the procedure shall include:

 

(1) an office, department, or other entity that a peace officer can contact at any time to determine the type of warrant issued by a court;

 

(2) if the warrant is a sign and release warrant, the ability to obtain an updated time for a defendant to appear to answer the charge;

 

(3) the ability to inactivate a sign and release warrant after a defendant has been notified of the new time to appear; and

 

(4) the ability to submit a form or other notification to the court's electronic filing system updating the defendant's personal contact information and indicating that the defendant received notice of the new time.

 

(c) The sheriff may develop forms to provide defendants with notice of the new time to appear.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective July 1, 2021, and applies to warrants issued on or after January 1, 2024."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

<HR><a name=752></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 752</b></center><HR><p>Raleigh moved to amend H. F. No. 63, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 59, after line 28, insert:

 

"Sec. 39. [609.5151] DISSEMINATION OF PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT LAW ENFORCEMENT PROHIBITED; PENALTY.

 

Subdivision 1.  Definitions.  As used in this section:

 

(1) "family or household member" has the meaning given in section 518B.01, subdivision 2;

 

(2) "law enforcement official" means both peace officers as defined in section 626.84, subdivision 1, and persons employed by a law enforcement agency; and

 

(3) "personal information" means a home address, directions to a home, or photographs of a home.

 

Subd. 2.  Crime described.  (a) It is a misdemeanor for a person to knowingly and without consent make publicly available, including but not limited to through the Internet, personal information about a law enforcement official or an official's family or household member, if:

 

(1) the dissemination poses an imminent and serious threat to the official's safety or the safety of an official's family or household member; and

 

(2) the person making the information publicly available knows or reasonably should know of the imminent and serious threat.

 

(b) A person is guilty of a gross misdemeanor if the person violates paragraph (a) and a law enforcement official or an official's family or household member suffers great bodily harm or death as a result of the violation.

 

(c) A person who is convicted of a second or subsequent violation of this section is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective September 15, 2021, and applies to crimes committed on or after that date."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

Grossell moved to amend H. F. No. 63, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 59, after line 28, insert:

 

"Sec. 39. Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 609.594, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2.  Prohibited conduct; penalty.  (a) Whoever causes damage to the physical property of a critical public service facility, utility, or pipeline with the intent to significantly disrupt the operation of or the provision of services by the facility, utility, or pipeline and without the consent of one authorized to give consent, is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than ten years or to payment of a fine of not more than $20,000, or both.

<HR><a name=753></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 753</b></center><HR><p>(b) Whoever intentionally recruits, trains, aids, advises, hires, counsels, or conspires with or otherwise procures another to commit a violation of paragraph (a) is guilty of a gross misdemeanor if a violation is committed and the person fails to make a reasonable effort to prevent the violation.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective September 15, 2021, and applies to violations committed on or after that date."

 

Page 60, after line 11, insert:

 

"Sec. 40. Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 609.6055, subdivision 2, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 2.  Prohibited conduct; penalty.  (a) Whoever enters or is found upon property containing a critical public service facility, utility, or pipeline, without claim of right or consent of one who has the right to give consent to be on the property, is guilty of a gross misdemeanor, if:

 

(1) the person refuses to depart from the property on the demand of one who has the right to give consent;

 

(2) within the past six months, the person had been told by one who had the right to give consent to leave the property and not to return, unless a person with the right to give consent has given the person permission to return; or

 

(3) the property is posted.

 

(b) Whoever enters an underground structure that (1) contains a utility line or pipeline and (2) is not open to the public for pedestrian use, without claim of right or consent of one who has the right to give consent to be in the underground structure, is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.  The underground structure does not need to be posted for this paragraph to apply.

 

(c) Whoever intentionally recruits, trains, aids, advises, hires, counsels, or conspires with or otherwise procures another to commit a violation of paragraph (a) is guilty of a gross misdemeanor if a violation is committed and the person fails to make a reasonable effort to prevent the violation.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective September 15, 2021, and applies to violations committed on or after that date."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The Speaker called Olson, L., to the Chair.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Grossell amendment and the roll was called.  There were 64 yeas and 70 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Akland

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Bahr

Baker

Bennett

Bliss

Boe

Burkel

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Franke

<HR><a name=754></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 754</b></center><HR><p>Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Igo

Johnson

Jurgens

Kiel

Koznick

Kresha

Lucero

Lueck

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Mortensen

Mueller

Munson

Nash

Nelson, N.

Neu Brindley

Novotny

O'Driscoll

Olson, B.

O'Neill

Petersburg

Pfarr

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Raleigh

Rasmusson

Robbins

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

West


 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Acomb

Agbaje

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Berg

Bernardy

Bierman

Boldon

Carlson

Christensen

Davnie

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Feist

Fischer

Frazier

Frederick

Freiberg

Gomez

Greenman

Hansen, R.

Hanson, J.

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hollins

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Jordan

Keeler

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Lee

Liebling

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Long

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Noor

Olson, L.

Pelowski

Pinto

Pryor

Reyer

Richardson

Sandell

Sandstede

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Thompson

Vang

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman


 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

 

 

      The Speaker resumed the Chair.

 

 

Johnson moved to amend H. F. No. 63, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 39, after line 29, insert:

 

"Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 244.09, subdivision 14, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 14.  Report on mandatory minimum sentences.  (a) The Sentencing Guidelines Commission shall include in its annual report to the legislature a summary and analysis of reports received from county attorneys under section 609.11, subdivision 10.

 

(b) For offenses listed in section 609.11, subdivision 9, where the mandatory minimum sentence was not imposed, the summary and analysis required under paragraph (a) must include:

 

(1) the name of the offender;

 

(2) a description of the facts of the case;

 

(3) the applicable mandatory minimum sentence;

 

(4) the sentence imposed;

 

(5) whether the sentence was stayed or executed and, if stayed, the length of probation ordered;

<HR><a name=755></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 755</b></center><HR><p>(6) the name of the judge;

 

(7) the name of the chief prosecutor; and

 

(8) the person who recommended the reduced sentence.

 

(c) The information required under paragraph (b) must be made publicly available on the website of the Sentencing Guidelines Commission."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Johnson amendment and the roll was called.  There were 64 yeas and 70 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Akland

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Bahr

Baker

Bennett

Bliss

Boe

Burkel

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Franke

Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Igo

Johnson

Jurgens

Kiel

Koznick

Kresha

Lucero

Lueck

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Mortensen

Mueller

Munson

Nash

Nelson, N.

Neu Brindley

Novotny

O'Driscoll

Olson, B.

O'Neill

Petersburg

Pfarr

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Raleigh

Rasmusson

Robbins

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

West


 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Acomb

Agbaje

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Berg

Bernardy

Bierman

Boldon

Carlson

Christensen

Davnie

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Feist

Fischer

Frazier

Frederick

Freiberg

Gomez

Greenman

Hansen, R.

Hanson, J.

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hollins

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Jordan

Keeler

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Lee

Liebling

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Long

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Noor

Olson, L.

Pelowski

Pinto

Pryor

Reyer

Richardson

Sandell

Sandstede

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Thompson

Vang

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman


 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

 

 

Novotny moved to amend H. F. No. 63, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 6, line 4, delete "3,000,000" and insert "3,400,000" and delete "3,156,000" and insert "3,556,000"

<HR><a name=756></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 756</b></center><HR><p>Page 6, line 6, delete "2,927,000" and insert "3,327,000" and delete "3,083,000" and insert "3,483,000"

 

Page 7, after line 12, insert:

 

"(c) Crime Prevention

 

$400,000 each year is for a grant to the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office.  In coordination with other sheriffs' offices, police departments, and Metro Transit, the Hennepin County sheriff must use the funds to prevent and combat surging rates of violent crime, including murder, assault, and other crimes against the person, in the seven-county metropolitan area with a concentration of efforts in areas that have experienced the largest increase in violent crimes in fiscal year 2021.  The Hennepin County sheriff may use these funds to reimburse or directly compensate peace officers from other jurisdictions who assist in crime prevention efforts coordinated by the sheriff.  This is a onetime appropriation."

 

Page 11, line 18, delete "47,817,000" and insert "47,417,000" and delete "47,737,000" and insert "47,337,000"

 

Page 11, line 20, delete "47,721,000" and insert "47,321,000" and delete "47,641,000" and insert "47,241,000"

 

Page 14, delete lines 7 to 10

 

Reletter the paragraphs in sequence

 

Page 68, delete section 47

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Novotny amendment and the roll was called.                 There were 64 yeas and 70 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Akland

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Bahr

Baker

Bennett

Bliss

Boe

Burkel

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Franke

Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Igo

Johnson

Jurgens

Kiel

Koznick

Kresha

Lucero

Lueck

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Mortensen

Mueller

Munson

Nash

Nelson, N.

Neu Brindley

Novotny

O'Driscoll

Olson, B.

O'Neill

Petersburg

Pfarr

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Raleigh

Rasmusson

Robbins

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

West


<HR><a name=757></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 757</b></center><HR><p>              Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Acomb

Agbaje

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Berg

Bernardy

Bierman

Boldon

Carlson

Christensen

Davnie

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Feist

Fischer

Frazier

Frederick

Freiberg

Gomez

Greenman

Hansen, R.

Hanson, J.

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hollins

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Jordan

Keeler

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Lee

Liebling

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Long

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Noor

Olson, L.

Pelowski

Pinto

Pryor

Reyer

Richardson

Sandell

Sandstede

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Thompson

Vang

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman


 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

 

 

Nash moved to amend H. F. No. 63, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 217, after line 19, insert:

 

"Sec. 24. Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 626.84, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

 

Subd. 3.  Declaration.  The state declares that Minnesota is a police and peace officer friendly state."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

Frazier moved to amend the Nash amendment to H. F. No. 63, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 1, line 5, delete "police and peace officer"

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Frazier amendment to the Nash amendment and the roll was called.  There were 70 yeas and 63 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Acomb

Agbaje

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Berg

Bernardy

Bierman

Boldon

Carlson

Christensen

Davnie

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Feist

Fischer

Frazier

Frederick

Freiberg

Gomez

Greenman

Hansen, R.

Hanson, J.

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hollins

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Jordan

Keeler

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Lee

<HR><a name=758></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 758</b></center><HR><p>Liebling

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Long

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Noor

Olson, L.

Pelowski

Pinto

Pryor

Reyer

Richardson

Sandell

Sandstede

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Thompson

Vang

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman


 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Akland

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Bahr

Baker

Bennett

Bliss

Boe

Burkel

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Franke

Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Igo

Johnson

Jurgens

Kiel

Koznick

Kresha

Lucero

Lueck

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Mortensen

Mueller

Munson

Nash

Nelson, N.

Neu Brindley

Novotny

O'Driscoll

Olson, B.

O'Neill

Petersburg

Pfarr

Poston

Quam

Raleigh

Rasmusson

Robbins

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

West


 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment to the amendment was adopted.

 

 

      Nash withdrew his amendment, as amended, to H. F. No. 63, the first engrossment, as amended.

 

 

Raleigh moved to amend H. F. No. 63, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 60, after line 31, insert:

 

"Sec. 41. [629.705] CHARITABLE BAIL ORGANIZATIONS; REQUIREMENTS; LIMITATIONS.

 

(a) As used in this section:

 

(1) "charitable bail organization" means an organization that:

 

(i) solicits or accepts donations from the public; and

 

(ii) agrees to deposit money bail for another person;

 

(2) "previous conviction" does not include a conviction if more than ten years have elapsed since the date of the conviction and the person's sentence has been discharged; and

 

(3) "violent offense" means:

 

(i) a crime of violence as defined in section 624.712, subdivision 5;

 

(ii) a crime described in section 243.166, subdivision 1b;

 

(iii) a violation of section 518B.01;

 

(iv) a violation of section 609.2242;

<HR><a name=759></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 759</b></center><HR><p>(v) a violation of section 609.749; and

 

(vi) a violation of section 629.75.

 

(b) To legally operate as a charitable bail organization, the organization must:

 

(1) except as provided in paragraph (e), comply fully with rule 702 of the Minnesota General Rules of Practice for the district courts and all related court policies and procedures;

 

(2) be a nonprofit charitable organization under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code;

 

(3) be currently registered to do business in Minnesota;

 

(4) comply fully with paragraphs (f) and (g); and

 

(5) be located in Minnesota.

 

(c) A charitable bail organization may not:

 

(1) deposit money bail for:

 

(i) a violent offense; or

 

(ii) a person who has a previous conviction for a violent offense or who is currently required to register as a predatory offender under section 243.166; or

 

(2) solicit or accept donations from the public before registering with the state court administrator as required in paragraph (g) and complying with paragraph (b), clauses (1), (2), (3), and (5).

 

(d) Paragraph (b), clause (1), applies only to charitable bail organizations that post money bail for more than two individuals within a 180-day period.

 

(e) A charitable bail organization does not have to be licensed by the Department of Commerce unless it executes surety bonds for defendants.

 

(f) A sheriff or district court administrator must collect the following information from a charitable bail organization before accepting money bail: 

 

(1) the name, address, taxpayer identification number, and legal structure of the charitable bail organization;

 

(2) the name and title of the person posting money bail on behalf of the charitable bail organization; and

 

(3) the amount posted.

 

Data collected under this paragraph is public data, as defined under section 13.02, subdivisions 14 and 15.  A sheriff or district court administrator must report information collected under this section to the state court administrator.

 

(g) A charitable bail organization must register with the state court administrator before posting money bail on behalf of a defendant by submitting an application form and an Internal Revenue Service Form 990, Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax.  The charitable bail organization must annually report by January 30 to the state court administrator the following:

 

(1) the number of defendants that received money bail from the charitable bail organization;

<HR><a name=760></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 760</b></center><HR><p>(2) the total amount of money bail posted; and

 

(3) the total amount of money bail returned to the charitable bail organization.

 

(h) The state court administrator shall aggregate information collected under paragraphs (f) and (g) and provide an annual report to the chairs and ranking minority members of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over public safety by March 1.

 

(i) The state court administrator may impose administrative sanctions and costs on a charitable bail organization for a violation of this section or court rule or policy applicable to the organization.  The administrator shall develop a process for making complaints against charitable bail organizations, investigating those complaints, imposing disciplinary sanctions and costs, and appealing the administrator's actions.

 

(j) A sheriff or district court administrator may not accept money bail from a charitable bail organization that is not fully compliant with this section."

 

Page 64, after line 7, insert:

 

"Sec. 44. APPLICATION; REPORTS.

 

(a) The state court administrator must create an application for charitable bail organizations to submit for registration under Minnesota Statutes, section 629.705, paragraph (g).

 

(b) The first reports under Minnesota Statutes, section 629.705, paragraph (g), are due by January 30, 2022.  The first report under Minnesota Statutes, section 629.705, paragraph (h), is due March 1, 2022."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Raleigh amendment and the roll was called.  There were 62 yeas and 71 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Akland

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Baker

Bennett

Bliss

Boe

Burkel

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Erickson

Franke

Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Igo

Johnson

Jurgens

Kiel

Koznick

Kresha

Lucero

Lueck

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Mortensen

Mueller

Nash

Nelson, N.

Neu Brindley

Novotny

O'Driscoll

Olson, B.

O'Neill

Petersburg

Pfarr

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Raleigh

Rasmusson

Robbins

Sandell

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

West


 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Acomb

Agbaje

Bahner

Bahr

Becker-Finn

Berg

Bernardy

Bierman

Boldon

Carlson

Christensen

Davnie

Drazkowski

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Feist

Fischer

<HR><a name=761></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 761</b></center><HR><p>Frazier

Frederick

Freiberg

Gomez

Greenman

Hansen, R.

Hanson, J.

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hollins

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Jordan

Keeler

Klevorn

Koegel

Lee

Liebling

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Long

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Munson

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Noor

Olson, L.

Pelowski

Pinto

Pryor

Reyer

Richardson

Sandstede

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Thompson

Vang

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman


 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

 

 

Nash moved to amend H. F. No. 63, the first engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 39, after line 29, insert:

 

"Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 244.052, subdivision 4a, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 4a.  Level III offenders; location of residence.  (a) When an offender assigned to risk level III is released from confinement or a residential facility to reside in the community or changes residence while on supervised or conditional release, the agency responsible for the offender's supervision shall:

 

(i) take into consideration the proximity of the offender's residence to that of other level III offenders and;

 

(ii) take into consideration the proximity of the offender's residence to schools, day care centers, residences for vulnerable adults, and neighborhoods with a high density of children; and,

 

(iii) to the greatest extent feasible, shall mitigate the concentration of level III offenders and concentration of level III offenders near schools, day care centers, residences for vulnerable adults, and neighborhoods with a high density of children.

 

(b) If the owner or property manager of a hotel, motel, lodging establishment, or apartment building has an agreement with an agency that arranges or provides shelter for victims of domestic abuse, the owner or property manager may not knowingly rent rooms to both level III offenders and victims of domestic abuse at the same time.  If the owner or property manager has an agreement with an agency to provide housing to domestic abuse victims and discovers or is informed that a tenant is a level III offender after signing a lease or otherwise renting to the offender, the owner or property manager may evict the offender."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Nash amendment and the roll was called.  There were 64 yeas and 70 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Akland

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Bahr

Baker

Bennett

Bliss

Boe

Burkel

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Franke

<HR><a name=762></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 762</b></center><HR><p>Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Igo

Johnson

Jurgens

Kiel

Koznick

Kresha

Lucero

Lueck

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Mortensen

Mueller

Munson

Nash

Nelson, N.

Neu Brindley

Novotny

O'Driscoll

Olson, B.

O'Neill

Petersburg

Pfarr

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Raleigh

Rasmusson

Robbins

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

West


 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Acomb

Agbaje

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Berg

Bernardy

Bierman

Boldon

Carlson

Christensen

Davnie

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Feist

Fischer

Frazier

Frederick

Freiberg

Gomez

Greenman

Hansen, R.

Hanson, J.

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hollins

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Jordan

Keeler

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Lee

Liebling

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Long

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Noor

Olson, L.

Pelowski

Pinto

Pryor

Reyer

Richardson

Sandell

Sandstede

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Thompson

Vang

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman


 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

 

 

      Scott offered an amendment to H. F. No. 63, the first engrossment, as amended.

 

 

POINT OF ORDER

 

      Pinto raised a point of order pursuant to rule 3.21 that the Scott amendment was not in order.  The Speaker ruled the point of order well taken and the Scott amendment out of order.

 

 

      Scott appealed the decision of the Speaker.

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The vote was taken on the question "Shall the decision of the Speaker stand as the judgment of the House?" and the roll was called.  There were 71 yeas and 63 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Acomb

Agbaje

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Berg

Bernardy

Bierman

Boldon

Carlson

Christensen

Davnie

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Feist

Fischer

Frazier

Frederick

Freiberg

Gomez

Greenman

Hansen, R.

Hanson, J.

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hollins

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Jordan

Keeler

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Lee

Liebling

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Long

Mariani

<HR><a name=763></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 763</b></center><HR><p>Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Munson

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Noor

Olson, L.

Pelowski

Pinto

Pryor

Reyer

Richardson

Sandell

Sandstede

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Thompson

Vang

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman


 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Akland

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Bahr

Baker

Bennett

Bliss

Boe

Burkel

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Franke

Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Igo

Johnson

Jurgens

Kiel

Koznick

Kresha

Lucero

Lueck

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Mortensen

Mueller

Nash

Nelson, N.

Neu Brindley

Novotny

O'Driscoll

Olson, B.

O'Neill

Petersburg

Pfarr

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Raleigh

Rasmusson

Robbins

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

West


 

 

      So it was the judgment of the House that the decision of the Speaker should stand.

 

 

      Daudt offered an amendment to H. F. No. 63, the first engrossment, as amended.

 

 

POINT OF ORDER

 

      Winkler raised a point of order pursuant to rule 4.05, relating to Amendment Limits, that the Daudt amendment was not in order.  The Speaker ruled the point of order well taken and the Daudt amendment out of order.

 

 

      Daudt appealed the decision of the Speaker.

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The vote was taken on the question "Shall the decision of the Speaker stand as the judgment of the House?" and the roll was called.  There were 70 yeas and 64 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Acomb

Agbaje

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Berg

Bernardy

Bierman

Boldon

Carlson

Christensen

Davnie

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Feist

Fischer

Frazier

Frederick

Freiberg

Gomez

Greenman

Hansen, R.

Hanson, J.

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hollins

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Jordan

Keeler

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Lee

Liebling

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Long

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Noor

Olson, L.

Pelowski

Pinto

Pryor

Reyer

Richardson

Sandell

Sandstede

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Thompson

Vang

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman


<HR><a name=764></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 764</b></center><HR><p>              Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Akland

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Bahr

Baker

Bennett

Bliss

Boe

Burkel

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Franke

Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Igo

Johnson

Jurgens

Kiel

Koznick

Kresha

Lucero

Lueck

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Mortensen

Mueller

Munson

Nash

Nelson, N.

Neu Brindley

Novotny

O'Driscoll

Olson, B.

O'Neill

Petersburg

Pfarr

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Raleigh

Rasmusson

Robbins

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

West


 

 

      So it was the judgment of the House that the decision of the Speaker should stand.

 

 

      H. F. No. 63, A bill for an act relating to public safety; modifying certain provisions relating to public safety, courts, corrections, sexual offenders, crime victims, background checks, forfeiture, law enforcement, human rights, and data practices; providing for task forces and working groups; requiring reports; providing for criminal penalties; appropriating money for courts, public safety, sentencing guidelines, corrections, human rights, Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) Board, Private Detective Board, Guardian ad Litem Board, state auditor, Legislative Coordinating Commission, Department of Natural Resources, Uniform Laws Commission, Board on Judicial Standards, and Board of Public Defense; amending Minnesota Statutes 2020, sections 2.722, subdivision 1; 13.41, subdivision 3; 13.411, by adding a subdivision; 13.552, by adding a subdivision; 13.7931, by adding a subdivision; 13.824, subdivision 6; 13.825, subdivision 9; 13.851, by adding a subdivision; 152.01, subdivision 18; 169.99, subdivision 1c, by adding a subdivision; 169A.55, subdivisions 2, 4; 169A.60, subdivisions 2, 3, 13; 169A.63, subdivisions 1, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, by adding subdivisions; 171.29, subdivision 1; 171.30, subdivision 1; 171.306, subdivisions 2, 4; 214.10, subdivision 11; 241.016; 241.021, subdivision 1, by adding subdivisions; 243.166, subdivision 1b; 243.48, subdivision 1; 243.52; 244.19, subdivision 3; 253B.18, subdivision 5a; 253D.14, subdivisions 2, 3, by adding a subdivision; 299A.52, subdivision 2; 299C.60; 299C.61, subdivisions 2, 4, by adding subdivisions; 299C.62, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 6; 299C.63; 299C.72; 299C.80, subdivision 3; 340A.504, subdivision 7; 357.021, subdivisions 1a, 6; 363A.02, subdivision 1; 363A.08, subdivision 6; 363A.28, subdivisions 1, 6; 363A.31, subdivision 2; 363A.33, subdivision 3; 363A.36, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, by adding a subdivision; 363A.44, subdivisions 2, 4, 9; 401.06; 403.02, subdivision 16; 403.03, subdivision 1; 403.07, subdivision 2; 403.11, subdivision 1; 403.21, subdivisions 3, 12; 403.36, subdivision 1; 477A.03, subdivision 2b; 524.2-503; 609.1095, subdivision 1; 609.131, subdivision 2; 609.135, subdivision 2; 609.221; 609.2325; 609.322, subdivisions 1, 1a; 609.324, subdivisions 1, 2, 4; 609.3241; 609.341, subdivisions 3, 7, 11, 12, 14, 15, by adding subdivisions; 609.342; 609.343; 609.344; 609.345; 609.3451; 609.3455; 609.3459; 609.352, subdivision 4; 609.531, subdivision 1, by adding a subdivision; 609.5311, subdivisions 2, 3, 4; 609.5314, subdivisions 1, 2, 3, by adding a subdivision; 609.5315, subdivisions 5, 5b, 6; 609.605, subdivision 2; 609.66, subdivision 1e; 611.21; 611.27, subdivisions 9, 10, 11, 13, 15; 611A.039, subdivision 1; 611A.06, subdivision 1; 617.246, subdivisions 2, 3, 4; 617.247, subdivisions 3, 4; 626.14; 626.842, subdivision 2; 626.8435, subdivision 1; 626.845, subdivision 3; 626.8457, subdivision 3; 626.8469, by adding a subdivision; 628.26; Laws 2016, chapter 189, article 4, section 7; Laws 2017, chapter 95, article 1, section 11, subdivision 7; article 3, section 30; Laws 2020, Seventh Special Session chapter 2, article 2, section 4; Laws 2021, First Special Session chapter 4, article 9, sections 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; Laws 2021, First Special Session chapter 5, article 3, sections 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 3; 84; 260B; 299A; 299F; 326B; 604A; 609; 611A; 626; 629; 634; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2020, sections 253D.14, subdivision 4; 609.324, subdivision 3; 609.5317; 611A.0385.

 

 

      The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon its final passage.

<HR><a name=765></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 765</b></center><HR><p>              The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called.  There were 77 yeas and 57 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Acomb

Agbaje

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Bennett

Berg

Bernardy

Bierman

Boldon

Carlson

Christensen

Davnie

Demuth

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Feist

Fischer

Franke

Frazier

Frederick

Freiberg

Greenman

Hansen, R.

Hanson, J.

Hausman

Her

Hollins

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Jordan

Jurgens

Keeler

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Koznick

Lee

Liebling

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Long

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Miller

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Mueller

Murphy

Nash

Nelson, M.

Noor

O'Driscoll

Olson, L.

O'Neill

Pelowski

Petersburg

Pinto

Pryor

Reyer

Richardson

Sandell

Sandstede

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Vang

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman


 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Akland

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Bahr

Baker

Bliss

Boe

Burkel

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Franson

Garofalo

Gomez

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Haley

Hamilton

Hassan

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Igo

Johnson

Kiel

Kresha

Lucero

Lueck

McDonald

Mekeland

Mortensen

Munson

Nelson, N.

Neu Brindley

Novotny

Olson, B.

Pfarr

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Raleigh

Rasmusson

Robbins

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Thompson

Torkelson

Urdahl

West

Xiong, J.


 

 

      The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.

 

 

      Winkler moved that the House recess subject to the call of the Chair.  The motion prevailed.

 

 

RECESS

 

 

RECONVENED

 

      The House reconvened and was called to order by the Speaker.

 

 

REPORT FROM THE COMMITTEE ON RULES

AND LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATION

 

      Winkler from the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration, pursuant to rule 1.21, designated the following bill to be placed on the Supplemental Calendar for the Day for Tuesday, June 29, 2021:

 

      S. F. No. 2.

<HR><a name=766></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 766</b></center><HR><p>CALENDAR FOR THE DAY, Continued

 

 

      S. F. No. 2 was reported to the House.

 

 

Nelson, M., moved to amend S. F. No. 2, the unofficial engrossment, as follows:

 

Page 25, line 10, after "design," insert "rent loss,"

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the amendment was adopted.

 

 

Dettmer moved to amend S. F. No. 2, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 15, line 19, delete "$353,000" and insert "$500,000"

 

Page 17, line 30, delete "$400,000" and insert "$253,000"

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Dettmer amendment and the roll was called.  There were 64 yeas and 70 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Akland

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Bahr

Baker

Bennett

Bliss

Boe

Burkel

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Franke

Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Igo

Johnson

Jurgens

Kiel

Koznick

Kresha

Lucero

Lueck

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Mortensen

Mueller

Munson

Nash

Nelson, N.

Neu Brindley

Novotny

O'Driscoll

Olson, B.

O'Neill

Petersburg

Pfarr

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Raleigh

Rasmusson

Robbins

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

West


 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Acomb

Agbaje

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Berg

Bernardy

Bierman

Boldon

Carlson

Christensen

Davnie

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Feist

Fischer

Frazier

Frederick

Freiberg

Gomez

Greenman

Hansen, R.

Hanson, J.

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hollins

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Jordan

Keeler

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Lee

Liebling

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Long

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Noor

Olson, L.

Pelowski

Pinto

Pryor

Reyer

Richardson

Sandell

Sandstede

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Thompson

Vang

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman


 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

<HR><a name=767></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 767</b></center><HR><p>Lucero moved to amend S. F. No. 2, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 39, after line 15, insert:

 

"Sec. 23.  PANDEMIC-RELATED LICENSE REINSTATEMENTS.

 

Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 12.45, any license revoked by a board or agency due to a violation of an executive order issued during a peacetime emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic is reinstated.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective retroactively from March 15, 2020."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Lucero amendment and the roll was called.  There were 64 yeas and 70 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Akland

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Bahr

Baker

Bennett

Bliss

Boe

Burkel

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Franke

Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Igo

Johnson

Jurgens

Kiel

Koznick

Kresha

Lucero

Lueck

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Mortensen

Mueller

Munson

Nash

Nelson, N.

Neu Brindley

Novotny

O'Driscoll

Olson, B.

O'Neill

Petersburg

Pfarr

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Raleigh

Rasmusson

Robbins

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

West


 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Acomb

Agbaje

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Berg

Bernardy

Bierman

Boldon

Carlson

Christensen

Davnie

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Feist

Fischer

Frazier

Frederick

Freiberg

Gomez

Greenman

Hansen, R.

Hanson, J.

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hollins

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Jordan

Keeler

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Lee

Liebling

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Long

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Noor

Olson, L.

Pelowski

Pinto

Pryor

Reyer

Richardson

Sandell

Sandstede

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Thompson

Vang

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman


 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

<HR><a name=768></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 768</b></center><HR><p>Lucero moved to amend S. F. No. 2, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 39, after line 2, insert:

 

"Sec. 22.  ROLLBACK OF PANDEMIC-RELATED FINES.

 

Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 12.45, any fine levied and collected for a violation of an executive order issued during a peacetime emergency shall be reimbursed to the person or entity fined for the violation by the applicable board or agency as soon as practicable following enactment of this section.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective retroactively from March 15, 2020."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Lucero amendment and the roll was called.  There were 64 yeas and 70 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Akland

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Bahr

Baker

Bennett

Bliss

Boe

Burkel

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Franke

Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Igo

Johnson

Jurgens

Kiel

Koznick

Kresha

Lucero

Lueck

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Mortensen

Mueller

Munson

Nash

Nelson, N.

Neu Brindley

Novotny

O'Driscoll

Olson, B.

O'Neill

Petersburg

Pfarr

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Raleigh

Rasmusson

Robbins

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

West


 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Acomb

Agbaje

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Berg

Bernardy

Bierman

Boldon

Carlson

Christensen

Davnie

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Feist

Fischer

Frazier

Frederick

Freiberg

Gomez

Greenman

Hansen, R.

Hanson, J.

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hollins

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Jordan

Keeler

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Lee

Liebling

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Long

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Noor

Olson, L.

Pelowski

Pinto

Pryor

Reyer

Richardson

Sandell

Sandstede

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Thompson

Vang

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman


 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

<HR><a name=769></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 769</b></center><HR><p>Mortensen moved to amend S. F. No. 2, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 39, after line 2, insert:

 

"Sec. 22.  ROLLBACK OF PANDEMIC-RELATED FINES AND PENALTIES; LICENSE REINSTATEMENTS.

 

Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 12.45, or any conflicting provisions of an executive order or law to the contrary, the maximum penalty for a willful violation of an executive order issued during a peacetime emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic shall be a misdemeanor and a fine not to exceed $1,000.  Any fine levied and collected for a violation of an executive order issued during a peacetime emergency in excess of the maximum fine amount provided in this section shall be reimbursed to the person or entity fined for the violation by the applicable board or agency in any amounts in excess of $1,000, as soon as practicable following enactment of this section.  Any license revoked by a board or agency due to a violation of an executive order issued during a peacetime emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic is reinstated.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective retroactively from March 15, 2020."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

 

 

Nash moved to amend S. F. No. 2, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 58, line 5, before "recorded" insert "video"

 

Page 58, line 8, before "building" insert "government-owned" and delete ", bolted"

 

Page 58, line 9, delete everything before the semicolon

 

Page 58, line 15, after "ballot" insert ", along with information describing the limitations on agent delivery of ballots as provided in section 203B.08"

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Nash amendment and the roll was called.  There were 64 yeas and 70 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Akland

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Bahr

Baker

Bennett

Bliss

Boe

Burkel

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Franke

Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Igo

Johnson

Jurgens

Kiel

Koznick

Kresha

Lucero

Lueck

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Mortensen

Mueller

Munson

Nash

Nelson, N.

Neu Brindley

Novotny

O'Driscoll

Olson, B.

<HR><a name=770></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 770</b></center><HR><p>O'Neill

Petersburg

Pfarr

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Raleigh

Rasmusson

Robbins

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

West


 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Acomb

Agbaje

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Berg

Bernardy

Bierman

Boldon

Carlson

Christensen

Davnie

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Feist

Fischer

Frazier

Frederick

Freiberg

Gomez

Greenman

Hansen, R.

Hanson, J.

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hollins

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Jordan

Keeler

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Lee

Liebling

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Long

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Noor

Olson, L.

Pelowski

Pinto

Pryor

Reyer

Richardson

Sandell

Sandstede

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Thompson

Vang

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman


 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

 

 

Neu Brindley moved to amend S. F. No. 2, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 56, after line 30, insert:

 

"Sec. 3.  Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 203B.03, is amended by adding a subdivision to read:

 

Subd. 1a.  Prohibited methods of compensation.  (a) No individual may be compensated for the solicitation, collection, or acceptance of absentee ballot applications from voters for submission to the county auditor or other local election official in a manner in which payment is calculated by multiplying (1) either a set or variable payment rate, by (2) the number of applications solicited, collected, or accepted.

 

(b) No individual may be deprived of compensation or have compensation automatically reduced exclusively for failure to solicit, collect, or accept a minimum number of absentee ballot applications.

 

(c) No individual may receive additional compensation for collecting a certain number of absentee ballot applications.

 

Sec. 4.  Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 203B.07, subdivision 3, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3.  Eligibility certificate.  (a) A certificate of eligibility to vote by absentee ballot shall be printed on the back of the return envelope.  The certificate shall contain space for the voter's Minnesota driver's license number, state identification number, or the last four digits of the voter's Social Security number, or to indicate that the voter does not have one of these numbers.  The space must be designed to ensure that the voter provides the same type of identification as provided on the voter's absentee ballot application for purposes of comparison.

 

(b) The certificate must also contain a statement to be signed and sworn by the voter indicating that the voter meets all of the requirements established by law for voting by absentee ballot and space for a statement signed by a person who is registered to vote in Minnesota or by a notary public or other individual authorized to administer oaths stating that:

 

(1) the ballots were displayed to that individual unmarked;

<HR><a name=771></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 771</b></center><HR><p>(2) the voter marked the ballots in that individual's presence without showing how they were marked, or, if the voter was physically unable to mark them, that the voter directed another individual to mark them; and

 

(3) if the voter was not previously registered, the voter has provided proof of residence as required by section 201.061, subdivision 3.

 

(c) The certificate must contain a space for a voter to list the name, address, and telephone number of an individual designated by the voter as an agent authorized to return the absentee ballot according to the methods permitted by section 203B.08, subdivision 1.  This space must include a statement, signed by the agent, certifying the agent's compliance with the requirements of section 203B.08 and other applicable laws governing agent delivery of ballots."

 

Page 57, delete section 3 and insert:

 

"Sec. 5.  Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 203B.08, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1.  Marking and return by voter.  (a) An eligible voter who receives absentee ballots as provided in this chapter shall mark them in the manner specified in the directions for casting the absentee ballots.  The return envelope containing marked ballots may be mailed as provided in the directions for casting the absentee ballots or, may be left with the county auditor or municipal clerk who transmitted the absentee ballots to the voter, or may be left in a drop box as provided in section 203B.082.  If delivered in person, the return envelope must be submitted to the county auditor or municipal clerk by 3:00 p.m. on election day.

 

(b) The voter may designate an agent to deliver in person the sealed absentee ballot return envelope to the county auditor or municipal clerk or to deposit the return envelope in the mail or in an absentee ballot drop box.  An agent may deliver or mail deposit the return envelopes of not more than three voters in any election, provided that this limitation does not apply to members of the agent's immediate family who reside in the agent's household.

 

(c) Any person designated as an agent who tampers with either the return envelope or the voted ballots or, does not immediately mail or deliver the return envelope to the county auditor or municipal clerk, or otherwise violates the requirements of this paragraph through an act of negligence is guilty of a misdemeanor.  Any person designated as an agent who intentionally or through an act of fraud tampers with either the return envelope or the voted ballots, does not immediately deliver the return envelope to the county auditor or municipal clerk, or otherwise violates the requirements of this paragraph is guilty of a felony."

 

Page 63, after line 24, insert:

 

"Sec. 14.  Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 204C.15, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1.  Physical assistance in marking ballots.  A voter who claims a need for assistance because of inability to read English or physical inability to mark a ballot may obtain the aid of two election judges who are members of different major political parties.  The election judges shall mark the ballots as directed by the voter and in as secret a manner as circumstances permit.  A voter in need of assistance may alternatively obtain the assistance of any individual the voter chooses.  Only the following persons may not provide assistance to a voter:  the voter's employer, an agent of the voter's employer, an officer or agent of the voter's union, or a candidate for election.  The person who assists the voter shall, unaccompanied by an election judge, retire with that voter to a booth and mark the ballot as directed by the voter.  No person who assists another voter as provided in the preceding sentence shall mark the ballots of more than three voters at one election.  Before the ballots are deposited, the voter may show them privately to an election judge to ascertain that they are marked as the voter directed.  An election judge or other individual assisting a voter shall not in any manner request, persuade, induce, or attempt to persuade or induce the voter to vote for any particular political party or candidate.  The election judges or other individuals who assist the <HR><a name=772></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 772</b></center><HR><p>voter shall not reveal to anyone the name of any candidate for whom the voter has voted or anything that took place while assisting the voter.  Before permitting an individual to assist a voter, an election judge must document the individual's name, address, and telephone number and must require the individual to sign a statement certifying compliance with this subdivision.  An individual who assists a voter in a manner not authorized by this section is guilty of a felony."

 

Page 64, after line 10, insert:

 

"Sec. 16.  Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 211B.07, is amended to read:

 

211B.07 UNDUE INFLUENCE ON VOTERS PROHIBITED.

 

A person may not directly or indirectly use or threaten force, coercion, violence, restraint, damage, harm, loss, including loss of employment or economic reprisal, undue influence, or temporal or spiritual injury against an individual to compel the individual to register to vote, to apply for an absentee ballot, or to vote for or against a candidate or ballot question.  Abduction, duress, or fraud may not be used to obstruct or prevent the free exercise of the right to vote of a voter at a primary or election, or compel an individual to register to vote, or compel a voter to apply for an absentee ballot or vote at a primary or election.  Violation of this section is a gross misdemeanor felony.

 

Sec. 17.  Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 211B.13, subdivision 1, is amended to read:

 

Subdivision 1.  Bribery, advancing money, and treating prohibited.  A person who willfully, directly or indirectly, advances, pays, gives, promises, or lends any money, food, liquor, clothing, entertainment, or other thing of monetary value, or who offers, promises, or endeavors to obtain any money, position, appointment, employment, or other valuable consideration, to or for a person, in order to induce a voter an individual to do any of the following:  (1) to register to vote, (2) to refrain from voting, or (3) to vote in a particular way, or (4) to apply for an absentee ballot at an election, is guilty of a felony.  This section does not prevent a candidate from stating publicly preference for or support of another candidate to be voted for at the same primary or election.  Refreshments of food or nonalcoholic beverages having a value up to $5 consumed on the premises at a private gathering or public meeting are not prohibited under this section."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Neu Brindley amendment and the roll was called.  There were 64 yeas and 70 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Akland

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Bahr

Baker

Bennett

Bliss

Boe

Burkel

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Franke

Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Igo

Johnson

Jurgens

Kiel

Koznick

Kresha

Lucero

Lueck

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Mortensen

Mueller

Munson

Nash

Nelson, N.

Neu Brindley

Novotny

O'Driscoll

Olson, B.

<HR><a name=773></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 773</b></center><HR><p>O'Neill

Petersburg

Pfarr

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Raleigh

Rasmusson

Robbins

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

West


 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Acomb

Agbaje

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Berg

Bernardy

Bierman

Boldon

Carlson

Christensen

Davnie

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Feist

Fischer

Frazier

Frederick

Freiberg

Gomez

Greenman

Hansen, R.

Hanson, J.

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hollins

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Jordan

Keeler

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Lee

Liebling

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Long

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Noor

Olson, L.

Pelowski

Pinto

Pryor

Reyer

Richardson

Sandell

Sandstede

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Thompson

Vang

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman


 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

 

 

Quam moved to amend S. F. No. 2, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 55, after line 22, insert:

 

"Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 201.061, subdivision 3, is amended to read:

 

Subd. 3.  Election day registration.  (a) An individual who is eligible to vote may register on election day by appearing in person at the polling place for the precinct in which the individual maintains residence, by and completing a voter registration application, making an oath in the form prescribed by the secretary of state and providing proof of residence.  An individual may prove residence for purposes of registering by:.

 

(1) presenting a driver's license or Minnesota identification card issued pursuant to section 171.07;

 

(2) presenting any document approved by the secretary of state as proper identification;

 

(3) presenting one of the following:

 

(i) a current valid student identification card from a postsecondary educational institution in Minnesota, if a list of students from that institution has been prepared under section 135A.17 and certified to the county auditor in the manner provided in rules of the secretary of state; or

 

(ii) a current student fee statement that contains the student's valid address in the precinct together with a picture identification card; or

 

(4) having a voter who is registered to vote in the precinct, or an employee employed by and working in a residential facility in the precinct and vouching for a resident in the facility, sign an oath in the presence of the election judge vouching that the voter or employee personally knows that the individual is a resident of the precinct.  A voter who has been vouched for on election day may not sign a proof of residence oath vouching for any other individual on that election day.  A voter who is registered to vote in the precinct may sign up to eight proof-of-<HR><a name=774></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 774</b></center><HR><p>residence oaths on any election day.  This limitation does not apply to an employee of a residential facility described in this clause.  The secretary of state shall provide a form for election judges to use in recording the number of individuals for whom a voter signs proof-of-residence oaths on election day.  The form must include space for the maximum number of individuals for whom a voter may sign proof-of-residence oaths.  For each proof-of-residence oath, the form must include a statement that the individual:  (i) is registered to vote in the precinct or is an employee of a residential facility in the precinct, (ii) personally knows that the voter is a resident of the precinct, and (iii) is making the statement on oath.  The form must include a space for the voter's printed name, signature, telephone number, and address.

 

The oath required by this subdivision and Minnesota Rules, part 8200.9939, must be attached to the voter registration application.

 

(b) The operator of a residential facility shall prepare a list of the names of its employees currently working in the residential facility and the address of the residential facility.  The operator shall certify the list and provide it to the appropriate county auditor no less than 20 days before each election for use in election day registration.

 

(c) "Residential facility" means transitional housing as defined in section 256E.33, subdivision 1; a supervised living facility licensed by the commissioner of health under section 144.50, subdivision 6; a nursing home as defined in section 144A.01, subdivision 5; a residence registered with the commissioner of health as a housing with services establishment as defined in section 144D.01, subdivision 4; a veterans home operated by the board of directors of the Minnesota Veterans Homes under chapter 198; a residence licensed by the commissioner of human services to provide a residential program as defined in section 245A.02, subdivision 14; a residential facility for persons with a developmental disability licensed by the commissioner of human services under section 252.28; setting authorized to provide housing support as defined in section 256I.03, subdivision 3; a shelter for battered women as defined in section 611A.37, subdivision 4; or a supervised publicly or privately operated shelter or dwelling designed to provide temporary living accommodations for the homeless.

 

(d) For tribal band members, an individual may prove residence for purposes of registering by:

 

(1) presenting an identification card issued by the tribal government of a tribe recognized by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, United States Department of the Interior, that contains the name, address, signature, and picture of the individual; or

 

(2) presenting an identification card issued by the tribal government of a tribe recognized by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, United States Department of the Interior, that contains the name, signature, and picture of the individual and also presenting one of the documents listed in Minnesota Rules, part 8200.5100, subpart 2, item B.  For purposes of registration under this subdivision, the voter registration application must be printed on or affixed to a provisional ballot envelope and contain the information required by section 201.071, subdivision 1.  An individual who registers on election day is entitled to cast a provisional ballot pursuant to section 204C.135.

 

(e) (b) A county, school district, or municipality may require that an election judge responsible for election day registration initial each completed registration application."

 

Renumber the sections in sequence and correct the internal references

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

<HR><a name=775></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 775</b></center><HR><p>              The question was taken on the Quam amendment and the roll was called.  There were 64 yeas and 70 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Akland

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Bahr

Baker

Bennett

Bliss

Boe

Burkel

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Franke

Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Igo

Johnson

Jurgens

Kiel

Koznick

Kresha

Lucero

Lueck

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Mortensen

Mueller

Munson

Nash

Nelson, N.

Neu Brindley

Novotny

O'Driscoll

Olson, B.

O'Neill

Petersburg

Pfarr

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Raleigh

Rasmusson

Robbins

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

West


 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Acomb

Agbaje

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Berg

Bernardy

Bierman

Boldon

Carlson

Christensen

Davnie

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Feist

Fischer

Frazier

Frederick

Freiberg

Gomez

Greenman

Hansen, R.

Hanson, J.

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hollins

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Jordan

Keeler

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Lee

Liebling

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Long

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Noor

Olson, L.

Pelowski

Pinto

Pryor

Reyer

Richardson

Sandell

Sandstede

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Thompson

Vang

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman


 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

 

 

      Winkler offered an amendment to S. F. No. 2, the unofficial engrossment, as amended.

 

 

      Daudt requested a division of the Winkler amendment to S. F. No. 2, the unofficial engrossment, as amended.

 

 

      The first portion of the Winkler amendment to S. F. No. 2, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, reads as follows:

 

Page 39, delete section 23 and insert:

 

"Sec. 23.  TERMINATION OF PEACETIME EMERGENCY.

 

Subdivision 1.  Executive Order 20-01 peacetime emergency terminated.  Effective July 1, 2021, at 11:59 p.m., and consistent with Minnesota Statutes, section 12.31, subdivision 2, paragraph (b), the peacetime emergency declared by Executive Order 20-01 issued March 13, 2020, is terminated.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective the day following final enactment."

 

Amend the title accordingly

<HR><a name=776></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 776</b></center><HR><p>              A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the first portion of the Winkler amendment and the roll was called.  There were 134 yeas and 0 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Acomb

Agbaje

Akland

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Bahner

Bahr

Baker

Becker-Finn

Bennett

Berg

Bernardy

Bierman

Bliss

Boe

Boldon

Burkel

Carlson

Christensen

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Davnie

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Erickson

Feist

Fischer

Franke

Franson

Frazier

Frederick

Freiberg

Garofalo

Gomez

Green

Greenman

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Haley

Hamilton

Hansen, R.

Hanson, J.

Hassan

Hausman

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Her

Hertaus

Hollins

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Igo

Johnson

Jordan

Jurgens

Keeler

Kiel

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Koznick

Kresha

Lee

Liebling

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Long

Lucero

Lueck

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Mortensen

Mueller

Munson

Murphy

Nash

Nelson, M.

Nelson, N.

Neu Brindley

Noor

Novotny

O'Driscoll

Olson, B.

Olson, L.

O'Neill

Pelowski

Petersburg

Pfarr

Pierson

Pinto

Poston

Pryor

Quam

Raleigh

Rasmusson

Reyer

Richardson

Robbins

Sandell

Sandstede

Schomacker

Schultz

Scott

Stephenson

Sundin

Swedzinski

Theis

Thompson

Torkelson

Urdahl

Vang

Wazlawik

West

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman


 

 

      The motion prevailed and the first portion of the Winkler amendment was adopted.

 

 

      Pursuant to rule 1.50, Winkler moved that the House be allowed to continue in session after 12:00 midnight.  The motion prevailed.

 

 

      The second portion of the Winkler amendment to S. F. No. 2, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, reads as follows:

 

Page 39, before line 23, insert:

 

"Subd. 2.  Acknowledgement of authority.  (a) Notwithstanding whether a peacetime emergency declared under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 12, is in effect, the governor may exercise authority under that chapter as necessary to coordinate, allocate, distribute, and manage COVID-19 vaccination and testing activities.

 

(b) Nothing in this section limits the authority of the governor to:

 

(1) exercise emergency powers granted in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 12, between the effective date of this section and July 1, 2021, at 11:59 p.m.; or

 

(2) consistent with Minnesota Statutes, chapter 12, declare a new peacetime emergency, including an emergency related to the COVID-19 infectious disease outbreak, at any time.

<HR><a name=777></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 777</b></center><HR><p>(c) Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, the commissioner of human services or the commissioner of health may declare a public health disaster if either commissioner determines that the state must take action to protect the public health, including providing public health services or enforcing existing health and human services laws, as part of the state's response to the ongoing COVID-19 infectious disease outbreak.

 

Subd. 3.  Orderly transition of government COVID-19 response.  Notwithstanding whether a peacetime emergency declared under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 12, is in effect, any other law to the contrary, or any contrary expiration date specified within the following executive orders, Executive Order 20-05 issued on March 16, 2020, Executive Order 20-07 issued on March 17, 2020, Executive Order 20-21 issued on March 27, 2020, and Executive Order 20-29 issued on April 6, 2020, remain in full force and effect until August 1, 2021, at 11:59 p.m.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective the day following final enactment."

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

Daudt moved to amend the second portion of the Winkler amendment to S. F. No. 2, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 1, line 11, after the period, insert "This authority is contingent upon the governor rebidding the vaccination contract currently in place."

 

 

      A roll call was requested and properly seconded.

 

 

      The question was taken on the Daudt amendment to the second portion of the Winkler amendment and the roll was called.  There were 63 yeas and 69 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Akland

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Bahr

Baker

Bennett

Bliss

Boe

Burkel

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Franke

Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Johnson

Jurgens

Kiel

Koznick

Kresha

Lucero

Lueck

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Mortensen

Mueller

Munson

Nash

Nelson, N.

Neu Brindley

Novotny

O'Driscoll

Olson, B.

O'Neill

Petersburg

Pfarr

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Raleigh

Rasmusson

Robbins

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

West


 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Acomb

Agbaje

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Berg

Bernardy

Bierman

Boldon

Carlson

Christensen

Davnie

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Feist

Fischer

Frazier

Frederick

Freiberg

Gomez

Greenman

Hansen, R.

Hanson, J.

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hollins

Hornstein

Howard

Jordan

Keeler

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Lee

Liebling

<HR><a name=778></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 778</b></center><HR><p>Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Long

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Noor

Olson, L.

Pelowski

Pinto

Pryor

Reyer

Richardson

Sandell

Sandstede

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Thompson

Vang

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman


 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the Daudt amendment to the second portion of the Winkler amendment was not adopted.

 

 

Drazkowski moved to amend the second portion of the Winkler amendment to S. F. No. 2, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, as follows:

 

Page 1, after line 21, insert:

 

"(d) The provisions in this subdivision expire August 1, 2021."

 

 

      The motion prevailed and the Drazkowski amendment to the second portion of the Winkler amendment was adopted.

 

 

      The question recurred on the second portion of the Winkler amendment, as amended, and the roll was called.  There were 70 yeas and 64 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Acomb

Agbaje

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Berg

Bernardy

Bierman

Boldon

Carlson

Christensen

Davnie

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Feist

Fischer

Frazier

Frederick

Freiberg

Gomez

Greenman

Hansen, R.

Hanson, J.

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hollins

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Jordan

Keeler

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Lee

Liebling

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Long

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Noor

Olson, L.

Pelowski

Pinto

Pryor

Reyer

Richardson

Sandell

Sandstede

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Thompson

Vang

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman


 

      Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Akland

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Bahr

Baker

Bennett

Bliss

Boe

Burkel

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Franke

Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Igo

Johnson

Jurgens

Kiel

Koznick

Kresha

Lucero

Lueck

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Mortensen

Mueller

Munson

Nash

Nelson, N.

Neu Brindley

Novotny

O'Driscoll

Olson, B.

O'Neill

Petersburg

Pfarr

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Raleigh

Rasmusson

Robbins

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

West


 

 

      The motion prevailed and the second portion of the Winkler amendment, as amended, was adopted.

<HR><a name=779></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 779</b></center><HR><p>              S. F. No. 2, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, was read for the third time.

 

 

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

 

      Winkler moved that the action whereby S. F. No. 2, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, was given its third reading be now reconsidered.  The motion prevailed.

 

 

      Winkler moved that the House recess subject to the call of the Chair.  The motion prevailed.

 

 

RECESS

 

 

RECONVENED

 

      The House reconvened and was called to order by the Speaker.

 

 

CALENDAR FOR THE DAY, Continued

 

 

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

 

      Winkler moved that the vote whereby the second portion of the Winkler amendment, as amended, to S. F. No. 2, the unofficial engrossment, as amended, was adopted be now reconsidered.  The motion prevailed.

 

 

      The second portion of the Winkler amendment to S. F. No. 2, the unofficial engrossment, as amended by the Drazkowski amendment, was again reported to the House and reads as follows:

 

Page 39, before line 23, insert:

 

"Subd. 2.  Acknowledgement of authority.  (a) Notwithstanding whether a peacetime emergency declared under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 12, is in effect, the governor may exercise authority under that chapter as necessary to coordinate, allocate, distribute, and manage COVID-19 vaccination and testing activities.

 

(b) Nothing in this section limits the authority of the governor to:

 

(1) exercise emergency powers granted in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 12, between the effective date of this section and July 1, 2021, at 11:59 p.m.; or

 

(2) consistent with Minnesota Statutes, chapter 12, declare a new peacetime emergency, including an emergency related to the COVID-19 infectious disease outbreak, at any time.

 

(c) Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, the commissioner of human services or the commissioner of health may declare a public health disaster if either commissioner determines that the state must take action to protect the public health, including providing public health services or enforcing existing health and human services laws, as part of the state's response to the ongoing COVID-19 infectious disease outbreak.

<HR><a name=780></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 780</b></center><HR><p>(d) The provisions in this subdivision expire August 1, 2021.

 

Subd. 3.  Orderly transition of government COVID-19 response.  Notwithstanding whether a peacetime emergency declared under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 12, is in effect, any other law to the contrary, or any contrary expiration date specified within the following executive orders, Executive Order 20-05 issued on March 16, 2020, Executive Order 20-07 issued on March 17, 2020, Executive Order 20-21 issued on March 27, 2020, and Executive Order 20-29 issued on April 6, 2020, remain in full force and effect until August 1, 2021, at 11:59 p.m.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE.  This section is effective the day following final enactment."

 

Amend the title accordingly

 

 

      The motion did not prevail and the second portion of the divided Winkler amendment, as amended, was not adopted.

 

 

      S. F. No. 2, A bill for an act relating to state government operation; appropriating money for certain constitutional offices, legislature, certain state agencies, offices, departments, boards, commissions, certain retirement accounts, general contingent accounts, tort claims, state lottery, Minnesota Historical Society, Minnesota Humanities Center, and military and veterans affairs; canceling certain fiscal year appropriations; making changes to policy provisions in state government operations; changing military and veterans affairs policy provisions; modifying election policy provisions; establishing provisions for federal funds; amending Minnesota Statutes 2020, sections 10.578; 14.389, subdivision 5; 15.057, as amended; 16A.06, by adding a subdivision; 16B.24, by adding a subdivision; 138.38; 155A.23, subdivision 16; 190.07; 197.791, subdivisions 4, 5, 5a, 5b; 198.006; 198.03, subdivision 2; 201.071, subdivision 2; 201.121, subdivision 3; 203B.08, subdivisions 1, 3; 203B.121, subdivision 1; 204B.14, subdivision 3; 204B.16, subdivision 1; 204B.18, subdivision 1; 204B.40; 204C.13, subdivision 3; 204C.35, subdivision 3, by adding a subdivision; 240.01, subdivision 18; 240.06, subdivision 7; 240.11; 240.131, subdivision 7; 240.24, subdivisions 2a, 3; 240.30, subdivision 5; 270C.21; 477A.03, subdivision 2b; 609.095; 645.071; Laws 2019, First Special Session chapter 10, article 1, section 40; Laws 2020, chapter 77, section 3, subdivision 6; Laws 2020, Fifth Special Session chapter 3, article 9, section 13; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 3; 10; 16A; 43A; 196; 198; 203B; 609.

 

 

      The bill was read for the third time, as amended, and placed upon its final passage.

 

      The question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called.  There were 70 yeas and 63 nays as follows:

 

      Those who voted in the affirmative were:

 


Acomb

Agbaje

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Berg

Bernardy

Bierman

Boldon

Carlson

Christensen

Davnie

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Feist

Fischer

Frazier

Frederick

Freiberg

Gomez

Greenman

Hansen, R.

Hanson, J.

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hollins

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Jordan

Keeler

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Lee

Liebling

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Long

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Noor

Olson, L.

Pelowski

Pinto

Pryor

Reyer

Richardson

Sandell

Sandstede

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Thompson

Vang

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman


<HR><a name=781></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 781</b></center><HR><p>              Those who voted in the negative were:

 


Akland

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Bahr

Baker

Bennett

Bliss

Boe

Burkel

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Franke

Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Igo

Johnson

Jurgens

Kiel

Koznick

Kresha

Lucero

Lueck

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Mortensen

Mueller

Munson

Nash

Nelson, N.

Neu Brindley

Novotny

O'Driscoll

Olson, B.

O'Neill

Petersburg

Pfarr

Poston

Quam

Raleigh

Rasmusson

Robbins

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

West


 

 

      The bill was passed, as amended, and its title agreed to.

 

 

      There being no objection, the order of business reverted to Introduction and First Reading of House Bills.

 

 

INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF HOUSE BILLS

 

 

      The following House File was introduced:

 

 

Stephenson introduced:

 

H. F. No. 69, A bill for an act relating to liquor; prohibiting exclusive contracts for distillers; amending Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 340A.307, subdivisions 1, 4.

 

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Commerce Finance and Policy.

 

 

IN MEMORIAM

 

      The members of the House of Representatives paused for a moment of silence in memory of former Representative Richard H. Jefferson of Minneapolis, Minnesota who served from 1987 to 1998, who passed away on Monday, June 28, 2021.

 

 

      Winkler moved that the House recess subject to the call of the Chair.  The motion prevailed.

 

 

RECESS

 

 

RECONVENED

 

      The House reconvened and was called to order by the Speaker.

<HR><a name=782></a><center><b>Journal of the House - 15th Day - Tuesday, June 29, 2021 - Top of Page 782</b></center><HR><p>REPORT FROM THE COMMITTEE ON RULES

AND LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATION

 

      Winkler from the Committee on Rules and Legislative Administration, pursuant to rule 1.21, designated the following bill to be placed on the Supplemental Calendar for the Day for Tuesday, June 29, 2021:

 

      H. F. No. 9.

 

 

CALENDAR FOR THE DAY

 

 

      H. F. No. 9 was reported to the House.

 

 

LAY ON THE TABLE

 

      Winkler moved that H. F. No. 9 be laid on the table.  The motion prevailed.

 

 

ADJOURNMENT

 

      Winkler moved that when the House adjourns today it adjourn until 12:00 noon, Wednesday, June 30, 2021.  The motion prevailed.

 

      Winkler moved that the House adjourn.  The motion prevailed, and the Speaker declared the House stands adjourned until 12:00 noon, Wednesday, June 30, 2021.

 

 

Patrick D. Murphy, Chief Clerk, House of Representatives