1.1    .................... moves to amend H.F. No. 2291 as follows:
1.2Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

1.3    "Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 120B.36, as amended by Laws 2007
1.4chapter 14, article 2, section 11, is amended to read:
1.5120B.36 SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY; APPEALS PROCESS.
1.6    Subdivision 1. School performance report cards. (a) The commissioner shall use
1.7objective criteria based on levels of student performance to report at least student academic
1.8performance, school safety, two separate student-to-teacher ratios that clearly indicate
1.9the definition of teacher consistent with sections 122A.06 and 122A.15 for purposes of
1.10determining these ratios, and staff characteristics, with a value-added component added no
1.11later than the 2008-2009 school year. The report must indicate a school's adequate yearly
1.12progress status, and must not set any designations applicable to high- and low-performing
1.13schools due solely to adequate yearly progress status.
1.14    (b) The commissioner shall develop, annually update, and post on the department
1.15Web site school performance report cards.
1.16    (c) The commissioner must make available the first performance report cards by
1.17November 2003, and during the beginning of each school year thereafter.
1.18    (d) A school or district may appeal its adequate yearly progress or other status
1.19determination in writing to the commissioner within 30 days of receiving the notice of its
1.20status. determination. The commissioner must give the affected school or school district
1.21notice and the opportunity for a hearing before an appeals advisory committee within 30
1.22days after the commissioner receives the written appeal. The commissioner must notify
1.23the school or district of the date, time, and place of the hearing at least 21 days before
1.24the hearing date. Within 30 days after the hearing, the appeals advisory committee must
1.25submit a written recommendation to the commissioner regarding whether to grant or
1.26deny the appeal and include the reasons for its recommendation. The commissioner must
1.27finally decide an appeal based on an objective evaluation and must make and transmit to
2.1the school or district the commissioner's evaluation and final decision within 15 days of
2.2receiving the advisory committee recommendation. The commissioner, after consulting
2.3with the appeals advisory committee, may postpone the hearing date under special
2.4circumstances. The appeals advisory committee is composed of five members:
2.5    (1) a representative of a statewide professional teachers' organization selected by the
2.6organization;
2.7    (2) a representative of a statewide organization of school administrators selected
2.8by the organization;
2.9    (3) a representative of a statewide parent and teachers organization selected by the
2.10organization;
2.11    (4) a representative of a statewide commerce organization having a significant
2.12interest in K-12 education selected by the organization; and
2.13    (5) a representative of a statewide school boards association selected by the
2.14organization.
2.15    Membership terms and removal of members are governed by section 15.059, except
2.16that the terms are three years. The commissioner may reimburse members for expenses
2.17under section 15.059 only if federal funding is available for this purpose. The appeals
2.18advisory committee does not expire.
2.19    The commissioner must seek the advice of the appeals advisory committee before
2.20deciding an appeal. The commissioner's decision to uphold or deny an appeal is final.
2.21    (e) School performance report cards data are nonpublic data under section 13.02,
2.22subdivision 9 , until not later than ten days after the appeal procedure described in
2.23paragraph (d) concludes. The department shall annually post school performance report
2.24cards to its public Web site no later than September 1.
2.25    Subd. 1a. GRAD test appeals. (a) Consistent with this subdivision, the
2.26commissioner must collaborate with high school teachers, high school administrators,
2.27parents of high school students, school district assessment directors, higher education
2.28faculty with expertise in kindergarten through grade 12 education and assessment, and
2.29other interested experts and stakeholders to establish a timely, transparent, and data-based
2.30appeals process that allows school districts, at their discretion, to grant a diploma to high
2.31school seniors in the 2008-2009, 2009-2010, and 2010-2011 school years who do not
2.32receive a passing score on the state reading or math GRAD test.
2.33    (b) A high school student in the 2008-2009, 2009-2010, or 2010-2011 school year
2.34who does not receive a passing score on the state reading or math GRAD test by April of
2.35the student's senior year may appeal to the chief administrator of the high school where
2.36the student is enrolled, in the form and manner the commissioner determines, requesting
3.1that the school district grant the student a high school diploma without passing the reading
3.2or math GRAD test. The high school administrator, in collaboration with teachers and
3.3other school staff selected by the administrator, must formally decide whether or not to
3.4grant the student a high school diploma based on multiple, well-understood measures of
3.5student learning that measurement experts have determined to be valid and reliable and
3.6that are available to the educators deciding whether or not to grant the student's request.
3.7School district officials must use the data that form the bases of the student appeals under
3.8this subdivision, where appropriate, to revise district curriculum to ensure that all students
3.9have an equal opportunity to learn and provide appropriate academic intervention and
3.10remediation to students who fail to pass the state's reading or math GRAD test.
3.11    (c) The commissioner must evaluate the effectiveness and impact of the appeals
3.12process and recommend to the legislature by February 1, 2011, whether or not to continue
3.13the appeals process under this subdivision. If the commissioner recommends continuing
3.14this process, the commissioner also must recommend student performance levels for the
3.15state reading and math GRAD tests and the appropriate indicators for school districts to
3.16consider in deciding whether or not to grant a diploma to high school seniors who do not
3.17receive a passing score on the state reading or math GRAD test.
3.18    Subd. 2. Adequate yearly progress data. All data the department receives, collects,
3.19or creates for purposes of determining adequate yearly progress designations under
3.20Public Law 107-110, section 1116, are nonpublic data under section 13.02, subdivision
3.219 , until not later than ten days after the appeal procedure described in subdivision 1,
3.22paragraph (d), concludes. Districts must provide parents sufficiently detailed summary
3.23data to permit parents to appeal under Public Law 107-110, section 1116(b)(2). The
3.24department shall annually post adequate yearly progress data to its public Web site no
3.25later than September 1.

3.26    Sec. 2. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION REPORT.
3.27    The Department of Education must submit a report to the education committees
3.28of the legislature by January 15, 2009, analyzing existing stand-alone school district
3.29reporting requirements and recommend the elimination of any district reports that are
3.30duplicative of other data already collected by the department."
3.31Amend the title accordingly