Initially authorized |
Laws 1991, ch. 291, art. 8, sec. 27;
Laws 2008, ch. 366, art. 7,
secs. 15, 16 |
Date imposed |
Laws 1991, ch. 291, art. 8, sec. 27
was imposed on April 1, 1992;
Laws 2008, ch. 366, art. 7,
secs. 15, 16 was imposed on April 1, 2009 |
Amount collected in CY 2016 |
$5,310,929 |
Additional legislative action |
Laws 1996,
ch. 471, art. 2, sec. 25; Laws 1998,
ch. 389, art. 8, sec. 28;
Laws 2005, 1st spec. sess., ch. 3, art. 5, secs.
24, 25;
Laws 2008, ch. 366, art. 7,
secs. 9, 10, 15, 16, 22;
Laws 2009, ch. 88, art. 4,
secs. 14 and 21;
Laws 2017, 1st spec. sess., ch. 1, art. 5, secs. 3-5 |
Tax authorized |
Sales tax of up to one-half of 1 percent. No
complementary use tax was imposed. The law also authorized a flat tax of up to $20 per motor
vehicle purchased within the city from anyone engaged in the retail sale of motor vehicles.
The 2008 law authorizes a food and beverage sales tax of up to 1 percent on
the gross receipts on: all sales of food and beverages by a restaurant or
place of refreshment and admissions to an entertainment event located within the city. |
Required city action to impose the tax |
The law allowed for a reverse referendum to stop
imposition of the tax. The city council was required to publish notices and hold hearings on the
intent to impose the tax. A petition signed by 10 percent of the voters from the last general
election asking for a vote on the issue would invoke the reverse referendum. The vote had to be
held on the issue at a general or special election by December 1, 1991. The reverse referendum
was not invoked.
The 2008 law allowed for a reverse
referendum (following the same procedures listed above) to stop the city
council from extending the local sales tax and modifying the use of
revenues from the tax. The taxes under consideration were authorized. The
reverse referendum was not invoked. |
Allowed use of the tax proceeds |
The tax funded bond issues not to exceed $25
million in support of the Riverfront 2000 downtown urban revitalization project, which included a
convention center, arena, and a riverside park. The 1996 amendment allowed the tax revenue to
also pay for expansion and operation of the Mankato municipal airport, with related bond issues
not to exceed $4.5 million. The 1998 law expanded the definition of Riverfront 2000 to include a
technology center. In 2005, the law was amended to state that the city
could spend $1.5 million annually for operations as well as the $29.5
million for capital costs for the Riverfront 2000 facility.
The 2008 law removed the provision allowing these revenues to be used for operating
expenses and added construction of a performing arts theatre and the Southern Minnesota Women's Hockey
Exposition Center (attached to the Mankato Civic Center for use by the
Minnesota State University, Mankato) as component facilities of the
Riverfront 2000 project. The requirement that the new projects had to be
attached to the civic center was eliminated in 2009.
Revenues from the food and beverage and entertainment taxes authorized
in 2008 will be used to pay all or a portion of the expenses of operating
and maintaining Riverfront 2000 and its related facilities. |
Tax expiration |
The tax expires after sufficient revenues are
raised to pay the combined $29.5 million for the revitalization project and the airport, or earlier by
ordinance. In 2005 this was amended to extend the tax to December 31, 2015, or
December 31, 2018 to allow the city to repay the bonds and use some of the
revenue for ongoing operations. In 2008, it was amended to an unconditional
date of December 31, 2022. |
Miscellaneous |
A complementary use tax was imposed in
Mankato beginning January 1, 2000, as required under
Minnesota Statutes sec. 297A.99.
The city may also choose to have the food and beverage and entertainment taxes authorized in
2008 to be administered, collected, and enforced by the Commissioner of
Revenue, with the commissioner's consent.
|