Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Lawmakers consider infrastructure advisory council to coordinate investment

Rep. Erin Koegel, chair of the House Sustainable Infrastructure Policy Committee, answers a question Wednesday about a bill she sponsors to establish the Minnesota Advisory Council on Infrastructure. (Photo by Michele Jokinen)
Rep. Erin Koegel, chair of the House Sustainable Infrastructure Policy Committee, answers a question Wednesday about a bill she sponsors to establish the Minnesota Advisory Council on Infrastructure. (Photo by Michele Jokinen)

To create a future vision, heightened coordination, and increased training between Minnesota’s infrastructure agencies, lawmakers are considering creation of a new non-regulatory advisory board.

The Minnesota Advisory Council on Infrastructure would work in tandem with stakeholders to identify and promote best practices that will preserve and extend the longevity of Minnesota’s public and privately owned infrastructure, and provide for proper management, coordination, and investment.

Its proposed creation comes on the heels of a report from the Infrastructure Resiliency Advisory Task Force which met during the interim. Its final report was issued last month.

On Wednesday, the House Sustainable Infrastructure Policy Committee considered language to create the council. Rep. Erin Koegel (DFL-Spring Lake Park), the committee chair, plans to sponsor the bill. She hopes the committee can hash out details over the next three committee meetings.

House infrastructure committee considers bill to create advisory council 2/14/24

“The goal of this is to educate and have the best practices out there so when we do award a bonding project, we know that these (small) communities know what they’re doing when it comes to our assets, and that they are going to be the very best stewards of the project and the money that we award them,” she said.

The 26-member board — 11 voting members and 15 non-voting members — would be charged with:

  • identifying approaches to enhance and expedite infrastructure coordination across jurisdictions, agencies, state and local government, and public and private sectors, including in planning, design, engineering, construction, maintenance, and operations;
  • identifying objectives and strategies that enhance the longevity and adaptability of infrastructure throughout the state;
  • developing any advisory recommendations;
  • developing and recommending a plan for a statewide asset managers program that provides for identification, exchange, and distribution of best practices on infrastructure management, training for infrastructure owners and asset managers and coordination and collaboration among infrastructure owners and asset managers; and
  • submitting an annual report to the Legislature.

Rep. Spencer Igo (R-Wabana Township) expressed concerns about creating a new state agency of unelected officials that would be creating policy.

“It sounds like the accountability of this new state agency would be to us, the Legislature,” Igo said. “But it also sounds like it totally opens the door for the executive branch to create rules out of what this committee would put forth. So my concern … would be we are giving up our legislative authority to unelected bureaucrats.”

Echoing those concerns, Rep. Isaac Schultz (R-Elmdale Township) is also worried about adding the cost of more state employees with the creation of another new agency.

“We added over 2,000 new state agency staff members in the last year, and that is a heavy burden for Minnesota taxpayers,” he said.


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

House closes 2024 session in chaotic fashion, trading bonding for budget boosts
(House Photography file photo) It was a session of modest ambitions. After 2023 produced a record $72 billion in biennial funding, Minnesota’s legislative leaders were dampening expectations for anything ...
Ways and Means Committee OKs proposed $512 million supplemental budget on party-line vote
(House Photography file photo) Meeting more needs or fiscal irresponsibility is one way to sum up the differences among the two parties on a supplemental spending package a year after a $72 billion state budg...

Minnesota House on Twitter