Rep. Aisha Gomez (DFL-Mpls) has spent time at homeless encampments in her district. She’s seen the impact of sudden changes when people in the encampments are forced to move suddenly.
Gomez wants to add protections for homeless people in such situations.
She sponsors HF4225 that would require local governments to create policies regarding homeless encampments, including provisions regarding public posting notices and storage of personal property when an encampment is removed.
The bill was laid over by the House Preventing Homelessness Division Wednesday until next week after the division ran out of time for member questions. It has no Senate companion.
“Often when you displace somebody who is in unsheltered homelessness, who’s living in a tent, they bring – they don’t like you to call them bulldozers. I guess they’re Bobcats – but they’ll bring little machines to scoop people’s stuff up and throw it away,” Gomez said.
Local governments would be required, per the bill, to develop policies “to ensure the most humane treatment for removal of homeless individuals from camping sites on public property.”
Among the provisions:
“We have to put some thought and put some parameters in place to make decisions about how to deal with unsheltered homelessness, and really to have policies that treat people humanely even when they’re in really difficult spots in their lives,” Gomez said.
The bill would also allow the Department of Transportation to work with cities or counties with a population of at least 50,000 to remove encampments on MnDOT property. A 48-hour notice would be required before removal of the encampment, which must also comply with the local policies regarding encampments.
Gomez agreed to have the bill laid over for more discussion after a request from Rep. Anne Neu Brindley (R-North Branch). One concern for Neu Brindley revolved around the space local agencies have to store the personal items.
“This is going to create a pretty significant burden, particularly on small cities and municipalities throughout the state who, No. 1, don’t have the same problem that we are dealing with in the same way in our urban core, but also don’t have the same resources and infrastructure available to deal with it in this way.”