Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Testifiers urge MN lawmakers to act fast on federal funds for road construction

(House Photography file photo)
(House Photography file photo)

Though winter seems firmly entrenched, Minnesota’s second season of road construction is fast approaching.

Lawmakers on one House committee are acting with a sense of urgency to unlock federal funds from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act so state employees can start drawing up blueprints and hiring crews.

The House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee approved a bill Thursday to appropriate $315.5 million from the act to the Department of Transportation. The amount reflects federal funds currently accessible for, in part, the state’s roads, bridges and transit purposes.

The bill is next scheduled before the House Ways and Means Committee Jan. 17.

Sponsored by Rep. Erin Koegel (DFL-Spring Lake Park), HF26 would fulfill a fiscal year 2023 request for increased state road construction budget authority. This includes $235 million to restore Trunk Highway Bonds used as a state match for bridge, community resiliency and carbon reduction programs and to address inflationary impacts and gaps in existing projects, according to a presentation by MnDOT officials. There is also $80 million to fully fund the approved State Transportation Improvement Program.

Many speakers urged legislators to act quickly – not only to unlock this initial phase of federal funds but to position the state to maximize future federal monies. The law is expected to ultimately provide $4.8 billion of federal funding over the next five years to upgrade Minnesota’s transportation infrastructure.

“If we had this authority last year, we’d be building roads today,” said Jason Duininck, director of business development for Duininck Inc. “If it’s not done quickly, we might miss another construction season.”

Rep. Bjorn Olson (R-Fairmont) cautioned against a single-minded pursuit of federal dollars that might displace easier, less expensive options.

For example, representatives for a utility in his district told Olson a charging station would cost $20,000 and require a $7,500 match including grant applications but the utility could do the work itself without taxpayer money for $5,000.

“I’d say four charging stations for the price of one is a good deal,” he said.


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

House closes 2024 session in chaotic fashion, trading bonding for budget boosts
(House Photography file photo) It was a session of modest ambitions. After 2023 produced a record $72 billion in biennial funding, Minnesota’s legislative leaders were dampening expectations for anything ...
Ways and Means Committee OKs proposed $512 million supplemental budget on party-line vote
(House Photography file photo) Meeting more needs or fiscal irresponsibility is one way to sum up the differences among the two parties on a supplemental spending package a year after a $72 billion state budg...

Minnesota House on Twitter