Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Local government officials urge lawmakers to remove compensation cap

Local units of government in Minnesota have a problem no other state faces when it comes to recruiting and retaining top talent: a compensation cap.

Per statute, “The salary and the value of all other forms of compensation of a person employed by a political subdivision of this state, excluding a school district, may not exceed 110 percent of the salary of the governor.”

As of Jan. 1, 2023, that limit is $206,939. A waiver is available through Minnesota Management and Budget, but it can be time-consuming and results uncertain.

Sponsored by Rep. Patty Acomb (DFL-Minnetonka), HF1213 would repeal the compensation cap. It was held over Tuesday by the House State and Local Government Finance and Policy Committee for possible omnibus bill inclusion.

We’re just looking for local control to meet our needs, and a compensation cap is “artificially limiting” our candidate pool, said Minnetonka City Council member Rebecca Schack.

“Recently, MMUA was notified of a member which was starting the search process for the eventual replacement of the utility’s manager and was told by a national search firm that they would not place a client in Minnesota due to the salary cap,” wrote Kent Sulem, director of government relations and senior counsel for the Minnesota Municipal Utilities Association.

“There’s something to be said about you get what you pay for. … We want really good, qualified people running our cities and our counties,” Acomb said.

Supporters do not foresee the bill, which has no cost to the state, opening up excessive spending by local units of government, whose leaders must answer to voters.

“City councils know that our local revenue and budgets are limited, so financial decisions are made with the utmost care,” said Patrick Keane, a member of the Rochester City Council.

Rep. Jim Nash (R-Waconia), a former mayor, does not like the bill and is OK with the current waiver process.

“I just feel that what is a potential of what happens is that we wind up having the impact go to the taxpayer without really having the ability to have a full-throated conversation. … When we pay public officials we’re using taxpayer money, and I think having another way to regulate this or slow it down to have a more thoughtful or deeper conversation is probably where we should stay.”


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

Minnesota's budget outlook worsens in both near, long term
Gov. Tim Walz takes questions following the release of the state's November budget forecast in December 2024. The latest projections show a $456 million surplus in the current budget cycle and a $6 billion deficit longer-term. (House Photography file photo) It looks as if those calling for less state spending could get their wish, judging from Thursday’s release of the February 2025 Budget and Economic Forecast. A state su...
Full House convenes for first time in 2025, elects Demuth speaker
Rep. Jeff Backer, left and Rep. Matt Norris greet each other on the House floor Feb. 6. House DFLers returned to the House Chamber for the first time during the 2025 session after leaders struck a power-sharing agreement. (Photo by Michele Jokinen) DFL, Republicans convene with a quorum for the first time in 2025 session after agreeing to a power-sharing deal.

Minnesota House on Twitter