Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Should vacant county attorney, sheriff positions be filled by appointment or special election?

(House Photography file photo)
(House Photography file photo)

If a county attorney or sheriff leaves, should their replacement be chosen by a handful of bureaucrats or the people they represent?

Current law requires a county board to appoint a replacement to serve the remainder of the term, but a former representative wonders if there’s a more inclusive way.

Dakota County Commissioner Laurie Halverson spoke to the House Elections Finance and Policy Committee Wednesday in support of a bill sponsored by Rep. John Huot (DFL-Rosemount) that would give a county board the option of appointment or a special election to fill a vacant county sheriff or attorney opening.

As amended, HF3632 was approved and sent to the House Floor.

“The appointment process ends up taking the voter out of a very important relationship. The county attorney and county sheriff play an important role for our communities and our voters. That relationship, to me, is one that shouldn’t have a barrier between it or have a board … create an incumbent essentially to go into a general election,” said Halverson, a DFLer who represented mostly parts of Eagan from 2013-20.

She acknowledges that running a special election could be cost-prohibitive, which could weigh into a board’s decision to elect or appoint.

The bill calls for a special election to be held on the second Tuesday of February, April, May, or August or “the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November.”

 


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

House closes 2024 session in chaotic fashion, trading bonding for budget boosts
(House Photography file photo) It was a session of modest ambitions. After 2023 produced a record $72 billion in biennial funding, Minnesota’s legislative leaders were dampening expectations for anything ...
Ways and Means Committee OKs proposed $512 million supplemental budget on party-line vote
(House Photography file photo) Meeting more needs or fiscal irresponsibility is one way to sum up the differences among the two parties on a supplemental spending package a year after a $72 billion state budg...

Minnesota House on Twitter